Skip to main content
Journal of Diabetes and Metabolic Disorders logoLink to Journal of Diabetes and Metabolic Disorders
. 2021 Jun 25;20(2):1129–1135. doi: 10.1007/s40200-021-00829-9

In vivo antidiabetic potential of standardized Gymnocarpos decandrus Forssk. Extract

Seham S El-Hawary 1, Mahmoud M Mubarek 2, Rehab A Lotfy 2, Amany A Sleem 3, Mona M Okba 1,
PMCID: PMC8630251  PMID: 34900766

Abstract

Background

Gymnocarpos decandrus (Caryophyllaceae) is a well-known wild plant used as a food for grazing animals. Recently it showed potent antidiabetic potential beside its established anti-inflammatory, analgesic and diuretic activities. G. decandrus antidiabetic potential was reported through in-vitro models and resulted in promising α-amylase, α-glucosidase and antiviral Coxsackie B4 inhibitory activities; however no in-vivo studies were conducted.

Purpose

This study aims to examine Gymnocarpos decandrus ethanol extract (GDEE) safety and to evaluate its in vivo antidiabetic potential.

Method

Adult albino rats were injected intraperitoneally with alloxan to induce diabetes mellitus and the glucose level was measured after two and four weeks against metformin as a standard drug. Additionally, GDEE characterization and standardization were carried out.

Results

GDEE LD50 was up to 5.8 mg/kg and exhibited significant antidiabetic activity 77.17% comparable to the standard drug metformin. Its total phenolics, and flavonoids amounted 127.2 ± 0.23 and 85.5 ± 0.21 mg/g respectively. Vitexin was used as a marker compound for GDEE (140.70 mg/100 gm).

Conclusion

This study represents the sole in vivo scientific validation of G. decandrus recently documented in vitro antidiabetic potential.

Keywords: Gymnocarpos decandrus, In vivo, Antidiabetic, Alloxan, Vitexin

Introduction

The International Diabetes Federation reported that diabetes mellitus (DM) affects more than 366 million worldwide and is expected to increase by the year 2030 to 552 million. Diabetes affects more than fourteen million people in Africa. West Africa was documented to exhibit the highest prevalence of DM, with Nigeria and Côte dʼIvoire ranking first and second, respectively. In South Africa tops and Southern Africa, the list followed by the Democratic Republic of Congo. Cameroon recorded the highest cases numbers in the Africa central countries [1]. Egypt is expected to have at least 8.6 million case of DM by the year 2030 [2]. The prevalence of diabetes in Egypt is rising. It is one of the most common cause of disability and premature mortality in such developing country [3].

The World Health Organization (WHO) reported that eighty percent of Asia and Africa population use traditional medicine for primary health care. Similarly developed countries represent 70–80% of the populations that use alternative or complementary medicine. Recently, research has focused on medicinal plants which was proved to provide reliable, effective, and inexpensive treatment [4]. The use of medicinal plants as antidiabetic candidates gained wide popularity in the last decades [57].

Exploring medicinal plants and their metabolites for diabetes management is not just a way to discover safer pharmaceuticals alternatives, but also is an attempt to find a natural effective affordable drug especially in developing countries.

Gymnocarpos decandrus Forssk. (Caryophyllaceae) is distributed in Middle East and North Africa. G. decandrus is a shrublet with erect stem, up to 45 cm tall [8]. It is widely distributed in Egypt north coast where it is used as a food for grazing animals [9]. New reports focused on G. decandrus aerial parts chemical profile [10, 11]. Recently the plant was proved to exhibit potent anti-inflammatory, analgesic, diuretic, α-amylase, α-glucosidase inhibitory, antitumor, antioxidant, antimicrobial, anticoagulant, and anti Coxsackie B4 virus activities [10, 12, 13]. The plant previously reported secondary metabolities [10, 1417]; apigenin, luteolin, epiafzelechin, catechins, epicatechins, daphnoretin, protocatechuic acid, vitexin and quercetin exhibited in vitro antidiabetic potential via inhibition of α-amylase [11], α-glucosidase and Coxsackie B4 virus which destroy insulin-producing pancreatic beta cells [10]. Its CoxB4 and digestive enzymes (α-amylase and α-glucosidase) inhibitory activities indicates its ability to manage both types of DM [1820].

All these reports did not report the plant’s safety/toxicity which is essential preliminary step for drug discovery and development. The formerly mentioned studies just reported the in vitro activities which are target-based approaches. The target-based approaches have been dominating early drug discovery in the past decades, which is concurrent with the pharmaceutical research and development productivity crisis [2123]. This single target-base screen may de facto be inactive as it chooses target (protein /enzyme) which may induce undesired toxicity and may be unessential to disease pathogenesis [24, 25]. In addition, the drug usually displays clinically relevant polypharmacology due to its specific binding to more than one target [26, 27]. In turn, examining the in vivo potential of a newly explored drug is a must preliminary step for drug development. This study targets evaluation of G. decandrus in vivo antidiabetic activity and standardization of its crude extract in order to provide more specific and detailed scientific evidence for its use in management of DM.

Material and methods

Plant material and G. decandrus ethanol extract (GDEE) preparation

G. decandrus flowering aerial parts were collected from the western Mediterranean coastal region (Mersa Matrooh-Alexandria road) during April, 2018. It was identified by Prof. Dr. Azza El Hadidy, Professor of Taxonomy and Flora- Herbarium, Faculty of Science, Cairo University. Voucher specimen (code number 7.12.15.1) was deposited at Pharmacognosy Department Herbarium, Faculty of Pharmacy, Cairo University. The G. decandrus ethanol extract (GDEE) previously prepared [10] was used.

Estimation of total phenolics and flavonoids

Total phenolic content (TPC) estimation

TPC in GDEE was estimated with Folin-Ciocalteu reagent using the method of [28]. Gallic acid was used as a standard. Sample spectral absorbance was measured at 765 nm using UV/visible light and the TPC was calculated from the standard calibration curve and was expressed as mg/g of gallic acid equivalents.

Total flavonoid content (TFC) estimation

TFC of GDEE was determined according to [29]. Quercetin was used as a standard compound. The absorbance was measured by UV–VIS spectrophotometer at 510 nm, the then the TFC was calculated from the standard calibration curve and was expressed as mg/g equivalent quercetin.

HPLC quantification of vitexin

Vitexin was selected for GDEE standardization as it was recently isolated with large quantities from GDEE [10] in addition to its well documented role in DM management [30, 31].

Sample preparation

GDEE (0.2 g) was dissolved IN 1 mL DMSO. The mixture was then homogenized using ultrasonic bath for 15 min, and filtered through membrane filter (0.45 μm), then 10 µl was injected for analysis into the HPLC system.

Authentic preparation

Serial dilutions of authentic vitexin (99% purity) (10–50 μg/mL) were prepared from stock solution (1 mg/mL). Standard calibration curve was plotted. The calibration curve was fitted by least-squares regression using y = 11091x + 17,222 as the weighting factor of the peak area [32].

HPLC conditions

Agilent Series 1200 liquid chromatography (Agilent Technologies Inc.) was used for the HPLC analysis. Quaternary pump, auto-sampler, vacuum degasser, and photodiode array detector were used. Grace Alltima C18 analytical column was equipped (5 μm, 250 mm × 4.6 mm, Grace-Alltech) with a flow rate of 1 mL/min at 35 °C. Binary gradient elution system composed of 0.1% phosphoric acid in H2O and CH3OH was applied (0–10 min, 25–35% methanol; 10–30 min, 35–45% methanol; 30–45 min, 45–80% methanol). The UV absorption was measured at λ 340 nm. Results were expressed as the mean of three determinations.

Toxicological studies

Animals

Adult male albino rats (130–150 g.b.wt Sprague Dawely strain) were used. The rats were obtained from National Research Center, Dokki, Giza, Egypt animal house colony. They were housed at 55 ± 5% humidity in standard metal cages, in an air-conditioned room (22 ± 3˚C) and provided with standard laboratory diet (vitamin mixture 1%, sucrose 0.2%, mineral mixture 4%, casein (95% pure) 10.5%, corn oil 10%, starch 54.3%). Faculty of Pharmacy, Cairo University Ethics Committee approved this study (No. MP. 1519).

Chemicals and kits

Serum alanine amino-transferase (ALT), aspartate amino-transferase (AST), (Spectrum Diagnostics, Cairo, Egypt), urea and creatinine (Biomérieux-France), glucose (Biomérieux-France), total cholesterol and triglycerides (TG) (Biolabo-France) were colorimetrically estimated using commercial kits.

Alloxan (Sigma Company, USA) and metformin (Chemical Industries Development-CID Co., Egypt) were used for diabetes induction and as antidiabetic standard drugs, respectively.

Acute toxicity

Oral acute toxicity was evaluated according to the Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development, Guideline- 423 OECD [33]. The toxicological effects were observed in terms of mortality and expressed as LD50.

Chronic toxicity

Twelve rats were divided into two groups each of 6 rats each. The 1st group kept as control (received daily oral dose of 1 mL saline). The 2nd group received 100 mg/kg b.wt. of GDEE for eight weeks. The blood samples were collected from the retro-orbital venous plexus at 0 time and every four weeks. Serum was isolated by centrifugation and subjected for AST, ALT, urea, creatinine, glucose, total cholesterol and triglycerides analysis [34, 35].

In vivo antidiabetic activity

Rats were injected with alloxan (150 mg/kg b.wt.) intraperitoneally to induce DM according to the method described by [36]. The blood glucose level was measured after 72 h, two- and four-weeks intervals. Rats were divided into four groups: 1st group: normal rats that served as normal control, 2nd group: diabetic rats that served as positive control, 3rd and 4th groups: Diabetic rats that received 100 mg/kg b.wt. of GDEE (treated group) and metformin drug as reference drug respectively. After 4 weeks, blood samples were collected from the anaesthetized rats from the retro-orbital venous plexus through the eye canthus after an overnight fasting. The blood glucose level was measured. in the serum isolated by centrifugation.

Statistical analysis

The data are presented as mean ± standard error of the mean and were analyzed using paired Student t- test.All data were subjected to statistical analysis using Statgraphics Centurion software package (version 16.1.11, StatPoint Technologies Inc., Warrenton, VA, USA). A probability of less than 0.05 was used as criterion for statistical significance.

Ethics

The study was approved by Faculty of Pharmacy, Cairo University Ethics Committee for Animal Experimentation (No. MP. 1519).

Results

Acute toxicological study of GDEE revealed that its LD50 was up to 5.8 g/kg b.wt. No visible signs of toxicity such as general behavioral changes e.g. sniffing, head down, crawling under or over the partner, spasms in both rear legs and convulsions were observed during 24 h of GDEE administration.

Administration of a daily oral dose of GDEE (100 mg/kg b.wt) for eight weeks did not cause any significant effect on AST, ALT, urea, creatinine, cholesterol and triglycerides levels in their sera as compared to the control group Table 1 and Fig. 1a. Meanwhile, the same dose showed a significant decrease in normal blood glucose levels. These results revealed safety upon long term use of GDEE.

Table 1.

Effect of long-term administration of GDEE on triglycerides, cholesterol, blood glucose, blood urea, creatinine, and liver enzymes (ALT & AST)

Group Time weeks Biochemical changes of serum level
Cholesterol Triglycerides Glucose Creatinine Urea AST ALT
mg/dl U/I
Control Zero 91.1 ± 3.5 79.9 ± 2.4 88.3 ± 1.9 1.46 ± 0.03 24.3 ± 0.3 45.1 ± 1.5 32.8 ± 1.2
4 94.2 ± 2.6 77.2 ± 2.1 84.6 ± 1.7 1.42 ± 0.02 23.1 ± 0.7 43.2 ± 1.3 34.5 ± 1.3
8 88.5 ± 3.3 81.1 ± 2.3 81.1 ± 1.4 1.45 ± 0.01 22.3 ± 0.3 41.3 ± 1.8 34.8 ± 1.5
GDEE (100 mg/kg b.wt.) Zero 85.6 ± 2.4 78.1 ± 1.2 89.5 ± 3.1 1.30 ± 0.01 21.8 ± 0.9 42.1 ± 1.2 34.8 ± 1.1
4 88.5 ± 2.1 81.5 ± 2.9 76.2 ± 1.1* 1.41 ± 0.04 22.4 ± 0.8 41.9 ± 1.4 31.3 ± 1.3
8 86.3 ± 2.2 82.1 ± 2.2 71.3 ± 1.3* 1.45 ± 0.02 23.7 ± 0.6 39.8 ± 1.4 31.3 ± 1.2

GDEE, G. decandrus ethanol extract

* Statistically different from zero time at p < 0.05

Fig. 1.

Fig. 1

Effect of administration of 100 mg/kg.b.wt of GDEE on: a) Normal rats’ cholesterol, triglycerides, blood glucose, creatinine, blood urea and liver enzymes (AST and ALT) serum levels, *: Statistically different from zero time at p < 0.05, b) Diabetic rats’ blood glucose level, *:  Statistically different from control group at p < 0.01

The oral daily dose (100 mg/kg.b.wt.) of GDEE and metformin drug in diabetic male albino rats for one month showed significant change in blood glucose level after 2 weeks with 30.9% and 46.6% decrease, respectively compared with control Table 2 and demonstrated in Fig. 1b. Four weeks administration resulted in continuation in blood glucose reduction by 52.4% and 67.9% for GDEE and metformin respectively.

Table 2.

Effect of GDEE administration on level of blood glucose

Groups Zero time 2 weeks 4 weeks
Mean ± S.E Mean ± S.E % of change Mean ± S.E % of change
Control 83.4 ± 2.1 84.3 ± 1.9 81.9 ± 2.2
Diabetic non-treated 243.8 ± 6.1 257.8 ± 6.4 268.4 ± 6.3
GDEE (100 mg/kg) 255.3 ± 5.9 176.3 ± 4.6* 30.9 121.6 ± 3.8* 52.4
Metformin (100 mg/kg) 268.9 ± 7.2 143.6 ± 5.1* 46.6 86.4 ± 2.6* 67.9

GDEE, G. decandrus ethanol extract

*Statistically significant different from control group at p < 0.01

The total phenolics and flavonoids of GDEE were estimated. They amounted 127.2 ± 0.23 (mg/g equivalent gallic acid) and 85.5 ± 0.21 (mg/g equivalent quercetin) respectively.

Standard calibration curve of vitexin is represented in Fig. 2. The concentration of vitexin in GDEE was 140.70 mg/100gm.

Fig. 2.

Fig. 2

Standard calibration curve of vitexin for GDEE standardization

Discussions

Natural compounds are feasible alternatives for diabetes treatment and reinforcements to currently used treatments. They may also reduce the risk of the disease. There are a large number of plants and natural biomolecules exhibited antidiabetic effects. More than one thousand plant species being used for the treatment of type two diabetes mellitus worldwide [3739]

In the present study, standardized G. decandrus crude extract was proved to exhibit promising antidiabetic potential. In 2020, our group evaluated the in vitro antidiabetic potential of G. decandrus by screening its crude extract and major isolated phytochemicals for their alpha-glucosidase and Coxsackie B4 inhibitory activities [10]. The crude extract and the isolated vitexin, protocatechuic acid and quercetin showed promising in vitro antidiabetic potentials.

According to Hodge and Sterner toxicity scale [40] GDEE is in the practically non-toxic category. Also, no signs of chronic toxicity were observed during/after long term oral administration of GDEE Table 1 and Fig. 1a. Moreover, Flavonoids exert their antidiabetic potential through improving insulin secretion, promoting pancreatic β-cells proliferation, reducing β-cells apoptosis, reducing insulin resistance, inflammation and oxidative stress [41].

Phenolic compounds of natural origin can help in preventing or reducing diabetes, obesity, and cardiovascular diseases due to their antioxidant potentials. Additionally, the phenolic compounds ability to inhibit digestive enzymes, including α-glucosidase, lipase and α-amylase, was considered as an effective strategy for type 2 DM management [42]

The herein reported high flavonoids and phenolic content of G. decandrus besides the previously identified and isolated apigenin, luteolin, epiafzelechin, catechins, epicatechins, daphnoretin, protocatechuic acid, vitexin and quercetin [10, 1417] which exhibited in vitro antidiabetic potential [11, 1820] are responsible for the potency of the tested crude extract for DM management.

Long term exposure to high levels of blood glucose has been involved in reactive oxygen species (ROS) overproduction of lead to impaired insulin secretion and insulin signaling [4345]. Thus, high content of phenolics and flavonoids, of well-documented antioxidant potential [46, 47], determined in GDEE is very beneficial in protection against the over production of ROS associated with high blood glucose levels in DM patients. The major limitation of our study was lack of histological evaluations which is an important part of toxicological evaluations; thus, detailed histological assessment including tissue sampling from the internal organs is highly recommended to ensure the safety of the GDEE extract for in vivo administration.

Vitexin is a naturally-occurring flavonoid. It's one of best-known C-glycosides due to its pronounced pharmacological activities. It possess antioxidant, α-amylase and α-glucosidase inhibitory effects that can reduce postprandial hyperglycemia and diabetic complications [30, 48]. Vitexin was previously isolated from GDEE [10], thus it was used in our study as marker compound for GDEE standardization.

Conclusion

The present study has successfully proved the safety and the in vivo antidiabetic effect of G. decancrus in alloxan induced diabetic model. Our findings presented G. decancrus as a promising natural candidate for diabetes management. In the future, detailed histological study to ensure its safety after in vivo administration is essential followed by its formulations in a suitable dosage form for clinical studies.

Declarations

Not applicable.

Conflict of interest

No conflict of interest.

Footnotes

Seham S. El-Hawary and Mahmoud M. Mubarek contributed equally to this work and both are considered as first author.

Publisher's note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Contributor Information

Seham S. El-Hawary, Email: seham.elhawary@pharma.cu.edu.eg

Mahmoud M. Mubarek, Email: mahmoudmubarek88@gmail.com

Rehab A. Lotfy, Email: Yousefyaser_2002@yahoo.com

Amany A. Sleem, Email: amany1950@live.com

Mona M. Okba, Email: mona.morad@pharma.cu.edu.eg

References

  • 1.Whiting DR, Guariguata L, Weil C, Shaw J. IDF diabetes atlas: global estimates of the prevalence of diabetes for 2011 and 2030. Diabetes Res Clin Pract. 2011;94(3):311–21. [DOI] [PubMed]
  • 2.Shaw JE, Sicree RA, Zimmet PZ. Global estimates of the prevalence of diabetes for 2010 and 2030. Diabetes Res Clin Pract. 2010;87(1):4–14. doi: 10.1016/j.diabres.2009.10.007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.National Information Center for Health and Population.  The burden of disease and injury in Egypt (mortality and morbidity); 2004.
  • 4.Samarghandian S, Azimi-Nezhad M, Farkhondeh T. Immunomodulatory and antioxidant effects of saffron aqueous extract (Crocus sativus L.) on streptozotocin-induced diabetes in rats. Indian Heart J. 2017;69(2):151–159. doi: 10.1016/j.ihj.2016.09.008. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Bnouham M, Ziyyat A, Mekhfi H, Tahri A, Legssyer A. Medicinal plants with potential antidiabetic activity-a review of ten years of herbal medicine research (1990–2000). Int J Diabetes Metab. 2006;14(1):1.
  • 6.Chauhan A, Sharma P, Srivastava P, Kumar N, Dudhe R. Plants having potential antidiabetic activity: a review. Pharm Lett. 2010;2(3):369–387. [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Mohammed A, Ibrahim MA, Islam MS. African medicinal plants with antidiabetic potentials: a review. Planta Med. 2014;80(05):354–377. doi: 10.1055/s-0033-1360335. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.El-Hawary SS, Okba MM, Lotfy RA, Mubarek MM. A botanical study and estimation of certain primary metabolites of Gymnocarpos decandrus Forssk. Jordan J Biol Sci. 2019;12(5).
  • 9.Bhatt A, Santo A. Effects of photoperiod, thermoperiod, and salt stress on Gymnocarpos decandrus seeds: potential implications in restoration ecology activities. Botany. 2017;95(11):1093–1098. doi: 10.1139/cjb-2017-0086. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.El-Hawary SS, Mubarek MM, Lotfy RA, Hassan AR, Sobeh M, Okba MM. Validation of antidiabetic potential of Gymnocarpos decandrus Forssk. Nat Prod Res. 2020;1–6. [DOI] [PubMed]
  • 11.Sallam A, Galala AA. Inhibition of alpha-amylase activity by Gymnocarpos decandrus Forssk. Constituents. Int J Pharm Phytochem Res. 2017;9:873–879. [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Bouaziz M, Dhouib A, Loukil S, Boukhris M, Sayadi S. Polyphenols content, antioxidant and antimicrobial activities of extracts of some wild plants collected from the south of Tunisia. Afr J Biotechnol. 2009;8(24):7017–7027. [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Fathy H. Polyphenolics from Gymnocarpos decandrus Forssk roots and their biological activities. Nat Prod Res. 2019;1–5. [DOI] [PubMed]
  • 14.Mukherjee B, Banerjee S, Mondal L, Chakraborty S, Chanda D, Perera JAC. Bioactive flavonoid Apigenin and its nanoformulations: a promising hope for diabetes and cancer. In: Nanomedicine for bioactives. Springer; 2020, p. 367–82.
  • 15.Olaokun OO, McGaw LJ, Janse van Rensburg I, Eloff JN, Naidoo V. Antidiabetic activity of the ethyl acetate fraction of Ficus lutea (Moraceae) leaf extract: comparison of an in vitro assay with an in vivo obese mouse model. BMC Complement Altern Med. 2016;16:110–110. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 16.Li H, Yao Y, Li L. Coumarins as potential antidiabetic agents. J Pharm Pharmacol. 2017;69(10):1253–1264. doi: 10.1111/jphp.12774. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Sangeetha R. Luteolin in the management of type 2 diabetes mellitus. Curr Res Nutr Food Sci J. 2019;7(2):393–398. doi: 10.12944/CRNFSJ.7.2.09. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.See DM, Tilles JG. Pathogenesis of virus-induced diabetes in mice. J Infect Dis. 1995;171(5):1131–1138. doi: 10.1093/infdis/171.5.1131. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Drescher KM, Kono K, Bopegamage S, Carson SD, Tracy S. Coxsackievirus B3 infection and type 1 diabetes development in NOD mice: insulitis determines susceptibility of pancreatic islets to virus infection. Virology. 2004;329(2):381–394. doi: 10.1016/j.virol.2004.06.049. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Trinh BT, Staerk D, Jäger AK. Screening for potential α-glucosidase and α-amylase inhibitory constituents from selected Vietnamese plants used to treat type 2 diabetes. J Ethnopharmacol. 2016;186:189–195. doi: 10.1016/j.jep.2016.03.060. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Paul SM, Mytelka DS, Dunwiddie CT, Persinger CC, Munos BH, Lindborg SR, Schacht AL. How to improve R&D productivity: the pharmaceutical industry's grand challenge. Nat Rev Drug Discovery. 2010;9(3):203–214. doi: 10.1038/nrd3078. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Pammolli F, Magazzini L, Riccaboni M. The productivity crisis in pharmaceutical R&D. Nat Rev Drug Discovery. 2011;10(6):428–438. doi: 10.1038/nrd3405. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Scannell JW, Blanckley A, Boldon H, Warrington B. Diagnosing the decline in pharmaceutical R&D efficiency. Nat Rev Drug Discovery. 2012;11(3):191. doi: 10.1038/nrd3681. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Hopkins AL. Network pharmacology. Nat Biotechnol. 2007;25(10):1110–1111. doi: 10.1038/nbt1007-1110. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Swinney DC, Anthony J. How were new medicines discovered? Nat Rev Drug Discovery. 2011;10(7):507–519. doi: 10.1038/nrd3480. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Roth BL, Sheffler DJ, Kroeze WK. Magic shotguns versus magic bullets: selectively non-selective drugs for mood disorders and schizophrenia. Nat Rev Drug Discovery. 2004;3(4):353–359. doi: 10.1038/nrd1346. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Rask-Andersen M, Almén MS, Schiöth HB. Trends in the exploitation of novel drug targets. Nat Rev Drug Discovery. 2011;10(8):579–590. doi: 10.1038/nrd3478. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Aiyegoro OA, Okoh AI. Preliminary phytochemical screening and in vitro antioxidant activities of the aqueous extract of Helichrysum longifolium DC. BMC Complement Altern Med. 2010;10(1):21. doi: 10.1186/1472-6882-10-21. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Zou Y, Lu Y, Wei D. Antioxidant activity of a flavonoid-rich extract of Hypericum perforatum L. in vitro. J Agric Food Chem. 2004;52(16):5032–5039. doi: 10.1021/jf049571r. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Choo C, Sulong N, Man F, Wong T. Vitexin and isovitexin from the leaves of Ficus deltoidea with in-vivo α-glucosidase inhibition. J Ethnopharmacol. 2012;142(3):776–781. doi: 10.1016/j.jep.2012.05.062. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Nurdiana S, Goh Y, Hafandi A, Dom S, Syimal'ain AN, Syaffinaz NN, Ebrahimi M. Improvement of spatial learning and memory, cortical gyrification patterns and brain oxidative stress markers in diabetic rats treated with Ficus deltoidea leaf extract and vitexin. J Tradit Complement Med. 2018;8(1):190–202. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcme.2017.05.006. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Ardalani H, Vidkjær NH, Laursen BB, Kryger P, Fomsgaard IS. Dietary quercetin impacts the concentration of pesticides in honey bees. Chemosphere. 2021;262:127848. doi: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2020.127848. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.OECD O . Guideline for the testing of chemicals. Acute oral toxicity e acute toxic class method: test no-423. Paris: Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development; 2001. [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Ramakrishnan S, Sulochana K. Manual of Medical laboratory techniques. JP Medical Ltd.; 2012.
  • 35.Maheshwari N. Clinical biochemistry. Jaypee Brothers Publishers; 2008.
  • 36.Huang Y, Hou T. Hypoglycaemic effect of Artemisia sphaerocephala Krasch seed polysaccharide in alloxan-induced diabetic rats. Swiss Med Wkly. 2006;136(33–34):529–532. doi: 10.4414/smw.2006.11348. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Jandaghi P, Noroozi M, Ardalani H, Alipour M. Lemon balm: a promising herbal therapy for patients with borderline hyperlipidemia—a randomized double-blind placebo-controlled clinical trial. Complement Ther Med. 2016;26:136–40. [DOI] [PubMed]
  • 38.Yousefi E, Zareiy S, Zavoshy R, Noroozi M, Jahanihashemi H, Ardalani H. Fenugreek: a therapeutic complement for patients with borderline hyperlipidemia: a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, clinical trial. Adv Integr Med. 2017;4(1):31–35. doi: 10.1016/j.aimed.2016.12.002. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Shukia R, Sharma S, Puri D, Prabhu K, Murthy P. Medicinal plants for treatment of diabetes mellitus. Indian J Clin Biochem. 2000;15(1):169–177. doi: 10.1007/BF02867556. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Sandu R, Tarţău L, Miron A, Zagnat M, Ghiciuc C, Lupuşoru C. Experimental researches on acute toxicity of a Bidens tripartita extract in mice-preliminary investigation. Rev Med Chir Soc Med Nat Iasi. 2012;116(4):1230–4. [PubMed]
  • 41.Vinayagam R, Xu B. Antidiabetic properties of dietary flavonoids: a cellular mechanism review. Nutr Metab. 2015;12(1):60. doi: 10.1186/s12986-015-0057-7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Lu Y-H, Tian C-R, Gao C-Y, Wang X-Y, Yang X, Chen Y-X, Liu Z-Z. Phenolic profile, antioxidant and enzyme inhibitory activities of Ottelia acuminata, an endemic plant from southwestern China. Ind Crop Prod. 2019;138:111423.
  • 43.DeFronzo RA, Tripathy D. Skeletal muscle insulin resistance is the primary defect in type 2 diabetes. Diabetes Care. 2009;32(suppl 2):S157–S163. doi: 10.2337/dc09-S302. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Gallagher EJ, LeRoith D, Karnieli E. Insulin resistance in obesity as the underlying cause for the metabolic syndrome. Mt Sinai J Med. 2010;77(5):511–523. doi: 10.1002/msj.20212. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Migdal C, Serres M. Reactive oxygen species and oxidative stress. Med Sci. 2011;27(4):405–412. doi: 10.1051/medsci/2011274017. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Khater M, Ravishankar D, Greco F, Osborn HM. Metal complexes of flavonoids: their synthesis, characterization and enhanced antioxidant and anticancer activities. Future Med Chem. 2019;11(21):2845–67. [DOI] [PubMed]
  • 47.Skalski B, Kontek B, Olas B, Żuchowski J, Stochmal A. Phenolic fraction and nonpolar fraction from sea buckthorn leaves and twigs: chemical profile and biological activity. Future Med Chem. 2018;10(20):2381–94. [DOI] [PubMed]
  • 48.Farsi E, Shafaei A, Hor SY, Ahamed MBK, Yam MF, Attitalla IH, Asmawi MZ, Ismail Z. Correlation between enzymes inhibitory effects and antioxidant activities of standardized fractions of methanolic extract obtained from Ficus deltoidea leaves. Afr J Biotech. 2011;10(67):15184–94.

Articles from Journal of Diabetes and Metabolic Disorders are provided here courtesy of Springer

RESOURCES