Abstract
In this study, the complete 16,583 bp mitochondrial genome of Lamprologus signatus (Poll, 1952) was determined from a specimen sourced from Lake Tanganyika. The mitogenome contains 37 genes [13 protein-coding genes (PCGs), two ribosomal RNA (rRNA) genes, and 22 transfer RNA (tRNA) genes] and a putative control region, which consists of 27.1% A, 27.0% T, 29.9% C, and 16.0% G, with a total G + C content of 45.9%. A maximum likelihood phylogenetic tree based on mitochondrial PCGs suggested that L. signatus is clustered with members of the tribes Haplochromini and Tropheini. As this is the first report of the entire mitogenome in the tribe Lamprologini, the complete mitochondrial sequence information of L. sigantus will be useful in determining phylogenetic relationships of Pseudocrenilabrinae tribes.
Keywords: Complete mitogenome, cichlid fish, Lamprologus signatus, phylogenetic analysis
Cichlids are one of the most species-rich acanthomorphs (spiny-rayed fish) with numerous species (>1700 species described), different evolutionary lineages, large genetic diversity, and significant ecological and morphological divergences (Kornfield and Smith 2000; Nelson et al. 2016). They are widely distributed from Africa to South America and Middle America (Smith et al. 2008). The predominantly biodiverse and adaptive radiations of cichlids have been observed in three Great Lakes of East Africa, including Lake Tanganyika, Lake Victoria, and Lake Malawi. Of these, Lake Tanganyika is a deep tropical and large Rift Valley lake with an age of 9–12 million years (Irisarri et al. 2018) and is ecologically important for the study of different biomes, including pelagic, benthic, and littoral ecosystems (Iliffe 1979). Lake Tanganyika too, is an invaluable region for studying adaptive diversification and colonization scenarios of fish, particularly for cichlids, which represent the major species-rich vertebrate radiations (Muschick et al. 2012; Brawand et al. 2014). Cichlids in Lake Tanganyika still show rapid diversification, as revealed by hybridization events occurring in two colonizing lineages at the onset of the radiation (Irisarri et al. 2018). The cichlid fauna of Lake Tanganyika has its roots in one subgroup of the monophyletic African cichlid assemblage (Schwarzer et al. 2009) and has been divided into 14 taxonomic subgroups, referred to as ‘tribes’ (Dunz and Schliewen 2013). Lamprologus signatus (Poll, 1952) is a species of the non-mouthbrooding cichlid tribe Lamprologini that is endemic to Lake Tanganyika. Due to ease of handling and maintenance in aquariums, L. signatus has great economic value as an ornamental species in the aquatic trade industry. The origin and distribution of Lamprologini is controversial. Almost all Lake Tanganyika tribes are endemic to the Great Lakes; however, members of the tribe Lamprologini are distributed in rivers across East and Central Africa (Schelly and Stiassny 2004). Several studies suggest that Lamprologini solely evolved as individual radiation in Lake Tanganyika and further contributed to the Congo Basin colony (Salzburger et al. 2002; Day et al. 2007; Sturmbauer et al. 2010), whereas the Congo Lamprologini colony was suggested to be a relict ancestral species of the Lake Tanganyika Lamprologini radiation (Clabaut et al. 2005). Thus, comprehensive mitogenomic information of L. signatus would be advantageous in establishing the precise phylogenetic placement of Lamprologini and understanding its Lake Tanganyika colonization scenarios.
There is no information on the complete mitogenome in the tribe Lamprologini, although their incomplete mitochondrial genome and genomic markers have been registered in the NCBI GenBank database. Several specimens of L. signatus were collected at Wonzye Point (8°43′ N 31°07′ E), Zambia, which were procured through aquarium trade. The specimens and DNA were deposited in the fish collection at the Research Institute of Basic Sciences of Incheon National University (Specimen ID: 2013-Cichlidae-13; https://www.inu.ac.kr/user/indexMain.do?siteId=ribs; Dr. Sang-Eun Nam; se_nam2@inu.ac.kr). Total genomic DNA was prepared from a specimen muscle using a DNeasy Blood and Tissue kit (Qiagen, Hilden, Germany) according to the manufacturer’s standard protocol. Since next-generation sequencing (NGS) technology has been widely applied for the assembly of complete mitogenomes in fish, the Illumina NGS platform was used in this study. A fragment library was prepared with the total genomic DNA using the TruSeq DNA Sample Preparation Kit (Illumina, San Diego, CA, USA) as previously described (Nam and Rhee 2020), before sequencing using an Illumina HiSeq sequencer. The sequencing library was prepared by random fragmentation of the DNA sample (<600 bp), followed by 5′ and 3′ adapter ligation. Raw reads were obtained from the sample that passed the quality control check on the Illumina HiSeq platform (Illumina) at Macrogen, Inc. (Seoul, South Korea). Adapter sequences, low quality reads, reads with >10% of unknown bases, and ambiguous bases were removed to obtain high quality assembly by using Trimmomatic (Bolger et al. 2014). After the quality check process, 36,998,926 filtered reads were obtained from 46,566,952 raw reads. Subsequently, de novo assembly was conducted with various k-mers using SPAdes (Bankevich et al. 2012), and a circular contig of the L. signatus mitogenome was obtained. The resulting contig consensus sequence was annotated using MITOS2 (Bernt et al. 2013) and tRNAscan-SE 2.0 (Lowe and Eddy 1997). BLAST searches confirmed the identity of the genes (http://blast.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov).
The complete mitochondrial genome of L. signatus was 16,583 bp in length (GenBank accession no. MZ427900) and contained 13 protein-coding genes (PCGs), two ribosomal RNA (rRNA) genes (12S and 16S), and 22 transfer RNA (tRNA) genes. For the 13 PCGs, the most common shared start codon was ATG (all PCGs except for cox1), followed by GTG (cox1). The most common termination codon was TAA (atp8, atp6, cox3, nad4l, nad5, nad6, cob, nad1, and nad2). The gene order and composition of the L. signatus mitogenome were identical to those of other cichlid mitogenomes.
To determine the phylogenetic relationship of L. signatus, a concatenated dataset of the 13 PCGs from the L. signatus mitogenome, closely related 31 published complete mitogenomes of cichlids, and an outgroup from the family Balistidae available from GenBank was used to build maximum-likelihood (ML) phylogeny. JModelTest ver. 2.1.10 (Darriba et al. 2012) was used to select the best substitution model, and a substitution model (HKY + G + I) was applied to perform an ML method in PhyML 2.4.5 (Guindon and Gascuel 2003) with 1000 bootstrap replicates. The overall topology of each tribe was consistent with previous phylogenetic results (Schwarzer et al. 2009; Irisarri et al. 2018) (Figure 1). The L. signatus mitogenome, a member of Lamprologini, was placed as a sister lineage to the members of Haplochromini (including Tropheini), as established in previous studies (Schwarzer et al. 2009; Meyer et al. 2015; Irisarri et al. 2018).
Figure 1.
Maximum-likelihood (ML) phylogeny of 31 published complete mitogenomes of cichlids and an outgroup from the family Balistidae based on the concatenated nucleotide sequences of protein-coding genes (PCGs). The phylogenetic analysis was performed using the maximum likelihood method, GTR + G + I model with a bootstrap of 1000 replicates. Numbers on the branches indicate ML bootstrap percentages. DDBJ/EMBL/Genbank accession numbers for published sequences are incorporated. The black triangle indicates the cichlid analyzed in this study.
Funding Statement
This research was supported by the Incheon National University Grant [2019-0390].
Disclosure statement
The authors report no conflicts of interest and are solely responsible for the content and writing of this manuscript.
Data availability statement
BioProject, BioSample, and SRA accession numbers are https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/search/all/?term=PRJNA550295, https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/biosample/SAMN19803888, and https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/sra/?term=SRR15356509, respectively. The data that support the findings of this study are openly available in the National Center for Biotechnology Information (NCBI) at https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov, with an accession number MZ427900.
References
- Bankevich A, Nurk S, Antipov D, Gurevich AA, Dvorkin M, Kulikov AS, Lesin VM, Nikolenko SI, Pham S, Prjibelski AD, Pyshkin AV, et al. 2012. SPAdes: a new genome assembly algorithm and its applications to single-cell sequencing. J Comput Biol. 19(5):455–477. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Bernt A, Donath A, Jühling F, Externbrink F, Florentz C, Fritzsch G, Pütz J, Middendorf M, Stadler PF.. 2013. MITOS: improved de novo metazoan mitochondrial genome annotation. Mol Phylogenet Evol. 69(2):313–319. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Bolger AM, Lohse M, Usadel B.. 2014. Trimmomatic: a flexible trimmer for Illumina sequence data. Bioinformatics. 30(15):2114–2120. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Brawand D, Wagner CE, Li YI, Malinsky M, Keller I, Fan S, Simakov O, Ng AY, Lim ZW, Bezault E, et al. 2014. The genomic substrate for adaptive radiation in African cichlid fish. Nature. 513(7518):375–381. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Clabaut C, Salzburger W, Meyer A.. 2005. Comparative phylogenetic analyses of the adaptive radiation of Lake Tanganyika cichlid fish: nuclear sequences are less homoplasious but also less informative than mitochondrial DNA. J Mol Evol. 61(5):666–681. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Darriba D, Taboada GL, Doallo R, Posada D.. 2012. jModelTest 2: more models, new heuristics and parallel computing. Nat Methods. 9(8):772. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Day JJ, Santini S, Garcia-Moreno J.. 2007. Phylogenetic relationships of the Lake Tanganyika cichlid tribe Lamprologini: the story from mitochondrial DNA. Mol Phylogenet Evol. 45(2):629–642. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Dunz AR, Schliewen UK.. 2013. Molecular phylogeny and revised classification of the haplotilapiine cichlid fishes formerly referred to as “Tilapia”. Mol Phylogenet Evol. 68(1):64–80. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Guindon S, Gascuel O.. 2003. A simple, fast, and accurate algorithm to estimate large phylogenies by maximum likelihood. Syst Biol. 52(5):696–704. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Iliffe J. 1979. A modern history of Tanganyika. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. [Google Scholar]
- Irisarri I, Singh P, Koblmüller S, Torres-Dowdall J, Henning F, Franchini P, Fischer C, Lemmon AR, Lemmon EM, Thallinger GG, et al. 2018. Phylogenomics uncovers early hybridization and adaptive loci shaping the radiation of Lake Tanganyika cichlid fishes. Nat Commun. 9(1):3159. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Kornfield I, Smith PF.. 2000. African cichlid fishes: model systems for evolutionary biology. Annu Rev Ecol Syst. 31(1):163–196. [Google Scholar]
- Lowe TM, Eddy SR.. 1997. tRNAscan-SE: a program for improved detection of transfer RNA genes in genomic sequence. Nucleic Acids Res. 25(5):955–964. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Meyer BS, Matschiner M, Salzburger W.. 2015. A tribal level phylogeny of Lake Tanganyika cichlid fishes based on a genomic multi-marker approach. Mol Phylogenet Evol. 83:56–71. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Muschick M, Indermaur A, Salzburger W.. 2012. Convergent evolution within an adaptive radiation of cichlid fishes. Curr Biol. 22(24):2362–2368. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Nam S-E, Rhee J-S.. 2020. Complete mitochondrial genome of the lemon damsel, Pomacentrus moluccensis (Perciformes, Pomacentridae). Mitochondrial DNA B Resour. 5(3):2157–2158. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Nelson JS, Grande TC, Wilson MVH.. 2016. Fishes of the World. 5th ed. Hoboken (NJ): John Wiley and Sons. [Google Scholar]
- Salzburger W, Meyer A, Baric S, Verheyen E, Sturmbauer C.. 2002. Phylogeny of the Lake Tanganyika cichlid species flock and its relationship to the central and east African haplochromine cichlid fish faunas. Syst Biol. 51(1):113–135. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Schelly RC, Stiassny MLJ.. 2004. Revision of the Congo River Lamprologus Schilthuis, 1891 (Teleostei: Cichlidae), with descriptions of two new species. Am Mus Novit. 3451:1–40. [Google Scholar]
- Schwarzer J, Misof B, Tautz D, Schliewen UK.. 2009. The root of the East African cichlid radiations. BMC Evol Biol. 9:186. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Smith W, Chakrabarty P, Sparks JS.. 2008. Phylogeny, taxonomy, and evolution of Neotropical cichlids (Teleostei: Cichlidae: Cichlinae). Cladistics. 24(5):625–641. [Google Scholar]
- Sturmbauer C, Salzburger W, Duftner N, Schelly R, Koblmüller S.. 2010. Evolutionary history of the Lake Tanganyika cichlid tribe Lamprologini (Teleostei: Perciformes) derived from mitochondrial and nuclear DNA data. Mol Phylogenet Evol. 57(1):266–284. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Data Availability Statement
BioProject, BioSample, and SRA accession numbers are https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/search/all/?term=PRJNA550295, https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/biosample/SAMN19803888, and https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/sra/?term=SRR15356509, respectively. The data that support the findings of this study are openly available in the National Center for Biotechnology Information (NCBI) at https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov, with an accession number MZ427900.

