Skip to main content
Global Medical Genetics logoLink to Global Medical Genetics
. 2021 Sep 7;8(4):176–182. doi: 10.1055/s-0041-1735590

From Anti-Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 Immune Response to Cancer Onset via Molecular Mimicry and Cross-Reactivity

Darja Kanduc 1,
PMCID: PMC8635832  PMID: 34877576

Abstract

Background and Objectives  Whether exposure to severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) may predispose to the risk of cancer in individuals with no prior cancers is a crucial question that remains unclear. To confirm/refute possible relationships between exposure to the virus and ex novo insurgence of tumors, this study analyzed molecular mimicry and the related cross-reactive potential between SARS-CoV-2 spike glycoprotein (gp) antigen and human tumor-suppressor proteins.

Materials and Methods  Tumor-associated proteins were retrieved from UniProt database and analyzed for pentapeptide sharing with SARS-CoV-2 spike gp by using publicly available databases.

Results  An impressively high level of molecular mimicry exists between SARS-CoV-2 spike gp and tumor-associated proteins. Numerically, 294 tumor-suppressor proteins share 308 pentapeptides with the viral antigen. Crucially, the shared peptides have a relevant immunologic potential by repeatedly occurring in experimentally validated epitopes. Such immunologic potential is of further relevancy in that most of the shared peptides are also present in infectious pathogens to which, in general, human population has already been exposed, thus indicating the possibility of immunologic imprint phenomena.

Conclusion  This article described a vast peptide overlap between SARS-CoV-2 spike gp and tumor-suppressor proteins, and supports autoimmune cross-reactivity as a potential mechanism underlying prospective cancer insurgence following exposure to SARS-CoV-2. Clinically, the findings call for close surveillance of tumor sequelae that possibly could result from the current coronavirus pandemic.

Keywords: SARS-CoV-2 spike gp, tumor-suppressor proteins, molecular mimicry, cross-reactivity, long COVID, cancer epidemic

Introduction

From lung damages to skin diseases and excessive immune responses, the disorders associated with severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2), that is, coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), are progressively being defined and diagnostically cataloged. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Among the many diseases encompassed by COVID-19, clinical attention has focused on the relationship between SARS-CoV-2 and cancer. 8 9 10 Indeed, when compared with the pre-COVID-19 era, COVID-19 pandemic appears to be characterized by higher hospitalization and mortality rates in prostate cancer patients 11 ; increased breast cancer dimensions 12 ; increased proportion of patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer 13 ; and a higher number of diagnosed head and neck cancers (2.9–8.06% in January–April 2020). 14 Such data have been interpreted as due to the pressure exerted by the viral pandemic on the health care system, so cancer treatments have been delayed and, also, have been related to the viral infection per se. 15 However, how SARS-CoV-2 infection might relate to cancer diseases remains unclear.

According to the research paradigm that peptide sequences common to pathogens and the human host may lead to autoimmunity through cross-reactivity, 16 17 18 19 20 21 a previous report 22 has proposed cross-reactivity as a likely mechanism that can explain the immunopathology related to SARS-CoV-2 exposure. As a matter of fact, many SARS-CoV-2-derived epitopes were shown to share peptide sequences with human proteins that are involved—when altered, mutated, deficient, and/or improperly functioning—in the etiology of the diseases encompassed by COVID-19. 22 Moreover, and of special importance, it was noted that the viral versus human peptide sharing also involved human proteins related to pleuropulmonary blastoma, non-small cell lung cancer, breast invasive ductal carcinoma, multiple human cancers, tumor predisposition syndrome, and mesothelioma, inter alia. That is, the data suggested the possibility that morbidity/mortality increases in various tumors might represent long-term sequelae following exposure to SARS-CoV-2 (Kanduc 22 and pertinent references therein).

Hence, this study was undertaken to further explore the relationship between SARS-CoV-2 infection/active immunization and carcinogenesis, and specifically focused on the amino acid (aa) sequence identities between SARS-CoV-2 spike glycoprotein (gp) and tumor-suppressor human proteins. Analyses revealed a vast peptide sharing potentially able to generate pathogenic autoantibodies via cross-reactivity and immunologic imprinting phenomena, thus possibly leading to or enhancing the onset of a wide spectrum of cancer diseases.

Materials and Methods

Peptide sharing between SARS-CoV-2 spike gp (NCBI, GenBank Protein Accession ID = QHD43416.1) and cancer-related human proteins was analyzed using pentapeptides as sequence probes as already described. 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 Pentapeptides were used as minimal immune determinant units since a peptide grouping formed of five aa residues defines an immune unit that can (1) induce highly specific antibodies and (2) determine antigen–antibody-specific interaction (Kanduc 23 24 and further references therein). Seven hundred eighty-two human proteins (in)directly linked to cancer were obtained from UniProtKB database ( www.uniprot.org ) 25 using “tumor suppressor” as keywords and are listed by UniProt entry in Supplementary Table S1 (available in online version only).

Methodologically, the spike gp primary sequence was dissected into pentapeptides offset by one residue (i.e., MFVFL, FVFLV, VFLVL, FLVLL, and so forth) and the resulting viral pentapeptides were analyzed for occurrences within the human proteins related to cancer. The shared peptides were also controlled for occurrences in the pathogens Bordetella pertussis , Corynebacterium diphtheriae , Clostridium tetani , Haemophilus influenzae , and Neisseria meningitides . The publicly available peptide match and peptide search programs ( www.uniprot.org ) were used. 25

The immunologic potential of the peptides shared between SARS-CoV-2 spike gp and cancer-related proteins was investigated by searching the Immune Epitope Database (IEDB, www.iedb.org ) 26 for experimentally validated immunoreactive SARS-CoV-2 spike gp-derived epitopes hosting the shared pentapeptides.

Results and Discussion

Searching UniProt database for tumor-suppressor proteins produced 782 protein entries (in)directly related to tumor-suppressor activity and listed in Supplementary Table S1 (available in online version only). Of the 782 proteins, 294 have pentapeptides in common with the spike gp, in a total of 308 occurrences (in all, 462, including multiple occurrences). These numbers certify the existence of an impressive, unexpected level of molecular mimicry between the viral antigen and the cancer-related human proteins. Obvious reasons of space prevent a detailed analysis peptide-by-peptide of the peptide overlap that is given in its entirety in Supplementary Table S2 (available in online version only). Here in text, a snapshot of the peptide sharing is reported and discussed.

Peptide Sharing between SARS-CoV-2 Spike gp and Tumor-Suppressor Proteins

Table 1 shows data relative to a representative sample of 19 tumor-suppressor proteins and documents that the peptide commonality with the viral antigen amounts to 29 pentapeptides. From a pathological perspective, Table 1 clearly illustrates that even hitting only 19 out of the 294 tumor-suppressor proteins described in Supplementary Table S2 (available in online version only) might equate to induce or enhance carcinogenesis in almost all of the human organs, from brain and liver to lung and bones. Examples of the cancers that might be evoked/potentiated by exposure to SARS-CoV-2 in the next future are T cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia, oligodendrogliomas, breast/ovarian cancers, sarcoma, malignant mesothelioma, B cell chronic lymphocytic leukemia, and non-small cell lung carcinoma, among the others.

Table 1. Peptide sharing between SARS-CoV-2 spike gp and a representative sample of 19 tumor-suppressor proteins.

Shared peptides Tumor-suppressor proteins and related cancer diseases a Refs b
DPFLG BC11B. B cell lymphoma/leukemia 11B. T cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia 27 28
LPPLL, GAGAA, QDVVN, SPDVD BICRA. Glioma tumor suppressor candidate. Oligodendrogliomas 29
EPQII BRCA1. Breast cancer type 1 susceptibility protein . Breast/ovarian cancer 30
SLGAE, LAATK, EPVLK BRCA2. Breast cancer type 2 susceptibility protein . Breast cancer 31
RVVVL DCC. Netrin receptor DCC. Deleted in colorectal carcinoma . Gallbladder cancer 32
YRVVV, SALGK DIRA1. GTP-binding protein Di-Ras1. Small GTP-binding tumor suppressor 1 . Lost/downregulated in neural tumors 33
ITDAV EXT1. Exostosin-1. Putative tumor suppressor protein EXT1 . Bone tumors 34
ALLAG EXT2. Exostosin-2. Putative tumor suppressor protein EXT2 . Bone tumors 34
TLKSF, RLQSL IL24. Interleukin-24. Suppression of tumorigenicity 16 protein . Melanoma 35 36
SKPSK LATS1. Large tumor suppressor homolog 1 . Soft tissue sarcoma. 37
ARDLI LATS2. Large tumor suppressor homolog 2 . Malignant mesothelioma 38
YSNNS MTUS1. Microtubule-associated tumor suppressor 1 . Hepatocellular carcinoma 39
GAGAA PLAT2. Phospholipase A and acyltransferase 2 . Gastric cancer 40
GAGAA PLAT3. Phospholipase A and acyltransferase 3 . Ovarian carcinoma cells 41
ADAGF, TYVPA RBM5. Putative tumor suppressor LUCA15 . Lung cancer 42
RDLPQ, NSVAY SCAI. Suppressor of cancer cell invasion . Downregulated in human tumors 43
LLTDE SDS3. Suppressor of defective silencing 3 protein homolog . Antitumor activity 44
TQSLL, NFKNL, AGAAA TASOR. Transcription activation suppressor . Clear cell renal cell carcinoma 45
LSRLD, GDSSS TRI13. B cell chronic lymphocytic leukemia tumor suppressor Leu5 . B cell chronic lymphocytic leukemia. Non-small cell lung carcinoma 46 47

Abbreviations: gp, glycoprotein; SARS-CoV-2, severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2.

a

Tumor-suppressor proteins given by UniProt entry are in italic.

b

Further references on cancer diseases are available at UniProt, OMIM, and PubMed.

Immunologic Potential of the Peptide Sharing between SARS-CoV-2 Spike gp and Tumor-Suppressor Proteins

The gloomy outlook hinted at by the findings described in Table 1 becomes all the more likely in light of the high immunologic potential of the shared peptides. De facto, investigation of IEDB shows that the 29 pentapeptides shared by the spike gp antigen and the 19 tumor-suppressor proteins ( Table 1 ) occur and recur in 150 epitopes derived from SARS-CoV-2 that have been experimentally validated and are cataloged as immunoreactive ( Table 2 ).

Table 2. Immunoreactive SARS-CoV-2 spike gp-derived epitopes containing peptides shared between SARS-CoV-2 spike gp and tumor-suppressor human proteins.

IEDB ID a Epitope sequence b IEDB ID a Epitope sequence b
36724 litgRLQSL 1329082 ADAGFikqygdclgdia
38831 lQDVVNqnaqalntl 1329083 ADAGFikqygdclgdiaa
51999 qpYRVVVLsf 1329254 demiaqytsALLAG
54725 RLQSLqtyv 1329256 demiaqytsALLAGt
533447 raaeirasanLAATK 1329258 demiaqytsALLAGti
1069290 cTLKSFtvekgiyqt 1329260 demiaqytsALLAGtit
1069445 EPQIIttdntfvsgn 1329323 efqfcnDPFLGvyy
1073938 vqidrlitgRLQSLq 1329325 efqfcnDPFLGvyyh
1074928 ilpdpSKPSK 1329327 efqfcnDPFLGvyyhk
1125063 gltvLPPLL 1329329 efqfcnDPFLGvyyhkn
1309132 nfsqilpdpSKPSKr 1329342 emiaqytsALLAG
1309418 aeirasanLAATKmsecvlg 1329344 emiaqytsALLAGt
1309447 dfggfnfsqilpdpSKPSKr 1329345 emiaqytsALLAGtit
1309450 dplsetkcTLKSFtvekgiy 1329353 EPQIIttdntfvsg
1309451 dsfkeeldkyfknhtSPDVD 1329390 fcnDPFLGvyyh
1309467 fdeddsEPVLKgvklhyt 1329414 fqfcnDPFLGvyy
1309478 gNFKNLrefvfknidgyfki 1329416 fqfcnDPFLGvyyh
1309482 gyqpYRVVVLsfellhapat 1329422 fsqilpdpSKPSKr
1309515 lhrsyltpGDSSSgwtagaa 1329571 idrlitgRLQSLq
1309516 litgRLQSLqtyvtqqlira 1329572 idrlitgRLQSLqt
1309519 lpdpSKPSKrsfiedllfnk 1329595 iqdslsstaSALGKlq
1309523 lssnfgaissvlndiLSRLD 1329597 iraaeirasanLAATK
1309532 ngltvLPPLLTDEmiaqyts 1329606 ITDAVdcaldplse
1309534 nitrfqTLLALhrsyltpgd 1329627 khtpinlvRDLPQg
1309546 pflmdlegkqgNFKNLrefv 1329659 lADAGFikqygdclgdiaa
1309556 qfcnDPFLGvyyhknnkswm 1329710 lpdpSKPSKrsfiedllfnkvt
1309561 qrnfyEPQIIttdntfvsgn 1329762 miaqytsALLAG
1309566 qygdclgdiaARDLIcaqkf 1329764 miaqytsALLAGt
1309567 RDLPQgfsaleplvdlpigi 1329793 ndiLSRLDkveaevq
1309585 sssgwtAGAAAyyvgylqpr 1329940 qidrlitgRLQSLqt
1309589 sygfqptngvgyqpYRVVVL 1329966 qpYRVVVLsfellhapa
1309593 tITDAVdcaldplsetkctl 1329969 qsiiaytmSLGAE
1309599 TYVPAqeknfttapaichdg 1329978 raaeirasanLAATKm
1309605 vsngthwfvtqrnfyEPQII 1330138 staSALGKlQDVVN
1310254 aeNSVAYSNNSiaip 1330167 tdemiaqytsALLAGt
1310284 ARDLIcaqkfngltv 1330169 tdemiaqytsALLAGti
1310303 caqkfngltvLPPLL 1330171 tdemiaqytsALLAGtit
1310362 eldkyfknhtSPDVD 1330209 TLKSFtvekgiyqts
1310392 fgttldskTQSLLiv 1330210 TLKSFtvekgiyqtsn
1310415 fngltvLPPLLTDEm 1330211 TLKSFtvekgiyqtsnf
1310448 gklQDVVNqnaqaln 1330219 tpGDSSSgwtAGAAA
1310586 litgRLQSLqtyvtq 1330220 tpinlvRDLPQg
1310609 lpdpSKPSKrsfied 1330305 vqidrlitgRLQSLqt
1310611 LPPLLTDEmiaqyts 1330306 vqidrlitgRLQSLqtyv
1310747 qpYRVVVLsfellha 1330368 yfkiyskhtpinlvRDLPQ
1310750 qrnfyEPQIIttdnt 1330391 ytsALLAGtit
1310847 titsgwtfGAGAAlq 1330433 diLSRLD
1310947 wtfGAGAAlqipfam 1330434 diLSRLDppeaevq
1311657 ccscgscckfdeddsEPVLKgvkl 1330437 dslsstaSALGKl
1311782 pdpSKPSKrsfiedllfnkvtlad 1330438 dslsstaSALGKlq
1312257 cckfdeddsEPVLKg 1330439 dslsstaSALGKlqdv
1312283 deddsEPVLKgvklh 1330447 EPQIIttdntfvsgnc
1312733 ilpdpSKPSKrsfie 1330456 fsqilpdpSKPSK
1312780 ITDAVdcaldplset 1330457 fsqilpdpSKPSKrs
1313154 miaqytsALLAGtit 1330463 gfnfsqilpdpSKPSKr
1313286 pinlvRDLPQgfwal 1330487 ilpdpSKPSKr
1313756 TLKSFtvek 1330489 iqdslsstaSALGKl
1313930 vTYVPAqeknfttap 1330490 iqdslsstaSALGKlqd
1314170 ADAGFikqy 1330515 lADAGFikqy
1315180 aYSNNSiai 1330551 pSKPSKrsf
1316068 etkcTLKSF 1330552 pSKPSKrsfi
1316945 fsqilpdpSKPSKrsfie 1330557 qilpdpSKPSKr
1318209 hvTYVPAqek 1330589 slsstaSALGKlq
1320443 lgaeNSVAY 1330597 sqilpdpSKPSK
1321084 LPPLLTDEm 1330598 sqilpdpSKPSKr
1323467 qpYRVVVL 1330623 tpinlvRDLPQgfs
1323750 rasanLAATK 1330624 tpinlvRDLPQgfsa
1323919 RLQSLqty 1330625 tpinlvRDLPQgfsalepl
1324353 setkcTLKSF 1331139 cnDPFLGvy
1325536 tlADAGFik 1332424 itgRLQSLqty
1327824 wtAGAAAyy 1332664 LLTDEmiaqy
1327836 wtfGAGAAl 1334122 TYVPAqeknft
1328800 ytmslgaeNSVAY 1334394 yqpYRVVVL
1328800 ytmSLGAEnsvay 1334452 alhrsyltpGDSSSg
1329076 aaeirasanLAATK 1334473 NSVAYSNNSiaiptnft

Abbreviations: gp, glycoprotein; IEDB, Immune Epitope Database; SARS-CoV-2, severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2.

a

Epitopes listed according to the IEDB ID number.

b

Shared sequences given are capitalized.

In essence, Table 2 factually supports the possibility that cross-reactions can be triggered by SARS-CoV-2 infection/active immunization and hit human proteins related to carcinogenesis. Very much this conclusion applies when considering that the extent of the potential immunologic cross-reactivity as well as the spectrum of potentially inducible tumors may be exponentially higher in light of the fact that Tables 1 and 2 refer to the peptide commonality involving only a tiny part (19 out of 294) of the human proteins that—if altered—may lead to cancer (see Supplementary Table S2 [available in online version only] for the peptide sharing in its totality).

Potential Immunologic Imprint

The 29 pentapeptides common to SARS-CoV-2 spike gp and tumor-suppressor proteins ( Table 1 ) are not only present in immunoreactive epitopes ( Table 2 ) but, in addition, almost all of them (24 out of 29) are also present in microbial organisms such as Bordetella pertussis , C. diphtheriae , C. tetani , H. influenzae , and N. meningitides ( Table 3 ). That is, most of the shared peptides are also present in pathogens that an individual possibly encountered during his life because of infections and/or vaccinal routes.

Table 3. Occurrences in microbial organisms of pentapeptides common to SARS-CoV-2 spike gp, human proteins related to cancer, and SARS-CoV-2 spike gp-derived epitopes.

Organism Shared peptides
Bordetella pertussis ADAGF, AGAAA, ALLAG, GAGAA, ITDAV, RLQSL, SLGAE, SPDVD, TYVPA
Clostridium tetani AGAAA, LAATK, LLTDE, YSNNS
Corynebacterium diphtheriae AGAAA, ALLAG, EPQII, GAGAA, ITDAV, SALGK, YRVVV
Haemophilus influenzae AGAAA, GAGAA, LLTDE, LPPLL, LSRLD, NFKNL, NSVAY, RDLPQ, RLQSL, RVVVL, SALGK, SLGAE, TLKSF, TQSLL, YSNNS
Neisseria meningitides AGAAA, ALLAG, EPVLK, GAGAA, LLTDE, LPPLL

Abbreviations: gp, glycoprotein; SARS-CoV-2, severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2.

Such interpathogen peptide commonality introduces the immunologic memory as a factor capable of enhancing the extent of the immune cross-reactive response against the tumor-suppressor proteins. That is, as already described since 1947, 48 49 the immune system does not induce ex novo primary responses toward a recent infection. Rather, the immune system recalls, amplifies, and intensifies preexisting memory responses toward past infections. In this way, what should have been a primary response to a recent infection is transformed into an anamnestic, secondary, and magnified response to past infections. Simply put, as already discussed in previous reports, 50 51 52 53 54 55 the early history of the individual's infections/vaccinations dictates the immune outcomes of any successive infections/vaccinations.

The immunologic imprint phenomenon has its molecular foundations in the massive peptide sharing that characterizes microbial and human proteins 17 56 57 and of which Table 3 is an example. The implications are noteworthy. In the case object, following exposure to SARS-CoV-2 by infection or vaccination, the expected primary response to the virus can turn into a secondary response to previously encountered pathogens against which the immune system already reacted and of which has stored an immunologic memory, that is, the microbial organisms reported in Table 3 . However, the previously encountered pathogens are no more present in the human organism, so that the anamnestic immune response triggered by the exposure to SARS-CoV-2 by infection or vaccination ends to divert onto available immune determinants that, in the present case, are the common determinants present in the tumor-suppressor human proteins. Pathologically, one has to consider that usually an anamnestic secondary immune response is characterized by high avidity and high affinity, besides being quantitatively relevant. Therefore, as a final result, exposure to SARS-CoV-2 by infection and/or vaccination can trigger immediate and violent cross-reactive attacks against the proteins that protect the human being from carcinogenesis.

Conclusion

The findings described in Tables 1 to 3 and Supplementary Table S2 (available in online version only) indicate that molecular mimicry and cross-reactivity between peptides common to SARS-CoV-2 and tumor-related proteins might cause/contribute to cancer epidemics worldwide in the next future. The potential cancer risk might be enhanced by immunologic imprinting phenomena, given the fact that the comparative analyses shown in Table 3 indicate the possibility that a preexisting immune response to previously encountered pathogens could be magnified and intensified following SARS-CoV-2 infection/active immunization. These data are disturbing and invite to immediately intensify clinical surveillance in oncology and to undertake rigid cancer prevention actions, including healthy lifestyle and continuous controls. It will be vital to formulate/implement actions that contemplate fast and safe procedures for clinical trials, development of specific and reliable tumor markers for diagnosis, accurate follow-up of treatments, and, administratively, medical health records, detailed registries, biobanks, health surveys, and coordinated observational studies. Never before do all the recommendations of the European plan for the fight against cancer appear current and necessary. 58 De facto, tumors appear to be the predominant pathologies that will populate the post pandemic long COVID-19.

Funding Statement

Funding None.

Footnotes

Conflict of Interest None declared.

Supplementary Material

10-1055-s-0041-1735590-s2100033.pdf (75.4KB, pdf)

Supplementary Material

Supplementary Material

References

  • 1.Huang C, Wang Y, Li X.Clinical features of patients infected with 2019 novel coronavirus in Wuhan, China Lancet 2020395(10223):497–506. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Sadeghzadeh-Bazargan A, Rezai M, Najar Nobari N, Mozafarpoor S, Goodarzi A. Skin manifestations as potential symptoms of diffuse vascular injury in critical COVID-19 patients. J Cutan Pathol. 2021 doi: 10.1111/cup.14059. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Boechat J L, Chora I, Morais A, Delgado L. The immune response to SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19 immunopathology - current perspectives. Pulmonology. 2021;27(05):423–437. doi: 10.1016/j.pulmoe.2021.03.008. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Cabrera Martimbianco A L, Pacheco R L, Bagattini ÂM, Riera R. Frequency, signs and symptoms, and criteria adopted for long COVID-19: s systematic review. Int J Clin Pract. 2021:e14357. doi: 10.1111/ijcp.14357. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Rosen H R, O'Connell C, Nadim M K. Extrapulmonary manifestations of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus-2 infection. J Med Virol. 2021;93(05):2645–2653. doi: 10.1002/jmv.26595. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Ramos-Casals M, Brito-Zerón P, Mariette X. Systemic and organ-specific immune-related manifestations of COVID-19. Nat Rev Rheumatol. 2021;17(06):315–332. doi: 10.1038/s41584-021-00608-z. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Suárez-Reyes A, Villegas-Valverde C A. Implications of low-grade inflammation in SARS-CoV-2 immunopathology. MEDICC Rev. 2021;23(02):42. doi: 10.37757/MR2021.V23.N2.4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Han H J, Nwagwu C, Anyim O, Ekweremadu C, Kim S. COVID-19 and cancer: from basic mechanisms to vaccine development using nanotechnology. Int Immunopharmacol. 2021;90:107247. doi: 10.1016/j.intimp.2020.107247. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Corti C, Curigliano G. Commentary: SARS-CoV-2 vaccines and cancer patients. Ann Oncol. 2021;32(04):569–571. doi: 10.1016/j.annonc.2020.12.019. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Xia P, Dubrovska A. Tumor markers as an entry for SARS-CoV-2 infection? FEBS J. 2020;287(17):3677–3680. doi: 10.1111/febs.15499. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Chakravarty D, Ratnani P, Sobotka S. Increased hospitalization and mortality from COVID-19 in prostate cancer patients. Cancers (Basel) 2021;13(07):1630. doi: 10.3390/cancers13071630. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Vanni G, Pellicciaro M, Materazzo M. Advanced stages and increased need for adjuvant treatments in breast cancer patients: the effect of the one-year COVID-19 pandemic. Anticancer Res. 2021;41(05):2689–2696. doi: 10.21873/anticanres.15050. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Park J Y, Lee Y J, Kim T. Collateral effects of the coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic on lung cancer diagnosis in Korea. BMC Cancer. 2020;20(01):1040. doi: 10.1186/s12885-020-07544-3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Taylor R, Omakobia E, Sood S, Glore R J. The impact of coronavirus disease 2019 on head and neck cancer services: a UK tertiary centre study. J Laryngol Otol. 2020;134(08):684–687. doi: 10.1017/S0022215120001735. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Derosa L, Melenotte C, Griscelli F. The immuno-oncological challenge of COVID-19. Nat Can. 2020;1:946–964. doi: 10.1038/s43018-020-00122-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Natale C, Giannini T, Lucchese A, Kanduc D. Computer-assisted analysis of molecular mimicry between human papillomavirus 16 E7 oncoprotein and human protein sequences. Immunol Cell Biol. 2000;78(06):580–585. doi: 10.1046/j.1440-1711.2000.00949.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Kanduc D, Stufano A, Lucchese G, Kusalik A. Massive peptide sharing between viral and human proteomes. Peptides. 2008;29(10):1755–1766. doi: 10.1016/j.peptides.2008.05.022. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Lucchese G, Capone G, Kanduc D. Peptide sharing between influenza A H1N1 hemagglutinin and human axon guidance proteins. Schizophr Bull. 2014;40(02):362–375. doi: 10.1093/schbul/sbs197. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Kanduc D. Peptide cross-reactivity: the original sin of vaccines. Front Biosci (Schol Ed) 2012;4:1393–1401. doi: 10.2741/s341. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Lucchese G, Kanduc D. Potential crossreactivity of human immune responses against HCMV glycoprotein B. Curr Drug Discov Technol. 2016;13(01):16–24. doi: 10.2174/1568009616666160129100621. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Lucchese G, Kanduc D. Zika virus and autoimmunity: from microcephaly to Guillain-Barré syndrome, and beyond. Autoimmun Rev. 2016;15(08):801–808. doi: 10.1016/j.autrev.2016.03.020. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Kanduc D. From anti-SARS-CoV-2 immune responses to COVID-19 via molecular mimicry. Antibodies (Basel) 2020;9(03):33. doi: 10.3390/antib9030033. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Kanduc D. Pentapeptides as minimal functional units in cell biology and immunology. Curr Protein Pept Sci. 2013;14(02):111–120. doi: 10.2174/1389203711314020003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Kanduc D. Homology, similarity, and identity in peptide epitope immunodefinition. J Pept Sci. 2012;18(08):487–494. doi: 10.1002/psc.2419. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.UniProt Consortium UniProt: a worldwide hub of protein knowledge Nucleic Acids Res 201947(D1):D506–D515. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Vita R, Mahajan S, Overton J A.The Immune Epitope Database (IEDB): 2018 update Nucleic Acids Res 201947(D1):D339–D343. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Gutierrez A, Kentsis A, Sanda T. The BCL11B tumor suppressor is mutated across the major molecular subtypes of T-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia. Blood. 2011;118(15):4169–4173. doi: 10.1182/blood-2010-11-318873. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Bartram I, Gökbuget N, Schlee C. Low expression of T-cell transcription factor BCL11b predicts inferior survival in adult standard risk T-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia patients. J Hematol Oncol. 2014;7:51. doi: 10.1186/s13045-014-0051-y. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Yang P, Kollmeyer T M, Buckner K, Bamlet W, Ballman K V, Jenkins R B. Polymorphisms in GLTSCR1 and ERCC2 are associated with the development of oligodendrogliomas. Cancer. 2005;103(11):2363–2372. doi: 10.1002/cncr.21028. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Clark S L, Rodriguez A M, Snyder R R, Hankins G D, Boehning D. Structure-function of the tumor suppressor BRCA1. Comput Struct Biotechnol J. 2012;1(01):e201204005. doi: 10.5936/csbj.201204005. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Angeli D, Salvi S, Tedaldi G. Genetic predisposition to breast and ovarian cancers: how many and which genes to test? Int J Mol Sci. 2020;21(03):1128. doi: 10.3390/ijms21031128. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Rai R, Sharma K L, Tiwari S, Misra S, Kumar A, Mittal B. DCC (deleted in colorectal carcinoma) gene variants confer increased susceptibility to gallbladder cancer (Ref. No.: Gene-D-12-01446) Gene. 2013;518(02):303–309. doi: 10.1016/j.gene.2013.01.019. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Ellis C A, Vos M D, Howell H, Vallecorsa T, Fults D W, Clark G J. Rig is a novel Ras-related protein and potential neural tumor suppressor. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2002;99(15):9876–9881. doi: 10.1073/pnas.142193799. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Duncan G, McCormick C, Tufaro F. The link between heparan sulfate and hereditary bone disease: finding a function for the EXT family of putative tumor suppressor proteins. J Clin Invest. 2001;108(04):511–516. doi: 10.1172/JCI13737. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Huang E Y, Madireddi M T, Gopalkrishnan R V. Genomic structure, chromosomal localization and expression profile of a novel melanoma differentiation associated (mda-7) gene with cancer specific growth suppressing and apoptosis inducing properties. Oncogene. 2001;20(48):7051–7063. doi: 10.1038/sj.onc.1204897. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Allen M, Pratscher B, Roka F. Loss of novel mda-7 splice variant (mda-7s) expression is associated with metastatic melanoma. J Invest Dermatol. 2004;123(03):583–588. doi: 10.1111/j.0022-202X.2004.23321.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Hisaoka M, Tanaka A, Hashimoto H. Molecular alterations of h-warts/LATS1 tumor suppressor in human soft tissue sarcoma. Lab Invest. 2002;82(10):1427–1435. doi: 10.1097/01.lab.0000032381.68634.ca. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Murakami H, Mizuno T, Taniguchi T. LATS2 is a tumor suppressor gene of malignant mesothelioma. Cancer Res. 2011;71(03):873–883. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-10-2164. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Di Benedetto M, Pineau P, Nouet S.Mutation analysis of the 8p22 candidate tumor suppressor gene ATIP/MTUS1 in hepatocellular carcinoma Mol Cell Endocrinol 2006252(1-2):207–215. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Liang Y, Zhang C, Dai D Q. Identification of DNA methylation-regulated differentially-expressed genes and related pathways using Illumina 450K BeadChip and bioinformatic analysis in gastric cancer. Pathol Res Pract. 2019;215(10):152570. doi: 10.1016/j.prp.2019.152570. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Nazarenko I, Schäfer R, Sers C.Mechanisms of the HRSL3 tumor suppressor function in ovarian carcinoma cells J Cell Sci 2007120(Pt 8):1393–1404. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Oh J J, Razfar A, Delgado I. 3p21.3 tumor suppressor gene H37/Luca15/RBM5 inhibits growth of human lung cancer cells through cell cycle arrest and apoptosis. Cancer Res. 2006;66(07):3419–3427. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-05-1667. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Brandt D T, Baarlink C, Kitzing T M. SCAI acts as a suppressor of cancer cell invasion through the transcriptional control of beta1-integrin. Nat Cell Biol. 2009;11(05):557–568. doi: 10.1038/ncb1862. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Ramakrishna S, Suresh B, Bae S M, Ahn W S, Lim K H, Baek K H. Hyaluronan binding motifs of USP17 and SDS3 exhibit anti-tumor activity. PLoS One. 2012;7(05):e37772. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0037772. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Iacobas D A, Mgbemena V E, Iacobas S, Menezes K M, Wang H, Saganti P B. Genomic fabric remodeling in metastatic clear cell renal cell carcinoma (ccRCC): a new paradigm and proposal for a personalized gene therapy approach. Cancers (Basel) 2020;12(12):3678. doi: 10.3390/cancers12123678. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.van Everdink W J, Baranova A, Lummen C. RFP2, c13ORF1, and FAM10A4 are the most likely tumor suppressor gene candidates for B-cell chronic lymphocytic leukemia. Cancer Genet Cytogenet. 2003;146(01):48–57. doi: 10.1016/s0165-4608(03)00126-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Xu L, Wu Q, Zhou X, Wu Q, Fang M. TRIM13 inhibited cell proliferation and induced cell apoptosis by regulating NF-κB pathway in non-small-cell lung carcinoma cells. Gene. 2019;715:144015. doi: 10.1016/j.gene.2019.144015. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Francis T, Salk J E, Quilligan J J. Experience with vaccination against influenza in the spring of 1947: a preliminary report. Am J Public Health Nations Health. 1947;37(08):1013–1016. doi: 10.2105/ajph.37.8.1013. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Davenport F M, Hennessy A V, Francis T., Jr Epidemiologic and immunologic significance of age distribution of antibody to antigenic variants of influenza virus. J Exp Med. 1953;98(06):641–656. doi: 10.1084/jem.98.6.641. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Lucchese G, Kanduc D. The Guillain–Barrè peptide signatures: from Zika virus to Campylobacter , and beyond . Virus Adaptation and Treatment. 2017;9:1–11. [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Lucchese G, Kanduc D. Minimal immune determinants connect Zika virus, human cytomegalovirus, and Toxoplasma gondii to microcephaly-related human proteins . Am J Reprod Immunol. 2017;77(02):e12608. doi: 10.1111/aji.12608. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Kanduc D. Immunobiology: on the inexistence of a negative selection process. Adv Stud Biol. 2020;12(01):19–28. [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Kanduc D. Anti-SARS-CoV-2 Immune response and sudden death: titin as a link. Adv Stud Biol. 2021;13(01):37–44. [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Kanduc D, Shoenfeld Y. Inter-pathogen peptide sharing and the original antigenic sin: solving a paradox. Open Immunol J. 2018;8:16–27. [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Kanduc D. Thromboses and hemostasis disorders associated with coronavirus disease 2019: the possible causal role of cross-reactivity and immunological imprinting. Glob Med Genet. 2021 doi: 10.1055/s-0041-1731068. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56.Trost B, Lucchese G, Stufano A, Bickis M, Kusalik A, Kanduc D. No human protein is exempt from bacterial motifs, not even one. Self Nonself. 2010;1(04):328–334. doi: 10.4161/self.1.4.13315. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57.Kanduc D. The comparative biochemistry of viruses and humans: an evolutionary path towards autoimmunity. Biol Chem. 2019;400(05):629–638. doi: 10.1515/hsz-2018-0271. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 58.Europe's Beating Cancer Plan: A new EU approach to prevention, treatment and care[Internet] Accessed on May 2021 at:https://ec.europa.eu/commission/presscorner/detail/en/ip_21_342

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

10-1055-s-0041-1735590-s2100033.pdf (75.4KB, pdf)

Supplementary Material

Supplementary Material


Articles from Global Medical Genetics are provided here courtesy of Thieme Medical Publishers

RESOURCES