Abstract
Over the last few decades, the prevalence of obesity has risen to epidemic proportions worldwide. Consequently, the number of obesity in pregnancy has risen drastically. Gestational overweight and obesity are associated with impaired outcomes for mother and child. Furthermore, studies show that maternal obesity can lead to long-term consequences in the offspring, increasing the risk for obesity and cardiometabolic disease in later life. In addition to genetic mechanisms, mounting evidence demonstrates the induction of epigenetic alterations by maternal obesity, which can affect the offspring’s phenotype, thereby influencing the later risk of obesity and cardiometabolic disease. Clear evidence in this regard comes from various animal models of maternal obesity. Evidence derived from clinical studies remains limited. The current article gives an overview of pathophysiological changes associated with maternal obesity and their consequences on placental structure and function. Furthermore, a short excurse is given on epigenetic mechanisms and emerging data regarding a putative interaction between metabolism and epigenetics. Finally, a summary of important findings of animal and clinical studies investigating maternal obesity-related epigenetic effects is presented also addressing current limitations of clinical studies.
Subject terms: Obesity, Epigenetics, Epigenomics, Model vertebrates, Obesity
Obesity during pregnancy
Overweight and obesity, defined as a body mass index (BMI) of 25–<30 or ≥30 kg/m2, respectively, have reached epidemic proportions over the last 30 years [1]. Current estimates suggest that by 2038 about 38% of the world’s population is expected to be obese [2]. In parallel with the increase in the general population, the prevalence of overweight and obesity also has increased in pregnant women [1]. Overweight and obesity are associated with a variety of pregnancy complications and are considered the most common health risks during pregnancy. These complications include gestational hypertension, preeclampsia, preterm birth, gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM), both, small and large for gestational age offspring, and a higher prevalence of stillbirth and congenital defects [3, 4]. In addition, there is growing evidence that exposure of offspring from obese mothers to an inadequate in utero environment may influence susceptibility for different non-communicable diseases in adulthood, including obesity and type 2 diabetes mellitus [5]. However, our understanding of the potential long-term effects of maternal overnutrition on the offspring and the mechanisms behind these is still limited, but a growing body of evidence highlights the importance of epigenetic modifications. Much insight in this regard comes from animal studies. In humans, however, it remains challenging to unravel the complex interaction between genetics, epigenetics, and pre- and postnatal environmental influences [6].
Pathophysiology of obesity in pregnancy
During a healthy pregnancy, maternal physiology changes to support the growth of the fetus. This includes crucial metabolic adjustments in maternal insulin sensitivity depending on the demands of the specific pregnancy stage. In the early stages of pregnancy, there is an increase in insulin sensitivity that promotes the uptake of glucose into adipose tissue and prepares the organism for the increased energy requirements in later stages of pregnancy. However, during the progression of pregnancy, the maternal metabolism switches to a state of relative insulin resistance, resulting in a modest elevation of maternal blood glucose that is readily transported across the placenta to support fetal growth. Moreover, this low-level insulin resistance drives endogenous glucose production and utilization of fat stores, leading to further increases in blood glucose and free fatty acids [7]. To maintain adequate glucose control during pregnancy, maternal pancreatic β cells must increase insulin secretion to counteract the decrease in tissue sensitivity to insulin. In GDM, pancreatic β cells are unable to compensate for increased insulin resistance leading to the emergence of maternal glucose intolerance and GDM [8]. Obesity is associated with hyperinsulinemia and insulin resistance, which may be triggered by concomitant low-grade systemic inflammation and subclinical endotoxemia [9]. Obesity in pregnancy has been shown to significantly affect glucose metabolism leading to impaired fasting glucose reduction in early pregnancy and a considerate increase of peripheral and hepatic insulin resistance [10]. Consequently, obesity-related prepregnancy insulin resistance is associated with a strongly increased risk for GDM [1]. It was shown that changes in insulin sensitivity through the course of pregnancy are in parts related to maternal fat mass, and a marked increase in fat mass can be observed during pregnancy in both normal weight and obese women [11]. Due to the reduced effect of insulin on lipolysis, pregnancy-related insulin resistance affects lipid metabolism resulting in a several-fold increase of triglyceride and cholesterol levels late in gestation [12]. Normal weight women display net lipogenesis in early gestation (12–14 weeks) and net lipolysis in late pregnancy stages (34–36 weeks). Obese women, in contrast, show net lipolysis at all pregnancy stages. This suggests that in obese pregnancies the developing fetus is exposed to high levels of free fatty acids throughout all stages of in utero development [13]. In obese pregnancies a lipotoxic effect can be observed that promotes inflammation, endothelial dysfunction, and impairs placental invasion, which subsequently leads to alterations in placental metabolism and function [14, 15]. The supply of excess lipid and glucose to the fetus in combination with an inadequate placental function and in utero environment are thought to be relevant factors that may also increase the risk of metabolic disease in the offspring [14, 15].
Placental changes associated with maternal obesity
In mammals, the placenta is the key element necessary for a successful pregnancy. Its various functions range from governing implantation of the early embryo and preventing its rejection by the maternal immune system, to mediating the transfer of gases, nutrients, and waste products between mother and fetus [9, 16]. The placenta is a major production site for pregnancy-related hormones that are released into the maternal circulation eliciting important functions in the adaptation of the maternal organism to and in the maintenance of pregnancy [16]. As the placenta is the main interface between mother and fetus, it is regulated by, both, fetal and maternal signals. Evidence is accumulating that the placenta acts as a sensor of the maternal-fetal environment, actively triggering adaptive responses toward intrinsic (e.g., gestational age, genetic setup) as well as extrinsic factors (e.g., nutritional variations) [16]. Furthermore, literature suggests a sexual dimorphism in adaptive placental responses [17].
Maternal overweight and obesity are associated with alterations in placental structure and function, characterized by increased inflammation and lipotoxic effects affecting nutrient transport, energy homeostasis, angiogenesis, and villous maturation [15, 18, 19]. Moreover, placental function may be compromised in maternal obesity, putatively due to impaired mitochondrial function, and increased oxidative stress [18–20]. It was shown that with increasing maternal adiposity there is a decrease in oxidative phosphorylation resulting in a lower placental cellular ATP production [19]. Similarly, another study demonstrated a reduced activity of mitochondrial respiratory complexes and increases in radical oxygen species formation in placentas of obese women, which by itself serves as a marker of impaired mitochondrial function [18]. Furthermore, it was demonstrated that maternal obesity is associated with a decreased expression of placental mitochondrial cholesterol transporter and reduced mitochondrial cholesterol concentrations. This indicates a critical modification of mitochondrial function in response to maternal obesity, which was shown to lead to a deficiency in placental endocrine output highlighted by a decreased synthesis of both progesterone and estradiol [21].
Insulin signaling plays an important role in placental growth and development that is supported by the observation of a higher trophoblastic insulin receptor expression in early gestation compared to late gestation [22]. Moreover, the area under the insulin curve determined by a glucose tolerance test at 12–14 weeks of gestation was shown to correlate with placental weight and neonatal adiposity at term, whereas this association is not found in glucose tolerance tests performed at late stages of pregnancy [23]. This suggests that the metabolic profile in early gestation dictates placental growth and development, and indicates involvement of maternal insulin in these processes [24]. It was demonstrated that maternal obesity with the accompanying insulin resistance and hyperinsulinemia is associated with a placental gene expression profile characteristic of mitochondrial dysfunction and impaired energy metabolism [25]. As outlined above, there is considerate evidence demonstrating impaired mitochondrial function in the placenta of obese women [18–21]. Compared to lean women, obese woman display an increased lipid accumulation in the placenta, which can ultimately affect the placental lipid supply to the fetus and therefore might be a cause for increased fetal adiposity in offspring of obese women [21, 25, 26]. Disturbances in placental fatty acid metabolism due to mitochondrial dysfunction, including uptake of fatty acids, decreased fatty acid oxidation, or increased esterification might be one cause for the increased lipid content found in placentas of obese women [21, 27].
Epigenetics and maternal obesity
Environmental factors can lead to epigenetic modifications that can alter gene expression without affecting the DNA-sequence. Essential epigenetic mechanisms include histone modifications, non-coding RNAs, and DNA methylation. Epigenetic mechanisms regulate the accessibility of DNA for transcription factor complexes, the efficiency of gene transcription, and the stability of messenger RNA (mRNA). Post-translational histone modifications, including acetylation, methylation, sumoylation, and phosphorylation, impact on chromatin structure, which may influence gene transcription [28–30]. By means of RNA interference, non-coding RNAs can influence the degradation of already transcribed mRNA [29]. One of the best-studied epigenetic mechanisms is DNA methylation. DNA methylation is defined as the addition of a methyl group to cytosine and is carried out by DNA methyltransferases, requiring the cofactor S-adenosylmethionine. Cytosine methylation can be mitotically inherited; thus, DNA methylation is considered a mechanism of somatic inheritance. In mammals, DNA methylation usually takes place at cytosines in a cytosine-guanine context referred to as “CpG” (the “p” stands for the intervening phosphate group), converting cytosine to 5-methylcytosine (5mC). CpG rich regions in the DNA are scattered unevenly across the genome and are generally referred to as “CpG islands.” CpG islands are usually found in higher numbers in promoter regions of genes. CpG methylation affects the expression of genes by binding to methylation-sensitive DNA binding proteins and by the interaction with different histone tail modifications regulating DNA accessibility [13]. In general, hypomethylation of promoter regions leads to an increased expression of a respective gene, whereas hypermethylation results in transcriptional repression [30]. DNA can also be actively demethylated by members of the ten eleven translocation (TET) dioxygenase enzyme family. The process of active demethylation encompasses several steps, starting with the conversion of 5mC to 5-hydroxymethylcytosine (5hmC). Next, 5hmC is converted to 5-formylcytosine (5fmC) and ultimately to 5-carboxylcytosine (5CmC). Both 5fmC and 5CmC can be processed by thymine-DNA glycosylase, creating an abasic site that is converted back to cytosine by base excision repair. It has been implicated that active demethylation of the genome has a regulatory function responsible for fine-tuning methylation marks [31]. Furthermore, evidence is accumulating that 5hmC is not just a passive intermediate during active demethylation but elicits unique epigenetic functions [32]. Obesity is known to be associated with altered patterns of placental gene expression and epigenetic changes including histone modifications, DNA methylation and hydroxymethylation, and microRNA expression [33–35].
The underlying mechanisms that trigger obesity-related epigenetic changes are still incompletely understood. However, recent findings suggest a possible link between metabolism and epigenetics. Comparing placental tissue of obese versus lean pregnancies, Mitsuya et al. investigated placental DNA methylation and hydroxymethylation on a genomic scale. They were able to show a partial but significant overlap of genes that experienced an increase in DNA methylation and a reciprocal decrease in DNA hydroxymethylation with increased maternal obesity, suggesting a possible decrease in the conversion efficiency of methylation to hydroxymethylation, which is governed by TET dioxygenases (Fig. 1). TET dioxygenases require α-ketoglutarate (αKG) as an essential cofactor that is formed from isocitrate in the mitochondrial tricarboxylic acid cycle by isocitrate dehydrogenase. Measuring αKG levels in placental tissue, the authors were able to demonstrate a modest but significant negative correlation between αKG levels and maternal early BMI (Fig. 1) [33]. Previously, evidence from metabolomic studies demonstrated a decrease in αKG levels in obese individuals and increases in αKG following weight loss [36, 37]. Since α-KG synthesis occurs largely in mitochondria, a potential connection between decreases in αKG and obesity might be disturbances in mitochondrial function and homeostasis, a common finding in placentas from obese women [18, 19, 21, 36]. Support for this notion comes from an animal study, which showed a high-fat diet-associated α-KG decrease in cardiac tissue that was attributable to impaired mitochondrial function [38]. Also other evidence points toward a connection between metabolism and epigenetics. Current literature suggests that dysregulation of adenosine monophosphate-activated protein kinase (AMPK) and mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) homeostasis is a relevant factor in gestational obesity and associated fetal overgrowth (Fig. 2) [39]. AMPK activation occurs in response to falling energy levels indicated by high AMP and low ATP concentrations. In situations of low cellular ATP levels, activation of AMPK leads to an inhibition of mTOR signaling, thereby preserving cellular energy during such low energy states [40]. Wu et al. demonstrated that activation of AMPK by falling cellular energy levels phosphorylates and stabilizes TET2. Under conditions that inhibit AMPK signaling, such as high glucose, AMPK was no longer activated, resulting in loss of TET2 phosphorylation and stability, decreased TET2 levels, and reduced nuclear levels of DNA hydroxymethylation [41]. Concerning obesity in pregnancy, it has recently been shown that prepregnancy BMI shows a negative correlation with AMPK activation in the placenta [42]. A study investigating the effects of obesity on the placenta in sows demonstrated an association between obesity and a lipotoxic placental milieu that was characterized by a decreased AMPK activation [43]. In a similar finding, a negative correlation between maternal prepregnancy BMI and AMPK expression was demonstrated for fetal cord blood, also highlighting that maternal BMI can act as an important factor in programming protein expression at birth in the offspring [44]. Taken together, evidence is accumulating that points toward a mechanistic connection between the metabolic state of a cell and its epigenome, which might have implications in obesity-related epigenetic modifications. Future studies are still needed to better characterize this putative mechanistic link between metabolism and epigenetics and also to disentangle the associated “chicken or egg” causal dilemma.
Epigenetic alterations in the offspring of obese mothers
It is well known that metabolic diseases such as obesity have a multifactorial etiology, with genetic and environmental factors contributing to disease development. Regardless of crucial environmental factors, such as the combination of an energy-dense diet and a sedentary lifestyle with a decreased energy expenditure, clear evidence highlighting a strong genetic basis of obesity exists [45]. The predicted genetic contribution to the obesity-related anthropometric trait of BMI was initially estimated from twin studies to range between 40 and 70% [46]. However, alternative statistical methods have suggested that these estimates may have been too high, with the genetic contribution rather ranging between 30 and 40% [46, 47]. More recently, whole-genome association studies (GWAS) have emerged as a tool for a non-hypothesis-driven identification of novel genes and loci contributing to obesity [45]. GWAS revealed important novel insights into the genetics of obesity; however, the majority of studies have estimated the overall contribution of identified GWAS single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) to the observed variance ranges between 5 and 15%. It was suggested that gene-gene and gene-environment effects and lack of rare variant coverage might be factors responsible for the underestimation of identified trait-linked loci. Moreover, the majority of disease and trait-linked SNPs were demonstrated to be located in non-coding portions of the genome. Thus, GWAS results often indicate disease-associated variants that modulate risk by altering functional DNA elements that regulate gene expression. However, identifying the corresponding target genes remains challenging [46, 48]. In summary, there is evidence for a rather strong genetic component in the development of obesity, but the heritability of obesity cannot entirely be attributed to genetic variation [45, 46, 49].
Next to genetic mechanisms, recent evidence indicates an involvement of epigenetic mechanisms in the intergenerational effects of maternal obesity. Seminal work by Barker et al. increased the popularity of a hypothesis previously put forward by other scientists—the so-called fetal programming hypothesis [50, 51]. This hypothesis states that certain environmental influences during embryonic, fetal, and also neonatal development can permanently affect the phenotype of an organism. The fact that epigenetic mechanisms (e.g., DNA methylation, histone modifications, expression of non-coding RNAs) can be influenced by environmental factors, particularly in early life, serves as the basis for the fetal programming hypothesis, which posits that specific intrauterine environments can lead to altered epigenomes and ultimately different phenotypes of a whole organism [51, 52].
Although many initial fetal programming studies were focused on maternal undernutrition, it was soon demonstrated in animal and clinical studies that maternal overnutrition can also lead to epigenetically mediated alterations in different physiological homeostatic regulatory systems and is associated with increases in the cardiometabolic risk in the offspring [51, 53]. Clear evidence that the maternal diet can epigenetically predispose offspring phenotype to metabolic disease in adulthood comes from studies investigating the Agouti yellow mouse (Avy/a). Agouti yellow mice boast a metastable epiallele that triggers a specific phenotype. The term epiallele is used for alleles of the same genes that only differ in their DNA methylation status. Moreover, metastable epialleles refer to epialleles in which the degree of DNA methylation can be altered by environmental factors [54]. Consequently, the methylation status can influence the expression of a metastable epiallele. Differences in promoter methylation of such metastable epialleles can lead to different phenotypes of genetically identical individuals [54, 55]. The Agouti gene encodes for a paracrine signaling molecule that leads to yellow hair follicle pigmentation and has an antagonistic effect on hypothalamic melanocortin 4-mediated satiety signaling. Therefore, Avy/a mice have yellow fur and develop obesity via hyperphagia. Mice that are carriers of a silent allele, in contrast, have Agouti colored coats and display a metabolically inconspicuous phenotype [56]. Using Avy mice, an important study by Waterland et al. was able to demonstrate that maternal obesity accumulates over several generations, resulting in a shift toward higher adult body weight in the investigated population. Furthermore, it was shown that the transgenerational effects on body weight could be inhibited by providing a methyl-rich diet that induces DNA hypermethylation during development, indicating that the observed effects were mediated by epigenetic alterations (Fig. 3) [56, 57]. Further studies by Li et al. demonstrated that the offspring of obese yellow Avy/a dams display a latent metabolic disease predisposition, which could be unmasked by providing a high-fat diet. Genome-wide profiling of DNA methylation demonstrated changes in the methylome with a significant clustering in developmental ontologies. It was concluded that genes necessary for developmental processes appear to be more susceptible to environmental challenges compared to other groups of genes and that the observed epigenetic alterations could likely underlie the offspring’s metabolic phenotype resulting from exposure to maternal obesity [56, 58, 59].
Different recent rodent studies have investigated the influence of gestational maternal high-fat diets on epigenetic alterations in adipose tissue, and the liver of the offspring [60–62]. A study by Masuyama and Hiramatsu demonstrated that reduced adiponectin and increased leptin mRNA expression in adipose tissue in offspring of gestational high-fat diet dams were caused by increased acetylation and decreased methylation of histone H3K9 in the adiponectin promoter and increased methylation of histone H4K20 in the leptin gene. Furthermore, an association was found between the observed epigenetic modifications and hypertension, insulin resistance, and hyperlipidemia in the offspring [60]. Similarly, other studies demonstrated the involvement of histone modifications affecting gene expression of phenotype relevant genes in the offspring of high-fat diet dams [61, 63]. Regarding the transgenerational impact of obesity, results of a study by Li et al. implicated an accumulation of epigenetic modifications including histone methylation that contributed to increased lipogenesis over several generations, making F2 offspring derived from both grand-maternal and maternal obesity extremely prone to developing obesity [64]. Supporting this finding, Masuyama et al. observed that the effects of maternal high-fat feeding were reversed in the offspring only after feeding a standard diet for three consecutive generations (Fig. 4) [65].
Investigating other epigenetic mechanisms beyond histone modifications, several studies observed differences in DNA methylation in offspring from dams receiving high-fat diets throughout gestation. Exposure to maternal obesity during development is associated with increased white adipose tissue in the progeny [28]. A study investigating potential epigenetic mechanisms underlying this observation demonstrated alterations in global DNA methylation of CpG sites and islands in white adipose tissue associated with an upregulation of lipogenic pathways. Yang et al. reported that maternal obesity reduces DNA methylation in the zinc finger protein 423 (zfp423) promoter, a gene that functions as a key regulator of progenitor cell commitment towards preadipocyte differentiation. Hypomethylation of the zfp423 promoter was correlated with increased zfp423 expression and progenitor adipogenesis in fetal mouse tissue [66]. Premature adipogenic differentiation in adipose tissue of the offspring negatively affects the pool of progenitor cells, limiting adipose tissue expandability, especially when exposed to a high‐energy diet. The inability to expand adipose tissue results in adipocyte hypertrophy, an important cause of hypoxia and inflammation [67]. Taken together, epigenetic changes, more precisely alterations in DNA methylation, in key genes regulating adipogenesis and the maintenance of an adipocyte progenitor cell pool appear to be a relevant mechanism in shaping the offspring’s phenotype by maternal obesity [28].
In addition to histone modifications and DNA methylation, the expression of micoRNAs was also demonstrated to be involved in affecting adipose tissue metabolism in offspring of obese dams [68, 69]. Fernandez-Twinn et al. demonstrated that lean offspring of obese dams display an increased adipose tissue expression of miR-126, which was accompanied by a reduced expression of the insulin signaling protein IRS-1, one of the targets of miR-126. As it was possible to maintain the adipocyte phenotype in in vitro expanded and differentiated epididymal adipose tissue precursor cells from offspring of obese dams, the authors hypothesized that the underlying mechanism acts in a cell-autonomous manner that may drive insulin resistance in later life [69].
Several clinical studies have investigated associations between maternal obesity and epigenetic changes in offspring. A major limitation in the setting of clinical studies investigating maternal obesity mediated epigenetic effects on the offspring is the fact that it is not possible to investigate samples of relevant target organs. Therefore, tissues that allow minimally invasive sampling are usually used. These include blood samples, to investigate circulating factors such as non-coding/micro RNAs, isolation of leukocyte DNA from umbilical cord blood, and tissue samples of the placenta. Commonly, DNA methylation of leukocyte DNA is evaluated as surrogate parameter for epigenetic changes in the whole organism. The true significance of changes in leukocyte DNA methylation as a surrogate marker for organismal epigenetic changes is not yet fully understood, but current literature suggests that this parameter may serve as a useful risk biomarker [5, 70]. It was demonstrated that changes in DNA methylation in leukocytes are stable and that associations between maternal BMI during pregnancy and global DNA methylation at the age of 3 years still exist (Fig. 5) [71]. Another issue of currently available data from clinical studies investigating epigenetically mediated effects of maternal obesity is the lack of replication of obtained results in suitably designed replication cohorts [5]. This problem is further aggravated, especially in DNA methylation studies, by a multitude of different methodological approaches in the analysis and quantification of DNA methylation. In this regard, a major distinction can be made between assays that determine gene-specific, genome-wide, or global DNA methylation. In the study of gene-specific and genome-wide DNA methylation, DNA methylation is mainly studied in promoter regions of genes that are rich in CpG sites. In commonly used array approaches only a fraction of genomic CpGs are covered and measurement is to some degree biased toward the measurement of promoter methylation, neglecting other regions and functions of DNA methylation [72–74]. Protein encoding genes account for only about 1.5% of the total genome sequence, with the remaining bulk consisting of introns, repetitive elements, and other non-coding sequences (Fig. 6) [75]. As recent research has demonstrated important functions of DNA methylation in such non-coding genomic regions, their neglect of analysis in currently available array approaches confers a limitation [72–74]. Even newer variants of genome-wide array approaches like the Illumina MethylationEPIC bead chip remain to some extent limited due to the exclusion of regions of potentially meaningful biological variation [76]. Other approaches, such as different sequencing methods, exis for a detailed, site-specific investigation of global DNA methylation. However, such methods currently have limited value in the analysis of DNA methylation in large study settings due to high costs and time-consuming protocols [77]. Next to array and sequencing-driven approaches also various methods exist that measure the amount of methylated cytosines in a global fashion. Commonly used approaches in this regard estimate global methylation by measuring DNA methylation of surrogates such as LINE-1 or Alu elements or by employing mass spectrometry for the quantification of global DNA methylation and hydroxymethylation. Until now, the significance of measuring global DNA methylation is not well understood, but several studies have shown that this parameter can be used as a crude biomarker to assess environmental influences and alterations in global DNA methylation have been demonstrated in obesity [78–80].
Employing array-based genome-wide DNA methylation analysis, several studies demonstrated associations between maternal BMI and offspring cord blood DNA methylation [81, 82]. Investigating a large cohort of mother–child pairs, Sharp et al. showed that the impact of maternal obesity on genome-wide methylation was stronger compared to the impact of paternal obesity, suggesting an intrauterine mechanism (Fig. 7) [82]. In another study, Sharp et al. performed a meta-analysis of the association between prepregnancy maternal BMI and methylation at over 450,000 sites in cord blood DNA using data from 19 cohorts including a total of 9340 mother–newborn pairs [83]. To infer causality, an attempt was made to incorporate genetic information in the analyses and to compare the effects of maternal and paternal BMI. In additional cohorts including 1817 mother–child pairs with available blood samples, the association between maternal BMI at the beginning of pregnancy and whole blood DNA methylation in adolescent offspring was meta-analyzed. Results of the study revealed an association between maternal BMI and cord blood DNA methylation variation at 9044 sites that was strongly reduced to 104 CpG sites after adjusting for estimated cell proportions. Comparing the results from cord blood to adolescent blood samples, the same direction associations were observed in 72 CpG sites indicating a potential persistence of signals. However, evidence supporting a causal, maternal BMI mediated intrauterine effect on cord blood methylation was demonstrated at just eight CpG sites. The authors concluded that these observed minute effects might be more likely due to genetic or lifestyle factors than due to a causal intrauterine mechanism. Results of this study demonstrate the need for large-scale collaborative study settings and the employment of causal inference techniques in epigenetic epidemiologic studies [83]. A very recent study by Martin et al. that determined genome-wide CpG methylation in cord blood leukocytes using the Illumina HumanMethylation450k BeadChip in 361 mother–child pairs focused on investigating sex-specific effects of maternal obesity on the offspring [84]. It was shown that maternal obesity before pregnancy was associated with the methylation of 876 CpGs in female offspring and only 293 CpGs in male offspring. However, in both female and male offspring of obese mothers, hypermethylation in CpG sites of the TAPBP gene was observed [84]. Interestingly, hypermethylation of TAPBP gene CpG sites measured in neonatal blood spot samples of 438 children also using the Illumina HumanMethylation450k BeadChip was previously demonstrated to be associated with an increased cardiometabolic risk in children in another study [85]. Thus, methylation of the TAPBP gene may be considered as an epigenetic mechanism by which maternal obesity increases the cardiometabolic risk of the offspring. However, the analysis of a replication cohort performed by Martin et al. in 751 mother–child pairs was not able to replicate the initial findings. The authors attributed the lack of replication to vastly different levels of obesity and differences in the ethnic composition of the two investigated cohorts [84].
Taken together, there is ample evidence existing that demonstrates epigenetically mediated effects of maternal obesity during pregnancy on weight development and cardiometabolic risk factors in the offspring. Currently, clear evidence in this regard still predominantly stems from animal studies. To substantiate existing evidence of clinical studies, more large-scale clinical trials are necessary. As highlighted by a few existing studies, potential future studies should employ combinations of genome-wide and epigenome-wide association studies, to better delineate what contribution the respective mechanism makes.
Funding
Open Access funding enabled and organized by Projekt DEAL.
Compliance with ethical standards
Conflict of interest
The author declares no competing interests.
Footnotes
Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
References
- 1.Poston L, Caleyachetty R, Cnattingius S, Corvalán C, Uauy R, Herring S, et al. Preconceptional and maternal obesity: epidemiology and health consequences. Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol. 2016;4:1025–36. doi: 10.1016/S2213-8587(16)30217-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Hruby A, Hu FB. The epidemiology of obesity: a big picture. Pharmacoeconomics. 2015;33:673–89. doi: 10.1007/s40273-014-0243-x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Poston L, Harthoorn LF, van der Beek EM. Obesity in pregnancy: implications for the mother and lifelong health of the child. A consensus statement. Pediatr Res. 2011;69:175–80. doi: 10.1203/PDR.0b013e3182055ede. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Stubert J, Reister F, Hartmann S, Janni W. The risks associated with obesity in pregnancy. Dtsch Arztebl Int. 2018;115:276–83. doi: 10.3238/arztebl.2018.0276. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Godfrey KM, Reynolds RM, Prescott SL, Nyirenda M, Jaddoe VWV, Eriksson JG, et al. Influence of maternal obesity on the long-term health of offspring. Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol. 2017;5:53–64. doi: 10.1016/S2213-8587(16)30107-3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.O’Reilly JR, Reynolds RM. The risk of maternal obesity to the long-term health of the offspring. Clin Endocrinol (Oxf) 2013;78:9–16. doi: 10.1111/cen.12055. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Plows JF, Stanley JL, Baker PN, Reynolds CM, Vickers MH. The pathophysiology of gestational diabetes mellitus. Int J Mol Sci. 2018;19. 10.3390/ijms19113342. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 8.Buchanan TA, Xiang A, Kjos SL, Watanabe R. What is gestational diabetes? Diabetes Care. 2007;30(Suppl 2):S105–11. doi: 10.2337/dc07-s201. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Catalano PM, Shankar K. Obesity and pregnancy: mechanisms of short term and long term adverse consequences for mother and child. BMJ. 2017;356:j1. doi: 10.1136/bmj.j1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Huda SS, Brodie LE, Sattar N. Obesity in pregnancy: prevalence and metabolic consequences. Semin Fetal Neonatal Med. 2010;15:70–6. doi: 10.1016/j.siny.2009.09.006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Catalano PM. Trying to understand gestational diabetes. Diabet Med. 2014;31:273–81. doi: 10.1111/dme.12381. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Catalano PM. Obesity, insulin resistance, and pregnancy outcome. Reproduction. 2010;140:365–71. doi: 10.1530/REP-10-0088. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Wankhade UD, Thakali KM, Shankar K. Persistent influence of maternal obesity on offspring health: mechanisms from animal models and clinical studies. Mol Cell Endocrinol. 2016;435:7–19. doi: 10.1016/j.mce.2016.07.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Jarvie E, Hauguel-de-Mouzon S, Nelson SM, Sattar N, Catalano PM, Freeman DJ. Lipotoxicity in obese pregnancy and its potential role in adverse pregnancy outcome and obesity in the offspring. Clin Sci. 2010;119:123–9. doi: 10.1042/CS20090640. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Kampmann U, Knorr S, Fuglsang J, Ovesen P. Determinants of maternal insulin resistance during pregnancy: an updated overview. J Diabetes Res. 2019;2019. 10.1155/2019/5320156. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 16.Sandovici I, Hoelle K, Angiolini E, Constância M. Placental adaptations to the maternal-fetal environment: implications for fetal growth and developmental programming. Reprod Biomed Online. 2012;25:68–89. doi: 10.1016/j.rbmo.2012.03.017. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Dearden L, Bouret SG, Ozanne SE. Sex and gender differences in developmental programming of metabolism. Mol Metab. 2018;15:8–19. doi: 10.1016/j.molmet.2018.04.007. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Hastie R, Lappas M. The effect of pre-existing maternal obesity and diabetes on placental mitochondrial content and electron transport chain activity. Placenta. 2014;35:673–83. doi: 10.1016/j.placenta.2014.06.368. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Mele J, Muralimanoharan S, Maloyan A, Myatt L. Impaired mitochondrial function in human placenta with increased maternal adiposity. Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab. 2014;307:E419–25. doi: 10.1152/ajpendo.00025.2014. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Myatt L, Maloyan A. Obesity and placental function. Semin Reprod Med. 2016;34:42–49. doi: 10.1055/s-0035-1570027. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Lassance L, Haghiac M, Minium J, Catalano P, Hauguel-de Mouzon S. Obesity-induced down-regulation of the mitochondrial translocator protein (TSPO) impairs placental steroid production. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2015;100:E11–8. doi: 10.1210/jc.2014-2792. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Jones CJ, Hartmann M, Blaschitz A, Desoye G. Ultrastructural localization of insulin receptors in human placenta. Am J Reprod Immunol. 1993;30:136–45. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0897.1993.tb00614.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.O’Tierney-Ginn P, Presley L, Myers S, Catalano P. Placental growth response to maternal insulin in early pregnancy. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2015;100:159–65. doi: 10.1210/jc.2014-3281. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Desoye G, Cervar-Zivkovic M. Diabetes mellitus, obesity, and the placenta. Obstet Gynecol Clin North Am. 2020;47:65–79. doi: 10.1016/j.ogc.2019.11.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Lassance L, Haghiac M, Leahy P, Basu S, Minium J, Zhou J, et al. Identification of early transcriptome signatures in placenta exposed to insulin and obesity. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2015;212:647.e1–647.11. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2015.02.026. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Saben J, Lindsey F, Zhong Y, Thakali K, Badger TM, Andres A, et al. Maternal obesity is associated with a lipotoxic. Placent Environ Placenta. 2014;35:171–7. doi: 10.1016/j.placenta.2014.01.003. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Calabuig-Navarro V, Haghiac M, Minium J, Glazebrook P, Ranasinghe GC, Hoppel C, et al. Effect of maternal obesity on placental lipid metabolism. Endocrinology. 2017;158:2543–55. doi: 10.1210/en.2017-00152. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Agarwal P, Morriseau TS, Kereliuk SM, Doucette CA, Wicklow BA, Dolinsky VW. Maternal obesity, diabetes during pregnancy and epigenetic mechanisms that influence the developmental origins of cardiometabolic disease in the offspring. Crit Rev Clin Lab Sci. 2018;55:71–101. doi: 10.1080/10408363.2017.1422109. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Yamada L, Chong S. Epigenetic studies in developmental origins of health and disease: pitfalls and key considerations for study design and interpretation. J Developmental Orig Health Dis. 2017;8:30–43. doi: 10.1017/S2040174416000507. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Jaenisch R, Bird A. Epigenetic regulation of gene expression: how the genome integrates intrinsic and environmental signals. Nat Genet. 2003;33(Suppl):245–54. doi: 10.1038/ng1089. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Martin EM, Fry RC. Environmental influences on the epigenome: exposure-associated DNA methylation in human populations. Annu Rev Public Health. 2018;39:309–33. doi: 10.1146/annurev-publhealth-040617-014629. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Wilson RL, François M, Jankovic-Karasoulos T, McAninch D, McCullough D, Leifert WR, et al. Characterization of 5-methylcytosine and 5-hydroxymethylcytosine in human placenta cell types across gestation. Epigenetics. 2019;14:660–71. doi: 10.1080/15592294.2019.1609866. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Mitsuya K, Parker AN, Liu L, Ruan J, Vissers MCM, Myatt L. Alterations in the placental methylome with maternal obesity and evidence for metabolic regulation. PLoS ONE. 2017;12:e0186115. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0186115. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Carreras-Badosa G, Bonmatí A, Ortega F-J, Mercader J-M, Guindo-Martínez M, Torrents D, et al. Dysregulation of placental miRNA in maternal obesity is associated with pre- and postnatal growth. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2017;102:2584–94. doi: 10.1210/jc.2017-00089. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Nogues P, Dos Santos E, Jammes H, Berveiller P, Arnould L, Vialard F, et al. Maternal obesity influences expression and DNA methylation of the adiponectin and leptin systems in human third-trimester placenta. Clin Epigenetics. 2019;11:20. doi: 10.1186/s13148-019-0612-6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Newgard CB, An J, Bain JR, Muehlbauer MJ, Stevens RD, Lien LF, et al. A branched-chain amino acid-related metabolic signature that differentiates obese and lean humans and contributes to insulin resistance. Cell Metab. 2009;9:311–26. doi: 10.1016/j.cmet.2009.02.002. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Lien LF, Haqq AM, Arlotto M, Slentz CA, Muehlbauer MJ, McMahon RL, et al. The STEDMAN project: biophysical, biochemical and metabolic effects of a behavioral weight loss intervention during weight loss, maintenance, and regain. OMICS. 2009;13:21–35. doi: 10.1089/omi.2008.0035. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Ciccarone F, Castelli S, Ioannilli L, Ciriolo MR. High dietary fat intake affects dna methylation/hydroxymethylation in mouse heart: epigenetic hints for obesity-related cardiac dysfunction. Mol Nutr Food Res. 2019;63:e1800970. doi: 10.1002/mnfr.201800970. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Jansson N, Rosario FJ, Gaccioli F, Lager S, Jones HN, Roos S, et al. Activation of placental mTOR signaling and amino acid transporters in obese women giving birth to large babies. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2013;98:105–13. doi: 10.1210/jc.2012-2667. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Xu J, Ji J, Yan X-H. Cross-talk between AMPK and mTOR in regulating energy balance. Crit Rev Food Sci Nutr. 2012;52:373–81. doi: 10.1080/10408398.2010.500245. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Wu D, Hu D, Chen H, Shi G, Fetahu IS, Wu F, et al. Glucose-regulated phosphorylation of TET2 by AMPK reveals a pathway linking diabetes to cancer. Nature. 2018;559:637–41. doi: 10.1038/s41586-018-0350-5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Lazo-de-la-Vega-Monroy M-L, Mata-Tapia K-A, Garcia-Santillan J-A, Corona-Figueroa M-A, Gonzalez-Dominguez M-I, Gomez-Zapata H-M, et al. Association of placental nutrient sensing pathways with birth weight. Reproduction. 2020;160:455–68. doi: 10.1530/REP-20-0186. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Liang T, Jinglong X, Shusheng D, Aiyou W. Maternal obesity stimulates lipotoxicity and up-regulates inflammatory signaling pathways in the full-term swine placenta. Anim Sci J. 2018;89:1310–22. doi: 10.1111/asj.13064. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Thakali KM, Faske JB, Ishwar A, Alfaro MP, Cleves MA, Badger TM, et al. Maternal obesity and gestational weight gain are modestly associated with umbilical cord DNA methylation. Placenta. 2017;57:194–203. doi: 10.1016/j.placenta.2017.07.009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Rohde K, Keller M, Poulsen L, la C, Blüher M, Kovacs P, et al. Genetics and epigenetics in obesity. Metab Clin Exp. 2019;92:37–50. doi: 10.1016/j.metabol.2018.10.007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Allum F, Grundberg E. Capturing functional epigenomes for insight into metabolic diseases. Mol Metab. 2020;38:100936. doi: 10.1016/j.molmet.2019.12.016. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Yang J, Bakshi A, Zhu Z, Hemani G, Vinkhuyzen AAE, Lee SH, et al. Genetic variance estimation with imputed variants finds negligible missing heritability for human height and body mass index. Nat Genet. 2015;47:1114–20. doi: 10.1038/ng.3390. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Zhu Y, Tazearslan C, Suh Y. Challenges and progress in interpretation of non-coding genetic variants associated with human disease. Exp Biol Med (Maywood) 2017;242:1325–34. doi: 10.1177/1535370217713750. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Ouni M, Schürmann A. Epigenetic contribution to obesity. Mamm Genome. 2020;31:134–45. doi: 10.1007/s00335-020-09835-3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50.Barker DJ, Osmond C, Golding J, Kuh D, Wadsworth ME. Growth in utero, blood pressure in childhood and adult life, and mortality from cardiovascular disease. BMJ. 1989;298:564–7. doi: 10.1136/bmj.298.6673.564. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51.Hanson MA, Gluckman PD. Early developmental conditioning of later health and disease: physiology or pathophysiology? Physiological Rev. 2014;94:1027–76. doi: 10.1152/physrev.00029.2013. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52.Armstrong L. Epigenetics. New York: Garland Science; 2013.
- 53.Harder T, Rodekamp E, Schellong K, Dudenhausen JW, Plagemann A. Birth weight and subsequent risk of type 2 diabetes: a meta-analysis. Am J Epidemiol. 2007;165:849–57. doi: 10.1093/aje/kwk071. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54.Bernal AJ, Jirtle RL. Epigenomic disruption: the effects of early developmental exposures. Birth Defects Res Part A: Clin Mol Teratol. 2010;88:938–44. doi: 10.1002/bdra.20685. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55.Plant TM, Zeleznik AJ. Knobil and Neill’s physiology of reproduction. London: Academic Press; 2014.
- 56.Nicholas LM, Ozanne SE. Early life programming in mice by maternal overnutrition: mechanistic insights and interventional approaches. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2019;374. 10.1098/rstb.2018.0116. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 57.Waterland RA, Travisano M, Tahiliani KG, Rached MT, Mirza S. Methyl donor supplementation prevents transgenerational amplification of obesity. Int J Obes (Lond) 2008;32:1373–9. doi: 10.1038/ijo.2008.100. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 58.Li CCY, Young PE, Maloney CA, Eaton SA, Cowley MJ, Buckland ME, et al. Maternal obesity and diabetes induces latent metabolic defects and widespread epigenetic changes in isogenic mice. Epigenetics. 2013;8:602–11. doi: 10.4161/epi.24656. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 59.Li CCY, Cropley JE, Cowley MJ, Preiss T, Martin DIK, Suter CM. A sustained dietary change increases epigenetic variation in isogenic mice. PLoS Genet. 2011;7. 10.1371/journal.pgen.1001380. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 60.Masuyama H, Mitsui T, Nobumoto E, Hiramatsu Y. The effects of high-fat diet exposure in utero on the obesogenic and diabetogenic traits through epigenetic changes in adiponectin and leptin gene expression for multiple generations in female mice. Endocrinology. 2015;156:2482–91. doi: 10.1210/en.2014-2020. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 61.Strakovsky RS, Zhang X, Zhou D, Pan Y-X. Gestational high fat diet programs hepatic phosphoenolpyruvate carboxykinase gene expression and histone modification in neonatal offspring rats. J Physiol (Lond) 2011;589:2707–17. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.2010.203950. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 62.Nicholas LM, Morrison JL, Rattanatray L, Zhang S, Ozanne SE, McMillen IC. The early origins of obesity and insulin resistance: timing, programming and mechanisms. Int J Obes. 2016;40:229–38. doi: 10.1038/ijo.2015.178. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 63.Chen J-R, Lazarenko OP, Zhao H, Alund AW, Shankar K. Maternal obesity impairs skeletal development in adult offspring. J Endocrinol. 2018;239:33–47. doi: 10.1530/JOE-18-0244. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 64.Li J, Huang J, Li J-S, Chen H, Huang K, Zheng L. Accumulation of endoplasmic reticulum stress and lipogenesis in the liver through generational effects of high fat diets. J Hepatol. 2012;56:900–7. doi: 10.1016/j.jhep.2011.10.018. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 65.Masuyama H, Hiramatsu Y. Effects of a high-fat diet exposure in utero on the metabolic syndrome-like phenomenon in mouse offspring through epigenetic changes in adipocytokine gene expression. Endocrinology. 2012;153:2823–30. doi: 10.1210/en.2011-2161. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 66.Yang Q-Y, Liang J-F, Rogers CJ, Zhao J-X, Zhu M-J, Du M. Maternal obesity induces epigenetic modifications to facilitate Zfp423 expression and enhance adipogenic differentiation in fetal mice. Diabetes. 2013;62:3727–35. doi: 10.2337/db13-0433. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 67.Liang X, Yang Q, Fu X, Rogers CJ, Wang B, Pan H, et al. Maternal obesity epigenetically alters visceral fat progenitor cell properties in male offspring mice. J Physiol. 2016;594:4453–66. doi: 10.1113/JP272123. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 68.Ferland-McCollough D, Fernandez-Twinn DS, Cannell IG, David H, Warner M, Vaag AA, et al. Programming of adipose tissue miR-483-3p and GDF-3 expression by maternal diet in type 2 diabetes. Cell Death Differ. 2012;19:1003–12. doi: 10.1038/cdd.2011.183. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 69.Fernandez-Twinn DS, Alfaradhi MZ, Martin-Gronert MS, Duque-Guimaraes DE, Piekarz A, Ferland-McCollough D, et al. Downregulation of IRS-1 in adipose tissue of offspring of obese mice is programmed cell-autonomously through post-transcriptional mechanisms. Mol Metab. 2014;3:325–33. doi: 10.1016/j.molmet.2014.01.007. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 70.Terry MB, Delgado-Cruzata L, Vin-Raviv N, Wu HC, Santella RM. DNA methylation in white blood cells. Epigenetics. 2011;6:828–37. doi: 10.4161/epi.6.7.16500. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 71.Herbstman JB, Wang S, Perera FP, Lederman SA, Vishnevetsky J, Rundle AG, et al. Predictors and consequences of global DNA methylation in cord blood and at three years. PLoS One. 2013;8:e72824. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0072824. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 72.Busche S, Shao X, Caron M, Kwan T, Allum F, Cheung WA, et al. Population whole-genome bisulfite sequencing across two tissues highlights the environment as the principal source of human methylome variation. Genome Biol. 2015;16:290. doi: 10.1186/s13059-015-0856-1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 73.Reddington JP, Pennings S, Meehan RR. Non-canonical functions of the DNA methylome in gene regulation. Biochem J. 2013;451:13–23. doi: 10.1042/BJ20121585. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 74.Lev Maor G, Yearim A, Ast G. The alternative role of DNA methylation in splicing regulation. Trends Genet. 2015;31:274–80. doi: 10.1016/j.tig.2015.03.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 75.Gregory TR. Synergy between sequence and size in large-scale genomics. Nat Rev Genet. 2005;6:699–708. doi: 10.1038/nrg1674. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 76.Carmona JJ, Accomando WP, Binder AM, Hutchinson JN, Pantano L, Izzi B, et al. Empirical comparison of reduced representation bisulfite sequencing and Infinium BeadChip reproducibility and coverage of DNA methylation in humans. npj Genom Med. 2017;2:1–10. doi: 10.1038/s41525-017-0012-9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 77.Kurdyukov S, Bullock M. DNA methylation analysis: choosing the right method. Biology (Basel). 2016;5. 10.3390/biology5010003. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 78.Reichetzeder C, Dwi Putra SE, Pfab T, Slowinski T, Neuber C, Kleuser B, et al. Increased global placental DNA methylation levels are associated with gestational diabetes. Clin Epigenetics. 2016;8:82. doi: 10.1186/s13148-016-0247-9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 79.Dwi Putra SE, Reichetzeder C, Hasan AA, Slowinski T, Chu C, Krämer BK, et al. Being born large for gestational age is associated with increased global placental DNA methylation. Sci Rep. 2020;10:927. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 80.Simar D, Versteyhe S, Donkin I, Liu J, Hesson L, Nylander V, et al. DNA methylation is altered in B and NK lymphocytes in obese and type 2 diabetic human. Metab Clin Exp. 2014;63:1188–97. doi: 10.1016/j.metabol.2014.05.014. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 81.Liu X, Chen Q, Tsai H-J, Wang G, Hong X, Zhou Y, et al. Maternal preconception body mass index and offspring cord blood DNA methylation: Exploration of early life origins of disease. Environ Mol Mutagenesis. 2014;55:223–30. doi: 10.1002/em.21827. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 82.Sharp GC, Lawlor DA, Richmond RC, Fraser A, Simpkin A, Suderman M, et al. Maternal pre-pregnancy BMI and gestational weight gain, offspring DNA methylation and later offspring adiposity: findings from the Avon Longitudinal Study of Parents and Children. Int J Epidemiol. 2015;44:1288–304. doi: 10.1093/ije/dyv042. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 83.Sharp GC, Salas LA, Monnereau C, Allard C, Yousefi P, Everson TM, et al. Maternal BMI at the start of pregnancy and offspring epigenome-wide DNA methylation: findings from the pregnancy and childhood epigenetics (PACE) consortium. Hum Mol Genet. 2017;26:4067–85. doi: 10.1093/hmg/ddx290. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 84.Martin CL, Jima D, Sharp GC, McCullough LE, Park SS, Gowdy KM, et al. Maternal pre-pregnancy obesity, offspring cord blood DNA methylation, and offspring cardiometabolic health in early childhood: an epigenome-wide association study. Epigenetics. 2019;14:325–40. doi: 10.1080/15592294.2019.1581594. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 85.van Dijk SJ, Peters TJ, Buckley M, Zhou J, Jones PA, Gibson RA, et al. DNA methylation in blood from neonatal screening cards and the association with BMI and insulin sensitivity in early childhood. Int J Obes. 2018;42:28–35. doi: 10.1038/ijo.2017.228. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]