Skip to main content
Microbiology Resource Announcements logoLink to Microbiology Resource Announcements
. 2021 Dec 2;10(48):e01029-21. doi: 10.1128/MRA.01029-21

Aerobiology from an Inactive Pyrite Mine: the Genome Sequence of the Airborne Pseudomonas sp. Strain L5B5

Jose L Gonzalez-Pimentel a,✉, Irene Domínguez-Moñino b, Valme Jurado b, Ana Teresa Caldeira a, Cesareo Saiz-Jimenez b
Editor: David A Baltrusc
PMCID: PMC8638580  PMID: 34854724

ABSTRACT

Pseudomonas sp. strain L5B5 is an antimicrobial-producing bacterium isolated from an air sample collected in a pyrite mine in Lousal, Portugal. Genomic analyses predicted genes involved in virulence factors. Here, we report the complete genome sequence of this bacterium, which consists of a circular chromosome with a length of 6,811,662 bp.

ANNOUNCEMENT

The genus Pseudomonas is a very abundant group found in antagonistic environments; some interact with plants, some are useful as growth-promoting and biocontrol agents, and some are parasites, such as Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Pseudomonas syringae, two opportunistic pathogens for plants and animals (1). Pseudomonas are also found in subterranean environments, including mines, where some of them are able to remove heavy metals, which is useful for bioremediation (2, 3).

Mining is one of the oldest ways of producing and extracting minerals, and it has been intrinsically linked to the economic and social evolution of human beings. Lousal Mine (Grândola, Portugal) was closed in 1988 because the mined ores were no longer viable economically. Afterwards, within the environmental, social, economic, and heritage context, the mining area was remediated and rehabilitated in 2010, a geo-tourism center created, and a mining gallery opened to visitors (4).

The airborne Pseudomonas sp. strain L5B5 was isolated using a surface air system (Duo SAS, model Super 360). The sample was managed as described by Porca et al. (5). The culture medium was Trypticase-soy-agar (TSA; BD), and the culture plate was incubated at 28°C after picking a single colony. DNA extraction was performed using the Canvax HigherPurity bacterial genomic DNA isolation kit (Córdoba, Spain) with RNase treatment.

Genomic DNA was sequenced using both the NovaSeq 6000 (Illumina, USA) and SMRT RS II (PacBio, Menlo Park, CA) platforms. A TruSeq DNA PCR-free library was constructed using 150-bp paired-end short reads (Illumina); an SMRT library (insert size, 20 kb), constructed following the instructions for the Pacific Biosciences SMRTbell prep kit, was used for de novo sequencing. Default parameters were used for all software unless otherwise specified. The long reads were assembled using Canu v2.1.1 (6) and Circlator v1.5.5 (7) to circularize and orientate the chromosome. Pilon v1.24 (8) was employed for assembly improvement. Annotation was carried out using the NCBI Prokaryotic Genome Annotation Pipeline (9) and Sma3s v2 (10) with the “uniprot” flag. antiSMASH v6.0 (11), with the detection parameters in “strict” mode and all extra features on, was used to predict and annotate the secondary metabolite biosynthesis gene clusters. The Virulence Factors of Pathogenic Bacteria Database (VFDB), through Vfanalyzer, was used for virulence factors prediction (12). The Comprehensive Antibiotic Resistance Database (CARD), through Resistance Gene Identifier (RGI) software, was launched for prediction of the resistome (13). The closest relatives of L5B5 were identified using the JSpecies Web tool (14), and the average nucleotide identity was calculated using the BLAST (ANIb) and MUMmer (ANIm) algorithms.

The PacBio sequencing generated a total of 140,791 subreads, averaging 10,080 bp long, for a genome coverage of >208×, whereas the Illumina sequencing produced a total of 19,767,134 reads for a genome coverage of >435×. A tetra correlation search against the JSpecies database linked the LSB5 genome with the genomes of the type species Pseudomonas aestus CMM1215 and P. protegens CHA0 and with the biotechnologically useful strains P. protegens Cab57 and P. protegens Pf-5. The ANIb and ANIm values were below the 95% threshold suggested for species differentiation.

Table 1 provides a comparison of the relationship between L5B5 and related strains, as well as their functional characterization. L5B5 showed a more dynamic secondary metabolism, as well as an increased presence of virulence factors and genes involved in the resistome, with respect to the related genomes.

TABLE 1.

Genome features and comparison between strain L5B5 and related bacteria

Strain GenBank accession no. GC content (%) Genome size (bp) Total no. of genes No. of antiSMASH-predicted clusters No. of VFDB mechanisms No. of CARD hits
L5B5 CP084742 63.2 6,811,662 6,265 20 185 7 (strict)
P. aestus CMAA1215 AVOY00000000.1 63.8 6,658,235 6,380 19 169 4 (strict)
P. protegens Cab57 AP014522 63.34 6,827,892 6,236 15 175 4 (strict)
P. protegens Pf-5 CP000076 63.30 7,074,893 6,392 16 178 4 (strict)
P. protegens CHA0T CP003190 63.39 6,867,980 6,252 15 178 4 (strict)

Data availability.

The whole-genome shotgun project for Pseudomonas sp. L5B5 has been deposited at DDBJ/ENA/GenBank under the accession number listed in Table 1. The version described in this paper is the first version. The BioProject accession number is PRJNA769239, and the raw data have been deposited in the Sequence Read Archive (SRA) under accession numbers SRR16308509 and SRR16308510, for the long and short reads, respectively.

ACKNOWLEDGMENT

Financial support was obtained through project 0483_PROBIOMA_5_E, cofinanced by the European Regional Development Fund within the framework of the INTERREG VA Spain-Portugal program (POCTEP), 2014 to 2020.

Contributor Information

Jose L. Gonzalez-Pimentel, Email: pimentel@irnas.csic.es.

David A. Baltrus, University of Arizona

REFERENCES

  • 1.Sitaraman R. 2015. Pseudomonas spp. as models for plant-microbe interactions. Front Plant Sci 6:787. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2015.00787. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Saxena D, Joshi N, Srivastav S. 2002. Mechanism of copper resistance in a copper mine isolate Pseudomonas putida strain S4. Curr Microbiol 45:410–414. doi: 10.1007/s00284-002-3787-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Palanivel TM, Sivakumar N, Al-Ansari A, Victor R. 2020. Bioremediation of copper by active cells of Pseudomonas stutzeri LA3 isolated from an abandoned copper mine soil. J Environ Manage 253:109706. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2019.109706. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Relvas JMRS, Pinto A, Fernandes C, Matos JX, Vieira A, Mendonça A, Malha C, Albuquerque F, Alegre L, Abrunhosa M, Pinheiro M, Oliveira M, Alves M, Ferreira M, Rufino R, Pratas S, Ferreira T. 2014. Lousal: an old mine, a recent dream, a new reality. Com Geol 101:1345–1347. [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Porca E, Jurado V, Martin-Sanchez PM, Hermosin B, Bastian F, Alabouvette C, Saiz-Jimenez C. 2011. Aerobiology: an ecological indicator for early detection and control of fungal outbreaks in caves. Ecol Indic 11:1594–1598. doi: 10.1016/j.ecolind.2011.04.003. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Koren S, Walenz BP, Berlin K, Miller JR, Bergman NH, Phillippy AM. 2017. Canu: scalable and accurate long-read assembly via adaptive k-mer weighting and repeat separation. Genome Res 27:722–736. doi: 10.1101/gr.215087.116. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Hunt M, Silva ND, Otto TD, Parkhill J, Keane JA, Harris SM. 2015. Circlator: automated circularization of genome assemblies using long sequencing reads. Genome Biol 16:294. doi: 10.1186/s13059-015-0849-0. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Walker BJ, Abeel T, Shea T, Priest M, Abouelliel A, Sakthikumar S, Cuomo CA, Zeng Q, Wortman J, Young SK, Earl AM. 2014. Pilon: an integrated tool for comprehensive microbial variant detection and genome assembly improvement. PLoS One 9:e112963. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0112963. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Tatusova T, DiCuccio M, Badretdin A, Chetvernin V, Nawrocki EP, Zaslavsky L, Lomsadze A, Pruitt KD, Borodovsky M, Ostell J. 2016. NCBI Prokaryotic Genome Annotation Pipeline. Nucleic Acids Res 44:6614–6624. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkw569. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Muñoz-Mérida A, Viguera E, Claros MG, Trelles O, Pérez-Pulido AJ. 2014. Sma3s: a three-step modular annotator for large sequence datasets. DNA Res 21:341–353. doi: 10.1093/dnares/dsu001. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Blin K, Shaw S, Steinke K, Villebro R, Ziemert N, Lee SY, Medema MH, Weber T. 2019. antiSMASH 5.0: updates to the secondary metabolite genome mining pipeline. Nucleic Acids Res 47:W81–W87. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkz310. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Liu B, Zheng D, Jin Q, Chen L, Yang J. 2019. VFDB 2019: a comparative pathogenomic platform with an interactive Web interface. Nucleic Acids Res 47:D687–D692. doi: 10.1093/nar/gky1080. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Alcock BP, Raphenya AR, Lau TTY, Tsang KK, Bouchard M, Edalatmand A, Huynh W, Nguyen AV, Cheng AA, Liu S, Min SY, Miroshnichenko A, Tran HK, Werfalli RE, Nasir JA, Oloni M, Speicher DJ, Florescu A, Singh B, Faltyn M, Hernandez-Koutoucheva A, Sharma AN, Bordeleau E, Pawlowski AC, Zubyk HL, Dooley D, Griffiths E, Maguire F, Winsor GL, Beiko RG, Brinkman FSL, Hsiao WWL, Domselaar GV, McArthur AG. 2020. CARD 2020: antibiotic resistome surveillance with the comprehensive antibiotic resistance database. Nucleic Acids Res 48:D517–D525. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkz935. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Richter M, Rosselló-Mora R, Oliver Glöckner F, Peplies J. 2016. JSpeciesWS: a Web server for prokaryotic species circumscription based on pairwise genome comparison. Bioinformatics 32:929–931. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btv681. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Data Availability Statement

The whole-genome shotgun project for Pseudomonas sp. L5B5 has been deposited at DDBJ/ENA/GenBank under the accession number listed in Table 1. The version described in this paper is the first version. The BioProject accession number is PRJNA769239, and the raw data have been deposited in the Sequence Read Archive (SRA) under accession numbers SRR16308509 and SRR16308510, for the long and short reads, respectively.


Articles from Microbiology Resource Announcements are provided here courtesy of American Society for Microbiology (ASM)

RESOURCES