ABSTRACT
We report the complete genome of Arachnia rubra strain DSM 100122T. The genome is 3.32 Mb, with a GC content of 64.2%. The genome contains 3,005 predicted genes, including 2,923 predicted protein-coding genes.
ANNOUNCEMENT
Species within the genus Propionibacterium were recently divided into four genera, i.e., Propionibacterium, Acidipropionibacterium, Cutibacterium, and Pseudopropionibacterium (1). The name Pseudopropionibacterium was taxonomically corrected to Arachnia because it was a homotypic synonym (2). Arachnia propionica (3) and Arachnia rubra (4) are the only two recognized species in the genus Arachnia, and both are members of the human oral microbiome (5). A 16S rRNA neighbor-joining tree for oral species within the family Propionibacteriaceae with current taxonomy is shown in Fig. 1. Both Arachnia species are hosts for species of the phylum Saccharibacteria (TM7), ultrasmall parasitic epibionts (6–8). Several strains of Saccharibacteria species HMT-488 and HMT-955 have been grown in coculture with both A. propionica and A. rubra (8), and their genomes are listed under BioProject accession number 282954 (9, 10).
FIG 1.

Neighbor-joining tree (13) for oral isolates of Propionibacteriaceae, with human oral Mycobacterium species included as an outgroup. Arachnia rubra strain DSM 100122T is highlighted in bold. This tree was constructed in MEGA X (14) using aligned full-length 16S rRNA sequences (∼1,450 bp) downloaded from the Human Oral Microbiome Database (HOMD) (5, 15, 16). The evolutionary distances were computed using the Jukes-Cantor method (17) and are in the units of the number of base substitutions per site. The scale bar represents 0.02 base substitutions per site. Bootstrap support values for 1,000 replicates are indicated for each branch (18). GenBank accession numbers for 16S rRNA are provided in curly brackets.
To fully examine the interactions of Saccharibacteria species with Arachnia hosts, it would be useful to have a genetically tractable strain of A. rubra and use it as a model host. Restriction modification (RM) systems are a major barrier to genetic transformation, and RM systems can be identified from the methylome obtained during single-molecule real-time (SMRT) genome sequencing (11). Based on the methylome data, plasmid vectors can be modified to eliminate RM incompatibilities with the target species, using techniques such as construction of syngenic DNA (12). The methylome reported here should facilitate efforts to make Arachnia rubra strain DSM 100122T genetically tractable.
Strain DSM 100122T was acquired from the German Collection of Microorganisms and Cell Cultures (DSM). For DNA isolation, the strain was grown in a 50:50 mixture of Trypticase soy broth and brain heart infusion broth with 1% yeast extract. Genomic DNA was extracted using a MasterPure DNA isolation kit (Lucigen) with a modified protocol that included bead beating for cell lysis. SMRT sequencing was carried out on a Sequel instrument (Pacific Biosciences, Menlo Park, CA, USA) with v3 chemistry, following standard SMRTbell template preparation protocols for base modification detection. Genomic DNA samples (5 to 10 μg) were sheared to an average size of 15 kbp via g-TUBE (Covaris, Woburn, MA, USA), end repaired, and ligated to hairpin-barcoded adapters prior to sequencing. Finally, prior to sequencing, the SMRTbell library was purified and size selected using AMPure PB beads to remove <3-kbp templates. Sequencing reads were processed using the Pacific Biosciences SMRT Link pipeline v8 (https://www.pacb.com/support/software-downloads) with Microbial Assembly under default parameters. A total of 145,877 subreads were obtained, covering 632,860,315 subread bases, with a mean read length of 4,329 bp and a read N50 value of 4,635 bp. The mean depth of coverage across the genome was 185×. A single circular contig of 3,316,958-bp length was assembled. The genomic GC content was 64.2%. The genome was annotated with the NCBI Prokaryotic Genome Annotation Pipeline (PGAP). A total of 3,005 genes were identified, including 2,923 predicted protein-coding genes, 56 predicted RNAs, and 26 predicted pseudogenes. Three motifs were identified as methylated throughout the genome, i.e., CTGCAm6G (2,690 modified motifs), ACGAm6BCT (2,130 modified motifs), and GAAAm6TG (712 modified motifs). REBASE analysis assigned the type II methyltransferase M.Aru100122I as being responsible for the CTGCAm6G motif modification, while the remaining modifications could not be assigned unambiguously to the remaining methyltransferase identified within the genome. Additionally, the genome harbors open reading frames (Aru100122McrBC) consistent with an active type IV restriction system, which should be taken into consideration during genetic engineering.
Data availability.
The genome sequence was deposited in GenBank under the accession number CP072384 and SRA accession number SRR15979320. Base modification files were submitted with the GenBank submission, and the methylome analysis is available at REBASE with organism number 46978 for strain DSM 100122T. The BioProject accession number for this genome, as well as those of many other oral bacteria, is PRJNA282954.
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
We thank Rich Roberts and Dana Macelis for REBASE analysis.
The research reported in this publication was supported by the National Institute of Dental and Craniofacial Research of the National Institutes of Health under grants R01 DE016937 and R01 DE024468 (to F.E.D.), T32 DE007327 (to M.O.), and R01 DE027850 (to C.D.J.).
The content of this article is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of the National Institutes of Health.
Contributor Information
Floyd E. Dewhirst, Email: fdewhirst@forsyth.org.
Julie C. Dunning Hotopp, University of Maryland School of Medicine
REFERENCES
- 1.Scholz CFP, Kilian M. 2016. The natural history of cutaneous propionibacteria, and reclassification of selected species within the genus Propionibacterium to the proposed novel genera Acidipropionibacterium gen. nov., Cutibacterium gen. nov. and Pseudopropionibacterium gen. nov. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 66:4422–4432. doi: 10.1099/ijsem.0.001367. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Tindall BJ. 2019. Arachnia propionica (Buchanan and Pine 1962) Pine and Georg 1969 (Approved Lists 1980), Propionibacterium propionicum corrig. (Buchanan and Pine 1962) Charfreitag et al. 1988 and Pseudopropionibacterium propionicum (Buchanan and Pine 1962) Scholz and Kilian 2016 and the nomenclatural consequences of changes in the taxonomy of the genus Propionibacterium. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 69:2612–2615. doi: 10.1099/ijsem.0.003442. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Buchanan BB, Pine L. 1962. Characterization of a propionic acid producing actinomycete, Actinomyces propionicus, sp. nov. J Gen Microbiol 28:305–323. doi: 10.1099/00221287-28-2-305. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Saito M, Shinozaki-Kuwahara N, Tsudukibashi O, Hashizume-Takizawa T, Kobayashi R, Kurita-Ochiai T. 2018. Pseudopropionibacterium rubrum sp. nov., a novel red-pigmented species isolated from human gingival sulcus. Microbiol Immunol 62:388–394. doi: 10.1111/1348-0421.12592. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Dewhirst FE, Chen T, Izard J, Paster BJ, Tanner AC, Yu W-H, Lakshmanan A, Wade WG. 2010. The human oral microbiome. J Bacteriol 192:5002–5017. doi: 10.1128/JB.00542-10. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.He X, McLean JS, Edlund A, Yooseph S, Hall AP, Liu SY, Dorrestein PC, Esquenazi E, Hunter RC, Cheng G, Nelson KE, Lux R, Shi W. 2015. Cultivation of a human-associated TM7 phylotype reveals a reduced genome and epibiotic parasitic lifestyle. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 112:244–249. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1419038112. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Bor B, Poweleit N, Bois JS, Cen L, Bedree JK, Zhou ZH, Gunsalus RP, Lux R, McLean JS, He X, Shi W. 2016. Phenotypic and physiological characterization of the epibiotic interaction between TM7x and its basibiont Actinomyces. Microb Ecol 71:243–255. doi: 10.1007/s00248-015-0711-7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Murugkar PP, Collins AJ, Chen T, Dewhirst FE. 2020. Isolation and cultivation of candidate phyla Radiation Saccharibacteria (TM7) bacteria in coculture with bacterial hosts. J Oral Microbiol 12:1814666. doi: 10.1080/20002297.2020.1814666. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Murugkar PP, Collins AJ, Dewhirst FE. 2019. Complete genome sequence of strain PM004, a novel cultured member of the human oral microbiome from the candidate phylum Saccharibacteria (TM7). Microbiol Resour Announc 8:e01159-19. doi: 10.1128/MRA.01159-19. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Collins AJ, Murugkar PP, Dewhirst FE. 2019. Complete genome sequence of strain AC001, a novel cultured member of the human oral microbiome from the candidate phylum Saccharibacteria (TM7). Microbiol Resour Announc 8:e01158-19. doi: 10.1128/MRA.01158-19. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Flusberg BA, Webster DR, Lee JH, Travers KJ, Olivares EC, Clark TA, Korlach J, Turner SW. 2010. Direct detection of DNA methylation during single-molecule, real-time sequencing. Nat Methods 7:461–465. doi: 10.1038/nmeth.1459. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Johnston CD, Cotton SL, Rittling SR, Starr JR, Borisy GG, Dewhirst FE, Lemon KP. 2019. Systematic evasion of the restriction-modification barrier in bacteria. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 116:11454–11459. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1820256116. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Saitou N, Nei M. 1987. The neighbor-joining method: a new method for reconstructing phylogenetic trees. Mol Biol Evol 4:406–425. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.molbev.a040454. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Kumar S, Stecher G, Li M, Knyaz C, Tamura K. 2018. MEGA X: Molecular Evolutionary Genetics Analysis across computing platforms. Mol Biol Evol 35:1547–1549. doi: 10.1093/molbev/msy096. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Chen T, Yu WH, Izard J, Baranova OV, Lakshmanan A, Dewhirst FE. 2010. The Human Oral Microbiome Database: a web accessible resource for investigating oral microbe taxonomic and genomic information. Database (Oxford) 2010:baq013. doi: 10.1093/database/baq013. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Escapa IF, Chen T, Huang Y, Gajare P, Dewhirst FE, Lemon KP. 2018. New insights into human nostril microbiome from the expanded Human Oral Microbiome Database (eHOMD): a resource for the microbiome of the human aerodigestive tract. mSystems 3:e00187-18. doi: 10.1128/mSystems.00187-18. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Jukes TH, Cantor CR. 1969. Evolution of protein molecules, p 21–132. In Munro HN (ed), Mammalian protein metabolism. Academic Press, New York, NY. doi: 10.1016/B978-1-4832-3211-9.50009-7. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Felsenstein J. 1985. Confidence limits on phylogenies: an approach using the bootstrap. Evolution 39:783–791. doi: 10.1111/j.1558-5646.1985.tb00420.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Data Availability Statement
The genome sequence was deposited in GenBank under the accession number CP072384 and SRA accession number SRR15979320. Base modification files were submitted with the GenBank submission, and the methylome analysis is available at REBASE with organism number 46978 for strain DSM 100122T. The BioProject accession number for this genome, as well as those of many other oral bacteria, is PRJNA282954.
