Abstract
Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) is a chronic autoimmune disease with widespread inflammation, immune dysregulation, and is associated with the generation of destructive anti-DNA autoantibodies. We have shown previously the immune modulatory properties of pCons peptide in the induction of both CD4+ and CD8+ regulatory T cells which can in turn suppress development of the autoimmune disease in (NZB/NZW) F1 (BWF1) mice, an established model of lupus. In the present study, we add novel protein information and further demonstrate the molecular and cellular phenotypes of pCons-induced CD4+ and CD8+ Treg subsets. Flow cytometry analyses revealed that pCons induced CD8+ Treg cells with the following cell surface molecules: CD25highCD28high and low subsets (shown earlier), CD62Lhigh, CD122low, PD1low, CTLA4low, CCR7low and 41BBhigh. Quantitative real-time PCR (qRT-PCR) gene expression analyses revealed that pCons-induced CD8+ Treg cells downregulated the following several genes: Regulator of G protein signaling (RGS2), RGS16, RGS17, BAX, GPT2, PDE3b, GADD45β and programmed cell death 1 (PD1). Further, we confirmed the down regulation of these genes by Western blot analyses at the protein level. To our translational significance, we showed herein that pCons significantly increased the percentage of CD8+FoxP3+ T cells and further increased the mean fluorescence intensity (MFI) of FoxP3 when healthy peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) are treated with pCons (10 μg/ml, for 24-48 hours). In addition, we found that pCons reduced apoptosis in CD4+ and CD8+ T cells and B220+ B cells of BWF1 lupus mice. These data suggest that pCons stimulates cellular, immunological, and molecular changes in regulatory T cells which in turn protect against SLE autoimmunity.
Keywords: pCons, regulatory T cells, systemic lupus erythematosus, anti-DNA Ab, immune tolerance, immune regulation
Introduction
SLE is an autoimmune disease characterized by widespread inflammation, autoantibody production, and immune complex deposition. Regulatory T cells (Treg) are protective in many inflammatory and autoimmune diseases including SLE. The modulation of abnormal immune regulation is an object of intense investigation in autoimmune diseases. A therapeutic goal is to limit the number and activity of abnormal pathogenic cells and autoantibodies through restoration of immune system self-tolerance. One way to achieve that is by administrating peptides (such as pConsensus peptide, edratide and nucleosomal peptides) that induce regulatory T cells (1–11). Another approach used recently utilized nanoparticles for expanding regulatory T cells to treat autoimmune diseases including lupus (12–15). Whereas a decrease in the number and/or function of regulatory CD4+ T cells has been extensively studied in SLE (16–24), the role and characterization of the CD8+ Treg subset is less clear. Investigating the genes, regulatory networks, and signaling pathways that regulate the functional activity and survival of CD8+ Treg cells is important for development of therapies for restoring immune homeostasis in SLE and other autoimmune diseases. However, in order to rationally intervene to restore immune homeostasis, there is much that remains to be understood about the molecular phenotypes, mechanisms and pathways that govern the differentiation, expansion, maintenance, and regulatory function of CD8+ Treg. We have developed a unique model in which CD8+ regulatory T cells can be induced to suppress the development of autoimmune disease in an animal model of lupus, the (NZB/NZW) F1 (BWF1) mouse (3, 5, 25, 26). In this model, we have demonstrated that synthetic peptides (pCons) based on T cell determinants in the VH region of IgG which encode murine antibodies to DNA that bind to MHC Class I/II regions can activate CD8+ T cells in vitro, which can result in the suppression of co-cultured CD4+ T helper cells and B cell activities (26, 27). In addition, when pCons is administered in vivo, we can demonstrate the suppression of anti-DNA antibody production, and subsequent nephritis. However, the cellular and molecular phenotypes of pCons-induced CD8+ regulatory T cells are not yet completely clear. In this study, we have further provided novel information and defined the immunological and molecular phenotypes of pCons-induced CD8+ T regulatory cells and CD4+ regulatory T cells. We also showed that pCons treatment reduces apoptosis in CD4+ T cells, and CD8+ T cells and B220+ B cells. To the translational significance, we showed herein that pCons also induces CD8+FoxP3+ Treg cells in healthy human peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs).
Materials and Methods
Mice
NZB (H-2d/d), NZW (H-2z/z) and NZB/NZW F1 (H-2d/z) mice were purchased from the Jackson Laboratories (Bar Harbor, ME, USA) or bred at the University of California Los Angeles (UCLA). All mice were treated in accordance with the guidelines of the University of California Los Angeles Animal Research Committee, an Institution accredited by the Association for Assessment and Accreditation of Laboratory Animal Care (AAALAC). Mice were housed in pathogen-free conditions according to the National Institutes of Health (NIH) guidelines for the use of experimental animals. Female mice were used for all experiments.
Subjects
We enrolled 6 healthy female donors (19-70 years of age) with no history of autoimmune disease. Subjects had regular menstrual cycles and were not taking any contraceptives or sex hormones. Written informed consent was obtained from each subject who participated in the study. The study was approved by the Institutional Review Board (# 11-000907) of the University of California Los Angeles.
Peptides
The pCons peptide used in this study and the MHC molecules they bind have been described earlier (26, 28). pCons (FIEWNKLRFRQGLEW), the artificial tolerizing peptide, contains T-cell determinants based on the J558 VH regions of several murine anti-dsDNA Ab from BWF1 mice (3, 5, 23, 26, 27, 29). Peptides were synthesized at Chiron Biochemicals (San Diego, CA, USA), purified to a single peak on high-performance liquid chromatography, and analyzed by mass spectroscopy for expected amino acid content.
Treatment of Mice
Ten- to twelve-week-old female BWF1 mice received a single i.v. dose of 1 mg of pCons, dissolved in saline, as reported previously (26, 27, 30) for tolerance induction. For immunophenotyping of regulatory T cells, female BWF1 mice were used and injected with pCons. Control mice received either a similar amount of pNeg (negative control peptide) or saline.
Cell Isolation, Preparation, Immunophenotyping, and Flow Cytometry
Spleen cells were isolated ~1 week after administration of the pCons peptide from tolerized, saline-treated, or naïve BWF1 mice. Single cell suspensions of splenocytes were prepared by passing cells through cell strainers (40µm) (Fisher). ACK lysing buffer, (Sigma, St Louis, MO, USA) was used to lyse red blood cells. Cells were washed and re-suspended in RPMI complete media. RPMI 1640-complete media was supplemented with L-glutamine (2 mM), penicillin (100 units/ml), streptomycin (0.1 mg/ml), 2-mercaptoethanol (Gibco) and 10% fetal bovine serum (FBS). FACS staining buffer was obtained from eBiosciences, BD Pharmingen, and/or BioLegend Inc. Cell subsets were further enriched following incubation with anti-CD4 (L3T4), anti-B (CD45R/B220), anti-CD8 (CD8a Ly-2), and microbeads from Miltenyi Biotech (Auburn, CA, USA). Purity of cells was determined to be more than 90% pure as assessed by flow cytometry (FACS). For immunophenotyping, isolated cells were washed with FACS buffer and 1–2 million cells were used for cell surface staining. Before staining, cells were incubated with rat anti-mouse CD16/CD32 (FC III/II receptor) Ab to block nonspecific binding.
For regulatory T cell immunophenotyping, spleen cells were stained with CD4 (L3T4), (RPA-T4), CD8 (Ly-2), CD25 (PC61), CD28 (37.51), CD62L (MEL-14), CD122 (TM-β1), PD1(RMP1), CCR7(4B12), GITR (DTA-1, AITR, TNFRSF18), CTLA-4 (UC10-4F10-11) and 4IBB(1AH2) antibodies for FACS analysis. Antibodies for cell surface staining and isotype controls were from BD Biosciences, BD Pharmingen, eBiosciences, or BioLegend. FoxP3 (PCH101) staining was performed with an eBiosciences intracellular kit (Cat #12-4776). Before intracellular FoxP3 staining, cells were stained with cell surface molecules (CD4, CD8, CD25, CD28, CD62L, CD122) as per manufacturer’s protocol. Cells were fixed and permeabilized, washed with permeabilization buffer, and then stained with anti-human FoxP3 (PCH101) antibody in 1X permeabilization buffer (eBiosciences), washed again with permeabilization buffer, and then the samples analyzed by FACS at the UCLA flow Core facility. Data was collected using an FACSCalibur (BD Biosciences) and analyzed with BD Cell Quest software (Becton-Dickinson, Mountain View, CA) or De Novo FCS Express Ver. 7 software (Ontario, Canada).
Human Peripheral Blood Mononuclear Cells (PBMCs) Isolation and Preparation
For human studies, peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) were isolated on a density gradient (Histopaque-1077, Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA) from blood samples of healthy volunteers. Lymphocytes were washed twice in RPMI complete media. Red blood cells (RBC) were lysed with RBC lysing solution (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA). After washing cells were stained with fluorochrome -labeled monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) and analyzed by FACS.
Western Blot Analysis
Western blot analyses were performed as described earlier (31). In brief, cell lysates were prepared from the CD8+ T cells of naïve and pCons-treated BWF1 mice. Cells were lysed with RIPA buffer (150 nM NaCl, 1.0% NP-40, 0.5% sodium deoxycholate, 0.1% SDS, 10 mM Tris, pH 7.3) supplemented with Protease Arrest protease inhibitor cocktail solution (G Biosciences, Maryland Heights, MO, USA). Protein was measured from each sample using the Bradford assay (Bio-Rad Laboratories, Hercules, CA, USA) and an equal amount of protein was loaded in each well. The lysates were resolved on a 4–12% NuPage gel (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA, USA) under reducing conditions. Proteins were electro-transferred onto a polyvinylidene fluoride membrane (Invitrogen). The membranes were blocked with 3% BSA and immunoblotted with a protein-specific antibodies [GPT2 (ab80947), Abcam; PD1 (DO-1), sc-126 Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Inc; PD1 (ab58811) Abcam; GADD45b (K-12), sc-133606, Santa Cruz Biotechnologies, Inc; p53 (DO-1) sc-126, Santa Cruz Biotechnologies, Inc, Santa Cruz, CA, USA, (1: 200 - 1:1000 dilution range); Bax (1:1000 dilution) Cat # #2772, Cell Signaling Technology, Danvers, MA; PDE3b, H-300, sc-20793 (1:1000 dilution); RGS16 (H-100), sc-30218 (1:1000 dilution) or β-actin (1:100 000 dilution; Sigma, Inc]. Following washing, the membranes were incubated in secondary antibodies (1:2500 dilution; Santa Cruz Inc, Santa Cruz, CA, USA). All blocking, incubation and washing steps were performed in TBST (TBS and 0.1% Tween-20). Proteins were visualized using ECL (GE Healthcare, Buckinghamshire, UK).
RNA Isolation and Real-Time PCR
Total cellular RNA was isolated from purified cell subsets from saline-treated or pCons-tolerized BWF1 mice with TRIzol (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA, USA) as per manufacturer’s protocols. One-step-real time PCR was analyzed as described earlier (3, 5, 26, 29). Each experimental group consists of the pooled spleen cells of 3–4 mice from each group, naïve CD8+ T cells or tolerized CD8+ T cells. One-step RT-PCR was performed (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA, USA) using 100 ng of total RNA. Quantitative real-time reverse transcription was performed using TaqMan technology on an ABI Prism 7900 HT Sequence Detection System (Applied Biosystems). Primers and probes of regulator of G protein signaling genes (RGS2, RGS16, and RGS17), glutamic pyruvate transaminase 2 (GPT2), BAX (Bcl-2-associated X protein), programmed cell death-1 (PD1), growth arrest and DNA damage inducible 45 beta (GADD45β), and phosphodiesterase 3b (PDE3b), and GAPDH were obtained from Applied Biosystems (Foster City, CA, USA). The other oligonucleotide sequences used for the primers and TaqMan probes (Applied Biosystem, Foster City, CA) are described (3, 5, 26, 29). GAPDH was used as an endogenous control in each experimental set.
Measurement of Apoptosis
Assays were performed to measure apoptosis as described earlier (5, 26). In brief, splenocytes were obtained from both naïve and pCons-treated BWF1 mice. RBC were lysed, cells washed, and stained with fluorochrome-labeled specific antibodies [CD4 (PerCP), CD8 (PE), B220 (APC), and Annexin V (FITC)] and flow cytometry performed.
Statistical Analyses
Data was analyzed using GraphPad Prism 4.0 Software (San Diego, CA). Comparisons between the two groups were performed using paired one- or two-tailed Student’s t-test. Nonparametric testing among more than two groups was performed by one-way ANOVA. Results are expressed as mean ± SEM. p<0.05 was considered significant.
Results
pCons Treatment Alters Cell Surface Expression of CD25, CD122, and Increased Intracellular FoxP3 Expression in CD4+ T Cells and Further Modifies Cell Surface Expression of CD25, CD28, CTLA-4 and 41BB in CD8+ T Cells in BWF1 Mice
To explore the tolerogenic immune responses of pCons peptide in the present study, we determined the various cell surface expression markers by flow cytometry in both CD4+ and CD8+ T cells in pCons-treated and negative control peptide and or saline-treated BWF1 mice. We found that pCons treatment increased the cell surface expression of CD25 and CD122 in CD4+ T cells compared to naïve CD4+ T cells ( Figure 1A Panels A, C, E, H, J, L). We also found that pCons treatment increased the intracellular FoxP3 expression in pCons-treated CD4+ T cells ( Figure 1A Panels B, D, F, G, I, K). Next, we investigated the effect of pCons on CD8+ T cells. Our data demonstrate that pCons treatment modified the cell surface expression of CD25 (increased), CD28 (increased), CTLA-4 (decreased) and 41BB (no changed) in CD8+ T cells ( Figure 1B Panels A–L). Gating strategy is shown in ( Supplementary Figure 1A and Figure 1B Panels A–H). Previously, we have demonstrated that pCons treatment increased the FoxP3 expression in CD8+ T cells (3, 26). In this study, we re-validated our previous findings of FoxP3 and added novel information for additional cell surface phenotypes including FoxP3 with cumulative data of 4-6 experiments ( Figure1A Panel K). Altogether, these data indicate that pCons treatment induced the various cell surface markers including intracellular FoxP3 in both CD4+ and CD8+T cells.
pCons Treatment Induces and Modifies Cell Surface Expression of CD62L, CD122, and CCR7 in CD8+ T Cells in BWF1 Mice
Previously we showed that pCons treatment increased the number of regulatory CD4+ and CD8+ T cells and modulated their functions including the ability for the suppression of anti-DNA antibody in BWF1 mice (3, 5, 23, 26). In the present study, we were interested to see whether pCons treatment of BWF1 mice changes the cell surface expression of CD122, CD62L, PD1, and CCR7 in CD8+ T cells since these markers have been implicated in the regulatory phenotypes of CD8+ T cells (32–36). We found two-fold increase in cell surface expression of CD62L and further increase in percent expression of CD8+ CD62L+ T cells and a decrease in the CD122 and CCR7 mean fluorescence intensity in pCons-treated CD8+ T cells compared to negative control peptide or saline-treated CD8+ T cells ( Figures 2A–E ). PD1 cell surface expression was decreased in pCons-treated CD8+ T cells ( Figure 2D ). Further, Western blot analysis demonstrated that protein levels of CCR7 are decreased in CD8+ T cells after pCons tolerance ( Figure 2F ). Taken together, these data suggest that pCons treatment has differential immune-regulatory effects on CD8+ T cells and on CD62L, CD122, PD1, and CCR7.
pCons Treatment Modifies Expression of Regulator of G-Protein Signaling Genes (RGS2, RGS16, RGS17), Interferon-Induced, and Apoptotic Genes in CD8+ T Cells
To determine whether there is cross-regulation of regulator of G protein signaling and interferon genes and whether pCons affect this cross-regulation in CD8+ T cells, we tested the expression of RGS and IFNs genes in pCons-treated CD8+ T cells. We have shown previously that pCons-induced CD8+ T regulatory cells are genetically reprogrammed following pCons induction (26, 29, 31). These pCons-induced CD8+ Treg cells display i) resist to apoptosis; ii) have immunosuppressive programs; and iii) traffic to sites of inflammation to inhibit the development of autoantibody formation. Our previous gene chip array analyses demonstrated that pCons-induced CD8+ Treg cells have upregulated genes including; interferon inducible 202b (Ifi202b), FoxP3, Bcl2, transformation related protein 53 (TP53) and interferon receptor IFNAR1 (29). In the present study, we showed herein that pCons treatment significantly downregulated and decreased (~2-5 fold) the expression of 6 genes: RGS2, RGS16, RGS17, BAX, GPT2, GADD45β ( Figures 3A–D ). We further confirmed the downregulation of GPT2, RGS16, GADD45β, and BAX proteins by Western blot analyses ( Figures 3E–H ). The downregulated BAX expression (37) in pCons-induced CD8+ T cells may contribute to the survival of these cells in vitro/vivo. Overall, these data indicate that pCons regulates RGS, IFNs, and apoptotic genes.
pCons Treatment Reduces Apoptosis of CD4+ and CD8+ T Cells, and of B220+ B Cells in BWF1 Lupus Mice
Since earlier studies demonstrated that apoptosis affects immune tolerance, we were interested to investigate whether pCons influences apoptosis in various immune cell subsets including T cells which play an important role in lupus. To address this, we treated BWF1 lupus mice with pCons. After 1-2 weeks, splenocytes were obtained, stained with Annexin V FITC, and then stained with fluorochrome-labeled CD4+, CD8+ and B cells specific monoclonal antibodies, and analyzed by FACS. We found that pCons treatment significantly decreased (~5 fold) apoptosis in CD4+ T cells, CD8+ T cells (8-10-fold) and B220+B cells (~2.5-fold) compared to naïve or saline treated cells ( Figures 4A–K ). These data clearly demonstrate that pCons reduces apoptosis in both T and B cells.
pCons Increases CD8+FoxP3+ T Cells in Healthy Human Subjects
Having examined the immunomodulatory properties of pCons in murine cells, we investigated whether pCons induces CD8+FoxP3+ T regulatory cells in healthy human subjects. To determine this, we isolated PBMCs from healthy subjects and cultured them with negative control peptide (pNeg) and pCons peptide (10 μg/ml) for 24-48 hours. After culture, cells were washed, stained with CD4, CD8, CD25 and FoxP3 fluorochrome-labeled monoclonal antibodies and analyzed by flow cytometry. As shown in Figure 5 , pCons significantly increases the mean fluorescence intensity of cells expressing FoxP3 ( Figure 5A ) and the percentage of CD8+FoxP3+ T cells are significantly increased (~5 fold) ( Figure 5B ). These data suggest that pCons induces CD8+FoxP3+ Treg cells and has translational significance in humans.
Discussion
Regulatory T cells play a key role in the regulation of immune responses and maintaining immune homeostasis. Impairment in the development and function of regulatory T cells is a major contributing factor in the development of autoimmune diseases, including SLE (17, 19, 38–40). Thus, inducing and regulating the function of Treg is currently one of the prime goals not only in the study of autoimmune diseases, but graft versus host disease, organ transplantation, and neoplastic disease (41–43). In this study, we provided novel information for the immunological, cellular, and molecular phenotypes of regulatory T cells especially CD8+ Treg cells induced by the pCons treatment in BWF1 lupus mice. pCons-induced CD8+ T cells express high levels of CD62L, and low levels of CD122, PD1, CTLA4, and CCR7. We did not find major changes in the expression of 41BB. Further, pCons modulated the expression of CD25, CD28, CD122, and FoxP3 in both CD4+ and CD8+ Treg cells. The molecular phenotypes of suppressive CD8+ Treg cells include low level of regulator of G protein signaling (RGS2, RGS16, RGS17), BAX, GPT2, GADD45β, PDE3b, and PD1 (programmed cell death 1). The downregulation of these genes in pCons-tolerized CD8+ T cells was confirmed with Western blot analyses ( Figure 3 ). Thus, our data revealed a molecular signature phenotype in CD8+ T cells induced by pCons peptide in BWF1 lupus mice that has clinical and functional importance in the immune tolerance and their immunoregulation. For example, L-selectin (CD62L) is a type-I transmembrane glycoprotein and adhesion molecule that plays an important role in T cell activation. A recent study revealed that CD62L expression on blood basophils may predict future response to standard induction therapy for patients with lupus nephritis (44). In addition, another study found that the expression levels of CD62L decreased on T cells during the inflammatory state and levels of CD8+CD62L+ T cells negatively correlated with disease severity (45). Previously glucocorticoids have been shown to increase the CD62L expression in patients with lupus (46). In agreement with our study, a recent study also showed an increase in expression of CD62L on CD8+ regulatory T cells in lupus mice (47). Thus, altogether, our finding of increased CD62L expression levels on CD8+ T cells after induction by pCons treatment in BWF1 lupus mice points to a therapeutic beneficial effect.
Recent evidence suggest that both CD8+CD122+ and CD8+C122- T cells are regulatory and can suppress autoimmunity (7, 48). Importantly, these cells express CD122 (IL-2Rβ), CD62Lhigh, PD1low and CCR7low (32, 49). Further, our data showed that pCons-induced CD8+ T cells in BWF1 mice have less cytotoxic-T lymphocyte-antigen-4 (CTLA-4) expression as compared to naïve CD8+ T cells. This is an important finding, since CTLA-4 (CD152) is an inhibitory cell-surface molecule that plays an important role in the promotion of anergy, immune regulation, and the prevention of autoimmunity. Abnormal function and susceptibility of CTLA-4 gene expression has been reported in SLE patients (50, 51). Further, it was demonstrated that CTLA-4 modulates regulatory and follicular helper T cells, thus controlling humoral immunity (52–54). CTLA-4 has been shown to downregulates CD80 and CD86 on antigen presenting cells (APC) (54). However, its precise mechanism of action has not been fully understood. Thus, our data supports the notion that pCons-induced CD8+ T cells are regulatory in nature and possess all the cellular and immunological phenotypes to induce immune tolerance.
Recent reports suggest that CCR7 was involved in the progression of lupus and its expression was increased in SLE patients (55, 56). Additionally, CCR7-CCL19 couples interaction of T helper, and B cells, and dendritic cell migration (56); thus CCR7 helps in immune complex deposition and autoantibody production. Our findings of reduction of cell surface expression of CCR7 in CD8+ T cells is important because CCR7, a G protein-coupled receptor may also help in production of TGFβ. We have previously shown that pCons-induced CD8+ T cells increase TGFβ mRNA and protein levels (3, 5, 26, 31); therefore, it is possible that TGFβ may be released via exosomes in CD8+ T cells in a CCR7-dependent manner. Exosomes are important in immunity (57), and we envision that they may play a role in CD8+ Treg-mediated suppression to establish and maintain self-tolerance. Earlier, we found that the mRNA of CCR7 was increased in pCons-tolerized CD8+ T cells (29). These differences may be due to cell surface trafficking and or differences in transcription/translational or “half-life” of CCR7 after pCons treatment in our model system. It is also conceivable that upregulated genes and cell surface receptors, e.g., IFNAR, IFI202b, may facilitate the expression, packaging, and release of TGFβ. In contrast, downregulation of CCR7 signaling may halt the inflammatory signals in pathogenic effectors CD4+ T cells, dendritic cells, antigen presenting cells (APCs), and B cells. Thus, CCR7 plays an important synergistic role in our model of immune tolerance. However, detailed mechanistic studies will be needed to address this issue.
Our findings that pCons-induced CD8+ T cells have decreased level of RGS proteins are important because reduction of RGS2 signaling increases Ca2+ mobilization and ERK1/2 activation in response to GPCR stimulation (58) which may be contributory to the observed CD8+ Treg expansion and maintenance. RGS proteins are potent GTPase-activating proteins (GAP) for heterotrimeric G protein (Gq, Gi, and Go family) alpha subunits acting as multifunctional inhibitors of signal transduction in many cells (59, 60), including “fine-tuning” GPCR signaling in lymphocytes (61). In particular, RGS2, also known as growth-inhibitory protein, plays a role in leukemogenesis (62). Thus, our finding that multiple RGS proteins are downregulated in tolerized CD8+ T cells ( Figure 3 ) reinforces the positive effect on GPCR signaling pathways, together with reduced PDE3b, that may enhance cAMP signaling and plays an important role in the suppression of T cell function (63). The downregulation of PDE3b has been associated with enhanced insulin secretion, suggesting that secretion of other factors could also be positively modulated. Consistent with the notion that reversal of its cAMP-degrading activity is important for maintenance of CD8+ T regulatory cells. However, future studies will be required to address these possibilities.
In the current study, we found that GPT2 protein level was significantly decreased following pCons treatment in CD8+ T cells in BWF1 mice. GPT2 (glutamic-pyruvic transaminase 2) also known as alanine aminotransferase (ALT) plays an important role in gluconeogenesis and amino acid homeostasis, and is an hepatic enzyme/biomarker (64) that is upregulated in disease states. GPT2 has been shown to exacerbating autoimmune disease (65), and its levels were shown to be increased in NZB/NZW F1 mice (66). Increased serum alanine aminotransferases have been reported to be associated with anti-mitochondrial antibodies in SLE patients with autoimmune liver disease (67). Further Liu et al. found that liver injury including increased level of ALT correlates with biomarkers of autoimmunity and disease activity in patients with SLE (68). Thus, our finding that pCons treatment reduces GPT2 protein level has both clinical and translational significance in immune tolerance of our model and in SLE.
Previously, we demonstrated that pCons-induced CD8+ regulatory cells have upregulated genes including interferon inducible 202b (Ifi202b), FoxP3, Bcl2, transformation related protein 53 (TP53) and interferon receptor IFNAR1 (29). We showed previously utilizing gene silencing studies that these genes are important in the suppression of anti-DNA ab in the BWF1 lupus mice (3, 5, 26, 31). In the current study, we added novel information of candidate’s downregulated genes in CD8+ T cells. For example, the Bax gene has been implicated in lupus nephritis and in apoptosis (37) suggesting that apoptosis dysregulation in SLE was affected by polymorphic variants in apoptotic-related genes including Fas, FasL, Bcl2, and Bax. While high expression of FasL expression contributes to increased apoptosis and to the breakdown of immune tolerance favoring autoantibody production and inflammation, low expression of the Bax protein was found to be protective in the SLE patients (69). In general, apoptotic T cells and neutrophils are increased in SLE patients and have positive correlation with SLE disease activity index (70, 71). Earlier, we showed that apoptosis was decreased in pCons-induced CD8+ T cells (26). In this study, we also found decreased percent of annexin V+ T cells and B cells in pCons-treated BWF1 mice ( Figure 4 ). We postulate that pCons treatment has direct effect on both T and B cells. In addition, pCons might have an indirect effect through CD8+ Tregs. This would require additional experiments to pinpoint the exact role. Thus, our finding of reduced Bax and annexin V in pCons-induced CD8+ T cells agrees with previous studies and suggests clinical significance. Similarly, GADD45β is a critical regulator of autoimmunity (72) that plays an important role in B cell apoptosis in response to Fas stimulation through activation of NF-κB (73). A recent report suggests that ablation of GADD45β ameliorates the inflammation and renal fibrosis caused by unilateral ureteral obstruction (UUO) in a chronic kidney disease mouse model (74). Previously it was shown that GADD45β was also induced in CD4+ T cells by inflammatory cytokines, such as IL-12 and IL-18 (75, 76). Furthermore, mRNA expression of GADD45β was associated with cytokine production and T helper cell differentiation (77, 78) and a genetic polymorphism study indicated a role for GADD45β in rheumatoid arthritis and lupus (79). Based on all these data, its plausible to hypothesize that some of the downregulated genes in pCons-induced CD8+ Treg cells may be regulated by specific miRNAs as these molecules have been identified with important roles in immune regulation (80). How these genes or their gene products cross-regulate in the overall suppression mechanism in our immune tolerance model has not been fully elucidated. Future detailed mechanistic studies are warranted to pinpoint the exact role.
In addition, we have shown herein that pCons peptide induces CD8+FoxP3+Treg cells in healthy human subjects suggesting translational significance. This finding is significant since patients with SLE have circulating T cells that can be activated by various peptides isolated from the variable regions of human anti-DNA antibodies (81, 82). Although, we were not able to study the modulation of CD8+FoxP3+Tregs in SLE patients with pCons, it may be possible that the pCons-modulation of CD8+ Tregs can be employed to reset the regulatory function of CD8+ regulatory T cells in lupus patients. Future study will be required to address this issue.
In summary, we found that pCons treatment promoted tolerogenic immune responses and modified the various cellular and molecular phenotypes in both CD8+ and CD4+ T regulatory cells in BWF1 mice. The data further demonstrate that CD8+FoxP3+ T cells can be modulated by pCons peptide in human cells indicating clinical and translational significance in SLE.
Data Availability Statement
The raw data supporting the conclusions of this article will be made available by the authors, without undue reservation.
Ethics Statement
The animal study was reviewed and approved by the Chancellor Animal Review Committee (ARC), University of California, Los Angeles. The human study was reviewed and approved by the University of California, Los Angeles, Institutional Review Board (UCLA-IRB).
Author Contributions
RPS contributed to the experimental design, obtaining funding, conducting experiments, analyzing data, preparing figures, and writing of the manuscript. BHH contributed to funding and editing of the manuscript. DSB contributed to figure and manuscript editing. All authors contributed to the article and approved the submitted version.
Funding
This work was supported by the NIH grants AR54034, AI 083894, AI65645 to RPS; UCLA Senate Core Grant to BHH and RPS; UCLA Oppenheimer Clinical Seed Grant and American Autoimmune Related Disease Association grant to RPS.
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
Publisher’s Note
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
Supplementary Material
The Supplementary Material for this article can be found online at: https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fimmu.2021.718359/full#supplementary-material
References
- 1. Filaci G, Bacilieri S, Fravega M, Monetti M, Contini P, Ghio M, et al. Impairment of CD8+ T Suppressor Cell Function in Patients With Active Systemic Lupus Erythematosus. J Immunol (2001) 166:6452–7. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.166.10.6452 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2. Karpouzas GA, La Cava A, Ebling FM, Singh RR, Hahn BH. Differences Between CD8+ T Cells in Lupus-Prone (NZB X NZW) F1 Mice and Healthy (BALB/c X NZW) F1 Mice may Influence Autoimmunity in the Lupus Model. Eur J Immunol (2004) 34:2489–99. doi: 10.1002/eji.200424978 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3. Singh RP, La Cava A, Wong M, Ebling F, Hahn BH. CD8+ T Cell-Mediated Suppression of Autoimmunity in a Murine Lupus Model of Peptide-Induced Immune Tolerance Depends on Foxp3 Expression. J Immunol (2007) 178:7649–57. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.178.12.7649 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4. Singh RP, Hahn BH, La Cava A. Tuning Immune Suppression in Systemic Autoimmunity With Self-Derived Peptides. Inflammation Allergy Drug Targets (2008) 7:253–9. doi: 10.2174/187152808786848423 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5. Singh RP, La Cava A, Hahn BH. Pconsensus Peptide Induces Tolerogenic CD8+ T Cells in Lupus-Prone (NZB X NZW)F1 Mice by Differentially Regulating Foxp3 and PD1 Molecules. J Immunol (2008) 180:2069–80. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.180.4.2069 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6. Skaggs BJ, Singh RP, Hahn BH. Induction of Immune Tolerance by Activation of CD8+ T Suppressor/Regulatory Cells in Lupus-Prone Mice. Hum Immunol (2008) 69:790–6. doi: 10.1016/j.humimm.2008.08.284 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7. Suzuki M, Konya C, Goronzy JJ, Weyand CM. Inhibitory CD8+ T Cells in Autoimmune Disease. Hum Immunol (2008) 69:781–9. doi: 10.1016/j.humimm.2008.08.283 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8. Kang HK, Michaels MA, Berner BR, Datta SK. Very Low-Dose Tolerance With Nucleosomal Peptides Controls Lupus and Induces Potent Regulatory T Cell Subsets. J Immunol (2005) 174:3247–55. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.174.6.3247 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9. Sharabi A, Azulai H, Sthoeger ZM, Mozes E. Clinical Amelioration of Murine Lupus by a Peptide Based on the Complementarity Determining Region-1 of an Autoantibody and by Cyclophosphamide: Similarities and Differences in the Mechanisms of Action. Immunology (2007) 121:248–57. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2567.2007.02565.x [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10. Sharabi A, Zinger H, Zborowsky M, Sthoeger ZM, Mozes E. A Peptide Based on the Complementarity-Determining Region 1 of an Autoantibody Ameliorates Lupus by Up-Regulating CD4+CD25+ Cells and TGF-Beta. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA (2006) 103:8810–5. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0603201103 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11. Urowitz MB, Isenberg DA, Wallace DJ. Safety and Efficacy of Hcdr1 (Edratide) in Patients With Active Systemic Lupus Erythematosus: Results of Phase II Study. Lupus Sci Med (2015) 2:e000104. doi: 10.1136/lupus-2015-000104 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12. Clemente-Casares X, Blanco J, Ambalavanan P, Yamanouchi J, Singha S, Fandos C, et al. Expanding Antigen-Specific Regulatory Networks to Treat Autoimmunity. Nature (2016) 530:434–40. doi: 10.1038/nature16962 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13. Serra P, Santamaria P. Nanoparticle-Based Approaches to Immune Tolerance for the Treatment of Autoimmune Diseases. Eur J Immunol (2018) 48:751–6. doi: 10.1002/eji.201747059 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14. Horwitz DA, Bickerton S, Koss M, Fahmy TM, La Cava A. Suppression of Murine Lupus by CD4+ and CD8+ Treg Cells Induced by T Cell-Targeted Nanoparticles Loaded With Interleukin-2 and Transforming Growth Factor Beta. Arthritis Rheumatol (2019) 71:632–40. doi: 10.1002/art.40773 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15. Giang S, Horwitz DA, Bickerton S, La Cava A. Nanoparticles Engineered as Artificial Antigen-Presenting Cells Induce Human CD4(+) and CD8(+) Tregs That Are Functional in Humanized Mice. Front Immunol (2021) 12:628059. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2021.628059 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16. Crispin JC, Alcocer-Varela J, de Pablo P, Martinez A, Richaud-Patin Y, Alarcon-Segovia D. Immunoregulatory Defects in Patients With Systemic Lupus Erythematosus in Clinical Remission. Lupus (2003) 12:386–93. doi: 10.1191/0961203303lu368oa [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17. Crispin JC, Martinez A, Alcocer-Varela J. Quantification of Regulatory T Cells in Patients With Systemic Lupus Erythematosus. J Autoimmun (2003) 21:273–6. doi: 10.1016/S0896-8411(03)00121-5 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18. Liu MF, Wang CR, Fung LL, Wu CR. Decreased CD4+CD25+ T Cells in Peripheral Blood of Patients With Systemic Lupus Erythematosus. Scand J Immunol (2004) 59:198–202. doi: 10.1111/j.0300-9475.2004.01370.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19. Miyara M, Amoura Z, Parizot C, Badoual C, Dorgham K, Trad S, et al. Global Natural Regulatory T Cell Depletion in Active Systemic Lupus Erythematosus. J Immunol (2005) 175:8392–400. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.175.12.8392 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20. Valencia X, Yarboro C, Illei G, Lipsky PE. Deficient CD4+CD25high T Regulatory Cell Function in Patients With Active Systemic Lupus Erythematosus. J Immunol (2007) 178:2579–88. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.178.4.2579 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21. Scalapino KJ, Tang Q, Bluestone JA, Bonyhadi ML, Daikh DI. Suppression of Disease in New Zealand Black/New Zealand White Lupus-Prone Mice by Adoptive Transfer of Ex Vivo Expanded Regulatory T Cells. J Immunol (2006) 177:1451–9. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.177.3.1451 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22. Horwitz DA, Gray JD, Zheng SG. The Potential of Human Regulatory T Cells Generated Ex Vivo as a Treatment for Lupus and Other Chronic Inflammatory Diseases. Arthritis Res (2002) 4:241–6. doi: 10.1186/ar414 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23. La Cava A, Ebling FM, Hahn BH. Ig-Reactive CD4+CD25+ T Cells From Tolerized (New Zealand Black X New Zealand White)F1 Mice Suppress In Vitro Production of Antibodies to DNA. J Immunol (2004) 173:3542–8. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.173.5.3542 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24. Horwitz DA, Zheng SG, Gray JD, Wang JH, Ohtsuka K, Yamagiwa S. Regulatory T Cells Generated Ex Vivo as an Approach for the Therapy of Autoimmune Disease. Semin Immunol (2004) 16:135–43. doi: 10.1016/j.smim.2003.12.009 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25. Dinesh RK, Skaggs BJ, La Cava A, Hahn BH, Singh RP. CD8+ Tregs in Lupus, Autoimmunity, and Beyond. Autoimmun Rev (2010) 9:560–8. doi: 10.1016/j.autrev.2010.03.006 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26. Hahn BH, Singh RP, La Cava A, Ebling FM. Tolerogenic Treatment of Lupus Mice With Consensus Peptide Induces Foxp3-Expressing, Apoptosis-Resistant, TGFbeta-Secreting CD8+ T Cell Suppressors. J Immunol (2005) 175:7728–37. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.175.11.7728 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27. Hahn BH, Singh RR, Wong WK, Tsao BP, Bulpitt K, Ebling FM. Treatment With a Consensus Peptide Based on Amino Acid Sequences in Autoantibodies Prevents T Cell Activation by Autoantigens and Delays Disease Onset in Murine Lupus. Arthritis Rheum (2001) 44:432–41. doi: [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28. Hahn BHA, Anderson M, La Cava A. The Anti-DNA Ig Consensus Peptide pCONS Facilitates Regulatory T Cell Activity in SLE Patients. Arthritis Rheumatism (2007) 56:S546–547. [Google Scholar]
- 29. Singh RP, Dinesh R, Elashoff D, de Vos S, Rooney RJ, Patel D, et al. Distinct Gene Signature Revealed in White Blood Cells, CD4(+) and CD8(+) T Cells in (NZBx NZW) F1 Lupus Mice After Tolerization With Anti-DNA Ig Peptide. Genes Immun (2010) 11:294–309. doi: 10.1038/gene.2010.6 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30. Hahn BH, Anderson M, Le E, La Cava A. Anti-DNA Ig Peptides Promote Treg Cell Activity in Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Patients. Arthritis Rheum (2008) 58:2488–97. doi: 10.1002/art.23609 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31. Dinesh R, Hahn BH, La Cava A, Singh RP. Interferon-Inducible Gene 202b Controls CD8(+) T Cell-Mediated Suppression in Anti-DNA Ig Peptide-Treated (NZB X NZW) F1 Lupus Mice. Genes Immun (2011) 12:360–9. doi: 10.1038/gene.2011.4 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32. Liu J, Chen D, Nie GD, Dai Z. CD8(+)CD122(+) T-Cells: A Newly Emerging Regulator With Central Memory Cell Phenotypes. Front Immunol (2015) 6:494. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2015.00494 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33. Dai Z, Zhang S, Xie Q, Wu S, Su J, Li S, et al. Natural CD8+CD122+ T Cells are More Potent in Suppression of Allograft Rejection Than CD4+CD25+ Regulatory T Cells. Am J Transplant (2014) 14:39–48. doi: 10.1111/ajt.12515 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34. Smigiel KS, Richards E, Srivastava S, Thomas KR, Dudda JC, Klonowski KD, et al. CCR7 Provides Localized Access to IL-2 and Defines Homeostatically Distinct Regulatory T Cell Subsets. J Exp Med (2014) 211:121–36. doi: 10.1084/jem.20131142 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35. Suzuki M, Jagger AL, Konya C, Shimojima Y, Pryshchep S, Goronzy JJ, et al. CD8+CD45RA+CCR7+FOXP3+ T Cells With Immunosuppressive Properties: A Novel Subset of Inducible Human Regulatory T Cells. J Immunol (2012) 189:2118–30. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.1200122 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36. Rifa’i M, Kawamoto Y, Nakashima I, Suzuki H. Essential Roles of CD8+CD122+ Regulatory T Cells in the Maintenance of T Cell Homeostasis. J Exp Med (2004) 200:1123–34. doi: 10.1084/jem.20040395 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37. Badillo-Almaraz I, Daza L, Avalos-Diaz E, Herrera-Esparza R. Glomerular Expression of Fas Ligand and Bax mRNA in Lupus Nephritis. Autoimmunity (2001) 34:283–9. doi: 10.3109/08916930109014697 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38. Buckner JH. Mechanisms of Impaired Regulation by CD4(+)CD25(+)FOXP3(+) Regulatory T Cells in Human Autoimmune Diseases. Nat Rev Immunol (2010) 10:849–59. doi: 10.1038/nri2889 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39. Mellor-Pita S, Citores MJ, Castejon R, Tutor-Ureta P, Yebra-Bango M, Andreu JL, et al. Decrease of Regulatory T Cells in Patients With Systemic Lupus Erythematosus. Ann Rheum Dis (2006) 65:553–4. doi: 10.1136/ard.2005.044974 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40. Singh RP, Bischoff DS. Sex Hormones and Gender Influence the Expression of Markers of Regulatory T Cells in SLE Patients. Front Immunol (2021) 12:619268. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2021.619268 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41. Flippe L, Bezie S, Anegon I, Guillonneau C. Future Prospects for CD8(+) Regulatory T Cells in Immune Tolerance. Immunol Rev (2019) 292:209–24. doi: 10.1111/imr.12812 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42. Tsai YG, Lee CY, Lin TY, Lin CY. CD8(+) Treg Cells Associated With Decreasing Disease Activity After Intravenous Methylprednisolone Pulse Therapy in Lupus Nephritis With Heavy Proteinuria. PloS One (2014) 9:e81344. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0081344 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43. Deng Q, Luo Y, Chang C, Wu H, Ding Y, Xiao R. The Emerging Epigenetic Role of CD8+T Cells in Autoimmune Diseases: A Systematic Review. Front Immunol (2019) 10:856. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2019.00856 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44. Halfon M, Bachelet D, Hanouna G, Dema B, Pellefigues C, Manchon P, et al. CD62L on Blood Basophils: A First Pre-Treatment Predictor of Remission in Severe Lupus Nephritis. Nephrol Dial Transplant (2020) 14:gfaa263. doi: 10.1093/ndt/gfaa263 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45. Liu Y, Hoang TK, Wang T, He B, Tran DQ, Zhou J, et al. Circulating L-Selectin Expressing-T Cell Subsets Correlate With the Severity of Foxp3 Deficiency Autoimmune Disease. Int J Clin Exp Pathol (2016) 9:899–909. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46. Tan G-z, Mao Y-p, Zeng F-q. Glucocorticoids Treatment Upregulates the Expression of CD62L in CD4+CD25+T Cells in Peripheral Blood Monocytes of Patients With Systemic Lupus Erythematosus. Chin J Dermatol (2007) 40:362–4. [Google Scholar]
- 47. Indriyanti N, Soeroso J, Khotib J. T-Cell Activation Controlling Effects of Ethyl Acetate Fraction of Kalanchoe Pinnata (Lmk) Pers on Tmpd-Treated Lupus Mice. Int J Pharm Sci Res (2018) 9:475–82. doi: 10.13040/IJPSR.0975-8232.9(2).475-82 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 48. Suzuki H, Shi Z, Okuno Y, Isobe K. Are CD8+CD122+ Cells Regulatory T Cells or Memory T Cells? Hum Immunol (2008) 69:751–4. doi: 10.1016/j.humimm.2008.08.285 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49. Okuno Y, Murakoshi A, Negita M, Akane K, Kojima S, Suzuki H. CD8+ CD122+ Regulatory T Cells Contain Clonally Expanded Cells With Identical CDR3 Sequences of the T-Cell Receptor Beta-Chain. Immunology (2013) 139:309–17. doi: 10.1111/imm.12067 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50. Barreto M, Santos E, Ferreira R, Fesel C, Fontes MF, Pereira C, et al. Evidence for CTLA4 as a Susceptibility Gene for Systemic Lupus Erythematosus. Eur J Hum Genet (2004) 12:620–6. doi: 10.1038/sj.ejhg.5201214 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51. Jury EC, Flores-Borja F, Kalsi HS, Lazarus M, Isenberg DA, Mauri C, et al. Abnormal CTLA-4 Function in T Cells From Patients With Systemic Lupus Erythematosus. Eur J Immunol (2010) 40:569–78. doi: 10.1002/eji.200939781 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52. Sage PT, Paterson AM, Lovitch SB, Sharpe AH. The Coinhibitory Receptor CTLA-4 Controls B Cell Responses by Modulating T Follicular Helper, T Follicular Regulatory, and T Regulatory Cells. Immunity (2014) 41:1026–39. doi: 10.1016/j.immuni.2014.12.005 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53. Wing K, Onishi Y, Prieto-Martin P, Yamaguchi T, Miyara M, Fehervari Z, et al. CTLA-4 Control Over Foxp3+ Regulatory T Cell Function. Science (2008) 322:271–5. doi: 10.1126/science.1160062 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54. Wang CJ, Heuts F, Ovcinnikovs V, Wardzinski L, Bowers C, Schmidt EM, et al. CTLA-4 Controls Follicular Helper T-Cell Differentiation by Regulating the Strength of CD28 Engagement. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA (2015) 112:524–9. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1414576112 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55. Yin S, Mao Y, Li X, Yue C, Zhou C, Huang L, et al. Hyperactivation and in Situ Recruitment of Inflammatory Vdelta2 T Cells Contributes to Disease Pathogenesis in Systemic Lupus Erythematosus. Sci Rep (2015) 5:14432. doi: 10.1038/srep14432 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 56. Clatworthy MR, Aronin CE, Mathews RJ, Morgan NY, Smith KG, Germain RN. Immune Complexes Stimulate CCR7-Dependent Dendritic Cell Migration to Lymph Nodes. Nat Med (2014) 20:1458–63. doi: 10.1038/nm.3709 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 57. Thery C, Zitvogel L, Amigorena S. Exosomes: Composition, Biogenesis and Function. Nat Rev Immunol (2002) 2:569–79. doi: 10.1038/nri855 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 58. Semplicini A, Lenzini L, Sartori M, Papparella I, Calo LA, Pagnin E, et al. Reduced Expression of Regulator of G-Protein Signaling 2 (RGS2) in Hypertensive Patients Increases Calcium Mobilization and ERK1/2 Phosphorylation Induced by Angiotensin II. J Hypertens (2006) 24:1115–24. doi: 10.1097/01.hjh.0000226202.80689.8f [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 59. Druey KM, Blumer KJ, Kang VH, Kehrl JH. Inhibition of G-Protein-Mediated MAP Kinase Activation by a New Mammalian Gene Family. Nature (1996) 379:742–6. doi: 10.1038/379742a0 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 60. Heximer SP, Blumer KJ. RGS Proteins: Swiss Army Knives in Seven-Transmembrane Domain Receptor Signaling Networks. Sci STKE (2007) 2007:pe2. doi: 10.1126/stke.3702007pe2 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 61. Kehrl JH. G-Protein-Coupled Receptor Signaling, RGS Proteins, and Lymphocyte Function. Crit Rev Immunol (2004) 24:409–23. doi: 10.1615/CritRevImmunol.v24.i6.20 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 62. Schwable J, Choudhary C, Thiede C, Tickenbrock L, Sargin B, Steur C, et al. RGS2 Is an Important Target Gene of Flt3-ITD Mutations in AML and Functions in Myeloid Differentiation and Leukemic Transformation. Blood (2005) 105:2107–14. doi: 10.1182/blood-2004-03-0940 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 63. Gavin MA, Rasmussen JP, Fontenot JD, Vasta V, Manganiello VC, Beavo JA, et al. Foxp3-Dependent Programme of Regulatory T-Cell Differentiation. Nature (2007) 445:771–5. doi: 10.1038/nature05543 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 64. Yang RZ, Blaileanu G, Hansen BC, Shuldiner AR, Gong DW. cDNA Cloning, Genomic Structure, Chromosomal Mapping, and Functional Expression of a Novel Human Alanine Aminotransferase. Genomics (2002) 79:445–50. doi: 10.1006/geno.2002.6722 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 65. Sundrud MS, Koralov SB, Feuerer M, Calado DP, Kozhaya AE, Rhule-Smith A, et al. Halofuginone Inhibits TH17 Cell Differentiation by Activating the Amino Acid Starvation Response. Science (2009) 324:1334–8. doi: 10.1126/science.1172638 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 66. Hsu TC, Huang CY, Chiang SY, Lai WX, Tsai CH, Tzang BS. Transglutaminase Inhibitor Cystamine Alleviates the Abnormality in Liver From NZB/W F1 Mice. Eur J Pharmacol (2008) 579:382–9. doi: 10.1016/j.ejphar.2007.10.059 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 67. Li CH, Xu PS, Wang CY, Zhang Y, Zou GL. The Presence of Anti-Mitochondrial Antibodies in Chinese Patients With Liver Involvement in Systemic Lupus Erythematosus. Rheumatol Int (2006) 26:697–703. doi: 10.1007/s00296-005-0034-y [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 68. Liu Y, Yu J, Oaks Z, Marchena-Mendez I, Francis L, Bonilla E, et al. Liver Injury Correlates With Biomarkers of Autoimmunity and Disease Activity and Represents an Organ System Involvement in Patients With Systemic Lupus Erythematosus. Clin Immunol (2015) 160:319–27. doi: 10.1016/j.clim.2015.07.001 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 69. Glesse N, Vianna P, Paim LMG, Matte MCC, Aguiar AKK, Palhano PL, et al. Evaluation of Polymorphic Variants in Apoptotic Genes and Their Role in Susceptibility and Clinical Progression to Systemic Lupus Erythematosus. Lupus (2017) 26:746–55. doi: 10.1177/0961203316678671 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 70. Yang X, Sun B, Wang H, Yin C, Wang X, Ji X. Increased Serum IL-10 in Lupus Patients Promotes Apoptosis of T Cell Subsets via the Caspase 8 Pathway Initiated by Fas Signaling. J BioMed Res (2015) 29:232–40. doi: 10.7555/JBR.29.20130037 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 71. Courtney PA, Crockard AD, Williamson K, Irvine AE, Kennedy RJ, Bell AL. Increased Apoptotic Peripheral Blood Neutrophils in Systemic Lupus Erythematosus: Relations With Disease Activity, Antibodies to Double Stranded DNA, and Neutropenia. Ann Rheum Dis (1999) 58:309–14. doi: 10.1136/ard.58.5.309 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 72. Liu L, Tran E, Zhao Y, Huang Y, Flavell R, Lu B. Gadd45 Beta and Gadd45 Gamma Are Critical for Regulating Autoimmunity. J Exp Med (2005) 202:1341–7. doi: 10.1084/jem.20051359 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 73. Zazzeroni F, Papa S, Algeciras-Schimnich A, Alvarez K, Melis T, Bubici C, et al. Gadd45 Beta Mediates the Protective Effects of CD40 Costimulation Against Fas-Induced Apoptosis. Blood (2003) 102:3270–9. doi: 10.1182/blood-2003-03-0689 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 74. Moon SJ, Kim JH, Choi YK, Lee CH, Hwang JH. Ablation of Gadd45beta Ameliorates the Inflammation and Renal Fibrosis Caused by Unilateral Ureteral Obstruction. J Cell Mol Med (2020) 24:8814–25. doi: 10.1111/jcmm.15519 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 75. Lu B, Ferrandino AF, Flavell RA. Gadd45beta Is Important for Perpetuating Cognate and Inflammatory Signals in T Cells. Nat Immunol (2004) 5:38–44. doi: 10.1038/ni1020 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 76. Yang J, Zhu H, Murphy TL, Ouyang W, Murphy KM. IL-18-Stimulated GADD45 Beta Required in Cytokine-Induced, But Not TCR-Induced, IFN-Gamma Production. Nat Immunol (2001) 2:157–64. doi: 10.1038/84264 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 77. Luo Y, Boyle DL, Hammaker D, Edgar M, Franzoso G, Firestein GS. Suppression of Collagen-Induced Arthritis in Growth Arrest and DNA Damage-Inducible Protein 45beta-Deficient Mice. Arthritis Rheum (2011) 63:2949–55. doi: 10.1002/art.30497 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 78. Du F, Wang L, Zhang Y, Jiang W, Sheng H, Cao Q, et al. Role of GADD45 Beta in the Regulation of Synovial Fluid T Cell Apoptosis in Rheumatoid Arthritis. Clin Immunol (2008) 128:238–47. doi: 10.1016/j.clim.2008.03.523 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 79. Li RN, Lin YZ, Pan YC, Lin CH, Tseng CC, Sung WY, et al. GADD45a and GADD45b Genes in Rheumatoid Arthritis and Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Patients. J Clin Med (2019) 8(6):801. doi: 10.3390/jcm8060801 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 80. Vinuesa CG, Rigby RJ, Yu D. Logic and Extent of miRNA-Mediated Control of Autoimmune Gene Expression. Int Rev Immunol (2009) 28:112–38. doi: 10.1080/08830180902934909 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 81. Kalsi JK, Ravirajan CT, Wiloch-Winska H, Blanco F, Longhurst CM, Williams W, et al. Analysis of Three New Idiotypes on Human Monoclonal Autoantibodies. Lupus (1995) 4:375–89. doi: 10.1177/096120339500400508 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 82. Williams WM, Staines NA, Muller S, Isenberg DA. Human T Cell Responses to Autoantibody Variable Region Peptides. Lupus (1995) 4:464–71. doi: 10.1177/096120339500400608 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Supplementary Materials
Data Availability Statement
The raw data supporting the conclusions of this article will be made available by the authors, without undue reservation.