Dear Editor,
We are writing this letter to present a rare case of severe toxic optic neuropathy induced by formaldehyde (FA) vapor under working in mushroom cultivation room. Since such circumstance exists popularly in rural China, this case warns us to pay more attention to avoid similar cases.
A 49-year-old male complained of bilateral vision loss after continuous working for 11h in an air-tight greenhouse filled with FA vapor on 03/15/2018. Soon after work, the patient felt weakness, dizziness, and nausea. Instead of asking for medical consultation, he went home to sleep. The next day, the patient was found to be in a coma with dyspnea and was taken to the local hospital by his family. His blood pressure waved around 70-80/50-65 mm Hg, and then maintained at 100/80 mm Hg by catecholamines. He was diagnosed with acute FA poisoning, pulmonary edema, metabolic acidosis, respiratory alkalosis, and hypotension and was given symptomatic relief and supportive measures. On 03/18/2018, he regained consciousness and found his bilateral vision decreased to count fingers. Supplementarily, FA-induced toxic optic neuropathy was diagnosed. However, no systematic treatment for visual impairment was received. Later, the patient suffered from anxiety and insomnia, weight losing, intermittent chest pain, and acroanesthesia.
To seek further ophthalmic diagnosis and treatment, he was referred to our hospital on 04/28/2018. At the time of consultation, his eyesight was light perception in both eyes. Anterior segment examination revealed bilateral 5-mm, dilated, and sluggishly reactive pupils. The rest of anterior segments was normal. Fundus examination showed bilateral pallor optic discs with clear demarcation and 0.5 of the cup-to-disc ratio. Also, attenuation of the vasculature was noticed (Figure 1A1, 1B1). B ultrasonic examination revealed rough reflex from the posterior pole and shrunken optic disc in both eyes (Figure 1A2, 1B2). Optical coherence tomography (OCT) of the retinae showed thinning of the nerve fiber layer (Figure 1A3, 1B3). Fluorescence fundus angiography (FFA) showed normal retina perfusion but fewer capillaries on the surface of the optic disc (Figure 1A4, 1B4). Visual electrophysiological examination results displayed decreased amplitude of the flash-electroretinogram (F-ERG) in right eye and significant decreased amplitude of the flash-visual evoked potential (F-VEP) in both eyes. The pattern-visual evoked potential (P-VEP) was not detected due to poor vision (Table 1). Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) demonstrated abnormal signals in the bilateral frontal cortex and basal ganglia (Figure 2A, 2B), which prompting possible metabolic diseases and poisoning. Diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI; Figure 2C) signal was slightly higher in the bilateral frontal lobe, parietal lobe, bilateral side ventricle. No obvious abnormality was noticed in orbital enhanced MRI (Figure 2D). Electroencephalography (EEG) revealed that α and β waves were symmetrically distributed in each function area and 0.42-0.35 µV. δ waves were mainly inspected in the frontal area, which indicating slightly abnormal neurological electrical activities[1]. Based on the above test results, toxic optic neuritis and neuratrophy caused by FA were diagnosed.
Figure 1. Examinations of the right eye (A1-A4) and the left eye (B1-B4).
A1, B1: Paled optic discs with a clear boundary, and 0.5 of the cup-to-disc ratio; A2, B2: B ultrasonic examination revealed rough reflex from the posterior pole and shrunken optic disc; A3, B3: OCT scans of the maculae showed the thinning of nerve fiber layer; A4, B4: FFA examination demonstrated the reduced fluorescence and fewer capillaries around the optic discs.
Table 1. Analysis of the electroretinogram and visual evoked potential.
| Items | OD |
OS |
||||||||
| a-wave latency (ms) | a-wave amplitudes (µV) | b-wave latency (ms) | b-wave amplitudes (µV) | a-wave latency (ms) | a-wave amplitudes (µV) | b-wave latency (ms) | b-wave amplitudes (µV) | |||
| F-ERG | Dark adaptation | Rod | 23 | 16 | 60 | 105 | 24 | 22 | 62 | 180 |
| Max | 23 | 143 | 46 | 327 | 24 | 204 | 46 | 432 | ||
| Ops | ΣO (5) µV | ΣO (83) µV | ||||||||
| Light adaptation | Cone | 17 | 17 | 36 | 122 | 16 | 22 | 35 | 145 | |
| 30 Hz | 91 | 119 | ||||||||
| VEP | P-VEP (µV/ms) | undetected | undetected | |||||||
| F-VEP (µV/ms) | 6/100 | 5/100 | ||||||||
OD: Right eye; OS: Left eye; F-ERG: Flash-electroretinogram; VEP: Visual evoked potential; P-VEP: Pattern-visual evoked potential; F-VEP: Flash-visual evoked potential; Rod: Rod response; Max: Maximal response; Ops: Oscillatory potentials; Cone: Cone response; 30Hz: 30Hz flicker response.
Figure 2. Different MRI sequences of the brain.
A, B: Long T1 and long T2 showed signals in bilateral frontal cortex and the bilateral basal ganglia; C: DWI signal showing slightly hyperintensity in the bilateral frontal lobe, parietal lobe, bilateral side ventricle; D: Enhanced MRI indicating the normal orbital structure.
Prednisone acetate (60 mg/d) was then applied orally for one week, followed by a weekly reduction of 5 mg till withdrawal. Other treatments, including 1.5 mg/d of mecobalamin tablets and 20 mg/d of vitamin B6 tablets, and hyperbaric oxygen therapy were given for 4wk. At the end of the treatment, his systemic symptoms disappeared except for fatigue and acroanesthesia. However, his bilateral vision did not improve.
DISCUSSION
FA is a pungent, flammable, and colorless gas, which is widely used in environmental and industrial activities such as space disinfectant, adhesives, melamine formaldehyde resins, particle or fiber wood board, and cosmetics production. People can expose to FA occupationally or residentially via the airway, digestive tract or skin. The occupational formaldehyde exposure limit is 0.94 mg/m3 or less than 0.94 mg/m3 on an 8-hour time-weighted average, and the short-term exposure limit is 2.5 mg/m3[2]–[3]. FA is normally present in both indoor and outdoor spaces, and inhalation at a lower level is the most common way of contact[4]. Given its widespread use, volatility and toxicity, FA has been classified as a known human carcinogen by the World Health Organization and International Agency for Research on Cancer[3],[5].
Acute FA intoxication is defined mainly as injures induced by exposing to high concentration FA in a short time. Mucosal injury is the most common toxic effect, often leading to irritated eyes, tearing, coughing, sneezing, chest congestion, asthma, fever, lethargy, skin sensitization and dermatitis[1],[3]. There are many reports of central nervous system damage caused by acute FA exposure, while FA-induced optic neuropathy had been rarely reported.
After working for 11h in an air-tight inoculation room filled with high concentrations of FA vapor, which was used to sterilize the room, this patient developed dizziness, nausea, drowsiness, coma, and later found severe vision loss. Since the patient came to our hospital too late, we did not get chance to test the concentration of the FA vapor in the mushroom cultivation room. Based on his medical history, general manifestations and the ophthalmic examinations (vision, ocular fundus, OCT and visual electrophysiology), acute FA poisoning and toxic optic neuritis were diagnosed. Wang et al[6] once reported a case of severe vision loss due to two days staying in a newly renovated house. Combined with the results of room formaldehyde and benzene tests, the patient was diagnosed as acute toxic optic neuritis. However, due to the presence of toxic benzene gas, FA could not be determined as the only cause of optic nerve damage in this patient.
After being absorbed, FA can be oxidized into formal acid and methanol, and cause further tissue damages[7]–[9]. As FA can pass through the blood-brain barrier, it may affect the central nervous system function, lead to emotional or cognitive behavior alternation[7],[10]–[13]. Hayasaka et al[14] found that FA, methanol and formic acid had toxic effect on the optic nerve and retina when injected intravitreally, while FA was the most toxic one. Regarding the mechanism involved, in vitro and in vivo studies showed that FA exposure leads to enhanced reactive oxygen species (ROS) generation, reduced glutathione (GSH), elevated level of tumor necrosis factor alpha (TNF-α), interleukin-1 beta (IL-1β), and caspase-3, thus to induce subsequent oxidative stress, inflammatory responses, mitochondrial dysfunction, cytochrome C release, caspase cascade activation, cell apoptosis, and necrosis[1]–[2],[15]–[19]. Using CRISPR-based functional genomics screening method, a newly study suggested the potential roles of one-carbon metabolism, fatty acid synthesis and mTOR signaling in FA toxicity[20].
In term of treatment, high dose of systemic glucocorticoid is currently considered to be the most important and effective treatment[21]. Recent studies found that the combination of erythropoietin with corticosteroid might achieve a stronger protective effect at the beginning[22]–[23]. FA-induced mitochondrial dysfunction leads to a depletion of adenosine triphosphate (ATP), which is involved in many essential biological processes. Studies showed that intravenous ATP administration significantly prevented the oxidative stress and histological destruction in optic nerve tissue. As this patient was in a coma, his visual impairment could not be identified at the beginning, so the initial treatments were mainly focused on systemic symptoms. Later, even comprehensive treatments such as glucocorticoid and hyperbaric oxygen therapy were given, his vision did not improve.
FA is now widely used in agricultural and industrial activities. This case reminds us that enough attention needs to be paid, and corresponding preventive measures need to be taken to avoid the similar cases. In addition, the possibility of FA-induced optic nerve damage should be considered in such situation, and the necessary treatment should be applied at the very beginning, especially when the patient is in a coma.
Acknowledgments
Conflicts of Interest: Gong M, None; Hui YN, None; Du HJ, None.
REFERENCES
- 1.Bernardini L, Barbosa E, Charão MF, Brucker N. Formaldehyde toxicity reports from in vitro and in vivo studies: a review and updated data. Drug Chem Toxicol. 2020:1–13. doi: 10.1080/01480545.2020.1795190. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Yu GY, Song XF, Liu Y, Sun ZW. Inhaled formaldehyde induces bone marrow toxicity via oxidative stress in exposed mice. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev. 2014;15(13):5253–5257. doi: 10.7314/apjcp.2014.15.13.5253. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Kim KH, Jahan SA, Lee JT. Exposure to formaldehyde and its potential human health hazards. J Environ Sci Health C Environ Carcinog Ecotoxicol Rev. 2011;29(4):277–299. doi: 10.1080/10590501.2011.629972. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Costa S, Carvalho S, Costa C, Coelho P, Silva S, Santos LS, Gaspar JF, Porto B, Laffon B, Teixeira JP. Increased levels of chromosomal aberrations and DNA damage in a group of workers exposed to formaldehyde. Mutagenesis. 2015;30(4):463–473. doi: 10.1093/mutage/gev002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Jia XW, Jia Q, Zhang ZH, Gao WM, Zhang XN, Niu Y, Meng T, Feng B, Duan HW, Ye M, Dai YF, Jia ZW, Zheng YX. Effects of formaldehyde on lymphocyte subsets and cytokines in the peripheral blood of exposed workers. PLoS One. 2014;9(8):e104069. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0104069. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Wang YY, Zhang ZY. A case of acute toxic optic neuritis after exposure to formaldehyde and benzene. Chin J Ocul Fundus Dis. 2015;31(2):187–188. [Google Scholar]
- 7.Tulpule K, Hohnholt MC, Dringen R. Formaldehyde metabolism and formaldehyde-induced stimulation of lactate production and glutathione export in cultured neurons. J Neurochem. 2013;125(2):260–272. doi: 10.1111/jnc.12170. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Eells JT, Henry MM, Lewandowski MF, Seme MT, Murray TG. Development and characterization of a rodent model of methanol-induced retinal and optic nerve toxicity. Neurotoxicology. 2000;21(3):321–330. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Zakharov S, Pelclova D, Diblik P, et al. Long-term visual damage after acute methanol poisonings: longitudinal cross-sectional study in 50 patients. Clin Toxicol (Phila) 2015;53(9):884–892. doi: 10.3109/15563650.2015.1086488. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Sarsilmaz M, Kaplan S, Songur A, Colakoglu S, Aslan H, Tunc AT, Ozen OA, Turgut M, Baş O. Effects of postnatal formaldehyde exposure on pyramidal cell number, volume of cell layer in hippocampus and hemisphere in the rat: a stereological study. Brain Res. 2007;1145:157–167. doi: 10.1016/j.brainres.2007.01.139. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Li YN, Song ZY, Ding YJ, Xin Y, Wu T, Su T, He RQ, Tai FD, Lian ZM. Effects of formaldehyde exposure on anxiety-like and depression-like behavior, cognition, central levels of glucocorticoid receptor and tyrosine hydroxylase in mice. Chemosphere. 2016;144:2004–2012. doi: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2015.10.102. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Rana I, Rieswijk L, Steinmaus C, Zhang LP. Formaldehyde and brain disorders: a meta-analysis and bioinformatics approach. Neurotox Res. 2021;39(3):924–948. doi: 10.1007/s12640-020-00320-y. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Gunnarsson LG, Bodin L. Occupational exposures and neurodegenerative diseases-A systematic literature review and meta-analyses. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2019;16(3):E337. doi: 10.3390/ijerph16030337. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Hayasaka Y, Hayasaka S, Nagaki Y. Ocular changes after intravitreal injection of methanol, formaldehyde, or formate in rabbits. Pharmacol Toxicol. 2001;89(2):74–78. doi: 10.1034/j.1600-0773.2001.d01-138.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Tulpule K, Dringen R. Formaldehyde in brain: an overlooked player in neurodegeneration? J Neurochem. 2013;127(1):7–21. doi: 10.1111/jnc.12356. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Tang XQ, Zhuang YY, Zhang P, Fang HR, Zhou CF, Gu HF, Zhang H, Wang CY. Formaldehyde impairs learning and memory involving the disturbance of hydrogen sulfide generation in the hippocampus of rats. J Mol Neurosci. 2013;49(1):140–149. doi: 10.1007/s12031-012-9912-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Huang JW, Lu Y, Zhang B, Yang SP, Zhang Q, Cui HY, Lu XX, Zhao Y, Yang X, Li R. Antagonistic effect of epigallocatechin-3-gallate on neurotoxicity induced by formaldehyde. Toxicology. 2019;412:29–36. doi: 10.1016/j.tox.2018.10.022. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Liu XD, Zhang YC, Wu RL, Ye M, Zhao YQ, Kang J, Ma P, Li JQ, Yang X. Acute formaldehyde exposure induced early Alzheimer-like changes in mouse brain. Toxicol Mech Methods. 2018;28(2):95–104. doi: 10.1080/15376516.2017.1368053. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Zerin T, Kim JS, Gil HW, Song HY, Hong SY. Effects of formaldehyde on mitochondrial dysfunction and apoptosis in SK-N-SH neuroblastoma cells. Cell Biol Toxicol. 2015;31(6):261–272. doi: 10.1007/s10565-015-9309-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Zhao Y, Wei LQ, Tagmount A, Loguinov A, Sobh A, Hubbard A, McHale CM, Chang CJ, Vulpe CD, Zhang LP. Applying genome-wide CRISPR to identify known and novel genes and pathways that modulate formaldehyde toxicity. Chemosphere. 2021;269:128701. doi: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2020.128701. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Abrishami M, Khalifeh M, Shoayb M, Abrishami M. Therapeutic effects of high-dose intravenous prednisolone in methanol-induced toxic optic neuropathy. J Ocul Pharmacol Ther. 2011;27(3):261–263. doi: 10.1089/jop.2010.0145. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Zamani N, Hassanian-Moghaddam H, Shojaei M, Rahimian S. Evaluation of the effect of erythropoietin + corticosteroid versus corticosteroid alone in methanol-induced optic nerve neuropathy. Cutan Ocul Toxicol. 2018;37(2):186–190. doi: 10.1080/15569527.2017.1373121. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Diem R, Molnar F, Beisse F, et al. Treatment of optic neuritis with erythropoietin (TONE): a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial-study protocol. BMJ Open. 2016;6(3):e010956. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2015-010956. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]


