Skip to main content
Canadian Urological Association Journal logoLink to Canadian Urological Association Journal
. 2021 May 11;15(11):E620–E621. doi: 10.5489/cuaj.7257

Case – Prostate-specific antigen bounce: A pitfall in prostate-specific membrane antigen positron emission tomography/computed tomography interpretation

Victor Polins Pedro 1, Golmehr Sistani 2,3,, Irina Rachinsky 3, Katherine Zukotynski 2,4, Glenn Bauman 5, Wei Liu 5
PMCID: PMC8641908  PMID: 33999811

Introduction

Prostate-specific antigen (PSA) “bounce,” a transient rise in PSA post-therapy, can happen after either brachytherapy (BT) or external beam radiation therapy (EBRT); however, it is more common in the former case.1,2 In general, PSA bounce tends to occur within 2–3 years of treatment, rarely exceeds levels of 2–3 ng/ml above the nadir PSA, and tends to resolve over 6–12 months.2 Studies have shown that prostate-specific membrane antigen positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PSMA PET/CT) has a high sensitivity and specificity for the detection of prostate cancer recurrence and can potentially guide therapy.3 Because salvage treatment (such as local or systemic salvage) may have associated morbidity, it is important to exclude the possibility of PSA bounce before proceeding with salvage treatment. We describe a case of clinically suspected local failure with initial PSA rise and suspicious PSMA PET/CT finding post-therapy that was actually related to a PSA bounce, emphasizing the need for caution in the evaluation of men where a PSA bounce may be a confounding phenomenon.

Case report

A 51-year-old male with intermediate-risk prostate cancer (clinical T2a, Gleason score 7 [3+4]) had low-dose rate (LDR) iodine-125 BT. His PSA at the time of diagnosis was 7.5 ng/mL falling to 4.8 and then 2.45 ng/mL at three and nine months, respectively, post-BT. However, his PSA rose to 2.91 ng/mL 15 months after therapy and continued to rise on followup to 5.8 ng/mL approximately 30 months post-BT. Disease recurrence was suspected. A CT scan of the abdomen and pelvis, multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (mpMRI) of the pelvis and bone scan were all negative. PSMA PET/CT showed mild focal uptake in the right prostate apex equivocal for recurrence (Fig. 1). In the context of rising PSA, this was clinically considered concerning for recurrence. Upon urology consultation, the decision was made to proceed with biopsy and then potentially high-intensity focused ultrasound (HIFU). However, a repeat PSA, before the biopsy and HIFU therapy or any systemic therapy, showed a spontaneous reduction in PSA to 3.23 ng/mL. On further followup, the PSA continued to decrease, becoming undetectable 65 months post-therapy in keeping with a benign PSA bounce post-BT (Fig. 2).

Fig. 1.

Fig. 1

Selected axial prostate-specific membrane antigen positron emission tomography/computed tomography images of the pelvis show asymmetric focal uptake in the right posterior prostate gland.

Fig. 2.

Fig. 2

Patient’s prostate-specific antigen (PSA) changes during the time. Time 0 is when the patient was diagnosed with prostate cancer.

Discussion

In general, an increase ≥0.2 ng/ml above the nadir within 2–3 months of therapy with subsequent decline has been widely accepted as a PSA bounce.4 A recent meta-analysis of 26 258 patients post-radiation (BT or EBRT) showed PSA bounce in one-third of cases, with a pooled mean amplitude of 1.3 ng/mL and time to occurrence of 18 months.5 Usually, serial PSA levels for 1–2 years after the initial rise can differentiate biochemical recurrence from PSA bounce.

In this case, the increase in PSA continued over a longer period of time and reached a higher level than one might typically expect with a benign PSA bounce after BT. PSMA PET/ CT also has limitations in the detection of local recurrence since benign prostatic pathologies, such as focal prostatitis, benign prostatic hyperplasia, and even normal prostate, can show areas of increased uptake.6,7 Some strategies, such as interval increased activity on delayed PSMA PET/CT scan can suggest malignancy in equivocal cases.8 Also, studies have shown that imaging and biopsy results can evolve post-radiation. 9,10 While PSMA PET/CT is well-studied for the detection of extra-prostatic recurrence with known sources of false-positives, there is little information regarding serial changes in PSMA-avid disease on PET/CT after primary radiation, and the relationship of these changes to intra-prostatic control are unknown.11,12 Until larger studies become available, we suggest caution in interpreting isolated local (prostate gland) recurrence detected on PSMA PET/CT at early time points (less than 2–3 years) post-radiotherapy. At early time points post-radiotherapy, continued serial PSA surveillance with deferred local salvage is warranted. If local salvage is contemplated, a confirmatory biopsy with clear confirmation of local recurrence prior to therapy is recommended.

Footnotes

Competing interests:: The authors do not report any competing personal or financial interests related to this work.

This paper has been peer-reviewed.

References

  • 1.Caloglu M, Ciezki J. Prostate-specific antigen bounce after prostate brachytherapy: Review of a confusing phenomenon. Urology. 2009;74:1183–90. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2009.01.043. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Kubo K, Wadasaki K, Kimura T, et al. Clinical features of prostate-specific antigen bounce after 125I brachytherapy for prostate cancer. J Radiat Res. 2018;59:649–55. doi: 10.1093/jrr/rry059. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Trabulsi EJ, Rumble RB, Jadvar H, et al. Optimum imaging strategies for advanced prostate cancer: ASCO guideline. J Clin Oncol. 2020;38:1963–96. doi: 10.1200/JCO.19.02757. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Caloglu M, Ciezki JP, Reddy CA, et al. PSA bounce and biochemical failure after brachytherapy for prostate cancer: A study of 820 patients with a minimum of 3 years of followup. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2011;80:735–41. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2010.02.021. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Darwis NDM, Oike T, Kubo N, et al. Characteristics of PSA bounce after radiotherapy for prostate cancer: A meta-analysis. Cancers (Basel) 2020;12:2180. doi: 10.3390/cancers12082180. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Shaygan B, Zukotynski K, Bénard F, et al. Canadian Urological Association best practice report: prostate-specific membrane antigen positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PSMA PET/CT) and PET/magnetic resonance (MR) in prostate cancer. Can Urol Assoc J. 2021;15:162–72. doi: 10.5489/cuaj.7268. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Shetty D, Patel D, Le K, et al. Pitfalls in Gallium-68 PSMA PET/CT interpretation-A pictorial review. Tomography. 2018;4:182–93. doi: 10.18383/j.tom.2018.00021. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Sistani G, Metser U, Bauman GS, et al. Case – 18F-DCFPyL-positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) time of imaging. Can Urol Assoc J. 2021;15:E376–9. doi: 10.5489/cuaj.6984. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Crook JM, Malone S, Perry G, et al. Twenty-four-month post-radiation prostate biopsies are strongly predictive of 7-year disease-free survival: Results from a Canadian randomized trial. Cancer. 2009;115:673–9. doi: 10.1002/cncr.24020. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Pickett B, Kurhanewicz J, Coakley F, et al. Use of MRI and spectroscopy in evaluation of external beam radiotherapy for prostate cancer. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2004;60:1047–55. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2004.05.015. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Liu W, Zukotynski K, Emmett L, et al. Utilization of salvage and systemic therapies for recurrent prostate cancer as a result of 18F-DCFPyL PET/CT restaging. Adv Radiat Oncol. 2020;6:100553. doi: 10.1016/j.adro.2020.08.010. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Young S, Liu W, Zukotynski K, et al. Prostate-specific membrane antigen targeted PET/CT for recurrent prostate cancer: A clinician’s guide. Expert Rev Anticancer Ther. 2021;21:641–55. doi: 10.1080/14737140.2021.1878883. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Canadian Urological Association Journal are provided here courtesy of Canadian Urological Association

RESOURCES