EARLY FLOWERING3 sub-nuclear localization responds to changes in ambient temperature

Abstract

EARLY FLOWERING3 sub-nuclear localization responds to changes in ambient temperature

Dear Editor,

Plants adapt their development to daily and seasonal ambient temperature fluctuations. Warming triggers a suite of molecular responses that leads to pronounced changes in plant development and architecture (Quint et al., 2016). Collectively, this response is called thermomorphogenesis. The evening complex (EC) is a transcriptional regulatory complex composed of EARLY FLOWERING3 (ELF3), ELF4, and LUX ARRYTHMO (LUX) that has emerged as a hub in the circadian clock and plant development (Nusinow et al., 2011, Herrero et al., 2012; Ezer et al., 2017). The ability of the EC to bind to DNA is temperature-dependent, with warm temperature reducing the association of the EC to DNA (Raschke et al., 2015; Press et al., 2016; Ezer et al., 2017; Silva et al., 2020). However, it is unclear how warm temperature inhibits the DNA binding ability of the EC. Previously, we observed that ELF3 localizes to sub-nuclear structures called foci (Herrero et al., 2012). Impaired localization of ELF3 to foci associated with elevated expression of EC targets (Anwer et al., 2014), suggesting that foci could be sites where the EC binds to DNA and represses gene expression. Therefore, we hypothesized that warm temperature inhibits EC function by reducing the localization of ELF3 to foci.

To test this, first, we investigated whether warm temperature influenced the sub-nuclear localization of ELF3 in Arabidopsis. Using the previously described 35S::YFP:ELF3 (elf3-4) line (Herrero et al., 2012), we observed that a 2-h 27°C temperature pulse resulted in fewer and smaller foci in hypocotyl nuclei (Figure 1, A, B, and E). ELF4 is required for ELF3 to localize to foci (Kolmos et al., 2011; Herrero et al., 2012; Anwer et al., 2014) and was also proposed to have a warm temperature specific function in the EC (Jung et al., 2020; Silva et al., 2020). Therefore, we investigated whether ELF4 regulated the sensitivity of ELF3 foci to warm temperature. We introgressed the 35S::YFP:ELF3 line into the elf3-4/elf4-1 mutant. This line will be referred to as ELF4 (4−), while the original line will be called ELF3 (4+). The localization of ELF3 (4−) to foci was impeded at 22°C (Figure 1C and this was further reduced by a 27°C pulse (Figure 1, D and E). However, the relative change in the number of foci for ELF3 (4−) in response to the 27°C pulse was similar to ELF3 (4+) (Figure 1F). Together, warm temperatures suppress the localization of ELF3 to foci and ELF4 has a limited role within this.

Figure 1.

Elevated temperature reduces the association of ELF3 to foci in hypocotyl nuclei. The localization of ELF3 at dusk in hypocotyl nuclei of (A and B) 35S::YFP:ELF3 elf3-4 (parental type) or (C and D) 35S::YFP:ELF3 elf3-4/elf4-1 (elf4 mutant) plants. Images were taken at (A, C) 22°C or (B, D) after a 2-h 27°C pulse started at ZT6 (short-day 8/16 photoperiods). E, Number of foci per nucleus under the respective treatment. F, Relative change in the number of ELF3 foci following a temperature pulse in the elf3-4 or elf3-4/elf4-1 mutant. Data were relative to the respective genotype at 22°C. For elf3-4/elf4-1, nuclei with no foci were removed from this calculation. Images were collected on two occasions, with a minimum of 10 images analyzed in total. For both (E and F) the center line within the box defines the median, with the cross defining the mean. The limits of the box define the upper and lower quartiles, while the whiskers extend 1.5× the interquartile range. Significance was determined by a T test: n.s = no significance, ***P < 0.001. Scale bars are 5 μm.

To understand if the response of ELF3 foci to temperature was tissue-dependent, we investigated the effect of a 27°C pulse on foci formation in root nuclei. As in hypocotyl nuclei, a 27°C pulse suppressed the localization of ELF3 (4+) to foci in root nuclei and these foci were smaller and less bright than at 22°C (Figure 2, A and B). There was no substantial change in the magnitude of effect caused by the 27°C pulse between the tissue types, with ELF3 (4+) foci reduced by 62% and 60% in hypocotyl and root nuclei, respectively. Therefore, ELF3 foci do not have a tissue-dependent response to warm temperature.

Figure 2.

A 27°C pulse inhibits the association of ELF3 to foci in root nuclei. The localization of ELF3 at dusk in root nuclei of (A and B) 35S::YFP:ELF3 elf3-4 (wild type) or (C and D) 35S::YFP:ELF3 elf3-4/elf4-1 (elf4 mutant). Images were taken at (A and C) 22°C or (B and D) after a 2-h 27°C pulse started at ZT6 (short-day 8/16 photoperiods). E, Number of foci per nuclei under the respective treatment. F, Relative change in the number of ELF3 foci following a temperature pulse in the elf3-4 or elf3-4/elf4-1 background. Data were relative to the respective genotype at 22°C. Images were collected on two occasions, with a minimum of 10 images analyzed in total. For both (E and F) the center line within the box defines the median, with the cross defining the mean. The limits of the box define the upper and lower quartiles, while the whiskers extend 1.5× the interquartile range. Significance was determined by a T test: n.s = no significance, ***P < 0.001. Scale bars are 5 μm.

As ELF4 protein moves from shoot to root tissue, and this movement is temperature sensitive (Chen et al., 2020), we examined the requirement of ELF4 in regulating the thermal responsiveness of ELF3 foci in root nuclei. As with ELF3 (4+), ELF3 (4−) localized to foci in root nuclei and these foci were larger and brighter than those in hypocotyl nuclei (Figures 1C and 2C). The phenotypic effect of the elf4-1 mutation on ELF3 foci abundance was weaker in root nuclei, with foci only reduced by 52% compared to an 81% reduction in hypocotyl nuclei at 22°C. ELF3 (4−) foci in root nuclei were also reduced by a 27°C temperature pulse (Figure 2, D and E). However, this effect was more variable and on average weaker than the response of ELF3 (4+) foci to the 27°C pulse (Figure 2F). As with ELF3 (4+), ELF3 (4−) foci appeared smaller and less bright after a 27°C pulse in root nuclei (Figure 2, C and D). Combined, ELF4 does not have a critical role in buffering ELF3 foci against warming temperatures in either hypocotyl or root nuclei.

The decrease in foci number following a 27°C pulse could reflect changes in the nuclear accumulation of ELF3. To investigate this, we measured ELF3 (4+) and ELF3 (4−) nuclear signal at 22°C and 27°C in hypocotyl and root nuclei. As we have reported previously (Herrero et al., 2012), ELF4 is required for proper nuclear accumulation of ELF3 (Supplemental Figure 1). ELF3 (4−) had a lower nuclear accumulation than ELF3 (4+) in hypocotyl and root nuclei. The 27°C pulse also strongly reduced the nuclear accumulation of ELF3 (4+) in hypocotyl nuclei (Supplemental Figure 1A). Furthermore, there was a cumulative effect of the 27°C pulse and the elf4-1 mutation on the nuclear accumulation of ELF3 in hypocotyl nuclei. A similar response to the 27°C pulse was seen in root nuclei for both ELF3 (4+) and ELF3 (4−) (Supplemental Figure 1B). As with hypocotyl nuclei, the 27°C pulse and the elf4-1 mutation had a cumulative effect on ELF3 nuclear accumulation (Supplemental Figure 1B). The reduced nuclear accumulation of ELF3 at 27°C is consistent with a recent report that ELF3 is degraded by B-BOX ZINC FINGER PROTEIN 18 (BBX18) and XB3 ORTHOLOG 1 IN ARABIDOPSIS THALIANA (XBAT31) and XBAT35 at warm temperatures (Zhang et al., 2021a, 2021b).

In summary, the localization of ELF3 to foci is suppressed by warm temperature and ELF4 does not seem to regulate this process. Thus, ELF4 must stabilize the function of the EC at warm temperatures through a separate mechanism (Silva et al., 2020). As the localization of ELF3 to foci is associated with increased transcriptional activity of ELF3, a reduction in foci may contribute to the weaker EC function at warm temperatures (Kolmos et al., 2011; Ezer et al., 2017). We also highlight a recent report that observed ELF3 localizing to sub-nuclear structures called speckles in response to warming (Jung et al., 2020). Direct comparisons are complicated because of the different genetic resources and experimental conditions used, but in the supplemental text, we discuss why our results may diverge from the work of Jung et al. (2020).

Supplemental Data

The following materials are available in the online version of this article.

Supplemental Figure S1. Elevated temperature reduces the nuclear accumulation of ELF3.

Supplemental Text.

 

The author responsible for distribution of materials integral to the findings presented in this article in accordance with the policy described in the Instructions for Authors (https://academic.oup.com/plphys/pages/general-instructions) is: Seth J. Davis (seth.davis@york.ac.uk).