Skip to main content
NCBI home page
PLOS Pathogens logoLink to PLOS Pathogens
. 2021 Nov 22;17(11):e1009820. doi: 10.1371/journal.ppat.1009820

TMPRSS2 promotes SARS-CoV-2 evasion from NCOA7-mediated restriction

Hataf Khan 1, Helena Winstone 1, Jose M Jimenez-Guardeño 1, Carl Graham 1, Katie J Doores 1, Caroline Goujon 2, David A Matthews 3, Andrew D Davidson 3, Suzannah J Rihn 4, Massimo Palmarini 4, Stuart J D Neil 1, Michael H Malim 1,*
Editor: Benhur Lee5
PMCID: PMC8648102  PMID: 34807954

Abstract

Interferons play a critical role in regulating host immune responses to SARS-CoV-2, but the interferon (IFN)-stimulated gene (ISG) effectors that inhibit SARS-CoV-2 are not well characterized. The IFN-inducible short isoform of human nuclear receptor coactivator 7 (NCOA7) inhibits endocytic virus entry, interacts with the vacuolar ATPase, and promotes endo-lysosomal vesicle acidification and lysosomal protease activity. Here, we used ectopic expression and gene knockout to demonstrate that NCOA7 inhibits infection by SARS-CoV-2 as well as by lentivirus particles pseudotyped with SARS-CoV-2 Spike in lung epithelial cells. Infection with the highly pathogenic, SARS-CoV-1 and MERS-CoV, or seasonal, HCoV-229E and HCoV-NL63, coronavirus Spike-pseudotyped viruses was also inhibited by NCOA7. Importantly, either overexpression of TMPRSS2, which promotes plasma membrane fusion versus endosomal fusion of SARS-CoV-2, or removal of Spike’s polybasic furin cleavage site rendered SARS-CoV-2 less sensitive to NCOA7 restriction. Collectively, our data indicate that furin cleavage sensitizes SARS-CoV-2 Spike to the antiviral consequences of endosomal acidification by NCOA7, and suggest that the acquisition of furin cleavage may have favoured the co-option of cell surface TMPRSS proteases as a strategy to evade the suppressive effects of IFN-induced endo-lysosomal dysregulation on virus infection.

Author summary

IFNs play a critical role in regulating host immune responses to virus infections. In cultured cell systems, SARS-CoV-2 can trigger robust IFN and innate immune responses through activation of cytoplasmic RNA sensors, and is also highly sensitive to inhibition by IFN treatment. Consistent with this, ISGs are induced in patients with COVID-19, and inborn errors in the IFN system are associated with severe COVID-19. Our understanding of the repertoire and mechanisms of action of the ISGs that impact SARS-CoV-2 is currently incomplete. In this study, we demonstrate that the IFN-inducible short isoform of NCOA7 is a potent inhibitor of SARS-CoV-2 infection. Our data support the presence of two distinct pathways of SARS-CoV-2 entry and reveal that only the pH-dependent endo-lysosomal pathway is efficiently inhibited by NCOA7. Unravelling the biological significance of the polybasic furin cleavage site in the viral Spike protein, and the concomitant use of TMPRSS2 for cell surface fusion is an area of intense research. Our findings suggest that the acquisition of the polybasic furin cleavage site in Spike may have driven the co-option of the cell surface TMPRSS2 protease to evade the antiviral effects of NCOA7-mediated perturbation of the endo-lysosomal system.

Introduction

Coronaviruses (CoV) are enveloped, positive-sense RNA viruses with genomes of approximately 30 kb that have a broad host range and the capability to cross species barriers to infect humans [1,2]. Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) is a betacoronavirus responsible for coronavirus disease-19 (COVID-19) [3,4]. It is the seventh coronavirus known to infect humans. SARS-CoV-1 and MERS-CoV are highly pathogenic whereas the seasonal coronaviruses, HCoV-HKU1, HCoV-NL63, HCoV-OC43 and HCoV-229E, circulate in the human population globally but typically cause mild symptoms [5–8].

The SARS-CoV-2 Spike protein initiates viral entry into host cells by interacting primarily with angiotensin-converting enzyme 2 (ACE2) on the host cell plasma membrane [9]. Additional factors such as neuropilin-1 (NRP1) and heparan sulphate can facilitate ACE2 dependent entry [10,11]. Recently, the Spike mutation E484D that is present in a number of variants of concern (VOCs) has been shown to allow entry in an ACE2 independent manner [12]. Spike is a trimeric type I transmembrane glycoprotein [13], and is organized into two main subunits, S1 and S2. S1 binds ACE2 and S2 contains the hydrophobic fusion peptide [13,14]. For entry into susceptible cells, SARS-CoV-2 Spike requires activation or priming by cellular protease-mediated cleavage at two distinct sites [15]. The first site is located at the S1/S2 junction and contains a polybasic motif Pro-Arg-Arg-Ala-Arg-Ser (P-R-R-A-R-S) [16]. The second cleavage site (S2´) is located within S2 immediately upstream of the fusion peptide and is responsible for triggering virus-cell membrane fusion [17]. Cell surface expressed TMPRSS2, a type II transmembrane serine protease, is thought to prime Spike at the S2´ site and promote virus entry at the plasma membrane in a pH-independent manner [18]. However, SARS-CoV-2 fusion can also occur in the endo-lysosomal system where the pH-dependent activity of various cysteine proteases known as cathepsins prime Spike at the S2´ site [19].

Viral glycoprotein polybasic sites can be key virulence determinants, as illustrated for highly pathogenic influenza viruses: for instance, the presence of the polybasic site in the hemagglutinin protein of H5N1 strains is associated with significantly higher virus titres in the respiratory tract [20–22]. Unlike SARS-CoV-1, the presence of a polybasic site in SARS-CoV-2 Spike is thought to be an important determinant of pandemic potential but its precise role in virus transmission and pathogenesis is unclear [23]. Furin, a proprotein convertase located in the Golgi that recognises and cleaves the sequence motif R-X-R/K-R where X can be any amino acid residue [24,25], has been shown to cleave the polybasic cleavage site in SARS-CoV-2 Spike in virus producing cells [16,18,26]. Structural studies have revealed that cleavage at the polybasic furin-cleavage site decreases the overall stability of SARS-CoV-2 Spike and facilitates the adoption of the open conformation that is required for Spike to bind the ACE2 receptor [27]. Consistent with this, deletion of the furin cleavage site in SARS-CoV-2 Spike promotes the adoption of closed form of the Spike and prevents cell–cell as well as virus–cell fusion in some cell types [16,26,28,29].

IFNs are immunomodulatory cytokines produced in response to viral challenge following recognition of pathogen-associated molecular patterns (PAMPs) by host-encoded pattern recognition receptors (PRRs). They are pivotal to cell-intrinsic antiviral immunity, contributing to innate responses through the activation of ISGs. There are at least 1000 human ISGs, with the viral substrates and functionality of many remaining to be elucidated [30]. Previously, we demonstrated that the IFN-inducible 219-amino acid short isoform of human nuclear receptor coactivator 7 (NCOA7) is an inhibitor of viruses that enter cells via the endo-lysosomal pathway [31]. The long isoform of NCOA7 which is not IFN-inducible was originally identified as an oestrogen receptor-associated protein that localizes to the nucleus upon oestradiol treatment [32,33]. The short IFN-inducible isoform of NCOA7, studied herein, contains a unique amino-terminal region of 25 amino acids and shares the carboxy-terminal five exons of the long isoform [34]. The carboxy-terminal region of NCOA7 comprises a TLDc (TBC/LysM domain-containing) domain, the function of which is currently not fully understood [33]. IFN-inducible NCOA7 has been shown to interact with the vacuolar H+-ATPase (V-ATPase) and promotes endo-lysosomal vesicle acidification, lysosomal protease activity and the degradation of endocytosed antigen [31]. In analyzing influenza virus, NCOA7 function is manifested through the inhibition of fusion of the viral and endosomal membranes and the cytosolic entry of viral ribonucleoproteins [31].

Recent genome-wide CRISPR-Cas9 screens have identified V-ATPase subunits and cathepsin L as SARS-CoV-2 cofactors [35–37]. Given that NCOA7 binds the V-ATPase and promotes cathepsin activity, we sought to investigate whether NCOA7 regulates SARS-CoV-2 infection. We found that NCOA7 is a potent inhibitor of SARS-CoV-2 and other coronavirus infections. Consistent with its mechanism of action, overexpression of TMPRSS2, which potentiates plasma membrane fusion rather than endosomal fusion of SARS-CoV-2, attenuates NCOA7-mediated restriction of SARS-CoV-2. We further show that presence of the polybasic furin cleavage site in SARS-CoV-2 Spike sensitizes infection to the inhibitory consequences of aberrant endosomal acidification by NCOA7.

Results

IFN-inducible isoform of NCOA7 inhibits SARS-CoV-2 infection

To investigate the activity of NCOA7 against SARS-CoV-2 we used A549 cells, a lung epithelial cell line, stably expressing the SARS-CoV-2 receptor ACE2 (S1A Fig). A549-ACE2 cells were transduced with lentiviral vectors to express the IFN-inducible short isoform of NCOA7 or an unrelated control protein, E2crimson. To examine the effect of NCOA7 on infectious (wild-type) SARS-CoV-2, NCOA7 expressing or control A549-ACE2 cells were challenged with increasing doses of the SARS-CoV-2 PHE England 02/2020 strain. Virus replication was inhibited in NCOA7 expressing cells compared to the control at each viral dose, as measured by flow cytometric enumeration of nucleocapsid positive cells 48 h after infection (Figs 1A and S1B). Concordantly, the titre of SARS-CoV-2 produced by NCOA7 expressing cells was 8-fold lower (Fig 1B). and crystal violet staining of cell monolayers showed that NCOA7 reduced SARS-CoV-2 mediated cytopathic effects at lower doses of input virus (Fig 1C).

Fig 1. NCOA7 inhibits SARS-CoV-2 infection.

Fig 1

Open in a new tab

(A) A549-ACE2 cells expressing E2crimson or NCOA7 were infected with replication-competent SARS-CoV-2 for 48 h. Nucleocapsid positive cells were enumerated by flow cytometry. (B) VeroE6 cells were incubated for 72 h with supernatants from A549-ACE2 cells expressing E2crimson or NCOA7 infected with replication-competent SARS-CoV-2 for 48 h. Plaque forming units were counted to calculate the titre. (C) Crystal violet staining of A549-ACE2 cells expressing E2crimson or NCOA7 after infection with replication competent SARS-CoV-2 for 72 h. (D) A549-ACE2 cells expressing E2crimson or NCOA7 were infected with SARS-CoV-2 Spike pseudotyped vector expressing luciferase. Luciferase activity was measured 48 h post-infection. (E) A549-ACE2 cells expressing E2crimson or NCOA7 were infected with Amphotropic MLV envelope pseudotyped vector expressing luciferase. Luciferase activity was measured 48 h post-infection. (F) A549-ACE2-Cas9 cells were transduced with lentiviral vectors expressing CRISPR non-targeting guide RNA (Ctrl-/-) or guide RNA targeting NCOA7. Treated with IFN-α for 24 h before challenge with SARS-CoV-2 Spike pseudotyped vector expressing luciferase. Luciferase activity was measured 48 h post-infection. (G) A549-ACE2-Cas9 cells were transduced with lentiviral vectors expressing CRISPR non-targeting guide RNA (Ctrl-/-) or guide RNA targeting NCOA7. Treated with IFN-α for 24 h before challenge with replication-competent SARS-CoV-2. Nucleocapsid positive cells were enumerated by flow cytometry 48 h post-infection. (H) A549-ACE2 cells expressing E2crimson or NCOA7 were infected with wild-type (WT) or D614G SARS-CoV-2 Spike pseudotyped vectors expressing luciferase. Luciferase activity was measured 48 h post-infection. (I) A549-ACE2 cells expressing E2crimson or NCOA7 were infected with wild-type (WT), P.1, B.1.351 or B.1.1.7 SARS-CoV-2 Spike pseudotyped vectors expressing luciferase. Luciferase activity was measured 48 h post-infection. For all the data n = 3, mean +/- SD. (A, D-G) analysed using two-way ANOVA. (B, H) analysed using unpaired t-test. (I) analysed using one-way ANOVA. * (p<0.05), ** (p<0.01), *** (p<0.001), **** (p<0.0001).

To investigate the effect of NCOA7 on Spike-mediated viral entry, NCOA7 or E2crimson expressing A549-ACE2 cells were challenged with 25, 50 or 100 μl of luciferase-expressing lentivirus vectors pseudotyped with SARS-CoV-2 Spike or amphotropic murine leukaemia virus (MLV) Envelope. Infection with the SARS-CoV-2 Spike pseudotype, as measured by luciferase production, was inhibited 4- to 5-fold in cells expressing NCOA7 compared to control cells at all doses tested (Fig 1D). In addition, expression of NCOA7 in a human bronchiolar epithelial cell line, BEAS-2B, which has been utilized as model for several infectious airway diseases also significantly inhibited Spike mediated viral entry (S1C Fig) [38–41]. As previously shown, infection with the MLV pseudotype, where entry depends on macropinocytosis, was unaffected by NCOA7 expression (Fig 1E) [31,42]. To study the direct effect of NCOA7 mediated endosomal acidification on SARS-CoV-2 membrane fusion, we used a lipophilic dye-based fluorescence dequenching assay that uses SP-DiOC18. SARS-CoV-2 pseudotypes and infectious virus particles were labelled with SP-DiOC18. In the labelled particles, the green fluorescence of SP-DiOC18 is suppressed by self-quenching [43]. Fluorescence dequenching of SP-DiOC18 occurs following viral–endosome membrane fusion and there were significant decreases in the number of SP-DiOC18 positive cells in the presence of NCOA7 across a range of inocula, reflecting reduced membrane fusion (S1H and S1I Fig).

We complemented these results by assessing the contribution of endogenous NCOA7 to IFN-induced suppression of SARS-CoV-2 infection by using CRISPR-Cas9 genome editing to deplete A549-ACE2 cells of the IFN-inducible isoform of NCOA7. Control or NCOA7 knockout cells were treated with IFN-α for 24 h and then challenged with the SARS-CoV-2 Spike pseudotype or wild-type SARS-CoV-2. IFN-α effectively inhibited infection by both viruses in control cells, however, in NCOA7 knockout cells IFN-α was 2- to 3-fold less effective at inhibiting SARS-CoV-2 Spike pseudotype (Fig 1F) or wild-type SARS-CoV-2 (Fig 1G) infections, demonstrating that endogenous NCOA7 contributes to IFN-α mediated suppression of SARS-CoV-2.

Rapidly emerging SARS-CoV-2 VOCs are a major worry. One of the first variants to be identified contained the D614G mutation in Spike, which enhances viral infectivity and shifts Spike conformation towards an ACE2-binding and fusion competent state [44–46]. The B.1.1.7 variant emerged in the United Kingdom, the B.1.351 variant in South Africa and P.1 in Brazil. These newly emerged variants contain mutations and deletions in the receptor-binding domain (RBD) and N-terminal domain of the Spike protein, as well as in other proteins [47–52]. The D614G, P.1 and B1.351 Spike pseudotypes displayed enhanced infectivity relative to the wild-type Spike pseudotype in A549-ACE2 cells (S1D and S1E Fig) [44–46], whereas B.1.1.7 was indistinguishable (S1E Fig). To test the effects of NCOA7 on these variant Spikes, we infected NCOA7 expressing or control A549-ACE2 cells with pseudotypes bearing variant Spikes and observed that wild-type, D614G, B.1.1.7 and P.1 Spike pseudotypes were equally sensitive to NCOA7 (Figs 1H, 1I, S1F and S1G), whereas the B.1.351 Spike pseudotype was 50% less sensitive to NCOA7-mediated restriction (Figs 1I and S1G). Taken together, these data show that the IFN-inducible isoform of NCOA7 is an effective inhibitor of SARS-CoV-2 Spike function.

NCOA7 inhibits pathogenic and seasonal coronavirus infections

Six other coronaviruses are known to infect humans. Seasonal coronaviruses include HCoV-229E, HCoV-OC43, HCoV-NL63, and HCoV-HKU1, which circulate in the human population globally and cause mild upper respiratory tract infections [8]. In contrast, infections with two others, SARS-CoV-1 and MERS-CoV, result in severe clinical presentations and substantial mortality [5,7]. HCoV-229E and HCoV-NL63 belong to the alphacoronavirus genus whereas HCoV-OC43, HCoV-HKU1, SARS-CoV-1 and MERS-CoV are betacoronaviruses [4]. Like SARS-CoV-2, SARS-CoV-1 and HCoV-NL63 use ACE2 as an entry receptor, HCoV-OC43 and HCoV-HKU1 use 9-O-acetylated sialic acids as a receptor [9,53–56], whereas MERS-CoV and HCoV-229E use dipeptidyl peptidase-4 (DPP4) and CD13 (also known as aminopeptidase N) as their receptors, respectively [57,58].

To test the activity of NCOA7 against seasonal and pathogenic human coronaviruses, NCOA7 expressing or control A549-ACE2 cells were infected with three doses of SARS-CoV-1 or HCoV-229E Spike pseudotypes. NCOA7 or E2crimson expressing U87-MG-ACE2 cells were used to test the sensitivity of MERS-CoV and HCoV-NL63 Spike pseudotypes. Consistent with all of the HCoVs being able to enter cells via the endocytic pathway, we found that NCOA7 inhibited infection by SARS-CoV-1 (Fig 2A), MERS-CoV (Fig 2B), HCoV-229E (Fig 2C) and HCoV-NL63 (Fig 2D) Spike pseudotypes, demonstrating the pan-coronavirus antiviral activity of NCOA7.

Fig 2. NCOA7 inhibits pathogenic and seasonal coronavirus infections.

Fig 2

Open in a new tab

(A) A549-ACE2 cells expressing E2crimson or NCOA7 were infected with SARS-CoV-1 Spike pseudotyped vector expressing luciferase (SARS-1). Luciferase activity was measured 48 h post-infection. (B) U87-MG cells expressing E2crimson or NCOA7 were infected with MERS-CoV Spike pseudotyped vector expressing luciferase (MERS). Luciferase activity was measured 48 h post-infection. (C) A549-ACE2 cells expressing E2crimson or NCOA7 were infected with HCoV-229E Spike pseudotyped vector expressing luciferase (229E). Luciferase activity was measured 48 h post-infection. (D) U87-MG-ACE2 cells expressing E2crimson or NCOA7 were infected with HCoV-NL63 Spike pseudotyped vector expressing luciferase (NL63). Luciferase activity was measured 48 h post-infection. For all the data n = 3, mean +/- SD. All analysed using two-way ANOVA * (p<0.05), ** (p<0.01), *** (p<0.001), **** (p<0.0001).

TMPRSS2 expression attenuates NCOA7-mediated restriction

As discussed earlier, SARS-CoVs can employ two routes for host cell entry that are determined by the localization of cellular proteases required for Spike protein activation. TMPRSS2, a type II transmembrane serine protease, has been shown to promote SARS-CoV-2 infection in a number of cell types [9], and is thought to prime Spike and allow virus-host membrane fusion at the cell surface in a pH-independent manner [59]. In TMPRSS2 expressing cells, SARS-CoVs entry can be blocked by the serine protease inhibitor camostat mesylate [9]. Given that NCOA7 inhibits virus entry through endosomes, we hypothesised that TMPRSS2 overexpression may promote virus fusion at the plasma membrane, and thereby bypass NCOA7-mediated restriction.

To test this, TMPRSS2 was stably expressed in NCOA7 expressing or control A549-ACE2 cells. As shown previously, TMPRSS2 expression enhanced infection by SARS-CoV-2 Spike pseudotypes by ~10-fold (Fig 3A). Consistent with this, infection with these pseudotypes was only inhibited by camostat mesylate in the TMPRSS2 expressing cells (Fig 3B). Next we examined the effect of TMPRSS2 on NCOA7-mediated inhibition of SARS-CoV-2 Spike pseudotype infection. In the absence of TMPRSS2, NCOA7 inhibited infection by ~8-fold (Fig 3C and 3D), however, in TMPRSS2 expressing cells the inhibitory effect dropped to ~3-fold (Fig 3C and 3D). Similarly, the inhibitory effect of NCOA7 on SARS-CoV-1 Spike pseudotyped vector infection was also suppressed by TMPRSS2 expression (Fig 3E and 3F). Our data demonstrate that TMPRSS2 overexpression attenuates NCOA7-mediated restriction likely by promoting virus fusion and entry at the plasma membrane.

Fig 3. TMPRSS2 overexpression attenuates NCOA7-mediated restriction.

Fig 3

Open in a new tab

(A) A549-ACE2 cells with or without TMPRSS2 were infected with increasing volumes of SARS-CoV-2 Spike pseudotyped vector expressing luciferase (SARS-2). Luciferase activity was measured 48 h post-infection. (B) A549-ACE2 cells with or without TMPRSS2 were treated with 100 μM camostat for 2 h and then infected with SARS-CoV-2 Spike pseudotyped vector expressing luciferase. Luciferase activity was measured 48 h post-infection. (C) A549-ACE2 cells expressing E2crimson or NCOA7 with (right) or without TMPRSS2 (left) were infected with SARS-CoV-2 Spike pseudotyped vector expressing luciferase. Luciferase activity was measured 48 h post-infection. (D) Fold inhibition of SARS-CoV-2 Spike pseudotyped vector infection by NCOA7 in the presence or absence of TMPRSS2 from Fig 3C. (E) A549-ACE2 cells expressing E2crimson or NCOA7 with (right) or without TMPRSS2 (left) were infected with SARS-CoV-1 Spike pseudotyped vector expressing luciferase (SARS-1). Luciferase activity was measured 48 h post-infection. (F) Fold inhibition of SARS-CoV-1 Spike pseudotyped vector infection by NCOA7 in the presence or absence of TMPRSS2 from Fig 3E. For all the data n = 3, mean +/- SD. (B) analysed using two-way ANOVA. (D, F) analysed using unpaired t-test. * (p<0.05), ** (p<0.01), *** (p<0.001), **** (p<0.0001).

TMPRSS2 expression attenuates SARS-CoV-2 inhibition by endo-lysosomal pathway inhibitors

NCOA7 inhibits endosomal viral entry and interacts with the V-ATPase [31]. This interaction promotes endo-lysosomal acidification which in turn enhances the activity of proteases such as cathepsins [31]. Endosomal acidity or prolonged activation of cathepsins by NCOA7 may cause aberrant processing of Spike, functionally compromise other components of the virions and/or culminate in degradation in lysosomes. To support our observation that TMPRSS2 can rescue infection from the suppressive effects of NCOA7 mediated endosomal acidification, we pharmacologically manipulated endosomal acidification and endo-lysosomal proteases. Bafilomycin A1 (BafA1) is a specific inhibitor of V-ATPase whereas Niclosamide acts as a proton carrier which blocks endosomal acidification independently of V-ATPase [60,61]. E64d, however, is a broad inhibitor for cathepsin B, H, L, and calpain [62]. A549-ACE2 cells with or without TMPRSS2 were pre-treated with inhibitors for 2 h and then infected with SARS-CoV-2 Spike pseudotype. Like NCOA7 (Fig 4A), BafA1 (Fig 4B), E64d (Fig 4C) or Niclosamide (Fig 4D) treatment potently inhibited infection with Spike pseudotype in the absence of TMPRSS2, however, TMPRSS2 overexpression attenuated the inhibitory effects of each of these inhibitors. These results indicate that similar to the effect of TMPRSS2 on NCOA7 function, the SARS-CoV-2 inhibitory activities of pharmacological agents that manipulate endo-lysosomal acidification are also diminished by TMPRSS2.

Fig 4. TMPRSS2 attenuates SARS-CoV-2 inhibition by endo-lysosomal pathway inhibitors.

Fig 4

Open in a new tab

(A) A549-ACE2 cells with or without NCOA7 and TMPRSS2 were infected with SARS-CoV-2 Spike pseudotyped vector expressing luciferase. Luciferase activity was measured 48 h post-infection. (B) A549-ACE2 cells with or without TMPRSS2 were treated with 100 nM BafilomycinA1 (BafA1: V-ATPase inhibitor) or left untreated for 2 h and then infected with SARS-CoV-2 Spike pseudotyped vector expressing luciferase. Luciferase activity was measured 48 h post-infection. (C) A549-ACE2 cells with or without TMPRSS2 were treated with 10 μM E64d (cathepsin inhibitor) or left untreated for 2 h and then infected with SARS-CoV-2 Spike pseudotyped vector expressing luciferase. Luciferase activity was measured 48 h post-infection. (D) A549-ACE2 cells with or without TMPRSS2 were treated with 5 μM Niclosamide (neutralise pH) or left untreated for 2 h and then infected with SARS-CoV-2 Spike pseudotyped vector expressing luciferase. Luciferase activity was measured 48 h post-infection. For all the data n = 3, mean +/- SD. All analysed using two-way ANOVA. * (p<0.05), ** (p<0.01), *** (p<0.001), **** (p<0.0001).

Furin cleavage site in Spike enhances NCOA7-mediated restriction

We noticed that infection with the SARS-CoV-1 Spike pseudotype was less sensitive to NCOA7 compared with the SARS-CoV-2 Spike pseudotype (compare Fig 3C and 3E). One of the most prominent differences between these Spike proteins is the presence of a polybasic furin cleavage site in SARS-CoV-2 [63]. Furin is a ubiquitously expressed calcium-dependent protease that is implicated in many viral infections via its cleavage of envelope glycoproteins, allowing not only virus-cell membrane fusion but also cell-to-cell fusion and syncytium formation [64]. Furin localises to the trans-Golgi network and acts on Spike during viral production [64]. In the context of SARS-CoV-2, the presence of a polybasic site in Spike is thought to be a determinant of pandemic potential, though its precise role(s) in virus infection and transmission remains unclear [23].

To test whether furin cleavage of Spike influences NCOA7-mediated restriction, we deleted the furin cleavage site (ΔPRRA) in SARS-CoV-2 Spike and added a furin cleavage site (PRRA) to SARS-CoV-1 Spike. NCOA7 expressing or control A549-ACE2 cells were infected with pseudotypes bearing wild-type or ΔPRRA SARS-CoV-2 Spike. NCOA7 inhibited wild-type virus infection by ~6-fold (Fig 5A and 5C), whereas infection with ΔPRRA Spike bearing virus was inhibited by ~3-fold (Fig 5B and 5C), an ~50% decrease in NCOA7 sensitivity. Conversely, infections with pseudotypes bearing wild-type (Fig 5D) or PRRA containing (Fig 5E) SARS-CoV-1 Spike revealed that addition of the polybasic furin cleavage site enhanced the inhibitory effect of NCOA7 from 2- to 4-fold (Fig 5F). Finally, to test whether the polybasic furin cleavage site has a similar effect in the context of replication-competent SARS-CoV-2 infection, control or NCOA7 expressing A549-ACE2 cells were infected with infectious wild-type or ΔPRRA SARS-CoV-2 (Fig 5G). Consistent with the results with pseudotypes, the ΔPRRA virus was inhibited ~50% less effectively by NCOA7 when compared to wild-type SARS-CoV-2 (6-fold to 3-fold) (Fig 5G and 5H). Our data therefore suggest that furin cleavage renders SARS-CoV-2 Spike more prone to the detrimental effects of endo-lysosomal acidification induced by NCOA7.

Fig 5. Furin cleavage site in Spike enhances NCOA7-mediated restriction.

Fig 5

Open in a new tab

(A) A549-ACE2 cells expressing E2crimson or NCOA7 were infected with SARS-CoV-2 Spike pseudotyped vector expressing luciferase. Luciferase activity was measured 48 h post-infection. (B) A549-ACE2 cells expressing E2crimson or NCOA7 were infected with SARS-CoV-2ΔPRRA Spike pseudotyped vector expressing luciferase. Luciferase activity was measured 48 h post-infection. (C) Fold inhibition of SARS-CoV-2 WT or ΔPRRA Spike pseudotyped vector infection by NCOA7 from Fig 5A. (D) A549-ACE2 cells expressing E2crimson or NCOA7 were infected with SARS-CoV-1 Spike pseudotyped vector expressing luciferase. Luciferase activity was measured 48 h post-infection. (E) A549-ACE2 cells expressing E2crimson or NCOA7 were infected with SARS-CoV-1 PRRA Spike pseudotyped vector expressing luciferase. Luciferase activity was measured 48 h post-infection. (F) Fold inhibition of SARS-CoV-1 WT or PRRA Spike pseudotyped vector infection by NCOA7 from Fig 5E. (G) A549-ACE2 cells expressing E2crimson or NCOA7 were infected with increasing volumes of replication competent wild-type (WT) SARS-CoV-2 (left) or SARS-CoV-2 ΔPRRA (right) for 48 h. Nucleocapsid positive cells were enumerated by flow cytometry. (H) Fold inhibition of wild-type SARS-CoV-2 or SARS-CoV-2 ΔPRRA infection by NCOA7 calculated from Fig 5E. For all the data n = 3, mean +/- SD. (F) analysed using two-way ANOVA. (C, F) analysed using unpaired t-test. * (p<0.05), ** (p<0.01), *** (p<0.001), **** (p<0.0001).

Discussion

IFNs play a critical role in regulating host immune responses to SARS-CoV-2 [65,66]. SARS-CoV-2 infection can trigger a robust innate immune response in vitro through activation of the cytoplasmic RNA sensors, RIG-I and MDA5 [67,68] and is highly sensitive to inhibition by IFN treatment, upregulation of ISGs has been observed in COVID-19 patient samples, and inborn errors in the IFN system are associated with severe COVID-19 [69–74]. The identity and mechanisms of action of many ISGs that impact SARS-CoV-2 are still elusive. Recent work has identified LY6E, AXIN2, CH25H, EPSTI1, GBP5, IFIH1, IFITM2, and IFITM3 as negative regulators of SARS-CoV-2 [75–79]. Furthermore, genetic screens have identified V-ATPase subunits, cathepsin L and other endosomal proteins, such as RAB7, as SARS-CoV-2 cofactors [35–37]. NCOA7 interacts with V-ATPase, and promote endo-lysosomal acidification and lysosomal protease activity [31]. In the present study, we focused on defining the activity of the IFN-inducible short isoform of NCOA7 against SARS-CoV-2. We used ectopic expression (Fig 1A–1D) and gene knockout (Fig 1F and 1G) to demonstrate that NCOA7 inhibits SARS-CoV-2 Spike pseudotyped virus and replication-competent virus infections in lung epithelial cells. We also show that entry of other pathogenic coronaviruses, SARS-CoV-1 (Fig 2A) and MERS-CoV (Fig 2B), and the seasonal coronaviruses, HCoV-229E (Fig 2C) and HCoV-NL63 (Fig 2C), is inhibited by NCOA7, highlighting the breadth of NCOA7’s anti-coronavirus activity.

The human airway epithelium is an important site of SARS-CoV-2 infection and replication [9,80]. The virus can then disseminate to other tissues and cause multi-organ dysfunction in COVID-19 patients [81]. Viral fusion requires proteolytic cleavage of the Spike by cellular proteases, furin, cathepsins and TMPRSS2 [9,82–84]. The complementarity and interchangeability of these proteases, in allowing SARS-CoV-2 entry into cells might explain the wider tropism and transmission characteristics of this virus compared to SARS-CoV-1. Our data support the presence of two distinct pathways of SARS-CoV-2 entry, and we reveal that the pH-dependent endo-lysosomal pathway is efficiently inhibited by NCOA7. The pH-independent pathway is thought to be important for pathogenesis and virus propagation [85]. This is supported by the fact that the polybasic furin cleavage site is conserved in SARS-CoV-2 isolated from COVID-19 patients even though it can be selected against during in vitro passage [63,86].

We have determined that SARS-CoV-2 is more sensitive to NCOA7 than SARS-CoV-1 (Fig 3C and 3E). The most obvious difference between the SARS-CoV-1 and -2 Spike proteins is the presence of the polybasic furin cleavage site at S1/S2 junction, which is thought to be an important determinant of pandemic potential [16,63,85]. Thus, SARS-CoV-2 Spike, but not SARS-CoV-1, is cleaved at this site in the virus-producing cells [79], and it is notable that this feature has not previously been observed in many SARS-like coronaviruses identified in bats [87–89]. We found that loss of the furin cleavage site decreased the sensitivity of SARS-CoV-2 to NCOA7 (Fig 5A–5C); conversely, addition of the furin cleavage site to SARS-CoV-1 Spike enhanced the inhibitory effect of NCOA7 against SARS-CoV-1 (Fig 5A–5C). Together, our data indicate that acquisition of the polybasic furin cleavage site in SARS-CoV-2 sensitises its Spike to the detrimental consequences of NCOA7-mediated endosomal acidification in cells expressing low levels of TMPRSS2, possibly owing to the relative instability of SARS-CoV-2 Spike compared to the Spike proteins of SARS-CoV-1 and bat RaTG13 [19,27]. This is consistent with other studies showing that SARS-CoV-2 utilizes the endocytic entry pathway less efficiently than SARS-CoV-1 in the absence of TMPRSS2, thus correlating furin-cleavage during virus production with greater dependence on TMPRSS2 for efficient entry at the plasma membrane and lower reliance on cathepsins [59]. Similarly, recent studies reveal that the polybasic site in Spike facilitates evasion from IFN-induced transmembrane protein (IFITM)-mediated restriction and is required for transmission [85], and that activation of Spike by TMPRSS2 at the cell surface allows SARS-CoV-2 to evade inhibition by IFITM proteins that are present in endosomal compartments [79,85]. Together, these findings suggest that the presence of the polybasic furin cleavage site in SARS-CoV-2 Spike may have driven the co-option of cell surface TMPRSS enzymes to evade the detrimental effects of endosomal restriction factors as well as endo-lysosomal acidification (including its amplification by factors such as NCOA7) on viral infection.

Finally, a recent study by Ghosh et al. (2020) showed that betacoronaviruses use lysosomes for egress instead of the biosynthetic secretory pathway [90], raising the possibility of a role for NCOA7 during late stages of virus life cycle. Importantly, it was also reported that lysosomes are deacidified, and proteolytic enzymes are inactive in infected cells, potentially indicating antagonism of NCOA7. In other work, mass spectrometry analyses of SARS-CoV-2 proteins have identified interactions between V-ATPase subunits and viral Matrix (M) and non-structural protein 6 (Nsp6) proteins [91]. Accordingly, there are a number of emerging questions centred on the dynamic interplay between NCOA7 and SARS-CoV-2: answering these may inform the strategic development of therapeutic interventions.

Methods and materials

Plasmids

NCOA7 variant 6 (NM_001199622.1) (encoding isoform 4 NP_001186551.1) or E2crimson cDNAs were inserted into pRRL.sin.cPPT.SFFV/IRES-puro.WPRE as described before [31]. Codon-optimised SARS-CoV-1, MERS-CoV, HCoV-229E and HCoV-NL63 Spike genes were synthesised in pcDNA3.1 from GeneArt. Codon-optimised SARS-CoV-2 Spike in pcDNA3.1 and ACE2 expression constructs were kindly provided by Dr Nigel Temperton [92]. SARS-CoV-2 Spike P.1, B.1.1.1.7, B1.351 were synthesised in pcDNA3.1 from GENEWIZ. The ACE2 cDNA was inserted into pMIGR1-blast using Notl and Xhol to create pMIGR1-blast-ACE2. TMPRSS2 lentiviral expression construct, RRL.sin.cPPT.SFFV/TMPRSS2(variant1).IRES-neo.WPRE, has been described before [31]. The LentiCas9-Blast vector was a gift from F. Zhang (Addgene). The guide RNA coding sequences used were as follows: g1-CTRL 5′-agcacgtaatgtccgtggat, g1-NCOA7 5′-aaaaggctcttcgtcaggtc. The NCOA7 guide was designed to target the first coding exon of NCOA7 variant 6, which is unique to the short IFN-inducible isoform 4 studied herein. The RNA guides were cloned into LentiGuide-Neo vector as described [31]. SARS-CoV-1 and SARS-CoV-2 Spike mutants were generated with Q5 Site-Directed Mutagenesis Kit (E0554) following the manufacturer’s instructions using the following primers as described in [79]:

SARS-CoV-2 ΔPRRA Spike (Fwd: AGAAGCGTGGCCAGCCAG, Rev: GCTATTGGTCTGGGTCTGGTAG)

SARS-CoV-1 PRRA Spike (Fwd: AGAGCCCGGAGCACCAGCCAGAAA, Rev: TCTAGGCAGCAGAGACACGGTGTG)

Cell lines

All cell lines were cultured in DMEM (Gibco) with 10% fetal bovine serum (FBS, Invitrogen) plus 100 U/ml penicillin and 100 μg/ml streptomycin (Pen/Strep; Gibco), and incubated at 37°C, 5% CO2. A549 and U87MG cells stably expressing ACE2 were generated by transduction with pMIGR1-blast-ACE2 vector and maintained with 10 μg/ml blasticidin selection. A549-ACE2 and U87MG-ACE2 cells stably expressing NCOA7 or E2crimson were generated by transduction with RRL.sin.cPPT.SFFV/IRES-puro.WPRE-containing vectors expressing NCOA7 or E2crimson and maintained with 2 μg/ml puromycin and 10 μg/ml balsticidin. A549-ACE2-NCOA7/E2crimson cells stably expressing TMPRSS2 were generated by transduction with RRL.sin.cPPT.SFFV/TMPRSS2(variant1).IRES-neo.WPRE-containing vector and maintained with 2 μg/ml puromycin, 10 μg/ml blasticidin and 800 μg/ml neomycin. For CRISPR–Cas9-mediated gene disruption, A549-ACE2 cells stably expressing Cas9 were first generated by transduction with the LentiCas9-Blast vector followed by blasticidin selection at 10 μg/ml. Cas9-expressing A549-ACE2 cells were then transduced with guide RNA expressing Lentiguide-Neo vectors and cells selected with antibiotics for at least 15 days. When indicated, IFN-α (INTRON A, Merck, Sharpe & Dohme Corp.) was added for 24 h before virus infection challenge. Cells were treated with 100 nM bafilomycin A1 (Sigma), 10 μM E64d (Sigma) or 100 μM Camostat mesylate (Sigma) for 2 h before virus challenge.

Pseudotyped lentiviral vector production and infection

Pseudotyped lentiviral vectors were produced in a 10-cm dish seeded the day before with HEK293T cells. Cells were transfected using 20 μl of TransIT-2020 (Mirus Bio) with: 4 μg of pCSLW [93], 4 μg of p8.91 [94] and 2 μg of the relevant glycoprotein expression plasmid. The medium was changed 24 h post-transfection and the supernatant was harvested 48 h post-transfection. Supernatant was filtered through a 0.45-μm filter (Sartorious) and stored at −80°C until required. Viral stocks were quantified by measuring reverse transcriptase activity by qPCR using a SYBR Green-based product-enhanced PCR assay (SG-PERT) as described [95]. Viral supernatant was then typically used at ~eight dilutions to transduce each cell line of interest for 48 h and luciferase activity was measured with Promega Steady-Glo kit (E2550) using a Victor X3 Multilabel Reader (Perkin Elmer). Typically, data are presented from three doses that were evidently in the quantitative range.

Replication competent SARS-CoV-2

SARS-CoV-2 Strain England/02/2020 was obtained from Public Health England. SARS-CoV-2 strain England/02/2020 in which the RRAR furin cleavage site had been deleted has been described [10,96]. The viruses were propagated by infecting 60–70% confluent Vero-E6 cells in T75 flasks. Supernatant was harvested 72 h post-infection after visible cytopathic effect, and filtered through a 0.22-μm filter (Sartorius) to eliminate debris, aliquoted and stored at −80°C. The infectious virus titre was determined by plaque assay in Vero-E6 cells. All work with infectious SARS-CoV-2 was carried out in a Containment Level 3 facility (Health and Safety Executive approvals, CBA1.295.20.1 and GM386/20.2).

Immunoblotting

Cells were lysed in buffer containing 50 mM Tris pH 8, 150 mM NaCl, 1 mM EDTA, 10% (v/v) glycerol, 1% (v/v) Triton X100, 0.05% (v/v) NP40 supplemented with protease inhibitors (Roche) and boiled in 6X Laemmli buffer for 10 min. Proteins were separated by SDS-PAGE on 12% polyacrylamide gels. Proteins were transferred to a Hybond ECL membrane (Amersham biosciences) using a semi-dry transfer system (Biorad) and probed with primary antibodies: 1:1000 rabbit anti-ACE2 (Abcam, Ab108209) or 1:10000 mouse anti-tubulin (Sigma, T5168) and secondary antibodies: anti-mouse IgG IRdye 800CW (LI-COR Biosciences) or anti-rabbit IgG IRdye 800CW (LI-COR Biosciences).

Intracellular SARS-CoV-2 nucleocapsid staining

Cells were resuspended 48 h post-infection and fixed in 5% formaldehyde in PBS (Gibco) for 30 minutes at room temperature. Cells were permeabilised with 0.1% Triton X100 (Sigma) in PBS for 10 min. Cells were blocked with 5% FCS in PBS (blocking buffer) for 30 min, and incubated with sheep anti-SARS-CoV-2 nucleocapsid antibody (1:10000) [97] in blocking buffer for 1 h. Samples were incubated with anti-sheep AlexaFluor 488 IgG (1:500, Invitrogen) in blocking buffer for 1 h. Cells were washed twice with PBS, resuspended in PBS, and nucleocapsid positive cells were enumerated by flow cytometry using a FACSCanto II (BD Biosciences). Data were analysed with Graphpad Prism 9.

Membrane fusion assay using SP-DiOC18

SARS-CoV-2 particles were labelled with the self-quenching dye SP-DiOC18 (Invitrogen). SP-DiOC18 was added to 1 ml of virus stock containing approximately 2.5 × 107 PFU/ml at a final concentration of 0.2 μM. The tube was protected from light, incubated while rolling for 1 h at room temperature and subsequently stored at −80°C or used as required. Cells were incubated for 1.5 h with the labelled virus, harvested with trypsin, fixed with 4% PFA for 30 min and analysed by FACSCanto II (BD Biosciences) using the 488 nm laser for excitation.

Crystal violet staining

Cells were fixed in 5% formaldehyde in PBS for 30 min at room temperature after 72 h infection. Cells were then stained with crystal violet (Pro-Lab Diagnostics) solution for 5 min. Cell were washed with PBS and then pictures were taken.

Supporting information

S1 Fig. NCOA7 inhibits SARS-CoV2 infection.

(A) Immunoblot showing ACE2 expression in A549 cells after transduction with ACE2 expressing vector. Tubulin is included as a loading control. (B) Gating strategy for flow cytometry analysis of SARS-CoV-2 nucleocapsid (N) positive cells. Cells were distinguished from debris using the forward scatter (FCS, related to the cell size) and side scatter (SSC, related to the cell granularity). Selected population was gated for N positive cells (FITC channel) using uninfected cells as a negative control. SARS-CoV-2 infected cells were then gated for N. (C) BEAS-2B-ACE2 cells expressing E2crimson or NCOA7 were infected with SARS-CoV-2 Spike pseudotyped vector expressing luciferase. Luciferase activity was measured 48 h post-infection. (D) A549-ACE2 cells were infected with increasing volumes of wild-type (WT) or D614G SARS-CoV-2 Spike pseudotyped vectors expressing luciferase. Luciferase activity was measured 48 h post-infection. (E) A549-ACE2 cells were infected with increasing volumes of wild-type (WT), P.1, B.1.351 or B.1.1.7 SARS-CoV-2 Spike pseudotyped vectors expressing luciferase. Luciferase activity was measured 48 h post-infection. (F) A549-ACE2 cells expressing E2crimson or NCOA7 were infected with wild-type (WT) or D614G SARS-CoV-2 Spike pseudotyped vectors expressing luciferase. Luciferase activity was measured 48 h post-infection. (G) A549-ACE2 cells expressing E2crimson or NCOA7 were infected with wild-type (WT), P.1, B.1.351 or B.1.1.7 SARS-CoV-2 Spike pseudotyped vectors expressing luciferase. Luciferase activity was measured 48 h post-infection. (H) A549-ACE2 cells expressing E2crimson or NCOA7 were infected with SP-DiOC18 labelled SARS-CoV-2 for 1.5 h. SP-DiOC18 positive cells were enumerated by flow cytometry. (I) A549-ACE2 cells expressing E2crimson or NCOA7 were infected with SP-DiOC18 labelled SARS-CoV-2 Spike pseudotyped vector for 1.5 h. SP-DiOC18 positive cells were enumerated by flow cytometry. (C, H, I) analysed using two-way ANOVA. * (p<0.05), ** (p<0.01), *** (p<0.001), **** (p<0.0001).

(TIF)

Click here for additional data file. (2.6MB, tif)

Acknowledgments

For the purpose of open access, the author has applied a CC BY public copyright license to any Author Accepted Manuscript version arising from this submission.

Data Availability

All relevant data are within the manuscript and its Supporting Information files.

Funding Statement

This work was funded by King’s Together Rapid COVID-19 Call awards to MHM, SJDN and KJD; the Wellcome Trust (106223/Z/14/Z to MHM); a Huo Family Foundation Award to MHM, SJDN, and KJD; and NIAID Award U54 AI150472 to MHM. We acknowledge the Genotype-to-Phenotype UK National Virology Consortium funded by MRC/UKRI (MR/W005611/1) and Public Health England for providing viral isolates. HW and CG were supported by the MRC-KCL Doctoral Training Partnership in Biomedical Sciences (MR/N013700/1). This work was supported by the Department of Health via a National Institute for Health Research comprehensive Biomedical Research Centre award to Guy’s and St. Thomas’ NHS Foundation Trust in partnership with King’s College London and King’s College Hospital NHS Foundation Trust (MHM). The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.

References

  • 1.Corman VM, Muth D, Niemeyer D, Drosten C. Hosts and Sources of Endemic Human Coronaviruses. Adv Virus Res. 2018;100: 163–188. doi: 10.1016/bs.aivir.2018.01.001 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.V’kovski P, Kratzel A, Steiner S, Stalder H, Thiel V. Coronavirus biology and replication: implications for SARS-CoV-2. Nat Rev Microbiol. 2021;19: 155–170. doi: 10.1038/s41579-020-00468-6 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Zhu N, Zhang D, Wang W, Li X, Yang B, Song J, et al. A Novel Coronavirus from Patients with Pneumonia in China, 2019. N Engl J Med. 2020;382: 727–733. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa2001017 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Gorbalenya AE, Baker SC, Baric RS, de Groot RJ, Drosten C, Gulyaeva AA, et al. The species Severe acute respiratory syndrome-related coronavirus: classifying 2019-nCoV and naming it SARS-CoV-2. Nat Microbiol. 2020;5: 536–544. doi: 10.1038/s41564-020-0695-z [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Azhar EI, El-Kafrawy SA, Farraj SA, Hassan AM, Al-Saeed MS, Hashem AM, et al. Evidence for camel-to-human transmission of MERS coronavirus. N Engl J Med. 2014;370: 2499–2505. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1401505 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Callow KA, Parry HF, Sergeant M, Tyrrell DA. The time course of the immune response to experimental coronavirus infection of man. Epidemiol Infect. 1990;105: 435–446. doi: 10.1017/s0950268800048019 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Tsang KW, Ho PL, Ooi GC, Yee WK, Wang T, Chan-Yeung M, et al. A cluster of cases of severe acute respiratory syndrome in Hong Kong. N Engl J Med. 2003;348: 1977–1985. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa030666 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Gaunt ER, Hardie A, Claas ECJ, Simmonds P, Templeton KE. Epidemiology and Clinical Presentations of the Four Human Coronaviruses 229E, HKU1, NL63, and OC43 Detected over 3 Years Using a Novel Multiplex Real-Time PCR Method. J Clin Microbiol. 2010;48: 2940 LP– 2947. doi: 10.1128/JCM.00636-10 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Hoffmann M, Kleine-Weber H, Schroeder S, Krüger N, Herrler T, Erichsen S, et al. SARS-CoV-2 Cell Entry Depends on ACE2 and TMPRSS2 and Is Blocked by a Clinically Proven Protease Inhibitor. Cell. 2020;181: 271–280.e8. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2020.02.052 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Cantuti-Castelvetri L, Ojha R, Pedro LD, Djannatian M, Franz J, Kuivanen S, et al. Neuropilin-1 facilitates SARS-CoV-2 cell entry and infectivity. Science (80-). 2020;370: 856 LP– 860. doi: 10.1126/science.abd2985 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Zhang Q, Chen CZ, Swaroop M, Xu M, Wang L, Lee J, et al. Heparan sulfate assists SARS-CoV-2 in cell entry and can be targeted by approved drugs in vitro. Cell Discov. 2020;6: 80. doi: 10.1038/s41421-020-00222-5 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Puray-Chavez M, LaPak KM, Schrank TP, Elliott JL, Bhatt DP, Agajanian MJ, et al. Systematic analysis of SARS-CoV-2 infection of an ACE2-negative human airway cell. Cell Rep. 2021; 109364. doi: 10.1016/j.celrep.2021.109364 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Yan R, Zhang Y, Li Y, Xia L, Guo Y, Zhou Q. Structural basis for the recognition of SARS-CoV-2 by full-length human ACE2. Science. 2020;367: 1444–1448. doi: 10.1126/science.abb2762 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Yang J, Petitjean SJL, Koehler M, Zhang Q, Dumitru AC, Chen W, et al. Molecular interaction and inhibition of SARS-CoV-2 binding to the ACE2 receptor. Nat Commun. 2020;11: 4541. doi: 10.1038/s41467-020-18319-6 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Belouzard S, Chu VC, Whittaker GR. Activation of the SARS coronavirus spike protein via sequential proteolytic cleavage at two distinct sites. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2009;106: 5871–5876. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0809524106 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Xia S, Lan Q, Su S, Wang X, Xu W, Liu Z, et al. The role of furin cleavage site in SARS-CoV-2 spike protein-mediated membrane fusion in the presence or absence of trypsin. Signal Transduct Target Ther. 2020;5: 92. doi: 10.1038/s41392-020-0184-0 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Madu IG, Roth SL, Belouzard S, Whittaker GR. Characterization of a highly conserved domain within the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus spike protein S2 domain with characteristics of a viral fusion peptide. J Virol. 2009;83: 7411–7421. doi: 10.1128/JVI.00079-09 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Bestle D, Heindl MR, Limburg H, Van Lam van T, Pilgram O, Moulton H, et al. TMPRSS2 and furin are both essential for proteolytic activation of SARS-CoV-2 in human airway cells. Life Sci alliance. 2020;3. doi: 10.26508/lsa.202000786 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Ou X, Liu Y, Lei X, Li P, Mi D, Ren L, et al. Characterization of spike glycoprotein of SARS-CoV-2 on virus entry and its immune cross-reactivity with SARS-CoV. Nat Commun. 2020;11: 1620. doi: 10.1038/s41467-020-15562-9 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Luczo JM, Stambas J, Durr PA, Michalski WP, Bingham J. Molecular pathogenesis of H5 highly pathogenic avian influenza: the role of the haemagglutinin cleavage site motif. Rev Med Virol. 2015;25: 406–430. doi: 10.1002/rmv.1846 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Suguitan ALJ, Matsuoka Y, Lau Y-F, Santos CP, Vogel L, Cheng LI, et al. The multibasic cleavage site of the hemagglutinin of highly pathogenic A/Vietnam/1203/2004 (H5N1) avian influenza virus acts as a virulence factor in a host-specific manner in mammals. J Virol. 2012;86: 2706–2714. doi: 10.1128/JVI.05546-11 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Chen J, Lee KH, Steinhauer DA, Stevens DJ, Skehel JJ, Wiley DC. Structure of the hemagglutinin precursor cleavage site, a determinant of influenza pathogenicity and the origin of the labile conformation. Cell. 1998;95: 409–417. doi: 10.1016/s0092-8674(00)81771-7 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Walls AC, Park Y-J, Tortorici MA, Wall A, McGuire AT, Veesler D. Structure, Function, and Antigenicity of the SARS-CoV-2 Spike Glycoprotein. Cell. 2020;181: 281–292.e6. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2020.02.058 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Walker JA, Molloy SS, Thomas G, Sakaguchi T, Yoshida T, Chambers TM, et al. Sequence specificity of furin, a proprotein-processing endoprotease, for the hemagglutinin of a virulent avian influenza virus. J Virol. 1994;68: 1213–1218. doi: 10.1128/JVI.68.2.1213-1218.1994 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Shiryaev SA, Chernov A V, Golubkov VS, Thomsen ER, Chudin E, Chee MS, et al. High-resolution analysis and functional mapping of cleavage sites and substrate proteins of furin in the human proteome. PLoS One. 2013;8: e54290. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0054290 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Hoffmann M, Kleine-Weber H, Pöhlmann S. A Multibasic Cleavage Site in the Spike Protein of SARS-CoV-2 Is Essential for Infection of Human Lung Cells. Mol Cell. 2020;78: 779–784.e5. doi: 10.1016/j.molcel.2020.04.022 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Wrobel AG, Benton DJ, Xu P, Roustan C, Martin SR, Rosenthal PB, et al. SARS-CoV-2 and bat RaTG13 spike glycoprotein structures inform on virus evolution and furin-cleavage effects. Nat Struct Mol Biol. 2020;27: 763–767. doi: 10.1038/s41594-020-0468-7 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Lau S-Y, Wang P, Mok BW-Y, Zhang AJ, Chu H, Lee AC-Y, et al. Attenuated SARS-CoV-2 variants with deletions at the S1/S2 junction. Emerg Microbes Infect. 2020;9: 837–842. doi: 10.1080/22221751.2020.1756700 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Gupta K, Toelzer C, Williamson MK, Shoemark DK, Oliveira ASF, Matthews DA, et al. Structural basis for cell-type specific evolution of viral fitness by SARS-CoV-2. bioRxiv. 2021; 2021.05.11.443384. doi: 10.1101/2021.05.11.443384 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Schneider WM, Chevillotte MD, Rice CM. Interferon-stimulated genes: A complex web of host defenses. Annual Review of Immunology. Laboratory of Virology and Infectious Disease, Rockefeller University, New York, NY: 10065, United States: Annual Reviews Inc.; 2014. pp. 513–545. doi: 10.1146/annurev-immunol-032713-120231 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Doyle T, Moncorgé O, Bonaventure B, Pollpeter D, Lussignol M, Tauziet M, et al. The interferon-inducible isoform of NCOA7 inhibits endosome-mediated viral entry. Nat Microbiol. 2018;3: 1369–1376. doi: 10.1038/s41564-018-0273-9 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Shao W, Halachmi S, Brown M. ERAP140, a Conserved Tissue-Specific Nuclear Receptor Coactivator. Mol Cell Biol. 2002;22: 3358 LP– 3372. doi: 10.1128/MCB.22.10.3358-3372.2002 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Durand M, Kolpak A, Farrell T, Elliott NA, Shao W, Brown M, et al. The OXR domain defines a conserved family of eukaryotic oxidation resistance proteins. BMC Cell Biol. 2007;8: 13. doi: 10.1186/1471-2121-8-13 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Yu L, Croze E, Yamaguchi KD, Tran T, Reder AT, Litvak V, et al. Induction of a Unique Isoform of the NCOA7 Oxidation Resistance Gene by Interferon β-1b. J Interf Cytokine Res. 2014;35: 186–199. doi: 10.1089/jir.2014.0115 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Daniloski Z, Jordan TX, Wessels H-H, Hoagland DA, Kasela S, Legut M, et al. Identification of Required Host Factors for SARS-CoV-2 Infection in Human Cells. Cell. 2021;184: 92–105.e16. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2020.10.030 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Wei J, Alfajaro MM, DeWeirdt PC, Hanna RE, Lu-Culligan WJ, Cai WL, et al. Genome-wide CRISPR Screens Reveal Host Factors Critical for SARS-CoV-2 Infection. Cell. 2021;184: 76–91.e13. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2020.10.028 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Wang R, Simoneau CR, Kulsuptrakul J, Bouhaddou M, Travisano KA, Hayashi JM, et al. Genetic Screens Identify Host Factors for SARS-CoV-2 and Common Cold Coronaviruses. Cell. 2021;184: 106–119.e14. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2020.12.004 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Hillyer P, Shepard R, Uehling M, Krenz M, Sheikh F, Thayer KR, et al. Differential Responses by Human Respiratory Epithelial Cell Lines to Respiratory Syncytial Virus Reflect Distinct Patterns of Infection Control. J Virol. 2018;92: e02202–17. doi: 10.1128/JVI.02202-17 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Gan H, Hao Q, Idell S, Tang H. Transcription Factor Runx3 Is Induced by Influenza A Virus and Double-Strand RNA and Mediates Airway Epithelial Cell Apoptosis. Sci Rep. 2015;5: 17916. doi: 10.1038/srep17916 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Wang S, Qiu Z, Hou Y, Deng X, Xu W, Zheng T, et al. AXL is a candidate receptor for SARS-CoV-2 that promotes infection of pulmonary and bronchial epithelial cells. Cell Res. 2021;31: 126–140. doi: 10.1038/s41422-020-00460-y [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Brandao-Rangel MAR, Melamed D, Silva-Reis A, Brill B, Santos Zamarioli L dos, Oliveira CR, et al. Virlaza Inhibits Sars-COV-2-induced Inflammatory Response of Bronchial Epithelial Cells and Pulmonary Fibroblast. medRxiv. 2021; 2021.07.17.21260123. doi: 10.1101/2021.07.17.21260123 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Rasmussen I, Vilhardt F. Macropinocytosis is the entry mechanism of amphotropic murine leukemia virus. J Virol. 2015;89: 1851–1866. doi: 10.1128/JVI.02343-14 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Sakai T, Ohuchi M, Imai M, Mizuno T, Kawasaki K, Kuroda K, et al. Dual wavelength imaging allows analysis of membrane fusion of influenza virus inside cells. J Virol. 2006;80: 2013–2018. doi: 10.1128/JVI.80.4.2013-2018.2006 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Hou YJ, Chiba S, Halfmann P, Ehre C, Kuroda M, Dinnon KH 3rd, et al. SARS-CoV-2 D614G variant exhibits efficient replication ex vivo and transmission in vivo. Science. 2020;370: 1464–1468. doi: 10.1126/science.abe8499 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Plante JA, Liu Y, Liu J, Xia H, Johnson BA, Lokugamage KG, et al. Spike mutation D614G alters SARS-CoV-2 fitness. Nature. 2020. doi: 10.1038/s41586-020-2895-3 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Zhang L, Jackson CB, Mou H, Ojha A, Peng H, Quinlan BD, et al. SARS-CoV-2 spike-protein D614G mutation increases virion spike density and infectivity. Nat Commun. 2020;11: 6013. doi: 10.1038/s41467-020-19808-4 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Tegally H, Wilkinson E, Giovanetti M, Iranzadeh A, Fonseca V, Giandhari J, et al. Detection of a SARS-CoV-2 variant of concern in South Africa. Nature. 2021;592: 438–443. doi: 10.1038/s41586-021-03402-9 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Rambaut A, Loman N, Pybus O, Barclay W, Barrett J, Carabelli A, et al. Preliminary genomic characterisation of an emergent SARS-CoV-2 lineage in the UK defined by a novel set of spike mutations. VirologicalOrg. 2020. [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Sabino EC, Buss LF, Carvalho MPS, Prete CAJ, Crispim MAE, Fraiji NA, et al. Resurgence of COVID-19 in Manaus, Brazil, despite high seroprevalence. Lancet (London, England). 2021;397: 452–455. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(21)00183-5 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Faria NR, Claro IM, Candido D, Franco LAM, Andrade PS, Thais M, et al. Genomic characterisation of an emergent SARS-CoV-2 lineage in Manaus: preliminary findings. VirologicalOrg. 2021. [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Buss LF, Prete CAJ, Abrahim CMM, Mendrone AJ, Salomon T, de Almeida-Neto C, et al. Three-quarters attack rate of SARS-CoV-2 in the Brazilian Amazon during a largely unmitigated epidemic. Science. 2021;371: 288–292. doi: 10.1126/science.abe9728 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Brown JC, Goldhill DH, Zhou J, Peacock TP, Frise R, Goonawardane N, et al. Increased transmission of SARS-CoV-2 lineage B.1.1.7 (VOC 2020212/01) is not accounted for by a replicative advantage in primary airway cells or antibody escape. bioRxiv. 2021; 2021.02.24.432576. doi: 10.1101/2021.02.24.432576 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Li W, Moore MJ, Vasilieva N, Sui J, Wong SK, Berne MA, et al. Angiotensin-converting enzyme 2 is a functional receptor for the SARS coronavirus. Nature. 2003;426: 450–454. doi: 10.1038/nature02145 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Hofmann H, Pyrc K, van der Hoek L, Geier M, Berkhout B, Pöhlmann S. Human coronavirus NL63 employs the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus receptor for cellular entry. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2005;102: 7988–7993. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0409465102 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Huang X, Dong W, Milewska A, Golda A, Qi Y, Zhu QK, et al. Human Coronavirus HKU1 Spike Protein Uses &lt;em&gt;O&lt;/em&gt;-Acetylated Sialic Acid as an Attachment Receptor Determinant and Employs Hemagglutinin-Esterase Protein as a Receptor-Destroying Enzyme. Perlman S, editor. J Virol. 2015;89: 7202 LP– 7213. doi: 10.1128/JVI.00854-15 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56.Vlasak R, Luytjes W, Spaan W, Palese P. Human and bovine coronaviruses recognize sialic acid-containing receptors similar to those of influenza C viruses. Proc Natl Acad Sci. 1988;85: 4526 LP– 4529. doi: 10.1073/pnas.85.12.4526 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57.Raj VS, Mou H, Smits SL, Dekkers DHW, Müller MA, Dijkman R, et al. Dipeptidyl peptidase 4 is a functional receptor for the emerging human coronavirus-EMC. Nature. 2013;495: 251–254. doi: 10.1038/nature12005 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 58.Wang G, Deering C, Macke M, Shao J, Burns R, Blau DM, et al. Human coronavirus 229E infects polarized airway epithelia from the apical surface. J Virol. 2000;74: 9234–9239. doi: 10.1128/jvi.74.19.9234-9239.2000 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 59.Ou T, Mou H, Zhang L, Ojha A, Choe H, Farzan M. Hydroxychloroquine-mediated inhibition of SARS-CoV-2 entry is attenuated by TMPRSS2. PLoS Pathog. 2021;17: e1009212. doi: 10.1371/journal.ppat.1009212 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 60.Jung E, Nam S, Oh H, Jun S, Ro H-J, Kim B, et al. Neutralization of Acidic Intracellular Vesicles by Niclosamide Inhibits Multiple Steps of the Dengue Virus Life Cycle In Vitro. Sci Rep. 2019;9: 8682. doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-45095-1 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 61.Mauvezin C, Neufeld TP. Bafilomycin A1 disrupts autophagic flux by inhibiting both V-ATPase-dependent acidification and Ca-P60A/SERCA-dependent autophagosome-lysosome fusion. Autophagy. 2015;11: 1437–1438. doi: 10.1080/15548627.2015.1066957 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 62.Murray EJ, Grisanti MS, Bentley G V, Murray SS. E64d, a membrane-permeable cysteine protease inhibitor, attenuates the effects of parathyroid hormone on osteoblasts in vitro. Metabolism. 1997;46: 1090–1094. doi: 10.1016/s0026-0495(97)90284-5 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 63.Johnson BA, Xie X, Bailey AL, Kalveram B, Lokugamage KG, Muruato A, et al. Loss of furin cleavage site attenuates SARS-CoV-2 pathogenesis. Nature. 2021;591: 293–299. doi: 10.1038/s41586-021-03237-4 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 64.Braun E, Sauter D. Furin-mediated protein processing in infectious diseases and cancer. Clin Transl Immunol. 2019;8: e1073. doi: 10.1002/cti2.1073 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 65.Ribero MS, Jouvenet N, Dreux M, Nisole S. Interplay between SARS-CoV-2 and the type I interferon response. PLoS Pathogens. 2020. doi: 10.1371/journal.ppat.1008737 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 66.Lei X, Dong X, Ma R, Wang W, Xiao X, Tian Z, et al. Activation and evasion of type I interferon responses by SARS-CoV-2. Nat Commun. 2020;11: 3810. doi: 10.1038/s41467-020-17665-9 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 67.Thorne LG, Reuschl A-K, Zuliani-Alvarez L, Whelan MVX, Turner J, Noursadeghi M, et al. SARS-CoV-2 sensing by RIG-I and MDA5 links epithelial infection to macrophage inflammation. EMBO J. 2021/07/02. 2021;40: e107826–e107826. doi: 10.15252/embj.2021107826 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 68.Rebendenne A, Valadão ALC, Tauziet M, Maarifi G, Bonaventure B, McKellar J, et al. SARS-CoV-2 triggers an MDA-5-dependent interferon response which is unable to control replication in lung epithelial cells. J Virol. 2021;95. doi: 10.1128/JVI.02415-20 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 69.Zhang Q, Bastard P, Liu Z, Le Pen J, Moncada-Velez M, Chen J, et al. Inborn errors of type I IFN immunity in patients with life-threatening COVID-19. Science (80-). 2020;370: eabd4570. doi: 10.1126/science.abd4570 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 70.Blanco-Melo D, Nilsson-Payant BE, Liu WC, Uhl S, Hoagland D, Møller R, et al. Imbalanced Host Response to SARS-CoV-2 Drives Development of COVID-19. Cell. 2020. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2020.04.026 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 71.Emanuel W, Kirstin M, Vedran F, Asija D, Theresa GL, Roberto A, et al. Transcriptomic profiling of SARS-CoV-2 infected human cell lines identifies HSP90 as target for COVID-19 therapy. iScience. 2021. doi: 10.1016/j.isci.2021.102151 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 72.Sun J, Ye F, Wu A, Yang R, Pan M, Sheng J, et al. Comparative Transcriptome Analysis Reveals the Intensive Early Stage Responses of Host Cells to SARS-CoV-2 Infection. Front Microbiol. 2020. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2020.593857 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 73.Lokugamage KG, Hage A, de Vries M, Valero-Jimenez AM, Schindewolf C, Dittmann M, et al. Type I Interferon Susceptibility Distinguishes SARS-CoV-2 from SARS-CoV. J Virol. 2020;94: e01410–20. doi: 10.1128/JVI.01410-20 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 74.Mantlo E, Bukreyeva N, Maruyama J, Paessler S, Huang C. Antiviral activities of type I interferons to SARS-CoV-2 infection. Antiviral Res. 2020. doi: 10.1016/j.antiviral.2020.104811 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 75.Pfaender S, Mar KB, Michailidis E, Kratzel A, Boys IN, V’kovski P, et al. LY6E impairs coronavirus fusion and confers immune control of viral disease. Nat Microbiol. 2020;5: 1330–1339. doi: 10.1038/s41564-020-0769-y [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 76.Zang R, Case JB, Yutuc E, Ma X, Shen S, Gomez Castro MF, et al. Cholesterol 25-hydroxylase suppresses SARS-CoV-2 replication by blocking membrane fusion. Proc Natl Acad Sci. 2020;117: 32105 LP– 32113. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2012197117 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 77.Shi G, Kenney AD, Kudryashova E, Zani A, Zhang L, Lai KK, et al. Opposing activities of IFITM proteins in SARS-CoV-2 infection. EMBO J. 2021;40: e106501. doi: 10.15252/embj.2020106501 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 78.Buchrieser J, Dufloo J, Hubert M, Monel B, Planas D, Rajah MM, et al. Syncytia formation by SARS-CoV-2-infected cells. EMBO J. 2020;39: e106267. doi: 10.15252/embj.2020106267 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 79.Winstone H, Lista MJ, Reid AC, Bouton C, Pickering S, Galao RP, et al. The polybasic cleavage site in the SARS-CoV-2 spike modulates viral sensitivity to Type I interferon and IFITM2. J Virol. 2021;95: JVI.02422-20. doi: 10.1128/JVI.02422-20 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 80.Wölfel R, Corman VM, Guggemos W, Seilmaier M, Zange S, Müller MA, et al. Virological assessment of hospitalized patients with COVID-2019. Nature. 2020;581: 465–469. doi: 10.1038/s41586-020-2196-x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 81.Mokhtari T, Hassani F, Ghaffari N, Ebrahimi B, Yarahmadi A, Hassanzadeh G. COVID-19 and multiorgan failure: A narrative review on potential mechanisms. J Mol Histol. 2020;51: 613–628. doi: 10.1007/s10735-020-09915-3 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 82.Papa G, Mallery DL, Albecka A, Welch LG, Cattin-Ortolá J, Luptak J, et al. Furin cleavage of SARS-CoV-2 Spike promotes but is not essential for infection and cell-cell fusion. PLoS Pathog. 2021;17: e1009246. doi: 10.1371/journal.ppat.1009246 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 83.Shang J, Wan Y, Luo C, Ye G, Geng Q, Auerbach A, et al. Cell entry mechanisms of SARS-CoV-2. Proc Natl Acad Sci. 2020;117: 11727 LP– 11734. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2003138117 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 84.Mykytyn AZ, Breugem TI, Riesebosch S, Schipper D, van den Doel PB, Rottier RJ, et al. SARS-CoV-2 entry into human airway organoids is serine protease-mediated and facilitated by the multibasic cleavage site. Elife. 2021;10. doi: 10.7554/eLife.64508 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 85.Peacock TP, Goldhill DH, Zhou J, Baillon L, Frise R, Swann OC, et al. The furin cleavage site in the SARS-CoV-2 spike protein is required for transmission in ferrets. Nat Microbiol. 2021;6: 899–909. doi: 10.1038/s41564-021-00908-w [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 86.Lamers MM, Mykytyn AZ, Breugem TI, Wang Y, Wu DC, Riesebosch S, et al. Human airway cells prevent SARS-CoV-2 multibasic cleavage site cell culture adaptation. Elife. 2021;10. doi: 10.7554/eLife.66815 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 87.Millet JK, Whittaker GR. Host cell entry of Middle East respiratory syndrome coronavirus after two-step, furin-mediated activation of the spike protein. Proc Natl Acad Sci. 2014;111: 15214 LP– 15219. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1407087111 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 88.Shirato K, Kawase M, Matsuyama S. Wild-type human coronaviruses prefer cell-surface TMPRSS2 to endosomal cathepsins for cell entry. Virology. 2018;517: 9–15. doi: 10.1016/j.virol.2017.11.012 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 89.Coutard B, Valle C, de Lamballerie X, Canard B, Seidah NG, Decroly E. The spike glycoprotein of the new coronavirus 2019-nCoV contains a furin-like cleavage site absent in CoV of the same clade. Antiviral Res. 2020;176: 104742. doi: 10.1016/j.antiviral.2020.104742 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 90.Ghosh S, Dellibovi-Ragheb TA, Kerviel A, Pak E, Qiu Q, Fisher M, et al. β-Coronaviruses Use Lysosomes for Egress Instead of the Biosynthetic Secretory Pathway. Cell. 2020;183: 1520–1535.e14. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2020.10.039 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 91.Gordon DE, Jang GM, Bouhaddou M, Xu J, Obernier K, White KM, et al. A SARS-CoV-2 protein interaction map reveals targets for drug repurposing. Nature. 2020;583: 459–468. doi: 10.1038/s41586-020-2286-9 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 92.Temperton NJ, Chan PK, Simmons G, Zambon MC, Tedder RS, Takeuchi Y, et al. Longitudinally profiling neutralizing antibody response to SARS coronavirus with pseudotypes. Emerg Infect Dis. 2005;11: 411–416. doi: 10.3201/eid1103.040906 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 93.Graham C, Seow J, Huettner I, Khan H, Kouphou N, Acors S, et al. Neutralization potency of monoclonal antibodies recognizing dominant and subdominant epitopes on SARS-CoV-2 Spike is impacted by the B.1.1.7 variant. Immunity. 2021;54: 1276–1289.e6. doi: 10.1016/j.immuni.2021.03.023 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 94.Zufferey R, Nagy D, Mandel RJ, Naldini L, Trono D. Multiply attenuated lentiviral vector achieves efficient gene delivery in vivo. Nat Biotechnol. 1997;15: 871–5. doi: 10.1038/nbt0997-871 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 95.Vermeire J, Naessens E, Vanderstraeten H, Landi A, Iannucci V, van Nuffel A, et al. Quantification of Reverse Transcriptase Activity by Real-Time PCR as a Fast and Accurate Method for Titration of HIV, Lenti- and Retroviral Vectors. PLoS One. 2012;7: e50859. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0050859 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 96.Davidson AD, Williamson MK, Lewis S, Shoemark D, Carroll MW, Heesom KJ, et al. Characterisation of the transcriptome and proteome of SARS-CoV-2 reveals a cell passage induced in-frame deletion of the furin-like cleavage site from the spike glycoprotein. Genome Med. 2020;12: 68. doi: 10.1186/s13073-020-00763-0 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 97.Rihn SJ, Merits A, Bakshi S, Turnbull ML, Wickenhagen A, Alexander AJT, et al. A plasmid DNA-launched SARS-CoV-2 reverse genetics system and coronavirus toolkit for COVID-19 research. PLOS Biol. 2021;19: e3001091. Available: doi: 10.1371/journal.pbio.3001091 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Decision Letter 0

Benhur Lee

5 Aug 2021

Dear Prof. Malim,

Thank you very much for submitting your manuscript "TMPRSS2 promotes SARS-CoV-2 evasion from NCOA7-mediated restriction" for consideration at PLOS Pathogens. As with all papers reviewed by the journal, your manuscript was reviewed by members of the editorial board and by several independent reviewers. In light of the reviews (below this email), we would like to invite the resubmission of a significantly-revised version that takes into account the reviewers' comments.

Please pay particular attention to central themes across the several reviews:

(1) The lack of any statistics  was noted by all four reviewers and must be rectified this age of rigor and reproducibility. For that matter, I agree that a more quantifiable way of measuring virus input is required for cross-comparison across experiments and figures (Reviewer 2).

(2) At the the end of the day, it is still unclear how the interplay between furin cleavage site and TMPRSS2 activity  modulates NCOA7 restriction of SARS2 infection (Reviewers1 and 4). Sone of the data provided appear counter-intuitive. Instead of speculation, I urged the authors to provide data that directly link how enhanced acidification or proteolysis impacts on coronavirus fusion.    

(3) Since SARS2 entry into airway epithelial cells expressing ACE2 and TMPRSS2 are most physiologically relevant, the authors should provide data on cell lines accepted to be more physiological mimics of of airway epithelial cells (e.g. Calu-3) or primary airway epithelial cells (even if it is for the key experiments to support the authors main point). Concerns from Reviewers 3 and 4 should be taken seriously in this regard. 

We cannot make any decision about publication until we have seen the revised manuscript and your response to the reviewers' comments. Your revised manuscript is also likely to be sent to reviewers for further evaluation.

When you are ready to resubmit, please upload the following:

[1] A letter containing a detailed list of your responses to the review comments and a description of the changes you have made in the manuscript. Please note while forming your response, if your article is accepted, you may have the opportunity to make the peer review history publicly available. The record will include editor decision letters (with reviews) and your responses to reviewer comments. If eligible, we will contact you to opt in or out.

[2] Two versions of the revised manuscript: one with either highlights or tracked changes denoting where the text has been changed; the other a clean version (uploaded as the manuscript file).

Important additional instructions are given below your reviewer comments.

Please prepare and submit your revised manuscript within 60 days. If you anticipate any delay, please let us know the expected resubmission date by replying to this email. Please note that revised manuscripts received after the 60-day due date may require evaluation and peer review similar to newly submitted manuscripts.

Thank you again for your submission. We hope that our editorial process has been constructive so far, and we welcome your feedback at any time. Please don't hesitate to contact us if you have any questions or comments.

Sincerely,

Benhur Lee

Section Editor

PLOS Pathogens

Benhur Lee

Section Editor

PLOS Pathogens

Kasturi Haldar

Editor-in-Chief

PLOS Pathogens

​orcid.org/0000-0001-5065-158X

Michael Malim

Editor-in-Chief

PLOS Pathogens

orcid.org/0000-0002-7699-2064

***********************

Reviewer's Responses to Questions

Part I - Summary

Please use this section to discuss strengths/weaknesses of study, novelty/significance, general execution and scholarship.

Reviewer #1: Previously, the authors identified an interferon (IFN) inducible gene, NCOA7, that inhibits entry of viruses via the endo-lysosome pathway. SARS-CoV-2 primarily enters host cells by fusing with the plasma membrane wherein transmembrane serine protease TMPRSS2 processes the viral spike protein to facilitate viral entry (1, 2). However, SARS-CoV-2 can also enter cells through the endo-lysosome pathway where cathepsins process the spike protein (2). Using lung epithelial A549 cells expressing the ACE2 receptor, the authors show that in the absence of TMPRSS2, overexpressing NCOA7 decreases SARS-CoV-2 infection. However, in the presence of TMPRSS2, the inhibition mediated by NCOA7 is attenuated. The authors conclude NCOA7 controls SARS-CoV-2 infection only when the virus enters the cell through the endo-lysosomal pathway. It was noted that in comparison to SARS-CoV-2, NCOA7 restriction of infection was not as pronounced with SARS-CoV-1. A major difference between the two viruses is the presence of a polybasic furin cleavage site in SARS-CoV-2 which enables initial processing of the spike protein in the Golgi network during virus production (2). Therefore, the authors investigated the role of the furin cleavage site in NCOA7 mediated restriction. Deletion of the furin cleavage site in SARS-CoV-2 decreased NCOA7 restriction. Conversely, addition of a furin cleavage site to SARS-CoV-1 enhanced NCOA7 restriction of the virus. The authors suggest the furin cleavage site sensitizes SARS-CoV-2 to NCOA7 inhibition within the endo-lysosomal pathway so the virus preferentially exploits TMPRSS2 to enter the host cell at the plasma membrane.

1. V’kovski, P., Kratzel, A., Steiner, S. et al. Coronavirus biology and replication: implications for SARS-CoV-2. Nat Rev Microbiol 19, 155–170 (2021).

2. Peacock, T.P., Goldhill, D.H., Zhou, J. et al. The furin cleavage site in the SARS-CoV-2 spike protein is required for transmission in ferrets. Nat Microbiol 6, 899–909 (2021).

3. Hoffmann, M., Kleine-Weber, H., Pöhlmann, S. A Multibasic Cleavage Site in the Spike Protein of SARS-CoV-2 Is Essential for Infection of Human Lung Cells. Mol Cell 78, 779-784 (2020).

4. Johnson, B.A., Xie, X., Bailey, A.L. et al. Loss of furin cleavage site attenuates SARS-CoV-2 pathogenesis. Nature 591, 293–299 (2021).

5. Lei, X., Dong, X., Ma, R. et al. Activation and evasion of type I interferon responses by SARS-CoV-2. Nat Commun 11, 3810 (2020).

Reviewer #2: In this work, the authors test the role of NCOA7 broadly for restriction of human coronaviruses. Despite its broad efficacy, the overexpression of TMPRSS2 or removal of the spike poly-basic cleavage site can help to avoid this restriction. The authors suggest that viral acquisition of a furin cleavage site and use of the co-receptor may have been selected for to avoid the suppressive effects of interferon. Understanding restriction of coronaviruses is an important topic and this study is well suited for this journal. While the experiments appear to be well-performed from a technical perspective, the lack of statistical analysis makes many of the conclusions drawn by the authors difficult to evaluate. Further, previous work on this restriction factor would allow one to predict with high confidence the results of this study, potentially limiting the impact of this work. My specific comments are below.

Reviewer #3: This is an interesting study of an interferon-stimulated gene and its potential role as a restriction factor for SARS-CoV-2 and other coronaviruses. NCOA7 acts within the endolysosomal pathway and would thus be expected to affect pseudovirus entry only when a) SARS-CoV-2 enters via that route or b) if somehow endolysosomal trafficking alters cell-surface expression of other entry factors. The major weakness of this study is its reliance on the A549 cell line, which is not a preferred model for SARS-CoV-2 infection. The results should be compared with NCOA7 effects on entry in Calu-3 cells or primary human respiratory epithelial cells. One might anticipate that the effects could be attenuated in Calu-3 because of the increased effect of TMPRSS2 in those cells, which the authors note reduces the NCOA7 effects observed.

Broadly, this line of inquiry would be a useful addition to the literature. The major weaknesses of both significance and rigor come from limiting the experiments to a cell type that is not believed to reproduce key properties for SARS-CoV-2 entry.

Reviewer #4: Previous studies have identified two cellular entry pathways for SARS-CoV-2: a mechanism involving endocytosis, cathepsin-mediated cleavage of the viral spike protein (S) and fusion with endosome membranes occurs in many cell lines, whereas cell surface fusion triggered by the serine protease TMPRSS2 has been suggested to be the main mechanism for entry into epithelial cells in organoid models of the respiratory epithelium. The authors of this paper have previously identified an interferon inducible protein NCOA7 that restricts the entry of pH-dependent viruses that infect cells via endocytic routes. NCOA7 interacts with the v-ATPase responsible for the acidification of endocytic organelles and appears to enhance both acidification and the activity of lysosomal hydrolases. In this paper, the authors show that NCOA7 also antagonises SARS-CoV-2 (and other coronaviruses known to infect humans) when virus entry is restricted to the endocytic route. The work is topical and likely to be of interest to not only SARS-CoV-2 researchers, but to virologists and cell biologists in general. However, I do have a few concerns the authors should consider.

Using primarily a respiratory epithelial derived cell line, A549, the authors show that NCOA7 expression inhibits infection by SARS-CoV-2 and by pseudotype viruses expressing SARS-CoV-2 S; they show that interferon-alpha treated cells knocked out for NCOA7 are less well protected than wt cells. They also show that other human coronaviruses and pseudotype viruses expressing S proteins from SARS-CoV-2 variants of concern are similarly affected, and that expression of TMPRSS2 or deletion of the polybasic furin cleavage site reduces NCOA7 mediated inhibition of infection by 2-3 fold. Together, the data make a compelling case for NCOA7 being an interferon inducible antagonist of coronavirus entry via the endocytic route.

**********

Part II – Major Issues: Key Experiments Required for Acceptance

Please use this section to detail the key new experiments or modifications of existing experiments that should be absolutely required to validate study conclusions.

Generally, there should be no more than 3 such required experiments or major modifications for a "Major Revision" recommendation. If more than 3 experiments are necessary to validate the study conclusions, then you are encouraged to recommend "Reject".

Reviewer #1: 1. Mechanistically, it is unclear how the presence of a furin cleavage site enhances NCOA7 restriction of SARS-CoV-2. Acquisition of the furin cleavage site is believed to be directly correlated with increased virus replication pathogenicity (3,4). If the furin cleavage site is negatively affecting the virus as the authors propose, why does the virus maintain this polybasic site?

2. SARS-CoV-2 encodes mechanisms to block and delay IFN production (5). What is the biological significance of IFN inducible NCOA7 in cells that do not express TMPRSS2? Do these cells produce IFN early enough during infection to prevent viral entry?

3. Statistical analyses are lacking in all figures.

Reviewer #2: For all figures, it does not appear that any statistical analysis was ever performed, but in some cases the fold-change is displayed. The appropriate statistical analyses should be applied whenever a comparison is being drawn. Without it, it is almost impossible for a reader to determine if potential changes are meaningful (for example Fig 1G or H).

For many figures, the x-axis describes "Vector volume" to indicate the magnitude of the pseudo typed virus inoculum. While I understand this is convenient, it makes it difficult to compare between viruses. And in some cases, this concern is important evaluate the author's conclusions. For example, Figure 1D and E, we are expected to conclude that NCOA7 restricts SARS-2 but not MLV, however the pseudo virus packaging could have been much more efficient for MLV and a dramatically higher "MOI" could overwhelm restriction. A more standardized quantification such as p24 ELISA would help alleviate this concern.

Figure 3: The cross-experiment comparisons for panels C,D and E,F are not convincing. These comparisons must be done within the same experiment (side-by-side) for a reader to appreciate if the difference between a 4X change in the absence of TMPRSS2 and a 2X change with TMPRSS2 is meaningful or the result of variability between experiments.

SARS-CoV-2 has been demonstrated to not induce strong interferon responses; this seems at odds with the authors suggestion that IFN-induced NCOA7 may have been a strong selection pressure on the virus. This should be discussed.

Reviewer #3: Repeat results in Calu-3 or primary human respiratory epithelial cultures

Reviewer #4: One issue I have with this work is the mechanism of NCOA7 action. To me it seems somewhat counter intuitive that a protein that enhances acidification and lysosomal activity should inhibit entry of a virus that relies on these activities to trigger fusion. The authors argue that excess or premature acidification negatively affects the ability of the virus to undergo fusion. While this may be true for influenza virus, as indicated in their previous paper, the key event for SARS-CoV-2 fusion is proteolytic cleavage of S, and there is no data in this paper to indicate that enhanced acidification/proteolysis impacts on coronavirus fusion.

Secondly, the authors argue that the presence of the furin cleavage site may have allowed the virus to use TMPRSS2 and a cell surface route of entry to evade NCOA7-mediated restriction. It seems to me that the virus without a furin cleavage site can still infect cells by a TMPRSS2 dependent route (Figs 3F and 5), albeit less efficiently. What the furin cleavage site may do is allow more efficient TMPRSS2-mediated activation of S. It’s worth noting that TMPRSS2 expression also reduces NCOA7 inhibition of SARS-1 infection – a virus that lacks the polybasic furin cleavage site? Polybasic cleavage sites do occur in other viruses (e.g. flu), with no obvious impact on the site and underlying mechanism of fusion, as far as I am aware, i.e. for flu at least, there is no evidence the acquisition of a furin cleavage site is linked to escape from NCOA7 mediate restriction.

As entry into respiratory epithelial cells in organoid systems, seems to occur primarily by TMPRSS2-mediated cell surface fusion, does NCOA7 play any role in controlling virus infection and spread in primary tissues, in particular the respiratory epithelium?

**********

Part III – Minor Issues: Editorial and Data Presentation Modifications

Please use this section for editorial suggestions as well as relatively minor modifications of existing data that would enhance clarity.

Reviewer #1: 1. In figure 4, relative light units (RLUs) for control samples are vastly different. For example, RLUs in figure 4B for A549-ACE2 untreated cells without TMPRSS2 are slightly above 103. In figure 4C, the same conditions (A549-ACE2 untreated cells without TMPRSS2) yield 104 RLUs.

2. In figures 1F and 1E, are the cells being treated with IFN� or IFN�? The figure axes are labeled IFN�, but the figure legends state the cells are treated with IFN�.

Reviewer #2: Figure 5E, the text is non-visible in the figure legends, I assume the authors are indicating microliters. Same comment for Sup Fig 1 C,D

Reviewer #3: Biosafety precautions for replication-competent SARS-CoV-2 should be stated explicitly.

"Each experiment shown is representative of three independent experiments." - if this statement were literally true, it would be unacceptable. However, it appears that each experiment was performed in triplicate with the results of each plotted. If such is correct, please alter the statement to reflect this.

Reviewer #4: Given MLV also requires endocytosis for entry, though perhaps not acidification, and that NCOA7 increases lysosomal degradation, is it not a bit surprising that NCOA7 expression has no effect of MLV entry? Or is there a small effect? NB, Rasmussen I, Vilhardt F. describe the entry of MLV as macropinocytosis, not micropinocytosis.

Line 145. Can the authors speculate on why is B.1.351 S protein pseudotypes are less sensitive to NCOA7? Is there any evidence this is giving this VOC an advantage?

Why is there still a 2-3 fold effect of NCOA7 on SARS-2 infection in TMPRSS2 expressing cells? Does NCOA7 expression affect ACE2 and/or TMPRSS2 cell surface expression?

Do BafA, Niclosamide and/or E64D inhibit the effects of NCOA7?

Fig 5. The authors should show that the addition and removal of the polybasic cleavage site does impact on S protein cleavage in virus, or pseudotype, particles.

The authors should cite recent papers from the Haagmans lab.

A number of symbols in the figures need to be corrected (e.g. Fig . 1 F and G, X axis).

**********

PLOS authors have the option to publish the peer review history of their article (what does this mean?). If published, this will include your full peer review and any attached files.

If you choose “no”, your identity will remain anonymous but your review may still be made public.

Do you want your identity to be public for this peer review? For information about this choice, including consent withdrawal, please see our Privacy Policy.

Reviewer #1: Yes: Tatyana Golovkina

Reviewer #2: No

Reviewer #3: No

Reviewer #4: No

Figure Files:

While revising your submission, please upload your figure files to the Preflight Analysis and Conversion Engine (PACE) digital diagnostic tool, https://pacev2.apexcovantage.com. PACE helps ensure that figures meet PLOS requirements. To use PACE, you must first register as a user. Then, login and navigate to the UPLOAD tab, where you will find detailed instructions on how to use the tool. If you encounter any issues or have any questions when using PACE, please email us at figures@plos.org.

Data Requirements:

Please note that, as a condition of publication, PLOS' data policy requires that you make available all data used to draw the conclusions outlined in your manuscript. Data must be deposited in an appropriate repository, included within the body of the manuscript, or uploaded as supporting information. This includes all numerical values that were used to generate graphs, histograms etc.. For an example see here on PLOS Biology: http://www.plosbiology.org/article/info%3Adoi%2F10.1371%2Fjournal.pbio.1001908#s5.

Reproducibility:

To enhance the reproducibility of your results, we recommend that you deposit your laboratory protocols in protocols.io, where a protocol can be assigned its own identifier (DOI) such that it can be cited independently in the future. Additionally, PLOS ONE offers an option to publish peer-reviewed clinical study protocols. Read more information on sharing protocols at https://plos.org/protocols?utm_medium=editorial-email&utm_source=authorletters&utm_campaign=protocols

Decision Letter 1

Benhur Lee

9 Nov 2021

Dear Prof. Malim,

We are pleased to inform you that your manuscript 'TMPRSS2 promotes SARS-CoV-2 evasion from NCOA7-mediated restriction' has been provisionally accepted for publication in PLOS Pathogens.

Before your manuscript can be formally accepted you will need to complete some formatting changes, which you will receive in a follow up email. A member of our team will be in touch with a set of requests.

Please note that your manuscript will not be scheduled for publication until you have made the required changes, so a swift response is appreciated.

IMPORTANT: The editorial review process is now complete. PLOS will only permit corrections to spelling, formatting or significant scientific errors from this point onwards. Requests for major changes, or any which affect the scientific understanding of your work, will cause delays to the publication date of your manuscript.

Should you, your institution's press office or the journal office choose to press release your paper, you will automatically be opted out of early publication. We ask that you notify us now if you or your institution is planning to press release the article. All press must be co-ordinated with PLOS.

Thank you again for supporting Open Access publishing; we are looking forward to publishing your work in PLOS Pathogens.

Best regards,

Benhur Lee

Section Editor

PLOS Pathogens

Benhur Lee

Section Editor

PLOS Pathogens

Kasturi Haldar

Editor-in-Chief

PLOS Pathogens

​orcid.org/0000-0001-5065-158X

Michael Malim

Editor-in-Chief

PLOS Pathogens

orcid.org/0000-0002-7699-2064

***********************************************************

Reviewer Comments (if any, and for reference):

Acceptance letter

Benhur Lee

17 Nov 2021

Dear Prof. Malim,

We are delighted to inform you that your manuscript, "TMPRSS2 promotes SARS-CoV-2 evasion from NCOA7-mediated restriction," has been formally accepted for publication in PLOS Pathogens.

We have now passed your article onto the PLOS Production Department who will complete the rest of the pre-publication process. All authors will receive a confirmation email upon publication.

The corresponding author will soon be receiving a typeset proof for review, to ensure errors have not been introduced during production. Please review the PDF proof of your manuscript carefully, as this is the last chance to correct any scientific or type-setting errors. Please note that major changes, or those which affect the scientific understanding of the work, will likely cause delays to the publication date of your manuscript. Note: Proofs for Front Matter articles (Pearls, Reviews, Opinions, etc...) are generated on a different schedule and may not be made available as quickly.

Soon after your final files are uploaded, the early version of your manuscript, if you opted to have an early version of your article, will be published online. The date of the early version will be your article's publication date. The final article will be published to the same URL, and all versions of the paper will be accessible to readers.

Thank you again for supporting open-access publishing; we are looking forward to publishing your work in PLOS Pathogens.

Best regards,

Kasturi Haldar

Editor-in-Chief

PLOS Pathogens

​orcid.org/0000-0001-5065-158X

Michael Malim

Editor-in-Chief

PLOS Pathogens

orcid.org/0000-0002-7699-2064

Associated Data

    This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

    Supplementary Materials

    S1 Fig. NCOA7 inhibits SARS-CoV2 infection.

    (A) Immunoblot showing ACE2 expression in A549 cells after transduction with ACE2 expressing vector. Tubulin is included as a loading control. (B) Gating strategy for flow cytometry analysis of SARS-CoV-2 nucleocapsid (N) positive cells. Cells were distinguished from debris using the forward scatter (FCS, related to the cell size) and side scatter (SSC, related to the cell granularity). Selected population was gated for N positive cells (FITC channel) using uninfected cells as a negative control. SARS-CoV-2 infected cells were then gated for N. (C) BEAS-2B-ACE2 cells expressing E2crimson or NCOA7 were infected with SARS-CoV-2 Spike pseudotyped vector expressing luciferase. Luciferase activity was measured 48 h post-infection. (D) A549-ACE2 cells were infected with increasing volumes of wild-type (WT) or D614G SARS-CoV-2 Spike pseudotyped vectors expressing luciferase. Luciferase activity was measured 48 h post-infection. (E) A549-ACE2 cells were infected with increasing volumes of wild-type (WT), P.1, B.1.351 or B.1.1.7 SARS-CoV-2 Spike pseudotyped vectors expressing luciferase. Luciferase activity was measured 48 h post-infection. (F) A549-ACE2 cells expressing E2crimson or NCOA7 were infected with wild-type (WT) or D614G SARS-CoV-2 Spike pseudotyped vectors expressing luciferase. Luciferase activity was measured 48 h post-infection. (G) A549-ACE2 cells expressing E2crimson or NCOA7 were infected with wild-type (WT), P.1, B.1.351 or B.1.1.7 SARS-CoV-2 Spike pseudotyped vectors expressing luciferase. Luciferase activity was measured 48 h post-infection. (H) A549-ACE2 cells expressing E2crimson or NCOA7 were infected with SP-DiOC18 labelled SARS-CoV-2 for 1.5 h. SP-DiOC18 positive cells were enumerated by flow cytometry. (I) A549-ACE2 cells expressing E2crimson or NCOA7 were infected with SP-DiOC18 labelled SARS-CoV-2 Spike pseudotyped vector for 1.5 h. SP-DiOC18 positive cells were enumerated by flow cytometry. (C, H, I) analysed using two-way ANOVA. * (p<0.05), ** (p<0.01), *** (p<0.001), **** (p<0.0001).

    (TIF)

    Click here for additional data file. (2.6MB, tif)
    Attachment

    Submitted filename: 281021 NCOA7 rebuttal.docx

    Click here for additional data file. (235.3KB, docx)

    Data Availability Statement

    All relevant data are within the manuscript and its Supporting Information files.

    Articles from PLoS Pathogens are provided here courtesy of PLOS

    RESOURCES