Skip to main content
. 2021 Aug 2;26(12):e2143–e2150. doi: 10.1002/onco.13909

Table 1.

First‐line immunotherapy outcomes in the pivotal RCTs, real‐world studies, and present study

First author, year Study design (country) Drug Patients, n Age median (range) Gender: males, n (%) PS ≥ 2, n (%) CNS metastases, n (%) Median PFS, mo Median OS, mo 1‐year OS, %
Reck, 2016 & 2019 [11, 12] RCT, multicentric Pem 154 64.5 (33–90) 92 (59.7) 1 (0.6) 18 (11.7) 10.3 30.0 70.3
Ksienski, 2019 [34] Observational, multicentric (Canada) Pem 141 70.0 (41–91) a 97 (51.1) a 65 (34.2) a 26 (13.7) a 3.7 a 24.3 ND
Velcheti, 2019 [39] Observational, multicentric (U.S.) Pem 188 72.0 (46–84) 90 (47.9) 0 23 (12.2) 6.8 19.1 60.4
Amrane, 2019 [24] Observational, multicentric (France) Pem 108 67.0 (37–87) 70 (64.8) 25 (23.1) 19 (17.6) 10.1 15.2 ND
Tamiya, 2019 [32] Observational, multicentric (Japan) Pem 213 71 (39–91) 176 (82.6) 41 (19.2) ND 8.3 17.8 ND
Tambo, 2020 [40] Observational, multicentric (Japan) Pem 95 72.0 (51–89) 71 (74.7) 21 (22.1) ND 6.1 NR 58.3
Current study Observational, single center (Slovenia) Pem 26 65.5 (39–78) 16 (62.0) 3 (11.0) 4 (15.0) 9.3 NR 62.0
a

Reported for 190 patients, of which 49 were treated in second‐line setting.

Abbreviations: CNS, central nervous system; ND, no data; NR, not reached; OS, overall survival; Pem, pembrolizumab; PFS, progression‐free survival; PS, performance status; RCT, randomized clinical trial.