Skip to main content
Journal of Clinical Microbiology logoLink to Journal of Clinical Microbiology
. 2000 Apr;38(4):1581–1586. doi: 10.1128/jcm.38.4.1581-1586.2000

Characterization of Salmonella enterica Serovar Typhimurium DT104 Isolated from Denmark and Comparison with Isolates from Europe and the United States

D L Baggesen 1,*, D Sandvang 1, F M Aarestrup 1
PMCID: PMC86494  PMID: 10747147

Abstract

A total of 136 isolates of Salmonella enterica serovar Typhimurium DT104 from Denmark (n = 93), Germany (n = 10), Italy (n = 4), Spain (n = 5), and the United Kingdom (n = 9) were characterized by antimicrobial resistance analysis, plasmid profiling, pulsed-field gel electrophoresis (PFGE) with the restriction enzymes XbaI and BlnI, and analysis for the presence of integrons and antibiotic resistance genes. The isolates from Denmark were from nine pig herds, while the isolates from other countries were both of animal and of human origin. All but 10 isolates were resistant to ampicillin, chloramphenicol, spectinomycin, streptomycin, sulfonamides, and tetracycline. Five isolates from the United Kingdom and Spain were sensitive to all antibiotics examined, whereas four isolates from the United Kingdom and the United States were also resistant to one or more of the antibiotics, namely, gentamicin, neomycin, and trimethoprim. All but two strains had the same PFGE profiles when the XbaI restriction enzyme was used, while seven different profiles were observed when the BlnI restriction enzyme was used. Different dominating BlnI types were observed among European isolates compared with the types observed among those from the United States. All the isolates harbored common 95-kb plasmids either alone or in combination with smaller plasmids, and a total of 11 different plasmid profiles were observed. Furthermore, all but one of the multidrug-resistant isolates contained two integrons, ant (3")-Ia and pse-1. Sensitive isolates contained no integrons, and isolates that were resistant to spectinomycin, streptomycin, and sulfonamides had only one integron containing ant (3")-Ia. When restriction enzyme BlnI was used, the 14 isolates from one of the nine herds in Denmark showed unique profiles, whereas isolates from the remaining herds were homogeneous. Among isolates from seven of nine herds, the same plasmid profile (95 kb) was observed, but isolates from two herds had different profiles. Thus, either PFGE (with BlnI) or plasmid profiling could distinguish isolates from three of nine pig herds in Denmark. The epidemiological markers (antimicrobial susceptibility testing, plasmid profiling, and PFGE) applied demonstrated high in vivo stability in the Danish herds. This may indicate that some different strains of multidrug-resistant S. enterica serovar Typhimurium DT104 have been introduced into Danish food animal herds. The presence of isolates from six different countries with similar profiles by PFGE with XbaI and highly homogeneous profiles by PFGE with BlnI indicate that multidrug-resistant S. enterica serovar Typhimurium DT104 has probably been spread clonally in these countries. However, some minor variation could be observed by using plasmid profiling and profiling by PFGE with BlnI. Thus, a more sensitive technique for subtyping of strains of DT104 and a broader investigation may help in elucidating the epidemiological spread of DT104 in different parts of the world.


During the last few decades, infections with Salmonella enterica have been recognized as a major hazard to humans in most developed countries, and the main source of infections has been contaminated food of animal origin (11). The genus Salmonella covers more than 2,400 different serotypes (21), and although all serotypes must be considered potential human pathogens, only a limited number of serotypes are attributed to as the cause of infection in humans and animals. In addition, some specific clones of S. enterica have been very dominant in one or more host species and have been able to spread worldwide. The establishment and spread of S. enterica serovar Enteritidis PT4 and PT8 in poultry and humans and of multidrug-resistant S. enterica serovar Typhimurium DT204 and DT193 in cattle and humans are typical examples of this (25, 26, 29).

In the 1990s, a new multidrug-resistant strain of S. enterica serovar Typhimurium, strain DT104, emerged and was first recognized in the United Kingdom (31), but in the following years the strain has been isolated in other countries as well, such as Germany (1), the United States (6), Canada (22), Italy (27), Belgium (15), Israel (19), and Denmark (5). However, this type may occur more widely, as all countries do not have an organized salmonella surveillance system that reports the resistance patterns and phage types of S. enterica strains isolated from different sources. The multidrug-resistant strain S. enterica serovar Typhimurium DT104 was initially characterized as having chromosomally located genes for resistance to ampicillin, chloramphenicol, streptomycin, sulfonamides, and tetracycline (resistance type, ACSSuT), but in recent years strains with additional resistance or decreased susceptibility to gentamicin, trimethoprim, and/or fluoroquinolones have been observed (17, 31, 32). Multidrug-resistant strain DT104 was originally isolated from cattle but has now been isolated from a wide range of animal host species (6, 17, 31), and the organism has become the second most common course of human salmonellosis after S. enterica serovar Enteritidis PT4 in the United Kingdom and Germany (1, 32).

The identification of multidrug-resistant S. enterica serovar Typhimurium DT104 in Danish food production animal herds in 1996 resulted in an agreement between animal producer organizations and veterinary authorities that contamination of foodstuffs of Danish origin with multidrug-resistant strain DT104 should be considered unacceptable (5). Therefore, the Danish salmonella surveillance system has been updated and adapted to identify infected animal herds aimed at eradicating multidrug-resistant strain DT104 from food production animal herds.

It would thus be important to investigate whether multidrug-resistant strain S. enterica serovar Typhimurium DT104 was introduced into Danish food production animal herds by imported animals or whether the resistance has emerged within the country as a result of selection of resistance genes. The aim of this study was to characterize multidrug-resistant S. enterica serovar Typhimurium DT104 isolated from Danish food production animal herds by the use of epidemiological markers and to compare these isolates with those from other countries in order to describe the clonality of these pathogens. In addition, selected antibiotic resistance genes have been characterized, and the localization of these genes has been investigated.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Bacterial isolates.

A total of 136 isolates of S. enterica serovar Typhimurium DT104 were included in this study. Ninety-three isolates originated from nine Danish food production animal herds that were infected in 1996, 1997, and early 1998. The number, origin, and period of isolation of the DT104 isolates from these nine herds are shown in Table 1. Approximately 19,000 pig herds were present in Denmark in 1998 (3). One herd (herd 1) was identified as DT104 positive following submission of material to the Danish Veterinary Laboratory for the diagnosis of clinical disease, whereas the remaining herds were subclinically infected and were identified through the ongoing surveillance program. The herds investigated were, to a certain degree, connected to each other, e.g., herds 1, 3, 4, 6, and 9, and were located within the same geographical area, but direct contact was known only between herds 3 and 4. Herds 5 and 7 were also located in the same area, but no contact between the two herds was known. Four isolates from an investigation of Danish pig herds during the years 1991 to 1995 were also included in this study.

TABLE 1.

Origin and characterization of multidrug-resistant S. enterica serovar Typhimurium DT104 isolates from Danish herds

Herd no. No. of isolates Period of isolation (mo.day.yr) Source(s) Characterization of the herd typea Stability of the herd type
HMb 1 1991 Pig Resistance profile, AmChSpStSuTe; PFGE profile, XbaI type I and BlnI type I; plasmid profile (approx. kb), 95, 2.2
HM 1 1994 Pig Resistance profile, SpStSu; PFGE profile, XbaI type I and BlnI type I; plasmid profile (approx. kb), 95
HM 1 1994 Pig Resistance profile, sensitive; PFGE profile, XbaI type I and BlnI type IV; plasmid profile (approx. kb): 95
HM 1 1995 Pig Resistance profile, sensitive; PFGE profile, XbaI type I and BlnI type IV; plasmid profile (approx. kb), 95
1 41 11.20.96–9.10.97 Pigs Resistance profile, AmChSpStSuTe; PFGE profile, XbaI type I and BlnI type I; plasmid profile (approx. kb), 95 One of 41 isolates had SpStSu resistance profile One of 41 isolates was BlnI type III
2 4 7.5.96–9.17.97 Pigs Resistance profile, AmChSpStSuTe; PFGE profile XbaI type I and BlnI type I; plasmid profile (approx. kb), 95 and 2.2 No variations in four isolates
3 2 1.19.96–5.9.97 Calf, pig Resistance profile, AmChSpStSuTe; PFGE profile, XbaI type I and BlnI type I; plasmid profile (approx. kb), 95 No variations in two isolates
4 2 8.6.96–5.12.97 Pigs Resistance profile, AmChSpStSuTe; PFGE profile, XbaI type I and BlnI type I; plasmid profile (approx. kb), 95 No variations in two isolates
5 20 3.10.97–11.7.97 Pigs, dog, environment Resistance profile, AmChSpStSuTe; PFGE profile, XbaI type I and BlnI type I; plasmid profile (approx. kb), 95 and 6.8 No variations in isolates from pigs or the environment One isolate from a dog with BlnI type X and plasmid profile of fragments of 115, 90, 4.4, and 3.0 kb
6 14 10.31.97–12.19.97 Pigs, cattle Resistance profile, AmChSpStSuTe; PFGE profile, XbaI type I and BlnI type V; plasmid profile (approx. kb), 95 No variations in 14 isolates
7 1 1.7.98 Pig Resistance profile, AmChSpStSuTe; PFGE profile, XbaI type I and BlnI type I; plasmid profile (approx. kb), 95
8 6 1.9.98–1.23.98 Pigs, dog Resistance profile, AmChSpStSuTe; PFGE profile, XbaI type I and BlnI type I; plasmid profile (approx. kb), 95 Two isolates with SpStSu resistance profile
9 3 12.1.97–12.22.97 Pigs Resistance profile, AmChSpStSuTe; PFGE profile, XbaI type I and BlnI type I; plasmid profile (approx. kb), 95 One isolate was XbaI type V
a

Herd type is defined as the type most frequently isolated from the herd. 

b

HM, historical material for comparison. 

The Danish isolates were compared with isolates from Germany (n = 10 isolates), Italy (n = 4), Spain (n = 5), the United Kingdom (n = 11), and the United States (n = 9). The isolates used in this investigation were supplied from the strain collections of the laboratories in the respective countries. The origins and periods of isolation of these isolates are shown in Table 2.

TABLE 2.

Origin and characterization of S. enterica serovar Typhimurium DT104 isolates from different countriesa

Country Year Source(s) No. of isolates Antimicrobial resistance profile (no. of isolates) PFGE profile (no. of isolates)
Plasmid profile [approx. kb (no. of isolates)]
XbaI type BlnI type
Denmark 1991–1997 Pigs, cattle, dog, environment 97 Sensitive (2), SpStSu (2), AmChSpStSuTe (93) I (96) I (79) 95 (72); 95 and 2.2 (5); 95 and 6.8 (19); 115, 95, 4.5, and 3.2 (1)
V (1) III (1)
IV (2)
V (14)
X (1)
Germany Recent years Poultry, cattle, pigs, human 10 AmChSpStSuTe (10) I (9) I (10) 95 (8), 95 and 2.2 (1); 95 and 2.8 (1); 95 and 2.4 (3); 95, 6.0, and 2.2 (1)
II (1)
Italy Unknown Human 4 AmChSpStSuTe (4) I (4) I (4)
Spain 1986–1996 Humans, water, food 5 Sensitive (1), AmChSpStSuTe (4) I I (4), IV (1) 95 (3); 95 and 2.4 (1); 954 and 2.6 (1)
United States Recent years Human 9 AmChSpStSuTe (6), AmChNeSpStSuTe (2); AmChGeNeSpStSuTe+S (1) I (9) I (1), V (7), VI (1) 95 (6); 95 and 3.5 (3)
a

Boldface indicates the dominating type within each country. 

All the isolates included in this study were identified as S. enterica serovar Typhimurium according to the Kauffmann-White serotyping scheme (21) and were definitive phage type DT104 according to the phage typing scheme described by Callow (8) and extended by Anderson et al. (2).

Antimicrobial susceptibility testing.

Antimicrobial susceptibility tests were performed by the agar diffusion method on Mueller-Hinton II agar (Becton Dickinson Microbiology Systems) supplemented with 5% bovine blood and the following antimicrobial agents (diffusible amount and abbreviation): amoxicillin-clavulanic acid (A+C; 30 and 15 μg, respectively), ampicillin (A; 33 μg), chloramphenicol (Ch; 60 μg), colistin (Co; 150 μg), enrofloxacin (E; 10 μg), gentamicin (G; 40 μg), neomycin (N; 120 μg), spectinomycin (Sp; 200 μg), streptomycin (St; 100 μg), sulfonamide (Su; 240 μg), tetracycline (T; 80 μg), and trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole (T+S; 5.2 and 240 μg, respectively) as NeoSensiTabs (Rosco Diagnostics, Taastrup, Denmark). The inhibition zones were interpreted as recommended by the supplier, except that the intermediate and sensitive isolates were grouped together (9).

Genotyping.

Analysis of the genome was performed by pulsed-field gel electrophoresis (PFGE) carried out by using a Pulsaphor Plus system (Pharmacia LKB). The preparation of DNA blocks and digestion with restriction enzymes were carried out as described by Olsen et al. (20). All isolates were analyzed by using restriction enzymes XbaI and BlnI. The gels were run in the electrophoresis system at 12 V/cm and 14°C for 23 h for analyses with both enzymes. Pulse times were increased in steps, as follows: 10 s for 22 h, 15 s for 52 h, 20 s for 6 h, 40 s for 5 h, and 60 s for 4 h. Polymerized phage lambda DNA (Pharmacia LKB) was used as a molecular size marker. After electrophoresis, the gels were stained in 2 μg of aqueous bromide (Sigma) per ml for 15 min and were photographed by using 300-nm UV light. Each fragment pattern that differed by one or more fragments (>100 kb) was assigned a type number. For publication purposes, the gels were photographed after electrophoresis was carried out in a CHEF DRIII system (Bio-Rad Laboratories), but limited differentials between the electrophoresis patterns of the two systems have been observed.

Extraction of plasmids was performed by conventional electrophoresis as described by Kado and Liu (16). The molecular sizes of the plasmids were determined in relation to the sizes of plasmids of Escherichia coli 39R861 (30) and E. coli V517 (18), and for small plasmids the sizes were determined in relation to the sizes of a supercoiled DNA ladder (Life Technologies).

Analysis of integrons and antibiotic resistance genes was done as described previously by Sandvang et al. (28). The detection of integrons was performed by PCR with primers against the intergrase gene (intI) (10, 12). Detection of antibiotic resistance genes was also performed by PCR with primers against a sulfonamide resistance gene (sul1), an aminoglycoside resistance gene cassette [ant (3")-Ia], and a β-lactamase resistance gene (pse-1) (13, 14, 23). The localization of the resistance genes on the integrons was confirmed by PCR with primers for the integrons in combination with primers for the resistance genes.

RESULTS

S. enterica serovar Typhimurium DT104 isolates were isolated at different times from nine Danish food animal herds infected in 1996, 1997, and early 1998 and were found to be homogeneous since all but one shared the resistance profile AChSpStSuT. A single DT104 isolate from herd 1 and two isolates from herd 8 had the resistance profile SpStSu. All but one of the isolates had a common PFGE profile when the restriction enzyme XbaI was used (XbaI type I). The different PFGE profile obtained with XbaI, which was found for a single isolate from an animal in herd 9, differed from the common type described above by two bands. When the restriction enzyme BlnI was used, 14 isolates from herd 6 showed a unique profile (BlnI type V), whereas isolates from the remaining herds were homogeneous since all but two were of a common type. One isolate of BlnI type III differed from the common type by two bands. This isolate was identified among the 42 isolates in herd 1 isolated over a period of 10 months. The second isolate (herd 5) was of BlnI type X, and the profile of this isolate, which originated from a dog, also differed from the common plasmid profile for isolates from the herd. The electrophoretic conditions applied gave a good separation of the minor fragments but gave an insufficient separation of the larger fragments. An additional analysis under other electrophoretic conditions applied for separation of fragments larger than 800 kb, however, showed variation in only one of all strains included in the study (data not shown). This single strain (BlnI type X) was from herd 5 and also differed from the other isolates in several other characteristics.

The common plasmid profile for isolates from pigs in herd 5 was fragments of 95 and 6.8 kb, but the plasmid profile of the isolate from the dog was fragments of 115, 90, 4.4, and 3.0 kb. Isolates from herd 2 harbored a 95-kb plasmid and an additional plasmid of approximately 2.2 kb, whereas isolates from all other herds contained a single plasmid of 95 kb.

The Danish isolates collected from 1991 to 1995 originated from four different pig herds. One of the four isolates had a resistance profile identical to the profile of those found during 1996 to 1998 (AChSpStSuT), another isolate had the SpStSu resistance profile, and the remaining two isolates were fully sensitive to all the antibiotics investigated. These four isolates had the common XbaI type (XbaI type I). Only the two resistant isolates were of the common BlnI type (type I), while the two sensitive isolates had another BlnI profile (type V) that was separated from the BlnI type I profile by a two-band difference. Three isolates (isolates with the SpStSu resistance profile and sensitive isolates) harbored the 95-kb plasmid alone, whereas the fourth multidrug-resistant isolate harbored plasmids of 95 and 2.2 kb.

A high degree of homogeneity was observed among the isolates from Denmark, Germany, Italy, Spain, the United Kingdom, and the United States. All but two strains had the same PFGE profiles when the restriction enzyme XbaI was used, whereas seven different profiles were observed when the restriction enzyme BlnI was used (Table 2; Fig. 1). The dominating BlnI type among European isolates was type I, whereas it was type V among isolates from the United States. AmChSpStSuTe was the most common resistance profile among isolates from each country, but one isolate from the United Kingdom and three isolates from the United States had additional resistance markers. Four of the 11 isolates from the United Kingdom and 1 of the 5 isolates from Spain were sensitive to all antibiotics examined, and 4 of these sensitive isolates were of BlnI type IV whereas the fifth isolate, from the United Kingdom, was BlnI type X. All isolates possessed a single 95-kb plasmid either alone or in combination with smaller plasmids, and a total of 11 different plasmid profiles were seen (Table 2).

FIG. 1.

FIG. 1

PFGE profiles of multidrug-resistant S. enterica serovar Typhimurium DT104 with restriction enzymes XbaI (a) and BlnI (b). (a) Lanes: size marker, XbaI type I (9621927-1), XbaI type II (2469), XbaI type V (9724913-3), and size marker, from left to right, respectively. (b) Lanes: size marker, BlnI type I (9621927-1), BlnI type III (9720518-5), BlnI type IV (9423445), BlnI type V (G10551), BlnI type VI (G11013), BlnI type IX (S1441/91), BlnI type X (9722797-1), BlnI type I (9621927-1), and size marker, from left to right, respectively.

Analysis of integrons and antibiotic resistance genes showed that isolates with the AmChSpStSuTe resistance profile had two integrons, indicated by two fragments of 1,008 and 1,133 bp generated by PCR. All isolates with these two integrons were also positive for products by PCR with the primers for integrons used in combination with primers for ant (3")-Ia and pse-1. Isolates with the SpStSu resistance profile had only one integron, indicated by a PCR product of 1,008 bp, and were positive for a product by PCR with the primers for integrons in combination with primers for ant (3")-Ia. Susceptible isolates did not yield any products by PCR. No integrons could be detected in a single multidrug-resistant isolate from a dog from herd 5.

DISCUSSION

In the 1990s, a new strain of S. enterica emerged in many countries. This multidrug-resistant strain, S. enterica serovar Typhimurium DT104, has been reported from the United Kingdom (31), Germany (1), the United States (6), Canada (22), Italy (27), Belgium (15), Israel (19), and Denmark (5). The spread may, however, be more extensive since only a limited number of countries have surveillance systems that report on the resistance patterns and phage types of Salmonella strains. Reports on resistance patterns alone have indicated that 69.8% of S. enterica serovar Typhimurium strains of bovine origin in France had a resistance profile which was compatible with that of multidrug-resistant strain DT104 (7).

In the present study, isolates from Danish food production animal herds were compared with the isolates from Germany, Italy, Spain, the United Kingdom, and the United States by using different epidemiological markers. Danish S. enterica serovar Typhimurium DT104 strains were isolated from nine different herds within periods of up to 16 months. These isolates were homogeneous and showed (with few exceptions) identical genomic profiles by PFGE when restriction enzymes XbaI and BlnI were used, as well as possessed identical resistance patterns (the AmChSpStSuTe resistance profile). By PFGE with the restriction enzyme BlnI, isolates from one herd (herd 6) could be separated from isolates from the other herds, and by plasmid profiling, isolates from two herds (herds 2 and 5) could be distinguished. The unique PFGE and plasmid profiles were stable among isolates within the isolation period. In all, the results showed a high degree of in vivo stability of the different epidemiological markers used in these investigations.

In the present study, either PFGE (with BlnI) or plasmid profiling could separate isolates from three of the nine Danish pig herds. The dominant plasmid profile consisted of a single plasmid of 95 kb. A plasmid of this size is known as the serotype-associated plasmid, and a plasmid profile consisting of this plasmid alone is dominant in S. enterica serovar Typhimurium strains (4, 33). The discriminatory power of this profile is therefore low compared to that of other plasmid profiles. The three different plasmid profiles observed among the isolates in this investigation and the unique BlnI profiles demonstrated a high degree of in vivo stability in the Danish herds for up to 16 months. This may indicate that different strains of multidrug-resistant strain S. enterica serovar Typhimurium DT104 have been introduced into Danish food production animal herds over time. Eleven different plasmid profiles were demonstrated in the total material investigated in this study. Such diversity has also been reported among isolates from the United Kingdom (17, 33, 34). Plasmid profiling has previously been used to differentiate a group of closely related, multidrug-resistant S. enterica serovar Typhimurium DT204c strains (36), with which the method has proved its usefulness, despite the potential instability of plasmids. In general, the discriminatory power of the epidemiological markers applied in the present study was low, which reflected the high degree of clonality among the Danish isolates of multidrug-resistant strain DT104.

The Danish isolates of multidrug-resistant strain S. enterica serovar Typhimurium DT104 recovered from 1991 to 1995 were very similar to those found from 1996 to 1998. These results may indicate that the multidrug-resistant strain DT104 has been present in Denmark for several years without causing a tremendous spread of infection, which has also been seen in Germany and the United Kingdom (1, 37). In contrast, sensitive isolates of strain DT104 (two Danish isolates, four isolates from the United Kingdom, and one isolate from Spain) differed from the multidrug-resistant isolates in their BlnI profiles and by the absence of the two integrons coding for resistance to ampicillin, streptomycin, and sulfonamide. Even though only minor differences in BlnI types were observed between sensitive and resistant isolates, they may indicate that the resistant isolates represent a unique clonal line which has spread among herds and countries. Recently, Ridley and Threlfall (24) have reported that sensitive and multidrug-resistant strains of S. enterica serovar Typhimurium DT104 can be separated by PFGE with XbaI, generating a fragment of approximately 10 kb which hybridizes to the integrons. This differentiation was not shown in the present study, as only fragments of >100 kb were used to determine the PFGE type, but the presence and absence of integrons in sensitive and resistant strains correlate with observations from the United Kingdom.

Multidrug-resistant strains of S. enterica serovar Typhimurium DT104 from different countries in Europe and from the United States had a common XbaI profile and a basic resistance pattern. This homogeneity is likely to be caused by a common origin, and thus, a new worldwide epidemic of S. enterica infection seems to have appeared. In the 1980s and 1990s, S. enterica serovar Enteritidis PT4 was the most dominant type among humans and was especially dominant in layer hens, and the distribution resulted in a worldwide epidemic (25). S. enterica serovar Enteritidis PT4 is still persistent worldwide and is the most common cause of human salmonellosis, but a number of scientists have pointed out that in the future, strain PT4 may be replaced by the multidrug-resistant S. enterica serovar Typhimurium DT104 (1, 35).

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

These investigations were supported by a grant from the Danish Ministry of Food, Agriculture and Fisheries.

We are grateful to Reiner Helmuth, Bundesinstitut für Gesundheitlichen Verbraucherschutz und Veterinærmedizin, Berlin, Germany; to D. J. Brown, Royal Veterinary and Agricultural University, Copenhagen, Denmark; to Clifford Wray, Central Veterinary Laboratory, Weybridge, United Kingdom; to Javier Garaizar, Basque Country University, Vitoria-Gasteiz, Spain; and to B. Swaminathan, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Ga., for supplying strains for the investigation. Special thanks go to Eva Pedersen for expert technical assistance and to Suraj Baloda for critical reading and correction of the manuscript.

REFERENCES

  • 1.Almuth L, Prager R, Streckel W, Rabsch W, Gericke B, Seltmann G, Helmuth R, Tschäpe H. Wird der Salmonella-enterica-Stamm DT104 des Serovar Typhimurium der neue führende Epidemietyp in Deutschland. Robert Koch Institut Info.; 1997. 1(6):10. [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Anderson E S, Ward L R, Saxe M J, de Sa J D. Bacteriophage-typing designations of Salmonella typhimurium. J Hyg. 1977;78:297–300. doi: 10.1017/s0022172400056187. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Anonymous. Annual report on zoonoses in Denmark 1998. Copenhagen, Denmark: Ministry of Food, Agriculture and Fisheries; 1999. [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Baggesen D L. Epidemiologiske markørsystemer ved Salmonella typhimurium infektioner. Ph.D. thesis. Copenhagen, Denmark: The Royal Veterinary and Agricultural University; 1992. [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Baggesen D L, Aarestrup F M. Characterisation of recently emerged multiple antibiotic-resistant Salmonella enterica serovar typhimurium DT104 and other multiresistant phage types from Danish pig herds. Vet Rec. 1998;143:95–97. doi: 10.1136/vr.143.4.95. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Besser T E, Gay C C, Gay J M, Hancock D D, Rice D, Pritchett L C, Erickson E D. Salmonellosis associated with S. typhimurium DT104 in the USA. Vet Rec. 1997;140:75. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Brisabois A, Fremy S, Moury F, Casin I, Breuil J, Collatz E. Salmonella and Salmonellosis Proceedings. Ploufragan, France: Zoopôle; 1997. Epidemiological survey on antibiotic susceptibility of Salmonella typhimurium strains from bovine origin in France; pp. 337–341. [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Callow B R. A new phage-typing scheme for Salmonella typhi-murium. J Hyg Camb. 1959;57:346–359. doi: 10.1017/s0022172400020209. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Casals J B, Pringler N. Antibacterial sensitivity testing using Neo-Sensitabs. Taastrup, Denmark: Rosco Diagnostica; 1991. [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Collis C M, Hall R M. Site-specific deletion and rearrangement of integron insert genes catalyzed by the integron DNA integrase. J Bacteriol. 1992;174:1574–1585. doi: 10.1128/jb.174.5.1574-1585.1992. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.D'Aoust J Y. Salmonella and the international food trade. Int J Food Microbiol. 1994;24:11–31. doi: 10.1016/0168-1605(94)90103-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Hall R M, Brookes D E, Stokes H W. Site-specific insertion of genes into integrons: role of the 59-base element and determination of the recombination cross-over point. Mol Microbiol. 1991;5:1941–1959. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2958.1991.tb00817.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Hollingshead S, Vapnek D. Nucleotide sequence analysis of a gene encoding a streptomycin/spectinomycin adenylyltransferase. Plasmid. 1985;13:17–30. doi: 10.1016/0147-619x(85)90052-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Huovinen P, Jacoby G A. Sequence of the PSE-1 beta-lactamase gene. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1991;35:2428–2430. doi: 10.1128/aac.35.11.2428. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Imberechts H, De Filette M, Wray C, Jones Y, Godard C, Pohl P. Salmonella typhimurium phage type DT104 in Belgian livestock. Vet Rec. 1998;143:424–425. doi: 10.1136/vr.143.15.424. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Kado C I, Liu S-T. Rapid procedure for detection and isolation of large and small plasmids. J Bacteriol. 1981;145:1365–1373. doi: 10.1128/jb.145.3.1365-1373.1981. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Low J C, Angus M, Hopkins G, Munro D, Rankin S C. Antimicrobial resistance of Salmonella enterica typhimurium DT104 isolates and investigation of strains with transferable apramycin resistance. Epidemiol Infect. 1997;118:97–103. doi: 10.1017/s0950268896007339. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Macrina F L, Kopecko D J, Jones K R, Ayers D J, McCowen S M. A multiple plasmid-containing Escherichia coli strain: convenient source of size reference plasmid molecules. Plasmid. 1978;1:417–420. doi: 10.1016/0147-619x(78)90056-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Metzer E, Agmon V, Andoren N, Cohen D. Emergence of multidrug-resistant Salmonella enterica serotype Typhimurium phage-type DT104 among salmonellae causing enteritis in Israel. Epidemiol Infect. 1998;121:555–559. doi: 10.1017/s0950268898001526. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Olsen J E, Skov M N, Threlfall E J, Brown D J. Clonal lines of Salmonella enterica serotype Enteritidis documented by IS200-, ribo-, pulsed-field gel electrophoresis and RFLP typing. J Med Microbiol. 1994;40:15–22. doi: 10.1099/00222615-40-1-15. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Popoff M Y, Le Minor L. Antigenic formulae of the Salmonella serovars. Paris, France: WHO Collaborating Centre for Reference and Research, Institut Pasteur; 1997. [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Poppe C, McFadden K A, Demczuk W H. Drug resistance, plasmids, biotypes and susceptibility to bacteriophages of Salmonella isolated from poultry in Canada. Int J Food Microbiol. 1996;30:325–344. doi: 10.1016/0168-1605(96)00960-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Recchia G D, Hall R M. Gene cassettes: a new class of mobile element. Microbiology. 1995;141:3015–3027. doi: 10.1099/13500872-141-12-3015. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Ridley A, Threlfall E J. Molecular epidemiology of antibiotic resistance genes in multiresistant epidemic Salmonella typhimurium DT 104. Microb Drug Resist. 1998;4:113–118. doi: 10.1089/mdr.1998.4.113. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Rodrigue D C, Tauxe R V, Rowe B. International increase in Salmonella enteritidis: a new pandemic? Epidemiol Infect. 1990;105:21–27. doi: 10.1017/s0950268800047609. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Rowe B, Threlfall E J, Ward L R, Ashley A S. International spread of multiresistant strains of Salmonella typhimurium phage types 204 and 193 from Britain to Europe. Vet Rec. 1979;105:468–469. doi: 10.1136/vr.105.20.468. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Rubino S, Muresu E, Solinas M, Santona M, Paglietti B, Azara A, Schiaffino A, Santona A, Maida A, Cappuccinelli P. IS200 fingerprint of Salmonella enterica serotype Typhimurium human strains isolated in Sardinia. Epidemiol Infect. 1998;120:215–222. doi: 10.1017/s095026889800867x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Sandvang D, Aarestrup F M, Jensen L B. Characterisation of integrons and antibiotic resistance genes in Danish multiresistant Salmonella enterica Typhimurium DT104. FEMS Microbiol Lett. 1997;157:177–181. doi: 10.1111/j.1574-6968.1997.tb12770.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Threlfall E J, Ward L R, Rowe B. Spread of multiresistant strains of Salmonella typhimurium phage types 204 and 193 in Britain. Br Med J. 1978;2:997. doi: 10.1136/bmj.2.6143.997. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Threlfall E J, Rowe B, Ferguson J L, Ward L R. Characterization of plasmids conferring resistance to gentamycin and apramycin in strains of Salmonella typhimurium phage type 204c isolated in Britain. J Hyg Camb. 1986;97:419–426. doi: 10.1017/s0022172400063609. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Threlfall E J, Frost J A, Ward L R, Rowe B. Epidemic in cattle and humans of Salmonella typhimurium DT 104 with chromosomally integrated multiple drug resistance. Vet Rec. 1994;134:577. doi: 10.1136/vr.134.22.577. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Threlfall E J, Frost J A, Ward L R, Rowe B. Increasing spectrum of resistance in multiresistant Salmonella typhimurium. Lancet. 1996;347:1053–1054. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(96)90199-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Threlfall E J, Hampton M D, Schofield S L, Ward L R, Frost J A, Rowe B. Epidemiological application of differentiating multiresistant Salmonella typhimurium DT104 by plasmid profile. Commun Dis Rep CDR Rev. 1996;6:155–159. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Wall P G, Morgan D, Lamden K, Ryan M, Griffin M, Threlfall E J, Ward L R, Rowe B. A case control study of infection with an epidemic strain of multiresistant Salmonella typhimurium DT104 in England and Wales. Commun Dis Rep CDR Rev. 1997;4:130–135. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Ward L R, Threlfall E J. Salmonella and Salmonellosis Proceedings. Ploufragan, France: Zoopôle; 1997. Human salmonellosis in England and Wales—current situation; pp. 547–549. [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Wray C, McLaren I, Parkinson N M, Beedell Y. Differentiation of Salmonella typhimurium DT204c by plasmid profile and biotyping. Vet Rec. 1987;121:514–516. doi: 10.1136/vr.121.22.514. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Wray C, Davies R H. A veterinary view of salmonella in farm animals. PHLS Microbiol Digest. 1996;13:44–48. [Google Scholar]

Articles from Journal of Clinical Microbiology are provided here courtesy of American Society for Microbiology (ASM)

RESOURCES