ABSTRACT
Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) continues to evolve in humans. Spike protein mutations increase transmission and potentially evade antibodies raised against the original sequence used in current vaccines. Our evaluation of serum neutralizing activity in both persons soon after SARS-CoV-2 infection (in April 2020 or earlier) or vaccination without prior infection confirmed that common spike mutations can reduce antibody antiviral activity. However, when the persons with prior infection were subsequently vaccinated, their antibodies attained an apparent biologic ceiling of neutralizing potency against all tested variants, equivalent to the original spike sequence. These findings indicate that additional antigenic exposure further improves antibody efficacy against variants.
KEYWORDS: SARS-CoV-2, COVID-19, vaccines, humoral immunity, spike variants, vaccine efficacy
OBSERVATION
Evolution of the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) spike protein results from selection for random mutations that yield fitness benefit that promotes person-to-person dissemination of the virus. Mutations in the receptor-binding domain (RBD), which is involved in viral entry and the key target of neutralizing antibodies, may also facilitate viral resistance to antibodies against the original spike sequence either from prior infection or the current vaccines. Spike variants such as B.1.351/Beta (1) and P.1/Gamma (2) have become predominant over the original sequence of the virus in some geographic locations, and a growing body of evidence suggests that some mutants can contribute to reinfections (3) and vaccine failures (4, 5).
Here, we examine the impact of several commonly observed spike mutations on the serum neutralizing activity of persons who had coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) in April 2020 or earlier, of vaccinated persons who had no prior history of infection, and of the persons who recovered from COVID-19 after subsequent vaccination. This examination directly compares serum neutralization of seven commonly observed spike variant combinations of five RBD mutations by antibodies elicited by vaccination alone, SARS-CoV-2 infection alone, and combined infection and vaccination, to evaluate whether repeated antigenic exposures would increase efficacy of humoral immunity to cope with spike mutations.
Results: mutations in RBD variably reduce the-spike neutralizing activity of antibodies elicited by vaccination.
Serum spike-neutralizing activity was assessed using a spike-pseudotyped neutralization assay and compared to the amount of serum anti-RBD antibodies to yield a measurement of antibody neutralizing potency. In 15 persons without a history of prior infection who were recently vaccinated (7 with BNT162b2 and 8 with mRNA-1273), potency against spike variants was variably less than against the original sequence contained in the vaccine (Fig. 1A). The mutants with the most reduced potency were K417N/E486K/N501Y and K417T/E486K/N501Y found in B.1.351/Beta (1) and P.1/Gamma (2), respectively. In contrast to a prior report (5), K501Y found in B.1.1.7/Alpha exhibited no appreciable resistance to neutralization. There were no clear differences between participants receiving different vaccines, although there were too few subjects for meaningful comparisons. Overall, these results demonstrated that spike mutation can affect the sensitivity to neutralization by antibodies elicited by vaccination with the original spike sequence.
Mutations in RBD also variably reduce the spike-neutralizing activity of antibodies elicited by natural infection with a similar pattern. Serum antibody spike-neutralizing potency was also assessed for 10 persons with recent mild SARS-CoV-2 infection (mean, 31 days after onset of symptoms; range, 18 to 45 days [see Table S1 in the supplemental material]) who were infected in the United States prior to May 2020, before reports of circulating variants. Again, potency was variably affected by different mutations, and the mutants with most reduced neutralizing potency were K417N/E486K/N501Y and K417T/E486K/N501Y (Fig. 1B). The neutralizing potencies of these infected persons correlated with those of the previously uninfected vaccinees, indicating similar susceptibilities to spike mutation of antibodies raised by either natural infection or vaccination alone.
Vaccination of previously SARS-CoV-2-infected persons increases neutralizing potency against variants to an apparent biologic ceiling. When the prior-infected individuals were vaccinated after approximately a year (mean, 353 days after symptom onset; range, 280 to 394 days), serum neutralizing potency against the original sequence spike was relatively unchanged, but activity against all variants equalized to a level similar to the original sequence (Fig. 2A). Neutralizing potency change correlated tightly to the baseline early after infection across all individuals and variants (Fig. 2B), suggesting a consistent biologic ceiling across all variants. Again, there were no clear differences between persons receiving different vaccines. Overall, these findings indicated that the combination of natural infection and vaccination drove antibody potency to an apparent maximum for all tested variants.
Discussion.
Our results confirm that vaccine- or infection-elicited antibodies raised against the original sequence can have reduced activity against recently circulating spike variants, substantiating evidence of reduced vaccine protection against variants, such as Vaxzevria and BNT162b2 against B.1.351/Beta (4–6). Furthermore, our findings indicate that both mild natural infection and vaccination presenting the original spike sequence elicit antibodies with similar patterns of susceptibility to variants.
After subsequent vaccination, however, antibodies in previously infected persons gain spike neutralizing potency equal to the original sequence against all tested variants, although activity against the original sequence itself is relatively unchanged. This suggests that (i) potency against the original sequence was already maximal, and (ii) the additional antigenic exposure from vaccination further increased antibody potency against suboptimally recognized variants to reach the same maximal potency.
This gained ability is compatible with further maturation of humoral immunity after SARS-CoV-2 infection and vaccination, consistent with reports of ongoing affinity maturation after resolved infection (7–9). It is unclear whether our observation relates to time elapsed after infection as proposed by that report, additional maturation due to vaccination, or both. In contrast to studies showing ongoing affinity maturation, a recent report suggests that potency declines after resolution of infection (10), suggesting that vaccination has a key role in this phenomenon. Our findings also agree with two other recent reports regarding vaccination after prior COVID-19; both Wang et al. (11) and Goel et al. (12) observed that the resulting antibodies gained breadth of coverage against spike variants. Finally, we define an apparent ceiling for antiviral potency against all tested variants, which is consistent with attaining a maximal threshold of binding affinity (13, 14) for the original sequence that eventually also applies to the tested variants.
Overall, our findings raise the possibility that resistance of SARS-CoV-2 spike variants to antibodies can be overcome by driving further maturation through continued antigenic exposure by vaccination, even if the vaccine does not deliver variant sequences. Whether this can also be accomplished in SARS-CoV-2-naive persons through vaccination alone, such as delivering supplemental doses beyond the original vaccination regimen of two doses, remains to be determined.
Materials and methods. (i) Participants.
Volunteers provided informed consent under an institutional review board-approved protocol. Persons with mild SARS-CoV-2 infection were evaluated shortly after recovery from illness, and these persons as well as healthy control individuals without prior SARS-CoV-2 infection were evaluated soon after vaccination for COVID-19. The persons with prior infection all had symptom onset no later than April 2020 in the United States, when the SARS-CoV-2 variants were not yet reported to circulate, and all had mild infection that did not require hospitalization (see Table S1 in the supplemental material).
(ii) Serum ELISA for anti-RBD antibodies.
Anti-RBD antibodies were evaluated with a quantitative enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) as recently described in detail (10, 15). In brief, we utilized a modification of a previously reported ELISA (16–18) against recombinant receptor-binding domain (RBD) protein bound to a 96-well microtiter plate, using secondary goat anti-human IgG-, IgM-, or IgA-horseradish peroxidase-conjugated detector antibodies. For quantitation, each plate contained serial dilutions of the CR3022 monoclonal antibody in IgG, IgM, or IgA formats, and the amount of binding activity in serum was expressed as an equivalent amount of the control antibody.
(iii) Serum spike-neutralizing assay and definition of neutralizing potency.
Spike neutralization activity was assessed with a spike-pseudotyped lentiviral vector assay as recently described in detail (10). Briefly, an HIV-1-based lentiviral vector delivering a luciferase reporter gene was pseudotyped with the indicated spike variant. The assay was performed by adding serial dilutions of serum during infection of angiotensin-converting enzyme 2 (ACE2)-expressing HEK 293T cells and assessing luciferase activity after 48 h. The Hill equation was utilized to estimate the dilution factor yielding 80% inhibition (DF80). The “neutralizing potency” (neutralizing activity adjusted for antibody concentration) was defined as the ratio of neutralization activity (DF80) to anti-RBD antibody concentration (log10 sum of IgG, IgM, and IgA anti-RBD antibodies in nanograms per milliliter), adjusting neutralizing activity for antibody quantity. All data are given in Table S1.
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
We are grateful for the generous participation of the volunteers who donated their blood to these studies.
Funding was provided by AIDS Healthcare Foundation to O.Y.; private philanthropic donors (including William Moses, Mari Edelman, Beth Friedman, Dana and Matt Walden, Kathleen Poncher, Scott Z. Burns, Gwyneth Paltrow, and Brad Falchuk) to O.Y.; with additional infrastructure support from the UCLA AIDS Institute Center for AIDS Research (NIH grant AI028697), James B. Pendleton Trust, and McCarthy Foundation.
We declare that we have no commercial or other associations that pose a conflict of interest.
Contributor Information
Otto O. Yang, Email: oyang@mednet.ucla.
Andrew Pekosz, Johns Hopkins University.
Diane E. Griffin, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health
REFERENCES
- 1.Tegally H, Wilkinson E, Giovanetti M, Iranzadeh A, Fonseca V, Giandhari J, Doolabh D, Pillay S, San EJ, Msomi N, Mlisana K, von Gottberg A, Walaza S, Allam M, Ismail A, Mohale T, Glass AJ, Engelbrecht S, Van Zyl G, Preiser W, Petruccione F, Sigal A, Hardie D, Marais G, Hsiao NY, Korsman S, Davies MA, Tyers L, Mudau I, York D, Maslo C, Goedhals D, Abrahams S, Laguda-Akingba O, Alisoltani-Dehkordi A, Godzik A, Wibmer CK, Sewell BT, Lourenco J, Alcantara LCJ, Kosakovsky Pond SL, Weaver S, Martin D, Lessells RJ, Bhiman JN, Williamson C, de Oliveira T. 2021. Detection of a SARS-CoV-2 variant of concern in South Africa. Nature 592:438–443. doi: 10.1038/s41586-021-03402-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Faria NR, Mellan TA, Whittaker C, Claro IM, Candido DDS, Mishra S, Crispim MAE, Sales FCS, Hawryluk I, McCrone JT, Hulswit RJG, Franco LAM, Ramundo MS, de Jesus JG, Andrade PS, Coletti TM, Ferreira GM, Silva CAM, Manuli ER, Pereira RHM, Peixoto PS, Kraemer MUG, Gaburo N, Jr, Camilo CDC, Hoeltgebaum H, Souza WM, Rocha EC, de Souza LM, de Pinho MC, Araujo LJT, Malta FSV, de Lima AB, Silva JDP, Zauli DAG, Ferreira ACS, Schnekenberg RP, Laydon DJ, Walker PGT, Schluter HM, Dos Santos ALP, Vidal MS, Del Caro VS, Filho RMF, Dos Santos HM, Aguiar RS, Proenca-Modena JL, Nelson B, Hay JA, Monod M, Miscouridou X, et al. 2021. Genomics and epidemiology of the P.1 SARS-CoV-2 lineage in Manaus, Brazil. Science 372:815–821. doi: 10.1126/science.abh2644. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Greaney AJ, Loes AN, Crawford KHD, Starr TN, Malone KD, Chu HY, Bloom JD. 2021. Comprehensive mapping of mutations in the SARS-CoV-2 receptor-binding domain that affect recognition by polyclonal human plasma antibodies. Cell Host Microbe 29:463–476.e6. doi: 10.1016/j.chom.2021.02.003. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Madhi SA, Baillie V, Cutland CL, Voysey M, Koen AL, Fairlie L, Padayachee SD, Dheda K, Barnabas SL, Bhorat QE, Briner C, Kwatra G, Ahmed K, Aley P, Bhikha S, Bhiman JN, Bhorat AE, Du Plessis J, Esmail A, Groenewald M, Horne E, Hwa SH, Jose A, Lambe T, Laubscher M, Malahleha M, Masenya M, Masilela M, McKenzie S, Molapo K, Moultrie A, Oelofse S, Patel F, Pillay S, Rhead S, Rodel H, Rossouw L, Taoushanis C, Tegally H, Thombrayil A, van Eck S, Wibmer CK, Durham NM, Kelly EJ, Villafana TL, Gilbert S, Pollard AJ, de Oliveira T, Moore PL, Sigal A, Ize A, et al. 2021. Efficacy of the ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 Covid-19 vaccine against the B.1.351 variant. N Engl J Med 384:1885–1898. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa2102214. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Kustin T, Harel N, Finkel U, Perchik S, Harari S, Tahor M, Caspi I, Levy R, Leshchinsky M, Ken Dror S, Bergerzon G, Gadban H, Gadban F, Eliassian E, Shimron O, Saleh L, Ben-Zvi H, Keren Taraday E, Amichay D, Ben-Dor A, Sagas D, Strauss M, Shemer Avni Y, Huppert A, Kepten E, Balicer RD, Netzer D, Ben-Shachar S, Stern A. 2021. Evidence for increased breakthrough rates of SARS-CoV-2 variants of concern in BNT162b2-mRNA-vaccinated individuals. Nat Med 27:1379–1384. doi: 10.1038/s41591-021-01413-7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Abu-Raddad LJ, Chemaitelly H, Butt AA. 2021. Effectiveness of the BNT162b2 Covid-19 vaccine against the B.1.1.7 and B.1.351 variants. N Engl J Med 385:187–189. doi:10.1056/NEJMc2104974. doi: 10.1056/NEJMc2104974. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Muecksch F, Weisblum Y, Barnes CO, Schmidt F, Schaefer-Babajew D, Lorenzi JCC, Flyak AI, DeLaitsch AT, Huey-Tubman KE, Hou S, Schiffer CA, Gaebler C, Wang Z, Da Silva J, Poston D, Finkin S, Cho A, Cipolla M, Oliveira TY, Millard KG, Ramos V, Gazumyan A, Rutkowska M, Caskey M, Nussenzweig MC, Bjorkman PJ, Hatziioannou T, Bieniasz PD. 2021. Development of potency, breadth and resilience to viral escape mutations in SARS-CoV-2 neutralizing antibodies. bioRxiv 10.1101/2021.03.07.434227. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 8.Gaebler C, Wang Z, Lorenzi JCC, Muecksch F, Finkin S, Tokuyama M, Cho A, Jankovic M, Schaefer-Babajew D, Oliveira TY, Cipolla M, Viant C, Barnes CO, Bram Y, Breton G, Hagglof T, Mendoza P, Hurley A, Turroja M, Gordon K, Millard KG, Ramos V, Schmidt F, Weisblum Y, Jha D, Tankelevich M, Martinez-Delgado G, Yee J, Patel R, Dizon J, Unson-O’Brien C, Shimeliovich I, Robbiani DF, Zhao Z, Gazumyan A, Schwartz RE, Hatziioannou T, Bjorkman PJ, Mehandru S, Bieniasz PD, Caskey M, Nussenzweig MC. 2021. Evolution of antibody immunity to SARS-CoV-2. Nature 591:639–644. doi: 10.1038/s41586-021-03207-w. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Moriyama S, Adachi Y, Sato T, Tonouchi K, Sun L, Fukushi S, Yamada S, Kinoshita H, Nojima K, Kanno T, Tobiume M, Ishijima K, Kuroda Y, Park ES, Onodera T, Matsumura T, Takano T, Terahara K, Isogawa M, Nishiyama A, Kawana-Tachikawa A, Shinkai M, Tachikawa N, Nakamura S, Okai T, Okuma K, Matano T, Fujimoto T, Maeda K, Ohnishi M, Wakita T, Suzuki T, Takahashi Y. 2021. Temporal maturation of neutralizing antibodies in COVID-19 convalescent individuals improves potency and breadth to circulating SARS-CoV-2 variants. Immunity 54:1841–1852.e4. doi:10.1016/j.immuni.2021.06.015. doi: 10.1016/j.immuni.2021.06.015. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Ibarrondo FJ, Hofman C, Fulcher JA, Goodman-Meza D, Mu W, Hausner MA, Ali A, Balamurugan A, Taus E, Elliott J, Krogstad P, Tobin NH, Ferbas KG, Kitchen SG, Aldrovandi GM, Rimoin AW, Yang OO. 2021. Primary, recall, and decay kinetics of SARS-CoV-2 vaccine antibody responses. ACS Nano 15:11180–11191. doi: 10.1021/acsnano.1c03972. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Wang Z, Muecksch F, Schaefer-Babajew D, Finkin S, Viant C, Gaebler C, Hoffmann HH, Barnes CO, Cipolla M, Ramos V, Oliveira TY, Cho A, Schmidt F, Da Silva J, Bednarski E, Aguado L, Yee J, Daga M, Turroja M, Millard KG, Jankovic M, Gazumyan A, Zhao Z, Rice CM, Bieniasz PD, Caskey M, Hatziioannou T, Nussenzweig MC. 2021. Naturally enhanced neutralizing breadth against SARS-CoV-2 one year after infection. Nature 595:426–431. doi: 10.1038/s41586-021-03696-9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Goel RR, Painter MM, Apostolidis SA, Mathew D, Meng W, Rosenfeld AM, Lundgreen KA, Reynaldi A, Khoury DS, Pattekar A, Gouma S, Kuri-Cervantes L, Hicks P, Dysinger S, Hicks A, Sharma H, Herring S, Korte S, Baxter AE, Oldridge DA, Giles JR, Weirick ME, McAllister CM, Awofolaju M, Tanenbaum N, Drapeau EM, Dougherty J, Long S, D’Andrea K, Hamilton JT, McLaughlin M, Williams JC, Adamski S, Kuthuru O, UPenn COVID Processing Unit, Frank I, Betts MR, Vella LA, Grifoni A, Weiskopf D, Sette A, Hensley SE, Davenport MP, Bates P, Luning Prak ET, Greenplate AR, Wherry EJ, Adamski S, Alam Z, Addison MM, Byrne KT, et al. 2021. mRNA vaccines induce durable immune memory to SARS-CoV-2 and variants of concern. Science doi: 10.1126/science.abm0829. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Batista FD, Neuberger MS. 1998. Affinity dependence of the B cell response to antigen: a threshold, a ceiling, and the importance of off-rate. Immunity 8:751–759. doi: 10.1016/S1074-7613(00)80580-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Roost HP, Bachmann MF, Haag A, Kalinke U, Pliska V, Hengartner H, Zinkernagel RM. 1995. Early high-affinity neutralizing anti-viral IgG responses without further overall improvements of affinity. Proc Natl Accad Sci USA 92:1257–1261. doi: 10.1073/pnas.92.5.1257. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Ibarrondo FJ, Fulcher JA, Goodman-Meza D, Elliott J, Hofmann C, Hausner MA, Ferbas KG, Tobin NH, Aldrovandi GM, Yang OO. 2020. Rapid decay of anti-SARS-CoV-2 antibodies in persons with mild Covid-19. N Engl J Med 383:1085–1087. doi: 10.1056/NEJMc2025179. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Amanat F, Stadlbauer D, Strohmeier S, Nguyen THO, Chromikova V, McMahon M, Jiang K, Arunkumar GA, Jurczyszak D, Polanco J, Bermudez-Gonzalez M, Kleiner G, Aydillo T, Miorin L, Fierer DS, Lugo LA, Kojic EM, Stoever J, Liu STH, Cunningham-Rundles C, Felgner PL, Moran T, García-Sastre A, Caplivski D, Cheng AC, Kedzierska K, Vapalahti O, Hepojoki JM, Simon V, Krammer F. 2020. A serological assay to detect SARS-CoV-2 seroconversion in humans. Nat Med 26:1033–1036. doi: 10.1038/s41591-020-0913-5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Stadlbauer D, Amanat F, Chromikova V, Jiang K, Strohmeier S, Arunkumar GA, Tan J, Bhavsar D, Capuano C, Kirkpatrick E, Meade P, Brito RN, Teo C, McMahon M, Simon V, Krammer F. 2020. SARS-CoV-2 seroconversion in humans: a detailed protocol for a serological assay, antigen production, and test setup. Curr Protoc Microbiol 57:e100. doi: 10.1002/cpmc.100. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Yang OO, Ibarrondo FJ. 2020. Loss of anti-SARS-CoV-2 antibodies in mild Covid-19. N Engl J Med 383:1697–1698. (Reply.) doi: 10.1056/NEJMc2027051. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.