Skip to main content
Frontiers in Medicine logoLink to Frontiers in Medicine
. 2021 Nov 23;8:721442. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2021.721442

Advances and Current Clinical Applications of Anterior Segment Optical Coherence Tomography Angiography

Man Luo 1, Yiqing Li 1,*, Yehong Zhuo 1,*
PMCID: PMC8649770  PMID: 34888319

Abstract

Optical coherence tomography angiography (OCTA) is the most relevant evolution based on optical coherence tomography (OCT). OCTA can present ocular vasculature, show detailed morphology for assessment, and quantify vessel parameters without intravenous dye agent. Research on the anterior segment OCTA (AS-OCTA) is only in its initial phase, and its advances in clinical diagnosis and treatment efficacy evaluations require a detailed comparison to traditional imaging methods. In this review of AS-OCTA, we summarize its technical features, imaging advances, current clinical applications in various eye diseases, as well as its limitations and potential future directions. AS-OCTA offers potential advantages in ophthalmic imaging, and with further development it could become a common tool in the near future.

Keywords: optical coherence tomography angiography, anterior segment, vascularization, clinical application, clinical diagnosis, efficacy evaluation

Introduction

Optical coherence tomography (OCT) provides a non-invasive and rapid way to image the eye in vivo. In the early 1990s, OCT was introduced to display retinal structures in cross-sections, such as the macula and optic nerve. Simultaneously, quantitative parameters of retina can also be detected, such as the peripapillary nerve fiber layer thickness, which is specifically identified in the development of open angle glaucoma (1, 2). With continuous development over the last 10 years, a new form of angiography, known as OCT angiography (OCTA), has been created (3). As the most relevant evolution of OCT, OCTA evaluates tissue from morphology to the study of functional components without intravenous injection of dye (4, 5). OCTA was designed for the posterior ocular segment, and has been widely used in age-related macular degeneration, high myopia, retinal vascular diseases, inflammatory diseases, and optic nerve diseases (2, 6, 7). OCTA allows better discrimination of the foveal avascular zone and parafoveal microvasculature than fluorescence angiography (FA), and can detect changes in lesions and early recurrence, even before the exudation detected on OCT (812). OCTA has improved identification of capillary non-perfusion, microaneurysms, and retinal ischemia, as well as delineating the foveal avascular zone (11, 1322).

Most recently, a growing number of studies have been focusing on OCTA for anterior segment diseases. Anterior segment OCTA (AS-OCTA) provides a novel technique for acquiring anterior segment vasculature images (23). Although research on AS-OCTA is only in its initial phase, it has been gaining attention and recognition (7, 24, 25). Therefore, the application of AS-OCTA in clinical diagnosis and treatment needs to be summarized.

AS-OCTA offers several advantages over traditional angiography. Its non-invasive nature and rapid inspection time allow frequent repetition of tests, and avoids the potential risks of dye-based angiography (5). In addition, AS-OCTA provides cross-sectional high-resolution images of the vasculature and allows for analysis according to depth located on a specific axis (7, 26). It is also a more cost-effective method over conventional angiography that is more time-consumable and requires training-certified clinicians (24, 27).

Slit-lamp photography is the most common method for capturing anterior segment vasculature. However, the results of slit-lamp photography are easily influenced by corneal transparency and background iris vessels (24, 28). Dye-based techniques, including FA and indocyanine green angiography, are applied to assess vessels clinically (2, 24). However, dye administration is not suitable for some patients, and has various contraindications (2, 2729). AS-OCT has advanced as a useful tool in providing rapid, non-contact evaluation of the anterior segment, and it takes a vital role in diagnosing and monitoring the effect of therapy in anterior segment diseases (3032). However, AS-OCTA has developed the imaging technologies for increasing the speed and image resolution. Moreover, it offers the technology of evaluation of vascular flow (33). Furthermore, with the development of anti-angiogenic therapy, non-invasive techniques are needed for quantitative analysis in anterior segment vasculature (25). Because the OCTA systems are designed for posterior diseases, imaging the anterior segment requires putting on an adaptor lens (24, 29, 34). The quantitative index, including vessel density and blood flow, can monitor the effect of anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) treatment, and guide treatment planning and prognostic evaluation (24, 25). Thus, an increasing role for AS-OCTA brings more attention and importance (35).

The aim of this review is to summarize the current applications of the AS-OCTA, including the diagnosis, therapy, and prognosis of detailed anterior diseases. In addition, the study discusses the limitations and potential future directions of AS-OCTA.

Acquisition and Analysis of AS-OCTA

Different types of devices have been reported in AS-OCTA scanning (e.g., AngioVue, DRI Triton, and PLEX Elite 9000). The majority of the studies use adaptor lens, and manually adjust the equipment parameters F and Z for anterior segment imaging (F was adjusted to the minimum value and Z was close to the maximum) (3641). During the whole scanning process, the external lens has been put near the eye, so we need to pay special attention during the inspection process to avoid damage (42). Some studies haven't used adaptor lens, applied the retina scanning procedure and manually adjusted the F value to the maximum value (39, 43). According to the anatomical structure of the eye, the diopter of posterior segment differs by 20D (diopters) from that of anterior segment (42). A self-designed lens holder was made by 3 Dimensions printing technology, which could place a 35D biconvex lens provided by Heidelberg at a suitable distance about 2 mm in front of the retinal lens to obtain an image (42). For the best image quality, the scanning area should be placed within the B scan range as far as possible. To avoid artifacts from the cornea and iris vessels, the scanning position can be placed flipping the zero-delay line and the image can be obtained “upside down” (39, 44). It is worth noting that the traditional image quality scoring standard and automatic image slicing function are not recommended in the current methods of obtaining AS-OCTA images (42).

AS-OCTA Precise Diagnosis

Conjunctiva

A chemical burn can lead to rapid and permanent denaturation to ocular surface (44). AS-OCTA was able to identify the normal vasculature in unaffected areas and areas of ischemia, similar in appearance to FA (45). Additionally, it can detect vascular flow though conjunctival edema and hemorrhages (46). In pterygium, AS-OCTA can detect more abundant vascularization in pterygium than in normal conjunctiva. In addition, these vessels are most obvious in the subepithelial connective tissue. The morphology of these vessels is newly formed, with smaller caliber, tortuous and branched shape, and rarely visible lumen (39). In the remaining connective tissue, the blood vessels have a regular diameter and morphology, very similar to normal conjunctive; their cavities are visible, sometimes dilated, and filled with blood (47). A study of scleral contact lens (ScCL) wearers demonstrates that repeated use of ScCL can cause vascular alterations in conjunctiva detected by AS-OCTA (48). Recent research shows that AS-OCTA works best on superficial and non-pigmented conjunctiva lesions, and malignant lesions always accompanied by deeper and larger perilesional vessels, which could be a significant marker of clinical diagnosis (49, 50).

Cornea and Limbus

Combing structure and vascular information, OCTA can distinctly diagnose corneal pathologies (2426). In addition, research suggests that AS-OCTA can show early corneal angiogenesis more clearly than slit-lamp photography (6, 24). OCTA can detect subtle abnormal blood vessels with corneal opacity, vascularization around the cornea or in front of the iris, which may not be detected by slit-lamp photography (6, 24). Both FA and indocyanine green angiography technologies only provide two-dimensional images, and dye leakage may hinder the analysis of deep blood vessels. OCTA allows simultaneous evaluation of the lesion structure and its related vessels in three-dimensions and at any predetermined depth (24). Severe corneal neovascularization (CoNV) always presents thicker, deeper, larger vessels on AS-OCTA (51). It has been noted that the extension and thickness of CoNV is related to the severity of limbal stem cell deficiency (LSCD) and best corrected visual acuity (BCVA) (52). In addition, Varma et al. (53) observed the conjunctivalization of the cornea caused by LSCD. The vascularization concentrated in superficial layer of peripheral cornea is the sign of LSCD, which can be differentiated from deeper vascularization caused by corneal inflammation.

Ciliary Body and Iris

OCTA provides a non-invasive method for detecting small capillaries or microaneurysm flow, even at an early stage of neovascularization of the iris without leakage of dye, and only need little adjustments to the OCTA device (54, 55). Current assessments for neovascularization of the iris include slit lamp biomicroscopy, gonioscopy, FA, and indocyanine green angiography (5658). Furthermore, conventional examinations may miss the very fine neovascularization of the iris (59, 60). Moreover, the assessment of neovascularization of the iris always needs a non-dilated pupil using dye-based angiography; thus, it is not possible to perform FA and indocyanine green angiography of the iris and retina at the same time, since most cases are caused by ischemic retinopathy (58).

The inflammation in the anterior uveitis always appears primarily on the iris and the ciliary body (3). During the active stage, the vessel in the iris dilates visibly. However, assessment of that presence is limited to previous examination, like fluorescein angiography (59). The reason is that the capillaries are non-fenestrated in the iris, and the leakage caused by inflammation cannot be shown by fluorescein angiography (59, 61). Since it is dye-free technology, AS-OCTA may provide more than a just promising method for assessing vascular anomalies in active anterior segment inflammation and para-inflammatory conditions. It might also be a safe and more precise method for investigating the pathophysiology of inflammation and the preclinical therapeutic strategies for uveitis (39, 55). Iris cysts appears with no intrinsic vascularity detected by AS-OCTA, and this could become a key imaging feature to distinguish iris cysts from other iris lesions (62).

AS-OCTA for Efficacy Follow-Up

Conjunctiva

The evaluation of limbal epithelial stem cells is related to the severity of the conjunctival chemical burn, therefore a reliable and objective assessment of limbal non-perfusion could make prognosis more accurate (6365). The range of severe limbal ischemia determined by AS-OCTA represented the severity of LSCD (46). The correlation between AS-OCTA prognosis and visual outcome at 3 months supersedes that of FA. AS-OCTA could also be used for longitudinal clinical estimation of recovery and reperfusion (46). En face OCTA can potentially assess the deeper intrascleral vessels, and index the more severe damage that can leads to iris atrophy, cataract, secondary ocular hypertension, or hypotony (46).

Trabeculectomy remains the common surgical procedure for glaucoma when other treatments have failed to control intraocular pressure (66). Fibrosis in the filtering bleb area plays a crucial role in failure of trabeculectomy (67). Hence, an early and objective means of detecting bleb vascularity to minimize fibrosis and lead to better outcomes is important. The Indiana Bleb Appearance Grading Scale and Moorfields Bleb Grading System are clinically used, but these grading systems are quite subjective (6870). The development in surgical area vascularity and tortuous vessels on bleb are signs of bleb failure (68, 70, 71). AS-OCTA could be applied to address the early evaluation of bleb, which plays a crucial role in discovering the failure of trabeculectomy (37, 38, 7274). Bleb vascularity can be examined sensitively; a previous study showed a correlation between the outcome of AS-OCTA and the outcome of previous grading systems (75). AS-OCTA could potentially be used in evaluating vessel parameters pre- and post-trabeculectomy (75). In a recent study, vascularization of the filtering bleb assessed by AS-OCTA at 1-month post-trabeculectomy could predict surgery effects at 6 months post-treatment and provided timely post-surgery intervention for a more successful outcome from the trabeculectomy (37). A study focused on eyedrops finds that the lowering effect of IOP is associated with a lower baseline vessel density detected by AS-OCTA (76).

Cornea and Limbus

AS-OCTA provides rapid processing and objective assessment of areas for corneal vessel invasion (77). OCTA is also useful for monitoring vascular changes before and after treatment. Furthermore, AS-OCTA allows estimations of the range and the depth of vascularization and fibrosis, such as the penetration of corneal abnormal vessels. This helps in pre-surgery planning, and monitoring of corneal vascularization after surgeries such as keratoplasty, pterygium surgery, and fine-needle diathermy (FND) combined with subconjunctival Ranibizumab (2426, 78). In patients who received various treatments after graft rejection, AS-OCTA was able to find a significant decrease in the vascularized area after 3 months of treatment, which is consistent with color photographs (79).

Ciliary Body and Iris

AS-OCTA is not only useful for screening, but also for following-up and assessment of treatments, such as laser or anti-VEGF therapy for neovascularization of the iris. Roberts et al. (55) showed that AS-OCTA provided a new stage for detecting neovascularization of the iris, which is regressed and clinically invisible. Additionally, en face OCTA can non-invasively show the persistent vessels by imaging blood flow after treatment. In the future, longitudinal follow-up will be indispensable for identifying OCTA markers for regression before and after therapy (37).

To better monitor the response to the treatment in clinical trials of anterior uveitis, efforts have been made utilizing multi-modal imaging to objectively measure ocular inflammation, for better patient monitoring and response measurement in clinical studies (80, 81). OCTA provides a superior objective measurement for showing the capillaries. Pichi et al. (82) showed that the dilatation and increased blood flow of an iris with acute anterior uveitis in OCTA could be recognized and quantified by AS-OCTA. This means that the iris vascular caliber might be a good index for quantifying the presence of inflammation and monitoring response to treatment. Choi et al. (83) compared the vessels caliber at different time points, whereas in the current study, an objective quantification was employed. A case of chronic retinal necrosis (CRN) finds that AS-OCTA can detect non-perfusion area of iris, and the reperfusion during the proper treatment, which could make an accurate follow-up of the progression (84).

Current Limitation and Future Directions

Although AS-OCTA has many advantages for clinical applications, its limitations need to be addressed in future AS-OCTA studies. First, the OCTA device and software were designed for the posterior segment; imaging the anterior segment requires putting on an adaptor lens, which may yield lower quality images and inaccurate parameter values. A specific algorithm for anterior imaging with automated adjustment is necessary to improve and standardize the scan quality, such as the automation of focus and scaling (68, 85). Secondly, pupil size might affect vasculature caliber and morphological characteristics (39). Although studies have chosen similar lighting conditions, pupil size changes are unavoidable. The need to control the effect of environmental factors that can influence the vasculature in anterior segment should not be ignored; quantitatively reproducible measurements are needed to solve the problem. Thirdly, the conventional technique of OCTA lacks a sequential image matching function, which makes it hard to fix the same area of interest and reduce motion artifacts caused by severely decreased visual acuity. Thus, an eye-tracking system and sequential image matching system need to be incorporated (24, 85).

Furthermore, the restriction of the scanning field and signal dropout does not support high-quality imaging of both the perimeter part and the central part of region in interest. AS-OCTA evaluates a limited area and depth compared to AS-OCT, which is designed for the external eye. To meet this challenge, AS-OCT with angiography technology needs to be developed to help diagnosis and assessment of anterior segment diseases. Moreover, a wide field swept-source OCTA, which is operated at longer wavelengths, might be able to solve this issue (55, 77). Currently, wide-field swept-source OCTA provides a wider-angle image for detecting diabetic retinopathy lesions, such as 12 × 12 mm or even 15 × 9 mm using the Montage technique (86). What's more, wide-field swept-source OCTA shows huge prospects for anterior segment imaging due to its sufficient scanning range and high sensitivity in detecting structures.

Conclusion

The imaging methods of AS-OCTA described here provide a rapid and non-invasive tool for specialized imaging. The technique allows detection of vessel diameter, density, and overall appearance, and provides powerful methods for helping clinical prognoses, diagnoses, and treatment outcomes (Table 1). Moreover, the challenges in AS-OCTA that were presented here should encourage the improvement of future techniques.

Table 1.

Advantages and applications of AS-OCTA.

Precise diagnosis Efficacy evaluation
Conjunctiva Identification of abnormal vasculature areas and conjunctival lesions Longitudinal estimation of reperfusion
Detection of deeper intrascleral vessels Early evaluation of blood flow density on filtering bleb after trabeculectomy
Assessment of limbal epithelial stem cell
Cornea and limbus Detection of early corneal angiogenesis Preoperative surgical planning by evaluating the depth and area of feeder vessel
Detection of subtle abnormal vessels with corneal opacity Repeatable evaluation of treatment effect by vascular progression and regression
3D imaging of cornea layers Better observation of corneal graft rejection
Scan of predetermined depth of cornea
Ciliary body and iris Early detection of small capillaries and microaneurysms flow Evaluation of regressed neovascularization of the iris during anti-VEGF therapy
Assessment of vascular anomalies in anterior uveitis Exposure of persistent neovascularization
Identification of iris lesions

VEGF, vascular endothelial growth factor; 3D, three dimensions.

Author Contributions

ML, YL, and YZ wrote and edited the manuscript. All authors contributed to the article and approved the submitted version.

Funding

This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (81870657, 81870658), the Natural Science Foundation of Guangdong Province (2018A030313049), the Medical Scientific Research Foundation of Guangdong Province (A2018052), and the Fundamental Research Funds for the Youth Scholars of Sun Yat-sen University (18ykpy32).

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Publisher's Note

All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

Acknowledgments

We would like to thank Editage (www.editage.cn) for English language editing.

References

  • 1.Koustenis A, Jr, Harris A, Gross J, Januleviciene I, Shah A, Siesky B. Optical coherence tomography angiography: an overview of the technology and an assessment of applications for clinical research. Br J Ophthalmol. (2017) 101:16–20. 10.1136/bjophthalmol-2016-309389 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Brunner M, Romano V, Steger B, Vinciguerra R, Lawman S, Williams B, et al. Imaging of corneal neovascularization: optical coherence tomography angiography and fluorescence angiography. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. (2018) 59:1263–9. 10.1167/iovs.17-22035 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Spaide RF, Fujimoto JG, Waheed NK, Sadda SR, Staurenghi G. Optical coherence tomography angiography. Prog Retin Eye Res. (2018) 64:1–55. 10.1016/j.preteyeres.2017.11.003 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Spaide RF. Volume-rendered optical coherence tomography of diabetic retinopathy pilot study. Am J Ophthalmol. (2015) 160:1200–10. 10.1016/j.ajo.2015.09.010 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Spaide RF, Fujimoto JG, Waheed NK. Optical coherence tomography angiography. Retina. (2015) 35:2161–2. 10.1097/IAE.0000000000000881 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Oie Y, Nishida K. Evaluation of corneal neovascularization using optical coherence tomography angiography in patients with limbal stem cell deficiency. Cornea. (2017) 36:S72–5. 10.1097/ICO.0000000000001382 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Tan ACS, Tan GS, Denniston AK, Keane PA, Ang M, Milea D, et al. An overview of the clinical applications of optical coherence tomography angiography. Eye. (2018) 32:262–86. 10.1038/eye.2017.181 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Kuehlewein L, Bansal M, Lenis TL, Iafe NA, Sadda SR, Bonin MA, et al. Optical coherence tomography angiography of type 1 neovascularization in age-related macular degeneration. Am J Ophthalmol. (2015) 160:739–48. 10.1016/j.ajo.2015.06.030 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Inoue M, Jung JJ, Balaratnasingam C, Dansingani KK, Dhrami-Gavazi E, Suzuki M, et al. A comparison between optical coherence tomography angiography and fluorescein angiography for the imaging of type 1 neovascularization. Investig Ophthalmol Vis Sci. (2016) 57:314–323. 10.1167/iovs.15-18900 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Veronese C, Maiolo C, Morara M, Armstrong GW, Ciardella AP. Optical coherence tomography angiography to assess pigment epithelial detachment. Retina. (2016) 36:645–50. 10.1097/IAE.0000000000000914 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Soares M, Neves C, Marques IP, Pires I, Schwartz C, Costa MA, et al. Comparison of diabetic retinopathy classification using fluorescein angiography and optical coherence tomography angiography. Br J Ophthalmol. (2017) 101:62–8. 10.1136/bjophthalmol-2016-309424 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Tan ACS, Dansingani KK, Yannuzzi LA, Sarraf D, Freund KB. Type 3 Neovascularization imaged with cross-sectional and en face optical coherence tomography angiography. Retina. (2017) 37:234–46. 10.1097/IAE.0000000000001343 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.de Castro-Abeger AH, de Carlo TE, Duker JS, Baumal CR. Optical coherence tomography angiography compared to fluorescein angiography in branch retinal artery occlusion. Ophthalmic Surg Lasers Imaging Retina. (2015) 46:1052–4. 10.3928/23258160-20151027-12 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Kashani AH, Lee SY, Moshfeghi A, Durbin MK, Puliafito CA. Optical coherence tomography angiography of retinal venous occlusion. Retina. (2015) 35:2323–31. 10.1097/IAE.0000000000000811 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Cardoso JN, Keane PA, Sim DA, Bradley P, Agrawal R, Addison PK, et al. Systematic evaluation of optical coherence tomography angiography in retinal vein occlusion. Am J Ophthalmol. (2016) 163:93–107. 10.1016/j.ajo.2015.11.025 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Coscas F, Glacet-Bernard A, Miere A, Caillaux V, Uzzan J, Lupidi M, et al. Optical coherence tomography angiography in retinal vein occlusion: evaluation of superficial and deep capillary plexa. Am J Ophthalmol. (2016) 161:160–71. 10.1016/j.ajo.2015.10.008 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Suzuki N, Hirano Y, Yoshida M, Tomiyasu T, Uemura A, Yasukawa T, et al. (2016). Microvascular abnormalities on optical coherence tomography angiography in macular edema associated with branch retinal vein occlusion. Am J Ophthalmol. 161:126–32e1. 10.1016/j.ajo.2015.09.038 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Dimitrova G, Chihara E, Takahashi H, Amano H, Okazaki K. Quantitative retinal optical coherence tomography angiography in patients with diabetes without diabetic retinopathy. Investig Ophthalmol Vis Sci. (2017) 58:190–6. 10.1167/iovs.16-20531 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Iafe N, Falavarjani KG, Hubschman JP, Tsui I, Sadda SR, Sarraf D. (2017). Optical coherence tomography angiography analysis of the foveal avascular zone and macular vessel density after anti-VEGF therapy in eyes with diabetic macular edema and retinal vein occlusion. Investig Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 58:30–4. 10.1167/iovs.16-20579 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Krawitz BD, Mo S, Geyman LS, Agemy SA, Scripsema NK, Garcia PM, et al. Acircularity index and axis ratio of the foveal avascular zone in diabetic eyes and healthy controls measured by optical coherence tomography angiography. Vision Res. (2017) 139:177–86. 10.1016/j.visres.2016.09.019 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Singh A, Agarwal A, Mahajan S, Karkhur S, Singh R, Bansal R, et al. Morphological differences between optic disc collaterals and neovascularization on optical coherence tomography angiography. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. (2017) 255:753–9. 10.1007/s00417-016-3565-x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Kadomoto S, Muraoka Y, Ooto S, Miwa Y, Iida Y, Suzuma K, et al. Evaluation of macular ischemia in eyes with branch retinal vein occlusion an optical coherence tomography angiography study. Retina. (2018) 38:272–82. 10.1097/IAE.0000000000001541 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Ang M, Devarajan K, Das S, Stanzel T, Tan A, Girard M, et al. Comparison of anterior segment optical coherence tomography angiography systems for corneal vascularisation. Br J Ophthalmol. (2018) 102:873–7. 10.1136/bjophthalmol-2017-311072 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Ang M, Sim DA, Keane PA, Sng CCA, Egan CA, Tufail A, et al. Optical coherence tomography angiography for anterior segment vasculature imaging. Ophthalmology. (2015) 122:1740–7. 10.1016/j.ophtha.2015.05.017 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Ang M, Cai YJ, Shahipasand S, Sim DA, Keane PA, Sng CCA, et al. En face optical coherence tomography angiography for corneal neovascularisation. Br J Ophthalmol. (2016) 100:616–21. 10.1136/bjophthalmol-2015-307338 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Ang M, Tan ACS, Cheung CMG, Keane PA, Dolz-Marco R, Sng CCA, et al. Optical coherence tomography angiography: a review of current and future clinical applications. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. (2018) 256:237–45. 10.1007/s00417-017-3896-2 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Cai YJ, del Barrio JLA, Wilkins MR, Ang M. (2017). Serial optical coherence tomography angiography for corneal vascularization. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 255:135–9. 10.1007/s00417-016-3505-9 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Stenzel TP, Devarajan K, Lwin NC, Yam GH, Schmetterer L, Mehta JS, et al. Comparison of optical coherence tomography angiography to indocyanine green angiography and slit lamp photography for corneal vascularization in an animal model. Sci Rep. (2018) 8:11493. 10.1038/s41598-018-29752-5 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Ang M, Cai YJ, MacPhee B, Sim DA, Keane PA, Sng CCA, et al. Optical coherence tomography angiography and indocyanine green angiography for corneal vascularisation. Br J Ophthalmol. (2016) 100:1557–63. 10.1136/bjophthalmol-2015-307706 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Ang M, Chong W, Tay WT, Yuen L, Wong TY, He MG, et al. Anterior segment optical coherence tomography study of the cornea and anterior segment in adult ethnic south asian indian eyes. Investig Ophthalmol Vis Sci. (2012) 53:120–5. 10.1167/iovs.11-8386 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Ang M, Chong W, Huang HQ, Tay WT, Wong TY, He MG, et al. (2013). Comparison of anterior segment optical tomography parameters measured using a semi-automatic software to standard clinical instruments. PLoS ONE. 8:e65559. 10.1371/journal.pone.0065559 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Venkateswaran N, Galor A, Wang JH, Karp CL. Optical coherence tomography for ocular surface and corneal diseases: a review. Eye Vis. (2018) 5:13. 10.1186/s40662-018-0107-0 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Spaide RF, Klancnik J, Cooney MJ. Retinal vascular layers imaged by fluorescein angiography and optical coherence tomography angiography. JAMA Ophthalmol. (2015) 133:45–50. 10.1001/jamaophthalmol.2014.3616 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Ang M, Baskaran M, Werkmeister RM, Chua J, Schmidl D, dos Santos VA, et al. Anterior segment optical coherence tomography. Prog Retin Eye Res. (2018) 66:132–56. 10.1016/j.preteyeres.2018.04.002 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Lee WD, Devarajan K, Chua J, Schmetterer L, Mehta JS, Ang M. Optical coherence tomography angiography for the anterior segment. Eye Vis. (2019) 6:4. 10.1186/s40662-019-0129-2 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Akagi T, Uji A, Huang AS, Weinreb RN, Yamada T, Miyata M, et al. Conjunctival and intrascleral vasculatures assessed using anterior segment optical coherence tomography angiography in normal eyes. Am J Ophthalmol. (2018) 196:1–9. 10.1016/j.ajo.2018.08.009 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Yin X, Cai QH, Song R, He XF, Lu PR. Relationship between filtering bleb vascularization and surgical outcomes after trabeculectomy: an optical coherence tomography angiography study. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. (2018) 256:2399–405. 10.1007/s00417-018-4136-0 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Hayek S, Labbe A, Brasnu E, Hamard P, Baudouin C. Optical coherence tomography angiography evaluation of conjunctival vessels during filtering surgery. Transl Vis Sci Technol. (2019) 8:4. 10.1167/tvst.8.4.4 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Pichi F, Roberts P, Neri P. The broad spectrum of application of optical coherence tomography angiography to the anterior segment of the eye in inflammatory conditions: a review of the literature. J Ophthalmic Inflamm Infect. (2019) 9:18. 10.1186/s12348-019-0184-9 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Seo JH, Lee Y, Shin JH, Kim YA, Park KH. Comparison of conjunctival vascularity changes using optical coherence tomography angiography after trabeculectomy and phacotrabeculectomy. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. (2019) 257:2239–55. 10.1007/s00417-019-04412-0 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Siddiqui Y, Yin J. Anterior segment applications of optical coherence tomography angiography. Semin Ophthalmol. (2019) 34:264–9. 10.1080/08820538.2019.1620805 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Ayres M, Smallwood R, Brooks AM, Chan E, Fagan X. Anterior segment optical coherence tomography angiography. J Vis Commun Med. (2019) 42:153–7. 10.1080/17453054.2019.1631122 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Mastropasqua R, Brescia L, Di Antonio L, Guarini D, Giattini D, Zuppardi E, et al. Angiographic biomarkers of filtering bleb function after XEN gel implantation for glaucoma: an optical coherence tomography-angiography study. Acta Ophthalmol. (2020) 98:e761–7. 10.1111/aos.14371 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Wagoner MD. Chemical injuries of the eye: current concepts in pathophysiology and therapy. Surv Ophthalmol. (1997) 41:275–313. 10.1016/S0039-6257(96)00007-0 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Kuckelkorn R, Remky A, Wolf S, Reim M, Redbrake C. Video fluorescein angiography of the anterior eye segment in severe eye burns. Acta Ophthalmol Scand. (1997) 75:675–80. 10.1111/j.1600-0420.1997.tb00629.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Fung SSM, Stewart RMK, Dhallu SK, Sim DA, Keane PA, Wilkins MR, et al. Anterior segment optical coherence tomographic angiography assessment of acute chemical injury. Am J Ophthalmol. (2019) 205:165–74. 10.1016/j.ajo.2019.04.021 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Liu YC, Devarajan K, Tan TE, Ang M, Mehta JS. Optical coherence tomography angiography for evaluation of reperfusion after pterygium surgery. Am J Ophthalmol. (2019) 207:151–8. 10.1016/j.ajo.2019.04.003 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Jesus J, Dias L, Almeida I, Costa T, Chibante-Pedro J. Analysis of conjunctival vascular density in scleral contact lens wearers using optical coherence tomography angiography. Cont Lens Anterior Eye. (2021) 101403. 10.1016/j.clae.2020.12.066. [Epub ahead of print]. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Binotti WW, Mills H, Nose RM, Wu HK, Duker JS, Hamrah P. Anterior segment optical coherence tomography angiography in the assessment of ocular surface lesions. Ocul Surf. (2021) 22:86–93. 10.1016/j.jtos.2021.07.009 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Brouwer NJ, Marinkovic M, Bleeker JC, Luyten GPM, Jager MJ. Anterior segment OCTA of melanocytic lesions of the conjunctiva and iris. Am J Ophthalmol. (2021) 222:137–47. 10.1016/j.ajo.2020.09.009 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Binotti WW, Koseoglu ND, Nose RM, Kenyon KR, Hamrah P. Novel parameters to assess the severity of corneal neovascularization using anterior segment optical coherence tomography angiography. Am J Ophthalmol. (2021) 222:206–17. 10.1016/j.ajo.2020.08.023 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Binotti WW, Nose RM, Koseoglu ND, Dieckmann GM, Kenyon K, Hamrah P. The utility of anterior segment optical coherence tomography angiography for the assessment of limbal stem cell deficiency. Ocul Surf. (2021) 19:94–103. 10.1016/j.jtos.2020.04.007 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Varma S, Shanbhag SS, Donthineni PR, Mishra DK, Singh V, Basu S. High-resolution optical coherence tomography angiography characteristics of limbal stem cell deficiency. Diagnostics (Basel). (2021) 11:1130. 10.3390/diagnostics11061130 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Gartner S, Henkind P. Neovascularization of the iris (rubeosis iridis). Surv Ophthalmol. (1978) 22:291–312. 10.1016/0039-6257(78)90175-3 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Roberts PK, Goldstein DA, Fawzi AA. Anterior segment optical coherence tomography angiography for identification of iris vasculature and staging of iris neovascularization: a pilot study. Curr Eye Res. (2017) 42:1136–42. 10.1080/02713683.2017.1293113 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56.Parodi MB, Bondel E, Russo D, Ravalico G. Iris indocyanine green videoangiography in diabetic iridopathy. Br J Ophthalmol. (1996) 80:416–9. 10.1136/bjo.80.5.416 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57.Brancato R, Bandello F, Lattanzio R. Iris fluorescein angiography in clinical practice. Surv Ophthalmol. (1997) 42:41–70. 10.1016/S0039-6257(97)84042-8 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 58.Sivak-Callcott JA, O'Day DM, Gass JD, Tsai JC. Evidence-based recommendations for the diagnosis and treatment of neovascular glaucoma. Ophthalmology. (2001) 108:1767–76. 10.1016/S0161-6420(01)00775-8 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 59.Bandello F, Brancato R, Lattanzio R, Falcomata B, Malegori A. Biomicroscopy versus fluorescein angiography of the iris in the detection of diabetic iridopathy. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. (1993) 231:444–8. 10.1007/BF02044229 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 60.Li ZQ, Zhou XX, Lin S, Li JL, Wu JG. Angiography reveals early hiding iris neovascularization after ischemic CRVO. Int J Ophthalmol. (2013) 6:253–4. 10.3980/j.issn.2222-3959.2013.02.28 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 61.Danzig CJ, Shields CL, Mashayekhi A, Ehya H, Manquez ME, Shields JA. Fluorescein angiography of iris juvenile xanthogranuloma. J Pediatr Ophthalmol Strabismus. (2008) 45:110–2. 10.3928/01913913-20080301-03 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 62.Kose HC, Gunduz K, Hosal MB. Iris Cysts: Clinical features, imaging findings, and treatment results. Turk J Ophthalmol. (2020) 50:31–6. 10.4274/tjo.galenos.2019.20633 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 63.Roper-Hall MJ. Thermal and chemical burns. Trans Ophthalmol Soc U K. (1965) 85:631–53. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 64.Dua HS, King AJ, Joseph A. A new classification of ocular surface burns. Br J Ophthalmol. (2001) 85:1379–83. 10.1136/bjo.85.11.1379 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 65.Bagley DM, Casterton PL, Dressler WE, Edelhauser HF, Kruszewski FH, McCulley JP, et al. Proposed new classification scheme for chemical injury to the human eye. Regul Toxicol Pharmacol. (2006) 45:206–13. 10.1016/j.yrtph.2006.04.005 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 66.Cairns JE. Trabeculectomy. Preliminary report of a new method. Am J Ophthalmol. (1968) 66:673–9. 10.1016/0002-9394(68)91288-9 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 67.Landers J, Martin K, Sarkies N, Bourne R, Watson P. A Twenty-year follow-up study of trabeculectomy: risk factors and outcomes. Ophthalmology. (2012) 119:694–702. 10.1016/j.ophtha.2011.09.043 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 68.Cantor LB, Mantravadi A, WuDunn D, Swamynathan K, Cortes A. Morphologic classification of filtering Blebs after glaucoma filtration surgery: The Indiana bleb appearance grading scale. J Glaucoma. (2003) 12:266–71. 10.1097/00061198-200306000-00015 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 69.Crowston JG, Kirwan JF, Wells A, Kennedy C, Murdoch IE. Evaluating clinical signs in trabeculectomized eyes. Eye. (2004) 18:299–303. 10.1038/sj.eye.6700638 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 70.Wells AP, Crowston JG, Marks J, Kirwan JF, Smith G, Clarke JCK, et al. A pilot study of a system for grading of drainage blebs after glaucoma surgery. J Glaucoma. (2004) 13:454–60. 10.1097/00061198-200412000-00005 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 71.Picht G, Grehn F. Classification of filtering blebs in trabeculectomy: biomicroscopy and functionality. Curr Opin Ophthalmol. (1998) 9:2–8. 10.1097/00055735-199804000-00002 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 72.Leung CK, Yick DW, Kwong YY, Li FC, Leung DY, Mohamed S, et al. Analysis of bleb morphology after trabeculectomy with Visante anterior segment optical coherence tomography. Br J Ophthalmol. (2007) 91:340–4. 10.1136/bjo.2006.100321 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 73.Jia YL, Wei E, Wang XG, Zhang XB, Morrison JC, Parikh M, et al. Optical coherence tomography angiography of optic disc perfusion in glaucoma. Ophthalmology. (2014) 121:1322–32. 10.1016/j.ophtha.2014.01.021 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 74.Watson P, Romano A. The impact of new methods of investigation and treatment on the understanding of the pathology of scleral inflammation. Eye. (2014) 28:915–30. 10.1038/eye.2014.110 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 75.Seo JH, Kim YA, Park KH, Lee Y. Evaluation of functional filtering bleb using optical coherence tomography angiography. Transl Vis Sci Technol. (2019) 8:14. 10.1167/tvst.8.3.14 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 76.Akagi T, Okamoto Y, Kameda T, Suda K, Nakanishi H, Miyake M, et al. Short-term effects of different types of anti-glaucoma eyedrop on the sclero-conjunctival vasculature assessed using anterior segment OCTA in normal human eyes: a pilot study. J Clin Med. (2020) 9:4016. 10.3390/jcm9124016 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 77.Kirwan RP, Zheng YL, Tey A, Anijeet D, Sueke H, Kaye SB. Quantifying changes in corneal neovascularization using fluorescein and indocyanine green angiography. Am J Ophthalmol. (2012) 154:850–8. 10.1016/j.ajo.2012.04.021 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 78.Foo VHX, Ke M, Tan CQL, Schmetterer L, Mehta JS, Ang M. anterior segment optical coherence tomography angiography assessment of corneal vascularisation after combined fine-needle diathermy with subconjunctival ranibizumab: a pilot study. Adv Ther. (2021) 38:4333–43. 10.1007/s12325-021-01849-w [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 79.Harun S, Srinivasan S, Hollingworth K, Batterbury M, Kaye S. Modification of classification of ocular chemical injuries. Br J Ophthalmol. (2004) 88:1353–4. 10.1136/bjo.2004.046797/047308 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 80.Li Y, Lowder C, Zhang XB, Huang D. Anterior chamber cell grading by optical coherence tomography. Investig Ophthalmol Vis Sci. (2013) 54:258–65. 10.1167/iovs.12-10477 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 81.Sharma S, Lowder CY, Vasanji A, Baynes K, Kaiser PK, Srivastava SK. Automated analysis of anterior chamber inflammation by spectral-domain optical coherence tomography. Ophthalmology. (2015) 122:1464–70. 10.1016/j.ophtha.2015.02.032 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 82.Pichi F, Sarraf D, Arepalli S, Lowder CY, Cunningham ET Jr, Neri P, et al. (2017). The application of optical coherence tomography angiography in uveitis and inflammatory eye diseases. Prog Retin Eye Res. 59:178–201. 10.1016/j.preteyeres.2017.04.005 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 83.Choi WJ, Pepple KL, Zhi ZW, Wang RK. Optical coherence tomography based microangiography for quantitative monitoring of structural and vascular changes in a rat model of acute uveitis in vivo: a preliminary study. J Biomed Optics. (2015) 20:016015. 10.1117/1.JBO.20.1.016015 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 84.Zicarelli F, Parrulli S, Torre A, Oldani M, Invernizzi A. Optical coherence tomography angiography findings of iris ischemia and reperfusion in cytomegalovirus panuveitis. Ocul Immunol Inflamm. 10.1080/09273948.2021.1916041 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 85.Akagi T, Uji A, Okamoto Y, Suda K, Kameda T, Nakanishi H, et al. Anterior segment optical coherence tomography angiography imaging of conjunctiva and intrasclera in treated primary open-angle glaucoma. Am J Ophthalmol. (2019) 208:313–22. 10.1016/j.ajo.2019.05.008 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 86.Zhu Y, Cui Y, Wang JC, Lu YF, Zeng R, Katz R, et al. Different scan protocols affect the detection rates of diabetic retinopathy lesions by wide-field swept-source optical coherence tomography angiography. Am J Ophthalmol. (2020) 215:72–80. 10.1016/j.ajo.2020.03.004 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Frontiers in Medicine are provided here courtesy of Frontiers Media SA

RESOURCES