Abstract
Aim:
To determine small RNA expression changes in mouse placenta induced by bisphenol A (BPA) exposure.
Methods:
Exposing female mice to BPA two weeks prior to conception through gestational day 12.5; whereupon fetal placentas were collected, frozen in liquid nitrogen and stored at -80°C. Small RNAs were isolated and used for small RNA-sequencing.
Results:
43 small RNAs were differentially expressed. Target mRNAs were closely aligned to those expressed by thymus and brain, and pathway enrichment analyses indicated that such target mRNAs regulate neurogenesis and associated neurodevelopment processes.
Conclusions:
BPA induces several small RNAs in mouse placenta that might provide biomarkers for BPA exposure. Further, the placenta might affect fetal brain development through the secretion of miRNAs.
Keywords : EDC, endocrine disrupting chemicals, miRNA, phenolic compounds, RNA-sequencing, trophoblast
Introduction
The placenta is in direct opposition to maternal tissue, and thus, it can be bathed by chemicals circulating in the maternal bloodstream. For the in utero period, the placenta acts in a variety of ways to aid in the exchange of nutrients, gases and wastes. The placenta also produces a range of hormones and cytokine factors that promote and protect the fetus against uterine alterations. Rodents and humans are unique in that both have an invasive hemochorial type of placentation where syncytiotrophoblast (syncytioTB) cells that mediate nutrient and gas exchange are directly bathed in maternal blood [1]. While the placenta has some ability to detoxify certain xenobiotic chemicals, as an endocrine organ, it can be vulnerable to such compounds, especially endocrine disrupting chemicals (EDCs).
EDCs are abundant in food products, everyday household items and in the environment. Bisphenol A (BPA) is one of the most prevalent EDCs as it is used as a plasticizer for plastic containers, found in the lining of canned good, cardboard boxes and receipts. Current estimates suggest that global production of BPA is around ∼ 20 billion lb [2]. The ubiquitous nature of BPA contamination has resulted in approximately 93% of the US population showing detectable amounts of BPA in their urine [3]. Dietary route is the primary source of exposure to BPA [4,5], although other routes of contact are possible [6,7]. Importantly, BPA is easily transmitted from mother to her developing fetus via the placenta [8,9], and as such, it is a major environmental concern during pregnancy.
We, and others, have previously shown that BPA exposure results in structural and functional changes in the mouse placenta [10–20]. Several studies have tested the effects of BPA in term human placental or trophoblast (TB)-derived cell lines [21–31], but this approach may not recapitulate all the placental responses that occur during the critical first and second trimesters [32]. Moreover, placental cell lines derived from neoplasms, e.g., BeWo, JEG-3 and JAR, may not be physiologically equivalent to non-transformed TB counterparts. Previous mouse studies have generally examined either transcriptomic responses or effects on placental morphology [10–20].
We used RNA-sequencing (RNA-seq) analyses to examine the global transcriptomic profile in embryonic age (E) 12.5 mouse placenta following dietary exposure to BPA or its substitute, bisphenol S (BPS). BPA and BPS changed the expression of an identical set of 13 genes [20]. Of which, 11 were suppressed and two (Actn2 and Efcab2) were increased. Four of the differentially expressed (DE) transcripts are considered enriched in the mouse placenta (Sfrp4, Coch, Gm9513 and Calm4) as determined by the TissueEnrich program [20]. Based on the DE gene-sets, WNT and chemokine signaling pathways, amino acid metabolism, and possibly neurotransmission are pathways were predicted to be affected in the BPA exposed placental samples [20].
Although such gene expression studies are important, miRNAs (miRs) can block the translation of mRNAs to a protein. miRs are transcribed as transcripts that span several kilobases in length [33,34], but they are then cleaved by RNase III enzymes, Drosha in the nucleus and Dicer in the cytoplasm to eventually yield 19–22 nt long mature miRs. miRs determine which mRNAs are translated into proteins by linking to RISC, and this complex than binds to the 3′ untranslated region of mRNA that results in mRNA destruction. In so doing, miRs are the final epigenetic regulators. An understanding of how BPA and other EDC affect miRs in the placenta has important public health ramifications as such epigenetic changes might be used to reveal those fetuses who are being exposed to such chemicals. Mitigation approaches might also be used to correct miR alterations in the placenta that may prevent later offspring health disorders.
BPA and other EDC affect miR patterns in other organs [35–38]. For instance, in the rat hypothalamus, developmental exposure to estradiol benzoate or polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs) alters miR expression patterns in several brain regions (medial preoptic nucleus [MPN] and ventromedial nucleus [VMN]) manner but such patterns vary according to age and sex [39]. We have shown that BPA and other EDCs affect miR profiles in the hypothalamus of California mice [40,41]. BPA exposure has been linked to changes in miR expression patterns in whole human placenta and TB cell lines [22,42]. However, no studies to date have used a rodent model to establish actual causation for BPA-induced miR changes in the placenta. The hypothesis of the current studies was that BPA exposure would alter the miR profile in the placenta of C57BL6J. To test this hypothesis, we performed small RNA sequencing with BPA-exposed and control samples and used bioinformatics analyses to compare these results, as well as determine those mRNAs and pathways that might be affected by miRs DE in BPA-exposed placenta. Such placental miRs might also provide useful biomarkers for gestational EDC exposure.
Materials & methods
Animals & treatments
All animal experiments were approved by the Institute Animal Care and Use Committee (IACUC) and were done in compliance with the NIH Guidelines for the care and use of laboratory animals. Five- to six-week-old C57BL6J female and male mice (Jackson Labs, ME, USA) were housed in polypropylene cages, fed a phytoestrogen free diet (AIN93G; Envigo, WI, USA), and provided a nestlet (Ancare, NY, USA) for environmental enrichment. Mice were maintained on a 12-h light: 12-h dark cycle with the lights turning on at 7:00 am and shutting off at 7:00 pm. The average room temperature was 70°F, and the humidity range was between 30 and 70%. Females were provided a week habituation period before the experiments were initiated. They were then randomly placed based on a random generator number assigned to them to be in one of two treatments groups: those who were provided daily a Nabisco Nilla wafer (Nabisco, NJ, USA) containing 70% ethanol (8-24 μl volume as adjusted for body weight [bw] that was air dried beforehand onto the wafer) and those who were provided a daily wafer containing BPA (200 μg/kg bw reconstituted in ethanol with a similar volume as vehicle control and air dried onto the wafer). The BPA dose falls well below the diet-administered maximum nontoxic dose for rodents (200 mg/kg bw/day), is within the presumptive no observed adverse effect level (NOAEL) [43–47], and results in serum concentrations comparable to those identified in human populations [48–53]. Females were singly housed (unless paired overnight with a male), weighed weekly and volume of ethanol or BPA pipetted on to the wafer adjusted based on their updated weight. To minimize background BPA contamination, animals were housed in polypropylene cages with aspen shavings rather than corn cob and provided glass water bottles. BPA (Chemical CAS no. 80-05-7, purity >99%,) was purchased from Sigma-Aldrich (MO, USA) and stored in amber glass bottles with aluminum foil around them to minimize exposure to light. It was reconstituted in polypropylene tubes. After two weeks of receiving one of these treatments, females were housed with breeder males, and the next morning, they were examined for a presence of a vaginal plug. The day one was observed, and it was considered as embryonic age (E) 0.5 days post coitus. In the case a vaginal plug was not observed, males and females were separated and then paired again that evening. Females were maintained on the respective treatments until they were humanely euthanized via CO2 inhalation followed by cervical dislocation at E 12.5. These combined methods are recommended by the American Veterinary Medical Association Guidelines for euthanasia of laboratory animals. Dams were thus exposed to BPA for two weeks prior to conception through E 12.5. After dams were euthanized, each uterine horn was incised, and the uterine position of each conceptus was denoted. Fetal tissue was collected for PCR sexing. The fetal placental tissue (as determined by the discoid morphology) was dissected from the underlying uterine tissue, including decidua and was frozen in liquid nitrogen, as done previously [20]. We have previously used histological analysis to confirm that only fetal placental tissue was collected. Gestational day 12.5 is a common day selected in the current and our past studies [20], as it is a point where the placenta is fully mature, but the genital ridge has not yet differentiated into a gonad that produces steroid hormones that could cause confounding effects. It is also equivalent to about mid-gestation in humans.
Fetal PCR sexing & placental RNA isolation
Fetal DNA was isolated with the DNeasy Blood & Tissue Kit (catalogue no. 69504; Qiagen, MD, USA), and it was used for PCR amplification for Sry (Y-chromosome specific gene, forward primer: 5′TCATGAGACTGCCAACCACAG3′; reverse primer: 5′CATGACCACCACCACCACCAA3′) and Myog (autosomal control gene; forward primer: 5′TTACGTCCATCGTGGACAGC3′; reverse primer: 5′TGGGCTGGGTGTTAGTCTTA3′), as detailed in [54]. For these analyses, only female placental samples were used with each one being from a different litter. We did not have sufficient male samples from different litters. Four BPA-exposed and four control placental samples were used for these studies, which should provide sufficient replicates based on our previous miR studies [40,41].
RNA was isolated from each of the placental samples with the Qiagen AllPrep DNA/RNA/miRNA Universal Kit (catalogue no. 80224; Qiagen, MD, USA). The quantity and quality of the RNA were determined with a Nanodrop ND1000 spectrophotometer (Nanodrop Products, DE, USA). The results were further confirmed by analyzing the RNA on the Fragment Analyzer (Advanced Analytical Technologies, IA, USA). Only samples with a RNA integrity number (RIN) score above 7 were used.
Illumina TruSeq small RNA library preparation
Small RNA sequencing was performed by the University of Missouri Genomics Technology Core Facility. Libraries were constructed according to the manufacturer's protocol with reagents supplied in Illumina's TruSeq small RNA sample preparation kit (Illumina, CA, USA). A two-step ligation process was performed with total RNA to add adapters to the 3′and 5′ ends of the small RNA, respectively. The modified small RNA was reverse transcribed using SuperScript III Reverse Transcriptase. A PCR amplification was done to enrich the small RNA library. Resulting small RNA libraries were pooled and purified by gel electrophoresis on a 6% polyacrylamide gel as recommended by Illumina. Bands consistent with the desired DNA insert size of 19–45 bases were excised from the gel. The DNA fragments (libraries) were retrieved from the gel slice by elution with water and ethanol precipitation. Purified library pool was quantified with Qubit HS DNA kit, and the fragment size determined by an Agilent Fragment Analyzer Automated CE system. Libraries were diluted based on Illumina's standard sequencing protocol for sequencing on the NextSeq 500 (Illumina).
Bioinformatics analyses of small RNA-seq data
sRNAnalyzer [55], which is a flexible and customizable pipeline for the analysis of small RNA-seq data, was used for this analysis. The adapters and any low-quality sequencing data were removed by cutadapt (version 3.2) [56]. The filtered clean reads were mapped to all miRNA database by Bowtie (version 1.3.0) [57]. The align command resulted in an output of several files, including feature, profile, read distribution and an unmatched sequence files. DESeq2 [58] was used to analyze DE small RNAs between the BPA exposed and control placenta. Small RNAs were considered upregulated if they exhibited an absolute fold-change ≥2 and adjusted p-value ≤0.05. To determined sample-to-sample distance heatmap, raw counts data were transformed by rlog function in DESeq2 and transformed count matrix was transposed to get heatmap by DESeq2 built in dist function. A volcano plot was generated by using plot function of DESeq2.
Target mRNA prediction & pathway analyses
To predict potential mRNA targets for those miRs that exhibited differential expression, the miRror 2.0 tool [59] was used. Eleven databases searched included PITA_TOP, PicTar_4way, TargetRank-all (TRnk all), TargetScan Conserved (TScan), microCosm (mCosm), miRanda Conserved (microRNA.org), DIANA-microT (microT), EIMMO-MirZ (MirZ), miRDB, RNA22, MAMI and Map2 (miRNAMap2). Based on the predicted mRNAs, functional enrichment analyses with the WEB-based Gene SeT AnaLysis Toolkit (WebGestalt) [60] and Gene Ontology biological terms was used to ascertain which pathways might be affected. Tissue-specific gene enrichment analysis was determined by TissueEnrich [61]. We used the mouse ENCODE [62] dataset to carry out the enrichment analysis with default settings. Enrichments were considered significant if p-value was ≤0.01 and fold-change ≥2.
Results
General features
The total number of small RNAs screened was 40,933. The average number of small RNA reads was 14,422,125.5, the average number of mapped reads was 9,324,998.6 and the average mapping rate percentage was 61% (Supplementary Table 1). The size of the small RNAs detected ranged from 19–27 base pairs (bp) with 22 bp being the predominant size. (Figure 1A). The volcano plot reveals that several small RNAs were DE based on a false discovery rate (FDR; q value ≤ 0.05; Figure 1B). The heat map based on the DE small RNAs is shown in Figure 1C.
Figure 1. . General features of the small RNA sequencing results.

(A) Base pair size range of detected small RNAs. The most common size of small RNAs detected was 22 bp. (B) Volcano plot of small RNAs that was differentially expressed based on a false discovery rate ≤ 0.05. Those that showed reduced expression in the BPA-exposed placenta are illustrated with green circles, while upregulated small RNAs in the bisphenol A placenta are depicted in red. Those shown in gray were not differentially expressed in BPA versus control placenta. (C) Heat map based on the differentially expressed small RNAs. The legend to the right of the figure represents a color continuum for differentially expressed small RNAs with those depicted in green showing the greatest reduction in expression and those shown in red had increased expression.
BPA: Bisphenol A; Ctrl: Control.
DE small RNAs
Small RNA-seq results show that 43 small RNAs were DE between BPA versus control placenta with 22 being upregulated in BPA and 21 downregulated in the BPA-exposed group (Supplementary File 1). The top ten miRs and other small RNAs upregulated in BPA placenta were miR-151-3p, miR-148-3p, miR-381-3, miR-125a-5p, piR-has-5937, miR-191-5p, miR-542-5p, miR-183-3p, miR-29a-3p and miR-369-3p. The top ten miRs and other small RNAs that were down-regulated in BPA placenta include miR-152-3p, miR-540-3p, miR-322-1-5p, mir-423, miR-144-5p, miR-30e-5p, miR-210-5p, miR-98-5p, miR-434-1-5p and miR-222-3p. Another miR that was down-regulated in the BPA placenta group was miR-146b-5p.
Predicted target mRNAs
After determining DE miRs between BPA and control placenta, we next determined those mRNAs that are predicted to be affected by these miRs, as determined by the modeling databases listed above in the methods section [59,63,64]. Supplementary File 2 lists the mRNAs that are likely to be affected by the DE miRs. As shown, 142 mRNAs are affected by the DE expressed miRs. The prediction at the outset was that the target mRNAs would be associated with the placenta. However, the target mRNAs were linked to the thymus, cerebellum, olfactory bulb, brain cortex, E 14.5 brain and heart (Figure 2).
Figure 2. . Tissue-specific gene enrichment based on target mRNAs.

Tissue-specific gene enrichment analysis based on target mRNAs was determined by TissueEnrich [61]. The mouse ENCODE [62] dataset was used for the enrichment analysis with default settings. Enrichments were considered significant if the p-value was ≤0.01 and fold-change ≥2. The target mRNAs are linked to the thymus, cerebellum, olfactory bulb, brain cortex, E 14.5 brain and heart.
E: Embryonic age.
Pathways predicted to be affected based on BPA-induced placental miR changes
Pathway enrichment analysis revealed that the mRNAs targeted by the DE miRs are associated with neural pathways, including neurogenesis, generation of neurons, neuron differentiation, neuron development and neuron projection development (Figure 3 & Table 1). Other pathways likely affected include cell projection organization, plasma membrane bounded cell projection organization, cation transmembrane transport, metal ion transport and inorganic cation transmembrane transport. Target mRNAs within neurogenesis included Ache, Adora2a, Afg312, Barhl1, Brinp3, Brsk1, Cdk16, Cngb1, Crk and Epb41l3.
Figure 3. . Pathway enrichment analysis based on target mRNAs.
Pathway enrichment analysis was performed based on Gene Ontology biological terms and was done using the WEB-based Gene SeT AnaLysis Toolkit (WebGestalt) [60], and revealed that the mRNAs targeted by the differenty expressed miRNAs are associated with neural pathways, including neurogenesis, generation of neurons, neuron differentiation, neuron development and neuron projection development. Other pathways likely affected include cell projection organization, plasma membrane bounded cell projection organization, cation transmembrane transport, metal ion transport and inorganic cation transmembrane transport. The diagram generated with this program shows how the enriched pathways relate to each other based on the lines connecting the various pathways to one another.
Table 1. . Pathway enrichment analysis based on target mRNAs. Pathway enrichment analysis based on Gene Ontology biological terms, which was done using the WEB-based gene set analysis toolkit (WebGestalt).
| Gene set | Description | Size | Expect | Ratio | p-value | FDR |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| GO:0048699 | Generation of neurons | 1526 | 9.5646 | 3.032 | 4.72E-08 | 0.0004255 |
| GO:0022008 | Neurogenesis | 1634 | 10.242 | 2.8316 | 2.05E-07 | 0.000872 |
| GO:0030182 | Neuron differentiation | 1372 | 8.5994 | 3.0235 | 2.90E-07 | 0.000872 |
| GO:0031175 | Neuron projection development | 990 | 6.2051 | 3.3843 | 8.25E-07 | 0.0018597 |
| GO:0048666 | Neuron development | 1119 | 7.0136 | 3.1367 | 1.5405E-06 | 0.0027784 |
| GO:0120036 | Plasma membrane bounded cell projection organization | 1434 | 8.988 | 2.4477 | 7.4723E-05 | 0.10789 |
| GO:0098662 | Inorganic cation transmembrane transport | 682 | 4.2746 | 3.2751 | 9.4817E-05 | 0.10789 |
| GO:0098655 | Cation transmembrane transport | 771 | 4.8325 | 3.104 | 9.5708E-05 | 0.10789 |
| GO:0030030 | Cell projection organization | 1473 | 9.2324 | 2.3829 | 0.00011067 | 0.11089 |
| GO:0030001 | Metal ion transport | 813 | 5.0957 | 2.9437 | 0.00017136 | 0.14155 |
FDR: False discovery rate; GO: Gene ontology.
Discussion
The current studies sought to determine BPA-induced miR and other small RNA changes in the mouse placenta at mid-gestation (E 12.5) as BPA and other EDCs might induce phenotypic changes by altering mRNA profiles within a given organ. Although previous studies have examined the correlations of maternal BPA exposure and miRs in the human placenta [22,42], inadequate information is known how such chemicals might affect miRNA expression patterns in the mouse placenta. Target mRNAs were then determined based on the DE miR.
Small RNAs that were DE between BPA versus control placenta included about half that were upregulated and half that were downregulated. One other miR that was down-regulated in the BPA placenta group was miR-146b-5p. Comparison of the DE miR identified in the mouse placenta to those previously identified in the human placental lines exposed to BPA reveals that the only one that is similar in both studies was miR146 (Supplementary File 3). The miR146 family includes four members: miR146a-5p, miR-146a (recently renamed miR-146a-3p, miR146b-5p and miR-146b-3p). In both human placenta cell lines [42], 3A and HTR-8ab, miR146a was upregulated in both human placental cell lines, 3A and HTR-8A, whereas miR146b-5p showed reduced expression in the mouse placenta. Overexpression of miR-146a in these cell lines reduced cellular proliferation and rendered the cells more vulnerable to a DNA mutagenic agent [42]. Genome-wide miR expression profiling revealed that maternal exposure to BPA significantly correlated with overexpression of miR-146a in whole human placenta [22]. Developmental exposure to California mice to BPA, genistein, or the combination of these two EDC upregulated miR-146 in the hypothalamus of males and females [40]. In the mouse testes, BPA-induced miR-146a-5p that in turn impaired steroidogenesis through negative regulation of MTA) signaling [36]. Even though it is not clear why it is downregulated in the mouse placenta, it may be related to the specific isoform, miR146b-5p. In humans, maternal smoking is associated with the suppression of miR-146a in the placenta [65]. The collective studies suggest that miR-146 might be sensitive in a range of organs to xenoestrogen exposure in mammals and could serve as a barometer for such exposure.
Various forms of let-7 were also DE in human trophoblast cells lines exposed to BPA and mouse placenta. For instance, let-7f and g were elevated in both human lines treated with BPA [42]. In the mouse placenta, let-7b-5p was considerably upregulated, but let-7d had reduced expression. Several let-7 forms have been previously identified in the placenta and extra-embryonic tissues [66]. Conceivably, miR-146 and let-7 may be useful biomarkers of BPA and possibly other xenoestrogen exposure in mouse and humans. If further work reveals that changes in such small RNA expression changes in the placenta lead to associated fetal diseases, therapeutic approaches might be designed based on these small RNAs.
While both of these small RNAs appear to be expressed in mouse and placental tissues, it is possible that there are differences in other small RNA expression patterns across the placenta of these two species. While similarities exist between TB cells between mouse and human, there are also notable differences that may contribute to variation in small RNA expression patterns under normal conditions and in response to BPA exposure. Thus, it is essential to examine how BPA and related EDC affect individual human and mouse TB lineages.
A total of 142 target mRNAs were predicted to be affected by the panel of DE miRs. We presumed that such target mRNAs would be enriched in the placenta. However, TissueEnrich revealed that they represent those enriched in the thymus and central nervous system. Further, enrichment analysis revealed that pathways predicted to be affected are those involved in neurogenesis, neuron development, and neuron projection development. Such results were unexpected and suggest further linkages between the placenta–brain axis [67]. Whether miR from the placenta can circulate in extracellular vesicles to the developing neural tissue remains uncertain. Such extracellular vesicles containing miRs have been identified in maternal plasma samples with miR populations fluctuating throughout pregnancy [68]. Past studies have also shown similar genes are expressed in the placenta and brain, such as glucose transporters, Ogt, and human GRB10 [69–72].
One of the limitations of the current study is that we only tested placenta from female conceptuses. It is possible that early BPA exposure may lead to sex-dependent differences in small RNA expression. Yet, we did not know such sex differences when examining global transcriptomic profiles in the placenta following BPA exposure [20]. In future work, we will also plan to test multiple time points throughout gestation as miR profiles in the placenta may fluctuate throughout pregnancy.
Another limitation is that the current studies were done with whole mouse placental tissues, but this organ comprises heterogenous populations of cells, including those that form the labyrinth and junctional regions, such as parietal trophoblast giant cells at the interface with maternal tissue. While single nuclei RNA-seq approaches have been used to screen transcriptome profiles in individual murine trophoblast cells [73,74], such approaches have not currently been adapted for analyzing small RNAs in this organ. Further, the transcriptome profile of parietal trophoblast giant cells is not represented in these studies. These cells endoreplicate their nuclear genome resulting in large cells with nuclei of a diameter of 50 μm or greater. Their size presumably explains why their genetic signature patterns are not reflected in the current mouse single nuclei and single cell RNA-seq approaches [73,74]. We are in the process of differentiating mouse trophoblast stem cells to parietal trophoblast giant cells. This approach will facilitate to examine small RNA profiles in undifferentiated and differentiated trophoblast cells, as well as to determine how BPA and other factors affect these individual cell populations.
Conclusion
The current findings reveal that early exposure to BPA alters placental small RNA profiles in the mouse with approximately equal number being up regulated as those downregulated. In contrast to previous work that suggest BPA and other EDCs upregulates miR146 members in the human placenta and other organs, the only miR-146 form, miR146b-5p, exhibited reduced expression in the mouse placenta following maternal BPA exposure. Notwithstanding, the findings suggest that miR-146 forms might be vulnerable to BPA exposure, which could be exploited for diagnostic purposes. Surprisingly target mRNAs most closely aligned to those expressed by the thymus and brain rather than the placenta. Such associations with the latter were also reflected in pathway enrichment analyses that indicated such target mRNAs regulate neurogenesis and associated neurodevelopment. If further studies bare out this linkage, it suggests further ties between the placenta and fetal brain development that could thus be impacted by contact to maternal EDCs. In sum, the current worker provides potential biomarkers for BPA and possibly other EDC exposure and potentially suggests new paradigms in thinking about the placenta-brain axis.
Future perspective
While the current studies have advanced our understanding of how developmental exposure to BPA affects small RNA expression patterns in the mouse placenta, much work remains to be done. As detailed above, it is essential to pinpoint how BPA affects small RNA expression patterns in individual mouse trophoblast cells, which can be done through single nuclei RNA-seq for small RNAs, assuming this methodology becomes available, or via cell culture studies. It will also be important to screen other EDCs, such as BPS, other xenoestrogens and xenoandrogens, to determine if there are common small RNAs that they target. Examining for sex differences in relation to such exposure will also be essential. Lastly, it will be important to elucidate whether such small RNA changes induced by these chemicals affect mRNA populations in the placenta and/or the fetal brain. In this aspect, it will be essential to use labeling methods to track miRs and other small RNAs originating from the placenta and potentially reaching the brain through extracellular vesicles.
Summary points.
Bisphenol A (BPA) is used as a plasticizer in many common household items.
BPA can affect transcriptome and DNA methylation profiles in the placenta and other organs.
It is uncertain whether BPA alters small RNA expression patterns in the mouse placenta.
Mouse dams were fed 200 μg/kg body weight BPA daily for two weeks and bred.
Placental samples were collected at gestational day 12.5 for small RNA-sequencing.
Forty-three small RNAs were differentially expressed.
Target mRNAs are closely aligned to those expressed by the thymus and brain.
Pathway enrichment showed predicted target mRNAs regulate neurogenesis and neurodevelopment processes.
Current findings provide potential biomarkers, small RNAs, for BPA exposure in the mouse placenta.
The placenta might affect fetal brain development through the secretion of miRNAs.
Supplementary Material
Acknowledgments
The authors appreciate the undergraduate students who assisted with the animal husbandry and general care of the mice colonies.
Footnotes
Supplementary data
To view the supplementary data that accompany this paper please visit the journal website at: www.futuremedicine.com/doi/suppl/10.2217/epi-2021-0339
Financial & competing interests disclosure
This study was supported by NIEHS 1R01ES025547 (CSR). The authors have no other relevant affiliations or financial involvement with any organization or entity with a financial interest in or financial conflict with the subject matter or materials discussed in the manuscript apart from those disclosed.
No writing assistance was utilized in the production of this manuscript.
Ethical conduct of research
The authors state that they have obtained appropriate institutional review board approval or have followed the principles outlined in the Declaration of Helsinki for all animal experimental investigations.
References
Papers of special note have been highlighted as: • of interest; •• of considerable interest
- 1.Rosenfeld CS. Sex-specific placental responses in fetal development. Endocrinology 156(10), 3422–3434 (2015). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Source: Digital Journal Global bisphenol A (BPA) market by appliation (appliances, automotive, consumer, construction, electrical & electronics) expected to reach USD 20.03 billion by 2020. Press release: http://www.digitaljournal.com/pr/2009287
- 3.Calafat AM, Ye X, Wong LY, Reidy JA, Needham LL. Exposure of the US population to bisphenol A and 4-tertiary-octylphenol: 2003-2004. Environ. Health Perspect. 116(1), 39–44 (2008). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Sieli PT, Jasarevic E, Warzak DA et al. Comparison of serum bisphenol A concentrations in mice exposed to bisphenol A through the diet versus oral bolus exposure. Environ. Health Perspect. 119(9), 1260–1265 (2011). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; • This article is of interest as it establishes that exposure doses of bisphenol A (BPA) used in rodent models mirror those that to which humans are unknowlingly be exposed.
- 5.Galloway T, Cipelli R, Guralnick J et al. Daily bisphenol A excretion and associations with sex hormone concentrations: results from the InCHIANTI adult population study. Environ. Health Perspect. 118, 1603–1608 (2010). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Xue J, Wan Y, Kannan K. Occurrence of bisphenols, bisphenol A diglycidyl ethers (BADGEs), and novolac glycidyl ethers (NOGEs) in indoor air from Albany, New York, USA, and its implications for inhalation exposure. Chemosphere 151, 1–8 (2016). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Hines CJ, Christianson AL, Jackson MV et al. An evaluation of the relationship among urine, air, and hand measures of exposure to bisphenol A (BPA) in US manufacturing workers. Annals Work Exposures Health 62(7), 840–851 (2018). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Vom Saal FS, Akingbemi BT, Belcher SM et al. Chapel Hill bisphenol A expert panel consensus statement: integration of mechanisms, effects in animals and potential to impact human health at current levels of exposure. Reprod. Toxicol. 24(2), 131–138 (2007). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Vandenberg LN, Hauser R, Marcus M, Olea N, Welshons WV. Human exposure to bisphenol A (BPA). Reprod. Toxicol. 24(2), 139–177 (2007). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Imanishi S, Manabe N, Nishizawa H et al. Effects of oral exposure of bisphenol A on mRNA expression of nuclear receptors in murine placentae assessed by DNA microarray. J. Reprod. Develop. 49(4), 329–336 (2003). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Kang ER, Iqbal K, Tran DA et al. Effects of endocrine disruptors on imprinted gene expression in the mouse embryo. Epigenetics 6(7), 937–950 (2011). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Lan X, Fu LJ, Zhang J et al. Bisphenol A exposure promotes HTR-8/SVneo cell migration and impairs mouse placentation involving upregulation of integrin-beta1 and MMP-9 and stimulation of MAPK and PI3K signaling pathways. Oncotarget 8(31), 51507–51521 (2017). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Lee JH, Ahn C, Kang HY et al. Effects of octylphenol and bisphenol A on the metal cation transporter channels of mouse placentas. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 13(10), (2016). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Muller JE, Meyer N, Santamaria CG et al. Bisphenol A exposure during early pregnancy impairs uterine spiral artery remodeling and provokes intrauterine growth restriction in mice. Sci. Rep. 8(1), 9196 (2018). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Susiarjo M, Sasson I, Mesaros C, Bartolomei MS. Bisphenol a exposure disrupts genomic imprinting in the mouse. PLoS Genet. 9(4), e1003401 (2013). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; • This article is of interest as it was one of the first to show that BPA can affect the expression of imprinted genes in the mouse placenta.
- 16.Tachibana T, Wakimoto Y, Nakamuta N et al. Effects of bisphenol A (BPA) on placentation and survival of the neonates in mice. J. Reprod. Dev. 53(3), 509–514 (2007). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Tait S, Tassinari R, Maranghi F, Mantovani A. Toxicogenomic analysis of placenta samples from mice exposed to different doses of BPA. Genomics Data 4, 109–111 (2015). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Tait S, Tassinari R, Maranghi F, Mantovani A. Bisphenol A affects placental layers morphology and angiogenesis during early pregnancy phase in mice. J. Appl. Toxicol. 35(11), 1278–1291 (2015). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; • This article is of interest as it showed that BPA can affect placental morphology in mice.
- 19.Ye Y, Tang Y, Xiong Y, Feng L, Li X. Bisphenol A exposure alters placentation and causes preeclampsia-like features in pregnant mice involved in reprogramming of DNA methylation of WNT2. FASEB J. 33 (2), 2732–2742 (2018). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Mao J, Jain A, Denslow ND et al. Bisphenol A and bisphenol S disruptions of the mouse placenta and potential effects on the placenta-brain axis. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 117(9), 4642–4652 (2020). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; •• This article is of considerable interest as it showed that both BPA and bisphenol S cause similar morphological, gene expression, metabolic and neurotransmitter expression changes in the mouse placenta.
- 21.Chu PW, Yang ZJ, Huang HH et al. Low-dose bisphenol A activates the ERK signaling pathway and attenuates steroidogenic gene expression in human placental cells. Biol. Reprod. 98(2), 250–258 (2018). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.De Felice B, Manfellotto F, Palumbo A et al. Genome-wide microRNA expression profiling in placentas from pregnant women exposed to BPA. BMC Med. Genomics 8, 56 (2015). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Li Q, Kappil MA, Li A et al. Exploring the associations between microRNA expression profiles and environmental pollutants in human placenta from the National Children's Study (NCS). Epigenetics 10(9), 793–802 (2015). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Morice L, Benaitreau D, Dieudonne MN et al. Antiproliferative and proapoptotic effects of bisphenol A on human trophoblastic JEG-3 cells. Reprod. Toxicol. 32(1), 69–76 (2011). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Perez-Albaladejo E, Fernandes D, Lacorte S, Porte C. Comparative toxicity, oxidative stress and endocrine disruption potential of plasticizers in JEG-3 human placental cells. Toxicol. In Vitro 38, 41–48 (2017). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Ponniah M, Billett EE, De Girolamo LA. Bisphenol A increases BeWo trophoblast survival in stress-induced paradigms through regulation of oxidative stress and apoptosis. Chem. Res. Toxicol. 28(9), 1693–1703 (2015). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Rajakumar C, Guan H, Langlois D, Cernea M, Yang K. Bisphenol A disrupts gene expression in human placental trophoblast cells. Reprod. Toxicol. 53, 39–44 (2015). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Sieppi E, Vahakangas K, Rautio A, Ietta F, Paulesu L, Myllynen P. The xenoestrogens, bisphenol A and para-nonylphenol, decrease the expression of the ABCG2 transporter protein in human term placental explant cultures. Mol. Cell Endocrinol. 429, 41–49 (2016). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Spagnoletti A, Paulesu L, Mannelli C et al. Low concentrations of bisphenol A and para-nonylphenol affect extravillous pathway of human trophoblast cells. Mol. Cell. Endocrinol. 412, 56–64 (2015). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Speidel JT, Xu M, Abdel-Rahman SZ. Bisphenol A (BPA) and bisphenol S (BPS) alter the promoter activity of the ABCB1 gene encoding P-glycoprotein in the human placenta in a haplotype-dependent manner. Toxicol. Appl. Pharmacol. 359, 47–54 (2018). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Wang ZY, Lu J, Zhang YZ, Zhang M, Liu T, Qu XL. Effect of bisphenol A on invasion ability of human trophoblastic cell line BeWo. Int. J. Clin. Exp. Pathol. 8(11), 14355–14364 (2015). [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Jain A, Ezashi T, Roberts RM, Tuteja G. Deciphering transcriptional regulation in human embryonic stem cells specified towards a trophoblast fate. Sci. Rep. 7(1), 17257 (2017). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Van Wynsberghe PM, Chan SP, Slack FJ, Pasquinelli AE. Analysis of microRNA expression and function. Methods Cell Biol. 106, 219–252 (2011). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Moreno-Moya JM, Vilella F, Simon C. MicroRNA: key gene expression regulators. Fertil. Steril. 101(6), 1516–1523 (2014). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Chou WC, Lee PH, Tan YY et al. An integrative transcriptomic analysis reveals bisphenol A exposure-induced dysregulation of microRNA expression in human endometrial cells. Toxicol. In Vitro 41, 133–142 (2017). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Gao GZ, Zhao Y, Li HX, Li W. Bisphenol A-elicited miR-146a-5p impairs murine testicular steroidogenesis through negative regulation of Mta3 signaling. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 501(2), 478–485 (2018). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Reed BG, Babayev SN, Chen LX, Carr BR, Word RA, Jimenez PT. Estrogen-regulated miRNA-27b is altered by bisphenol A in endometrial stromal cells. Reproduction 156 (6),559–567 (2018). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Verbanck M, Canouil M, Leloire A et al. Low-dose exposure to bisphenols A, F and S of human primary adipocyte impacts coding and non-coding RNA profiles. PLoS ONE 12(6), e0179583 (2017). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Topper VY, Walker DM, Gore AC. Sexually dimorphic effects of gestational endocrine-disrupting chemicals on microRNA expression in the developing rat hypothalamus. Mol. Cell. Endocrinol. 414, 42–52 (2015). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Kaur S, Kinkade JA, Green MT et al. Disruption of global hypothalamic microRNA (miR) profiles and associated behavioral changes in California mice (Peromyscus californicus) developmentally exposed to endocrine disrupting chemicals. Horm. Behav. 128, 104890 (2021). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; •• This article is of considerable interest as it was the first to examine small RNA-sequencing profiles in a rodent model in response to BPA and other endocrine disruptors.
- 41.Butler MC, Long CN, Kinkade JA et al. Endocrine disruption of gene expression and microRNA profiles in hippocampus and hypothalamus of California mice: Association of gene expression changes with behavioural outcomes. J. Neuroendocrinol. 32 (5), e12847 (2020). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; • This article is of interest as it examined select miRNAs in two brain regions and linked such changes to behavioral outcomes in a rodent model.
- 42.Avissar-Whiting M, Veiga KR, Uhl KM et al. Bisphenol A exposure leads to specific microRNA alterations in placental cells. Reprod. Toxicol. 29(4), 401–406 (2010). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; •• This article is of considerable interest as it was one of the first to show that BPA can affect miRNA expression patterns in human placental cells.
- 43.Anderson OS, Nahar MS, Faulk C et al. Epigenetic responses following maternal dietary exposure to physiologically relevant levels of bisphenol A. Environ. Mol Mutagenesis 53 (5), 334–342 (2012). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Dolinoy DC, Huang D, Jirtle RL. Maternal nutrient supplementation counteracts bisphenol A-induced DNA hypomethylation in early development. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 104(32), 13056–13061 (2007). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Dolinoy DC, Weidman JR, Waterland RA, Jirtle RL. Maternal genistein alters coat color and protects Avy mouse offspring from obesity by modifying the fetal epigenome. Environ. Health Persp. 114(4), 567–572 (2006). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Cox KH, Gatewood JD, Howeth C, Rissman EF. Gestational exposure to bisphenol A and cross-fostering affect behaviors in juvenile mice. Horm. Behav. 58(5), 754–761 (2010). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Vandenberg LN, Chahoud I, Padmanabhan V, Paumgartten FJ, Schoenfelder G. Biomonitoring studies should be used by regulatory agencies to assess human exposure levels and safety of bisphenol a. Environ. Health Perspect. 118(8), 1051–1054 (2010). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Sieli PT, Jasarevic E, Warzak DA et al. Comparison of serum bisphenol A concentrations in mice exposed to bisphenol A through the diet versus oral bolus exposure. Environ. Health Perspect. 119(9), 1260–1265 (2011). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Jasarevic E, Williams SA, Vandas GM et al. Sex and dose-dependent effects of developmental exposure to bisphenol A on anxiety and spatial learning in deer mice (Peromyscus maniculatus bairdii) offspring. Horm. Behav. 63, 180–189 (2013). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50.Padmanabhan V, Siefert K, Ransom S et al. Maternal bisphenol-A levels at delivery: a looming problem? J. Perinatol. 28(4), 258–263 (2008). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51.Teeguarden JG, Calafat AM, Ye X et al. Twenty-four hour human urine and serum profiles of bisphenol a during high-dietary exposure. Toxicol. Sci. 123(1), 48–57 (2011). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52.Vandenberg LN, Chahoud I, Heindel JJ, Padmanabhan V, Paumgartten FJ, Schoenfelder G. Urinary, circulating, and tissue biomonitoring studies indicate widespread exposure to bisphenol A. Environ. Health Perspect. 118(8), 1055–1070 (2010). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53.Vandenberg LN, Hauser R, Marcus M, Olea N, Welshons WV. Human exposure to bisphenol A (BPA). Reprod. Toxicol. 24(2), 139–177 (2007). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54.Koopman P, Gubbay J, Vivian N, Goodfellow P, Lovell-Badge R. Male development of chromosomally female mice transgenic for Sry. Nature 351(6322), 117–121 (1991). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55.Institute for Systems Biology. sRNAnalyzer - a pipeline for sRNA sequencing data analysis. http://srnanalyzer.systemsbiology.net/
- 56.Martin M. Cutadapt removes adapter sequences from high-throughput sequencing reads. EMBnet. J. 17, 200 (2011). [Google Scholar]
- 57.Langmead B, Trapnell C, Pop M, Salzberg SL. Ultrafast and memory-efficient alignment of short DNA sequences to the human genome. Genome Biol. 10(3), R25 (2009). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 58.Love MI, Huber W, Anders S. Moderated estimation of fold change and dispersion for RNA-seq data with DESeq2. Genome Biol. 15(12), 550 (2014). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 59.Friedman Y, Naamati G, Linial M. MiRror: a combinatorial analysis web tool for ensembles of microRNAs and their targets. Bioinformatics 26(15), 1920–1921 (2010). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 60.Wang J, Duncan D, Shi Z, Zhang B. WEB-based GEne SeT AnaLysis Toolkit (WebGestalt): update 2013. Nucl. Acids Res. 41, W77–83 (2013). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 61.Jain A, Tuteja G. TissueEnrich: tissue-specific gene enrichment analysis. Bioinformatics 35(11), 1966–1967 (2019). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 62.Shen Y, Yue F, Mccleary DF et al. A map of the cis-regulatory sequences in the mouse genome. Nature 488(7409), 116–120 (2012). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 63.ENCORI (2020). http://starbase.sysu.edu.cn/tutorialAPI.php#miRNA-Target
- 64.Li JH, Liu S, Zhou H, Qu LH, Yang JH. starBase v2.0: decoding miRNA-ceRNA, miRNA-ncRNA and protein-RNA interaction networks from large-scale CLIP-Seq data. Nucl. Acids Res. 42, D92–97 (2014). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 65.Maccani MA, Avissar-Whiting M, Banister CE, Mcgonnigal B, Padbury JF, Marsit CJ. Maternal cigarette smoking during pregnancy is associated with downregulation of miR-16, miR-21, and miR-146a in the placenta. Epigenetics 5(7), 583–589 (2010). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 66.Chan HW, Lappas M, Yee SW, Vaswani K, Mitchell MD, Rice GE. The expression of the let-7 miRNAs and Lin28 signalling pathway in human term gestational tissues. Placenta 34(5), 443–448 (2013). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 67.Rosenfeld CS. The placenta-brain-axis. J. Neurosci. Res. 99(1), 271–283 (2021). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; • This article is of interest as it establishes how changes in the placenta can affect fetal brain development and later neurobehavioral outcomes.
- 68.Foley HB, Howe CG, Eckel SP et al. Extracellular vesicle-enriched miRNA profiles across pregnancy in the MADRES cohort. PLoS ONE 16(5), e0251259 (2021). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 69.Hauguel-De Mouzon S, Leturque A, Alsat E, Loizeau M, Evain-Brion D, Girard J. Developmental expression of Glut1 glucose transporter and c-fos genes in human placental cells. Placenta 15(1), 35–46 (1994). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 70.Howerton CL, Morgan CP, Fischer DB, Bale TL. O-GlcNAc transferase (OGT) as a placental biomarker of maternal stress and reprogramming of CNS gene transcription in development. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 110(13), 5169–5174 (2013). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 71.Kitano T, Iizasa H, Terasaki T et al. Polarized glucose transporters and mRNA expression properties in newly developed rat syncytiotrophoblast cell lines, TR-TBTs. J. Cell Physiol. 193(2), 208–218 (2002). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 72.Monk D, Arnaud P, Frost J et al. Reciprocal imprinting of human GRB10 in placental trophoblast and brain: evolutionary conservation of reversed allelic expression. Hum. Mol. Genet. 18(16), 3066–3074 (2009). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 73.Marsh B, Blelloch R. Single nuclei RNA-seq of mouse placental labyrinth development. eLife 9, e60266 (2020). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 74.Nelson AC, Mould AW, Bikoff EK, Robertson EJ. Single-cell RNA-seq reveals cell type-specific transcriptional signatures at the maternal-foetal interface during pregnancy. Nat. Commun. 7, 11414 (2016). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

