Abstract
An iodide-accelerated, palladium-catalyzed C–P bond-forming reaction of aryl nonaflates is described. The protocol was optimized for the synthesis of aryl phosphine oxides and was found to be tolerant of a wide range of aryl nonaflates. The general nature of this transformation was established with coupling to other P(O)H compounds for the synthesis of aryl phosphonates and an aryl phosphinate. The straightforward synthesis of stable, isolable aryl nonaflates, in combination with the rapid C–P bond-forming reaction allows facile preparation of aryl phosphorus target compounds from readily available phenol starting materials. The synthetic utility of this general strategy was demonstrated with the efficient preparation of an organic light-emitting diode (OLED) material and a phosphonophenylalanine mimic.
Introduction
Aryl phosphorus compounds are important due to their widespread application in organic, medicinal, and materials chemistry.1,2 As a consequence, carbon–phosphorus bond formation is a highly active area of research in organophosphorus chemistry. Traditionally, aryl C–P bonds were formed via the reaction of Grignard or organolithium reagents with electrophilic phosphorus compounds.3 In 1981, pioneering work by Hirao and co-workers demonstrated that aryl C–P bonds could be generated by palladium-catalyzed cross-coupling reactions of aryl bromides with P(O)–H compounds (Scheme 1a).4 Since the discovery of the Hirao reaction, efforts have focused on extending the range of electrophilic aryl substrates, elucidation of the reaction mechanism and optimization of the reaction conditions.5,6
Scheme 1. Selected Palladium-Catalyzed Reactions for the Synthesis of Aryl C–P Bonds.
Despite the availability of aryl halides as coupling reagents, many complex arenes, particularly natural product-based (e.g., steroids and amino acids), exist only in phenolic form. For this reason, Hirao-type reactions using activated sulfonates have been reported. Aryl triflates have been explored as substrates,5,6e,7 but the high cost and reactive nature of reagents limits applications. This has led to the development of metal-catalyzed aryl C–P bond-forming reactions using mesylates and tosylates.5,8 For example, the Kwong group has demonstrated the effective phosphorylation of aryl mesylates and tosylates using low catalyst loadings of Pd(OAc)2 in combination with the CM-Phos ligand (Scheme 1b).9 Transformations at 110 °C and a reaction time of 18 h gave a wide range of phosphonate esters in high yields. Recently, the Ding and Xu groups independently reported Pd-catalyzed C–P bond-forming reactions of aryl fluorosulfonates.10 Following synthesis of these from phenols and sulfuryl fluoride gas, these compounds were readily coupled with a range of P(O)–H compounds using Pd(OAc)2 and either dppf or DPEPhos ligands.
Although advances in palladium-catalyzed C–P bond-forming reactions with aryl sulfonates have been achieved, we were interested in developing a method with a short reaction time, which avoided the need for additional ligands or gaseous reagents, and that could also be applied for the preparation of a range of aryl phosphorus compounds. Aryl nonafluorobutylsulfonates [nonaflates, ArOSO2(CF2)3CF3] are easily prepared from phenols and the inexpensive, industrial product nonaflyl fluoride. In addition, these are stable and can be readily purified by flash column chromatography. For these reasons, aryl nonaflates have been used for a wide range of palladium-catalyzed cross-coupling reactions.11,12 However, utilization of these for analogous C–P bond-forming reactions are relatively rare. Apart from a few specific examples,13 the only methodology study was reported by the Lipshutz group, who demonstrated the efficient synthesis of triarylphosphine boranes via the reaction of aryl nonaflates with diphenylphosphine-borane.14 Herein, we disclose a palladium-catalyzed C–P bond-forming reaction with aryl nonaflates that can be accelerated by iodide, resulting in short reaction times (Scheme 1c). The method does not require additional ligands or substrates prepared by gaseous reagents. Furthermore, we demonstrate that the method can be used as part of an effective strategy for the synthesis of important organophosphorus compounds from phenol starting materials.
Results and Discussion
Initial studies focused on the reaction of diphenylphosphine oxide with the nonactivated starting material, p-tolyl nonaflate (1a) (Table 1). As previous work has shown palladium acetate as an effective catalyst for C–P bond formation,6 this was used in combination with triethylamine, originally utilized as a base by the Hirao group.4 In addition, dimethylformamide (DMF) was chosen as an effective solvent for working with aryl nonaflates. Using 1 equiv of diphenylphosphine oxide, at a reaction temperature of 90 °C, showed only 70% conversion by 1H nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) spectroscopy, resulting in a 41% isolated yield (entry 1). Mechanistic work of palladium-catalyzed C–P bond-forming reactions by the Stawinski,6a,6c Montchamp,6f,6g and Keglevich groups6h,6i have shown that excess amounts of the P(O)H coupling partner are required to reduce the palladium(II) catalyst and act as a ligand (see Scheme 6). Therefore, using 1.5 equiv of diphenylphosphine oxide and an increased reaction temperature of 110 °C, allowed full conversion after 24 h and a 58% isolated yield (entry 2). A further increase of reaction temperature to 120 °C resulted in further improvement in isolated yield (79%); however, the reaction still required 24 h to reach completion (entry 3). As ionic additives such as chloride and acetate ions are well known to promote Pd-mediated cross-coupling reactions,15,16 and facilitate the Hirao reaction,6a,6c,6e these were investigated to improve the reaction time. Interestingly, the addition of stoichiometric quantities of NaOAc or NaCl (entries 4 and 5) led to no improvement in the reaction time and gave phosphine oxide 2a in lower isolated yields. In contrast, the addition of NaI (1 equiv) resulted in a significantly faster reaction time of 4 h, which gave 2a in 78% yield (entry 6). This effect was observed to a lesser extent using 0.1 equiv of NaI (entry 7). In this case, the reaction was complete after 8 h.
Table 1. Optimization Studies for Palladium-Catalyzed Synthesis of (p-Tolyl)diphenylphosphine Oxide (2a).
| entry | additive (equiv) | time (h) | temperature (°C) | isolated yield (%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1a | 24 | 90 | 41 | |
| 2 | 24 | 110 | 58 | |
| 3 | 24 | 120 | 79 | |
| 4 | NaOAc (1) | 22 | 120 | 55 |
| 5 | NaCl (1) | 32 | 120 | 64 |
| 6 | NaI (1) | 4 | 120 | 78 |
| 7 | NaI (0.1) | 8 | 120 | 76 |
Using 1 equiv of Ph2P(O)H.
Scheme 6. Proposed Mechanism for the Iodide-Accelerated, Palladium-Catalyzed C–P Bond-Forming Reaction.
Having identified rapid and efficient conditions for the synthesis of 2a, the scope of the iodide-accelerated reaction was investigated for the coupling of diphenylphosphine oxide with various aryl nonaflates (Scheme 2). Using NaI (1 equiv) throughout, the process was found to be compatible with a wide range of substituents and functional groups, forming the majority of diphenylphosphine oxides after 4 h reaction times. Some variations to the standard conditions were observed. For example, the reaction of naphthyl analogue 1f was found to proceed at 90 °C and was complete after 3 h, while aryl nonaflates with ortho-substituents (1c) or with strong electron-donating groups (1h) required slightly longer reaction times. Although the reaction conditions tolerated chloride substituents (1p), attempted coupling of 3-bromophenyl nonaflate (1q) with diphenylphosphine oxide (1.5 equiv) gave a mixture of compounds. Analysis of the reaction mixture by 1H NMR spectroscopy showed the presence of bis-phosphine oxide 2q as the major product, along with mono-phosphine oxide by-products. As a selective reaction was not possible, 1q was allowed to react with 3 equiv of diphenylphosphine oxide, which gave bis-phosphine oxide 2q in 57% yield. Pyridin-2-yl nonaflate (1r) was also a substrate for this transformation, giving clean conversion to 2r in 60% yield. From the series of nonaflates investigated, only a p-nitrophenyl analogue failed to generate the desired product. In this case, the reaction conditions led to decomposition of the nonaflate.
Scheme 2. Reaction Scope of Aryl Nonaflates,
Isolated yields.
Reactions performed at 0.2 or 0.4 mmol scale.
Reaction performed at 90 °C.
From 3-bromophenyl nonaflate using Ph2P(O)H (3 equiv).
Using p-tolyl nonaflate (1a) as a standard substrate, the study then investigated the use of the reaction for the preparation of other aryl C–P bonds (Scheme 3). In a similar manner to the synthesis of diphenylphosphine oxide 2a, the iodide-accelerated reaction with Pd(OAc)2 permitted the synthesis of phosphine oxide 3a. While Pd(OAc)2 did allow the preparation of other aryl C–P-containing compounds, the reactions were less efficient, leading to the products in moderate yields (40–50%). For this reason, a brief screen for alternative catalysts was performed that identified Pd(PPh3)4 as an effective substitute.17 Reaction of 1a with di-n-butylphosphine oxide in the presence of Pd(PPh3)4 and NaI gave dialkylphosphine oxide 3b in 58% yield, after a reaction time of 5 h. Reaction of 1a with the more reactive coupling partners, ethyl phenylphosphinate and diethyl phosphite was found to proceed at 80 °C and after reaction times of 4 and 6 h, respectively, gave phosphinate 3c and phosphonate 3d in good yields.
Scheme 3. Reaction Scope for the Synthesis of Various Aryl Phosphorus Compounds,
Isolated yields.
Reactions performed at 0.2 or 0.4 mmol scale.
Reaction performed using Pd(OAc)2 (10 mol %).
Reaction performed using Pd(PPh3)4 (10 mol %).
The study next investigated the combination of the mild conditions for nonaflate synthesis with the accelerated aryl C–P bond-forming reaction for the simple conversion of phenols to aryl phosphorus-containing targets (Scheme 4). Pyrene nonaflate 5 was prepared in 87% yield by the treatment of 1-hydroxypyrene (4) with nonaflyl fluoride, under basic conditions. Reaction of 5 with diphenylphosphine oxide, using Pd(OAc)2 and NaI gave phosphine oxide 6, a blue light-emitting diode material in 73% yield.18 In a similar manner, commercially available l-tyrosine derivative 7 was converted to the corresponding aryl nonaflate 8 under mild conditions, in 94% yield. Iodide-accelerated phosphorylation of 8, performed at a 1 mmol scale, was found to proceed at 80 °C, and after a reaction time of 6 h, gave phosphonate ester 9 in 72% yield. With this transformation, a lower loading of the palladium catalyst was investigated. Using 5 mol % Pd(PPh3)4 showed no significant difference in reaction efficiency. Again, at a 1 mmol scale, the transformation was complete in 7 h and produced phosphonate ester in 65% yield. Acid-mediated deprotection allowed the isolation of phosphonophenylalanine 10, a compound used for various medicinal chemistry applications, such as a component of peptides that act as thrombin inhibitors and as competitive N-methyl-d-aspartic acid antagonists.7a,19
Scheme 4. Synthesis of Various Aryl Phosphorus Target Compounds.
Having demonstrated the utility of this method, the possible role of iodide in accelerating the C–P bond-forming process was considered. Initially, the different rates observed during the reaction of p-tolyl nonaflate (1a) with diphenylphosphine oxide in the presence of NaI (0, 0.1, and 1 equiv) were further investigated. A conversion graph generated by 1H NMR spectroscopy confirmed that while the reaction with NaI (1 equiv) was complete after 4 h (∼95% conversion), only 12% conversion was observed at the same time during the reaction without NaI (Figure 1).
Figure 1.
Conversion graph for the synthesis of 2a (measured using 1H NMR spectroscopy and dimethyl terephthalate as an internal standard).
Halide and acetate additives have been shown to promote Pd-catalyzed cross-coupling reactions by the formation of more nucleophilic anionic palladium complexes.15,16 However, no accelerating effects were observed when acetate or chloride ions were employed during this transformation (Table 1). It has also been proposed that iodide accelerating effects during Pd-catalyzed cross-coupling reactions are due to the faster oxidative addition of aryl iodide intermediates formed in situ via a Finkelstein reaction.20 Using the optimized conditions for the coupling of p-tolyl nonaflate (1a) with diphenylphosphine oxide, control experiments were conducted to determine whether p-tolyl iodide (11) was an intermediate (Scheme 5). Repeating the reaction under the same conditions, but in the absence of either diphenylphosphine oxide or Pd(OAc)2, no iodide could be detected (by 1H NMR spectroscopy), even after 24 h. A final experiment to probe the mechanism investigated the use of p-tolyl iodide (11) as the starting material. Previous work using aryl iodides as substrates for palladium-catalyzed C–P cross-coupling reactions reported lower yields compared to other halide leaving groups.21 It was proposed that this was due to competing reduction of the ArPdI intermediate. Reaction of p-tolyl iodide (11) using our non-catalyzed, standard conditions was found to be fast, with completion observed after 1.5 h. However, this gave phosphine oxide 2a in only 34% isolated yield. This is in contrast to p-tolyl nonaflate (1a), which under the same conditions required a reaction time of 24 h but gave 2a in 79% yield (Table 1, entry 3). This difference in reaction times and isolated yields of 2a suggest that an aryl iodide and the subsequent oxidative addition product, ArPdI are not intermediates during the reaction with aryl nonaflates and that the reaction of these proceeds via an alternative mechanism in the presence of iodide.
Scheme 5. Experiments to Investigate the Role of p-Tolyl Iodide as an Intermediate.
Based on these results and previous mechanistic studies by the Stawinski,6a,6c Montchamp,6f,6g and Keglevich groups,6h,6i that implicated the role of the tautomer form of diphenylphosphine oxide as a reducing agent to form Pd(0), as a ligand and as the nucleophilic coupling partner, we propose the following catalytic cycle (Scheme 6). Initially, the active palladium species I is formed by reduction and coordination with the tautomeric form of the excess P(O)H coupling reagent (30 mol % required for 10 mol % Pd catalyst). Following oxidative addition of the aryl nonaflate by Pd(0) species I, the presence of NaI may result in the formation of sodium nonaflate and a coordinatively unsaturated Pd(0) complex II. With the iodide anion weakly bound, this may accelerate coordination and subsequent reaction with the phosphorus nucleophile,22 and following reductive elimination, allow overall faster access to the coupled product. There are other possible roles of iodide that could result in accelerated reactions. For example, the larger trans effect of the iodide when complexed to a Pd intermediate, in comparison to the other ionic additives, could also lead to an accelerated transformation through faster substitution reactions.16
Conclusions
In summary, aryl nonaflates, which are isolable intermediates, readily prepared from abundant phenols, were found to be effective substrates for palladium-catalyzed C–P bond-forming reactions. Optimization studies revealed that the addition of NaI resulted in accelerated reactions, allowing the rapid synthesis of a wide range of aryl phosphine oxides. Extension of the process with other P(O)H coupling reagents resulted in the synthesis of further aryl phosphorus compounds, such as an aryl phosphinate and aryl phosphonates. This included the three-step synthesis of pharmaceutically relevant, phosphonophenylalanine 10 from a commercially available tyrosine derivative in 60% overall yield. Preliminary mechanistic studies suggested that the addition of iodide may accelerate the reaction via a coordinatively unsaturated Pd(0) complex or through the trans effect of a Pd–I intermediate. Investigation of further applications of this transformation is currently underway.
Experimental Section
All reagents and starting materials, including methyl (2S)-2-[(benzyloxycarbonyl)amino]-3-(4-hydroxyphenyl)propanoate (7), were obtained from commercial sources and used as received, unless otherwise stated. Anhydrous dichloromethane was purified using a PureSolv 500 MD solvent purification system. All reactions were performed under an atmosphere of air unless otherwise stated. All reactions performed at elevated temperatures were heated using an oil bath. Dry glassware was oven-dried at 140 °C for a minimum of 16 h, cooled to room temperature in vacuo, and then purged with argon. Brine is defined as a saturated aqueous solution of sodium chloride. Merck aluminum-backed plates precoated with silica gel 60 (UV254) were used for thin-layer chromatography and were visualized under UV light (254/365 nm) and then stained with iodine, potassium permanganate, vanillin, or ninhydrin solution. Flash column chromatography was carried out using Merck Geduran Si 60 (40–63 μm). 1H and 13C NMR spectra were recorded on Bruker DPX 400, Bruker AVI 400, and Bruker AVIII 400 (1H 400 MHz; 13C 101 MHz) spectrometers or a Bruker AVIII 500 (1H 500 MHz; 13C 126 MHz) spectrometer with chemical shift values reported in ppm relative to tetramethylsilane (δH 0.00 and δC 0.0), CDCl3 (δH 7.26 and δC 77.2) or 3-(trimethylsilyl)propionic-2,2,3,3-d4 acid sodium salt in D2O (δH 0.00 and δC 0.0). Assignments of 1H and 13C NMR signals are based on COSY, DEPT, HSQC, and HMBC experiments. Mass spectra were obtained using a JEOL JMS-700 spectrometer or a Bruker microTOFq high-resolution mass spectrometer. Melting points were determined on a Gallenkamp melting point apparatus and are uncorrected. Infrared spectra were recorded neat on a Shimadzu FTIR-84005 spectrometer. Optical rotations were determined as solutions irradiating with the sodium D line (λ = 598 nm) using an Autopol V polarimeter. [α]D values are reported in units 10–1 deg cm2 g–1. Di-(n-butyl)phosphine oxide was prepared as previously described via the reaction of n-butylmagnesium chloride with diethyl phosphite.23
4-Methylphenyl nonafluorobutanesulfonate (1a)24
In an oven-dried flask under argon, p-cresol (1.08 g, 10.0 mmol) was dissolved in anhydrous dichloromethane (33 mL) and cooled to 0 °C. Triethylamine (3.48 mL, 25.0 mmol) was then added followed by perfluoro-1-butanesulfonyl fluoride (2.70 mL, 15.0 mmol). The reaction mixture was warmed to room temperature and stirred for 2 h. The crude mixture was then diluted with dichloromethane (50 mL) and washed with water (3 × 50 mL). The organic layer was dried (MgSO4), filtered, and concentrated in vacuo. The crude material was purified by flash column chromatography eluting with 5% diethyl ether in petroleum ether (40–60) to give 4-methylphenyl nonafluorobutanesulfonate (1a) as a colorless oil (3.40 g, 87%). Spectroscopic data were consistent with the literature.241H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3) δ 2.38 (s, 3H), 7.16 (d, J = 8.6 Hz, 2H), 7.24 (d, J = 8.6 Hz, 2H); 13C{1H} NMR (101 MHz, CDCl3) δ 21.0 (CH3), 121.2 (2 × CH), 130.8 (2 × CH), 138.6 (C), 148.0 (C); MS (ESI) m/z 413 (M + Na+, 100).
3-Methylphenyl nonafluorobutanesulfonate (1b)
The reaction was carried out according to the previously described procedure for 4-methylphenyl nonafluorobutanesulfonate (1a) using m-cresol (0.209 mL, 2.00 mmol), anhydrous dichloromethane (5 mL), triethylamine (0.700 mL, 5.02 mmol), and perfluoro-1-butanesulfonyl fluoride (0.540 mL, 3.00 mmol). The reaction mixture was stirred at room temperature for 3 h. The crude material was purified by flash column chromatography eluting with 100% petroleum ether (40–60) to give 3-methylphenyl nonafluorobutanesulfonate (1b) as a colorless oil (0.588 g, 76%). IR (neat) 2970, 1740, 1425, 1354, 1231, 1198, 1142, 1117, 930 cm–1; 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3) δ 2.41 (s, 3H), 7.06–7.12 (m, 2H), 7.17–7.22 (m, 1H), 7.29–7.36 (m, 1H); 13C{1H} NMR (101 MHz, CDCl3) δ 21.5 (CH3), 118.4 (CH), 122.0 (CH), 129.3 (CH), 130.0 (CH), 141.0 (C), 149.9 (C); MS (EI) m/z 390 (M+, 59), 326 (24), 151 (38), 107 (100), 91 (38), 77 (49); HRMS (EI) m/z: [M]+ calcd for C11H7F9O3S 389.9972; found 389.9953.
2-Methylphenyl nonafluorobutanesulfonate (1c)24
The reaction was carried out according to the previously described procedure for 4-methylphenyl nonafluorobutanesulfonate (1a) using o-cresol (0.270 g, 2.50 mmol), anhydrous dichloromethane (8 mL), triethylamine (0.870 mL, 6.25 mmol), and perfluoro-1-butanesulfonyl fluoride (0.680 mL, 3.77 mmol). The reaction mixture was stirred at room temperature for 2 h. The crude material was purified by flash column chromatography eluting with 5% diethyl ether in hexane to give 2-methylphenyl nonafluorobutanesulfonate (1c) as a colorless oil (0.708 g, 72%). Spectroscopic data were consistent with the literature.241H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3) δ 2.40 (s, 3H), 7.23–7.34 (m, 4H); 13C{1H} NMR (101 MHz, CDCl3) δ 16.6 (CH3), 121.4 (CH), 127.8 (CH), 128.4 (CH), 131.1 (C), 132.3 (CH), 148.8 (C); MS (ESI) m/z 413 (M + Na+, 100).
4-tert-Butylphenyl nonafluorobutanesulfonate (1d)25
The reaction was carried out according to the previously described procedure for 4-methylphenyl nonafluorobutanesulfonate (1a) using 4-tert-butylphenol (0.300 g, 2.00 mmol), anhydrous dichloromethane (6 mL), triethylamine (0.700 mL, 5.02 mmol), and perfluoro-1-butanesulfonyl fluoride (0.540 mL, 3.01 mmol). The reaction mixture was stirred at room temperature for 5 h. The crude material was purified by flash column chromatography eluting with 100% hexane to give 4-tert-butylphenyl nonafluorobutanesulfonate (1d) as a colorless oil (0.802 g, 93%). Spectroscopic data were consistent with the literature.251H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3) δ 1.33 (s, 9H), 7.20 (d, J = 9.0 Hz, 2H), 7.45 (d, J = 9.0 Hz, 2H); 13C{1H} NMR (101 MHz, CDCl3) δ 31.4 (3 × CH3), 34.9 (C), 120.9 (2 × CH), 127.3 (2 × CH), 147.8 (C), 151.8 (C); MS (ESI) m/z 455 (M + Na+, 100).
Phenyl nonafluorobutanesulfonate (1e)26
The reaction was carried out according to the previously described procedure for 4-methylphenyl nonafluorobutanesulfonate (1a) using phenol (0.200 g, 2.12 mmol), anhydrous dichloromethane (7 mL), triethylamine (0.740 mL, 5.31 mmol), and perfluoro-1-butanesulfonyl fluoride (0.570 mL, 3.17 mmol). The reaction mixture was stirred at room temperature for 3 h. The crude material was purified by flash column chromatography eluting with 10% diethyl ether in petroleum ether (40–60) to give phenyl nonafluorobutanesulfonate (1e) as a colorless oil (0.720 g, 90%). Spectroscopic data were consistent with the literature.261H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3) δ 7.27–7.33 (m, 2H), 7.37–7.42 (m, 1H), 7.43–7.50 (m, 2H); 13C{1H} NMR (101 MHz, CDCl3) δ 121.5 (2 × CH), 128.5 (CH), 130.4 (2 × CH), 150.0 (C); MS (EI) m/z 376 (M+, 42), 312 (13), 219 (4), 143 (10), 93 (73), 84 (35), 77 (94), 69 (35), 65 (100).
2-Naphthyl nonafluorobutanesulfonate (1f)27
The reaction was carried out according to the previously described procedure for 4-methylphenyl nonafluorobutanesulfonate (1a) using 2-naphthol (1.00 g, 6.94 mmol), anhydrous dichloromethane (15 mL), triethylamine (2.42 mL, 17.4 mmol), and perfluoro-1-butanesulfonyl fluoride (1.87 mL, 10.4 mmol). The reaction mixture was stirred at room temperature for 1 h. The crude material was purified by flash column chromatography eluting with 5% ethyl acetate in petroleum ether (40–60) to give 2-naphthyl nonafluorobutanesulfonate (1f) as a colorless oil (1.97 g, 67%). Spectroscopic data were consistent with the literature.271H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3) δ 7.39 (dd, J = 9.0, 2.5 Hz, 1H), 7.54–7.63 (m, 2H), 7.77 (d, J = 2.5 Hz, 1H), 7.84–7.92 (m, 2H), 7.93 (d, J = 9.0 Hz, 1H); 13C{1H} NMR (101 MHz, CDCl3) δ 119.4 (CH), 119.7 (CH), 127.3 (CH), 127.7 (CH), 128.1 (CH), 128.2 (CH), 130.7 (CH), 132.5 (C), 133.5 (C), 147.5 (C); MS (ESI) m/z 425 [(M – H)−, 100].
(1,1′-Biphenyl)-4-yl nonafluorobutanesulfonate (1g)28
The reaction was carried out according to the previously described procedure for 4-methylphenyl nonafluorobutanesulfonate (1a) using 4-phenylphenol (0.340 g, 2.00 mmol), anhydrous dichloromethane (6 mL), triethylamine (0.700 mL, 5.02 mmol), and perfluoro-1-butanesulfonyl fluoride (0.540 mL, 3.01 mmol). The reaction mixture was stirred at room temperature for 2 h. The crude material was purified by flash column chromatography eluting with 10% diethyl ether in hexane to give (1,1′-biphenyl)-4-yl nonafluorobutanesulfonate (1g) as a white solid (0.838 g, 93%). Mp 45–47 °C (lit.28 45.5–46.7 °C); 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3) δ 7.36 (d, J = 8.8 Hz, 2H), 7.38–7.42 (m, 1H), 7.44–7.49 (m, 2H), 7.54–7.58 (m, 2H), 7.65 (d, J = 8.8 Hz, 2H); 13C{1H} NMR (101 MHz, CDCl3) δ 121.8 (2 × CH), 127.3 (2 × CH), 128.2 (CH), 129.0 (2 × CH), 129.1 (2 × CH), 139.5 (C), 141.8 (C), 149.3 (C); MS (ESI) m/z 475 (M + Na+, 100).
4-Methoxyphenyl nonafluorobutanesulfonate (1h)25
The reaction was carried out according to the previously described procedure for 4-methylphenyl nonafluorobutanesulfonate (1a) using 4-methoxyphenol (0.372 g, 3.00 mmol), anhydrous dichloromethane (10 mL), triethylamine (1.05 mL, 7.50 mmol), and perfluoro-1-butanesulfonyl fluoride (0.810 mL, 4.50 mmol). The reaction mixture was stirred at room temperature for 2 h. The crude material was purified by flash column chromatography eluting with 10% diethyl ether in petroleum ether (40–60) to give 4-methoxyphenyl nonafluorobutanesulfonate (1h) as a colorless oil (1.13 g, 93%). Spectroscopic data were consistent with the literature.251H NMR (500 MHz, CDCl3) δ 3.82 (s, 3H), 6.92 (d, J = 9.2 Hz, 2H), 7.21 (d, J = 9.2 Hz, 2H); 13C{1H} NMR (126 MHz, CDCl3) δ 55.8 (CH3), 115.2 (2 × CH), 122.5 (2 × CH), 143.4 (C), 159.2 (C); MS (EI) m/z 406 (M+, 12), 219 (5), 123 (100), 95 (14), 69 (11).
4-Acetamidophenyl nonafluorobutanesulfonate (1i)29
The reaction was carried out according to the previously described procedure for 4-methylphenyl nonafluorobutanesulfonate (1a) using 4-acetamidophenol (0.302 g, 2.00 mmol), anhydrous dichloromethane (6 mL), triethylamine (0.700 mL, 5.02 mmol), and perfluoro-1-butanesulfonyl fluoride (0.540 mL, 3.01 mmol). The reaction mixture was stirred at room temperature for 3 h. The crude material was purified by flash column chromatography eluting with 100% diethyl ether to give 4-acetamidophenyl nonafluorobutanesulfonate (1i) as a white solid (0.781 g, 90%). Mp 102–103 °C. Spectroscopic data were consistent with the literature.291H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3) δ 2.19 (s, 3H), 7.23 (d, J = 9.0 Hz, 2H), 7.41 (br s, 1H), 7.60 (d, J = 9.0 Hz, 2H); 13C{1H} NMR (101 MHz, CDCl3) δ 24.7 (CH3), 121.1 (2 × CH), 122.1 (2 × CH), 138.0 (C), 145.7 (C), 168.6 (C); MS (ESI) m/z 456 (M + Na+, 100).
4-Acetylphenyl nonafluorobutanesulfonate (1j)25
The reaction was carried out according to the previously described procedure for 4-methylphenyl nonafluorobutanesulfonate (1a) using 4-hydroxyacetophenone (0.272 g, 2.00 mmol), anhydrous dichloromethane (6 mL), triethylamine (0.700 mL, 5.02 mmol), and perfluoro-1-butanesulfonyl fluoride (0.540 mL, 3.01 mmol). The reaction mixture was stirred at room temperature for 2 h. The crude material was purified by flash column chromatography eluting with 50% diethyl ether in hexane to give 4-acetylphenyl nonafluorobutanesulfonate (1j) as a white solid (0.786 g, 94%). Mp 38–40 °C (lit.25 38–40 °C); 1H NMR (500 MHz, CDCl3) δ 2.63 (s, 3H), 7.39 (d, J = 8.9 Hz, 2H), 8.06 (d, J = 8.9 Hz, 2H); 13C{1H} NMR (126 MHz, CDCl3) δ 26.8 (CH3), 121.8 (2 × CH), 130.7 (2 × CH), 137.0 (C), 152.9 (C), 196.3 (C); MS (EI) m/z 418 (M+, 30), 403 (100), 339 (38), 219 (8), 131 (11), 120 (37), 107 (38).
4-Nonafluorobutanesulfonyloxybenzophenone (1k)
The reaction was carried out according to the previously described procedure for 4-methylphenyl nonafluorobutanesulfonate (1a) using 4-hydroxybenzophenone (0.200 g, 1.01 mmol), anhydrous dichloromethane (5 mL), triethylamine (0.350 mL, 2.51 mmol), and perfluoro-1-butanesulfonyl fluoride (0.270 mL, 1.50 mmol). The reaction mixture was stirred at room temperature for 16 h. The crude material was purified by flash column chromatography eluting with 20% ethyl acetate in petroleum ether (40–60) to give 4-nonafluorobutanesulfonyloxybenzophenone (1k) as a beige solid (0.341 g, 70%). Mp 42–43 °C; IR (neat) 2980, 1740, 1651, 1424, 1227, 1202, 1138, 889, 797, 731 cm–1; 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3) δ 7.42 (d, J = 8.6 Hz, 2H), 7.52 (t, J = 7.6 Hz, 2H), 7.63 (t, J = 7.6 Hz, 1H), 7.80 (d, J = 7.6 Hz, 2H), 7.91 (d, J = 8.6 Hz, 2H); 13C{1H} NMR (101 MHz, CDCl3) δ 121.5 (2 × CH), 128.7 (2 × CH), 130.1 (2 × CH), 132.3 (2 × CH), 133.2 (CH), 136.9 (C), 137.7 (C), 152.3 (C), 194.9 (C); MS (EI) m/z 480 (M+, 100), 169 (89), 105 (84), 84 (93), 63 (81); HRMS (EI) m/z: [M]+ calcd for C17H9F9O4S 480.0078; found 480.0083.
Methyl 4-nonafluorobutanesulfonyloxybenzoate (1l)25
The reaction was carried out according to the previously described procedure for 4-methylphenyl nonafluorobutanesulfonate (1a) using methyl 4-hydroxybenzoate (0.200 g, 1.32 mmol), anhydrous dichloromethane (5 mL), triethylamine (0.460 mL, 3.30 mmol), and perfluoro-1-butanesulfonyl fluoride (0.360 mL, 2.00 mmol). The reaction mixture was stirred at room temperature for 16 h. The crude material was purified by flash column chromatography eluting with 15% ethyl acetate in petroleum ether (40–60) to give methyl 4-nonafluorobutanesulfonyloxybenzoate (1l) as a colorless oil (0.526 g, 92%). Spectroscopic data were consistent with the literature.251H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3) δ 3.94 (s, 3H), 7.36 (d, J = 8.9 Hz, 2H), 8.14 (d, J = 8.9 Hz, 2H); 13C{1H} NMR (101 MHz, CDCl3) δ 52.7 (CH3), 121.6 (2 × CH), 130.5 (C), 132.0 (2 × CH), 152.9 (C), 165.6 (C); MS (EI) m/z 434 (M+, 70), 403 (40), 339 (100), 151 (38), 123 (42).
4-Cyanophenyl nonafluorobutanesulfonate (1m)25
The reaction was carried out according to the previously described procedure for 4-methylphenyl nonafluorobutanesulfonate (1a) using 4-cyanophenol (0.200 g, 1.68 mmol), anhydrous dichloromethane (5 mL), triethylamine (0.590 mL, 4.23 mmol), and perfluoro-1-butanesulfonyl fluoride (0.460 mL, 2.56 mmol). The reaction mixture was stirred at room temperature for 2 h. The crude material was purified by flash column chromatography eluting with 20% ethyl acetate in petroleum ether (40–60) to give 4-cyanophenyl nonafluorobutanesulfonate (1m) as a white solid (0.609 g, 90%). Mp 109–110 °C (lit.25 111–112 °C); 1H NMR (500 MHz, CDCl3) δ 7.44 (d, J = 9.0 Hz, 2H), 7.79 (d, J = 9.0 Hz, 2H); 13C{1H} NMR (101 MHz, CDCl3) δ 113.0 (C), 117.2 (C), 122.8 (2 × CH), 134.6 (2 × CH), 152.4 (C); MS (EI) m/z 401 (M+, 38), 337 (33), 219 (12), 118 (47), 102 (100), 90 (71), 77 (41), 69 (99).
4-(Trifluoromethyl)phenyl nonafluorobutanesulfonate (1n)30
The reaction was carried out according to the previously described procedure for 4-methylphenyl nonafluorobutanesulfonate (1a) using 4-hydroxybenzotrifluoride (0.200 g, 1.23 mmol), anhydrous dichloromethane (5 mL), triethylamine (0.430 mL, 3.09 mmol), and perfluoro-1-butanesulfonyl fluoride (0.330 mL, 1.84 mmol). The reaction mixture was stirred at room temperature for 16 h. The crude material was purified by flash column chromatography eluting with 20% ethyl acetate in petroleum ether (40–60) to give 4-(trifluoromethyl)phenyl nonafluorobutanesulfonate (1n) as a colorless oil (0.454 g, 83%). Spectroscopic data were consistent with the literature.301H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3) δ 7.43 (d, J = 8.8 Hz, 2H), 7.75 (d, J = 8.8 Hz, 2H); 13C{1H} NMR (101 MHz, CDCl3) δ 122.2 (2 × CH), 123.4 (q, 1JCF 273.4 Hz, CF3), 127.9 (q, 3JCF 3.6 Hz, 2 × CH), 131.0 (q, 2JCF 33.4 Hz, C), 152.0 (C); MS (EI) m/z 444 (M+, 44), 145 (100), 133 (36), 78 (32), 69 (41).
2-Fluorophenyl nonafluorobutanesulfonate (1o)
The reaction was carried out according to the previously described procedure for 4-methylphenyl nonafluorobutanesulfonate (1a) using 2-fluorophenol (0.178 mL, 2.00 mmol), anhydrous dichloromethane (6 mL), triethylamine (0.700 mL, 5.02 mmol), and perfluoro-1-butanesulfonyl fluoride (0.540 mL, 3.01 mmol). The reaction mixture was stirred at room temperature for 3 h. The crude material was purified by flash column chromatography eluting with 10% diethyl ether in hexane to give 2-fluorophenyl nonafluorobutanesulfonate (1o) as a colorless oil (0.661 g, 84%). IR (neat) 1612, 1501, 1431, 1227, 1200, 1142, 1096, 895, 760 cm–1; 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3) δ 7.19–7.24 (m, 1H), 7.27 (ddd, J = 9.8, 8.4, 1.4 Hz, 1H), 7.33–7.41 (m, 2H); 13C{1H} NMR (101 MHz, CDCl3) δ 117.8 (d, 2JCF 18.2 Hz, CH), 123.6 (CH), 125.2 (d, 3JCF 4.1 Hz, CH), 129.8 (d, 3JCF 7.1 Hz, CH), 137.3 (d, 2JCF 13.4 Hz, C), 153.9 (d, 1JCF 254.6 Hz, C); MS (ESI) m/z 417 (M + Na+, 100); HRMS (ESI) m/z: [M + Na]+ calcd for C10H4F10NaO3S 416.9614; found 416.9614.
3-Chlorophenyl nonafluorobutanesulfonate (1p)31
The reaction was carried out according to the previously described procedure for 4-methylphenyl nonafluorobutanesulfonate (1a) using 3-chlorophenol (0.257 g, 2.00 mmol), anhydrous dichloromethane (6 mL), triethylamine (0.700 mL, 5.02 mmol), and perfluoro-1-butanesulfonyl fluoride (0.540 mL, 3.01 mmol). The reaction mixture was stirred at room temperature for 2 h. The crude material was purified by flash column chromatography eluting with 100% hexane to give 3-chlorophenyl nonafluorobutanesulfonate (1p) as a colorless oil (0.672 g, 82%). Spectroscopic data were consistent with the literature.311H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3) δ 7.18–7.24 (m, 1H), 7.30–7.33 (m, 1H), 7.37–7.43 (m, 2H); 13C{1H} NMR (101 MHz, CDCl3) δ 119.9 (CH), 122.2 (CH), 129.0 (CH), 131.1 (CH), 135.8 (C), 149.9 (C); MS (EI) m/z 410 (M+, 33), 348 (9), 346 (27), 127 (28), 111 (44), 99 (34), 84 (100).
3-Bromophenyl nonafluorobutanesulfonate (1q)
The reaction was carried out according to the previously described procedure for 4-methylphenyl nonafluorobutanesulfonate (1a) using 3-bromophenol (0.356 g, 2.06 mmol), anhydrous dichloromethane (5 mL), triethylamine (0.720 mL, 5.17 mmol), and perfluoro-1-butanesulfonyl fluoride (0.560 mL, 3.11 mmol). The reaction mixture was stirred at room temperature for 1 h. The crude material was purified by flash column chromatography eluting with 100% petroleum ether (40–60) to give 3-bromophenyl nonafluorobutanesulfonate (1q) as a colorless oil (0.830 g, 88%). IR (neat) 1582, 1468, 1425, 1354, 1227, 1200, 1142, 1034, 897, 785 cm–1; 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3) δ 7.26 (ddd, J = 8.2, 2.0, 0.8 Hz, 1H), 7.34 (t, J = 8.2 Hz, 1H), 7.47 (t, J = 2.0 Hz, 1H), 7.55 (ddd, J = 8.2, 2.0, 0.8 Hz, 1H); 13C{1H} NMR (101 MHz, CDCl3) δ 120.3 (CH), 123.2 (C), 125.0 (CH), 131.4 (CH), 131.9 (CH), 149.9 (C); MS (EI) m/z 454 (M+, 42), 392 (21), 390 (22), 173 (20), 171 (20), 157 (27), 155 (28), 83 (100), 78 (50), 63 (59); HRMS (EI) m/z: [M]+ calcd for C10H479BrF9O3S 453.8921; found 453.8920.
Pyridin-2-yl nonafluorobutanesulfonate (1r)12h
The reaction was carried out according to the previously described procedure for 4-methylphenyl nonafluorobutanesulfonate (1a) using pyridin-2-ol (0.190 g, 2.00 mmol), anhydrous dichloromethane (6 mL), triethylamine (0.700 mL, 5.02 mmol), and perfluoro-1-butanesulfonyl fluoride (0.540 mL, 3.01 mmol). The reaction mixture was stirred at room temperature for 166 h. The crude material was purified by flash column chromatography eluting with 30% diethyl ether in hexane to give pyridin-2-yl nonafluorobutanesulfonate (1r) as a colorless oil (0.495 g, 66%). Spectroscopic data were consistent with the literature.12h1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3) δ 7.19 (br d, J = 8.2 Hz, 1H), 7.40 (ddd, J = 7.4, 4.8, 0.4 Hz, 1H), 7.90 (ddd, J = 8.2, 7.4, 2.0 Hz, 1H), 8.42 (dd, J = 4.8, 2.0 Hz, 1H); 13C{1H} NMR (101 MHz, CDCl3) δ 115.4 (CH), 124.4 (CH), 141.1 (CH), 148.9 (CH), 156.1 (C); MS (ESI) m/z 400 (M + Na+, 100).
(4-Methylphenyl)diphenylphosphine Oxide (2a)32
General Procedure Using 1 equiv of Sodium Iodide
A stirrer bar and sodium iodide (0.0600 g, 0.400 mmol) were added to a microwave tube and dried in an oven at 140 °C overnight. 4-Methylphenyl nonafluorobutanesulfonate (1a) (0.156 g, 0.400 mmol) was dried under high vacuum for 1 h, purged with argon, and dissolved in anhydrous N,N′-dimethylformamide (2.4 mL). Diphenylphosphine oxide (0.121 g, 0.600 mmol) was dried in vacuo for 1 h. The oven-dried microwave tube was cooled to room temperature in vacuo and then purged with argon. To the tube was added diphenylphosphine oxide and palladium(II) acetate (0.00900 g, 0.0400 mmol), followed by the 4-methylphenyl nonafluorobutanesulfonate (1a) solution and triethylamine (0.220 mL, 1.58 mmol). The tube was sealed, heated to 120 °C, and stirred for 4 h. The reaction mixture was cooled to room temperature, diluted with ethyl acetate (15 mL), and washed with 2 M aqueous lithium chloride solution (3 × 15 mL). The organic layer was dried (MgSO4), filtered, and concentrated in vacuo. The crude material was purified by flash column chromatography eluting with 30% ethyl acetate in dichloromethane to give (4-methylphenyl)diphenylphosphine oxide (2a) as a white solid (0.0905 g, 78%). Mp 118–120 °C. Spectroscopic data were consistent with previously published data.321H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3) δ 2.40 (s, 3H), 7.27 (dd, J = 8.0, 2.8 Hz, 2H), 7.41–7.49 (m, 4H), 7.50–7.59 (m, 4H), 7.62–7.71 (m, 4H); 13C{1H} NMR (101 MHz, CDCl3) δ 21.8 (d, 5JCP = 1.3 Hz, CH3), 128.6 (d, 3JCP = 12.1 Hz, 4 × CH), 129.3 (d, 1JCP = 107.0 Hz, C), 129.4 (d, 3JCP = 12.5 Hz, 2 × CH), 131.9 (d, 4JCP = 2.7 Hz, 2 × CH), 132.2 (d, 2JCP = 9.8 Hz, 4 × CH), 132.3 (d, 2JCP = 10.3 Hz, 2 × CH), 133.0 (d, 1JCP = 104.3 Hz, 2 × C), 142.6 (d, 4JCP = 2.7 Hz, C); MS (ESI) m/z 315 (M + Na+, 100).
Using 0.1 equiv of Sodium Iodide
The reaction was carried out according to the previously described procedure for (4-methylphenyl)diphenylphosphine oxide (2a) using sodium iodide (0.00300 g, 0.0200 mmol), 4-methylphenyl nonafluorobutanesulfonate (1a) (0.0780 g, 0.200 mmol), anhydrous N,N′-dimethylformamide (1.2 mL), diphenylphosphine oxide (0.0610 g, 0.302 mmol), palladium(II) acetate (0.00450 g, 0.0200 mmol), and triethylamine (0.110 mL, 0.790 mmol). The reaction mixture was stirred at 120 °C for 8 h. The crude material was purified by flash column chromatography eluting with 2% methanol in diethyl ether to give (4-methylphenyl)diphenylphosphine oxide (2a) as a white solid (0.0441 g, 76%). Spectroscopic data were consistent as described above.
Without Sodium Iodide
The reaction was carried out according to the previously described procedure for (4-methylphenyl)diphenylphosphine oxide (2a) using 4-methylphenyl nonafluorobutanesulfonate (1a) (0.0780 g, 0.200 mmol), anhydrous N,N′-dimethylformamide (1.2 mL), diphenylphosphine oxide (0.0610 g, 0.302 mmol), palladium(II) acetate (0.00450 g, 0.0200 mmol), and triethylamine (0.110 mL, 0.790 mmol). The reaction mixture was heated to 120 °C and stirred for 24 h. The crude material was purified by flash column chromatography eluting with 2% methanol in diethyl ether to give (4-methylphenyl)diphenylphosphine oxide (2a) as a white solid (0.0461 g, 79%). Spectroscopic data were consistent as described above.
Using 1 equiv of Sodium Acetate
The reaction was carried out according to the previously described procedure for (4-methylphenyl)diphenylphosphine oxide (2a) using sodium acetate (0.0328 g, 0.400 mmol), 4-methylphenyl nonafluorobutanesulfonate (1a) (0.156 g, 0.400 mmol), anhydrous N,N′-dimethylformamide (2.4 mL), diphenylphosphine oxide (0.121 g, 0.600 mmol), palladium(II) acetate (0.00900 g, 0.0400 mmol), and triethylamine (0.220 mL, 1.58 mmol). The reaction was heated to 120 °C and stirred for 22 h. The crude material was purified by flash column chromatography eluting with 2% methanol in diethyl ether to give (4-methylphenyl)diphenylphosphine oxide (2a) as a white solid (0.0642 g, 55%). Spectroscopic data were consistent as described above.
Using 1 equiv of Sodium Chloride
The reaction was carried out according to the previously described procedure for (4-methylphenyl)diphenylphosphine oxide (2a) using sodium chloride (0.0234 g, 0.400 mmol), 4-methylphenyl nonafluorobutanesulfonate (1a) (0.156 g, 0.400 mmol), anhydrous N,N′-dimethylformamide (2.4 mL), diphenylphosphine oxide (0.121 g, 0.600 mmol), palladium(II) acetate (0.00900 g, 0.0400 mmol), and triethylamine (0.220 mL, 1.58 mmol). The reaction was heated to 120 °C and stirred for 32 h. The crude material was purified by flash column chromatography eluting with 2% methanol in diethyl ether to give (4-methylphenyl)diphenylphosphine oxide (2a) as a white solid (0.0745 g, 64%). Spectroscopic data were consistent as described above.
(3-Methylphenyl)diphenylphosphine Oxide (2b)33
The reaction was carried out according to the previously described general procedure for (4-methylphenyl)diphenylphosphine oxide (2a) using sodium iodide (0.0600 g, 0.400 mmol), 3-methylphenyl nonafluorobutanesulfonate (1b) (0.156 g, 0.400 mmol), anhydrous N,N′-dimethylformamide (2.4 mL), diphenylphosphine oxide (0.121 g, 0.600 mmol), palladium(II) acetate (0.00900 g, 0.0400 mmol), and triethylamine (0.220 mL, 1.58 mmol). The reaction mixture was stirred at 120 °C for 4 h. The crude material was purified by flash column chromatography eluting with 2% methanol in diethyl ether to give (3-methylphenyl)diphenylphosphine oxide (2b) as a pale orange solid (0.111 g, 95%). Mp 112–114 °C. Spectroscopic data were consistent with previously published data.331H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3) δ 2.36 (s, 3H), 7.29–7.41 (m, 3H), 7.42–7.49 (m, 4H), 7.54 (ttd, J = 7.3, 1.7, 1.6 Hz, 2H), 7.58 (br d, J = 12.4 Hz, 1H), 7.62–7.71 (m, 4H); 13C{1H} NMR (101 MHz, CDCl3) δ 21.6 (CH3), 128.4 (d, 3JCP = 12.9 Hz, CH), 128.6 (d, 3JCP = 12.1 Hz, 4 × CH), 129.3 (d, 2JCP = 10.3 Hz, CH), 132.0 (d, 4JCP = 2.7 Hz, 2 × CH), 132.2 (d, 2JCP = 9.9 Hz, 4 × CH), 132.5 (d, 1JCP = 104.5 Hz, C), 132.6 (d, 2JCP = 9.5 Hz, CH), 132.8 (d, 4JCP = 2.8 Hz, CH), 132.9 (d, 1JCP = 104.2 Hz, 2 × C), 138.6 (d, 3JCP = 12.1 Hz, C); MS (ESI) m/z 315 (M + Na+, 100).
(2-Methylphenyl)diphenylphosphine Oxide (2c)32
The reaction was carried out according to the previously described general procedure for (4-methylphenyl)diphenylphosphine oxide (2a) using sodium iodide (0.0600 g, 0.400 mmol), 2-methylphenyl nonafluorobutanesulfonate (1c) (0.156 g, 0.400 mmol), anhydrous N,N′-dimethylformamide (2.4 mL), diphenylphosphine oxide (0.121 g, 0.600 mmol), palladium(II) acetate (0.00900 g, 0.0400 mmol), and triethylamine (0.220 mL, 1.58 mmol). The reaction mixture was stirred at 120 °C for 7 h. The crude material was purified by flash column chromatography eluting with 2% methanol in diethyl ether to give (2-methylphenyl)diphenylphosphine oxide (2c) as an off-white solid (0.0679 g, 58%). Mp 119–121 °C (lit.32 121.5–122.9 °C); 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3) δ 2.45 (s, 3H), 7.03 (ddd, J = 14.0, 7.5, 1.3 Hz, 1H), 7.13 (br td, J = 7.5, 2.0 Hz, 1H), 7.28 (br dd, J = 7.5, 4.0 Hz, 1H), 7.41 (tt, J = 7.5, 1.3 Hz, 1H), 7.44–7.50 (m, 4H), 7.55 (ttd, J = 7.4, 1.8, 1.6 Hz, 2H), 7.61–7.70 (m, 4H); 13C{1H} NMR (101 MHz, CDCl3) δ 21.8 (d, 3JCP = 4.6 Hz, CH3), 125.3 (d, 3JCP = 12.9 Hz, CH), 128.7 (d, 3JCP = 12.1 Hz, 4 × CH), 131.0 (d, 1JCP = 103.5 Hz, C), 131.9 (d, 4JCP = 2.8 Hz, 2 × CH), 132.0 (d, 3JCP = 10.5 Hz, CH), 132.1 (d, 2JCP = 9.9 Hz, 4 × CH), 132.2 (d, 4JCP = 2.6 Hz, CH), 133.0 (d, 1JCP = 103.7 Hz, 2 × C), 133.6 (d, 2JCP = 12.8 Hz, CH), 143.5 (d, 2JCP = 8.1 Hz, C); MS (ESI) m/z 315 (M + Na+, 100).
(4-tert-Butylphenyl)diphenylphosphine Oxide (2d)34
The reaction was carried out according to the previously described general procedure for (4-methylphenyl)diphenylphosphine oxide (2a) using sodium iodide (0.0600 g, 0.400 mmol), 4-tert-butylphenyl nonafluorobutanesulfonate (1d) (0.173 g, 0.400 mmol), anhydrous N,N′-dimethylformamide (2.4 mL), diphenylphosphine oxide (0.121 g, 0.600 mmol), palladium(II) acetate (0.00900 g, 0.0400 mmol), and triethylamine (0.220 mL, 1.58 mmol). The reaction mixture was stirred at 120 °C for 6 h. The crude material was purified by flash column chromatography eluting with 2% methanol in dichloromethane to give (4-tert-butylphenyl)diphenylphosphine oxide (2d) as an orange solid (0.0857 g, 64%). Mp 113–115 °C. Spectroscopic data were consistent with previously published data.341H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3) δ 1.32 (s, 9H), 7.41–7.49 (m, 6H), 7.50–7.56 (m, 2H), 7.58 (dd, J = 11.8, 8.6 Hz, 2H), 7.63–7.72 (m, 4H); 13C{1H} NMR (101 MHz, CDCl3) δ 31.2 (3 × CH3), 35.2 (C), 125.7 (d, 3JCP = 12.4 Hz, 2 × CH), 128.6 (d, 3JCP = 12.1 Hz, 4 × CH), 129.2 (d, 1JCP = 106.9 Hz, C), 131.9 (d, 4JCP = 2.8 Hz, 2 × CH), 132.1 (d, 2JCP = 10.3 Hz, 2 × CH), 132.2 (d, 2JCP = 9.9 Hz, 4 × CH), 133.0 (d, 1JCP = 104.3 Hz, 2 × C), 155.5 (d, 4JCP = 2.8 Hz, C); MS (ESI) m/z 357 (M + Na+, 100).
Triphenylphosphine Oxide (2e)20b
The reaction was carried out according to the previously described general procedure for (4-methylphenyl)diphenylphosphine oxide (2a) using sodium iodide (0.0600 g, 0.400 mmol), phenyl nonafluorobutanesulfonate (1e) (0.150 g, 0.400 mmol), anhydrous N,N′-dimethylformamide (2.4 mL), diphenylphosphine oxide (0.121 g, 0.600 mmol), palladium(II) acetate (0.00900 g, 0.0400 mmol), and triethylamine (0.220 mL, 1.58 mmol). The reaction mixture was stirred at 120 °C for 4 h. The crude material was purified by flash column chromatography eluting with 2% methanol in diethyl ether to give triphenylphosphine oxide (2e) as a white solid (0.0740 g, 67%). Mp 144–146 °C (lit.20b 148–149 °C); 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3) δ 7.42–7.50 (m, 6H), 7.55 (ttd, J = 7.5, 1.6, 1.6 Hz, 3H), 7.62–7.72 (m, 6H); 13C{1H} NMR (101 MHz, CDCl3) δ 128.6 (d, 3JCP = 12.1 Hz, 6 × CH), 132.1 (d, 4JCP = 2.8 Hz, 3 × CH), 132.2 (d, 2JCP = 10.0 Hz, 6 × CH), 132.7 (d, 1JCP = 104.5 Hz, 3 × C); MS (ESI) m/z 301 (M + Na+, 100).
(2-Naphthyl)diphenylphosphine Oxide (2f)35
The reaction was carried out according to the previously described general procedure for (4-methylphenyl)diphenylphosphine oxide (2a) using sodium iodide (0.0600 g, 0.400 mmol), 2-naphthyl nonafluorobutanesulfonate (1f) (0.171 g, 0.400 mmol), anhydrous N,N′-dimethylformamide (2.4 mL), diphenylphosphine oxide (0.121 g, 0.600 mmol), palladium(II) acetate (0.00900 g, 0.0400 mmol), and triethylamine (0.220 mL, 1.58 mmol). The reaction mixture was stirred at 90 °C for 3 h. The crude material was purified by flash column chromatography eluting with 30% ethyl acetate in dichloromethane to give (2-naphthyl)diphenylphosphine oxide (2f) as a pale yellow solid (0.122 g, 93%). Mp 106–108 °C. Spectroscopic data were consistent with previously published data.351H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3) δ 7.44–7.51 (m, 4H), 7.52–7.67 (m, 5H), 7.68–7.77 (m, 4H), 7.85–7.94 (m, 3H), 8.29 (d, J = 13.6 Hz, 1H); 13C{1H} NMR (101 MHz, CDCl3) δ 127.0 (d, 3JCP = 10.8 Hz, CH), 127.1 (d, 5JCP = 0.6 Hz, CH), 128.0 (d, 5JCP = 0.8 Hz, CH), 128.3 (d, 4JCP = 2.2 Hz, CH), 128.4 (d, 2JCP = 9.8 Hz, CH), 128.7 (d, 3JCP = 12.1 Hz, 4 × CH), 129.1 (CH), 129.8 (d, 1JCP = 104.6 Hz, C), 132.1 (d, 4JCP = 2.6 Hz, 2 × CH), 132.3 (d, 2JCP = 10.1 Hz, 4 × CH), 132.6 (d, 3JCP = 13.2 Hz, C), 132.8 (d, 1JCP = 103.9 Hz, 2 × C), 134.2 (d, 2JCP = 9.4 Hz, CH), 134.9 (d, 4JCP = 2.4 Hz, C); MS (ESI) m/z 351 (M + Na+, 100).
(1,1′-Biphenyl)-4-yldiphenylphosphine Oxide (2g)35
The reaction was carried out according to the previously described general procedure for (4-methylphenyl)diphenylphosphine oxide (2a) using sodium iodide (0.0300 g, 0.200 mmol), (1,1′-biphenyl)-4-yl nonafluorobutanesulfonate (1g) (0.0905 g, 0.200 mmol), anhydrous N,N′-dimethylformamide (1.2 mL), diphenylphosphine oxide (0.0610 g, 0.302 mmol), palladium(II) acetate (0.00450 g, 0.0200 mmol), and triethylamine (0.110 mL, 0.790 mmol). The reaction mixture was stirred at 120 °C for 4 h. The crude material was purified by flash column chromatography eluting with 1% methanol in diethyl ether to give (1,1′-biphenyl)-4-yldiphenylphosphine oxide (2g) as a pale brown oil (0.0680 g, 96%). Spectroscopic data were consistent with previously published data.351H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3) δ 7.39 (tt, J = 7.3, 1.7 Hz, 1H), 7.43–7.52 (m, 6H), 7.53–7.63 (m, 4H), 7.66–7.78 (m, 8H); 13C{1H} NMR (101 MHz, CDCl3) δ 127.3 (d, 3JCP = 12.5 Hz, 2 × CH), 127.4 (2 × CH), 128.3 (CH), 128.7 (d, 3JCP = 12.2 Hz, 4 × CH), 129.1 (2 × CH), 131.2 (d, 1JCP = 105.6 Hz, C), 132.1 (d, 4JCP = 2.7 Hz, 2 × CH), 132.2 (d, 2JCP = 10.0 Hz, 4 × CH), 132.7 (d, 2JCP = 10.3 Hz, 2 × CH), 132.7 (d, 1JCP = 104.8 Hz, 2 × C), 140.0 (d, 5JCP = 0.7 Hz, C), 144.8 (d, 4JCP = 2.8 Hz, C); MS (ESI) m/z 377 (M + Na+, 100).
(4-Methoxyphenyl)diphenylphosphine Oxide (2h)20b
The reaction was carried out according to the previously described general procedure for (4-methylphenyl)diphenylphosphine oxide (2a) using sodium iodide (0.0600 g, 0.400 mmol), 4-methoxyphenyl nonafluorobutanesulfonate (1h) (0.162 g, 0.400 mmol), anhydrous N,N′-dimethylformamide (2.4 mL), diphenylphosphine oxide (0.121 g, 0.600 mmol), palladium(II) acetate (0.00900 g, 0.0400 mmol), and triethylamine (0.220 mL, 1.58 mmol). The reaction mixture was stirred at 120 °C for 6 h. The crude material was purified by flash column chromatography eluting with 2% methanol in diethyl ether to give (4-methoxyphenyl)diphenylphosphine oxide (2h) as a pale yellow solid (0.0784 g, 64%). Mp 103–105 °C (lit.20b 106–108 °C); 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3) δ 3.84 (s, 3H), 6.96 (dd, J = 8.8, 2.4 Hz, 2H), 7.40–7.55 (m, 6H), 7.58 (dd, J = 11.2, 8.8 Hz, 2H), 7.62–7.71 (m, 4H); 13C{1H} NMR (101 MHz, CDCl3) δ 55.5 (CH3), 114.2 (d, 3JCP = 13.1 Hz, 2 × CH), 123.8 (d, 1JCP = 110.8 Hz, C), 128.6 (d, 3JCP = 12.1 Hz, 4 × CH), 131.9 (d, 4JCP = 2.7 Hz, 2 × CH), 132.2 (d, 2JCP = 10.0 Hz, 4 × CH), 133.2 (d, 1JCP = 104.7 Hz, 2 × C), 134.1 (d, 2JCP = 11.2 Hz, 2 × CH), 162.6 (d, 4JCP = 2.8 Hz, C); MS (ESI) m/z 331 (M + Na+, 100).
(4-Acetamidophenyl)diphenylphosphine Oxide (2i)36
The reaction was carried out according to the previously described general procedure for (4-methylphenyl)diphenylphosphine oxide (2a) using sodium iodide (0.0300 g, 0.200 mmol), 4-acetamidophenyl nonafluorobutanesulfonate (1i) (0.0866 g, 0.200 mmol), anhydrous N,N′-dimethylformamide (1.2 mL), diphenylphosphine oxide (0.0610 g, 0.302 mmol), palladium(II) acetate (0.00450 g, 0.0200 mmol), and triethylamine (0.110 mL, 0.790 mmol). The reaction mixture was heated to 120 °C and stirred for 6 h. The reaction mixture was cooled to room temperature, diluted with ethyl acetate (15 mL) and washed with water (3 × 15 mL). The organic layer was dried (MgSO4), filtered, and concentrated in vacuo. The crude material was purified by flash column chromatography eluting with 8% methanol in diethyl ether to give (4-acetamidophenyl)diphenylphosphine oxide (2i) as a brown solid (0.0431 g, 65%). Mp 144–146 °C (lit.36 150–152 °C); 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3) δ 2.14 (s, 3H), 7.40–7.50 (m, 6H), 7.54 (ttd, J = 7.4, 1.7, 1.6 Hz, 2H), 7.58–7.69 (m, 6H), 9.28 (br s, 1H); 13C{1H} NMR (101 MHz, CDCl3) δ 24.6 (CH3), 119.7 (d, 3JCP = 12.6 Hz, 2 × CH), 126.3 (d, 1JCP = 108.7 Hz, C), 128.7 (d, 3JCP = 12.2 Hz, 4 × CH), 132.1 (d, 2JCP = 10.0 Hz, 4 × CH), 132.2 (d, 4JCP = 2.6 Hz, 2 × CH), 132.4 (d, 1JCP = 105.2 Hz, 2 × C), 133.1 (d, 2JCP = 10.9 Hz, 2 × CH), 142.4 (d, 4JCP = 3.0 Hz, C), 169.6 (C); MS (ESI) m/z 358 (M + Na+, 100).
(4-Acetylphenyl)diphenylphosphine Oxide (2j)37
The reaction was carried out according to the previously described general procedure for (4-methylphenyl)diphenylphosphine oxide (2a) using sodium iodide (0.0300 g, 0.200 mmol), 4-acetylphenyl nonafluorobutanesulfonate (1i) (0.0836 g, 0.200 mmol), anhydrous N,N′-dimethylformamide (1.2 mL), diphenylphosphine oxide (0.0610 g, 0.302 mmol), palladium(II) acetate (0.00450 g, 0.0200 mmol), and triethylamine (0.110 mL, 0.790 mmol). The reaction mixture was stirred at 120 °C for 4 h. The crude material was purified by flash column chromatography eluting with 2% methanol in diethyl ether to give (4-acetylphenyl)diphenylphosphine oxide (2i) as a pale yellow solid (0.0615 g, 96%). Mp 116–118 °C (lit.37 120.0–120.5 °C); 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3) δ 2.63 (s, 3H), 7.42–7.52 (m, 4H), 7.53–7.60 (m, 2H), 7.61–7.71 (m, 4H), 7.79 (dd, J = 10.8, 8.4 Hz, 2H), 8.02 (dd, J = 8.4, 2.0 Hz, 2H); 13C{1H} NMR (101 MHz, CDCl3) δ 27.0 (CH3), 128.2 (d, 3JCP = 12.1 Hz, 2 × CH), 128.8 (d, 3JCP = 12.3 Hz, 4 × CH), 132.0 (d, 1JCP = 105.2 Hz, 2 × C), 132.2 (d, 2JCP = 10.0 Hz, 4 × CH), 132.4 (d, 4JCP = 2.7 Hz, 2 × CH), 132.6 (d, 2JCP = 10.1 Hz, 2 × CH), 137.9 (d, 1JCP = 101.0 Hz, C), 139.6 (d, 4JCP = 2.7 Hz, C), 197.7 (d, 5JCP = 0.8 Hz, C); MS (ESI) m/z 343 (M + Na+, 100).
4-(Diphenylphosphoryl)benzophenone (2k)
The reaction was carried out according to the previously described general procedure for (4-methylphenyl)diphenylphosphine oxide (2a) using sodium iodide (0.0300 g, 0.200 mmol), 4-nonafluorobutanesulfonyloxybenzophenone (1k) (0.0960 g, 0.200 mmol), anhydrous N,N′-dimethylformamide (1.2 mL), diphenylphosphine oxide (0.0610 g, 0.302 mmol), palladium(II) acetate (0.00450 g, 0.0200 mmol), and triethylamine (0.110 mL, 0.790 mmol). The reaction mixture was stirred at 120 °C for 4 h. The crude material was purified by flash column chromatography eluting with 2% methanol in diethyl ether to give 4-(diphenylphosphoryl)benzophenone (2k) as a pale yellow solid (0.0624 g, 82%). Mp 138–140 °C; IR (neat) 3028, 1659, 1435, 1285, 1196, 1111, 926, 717 cm–1; 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3) δ 7.45–7.54 (m, 6H), 7.55–7.64 (m, 3H), 7.65–7.74 (m, 4H), 7.76–7.89 (m, 6H); 13C{1H} NMR (101 MHz, CDCl3) δ 128.6 (2 × CH), 128.8 (d, 3JCP = 12.2 Hz, 4 × CH), 129.8 (d, 3JCP = 12.1 Hz, 2 × CH), 130.3 (2 × CH), 132.0 (d, 1JCP = 105.1 Hz, 2 × C), 132.2 (d, 2JCP = 10.0 Hz, 6 × CH), 132.4 (d, 4JCP = 2.8 Hz, 2 × CH), 133.2 (CH), 136.9 (C), 137.1 (d, 1JCP = 101.3 Hz, C), 140.7 (d, 4JCP = 2.8 Hz, C), 196.2 (d, 5JCP = 0.8 Hz, C); MS (ESI) m/z 405 (M + Na+, 100); HRMS (ESI) m/z: [M + Na]+ calcd for C25H19NaO2P 405.1015; found 405.1017.
(4-Methoxycarbonylphenyl)diphenylphosphine Oxide (2l)38
The reaction was carried out according to the previously described general procedure for (4-methylphenyl)diphenylphosphine oxide (2a) using sodium iodide (0.0300 g, 0.200 mmol), methyl 4-nonafluorobutanesulfonyloxybenzoate (1l) (0.0870 g, 0.200 mmol), anhydrous N,N′-dimethylformamide (1.2 mL), diphenylphosphine oxide (0.0610 g, 0.302 mmol), palladium(II) acetate (0.00450 g, 0.0200 mmol), and triethylamine (0.110 mL, 0.790 mmol). The reaction mixture was stirred at 120 °C for 4 h. The reaction mixture was cooled to room temperature and diluted with ethyl acetate (10 mL). The organic layer was washed with 2 M aqueous lithium chloride solution (3 × 10 mL) and then water (2 × 10 mL). The organic layer was dried (MgSO4), filtered, and concentrated in vacuo. The crude material was purified by flash column chromatography eluting with 2% methanol in diethyl ether to give (4-methoxycarbonylphenyl)diphenylphosphine oxide (2l) as an off-white solid (0.0518 g, 77%). Mp 101–103 °C (lit.38 104–105 °C); 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3) δ 3.93 (s, 3H), 7.42–7.51 (m, 4H), 7.56 (ttd, J = 7.5, 1.6, 1.5 Hz, 2H), 7.61–7.70 (m, 4H), 7.76 (dd, J = 11.6, 8.4 Hz, 2H), 8.11 (dd, J = 8.4, 2.4 Hz, 2H); 13C{1H} NMR (101 MHz, CDCl3) δ 52.6 (CH3), 128.8 (d, 3JCP = 12.2 Hz, 4 × CH), 129.5 (d, 3JCP = 12.1 Hz, 2 × CH), 132.0 (d, 1JCP = 105.1 Hz, 2 × C), 132.2 (d, 2JCP = 10.2 Hz, 4 × CH), 132.3 (d, 2JCP = 10.8 Hz, 2 × CH), 132.3 (d, 4JCP = 2.7 Hz, 2 × CH), 133.3 (d, 4JCP = 2.7 Hz, C), 137.8 (d, 1JCP = 101.2 Hz, C), 166.4 (d, 5JCP = 0.8 Hz, C); MS (ESI) m/z 359 (M + Na+, 100).
(4-Cyanophenyl)diphenylphosphine Oxide (2m)37
The reaction was carried out according to the previously described general procedure for (4-methylphenyl)diphenylphosphine oxide (2a) using sodium iodide (0.0300 g, 0.200 mmol), 4-cyanophenyl nonafluorobutanesulfonate (1m) (0.0802 g, 0.200 mmol), anhydrous N,N′-dimethylformamide (1.2 mL), diphenylphosphine oxide (0.0610 g, 0.302 mmol), palladium(II) acetate (0.00450 g, 0.0200 mmol), and triethylamine (0.110 mL, 0.790 mmol). The reaction mixture was stirred at 120 °C for 4 h. The reaction mixture was cooled to room temperature and diluted with ethyl acetate (10 mL). The organic layer was washed with 2 M aqueous lithium chloride solution (3 × 10 mL) and then water (2 × 10 mL). The organic layer was dried (MgSO4), filtered, and concentrated in vacuo. The crude material was purified by flash column chromatography eluting with 2% methanol in diethyl ether to give (4-cyanophenyl)diphenylphosphine oxide (2m) as a pale brown oil (0.0536 g, 89%). Spectroscopic data were consistent with previously published data.371H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3) δ 7.44–7.54 (m, 4H), 7.59 (ttd, J = 7.5, 1.7, 1.6 Hz, 2H), 7.61–7.70 (m, 4H), 7.71–7.84 (m, 4H); 13C{1H} NMR (101 MHz, CDCl3) δ 115.7 (d, 4JCP = 3.2 Hz, C), 118.0 (d, 5JCP = 1.6 Hz, C), 128.9 (d, 3JCP = 12.4 Hz, 4 × CH), 131.3 (d, 1JCP = 105.7 Hz, 2 × C), 132.1 (d, 3JCP = 11.4 Hz, 2 × CH), 132.1 (d, 2JCP = 10.3 Hz, 4 × CH), 132.7 (d, 4JCP = 3.1 Hz, 2 × CH), 132.7 (d, 2JCP = 10.1 Hz, 2 × CH), 138.6 (d, 1JCP = 99.5 Hz, C); MS (ESI) m/z 326 (M + Na+, 100).
[4-(Trifluoromethyl)phenyl]diphenylphosphine Oxide (2n)37
The reaction was carried out according to the previously described general procedure for (4-methylphenyl)diphenylphosphine oxide (2a) using sodium iodide (0.0300 g, 0.200 mmol), 4-(trifluoromethyl)phenyl nonafluorobutanesulfonate (1n) (0.0890 g, 0.200 mmol), anhydrous N,N′-dimethylformamide (1.2 mL), diphenylphosphine oxide (0.0610 g, 0.302 mmol), palladium(II) acetate (0.00450 g, 0.0200 mmol), and triethylamine (0.110 mL, 0.790 mmol). The reaction mixture was stirred at 120 °C for 4 h. The reaction mixture was cooled to room temperature and diluted with ethyl acetate (10 mL). The organic layer was washed with 2 M aqueous lithium chloride solution (3 × 10 mL) and then water (2 × 10 mL). The organic layer was dried (MgSO4), filtered, and concentrated in vacuo. The crude material was purified by flash column chromatography eluting with 1% methanol in diethyl ether to give [4-(trifluoromethyl)phenyl]diphenylphosphine oxide (2n) as a pale brown oil (0.0604 g, 87%). Spectroscopic data were consistent with previously published data.371H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3) δ 7.49 (td, J = 7.4, 2.4 Hz, 4H), 7.58 (t, J = 7.4 Hz, 2H), 7.66 (dd, J = 12.4, 7.4 Hz, 4H), 7.72 (dd, J = 8.4, 2.4 Hz, 2H), 7.82 (dd, J = 11.2, 8.4 Hz, 2H); 13C{1H} NMR (101 MHz, CDCl3) δ 123.7 (q, 1JCF = 273.6 Hz, CF3), 125.5 (dq, 3JCP = 12.0 Hz, 3JCF = 3.8 Hz, 2 × CH), 128.9 (d, 3JCP = 12.3 Hz, 4 × CH), 131.8 (d, 1JCP = 105.4 Hz, 2 × C), 132.2 (d, 2JCP = 10.1 Hz, 4 × CH), 132.5 (d, 4JCP = 2.8 Hz, 2 × CH), 132.7 (d, 2JCP = 10.1 Hz, 2 × CH), 133.8 (qd, 2JCF = 32.9 Hz, 4JCP = 2.9 Hz, C), 137.3 (d, 1JCP = 101.2 Hz, C); MS (ESI) m/z 369 (M + Na+, 100).
(2-Fluorophenyl)diphenylphosphine Oxide (2o)
The reaction was carried out according to the previously described general procedure for (4-methylphenyl)diphenylphosphine oxide (2a) using sodium iodide (0.0300 g, 0.200 mmol), 2-fluorophenyl nonafluorobutanesulfonate (1o) (0.0790 g, 0.200 mmol), anhydrous N,N′-dimethylformamide (1.2 mL), diphenylphosphine oxide (0.0610 g, 0.302 mmol), palladium(II) acetate (0.00450 g, 0.0200 mmol), and triethylamine (0.110 mL, 0.790 mmol). The reaction mixture was stirred at 120 °C for 4 h. The reaction mixture was cooled to room temperature and diluted with ethyl acetate (10 mL). The organic layer was washed with 2 M aqueous lithium chloride solution (3 × 10 mL) and then water (2 × 10 mL). The organic layer was dried (MgSO4), filtered, and concentrated in vacuo. The crude material was purified by flash column chromatography eluting with 2% methanol in diethyl ether to give (2-fluorophenyl)diphenylphosphine oxide (2o) as a pale yellow solid (0.0303 g, 51%). Mp 119–121 °C; IR (neat) 3010, 1601, 1437, 1273, 1191, 1119, 823, 757 cm–1; 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3) δ 7.05–7.13 (m, 1H), 7.31 (br t, J = 7.6 Hz, 1H), 7.47 (td, J = 7.4, 3.2 Hz, 4H), 7.52–7.61 (m, 3H), 7.73 (dd, J = 12.6, 7.4 Hz, 4H), 7.83–7.93 (m, 1H); 13C{1H} NMR (101 MHz, CDCl3) δ 116.2 (dd, 2JCF = 22.8 Hz, 3JCP = 5.6 Hz, CH), 120.4 (dd, 1JCP = 100.6 Hz, 2JCF = 18.6 Hz, C), 124.7 (dd, 3JCP = 10.6, 4JCF = 3.4 Hz, CH), 128.6 (d, 3JCP = 12.6 Hz, 4 × CH), 131.9 (dd, 2JCP = 10.6 Hz, 5JCF = 2.0 Hz, 4 × CH), 132.2 (d, 4JCP = 2.9 Hz, 2 × CH), 132.3 (d, 1JCP = 108.6 Hz, 2 × C), 134.8–135.0 (m, 2 × CH), 163.1 (dd, 1JCF = 251.3 Hz, 2JCP = 2.1 Hz, C); MS (ESI) m/z 319 (M + Na+, 100); HRMS (ESI) m/z: [M + Na]+ calcd for C18H14FNaOP 319.0659; found 319.0654.
(3-Chlorophenyl)diphenylphosphine Oxide (2p)
The reaction was carried out according to the previously described general procedure for (4-methylphenyl)diphenylphosphine oxide (2a) using sodium iodide (0.0300 g, 0.200 mmol), 3-chlorophenyl nonafluorobutanesulfonate (1p) (0.0820 g, 0.200 mmol), anhydrous N,N′-dimethylformamide (1.2 mL), diphenylphosphine oxide (0.0610 g, 0.302 mmol), palladium(II) acetate (0.00450 g, 0.0200 mmol), and triethylamine (0.110 mL, 0.790 mmol). The reaction mixture was stirred at 120 °C for 4 h. The reaction mixture was cooled to room temperature and diluted with ethyl acetate (10 mL). The organic layer was washed with 2 M aqueous lithium chloride solution (3 × 10 mL) and then water (2 × 10 mL). The organic layer was dried (MgSO4), filtered, and concentrated in vacuo. The crude material was purified by flash column chromatography eluting with 2% methanol in diethyl ether to give (3-chlorophenyl)diphenylphosphine oxide (2p) as an off-white solid (0.0544 g, 87%). Mp 99–101 °C; IR (neat) 3055, 1439, 1400, 1188, 1119, 1076, 795, 752, 721 cm–1; 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3) δ 7.40 (td, J = 7.8, 3.3 Hz, 1H), 7.44–7.60 (m, 8H), 7.61–7.71 (m, 5H); 13C{1H} NMR (101 MHz, CDCl3) δ 128.8 (d, 3JCP = 12.3 Hz, 4 × CH), 130.1 (d, 3JCP = 13.0 Hz, CH), 130.3 (d, 2JCP = 9.4 Hz, CH), 132.0 (d, 1JCP = 105.4 Hz, 2 × C), 132.0 (d, 2JCP = 10.7 Hz, CH), 132.2 (d, 2JCP = 10.0 Hz, 4 × CH), 132.2 (d, 4JCP = 1.8 Hz, CH), 132.4 (d, 4JCP = 2.9 Hz, 2 × CH), 135.1 (d, 3JCP = 15.7 Hz, C), 135.3 (d, 1JCP = 101.6 Hz, C); MS (ESI) m/z 335 (M + Na+, 100); HRMS (ESI) m/z: [M + Na]+ calcd for C18H1435ClNaOP 335.0363; found 335.0365.
1,3-Bis(diphenylphosphoryl)benzene (2q)39
The reaction was carried out according to the previously described general procedure for (4-methylphenyl)diphenylphosphine oxide (2a) using sodium iodide (0.0300 g, 0.200 mmol), 3-bromophenyl nonafluorobutanesulfonate (1q) (0.0910 g, 0.200 mmol), anhydrous N,N′-dimethylformamide (1.2 mL), diphenylphosphine oxide (0.121 g, 0.600 mmol), palladium(II) acetate (0.00450 g, 0.0200 mmol), and triethylamine (0.110 mL, 0.790 mmol). The reaction mixture was stirred at 120 °C for 5 h. The reaction mixture was cooled to room temperature and diluted with ethyl acetate (10 mL). The organic layer was washed with 2 M aqueous lithium chloride solution (3 × 10 mL) and then water (2 × 10 mL). The organic layer was dried (MgSO4), filtered, and concentrated in vacuo. The crude material was purified by flash column chromatography eluting with 3% methanol in dichloromethane to give 1,3-bis(diphenylphosphoryl)benzene (2q) as a colorless oil (0.0545 g, 57%). Spectroscopic data were consistent with previously published data.391H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3) δ 7.40 (td, J = 7.6, 2.8 Hz, 8H), 7.52 (ttd, J = 7.4, 1.5, 1.3 Hz, 4H), 7.53–7.60 (m, 8H), 7.61 (t, J = 7.6 Hz, 1H), 7.68 (tt, J = 11.7, 1.2 Hz, 1H), 7.90–8.00 (m, 2H); 13C{1H} NMR (101 MHz, CDCl3) δ 128.7 (d, 3JCP = 12.7 Hz, 8 × CH), 129.1 (t, 3JCP = 11.3 Hz, CH), 131.8 (d, 1JCP = 105.3 Hz, 4 × C), 132.1 (d, 2JCP = 10.1 Hz, 8 × CH), 132.3 (d, 4JCP = 2.8 Hz, 4 × CH), 133.8 (dd, 1JCP = 102.1 Hz, 3JCP 10.9 Hz, 2 × C), 135.5 (t, 2JCP = 11.2 Hz, CH), 135.6 (dd, 2JCP = 10.2 Hz, 4JCP 3.3 Hz, 2 × CH); MS (ESI) m/z 501 (M + Na+, 100).
Pyridin-2-yldiphenylphosphine Oxide (2r)40
The reaction was carried out according to the previously described general procedure for (4-methylphenyl)diphenylphosphine oxide (2a) using sodium iodide (0.0600 g, 0.400 mmol), pyridin-2-yl nonafluorobutanesulfonate (1r) (0.151 g, 0.400 mmol), anhydrous N,N′-dimethylformamide (2.4 mL), diphenylphosphine oxide (0.121 g, 0.600 mmol), palladium(II) acetate (0.00900 g, 0.0400 mmol), and triethylamine (0.220 mL, 1.58 mmol). The reaction mixture was stirred at 120 °C for 4 h. The reaction mixture was cooled to room temperature and diluted with ethyl acetate (10 mL). The organic layer was washed with 2 M aqueous lithium chloride solution (3 × 10 mL) and then water (2 × 10 mL). The organic layer was dried (MgSO4), filtered, and concentrated in vacuo. The crude material was purified by flash column chromatography eluting with 2% methanol in diethyl ether to give pyridin-2-yldiphenylphosphine oxide (2r) as a white solid (0.0673 g, 60%). Mp 101–103 °C (lit.40 106–107 °C); 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3) δ 7.34–7.55 (m, 7H), 7.80–7.86 (m, 1H), 7.88 (dd, J = 12.0, 8.0 Hz, 4H), 8.30 (t, J = 6.8 Hz, 1H), 8.72–8.81 (m, 1H); 13C{1H} NMR (101 MHz, CDCl3) δ 125.4 (d, 4JCP = 3.2 Hz, CH), 128.5 (d, 3JCP = 12.3 Hz, 4 × CH), 128.5 (d, 3JCP = 19.0 Hz, CH), 132.0 (d, 4JCP = 2.9 Hz, 2 × CH), 132.2 (d, 2JCP = 9.5 Hz, 4 × CH), 132.3 (d, 1JCP = 104.5 Hz, 2 × C), 136.3 (d, 2JCP = 9.2 Hz, CH), 150.3 (d, 3JCP = 19.2 Hz, CH), 156.5 (d, 1JCP = 132.2 Hz, C); MS (ESI) m/z 302 (M + Na+, 100).
Tris(p-tolyl)phosphine Oxide (3a)41
The reaction was carried out according to the previously described general procedure for (4-methylphenyl)diphenylphosphine oxide (2a) using sodium iodide (0.0600 g, 0.400 mmol), 4-methylphenyl nonafluorobutanesulfonate (1a) (0.156 g, 0.400 mmol), anhydrous N,N′-dimethylformamide (2.4 mL), bis(p-tolyl)phosphine oxide (0.138 g, 0.600 mmol), and palladium(II) acetate (0.00900 g, 0.0400 mmol). The reaction was heated to 120 °C and stirred for 4 h. The crude material was purified by flash column chromatography eluting with 2% methanol in diethyl ether to give tris(p-tolyl)phosphine oxide (3a) as a white solid (0.0810 g, 63%). Mp 135–137 °C (lit.41 140 °C); 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3) δ 2.39 (s, 9H), 7.24 (dd, J = 8.0, 2.4 Hz, 6H), 7.54 (dd, J = 12.0, 8.0 Hz, 4H); 13C{1H} NMR (101 MHz, CDCl3) δ 21.7 (d, 5JCP = 1.4 Hz, 3 × CH3), 129.3 (d, 3JCP = 12.4 Hz, 6 × CH), 129.9 (d, 1JCP = 106.7 Hz, 3 × C), 132.2 (d, 2JCP = 10.3 Hz, 6 × CH), 142.3 (d, 4JCP = 2.8 Hz, 3 × C); MS (ESI) m/z 343 (M + Na+, 100).
(4-Methylphenyl)di(n-butyl)phosphine Oxide (3b)
The reaction was carried out according to the previously described general procedure for (4-methylphenyl)diphenylphosphine oxide (2a) using sodium iodide (0.0600 g, 0.400 mmol), 4-methylphenyl nonafluorobutanesulfonate (1a) (0.156 g, 0.400 mmol), anhydrous N,N′-dimethylformamide (2.4 mL), di(n-butyl)phosphine oxide (0.0973 g, 0.600 mmol), tetrakis(triphenylphosphine)palladium(0) (0.0462 g, 0.0400 mmol), and triethylamine (0.220 mL, 1.58 mmol). The reaction mixture was heated to 120 °C and stirred for 5 h. The reaction mixture was cooled to room temperature, diluted with ethyl acetate (30 mL), and washed with water (3 × 30 mL). The organic layer was dried (MgSO4), filtered, and concentrated in vacuo. The crude material was purified by flash column chromatography eluting with 0–2% gradient of methanol in diethyl ether to give (4-methylphenyl)di(n-butyl)phosphine oxide (3b) as a white solid (0.0587 g, 58%). Mp 51–53 °C; IR (neat) 2926, 2865, 1462, 1163, 1109, 1054, 900, 808, 757 cm–1; 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3) δ 0.85 (t, J = 7.2 Hz, 6H), 1.30–1.65 (m, 8H), 1.75–2.00 (m, 4H), 2.39 (s, 3H), 7.27 (dd, J = 8.2, 2.4 Hz, 2H), 7.56 (dd, J = 10.6, 8.2 Hz, 2H); 13C{1H} NMR (101 MHz, CDCl3) δ 13.7 (2 × CH3), 21.6 (d, 5JCP = 1.2 Hz, CH3), 23.7 (d, 2JCP = 4.1 Hz, 2 × CH2), 24.2 (d, 3JCP = 14.4 Hz, 2 × CH2), 29.9 (d, 1JCP = 68.9 Hz, 2 × CH2), 129.4 (d, 3JCP = 11.4 Hz, 2 × CH), 129.5 (d, 1JCP = 94.5 Hz, C), 130.5 (d, 2JCP = 9.0 Hz, 2 × CH), 141.8 (d, 4JCP = 2.6 Hz, C); MS (ESI) m/z 275 (M + Na+, 100); HRMS (ESI) m/z: [M + Na]+ calcd for C15H25NaOP 275.1535; found 275.1534.
Ethyl (4-methylphenyl)phenylphosphinate (3c)42
The reaction was carried out according to the previously described general procedure for (4-methylphenyl)diphenylphosphine oxide (2a) using sodium iodide (0.0300 g, 0.200 mmol), 4-methylphenyl nonafluorobutanesulfonate (1a) (0.0780 g, 0.200 mmol), anhydrous N,N′-dimethylformamide (1.2 mL), tetrakis(triphenylphosphine)palladium(0) (0.0231 g, 0.0200 mmol), ethyl phenylphosphinate (0.0450 mL, 0.299 mmol), and triethylamine (0.110 mL, 0.790 mmol). The reaction was heated to 80 °C and stirred for 4 h. The reaction mixture was cooled to room temperature, diluted with ethyl acetate (15 mL) and washed with water (3 × 15 mL). The organic layer was dried (MgSO4), filtered, and concentrated in vacuo. The crude material was purified by flash column chromatography eluting with 1% methanol in diethyl ether to give ethyl (4-methylphenyl)phenylphosphinate (3c) as a colorless oil (0.0381 g, 73%). Spectroscopic data were consistent with previously published data.421H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3) δ 1.36 (t, J = 7.2 Hz, 3H), 2.38 (s, 3H), 4.09 (quin., J = 7.2 Hz, 2H), 7.25 (dd, J = 8.0, 3.2 Hz, 2H), 7.39–7.47 (m, 2H), 7.50 (ttd, J = 7.4, 1.9, 1.3 Hz, 1H), 7.70 (dd, J = 12.0, 8.0 Hz, 2H), 7.76–7.84 (m, 2H); 13C{1H} NMR (101 MHz, CDCl3) δ 16.7 (d, 3JCP = 6.7 Hz, CH3), 21.8 (d, 5JCP = 1.3 Hz, CH3), 61.1 (d, 2JCP = 5.9 Hz, CH2), 128.6 (d, 1JCP = 139.8 Hz, C), 128.6 (d, 3JCP = 13.2 Hz, 2 × CH), 129.4 (d, 3JCP = 13.5 Hz, 2 × CH), 131.7 (d, 2JCP = 10.0 Hz, 2 × CH), 131.9 (d, 2JCP = 10.6 Hz, 2 × CH), 132.1 (d, 4JCP = 2.8 Hz, CH), 132.2 (d, 1JCP = 137.6 Hz, C), 142.7 (d, 4JCP = 2.9 Hz, C); MS (ESI) m/z 283 (M + Na+, 100).
Diethyl (4-methylphenyl)phosphonate (3d)42
The reaction was carried out according to the previously described general procedure for (4-methylphenyl)diphenylphosphine oxide (2a) using sodium iodide (0.105 g, 0.700 mmol), 4-methylphenyl nonafluorobutanesulfonate (1a) (0.273 g, 0.700 mmol), anhydrous N,N′-dimethylformamide (4 mL), tetrakis(triphenylphosphine)palladium(0) (0.0809 g, 0.0700 mmol), diethyl phosphite (0.136 mL, 1.06 mmol), and triethylamine (0.390 mL, 2.80 mmol). The reaction mixture was stirred at 80 °C for 6 h. The crude material was purified by flash column chromatography eluting with 1% methanol in diethyl ether to give diethyl (4-methylphenyl)phosphonate (3d) as a yellow oil (0.107 g, 67%). Spectroscopic data were consistent with previously published data.421H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3) δ 1.31 (t, J = 7.2 Hz, 6H), 2.39 (s, 3H), 3.99–4.18 (m, 4H), 7.26 (ddd, J = 8.0, 4.0, 0.4 Hz, 2H), 7.69 (dd, J = 13.2, 8.0 Hz, 2H); 13C{1H} NMR (101 MHz, CDCl3) δ 16.5 (d, 3JCP = 6.6 Hz, 2 × CH3), 21.8 (d, 5JCP = 1.4 Hz, CH3), 62.1 (d, 2JCP = 5.4 Hz, 2 × CH2), 125.2 (d, 1JCP = 190.8 Hz, C), 129.3 (d, 3JCP = 15.5 Hz, 2 × CH), 132.0 (d, 2JCP = 10.4 Hz, 2 × CH), 143.0 (d, 4JCP = 3.1 Hz, C); MS (ESI) m/z 251 (M + Na+, 100).
1-Pyrenyl nonafluorobutanesulfonate (5)
The reaction was carried out according to the previously described procedure for 4-methylphenyl nonafluorobutanesulfonate (1a) using pyren-1-ol (4) (0.327 g, 1.50 mmol), anhydrous dichloromethane (5 mL), triethylamine (0.530 mL, 3.80 mmol) and perfluoro-1-butanesulfonyl fluoride (0.410 mL, 2.28 mmol). The reaction mixture was stirred at room temperature for 3 h. The crude material was purified by flash column chromatography eluting with 5% diethyl ether in hexane to give 1-pyrenyl nonafluorobutanesulfonate (5) as a white solid (0.654 g, 87%). Mp 122–124 °C; IR (neat) 3049, 1598, 1416, 1236, 1193, 1135, 1031, 904, 844 cm–1; 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3) δ 7.96 (d, J = 8.4 Hz, 1H), 8.01–8.12 (m, 3H), 8.15 (d, J = 8.4 Hz, 1H), 8.19–8.30 (m, 4H); 13C{1H} NMR (101 MHz, CDCl3) δ 118.7 (CH), 119.5 (CH), 123.9 (C), 124.1 (C), 125.1 (CH), 125.8 (C), 126.3 (CH), 126.6 (CH), 126.8 (CH), 127.0 (CH), 128.6 (CH), 129.9 (CH), 130.8 (C), 131.0 (C), 131.1 (C), 142.9 (C); MS (ESI) m/z 523 (M + Na+, 100); HRMS (ESI) m/z: [M + Na]+ calcd for C20H9F9NaO3S 523.0021; found 523.0024.
(1-Pyrenyl)diphenylphosphine Oxide (6)18
The reaction was carried out according to the previously described general procedure for (4-methylphenyl)diphenylphosphine oxide (2a) using sodium iodide (0.0300 g, 0.200 mmol), 1-pyrenyl nonafluorobutanesulfonate (5) (0.100 g, 0.200 mmol), diphenylphosphine oxide (0.0610 g, 0.302 mmol), palladium(II) acetate (0.00450 g, 0.0200 mmol), anhydrous N,N′-dimethylformamide (1.2 mL), and triethylamine (0.110 mL, 0.790 mmol). The reaction mixture was heated to 120 °C and stirred for 4 h. The reaction mixture was cooled to room temperature, diluted with ethyl acetate (15 mL), and washed with water (3 × 15 mL). The organic layer was dried (MgSO4), filtered, and concentrated in vacuo. The crude material was purified by flash column chromatography eluting with 2% methanol in diethyl ether to give (1-pyrenyl)diphenylphosphine oxide (6) as an off-white solid (0.0588 g, 73%). Mp 233–235 °C. Spectroscopic data were consistent with previously published data.181H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3) δ 7.47 (td, J = 7.4, 2.9 Hz, 4H), 7.57 (ttd, J = 7.4, 1.7, 1.3 Hz, 2H), 7.68–7.80 (m, 5H), 8.00–8.11 (m, 4H), 8.19 (d, J = 9.2 Hz, 1H), 8.24 (t, J = 7.6 Hz, 2H), 8.94 (d, J = 9.2 Hz, 1H); 13C{1H} NMR (101 MHz, CDCl3) δ 123.7 (d, 3JCP = 13.7 Hz, CH), 124.3 (d, 5JCP = 0.9 Hz, C), 125.3 (d, 1JCP = 103.6 Hz, C), 125.3 (d, 3JCP = 10.3 Hz, C), 126.3 (CH), 126.5 (d, 2JCP = 6.5 Hz, CH), 126.6 (2 × CH), 127.3 (d, 5JCP = 0.8 Hz, CH), 128.8 (d, 3JCP = 12.2 Hz, 4 × CH), 129.0 (CH), 130.0 (CH), 130.6 (C), 131.2 (d, 5JCP = 0.8 Hz, C), 131.3 (d, 3JCP = 12.2 Hz, CH), 132.0 (d, 4JCP = 2.8 Hz, 2 × CH), 132.4 (d, 2JCP = 9.9 Hz, 4 × CH), 133.5 (d, 1JCP = 104.7 Hz, 2 × C), 134.3 (d, 2JCP = 8.2 Hz, C), 134.4 (d, 4JCP = 2.6 Hz, C); MS (ESI) m/z 425 (M + Na+, 100).
Methyl (2S)-2-[(benzyloxycarbonyl)amino]-3-[(phenylnonafluorobutanesulfonate)-4′-yl]propanoate (8)
The reaction was carried out according to the previously described procedure for 4-methylphenyl nonafluorobutanesulfonate (1a) using methyl (2S)-2-[(benzyloxycarbonyl)amino]-3-(4-hydroxyphenyl)propanoate (7) (0.988 g, 3.00 mmol), anhydrous dichloromethane (10 mL), triethylamine (1.05 mL, 7.53 mmol), and perfluoro-1-butanesulfonyl fluoride (0.810 mL, 4.50 mmol). The reaction mixture was stirred at room temperature for 2 h. The crude material was purified by flash column chromatography eluting with 50% diethyl ether in hexane to give methyl (2S)-2-[(benzyloxycarbonyl)amino]-3-[(phenylnonafluorobutanesulfonate)-4′-yl]propanoate (8) as a colorless oil which solidified upon standing (1.72 g, 94%). Mp 46–48 °C; IR (neat) 3341, 2959, 1717, 1501, 1423, 1200, 1142, 1015, 891 cm–1; [α]D17 −14.6 (c 0.5, MeOH); 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3) δ 3.09 (dd, J = 14.0, 6.4 Hz, 1H), 3.19 (dd, J = 14.0, 5.6 Hz, 1H), 3.72 (s, 3H), 4.60–4.72 (m, 1H), 5.07 (d, J = 12.2 Hz, 1H), 5.12 (d, J = 12.2 Hz, 1H), 5.26 (d, J = 8.0 Hz, 1H), 7.18 (br s, 4H), 7.28–7.42 (m, 5H); 13C{1H} NMR (101 MHz, CDCl3) δ 37.8 (CH2), 52.6 (CH3), 54.8 (CH), 67.3 (CH2), 121.6 (2 × CH), 128.3 (2 × CH), 128.5 (CH), 128.7 (2 × CH), 131.2 (2 × CH), 136.2 (C), 136.7 (C), 149.0 (C), 155.6 (C), 171.6 (C); MS (ESI) m/z 634 (M + Na+, 100); HRMS (ESI) m/z: [M + Na]+ calcd for C22H18F9NNaO7S 634.0552; found 634.0549.
Methyl (2S)-2-[(benzyloxycarbonyl)amino]-3-[(diethylphenylphosphonate)-4′-yl]propanoate (9) Using Pd(PPh3)4 (10 mol %)
The reaction was carried out according to the previously described general procedure for (4-methylphenyl)diphenylphosphine oxide (2a) using sodium iodide (0.150 g, 1.00 mmol), methyl (2S)-2-[(benzyloxycarbonyl)amino]-3-[(phenylnonafluorobutanesulfonate)-4′-yl]propanoate (8) (0.611 g, 1.00 mmol), anhydrous N,N′-dimethylformamide (6 mL), diethyl phosphite (0.193 mL, 1.50 mmol), tetrakis(triphenylphosphine)palladium(0) (0.116 g, 0.100 mmol), and triethylamine (0.557 mL, 4.00 mmol). The reaction mixture was heated to 80 °C and stirred for 6 h. The reaction mixture was cooled to room temperature, diluted with ethyl acetate (50 mL), and washed with water (3 × 50 mL). The organic layer was dried (MgSO4), filtered, and concentrated in vacuo. The crude material was purified by flash column chromatography eluting with 2% methanol and 2% toluene in diethyl ether to give methyl (2S)-2-[(benzyloxycarbonyl)amino]-3-[(diethylphenylphosphonate)-4′-yl]propanoate (9) as a colorless oil (0.326 g, 72%). IR (neat) 3248, 2983, 1714, 1533, 1225, 1017, 961, 745 cm–1; [α]D23 +50.1 (c 0.1, CHCl3); 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3) δ 1.31 (t, J = 7.0 Hz, 6H), 3.11 (dd, J = 14.0, 6.0 Hz, 1H), 3.20 (dd, J = 14.0, 5.6 Hz, 1H), 3.71 (s, 3H), 4.00–4.20 (m, 4H), 4.61–4.75 (m, 1H), 5.07 (d, J = 12.4 Hz, 1H), 5.11 (d, J = 12.4 Hz, 1H), 5.28 (d, J = 8.0 Hz, 1H), 7.20 (dd, J = 8.2, 3.6 Hz, 2H), 7.27–7.42 (m, 5H), 7.71 (dd, J = 13.2, 8.2 Hz, 2H); 13C{1H} NMR (101 MHz, CDCl3) δ 16.5 (d, 3JCP = 6.6 Hz, 2 × CH3), 38.3 (CH2), 52.6 (CH3), 54.7 (CH), 62.2 (d, 2JCP = 5.6 Hz, 2 × CH2), 67.2 (CH2), 127.3 (d, 1JCP = 190.3 Hz, C), 128.2 (2 × CH), 128.4 (CH), 128.7 (2 × CH), 129.6 (d, 3JCP = 15.4 Hz, 2 × CH), 132.1 (d, 2JCP = 10.3 Hz, 2 × CH), 136.2 (C), 140.7 (d, 4JCP = 2.8 Hz, C), 155.7 (C), 171.7 (C); MS (ESI) m/z 472 (M + Na+, 100); HRMS (ESI) m/z: [M + Na]+ calcd for C22H28NNaO7P 472.1496; found 472.1498.
Methyl (2S)-2-[(benzyloxycarbonyl)amino]-3-[(diethylphenylphosphonate)-4′-yl]propanoate (9) Using Pd(PPh3)4 (5 mol %)
The reaction was carried out according to the previously described general procedure for (4-methylphenyl)diphenylphosphine oxide (2a) using sodium iodide (0.150 g, 1.00 mmol), methyl (2S)-2-[(benzyloxycarbonyl)amino]-3-[(phenylnonafluorobutanesulfonate)-4′-yl]propanoate (8) (0.611 g, 1.00 mmol), anhydrous N,N′-dimethylformamide (6 mL), diethyl phosphite (0.193 mL, 1.50 mmol), tetrakis(triphenylphosphine)palladium(0) (0.058 g, 0.05 mmol), and triethylamine (0.557 mL, 4.00 mmol). The reaction mixture was heated to 80 °C and stirred for 7 h. The reaction mixture was cooled to room temperature, diluted with ethyl acetate (50 mL), and washed with water (3 × 50 mL). The organic layer was dried (MgSO4), filtered, and concentrated in vacuo. The crude material was purified by flash column chromatography eluting with 2% methanol and 2% toluene in diethyl ether to give methyl (2S)-2-[(benzyloxycarbonyl)amino]-3-[(diethylphenylphosphonate)-4′-yl]propanoate (9) as a colorless oil (0.294 g, 65%). Spectroscopic data were consistent as described above.
(2S)-2-Amino-3-[(phenylphosphonate)-4′-yl]propanoic Hydrochloride (10)
Methyl (2S)-2-[(benzyloxycarbonyl)amino]-3-[(diethylphenylphosphonate)-4′-yl]propanoate (9) (0.209 g, 0.465 mmol) was suspended in 6 M aqueous hydrochloric acid solution (1.70 mL, 10.2 mmol) and stirred under reflux for 6 h. The reaction mixture was cooled to room temperature and concentrated in vacuo. The crude material was purified by trituration with diethyl ether to give (2S)-2-amino-3-[(phenylphosphonate)-4′-yl]propanoic hydrochloride (10) as a white solid (0.115 g, 88%). Mp 218–220 °C; IR (neat) 2745, 1729, 1605, 1501, 1407, 1135, 921 cm–1; [α]D25 +3.5 (c 0.1, H2O); 1H NMR (400 MHz, D2O) δ 3.25 (dd, J = 14.6, 7.6 Hz, 1H), 3.41 (dd, J = 14.6, 5.6 Hz, 1H), 4.32 (dd, J = 7.6, 5.6 Hz, 1H), 7.43 (dd, J = 8.0, 3.2 Hz, 2H), 7.71 (dd, J = 12.8, 8.0 Hz, 2H); 13C{1H} NMR (101 MHz, D2O) δ 38.6 (CH2), 57.3 (CH), 132.3 (d, 3JCP = 14.5 Hz, 2 × CH), 134.0 (d, 2JCP = 10.2 Hz, 2 × CH), 136.2 (d, 1JCP = 180.5 Hz, C), 140.3 (d, 4JCP = 3.1 Hz, C), 174.7 (C); MS (ESI) m/z 246 (M + Na+, 100); HRMS (ESI) m/z: [M + Na]+ calcd for C9H13NO5P 246.0526; found 246.0527.
(4-Methylphenyl)diphenylphosphine Oxide (2a) Using p-Tolyl Iodide (11)32
The reaction was carried out according to the previously described procedure for (4-methylphenyl)diphenylphosphine oxide (2a) using p-tolyl iodide (11) (0.0436 g, 0.200 mmol), anhydrous N,N′-dimethylformamide (1.2 mL), diphenylphosphine oxide (0.0610 g, 0.302 mmol), palladium(II) acetate (0.00450 g, 0.0200 mmol), and triethylamine (0.110 mL, 0.790 mmol). The reaction mixture was heated to 120 °C and stirred for 1.5 h. The crude material was purified by flash column chromatography eluting with 2% methanol in diethyl ether to give (4-methylphenyl)diphenylphosphine oxide (2a) as a white solid (0.0199 g, 34%). Spectroscopic data were consistent as described above.
Acknowledgments
Financial support from Dr. Ian Sword (Ph.D. studentship to H.M.), EPSRC (Ph.D. studentship to L.M.R., EP/N509668/1), and the University of Glasgow is gratefully acknowledged.
Supporting Information Available
The Supporting Information is available free of charge at https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acs.joc.1c02172.
1H and 13C NMR spectra of all compounds (PDF)
The authors declare no competing financial interest.
Supplementary Material
References
- a Quin L. D.A Guide to Organophosphorus Chemistry; Wiley Interscience: New York, 2000. [Google Scholar]; b Murphy P. J.Organophosphorus Reagents; Oxford University Press: Oxford, U.K., 2004. [Google Scholar]; c Baumgartner T.; Réau R. Organophosphorus π-Conjugated Materials. Chem. Rev. 2006, 106, 4681–4727. 10.1021/cr040179m. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; d Martin R.; Buchwald S. L. Palladium-Catalyzed Suzuki-Miyaura Cross-Coupling Reactions Employing Dialkylbiaryl Phosphine Ligands. Acc. Chem. Res. 2008, 41, 1461–1473. 10.1021/ar800036s. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- For some specific examples, see; a Liu W.-Q.; Olszowy C.; Bischoff L.; Garbay C. Enantioselective Synthesis of (2S)-2-(4-Phosphonophenylmethyl)-3-aminopropanoic Acids Suitably Protected for Peptide Synthesis. Tetrahedron Lett. 2002, 43, 1417–1419. 10.1016/S0040-4039(02)00004-7. [DOI] [Google Scholar]; b Muthukumaran K.; Loewe R. S.; Ambroise A.; Tamaru S.-i.; Li Q.; Mathur G.; Bocian D. F.; Misra V.; Lindsey J. S. Porphyrins Bearing Arylphosphonic Acid Tethers for Attachment to Oxide Surfaces. J. Org. Chem. 2004, 69, 1444–1452. 10.1021/jo034945l. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; c Oishi S.; Kang S.-U.; Liu H.; Zhang M.; Yang D.; Deschamps J. R.; Burke T. R. Jr. Synthesis of α,α-Disubstituted 4-Phosphonophenylalanine Analogues as Conformationally-Constrained Phosphptyrosyl Mimetics. Tetrahedron 2004, 60, 2971–2977. 10.1016/j.tet.2004.02.005. [DOI] [Google Scholar]; d Jiang W.; Allan G.; Fiordeliso J. J.; Linton O.; Tannenbaum P.; Xu J.; Zhu P.; Gunnet J.; Demarest K.; Lundeen S.; Sui Z. New Progesterone Receptor Antagonists: Phosphorus-Containing 11β-Aryl-Substituted Steroids. Bioorg. Med. Chem. 2006, 14, 6726–6732. 10.1016/j.bmc.2006.05.066. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; e Amaya T.; Abe Y.; Inada Y.; Hirao T. Synthesis of Self-Doped Conducting Polyaniline Bearing Phosphonic Acid. Tetrahedron Lett. 2014, 55, 3976–3978. 10.1016/j.tetlet.2014.04.115. [DOI] [Google Scholar]; f Amaya T.; Kurata I.; Inada Y.; Hatai T.; Hirao T. Synthesis of Phosphonic Acid Ring-Substituted Polyanilines via Direct Phosphonation to Polymer Main Chains. RSC Adv. 2017, 7, 39306–39313. 10.1039/C7RA04678B. [DOI] [Google Scholar]; g Batuecas M.; Luo J.; Gergelitsova I.; Kramer K.; Witaker D.; Vitorica-Yrezabal I. J.; Larrosa I. Catalytic Asymmetric C-H Arylation of (η6-Arene)Chromium Complexes: Facile Access to Planar-Chiral Phosphines. ACS Catal. 2019, 9, 5268–5278. 10.1021/acscatal.9b00918. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; h Gao Z.; Wang F.; Qian J.; Yang H.; Xia C.; Zhang J.; Jiang G. Enantioselective Construction of Quinoxaline-Based Heterbiaryls and P,N-Ligands via Chirality Transfer Strategy. Org. Lett. 2021, 23, 1181–1187. 10.1021/acs.orglett.0c03827. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- a Van der Jeught S.; Stevens C. V. Direct Phosphonylation of Aromatic Azaheterocycles. Chem. Rev. 2009, 109, 2672–2702. 10.1021/cr800315j. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; b Tomori H.; Fox J. M.; Buchwald S. L. An Improved Synthesis of Functionalized Biphenyl-Based Phosphine Ligands. J. Org. Chem. 2000, 65, 5334–5341. 10.1021/jo000691h. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- a Hirao T.; Masungaa; Ohshiro Y.; Agawa T. A Novel Synthesis of Dialkyl Arenephosphonates. Synthesis 1981, 56–57. 10.1055/s-1981-29335. [DOI] [Google Scholar]; b Hirao T.; Maunaga T.; Yamada N.; Ohshiro Y.; Agawa T. Palladium-Catalyzed New Carbon-Phosphorus Bond Formation. Bull. Chem. Soc. Jpn. 1982, 55, 909–913. 10.1246/bcsj.55.909. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- For reviews, see; a Prim D.; Campagne J.-M.; Joseph D.; Andrioletti B. Palladium-Catalyzed Reactions of Aryl Halides with Soft, Non-Organometallic Nucleophiles. Tetrahedron 2002, 58, 2041–2075. 10.1016/S0040-4020(02)00076-5. [DOI] [Google Scholar]; b Schwan A. L. Palladium Catalyzed Cross-Coupling Reactions for Phosphorus-Carbon Bond Formation. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2004, 33, 218–224. 10.1039/B307538A. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; c Tappe F. M.; Trepohl V. T.; Oestreich M. Transition-Metal-Catalyzed C-P Cross-Coupling Reactions. Synthesis 2010, 3037–3062. 10.1055/s-0030-1257960. [DOI] [Google Scholar]; d Demmer C. S.; Krogsgaard-Larsen N.; Bunch L. Review on Modern Advances of Chemical Methods for the Introduction of a Phosphonic Acid Group. Chem. Rev. 2011, 111, 7981–8006. 10.1021/cr2002646. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; e Keglevich G.; Henyecz R.; Mucsi Z. Focusing on the Catalysts of the Pd- and Ni-Catalyzed Hirao Reactions. Molecules 2020, 25, 3897 10.3390/molecules25173897. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; f Kanchana U. S.; Diana E. J.; Mathew T. V.; Anilkumar G. Palladium-Catalyzed C-P Bond Forming Reactions: An Overview. ChemistrySelect 2021, 6, 1579–1588. 10.1002/slct.202004433. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- For example, see; a Kalek M.; Stawinski J. Pd(0)-Catalyzed Phosphorus-Carbon Bond Formation. Mechanistic and Synthetic Studies on the Role of the Palladium Sources and Anionic Additives. Organometallics 2007, 26, 5840–5847. 10.1021/om700797k. [DOI] [Google Scholar]; b Belabassi Y.; Alzghari S.; Montchamp J.-L. Revisiting the Hirao Cross-Coupling: Improved Synthesis of Aryl and Heteroaryl Phosphonates. J. Organomet. Chem. 2008, 693, 3171–3178. 10.1016/j.jorganchem.2008.07.020. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; c Kalek M.; Stawinski J. Palladium-Catalyzed C–P Bond Formation: Mechanistic Studies on the Ligand Substitution and the Reductive Elimination. An Intramolecular Catalysis by the Acetate Group in PdII Complexes. Organometallics 2008, 27, 5876–5888. 10.1021/om800641n. [DOI] [Google Scholar]; d Kohler M. C.; Sokol J. G.; Stockland R. A. Jr. Development of a Room Temperature Hirao Reaction. Tetrahedron Lett. 2009, 50, 457–459. 10.1016/j.tetlet.2008.11.040. [DOI] [Google Scholar]; e Kalek M.; Jezowska M.; Stawinski J. Preparation of Arylphosphonates by Palladium(0)-Catalyzed Cross-Coupling in the Presence of Acetate Additives: Synthetic and Mechanistic Studies. Adv. Synth. Catal. 2009, 351, 3207–3216. 10.1002/adsc.200900590. [DOI] [Google Scholar]; f Deal E. L.; Petit C.; Montchamp J.-L. Palladium-Catalyzed Cross-Coupling of H-Phosphinate Esters with Chloroarenes. Org. Lett. 2011, 13, 3270–3273. 10.1021/ol201222n. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; g Berger O.; Petit C.; Deal E. L.; Montchamp J.-L. Phosphorus-Carbon Bond Formation: Palladium-Catalyzed Cross-Coupling of H-Phosphinates and Other P(O)H-Containing Compounds. Adv. Synth. Catal. 2013, 355, 1361–1373. 10.1002/adsc.201300069. [DOI] [Google Scholar]; h Keglevich G.; Jablonkai E.; Balazs L. B. A “Green” Variation of the Hirao Reaction: The P-C Coupling of Diethyl Phosphite, Alkyl Phenyl-H-Phosphinates and Secondary Phosphine Oxides with Bromoarenes Using a P-Ligand-Free Pd(OAc)2 Catalyst Under Microwave and Solvent-Free Conditions. RSC Adv. 2014, 4, 22808–22816. 10.1039/C4RA03292F. [DOI] [Google Scholar]; i Keglevich G.; Henyecz R.; Musci Z.; Kiss N. Z. The Palladium Acetate-Catalyzed Microwave-Assisted Hirao Reaction without an Added Phosphorus Ligand as a “Green” Protocol: A Quantum Chemical Study on the Mechanism. Adv. Synth. Catal. 2017, 359, 4322–4331. 10.1002/adsc.201700895. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- For example, see; a Petrakis K. S.; Nagabhushan T. L. Palladium-Catalyzed Substitutions of Triflates Derived from Tyrosine-Containing Peptides and Simpler Hydroxyarenes Forming 4-(Diethoxyphosphinyl)phenylalanines and Diethyl Arylphosphonates. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1987, 109, 2831–2833. 10.1021/ja00243a050. [DOI] [Google Scholar]; b Uozumi Y.; Tanahashi A.; Lee S.-Y.; Hayashi T. Synthesis of Optically Active 2-(Diarylphosphono)-1,1′-binaphthyls, Efficient Chiral Mondodentate Phosphine Ligands. J. Org. Chem. 1993, 58, 1945–1948. 10.1021/jo00059a059. [DOI] [Google Scholar]; c Marcoux D.; Charette A. B. Palladium-Catalyzed Synthesis of Functionalized Tetraarylphosphonium Salts. J. Org. Chem. 2008, 73, 590–593. 10.1021/jo702355c. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; d Yang J.; Xiao J.; Chen T.; Han L.-B. Nickel-Catalyzed Phosphorylation of Aryl Triflates with P(O)-H Compounds. J. Organomet. Chem. 2016, 820, 120–124. 10.1016/j.jorganchem.2016.07.026. [DOI] [Google Scholar]; e Henyecz R.; Huszár B.; Grenitzer V.; Keglevich G. A Study on the Reactivity of Monosubstituted Benzenes in the MW-Assisted Pd(OAc)2-catalyzed Hirao Reaction with Ph2P(O)H and (EtO)2P(O)H Reagents. Curr. Org. Chem. 2020, 24, 1048–1054. 10.2174/1385272824999200403170827. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- For example, see; a Liao L.-L.; Gui Y.-Y.; Zhang X.-B.; Shen G.; Liu H.-D.; Zhou W.-J.; Li J.; Yu D.-G. Phosphorylation of Alkenyl and Aryl C-O Bonds via Photoredox/Nickel Dual Catalysis. Org. Lett. 2017, 19, 3735–3738. 10.1021/acs.orglett.7b01561. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; b Li C.-j. Nickel-Catalyzed Phosphorylation of Tosylates. Russ. J. Gen. Chem. 2020, 90, 725–730. 10.1134/S1070363220040258. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Fu W. C.; So C. M.; Kwong F. Y. Palladium-Catalyzed Phosphorylation of Aryl Mesylates and Tosylates. Org. Lett. 2015, 17, 5906–5909. 10.1021/acs.orglett.5b03104. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- a Zhang G.; Wang J.; Guan C.; Zhao Y.; Ding C. Nickel- and Palladium-Catalyzed Cross-Coupling of Aryl Fluorosulfonates and Phosphites: Synthesis of Aryl Phosphonates. Eur. J. Org. Chem. 2021, 810–813. 10.1002/ejoc.202001485. [DOI] [Google Scholar]; b Zhang Y.; Chen W.; Tan T.; Gu Y.; Zhang S.; Wang J. L.; Hou W.; Ma P.; Xu H.; et al. Palladium-Catalyzed One-Pot Phosphorylation of Phenols Mediated by Sulfuryl Fluoride. Chem. Commun. 2021, 57, 4588–4591. 10.1039/D1CC00769F. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- For a review, see; Högermeier J.; Reissig H.-U. Nine Times Fluoride can be Good for your Syntheses. Not Just Cheaper: Nonafluorobutanesulfonates as Intermediates for Transition Metal-Catalyzed Reactions. Adv. Synth. Catal. 2009, 351, 2747–2763. 10.1002/adsc.200900566. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- For examples, see; a Rottländer M.; Knochel P. Palladium-Catalyzed Cross-Coupling Reactions with Aryl Nonaflates: A Practical Alternative to Aryl Triflates. J. Org. Chem. 1998, 63, 203–208. 10.1021/jo971636k. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; b Denmark S. E.; Sweis R. F. Cross-Coupling Reactions of Alkenylsilanols with Fluoroalkylsulfonates. Org. Lett. 2002, 4, 3771–3774. 10.1021/ol026900x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; c Tundel R. E.; Anderson K. W.; Buchwald S. L. Expedited Palladium-Catalyzed Amination of Aryl Nonaflates Through the Use of Microwave-Irradiation and Soluble Organic Amine Bases. J. Org. Chem. 2006, 71, 430–433. 10.1021/jo052131u. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; d Barluenga J.; Florentino L.; Aznar F.; Valdés C. Synthesis of Polysubstituted Olefins by Pd-Catalyzed Cross-Coupling Reaction of Tosylhydrazones and Aryl Nonaflates. Org. Lett. 2011, 13, 510–513. 10.1021/ol102884g. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; e Eidamshaus C.; Hommes P.; Reissig H.-U. Palladium-Catalyzed Coupling of Pyrid-4-yl Nonaflates with Methyl Diazoacetate. Synlett 2012, 23, 1670–1674. 10.1055/s-0031-1290398. [DOI] [Google Scholar]; f Wannberg J.; Wallinder C.; Ünlüsoy M.; Sköld C.; Larhed M. One-Pot, Two-Step, Microwave-Assisted Palladium-Catalyzed Conversion of Aryl Alcohols to Aryl Fluorides via Aryl Nonaflates. J. Org. Chem. 2013, 78, 4184–4189. 10.1021/jo400255m. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; g An Y.; Xia H.; Wu J. A Palladium-Catalyzed Coupling Reaction of Aryl Nonaflates, Sulfur Dioxide and Hydrazines. Org. Biomol. Chem. 2016, 14, 1665–1669. 10.1039/C5OB02514A. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; h Zhang K.-F.; Christoffel F.; Baudoin O. Barbier-Negishi Coupling of Secondary Alkyl Bromides with Aryl and Alkenyl Triflates and Nonaflates. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2018, 57, 1982–1986. 10.1002/anie.201711990. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- a Al-Masum M.; Livinghouse T. Pd(0)-Cu(I) Cocatalyzed Coupling of Methylphenylphosphine-Borane with Aryl Halides and Aryl Nonaflates. Tetrahedron Lett. 1999, 40, 7731–7734. 10.1016/S0040-4039(99)01636-6. [DOI] [Google Scholar]; b Kwong F. Y.; Chan K. S. A Novel Synthesis of Atropisomeric P,N Ligands by Catalytic Phosphination Using Triarylphosphines. Organometallics 2001, 20, 2570–2578. 10.1021/om0100277. [DOI] [Google Scholar]; c Wang Y.; Lai C. W.; Kwong F. Y.; Jia W.; Chan K. S. Synthesis of Aryl Phosphines via Phosphination with Triphenylphosphine by Supported Palladium Catalysts. Tetrahedron 2004, 60, 9433–9439. 10.1016/j.tet.2004.08.020. [DOI] [Google Scholar]; d Botman P. N. M.; Fraanje J.; Goubitz K.; Peschar R.; Verhoeven J. W.; van Maarseveen J. H.; Hiemstra H. Synthesis, Properties and Applications of BICAP: A New Family of Carbazole-Based Diphosphine Ligands. Adv. Synth. Catal. 2004, 346, 743–754. 10.1002/adsc.200303241. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Lipshutz B. H.; Buzard D. J.; Yun C. S. Pd(0)-Mediated Couplings of Aryl Nonaflates and Triflates with Diphenylphosphine-Borane. Preparation of BH3-Stabilized, Unsymmetrical Triarylphosphines. Tetrahedron Lett. 1999, 40, 201–204. 10.1016/S0040-4039(98)02334-X. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- a Amatore C.; Jutand A.; Suarez A. Intimate Mechanism of Oxidative Addition to Zerovalent Palladium Complexes in the Presence of Halide Ions and Its Relevance to the Mechansim of Palladium-Catalyzed Nucleophilic Substitutions. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1993, 115, 9531–9541. 10.1021/ja00074a018. [DOI] [Google Scholar]; b Amatore C.; Jutand A. Anionic Pd(0) and Pd(II) Intermediates in Palladium-Catalyzed Heck and Cross-Coupling Reactions. Acc. Chem. Res. 2000, 33, 314–321. 10.1021/ar980063a. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; c Roy A. H.; Hartwig J. F. Oxidative Addition of Aryl Sulfonates to Palladium(0) Complexes of Mono- and Bidentate Phosphines. Mild Addition of Aryl Tosylates and the Effects of Anions on Rate and Mechanism. Organometallics 2004, 23, 194–202. 10.1021/om034187p. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Fagnou K.; Lautens M. Halide Effects in Transition Metal Catalysis. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2002, 41, 26–47. . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- During the initial screening of catalysts for the coupling of 1a with diphenylphosphine oxide, Pd(PPh3)4 was also investigated. However, in this case, the catalyst was found to be less efficient than Pd(OAc)2.
- Mallesham G.; Swetha C.; Niveditha; Mohanty M. E.; Babu N. J.; Kumar A.; Bhanuprakash K.; Rao V. J. Phosphine Oxide Functionalized Pyrenes as Efficient Blue Light Emitting Mutlifunctional Materials for Organic Light Emitting Diodes. J. Mater. Chem. C 2015, 3, 1208–1224. 10.1039/C4TC01753F. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- a Bigge C. F.; Drummond J. T.; Johnson G.; Malone T.; Probert A. W. Jr.; Marcoux F. W.; Coughenour L. L.; Brahce L. Exploration of Phenyl-Spaced 2-Amino(5–9)-phosphonoalkanoic Acids as Competitive N-Methyl-D-aspartic Acid Antagonists. J. Med. Chem. 1989, 32, 1580–1590. 10.1021/jm00127a030. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; b Bayle-Lacoste M.; Moulines J.; Collignon N.; Boumekouez A.; de Tinguy-Moreaud E.; Neuzil E. Synthesis of 4-Phosphono- and 4-(Phosphonomethyl)-DL-Phenylalanine, Two Analogues of O-Phosphotyrosine. Tetrahedron 1990, 46, 7793–7802. 10.1016/S0040-4020(01)90076-6. [DOI] [Google Scholar]; c Thurieau C.; Simonet S.; Paladino J.; Prost J.-F.; Verbeuren T.; Fauchére J.-L. New Nα-Guanidinobenzoyl Derivatives of Hirudin-54-65 Containing Stabilized Carboxyl or Phosphoryl Groups on the Side Chain of Phenylalanine-63. J. Med. Chem. 1994, 37, 625–629. 10.1021/jm00031a012. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; d Chauhan S. S.; Varshney A.; Verma B.; Pennington M. W. Efficient Synthesis of Protected L-Phosphonophenylalanine (Ppa) Derivatives Suitable for Solid Phase Peptide Synthesis. Tetrahedron Lett. 2007, 48, 4051–4054. 10.1016/j.tetlet.2007.04.027. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- a Kwong F. Y.; Lai C. W.; Yu M.; Chan K. S. Application of Palladium-Catalyzed Pd-Aryl/P-Aryl Exchanges: Preparation of Functionalized Aryl Phosphine by Phoshination of Aryl Bromides using Triarylphosphines. Tetrahedron 2004, 60, 5635–5645. 10.1016/j.tet.2004.04.085. [DOI] [Google Scholar]; b Berrino R.; Cacchi S.; Fabrizi G.; Goggiamani A.; Stabile P. Arenediazonium Tetrafluoroborates in Palladium-Catalyzed C–P Bond Forming Reactions. Synthesis of Arylphosphates, -Phosphine Oxides, and -Phosphines. Org. Biomol. Chem. 2010, 8, 4518–4520. 10.1039/c0ob00243g. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; c Peng A.-Y.; Chen B.-T.; Wang Z.; Wang B.; Mo X.-B.; Wang Y.-Y.; Chen P.-J. Pd(0)Iodide Salt-Mediated Heck Reaction of Aryl Nonaflates: Application to the Synthesis of 2-(1-Alkenyl)phenylphosphonates. J. Fluorine Chem. 2011, 132, 982–986. 10.1016/j.jfluchem.2011.06.029. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Zakirova G. G.; Mladentsev D. Y.; Borisova N. E. Palladium-Catalyzed C-P Cross-Coupling Between (Het)aryl Halides and Secondary Phosphine Oxides. Synthesis 2019, 51, 2379–2386. 10.1055/s-0037-1610698. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Grushin V. V. Thermal Stability, Decomposition Paths, and Ph/Ph Exchange Reactions of [(Ph3P)2Pd(Ph)X] (X = I, Br, Cl, F and HF2). Organometallics 2000, 19, 1888–1900. 10.1021/om0001265. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Busacca C. A.; Lorenz J. C.; Grinberg N.; Haddad N.; Hrapchak M.; Latli B.; Lee H.; Sabila P.; Saha A.; Sarvestani M.; Shen S.; Varsolona R.; Wei X.; Senanayake C. H. A Superior Method for the Reduction of Secondary Phosphine Oxides. Org. Lett. 2005, 7, 4277–4280. 10.1021/ol0517832. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Shekhar S.; Dunn T. B.; Kotecki B. J.; Montavon D. K.; Cullen S. C. A General Method for Palladium-Catalyzed Reactions of Primary Sulfonamides with Aryl Nonaflates. J. Org. Chem. 2011, 76, 4552–4563. 10.1021/jo200443u. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Anderson K. W.; Mendez-Perez M.; Priego J.; Buchwald S. L. Palladium-Catalyzed Amination of Aryl Nonaflates. J. Org. Chem. 2003, 68, 9563–9573. 10.1021/jo034962a. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Uemura M.; Yorimitsu H.; Oshima K. Cp*Li as Base: Application to Palladium-Catalyzed Cross -Coupling Reaction of Aryl-X or Alkenyl-X (X=I, Br, OTf, ONf) with Terminal Acetylenes. Tetrahedron 2008, 64, 1829–1833. 10.1016/j.tet.2007.11.095. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Meadows R. E.; Woodward S. Steric Effects in Palladium-Catalysed Amination of Aryl Triflates and Nonaflates with the Primary Amines PhCH(R)NH2 (R=H, Me). Tetrahedron 2008, 64, 1218–1224. 10.1016/j.tet.2007.11.074. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Schimler S. D.; Froese R. D. J.; Bland D. C.; Sanford M. S. Reactions of Arylsulfonate Electrophiles with NMe4F: Mechanistic Insight, Reactivity, and Scope. J. Org. Chem. 2018, 83, 11178–11190. 10.1021/acs.joc.8b01762. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Pialat A.; Liéault B.; Taillefer M. Oxidative para-Triflation of Acetanides. Org. Lett. 2013, 15, 1764–1767. 10.1021/ol400604e. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Sumida Y.; Sumida T.; Hosoya T. Nickel-Catalyzed Reductive Cross-Coupling of Aryl Triflates and Nonaflates with Alkyl Iodides. Synthesis 2017, 49, 3590–3601. 10.1055/s-0036-1588464. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Hicks J. D.; Hyde A. M.; Cuezva A. M.; Buchwald S. L. Pd-Catalyzed N-Arylation of Secondary Acyclic Amides: Catalyst Development, Scope, and Computational Study. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2009, 131, 16720–16734. 10.1021/ja9044357. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Stankevič M.; Pisklak J.; Włodarczyk K. Aryl Group – A Leaving Group in Arylphosphine Oxides. Tetrahedron 2016, 72, 810–824. 10.1016/j.tet.2015.12.043. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Shen C.; Yang G.; Zhang W. Nickel-Catalyzed C–P Coupling of Aryl Mesylates and Tosylates with H(O)PR1R2. Org. Biomol. Chem. 2012, 10, 3500–3505. 10.1039/c2ob25225b. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Xu J.; Zhang P.; Gao Y.; Chen Y.; Tang G.; Zhao Y. Copper-Catalyzed P-Arylation via Direct Coupling of Diaryliodonium Salts with Phosphorus Nucleophiles at Room Temperature. J. Org. Chem. 2013, 78, 8176–8183. 10.1021/jo4012199. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Hu G.; Chen W.; Fu T.; Peng Z.; Qiao H.; Gao Y.; Zhao Y. Nickel-Catalyzed C–P Cross-Coupling of Arylboronic Acids with P(O)H Compounds. Org. Lett. 2013, 15, 5362–5365. 10.1021/ol402672e. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Berger O.; Montchamp J.-L. Manganese-Catalyzed and Mediated Synthesis of Arylphosphinates and Related Compounds. J. Org. Chem. 2019, 84, 9239–9256. 10.1021/acs.joc.9b01239. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Zhu D.-L.; Jiang S.; Wu Q.; Wang H.; Chai L.-L.; Li H.-Y.; Li H.-X. Visible-Light-Induced Nickel-Catalyzed P(O)-C(sp2) Coupling Using Thioxanthen-9-one as a Photoredox Catalysis. Org. Lett. 2021, 23, 160–165. 10.1021/acs.orglett.0c03892. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Martorell G.; Garcías X.; Janura M.; Saá J. M. Direct Palladium-Catalyzed Phosphinylation of Aryl Triflates with Secondary Phosphines. Its Scope and Limitations: The Synthesis of Optically Active Carboxylated 2-(Diphenylphosphino)-1,1′-binaphthalenes. J. Org. Chem. 1998, 63, 3463–3467. 10.1021/jo971428s. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Zhang X.; Liu H.; Hu X.; Tang G.; Zhu J.; Zhao Y. Ni(II)/Zn Catalyzed Reductive Coupling of Aryl Halides with Diphenylphosphine Oxides in Water. Org. Lett. 2011, 13, 3478–3481. 10.1021/ol201141m. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Tay W. S.; Li Y.; Yang X. Y.; Pullarkat S. A.; Leung P. H. Air-Stable Phosphine Organocatalysts for the Hydroarsination Reaction. J. Organomet. Chem. 2020, 914, 121216 10.1016/j.jorganchem.2020.121216. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Däbritz F.; Jäger A.; Bauer I. Synthesis, Derivatisation and Structural Characterisation of a New Macrobicyclic Phosphane Oxide Cryptand. Eur. J. Org. Chem. 2008, 5571–5576. 10.1002/ejoc.200800630. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Huang C.; Tang X.; Fu H.; Jiang Y.; Zhao Y. Proline/Pipecolinic Acid-Promoted Copper-Catalyzed P-Arylation. J. Org. Chem. 2006, 71, 5020–5022. 10.1021/jo060492j. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.









