Abstract
Interstrand DNA cross-links are important in biology, medicinal chemistry, and materials science. Methods for the targeted installation of interstrand cross-links in DNA duplexes may be useful in diverse fields including studies of DNA repair, materials science, and structural biology. Here a simple procedure is reported for the preparation of DNA duplexes containing site-specific, chemically-defined interstrand cross-links. The approach involves sequential reductive amination reactions between diamine linkers and two abasic (apurinic/apyrimidinic, AP) sites on complementary oligodeoxynucleotides. Use of the symmetrical triamine, tris(2-aminoethyl)amine, in this reaction sequence enabled preparation of a cross-linked DNA duplex bearing a derivatizable aminoethyl group.
Graphical Abstract

INTRODUCTION
Interstrand cross-links (ICLs) are an important type of DNA modification because they block and read-out and replication of the genetic code. ICLs generated by anticancer drugs exert therapeutic effects through their ability to block DNA replication in rapidly dividing cancer cells.1, 2 Unavoidable, endogenous ICLs may contribute to cancer, accelerated aging (progeria), and neurodegeneration.3–7 The mechanisms by which ICLs are removed from or bypassed in genomic DNA are important in biology and medicine but are not yet completely understood.1, 8–18
Some studies aimed at elucidating the mechanisms of cellular ICL repair require DNA substrates containing a single, site-specific cross-link.19–25 The preparation of such cross-linked DNA duplexes can be challenging. Single-step procedures involving treatment of a DNA duplex with a cross-linking agent often give complex mixtures and low ICL yields.2, 26, 27 Alternatively, high yield preparation of some ICLs has been accomplished through multi-step organic synthesis.28–31 Here we describe a concise method for the synthesis of cross-linked DNA duplexes from commercially-available reagents. Our approach employs sequential reductive amination reactions between diamine linkers and a pair of abasic (apurinic/apyrimidinic, AP) sites on complementary oligodeoxynucleotides to achieve good yields of site-specific, alkylamine ICLs in duplex DNA. This procedure was extended to the preparation of an ICL bearing a derivatizable amino group.
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
Materials and Methods.
Oligonucleotides were purchased from Integrated DNA Technologies (IDT, Coralville, IA, USA), [γ-32P]-ATP (6000 Ci/mmol) was purchased from Perkin-Elmer, C-18 Sep-Pak cartridges were purchased from Waters (Milford, MA, USA), and BS Poly-prep columns were obtained from BioRad (Hercules, CA, USA), acrylamide/bis-acrylamide 19:1 (40% solution, electrophoresis grade) was purchased from Fisher Scientific (Waltham, MA, USA). Uracil DNA glycosylase (UDG) and streptavidin were purchased from New England Biolabs (Ipswich, MA, USA). The compounds 1,4-diaminobutane, 1,5-diaminopentane, 1,6-diaminohexane, tris(2-aminoethyl)amine, NaBH3CN, buffers, and other chemical reagents were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich (St. Louis, MO, USA). Quantification of radioactivity in polyacrylamide gels was carried out using a Personal Molecular Imager (BioRad) with Quantity One software (v.4.6.5). DMBAA (dimethylbutylammonium acetate) solutions used in the ESI-MS experiments was prepared as follows: a stock solution of N,N-dimethylbutyl amine (7.125 M) was diluted to 100 mM with water and adjusted to pH 7.1 with glacial acetic acid.
Representative Cross-linking Protocol.
The single-stranded 2’-deoxyuridine (dU)-containing oligonucleotides were purified on a 20% polyacrylamide preparative gel prior to 5’-32P-radiolabeling.32 The oligonucleotides were labeled with a 5’-32P-phosophoryl group using standard methods.32 The labeled dU-containing oligonucleotide was treated with the enzyme uracil DNA glycosylase (UDG, final concentration of 200 units/mL) in Tris-HCl buffer (20 mM, pH 8) containing dithiothreitol (DTT, 1 mM) and EDTA (1 mM). After incubation at 37 °C for 2 h, the UDG enzyme was removed by phenol-chloroform extraction and the DNA ethanol precipitated.32 The resulting AP-containing oligonucleotide 1 was re-dissolved and incubated in HEPES (50 mM, pH 7.4) containing NaCl (100 mM), amine linker (10 mM) and NaBH3CN (250 mM) at 37 °C for 12 h. The DNA was ethanol precipitated. The unlabeled dU-containing oligonucleotide was treated with UDG (200 units/mL, final concentration) in Tris-HCl buffer (20 mM, pH 8) containing DTT (1 mM), EDTA (1 mM). After incubation for 2 h at 37 °C, the UDG enzyme was removed by phenol-chloroform extraction and the DNA ethanol precipitated. The labeled oligonucleotide 1 with the pendent amino group was then incubated with the unlabeled, AP-containing oligonucleotide 2 in HEPES (50 mM, pH 7.4) containing NaCl (100 mM), and NaBH3CN (250 mM) at 37 °C for 24 h. The reaction mixture was combined with formamide loading buffer, and loaded onto a 0.4 mm thick, 20% denaturing polyacrylamide gel (containing 6 M urea).32 The gel was electrophoresed for 4 h at 1600 V. The gel images obtained and the amount of radiolabeled DNA in each band on the gel quantitatively measured by storage phosphor autoradiography.33
Conjugation of Biotin to NH2-ICL.
The NH2-ICL was prepared as described above except using tris(2-aminoethyl)amine linker. The resulting NH2-ICL was treated with the biotin-N-hydroxysuccinimidyl ester (12, 3 mM) for 12 h at 4 °C in sodium bicarbonate buffer (12.5 mM, pH 8.0). The DNA was then ethanol precipitated and dissolved in sodium phosphate buffer (8 mM, pH 7.4, with 140 mM NaCl, 2 mM potassium phosphate, and 10 mM KCl) containing streptavidin (1 mg/mL) and incubated for 12 h at 37 °C. The mixture was combined with formamide loading buffer and the resulting sample loaded onto a 10% non-denaturing polyacrylamide gel (2 mm thick) and electrophoresed for 2 h at 200 V. Gel images and quantitative measurement of the amount of radiolabeled DNA in each band were obtained by storage phosphor autoradiography.33
Mass spectrometric analysis of the cross-linked duplexes.
LC-MS data were acquired on an Agilent Technologies 6520A Accurate Mass QTOF. Samples were analyzed according to the protocol of Studzinska and Buszewski,34 with slight modifications as outlined. Sample was injected onto a C8 trap column (Michrom Bioresources Captrap) at a flow rate of 5 μL/min of 10 mM DMBAA, pH 7.1 over 4 min. and separated by isocratic elution (either 80% or 42.5% methanol, 15 mM DMBAA, pH 7.1) at a flow rate of 0.4 μL/min on a 10 cm × 75 μm C8 analytical column (fused silica packed with Michrom Bioresources C8, 3.5 μm particles). Following the 4 min trap load, separation on the trap/analytical columns continued for 16 min, under isocratic elution conditions. Total run time was 20 min. Mass spectra were acquired using the following parameters: negative-ion mode; VCap 2500 V; mass range 290–3200 m/z; 0.63 spectra/second; fragmentor at 300 V (250 V for IDT oligo); internal MS recalibration was achieved using the K/Na adducted Hexakis 1221 Chip Cube High Mass Reference compound (m/z 1279.99). Samples were loaded in sequence as follows: blank (10 mM DMBAA), sample, and blank. Multiply-charged DNA peaks were deconvoluted using the maximum entropy algorithm in Qualitative Analysis software (version B.07.00 Agilent Technologies) with the following parameters: adduct = proton-loss; m/z range = 600–1500 m/z; mass range = expected mass ±2 kDa; peak height to calculate mass = 25%. The m/z values reported are neutral deconvoluted masses. The cross-linking reactions were carried out as described above. After a 72 h incubation, 20 vol of ammonium acetate (2.5 M) was added. After 30 min at room temperature the mixture was desalted using a C18 Sep-Pak column eluted with HPLC grade methanol and ultrapure, deionized water.
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
Background: Reductive Amination Reactions Involving AP sites in DNA.
Our approach involves the use of complementary AP-containing oligodeoxynucleotides, diamines, and two sequential reductive amination reactions to generate DNA duplexes containing site-specific ICLs. AP residues in DNA exist as an equilibrium mixture of the ring-closed hemiacetal and the ring-opened aldehyde.35 The ring-opened aldehyde form of an AP site can engage in reductive amination reactions. In this process, reaction of the AP aldehyde with an amine yields an iminium ion intermediate that is selectively reduced by a hydride reagent to yield a chemically stable alkylamine or arylamine attachment to the deoxyribose backbone (Scheme 1).20, 36–39 This reaction has been widely employed in mechanistic studies of amine-catalyzed strand cleavage at AP sites in DNA40–45 but, perhaps surprisingly, has seen limited use for derivatization or targeted modification of DNA.19, 20, 36–38, 46–50 In the present studies, reductive amination reactions involving the AP aldehyde residues in DNA were carried out by incubation of the AP-containing oligodeoxynucleotides with amine-containing linkers in the presence of the water-compatible hydride reducing agent NaBH3CN.51, 52
Scheme 1.

Reductive amination reactions involving an amine and a DNA abasic (AP) site yield a chemically stable alkylamine attachment to the deoxyribose backbone.
Generation of a Site-Specific ICL By Two Sequential Reductive Amination Reactions Involving Diamines and AP Sites On Complementary Oligodeoxynucleotides.
AP sites were installed in the oligodeoxynucleotides by the treatment of the corresponding uracil-containing DNA oligomer with uracil DNA glycosylase (UDG).37, 53–55 One of the AP-containing strands in each cross-linking reaction was labeled with a 5’-32P-phosphoryl group to enable detection of the reaction products. The 32P-labeled products were analyzed by electrophoresis on denaturing 20% polyacrylamide gels and the radioactivity in each DNA band quantitatively measured by storage phosphor autoradiography.33 To confirm installation of the AP site, piperidine work-up56, 57 was employed to convert the full-length AP-containing oligodeoxynucleotide (displaying intermediate mobility in the gel shown in Figure 1, lane 1) to a faster-migrating, small fragment that appears near the bottom of the gel. The results showed that the UDG reaction produced the desired AP-containing oligonucleotide in nearly quantitative yield (Figure 1, lane 2).
Figure 1.

Synthesis of a DNA duplex containing a site-specific interstrand cross-link via sequential reductive amination reactions involving a 1,4-diaminobutane linker and complementary AP-containing oligodeoxynucleotides. The 5’-32P-labeled oligonucleotides were resolved by electrophoresis on a 20% denaturing polyacrylamide gel and the radioactivity in each band visualized and quantitatively measured by storage phosphor autoradiography.33 Lane 1: 5’-32P-labeled AP-containing oligodeoxynucleotide 1 as a size marker. Lane 2: Treatment of the AP-containing oligodeoxynucleotide 1 with piperidine (1 M, 95 °C, 25 min) to generate the strand cleavage product containing a 3’-phosphoryl group.56, 58 Lane 3: Reaction of the 5’-32P-labeled AP-containing oligodeoxynucleotide 1 with 1,4-diaminobutane and NaBH3CN (250 mM) at 37 °C for 12 h in HEPES buffer (50 mM, pH 7.4) containing NaCl (100 mM). Lane 4: Generation of the cross-linked duplex 1/2 by reaction of the 5’-32P-labeled oligodeoxynucleotide bearing the pendent amino group (the product from lane 3) and the complementary AP-containing oligodeoxynucleotide 2 with NaBH3CN (250 mM) at 37 °C for 24 h in HEPES buffer (50 mM, pH 7.4) containing NaCl (100 mM). The asterisk (*) indicates a 5’-32P-phosphoryl group. The minor band marked by the “#” symbol was assigned to a small amount of a lower molecular weight ICL (3) resulting from cross-linking of the pendent amine produced in the first step to a 3’-α,β-unsaturated sugar remnant generated by a small amount of strand cleavage of the unlabeled AP-containing oligonucleotide 2.
In the first step of the cross-linking procedure, the 32P-labeled, AP-containing oligonucleotide 1 was incubated in HEPES buffer (50 mM, pH 7.4, containing 100 mM NaCl) with 1,4-diaminobutane (10 mM) and NaBH3CN (250 mM) at 37 °C for 12 h, followed by ethanol precipitation of the DNA. The resulting product displayed slightly decreased gel mobility relative to the parent AP-containing oligonucleotide, consistent with the expected effects of increased mass and the partially protonated amino groups associated with the pendent diaminobutane linker (Figure 1, lane 3). Importantly, no strand cleavage product was observed, despite the fact that amines and diamines can catalyze β-elimination of the 3’-phosphoryl group from AP sites in DNA.56–58 Evidently, under these conditions, reduction of the iminium ion intermediate by the NaBH3CN reagent is much faster than the competing β-elimination reaction that leads to strand cleavage.
In the second step of the cross-linking procedure, the single-stranded, 32P-labeled oligodeoxynucleotide containing the pendent diaminobutane linker was combined with the complementary, unlabeled AP-containing oligonucleotide 2, followed by incubation at 37 °C in HEPES buffer (50 mM, pH 7.4, containing 100 mM NaCl) with NaBH3CN (250 mM) for 12 h. This reaction provided a high yield (86±2%) of a product that migrated slowly in the denaturing gel, as expected for a cross-linked DNA duplex (Figure 1, lane 4).37, 59, 60 The major signal observed in ESI-TOF mass spectrometric analysis of the cross-linked DNA corresponded to a deconvoluted mass of 21,311.82 amu, in close agreement with the calculated mass for the expected diaminobutane-ICL (Table 1 and Scheme 2).
Table 1.
Mass spectrometric characterization of cross-linked duplexes.
| ICL-Containing Duplexa,b | Observed Mass | Calculated Mass |
|---|---|---|
| Diaminobutane-ICL | 21311.82 | 21,312.03 |
| NH2-ICL | 21369.78 | 21,370.11 |
| Biotin-ICL | 21,843.85 | 21,843.70 |
| Diaminobutane-LMWc | 16,062.35 | 16062.61 |
| NH2-LMW | 16,120.06 | 16,120.70 |
Cross-linked duplexes for mass spectrometric analyses were prepared using the protocol described in the Experimental Procedures except without 5’-32P labels.
Cross-links were prepared in duplex 1/2 (see Figure 1 for sequence).
LMW-ICLs appear as weaker signals in the MS analyses.
Scheme 2.

Sequential reductive amination reactions involving 1,4-diaminobutane and complementary AP-containing oligodeoxyribonucleotides produce high yields of a site-specific AP-AP ICL in duplex DNA. cDNA = complementary AP-containing strand.
A weak band (marked with a “#” symbol in lane 4 of Figure 1) can be seen in the gel migrating slightly faster than the major ICL product. We ascribe this minor product to a lower molecular weight cross-link (diamino-LMW-ICL, 3 in Figure 5) arising from a reductive amination reaction between the pendent amine linker and the 3’-α,β-unsaturated aldehyde residue generated by strand cleavage of the unlabeled AP-oligonucleotide in the second step of the cross-linking protocol (for background regarding strand cleavage via β-elimination at AP sites in DNA, see references40, 56, 61–65 and for an analogous reductive amination involving reaction of an unsaturated aldehyde with the amino group of lysine, see reference66). Indeed, a relatively weak signal consistent with this low molecular weight ICL attachment was observed in the mass spectrometric analyses (Table 1, Figure S1). It is interesting that no strand cleavage of the 32P-labeled oligonucleotide 1 was detected during the first step of the cross-linking protocol (lane 3, Figure 1), while formation of the low molecular weight ICL indicates that small amounts of strand cleavage can compete with reduction of the iminium ion in the unlabeled oligonucleotide during the second step of the process.
Figure 5.

Structures discussed in this work.
The cross-link in duplex 1/2 described above involves connection of AP sites that are offset by one nucleotide (nt) in the DNA duplex. We examined the effects of AP spacing on the yield of ICL in this procedure. We found that the highest yields were obtained with 3’-offset spacings of 1 or 2 nt between the two AP sites (Figure 2). Somewhat lower yields of ICL were obtained with AP/AP offsets of 0 and 3 nt (Figure 2). A larger offset spacing of 10 nt produced a very low yield of slow-migrating ICL band (Figure 2). In general, DNA duplexes containing two AP sites on opposing strands retain an overall, B-DNA-like structure with some minor distortions near the AP residues.67, 68 Presumably bridging distant AP sites with the 1,4-diaminobutane linker would require substantial, energetically costly distortions of the duplex structure.
Figure 2.

Effects of AP/AP spacing in duplex DNA on the yields of AP-AP ICL formation with the 1,4-diaminobutane linker. X = AP in the sequences shown. The 16 nucleotide, AP-containing sequences shown above are part of 35 nucleotide duplexes with the same flanking sequences shown for duplex 1/2 at the bottom of Figure 1. The error bars represent the standard deviation calculated from at least three separate measurements.
We next investigated the ability of various commercially available diamines to function in the cross-linking procedure. We found that the cross-linking protocol using the duplex sequence in which AP sites are offset by 1 nt was insensitive to increases in linker length, performing equally well with 1,4-diaminobutane, 1,5-diaminopentane, and 1,6-diaminohexane (Figure 3).
Figure 3.

Various linkers function effectively in the AP/AP cross-linking protocol using duplex 1/2 (shown above in Figure 1). The linkers from top to bottom are 1,4-diaminobutane (A), 1,5-diaminopentane (B), 1,6-diaminohexane (C), and tris(2-aminoethyl)amine (D). The error bars represent the standard deviation calculated from at least three separate measurements.
Use of the Double-Reductive Amination Protocol to Generate a Cross-Linked DNA Duplex Containing a Derivatizable Amino Group.
Derivatizable DNA ICLs may be useful in DNA repair studies. For example, Evison et al. prepared an alkynyl psoralen that generates DNA cross-links that can be derivatized using a Huisgen alkyne-azide 1,3-dipolar cycloaddition (“click”) reaction.69 To prepare a DNA duplex containing a derivatizable ICL using our sequential reductive amination protocol, we employed a symmetrical triamine reagent, tris(2-aminoethyl)amine. Use of this triamine linker in the two-step protocol gave a slow-migrating ICL band in high yield (77±3%), analogous to the ICL derived from cross-linking of duplex 1/2 by 1,4-diaminobutane (Figure S2). The major signal observed in ESI-TOF mass spectrometric analysis of the cross-linked material (Table 1, Figure S1) corresponded to the deconvoluted neutral mass expected for duplex 1/2 containing two reductively-aminated AP sites bridged by the tris(2-aminoethyl)amine linker (depicted schematically as NH2-ICL in Figure 4).
Figure 4.

Conjugation of biotin to the derivatizable NH2-ICL. In these experiments, the 5’-32P-labeled NH2-ICL (prepared using the tris(2-aminoethyl)amine linker) was analyzed by electrophoresis on a 20% denaturing polyacrylamide gel and the radioactivity in each band visualized and quantitatively measured by storage phosphor autoradiography.33 The schematic diagram simplifies the chemical structure of the biotin-linker conjugate. The actual structure of the biotin-NHS reagent 12 showing the complete linker is shown below. The asterisk (*) indicates a 5’-32P-phosphoryl group. Lane 1: 5’-32P-labeled NH2-ICL as a marker lane. Lane 2: Control experiment in which NH2-ICL was incubated with the biotin-binding protein streptavidin for 12 h at 37 °C. Lane 3: Reaction of NH2-ICL with the biotin-NHS reagent 12 in sodium bicarbonate buffer (12.5 mM, pH 8) for 12 h at 4 °C. Lane 4: Incubation of the biotin-NHS-treated NH2-ICL with streptavidin for 12 h at 37 °C, to generate the gel-shifted NH2-ICL-biotin•streptavidin complex. The minor band marked by the “#” symbol was assigned to a small amount of a lower molecular weight ICL resulting from cross-linking of the pendent diamine produced in the first step to the 3’-α,β-unsaturated sugar remnant generated by a small amount of strand cleavage of the unlabeled AP-containing oligonucleotide 2.
To demonstrate the utility of the derivatizable aminoethyl group in the NH2-ICL, the cross-linked DNA duplex was treated with a commercial biotin N-hydroxysuccinimidyl (NHS) ester reagent 12 (Figure 5). Conjugation of the cross-linked duplex with the biotin-linker ensemble did not cause a significant shift in gel mobility (Figure 4, lane 3) but efficient biotinylation of the cross-link was revealed by a dramatic gel shift induced by incubation of the biotinylated ICL with the biotin-binding protein streptavidin70 to generate the duplex-biotin-streptavidin complex (Figure 4, lane 4). In contrast, a control experiment showed that incubation of the underivatized NH2-ICL (lacking the pendent biotin group) did not induce a gel shift (Figure 4, lane 2). Mass spectrometric analysis was consistent with the expected biotin-ICL structure (Table 1). As described above in the context of the diaminobutane ICL, we assigned the relatively weak band migrating near the ICL (marked with an “#” symbol in Figure 4) to a lower molecular weight cross-link (NH2-LMW) analogous to 3, arising from strand cleavage of the unlabeled AP-oligonucleotide in the second step of the cross-linking protocol. Consistent with this view, a signal consistent with this low molecular weight ICL attachment was observed in the mass spectrometric analysis (Table 1, Figure S1).
CONCLUSIONS
In this work, we developed a concise method for the preparation of cross-linked DNA duplexes involving simple manipulations of deprotected, commercially available oligodeoxynucleotides. This facile, site-specific installation of cross-links into duplex DNA may be useful in diverse fields including DNA repair, materials science,71 diagnostic medicine,72, 73 and structural biology.74 Our two-step reaction sequence (four steps if one counts the enzymatic generation of an AP site in each of the complementary oligonucleotides) evades multistep organic synthesis of non-canonical nucleobases that is often required for the construction of cross-linked DNA duplexes.21, 28–31
Our protocol employs sequential reductive amination reactions between diamine linkers and two complementary AP-containing oligodeoxynucleotides and provides good yields of cross-linked duplexes. This strategy is conceptually similar to approaches described previously involving cross-linking of aldehyde residues on non-native nucleobases by diamine linkers.21, 22 Similarly, this approach mirrors the cross-linking of AP in duplex DNA residues with bis-aminooxy linkers via reversible oxime formation.75 Multiple examples of interstrand cross-link formation involving reductive amination reactions between a single AP site and an NH2-group on the opposing strand of a DNA duplex have been reported.19, 20, 37, 47, 76
We extended our procedure to the preparation of a cross-linked duplex bearing a derivatizable amino group. This was accomplished using the symmetrical triamine, tris(2-aminoethyl)amine. The resulting pendent aminoethyl group in the cross-link is uniquely reactive amongst all of the NH2 groups in the duplex and can be selectively derivatized by NHS-ester or isothiocyanate reagents.77–80 We demonstrated that the NH2-ICL can be biotinylated using a commercially-available NHS-ester derivatizing reagent.
DNA duplexes containing a derivatizable ICL might find a variety of applications in the identification and characterization of proteins involved in cross-link repair. For example, a cross-linked duplex derivatized with biotin could be used in biotin-streptavidin pull-down experiments81 that identify proteins in cell extracts that associate with a cross-link or a replication fork that has been stalled by a cross-link. Similarly, conjugation of the ICL with a photoaffinity labeling agent introduced via an NHS-ester such as 13 (Figure 5) may enable the capture of proteins involved in the recognition and repair of DNA cross-links.82–84 Finally, DNA cross-links derivatized with fluorophores could be used in Förster resonance energy transfer (FRET)85 or microscale thermophoresis (MST)86 experiments designed to characterize ICL-binding proteins and protein complexes.
Supplementary Material
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
We are grateful to the National Institutes of Health (ES021007) and the National Science Foundation (NSF-CHE 1808672) for support of this work. In addition, we thank Amanda Wallace for assistance with data analysis and Jay S. Jha for critical review of the manuscript.
Footnotes
Supporting Information
The Supporting Information is available free of charge via the Internet at http://pubs.acs.org.
Mass spectrometric analysis of AP-AP cross-linked duplexes and gel electrophoretic analysis of the reactions generating the tris(2-aminoethyl)amine ICL.
The authors declare no conflicts of interest
REFERENCES
- (1).Rycenga HB, and Long DT (2018) The evolving role of DNA inter-strand crosslinks in chemotherapy. Curr. Opin. Pharmacol 41, 20–26. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (2).Imani-Nejad M, Johnson KM, Price NE, and Gates KS (2016) A new cross-link for an old cross-linking drug: the nitrogen mustard anticancer agent mechlorethamine generates cross-links derived from abasic sites in addition to the expected drug-bridged cross-links. Biochemistry 55, 7033–7041. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (3).Housh K, Jha JS, Haldar T, Binth Md. Amin S, Islam T, Wallace A, Gomina A, Guo X, Nel C, Wyatt JW, and Gates KS (2021) Formation and repair of unavoidable, endogenous interstrand cross-links in cellular DNA. DNA Repair 98, 103029. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (4).Duxin JP, and Walter JC (2015) What is the DNA repair defect underlying Fanconi anemia. Curr. Opin. Cell. Biol 37, 49–60. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (5).Tiwari V, and Wilson DM III (2019) DNA damage and associated DNA repair defects in disease and premature aging. Am. J. Hum. Genet 105, 237–257. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (6).O’Driscoll M (2012) Diseases Associated with Defective Responses to DNA Damage. Cold Spring Harb. Perspect. Biol 4, a012773. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (7).Yousefzadeh M, Henpita C, Vyas R, Soto-Palma C, and Robbins PNL . (2021) DNA damage-how and why we age? eLife 10, e62852. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (8).Liang C-C, Li Z, Lopez-Martinez D, Nicholson WV, Vénien-Bryan C, and Cohn MA (2016) The FANCD2–FANCI complex is recruited to DNA interstrand crosslinks before monoubiquitination of FANCD2. Nat. Commun 7, doi: 10.1038/ncomms12124. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (9).Longerich S, Kwon Y, Tasi M-S, Hiaing AS, Kupfer GM, and Sung P (2014) Regulation of FANCD2 and FANCI monoubiquitination by their interaction and by DNA. Nucleic Acids Res. 42, 5657–5670. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (10).Clauson C, Schärer OD, and Niedernhofer LJ (2013) Advances in understanding the complex mechanisms of DNA interstrand cross-link repair. Cold Spring Harbor Perspectives in Biology 5, a012732/012731-a012732/012725. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (11).Williams HL, Gottesman ME, and Gautier J (2013) The differences between ICL repair during and outside of S phase. Trends Biochem. Sci 38, 386–393. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (12).Rohleder F, Kuper J, Kisker C, Huang J-C, Seidman M, Xue Y, Wang W, and Round A (2016) FANCM interacts with PCNA to promote replication traverse of DNA interstrand crosslinks. Nucleic Acids Res. 44, 3219–3232. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (13).Wu RA, Semlow DR, Kamimae-Lanning AN, Kochenova OV, Chistol G, Hodskinson MRG, Amunugama R, Sparks JL, Wang M, Deng L, Mimoso CA, Low E, Patel KJ, and Walter JC (2019) TRAIP is a master regulator of DNA interstrand crosslink repair. Nature 567–272. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (14).Imani-Nejad M, Housh K, Rodriguez AA, Haldar T, Kathe S, Wallace SS, Eichman BF, and Gates KS (2020) Unhooking of an interstrand cross-link at DNA fork structures by the DNA glycosylase NEIL3. DNA Repair 86, 102752. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (15).Yang Z, Nejad MI, Gamboa Varela J, Price NE, Wang Y, and Gates KS (2017) A role for the base excision repair enzyme NEIL3 in replication-dependent repair of interstrand cross-links derived from psoralen and abasic sites. DNA Repair 52, 1–11. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (16).Rogers CM, Simmons RH Iii, Fluhler Thornburg GE, Buehler NJ, and Bochman ML (2020) Fanconi anemia-independent DNA inter-strand crosslink repair in eukaryotes. Prog Biophys Mol Biol 158, 33–46. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (17).Deans AJ, and West SC (2011) DNA interstrand crosslink repair and cancer. Nat. Rev. Cancer 11, 467–480. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (18).Usanova S, Piée-Staffa A, Sied U, Thomale J, Schneider A, Kaina B, and Köberle B (2010) Cisplatin sensitivity of testis tumour cells is due to deficiency in interstrand-crosslink repair and low ERCC1-XPF expression. Mol. Cancer 9, 248. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (19).Imani-Nejad M, Guo X, Housh K, Nel C, Yang Z, Price NE, Wang Y, and Gates KS (2019) Preparation and purification of oligodeoxynucleotide duplexes containing a site-specific, reduced, chemically stable covalent interstrand cross-link between a guanine residue and an abasic site. Methods Mol. Biol 1973, 163–175. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (20).Imani-Nejad M, Price NE, Haldar T, Lewis C, Wang Y, and Gates KS (2019) Interstrand DNA cross-links derived from reaction of a 2-aminopurine residue with an abasic site. ACS Chem. Biol 14. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (21).Angelov T, Guainazzi A, and Schärer OD (2009) Generation of DNA interstrand cross-links by post-synthetic reductive amination. Org. Lett 11, 661–664. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (22).Roy U, and Schärer OD (2016) Involvement of Translesion Synthesis DNA Polymerases in DNA Interstrand Crosslink Repair. DNA Repair (Amst) 44, 33–41. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (23).Semlow DR, Zhang J, Budzowska M, Drohat AC, and Walter JC (2016) Replication-dependent unhooking of DNA interstrand cross-links by the NEIL3 glycosylase. Cell 167, 498–511. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (24).Hodskinson MR, Bolner A, Sato K, Kamimae-Lanning AN, Rooijers K, Witte M, Mahesh M, Silhan J, Petek M, Williams DM, Kind J, Chin JW, Patel KJ, and Knipsheer P (2020) Alcohol-derived DNA crosslinks are repaired by two distinct mechanisms. Nature 579, 605–608. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (25).Price NE, Li L, Gates KS, and Wang Y (2017) Replication and repair of a reduced 2’-deoxyguanosine-abasic site cross-link in human cells. Nucleic Acids Res. 45, 6486–6493. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (26).Huang H, and Hopkins PB (1993) DNA interstrand cross-linking by formaldehyde: nucleotide sequence preference and covalent structure of the predominant cross-link formed in synthetic oligonucleotides. J. Am. Chem. Soc 115, 9402–9408. [Google Scholar]
- (27).Millard JT, Raucher S, and Hopkins PB (1990) Mechlorethamine cross-links deoxyguanosine residues at 5’-GNC sequences in duplex DNA fragments. J. Am. Chem. Soc 112, 2459–2460. [Google Scholar]
- (28).Harwood EA, Hopkins PB, and Sigurdsson ST (2000) Chemical synthesis of cross-link lesions found in nitrous acid treated DNA: A general method for the preparation of N2-substituted 2’-deoxyguanosines. J. Org. Chem 65, 2959–2964. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (29).Mukherjee S, Guainazzi A, and Schärer OD (2014) Synthesis of struturally diverse major groove DNA interstrand crosslinks using three different aldehyde precursors. Nucleic Acids Res. 42, 7429–7435. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (30).Tomás-Gamasa M, Serdjukow S, Su M, Müller M, and Carell T (2014) “Post-it” type connected DNA created with a reversible covalent cross-link. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. Eng 53, 796–800. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (31).Sinden RR, and Hagerman PJ (1984) Interstrand psoralen cross-links do not introduce appreciable bends in DNA. Biochemistry 23, 6299–6303. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (32).Sambrook J, Fritsch EF, and Maniatis T (1989) Molecular Cloning: A Lab Manual. Cold Spring Harbor Press, Cold Spring Harbor, NY. [Google Scholar]
- (33).Johnston RF, Pickett SC, and Barker DL (1990) Autoradiography using storage phosphor technology. Electrophoresis 11, 355–360. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (34).Studzińska S, and Buszewski B (2014) Evaluation of ultra high-performance [corrected] liquid chromatography columns for the analysis of unmodified and antisense oligonucleotides. Anal. Bioanal. Chem 406, 7127–7136. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (35).Wilde JA, Bolton PH, Mazumdar A, Manoharan M, and Gerlt JA (1989) Characterization of the equilibrating forms of the abasic site in duplex DNA using 17O-NMR. J. Am. Chem. Soc 111, 1894–1896. [Google Scholar]
- (36).Dutta S, Chowdhury G, and Gates KS (2007) Interstrand crosslinks generated by abasic sites in duplex DNA. J. Am. Chem. Soc 129, 1852–1853. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (37).Johnson KM, Price NE, Wang J, Fekry MI, Dutta S, Seiner DR, Wang Y, and Gates KS (2013) On the Formation and Properties of Interstrand DNA-DNA Cross-links Forged by Reaction of an Abasic Site With the Opposing Guanine Residue of 5’-CAp Sequences in Duplex DNA. J. Am. Chem. Soc 135, 1015–1025. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (38).Singh MP, Hill GC, Péoc’h D, Rayner B, Imbach J-L, and Lown JW (1994) High-field NMR and restrained molecular modeling studies on a DNA heteroduplex containing a modified apurinic abasic site in the form of a covalently linked 9-aminoellipticine. Biochemistry 33, 10271–10285. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (39).Rieger RA, Zaika EI, Xie W, Johnson F, Grollman AP, Iden CR, and Zharkov DO (2006) Proteomic approach to identification of proteins reactive for abasic sites in DNA. Mol Cell Proteomics 5, 858–867. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (40).Yang Z, Price NE, Johnson KM, Wang Y, and Gates KS (2017) Interstrand cross-links arising from strand breaks at true abasic sites in duplex DNA. Nucleic Acids Res. 45, 6275–6283. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (41).Minko IG, Jacobs AC, de Leon AR, Gruppi F, Donley N, Harris TM, Rizzo CJ, McCullough AK, and Lloyd RS (2016) Catalysts of DNA strand cleavage at apurinic/apyrmidinic sites. Sci. Rep 6, DOI: 10.1038/srep28894. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (42).Marchand C, Krajewski K, Lee H-F, Antony S, Johnson AA, Amin R, Roller PP, Kvaratskhelia M, and Pommier Y (2006) Covalent binding of the natural antimicrobial peptide indolicidin to DNA abasic sites. Nucleic Acids Res. 34, 5157–5165. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (43).Kurtz AJ, Dodson ML, and Lloyd RS (2002) Evidence for multiple imino intermediates and identification of reactive nucleophiles in peptide-catalyzed beta-elimination at abasic sites. Biochemistry 41, 7054–7064. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (44).Sun B, Latham KA, Dodson ML, and Lloyd RS (1995) Studies on the catalytic mechanism of five DNA glycosylases. J. Biol. Chem 270, 19501–19508. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (45).Fromme JC, and Verdine GL (2003) Structure of a trapped endonuclease III-DNA covalent intermediate. EMBO J. 22, 3461–3471. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (46).An N, Fleming AM, White HS, and Burrows CJ (2012) Crown ether-electrolyte interactions permit nanopore detection of individual DNA abasic sites in single molecules. Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. USA 109, 11504–11509. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (47).Manoharan M, Andrade LK, and Cook PD (1999) Site-specific cross-linking of nucleic acids using the abasic site. Org. Lett 1, 311–314. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (48).Manoharan M, Andrade LK, Mohan V, Freier SM, and Cook PD (1997) Oligonucleotide Conjugates Derived from an Electrophilic Site: Conjugation to Baseless Carbohydrate Residue. Synthesis, Hybridization and Modeling Studies. Nucleosides Nucleotides 16, 1741–1744. [Google Scholar]
- (49).Bertrand J-R, Vasseur J-J, Gouyette A, Rayner B, Imbac J-L, Paoletti C, and Malvy C (1989) Mechanism of Cleavage of Apurinic Sites by 9-Aminoellipticin. J. Biol. Chem 264, 14172–14178. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (50).Vasseur J-J, Peoc’h D, Rayner B, and Imbach J-L (1991) Derivatization of oligonucleotides through abasic site formation. Nucleosides Nucleotides 10, 107–117. [Google Scholar]
- (51).Borch RF, Bernstein MD, and Durst HD (1971) The cyanohydridoborate anion as a selective reducing agent. J. Am. Chem. Soc 93, 2897–2904. [Google Scholar]
- (52).Borch RF, and Hassid AI (1972) A new method for the methylation of amines. J. Org. Chem 37, 1673–1674. [Google Scholar]
- (53).Lindahl T, Ljunquist S, Siegert W, Nyberg B, and Sperens B (1977) DNA N-glycosidases: properties of uracil-DNA glycosidase from Escherichia coli. . J. Biol. Chem 252, 3286–3294. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (54).Varshney U, and van de Sande JH (1991) Specificities and kinetics of uracil excision from uracil-containing DNA oligomers by Escherichia coli uracil DNA glycosylase. Biochemistry 30, 4055–4061. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (55).Stuart GR, and Chambers RW (1987) Synthesis and properties of oligodeoxynucleotides with an AP site at a preselected position. Nucleic Acids Res. 15, 7451–7462. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (56).Gates KS (2009) An overview of chemical processes that damage cellular DNA: spontaneous hydrolysis, alkylation, and reactions with radicals. Chem. Res. Toxicol 22, 1747–1760. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (57).Gates KS, Nooner T, and Dutta S (2004) Biologically relevant chemical reactions of N7-alkyl-2’-deoxyguanosine adducts in DNA. Chem. Res. Toxicol 17, 839–856. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (58).McHugh PJ, and Knowland J (1995) Novel reagents for chemical cleavage at abasic sites and UV photoproducts in DNA. Nucleic Acids Res. 23, 1664–1670. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (59).Hartley JA, Souhami RL, and Berardini MD (1993) Electrophoretic and chromatographic separation methods used to reveal interstrand crosslinking of nucleic acids. J. Chromatog 618, 277–288. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (60).Price NE, Johnson KM, Wang J, Fekry MI, Wang Y, and Gates KS (2014) Interstrand DNA–DNA Cross-Link Formation Between Adenine Residues and Abasic Sites in Duplex DNA. J. Am. Chem. Soc 136, 3483–3490. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (61).Sugiyama H, Fujiwara T, Ura A, Tashiro T, Yamamoto K, Kawanishi S, and Saito I (1994) Chemistry of thermal degradation of abasic sites in DNA. mechanistic investigation on thermal DNA strand cleavage of alkylated DNA. Chem. Res. Toxicol 7, 673–683. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (62).Kushida T, Uesugi M, Sugiura Y, Kigoshi H, Tanaka H, Hirokawa J, Ojika M, and Yamada K (1994) DNA damage by ptaquiloside, a potent bracken carcinogen: detection of selective strand breaks and identification of DNA-cleavage products. J. Am. Chem. Soc 116, 479–486. [Google Scholar]
- (63).Mazumdar A, Gerlt JA, Rabow L, Absalon MJ, Stubbe J, and Bolton PH (1989) UV endonuclease V from bacteriophage T4 catalyzes DNA strand cleavage at aldehydic abasic sites by a syn beta-elimination reaction. J. Am. Chem. Soc 111, 8029–8030. [Google Scholar]
- (64).Mazumdar A, Gerlt JA, Rabow L, Absalon MJ, Stubbe J, and Bolton PH (1991) UV Endonuclease V from Bacteriophage T4 catalyzes DNA strand cleavage at aldehydic sites by a syn beta-elimination reaction. J. Am. Chem. Soc 111, 8029–8030. [Google Scholar]
- (65).Mazumder A, Gerlt JA, Absalon MJ, Stubbe J, Cunningham RP, Withka J, and Bolton PH (1991) Stereochemical studies of the b-elimination reactions at aldehydic abasic sites in DNA: endonuclease III from Escherichia coli, sodium hydroxide, and Lys-Trp-Lys. Biochemistry 30, 1119–1126. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (66).Fenaille F, Guy PA, and Tabet JC (2003) Study of protein modification by 4-hydroxy-2-nonenal and other short chain aldehydes analyzed by electrospray ionization tandem mass spectrometry. J Am Soc Mass Spectrom 14, 215–226. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (67).Hazel RD, and de los Santos C (2010) NMR solution structures of clustered abasic site lesions in DNA: structural differences between 3’-staggered (−3) and 5’-staggered (+3) bistranded lesions. Biochemistry 49, 8978–8987. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (68).Hazel RD, Tian K, and de los Santos C (2008) NMR solution sructures of bistranded abasic site lesions in DNA. Biochemistry 47, 11909–11919. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (69).Evison BJ, Actis ML, and Fujii N (2016) A clickable psoralen to directly quantify DNA interstrand crosslinking and repair. Bioorg Med Chem 24, 1071–1078. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (70).Weber PC, Ohlendorf DH, Wendoloski JJ, and Salemme FR (1989) Structural origins of high-affinity biotin binding to streptavidin. Science 243, 85–88. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (71).Abdallah HO, Ohayon YP, Chandrasekaran AR, Sha R, Fox KR, Brown T, Rusling DA, Mao C, and Seeman NC (2016) Stabilisation of self-assembled DNA crystals by triplex-directed photo-cross-linking. Chem. Comm 52, 8014–8017. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (72).Imani-Nejad M, Shi R, Zhang X, Gu L-Q, and Gates KS (2017) Sequence-specific covalent capture coupled with high-contrast nanopore detection of a disease-derived nucleic acid sequence. ChemBioChem 18, 1383–1386. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (73).Guo X, Imani-Nejad M, Gu L-Q, and Gates KS (2019) Selective covalent capture of a DNA sequence corresponding to a cancer-driving C>G mutation in the KRAS gene by a chemically reactive probe: optimizing a cross-linking reaction with non- canonical duplex structures. RSC Adv. 9, 32804–32810. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (74).Erlanson DA, Chen L, and Verdine GL (1993) DNA methylation through a locally unpaired intermediate. J. Am. Chem. Soc 115, 12583–12584. [Google Scholar]
- (75).Ichikawa K, Kojima N, Hirano Y, Takebayashi T, Kowatab K, and Komatsu Y (2012) Interstrand cross-link of DNA by covalently linking a pair of abasic sites. Chem. Comm 48, 2143–2145. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (76).Yang B, Jinnouchi A, Usui K, Katayama T, Fujii M, Suemune H, and Aso M (2015) Bioconjugation of Oligodeoxynucleotides Carrying 1,4-Dicarbonyl Groups via Reductive Amination with Lysine Residues. Bioconjug Chem 26, 1830–1838. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (77).Povsic TJ, and Dervan PB (1990) Sequence-specific alkylation of double-helical DNA by oligonucleotide-directed triple-helix formation. J. Am. Chem. Soc 112, 9428–9430. [Google Scholar]
- (78).al-Deen AN, Cecchini DC, Abdel-Baky S, Moneam NM, and Giese RW (1990) Preparation of ethylenediaminephosphoramidates of nucleotides and derivatization with fluorescein isothiocyanate. J Chromatogr 512, 409–414. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (79).Agrawal S, Christodoulou C, and Gait MJ (1986) Efficient methods for attaching non-radioactive labels to the 5’ ends of synthetic oligodeoxyribonucleotides. Nucleic Acids Res 14, 6227–6245. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (80).Kalkhof S, and Sinz A (2008) Chances and pitfalls of chemical cross-linking with amine-reactive N-hydroxysuccinimide esters. Anal Bioanal Chem 392, 305–312. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (81).Wu KK (2006) Analysis of protein-DNA binding by streptavidin-agarose pulldown. Methods Mol Biol 338, 281–290. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (82).Qiu Z, Lu L, Jian X, and He C (2008) A diazirine-based nucleoside analogue for efficient DNA interstrand photocross-linking. J Am Chem Soc 130, 14398–14399. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (83).Muller F, Graziadei A, and Rappsilber J (2019) Quantitative Photo-crosslinking Mass Spectrometry Revealing Protein Structure Response to Environmental Changes. Anal Chem 91, 9041–9048. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (84).Zhang H, Song Y, Zou Y, Ge Y, An Y, Ma Y, Zhu Z, and Yang CJ (2014) A diazirine-based photoaffinity probe for facile and efficient aptamer-protein covalent conjugation. Chem Commun (Camb) 50, 4891–4894. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (85).Kaur A, Kaur P, and Ahuja S (2020) Forster resonance energy transfer (FRET) and applications thereof. Anal Methods 12, 5532–5550. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (86).Moon MH, Hilimire TA, Sanders AM, and Schneekloth JS Jr. (2018) Measuring RNA-Ligand Interactions with Microscale Thermophoresis. Biochemistry 57, 4638–4643. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
