Skip to main content
PMC home page
Scientific Reports logoLink to Scientific Reports
. 2021 Dec 8;11:23575. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-03032-1

In-vitro propagation and phytochemical profiling of a highly medicinal and endemic plant species of the Himalayan region (Saussurea costus)

Ajmal Khan 1, Azhar Hussain Shah 2,✉, Niaz Ali 1
PMCID: PMC8654858  PMID: 34880342

Abstract

Efficient protocols for callus induction and micro propagation of Saussurea costus (Falc.) Lipsch were developed and phytochemical diversity of wild and in-vitro propagated material was investigated. Brown and red compact callus was formed with frequency of 80–95%, 78–90%, 70–95% and 65–80% from seeds, leaf, petiole and root explants, respectively. MS media supplemented with BAP (2.0 mgL−1), NAA (1.0 mgL−1) and GA3 (0.25 mgL−1) best suited for multiple shoot buds initiation (82%), while maximum shoot length was formed on media with BAP (1.5 mgL−1), NAA (0.25 mgL−1) and Kinetin (0.5 mgL−1). Full strength media with IAA (0.5 mgL−1) along with IBA (0.5 mgL−1) resulted in early roots initiation. Similarly, maximum rooting (87.57%) and lateral roots formation (up to 6.76) was recorded on full strength media supplemented with BAP (0.5 mgL−1), IAA (0.5 mgL−1) and IBA (0.5 mgL−1). Survival rate of acclimatized plantlets in autoclaved garden soil, farmyard soil, and sand (2:1:1) was 87%. Phytochemical analysis revealed variations in biochemical contents i.e. maximum sugar (808.32 µM/ml), proline (48.14 mg/g), ascorbic acid (373.801 mM/g) and phenolic compounds (642.72 mgL−1) were recorded from callus cultured on different stress media. Nonetheless, highest flavenoids (59.892 mg/g) and anthocyanin contents (32.39 mg/kg) were observed in in-vitro propagated plants. GC–MS analysis of the callus ethyl acetate extracts revealed 24 different phytochemicals. The variability in secondary metabolites of both wild and propagated plants/callus is reported for the first time for this species. This study may provide a baseline for the conservation and sustainable utilization of S. costus with implications for isolation of unique and pharmacologically active compounds from callus or regenerated plantlets.

Subject terms: Tissue engineering, Plant regeneration

Introduction

Plants have been essential sources of medicine for thousands of years and nearly 80% of the world’s population still relies on traditional medicine for their primary healthcare1. Saussurea costus is an endemic species in geographically limited places of the Himalayas, where it grows on moist slopes at altitudes of 2500–4000 m. The species is critically endangered and is listed in Appendix I of the Convention on International Trade in Endangered Species of Wild Fauna and Flora (CITES). In addition, it is one of the 37 endangered and highly medicinal plants of the Himalayas, and has been prioritized for both in-situ and ex-situ conservation2. S. costus is a highly prized medicinal plant in the Kaghan valley Pakistan. Roots of S. costus have sweet and strong aromatic odor with bitter taste and are used as antiseptics as well as for treating bronchial asthma, especially of the vagotonic type. The roots of S. costus have been widely used for curing diarrhea, jaundice, stomachache, respiratory tract infections, antispasmodic agents against spasms caused by asthma, cholera, rheumatism, chronic skin diseases and leprosy3. Further, oil extracted from the roots (referred to as Costus oil) is used for making high grade perfumes and hair oils4. In addition, many studies have shown that extracts of S. costus have potent anti-cancer, anti-inflammatory and anti-ulcer properties5. Because of the high demands for roots, most natural populations of S. costus are on the verge of extinction6.

In order to avoid the future loss of endangered, endemic and rare species, conservation of plant genetic resources has long been realized as an integral part of biodiversity conservation. Plant cell and tissue culture has been a powerful tool for rapid propagation and biomass production of valuable species. To overcome environmental constraints in-vitro cultures (cell, callus, buds and shoot) provide the best alternative choice for the smooth and constant supply of plant active ingredients7. However, there are no effort in literature for ex-situ conservation and micro propagation of S. costus. Further, phytochemical composition of the wild (natural) S. costus and tissue culture generated material is totally non-existent. The purpose of this research was to establish an effective and efficient in vitro regeneration protocol for S. costus and to compare the photochemical variability in the aqueous extracts of induced callus, in-vitro propagated plants with the wild/natural collections.

Materials and Methods

Plant material and sterilization procedure

Mother plant was collected from wild populations in Makra, Kaghan valley, Pakistan (lat 34.57439º N, long 073.49580º E, alt 3,878 m). The specimen was identified by Dr. Abdul Majid Department of Botany Hazara University Mansehra, and scientific name validated online (http://www.theplantlist.org/). Voucher specimen was submitted to the Herbarium Department of Botany Hazara University, Mansehra. Healthy plant parts (explant) were separated from the mother plant, washed and sterilized following Yesmin et al. (2016)8.

Culture conditions

The basal MS media9 was used with various concentration and composition of growth regulators (BAP, IAA, IBA, NAA, 2,4-D and kinetin). All culture media were agitated with 7% technical agar and 3% sucrose. The pH of media was set to 5.8 before addition of agar. These media were autoclaved at 121 °C for 20 min at 15 psi. Cultures were maintained in a culture room incubated with a 16-h light cycle and temperature maintained at 25 ± 2 °C with 50% humidity.

Callus induction

Growth regulators such as 2,4-D (0.25, 0.5, and 1.0 mgL−1) in combination with varied concentration of Kinetin (0.5, 1.0, 1.5 and 2.0 mgL−1), and four explants types (seeds, leaf, petiole and internode) were compared for callus induction. Explants were subjected to two subcultures at an interval of fourteen days10.

Shoot bud initiation

Full strength MS media with different concentration of BAP (0.5, l.0, 2.0 mgL−1), NAA (0, 0.25, l.0 mgL−1) and GA3 (0, 0.25, 1.0 mgL−1) were compared for shoot buds initiation. The percentage of shoot induction, time taken for bud initiation and the growth state of the buds were measured after four weeks of culturing.

Shoot proliferation

Nodal segments (1–2 cm long) were excised from cultured plant and transferred into MS media agitated with BAP (0.5, 1.0, 1.5 mgL−1) in combination with NAA (0.25, 0.25 and 0.5 mgL−1) and Kinetin (0, 0.25 and 0.5 mgL−1) in order to maximize shoot multiplication. In addition, basic MS media with different plant growth regulators were compared during the phase of subculture, and the optimal media for shoot proliferation was selected.

Root initiation

To optimize root induction media, full-strength MS media was supplemented with different combination and concentrations of IAA (0.5, 1.0 mgL−1) and IBA (0.5, 0.1 mgL−1) along BAP (0.5 mgL−1). The time to root initiation was observed and recorded after every two days. Data on average root numbers and length were recorded after 45 days of culturing.

Photochemical analysis

Treatments of in-vitro callus

After subculture for eight cycles, fourteen days old callus was subjected to four different stresses each having five (05) replications. Callus was cultured on callus promoting media (CPM) having 0.5 and 1.0 mgL−1 Kinetin and 2.4-D respectively. In addition, callus was cultured on media agitated with 60 gL−1 D-Sorbitol stress (CPM-1), 60 gL−1 D-Manitol stress (CPM-2), 5 gL−1 Poly ethylene glycol 600 stress (CPM-3) and 60 gL−1 Sucrose stress (CPM-4) for 120 days, while the callus cultured on CPM alone was considered as control (Table 1). Similarly, different concentrations of growth hormones given to calli for bud, shoot or root induction are given (see Tables 2–5).

Table 1.

Different stress for phytochemical comparison of callus grown on simple callus promoting media (CPM) supplemented with Kinetin (0.5 mgL-1) and 2.4-D (1.0 mgL-1) and callus subjected to various stresses i.e. 60 gL-1 D-Sorbitol stress (CPM-1), 60 gL-1 D-Manitol (CPM-2), 5 gL-1 Poly ethylene glycol 600 (CPM-3) and 60 gL-1 Sucrose (CPM-4).

Samples Kinetin (mgL-1) 2,4-D (mgL-1) Callus stress
CPM 0.5 1.0 –-
CPM-1 0.5 1.0 D-Sorbitol (60 gL-1)
CPM-2 0.5 1.0 D-Manitol (60 gL-1)
CPM-3 0.5 1.0 Poly ethylene glycol 600 (5 gL-1)
CPM-4 0.5 1.0 Sucrose (60 gL-1)
Open in a new tab
Table 2.

In-vitro callus induction and callus growth after 30 days of culturing of S. costus using seed, leaf, petiole and root as an explants.

Treatments Conc. 2,4-D/Kinetin mgL-1 Type of explants used Means days to callus induction (x- ± SE) Callus growth after 30 days (x- ± SE)
T1 0.25/0.5 Seeds 14.00 ± 1.09A 0.22 ± 0.07D
Leaf 15.20 ± 0.73C 1.50 ± 0.08AB
Petiole 15.80 ± 0.734BC 0.91 ± 0.02D
Root 16.40 ± 0.97A 0.91 ± 0.05BC
T2 0.5/0.5 Seeds 17.60 ± 0.67A 1.39 ± 0.06CD
Leaf 17.20 ± 0.37C 1.34 ± 0.04AB
Petiole 17.80 ± 0.37AB 1.27 ± 0.08BC
Root 19.20 ± 0.37AB 0.92 ± 0.02B
T3 0.5/1.0 Seeds 13.40 ± 0.60A 1.86 ± 0.06A
Leaf 15.80 ± 1.07C 1.65 ± 0.06A
Petiole 15.60 ± 0.50C 1.42 ± 0.05A
Root 17.40 ± 0.86BC 1.114 ± 0.07A
T4 0.5/1.5 Seeds 16.60 ± 0.60A 1.62 ± 0.05B
Leaf 18.60 ± 1.07AB 1.32 ± 0.08AB
Petiole 18.60 ± 0.50A 1.33 ± 0.02AB
Root 17.20 ± 0.86BC 0.75 ± 0.08C
T5 0.5/2.0 Seeds 17.40 ± 1.07A 1.54 ± 0.08BC
Leaf 18.20 ± 0.66AB 1.23 ± 0.06BC
Petiole 18.40 ± 0.50A 1.26 ± 0.03BC
Root 19.40 ± 0.74AB 0.90 ± 0.01BC
T6 1.0/2.0 Seeds 18.20 ± 0.80A 1.65 ± 0.06B
Leaf 19.60 ± 0.81A 0.92 ± 0.20C
Petiole 19.01 ± 0.89A 1.18 ± 0.06C
Root 20.80 ± 0.73A 0.84 ± 0.03BC
Open in a new tab
Table 5.

The effect of different concentrations of IAA and IBA along with BAP on roots initiation, number of roots and total root length of S. costus. Each value represents mean ± SE of five replicates.

Treatment BAP (mgL-1) IAA (mgL-1) IBA (mgL-1) Days to root initation (mean ± SE) Number of roots (mean ± SE) Total root length (cm) (mean ± SE)
T16 0.5 1.0 0 18.80 ± 1.01A 3.84 ± 0.508B 1.50 ± 0.19B
T17 0.5 0 1.0 16.20 ± 0.80AB 5.32 ± 0.531AB 2.53 ± 0.21A
T18 0.5 0.5 0.5 13.80 ± 0.91B 6.76 ± 0.733A 2.27 ± 0.24A
Open in a new tab

Samples preparation

Samples for spectrometry (BMS, UV-1900) were prepared following Storey and Jones (1975)11. Total sugars contents were analyzed following Dubois et al. (1956)12, proline content was assessed following Bates et al. (1973)13, flavenoids were assessed as per Csepregi et al. (2013)14. Antioxidant activity was as described in Re et al. (1999)15, total phenol contents was measured following Singleton and Rossi (1965)16 and total anthocyanin content was determined following Giusti and Wrolstad (2001)17.

Preparation of solvent extraction for GC–MS

Callus subjected to different stresses (Table 1) as well as grown on CPM was shade dried and grounded to fine powder using mortar and pestle. For solvent preparation 1 g (dry weight) of powder was soaked in 10 ml of ethyl acetate for 2 days. The sample was centrifuged at 8,000 rpm for 5 min and the supernatant collected was stored at 4 °C for further analyses18.

Gas chromatography-mass spectrometry (GC–MS) analysis

Chemical analysis of ethyl acetate extract was carried out using gas chromatography coupled with mass spectrometry (GC–MS) with a Hewlett Packard GC–MS system (PerkinElmer precisely, Carlus 600C). The relative percentage of each component was calculated by comparing the average GC chromatogram peak to the total area. The mass detector used in this analysis was Turbo-Mass Gold-Perkin-Elmer, and the software adopted to handle mass spectra and chromatograms was a Turbo-Mass ver-5.419.

Identification of compounds

Interpretation on mass spectrum GC–MS was conducted using the database of National Institute Standard and Technology (NIST). The spectrum of a component was compared with the spectrum of the known components stored in the NIST library. Similarly, name, molecular weight and structure of the components of the test materials were ascertained19.

Statistical analysis

Statistical analysis was performed with Statistic 8.1 (Trial version). Results were presented as mean ± standard error (SE), and the data was analyzed by one way Analysis of variance (ANOVA) at 0.05% confidence level (p < 0.01). All in-vitro propagation treatments had 5 replications whereas; the phytochemical analyses had three replications for each treatment.

Results and discussion

Callus induction

Callus response was influenced by hormonal combinations as well as the type of explant used. The callus response varied i.e. 80–95%, 78–90%, 70–95% and 65–80% for seeds, leaf, petiole and root explants, respectively (Fig. 1A-H). Similarly, explants were grown on MS media alone (as control) for 14 days and no callus induction or regeneration was observed and therefore, these results are not included. Maximum amount of callus tissue per seed explant was formed on MS media agitated with 2,4-D (0.5 mgL−1) and Kinetin (1.0 mgL−1) as demonstrated in Fig. 1A-C. The colour of callus ranged from white to dark brown. Successful callus initiation was observed after 13, 15, 15 and 16 day of culturing from seed, leaf, petiole and root explants respectively (Table 2). It was also noted that subculture of callus into new media increased the callus biomass. Maximum callus growth from seed (1.86 g), leaf (1.65 g), petiole (1.42 g) and root (1.14 g) were record at 2, 4-D (0.5 mgL−1) and Kinetin (1.0 mgL−1) after twenty-eight days of culture (Table 2). Higher concentration of 2,4-D reduced callus induction and it was observed that the colour changed to brown with hard texture, followed by necrosis. Although 2,4-D is a synthetic plant growth regulator, its role in callus induction is highlighted for S. costus. Previous studies have also reported the efficacy of exogenous 2,4-D in other medicinal plants. Hassan et al. (2009)20 and Sen et al. (2014)21 have shown the positive role of 2,4-D plant growth hormones in culture media of W. somnifera, I. obscura, A. precatorius and C. halicacabum and their results are in agreement to those mentioned here. The effect of 2,4-D in combination with Kinetin demonstrated the potential of a synthetic plant growth regulators in the production of callus from seeds, leaf, petiole as well as root explants of S. costus as a potent plant growth regulator.

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Open in a new tab

In-vitro callus induction of S. costus using seeds (A, B, C), leaf (D, E), roots (F) and nodes (G) as an explant.

Shoot bud initiation

Auxiliary buds induction was observed after 15 to 20 days of culturing (Fig. 2A,B). The earliest shoot bud initiations were observed on media agitated with BAP (2 mgL−1), NAA (1 mgL−1) and GA3 (0.25 mgL−1). Higher concentration of BAP resulted in earlier buds induction. The analysis revealed BAP had a marked influence on the rate of induction. Similarly, BAP in low concentration, the induction rate was 64% and the lateral buds sprouted late. In addition, new buds were relatively thinner and delicate. ANOVA showed that shoot bud initiation was highly significant among the treatments (Table 3). Previous studies have also indicated that high level of BAP and low GA3 induced greater response to shoot buds initiation22. Similarly, BAP here was most effective for bud induction. GA3 contributes to the initiation and elongation of auxiliary buds and expansion of leaves23. Further, GA3 regulates the growth and development of plants, mainly by stimulating mitotic division and cell elongation24. It was found that high level of GA3 effectively increased stem length, while lower GA3 concentration inhibited potato shoot growth25. Further, GA3 has long been used to break dormancy and to stimulate shoot elongation in different species of magnolias26. In line with the previous reports, it was also observed that BAP in combination with GA3 was important for bud initiation, reducing time for buds initiation as well as resulted in stronger buds27.

Figure 2.

Figure 2

Open in a new tab

In-vitro Propagation of S. costus using nodal explant (A) Auxiliary buds, (B) Shoot buds initiation, (C) Multiple shoot initiation, (D, E, F) Mature plantlets, (E, F) Roots initiation, (G, H) Acclimatization of plants.

Table 3.

Influence of different plant growth regulators on buds initiation and Range analysis. Vigorous and green buds (+ + +); healthy buds (+ +); weak bud ( +). Each Value represents the mean ± SE of five replicates. Significant deference at P ≤ 0.05, x- ± Sd- average ± Standard deviation, x ± SE – average ± Standard error.

Treatment BAP mgL-1) NAA mgL-1 GA3 mgL-1 Bud induction rate (x- ± SE) Time to bud initiation Growth state of bud
T7 0.5 0 0 19.40 ± 1.50A 19 Days  + 
T8 0.5 0.25 0 17.80 ± 1.02AB 18 Days  +  + 
T9 1.0 0 0.25 17.60 ± 0.37AB 18 Days  +  +  + 
T10 1.0 0.25 0.25 17.00 ± 0.44AB 17 Days  +  +  + 
T11 2.0 1.0 0.25 15.60 ± 0.87B 15 Days  +  +  + 
T12 2.0 1.0 1.0 16.40 ± 0.67B 16 Days  +  +  + 
Open in a new tab

Shoot bud proliferation

Full strength media augmented with BAP (0.1 mgL−1), NAA (0.25 mgL−1) and Kinetin (0.25 mgL−1) proved best for shoot bud proliferation and elongation (Fig. 2C). Significant differences were observed in multiplication rate and numbers of shoots between T7, T8 and T9, although T13 is significantly different from T14 and T15, while T13 and T14 are not significantly different (Table 4). Das et al. (2020)28 has also recorded maximum number of shoot/explant of B. polystachyon with combination of BAP (13.32 μM) and NAA (0.53 μM). Several medicinal plants such as, C. paniculatus 29 and C. blumei 30, have shown similar results and BAP with NAA have been reported as being the most effective in direct organogenesis. Our results are in alignment to those of Kaur et al. (1998)31, where 8–10 shoot/explants of A. catechu from nodal segment on media containing BAP (4.0 mgL−1) with NAA (0.5 mgL−1) were reported.

Table 4.

The influence of different concentrations of plant growth regulators on bud proliferation of S. costus. vigorous and green buds (+ + +); healthy buds (+ +); weak buds ( +). Each value represents the mean ± SE of five replicates.

Treatments BAP (mgL-1) NAA (mgL-1) Kinetin (mgL-1) shoots numbers per plant (≧0.5 cm) (mean ± SE) shoots numbers per plant (≧0.5 cm) (mean ± SE) Total shoot length (≧0.5 cm) (mean ± SE)
T13 0.5 0.25 0 2.20 ± 0.44 2.20 ± 0.20B 2.19 ± 0.26B
T14 1.0 0.25 0.25 4.00 ± 0.70 4.00 ± 0.31A 2.50 ± 0.30AB
T15 1.5 0.25 0.5 2.80 ± 0.83 2.80 ± 0.37B 3.11 ± 0.33A
Open in a new tab

Total shoot length

Average shoot length ranged from 2.19 to 3.11 cm among the treatments. Maximum shoot length was recorded for media fortified with BAP (1.5 mgL−1), NAA (0.25 mgL−1) and Kinetin (0.5 mgL−1). While, the minimum shoot length was recorded in media with BAP (0.5 mgL−1), NAA (0.25 mgL−1) without Kinetin (Fig. 2D,E). ANOVA revealed significant variation in T15 compared to T13 and T14 (Table 4). The addition of even smaller amounts of BAP or NAA help inducing adventitious shoot formation by increasing propagation coefficient32. Other researchers have also reported that highest shoot length (3.73 ± 0.14 cm) of S. rebaudiana was observed on MS media supplemented with BAP (2.0 mgL−1) and IAA (0.25 mgL−1) after 15 days of culturing33. Additionally, higher concentrations of BAP reduces shoot length, which is in agreement to the known literature34.

Root initiation, number of roots and total root length

Roots induction is a critical step in successful in-vitro propagation experiments; here combination of IAA (0.5 mgL−1) with IBA (0.5 mgL−1) resulted in earliest roots initiation (13 days), while IAA (0.1 mgL−1) delayed late root formation (19 days) (Fig. 2D-E). Further, IAA (0.5 mgL−1) in combination with IBA (0.5 mgL−1) resulted in earliest as well as plenty of lateral roots formation (Table. 5). ANOVA showed that TI6 was significantly different, while T17 and T18 had no significant variation (Table 5). IBA is a highly stable and potential auxin for roots induction35. Maximum numbers of roots (6.76) were recorded on full strength media supplemented with BAP (0.5 mgL−1), IAA (0.5 mgL−1) and IBA (0.5 mgL−1) (Fig. 2E). On the contrary, least number of roots per plant (3.84) were formed on media supplemented with IAA (1 mgL−1). Statistical analysis revealed that T16 and T18 varied significantly (Table 5). The in-vitro derived shoots on MS medium were supplemented with a range of concentrations of two auxins (IAA and IBA) for 75 days, it was observed that the lower concentrations of BAP (0.5 mgL−1) in combination with IBA (1 mgL−1) resulted in a higher root length (2.53 cm), while IAA (1mgL−1) and IBA (1 mgL−1) alone induced roots length of (1.5 cm) and (2.27 cm) respectively. Results showed that IAA in comparison to IBA reduced roots length when compared at the same concentration (Table 4). Statistical analysis showed that root length at T16 was significantly different from T17 and T18. Cheepala et al. (2004)36 reported that IAA is a widely used auxin for rooting in A. stenosperma and A. villosa. In several other plants species the promoting effect of IBA in rooting has also been reported37. In contrast, induction of rooting of G. scabra was obtained on NAA (0.3 mgL−1) and IAA (0.1 mgL−1) containing media38. Similarly higher percentage of rooting were obtained in half strength MS media with NAA (1.0 mgL−1), were as full strength medium with NAA (1.5 mgL−1) was the best media for rooting10. Bekheet (2013)39 has indicated that addition of IAA, IBA or NAA (1 mgL−1) induced rooting of in-vitro grown P. dactylifera. However, in the present study, IAA in combination with IBA was found to be the most efficient in multiple shoots induction, followed by IBA alone.

Acclimatization

The ultimate success of all in-vitro micro propagation endeavors heavily relies on the higher survival rates of such plantlets. Direct field transfers of the plantlets do not allow acclimatization of the in-vitro generated plants as they fail to establish successful interactions with the soil microbes and/or to sustain the environmental conditions40. Here, well rooted micro propagated plantlets were transferred into plastic pots containing autoclaved garden soil, farmyard soil, and sand (2:1:1) as shown in Fig. 2F–H. The plants were then acclimatized in the growth room at 27 °C temperature for 2 weeks followed by another 3 weeks at room temperature under laboratory conditions. Finally, 35–40 days old plantlets were transferred to nursery where, morphological anatomical and growth characteristics were observed (results not shown) and survival efficiency recorded. Out of 92 plantlets, 80 (87%) could successfully acclimatize and the relatively low mortality rate here is likely to be due to the biohardening of the micropropagated plants achieved prior to their nursery transfer. Similarly, we have given water to the plantlets after 6 days interval and that too very close to the roots and have avoided leaves. This approach has been previously reported beneficial for in-vitro raised plants41 and the survival rate could be raised significantly higher if biotization of the explants is attempted42.

Phytochemical variation

Total sugar contents

Total sugar contents revealed significant variation with treatments. Maximum sugar contents (808.326 µM/ml) was observed in callus cultured on CPM-4 supplemented with 60 gL−1 sucrose, while the lowest sugar contents (16.64 µM/ml) was noted in wild plants (Fig. 3A). Accumulation of sugars contents in different parts of plants increases in response to a variety of environmental stresses43. The accumulation of total sugars is associated with adaptation of plants to various environmental stresses44. The results shown here are in agreement to earlier findings where salinity increased total sugar contents in leaves of in-vitro propagated P. euphratica. Similarly, addition of NaCl (250 mmoll−1) increased sugars contents by 2.7 times45. In calli of M. arborea total sugars account for about 90% of the total dry weight and there were no significant differences. The remarkable differences between the embryogenic and non-embryogenic calli of M. arborea, was the amount of sugar found in embryogenic calli46. A similar trend with total sugars accumulation was also detected in P. kurroa47. In line results are also shown for the total sugars in selected calli of D. caryophyllus subjected to different concentrations of culture filtrate that were significantly higher than those of non selected calli48.

Figure 3.

Figure 3

Open in a new tab

Variation in the Total Sugar contents (A) and proline contents (B) of S. costus collected from wild, in-vitro propagated plant and induced callus. Different stress for phytochemical comparison of callus grown on simple callus promoting media (CPM) supplemented with Kinetin (0.5 mgL-1) and 2.4-D (1.0 mgL-1) and callus subjected to various stresses i.e. 60 gL-1 D-Sorbitol stress (CPM-1), 60 gL-1 D-Manitol (CPM-2), 5 gL-1 Poly ethylene glycol 600 (CPM-3) and 60 gL-1 Sucrose (CPM-4).

Proline content

Since, callus promoting media was used as a control; the stresses imposed increased proline content in callus from 1.63 to 48.14 mg/g F.Wt. The variability in proline content among the different treatments were highly significant as shown in Fig. 3B. Maximum proline contents was noticed in CPM-2 agitated with 60 gL−1 D-Manitol (48.14 mg/g) whereas, minimum was observes in CPM-3 supplemented with 5 gL−1 Poly ethylene glycol 600 (1.63 mg/g). In brief, different stresses enhanced proline contents in S. costus callus as follows: callus treated with 60 gL−1 D-Manitol (48.14 µM/g) > 60 gL−1 D-Sorbitol (18.45 µM/g) > 60 gL−1 Sucrose (17.79 µM/g) > 5 gL−1 Poly ethylene glycol 600 (1.63 µM/g). Results presented here are in general agreement to earlier reports where, authors have reported proline accumulation in calli of sugarcane grown on different concentration of PEG49. Similarly, total proline level of 20% PEG selected calli was reported to be 17 times higher than the non-selected calli of O. sativum50. Pradhan et al. (2021)51 reported on the increasing trends in proline contents (0.798 µMg−1) in mango callus subjected to 15% PEG stress as compare to control (no PEG) with the value of 0.080 µM g−1 FW. Similar increase in proline contents is also mentioned for H. annuus52 as well as rice in response to PEG stress53. Previously, D-sorbitol stress has resulted in more than four-fold increase in proline level in maize seedling54 and these results are in full agreement to those reported here.

Total flavonoids

Favonoids have protective functions for plants growing in soils that are rich in toxic metals. Here flavonoids contents showed significant variation among wild and in-vitro propagated plant as well as induced callus of S. costus. This variation in flavonoids content ranged from 0.90 to 59.89 mg/g. Results showed that in-vitro propagated plants had the highest flavonoids contents (59.892 mg/g) followed by plants collected from wild (49.199 mg/g). Similarly, lowest flavonoids contents were reported in callus agitated on CPM-4 supplemented with 60 gL−1 Sucrose (Fig. 4A). Comparing wild and in-vitro propagated plants, callus contained relatively scarce amount of flavonoids, and this is most likely due to plants were grown in laboratory environment with very much uniform environmental conditions. In natural habitats plants are well adapted and have evolved mechanisms to minimize injuries under extreme environmental conditions. The accumulation of flavonoids in the cells resulted by osmotic stress are often associated with a mechanisms that allow plants to tolerate harmful effects of water shortage. Further, accumulation of these solutes lower the osmotic potential of plant tissues at cellular level and hence allowing plants to sustain growth in stressful environments55. Ibrahim et al. (2018)56 have also noted maximum level of total flavonoids in wild or natural P. barbatus as compared to in-vitro propagated plants and callus57.

Figure 4.

Figure 4

Open in a new tab

Variation in the Total Flavenoids (A) and Ascorbic acid (B) contents of S. costus collected from wild, micro propagated plant and induced callus grown on simple callus promoting media (CPM) supplemented with Kinetin (0.5 mgL-1) and 2.4-D (1.0 mgL-1) and callus subjected to various stresses i.e. 60 gL-1 D-Sorbitol stress (CPM-1), 60 gL-1 D-Manitol (CPM-2), 5 gL-1 Poly ethylene glycol 600 (CPM-3) and 60 gL-1 Sucrose (CPM-4).

Ascorbic acid contents

Maximum accumulation of Ascorbic acid (373.801 mM/g) was recorded in callus cultured on CPM-1 supplemented with 60 gL−1 D-Sorbitol, followed by CPM-2 that had subjected to (60 gL−1) D-Manitol stress (373.801 mM/g), while minimum amount was observed in callus grown on CPM (104.95 mM/g) (see Fig. 4b). Kamal et al. (2020)58 have studied the optimization of suitable media for callus induction and ascorbic acids accumulation in Chinese cabbage cultivars. The authors have found maximum ascorbic acid accumulation in callus of root explant cultured on TDZ (1.0 mgL−1), NAA (0.25 mgL−1) and AgNO3 (5.0 mgL−1), while minimum ascorbic acid was noted for callus grown from hypocotyl tissues cultured on TDZ (1.0 mgL−1), NAA (1.0 mgL−1) and AgNO3 (9.0 mgL−1). Likewise, using the DPPH assay, free radical scavenging and antioxidant potential of in-vitro propagated S. corymbosa plants were compared with the wild plants in where the wild plants have shown highest free radical scavenging activity compared to the in-vitro propagated plants59.

Total phenolic compounds

Phenolics compounds represent a diverse array of plant secondary metabolites, which are predominantly used as powerful scavengers of free radicals (Pietta, 2000)60. Here, highest phenolic contents (642.72 mgL−1) accumulated in calli cultured on CPM when compared to wild or in-vitro propagated plantlet. Similarly, lowest levels of phenolic compounds (420 mgL−1) were recorded in plants collected from wild (Fig. 5A). Increase in phenolic compounds accumulation (37% and 34%) was observed in callus treated with 100 mgL−1 yeast extract and 50 mgL−1 salicylic acid24. These finding are supported by those given in El-Nabarawy et al. (2015)61, where the culture medium supplemented with low concentration of yeast extract increased phenolic accumulation in micro propagated plants. Furthermore, Gorni and Pacheco (2016)62 have reported that A. millefolium treated with 0.5 and 1.0 mM salicylic acid significantly increases phenolic contents. A slight increase in total phenolic content was found in callus treated with glycine (200 mgL−1), yeast extracts (500 mgL−1) and salicylic acid (100 mgL−1). This increase of phenolic contents in callus cultures was related to mitochondrial activity; that is, while the cell dehydrogenase activity (FADH2/NADH) and the cytochrome C-oxidase decrease, the production of phenolic compounds increases63. On the other hand, variation in total phenolics within the mother source plant, micropropagated plants and callus subjected to different stresses may be attributed to changes in the levels of various phytohormones or other endogenous physiological pathways that occur in plant64. Also synthetic plant growth regulators used during the micro propagation pathways make a significant contribution in the production of secondary metabolites within the in-vitro cultured cells and tissues by controlling the expression of genes involved in the synthesis of secondary metabolites such as shikimate and flavonoids65.

Figure 5.

Figure 5

Open in a new tab

Variation in the Total Phenolics (A) and Anthocyanin (B) of S. costus collected from wild, micro propagated plant and induced callus. Different stresses for phytochemical comparison of callus grown on simple callus promoting media (CPM) supplemented with Kinetin (0.5 mgL-1) and 2.4-D (1.0 mgL-1) and callus subjected to various stresses i.e. 60 gL-1 D-Sorbitol stress (CPM-1), 60 gL-1 D-Manitol (CPM-2), 5 gL-1 Poly ethylene glycol 600 (CPM-3) and 60 gL-1 Sucrose (CPM-4).

Total anthocyanin

Anthocyanin contents were detected in the form of Pelargonidin-3-glucoside per kilogram of fresh sample. In the current analyses, in-vitro propagated plant possessed highest amounts of anthocyanin (32.39 mg/kg) followed by wild (31.84 mg/kg) whereas, lowest amount of anthocyanin was recorded in callus grown on CPM (with no stress see Fig. 5B). A similar trend in callus cultures of A. cordata anthocyanin accumulations was achieved with a combination of either NAA or 2,4-D and Kinetin in comparison with auxins or cytokinins66. Similarly, maximum total anthocyanin contents (3.3 to 7.4 CV/g) was reported from cultures on moderate level (40 and 50 mM) of total nitrogen67. Our results are in agreements with several authors where, highest values of all estimated anthocyanin were recorded in shootlets of A. leptopus obtained from MS supplemented with 2iP (0.4 mg/l) and IBA (0.1 mgL−1)68. Similarly, calli derived from style of Crocus sativus showed anthocyanin pigment of 3.75 × 10–7 mg g−1 on media supplemented with NAA (2 mgL−1) and TDZ (1 mgL−1) compared to that of calli produced from corm 2.52 × 10–7 mg g−1 DW69.

GC–MS analysis of callus ethyl acetate extract

GC–MS chromatograms of ethyl acetate extract of callus and callus subjected to different stresses revealed the presence of 24 compounds. The active principles with their retention time, molecular weight and peak area (%) of the identified compounds that could contribute the medicinal quality of the plant are summarized in Table 6. The major components in the CPM extract were Propanic acid, 2-methyl-,3,7-dimethyl-2,6-octadienyl ester and Selina-3,7(11)-diene. The analysis of GC–MS chromatogram showed peaks of various phytochemical constituents present in ethyl acetate CPM extracts (Fig. 6). In contrast, major components identified in CPM-1 were Nonadecane, 2,6,10,14,18-pentamethyl, Nonadecane,2,6,10,14–tetramethyl and 6-tetradecane sulfonic acid, butyl ester (see Table 6, Fig. 7). In CPM-2, major phytocomponents were Octacosane,1-Iodo, Octadecane-2,6,10,14-tetramethyl, Nonadecane, 2,6,10,14,18-pentamethyl and Nonadecane ,2,6,10,14–tetramethyl. Similarly, in CPM-3 and CPM-4 major phytocomponents recorded were Nonadecane,2,6,10,14–tetramethyl, Eicosane,2,6,10,14,18-pentamethyl, Tetrapentacotane and Nonadecane,2,6,10,14,18-pentamethyl, Nonadecane, 2,6,10,14–tetramethyl and Heneisane respectively (see supplementary Figs. 8–10 and Table 6). While, the phytocomponents such as Octadecane-2,6,10,14-tetramethyl and Hentriacontane were present in all the tasted samples. High amount of Octadecane-2,6,10,14-tetramethyl was observed in CPM-2, while the amount of Hentriacontane was higher in CPM-1. Previously, Gwari et al. (2013)3 has reported 41 aromatic compounds from essential oil of S. costus roots extracts. Among the identified compounds Aldehyde like (7Z, 10Z, 13Z)-7, 10, 13-hexadecaterinal, ketones like dehydrocostus lactone, alcohols like elemol, g-costol, vulgarol B, valerenol, and terpinen-4-ol, etc. were found a major component. In addition, Esters and acids were found to be completely absent in root extracts of S. costus. Srinivasan et al. (2016)70 studied the chemical compounds in costus oil and observed that n-hexadecanoic acid to be the major constituent in all examined essential oil accompanied with other fatty acids, hydrocarbons and mono-,di- sesquiterpenes. Recently, Deabes et al. (2021)71 identified 14 components from S. costus ethyl acetate extracts. Compounds like Butanedioic acid and 2TMS derivative were recorded in highest percentage followed by D-(-)-Fructofuranose, pentakis (trimethylsilyl) ether (isomer1), Androstan-17-one, 3-ethyl-3-hydroxy-, (5.alpha.)-, Caffeic acid, 3TMS derivative and L-(-)- Sorbofuranose and pentakis (trimethylsilyl) ether. This great variation in phytocomponents of S. costus may be attributed to factors related to ecotype, chemotype, phenophases and the variations in environmental conditions such as temperature, relative humidity, irradiance and photoperiod. Moreover, the genetic background may also affect the chemistry of secondary metabolites of plants72. Furthermore, exposure to various type stresses may result in drastic epigenetic modifications thereby, changing the transcriptional activities and the overall transcriptomic profile73. Recently it has been shown that stable phenotypes can be generated through epigenetic modifications and thereby increasing the success and survival of plants in their natural habitats. Although, we have not studied any such epigenetic modifications here, but these are very likely targets and are important consideration to be included in future studies.

Table 6.

Phytocomponents identified in ethyl acetate extract of S. costus callus grown on simple callus promoting media (Kinetin: 0.5mgL-1 and 2.4-D: 1.0 mgL-1) and callus subjected to various stresses i.e. 60gL-1 D-Sorbitol stress (CPM-1), 60gL-1 D-Manitol (CPM-2), 5gL-1 Poly ethylene glycol 600 (CPM-3) and 60gL-1 Sucrose (CPM-4).

RT Compound name Molecular mass Cas number CPM CPM-1 CPM-2 CPM-3 CPM-4
% area % area % area % area % area
10.13 Dodecane,2,6,10-trimethyl 212 3891–98-3 1.35 3.045 1.97
13.04 Hexadecane 226 544–76-3 2.48 5.92 4.57 3.73
14.23 Bezene,1,4-bis(1,1-dimethylethyl) 190 1012–72-2 8.67 5.31 5.17
14.41 Benzene, 1,3bis(dimethylethyl) 190 1014–60-4 2.26
14.92 Nonadecane,2,6,10,14 tetramethyl 324 55,124–80-6 7.55 4.31
14.98 Octacosane,1-Iodo 520 900,406–32-2 12.34
15.24 Octadecane-2,6,10,14-tetramethyl 310 54,964–82-8 4.08 6.85 12.34 3.20 9.40
16.64 Hentriacontane 436 630–04-6 3.66 7.68 7.47 1.89 3.87
18.4 Heptadecane,2,6,10,15-Tetramethyl 296 54,833–54-6 7.90 5.38
18.31 Tritetracontane 604 7098–21-7 5.46
18.32 Dodecane,1-fluoro 188 334–68-9 9.89
19.13 Carbonic acid,decyl undecyl ester 356 900,383–16-0 3.11
20.7 6-tetradecanesulfonicacid,butyl ester 334 20,028,280–27-4 10.30 10.62
21.6 Nonadecane,2,6,10,14,18-pentamethyl 338 55,191–61-2 13.39 12.76 10.47 18.60
21.7 Nonadecane,2,6,10,14 -tetramethyl 324 55,124–80-6 22.43 16.90 14.28
21.9 Eicosane,2,6,10,14,18-pentamethyl 352 51,794–16-2 13.39 16.01
23.67 Heneisane 296 629–94-7 4.28 7.04 12.89
24.65 Propanic acid,2-methyl-,3,7-dimethyl-2,6-octadienyl ester 224 2345–24-6 64.24
25.24 Alpha-maaliene 204 489–28-1 9.31
25.59 Dotriacontane 450 544,854 12.29
26.4 Tetrapentacotane 758 5856–66-6 7.795 14.37 5.92
27.52 Dotricotane 450 544,854 5.84
27.73 Triacotane 422 638–68-6 10.11 7.04
28.7 Selina-3,7(11)-diene 204 6813–21-4 18.81
Total identification 100 99.99 100 100 100
Open in a new tab
Figure 6.

Figure 6

Open in a new tab

GC–MS Chromatogram of ethyl acetate extracts of callus grown on simple callus promoting media (CPM) supplemented with Kinetin (0.5 mgL-1) and 2.4-D (1.0 mgL-1).

Figure 7.

Figure 7

Open in a new tab

GC–MS Chromatogram of ethyl acetate extracts of callus subjected to 60 gL-1 D-Sorbitol stress (CPM-1).

Conclusion

Efficient protocols for large scale callus induction of four explants (seeds, leaf, petiole and internodes) as well as micro propagation from auxiliary buds of S. costus were developed. Callus formation was greatly influenced by type of explant used and maximum callus tissue with minimum time taken was record for seed explants. The best response to direct organogenesis was observed on media fortified with BAP (2.0 mgL−1), NAA (1.0 mgL−1) and GA3 (0.25 mgL−1). Micropropagated plantlets suffer high mortality due to their slow acclimatization to ex-vitro conditions. In spite of the prior limited success with Asteraceae members in inducing roots during tissue culture and acclimatization; here, the regenerated plantlets had 87% of survival rate. We argue this survival rate could be further improved through biotization of micro propagated plants with endophytic bacteria and fungi. Here, phytochemical characterization and variability in metabolites such as total sugars, proline, flavonoids, ascorbic acid, phenolics and anthocyanin is recorded from callus, wild as well as micro propagated plantlets. It is also demonstrated that S. costus callus is rich source of various bioactive compounds as indicated in the GC–MS profiles. The remarkable variation in the secondary metabolites may be partly explained by the preexisting genetic variation within the populations of S. costus, understanding the role of epigenetic regulation in response to environmental stimuli, particularly in response to stresses is of paramount significance to the stability and survival of the plants in their natural habitat. The current work on this critically endangered species provides a baseline for future work including application of the newly evolved biotechnological tools that may speed up and ensure sustainability of the plant species, thereby enhancing conservation and management of S. costus in natural ecosystems.

Approval and compliance with regulation

The study was formally authorized by the Directorate of Academics and Research Hazara University Mansehra, Pakistan. Experimental research and field studies on selected plant, including the collection of plant material comply with relevant institutional guidelines and legislation.

Statement for submission of specimen to University herbarium

Specimen was collected from Makra, mountain peak (alt 3,878 m), situated in District Mansehra, KP Pakistan. Date 10–07-2019, GPS (lat 34.57439º N, long 073.49580º E), collected by Ajmal Khan, Azhar Hussain Shah, and Abdul Majid, 57 (HUP).

Supplementary Information

Supplementary Information. (64.8KB, doc)

Author contributions

A.K. collected the data carried out lab work and drafted the manuscript. A.H.S. and N.A. conceived the overall project, reviewed, edited and finalized the manuscript.

Funding

The authors deeply acknowledge Higher Education Commission (HEC), Islamabad, Pakistan for providing financial assistance to this project (NRPU Project No.  20-4253).

Data availability

All data are available in the manuscript.

Competing interests

The authors declare to have no conflict of interest.

Footnotes

Publisher's note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1038/s41598-021-03032-1.

References

  • 1.Vines, G. Herbal harvests with a future: towards sustainable sources for medicinal plants. (Plantlife International, 2004).
  • 2.Zahara K, et al. A review of therapeutic potential of Saussurea lappa-An endangered plant from Himalaya. Asian Pac. J. Trop. Med. 2014;7:S60–S69. doi: 10.1016/S1995-7645(14)60204-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Gwari G, Bhandari U, Andola HC, Lohani H, Chauhan N. Volatile constituents of Saussurea costus roots cultivated in Uttarakhand Himalayas India. Pharmacognosy Res. 2013;5:179. doi: 10.4103/0974-8490.112424. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Bisht, A. S. & Chauhan, R. S. Phenological Studies of High Value Endangered Medicinal Herbs: Picrorhiza kurroa and Saussurea costus in Sub-alpine Regions of Garhwal Hiamalya, Uttarakhand India.
  • 5.Cho JY, et al. Cytotoxic and pro-apoptotic activities of cynaropicrin, a sesquiterpene lactone, on the viability of leukocyte cancer cell lines. Eur. J. Pharmacol. 2004;492:85–94. doi: 10.1016/j.ejphar.2004.03.027. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Peng Z, et al. Costunolide and dehydrocostuslactone combination treatment inhibit breast cancer by inducing cell cycle arrest and apoptosis through c-Myc/p53 and AKT/14-3-3 pathway. Sci. Rep. 2017;7:1–16. doi: 10.1038/srep41254. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Davies KM, Deroles SC. Prospects for the use of plant cell cultures in food biotechnology. Curr. Opin. Biotechnol. 2014;26:133–140. doi: 10.1016/j.copbio.2013.12.010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Yasmin, S. et al. Plant growth promotion and suppression of bacterial leaf blight in rice by inoculated bacteria. PloS one11, e0160688 (2016). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 9.Murashige T, Skoog F. A revised medium for rapid growth and bio assays with tobacco tissue cultures. Physiol. Plant. 1962;15:473–497. [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Hossain A, Mishty A, Mian A. Numerical analysis for design optimization of microcantilever beams for measuring rheological properties of viscous fluid. Finite Elem. Anal. Des. 2013;68:1–9. [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Storey R, Jones RW. Betaine and choline levels in plants and their relationship to NaCl stress. Plant Sci. Lett. 1975;4:161–168. [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Dubois M, Gilles KA, Hamilton JK, Rebers PT, Smith F. Colorimetric method for determination of sugars and related substances. Anal. Chem. 1956;28:350–356. [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Bates LS, Waldren RP, Teare I. Rapid determination of free proline for water-stress studies. Plant Soil. 1973;39:205–207. [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Csepregi K, Kocsis M, Hideg É. On the spectrophotometric determination of total phenolic and flavonoid contents. Acta Biol. Hung. 2013;64:500–509. doi: 10.1556/ABiol.64.2013.4.10. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Re R, et al. Antioxidant activity applying an improved ABTS radical cation decolorization assay. Free Radical Biol. Med. 1999;26:1231–1237. doi: 10.1016/s0891-5849(98)00315-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Singleton VL, Rossi JA. Colorimetry of total phenolics with phosphomolybdic-phosphotungstic acid reagents. Am. J. Enol. Vitic. 1965;16:144–158. [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Giusti, M. M. & Wrolstad, R. E. Characterization and measurement of anthocyanins by UV‐visible spectroscopy. Curr. Protocols Food Anal. Chem., F1. 2.1-F1. 2.13 (2001).
  • 18.Deventhiran M, et al. Comparative phytochemical analysis of wild and micropropagated Cleome viscosa L. J. Appl. Pharm. Sci. 2017;7:83–88. [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Rosy BA, Rosakutty P. GC-MS analysis of methanol wild plant and callus extracts from three Cissus species, family Vitaceae. J. Chem. Pharm. Res. 2012;4:3420–3426. [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Hassan, M. M., Azam, F. S., Chowdhury, M. H. & Rahmatullah, M. Callus induction of Abrus precatorius: screening of phytohormones. Am. Eur. J. Sustain. Agric., 512–519 (2009).
  • 21.Sen MK, Nasrin S, Rahman S, Jamal AHM. In vitro callus induction and plantlet regeneration of Achyranthes aspera L, a high value medicinal plant. Asian Pac. J. Trop. Biomed. 2014;4:40–46. doi: 10.1016/S2221-1691(14)60206-9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Ardelean M, et al. Cytological aspects and anthocyanin accumulation observed in Sedum telephium ssp. maximum L. callus. Roman. Biotechnol. Lett. 2017;22:13025. [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Khoo, I.-C. Liquid crystals. Vol. 64 (John Wiley & Sons, 2007).
  • 24.Ali S, et al. In vitro effects of GA 3 on morphogenesis of CIP potato explants and acclimatization of plantlets in field. In Vitro Cell. Dev. Biol. Plant. 2018;54:104–111. [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Sabeti M, Zarghami R, Zadeh M. Effects of explants and growth regulators on callogenesis and somatic embryogenesis of Agria potato cultivar. Int. J. Agrisci. 2013;3:213–221. [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Iralu V, Upadhaya K. Dormancy, storability, and germination of seeds in Magnolia punduana (Magnoliaceae) Botany. 2016;94:967–973. [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Wojtania, A., Skrzypek, E. & Gabryszewska, E. Morphological and biochemical responses to gibberellic acid in MagnoliaבSpectrum’in vitro. Acta Biologica Cracoviensia. Series Botanica58 (2016).
  • 28.Das S, et al. Core–shell structured catalysts for thermocatalytic, photocatalytic, and electrocatalytic conversion of CO 2. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2020;49:2937–3004. doi: 10.1039/c9cs00713j. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Martin, G. et al. An efficient micropropagation system for Celastrus paniculatus Willd.: a vulnerable medicinal plant. J. For. Res.11, 461–465 (2006).
  • 30.Rani G, Talwar D, Nagpal A, Virk G. Micropropagation of Coleus blumei from nodal segments and shoot tips. Biol. Plant. 2006;50:496–500. [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Kaur K, Verma B, Kant U. Plants obtained from the Khair tree (Acacia catechu Willd.) using mature nodal segments. Plant Cell Rep. 1998;17:427–429. doi: 10.1007/s002990050419. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Sivaram L, Mukundan U. In vitro culture studies on Stevia rebaudiana. In vitro Cell. Dev. Biol. Plant. 2003;39:520–523. [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Rafiq M, Dahot MU, Mangrio SM, Naqvi HA, Qarshi IA. In vitro clonal propagation and biochemical analysis of field established Stevia rebaudiana Bertoni. Pak. J. Bot. 2007;39:2467–2474. [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Dhar U, Upreti J, Bhatt ID. Micropropagation of Pittosporum napaulensis (DC.) Rehder & Wilson–a rare, endemic Himalayan medicinal tree. Plant Cell, Tissue Organ Culture. 2000;63:231–235. [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Guo, Y.-X., Zhao, Y.-Y., Zhang, M. & Zhang, L.-Y. Development of a novel in vitro rooting culture system for the micropropagation of highbush blueberry (Vaccinium corymbosum) seedlings. Plant Cell, Tissue and Organ Culture (PCTOC)139, 615–620 (2019).
  • 36.Cheepala S, Sharma N, Sahi S. Rapid in vitro regeneration of Sesbania drummondii. Biol. Plant. 2004;48:13–18. [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Kumar S, Kumaria S, Tandon P. Efficient in vitro plant regeneration protocol from leaf explant of Jatropha curcas L—a promising biofuel plant. J. Plant Biochem. Biotechnol. 2010;19:273–275. [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Wen W, Yang J. Study on the tissue culture and propagation system of Gentiana scabra Bunge. Med. Plant. 2010;1:13–23. [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Bekheet S. Direct organogenesis of date palm (Phoenix dactylifera L.) for propagation of true-to-type plants. Sci. Agric. 2013;4:85–92. [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Chandra S, Bandopadhyay R, Kumar V, Chandra R. Acclimatization of tissue cultured plantlets: from laboratory to land. Biotech. Lett. 2010;32:1199–1205. doi: 10.1007/s10529-010-0290-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Deb C, Imchen T. An efficient in vitro hardening technique of tissue culture raised plants. Biotechnology. 2010;9:79–83. [Google Scholar]
  • 42.del Rosario Espinoza-Mellado, M. et al. Biotization and in vitro plant cell cultures: plant endophyte strategy in response to heavy metals knowledge in assisted phytoremediation. Microbe Med. Remed. Environ. Contamin., 27–36 (2021).
  • 43.Prado R, Huerta G, West M. Bayesian time-varying autoregressions: Theory, methods and applications. Resenhas do Instituto de Matemática e Estatística da Universidade de São Paulo. 2000;4:405–422. [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Wang Z, Stutte GW. The role of carbohydrates in active osmotic adjustment in apple under water stress. J. Am. Soc. Hortic. Sci. 1992;117:816–823. [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Zhang F, Yang Y, He W, Zhao X, Zhang L. Effects of salinity on growth and compatible solutes of callus induced from Populus euphratica. In Vitro Cell. Dev. Biol. Plant. 2004;40:491–494. [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Martin K. Rapid in vitro multiplication and ex vitro rooting of Rotula aquatica Lour., a rare rhoeophytic woody medicinal plant. Plant Cell Rep. 2003;21:415–420. doi: 10.1007/s00299-002-0547-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Malik AA, Williams CA, Weston KL, Barker AR. Perceptual and prefrontal cortex haemodynamic responses to high-intensity interval exercise with decreasing and increasing work-intensity in adolescents. Int. J. Psychophysiol. 2018;133:140–148. doi: 10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2018.07.473. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Mehta R, Sharma S, Nath AK. In vitro selection and biochemical characterization of carnation (Diathus caryophyllus L.) callus culture tolerant to Alternaria dianthi. Indian J. Plant Physiol. 2007;12:120. [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Felix K, et al. Hydrogen-induced tolerance against osmotic stress in alfalfa seedlings involves ABA signaling. Plant Soil. 2019;445:409–423. [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Shah AH, Shah SH, Ahmad H, Swati ZA. Adaptation to polyethylene stress maintains totipotency of cell lines of Oryza sativa L. CV Swat-1 for a longer period. Pak. J. Bot. 2012;44:313–316. [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Pradhan S, et al. Poly ethylene glycol mediated in vitro screening and physico-biochemical changes induced in mango callus due to moisture stress. Plant Cell, Tissue Organ Culture PCTOC. 2021;145:155–172. [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Hassan A, Roy S. Micropropagation of Smilax zeylanica L., a perennial climbing medicinal shrub, through axillary shoot proliferation. Bangladesh J. Life Sci. 2004;16:33–39. [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Ahmad MSA, Javed F, Ashraf M. Iso-osmotic effect of NaCl and PEG on growth, cations and free proline accumulation in callus tissue of two indica rice (Oryza sativa L.) genotypes. Plant Growth Reg. 2007;53:53–63. [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Jain M, Tiwary S, Gadre R. Sorbitol-induced changes in various growth and biochemici parameters in maize. Plant Soil Environ. 2010;56:263–267. [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Razavizadeh R, Adabavazeh F. Effects of sorbitol on essential oil of Carum copticum L. under in vitro culture. Rom. Biotechnol. Lett. 2017;22:12281–12289. [Google Scholar]
  • 56.Ibrahim SR, et al. Lipoxygenase inhibitors flavonoids from Cyperus rotundus aerial parts. Rev. Bras. 2018;28:320–324. [Google Scholar]
  • 57.Khan T, et al. Melatonin-enhanced biosynthesis of antimicrobial AgNPs by improving the phytochemical reducing potential of a callus culture of Ocimum basilicum L var thyrsiflora. RSC Adv. 2017;7:38699–38713. [Google Scholar]
  • 58.Kamal OM, Shah SHA, Li Y, Hou X, Li Y. Production of ascorbic acid, total protein, callus and root in vitro of non-heading Chinese cabbage by tissue culture. Mol. Biol. Rep. 2020;47:6887–6897. doi: 10.1007/s11033-020-05745-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 59.Narayan M, Thimmaraju R, Bhagyalakshmi N. Interplay of growth regulators during solid-state and liquid-state batch cultivation of anthocyanin producing cell line of Daucus carota. Process Biochem. 2005;40:351–358. [Google Scholar]
  • 60.Pietta P-G. Flavonoids as antioxidants. J. Nat. Prod. 2000;63:1035–1042. doi: 10.1021/np9904509. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 61.El-Nabarawy M, El-Kafafi S, Hamza M, Omar M. The effect of some factors on stimulating the growth and production of active substances in Zingiber officinale callus cultures. Ann. Agric. Sci. 2015;60:1–9. [Google Scholar]
  • 62.Gorni PH, Pacheco AC. Growth promotion and elicitor activity of salicylic acid in Achillea millefolium L. Afr. J. Biotech. 2016;15:657–665. [Google Scholar]
  • 63.Dias MI, Sousa MJ, Alves RC, Ferreira IC. Exploring plant tissue culture to improve the production of phenolic compounds: a review. Ind. Crops Prod. 2016;82:9–22. [Google Scholar]
  • 64.Surveswaran S, Cai Y-Z, Xing J, Corke H, Sun M. Antioxidant properties and principal phenolic phytochemicals of Indian medicinal plants from Asclepiadoideae and Periplocoideae. Nat. Prod. Res. 2010;24:206–221. doi: 10.1080/14786410802228827. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 65.Sakakibara H, Takei K, Hirose N. Interactions between nitrogen and cytokinin in the regulation of metabolism and development. Trends Plant Sci. 2006;11:440–448. doi: 10.1016/j.tplants.2006.07.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 66.Murthy HN, Lee E-J, Paek K-Y. Production of secondary metabolites from cell and organ cultures: strategies and approaches for biomass improvement and metabolite accumulation. Plant Cell, Tissue Org. Culture PCTOC. 2014;118:1–16. [Google Scholar]
  • 67.Irshad M, et al. Accumulation of anthocyanin in callus cultures of red-pod okra [Abelmoschus esculentus (L.) Hongjiao] in response to light and nitrogen levels. Plant Cell, Tissue Organ Cul PCTOC. 2018;134:29–39. [Google Scholar]
  • 68.Youssef NM, Taha LS, El-Khalek A, Nagy S. Secondary metabolites characterization of in vitro propagated Antigonon leptopus cultures. Egypt. J. Chem. 2021;64:923–932. [Google Scholar]
  • 69.Moradi A, Zarinkamar F, Caretto S, Azadi P. Influence of thidiazuron on callus induction and crocin production in corm and style explants of Crocus sativus L. Acta Physiol. Plant. 2018;40:1–8. [Google Scholar]
  • 70.Srinivasan J, Liu C, Kelly R. Geometric evolution of flux from a corroding one-dimensional pit and its implications on the evaluation of kinetic parameters for pit stability. J. Electrochem. Soc. 2016;163:C694. [Google Scholar]
  • 71.Deabes M, Aboulthana W, Marzouk EE-D, Mohamed MI, Ahmed KA. Evaluation of hepato-and neuroprotective effect of chemical constituents in Saussurea costus extract against the toxicity induced by chloropyrofos ethyl in rats. Egypt. J. Chem. 2021;64:631–647. [Google Scholar]
  • 72.Negi JS, et al. Antidiarrheal activity of methanol extract and major essential oil contents of Saussurea lappa Clarke. Afr. J. Pharm. Pharmacol. 2013;7:474–477. [Google Scholar]
  • 73.Thiebaut F, Hemerly AS, Ferreira PCG. A role for epigenetic regulation in the adaptation and stress responses of non-model plants. Front. Plant Sci. 2019;10:246. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2019.00246. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Supplementary Information. (64.8KB, doc)

Data Availability Statement

All data are available in the manuscript.

Articles from Scientific Reports are provided here courtesy of Nature Publishing Group

RESOURCES