Abstract
Low temperature remarkably limits rubber tree (Hevea brasiliensis Muell. Arg.) growth, latex production, and geographical distribution, but the underlying mechanisms of Hevea brasiliensis cold stress response remain elusive. Here, we identified HbSnRK2.6 as a key component in ABA signaling functions in phytohormone abscisic acid (ABA)-regulated cold stress response in Hevea brasiliensis. Exogenous application of ABA enhances Hevea brasiliensis cold tolerance. Cold-regulated (COR) genes in the CBF pathway are upregulated by ABA. Transcript levels of all five HbSnRK2.6 members are significantly induced by cold, while HbSnRK2.6A, HbSnRK2.6B, and HbSnRK2.6C can be further activated by ABA under cold conditions. Additionally, HbSnRK2.6s are localized in the cytoplasm and nucleus, and can physically interact with HbICE2, a crucial positive regulator in the cold signaling pathway. Overexpression of HbSnRK2.6A or HbSnRK2.6B in Arabidopsis extensively enhances plant responses to ABA and expression of COR genes, leading to increased cold stress tolerance. Furthermore, HbSnRK2.6A and HbSnRK2.6B can promote transcriptional activity of HbICE2, thus, increasing the expression of HbCBF1. Taken together, we demonstrate that HbSnRK2.6s are involved in ABA-regulated cold stress response in Hevea brasiliensis by regulating transcriptional activity of HbICE2.
Keywords: cold stress tolerance, ABA, Hevea brasiliensis
1. Introduction
The rubber tree (Hevea brasiliensis Muell. Arg.) is an economically important tropical tree species, and the latex in its laticifers is the exclusive commercial source of natural rubber, an indispensable industrial raw material [1]. As a representative tropical rainforest tree species, the growth and development of Hevea brasiliensis are promoted under warm temperatures while they are suppressed by low temperatures, which restrict its geographical distribution and decrease latex production [2,3,4]. Low temperatures can cause suspension of latex production for 1–3 months per year. In addition, cold stress threatens the survival of young rubber trees, especially in the marginal northern tropics [5,6]. Therefore, improvement of cold tolerance is one of the major tasks of Hevea brasiliensis breeding programs. However, there have been few studies on the cold tolerance of Hevea brasiliensis, and the key regulators and underlying mechanisms of Hevea brasiliensis cold response are largely unknown. Thus, identification of potential genes that function in cold response and illustration of the cold tolerance mechanisms are essential for the development of novel genetic resources for breeding of cold-tolerant Hevea brasiliensis varieties.
Plants are sessile organisms that have evolved sophisticated mechanisms for perceiving, transmitting, and responding to cold stress signals by regulating their molecular, biochemical, and physiological processes, thus, enabling them to survive under adverse environmental conditions [7,8,9]. Over the past two decades, enormous achievements have been made in identifying the crucial components implicated in plant cold signaling pathways and deciphering their regulatory mechanisms using the model plant Arabidopsis [8,10,11]. The best understood cold regulatory pathway, the inducer of CBF expression (ICE)-C-repeat binding factor/DRE binding factor1 (CBF/DREB1) transcriptional cascade, plays a critical role in cold acclimation in Arabidopsis [9,12]. The CBFs/DREBs in this pathway are rapidly activated by cold, which can bind to the promoters of the cold-regulated (COR) genes to upregulate their expression, thus, increasing plant cold tolerance [13]. Several transcription factors activating or suppressing the expression of cold-induced CBF have been identified. For instance, ICE1, brassinazole-resistant 1 (BZR1), and calmodulin-binding transcription activator 3 (CAMTA3) and CESTA are positive regulators of CBF genes [14,15,16,17]. By contrast, MYB15, ethylene insensitive 3 (EIN3) and phytochrome-interacting factor 3/4/7 (PIF3/4/7) directly inhibit cold-induced CBF expression [18,19,20,21]. ICE1, the best characterized upstream component of CBF, acts as a master regulator of CBF, which binds to the promoter of CBF and activates its transcription [14]. Recent studies have uncovered that ICE1 can be degraded by the E3 ligase high expression of osmotically responsive gene 1 (HOS1)-mediated ubiquitination, while it can be stabilized by the SAP and Miz1 (SIZ1)-mediated sumoylation [22,23]. In addition, phosphorylation of ICE1 is important for its function in plant cold tolerance. It has been reported that ICE1 can be phosphorylated by several protein kinases, including open stomata 1 (OST1)/SNF1-related protein kinase 2.6 (SnRK2.6), mitogen-activated protein kinase 3/6 (MPK3/6), and brassinosteroid-insensitive 2 (BIN2) in Arabidopsis, and OsMAPK3 in rice [21,24,25,26].
Recent reports have also documented that plant hormones play important roles in the regulation of coordinating ICE/CBF cold regulatory pathway to modulate plant cold tolerance [27,28]. For example, ethylene has been shown to decrease plant freezing tolerance through inhibiting the expression of CBFs and type-A ARR genes in Arabidopsis [19]. In addition, exogenous application of 24-epibrassinolide (EBR), analogs of brassinosteroids, reduced the expression levels of the ICE1 gene under low-temperature stress (9 °C) in tomato seedlings [29]. Jasmonic acid (JA) has been reported to positively regulate freezing tolerance by regulating the transcriptional activity of ICE1 through its interaction with JA signaling repressor JAZ1/4 in Arabidopsis [30]. As the most important stress hormone in plants, abscisic aid (ABA) also plays roles in plant response to low temperature. For example, an early report documented that exogenous application of ABA enhanced Arabidopsis tolerance to cold stress [31]. However, whether and how ABA regulates the cold stress response of rubber trees remain elusive.
SnRK2.6, a serine/threonine protein kinase, is a key positive regulator of ABA signaling in plants [32]. SnRK2.6, along with ABA receptors PYR/PYL/RCAR and type-2C protein phosphatases PP2Cs, constitute the core ABA signal module, which is responsible for the earliest ABA signaling events and participates in the regulation of plant growth, metabolism, and various stress responses [9,33,34,35,36,37,38]. SnRK2.6 controls Arabidopsis stomatal movement by interacting with and regulating the activity of guard cell anion channel SLAC1 [39]. SnRK2.6 also regulates seed development and dormancy by affecting the expression of extensive ABA-responsive genes [40,41]. In strawberry, FaSnRK2.6 has been found to mediate ABA-regulated fruit development and ripening mainly through the transcriptional regulation of FaSnRK2.6 [42]. Recent studies have demonstrated that Arabidopsis SnRK2.6 was a key regulator in plant response to cold stress [21,25,43,44]. SnRK2.6 can phosphorylate and stabilize ICE1 protein, promoting plant freezing tolerance [25]. Recently, SnRK2.6 was found to regulate the interaction between basic transcription factor 3 (BTF3)/BTF3-like (BTF3L) protein and CBF to stabilize CBF protein, and therefore enhance Arabidopsis cold tolerance [44]. In contrast, CBF genes have been found to be less induced in tomato species in response to low temperature and cold stress, unlike Arabidops [45,46]. However, the roles of Hevea brasiliensis SnRK2.6 genes in cold stress response remain unknown.
Although the molecular mechanisms of plant response to low temperature stress have been thoroughly studied in Arabidopsis, research on the molecular mechanism of Hevea brasiliensis response to low temperature stress is still in its infancy, due to the late genome sequencing and the immaturity of transgenic technology of the rubber tree. In recent years, with the completion of the rubber tree whole-genome sequencing [47,48], several key genes involved in the regulation of responses to low temperature stress in Hevea brasiliensis have been cloned and identified, including HbCBF1, HbICE1, and HbICE2, which have laid a foundation for the study of molecular mechanism underlying Hevea brasiliensis cold stress response [4,49,50]. However, key factors regulating the ICE/CBF signaling pathway in Hevea brasiliensis have not been well studied. In the present study, we investigated the effect of ABA on the cold tolerance of Hevea brasiliensis; identified the core ABA signaling component, SnRK2.6s, in Hevea brasiliensis; and evaluated their positive role in cold response. Our results provide a novel molecular mechanism underlying cold stress response in Hevea brasiliensis.
2. Results
2.1. ABA Promotes the Expression of Cold-Regulated Genes in the CBF Pathway in Hevea brasiliensis
ABA is an important plant hormone regulating plant growth, metabolism, and various stress processes [51]. Whether ABA regulates the cold resistance of rubber trees is unknown. To explore the role of ABA in cold stress response in Hevea brasiliensis, first, we assayed the expression of several key cold-regulated genes in Hevea brasiliensis treated with ABA under cold conditions. Since ICE-CBF transcriptional cascade plays an important role in plant cold tolerance, the expression of the CBF pathway genes, including HbICE2, HbCBF1, HbCBF2, and HbCBF3 of Hevea brasiliensis under cold stress treated with ABA for an indicated time, was tested using qRT-PCR. The results showed that the transcription level of HbICE2 increased with the extension of low temperature treatment time and reached the highest at 24 h, while HbICE2 transcripts in Hevea brasiliensis seedlings treated with both cold and ABA were higher than those in the plants treated with cold alone (Figure 1A). Similarly, the expressions of HbCBF1–3 were significantly induced by cold stress, and ABA further enhanced their expression during the late stages of cold treatment (12–24 h) (Figure 1B–D). Collectively, these findings indicate that ABA promotes cold-regulated genes involved in the ICE/CBF transcriptional regulatory pathway in Hevea brasiliensis.
2.2. Exogenous Application of ABA Enhances Plant Cold Tolerance
Our above results showed that ABA can enhance Hevea brasiliensis response to cold stress by positively regulating cold-regulated genes involved in the ICE/CBF signaling pathway, prompting us to further test the role of ABA in Hevea brasiliensis cold stress tolerance. For this purpose, exogenous ABA was applied to the cold-treated Hevea brasiliensis plants, and their cold resistance phenotypes were observed. Rubber tree plants co-treated with ABA and cold had fewer wilted and necrotic leaves and exhibited fewer cold-induced injury symptoms than the plants treated with cold alone (Figure 2A). Our phenotypic analysis indicated that ABA could enhance the cold tolerance of rubber trees in a concentration-dependent manner. As compared with other tested concentrations, i.e., 50 µM and 75 µM, ABA could improve the cold tolerance of rubber trees more effectively. Therefore, a relatively low ABA concentration, i.e., 50 µM, was selected for the analysis of the cold-related physiological indicators and gene expression analysis of Hevea brasiliensis. In accordance with the phenotype, cold-induced cellular damage was less evident in the ABA-treated Hevea brasiliensis following exposure to cold stress than control plants subjected to cold temperature stress, as evidenced by significantly lower electrolyte leakage (EL) and malondialdehyde (MDA) content (Figure 2B,C). In addition, ABA-treated rubber tree leaves had higher free proline accumulation and chlorophyll levels as compared with the control plant, i.e., Hevea brasiliensis leaves under cold stress condition (Figure 2D,E). These results indicate that ABA positively regulates Hevea brasiliensis cold tolerance.
2.3. Identification and Bioinformatics Analysis of HbSnRK2.6s from Hevea brasiliensis
To elucidate how ABA regulates the ICE-CBF cascade and cold tolerance in Hevea brasiliensis, we sought to identify the HbICE2-interacting proteins using a yeast two-hybrid screen system, since ICE-like transcription factor HbICE2 was a key positive regulator in plant cold tolerance in our previous study [49]. An ortholog of AtSnRK2.6 encoded by one CDS (designated as HbSnRK2.6A, accession no. MK640229) was uncovered as one of the putative HbICE2-interacting proteins. Interestingly, SnRK2.6 in Arabidopsis has been demonstrated to be a key factor in ABA response [25,40]. Thus, we have focused on this protein this study. HbSnRK2.6A and other members of the HbSnRK2.6 family in Hevea brasiliensis have not been functionally characterized. A BLAST search was performed to identify HbSnRK2.6 members in the Hevea brasiliensis genome database using the coding sequence of Arabidopsis SnRK2.6 as the query sequence. Five predicted, candidate HbSnRK2.6 family genes were detected. We cloned all these HbSnRK2.6-like genes designated as HbSnRK2.6A (accession no. MK640229), HbSnRK2.6B (accession no. MK640230), HbSnRK2.6C (accession no. MK640231), HbSnRK2.6D (accession no. MK640232), and HbSnRK2.6E (accession no. MK640233). The protein sequences of the HbSnRK2.6s ranged from 306 to 364 amino acids, and the amino acid sequence alignment showed that HbSnRK2.6s and AtSnRK2.6 shared highly conserved N-terminal regions, while the C-terminus regions were divergent. In the conserved N-terminal kinase domain, all of the HbSnRK2.6 proteins contained a conserved serine/threonine kinase protein active-site signature and an ATP-binding site, except for HbSnRK2.6B which had no typical ATP-binding site (Figure 3A). In addition to the conserved kinase domain, all of the HbSnRK2.6 kinases contained two distinct domains in the C-terminal regulatory region: a SnRK2-specific box (Domain I) needed for kinase activity and an ABA-specific box domain (Domain II) required for ABA response. A phylogenetic tree was constructed using the full-length SnRK2.6 protein sequences of Hevea brasiliensis and SnRK2 protein sequences in Arabidopsis; the results showed that HbSnRK2.6A and HbSnRK2.6B were most closely related to Arabidopsis SnRK2.6, with the highest degree of amino acid sequence similarity with AtSnRK2.6 (Figure 3B).
2.4. Expression Patterns of HbSnRK2.6s in Hevea brasiliensis
To determine the role of HbSnRK2.6s in Hevea brasiliensis response to cold stress, the expression profiles of HbSnRK2.6s under cold stress were also analyzed. As is shown in Figure 4, the transcript levels of HbSnRK2.6s were gradually increased by the cold treatment, and reached the highest levels at 24 h. The effects of ABA on the transcriptional expression of HbSnRK2.6s were also examined. The results showed that HbSnRK2.6A–E transcript levels were induced by ABA, and the transcriptional expression of HbSnRK2.6A and HbSnRK2.6C were most strongly induced by ABA. In addition, HbSnRK2.6A, HbSnRK2.6B, and HbSnRK2.6C transcripts in Hevea brasiliensis exposed to both cold and ABA treatments were significantly higher as compared with those treated with cold alone. These data suggest that HbSnRK2.6s are responsible for cold stress and ABA stimuli at its transcription level, and may play an important role in ABA-regulated cold tolerance in Hevea brasiliensis.
2.5. Subcellular Localization of HbSnRK2.6s
To determine the subcellular localization of HbSnRK2.6 protein, five HbSnRK2.6 proteins were fused with GFP to generate a fusion protein HbSnRK2.6s-GFP, which was driven by CaMV35S promoter. The GV3101 strain with fusion construct and empty vector was infiltrated into the leaves of N. benthamiana plants. The microscopic visualization showed that the control GFP fluorescence signal was distributed throughout the tobacco cells, while HbSnRK2.6s-GFP fluorescence was mainly localized in the nucleus and cytoplasm of tobacco cells (Figure 5A). To further verify the subcellular localization of the protein HbSnRK2.6s in Hevea brasiliensis, the subcellular localization plasmid vectors of HbSnRK2.6s were transformed into Hevea brasiliensis protoplasts. In accordance with the subcellular localization results in tobacco cells, all five HbSnRK2.6 proteins were mainly localized in the cytoplasm and nucleus, as well as in close proximity to the plasma membrane of rubber tree (Hevea brasiliensis) protoplasts (Figure 5B).
2.6. HbSnRK2.6A and HbSnRK2.6B Are Positive Regulators in ABA Response
It has been documented that SnRK2.6 proteins in other plant species are core components of ABA signaling pathway, which is involved in ABA-mediated physiological processes [40,42,52,53]. To investigate whether the HbSnRK2.6s we cloned participated in the regulation of ABA response, we overexpressed HbSnRK2.6A and HbSnRK2.6B in Arabisopisis, resulting in HbSnRK2.6A-OE and HbSnRK2.6B-OE transgenic lines, and then seed germination and root growth of these overexpressing lines with or without ABA treatment were examined. We found that under normal growth conditions, the transgenic lines HbSnRK2.6A-OE and HbSnRK2.6B-OE had similar germination rates as compared with wild-type plants, whereas the seed germination rates of transgenic plants HbSnRK2.6A-OE and HbSnRK2.6B-OE were significantly lower than those of the wild-type plants when treated by ABA (Figure 6A), indicating that seed germination rates in transgenic lines HbSnRK2.6A-OE and HbSnRK2.6B-OE were relatively sensitive to ABA as compared with those of wild-type plants. Consistent with seed germination rates, the root growths of HbSnRK2.6A-OE and HbSnRK2.6B-OE lines showed hypersensitivity to ABA as compared with those of wild-type plants (Figure 6B). These results indicate that HbSnRK2.6A and HbSnRK2.6B are positive regulators of ABA response during seed germination and root growth. These combined results further confirm that HbSnRK2.6A and HbSnRK2.6B are key components of the ABA signaling pathway.
2.7. HbICE2 Interacts with HbSnRK2.6s
To test the interaction between HbSnRK2.6A and HbICE2, a point-to-point yeast two-hybrid experiment was performed. The full-length HbSnRK2.6A and truncated HbICE2 (HbICE2-ΔN80, deletion of the transactivation region at aa 1–80) were cloned into pGADT7 and pGBKT7 vectors, respectively, generating pGADT7-HbSnRK2.6A and pGBKT7-HbICE2-ΔN80. As positive control did, yeast cells co-transformed pGADT7- HbSnRK2.6A and pGBKT7-HbICE2-ΔN80 were grown on SD/-Leu/-Trp/-His/-Ade medium. To confirm whether HbICE2 interacted specifically with HbSnRK2.6A, other HbSnRK2.6s including HbSnRK2.6B, HbSnRK2.6C, HbSnRK2.6D, and HbSnRK2.6E were cloned and analyzed. As shown in Figure 7A, HbICE2 interacted with all five HbSnRK2.6 proteins. In addition, a BiFC assay was conducted in Hevea brasiliensis protoplasts to verify the interactions in vivo. Co-expressing HbICE2-nYFP and HbSnRK2.6s-cYFP could generate florescence signal in Hevea brasiliensis protoplasts (Figure 7B), implicating that HbICE2 could interact with HbSnRK2.6 in vivo. The yeast two-hybrid and BiFC assays both collectively indicated that HbICE2 could physically interact with HbSnRK2.6s.
2.8. Overexpression of HbSnRK2.6A and HbSnRK2.6B in Arabidopsis Enhances Cold Stress Tolerance
Given that our experiments have demonstrated that HbSnRK2.6A/B could physically interact with HbICE2, a crucial positive regulator in a cold signaling pathway, efforts were then made to explore the role of HbSnRK2.6A/B in the tolerance to cold stress. The Arabidopsis transgenic lines overexpressing HbSnRK2.6A (HbSnRK2.6A-OE-7 and HbSnRK2.6A-OE-14) and HbSnRK2.6B (HbSnRK2.6B-OE-1 and HbSnRK2.6A-OE-16) were used for cold stress assays. Under normal growth conditions, there was no significant differences in morphology and survival rates between HbSnRK2.6A/B overexpressing transgenic lines and wild-type plants. When exposed to cold stress, transgenic lines were more resistant to freezing treatment as compared with wild-type plants (Figure 8A,B), and the survival rates of HbSnRK2.6A/B overexpressing transgenic lines were significantly higher than those of wild-type seedlings after freezing temperatures treatment (Figure 8C,D), indicating that overexpression of HbSnRK2.6A/B could enhance tolerance of the Arabidopsis plants to cold stress. Several physiological parameters such as electrolyte leakage (EL), malondialdehyde (MDA) level, and proline content are known indicators of cell injuries caused by the stresses. To further confirm the role of HbSnRK2.6A/B on cold tolerance, the above physiological parameters were measured. The EL and MDA contents in these transgenic plants were both consistently lower as compared with those in the wild-type plants when exposed to cold stress (Figure 8E,F), indicating that transgenic lines suffered less cold-induced cellular damage than wild-type seedlings. In addition, when subjected to cold treatment, the proline levels in the transgenic lines were significantly higher than those in WT plants (Figure 8G). Taken together, these findings suggest that HbSnRK2.6A/B contribute positively to cold tolerance.
2.9. HbSnRK2.6A/B Positively Regulate the Expression of Cold-Responsive Genes
To reveal whether HbSnRK2.6A/B-regulated plant cold stress responses are dependent on the CBF signaling pathway, the transcript levels of Arabidopsis CBF cold-responsive pathway genes, including AtCBF1–3, AtCOR47, and RD29A, were analyzed by qRT-PCR. As is shown in Figure 9, the expressions of AtCBF1–3, AtCOR47, and RD29A were dramatically induced by cold in both HbSnRK2.6A-OE and HbSnRK2.6B-OE lines as compared with those in wild-type plants, while this induction was much stronger in the overexpressing lines than that in the wild type. These results imply that HbSnRK2.6A/B positively regulate the expression of CBF cold-responsive pathway genes under cold conditions, thereby, contributing to enhanced cold resistance.
2.10. HbSnRK2.6A/B Promote HbICE2 Transcriptional Activity
Since HbSnRK2.6A/B could interact with HbICE2, it is possible that the HbSnRK2.6A/B–HbICE2 interaction may interfere with the transcriptional activity of transcription factor HbICE2. To verify this assumption, transient transactivation assays were performed using firefly LUC gene driven by HbCBF1 promoter as a reporter. HbSnRK2.6A/B and HbICE2 effector plasmids were generated by fusing the constitutive CaMV35S promoter with the HbSnRK2.6A/B and HbICE2 (Figure 10A). When reporter construct HbCBF1::LUC was transformed together with the effector plasmid 35S::HbICE2 into leaves of N. benthamiana., the LUC activity was significantly increased as compared with infiltration of HbCBF::LUC alone, suggesting that HbICE2 transactivated the expression of HbCBF1. Moreover, under cold treatment, co-expression of reporter plasmid HbCBF1::LUC with effector plasmids 35S::HbSnRK2.6A or 35S::HbSnRK2.6A and 35S::HbICE2 generated much higher LUC activity than infiltration of HbCBF1::LUC alone or co-expression of HbCBF1::LUC with 35S::HbICE2 (Figure 10B), indicating that HbSnRK2.6A/B promote the HbICE2-induced HbCBF1 expression. These results suggest that HbSnRK2.6A/B enhance cold tolerance by promoting the transcriptional ability of HbICE2.
3. Discussion
Hevea brasiliensis is a typical tropical rainforest tree species, and therefore low temperature significantly suppresses its growth and development and also restricts its geographical distribution and latex production [3,4]. Hence, improvement of cold tolerance in rubber tree varieties is of great importance. However, the molecular mechanisms of rubber tree response to cold stress are still largely unknown. In the present study, we investigated the role and molecular mechanism of ABA in Hevea brasiliensis cold stress responses. We found that ABA can increase cold induction of HbSnRK2.6A, HbSnRK2.6B, and HbSnRK2.6C transcripts and significantly enhance Hevea brasiliensis cold tolerance. In addition, overexpression of HbSnRK2.6A/B increased plant cold resistance. Furthermore, HbSnRK2.6s can physically interact with HbICE2 and promote its transcriptional activity, increasing HbCBF1 expression, thereby, rendering an enhanced cold tolerance of Hevea brasiliensis. Interestingly, in rubber trees, ABA is an important hormone that can stimulate latex synthesis, and exogenous application of ABA significantly increased latex yield by 4.3 times [54,55]. Although whether and how HbSnRK2.6, the key player in ABA signaling, functions in latex production are still unknown, our study on the mechanism of ABA-HbSnRK2.6 module regulating the cold tolerance of rubber trees is helpful to the breeding of rubber tree varieties with both increased cold resistance and high latex yield.
SnRK2s are central components in ABA-triggered signaling pathway [9,31,51,52]. In our study, HbSnRK2.6s (HbSnRK2.6A–E) in Hevea brasiliensis were cloned and functionally characterized. Amino acid sequence alignment showed that HbSnRK2.6s share high sequence similarity with AtSnRK2.6, and all HbSnRK2.6s have typical structural signatures of SnRK2 family proteins, including serine/threonine kinase protein active-site signature, ATP-binding site, SnRK2-specific box (Domain I), and ABA-specific box domain (Domain II); however, HbSnRK2.6B has no typical ATP-binding site (Figure 3). Consistent with SnRK2 members in many other plant species, HbSnRK2.6s showed highly conserved N-terminal domains but divergent C-terminus regions (Figure 3) [56,57,58,59]. The conserved domain of HbSnRK2.6B was lost, suggesting that subfunctionalization may have occurred during the long-term evolution of rubber tree. This phenomenon has also been observed in PbrSnRK2 proteins in pear [59].
Previous studies have demonstrated that exogenous application of ABA could enhance cold tolerance in some plants and may be correlated with cold-induced physiological alteration [39,60,61,62,63]. SnRK2.6 function is necessary in plant cold stress tolerance as snrk2.6 Arabidopsis mutant is very sensitive to cold stress, while HbSnRK2.6-overexpressing transgenic Arabidopsis plants display enhanced cold stress tolerance (Figure 2) [25]. However, cold-activated kinase activity of SnRK2.6 is independent of ABA in Arabidopsis [64], while our study showed that exogenous ABA treatment extensively upregulated the expression of HbICE2, HbCBF1, HbCBF2, and HbCBF3 in cold-treated rubber seedings, resulting in increased cold stress tolerance of rubber seedlings, implying a distinct role of ABA in cold response of rubber trees and Arabidopsis. We speculated that the different effects of ABA on cold responses in rubber trees and Arabidopsis plants may be dependent on plant species.
Our study showed that HbSnRK2.6A- or HbSnRK2.6B-overexpressing Arabidopsis plants are hypersensitive to ABA in terms of seed germination and root elongation as compared with the wild-type Arabidopsis plants (Figure 6), revealing that HbSnRK2.6 plays a conserved role with its homologous protein AtSnRK2.6 in Arabidopsis in ABA signaling transduction. SnRK2.6 usually plays its role in ABA-mediated stress responses through phosphorylating downstream factors [9,39]. Indeed, several crucial phosphorylation substrates of AtSnRK2.6/OST1 have been identified in plant cold stress responses including AtICE1, BTF3, and BTF3-like protein, which elicits different effects on promoting plant cold stress tolerance [44]. In our study, we found that both HbSnRK2.6A and HbSnRK2.6B could significantly enhance the transcription activity of HbICE2 on the expression of HbCBF1, suggesting that HbSnRK2.6 may also phosphorylate HbICE2, but additional analysis is needed to draw a firm conclusion.
MDA is a lipid peroxidation marker, which is produced and accumulated in various abiotic stresses including cold stresses [10,50]. We have also noticed that cold stress-induced MDA accumulation in the wild-type plant could be significantly repressed by the overexpression of HbSnRK2.6A or HbSnRK2.6B, suggesting another role of HbSnRK2.6 in plant cold stress tolerance through regulating the expression of reactive oxygen species (ROS)-metabolizing enzymes directly or indirectly. Recently, a large number of AtCBFs downstream target genes were identified in Arabidopsis [65], shedding a light on whether and how HbSnRK2.6-ICE2 module functions in the maintenance of ROS homeostasis by targeting the genes encoding ROS-scavenging enzymes.
Stomata are the specialized epidermal cells in leaf, and control both the water transpiration and gas exchange in plants [66]. In addition to the activation of the ICE/CBF signaling pathway during plant cold response, SnRK2.6/OST1 was initially identified as an important central player that could extensively promote stomatal closure under drought or dehydration stress conditions by phosphorylating membrane ion channel proteins such as slow anion channel-associated 1 (SLAC1) [67]. As stomatal closure restricts leaf water transpiration, and thus decreases the loss of leaf heat, we still cannot exclude the possibility that ABA- and HbSnRK2.6-conferred cold stress tolerance in rubber tree seedlings is at least partially due to higher plant foliar temperature caused by smaller stomatal aperture and slower water transpiration.
In addition to the stimulation of kinase activity of OST1/SnRK2.6, cold also significantly increases the mRNA abundance of HbSnRK2.6s in rubber tree (Figure 4), consistent with previous results that transcripts of SnRK2s are upregulated under cold stress in other plants including maize, wheat, and Arabidopsis [41,62,64], suggesting a conserved mechanism underlying the regulation of SnRK2.6 expression across different plant species. We also found that ABA could increase cold induction of HbSnRK2.6A, HbSnRK2.6B, and HbSnRK2.6C transcripts. These results, in combination with our other findings that HbSnRK2.6s could enhance plant cold tolerance, and HbSnRK2.6 could promote the transcriptional activity of HbICE2 by interacting with HbICE2 to induce HbCBF1 expression, strongly suggest that the transcriptional regulation of HbSnRK2.6s is involved in HbSnRK2.6s-mediated ABA-regulated Hevea brasiliensis cold tolerance. These data are also consistent with previous results in strawberry fruit that FaSnRK2.6 mediates ABA-regulated fruit ripening mainly through the transcriptional regulation of FaSnRK2.6 [42].
4. Materials and Methods
4.1. Plant Materials and Growth Conditions
The Hevea brasiliensis cultivars ReYan 7-33-97 seedlings were purchased from CATAS (Chinese Academy of Tropical Agricultural Sciences) and cultivated in pots in the greenhouse of Hainan University. In order to analyze the effect of ABA on Hevea brasiliensis cold tolerance, four-month-old Hevea brasiliensis seedlings were watered in the soil with water or ABA solution, and then transferred to plant growth chamber set at 10 °C. Phenotypic observation was carried at 7 days after treatment. To investigate the effect of ABA on the expression of HbSnRK2.6s and cold-responsive genes, ABA was sprayed onto the leaves of rubber tree seedlings. Leaves were collected at 0, 3, 6, 12, and 24 h after ABA treatment for RNA extraction.
Arabidopsis ecotype Columbia (Col) plants and overexpressing HbSnRK2.6A/B transgenic Arabidopsis lines were grown in a greenhouse at 23 °C under a 16:8 h light/ dark photoperiod. To generate the transgenic plants, the plants’ overexpression vectors, pBWA(v) harboring full-length cDNA of HbSnRK2.6A or HbSnRK2.6B, were transferred into wild-type Arabidopsis by an A. tumefaciens (GV3101)-mediated transformation and the floral dip method [68]. Transgenic lines were selected on 1/2 MS medium supplied with 30 μg mL−1 Basta resistance, and positive transgenic lines were confirmed by genomic PCR and RT-qPCR analyses. Primers used are listed in Supplementary Table S1. T4 transgenic plants were used for further analysis. For Arabidopsis cold tolerance, assays were performed as described by Yuan et al. [50].
4.2. Physiological Measurements
For physiological analyses, 4-month-old Hevea brasiliensis seedlings treated with 0 µM ABA or 50 µM ABA were placed in a growth chamber at 10 °C for the designated time points, and 14-day-old transgenic HbSnRK2.6A/B and WT Arabidopsis grown in nutrient soil were kept in a controlled-environment growth chamber at 4 °C for 0, 24, or 48 h. After treatment, leaves were collected, and then electrolyte leakage and proline accumulation were quantified, according to Yuan et al. [50]. Briefly, for electrolyte leakage measurement, the harvested leaves were placed in a bottle containing 40 mL deionized distilled water, and the bottle was shaken on a shaker at 120 rpm for 3 h at room temperature. The initial conductivity of sample (C1) was measured by a conductivity meter. After boiling the leaves for 30 min and shaking the bottle for 1 h at room temperature, the conductivity (C2) was measured. Electrolyte leakage was calculated using the following equation: C (%) = (C1/C2) × 100%. For proline content measurement, the collected leaves were weighed, and then extracted in 3% sulfosalicylic acid. The supernatant (2 mL) was mixed with glacial acetic acid (2 mL) and ninhydrin reagent (2 mL). After boiling the reaction mixture for 40 min, the reaction was terminated in an ice bath. The reaction mixture was extracted with toluene (5 mL) and the proline content was calculated based on the absorbance at 520 nm. MDA contents were measured, as previous described [69]. Briefly, MDA was extracted with thiobarbituric acid (TBA), and MDA content was calculated based on the absorbance at 450, 532, and 600 nm. Chlorophyll level was measured according to previous description [70].
4.3. RNA Extraction and qPCR Analysis
Total RNA from Hevea brasiliensis and Arabidopsis was extracted, according to manufacturer’s instructions (BioTeke, Beijing, China). First-strand complementary cDNA was synthesized using a commercial kit (K1622, Thermo Fischer, MA, USA). Quantitative real-time PCR (qRT-PCR) was performed, according to a previous description [50]. Briefly, qRT-PCR was carried out on an ABI-7500 real-time PCR system with SYBR green PCR Mix (TaKaRa, Tokyo, Japan). The genes HbeIF2 and AtEIF4 were chosen as reference genes for Hevea brasiliensis and Arabidopsis, respectively. The relative expression levels were normalized to reference genes through 2−∆∆CT method. Three independent biological replicates were used for data analysis, and each biological sample contained three technical replicates. The primers are listed in Supplementary Table S1.
4.4. Bioinformatics Analysis
To identify SnRK2.6s from Hevea brasiliensis, a BLAST was performed in the Hevea brasiliensis genome database using the coding sequence of Arabidopsis SnRK2.6 as the query sequence. Five sucrose nonfermenting1-related protein kinases were identified, which designated as SnRK2.6A–E. Sequence alignment was generated using the DNAMAN program. A neighbor-joining analysis was carried out to construct a phylogenetic tree by software MEGA 6.0.
4.5. Yeast Two-Hybrid Assays
The full-length cDNA sequences of HbSnRK2.6s were fused with GAL4 activation domain in the pGADT7 vector to get recombinant vectors, pGADT7-HbSnRK2.6s; the truncated CDS of HbICE2 (deletion of the N-terminal transactivation region at aa 1–80) was fused in frame downstream of the binding domain of pGBKT7 to generate pGBKT7-HbICE2-ΔN80. The primers are listed in Supplementary Table S1. The recombinant bait and prey constructs were co-transformed into AH109 yeast strain by the LiAc method, according to the manufacturer’s instructions (Clontech, San Francisco, CA, USA). Transformed colonies were screened on selective SD medium at 28 °C to test for possible interactions.
4.6. BiFC Assays
To generate the BiFC recombinant constructs, the ORFs without a stop codon of HbSnRK2.6s and HbICE2 were inserted into pSPYNE-35S and pSPYCE-35S vectors, respectively, and confirmed by sequencing. Primers are listed in Supplementary Table S1. The recombinant plasmids were transformed into Agrobacterium tumefaciens GV3101 strain. Rubber tree mesophyll cell protoplasts were extracted and transformed, as previously described [71]; transformed protoplasts were incubated for 12 h in low light situations, and then YFP fluorescence was detected by a Leica TCS SP8 confocal laser scanning microscope.
4.7. Subcellular Location
The cDNA sequences of HbSnRK2.6s were cloned into the pBWA(v)BS vector. For subcellular localization of HbSnRK2.6s in tobacco leaf epidermal cells, the Agrobacterium tumefaciens GV3101 strain containing recombinant constructs were infiltrated into N. benthamiana leaf, according to a previous study [72]. Two days after infiltration, HbSnRK2.6 subcellular locations were detected by visualizing GFP fluorescence under a Leica TCS S98 confocal laser scanning microscope. For subcellular localization of HbSnRK2.6s in rubber tree protoplasts, rubber tree mesophyll cell protoplast extraction and transformation were performed, as previously described [71]. After transformation for 12 h, GFP fluorescence was examined using confocal laser scanning microscope (Leica TCS SP8).
4.8. Transient Transactivation Assay
HbCBF1promoter was cloned to pGreenII0800-LUC to generate reporter construction 35S::REN-pHbCBF1::LUC, the full-length CDSs of HbICE2 and HbSnRK2.6s were under control of CaMV35S promoter to form effector plasmids pGreenII62-SK-HbICE2 and pGreenII62-SK-HbSnRK2.6s. The plasmids were introduced into Agrobacterium tumefaciens GV3101 strain. The transient expression was carried out in tobacco (N. benthamiana) leaves, based on a previous method [72]. The infected tobacco plants were grown at 25 °C for 2 days, and then exposed to 4 °C for 4 h. Transient expression was quantified by measuring relative LUC and REN activities using the Dual Luciferase Reporter Gene Assay Kit (RG027, Beyotime, Shanghai, China), according to the manufacturer’s instructions.
4.9. Statistical Analysis
All experiments were performed in three independent repetitions. All data are shown as means ± standard deviation (SD), which were statistically analyzed by ANOVA or by Student’s t-test using GraphPad PRISM v.8.0 software. Different asterisks indicate significant differences at *** p < 0.001, ** p < 0.01, and * p < 0.05.
Supplementary Materials
The following are available online at https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/ijms222312707/s1.
Author Contributions
H.-M.Y. conceived and designed the experiments; X.W., W.-C.L., X.-W.Z., S.Y., Y.-M.Q. and J.-B.W. performed experiments; X.H. helped to interpret data; H.-M.Y. wrote the manuscript; H.-M.Y. and W.-C.L. revised the manuscript; X.W. and W.-C.L. contributed equally to this work. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.
Funding
This research was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (31870245) and Hainan Provincial Natural Science Foundation of China (321RC478).
Institutional Review Board Statement
Not applicable.
Informed Consent Statement
Not applicable.
Data Availability Statement
Not applicable.
Conflicts of Interest
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
Footnotes
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
References
- 1.Van Beilen J.B., Poirier Y. Establishment of new crops for the production of natural rubber. Trends Biotechnol. 2007;25:522–529. doi: 10.1016/j.tibtech.2007.08.009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Priyadarshan P.M., Hoa T., Huasun H., De Gonalves P. Yielding Potential of Rubber (Hevea brasiliensis) in Sub-Optimal Environments. J. Crop Improv. 2005;14:221–247. doi: 10.1300/J411v14n01_10. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Mai J., Herbette S., Vandame M., Cavaloc E., Julien J.L., Ameglio T., Roeckel-Drevet P. Contrasting strategies to cope with chilling stress among clones of a tropical tree, Hevea brasiliensis. Tree Physiol. 2010;30:1391–1402. doi: 10.1093/treephys/tpq075. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Cheng H., Cai H., Fu H., An Z., Fang J., Hu Y., Guo D., Huang H. Functional Characterization of Hevea brasiliensis CRT/DRE Binding Factor 1 Gene Revealed Regulation Potential in the CBF Pathway of Tropical Perennial Tree. PLoS ONE. 2015;10:e0137634. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0137634. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Campos Mantello C., Boatwright L., da Silva C.C., Scaloppi E.J., Jr., de Souza Goncalves P., Barbazuk W.B., Pereira de Souza A. Deep expression analysis reveals distinct cold-response strategies in rubber tree (Hevea brasiliensis) BMC Genom. 2019;20:455. doi: 10.1186/s12864-019-5852-5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Cheng H., Chen X., Zhu J., Huang H. Overexpression of a Hevea brasiliensis ErbB-3 Binding protein 1 Gene Increases Drought Tolerance and Organ Size in Arabidopsis. Front. Plant Sci. 2016;7:1703. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2016.01703. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Guo X., Liu D., Chong K. Cold signaling in plants: Insights into mechanisms and regulation. J. Integr. Plant Biol. 2018;60:745–756. doi: 10.1111/jipb.12706. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Ding Y., Shi Y., Yang S. Advances and challenges in uncovering cold tolerance regulatory mechanisms in plants. New Phytol. 2019;222:1690–1704. doi: 10.1111/nph.15696. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Gong Z., Xiong L., Shi H., Yang S., Herrera-Estrella L.R., Xu G., Chao D.Y., Li J., Wang P.Y., Qin F., et al. Plant abiotic stress response and nutrient use efficiency. Sci. China Life Sci. 2020;63:635–674. doi: 10.1007/s11427-020-1683-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Ming R., Zhang Y., Wang Y., Khan M., Dahro B., Liu J.H. The JA-responsive MYC2-BADH-like transcriptional regulatory module in Poncirus trifoliata contributes to cold tolerance by modulation of glycine betaine biosynthesis. New Phytol. 2021;229:2730–2750. doi: 10.1111/nph.17063. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Zhang J., Li X.M., Lin H.X., Chong K. Crop Improvement Through Temperature Resilience. Annu. Rev. Plant Biol. 2019;70:753–780. doi: 10.1146/annurev-arplant-050718-100016. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Shi Y., Ding Y., Yang S.J.P., Physiology C. Cold Signal Transduction and its Interplay with Phytohormones during Cold Acclimation. Plant Cell Physiol. 2015;56:7–15. doi: 10.1093/pcp/pcu115. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Thomashow F.M. Plant Cold Acclimation: Freezing Tolerance Genes and Regulatory Mechanisms. Annu. Rev. Plant Phys. 1999;50:571–599. doi: 10.1146/annurev.arplant.50.1.571. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Chinnusamy V., Ohta M., Kanrar S., Lee B.H., Hong X., Agarwal M., Zhu J.K. Development, ICE1: A regulator of cold-induced transcriptome and freezing tolerance in Arabidopsis. Genes Dev. 2003;17:1043–1054. doi: 10.1101/gad.1077503. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Doherty C.J., Buskirk H.V., Myers S.J., Thomashow M.F. Roles for Arabidopsis CAMTA Transcription Factors in Cold-Regulated Gene Expression and Freezing Tolerance. Plant Cell. 2009;21:972–984. doi: 10.1105/tpc.108.063958. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Li H., Ye K., Shi Y., Cheng J., Zhang X., Yang S. BZR1 Positively Regulates Freezing Tolerance via CBF-Dependent and CBF-Independent Pathways in Arabidopsis. Mol. Plant. 2017;10:545–559. doi: 10.1016/j.molp.2017.01.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Eremina M., Unterholzner S.J., Rathnayake A.I., Castellanos M., Khan M., Kugler K.G., May S.T., Mayer K.F.X., Rozhon W., Poppenberger B. Brassinosteroids participate in the control of basal and acquired freezing tolerance of plants. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 2017;114:E1038–E1039. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1611477113. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Agarwal M., Hao Y., Kapoor A., Dong C.H., Fujii H., Zheng X., Zhu J.K. R2R3 type MYB transcription factor is involved in the cold regulation of CBF genes and in acquired freezing tolerance. J. Biol. Chem. 2006;281:37636–37645. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M605895200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Shi Y., Tian S., Hou L., Huang X., Zhang X., Guo H., Yang S. Ethylene signaling negatively regulates freezing tolerance by repressing expression of CBF and type-A ARR genes in Arabidopsis. Plant Cell. 2012;24:2578–2595. doi: 10.1105/tpc.112.098640. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Jiang B., Shi Y., Zhang X., Xin X., Yang S. PIF3 is a negative regulator of the CBF pathway and freezing tolerance in Arabidopsis. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 2017;114:E6695. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1706226114. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Ye K., Li H., Ding Y., Shi Y., Song C., Gong Z., Yang S. BRASSINOSTEROID-INSENSITIVE2 Negatively Regulates the Stability of Transcription Factor ICE1 in Response to Cold Stress in Arabidopsis. Plant Cell. 2019;31:2682–2696. doi: 10.1105/tpc.19.00058. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Miura K., Jin J.B., Lee J., Yoo C.Y., Stirm V., Miura T., Ashworth E.N., Bressan R.A., Yun D.-J., Hasegawa P.M. SIZ1-mediated sumoylation of ICE1 controls CBF3/DREB1A expression and freezing tolerance in Arabidopsis. Plant Cell. 2007;19:1403–1414. doi: 10.1105/tpc.106.048397. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Dong C.H., Agarwal M., Zhang Y., Xie Q., Zhu J.K. The negative regulator of plant cold responses, HOS1, is a RING E3 ligase that mediates the ubiquitination and degradation of ICE1. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 2006;103:8281–8286. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0602874103. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Zhang Z., Li J., Li F., Liu H., Yang W., Chong K., Xu Y. OsMAPK3 Phosphorylates OsbHLH002/OsICE1 and Inhibits Its Ubiquitination to Activate OsTPP1 and Enhances Rice Chilling Tolerance. Dev. Cell. 2017;43:731–743.e5. doi: 10.1016/j.devcel.2017.11.016. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Ding Y., Li H., Zhang X., Xie Q., Gong Z., Yang S. OST1 kinase modulates freezing tolerance by enhancing ICE1 stability in Arabidopsis. Dev. Cell. 2015;32:278–289. doi: 10.1016/j.devcel.2014.12.023. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Li H., Ding Y., Shi Y., Zhang X., Zhang S., Gong Z., Yang S. MPK3- and MPK6-Mediated ICE1 Phosphorylation Negatively Regulates ICE1 Stability and Freezing Tolerance in Arabidopsis. Dev. Cell. 2017;43:630–642.e4. doi: 10.1016/j.devcel.2017.09.025. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Shi Y., Ding Y., Yang S. Molecular Regulation of CBF Signaling in Cold Acclimation. Trends Plant Sci. 2018;23:623–637. doi: 10.1016/j.tplants.2018.04.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Barrero-Gil J., Salinas J.J.M.P. CBFs at the Crossroads of Plant Hormone Signaling in Cold Stress Response. Mol. Plant. 2017;10:542–544. doi: 10.1016/j.molp.2017.03.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Heidari P., Entazari M., Ebrahimi A., Ahmadizadeh M., Vannozzi A., Palumbo F., Barcaccia G. Exogenous EBR Ameliorates Endogenous Hormone Contents in Tomato Species under Low-Temperature Stress. Horticulturae. 2021;7:84. doi: 10.3390/horticulturae7040084. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Hu Y., Jiang L., Wang F., Yu D. Jasmonate regulates the inducer of cbf expression-C-repeat binding factor/DRE binding factor1 cascade and freezing tolerance in Arabidopsis. Plant Cell. 2013;25:2907–2924. doi: 10.1105/tpc.113.112631. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Mantyla E., Lang V., Palva E.T. Role of Abscisic Acid in Drought-Induced Freezing Tolerance, Cold Acclimation, and Accumulation of LT178 and RAB18 Proteins in Arabidopsis thaliana. Plant Physiol. 1995;107:141–148. doi: 10.1104/pp.107.1.141. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Mustilli A.C., Merlot S., Vavasseur A., Fenzi F., Giraudat J. Arabidopsis OST1 protein kinase mediates the regulation of stomatal aperture by abscisic acid and acts upstream of reactive oxygen species production. Plant Cell. 2002;14:3089–3099. doi: 10.1105/tpc.007906. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Ma Y., Szostkiewicz I., Korte A., Moes D., Yang Y., Christmann A., Grill E. Regulators of PP2C phosphatase activity function as abscisic acid sensors. Science. 2009;324:1064–1068. doi: 10.1126/science.1172408. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Park S.Y., Fung P., Nishimura N., Jensen D.R., Fujii H., Zhao Y., Lumba S., Santiago J., Rodrigues A., Chow T.F., et al. Abscisic acid inhibits type 2C protein phosphatases via the PYR/PYL family of START proteins. Science. 2009;324:1068–1071. doi: 10.1126/science.1173041. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Vlad F., Rubio S., Rodrigues A., Sirichandra C., Belin C., Robert N., Leung J., Rodriguez P.L., Lauriere C., Merlot S. Protein phosphatases 2C regulate the activation of the Snf1-related kinase OST1 by abscisic acid in Arabidopsis. Plant Cell. 2009;21:3170–3184. doi: 10.1105/tpc.109.069179. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Tischer S.V., Wunschel C., Papacek M., Kleigrewe K., Hofmann T., Christmann A., Grill E.J. Combinatorial interaction network of abscisic acid receptors and coreceptors from Arabidopsis thaliana. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 2017;114:10280–10285. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1706593114. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Umezawa T., Sugiyama N., Mizoguchi M., Hayashi S., Myouga F., Yamaguchi-Shinozaki K., Ishihama Y., Hirayama T., Shinozaki K. Type 2C protein phosphatases directly regulate abscisic acid-activated protein kinases in Arabidopsis. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 2009;106:17588–17593. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0907095106. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Zhu J.K. Abiotic Stress Signaling and Responses in Plants. Cell. 2016;167:313–324. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2016.08.029. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Geiger D., Scherzer S., Mumm P., Stange A., Marten I., Bauer H., Ache P., Matschi S., Liese A., Al-Rasheid K. Activity of guard cell anion channel SLAC1 is controlled by drought-stress signaling kinase-phosphatase pair. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 2009;106:21425–21430. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0912021106. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Nakashima K., Fujita Y., Kanamori N., Katagiri T., Umezawa T., Kidokoro S., Maruyama K., Yoshida T., Ishiyama K., Kobayashi M., et al. Three Arabidopsis SnRK2 protein kinases, SRK2D/SnRK2.2, SRK2E/SnRK2.6/OST1 and SRK2I/SnRK2.3, involved in ABA signaling are essential for the control of seed development and dormancy. Plant Cell Physiol. 2009;50:1345–1363. doi: 10.1093/pcp/pcp083. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Yoshida R., Hobo T., Ichimura K., Mizoguchi T., Takahashi F., Aronso J., Ecker J.R., Shinozaki K. ABA-activated SnRK2 protein kinase is required for dehydration stress signaling in Arabidopsis. Plant Cell Physiol. 2002;43:1473–1483. doi: 10.1093/pcp/pcf188. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Han Y., Dang R., Li J., Jiang J., Zhang N., Jia M., Wei L., Li Z., Li B., Jia W. Sucrose Nonfermenting1-Related Protein Kinase2.6, an Ortholog of OPEN STOMATA1, Is a Negative Regulator of Strawberry Fruit Development and Ripening. Plant Physiol. 2015;167:915–930. doi: 10.1104/pp.114.251314. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Wang X., Wang L., Wang Y., Liu H., Hu D., Zhang N., Zhang S., Cao H., Cao Q., Zhang Z., et al. Arabidopsis PCaP2 Plays an Important Role in Chilling Tolerance and ABA Response by Activating CBF- and SnRK2-Mediated Transcriptional Regulatory Network. Front. Plant Sci. 2018;9:215. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2018.00215. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Ding Y., Jia Y., Shi Y., Zhang X., Song C., Gong Z., Yang S. OST1-mediated BTF3L phosphorylation positively regulates CBFs during plant cold responses. EMBO J. 2018;37:e98228. doi: 10.15252/embj.201798228. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Zhang X., Fowler S.G., Cheng H., Lou Y., Rhee S.Y., Stockinger E.J., Thomashow M.F. Freezing-sensitive tomato has a functional CBF cold response pathway, but a CBF regulon that differs from that of freezing-tolerant Arabidopsis. Plant J. 2004;39:905–919. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-313X.2004.02176.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Heidari P. Comparative Analysis of C-repeat Binding Factors (CBFs) in Tomato and Arabidopsis. Braz. Arch. Biol. Technol. 2019;62 doi: 10.1590/1678-4324-2019180715. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Tang C., Yang M., Fang Y., Luo Y., Gao S., Xiao X., An Z., Zhou B., Zhang B., Tan X., et al. The rubber tree genome reveals new insights into rubber production and species adaptation. Nat. Plants. 2016;2:16073. doi: 10.1038/nplants.2016.73. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Liu J., Shi C., Shi C.C., Li W., Zhang Q.J., Zhang Y., Li K., Lu H.F., Shi C., Zhu T.-S., et al. The Chromosome-Based Rubber Tree Genome Provides New Insights into Spurge Genome Evolution and Rubber Biosynthesis. Mol. Plant. 2020;13:336–350. doi: 10.1016/j.molp.2019.10.017. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Chen W.J., Wang X., Yan S., Huang X., Yuan H.M. The ICE-like transcription factor HbICE2 is involved in jasmonate-regulated cold tolerance in the rubber tree (Hevea brasiliensis) Plant Cell Rep. 2019;38:699–714. doi: 10.1007/s00299-019-02398-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50.Yuan H.M., Sheng Y., Chen W.J., Lu Y.Q., Tang X., Ou-Yang M., Huang X. Overexpression of Hevea brasiliensis HbICE1 Enhances Cold Tolerance in Arabidopsis. Front. Plant Sci. 2017;8:1462. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2017.01462. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51.Chen K., Li G.J., Bressan R.A., Song C.P., Zhu J.K., Zhao Y. Abscisic acid dynamics, signaling, and functions in plants. J. Integr. Plant Biol. 2020;62:25–54. doi: 10.1111/jipb.12899. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52.Yoshida R., Umezawa T., Mizoguchi T., Takahashi S., Takahashi F., Shinozaki K. The regulatory domain of SRK2E/OST1/SnRK2.6 interacts with ABI1 and integrates abscisic acid (ABA) and osmotic stress signals controlling stomatal closure in Arabidopsis. J. Biol. Chem. 2006;281:5310–5318. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M509820200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53.Chen S., Jia H., Wang X., Shi C., Wang X., Ma P., Wang J., Ren M., Li J. Hydrogen Sulfide Positively Regulates Abscisic Acid Signaling through Persulfidation of SnRK2.6 in Guard Cells. Mol. Plant. 2020;13:732–744. doi: 10.1016/j.molp.2020.01.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54.Tungngoen K., Viboonjun U., Kongsawadworakul P., Katsuhara M., Julien J.L., Sakr S., Chrestin H., Narangajavana J. Hormonal treatment of the bark of rubber trees (Hevea brasiliensis) increases latex yield through latex dilution in relation with the differential expression of two aquaporin genes. J. Plant Physiol. 2011;168:253–262. doi: 10.1016/j.jplph.2010.06.009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55.Guo D., Li H.L., Tang X., Peng S.Q. Molecular and functional characterization of the HbSRPP promoter in response to hormones and abiotic stresses. Transgenic Res. 2014;23:331–340. doi: 10.1007/s11248-013-9753-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 56.Liu Z., Ge X., Yang Z., Zhang C., Zhao G., Chen E., Liu J., Zhang X., Li F. Genome-wide identification and characterization of SnRK2 gene family in cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.) BMC Genet. 2017;18:54. doi: 10.1186/s12863-017-0517-3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 57.Ng L.M., Soon F.F., Zhou X.E., West G.M., Kovach A., Suino-Powell K.M., Chalmers M.J., Li J., Yong E.L., Zhu J.K. Structural basis for basal activity and autoactivation of abscisic acid (ABA) signaling SnRK2 kinases. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 2011;108:21259–21264. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1118651109. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 58.Zhang H., Li W., Mao X., Jing R., Jia H. Differential Activation of the Wheat SnRK2 Family by Abiotic Stresses. Front. Plant Sci. 2016;7:420. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2016.00420. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 59.Chen G., Wang J., Qiao X., Jin C., Duan W., Sun X., Wu J. Genome-wide survey of sucrose non-fermenting 1-related protein kinase 2 in Rosaceae and expression analysis of PbrSnRK2 in response to ABA stress. BMC Genom. 2020;21:781. doi: 10.1186/s12864-020-07201-w. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 60.Sah S.K., Reddy K.R., Li J. Abscisic Acid and Abiotic Stress Tolerance in Crop Plants. Front Plant Sci. 2016;7:571. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2016.00571. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 61.Kumar S., Kaur G., Nayyar H. Exogenous Application of Abscisic Acid Improves Cold Tolerance in Chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) J. Agron. Crop. Sci. 2010;194:449–456. [Google Scholar]
- 62.Kim Y.H., Choi K.I., Khan A.L., Waqas M., Lee I.J. Exogenous application of abscisic acid regulates endogenous gibberellins homeostasis and enhances resistance of oriental melon (Cucumis melo var. L.) against low temperature. Sci. Hortic. 2016;207:41–47. doi: 10.1016/j.scienta.2016.05.009. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 63.Huang X., Shi H., Hu Z., Ao L., Erick A., Chen L., Fu J. ABA Is Involved in Regulation of Cold Stress Response in Bermudagrass. Front. Plant Sci. 2017;8:1613. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2017.01613. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 64.Ding Y., Lv J., Shi Y., Gao J., Hua J., Song C., Gong Z., Yang S. EGR2 phosphatase regulates OST1 kinase activity and freezing tolerance in Arabidopsis. EMBO J. 2019;38:e99819. doi: 10.15252/embj.201899819. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 65.Song Y., Zhang X., Li M., Yang H., Fu D., Lv J., Ding Y., Gong Z., Shi Y., Yang S. The direct targets of CBFs: In cold stress response and beyond. J. Integr. Plant Biol. 2021;63:1874–1887. doi: 10.1111/jipb.13161. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 66.Shimazaki K., Doi M., Assmann S.M., Kinoshita T. Light regulation of stomatal movement. Annu Rev. Plant Biol. 2007;58:219–247. doi: 10.1146/annurev.arplant.57.032905.105434. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 67.Munemasa S., Hauser F., Park J., Waadt R., Brandt B., Schroeder J.I. Mechanisms of abscisic acid-mediated control of stomatal aperture. Curr. Opin. Plant Biol. 2015;28:154–162. doi: 10.1016/j.pbi.2015.10.010. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 68.Clough S.J., Bent A.F. Floral dip: A simplified method forAgrobacterium-mediated transformation of Arabidopsis thaliana. Plant J. 1998;16:735–743. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-313x.1998.00343.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 69.Cai W., Liu W., Wang W.S., Fu Z.W., Han T.T., Lu Y.T. Overexpression of Rat Neurons Nitric Oxide Synthase in Rice Enhances Drought and Salt Tolerance. PLoS ONE. 2015;10:e0131599. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0131599. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 70.Liu J.H., Inoue H., Moriguchi T.J.E., Botany E. Salt stress-mediated changes in free polyamine titers and expression of genes responsible for polyamine biosynthesis of apple in vitro shoots. Environ. Exp. Bot. 2008;62:28–35. doi: 10.1016/j.envexpbot.2007.07.002. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 71.Zhang H., Mao X., Wang C., Jing R. Overexpression of a Common Wheat Gene TaSnRK2.8 Enhances Tolerance to Drought, Salt and Low Temperature in Arabidopsis. PLoS ONE. 2010;5:e16041. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0016041. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 72.Sparkes I.A., Runions J., Kearns A., Hawes C. Rapid, transient expression of fluorescent fusion proteins in tobacco plants and generation of stably transformed plants. Nat. Protoc. 2006;1:2019–2025. doi: 10.1038/nprot.2006.286. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Supplementary Materials
Data Availability Statement
Not applicable.