In the original article, there was a mistake in Figure 11 as published. In Figures 11D, E , we put the wrong pictures of wound healing assay in NC group at 0 h of both conditions. We made a mistake when we dragged the original figure into the AI software. We re-examined the original experiment notes and confirmed that this omission did not affect the statistical results and conclusions. The corrected Figure 11 appears below.
The authors apologize for this error and state that this does not change the scientific conclusions of the article in any way. The original article has been updated.
Publisher’s Note
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.