Abstract
In this study, single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) in the ANXA9 (annexin 9), FASN (fatty acid synthase) and SCD1 (stearoyl-CoA desaturase 1) genes were analyzed as factors influencing fatty acid profiles in milk from Zošľachtená valaška sheep. SNP in selected genes was identified using polymerase chain reaction (PCR) and restriction fragment length polymorphism (PCR–RFLP). The long-chain fatty acids profile in sheep milk was identified by gas chromatography. Statistical analysis of the SCD1/Cfr13I polymorphism showed that the milk of the homozygous AA animals was characterized by a lower (P < 0.05) share of C4:0, C6:0, C8:0, C10:0, C12:0, C14:0 in comparison to the homozygous CC sheep. The milk of heterozygous sheep was characterized by a higher (P < 0.05) proportion of C13:0 acid compared to the milk of sheep with the homozygous AA type. A higher (P < 0.05) level of saturated fatty acids (SFA) was found in the milk of CC genotype sheep compared to the AA genotype. Our results lead to the conclusion that the greatest changes were observed for the SCD1/Cfr13I polymorphism and the least significant ones for FASN/AciI. Moreover, it is the first evidence that milk from sheep with SCD1/Cfr13I polymorphism and the homozygous AA genotype showed the most desirable fatty acids profile.
Subject terms: Biotechnology, Genetics
Introduction
Diseases of Civilization and the rapid development of food production have resulted in new consumer food trends. Modern consumers are looking for products rich in valuable nutrients, vitamins and substances that have a positive effect on human health. In contrast, excessive consumption of the SFA highly increases coronary disease risk, diabetes, obesity, atherosclerosis, and high low-density lipoprotein (LDL) levels1. In food, unsaturated fatty acids have pro-health properties, in particular, they contribute to reducing blood cholesterol2. The most desirable fatty acids in the human diet are conjugated linoleic acid (CLA), eicosapentaenoic acid (C20:5n-3, EPA) and docosahexaenoic acid (C22:6n-3, DHA), which play an important role in preventing cancer, cardiovascular, autoimmune, and psychological diseases3,4.
Sheep milk is a rich source of unsaturated fatty acids compared to cow and goat milk5. The composition of milk, including the fatty acids profile, is determined by environmental and genetic factors6–10 and was valuably reviewed by Lazar et al.11.
The candidate gene approach is applied concerning genes whose products might affect production traits. The most extensively studied genes are genes encoding milk proteins (e.g. caseins), hormones and their receptors. Other genes of interest in this area include genes encoding enzymes that participate in fatty acid metabolism as well as genes encoding fatty acid binding and transport proteins12.
Fatty acid synthase (FAS) encoded by the FASN gene is a multifunctional homodimeric enzyme that catalyzes the synthesis of fatty acids (FA), plays a key role in the synthesis of short- and medium-chain fatty acids in mammals13,14. Additionally, which is important in the adult life of mammals, it determines the energy homeostasis of the organism and is involved in the production of milk lipids during lactation15. Annexin 9 (ANXA9) encoded by the ANXA9 gene is a phospholipid and Ca2+ binding protein. It is also involved in the transport across the cytoplasmic membrane, which is important in the mammary gland16. On the other hand, stearoyl-CoA desaturase 1 (SCD1) encoded by the SCD1 gene is the key and a rate-limiting enzyme involved in the metabolism of mammary lipids and is responsible for the conversion of SFA into monounsaturated fatty acids (MUFA). Also be a key enzyme in the production of the cis-9, trans-11 isomer of conjugated CLA. CLA can be found in ruminant milk and tissue fat and is considered a beneficial effect on human health17,18.
Dairy sheep farming systems vary from extensive to intensive according to the economic relevance of the production chain and the specific environment and breed19. Only a few publications have comparative values of milk composition for different breeds of sheep and milk energy of sheep breeds, but milk components were not different among breeds19.
The available literature data have shown the effects of SNP on the basic composition and protein fractions in sheep milk, however, each variant of the polymorphism was considered separately for each of the FASN, ANXA9 and SCD1 genotypes8,20,21. Therefore, an attempt was made to determine which of the studied polymorphisms has a more significant impact on the proportion of fatty acids in sheep milk and could be the best candidate marker. Additionally, Zošľachtená valaška sheep are a local Slovak breed, which opens up prospects for future selection programs and animal protection strategies. For this purpose, this study analyzed SNP polymorphisms in the ANXA9, FASN and SCD1 genes as a factor influencing the fatty acid profile in the milk of Zošľachtená valaška sheep.
Materials and methods
Animals and nutrition
The experiment was carried out in a flock of sheep of the Zošľachtená valaška a perspective breed, mainly for mountainous areas, which is included in the native Slovak breed. They are bred in the three Slovak regions (Spiš, Orava, and Liptov). The breed was generated by the intentionally combined crossing of Native Wallachian sheep with the rams of various imported breeds as, Cheviot, Hampshire, Lincoln, Texel and Leicester. The targeted crossing breed resulted in the improvement of the qualitative and quantitative properties of wool production, live weight, milk production while maintaining good walking ability and adaptation to worse climatic conditions and was recognized as a semi-fat breed with combined performance parameters (meat, milk, wool). The breeding program of Zošľachtená valaška sheep is aimed at improving genetic indicators and is still being developed towards breed, aimed at improving the production of milk and meat, and thus creating a meat-and-dairy utility type, therefore it is genetically interesting for study genes polymorphism involved in milk production according to their function and effects. At present, 128,930 animals of this breed are kept in Slovakia22. Animals of this breed are characterized by good adaptation to difficult mountain conditions. Ewes weigh from 50 to 55 kg, they are seasonally polyoestrous during the fall season (October – November). Breed, age and stage of lactation have a significant impact on changes in sheep's milk. Therefore, fifty sheep were selected from a herd, taking into account age and lactation stage to eliminate the main variables influencing milk parameters. After lamb weaning, the ewes produced 80–120 kg of milk during the 150 days of lactation.
Ethical statement
All methods and procedures strictly complied with the “Regulation on the Studying Procedures and Principles of Animal Experiments of Ethics Committees” and were approved by the Veterinary Care of the University of Veterinary Medicine and Pharmacy in Košice, permission number IČO 00,397,474 2015, licensed by the Ministry of Education, Sciences, Research and Sport of the Slovak Republic All animals used in this study were handled in strict accordance with good clinical practices following EU legislation (Council Directive 2010/63/EU), and all efforts were made to minimize suffering.
Milk and blood sampling
The material for the study was collected from 50 ewes in the similar phase of milking (25–30 days of lactation) and lactation (1st and 2nd lactation). In the lambing period, the sheep were kept in sheepfold complying with the European Union Directive (No. 116, item 778, 2010) and were fed hay ad libitum, 250 g/ewe/day of wheat middlings, and 3 kg/ewe/day of haylage. To collect milk samples from ewes, their lambs were separated overnight. The milk was collected into sterile containers and transported to the laboratory at 4 °C. Besides, peripheral blood samples were collected from the external jugular vein (EJV) of ewes into test tubes containing anticoagulant (tripotassium ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid, K3EDTA) for DNA isolation and immediately transported to the laboratory, and frozen at − 20 °C for subsequent analysis.
Genetic polymorphism analysis
DNA isolation was performed using the MasterPure DNA Purification Kit for Blood, Version II (Lucigen, Middleton, WI, USA) according to the manufacturer's instructions. Animal genotyping was performed using PCR–RFLP. Three SNPs in the ANXA9 gene (intron 4, intron 5, GenBank: AY785286.1) and one in the FASN gene (exon 32, GenBank: GQ150557.1) and SCD1 (promoter region, GenBank: FJ513370.1) were analyzed. Table 1 shows the location of individual SNPs and the appropriate primers, designed using the Primer3 software (http://bioinfo.ut.ee/primer3-0.4.0/), enabling the amplification of selected fragments of the analyzed genes. In the case of the reverse primer for the FASN gene, a mismatched nucleotide was introduced to create a cleavage site for the enzyme (this nucleotide is underlined in Table 1). The polymerase chain reaction (PCR) reaction was performed in a final volume of 25 μl, using 2 × PCR Master Mix (A&A Biotechnology, Gdynia, Poland),) containing 50 ng genomic DNA and 5 pmol of each primer. DNA amplification was performed using an initial denaturation at 94 °C for 5 min, followed by 30 cycles of 30 s denaturation at 94 °C each, annealing at a temperature appropriate for each gene for 30 s and extension at 72 °C for 30 s, ending with a final extension of 8 min at 72 °C (Table 1).
Table 1.
Gene | Location | Primer Sequence (5′–3′) | Annealing temperature |
---|---|---|---|
SCD1 Chromosome 22 |
Promoter region (31 C > A) |
F: CAGGGGCAGGGGCAGAGGCA R: CGCTGGCAGCCGGTGACTGTG |
62 °C |
FASN Chromosome 11 |
Exon 32 (257 C > T) |
F: TGAGATGGGGCAGCAGGCCT R: GGAACACTGTTCGCTTGCGGG |
60 °C |
ANXA9 Chromosome 1 |
Intron 4 (c.172 + 181G > A) Intron 4 (c.173-27C > G) Intron 5 (c.267 + 103C > A) |
F: CATTCCTGTGTGTCCGGTAC R: TCATCTCAGACCTAACCACCA |
50 °C |
After the amplification of selected fragments of SCD1, FASN and ANXA9 genes, the identification of polymorphic loci in these genes was carried out using appropriately selected restriction enzymes. Individual PCR products were digested separately with restriction enzymes according to the manufacturer's recommendations. Next, the restriction fragments were separated on agarose gels with appropriately selected agarose concentrations. The restriction enzymes and the obtained restriction fragments for individual genotypes are presented in Table 2.
Table 2.
Gene | Product size (bp) | Restriction enzyme | Size of RFLP band (bp) |
---|---|---|---|
SCD1 | 225 | Cfr13I |
CC: 194, 31 CA: 225, 194, 31 AA: 225 |
FASN | 275 | AciI |
CC: 149, 107, 19 CT: 168, 149, 107, 19 TT: 168, 107 |
ANXA9 | 675 | NlaIII |
GG: 252, 177, 175, 71 GA: 252, 248, 177, 175, 71 AA: 252, 248, 175 |
HinfI |
GG: 366, 162 147, GC: 366, 227, 162 147,139 CC: 227, 162,147, 139 |
||
Tru1 |
CC: 450, 225 CA: 450, 389, 225, 61 AA: 389, 225, 61 |
Fatty acids analysis
Fats were extracted from the milk samples using the Folch method23. Next, the obtained fat was converted to fatty acid methyl esters using the Christopherson and Glass procedure (1969)24 with 2 M KOH in methanol. The fatty acid profile was determined, by using a gas chromatography method (Agilent Technologies 7890A, Agilent Technologies, Santa Clara, CA, USA), with a flame ionization detector and an HP-88 capillary column designed for the separation of fatty acid methyl esters (FAMEs) (100 m length, 25 mm i.d. × 0.20 μm). The initial oven temperature was 50 °C and was increased by 3 °C/min to 220 °C. The detector and dispenser temperatures were − 270 °C and 270 respectively.
To analyse experimental chromatograms a comparative analysis of the retention times of the fatty acid methyl ester standards (Sigma-Aldrich) was performed using the ChemStation software (Agilent Technologies, USA).
The desaturase index was also calculated of fatty acids as a ratio of unsaturated cis-9 to unsaturated + saturated cis-9 for different FAs25,27 as follows.
C14:1 cis-9 to C14:1 cis-9 + C14:0: desaturation index for C14:0;
C16:1 cis-9 to C16:1 cis-9 + C16:0: desaturation index for C16:0;
C18:1 cis-9 to C18:1 cis-9 + C18:0: desaturation index for C18:0;
CLA to CLA + trans 18:1: desaturation index for CLA.
Statistical analysis
The frequencies of genotypes and alleles and the Hardy–Weinberg equilibrium for individual SNPs were calculated using the POPGENE software27, the effective number of alleles (Ne) was evaluated according to Kimura and Crow (1964)28 and expected heterozygosity (He) and the polymorphism information content (PIC) were evaluated according to Nei's methods29.
The statistical analysis of the influence of selected SNPs on the fatty acid profile in sheep milk was carried out in the Statistica 13.1 program (StatSoft Poland, Krakow, Poland). The results of the study were statistically analyzed using one-way ANOVA followed by a multiple comparisons Tukey Post-Hoc Test. Pearson correlation coefficient (r) with a two-tailed test of significance was conducted to examine the relationship between certain parameters.
The statistical analysis was performed using the following model:
where yij—analysed trait, µ—overall mean, ai—the effect of genotype on trait value, and eij—the effect of random error.
The correlation coefficients have been calculated with the following formula:
ARRIVE guidelines
The present study has been carried out in accordance with ARRIVE guidelines.
Results
The analysis of the obtained genotyping results suggested that for almost all polymorphic loci tested, the presence of all three possible genotypes was identified; only in the FASN gene, two out of three possible genotypes were identified. Table 3 shows the frequencies of genotypes and alleles and the expected heterozygosity, the effective number of alleles, PIC, and the value of χ2 calculated based on genotyping results.
Table 3.
Polymorphism | n | Genotype frequencies | Allele frequencies | He | Ne | PIC | HWE | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
χ2 | P value | |||||||||
SCD1/Cfr13I |
5 27 18 |
AA AC CC |
0.10 0.54 0.36 |
A C |
0.37 0.63 |
0.466 | 1.150 | 0.358 | 1.253 | 0.263 |
ANXA9/NlaIII |
23 20 7 |
GG GA AA |
0.46 0.40 0.14 |
G A |
0.66 0.34 |
0.449 | 1.814 | 0.348 | 0.591 | 0.442 |
ANXA9/HinfI |
22 12 18 |
GG CG CC |
0.32 0.44 0.24 |
G C |
0.54 0.46 |
0.497 | 1.987 | 0.373 | 14.923 | 0.0001 |
ANXA9/ Tru1 |
18 21 11 |
CC CA AA |
0.36 0.42 0.22 |
C A |
0.57 0.43 |
0.490 | 1.962 | 0.370 | 1.025 | 0.311 |
n – animal numbers; He – expected heterozygosity; Ne – effective number of alleles; PIC polymorphic information content, HWE Hardy–Weinberg equilibrium.
The expected heterozygosity for almost all examined loci was quite similar and ranged from 0.449 to 0.497; the only exception was the FASN polymorphism where two out of three genotypes were identified. In the case of the effective number of alleles, similar values were observed for most of the analyzed SNPs in the range of 1.814–1.987, except for the SCD1 genes, where this value was 1.150. The PIC value for all tested SNPs was similar and ranged from 0.311 to 0.373, that according to the classification of Botstein et al. (1980)30 indicates an average polymorphism (0.25 < PIC value < 0.5). The next analyzed parameter was the Hardy–Weinberg equilibrium value (HWE). The distribution of genotypes consistent with the HWE was at P > 0.05. The analysis of the results collected in Table 3 shows that the ANXA9/HinfI polymorphism was found to be incompatible with the Hardy–Weinberg equilibrium. We also assessed the effects of SNPs within the fatty acid synthase gene (FASN), however, we detected only two genotypes (CC, CT) out of 3 FASN/AciI polymorphisms (without TT). Due to this, we did not calculate HWE for FASN/AciI.
The profile of individual saturated fatty acids in sheep milk in relation to individual genotypes of the studied polymorphisms of the SCD1 and FASN genes is presented in Table 4. Statistical analysis for the SCD1/Cfr13I polymorphism showed that the milk of individuals with the homozygous AA genotype was characterized by a lower (P < 0.05) share of butanoic acid (C4:0), hexanoic acid (C6:0), octanoic acid (C8:0), decanoic acid (C10:0), dodecane (C12:0), tetradecanoate (C14:0) than the homozygous CC sheep. On the other hand, the milk of sheep with the heterozygous genotype was characterized by a higher (P < 0.05) share of tridecanoic acid (C13:0) as compared to the milk of sheep with the AA genotype. A higher (P < 0.05) total level of saturated fatty acids (SFA) was found in the milk of the homozygous CC sheep compared to those of the homozygous AA genotype.
Table 4.
SCD1/Cfr13I | FASN/AciI | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
AA | CA | CC | CC | CT | |
SCFA | |||||
C4:0 | 0.53 ± 0.17a | 0.54 ± 0.21 | 0.67 ± 0.28b | 0.59 ± 0.23 | 0.58 ± 0.29 |
C6:0 | 0.68 ± 0.19a | 0.75 ± 0.17 | 0.85 ± 0.21b | 0.78 ± 0.19 | 0.77 ± 0.21 |
C8:0 | 0.81 ± 0.21a | 0.92 ± 0.20 | 1.00 ± 0.20b | 0.94 ± 0.21 | 0.95 ± 0.18 |
C10:0 | 2.79 ± 0.86a | 3.25 ± 0.71 | 3.45 ± 0.72b | 3.25 ± 0.76 | 3.46 ± 0.55 |
Total | 4.80 ± 1.38 | 5.47 ± 1.11 | 5.96 ± 1.26 | 5.77 ± 1.07 | 5.56 ± 1.24 |
LCFA | |||||
C12:0 | 1.92 ± 0.38a | 2.15 ± 0.34 | 2.31 ± 0.40b | 2.17 ± 0.40 | 2.29 ± 0.16 |
C13:0 | 0.03 ± 0.05a | 0.06 ± 0.02b | 0.05 ± 0.02 | 0.05 ± 0.03 | 0.07 ± 0.02 |
C14:0 | 7.22 ± 0.65a | 7.74 ± 0.81 | 8.18 ± 0.89b | 7.83 ± 0.91 | 8.01 ± 0.59 |
C15:0 | 1.10 ± 0.19 | 1.09 ± 0.19 | 1.12 ± 0.06 | 1.07 ± 0.16 | 1.16 ± 0.19 |
C16:0 | 21.44 ± 0.95 | 22.03 ± 1.15 | 21.81 ± 1.44 | 21.90 ± 1.29 | 21.89 ± 1.02 |
C17:0 | 1.09 ± 0.08 | 1.01 ± 0.11 | 1.01 ± 0.12 | 1.03 ± 0.11 | 0.98 ± 0.10 |
C18:0 | 12.61 ± 0.16 | 11.48 ± 1.41 | 12.33 ± 1.74 | 11.91 ± 1.58 | 11.83 ± 1.31 |
C20:0 | 0.31 ± 0.04 | 0.32 ± 0.04 | 0.33 ± 0.06 | 0.32 ± 0.05 | 0.34 ± 0.05 |
Total | 45.70 ± 1.64 | 45.88 ± 2.13 | 47.08 ± 1.19 | 46.55 ± 1.33 | 46.27 ± 1.95 |
ƩSFA% | 50.49 ± 2.85a | 51.32 ± 2.85 | 53.02 ± 1.84b | 51.80 ± 2.71 | 52.30 ± 2.27 |
SCFA short-chain fatty acids, LCFA long-chain fatty acids, SFA saturated fatty acids.
Mean ± SD values within the same row sharing a different superscript letter (a, b, c, etc.) are significantly different (P < 0.05).
Table 5 presents the share of unsaturated fatty acids in sheep milk in relation to the studied polymorphisms of the SCD1 and FASN genes. The analysis of the SCD1/Cfr13I polymorphism revealed that the proportion of (Z)-11-eicosenoic acid (C20:1) in milk was lower (P < 0.05) in the homozygous AA sheep in relation to the heterozygous and homozygous CC individuals. Higher (P < 0.05) levels of MUFA were noted in the homozygous AA individuals compared to the homozygous CC individuals. The relationship for all cis-5,8,11,14,17-eicosapentaenoic acid (C20:5n3) was reverse: in the milk of the homozygous AA sheep the level of this acid was lower (P < 0.05) compared to individuals with the CC genotype. The polymorphism in the FASN gene will not statistically affect the fatty acid profile in sheep milk. For the remaining saturated and saturated fatty acids in milk, no statistical effect of polymorphisms for the SCD1 gene was observed. Polymorphism in the FASN, SDC and ANXA9 genes did not affect the desaturase index in sheep milk (Tables 5 and 7).
Table 5.
SCD1/Cfr13I | FASN/AciI | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
AA | CA | CC | CC | CT | |
MUFA | |||||
C14:1 | 0.53 ± 0.15 | 0.57 ± 0.09 | 0.56 ± 0.08 | 0.56 ± 0.09 | 0.62 ± 0.08 |
C16:1 | 5.63 ± 0.66 | 5.78 ± 0.73 | 5.44 ± 0.64 | 5.59 ± 0.69 | 5.93 ± 0.75 |
C17:1 | 0.53 ± 0.08 | 0.50 ± 0.06 | 0.49 ± 0.06 | 0.50 ± 0.06 | 0.48 ± 0.06 |
C18:1n9c | 23.57 ± 1.35 | 22.75 ± 2.31 | 21.85 ± 1.67 | 22.66 ± 2.16 | 21.51 ± 0.94 |
C18:1n9t | 1.92 ± 0.51 | 1.84 ± 0.37 | 1.88 ± 0.49 | 1.85 ± 0.37 | 1.94 ± 0.66 |
C18:1n7t | 2.27 ± 0.19 | 2.15 ± 0.27 | 2.06 ± 0.27 | 2.13 ± 0.28 | 2.09 ± 0.23 |
C20:1 | 0.06 ± 0.04a | 0.08 ± 0.03b | 0.08 ± 0.02b | 0.08 ± 0.03 | 0.08 ± 0.02 |
Σ MUFA | 34.51 ± 2.00b | 33.66 ± 2.29 | 32.36 ± 1.60a | 32.63 ± 1.24 | 33.36 ± 2.24 |
PUFA | |||||
C18:2n6c | 1.91 ± 0.33 | 1.76 ± 0.29 | 1.77 ± 0.23 | 1.78 ± 0.27 | 1.74 ± 0.31 |
CLA | 1.29 ± 0.12 | 1.25 ± 0.27 | 1.19 ± 0.15 | 1.24 ± 0.23 | 1.22 ± 0.18 |
C18:3n3 | 1.46 ± 0.08 | 1.53 ± 0.23 | 1.48 ± 0.19 | 1.53 ± 0.21 | 1.35 ± 0.10 |
C20:4n6 | 0.10 ± 0.07 | 0.11 ± 0.03 | 0.10 ± 0.02 | 0.10 ± 0.03 | 0.12 ± 0.04 |
C20:5n3 | 0.07 ± 0.05a | 0.08 ± 0.02 | 0.09 ± 0.02b | 0.08 ± 0.03 | 0.08 ± 0.02 |
Σ PUFA | 4.82 ± 0.40 | 4.72 ± 0.66 | 4.62 ± 0.45 | 4.49 ± 0.44 | 4.73 ± 0.59 |
Σ UFA | 40.14 ± 1.73 | 39.17 ± 2.61 | 37.74 ± 1.73 | 38.87 ± 2.49 | 37.92 ± 1.23 |
Desaturase index | |||||
C14 | 0.07 ± 0.01 | 0.07 ± 0.01 | 0.06 ± 0.01 | 0,07 ± 0,01 | 0.07 ± 0.01 |
C16 | 0.21 ± 0.02 | 0.21 ± 0.02 | 0.20 ± 0.02 | 0,20 ± 0,02 | 0.21 ± 0.03 |
C18 | 0.69 ± 0.01 | 0.70 ± 0.03 | 0.68 ± 0.03 | 0,69 ± 0,03 | 0.68 ± 0.03 |
CLA | 0.24 ± 0.03 | 0.24 ± 0.04 | 0.23 ± 0.03 | 0,24 ± 0,04 | 0.23 ± 0.04 |
MUFA monounsaturated fatty acids, PUFA Polyunsaturated fatty acids.
Mean ± SD values within the same row sharing a different superscript letter (a, b, c, etc.) are significantly different (P < 0.05).
Table 7.
ANXA9/NlaIII | ANXA9/HinfI | ANXA9/Tru1I | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AA | GA | GG | CC | CG | GG | AA | CA | CC | |
MUFA | |||||||||
C14:1 | 0.55 ± 0.07 | 0.58 ± 0.08 | 0.56 ± 0.11 | 0.60 ± 0.06 | 0.55 ± 0.09 | 0.57 ± 0.08 | 0.55 ± 0.08 | 0.58 ± 0.08 | 0.55 ± 0.11 |
C16:1 | 5.95 ± 0.78 | 5.57 ± 0.70 | 5.61 ± 0.69 | 5.55 ± 0.70 | 5.66 ± 0.72 | 5.68 ± 0.71 | 5.69 ± 0.58 | 5.69 ± 0.73 | 5.42 ± 0.85 |
C17:1 | 0.50 ± 0.02 | 0.51 ± 0.07 | 0.49 ± 0.06 | 0.51 ± 0.05 | 0.50 ± 0.06 | 0.49 ± 0.07 | 0.49 ± 0.08 | 0.50 ± 0.05 | 0.51 ± 0.05 |
C18:1n9c | 21.87 ± 1.80 | 22.37 ± 1.95 | 22.77 ± 2.26 | 22.06 ± 1.75 | 22.62 ± 1.98 | 22.66 ± 2.44 | 22.79 ± 2.04 | 21.87 ± 1.64 | 23.40 ± 2.70 |
C18:1n9t | 2.03 ± 0.47 | 1.85 ± 0.48 | 1.82 ± 0.35 | 1.76 ± 0.55A | 1.80 ± 0.40a | 2.02 ± 0.28Bb | 1.83 ± 0.33ab | 1.95 ± 0.47a | 1.70 ± 0.41b |
C18:1n7t | 2.10 ± 0.29 | 2.07 ± 0.26 | 2.18 ± 0.28 | 2.04 ± 0.32 | 2.18 ± 0.26 | 2.12 ± 0.24 | 2.15 ± 0.26 | 2.09 ± 0.28 | 2.16 ± 0.30 |
C20:1 | 0.08 ± 0.07 | 0.07 ± 0.01 | 0.08 ± 0.03 | 0.08 ± 0.02 | 0.08 ± 0.04 | 0.07 ± 0.03 | 0.08 ± 0.04 | 0.08 ± 0.02 | 0.07 ± 0.01 |
Σ MUFA | 33.06 ± 1.92 | 33.01 ± 1.93 | 33.50 ± 2.26 | 32.57 ± 1.88 | 28.90 ± 11.63 | 33.82 ± 2.16 | 32.75 ± 1.66 | 32.75 ± 1.66 | 33.57 ± 4.73 |
PUFA | |||||||||
C18:2n6c | 1.66 ± 0.20 | 1.78 ± 0.27 | 1.81 ± 0.29 | 1.79 ± 0.27 | 1.79 ± 0.27 | 1.75 ± 0.25 | 1.77 ± 0.25 | 1.73 ± 0.27 | 1.88 ± 0.33 |
CLA | 1.16 ± 0.28 | 1.18 ± 0.23 | 1.30 ± 0.19 | 1.21 ± 0.24 | 1.0 ± 0.24b | 1.16 ± 0.17a | 1.26 ± 0.24 | 1.20 ± 0.18 | 1.24 ± 0.30 |
C18:3n3 | 1.45 ± 0.14 | 1.54 ± 0.26 | 1.48 ± 0.16 | 1.53 ± 0.24 | 1.46 ± 0.16 | 1.53 ± 0.23 | 1.53 ± 0.22 | 1.47 ± 0.19 | 1.52 ± 0.23 |
C20:4n6 | 0.07 ± 0.04A | 0.11 ± 0.03B | 0.11 ± 0.03B | 0.10 ± 0.03 | 0.11 ± 0.03 | 0.09 ± 0.04 | 0.10 ± 0.02 | 0.10 ± 0.02 | 0.11 ± 0.04 |
C20:5n3 | 0.08 ± 0.04 | 0.09 ± 0.03 | 0.08 ± 0.02 | 0.09 ± 0.02 | 0.08 ± 0.02 | 0.08 ± 0.03 | 0.08 ± 0.03 | 0.09 ± 0.02 | 0.08 ± 0.02 |
Σ PUFA | 4.42 ± 0.41 | 4.69 ± 0.59 | 4.76 ± 0.5 | 4.71 ± 0.66 | 4.14 ± 1.72 | 4.56 ± 0.51 | 4.73 ± 0.52 | 4.59 ± 0.52 | 2.47 ± 0.53 |
Σ UFA | 38.30 ± 2.51 | 38.47 ± 2.12 | 39.08 ± 2.58 | 38.03 ± 2.20 | 38.95 ± 2.56 | 39.00 ± 2.25 | 39.13 ± 2.56 | 38.15 ± 1.95 | 39.36 ± 2.80 |
Desaturase index | |||||||||
C14 | 0.06 ± 0.01 | 0.07 ± 0.01 | 0.07 ± 0.01 | 0.07 ± 0.01 | 0.06 ± 0.01 | 0.07 ± 0.01 | 0.07 ± 0.01 | 0.07 ± 0.01 | 0.07 ± 001 |
C16 | 0.21 ± 0.03 | 0.20 ± 0.02 | 0.20 ± 0.02 | 0.20 ± 0.02 | 0.20 ± 0.02 | 0.21 ± 0.02 | 0.19 ± 0.03 | 0.21 ± 0.02 | 0.21 ± 0.02 |
C18 | 0.69 ± 0.02 | 0.68 ± 0.04 | 0.70 ± 0.03 | 0.69 ± 0.04 | 0.70 ± 0.03 | 0.68 ± 0.03 | 0.70 ± 0.04 | 0.68 ± 0.03 | 0.70 ± 0.03 |
CLA | 0.22 ± 0.04 | 0.23 ± 0.04 | 0.25 ± 0.03 | 0.24 ± 0.04 | 0.25 ± 0.04 | 0.22 ± 0.03 | 0.24 ± 0.05 | 0.23 ± 0.03 | 0.24 ± 0.04 |
MUFA monounsaturated fatty acids, PUFA Polyunsaturated fatty acids; (g/100 g of fat).
Mean ± SD values within the same row sharing a different superscript letter (a, b, c, etc.) are significantly different (P < 0.05) and the superscript capital letter (A, B, C, etc.) different at P < 0.01.
The analysis of the share of short- and long-chain saturated fatty acids with respect to the individual genotypes of the studied polymorphisms in the ANXA9 gene is presented in Table 6. Statistical analysis for the ANXA9/HinfI polymorphism showed that the milk of individuals with the homozygous CC genotype was characterized by a higher (P < 0.05) content of pentadecanoic acid (C15:0) and eicosanoic acid (C20:0) than the milk of heterozygous sheep. In contrast, the milk of sheep with the CG genotype was characterized by a lower (P < 0.05) proportion of octadecanoic acid (C18:0) compared to the milk of sheep with the homozygous GG genotype. For the remaining saturated fatty acids in milk, no statistical effect of ANXA9 polymorphisms was observed.
Table 6.
ANXA9/NlaIII | ANXA9/HinfI | ANXA9/Tru1I | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AA | GA | GG | CC | CG | GG | AA | AC | CC | |
SCFA | |||||||||
C4:0 | 0.46 ± 0.20 | 0.64 ± 0.29 | 0.57 ± 0.18 | 0.63 ± 0.27 | 0.53 ± 0.18 | 0.63 ± 0.27 | 0.58 ± 0.21 | 0.58 ± 0.25 | 0.63 ± 0.27 |
C6:0 | 0.68 ± 0.19 | 0.83 ± 0.20 | 0.77 ± 0.17 | 0.83 ± 0.21 | 0.76 ± 0.19 | 0.77 ± 0.17 | 0.79 ± 0.19 | 0.78 ± 0.20 | 0.77 ± 0.17 |
C8:0 | 0.82 ± 0.20 | 0.98 ± 0.19 | 0.94 ± 0.21 | 0.97 ± 0.21 | 0.95 ± 0.22 | 0.91 ± 0.19 | 0.97 ± 0.21 | 0.95 ± 0.22 | 0.87 ± 0.16 |
C10:0 | 2.87 ± 0.78 | 3.38 ± 0.64 | 3.31 ± 0.78 | 3.36 ± 0.70 | 3.36 ± 0.79 | 3.13 ± 0.71 | 3.40 ± 0.82 | 3.31 ± 0.73 | 3.00 ± 0.55 |
Total | 4.83 ± 1.14 | 5.21 ± 1.11 | 5.59 ± 1.20 | 5.78 ± 1.26 | 5.60 ± 2.27 | 5.36 ± 1.11 | 5.26 ± 0.91 | 5.61 ± 1.28 | 5.74 ± 1.30 |
LCFA | |||||||||
C12:0 | 2.03 ± 0.36 | 2.23 ± 0.30 | 2.20 ± 0.44 | 2.23 ± 0.32 | 2.23 ± 0.42 | 2.11 ± 0.36 | 2.23 ± 0.42 | 2.22 ± 0.36 | 2.04 ± 0.30 |
C13:0 | 0.06 ± 0.03 | 0.05 ± 0.02 | 0.05 ± 0.03 | 0.06 ± 0.01 | 0.05 ± 0.03 | 0.05 ± 0.03 | 0.05 ± 0.03 | 0.05 ± 0.02 | 0.05 ± 0.03 |
C14:0 | 7.98 ± 1.12 | 7.84 ± 0.80 | 7.84 ± 0.89 | 8.02 ± 0.95 | 7.91 ± 0.83 | 7.66 ± 0.86 | 7.83 ± 0.89 | 7.97 ± 0.91 | 7.66 ± 0.74 |
C15:0 | 1.13 ± 0.16 | 1.09 ± 0.18 | 1.06 ± 0.16 | 1.17 ± 0.15b | 1.04 ± 0.17a | 1.07 ± 0.17 | 1.08 ± 0.12 | 1.08 ± 0.19 | 1.11 ± 0.19 |
C16:0 | 22.59 ± 1.19 | 21.81 ± 1.26 | 21.79 ± 1.23 | 22.36 ± 1.42 | 22.07 ± 0.91 | 21.31 ± 1.30 | 21.78 ± 1.18 | 21.77 ± 1.39 | 22.42 ± 0.92 |
C17:0 | 1.03 ± 0.09 | 1.03 ± 0.11 | 1.00 ± 0.11 | 1.04 ± 0.10 | 0.98 ± 0.11 | 1.05 ± 0.10 | 1.03 ± 0.11 | 1.01 ± 0.12 | 1.02 ± 0.07 |
C18:0 | 11.74 ± 0.98 | 12.22 ± 1.78 | 11.65 ± 1.43 | 11.80 ± 1.78 | 11.29 ± 1.03a | 12.74 ± 1.56b | 11.52 ± 1.16 | 12.22 ± 1.83 | 11.80 ± 1.32 |
C20:0 | 0.33 ± 0.05 | 0.33 ± 0.05 | 0.31 ± 0.05 | 0.34 ± 0.04b | 0.30 ± 0.04a | 0.33 ± 0.05 | 0.30 ± 0.04 | 0.33 ± 0.06 | 0.33 ± 0.05 |
Total | 46.87 ± 2.02 | 46.58 ± 1.71 | 45.88 ± 1.82 | 47.01 ± 2.09 | 45.87 ± 15.91 | 46.20 ± 1.61 | 46.41 ± 2.66 | 46.64 ± 1.44 | 45.79 ± 1.86 |
Σ SFA% | 51.69 ± 3.28 | 52.39 ± 2.36 | 51.46 ± 2.72 | 52.79 ± 2.65 | 51.47 ± 2.86 | 51.72 ± 2.27 | 51.67 ± 3.03 | 52.24 ± 2.29 | 51.67 ± 3.04 |
SCFA short-chain fatty acids, LCFA long-chain fatty acids, SFA saturated fatty acids; (g/100 g of fat).
Mean ± SD values within the same row sharing a different superscript letter (a, b, c, etc.) are significantly different (P < 0.05).
Table 7. shows the contribution of UFA in Zošľachtená valaška milk with respect to individual genotypes of the ANXA9 polymorphisms examined in this study. Analysis of the ANXA9/NlaIII polymorphism showed that the share of (all-Z) -5,8,11,14-eicosatetraenoic acid (20:4n6) in milk was lower (P < 0.01) in the sheep with the homozygous AA genotype in relation to individuals with heterozygous and homozygous GG genotypes. In the case of the ANXA9/HinfI polymorphism, it was shown that the milk of sheep with the homozygous GG genotype was characterized by a higher proportion of trans-octadecenoic acid (C18:1n9t) compared to the homozygous CC (P < 0.01) and heterozygous (P < 0.05) sheep. Also, a higher (P < 0.05) share of CLA was found in the homozygous GG individuals compared to heterozygous ones. For the ANXA9/Tru1I polymorphism, it was found that animals with the homozygous AA genotype were characterized by a lower (P < 0.05) proportion of C18:1n9t acid in milk compared to heterozygous sheep and higher (P < 0.05) compared to the homozygous CC animals. The polymorphism in the ANXA9 gene did not statistically affect the share of other unsaturated fatty acids in sheep milk.
Furthermore, we estimated the genetic correlations among individual FAs, which were shown in (Tables 8 and 9). For two individual SCFA (C4:0, C6:0), and one LCFA (C:14) negative genetic correlations were observed for SCD1/Cfr13I polymorphism and two negative correlations for two LCFA (C15:0, C20:0) over ANXA9/HinfI polymorphism.
Table 8.
SCD1/Cfr13I | FASN/AciI | ANXA9/NlaIII | ANXA9/HinfI | ANXA9/Tru1I | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
SCFA | |||||
C4:0 | − 0.3734* | 0.0591 | 0.2211 | − 0.1925 | 0.0956 |
C6:0 | − 0.3742* | 0.0375 | 0.2350 | − 0.1748 | 0.0042 |
C8:0 | − 0.2999 | 0.0636 | 0.2420 | − 0.0920 | − 0.0972 |
C10:0 | − 0.2405 | 0.1467 | 0.2453 | − 0.0467 | − 0.1456 |
Total | − 0.3192* | 0.1145 | 0.2630 | − 0.1054 | − 0.0846 |
LCFA | |||||
C12:0 | − 0.3043 | 0.1499 | 0.1894 | − 0.0476 | − 0.1140 |
C13:0 | − 0.0231 | 0.2420 | 0.0153 | − 0.1343 | − 0.0352 |
C14:0 | − 0.3670* | 0.1308 | − 0.0542 | − 0.1159 | 0.0153 |
C15:0 | 0.0536 | 0.2259 | − 0.0184 | − 0.3889* | 0.1071 |
C16:0 | − 0.0012 | 0.0553 | − 0.1496 | − 0.1792 | 0.2070 |
C17:0 | − 0.0406 | − 0.1041 | 0.0068 | − 0.2491 | 0.0516 |
C18:0 | − 0.1226 | − 0.0989 | 0.1022 | − 0.0513 | 0.0874 |
C20:0 | − 0.0942 | 0.0682 | 0.1736 | − 0.3627* | 0.1886 |
Total | − 0.3288* | 0.0635 | 0.0008 | − 0.2801 | 0.2082 |
ƩSFA% | − 0.3808* | 0.0975 | 0.1210 | − 0.2490 | 0.1096 |
SCFA short-chain fatty acids, LCFA long-chain fatty acids, SFA saturated fatty acids; (g/100 g of fat).
*Significance at P < 0.05 was marked by an asterisk.
Table 9.
SCD1/Cfr13I | FASN/AciI | ANXA9/NlaIII | ANXA9/HinfI | ANXA9/Tru1I | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
MUFA | |||||
C14:1 | − 0.0424 | 0.3085 | 0.1773 | − 0.2766 | 0.1236 |
C16:1 | 0.2792 | 0.0831 | − 0.1110 | 0.1654 | − 0.2709 |
C17:1 | 0.0187 | − 0.0681 | 0.0297 | − 0.0887 | 0.1980 |
C18:1n9c | 0.2592 | − 0.1532 | − 0.0140 | 0.0911 | 0.0871 |
C18:1n9t | 0.1201 | − 0.1344 | − 0.1151 | 0.2373 | − 0.2861 |
C18:1n7t | 0.2037 | − 0.0119 | − 0.1108 | 0.2133 | 0.0356 |
C20:1 | − 0.1999 | 0.0528 | − 0.0688 | − 0.0076 | − 0.0863 |
Σ MUFA | 0.3576* | − 0.1208 | − 0.0717 | 0.1832 | − 0.0383 |
PUFA | |||||
C18:2n6c | 0.0596 | − 0.0714 | 0.1185 | − 0.0048 | 0.2117 |
CLA | 0.1565 | 0.0415 | − 0.1189 | 0.1366 | 0.0708 |
C18:3n3 | − 0.0284 | − 0.2810 | 0.1501 | − 0.1931 | 0.1059 |
C20:4n6 | 0.0232 | 0.1968 | 0.3630* | 0.1773 | 0.0994 |
C20:5n3 | − 0.3164* | − 0.1220 | 0.1814 | − 0.2666 | 0.1570 |
Σ PUFA | 0.0654 | − 0.1122 | 0.0952 | − 0.0205 | 0.1804 |
Σ UFA | 0.3460* | − 0.1348 | − 0.0451 | 0.1727 | − 0.0089 |
Desaturase index | |||||
C14 | − 0.1992 | 0.2462 | 0.2953 | 0.2149 | 0.1108 |
C16 | − 0.1787 | 0.1026 | − 0.0955 | − 0.0551 | − 0.0097 |
C18 | − 0.2240 | − 0.0752 | − 0.1707 | − 0.2658 | − 0.2314 |
CLA | − 0.0549 | 0.0114 | − 0.0060 | − 0.1211 | − 0.1170 |
MUFA monounsaturated fatty acids, PUFA Polyunsaturated fatty acids; (g/100 g of fat).
*Significance at P < 0.05 was marked by an asterisk.
Positive genetic correlations were observed between MUFA and UFA and SCD1/Cfr13I, although negative correlations for C20:5n3 was observed (Table 9). We also showed a positive correlation between C20:4n6 and ANXA9/NlaIII.
Discussion
Milk fat and fatty acid (FA) profiles affect milk and cheese quality. Some previous studies13,31,32, shown some genes putatively affecting the milk fat and FA content included FASN and the SCD1 genes. FAS catalyzes the de novo synthesis of small- to medium-chain FAs (Crisà et al., 2010), while the SCD1 gene affects the milk FA profile and is involved in the synthesis of monounsaturated FA by introducing a double bond in the delta-9 position of C14:0, C16:0 and C18:013,32 . However, the role of ANXA9 in lactation is unknown33.
Sheep milk is characterized by high variability in the level of fatty acids34–36. The level of saturated fatty acids (SFA) ranges from 49.43 to 82.9 g/100 g fat. On the other hand, the share of MUFA and polyunsaturated fatty acids (PUFA) is slightly lower (MUFA: 11.95–45.26 g/100 g fat, PUFA 2.79–12.24 g/100 g fat)35. The results obtained in the author's research correspond with the literature data.
Because the biohydrogenation process takes place in the rumen content, nutrition is the main factor determining the fatty acid profile in the milk of ruminants14. However, the level of fatty acids in sheep milk shows a low to moderate genetic variation for individual acids (ranging from 0.01 to 0.47)35. Therefore, nutrition and genetics play a key role in modulating the composition of milk fat34. Moreover, due to the crucial role of the FASN and SCD1 genes in lipid metabolism and/or their location in chromosomal regions associated with milk content and quality, SNP polymorphisms within these genes allow partially explain the variation of FA composition in sheep milk.
In the case of polymorphism in the SCD1 and ANXA9 genes, the analyzed SNPs are mapped in the non-coding parts, i.e. the promoter region and introns, respectively. Mutations in regulatory regions such as promoters or enhancers can disrupt or create new transcription factor binding sites and cause changes in transcription regulation. Mutations in untranslated regions may affect the regulation of translation or modify the microRNA binding sites and thus affect mRNA stability37. The polymorphism analyzed in the FASN gene is an exon mapped change and it is a synonymous mutation. In our work, it was not investigated whether the analyzed mutations in the FASN gene directly influenced the expression of this gene. In contrast, it is generally believed that the amino acid sequence of proteins determines the expression, folding, and function of a protein, while mutations that alter the basic structure of a protein may affect these properties38. In general, silent mutations can modify all phases of the gene expression process, resulting in the amplification or reduction of proteins concentration. Therefore, while most silent mutations do not alter protein functionality, they can dramatically alter protein abundance37. In many cases, the effect of the SNP polymorphism rather regulate gene expression than changing the amino acid sequence as was shown by Knutsen et al. in bovine39.
Intronic mutations in the ANXA9 gene are not located at sites involved in splicing and are not conserved. In the case of polymorphism in the promoter region of the SCD1 gene, Garciá-Fernández et al. (2009)40, based on the characteristics of the promoter of the bovine SCD1 gene, report that the 31 C > A polymorphism is located between two conserved regions that include the critical binding sites of the transcription factor. Importantly, the second conserved promoter region is the critical region for the expression of the SCD—transcriptional enhancer element (STE). This region, which is 109 bp downstream of the polymorphism understudy, contains the sterol response element-binding protein (SREBP) and PUFA response element and plays a key role in the inhibitory effect of CLA and oleic acid on SCD transcription40.
Stearic-CoA desaturase, also known as Δ9-desaturase, is an enzyme [EC 1.14.19.1] associated with an endoplasmic reticulum (ER) that catalyzes the formation of monounsaturated fatty acids (MUFAs) from de novo-synthesized or food-supplied saturated fatty acids (SFAs)41. It is a rate-limiting enzyme in monounsaturated fatty acid (MUFA) biosynthesis that introduces a cis double bond between carbons 9 and 10 in the saturated fatty acid spectrum, with a preference for C16: 0 and C18: 0. This enzyme plays a key role in lipid metabolism and the maintenance of membrane fluidity, based on the physiological importance of the ratio between saturated and monounsaturated fatty acids40. An extremely important function of stearyl-CoA desaturase seems to be shaping the composition of fats contained in adipose tissue and the profile of fatty acids in meat and milk of farm animals42. Barber et al. examined the level of SCD mRNA expression in seven types of sheep adipose tissue to demonstrate its effect on the size of fat cells, as well as the ratio of stearic acid content (C18: 0) to oleic acid content (C18: 1)43.
According to Crisà et al. (2010)13, 257C > T (exon 32) polymorphism in the FASN gene significantly affects the level of the following acids in sheep milk: C10:0; C10:1, C12:0; C14:0; C15:0; C17:1. On the other hand, other authors found the effect of the FASN gene polymorphism (SNP was mapped in intron 31) also on the C13:0 level in sheep milk44. However, it is the T allele in FASN that is responsible, at least in part, for a higher level of fatty acids in milk13. In our research, the FASN polymorphism affected no changes in the fatty acid composition in milk, which may be related to the low share of the T allele in the sheep genotype. The study performed on sheep by Sztankoova et al. also confirmed that the SNP g.257C > T (FASN) contributes to influencing the medium- and long-chain FAs (C5:0 and C15:0), and a tendency was also observed for association with C18:1n9c and C18:3n645.
Studies by other authors have shown a link between polymorphisms (other than those studied in the present work) of the SCD1 gene and the composition of fatty acids in ruminant products, including sheep milk. They found that the analyzed SNPs in SCD1 significantly influenced the level of C16:1 acid, C18:1 trans-11 acid, the content of SFA and MUFA in sheep milk46. Moreover, Gu et al. (2019)47 analyzed the polymorphism in the promoter region of the SCD1 gene (g.133A > C) showed that the presence of the C allele results in higher levels of MUFA and lower levels of SFA. In our study we found, that the milk of the homozygous CC sheep contains a higher level of C20:1 and C20:5n3 fatty acids than the milk of sheep with AA genotype.
In the case of SFA and MUFA, a higher share of MUFA and a lower share of SFA were obtained in the milk of the homozygous AA sheep. The presence of features linked to polymorphism is related, among others, to the specificity of population and animal species48, which may explain the obtained results.
There are only a few studies in the available literature describing the effect of SCD146 and ANXA9 polymorphisms on the composition of sheep milk, including the fatty acid profile. The polymorphism in the ANXA9 gene affects the yield of milk fat in cows33 and the level of fat in sheep milk8. Our research revealed the effect of SNP in the ANXA9 gene on the share of the following acids: C15:0; C18:0; C20:0 and C18:19t; C20:4n6; and CLA.
Furthermore, Carta et al. (2008)49 performed a genome-wide scan for loci associated with FA composition in sheep's milk, where the most significant QTL that affects the fatty acid composition (chromosome-wise thresholds) associated with FASN were detected on OAR11 (C14:0 and C16:0) and OAR6 (MUFA). Our analysis of QTL located next to the studied genes by using Sheep QTLdb (https://www.animalgenome.org/cgi-bin/QTLdb/index) showed additional QTL on OAR11 (cis-10-C17:1; QTL 14,223; and C10:0; QTL 14,220)50. Analysis performed for SCD1 showed QTL on OAR22 that affect C4:0 (QTL:13,868), C16:1 (QTL:13,869;), C18:1 (QTL:13,870), C18:2(n-6) (QTL:13,871), and MUFA (QTL:13,877) content in milk. The QTL related to the ANXA9 gene and FA composition in milk has not been demonstrated in sheep. However, Calvo et al. suggested that ANXA9 may be a candidate gene for milk production traits, as well as for SCC in cattle, concerning its localisation in the proximity of QTL for these traits16. This was also confirmed by Martinez et al. (2010) in a Spanish Holstein–Friesian population33. Furthermore, Kulig et al. (2015) have shown that there are associations between the ANXA9 polymorphism and SCC in the milk of Jersey cows51.
In the human diet, foods with a low n-6/n-3 share, ranging from 1:1 to 4:1, are desirable52. Maintaining a sufficiently low n-6/n-3 ratio in the diet has a positive effect on the cognitive functions of the body and reduces the risk of depression53. Additionally, the high consumption rate of (n-3)/(n-6) PUFAs reduces the risk of neoplastic diseases and inflammations9,52,54.
In the case of the SCD1/Cfr13I polymorphism, an increase in C20:5n3 was observed in milk of the sheep with homozygous CC genotypes, without changes in the level of n-6 acids, which may cause an increase in the value of (n-3)/(n-6). In the case of ANXA9/NlaIII polymorphism analysis for AA homozygous animals, a decrease in the C20:4n6 acid level was found, which can also be considered a favourable phenomenon. Supplementation of CLA in the diet of animals and humans improves the metabolism of glucose and lipids in the body55. In our research, an increase in the level of CLA in the milk of sheep with the GG ANXA9/HinfI genotype was observed.
According to studies by other authors, long-chain unsaturated fatty acids are important in the human diet52,54,55. Replacing SFA with PUFA in the human diet is beneficial for the cardiovascular system56. In the diet, saturated acids, such as C18:0, C14:0 and C12:0, adversely affect the increase of plasma lipoproteins57. On the other hand, the consumption of saturated fatty acids with a carbon chain from C12 to C16 increases the level of plasma LDL-C56,58. In our research, an increase in the level of C18:0 acid was noted in the ANXA9/HinfI polymorphism in the homozygous GG individuals, while in the homozygous AA sheep, in the case of the SCD1/Cfr13I polymorphism, a decrease in the level of C12:0, C13:0, C14:0 acids and an increase in MUFA level in milk was observed. Consuming MUFA has a positive effect on humans, reduces total cholesterol and LDL fraction in the blood59.
The share of individual fatty acids in the human diet determines both physical and mental health. The present study determined the relationship between the studied polymorphisms and the fatty acid profile in milk and the results may be used in the selection program in sheep flocks: the choice of an appropriate genotype variant will ensure the desired fatty acid profile in milk.
Conclusions
The research was aimed at searching for the best genetic marker influencing the fatty acid profile in sheep milk. These preliminary findings show that the greatest changes were observed in sheep with SCD1/Cfr13I polymorphism and the least significant ones in FASN/AciI. Milk obtained from the homozygous AA sheep (SCD1/Cfr13I) had the best fatty acid profile. Slight changes in the milk of sheep were found for polymorphisms in the ANXA9 gene. For the ANXA9/NlaIII polymorphism (AA genotype animals) a favourable reduction in the level of C20:4n6 acid in the milk was noted. Changes were also found for the ANXA9/HinfI polymorphism (homozygous GG individuals). The milk of these sheep was characterized by an increase in the level of C18:1n9t and CLA acids, which is beneficial; unfortunately, an undesirable increase in the proportion of C18:0 acid was also found. Because presented results indicate the association of the analyzed genotypes with the fatty acid profile in Zošľachtená valaška, a larger prospective study will be continued to explore the effect of SNPs, also in the other genes showing effects on sheep milk. Moreover, results of our study can be useful for breeders, especially that Zošľachtená valaška sheep are included in the breeding program and sheep with homozygous AA (SCD1/Cfr13I) could be used during the breed improvement program for genetic selection if no detrimental trait is associated with this genotype.
Author contributions
Conceptualization, E.P.-K. and I.K.-Ł.; investigation, E.P.-K and I.K.-Ł.; Analyzed the data E.P.-K., I.K.-Ł., E.C.-P, B.K.; writing the first version of the manuscript, E.P.-K., I.K.-Ł., E.C.-P., B.K.; prepared revision B.K., E.P.-K. All authors approved the final version of the manuscript.
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Footnotes
Publisher's note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
References
- 1.Astrup A, Yusuf RDS, Krauss RM, et al. Saturated fats and health: a reassessment and proposal for food-based recommendations: state-of-the-art review. JACC. 2020;76:844–857. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2020.05.077. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Chen J, Liu H. Nutritional indices for assessing fatty acids: A mini-review. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2002;21:5695. doi: 10.3390/ijms21165695. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Zhang X, et al. Fatty acid composition analyses of commercially important fish species from the Pearl River Estuary, China. PlosOne. 2020 doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0228276. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Givens DI, Gibbs RA. Symposium on ‘How can the n-3 content of the diet be improved? Current intakes of EPA and DHA in European populations and the potential of animal-derived foods to increase them. Proc. Nutr. Soc. 2008;67:273–280. doi: 10.1017/S0029665108007167. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Cividini A, Simčič M. Fatty acid profile in milk of Bovec sheep fed in the stable or grazed in different pastures. Agriculture. 2015;21:109–112. doi: 10.18047/poljo.21.1.sup.25. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Ganter V, Mijić P, Baban M, Škrtić Z, Turalika A. The overall and fat composition of milk of various species. Mljekarstvo. 2015;65:223–231. doi: 10.15567/mljekarstvo.2015.0401. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Pecka E, Zachwieja A, Tumanowicz J. Technological parameters of milk depending on the cow housing system, nutrition system, age, and number of somatic cells. Przemysł Chemiczny. 2013;92:1087–1091. [Google Scholar]
- 8.Pecka-Kiełb E, Czerniawska-Piątkowska E, Kowalewska-Łuczak I, Vasil M. Polymorphism in ovine ANXA9 gene and physic-chemical properties and the fraction of protein in milk. J. Sci. Food Agric. 2018;98:5396–5400. doi: 10.1002/jsfa.9081. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Toral PG, Belenguer A, Frutos P, Hervas G. Effect of the supplementation of a high-concentrate diet with sunflower and fish oils on ruminal fermentation in sheep. Small Rumin. Res. 2009;81:119–125. doi: 10.1016/j.smallrumres.2008.12.009. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Selvaggi M, D'Alessandro A, Dario C. Environmental and genetic factors affecting milk yield and quality in three Italian sheep breeds. J. Dairy Res. 2017;84:27–31. doi: 10.1017/S0022029916000765. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Lazăr C, Gras MA, Pelmu RS, Rotar CM, Popa F. Review regarding the genomic evolution in sheep milk production and their application to improve the selection criteria. Emir. J. Food Agric. 2020;32:691–701. doi: 10.9755/ejfa.2020.v32.i10.2177. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Zidi A, et al. Association between the polymorphism of the goat stearoyl-CoA desaturase 1 (SCD1) gene and milk fatty acid composition in Murciano-Granadina goats. J Dairy Sci. 2010;93:4332–4339. doi: 10.3168/jds.2009-2597. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Crisà A, et al. Exploring polymorphisms and effects of candidate genes on milk fat quality in dairy sheep. J. Dairy Sci. 2010;93:3834–3845. doi: 10.3168/jds.2009-3014. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Urrutia O, et al. Adipose tissue modification through feeding strategies and their implication on adipogenesis and adipose tissue metabolism in ruminants. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2020;21:3183. doi: 10.3390/ijms21093183. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Chirala SS, et al. Fatty acid synthesis is essential in embryonic development: Fatty acid synthase null mutants and most of the heterozygotes die in utero. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U S A. 2003;100:6358–6363. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0931394100. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Calvo JH, et al. Isolation, mapping, and identification of SNPs for four genes (ACP6, CGN, ANXA9, SLC27A3) from a bovine QTL region on BTA3. Cytogenet. Genome Res. 2006;114:39–43. doi: 10.1159/000091926. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Mele M, et al. Stearoyl-coenzyme A desaturase gene polymorphism and milk fatty acid composition in Italian Holsteins. J. Dairy Sci. 2007;90:4458–4465. doi: 10.3168/jds.2006-617. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Barton L, et al. The polymorphisms of stearoyl-CoA desaturase (SCD1) and sterol regulatory element binding protein-1 (SREBP-1) genes and their association with the fatty acid profile of muscle and subcutaneous fat in Fleckvieh bulls. Meat Sci. 2010;85:15–20. doi: 10.1016/j.meatsci.2009.11.016. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Ferro MM, Tedeschi LO, Atzori AS. The comparison of the lactation and milk yield and composition of selected breeds of sheep and goats. Transl. Animal Sci. 2017;1:498–506. doi: 10.2527/tas2017.0056. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Czerniawska-Piątkowska E, Kowalewska-Łuczak I, Pecka-Kiełb E, Banaszewska D. Effects of FASN and SCD gene polymorphism on the composition of sheep’s milk. JAPS. 2021;31:906–912. doi: 10.36899/JAPS.2021.3.0280. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Kowalewska-Łuczak I, Czerniawska-Piątkowska E, Pecka-Kiełb E. Investigation on relationships of the FABP3 AND SLC27A3 genes with milk production traits in sheep. J. Elementol. 2017;22:1485–1493. doi: 10.5601/jelem.2017.22.1.1406. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Chrenek, P., Makarevič, A., Kubovičová, E., Bulla, J. & Supuka, P. Slovak national animal breeds; Slovak University of Agriculture in Nitra. Nitra, Slovakia, pp. 1–100 (2019).
- 23.Christie W, William S. Lipid analysis. Isolation, separation, identification, and structural analysis of lipids. The isolation of lipids from tissues. Oxford, UK: Pergamon Press; 1973. pp. 39–40. [Google Scholar]
- 24.Christopherson SW, Glass RL. Preparation of milk fat methyl esters by alcoholysis in an essentially nonalcoholic solution. J. Dairy Sci. 1969;52:1289–1290. doi: 10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(69)86739-1. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Kelsey JA, Corl BA, Collier RJ, Bauman DE. The effectof breed, parity and stage of lactation on conjugated linoleic acid (CLA) in milk fat from dairy cows. J. Dairy Sci. 2003;86:2588–2597. doi: 10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(03)73854-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Conte G, et al. Diacylglycerol acyltransferase 1, stearoyl-CoA desaturase 1, and sterol regulatory element binding protein 1 gene polymorphisms and milk fatty acid composition in Italian Brown cattle. J. Dairy Sci. 2010;93:753–763. doi: 10.3168/jds.2009-2581. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Yeh FC, Yang RTJ, Xiyan JM. PopGene32. Microsoft window-based freeware for population genetic analysis, Version 1.32 (Software) Edmonton, AB: University of Alberta; 2000. [Google Scholar]
- 28.Kimura M, Crow JF. The number of alleles that can be maintained in a finite population. Genetics. 1964;49:725–738. doi: 10.1093/genetics/49.4.725. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Nei M, Roychoudhury AK. Sampling variances of heterozygosity and genetic distance. Genetics. 1974;76:379–390. doi: 10.1093/genetics/76.2.379. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Botstein D, White EL, Skolnick M, Dawis RW. Construction of a genetic linkage map in man using restriction fragment length polymorphism. Am. J. Hum. Genet. 1980;32:314–331. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Symeou S, Tzamaloukas O, Banos G, Miltiadou D. ACAA2 and FASN polymorphisms affect the fatty acid profile of Chios sheep milk. J. Dairy Res. 2020;87:23–26. doi: 10.1017/S0022029919000992. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Schennink A, Heck JML, Bovenhuis H, Visker MHPW, van Valenberg HJF, van Arendonk JAM. Milk fatty acid unsaturation: genetic parameters and effects of stearoyl-CoA desaturase (SCD1) and acyl CoA: diacylglycerol acyltransferase 1 (DGAT1) J. Dairy Sci. 2020;91:213. doi: 10.3168/jds.2007-0825. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Martínez-Royo A, et al. The bovine annexin 9 gene (ANXA9) is significantly associated with milk-fat yield in a Spanish Holstein-Friesian population. Res Vet Sci. 2010;88:452–455. doi: 10.1016/j.rvsc.2009.12.009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Bastin C, Gengler N, Soyeurt H. Phenotypic and genetic variability of production traits and milk fatty acid contents across days in milk for Walloon Holstein first-parity cows. J. Dairy Sci. 2011;94:4152–4163. doi: 10.3168/jds.2010-4108. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Correddu F, et al. Genetic parameters of milk fatty acid profile in sheep: comparison between gas chromatographic measurements and Fourier-transform IR spectroscopy predictions. Animal. 2019;13:469–476. doi: 10.1017/S1751731118001659. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Nudda A, et al. Feeding strategies to design the fatty acid profile of sheep milk and cheese. R. Bras. Zootec. 2014;43:445–456. doi: 10.1590/S1516-35982014000800008. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Gutman T, Goren G, Efroni O, Tuller T. Estimating the predictive power of silent mutations on cancer classification and prognosis. Genomic Med. 2021 doi: 10.1038/s41525-021-00229-1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Supek F, Vlahoviček K. Comparison of codon usage measures and their applicability in prediction of microbial gene expressivity. BMC. 2005;6:182. doi: 10.1186/1471-2105-6-182. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Knutsen TM, Olsen HG, Tafintseva V, et al. Unravelling genetic variation underlying de novo-synthesis of bovine milk fatty acids. Sci. Rep. 2018;8:2179. doi: 10.1038/s41598-018-20476-0. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Garciá-Fernández M, Gutiérrez-Gil B, Garciá-Gámez E, Arranz JJ. Genetic variability of the Stearoyl-CoA desaturase gene in sheep. Mol. Cell Probes. 2009;23:107–111. doi: 10.1016/j.mcp.2009.01.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Ntambi JM. The regulation of stearoyl-CoA desaturase (SCD) Prog. Lipid Res. 1995;34:139–150. doi: 10.1016/0163-7827(94)00010-j. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Kucharski M, Kaczor U. Stearoyl-CoA desaturase – the lipid metabolism regulator. Adv. Hyg. Exp. Med. 2014;68:334–342. doi: 10.5604/17322693.1095856. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Barber MC, Travers MT, et al. Ovine adipose tissue monounsaturated fat content is correlated to depot-specific expression of the stearoyl-CoA desaturase gene. J. Anim. Sci. 2000;78:62–68. doi: 10.2527/2000.78162x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Symeou S, Tzamaloukas O, Banos G, Miltiadou D. ACAA2 and FASN polymorphisms affect the fatty acid profile of Chios sheep milk. JDR. 2020;87:23–26. doi: 10.1017/S0022029919000992. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Sztankoova Z, Rychtarova J, Borkova M, Svitakova A, Milerski M. Polymorphism and association of the FASN gene with milk production traits in Czech sheep population. J. Hyg. Eng. Design. 2018;24:84–89. [Google Scholar]
- 46.García-Fernández M, Gutiérrez-Gil B, García-Gámez E, Sánchez JP, Arranz JJ. Detection of quantitative trait loci affecting the milk fatty acid profile on sheep chromosome 22: Role of the stearoyl-CoA desaturase gene in Spanish Churra sheep. J. Dairy Sci. 2010;93:348–357. doi: 10.3168/jds.2009-2490. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Gu M, et al. The single nucleotide polymorphism g.133A>C in the stearoyl CoA desaturase gene (SCD) promoter affects gene expression and quali-quantitative properties of river buffalo milk. J. Dairy Sci. 2019;102:442–451. doi: 10.3168/jds.2018-15059. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Palombo V, et al. Genome-wide association study of milk fatty acid composition in Italian Simmental and Italian Holstein cows using single nucleotide polymorphism arrays. J. Dairy Sci. 2018;101:11004–11019. doi: 10.3168/jds.2018-14413. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Carta A, Casu S, Usai MG, et al. Investigating the genetic component of fatty acid content in sheep milk. Small Rumin. Res. 2008;79:22–28. doi: 10.1016/j.smallrumres.2008.07.015. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 50.Hu ZL, Carissa A, Park CA, Reecy JM. Building a livestock genetic and genomic information knowledgebase through integrative developments of Animal QTLdb and CorrDB. Nucleic Acids Res. 2019;47(D1):D701–D710. doi: 10.1093/nar/gky1084. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51.Kulig H, Kowalewska-Łuczak I, Kmieć M, Wojdak-Maksymiec K. ANXA9, SLC27A3, FABP3 and FABP4 single nucleotide polymorphisms in relation to milk production traits in Jersey cows. Czech J. Anim. Sci. 2015;55:463–467. doi: 10.17221/1714-CJAS. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 52.Balić A, Vlašić D, Žužul K, Marinović B, Mokos AB. Omega-3 versus omega-6 polyunsaturated fatty acids in the prevention and treatment of inflammatory skin diseases. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2020;21:741. doi: 10.3390/ijms21030741. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53.Layé S, Nadjar A, Joffre C, Bazinet RP. Anti-inflammatory effects of omega-3 fatty acids in the brain: physiological mechanisms and relevance to pharmacology. Pharmacol. Rev. 2017;70:12–38. doi: 10.1124/pr.117.014092. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54.Goodstine SL, et al. Dietary (n-3)/(n-6) fatty acid ratio: possible relationship to premenopausal but not postmenopausal breast cancer risk in US women. J. Nutr. 2003;133:1409–1414. doi: 10.1093/jn/133.5.1409. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55.Martín-González MZ, et al. Beneficial effects of a low-dose of conjugated linoleic acid on body weight gain and other cardiometabolic risk factors in cafeteria diet-fed rats. Nutrients. 2020;12:408. doi: 10.3390/nu12020408. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 56.Siri-Tarino PF, Chiu S, Bergeron N, Krauss RM. Saturated fats versus polyunsaturated fats versus carbohydrates for cardiovascular disease prevention and treatment. Annu. Rev. Nutr. 2015;35:517–543. doi: 10.1146/annurev-nutr-071714-034449. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 57.Karupaiah T, Tan CH, Chinna K, Sundram K. The chain length of dietary saturated fatty acids affects human postprandial lipemia. J. Am. Coll. Nutr. 2011;30:511–521. doi: 10.1080/07315724.2011.10719997. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 58.Mensink RP, Zock PL, Kester AD, Katan MB. Effects of dietary fatty acids and carbohydrates on the ratio of serum total to HDL cholesterol and on serum lipids and apolipoproteins: A meta-analysis of 60 controlled trials. Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 2003;77:1146–1155. doi: 10.1093/ajcn/77.5.1146. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 59.Gill J, et al. Effects of dietary monounsaturated fatty acids on lipoprotein concentrations, compositions, and subfraction distributions and on VLDL apolipoprotein B kinetics: dose-dependent effects on LDL. Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 2003;78:47–56. doi: 10.1093/ajcn/78.1.47. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]