Skip to main content
Wiley - PMC COVID-19 Collection logoLink to Wiley - PMC COVID-19 Collection
letter
. 2021 Nov 9;27(1):90–92. doi: 10.1111/resp.14173

Clinical differentiation of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 pneumonia using the Japanese guidelines

Naoyuki Miyashita 1,, Yasushi Nakamori 2, Makoto Ogata 1, Naoki Fukuda 1, Akihisa Yamura 1, Yoshihisa Ishiura 3, Shosaku Nomura 1
PMCID: PMC8661815  PMID: 34755416

To the Editors:

The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID‐19) pandemic, caused by the novel severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS‐CoV‐2), has caused a sudden and substantial increase in hospitalizations for pneumonia worldwide. 1 Although the reverse transcription PCR assay is a commonly used tool for the diagnosis of COVID‐19, the sensitivity of PCR is not high using oropharyngeal and nasopharyngeal swab specimens and depends on the time of collection and the collector. 2 , 3 The Japanese Respiratory Society (JRS) scoring system, consisting of six parameters, is a useful tool for the early presumptive diagnosis of mild‐to‐moderate atypical pneumonia, mainly Mycoplasma pneumoniae pneumonia. 4 These parameters were: (1) age < 60 years, (2) no or minor comorbid illness, (3) presence of stubborn cough, (4) absence of chest adventitious sounds, (5) no sputum or no identified aetiological agent by rapid diagnostic tests (Gram staining, urinary antigen tests and nasopharyngeal antigen test) and (6) a peripheral white blood cell (WBC) count of <10,000/μl. We evaluated whether the JRS scoring system could be adapted to the diagnosis of mild‐to‐moderate SARS‐CoV‐2 pneumonia.

This study was conducted at five institutions between February 2020 and June 2021, and assessed a total of 823 patients with SARS‐CoV‐2 pneumonia (335 had lineage B.1.1.7., also known as the Alpha variant; Table 1) and 202 patients with bacterial pneumonia. COVID‐19 was diagnosed with positive PCR results from sputum or nasopharyngeal swab specimens according to the protocol recommended by the National Institute of Infectious Diseases, Japan.

TABLE 1.

Underlying conditions and clinical findings in patients with SARS‐CoV‐2 pneumonia in the non‐Alpha variant and Alpha variant groups at the first examination

Variables Non‐Alpha variant Alpha variant p‐value
No. of patients 488 335
Median age (IQR), years 65 (46–76) 64 (51–74) 0.387
No. of males/females 302/186 227/108 0.889
No. (%) of patients with comorbid illnesses
Diabetes mellitus 100 (20.5) 65 (19.4) 0.723
Chronic lung disease 55 (11.3) 43 (12.8) 0.512
Chronic heart disease 38 (7.8) 23 (6.9) 0.685
Cerebrovascular disease 32 (6.6) 20 (6.0) 0.772
Chronic renal disease 31 (6.4) 24 (7.2) 0.671
Neoplastic disease 30 (6.1) 14 (4.2) 0.269
Chronic liver disease 15 (3.1) 9 (2.7) 0.834
Autoimmune disease 15 (3.1) 7 (2.1) 0.510
No. (%) of patients with the following clinical signs and symptoms
History of fever (≥37.0°C) 413 (84.6) 295 (88.1) 0.183
Cough 249 (51.0) 209 (62.4) 0.001
Fatigue 167 (35.9) 110 (32.8) 0.707
Shortness of breath 132 (27.0) 109 (32.5) 0.101
Sore throat 97 (19.9) 68 (20.3) 0.929
Loss of taste 65 (13.3) 55 (16.4) 0.228
Anosmia 54 (11.1) 49 (14.6) 0.134
Headache 54 (11.1) 33 (9.9) 0.644
Diarrhoea 51 (10.5) 27 (8.1) 0.276
Sputum production 49 (10.0) 54 (16.1) 0.013
Runny nose 36 (7.4) 24 (7.2) >0.999
Joint pain 28 (5.7) 14 (4.2) 0.338
Chest pain 18 (3.7) 5 (1.5) 0.083
Muscle ache 17 (3.5) 4 (1.2) 0.044
Nausea or vomiting 16 (3.3) 14 (4.2) 0.571
Abdominal pain 6 (1.2) 1 (0.3) 0.250
Laboratory findings, median (IQR)
White blood cell count, /μl 5100 (4295–6400) 5400 (4400–7350) 0.242
No. (%) of patients with each pneumonia severity score a
0 197 (40.4) 57 (17.0) <0.001
1 128 (26.2) 134 (40.0) <0.001
2 110 (22.5) 88 (26.3) 0.245
3 52 (10.7) 56 (16.7) 0.015
Positive cases/no. (%) for the presumptive diagnosis of atypical pneumonia in different age groups
20–29 years 41/41 (100) 29/29 (100) >0.999
30–39 years 54/54 (100) 15/15 (100) >0.999
40–49 years 41/42 (97.6) 37/37 (100) >0.999
50–59 years 53/63 (84.1) 52/56 (92.9) 0.164
60–69 years 46/96 (47.9) 30/71 (42.3) 0.531
70–79 years 29/112 (25.9) 23/90 (25.6) >0.999
≥80 years 23/80 (28.8) 7/37 (18.9) 0.363

Note: Continuous values are presented as medians and IQRs and categorical/binary values as counts and percentages.

Abbreviations: IQR, interquartile range; JRS, Japanese Respiratory Society; SARS‐CoV‐2, severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2.

a

The severity of pneumonia was evaluated using predictive rules via the A‐DROP system (a 5‐point scoring system) proposed by the JRS guidelines: age over 70 years in men and over 75 years in women, dehydration, respiratory failure, orientation disturbance and low blood pressure. An A‐DROP score of 0–3 points was classified as mild‐to‐moderate pneumonia.

Matching rates to the six parameters of the JRS scoring system were identical in both non‐Alpha variant and Alpha variant groups, and high matching rates were observed in the following parameters: absence of chest adventitious sounds, 71.6% (non‐Alpha variant group, 73.2%; Alpha variant group, 69.3%); no sputum or no identified aetiological agent by rapid diagnostic tests, 87.1% (90.0% and 83.0%); and a peripheral WBC count of <10,000/μl, 97.6% (98.2% and 96.7%). The matching rates of the other three parameters were as follows: age < 60 years, 42.2% (43.0% and 40.9%); no or minor comorbid illness, 57.8% (57.8% and 57.9%); and presence of stubborn cough, 10.4% (9.4% and 11.9%). The sensitivity and specificity for the diagnosis of atypical pneumonia in patients with SARS‐CoV‐2 pneumonia based on four or more parameters were 58.3% (58.8% in the non‐Alpha variant group and 57.6% in the Alpha variant group, respectively) and 92.2%, respectively.

When the diagnostic sensitivity was analysed for different ages stratified into the 10‐year groups, the diagnostic sensitivity of patients in both the non‐Alpha variant and Alpha variant groups was highest in the 20–39‐year age group and decreased in order from the youngest to the oldest age group (Table 1). There was a clear difference between elderly (aged ≥60 years) and non‐elderly (aged <60 years) patients with SARS‐CoV‐2 pneumonia. The diagnostic sensitivity for SARS‐CoV‐2 pneumonia was 95.5% for non‐elderly patients and 32.5% for elderly patients.

Our results demonstrated that the JRS scoring system is a useful tool for distinguishing between SARS‐CoV‐2 pneumonia and bacterial pneumonia in patients aged <60 years, but not in patients aged ≥60 years.

CONFLICT OF INTEREST

None declared.

AUTHOR CONTRIBUTION

Conceptualization: Naoyuki Miyashita (lead), Yasushi Nakamori (equal), Makoto Ogata (supporting), Naoki Fukuda (supporting), Akihisa Yamura (supporting), Yoshihisa Ishiura (supporting), Shosaku Nomura (supporting). Data curation: Naoyuki Miyashita (lead), Yasushi Nakamori (lead), Makoto Ogata (supporting), Naoki Fukuda (supporting), Akihisa Yamura (supporting), Yoshihisa Ishiura (supporting), Shosaku Nomura (supporting). Formal analysis: Makoto Ogata (lead), Naoki Fukuda (equal). Funding acquisition: Yoshihisa Ishiura (lead), Shosaku Nomura (equal). Investigation: Naoyuki Miyashita (lead), Yasushi Nakamori (equal), Makoto Ogata (supporting), Naoki Fukuda (supporting), Akihisa Yamura (supporting), Yoshihisa Ishiura (supporting), Shosaku Nomura (supporting). Methodology: Makoto Ogata (lead), Naoki Fukuda (equal). Project administration: Naoyuki Miyashita (lead), Yasushi Nakamori (equal), Yoshihisa Ishiura (supporting), Shosaku Nomura (supporting). Resources: Naoyuki Miyashita (lead), Yasushi Nakamori (equal), Yoshihisa Ishiura (supporting), Shosaku Nomura (supporting). Software: Naoyuki Miyashita (lead), Yasushi Nakamori (equal), Yoshihisa Ishiura (supporting), Shosaku Nomura (supporting). Supervision: Naoyuki Miyashita (lead), Yasushi Nakamori (equal), Yoshihisa Ishiura (supporting), Shosaku Nomura (supporting). Validation: Yoshihisa Ishiura (lead), Shosaku Nomura (equal). Visualization: Makoto Ogata (lead), Naoki Fukuda (equal). Writing – original draft: Naoyuki Miyashita (lead), Yasushi Nakamori (equal). Writing – review & editing: Naoyuki Miyashita (lead), Yasushi Nakamori (equal), Makoto Ogata (supporting), Naoki Fukuda (supporting), Akihisa Yamura (supporting), Yoshihisa Ishiura (supporting), Shosaku Nomura (supporting).

HUMAN ETHICS APPROVAL STATEMENT

The study protocol was approved by the Ethics Committee of Kansai Medical University and all participating facilities (approval number 2020319). Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants in the study.

Miyashita N, Nakamori Y, Ogata M, Fukuda N, Yamura A, Ishiura Y, et al. Clinical differentiation of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 pneumonia using the Japanese guidelines. Respirology. 2022;27:90–92. 10.1111/resp.14173

Handling Editor: Philip Bardin

REFERENCES

  • 1. Zhu N, Zhang D, Wang W, Li X, Yang B, Song J, et al. A novel coronavirus from patients with pneumonia in China, 2019. N Engl J Med. 2020;382:727–33. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2. Wang W, Xu Y, Gao R, Lu R, Han K, Wu G, et al. Detection of SARS‐CoV‐2 in different types of clinical specimens. JAMA. 2020;323:1843–4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3. Kucirka LM, Lauer SA, Laeyendecker O, Boon D, Lessler J. Variation in false‐negative rate of reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction‐based SARS‐CoV‐2 tests by time since exposure. Ann Intern Med. 2020;173:262–7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4. Committee for the Japanese Respiratory Society Guidelines for the Management of Respiratory Infections . Guidelines for the management of community acquired pneumonia in adults, revised edition. Respirology. 2006;11(Suppl 3):S79–133. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Respirology (Carlton, Vic.) are provided here courtesy of Wiley

RESOURCES