Author Roles
(1) Research project: A. Conception, B. Organization, C. Execution; (2) Statistical analysis: A. Design, B. Execution, C. Review and critique; (3) Manuscript: A. Writing of the first draft, B. Review and critique.
S.P.: 1A, 1B, 2A, 2B, 3A
H.K.: 1A, 2C, 3B
R.B.: 1A, 2C, 3B
P.K.P.: 1A, 1C, 2C, 3B
The COVID‐19 pandemic has caused disruptions in movement disorder clinical services and education. 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 5 The Movement Disorder Society‐Asian and Oceanian Section (MDS‐AOS) is a subsection of the MDS comprised of 41 countries and territories, with diverse socioeconomic backgrounds, health care systems, and varied exposure to prior pandemics.
To determine the impact of the pandemic on clinical, training, and research activities of movement disorders, a structured questionnaire was developed with expert consensus during a conference call organized by the MDS‐AOS. Fifteen months into the pandemic, that is, March 2021, members of the MDS‐AOS were invited to participate in an online survey. The impact of the pandemic was graded from zero to five (zero: “no impact,” five: “total disruption”), and responses were recorded over five time points. Seventy‐four responses were received from 20 countries, with the majority (36%, n = 27) from India (Supplementary Material).
Almost complete (76%–99%) disruption in clinical services occurred for 3 months (April–June 2020), with total disruption (100%) in the domains of outpatient and inpatient care and physiotherapy for 3 months (April–June 2020) and botulinum toxin therapy and deep brain stimulation for 6 months (April–September 2020) (Fig. 1, Supplementary Material). Although the impact gradually declined, nothing reverted to a pre‐COVID‐19 state, and all participants predicted a persistent mild impact. Training and research activities were completely disrupted (100%). Clinical bedside sessions and training of PhD candidates were completely disrupted for 6 months (April–September 2020), whereas fellowship training was least affected. Both clinical and basic science research were impacted due to difficulties with patient recruitment and initiation and sanction of new projects. Among countries that responded, a consistent relatively low impact, that is, 25%–50% disruption, was reported from China, Japan, South Korea, and Taiwan.
Disruptions in clinical services could be secondary to a shift of focus to COVID‐19, designation of health care professionals to COVID‐19 facilities, and travel restrictions. Social distancing, cessation of in‐person meetings, and prioritization of COVID‐19‐related activities probably contributed to the disruption of teaching and research activities. Significant impact was observed during the initial 6–9 months when maximal restrictions were imposed, after which although the severity of the pandemic increased, the impact appeared to decline. This could be attributable to the reduction in general restrictions and the implementation of numerous adaptive measures such as online clinical discussions and virtual training programs that permitted resumption of routine activities albeit in a different format. The differential impact and rate of resumption of activities could be due to the baseline preparedness for pandemics, socioeconomic status, and structure of the health care systems across countries.
A key limitation was the low number of responses, with the majority from a single country. Although it is difficult to predict the long‐term implications on movement disorders–related services, it is certain that a pre‐COVID state of functioning may not be achieved, and adaptive measures assumed to be temporary may be more permanent than anticipated. 6 This survey demonstrates that AOS countries are constantly learning to adapt to this challenging situation, and the MDS‐AOS will continually support this endeavor with the ultimate aim of benefiting patients with movement disorders.
Supporting information
Acknowledgments
We thank the Movement Disorder Society for assistance in conducting the survey. In addition, we thank all participants who took part in this survey.
Relevant conflicts of interest/financial disclosures: None of the authors have any financial disclosure to make or have any conflict of interest.
Funding agency: Nothing to report.
Data Availability Statement
The data that supports the findings of this study are available in the supplementary material of this article.
References
- 1. Bhidayasiri R, Virameteekul S, Kim JM, Pal PK, Chung SJ. COVID‐19: an early review of its global impact and considerations for Parkinson's disease patient care. J Mov Disord 2020;13(2):105–114. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2. Sohrabi C, Mathew G, Franchi T, et al. Impact of the coronavirus (COVID‐19) pandemic on scientific research and implications for clinical academic training ‐ a review. Int J Surg 2021;86:57–63. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3. Sigdel S, Ozaki A, Dhakal R, Pradhan B, Tanimoto T. Medical education in Nepal: impact and challenges of the COVID‐19 pandemic. Acad Med 2021;96(3):340–342. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4. Korbel JO, Stegle O. Effects of the COVID‐19 pandemic on life scientists. Genome Biol 2020;21(1):113. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5. Tan EK, Albanese A, Chaudhuri KR, et al. Neurological research & training after the easing of lockdown in countries impacted by COVID‐19. J Neurol Sci 2020;418:117105. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6. Tan EK, Albanese A, Chaudhuri K, et al. Adapting to post‐COVID19 research in Parkinson's disease: lessons from a multinational experience. Parkinsonism Relat Disord 2021;82:146–149. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Supplementary Materials
Data Availability Statement
The data that supports the findings of this study are available in the supplementary material of this article.