Skip to main content
Military Medical Research logoLink to Military Medical Research
. 2021 Dec 10;8:66. doi: 10.1186/s40779-021-00357-w

Risk factors for musculoskeletal injuries in the military: a qualitative systematic review of the literature from the past two decades and a new prioritizing injury model

Stefan Sammito 1,2,, Vedran Hadzic 3, Thomas Karakolis 4, Karen R Kelly 5, Susan P Proctor 6,7, Ainars Stepens 8, Graham White 9, Wes O Zimmermann 10,11
PMCID: PMC8662851  PMID: 34886915

Abstract

Background

Musculoskeletal injuries (MSkIs) are a leading cause of health care utilization, as well as limited duty and disability in the US military and other armed forces. MSkIs affect members of the military during initial training, operational training, and deployment and have a direct negative impact on overall troop readiness. Currently, a systematic overview of all risk factors for MSkIs in the military is not available.

Methods

A systematic literature search was carried out using the PubMed, Ovid/Medline, and Web of Science databases from January 1, 2000 to September 10, 2019. Additionally, a reference list scan was performed (using the “snowball method”). Thereafter, an international, multidisciplinary expert panel scored the level of evidence per risk factor, and a classification of modifiable/non-modifiable was made.

Results

In total, 176 original papers and 3 meta-analyses were included in the review. A list of 57 reported potential risk factors was formed. For 21 risk factors, the level of evidence was considered moderate or strong. Based on this literature review and an in-depth analysis, the expert panel developed a model to display the most relevant risk factors identified, introducing the idea of the “order of importance” and including concepts that are modifiable/non-modifiable, as well as extrinsic/intrinsic risk factors.

Conclusions

This is the qualitative systematic review of studies on risk factors for MSkIs in the military that has attempted to be all-inclusive. A total of 57 different potential risk factors were identified, and a new, prioritizing injury model was developed. This model may help us to understand risk factors that can be addressed, and in which order they should be prioritized when planning intervention strategies within military groups.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s40779-021-00357-w.

Keywords: Military, Musculoskeletal injuries, Risk factors, Prevention, Intervention, Injury

Background

Musculoskeletal injuries (MSkIs) are a leading cause of health care utilization, as well as limited duty and disability in the US military [1] and other armed forces [26]. MSkIs affect members of the military during initial training [7], operational training [8], and deployment [9], and have a direct negative impact on overall troop readiness. MSkIs have been shown to make up 50% of disease and non-battle injury (DNBI) casualties, and 43% of DNBI casualties requiring evacuation. Additionally, many service members sustain MSkIs, which are treated conservatively in the theater during deployment, but eventually require surgery following a combat tour [10, 11]. The consequences of MSkIs are reduced individual fitness and health [12], and ultimately discharge from military duty [13, 14].

As such, the prevention of MSkIs is considered a main target area to increase the readiness, performance, and health of military personnel. Approaches include the identification of risk factors and purposeful intervention strategies to reduce MSkIs. In recent decades, hundreds of original studies have been published with the goal of identifying risk factors for MSkIs, including narrative and systematic reviews on specific risk factors [1526]. However, an overall summary of the published data on risk factors for MSkIs in the military is not available. Further, for several risk factors, such as sex, there is an ongoing debate on whether there is a direct association with an increased risk of MSkIs, or whether the association is indirect via a confounding risk factor [27]. Finally, there is no model that clarifies the relative order of importance of the risk factors for MSkIs in the military.

Given the gaps in knowledge identified above and the fact that soldier readiness is of great importance to all allied militaries, the multidisciplinary NATO Science and Technology Organization (STO) Research Task Group (RTG) 283 on “Reducing musculoskeletal injuries” set out to perform a systematic review of risk factors for MSkIs in the military to address and discuss the facilitation of successful interventions.

Methods

A systematic literature search considering the PRISMA guidelines [28] was initiated using the PubMed, Ovid/Medline, and Web of Science databases with the search terms “(military) AND ((injury) OR (trauma)) AND ((basic training) OR (physical training))” with all MeSH terms (see details on Additional file 1) on September 10, 2019. The principal criterion for inclusion was that the study reported on risk factors for MSkIs in a military population. The exclusion criteria were as follows: a language other than English; studies without a risk factor evaluation; and studies published before January 1, 2000. Review articles (without a meta-analysis) were used to find the included original works (see below), but were not included as such in this review. Of the 1794 studies identified (after removing duplicates), 179 were selected for full-text analysis. After full-text analysis, 42 papers were excluded because they did not meet the inclusion criteria, and 19 studies were reviews and did not present new information. So far, a total of 118 original papers and 3 meta-analyses have been included.

Moreover, to present a complete overview, a reference list scan (using the “snowball method”) [29] was performed on each of the 179 fully analyzed texts, including each of the 19 review articles. With this approach, an additional 283 studies were identified, of which 87 were excluded due to the publication date being before January 1, 2000. The remaining 196 papers were also read in full to determine relevance. If two studies reported on exactly the same population, only the publication that provided the most details was included. As a result, an additional 58 studies were included in this review, bringing the total to 176 original papers and 3 meta-analyses (Fig. 1).

Fig. 1.

Fig. 1

Flowchart of the systematic review

Once all the literature was identified, a list of all reported risk factors was created. Each original paper and meta-analysis was then assigned to a risk factor. If an original paper described multiple risk factors, it was assigned to every risk factor it reported.

In the results section, a general description of all the included publications is provided first, followed by specific descriptions per risk factor. Risk factors were sorted into different groups (in alphabetical order): lifestyle factors, medical factors, occupational factors, physiological factors, social factors, and training factors. For each risk factor, an accompanying table was included that summarizes each aspect of the supporting studies: lead author; year of publication; country of origin; characteristics of the population examined (branch and unit/type of military activity); study type (retrospective or prospective); sample size of the population studied; and whether or not the study concluded that the risk factor was correlated to MSkIs (yes or no). In a number of publications, more than one risk factor was evaluated.

Finally, the multidisciplinary expert panel (consisting of all coauthors of this review) classified the evidence supporting the association between a risk factor and MSkI into one of five categories: strong, moderate, weak, insufficient, or no evidence. For this classification, the expert panel took into account the results of the studies, as well as the number of participants and their professional experience in military MSkI injury prevention. In addition, the expert panel included a determination as to whether a risk factor would be considered modifiable or non-modifiable in the military context. A risk factor was defined as modifiable if a service member could influence it (e.g., to be a smoker) or if military authorities could influence it (e.g., by changing the training schedule or by providing other gear). Risk factors classified as non-modifiable are beyond personal control (e.g., the weather). Whether a risk factor is modifiable is a significant determinant for the application of intervention strategies. Based on the literature review and an in-depth analysis, the multidisciplinary expert panel developed a model to classify the different risk factors identified, introducing the concept of “order of importance” and including the notions of modifiable/non-modifiable and extrinsic/intrinsic risk factors.

Results

Of the 176 original papers, 101 came from investigations in the US Armed Forces. Additional investigations were conducted in the armed forces of the UK (19 studies), Israel (18 studies), and Finland (14 studies). Australia and Switzerland produced 4 studies each, China and Greece had 3 studies each, Germany had 2 studies, and Belgium, Denmark, India, Iran, Malta, Poland, Slovenia, and Sweden were represented by 1 study each. A majority of the studies examined risk factors in the army (113 studies), whereas there were considerably fewer studies conducted in the marines (16 studies), the air force (7 studies), the navy (5 studies), and the special operations forces (2 studies). Seven studies explored risk factors, including multiple armed services branches; 4 studies were conducted only among recruits or participants in academy training, and 22 studies did not include descriptions of the particular service branch. More than half of the studies (n = 101) chose a prospective study design, and the remaining 75 papers evaluated data retrospectively. The study populations ranged from 20 subjects [30] to 5,580,875 analyzed person-years [31]. In two studies [32, 33], no information about the underlying size of the population was reported. Less than half of the studies (n = 79) scrutinized populations of less than 1000 participants, while 27 studies had a population greater than 10,000 participants. A number of retrospective studies involved populations with over 100,000 participants [31, 3451]. A large minority of the studies included both male and female military personnel (n = 51). In 33 studies, only male members were included, whereas 17 studies focused exclusively on women in the military. In most of the studies (n = 75), no specific information was given about the sex of the included participants.

Lifestyle factors

Alcohol intake

Nine studies focused on higher alcohol intake as a risk factor for MSkIs (Table 1). Five studies were conducted in the US Army, 2 within the British Army, and 1 in Finland and in Greece. The sizes of the study populations ranged from 64 to 4139 participants. Three of the 9 studies identified alcohol intake as a risk factor for MSkIs, and 6 did not show a significant association between alcohol intake and MSkIs.

Table 1.

Summary of studies that focused on alcohol intake, calcium intake, milk consumption, vegetable consumption, vegetarian diet, sleep time, and smoking as risk factors for MskIs

Study Publication year Country Branches Unit/training Study type n Risk factor*
Alcohol intake
 Canham-Chervak [52] 2006 USA Army Recruits P 1156 M, 746 F No
 Chatzipapas [53] 2008 Greece n/a Active duty R 64 No
 Cosio-Lima [54] 2013 USA Army Sergeants Major Academy R 149 No
 Lappe [55] 2005 USA Army Recruits BCT R 4139 F Yes (F)
 Lappe [56] 2001 USA Army Recruits BCT P 3758 F Yes (F)
 Robinson [57] 2016 UK Army Recruits P 1810 No
 Schneider [58] 2000 USA Army Airborne Div R 1214 Yes
 Taanila [59] 2012 Finland Army Conscripts P 982 M No (M)
 Wilkinson [60] 2009 UK Army Infantry P 660 No
Calcium intake (low)
 Chatzipapas [53] 2008 Greece n/a Active duty R 64 No
 Givon [61] 2000 Israel n/a P 2306 M No (M)
 Moran [62] 2012 Israel Army Recruits of elite combat unit P 116 No
 Moran [63] 2012 Israel Army Elite combat unit BCT P 74 Yes
Milk consumption (low)
 Cosman [64] 2013 USA Army Military Academy P 755 M, 136 F No
 Moran [62] 2012 Israel Army Recruits of elite combat unit P 116 No
 Sanchez-Santos [65 2017 UK Marines Recruits P 1082 M Yes (M)
Vegetables consumption
 Robinson [57] 2016 UK Army Recruits P 1810 No
 Sanchez-Santos [65] 2017 UK Marines Recruits P 1082 M No (M)
Vegetarian diet
 Dash [66] 2012 India Army Recruits P 8570 Yes
Sleep time (reduced)
 Kovcan [67] 2019 Slovenia Army Infantry, active duty R 118 M, 11 F No
 Wyss [68] 2014 Switzerland Army Recruits BCT P 1676 Yes
Smoking
 Altarac [69] 2000 USA Army Recruits P 187 M, 915 F Yes
 Anderson [70] 2015 USA Army Light Infantry Brigade R 2101 Yes
 Anderson [71] 2017 USA Army Light Infantry R 4384 M, 363 F No
 Bedno [72] 2013 USA Army IET P 8456 M Yes
 Bedno [35] 2019 USA Army Recruits BCT R 238,772 Yes
 Brooks [73] 2019 USA Army Recruits BCT R 1460 M, 540 F Yes
 Canham-Chervak [52] 2006 USA Army Recruits P 1156 M, 746 F Yes
 Chatzipapas [53] 2008 Greece n/a Active duty R 64 No
 Cosio-Lima [54] 2013 USA Army Sergeants Major Academy R 149 No
 Cosman [64] 2013 USA Army Military Academy P 755 M, 136 F Yes
 Cowan [74] 2012 USA Army Trainees P 1568 F No
 Cowan [75] 2011 USA Army Recruits P 7323 Yes
 Davey [76] 2015 UK Marines P 1090 M Yes
 Fallowfield [77] 2018 UK Air Force Recruits P 990 M, 203 F Yes
 Givon [61] 2000 Israel n/a P 2306 M Yes (less)
 Grier [78] 2017 USA Army Infantry brigades R 4236 M No
 Grier [79] 2010 USA Multiple R 24,177 M Yes
 Kelly [80] 2000 USA Navy Recruits BCT R 86 F No
 Knapik [81] 2010 USA Air Force Recruits BCT P 1042 M, 375 F Yes
 Knapik [82] 2013 USA Army Army military police training P 1838 M, 553 F Yes##
 Knapik [83] 2013 USA Army Brigade Combat Team# P 805 No
 Knapik [84] 2007 USA Army Band R 159 M, 46 F No
 Knapik [85] 2001 USA Army Recruits P 182 M, 168 F Yes
 Knapik [86] 2008 USA Army Paratrooper training R 1677 No
 Knapik [87] 2008 USA Army Recruits BCT P 2147 M, 920 F Yes
 Knapik [88] 2009 USA Marines Recruits BCT P 840 M, 571 F Yes (M), No (F)
 Korvala [89] 2010 Finland n/a Conscripts P 192 No
 Lappe [55] 2005 USA Army Recruits BCT R 4139 F Yes
 Kovcan [67] 2019 Slovenia Army Infantry, active duty R 118 M, 11 F Yes
 Lappe [56] 2001 USA Army Recruits BCT P 3758 F Yes
 Lauder [90] 2000 USA Army Active duty P 230 F No (F)
 Munnoch [91] 2007 UK Marines P 1115 M Yes
 Nagai [92] 2017 USA Army Airborne Div P 275 Yes
 Pihlajamäki [93] 2019 Finland n/a R 4029 M No
 Psaila [94] 2017 Malta n/a Recruits BCT P 114 M, 13 F No
 Rappole [95] 2017 USA Army Army Brigade R 1099 Yes
 Reynolds [96] 2009 USA Army Infantry P 181 Yes
 Reynolds [97] 2002 USA Army Construction engineers & Combat artillery soldiers P 313 No
 Reynolds [98] 2000 USA Marines Winter mountain training P 356 Yes
 Robinson [57] 2016 UK Army Recruits P 1810 No
 Roos [99] 2015 Switzerland Army Recruits P 651 M Yes
 Ruohola [100] 2006 Finland n/a Recruits P 756 M No
 Sanchez-Santos [65] 2017 UK Marines Recruits P 1082 M No
 Scheinowitz [101] 2017 Israel Army Recruits P 350 F No
 Schneider [58] 2000 USA Army Airborne Div R 1214 No
 Sharma [102] 2019 UK Army Infantry recruits P 562 M Yes
 Sharma [103] 2011 UK Army Infantry recruits P 468 M Yes
 Taanila [59] 2012 Finland Army Conscripts P 982 M No (M)
 Taanila [104] 2015 Finland Army Conscripts P 1411 M Yes
 Trone [105] 2014 USA

Marine Corp

Air Force

Army

Recruits BCT R 900 M, 597 F Yes
 Wang [106] 2003 China n/a Military Police Forces Training R 805 M No
 Wilkinson [60] 2009 UK Army Infantry P 660 No
 Wunderlin [107] 2015 Switzerland Army Recruits P 230 M Yes
 Zhao [108] 2016 China Army Recruits P 1398 M No

BCT basis combat training; n/a Not available; R retrospective study; P prospective study; M male; F female; (M) risk factor only for males; (F) risk factor only for females

*Risk factor for musculoskeletal injuries (MSkI); #Deployment; ##Former smoking

There is insufficient scientific evidence for alcohol intake as a modifiable risk factor.

Calcium intake (low)

Four studies focused on low (daily) calcium intake as a risk factor for MSkIs (Table 1). Three studies were conducted in the Israel Defense Force (IDF) and one in the Armed Forces of Greece. The sizes of the study populations ranged from 64 to 2306 participants. Only the study with one of the smallest populations identified low daily calcium intake as a risk factor for MSkIs. The other three studies, including one with more than 2000 participants, did not find a significant association.

There is insufficient scientific evidence for low (daily) calcium intake as a modifiable risk factor.

Milk consumption (low)

Three studies focused on milk consumption as a risk factor for MSkIs (Table 1). The research was conducted within the militaries of Israel, the USA, and the UK (1 study from each country). The sizes of the study populations ranged from 116 to 1082 participants. Only one study identified low milk consumption as a risk factor for MSkIs; the other two studies did not find a significant association.

There is insufficient scientific evidence for low milk consumption as a modifiable risk factor.

Vegetable consumption

Two studies focused on the amount of vegetables eaten (as measured via a self-report questionnaire) as a risk factor for MSkIs (Table 1). The research was conducted within different branches of the UK military. The sizes of the study populations ranged from 1082 to 1810 participants. Neither study found a significant association between the amount of vegetable consumption and MSkIs.

There is no scientific evidence for the amount of vegetable consumption as a modifiable risk factor for MSkIs.

Vegetarian diet

Only one study focused on a vegetarian diet as a risk factor for MSkIs (Table 1). This study was conducted within the Indian Army. In this study, with 8570 participants, a vegetarian diet was identified as a risk factor for stress fractures.

There is weak scientific evidence for a vegetarian diet as a modifiable risk factor.

(Reduced) sleep time

Two studies focused on little time for sleep as a risk factor for MSkIs (Table 1). These studies were conducted within the Army of Switzerland and the Army of Slovenia. The sizes of the study populations ranged from 129 to 1676 participants. A larger study identified little time for sleep as a risk factor for MSkIs; however, this was not observed within the smaller study.

There is weak scientific evidence for little time for sleep as a modifiable risk factor.

Smoking

Fifty-four studies focused on smoking as a risk factor for MSkIs (Table 1). Most of the research was conducted within different branches of the US Armed Forces (32 studies); additional studies were conducted within the militaries of the UK (8 studies), Finland (5 studies), China, Israel, Switzerland (2 studies from each) and Greece, Malta and Slovenia (1 study from each nation). The study populations ranged from 64 to 238,772 participants. Twenty-seven studies identified smoking as a risk factor for MSkIs, and 23 studies did not find a significant association between smoking and MSkI. One study found a significant increase in MSkIs related to a lower level of smoking, and one study found that former smoking habits were a significant risk factor for MSkIs. In one study, the association between smoking and increased risk for MSkIs was found only for males (not for females). A meta-analysis, which included 18 studies, found that smoking increases the risk for MSkIs, for males by 26% (a low level of smoking) up to 84% (a high level of smoking) and for females by 30% (low level of smoking) up to 56% (high level of smoking) [24]. For both sexes together, the increased risk ranges from 27 to 71%.

There is strong scientific evidence for smoking as a modifiable risk factor for MSkIs. Smoking is associated with a 27–71% increased risk of MSkIs.

Medical factors

Current illness

The term “current illness” was used to describe the situation where an injured person was ill (e.g., with influenza at the time the MSkI occurred). There was only one study on current illness as a risk factor for MSkIs (Table 2). The study was conducted in 2010 in the US Armed Forces. With 24,177 male participants, this study found a significant association between current illness and an increased risk for MSkIs. It must be noted that the risk factor “current illness” may represent a bias. Soldiers with an identified current illness are generally removed from active duty and training. This means that current illness is a risk factor mostly based on retrospective self-report by the service member.

Table 2.

Summary of studies that focused on current illness, prior pregnancy, prescription of contraceptives, prescription of NSAIDs, previous MSkIs, serum iron/serum ferritin, and vitamin D status as risk factors for MSkIs

Study Publication year Country Branches Unit/training Study type n Risk factor*
Current illness
 Grier [79] 2010 USA Multiple R 24,177 M Yes (M)
Prescription of contraceptives
 Knapik [87] 2008 USA Army Recruits BCT P 920 F No
 Knapik [88] 2009 USA Marines Recruits BCT P 571 F No
 Scheinowitz [101] 2017 Israel Army Recruits P 350 F No
 Shaffer [109] 2006 USA Marines Recruits BCT R 2962 F No
Prescription of NSAID
 Hughes [50] 2019 USA Army Active duty R 120,730 Yes
Previous MSkI
 Cameron [110] 2013 USA Army Military Academy P 630 M, 84 F Yes
 Cosman [64] 2013 USA Army Military Academy P 755 M, 136 F No
 Evans [111] 2005 USA Army R 1532 Yes
 Finestone [112] 2011 Israel Army Elite infantry soldier P 77 M No (M)
 Garnock [113] 2018 Australia Navy Recruits P 95 M, 39 F Yes
 George [114] 2012 USA Army Combat medics P 1230 Yes
 Givon [61] 2000 Israel n/a P 2306 M Yes (M) (invers)
 Hill [115] 2013 USA Army Active duty R 83,323 Yes
 Knapik [81] 2010 USA Air Force Recruits BCT P 1042 M, 375 F No
 Knapik [82] 2013 USA Army Army military police training P 1838 M, 553 F Yes (M), No (F)
 Knapik [116] 2013 USA Army Combat engineer enlisted trainees P 1633 Yes
 Knapik [83] 2013 USA Army Brigade Combat Team# P 805 No
 Knapik [86] 2008 USA Army Paratrooper training R 1677 Yes
 Knapik [87] 2008 USA Army Recruits BCT P 2147 M, 920 F No (M), Yes (F)
 Kovcan [67] 2019 Slovenia Army Infantry, active duty R 118 M, 11 F Yes
 Kucera [117] 2016 USA Army Cadets P 9811 Yes
 Lappe [56] 2001 USA Army Recruits BCT P 3758 F No (F)
 Lisman [118] 2013 USA Marines Officer candidate training P 874 Yes
 Monnier [119] 2019 Sweden Marines Training course P 48 M, 5 F Yes
 Rice [120] 2017 UK Marines Recruits P 147 M Yes (M) (invers)
 Robinson [57] 2016 UK Army Recruits P 1810 Yes
 Roos [99] 2015 Switzerland Army Recruits P 651 M Yes (M)
 Roy [121] 2014 USA Army Active duty R 625 F Yes (F)
 Schneider [58] 2000 USA Army Airborne Div R 1214 Yes
 Scott [122] 2015 USA Army Reserve Officer Training R 165 M, 30 F No
 Shaffer [109] 2006 USA Marines Recruits BCT R 2962 F No (F)
 Taanila [123] 2010 Finland n/a Conscripts P 944 M Yes (M)
 Wang [106] 2003 China n/a Military Police Forces Training R 805 M Yes (M)
 Wilkinson [60] 2009 UK Army Infantry P 660 Yes
 Zhao [108] 2016 China Army Recruits P 1398 M Yes## (M)
Prior pregnancy
 Knapik [87] 2008 USA Army Recruits BCT P 920 F Yes
Serum iron/serum ferritin
 Merkel [124] 2008 Israel Army Infantry/non-combatant (medics) P 83 M, 355 F Yes
 Moran [125] 2008 Israel Army Recruits P 227 F Yes (F)
Vitamin D status
 Burgi [126] 2011 USA Navy Recruits P 2300 F Yes (F)
 Davey [127] 2016 UK Marines P 1082 M Yes (M)
 Givon [61] 2000 Israel n/a P 2306 M Yes (M)
 Sanchez-Santos [65] 2017 UK Marines Recruits P 1082 M No (M)

BCT basis combat training; n/a not available; R retrospective study; P prospective study; M male; F female; (M) risk factor only for males; (F) risk factor only for females; NSAID non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs

*Risk factor for musculoskeletal injuries (MSkI); #Deployment; ##Only for fractures

There is weak scientific evidence for current illness as a non-modifiable risk factor.

The prescription of contraceptives

Four studies focused on the prescription of contraceptives as a risk factor for MSkIs (Table 2). Most of the research was conducted within different branches of the US Armed Forces (3 studies). An additional study was conducted within the IDF. The sizes of the study populations ranged from 350 to 2962 participants. None of the four studies identified the prescription of contraceptives as a risk factor for MSkIs.

There is no scientific evidence for the prescription of contraceptives as a modifiable risk factor for MSkIs.

The prescription of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs)

Only one study focused on the prescription of a NSAID as a risk factor for MSkIs (Table 2). This study was conducted within the US Army. In this retrospective study, with 120,730 participants, the prescription of a NSAID was identified as a risk factor for MSkIs (specifically stress fractures). There may be a bias between NSAID use and increased risk for a stress fracture because with the medication, soldiers may have stayed in training longer and consequently were more likely to suffer a fracture. Therefore, this study also explored the relationship with a subset who were taking NSAIDs for non-pain or injury reasons and found a similar relationship with increased risk for MSkIs.

There is weak scientific evidence for prescription for a NSAID as a modifiable risk factor.

Previous MSkIs

Thirty studies focused on previous MSkIs as a risk factor for MSkIs (Table 2). Most of the research was conducted within different branches of the US Armed Forces (18 studies); the remaining research was conducted within the militaries of the UK (3 studies), Israel and China (2 studies from each), Australia, Finland, Slovenia, Sweden, and Switzerland (1 study from each nation). The sizes of the study populations ranged from 53 to 83,323 participants. Nineteen of the 30 studies identified an earlier MSkI as a risk factor for MSkIs; 7 studies did not find a significant association. Two studies found a significant association only for one sex but not the other. The remaining two studies found that an earlier MSkI reduced the risk for MSkIs.

There is strong scientific evidence for earlier MSkIs as a non-modifiable risk factor for MSkIs.

Prior pregnancy

Only one study focused on prior pregnancy as a risk factor for MSkIs (Table 2). This study was conducted within the US Army. In this study, with 920 female participants, prior pregnancy > 7 months prior was identified as a risk factor for MSkIs.

There is weak scientific evidence for prior pregnancy as a non-modifiable risk factor.

Serum iron/serum ferritin (lower)

Two studies focused on serum iron/serum ferritin as a risk factor for MSkIs (Table 2). Both studies were conducted within the IDF. The sizes of the study populations were 227 and 438 participants. Both studies identified low serum iron/serum ferritin as a risk factor for MSkIs.

There is weak scientific evidence for low serum iron/serum ferritin as a modifiable risk factor.

Vitamin D status [low level of 25(OH)D]

Four studies focused on vitamin D status as a risk factor for MSkIs (Table 2). The studies were conducted within the militaries of the UK (2 studies), Israel, and the US (1 study from each country). The sizes of the populations of both UK studies [65, 127] were the same. The study populations ranged from 1082 to 2306 participants. Three studies identified low vitamin D status as a risk factor for MSkIs, while another study did not find a significant association. The two studies from the UK reported different outcomes. Davey et al. [127] reported a significant difference in vitamin D level for participants who have suffered a stress fracture when compared to a group that did not [(64.2 ± 28.2) nmol/L for participants with stress fracture vs. (78.6 ± 35.9) nmol/L for participants without a stress fracture, P = 0.004]. Alternatively, Sanchez-Santos et al. [65] presented the results as odds ratios with a cutoff value for a low level of vitamin D at 50 nmol/L. They found no difference in the likelihood of stress fractures between the groups above and below the vitamin D level cutoff (P = 0.077).

In a meta-analysis by Dao et al. [23], it was reported that the mean serum 25(OH)D level was lower in stress fracture cases than in controls at the time of entry into basic training. The mean serum 25(OH)D level was also lower in the stress fracture cases at the time of stress fracture diagnosis.

There is moderate scientific evidence for a low level of vitamin D status as a modifiable risk factor.

Occupational factors

Branch

Three studies focused on membership in different branches as a risk factor for MSkIs (Table 3). Two studies were conducted within the US Armed Forces and 1 within the Army of Finland. The sizes of the study populations ranged from 982 to 423,581 participants. All 3 studies identified membership to different branches as a risk factor for MSkIs.

Table 3.

Summary of studies that focused on branch, length of service, load carriage, MOS, previous deployment, and status (active vs. reserve) as risk factors for MskIs

Study Publication year Country Branches Unit/training Study type n Risk factor*
Branch
 Cameron [44] 2010 USA Multiple Active duty R 423,581 Yes
 Owens [128] 2009 USA Army, Marines, Navy, Air Force Active duty R 19,730 Yes
 Taanila [59] 2012 Finland Army Conscripts P 982 M Yes (M)
Length of service
 Hill [115] 2013 USA Army Active duty R 83,323 Yes
 Knapik [86] 2008 USA Army Paratrooper training R 1677 Yes
 Kuikka [36] 2013 Finland Army Conscripts R 128,584 Yes
 Mattila [38] 2007 Finland Army Conscripts P 149,750 M, 2345 F No
 Reynolds [98] 2000 USA Marines Winter mountain training P 356 No
 Schermann [129] 2018 Israel Army Infantry unit vs. female unit working with dogs## R 7949 Yes
 Scott [122] 2015 USA Army Reserve Officer Training R 165 M, 30 F Yes
 Wilkinson [60] 2009 UK Army Infantry P 660 No
Load carriage
 Constantini [130] 2010 Israel Army Border Police Infantry P 1423 F Yes (F)
 Knapik [83] 2013 USA Army Brigade Combat Team# P 805 Yes
 Konitzer [131] 2008 USA n/a Active duty# R 863 Yes
 Rappole [132] 2018 USA Army Active duty R 368 F No (F)
 Roy [133] 2012 USA Army Brigade Combat Team# P 246 M, 17 F Yes
 Roy [134] 2015 USA Army Brigade Combat Team# R 536 M, 57 F Yes
MOS
 Anderson [71] 2017 USA Army Light Infantry R 4384 M, 363 F No
 Darakjy [8] 2006 USA Army Active duty P 4101 M, 413 F Yes
 Roy [135] 2011 USA Army Brigade Combat Team P 3066 patient encounters Yes
 Schermann [129] 2018 Israel Army Infantry unit vs. female unit working with dogs R 7949 Yes
 Schwartz [136] 2018 Israel Army Combat units R 19,791 M Yes (M)
 Sefton [137] 2016 USA Army Recruits IET P 1788 M Yes (M)
 Sharma [138] 2017 UK Army Recruits P 5708 Yes
Previous deployment
 Hill [115] 2013 USA Army Active duty R 83,323 Yes
 Konitzer [131] 2008 USA n/a Active duty# R 863 Yes
 Roy [121] 2014 USA Army Active duty R 625 F Yes (F)
 Skeehan [139] 2009 USA Army, Marine, Navy Active duty# R 3367 No
Status (active vs. reserve)
 Canham-Chervak [52] 2006 USA Army Recruits P 1156 M, 746 f

No (M)

Yes (F)

 Knapik [87] 2008 USA Army Recruits BCT P 2147 M, 920 F Yes (invers)
 Skeehan [139] 2009 USA Army, Marine, Navy Active duty# R 3367 Yes

BCT basis combat training; IET initial entry training; n/a not available; R retrospective study; P prospective study; M male; F female; (M) risk factor only for males; (F) Risk factor only for females; MOS Military occupational specialty

*Risk factor for musculoskeletal injuries (MSkI); #Deployment; ##LOS examined in month of service

There is strong scientific evidence for branches as a non-modifiable risk factor for MSkI.

Length of service

Eight studies focused on the length of service as a risk factor for MSkIs (Table 3). Half of the research was conducted within different branches of the US Armed Forces (4 studies), and the remaining studies were conducted within the militaries of Finland (2 studies), Israel, and the UK (1 study from each country). The sizes of the study populations ranged from 195 to 152,095 participants. Five studies identified that military servicemen and servicewomen with a longer length of service have an increased risk for MSkIs; 3 studies did not find a significant association. Two of the largest studies only examined conscripts (Kuikka et al. [36] and Mattila et al. [38]), with a small range of lengths of service, and found conflicting results. Hill et al. [115] included a broad range of active duty personnel and showed a strong association for military servicemen and women with more than 10 years of service for an increased risk of MSkIs. Reynolds et al. [98] and Wilkinson et al. [60] detected no association, but had only a small range of lengths of service.

There is moderate scientific evidence for length of service as a non-modifiable risk factor.

Load carriage

Six studies focused on load carriage as a risk factor for MSkIs (Table 3). Most of the research was conducted in the US Armed Forces (5 studies); the remaining study was conducted within the IDF. The sizes of the study populations ranged from 263 to 1423 participants. Five studies identified body-borne load as a risk factor for MSkIs, with 3 of the 5 studies reporting load via self-report. One study found no association between load carriage and the risk for MSkIs.

There is strong scientific evidence for body-borne load as a modifiable risk factor for MSkI.

Military occupational specialty (MOS)

Seven studies focused on military occupational specialties (MOS) as a risk factor for MSkIs (Table 3). Most of the research was conducted within the US Armed Forces, 2 studies were from the IDF, and only 1 study was from the military of the UK. The sizes of the study populations ranged from 1788 to 19,791 participants. All but one study (with light infantry) identified membership in different MOSs as a risk factor for MSkIs.

There is strong scientific evidence for MOS as a non-modifiable risk factor for MSkI.

Previous deployment

Four studies focused on previous deployment as a risk factor for MSkIs (Table 3). All 4 studies were conducted within different branches of the US Armed Forces. The sizes of the study populations ranged from 625 to 83,323 participants. Three of the 4 studies identified previous deployment as a risk factor for MSkI, and 1 study did not find a significant association.

There is moderate scientific evidence for previous deployment as a non-modifiable risk factor.

Status (active vs. reserve)

Three studies focused on status (active vs. reserve) as a risk factor for MSkIs (Table 3). All 3 studies were conducted within the US Armed Forces. The sizes of the study populations ranged from 1902 to 3367 participants. All 3 studies identified status as a risk factor for MSkIs: 1 study only for women (when they are in the reserve instead of active duty), 1 for active personnel vs. reserve, and 1 for reserve vs. active personnel.

There is no scientific evidence for being part of the reserve (instead of active duty) as a non-modifiable risk factor for MSkIs.

Physiological factors

Age

Sixty-five studies focused on age as a risk factor for MSkIs (Table 4). Most of the research was conducted within different branches of the US Armed Forces, 8 within the military of the UK, and 7 within the military of Finland; the other studies were conducted within the militaries of China (3 studies), Israel (2 studies), Belgium, Greece, Iran, Poland, and Switzerland (1 study for each country). The study populations ranged from 44 to 5,580,875 participants. Thirty-three of the 65 studies identified older age as a risk factor for MSkIs (however, the definitions of older age differ across studies); 30 studies did not find a significant association between age and MSkIs, while 1 study found a significant rise in MSkIs for younger participants when compared to older participants. When only studies with a population of 1400 or more participants were taken into account (this represents 31 of the 65 studies), 23 studies revealed a significant association between age and an increased risk for MSkIs compared to only 8 studies that did not find a significant association. When only studies that had 5000 participants or more were considered, the relationship was 12 (significant association) vs. 1 (no association).

Table 4.

Summary of studies that focused on age, ankle dorsiflexion, and balance as risk factors for MskI

Study Publication year Country Branches Unit/training Study type n Risk factor*
Age
 Anderson [70] 2015 USA Army Light Infantry Brigade R 2101 Yes
 Anderson [71] 2017 USA Army Light Infantry R 4384 M, 363 F Yes
 Beck [140] 2000 USA Marines P 624 M, 693 F No
 Bedno [72] 2013 USA Army IET P 8456 M Yes (M)
 Cameron [44] 2010 USA Multiple Active duty R 423,581 Yes
 Canham-Chervak [141] 2000 USA Army Recruits BCT P 655 M, 498 F No
 Canham-Chervak [52] 2006 USA Army Recruits P 1156 M, 746 F No
 Cosio-Lima [54] 2013 USA Army Sergeants Major Academy R 149 No
 Cowan [74] 2012 USA Army Trainees P 1568 F No (F)
 Cowan [75] 2011 USA Army Recruits P 7323 Yes
 Craig [40] 2000 USA Army Airborne Division R 242,949 aircraft exists Yes (30 years +)
 Davey [76] 2015 UK Marines P 1090 M No (M)
 Dixon [142] 2019 UK Marines Recruits P 1065 Yes (younger)
 Grier [78] 2017 USA Army Infantry Brigade R 4236 M Yes (M)
 Grier [79] 2010 USA Multiple R 24,177 M Yes (M)
 Havenetidis [143] 2011 Greece n/a Recruits P 253 Yes
 Henderson [144] 2000 USA Army Combat medic P 439 M, 287 F Yes
 Hill [115] 2013 USA Army Active duty R 83,323 Yes
 Knapik [47] 2012 USA Army Recruits BCT R 475,745 M, 107,906 F Yes
 Knapik [145] 2006 USA Army Recruits BCT P 1174 M, 898 F Yes
 Knapik [82] 2013 USA Army Army military police training P 1838 M, 553 F Yes
 Knapik [146] 2007 USA Army Mechanics R 518 M, 43 F No
 Knapik [84] 2007 USA Army Band R 159 M, 46 F No
 Knapik [85] 2001 USA Army Recruits P 182 M, 168 F No
 Knapik [86] 2008 USA Army Paratrooper training R 1677 Yes
 Knapik [87] 2008 USA Army Recruits BCT P 2147 M, 920 F Yes
 Knapik [88] 2009 USA Marines Recruits BCT P 840 M, 571 F No
 Korvala [89] 2010 Finland n/a Conscripts P 192 Yes
 Kuikka [36] 2013 Finland Army Conscripts R 128,584 Yes
 Lappe [55] 2005 USA Army Recruits BCT R 4139 F Yes (F)
 Lappe [56] 2001 USA Army Recruits BCT P 3758 F Yes (F)
 Lauder [90] 2000 USA Army Active duty P 230 F No (F)
 Ma [147] 2016 China n/a R 2479 No
 Mahieu [148] 2006 Belgium n/a Recruits Royal Military Academy P 69 M No (M)
 Mattila [38] 2007 Finland Army Conscripts P 149,750 M, 2345 F Yes
 Moran [149] 2013 Israel Army Recruits P 44 No
 Munnoch [91] 2007 UK Marines P 1115 M Yes (M)
 Nunns [150] 2016 UK Marines Recruits P 160 M No (M)
 Nye [151] 2016 USA Air Force Recruits BCT R 67,525 Yes
 Owens [152] 2007 USA n/a Active duty R 4451 Yes
 Owens [128] 2009 USA Army, Marines, Navy, Air Force Active duty R 19,730 Yes
 Parr [153] 2015 USA Army Special Operations Forces P 106 No
 Pihlajamäki [93] 2019 Finland n/a Full duty R 4029 M No (M)
 Rabin [154] 2014 Israel Army Recruits P 70 M No (M)
 Reynolds [96] 2009 USA Army Infantry P 181 No
 Reynolds [97] 2002 USA Army Construction engineers & Combat artillery soldiers P 313 No
 Roos [99] 2015 Switzerland Army Recruits P 651 M No (M)
 Roy [133] 2012 USA Army Brigade Combat Team# P 246 M, 17 F No
 Roy [121] 2014 USA Army Active duty R 625 F Yes (F)
 Ruohola [100] 2006 Finland n/a Recruits P 756 M No (M)
 Sanchez-Santos [65] 2017 UK Marines Recruits P 1082 M Yes (M)
 Schneider [58] 2000 USA Army Airborne Div R 1214 Yes
 Sefton [137] 2016 USA Army Recruits IET P 1788 M Yes (M)
 Shaffer [109] 2006 USA Marines Recruits BCT R 2962 F No (F)
 Sharma [102] 2019 UK Army Infantry recruits P 562 M No (M)
 Sharma [103] 2011 UK Army Infantry recruits P 468 M No (M)
 Skeehan [139] 2009 USA Army, Marine, Navy Active duty# R 3367 No
 Sobhani [155] 2015 Iran n/a Recruits R 181 M No (M)
 Sormaala [39] 2006 Finland n/a Recruits R 118,149 No
 Taanila [59] 2012 Finland Army Conscripts P 982 M Yes (M)
 Trybulec [156] 2016 Poland Army Airborne Brigade R 162 M, 3 F Yes
 Wang [106] 2003 China n/a Military Police Forces Training R 805 M No (M)
 Waterman [31] 2016 USA Multiple Active Duty R 5,580,875 Yes
 Wilkinson [60] 2009 UK Army Infantry P 660 Yes
 Zhao [108] 2016 China Army Recruits P 1398 M No (M)
Ankle dorsiflexion (limited)
 Dixon [30] 2006 UK Marines Recruits R 20 No
 Rabin [154] 2014 Israel Army Recruits P 70 M No (M)
Balance (low)
 Heebner [157] 2017 USA Army Special Operation Forces P 95 No
 Sell [158] 2014 USA Special Operation Forces P 226 Yes

BCT basis combat training; IET initial entry training; n/a not available; R retrospective study; P prospective study; M male; F female; (M) risk factor only for males; (F) risk factor only for females

*Risk factor for musculoskeletal injuries (MSkI); #Deployment

There is moderate scientific evidence for age as a non-modifiable risk factor.

Ankle dorsiflexion (limited)

Only 2 studies focused on limited ankle dorsiflexion as a risk factor for MSkIs (Table 4). One study was conducted within the IDF, and one in the armed forces of the UK. The sizes of the study populations were 20 and 70 participants, respectively. In both studies, limited ankle dorsiflexion was not significantly identified as a risk factor for MSkIs.

There is no scientific evidence for limited ankle dorsiflexion as a non-modifiable risk factor.

Balance (low)

Two studies focused on low balance as a risk factor for MSkIs (Table 4). These studies were conducted within the special operations forces of the US military. In the larger study, poor balance (measured as single-leg balance with the eyes open, and the eyes closed on a force plate) was identified as a risk factor for MSkIs, whereas in the other studies, no association was identified.

There is weak scientific evidence for low balance as a modifiable risk factor.

BMI: in general

Fifty-two studies focused on BMI (in general) as a risk factor for MSkIs (Table 5). BMI in general means that the studies have looked at BMI without categorization (such as obese, overweight, underweight categories). This makes it very difficult to compare different study outcomes. Most of the research was conducted within different branches of the US Armed Forces (24 studies); 9 studies within the military of the UK, 6 within the Finnish armed forces, and 5 within the IDF. The remaining studies were conducted in the militaries of Switzerland (3 studies), Greece (2 studies), Australia, Belgium, and Malta (1 study each). The sizes of the study populations ranged from 44 to 238,772 participants. Fourteen of the 52 studies identified BMI as a risk factor for MSkIs. Thirteen studies found that higher BMI was a risk factor; 1 study found that lower BMI was a risk factor. Thirty-five studies did not find a significant association between BMI and MSkIs, and 3 studies found that BMI is a risk factor for men, but not for women.

Table 5.

Summary of studies that focused on BMI (in general), obesity, being overweight, and being underweight as risk factors for MskIs

Study Publication year Country Branches Unit/training Study type n Risk factor*
BMI (in general)
 Allsopp [159] 2003 UK Navy Recruits R 1287 M, 354 F Yes
 Beck [140] 2000 USA Marines P 624 M, 693 F Yes (M), no (F)
 Bedno [35] 2019 USA Army Recruits BCT R 238,772 Yes (M), no (F)
 Billings [160] 2004 USA Air Force Recruits BCT R 2006 Yes
 Blacker [161] 2008 UK Army Recruits R 11,937 M, 1480 F Yes
 Burgi [126] 2011 USA Navy Recruits P 2300 F No (F)
 Cosio-Lima [54] 2013 USA Army Sergeants Major Academy R 149 No
 Davey [76] 2015 UK Marines P 1090 M No (M)
 Garnock [113] 2018 Australia Navy Recruits P 95 M, 39 F No
 George [114] 2012 USA Army Combat medics P 1230 Yes
 Havenetidis [162] 2017 Greece Army Officer recruits P 268 M No (M)
 Havenetidis [143] 2011 Greece n/a Recruits P 253 No
 Jones [34] 2017 USA Army Recruits BCT R 143,398 M, 41,727 F Yes
 Knapik [145] 2006 USA Army Recruits BCT P 1174 M, 898 F No
 Knapik [82] 2013 USA Army Army military police training P 1838 M, 553 F Yes
 Knapik [146] 2007 USA Army Mechanics R 518 M, 43 F Yes (M)
 Knapik [84] 2007 USA Army Band R 159 M, 46 F No
 Knapik [85] 2001 USA Army Recruits P 182 M, 168 F No
 Knapik [86] 2008 USA Army Paratrooper training R 1677 No
 Knapik [87] 2008 USA Army Recruits BCT P 2147 M, 920 F No
 Knapik [88] 2009 USA Marines Recruits BCT P 840 M, 571 F No
 Kodesh [163] 2015 Israel n/a Combat Fitness Instructor Course P 158 F No
 Korvala [89] 2010 Finland n/a Conscripts P 192 Yes
 Kupferer [164] 2014 USA Air Force Trainees R 141 No
 Lauder [90] 2000 USA Army Active duty P 230 F Yes (F)
 Mahieu [148] 2006 Belgium n/a Recruits Royal Military Academy P 69 M No
 Mattila [38] 2007 Finland Army Conscripts P 149,750 M, 2345 F No
 Moran [149] 2013 Israel Army Recruits P 44 No
 Moran [63] 2012 Israel Army Elite combat unit BCT P 74 No (M)
 Moran [125] 2008 Israel Army Recruits P 227 F Yes (F)
 Munnoch [91] 2007 UK Marines P 1115 M No (M)
 Nunns [150] 2016 UK Marines Recruits P 160 M Yes (M)
 Nye [151] 2016 USA Air Force Recruits BCT R 67,525 No
 Parr [153] 2015 USA Army Special Operations Forces P 106 No
 Pihlajamäki [93] 2019 Finland n/a Full duty R 4029 M No (M)
 Psaila [94] 2017 Malta n/a Recruits BCT P 114 M, 13 F No
 Rabin [154] 2014 Israel Army Recruits P 70 M No (M)
 Rappole [95] 2017 USA Army Army Brigade R 1099 Yes
 Reynolds [98] 2000 USA Marines Winter mountain training P 356 No
 Rice [120] 2017 UK Marines Recruits P 147 M Yes (M, especially lower BMI)
 Roos [99] 2015 Switzerland Army Recruits P 651 M No (M)
 Ruohola [100] 2006 Finland n/a Recruits P 756 M No (M)
 Scott [122] 2015 USA Army Reserve Officer Training R 165 M, 30 F No
 Shaffer [109] 2006 USA Marines Recruits BCT R 2962 F No (F)
 Sharma [102] 2019 UK Army Infantry recruits P 562 M No (M)
 Sharma [103] 2011 UK Army Infantry recruits P 468 M No (M)
 Sillanpää [51] 2008 Finland n/a Conscripts R 128,508 M No (M)
 Sormaala [39] 2006 Finland n/a Recruits R 118,149 No
 Waterman [165] 2010 USA Military Academy R 10,511 person years Yes (M), no (F)
 Wilkinson [60] 2009 UK Army Infantry P 660 No
 Wunderlin [107] 2015 Switzerland Army Recruits P 230 M Yes (M)
 Wyss [68] 2014 Switzerland Army Recruits BCT P 1676 NO
Obesity (BMI ≥ 30 kg/m2)
 Anderson [70] 2015 USA Army Light Infantry Brigade R 2101 Yes
 AMSA [43] 2000 USA Army Active duty R 387,536 Yes
 Bedno [72] 2013 USA Army IET P 8456 M Yes (M)
 Billings [160] 2004 USA Air Force Recruits BCT R 2006 Yes
 Canham-Chervak [52] 2006 USA Army Recruits P 1156 M, 746 F Yes
 Cowan [74] 2012 USA Army Trainees P 1568 F No (F)
 Cowan [75] 2011 USA Army Recruits P 7323 Yes
 Gundlach [166] 2012 Germany Army Active duty P 410 Yes
 Henderson [144] 2000 USA Army Combat medic P 439 M, 287 F Yes
 Hruby [48] 2016 USA Army R 736,608 Yes
 Jones [34] 2017 USA Army Recruits BCT R 143,398 M, 41,727 F Yes
 Kuikka [36] 2013 Finland Army Conscripts R 128,584 Yes
 Ma [147] 2016 China n/a R 2479 Yes
 Packnett [41] 2011 USA Army Recruits BCT R 217,468 M, 47,813 F Yes
 Rappole [95] 2017 USA Army Army Brigade R 1099 Yes
 Taanila [123] 2010 Finland n/a Conscripts P 944 M Yes (M)
 Taanila [59] 2012 Finland Army Conscripts P 982 M Yes (M)
Overweight (BMI ≥ 25 and < 30 kg/m2)
 Anderson [70] 2015 USA Army Light Infantry Brigade R 2101 Yes
 Bedno [72] 2013 USA Army IET P 8456 M No (M)
 Billings [160] 2004 USA Air Force Recruits BCT R 2006 Yes
 Canham-Chervak [52] 2006 USA Army Recruits BCT P 1156 M, 746 F Yes
 Cowan [74] 2012 USA Army Trainees P 1568 F No (F)
 Grier [78] 2017 USA Army Infantry Brigade R 4236 M Yes (M)
 Gundlach [166] 2012 Germany Army Active duty P 410 Yes
 Henderson [144] 2000 USA Army Combat medic P 439 M, 287 F Yes
 Hruby [48] 2016 USA Army R 736,608 Yes
 Knapik [47] 2012 USA Army Recruits BCT R 475,745 M, 107,906 F Yes (M), no (F)
 Kuikka [36] 2013 Finland Army Conscripts R 128,584 No
 Ma [147] 2016 China n/a R 2479 Yes
 Mattila [37] 2007 Finland n/a Conscripts R 133,943 M, 2044 F Yes
 Rappole [95] 2017 USA Army Army Brigade R 1099 M Yes (M)
 Taanila [123] 2010 Finland n/a Conscripts P 944 M Yes (M)
 Taanila [59] 2012 Finland Army Conscripts P 982 M No (M)
Underweight (BMI < 18.5 kg/m2)
 AMSA [43] 2000 USA Army Active duty R 387,536 Yes
 Bedno [72] 2013 USA Army IET P 8456 M Yes (M)
 Billings [160] 2004 USA Air Force Recruits BCT R 2006 Yes
 Cowan [74] 2012 USA Army Trainees P 1568 F No (F)
 Finestone [167] 2008 Israel Army Light Infantry training P 36 M, 99 F Yes
 Grier [78] 2017 USA Army Infantry brigade R 4236 M Yes (M)
 Hruby [48] 2016 USA Army R 736,608 Yes
 Jones [34] 2017 USA Army Recruits BCT R 143,398 M, 41,727 F Yes
 Knapik [47] 2012 USA Army Recruits BCT R 475,745 M, 107,906 F Yes
 Kuikka [36] 2013 Finland Army Conscripts R 128,584 No
 Packnett [41] 2011 USA Army Recruits BCT R 217,468 M, 47,813 F Yes
 Reynolds [96] 2009 USA Army Infantry P 181 Yes
 Taanila [104] 2015 Finland Army Conscripts P 1411 M Yes (M)
 Taanila [59] 2012 Finland Army Conscripts P 982 M No (M)
 Wang [106] 2003 China n/a Military Police Forces Training R 805 M Yes (M)

BMI body mass index; BCT basis combat training; IET initial entry training; n/a not available; R Retrospective study; P prospective study; M male; F female; (M) risk factor only for males; (F) risk factor only for females

*Risk factor for musculoskeletal injuries (MSkI)

There is insufficient scientific evidence for BMI in general as a modifiable risk factor.

BMI: obesity (BMI ≥ 30 kg/m2)

Seventeen studies focused on obesity as a risk factor for MSkIs (Table 5). Most of the research was conducted within different branches of the US Armed Forces (12 studies). Additional studies were conducted within the militaries of Finland (3 studies), China, and Germany (1 study for each country). The sizes of the study populations ranged from 410 to 387,536 participants. Sixteen studies identified obesity as a risk factor for MSkIs; only one study, with 1568 participants, did not find a significant association.

There is strong scientific evidence for obesity (BMI ≥ 30 kg/m2) as a modifiable risk factor for MSkIs.

BMI: overweight (BMI ≥ 25 and < 30 kg/m2)

Sixteen studies focused on being overweight as a risk factor for MSkIs (Table 5). Most of the research was conducted within different branches of the US Armed Forces (10 studies); the remaining studies were conducted within the Finnish armed forces (4 studies) and within the militaries of China and Germany (1 study each). The sizes of the study populations ranged from 410 to 736,608 participants. Eleven studies identified being overweight as a risk factor for MSkIs; 4 studies did not find a significant association. One study found an association for men but not for women. It is important to acknowledge that these findings are based on BMI alone; none of the 16 studies analyzed the body composition of the included soldiers in detail (i.e., body fat or muscle mass).

There is strong scientific evidence for being overweight (BMI ≥ 25 and < 30 kg/m2) as a modifiable risk factor for MSkI.

BMI: underweight (BMI < 18.5 kg/m2)

Fifteen studies focused on being underweight as a risk factor for MSkIs (Table 5). Most of the research was conducted within different branches of the US Armed Forces (10 studies); the remaining studies were conducted within the militaries of Finland (3 studies), China, and Israel (1 study each). The sizes of the study populations ranged from 135 to 736,608 participants. Twelve studies identified being underweight as a risk factor for MSkIs, and 3 studies did not find a significant association.

There is strong scientific evidence for being underweight (BMI < 18.5 kg/m2) as a modifiable risk factor for MSkIs.

Body fat (higher)

Eight studies focused on body fat as a risk factor for MSkIs (Table 6). The research was conducted within the armies of Greece (2 studies), Iran (1 study), Israel (2 studies), and the US (3 studies); the studies included different methods for measuring body fat (e.g., self-report, circumference, dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry, 4-site skinfold test). The sizes of the study populations ranged from 44 to 583,651 participants. Six of the 8 studies identified a higher percentage of body fat as a risk factor for MSkIs, and 2 studies did not find a significant association. A retrospective study by Knapik et al. [46], with more than a half million participants, showed a relationship between a greater percentage of body fat and a higher risk for MSkIs.

Table 6.

Summary of studies that focused on body fat, body height, and body weight as risk factors for MskIs

Study Publication year Country Branches Unit/training Study type n Risk factor*
Body fat (higher)
 Anderson [71] 2017 USA Army Light Infantry R 4384 M, 363 F Yes
 Havenetidis [162] 2017 Greece Army Officer recruits P 268 M Yes (M)
 Havenetidis [143] 2011 Greece n/a Recruits P 253 Yes
 Knapik [46] 2018 USA Army Recruits BCT R 475,745 M, 107,906 F Yes
 Kodesh [163] 2015 Israel n/a Combat Fitness Instructor Course P 158 F Yes (F)
 Krauss [168] 2017 USA Army Recruits BCT R 1900 F Yes (F)
 Moran [149] 2013 Israel Army Recruits P 44 No
 Sobhani [155] 2015 Iran n/a Recruits R 181 M No (M)
Body height (higher)
 Beck [140] 2000 USA Marines P 624 M, 693 F Yes (M), no (F)
 Blacker [161] 2008 UK Army Recruits R 11,937 M, 1480 F No
 Cosio-Lima [54] 2013 USA Army Sergeants Major Academy R 149 No
 Davey [76] 2015 UK Marines P 1090 M No (M)
 Fallowfield [77] 2018 UK Air Force Recruits P 990 M, 203 F Yes
 Finestone [112] 2011 Israel Army Elite infantry soldier P 77 M No (M)
 Givon [61] 2000 Israel n/a P 2306 M No (M)
 Kelly [80] 2000 USA Navy Recruits BCT R 86 F Yes (F)
 Knapik [47] 2012 USA Army Recruits BCT R 475,745 M, 107,906 F Yes
 Knapik [145] 2006 USA Army Recruits BCT P 1174 M, 898 F No
 Knapik [146] 2007 USA Army Mechanics R 518 M, 43 F No
 Knapik [84] 2007 USA Army Band R 159 M, 46 F No
 Knapik [86] 2008 USA Army Paratrooper training R 1677 No
 Knapik [87] 2008 USA Army Recruits BCT P 2147 M, 920 F No
 Knapik [88] 2009 USA Marines Recruits BCT P 840 M, 571 F No
 Kodesh [163] 2015 Israel n/a Combat Fitness Instructor Course P 158 F No
 Korvala [89] 2010 Finland n/a Conscripts P 192 Yes
 Kuikka [36] 2013 Finland Army Conscripts R 128,584 No
 Lappe [56] 2001 USA Army Recruits BCT P 3758 F No (F)
 Ma [147] 2016 China n/a R 2479 No
 Mahieu [148] 2006 Belgium n/a Recruits Royal Military Academy P 69 M No (M)
 Mattila [38] 2007 Finland Army Conscripts P 149,750 M, 2345 F No
 Monnier [119] 2019 Sweden Marines Training course P 48 M, 5 F Yes
 Moran [149] 2013 Israel Army Recruits P 44 No
 Moran [63] 2012 Israel Army Elite combat unit BCT P 74 No
 Moran [125] 2008 Israel Army Recruits P 227 F Yes (F)
 Munnoch [91] 2007 UK Marines P 1115 M No (M)
 Nunns [150] 2016 UK Marines Recruits P 160 M No (M)
 Parr [153] 2015 USA Army Special Operations Forces P 106 No
 Reynolds [96] 2009 USA Army Infantry P 181 No
 Reynolds [97] 2002 USA Army Construction engineers & Combat artillery soldiers P 313 Yes (to be shorter)
 Reynolds [98] 2000 USA Marines Winter mountain training P 356 No
 Ruohola [100] 2006 Finland n/a Recruits P 756 M No (M)
 Shaffer [109] 2006 USA Marines Recruits BCT R 2962 F No (F)
 Sharma [102] 2019 UK Army Infantry recruits P 562 M No (M)
 Sharma [103] 2011 UK Army Infantry recruits P 468 M No (M)
 Sillanpää [51] 2008 Finland n/a Conscripts R 128,508 M Yes (M)
 Sobhani [155] 2015 Iran n/a Recruits R 181 M No (M)
 Sormaala [39] 2006 Finland n/a Recruits R 118,149 No
 Sulsky [42] 2018 USA Army Recruits BCT R 278,045 M, 55,302 F Yes
 Taanila [59] 2012 Finland Army Conscripts P 982 M No (M)
 Trybulec [156] 2016 Poland Army Airborne Brigade R 162 M, 3 F No
 Wang [106] 2003 China n/a Military Police Forces Training R 805 M No (M)
 Waterman [165] 2010 USA Military Academy R 10,511 person years Yes
 Wilkinson [60] 2009 UK Army Infantry P 660 No
 Zhao [108] 2016 China Army Recruits P 1398 M No (M)
Body weight (higher)
 Beck [140] 2000 USA Marines P 624 M, 693 F Yes (M), no (F)
 Blacker [161] 2008 UK Army Recruits R 11,937 M, 1480 F No
 Davey [76] 2015 UK Marines P 1090 M No (M)
 Davey [127] 2016 UK Marines P 1082 M No (M)
 Finestone [112] 2011 Israel Army Elite infantry soldier P 77 M No (M)
 Givon [61] 2000 Israel n/a P 2306 M Yes (M)
 Havenetidis [162] 2017 Greece Army Officer recruits P 268 M Yes (M)
 Hughes [169] 2008 Australia Special Operation Forces Active duty R 554 descents Yes
 Kelly [80] 2000 USA Navy Recruits BCT R 86 F Yes (F)
 Knapik [47] 2012 USA Army Recruits BCT R 475,745 M, 107,906 F Yes (invers)
 Knapik [145] 2006 USA Army Recruits BCT P 1174 M, 898 F No
 Knapik [146] 2007 USA Army Mechanics R 518 M, 43 F Yes
 Knapik [84] 2007 USA Army Band R 159 M, 46 F No
 Knapik [86] 2008 USA Army Paratrooper training R 1677 Yes
 Knapik [87] 2008 USA Army Recruits BCT P 2147 M, 920 F No
 Knapik [88] 2009 USA Marines Recruits BCT P 840 M, 571 F No (M), yes (F)
 Kodesh [163] 2015 Israel n/a Combat Fitness Instructor Course P 158 F No (F)
 Korvala [89] 2010 Finland n/a Conscripts P 192 Yes
 Lappe [56] 2001 USA Army Recruits BCT P 3758 F Yes (F)
 Ma [147] 2016 China n/a R 2479 No
 Mahieu [148] 2006 Belgium n/a Recruits Royal Military Academy P 69 M No (M)
 Moran [149] 2013 Israel Army Recruits P 44 No
 Moran [63] 2012 Israel Army Elite combat unit BCT P 74 No
 Monnier [119] 2019 Sweden Marines Training course P 48 M, 5 F No
 Munnoch [91] 2007 UK Marines P 1115 M No (M)
 Nunns [150] 2016 UK Marines Recruits P 160 M No (M)
 Parr [153] 2015 USA Army Special Operations Forces P 106 No
 Reynolds [96] 2009 USA Army Infantry P 181 No
 Reynolds [97] 2002 USA Army Construction engineers & Combat artillery soldiers P 313 Yes
 Reynolds [98] 2000 USA Marines Winter mountain training P 356 No
 Rice [120] 2017 UK Marines Recruits P 147 M Yes (M) (invers)
 Robinson [57] 2016 UK Army Recruits P 1810 Yes
 Ruohola [100] 2006 Finland n/a Recruits P 756 M No (M)
 Sanchez-Santos [65] 2017 UK Marines Recruits P 1082 M Yes (M) (invers)
 Schermann [129] 2018 Israel Army Infantry unit vs. female unit working with dogs R 7949 Yes
 Shaffer [109] 2006 USA Marines Recruits BCT R 2962 F No (F)
 Sharma [102] 2019 UK Army Infantry recruits P 562 M No (M)
 Sharma [103] 2011 UK Army Infantry recruits P 468 M No (M)
 Sillanpää [51] 2008 Finland n/a Conscripts R 128,508 M Yes (M)
 Sobhani [155] 2015 Iran n/a Recruits R 181 M No (M)
 Sormaala [39] 2006 Finland n/a Recruits R 118,149 No
 Trybulec [156] 2016 Poland Army Airborne Brigade R 162 M, 3 F No
 Waterman [165] 2010 USA Military Academy R 10,511 person years Yes
 Wilkinson [60] 2009 UK Army Infantry P 660 No
 Zhao [108] 2016 China Army Recruits P 1398 M No (M)

BCT basis combat training; n/a not available; R retrospective study; P prospective study; M male; F female; (M) risk factor only for males; (F) risk factor only for females

*Risk factor for musculoskeletal injuries (MSkI)

There is strong scientific evidence for higher body fat as a modifiable risk factor for MSkIs.

Body height (higher)

Forty-six studies focused on body height as a risk factor for MSkIs (Table 6). Most of the research was conducted within different branches of the US Armed Forces (18 studies); 8 within the military of the UK, 7 within the military of Finland, and 6 studies within the IDF; the other studies were conducted within the military of China (3 studies), Belgium, Iran, Poland, and Sweden (1 study each). The sizes of the study populations ranged from 44 to 583,651 participants. Eight of the 46 studies identified a taller stature as a risk factor for MSkIs, and 35 studies did not find a significant association. One study found a significant increase in MSkIs associated with a taller stature for men but not for women, and one study found that a shorter stature was a significant risk factor for MSkIs.

There is insufficient scientific evidence for body height as a non-modifiable risk factor for MSkIs.

Body weight (higher)

Forty-five studies focused on body weight as a risk factor for MSkIs (Table 6). Most of the research was conducted within different branches of the US Armed Forces (16 studies); 11 studies within the military of the UK, and 6 within the IDF. The remaining studies were conducted within the militaries of Finland (4 studies), China (2 studies), Australia, Belgium, Greece, Iran, Poland, and Sweden (1 study each). The sizes of the study populations ranged from 44 to 583,651 participants. Thirteen of the 45 studies identified a higher body weight as a risk factor for MSkIs, 27 did not find a significant association between body weight and MSkIs, and 3 studies found a significant increase in MSkIs for a lower body weight. Two studies found different outcomes regarding the participants’ sex.

There is insufficient scientific evidence for higher body weight as a modifiable risk factor.

Bone (mineral) density (low)

Three studies focused on low bone (mineral) density as a risk factor for MSkIs (Table 7). All 3 studies were conducted in the US Army. The sizes of the study populations ranged from 230 to 891 participants. Two studies identified low bone (mineral) density as a risk factor for MSkIs; one study did not find a significant association.

Table 7.

Summary of studies that focused on bone (mineral) density, external rotation of the hip, flexibility, and foot type as risk factors for MskIs

Study Publication year Country Branches Unit/training Study type n Risk factor*
Bone (mineral) density (low)
 Cosman [64] 2013 USA Army Military Academy P 755 M, 136 F Yes
 Knapik [85] 2001 USA Army Recruits P 182 M, 168 F No
 Lauder[90] 2000 USA Army Active duty P 230 F Yes (F)
External rotation of the hip (higher)
 Burne [170] 2004 Australia Military Academy P 122 M, 25 F No
 Finestone [112] 2011 Israel Army Elite infantry soldier P 77 M No (M)
 Garnock [113] 2018 Australia Navy Recruits P 95 M, 39 F Yes
 Rauh [171] 2010 USA Marines Recruits BCT P 748 F Yes (F)
 Sobhani [155] 2015 Iran n/a Recruits R 181 M Yes (M)
Flexibility (lower)
 Heebner [157] 2017 USA Army Special Operations Forces P 95 No
 Keenan [172] 2017 USA Multiple Special Forces P 726 Yes#,##
 Knapik [85] 2001 USA Army Recruits P 182 M, 168 F No#
 Nagai [92] 2017 USA Army Airborne Div P 275 No###
 Wang [106] 2003 China n/a Military Police Forces Training R 805 M No (M)
Foot type
 Esterman [173] 2005 Australia Air Force Recruits P 230 No
 Hetsroni [174] 2006 Israel Army Recruits P 405 M No&
 Levy [175] 2006 USA n/a Military Academy Cadets R 431 M, 73 F Yes&&
 Nunns [150] 2016 UK Marines Recruits P 160 M Yes (M)&&&,&&&&
 Psaila [94] 2017 Malta n/a Recruits BCT P 114 M, 13 F No
 Reynolds [98] 2000 USA Marines Winter mountain training P 356 Yes&&&&&
 Rice [120] 2017 UK Marines Recruits P 147 M Yes (M)&&&
 Yates [176] 2004 UK Navy Recruits P 84 M, 40 F Yes

BCT basis combat training; n/a not available; R retrospective study; P prospective study; M male; F female; (M) risk factor only for males; (F) risk factor only for females

*Risk factor for musculoskeletal injuries (MSkI); #Hamstring-flexibility; ##Gastrocnemius-soleus flexibility; ###Several muscle groups (shoulder, trunk rotation, hip extension, active knee extension, ankle dorsiflexion, ankle plantarflexion); &For any type for foot pronation; &&Pes planus; &&&Width malleolar; &&&&Arch index, corrected calf girth; &&&&&Forefoot varus

There is insufficient scientific evidence for low bone (mineral) density as a non-modifiable risk factor.

External rotation of the hip (higher)

Five studies focused on external rotation (range of motion) of the hip as a risk factor for MSkIs (Table 7). The research was conducted within the militaries of Australia (2 studies), Iran, Israel, and the US (each 1 study). The range of motion of the hip was measured in different ways across the identified studies. The sizes of the study populations ranged from 77 to 748 participants. Three studies (including the two with the most participants) identified that higher external rotation of the hip is a risk factor for MSkIs; two studies did not find a significant association.

There is insufficient scientific evidence for higher external rotation of the hip as a non-modifiable risk factor.

Flexibility (lower)

Five studies focused on flexibility at different anatomical locations as a risk factor for MSkIs (Table 7). Most of the research was conducted within different branches of the US Armed Forces (4 studies), and 1 study was conducted by armed forces from China. The sizes of the study populations ranged from 95 to 805 participants. Only 1 study identified low flexibility as a risk factor for MSkIs, and 5 studies did not find a significant association.

There is insufficient scientific evidence for lower flexibility as a modifiable risk factor.

Foot type

Eight studies focused on foot type (e.g., anatomic differences such as a pes planus, a wide malleolar or a forefoot varus) as a risk factor for MSkIs (Table 7). The studies were conducted within the militaries of the UK (3 studies), USA (2 studies), Australia, Israel, and Malta (1 study from each country). The sizes of the study populations ranged from 124 to 504 participants. Five studies identified different foot types as a risk factor for MSkI, while 3 studies did not.

There is moderate scientific evidence for different foot types as a non-modifiable risk factor.

Genetic factors

Two studies focused on genetic factors as risk factors for MSkIs (Table 8). One study was conducted within the military of China and 1 within the military of Finland. The study populations ranged from 192 to 1398 participants. Both studies identified an association between certain genetic factors and an increased risk for MSkIs. The analyzed genetic factors were different between the 2 studies, so a comparison was not possible. Korvala et al. [89] examined genes involved in bone metabolism and pathology, and Zhao et al. [108] looked at a specific growth differentiation factor 5 (GDF5) polymorphism between recruits with and without stress fractures.

Table 8.

Summary of studies that focused on genetic factors, late menarche, muscular strength, and physical fitness as risk factors for MSkIs

Study Publication year Country Branches Unit/training Study type n Risk factor*
Genetic factors
 Korvala [89] 2010 Finland n/a Conscripts P 192 Yes
 Zhao [108] 2016 China Army Recruits P 1398 M Yes (M)
Late menarche
 Cosman [64] 2013 USA Army Military Academy P 136 F Yes
 Knapik [81] 2010 USA Air Force Recruits BCT P 375 F No
 Knapik [87] 2008 USA Army Recruits BCT P 920 F No
 Knapik [88] 2009 USA Marines Recruits BCT P 571 F No
 Lappe [56] 2001 USA Army Recruits BCT P 3758 F No
 Shaffer [109] 2006 USA Marines Recruits BCT R 2962 F No
 Trone [105] 2014 USA Marine Corp Air Force Army Recruits BCT R 597 F Yes
Muscular strength (lower)
 Blacker [161] 2008 UK Army Recruits R 11,937 M, 1480 F No
 Heebner [157] 2017 USA Army Special Operation Forces P 95 Yes
 Knapik [84] 2007 USA Army Band R 159 M, 46 F No
 Kuikka [36] 2013 Finland Army Conscripts R 128,584 Yes
 Mattila [38] 2007 Finland Army Conscripts P 149,750 M, 2345 F Yes
 Nagai [92] 2017 USA Army Airborne Div P 275 No
 Parr [153] 2015 USA Army Special Operations Forces P 106 No##
 Roy [177] 2012 USA Army Brigade Combat Team# R 593 Yes
 Ruohola [100] 2006 Finland n/a Recruits P 756 M Yes (M)
 Sillanpää [51] 2008 Finland n/a Conscripts R 128,508 M No (M)
 Wunderlin [107] 2015 Switzerland Army Recruits P 230 M Yes (M)
Physical fitness (low)
 Allsopp [159] 2003 UK Navy Recruits R 1287 M, 354 F Yes
 Anderson [70] 2015 USA Army Light Infantry Brigade R 2101 Yes
 Anderson [71] 2017 USA Army Light Infantry R 4384 M, 363 F Yes
 Beck [140] 2000 USA Marines P 624 M, 693 F Yes
 Bedno [72] 2013 USA Army IET P 8456 M Yes (M)
 Bedno [35] 2019 USA Army Recruits BCT R 238,772 No (M), yes (F)
 Bell [27] 2000 USA Army Recruits P 861 Yes
 Blacker [161] 2008 UK Army Recruits R 11,937 M, 1480 F Yes
 Brooks [73] 2019 USA Army Recruits BCT R 1460 M, 540 F Yes
 Canham-Chervak [141] 2000 USA Army Recruits BCT P 655 M, 498 F Yes
 Canham-Chervak [52] 2006 USA Army Recruits BCT P 1156 M, 746 F Yes
 Cosio-Lima [54] 2013 USA Army Sergeants Major Academy R 149 No
 Cosman [64] 2013 USA Army Military Academy P 755 M, 136 F No
 Cowan [74] 2012 USA Army Trainees P 1568 F Yes (F)
 Davey [76] 2015 UK Marines P 1090 M No (M)
 Davey [127] 2016 UK Marines P 1082 M No (M)
 Fallowfield [77] 2018 UK Air Force Recruits P 990 M, 203 F Yes
 George [114] 2012 USA Army Combat medics P 1230 No
 Grier [78] 2017 USA Army Infantry brigades R 4236 M Yes (M)
 Grier [178] 2011 USA Army Ordinance school students P 4255 Yes (M), no (F)
 Hall [179] 2017 UK Army Recruits R 3050 M Yes (M)
 Hauret [180] 2018 USA Army Recruits BCT P 1181 Yes (endurance)
 Heller [181] 2020 USA Army Recruits BCT R 227 F Yes (F)
 Jones [34] 2017 USA Army Recruits BCT R 143,398 M, 41,727 F Yes
 Keenan [172] 2017 USA Multiple Special Forces P 726 Yes
 Kelly [80] 2000 USA Navy Recruits BCT R 86 F No (F)
 Knapik [81] 2010 USA Air Force Recruits BCT P 1042 M, 375 F Yes
 Knapik [145] 2006 USA Army Recruits BCT P 1174 M, 898 F Yes
 Knapik [83] 2013 USA Army Brigade combat team# P 805 No
 Knapik [182] 2003 USA Army R 1414 M, 1166 F Yes
 Knapik [84] 2007 USA Army Band R 159 M, 46 F No
 Knapik [85] 2001 USA Army Recruits P 182 M, 168 F Yes
 Knapik [86] 2008 USA Army Paratrooper training R 1677 Yes
 Knapik [87] 2008 USA Army Recruits BCT P 2147 M, 920 F Yes
 Knapik [183] 2009 USA Army Recruits BCT P 2689 M, 1263 F Yes
 Knapik [88] 2009 USA Marines Recruits BCT P 840 M, 571 F Yes
 Kodesh [163] 2015 Israel n/a Combat Fitness Instructor Course P 158 F Yes (F) (running)
 Krauss [168] 2017 USA Army Recruits BCT R 1900 F Yes
 Kuikka [36] 2013 Finland Army Conscripts R 128,584 No
 Kupferer [164] 2014 USA Air Force Trainees R 141 Yes
 Lisman [118] 2013 USA Marines Officer candidate training P 874 Yes (running)
 Martin [184] 2018 USA Army Light infantry division R 6865 Yes
 Mattila [37] 2007 Finland n/a Conscripts R 133,943 M, 2044 F Yes (invers)
 Mattila [38] 2007 Finland Army Conscripts P 149,750 M, 2345 F Yes
 Moran [149] 2013 Israel Army Recruits P 44 No
 Müller-Schilling [185] 2019 Germany Army Recruits P 774 Yes
 Munnoch [91] 2007 UK Marines P 1115 M No (M)
 Nye [151] 2016 USA Air Force Recruits BCT R 67,525 Yes
 Psaila [94] 2017 Malta n/a Recruits BCT P 114 M, 13 F Yes
 Rauh [186] 2006 USA Marines P 824 F Yes (F)
 Reynolds [96] 2009 USA Army Infantry P 181 Yes
 Reynolds [97] 2002 USA Army Construction engineers & Combat artillery soldiers P 313 No
 Reynolds [98] 2000 USA Marines Winter mountain training P 356 No
 Robinson [57] 2016 UK Army Recruits P 1810 Yes (running)
 Rosendal [187] 2003 Denmark n/a Conscripts BCT P 330 Yes
 Ruohola [100] 2006 Finland n/a Recruits P 756 M Yes (M)
 Sanchez-Santos [65] 2017 UK Marines Recruits P 1082 M No (M)
 Schneider [58] 2000 USA Army Airborne Div R 1214 Yes
 Scott [122] 2015 USA Army Reserve Officer Training R 165 M, 30 F No
 Sefton [137] 2016 USA Army Recruits IET P 1788 M Yes (M)
 Shaffer [109] 2006 USA Marines Recruits BCT R 2962 F Yes (F)
 Sharma [102] 2019 UK Army Infantry recruits P 562 M Yes (M)
 Sharma [103] 2011 UK Army Infantry recruits P 468 M Yes (M)
 Sillanpää [51] 2008 Finland n/a Conscripts R 128,508 M No (M)
 Sormaala [39] 2006 Finland n/a Recruits R 118,149 No
 Taanila [123] 2010 Finland n/a Conscripts P 944 M Yes (M)
 Taanila [59] 2012 Finland Army Conscripts P 982 M Yes (M)
 Trone [105] 2014 USA

Marine Corp

Air Force

Army

Recruits BCT R 900 M, 597 F Yes
 Välimäki [188] 2005 Finland Army Conscripts P 179 Yes
 Waterman [165] 2010 USA Military Academy R 10,511 person years Yes (invers)
 Wilkinson [60] 2009 UK Army Infantry P 660 No
 Wyss [68] 2014 Switzerland Army Recruits BCT P 1676 No
 Wyss [189] 2012 Switzerland Army R 459 Yes
 Zhao [108] 2016 China Army Recruits P 1398 M No (M)

BCT basis combat training; IET initial entry training; n/a not available; R retrospective study; P prospective study; M male; F female; (M) risk factor only for males; (F) risk factor only for females

*Risk factor for musculoskeletal injuries (MSkI); #Deployment; ##Shoulder, knee, low back

There is weak scientific evidence for genetic factors as a non-modifiable risk factor.

Late menarche

Seven studies focused on late menarche as a risk factor for MSkIs (Table 8). All of the research was conducted within different branches of the US Armed Forces. The sizes of the study populations ranged from 136 to 3758 participants. Two studies identified late menarche as a risk factor for MSkIs, and 5 studies did not find a significant association.

There is no scientific evidence for late menarche as a non-modifiable risk factor for MSkIs.

Muscular strength (lower)

Eleven studies focused on muscular strength as a risk factor for MSkIs (Table 8), although it was measured in different ways depending on the study. Most of the research was conducted within the US Army (5 studies) or the military of Finland (4 studies). Additional studies were conducted within the militaries of Switzerland and the UK (1 study from each country). The sizes of the study populations ranged from 95 to 152,095 participants. Six studies identified low muscular strength as a risk factor for MSkIs, while 5 studies did not find a significant association. Notably, two studies with more than 100,000 participants found an inverse association between muscular strength and the risk for MSkIs, the other study found no association, but this study focused on traumatic patellar luxation.

There is moderate scientific evidence for lower muscular strength as a modifiable risk factor.

Physical fitness (low)

Seventy-four studies focused on physical fitness, based on results from physical fitness tests, as a risk factor for MSkIs (Table 8). Most of the research was conducted in different branches of the US Armed Forces (45 studies); 12 studies were conducted within the military of the UK, and 9 were conducted within the military of Finland. The remaining studies were conducted within the militaries of Israel and Switzerland (2 studies each) as well as China, Denmark, Germany, and Malta (1 study each). The size of the study population ranged from 44 to 238,772 participants. Fifty studies identified low physical fitness as a risk factor for MSkIs. Out of these 50 studies, 4 studies explored low physical endurance. Two studies found an association between low physical fitness and an increased risk for MSkI, but not for both sexes, and 20 studies did not find a significant association. In two studies, there was an inverse effect; high physical fitness was associated with an increased risk for MSkIs. A meta-analysis that included 27 publications found that the relative risk is 2.34 (95% CI 2.02—2.70) for injuries incurred during training, as well as for personnel who perform in the bottom quartile or quintile when compared to their peers in the top quartile or quintile of physical fitness [25].

There is strong scientific evidence for low physical fitness as a modifiable risk factor for MSkIs. Low physical fitness has an increased relative risk of 2.34 for MSkIs.

Secondary amenorrhea

Eight studies focused on having no menses in the last months (secondary amenorrhea) as a risk factor for MSkIs (Table 9). All of the research was conducted within different branches of the US Armed Forces. The sizes of the study populations ranged from 86 to 2962 participants. Three studies identified secondary amenorrhea as a risk factor for MSkIs, and 5 studies did not find a significant association.

Table 9.

Summary of studies that focused on secondary amenorrhea, sex, plantar pressure assessment (of walking gait), range of tibial rotation, tibia length, and waist circumference as risk factors for MskIs

Study Publication year Country Branches Unit/training Study type n Risk factor*
Secondary amenorrhea
 Canham-Chervak [52] 2006 USA Army Recruits P 746 F No
 Kelly [80] 2000 USA Navy Recruits BCT R 86 F No
 Knapik [81] 2010 USA Air Force Recruits BCT P 375 F No
 Knapik [82] 2013 USA Army Army military police training P 553 F Yes
 Knapik [87] 2008 USA Army Recruits BCT P 920 F No
 Knapik [88] 2009 USA Marines Recruits BCT P 571 F No
 Rauh [186] 2006 USA Marines P 824 F Yes
 Shaffer [109] 2006 USA Marines Recruits BCT R 2962 F Yes
Sex (female)
 Allsopp [159] 2003 UK Navy Recruits R 1287 M, 354 F Yes
 Anderson [71] 2017 USA Army Light Infantry R 4384 M, 363 F No
 Bell [27] 2000 USA Army Recruits P 861 No
 Billings [160] 2004 USA Air Force Recruits BCT R 2006 Yes
 Blacker [161] 2008 UK Army Recruits R 11,937 M, 1480 F Yes
 Bulathsinhala [49] 2017 USA Army Active duty R 1,299,332 Yes
 Burne [170] 2004 Australia Military Academy P 122 M, 25 F Yes
 Canham-Chervak [141] 2000 USA Army Recruits BCT P 655 M, 498 F Yes
 Craig [40] 2000 USA Army Airborne Division R 242,949 aircraft exits Yes
 Darakjy [8] 2006 USA Army Active duty P 4101 M, 413 F Yes
 Fallowfield [77] 2018 UK Air Force Recruits P 990 M, 203 F Yes
 Finestone [167] 2008 Israel Army Light infantry training P 36 M, 99 F No
 Finestone [190] 2014 Israel Army Cadets P 78 M, 227 F Yes
 Gam [191] 2005 Israel n/a Recruits P 375 M, 138 F Yes
 Garnock [113] 2018 Australia Navy Recruits P 95 M, 39 F Yes
 Gemmell [192] 2002 UK Army Recruits R 11,907 M, 1483 F Yes
 George [114] 2012 USA Army Combat medics P 1230 Yes
 Havenetidis [143] 2011 Greece n/a Recruits P 253 Yes
 Hill [115] 2013 USA Army Active duty R 83,323 No
 Itskoviz [32] 2011 Israel Army Recruits R n/a Yes
 Knapik [81] 2010 USA Air Force Recruits BCT P 1042 M, 375 F No
 Knapik [82] 2013 USA Army Army military police training P 1838 M, 553 F Yes
 Knapik [83] 2013 USA Army Brigade Combat Team# P 805 Yes (to be male)
 Knapik [84] 2007 USA Army Band R 159 M, 46 F No
 Knapik [85] 2001 USA Army Recruits P 182 M, 168 F Yes
 Knapik [46] 2018 USA Army Recruits BCT R 475,745 M, 107,906 F Yes
 Kupferer [164] 2014 USA Air Force Trainees R 141 Yes
 Mattila [37] 2007 Finland n/a Conscripts R 133,943 M, 2044 F Yes
 Mattila [38] 2007 Finland Army Conscripts P 149,750 M, 2345 F Yes
 Montain [45] 2013 USA Army Recruits BCT R 421,461 M, 90,141 F Yes
 Nye [151] 2016 USA Air Force Recruits BCT R 67,525 Yes
 Owens [128] 2009 USA Army, Marines, Navy, Air Force Active duty R 19,730 Yes
 Roy [133] 2012 USA Army Brigade Combat Team# P 246 M, 17 F Yes
 Scott [122] 2015 USA Army Reserve Officer Training R 165 M, 30 F No
 Snedecor [193] 2000 USA Air Force Recruits R 8656 M, 5250 F Yes
 Sormaala [39] 2006 Finland n/a Recruits R 118,149 No
 Waterman [165] 2010 USA Military Academy R 10,511 person years Yes
 Waterman [31] 2016 USA Multiple Active Duty R 5,580,875 Yes
 Yates [176] 2004 UK Navy Recruits P 84 M, 40 F Yes
Plantar pressure assessment (of walking gait)
 Finestone [112] 2011 Israel Army Elite infantry soldier P 77 M No (M)
 Mahieu [148] 2006 Belgium n/a Recruits Royal Military Academy P 69 M Yes (M)
 Nunns [150] 2016 UK Marines Recruits P 160 M No (M)
 Rice [120] 2017 UK Marines Recruits P 147 M Yes$ (M)
 Sharma [103] 2011 UK Army Infantry recruits P 468 M Yes (M)
Range of tibial rotation during running (lower)
 Nunns [150] 2016 UK Marines Recruits P 160 M Yes (M)
Tibia length (shorter)
 Beck [140] 2000 USA Marines P 624 M, 693 F Yes
 Finestone [112] 2011 Israel Army Elite infantry soldier P 77 M Yes (M)
 Goss [194] 2006 USA Military Academy Cadets R 1100 No##
 Moran [149] 2013 Israel Army Recruits P 44 No
 Zhao [108] 2016 China Army Recruits P 1398 M No (M)###
Waist circumference (higher)
 Kupferer [164] 2014 USA Air Force Trainees R 141 No
 Nye [151] 2016 USA Air Force Recruits BCT R 67,525 No
 Taanila [123] 2010 Finland n/a Conscripts P 944 M Yes (M)
 Taanila [59] 2012 Finland Army Conscripts P 982 M No (M)
 Taanila [104] 2015 Finland Army Conscripts P 1411 M Yes (M)

BCT basis combat training; IET initial entry training; n/a not available; R retrospective study; P prospective study; M male; F female; (M) risk factor only for males; (F) risk factor only for females

*Risk factor for musculoskeletal injuries (MSkI); #Deployment; ##Limb length inequality; ###Leg length; $Pressure on digital V

There is insufficient scientific evidence for secondary amenorrhea as a modifiable risk factor.

Sex (female)

Thirty-eight studies focused on sex as a risk factor for MSkIs (Table 9). Most of the research was conducted within different branches of the US Armed Forces (24 studies). Additional studies were conducted within the militaries of Israel and the UK (4 studies each), Finland (3 studies), Australia (2 studies), and Greece (1 study). The sizes of the study populations ranged from 124 to 5,580,875 participants. Twenty-nine studies identified being female as a risk factor for MSkIs (when compared to males), 8 studies did not find a significant association between sex and MSkIs, and 1 study found a significant increase in MSkIs for males when compared to females.

There is strong scientific evidence that being female is a non-modifiable risk factor for MSkIs.

Plantar pressure assessment (of walking gait)

Five studies focused on plantar pressure assessment (of walking gait) as a risk factor for MSkIs (Table 9). Most of the research was conducted within different branches of the UK military (3 studies). Additional studies were conducted within the militaries of Belgium and Israel (1 study from each country). The study populations ranged from 69 to 468 participants. All studies included males only. Two studies identified a particular foot pressure pattern while walking as a risk factor for MSkIs, and two studies did not find a significant association. In one study, this association was only found for a pressure pattern involving the little toe (digitus V).

There is insufficient scientific evidence for specific plantar pressure patterns during walking as a modifiable risk factor.

Range of tibial rotation during running (lower)

Only one study focused on the range of tibial rotation (calculated as the difference between peak internal and external rotation) during running as a risk factor for MSkIs (Table 9). This study was conducted within the UK Marines. In this prospective study with 160 male participants, a lower range of tibial rotation during running (the difference between peak internal and external lower leg segment rotation) was identified as a risk factor for MSkIs.

There is weak scientific evidence for a lower range of tibial rotation during running as a modifiable risk factor.

Tibia length (shorter)

Four studies focused on tibia length as a risk factor for MSkIs (Table 9). The research was conducted within the IDF (2 studies) and within the US Marines (1 study) and within the army of China (1 study). The sizes of the study populations ranged from 44 to 1398 participants. Two studies identified a shorter tibia length as a risk factor for MSkIs, and the two studies did not find a significant association. Hence, one of these studies reported leg length, not tibia length.

There is insufficient scientific evidence for shorter tibia length as a modifiable risk factor.

Waist circumference (higher)

Five studies focused on high circumference as a risk factor for MSkIs (Table 9). Three studies were conducted within the military of Finland, and two were carried out within the US Air Force. The size of the study populations ranged from 141 to 67,525 participants. Two studies from Finland identified high circumference as a risk factor for MSkIs, while the other 3 studies did not find a significant association. Especially, the retrospective study by Nye et al. [151], with 67,525 participants, found no association between high waist circumference and an increased risk for MSkIs.

There is insufficient scientific evidence for a high waist circumference as a modifiable risk factor.

Social factors

Education (lower)

Thirteen studies focused on education as a risk factor for MSkIs (Table 10). Nearly half of the research was conducted within different branches of the US Armed Forces (6 studies); the others were conducted within the militaries of Finland (4 studies), the UK (2 studies), and Israel (1 study). The sizes of the study populations ranged from 205 to 4029 participants. Five of the 13 studies identified a lower level of education as a risk factor for MSkIs, and 8 studies did not find a significant association between lower education and MSkIs. The definitions of lower education are different among the studies examined.

Table 10.

Summary of studies that focused on education, marital status, race/ethnicity, rank, season of the year, and UV index as risk factors for MskIs

Study Publication year Country Branches Unit/training Study type n Risk factor*
Education (lower)
 Canham-Chervak [52] 2006 USA Army Recruits P 1156 M, 746 F Yes
 Fallowfield [77] 2018 UK Air Force Recruits P 990 M, 203 F Yes
 George [114] 2012 USA Army Combat medics P 1230 No
 Givon [61] 2000 Israel n/a P 2306 M No (M)
 Knapik [84] 2007 USA Army Band R 159 M, 46 F No
 Knapik [87] 2008 USA Army Recruits BCT P 2147 M, 920 F No
 Knapik [88] 2009 USA Marines Recruits BCT P 840 M, 571 F No
 Munnoch [91] 2007 UK Marines P 1115 M No (M)
 Pihlajamäki [93] 2019 Finland n/a Full duty R 4029 M No (M)
 Reynolds [98] 2000 USA Marines Winter mountain training P 356 Yes
 Taanila [123] 2010 Finland n/a Conscripts P 944 M Yes (M)
 Taanila [59] 2012 Finland Army Conscripts P 982 M Yes (M)
 Taanila [104] 2015 Finland Army Conscripts P 1411 M No (M)
Marital status
 Canham-Chervak [52] 2006 USA Army Recruits P 1156 M, 746 F No
 Hill [115] 2013 USA Army Active duty R 83,323 Yes
 Knapik [84] 2007 USA Army Band R 159 M, 46 F No
 Knapik [87] 2008 USA Army Recruits BCT P 2147 M, 920 F Yes#
 Knapik [88] 2009 USA Marines Recruits BCT P 840 M, 571 F No
 Schneider [58] 2000 USA Army Airborne Div R 1214 No
Race/ethnicity
 Bedno [72] 2013 USA Army IET P 8456 M No (M)1
 Billings [160] 2004 USA Air Force Recruits BCT R 2006 Yes2
 Blacker [161] 2008 UK Army Recruits R 11,937 M, 1480 F Yes3
 Bulathsinhala [49] 2017 USA Army Active duty R 1,299,332 Yes4
 Canham-Chervak [52] 2006 USA Army Recruits P 1156 M, 746 F No5
 Cowan [74] 2012 USA Army Trainees P 1568 F No (F)1
 Cowan [75] 2011 USA Army Recruits P 7323 No1
 Givon [61] 2000 Israel n/a P 2306 M No (M)6
 Grier [79] 2010 USA Multiple R 24,177 M Yes7
 Hughes [50] 2019 USA Army Active duty R 120,730 Yes8
 Kelly [80] 2000 USA Navy Recruits BCT R 86 F Yes9
 Knapik [47] 2012 USA Army Recruits BCT R 475,745 M, 107,906 F Yes10
 Knapik [146] 2007 USA Army Mechanics R 518 M, 43 F No11
 Knapik [46] 2018 USA Army Recruits BCT R 475,745 M, 107,906 F Yes10
 Knapik [87] 2008 USA Army Recruits BCT P 2147 M, 920 F No12
 Knapik [88] 2009 USA Marines Recruits BCT P 840 M, 571 F No13
 Lappe [55] 2005 USA Army Recruits BCT R 4139 F Yes14
 Lappe [56] 2001 USA Army Recruits BCT P 3758 F Yes15
 Lauder [90] 2000 USA Army Active duty P 230 F No (F)16
 Montain [45] 2013 USA Army Recruits BCT R 421,461 M, 90,141 F Yes17
 Owens [152] 2007 USA n/a Active duty R 4451 Yes18
 Owens [128] 2009 USA Army, Marines, Navy, Air Force Active duty R 19,730 Yes19
 Reynolds [96] 2009 USA Army Infantry P 181 Yes20
 Reynolds [97] 2002 USA Army Construction engineers & Combat artillery soldiers P 313 Yes21
 Reynolds [98] 2000 USA Marines Winter mountain training P 356 Yes22
 Waterman [31] 2016 USA Multiple Active Duty R 5,580,875 Yes19
 Wilkinson [60] 2009 UK Army Infantry P 660 No23
Rank (lower)
 Canham-Chervak [52] 2006 USA Army Recruits P 1156 M, 746 F No
 Craig [40] 2000 USA Army Airborne Division R 242,949 aircraft exits Yes
 Darakjy [8] 2006 USA Army Active duty P 4101 M, 413 F Yes
 Grier [79] 2010 USA Multiple R 24,177 M No (M)
 Hill [115] 2013 USA Army Active duty R 83,323 Yes
 Lauder [90] 2000 USA Army Active duty P 230 F No (F)
 Owens [128] 2009 USA Army, Marines, Navy, Air Force Active duty R 19,730 Yes
 Reynolds [98] 2000 USA Marines Winter mountain training P 356 Yes
 Roy [133] 2012 USA Army Brigade Combat Team## P 246 M, 17 F No
 Skeehan [139] 2009 USA Army, Marine, Navy Active duty## R 3367 Yes
 Wilkinson [60] 2009 UK Army Infantry P 660 No
Season of the year (summer time)
 Jones [33] 2008 USA Army Ordinance school students P n/a Yes$
 Knapik [195] 2002 USA Army Recruits BCT R 1543 M, 1025 F Yes$
 Mattila [196] 2006 Finland n/a P 213,500 person years Yes$$
 Taanila [197] 2009 Finland Army Conscripts P 955 M Yes (M)$
UV index (higher)
 Montain [45] 2013 USA Army Recruits BCT R 421,461 M, 90,141 F Yes

BCT basis combat training; IET initial entry training; n/a not available; R retrospective study; P prospective study; M male; F female; (M) risk factor only for males; (F) risk factor only for females

*Risk factor for musculoskeletal injuries (MSkI); #Divorced or widowed; ##Deployment; $Summer; $$Summer and autumn

1White vs. Black vs. other; 2Other > African American > Hispanic > Caucasian; 3Caucasian > others; 4Non-Hispanic white > Hispanic > American Indian/Native Alaskan > Asian > Native Hawaiian/Pacific Islander > Non-Hispanic Black > others; 5White vs. Black vs. Hispanic; 6Ashkenazi vs. non-Ashkenazi; 7Black > (Native, Causasian, Asian, Hispanic, other); 8White > Black (and Asian, American Indian, other); 9Hispanic and Asian and other > white and African American; 10White, Hispanic, Asian, American Indian, other > Black; 11Caucasian vs. African American vs. other; 12White, Hispanic, Asian, American Indian, Black and others; 13White, Hispanic, Black, Other; 14Hispanic and White > Black, American Indians, Asian; 15All others races and White > Black; 16Hispanic and Asian > African-American or Caucasian; 17White, Hispanic, Asian, American Indian, others > Black; 18Black vs. White and others; 19White > others > Black; 20Caucasian > African-American, Hispanic, others; 21Caucasian was identified as a risk factor; 22White was identified as a risk factor; 23White vs. others

There is weak scientific evidence for a lower level of education as a non-modifiable risk factor for MSkIs.

Marital status

Six studies focused on marital status as a risk factor for MSkIs (Table 10). All of the research was conducted within different branches of the US Armed Forces (mostly in the army). The sizes of the study populations ranged from 205 to 83,323 participants. Only one study (with the largest number of participants examined) identified being married as a risk factor for MSkI. Another study identified being divorced or widowed as a risk factor for MSkIs. The remaining 4 studies did not find a significant association between marital status and MSkIs.

There is insufficient scientific evidence for marital status as a non-modifiable risk factor.

Race/ethnicity

Twenty-seven studies focused on race/ethnicity as a risk factor for MSkIs (Table 10). Most of the research was conducted within different branches of the US Armed Forces (24 studies); 2 studies were conducted within the militaries of the UK, and 1 was conducted in Israel. The sizes of the study populations ranged from 86 to 5,580,875 participants. Seventeen studies identified race/ethnicity as a risk factor for MSkIs, while 10 studies did not find a significant association. When only studies with more than 10,000 participants were taken into account (9 studies, total: 8,640,581 participants), all studies found an association between race/ethnicity and the risk for MSkIs, but the findings were contradictory in that there was no clear association as to which race/ethnicity was at the highest risk.

There is strong scientific evidence for race/ethnicity as a non-modifiable risk factor for MSkIs.

Rank (lower)

Eleven studies focused on rank as a risk factor for MSkIs (Table 10). All except one of the studies were conducted within different branches of the US Armed Forces, and the exception was conducted within the British Army. The sizes of the study populations ranged from 230 to 242,949 participants or aircraft exits. Six studies identified as having a lower rank as a risk factor for MSkIs, and 5 studies did not find a significant association between rank and MSkIs (3 of the 5 had less than 1000 participants).

There is weak scientific evidence for lower rank as a non-modifiable risk factor.

Seasons of the year (summertime)

Four studies focused on the seasons of the year as a risk factor for MSkIs (Table 10). Two studies were conducted within the Finnish armed forces and two within the US Army. The study populations ranged from 955 to 2568 participants, and one study examined 213,500 person-years. All 4 studies identified the effect of the season of the year as a risk factor for MSkIs, with a higher risk in the summer months.

There is strong scientific evidence for the season of the year (summertime) as a non-modifiable risk factor for MSkIs.

UV index (higher)

Only one study focused on the UV index (a surrogate for vitamin D exposure) as a risk factor for MSkIs (Table 10). This study was conducted within the US Army. In this retrospective study, with 511,602 participants, a higher UV index at a recruit’s home before basic combat training (BCT) was identified as a risk factor for MSkIs during BCT. The relative risk reduction for a lower UV index was small (0.92 and 0.89 vs. 1.00, P < 0.01).

There is weak scientific evidence for a higher UV index as a non-modifiable risk factor.

Training factors

Equipment: running shoes

Only one study focused on running shoes as a risk factor for MSkIs (Table 11). This study was conducted within the US Armed Forces. In this prospective study, with 827 participants, no association between the kinds of running shoes and an increased risk for MSkIs could be identified.

Table 11.

Summary of studies that focused on running shoes, participation in sports before military service, time available and participation rate in physical training, personal non-military training, unit training, training program content, and site as risk factors for MSkI

Study Publication year Country Branches Unit/training Study type n Risk factor*
Running shoes
 Helton [198] 2019 USA Military Academy Cadets P 827 No
Participation in sport before military service (no or low)
 Canham-Chervak [52] 2006 USA Army Recruits P 1156 M, 746 f Yes
 Dash [66] 2012 India Army Recruits P 8570 Yes
 Finestone [112] 2011 Israel Army Elite Infantry soldier P 77 M Yes (only for ball sports)
 Garnock [113] 2018 Australia Navy Recruits P 95 M, 39 F No (running)
 Kelly [80] 2000 USA Navy Recruits BCT R 86 F No (F)
 Knapik [82] 2013 USA Army Army military police training P 1838 M, 553 F Yes
 Knapik [116] 2013 USA Army Combat engineer enlisted trainees P 1633 Yes
 Knapik [85] 2001 USA Army Recruits P 182 M, 168 F No
 Knapik [87] 2008 USA Army Recruits BCT P 2147 M, 920 F Yes (M), no (F)
 Knapik [88] 2009 USA Marines Recruits BCT P 840 M, 571 F Yes (M), no (F)
 Lappe [55] 2005 USA Army Recruits BCT R 4139 F Yes (F)
 Lappe [56] 2001 USA Army Recruits BCT P 3758 F Yes (F)
 Lisman [118] 2013 USA Marines Officer candidate training P 874 Yes
 Monnier [119] 2019 Sweden Marines Training course P 48 M, 5 F No
 Pihlajamäki [93] 2019 Finland n/a Full duty R 4029 M Yes (M)
 Rauh [186] 2006 USA Marines P 824 F Yes (F)
 Rosendal [187] 2003 Denmark n/a Conscripts BCT P 330 Yes
 Sanchez-Santos [65] 2017 UK Marines Recruits P 1082 M Yes (M) (invers)
 Scheinowitz [101] 2017 Israel Army Recruits P 350 F No (F)
 Scott [122] 2015 USA Army Reserve Officer Training R 165 M, 30 F No
 Taanila [104] 2015 Finland Army Conscripts P 1411 M Yes (M)
 Trone [105] 2014 USA

Marine Corp

Air Force

Army

Recruits BCT R 900 M, 597 F Yes
 Wang [106] 2003 China n/a Military Police Forces Training R 805 M Yes (M)
 Zhao [108] 2016 China Army Recruits P 1398 M Yes (M)
Time available for taking part in physical training (low)
 Knapik [86] 2008 USA Army Paratrooper training R 1677 No
 Wyss [68] 2014 Switzerland Army Recruits BCT P 1676 Yes
Participation rate in physical training (low)
 Knapik [84] 2007 USA Army Band R 159 M, 46 F Yes
 Martin [184] 2018 USA Army Light Infantry division R 6865 Yes
 Roy [133] 2012 USA Army Brigade Combat Team# P 246 M, 17 F No
 Roy [121] 2014 USA Army Active duty R 625 F Yes (F)
 Scott [122] 2015 USA Army Reserve Officer Training R 165 M, 30 F No
 Wilkinson [60] 2009 UK Army Infantry P 660 No
Personal non-military training (high amounts)
 George [114] 2012 USA Army Combat medics P 1230 No
 Grier [78] 2017 USA Army Infantry brigade R 4236 M Yes (M) (invers)
 Lisman [118] 2013 USA Marines Officer candidate training P 874 No
 Moran [62] 2012 Israel Army Recruits of elite combat unit P 116 Yes
 Rappole [132] 2018 USA Army Active duty R 368 F Yes (F) (invers)
 Shaffer [109] 2006 USA Marines Recruits BCT R 2962 F Yes (F)
 Taanila [59] 2012 Finland Army Conscripts P 982 M No (M)
 Wyss [68] 2014 Switzerland Army Recruits BCT P 1676 Yes
Unit training (high amounts)
 Grier [78] 2017 USA Army Infatery brigades R 4236 M Yes (M)
 Knapik [199] 2011 USA Army Recruits BCT P 2072 Yes
 Lauder [90] 2000 USA Army Active duty P 230 (F) Yes (F)
 Lisman [118] 2013 USA Marines Officer candidate training P 874 No
 Moran [149] 2013 Israel Army Recruits P 44 Yes
 Nye [151] 2016 USA Air Force Recruits BCT R 67,525 Yes
 Roos [99] 2015 Switzerland Army Recruits P 651 M Yes (M)
 Roy [177] 2012 USA Army Brigade Combat Team R 593 No
 Schuh [200] 2017 USA Army Infantry soldiers R 831 Yes
 Scott [122] 2015 USA Army Reserve Officer Training R 165 M, 30 F Yes
 Wang [106] 2003 China n/a Military Police Forces Training R 805 M No (M)
Training program content
 Knapik [201] 2005 USA Army Recruits BCT P 1142 M, 825 F Yes
 Kovcan [67] 2019 Slovenia Army Infantry, active duty R 118 M, 11 F No
 Rappole [132] 2018 USA Army Active duty R 368 F Yes1
 Waterman [165] 2010 USA Military Academy Students R 10,511 person years Yes
Training site
 Blacker [161] 2008 UK Army Recruits R 11,937 M, 1480 F Yes
 Givon [61] 2000 Israel n/a P 2306 M No (M)
 Grier [79] 2010 USA Multiple R 24,177 M Yes (M)
 Jones [33] 2008 USA Army Ordinance school students P n/a Yes
 Schneider [58] 2000 USA Army Airborne Div R 1214 No
 Wilkinson [60] 2009 UK Army Infantry P 660 No

BCT basis combat training; n/a not available; R retrospective study; P prospective study; M male; F female; (M) risk factor only for males; (F) risk factor only for females

#Deployment; 1Unit resistance training was associated with higher risk of MSkI; *Risk factor for musculoskeletal injuries (MSkI)

There is no scientific evidence for the kinds of running shoes as a modifiable risk factor.

Participation in sports before military service (no or low)

Twenty-four studies focused on a history of participation in sports before military service as a risk factor for MSkIs (Table 11). Most of the research was conducted among recruits or those new to military service within different branches of the US Armed Forces (13 studies). The militaries of China, Finland, and Israel conducted 2 studies each; the remaining studies were conducted within the militaries of Australia, Denmark, India, Sweden, and the UK (1 study each). The sizes of the study populations ranged from 53 to 8570 participants. Fifteen studies identified no or low participation in sports before military service time as a risk factor for MSkIs, and 6 studies (all with fewer than 350 participants) did not find a significant association. In two studies, an association was found only for men, and in another study, an inverse association was found (higher participation in a sport before military service was a risk factor for MSkIs).

There is strong scientific evidence for no or low participation in sports before military service time as a non-modifiable risk factor for MSkIs.

Physical training: available participation time (low)

Two studies focused on the amount of time available to take part in physical training as a risk factor for MSkIs (Table 11). The research was conducted within the US Army (1 study) and the army of Switzerland (1 study). The sizes of the study populations were 1677 and 1676 participants. The study from Switzerland found an association between having little time for physical training and an increased risk for MSkIs, while the study from the US military did not show a significant association.

There is insufficient scientific evidence for having little time available for taking part in physical training as a modifiable risk factor.

Physical training: participation rate (low)

Six studies focused on participation in physical training as a risk factor for MSkIs (Table 11). Most of the research was conducted within different branches of the US Armed Forces (5 studies). An additional study was conducted within the military of the UK. The study populations ranged from 195 to 6865 participants. Three studies identified a low participation rate in physical training as a risk factor for MSkIs, and 3 studies did not find a significant association.

There is insufficient scientific evidence for the participation rate in physical training as a modifiable risk factor.

Physical training: personnel, non-military training (high amounts)

Eight studies focused on high amounts of training during free time (non-military training) as a risk factor for MSkIs (Table 11). Most of the research was conducted within the army and the Marines Corp of the US Armed Forces (5 studies in total). Additional studies were conducted within the militaries of Finland, Israel, and Switzerland (1 study from each country). The sizes of the study populations ranged from 116 to 4236 participants. Three studies identified a high amount of personal training during free time as a risk factor for MSkIs, and 3 studies did not find a significant association. Two studies found an inverse effect; a low amount of personal training was associated with an increased risk of MSkIs.

There is insufficient scientific evidence for high amounts of personnel training during free time as a modifiable risk factor.

Physical training: unit training (high amount)

Eleven studies focused on physical training during unit training as a risk factor for MSkIs (Table 11). Most of the research was conducted within different branches of the US Armed Forces (8 studies). Additional studies were conducted within the militaries of China, Israel, and Switzerland (1 study from each). The study populations ranged from 44 to 67,525 participants. Eight studies identified a high amount of training during unit training as a risk factor for MSkIs, whereas 3 studies did not find a significant association.

There is strong scientific evidence for high amounts of training during unit training as a modifiable risk factor for MSkIs.

Training program content

Four studies focused on different training program content as a risk factor for MSkIs (Table 11). Three studies were conducted within the US Armed Forces and 1 in the Army of Slovenia. The sizes of the study populations ranged from 129 to 1967 participants. One study included a total of 10,511 person-years. Three studies identified that different training program content could be a risk factor for MSkIs, and the smallest study found no association.

There is weak scientific evidence for training program content as a modifiable risk factor.

Training site

Six studies focused on the training site as a risk factor for MSkIs (Table 11). The studies were conducted within the militaries of the US Armed Forces (3 studies), the UK (2 studies), and Israel (1 study). The sizes of the study populations ranged from 660 to 24,177 participants. Three studies identified the training site as a risk factor for MSkIs (two of these studies had more than 10,000 participants), and 3 studies did not find a significant association between the training site and MSkIs. It should be taken into account that the training site is a combination of many different factors (e.g., training situation, climate, infrastructure, etc.), so it is very difficult to identify the true factor that influenced the MSkI risk.

There is weak scientific evidence for training sites as a possibly modifiable risk factor.

Risk factor classification

In sum, 57 potential risk factors for MSkIs in the military were identified. Twenty-one factors were classified as risk factors with a strong or moderate association with an increased risk for MSkIs. For 14 other potential risk factors, an association was possible, but the evidence in the scientific literature was considered weak. For the final 22 potential risk factors, the evaluation showed either insufficient evidence or no evidence. As such, they cannot be classified as risk factors for an increased risk for MSkIs at this time (Table 12).

Table 12.

Summary of all factors and categorization in five scientific evidence grades (sorted alphabetically)

Strong Moderate Weak Insufficient No
Body fat (higher) (m) Age (nm) Balance (low) (m) Alcohol intake (m) Ankle dorsiflexion (limited) (nm)
Branch (nm) Foot type (nm) Current illness (nm) Available participation time (low) (m) Body height (higher) (nm)
Load carriage (m) Length of service (nm) Genetic factors (nm) BMI in general (m) Equipment: running shoes (m)
Military occupational specialty (nm) Muscular strength (lower) (m) Prescription of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (m) Body weight (higher) (m) Late menarche (nm)
Obesity (m) Previous deployment (nm) Prior pregnancy (nm) Bone (mineral) density (low) (nm) Prescription of contraceptive (m)
Overweight (m) Vitamin D status (low) (m) Range of tibial rotation during running (lower) (m) Calcium intake (low) (m) Status (active vs. reserve) (nm)
Participation in sports before military service (no or low) (nm) Rank (lower) (nm) Education (lower) (nm) Vegetables consumption (m)
Physical fitness (low) (m) Serum iron/serum ferritin (lower) (m) External rotation of hip (higher) (nm)
Previous MSkI (nm) Sleep time (reduced) (m) Flexibility (lower) (m)
Race/ethnicity (nm) Training program content (m) Marital status (nm)
Season of the year (summer time) (nm) Training site (m) Milk consumption (low) (m)
Sex (female) (nm) UV index (higher) (nm) Participation rate in physical training (m)
Smoking (m) Vegetarian diet (m) Personal non-military training (high amounts) (m)
Underweight (m) Waist circumference (higher) (m) Plantar pressure assessment (of walking gait)
Unit training (high amount) (m) Secondary amenorrhoe (m)
Tibial length (shorter) (m)

m modifiable; nm non-modifiable

Based on this systematic literature review and an in-depth analysis, the NATO HFM-283 Research Task Group developed a model to classify the different risk factors identified. The classification model was based upon the rationale that some risk factors directly increase MSkI risk, whereas others merely increase the risk for MSkIs indirectly as a cofactor. As an example of a direct factor (1st order), high amounts of training during unit training increase the total volume of load placed upon the biological tissues of the soldier, directly resulting in injury. Alternatively, as an example of a cofactor, low vitamin D levels may lead to lower bone density, which may result in lower tissue resilience, which in turn may cause an MSkI due to the training load now exceeding the soldier’s reduced tissue capacity. The term “order” was used to classify how close each risk factor was to a direct cause of injury. A 1st-order risk factor was thought to be most closely related to injury, whereas a 3rd-order factor was thought to follow a path through multiple cofactors. Table 12 shows all risk factors categorized as 1st, 2nd, or 3rd order of importance. Additionally, the model includes the established concepts of modifiable/non-modifiable and extrinsic/intrinsic risk factors. This prioritizing classification model may guide the planning and implementation of intervention strategies, introducing the notion that a larger risk reduction can likely be achieved if risk factors in a higher order are targeted (Fig. 2).

Fig. 2.

Fig. 2

Injury model with a classification in 1st, 2nd and 3rd order

Discussion

This review is the qualitative systematic review of studies on risk factors for MSkIs in the military that has attempted to be all-inclusive. With a total of 179 original papers and 3 meta-analyses from the past two decades, a very large number of studies on MSkIs in the military were included. A total of 57 different risk factors were identified and evaluated.

The approach used in this study identified more risk factors for MSkIs in the military than previously reported [1526]. The aim was to have an overview of all risk factors in one place. Further, the project is one of the first to include the classification of risk factors for MSkIs in the military into modifiable or non-modifiable categories. This additional distinction (modifiable vs. non-modifiable) helps us to understand which risk factors can be addressed and which ones cannot be addressed when an intervention is planned.

In addition to listing all potential risk factors, the members of the multidisciplinary expert panel assessed the combined evidence presented for each risk factor on a five-grade scale (strong evidence to no evidence). The number of participants (e.g., > 10,000 subjects) significantly influenced the evaluation of available evidence. Some classifications of available evidence had to be made based on a small number of studies with a small number of participants. The final rating also included the subjective professional experience (opinion) of the experts on the panel.

This review introduces a new injury model for the military, incorporating the established principles of modifiable vs. non-modifiable and intrinsic vs. extrinsic risk factors. The model clearly illustrates differences between risk factors; some increase the risk for MSkIs directly (1st order), whereas others influence the injury risk only indirectly (2nd or 3rd order). The model may explain why many of the interventions that have been attempted over the past decades to reduce MSkIs were not successful. In fact, a systematic review of successful interventions in reducing MSkIs in the military [6] shows that the only successful interventions are those that target 1st- and 2nd-order modifiable risk factors (i.e., in the upper half of the model).

Hence, most of the scientific publications are from the US Armed Forces, with studies conducted by other countries much less frequently. As such, the findings may not be generalizable across all nations. In addition, most studies focused on one branch of the armed forces—the army—which might not be representative of all service branches. Transferring the information from one country to another or from one military branch to another must be done with great caution.

Even with the very broad systematic approach used in this review, no studies on psychological, cognitive, and/or behavioral risk factors for MSkIs in the military could be identified. In civilian sports, these risk factors have been reported for several years [202, 203]. It is possible that the search terms used in this review did not allow for psychological factors to be identified or the psychosocial aspects of injuries.

This review has several limitations. First, the method used is a variation of the strict PRISMA protocol for systematic reviews. The group of coauthors decided that the topic at hand deserved a broad approach, including all possible risk factors and all military studies, even those with a potentially poor scientific design. In addition, it was decided to include the multidisciplinary, professional experience of the group as a subjective element in assessing the level of evidence per risk factor reported. Second, all studies before 2000 were excluded. This was decided because training schedules and conditions in the militaries have changed significantly over the past two decades and anticipated that including studies from before 2000 would not yield additional, currently relevant insights. Third, this review did not include studies on risk factors for MSkIs in civilian sports activities. Although some of the risk factors for civilian sports injuries are the same, the military training environment has many unique aspects that make risk factors for MSkIs not comparable to civilian sports. Fourth, differences in how the risk factors were measured (e.g., self-report vs. direct measurements) or the potential interrelationships between risk factors (e.g., that the strong evidence for sex as a risk factor may be related to differences in the percentage of body fat or previous physical activity before service between the sexes) were not considered when assigning the level of evidence for each risk factor. However, these issues were taken into account when depicting the 1st-, 2nd-, or 3rd-order level of the risk factors in the model. Fifth, this review did not include calculated effect sizes or a meta-analysis of every risk factor. Of course, this could further enhance the scientific value of the current work. The authors propose that future scientific evaluations can now be done, concentrating on the risk factors that have been identified as high order and modifiable in this work.

Conclusions

This systematic review presents an all-inclusive, graded overview of risk factors for MSkIs in the military. Experts with a multidisciplinary background, from a total of seven nations as part of the NATO Research Task Group, introduced a new prioritizing injury model for the military. The model provides a foundation for understanding which risk factors would be most important to address and in which order when an intervention is planned.

Supplementary Information

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank LTC Dr. Damien Van Tiggelen (Belgium) and Ms. Beatriz Sanz-Bustillo Aguirre (Spain) for their participation and input in the discussion during the HFM-283 meeting in Cologne (Germany) in January 2020.

Abbreviations

BCT

Basis combat training

DNBI

Disease and nonbattle injury

IET

Initial entry training

MSkIs

Musculoskeletal injuries

MOS

Military occupational specialties

NSAID

Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs

RTG

Research Task Group

STO

Science and Technology Organization

Authors' contributions

SS was responsible for the review and the screening of the articles. KRK, SPR, and WOZ also screened articles. SS was the major contributor in writing the manuscript. All authors discussed the article during a personal meeting in January 2020. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Funding

No funding was received for the publication of this article.

Availability of data and materials

All data generated or analyzed in this review are included in the published article.

Declarations

Ethical approval and consent to participate

For this systematic review of the literature, approval from the ethics committee and informed consent by participants was not necessary.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests. The views expressed herein are solely those of the authors and do not reflect an endorsement by, or the official policy or position of, the NATO nations represented, including the US Department of Defense.

Contributor Information

Stefan Sammito, Email: stefansammito@bundeswehr.org.

Vedran Hadzic, Email: Vedran.Hadzic@fsp.uni-lj.si.

Thomas Karakolis, Email: Thomas.Karakolis@drdc-rddc.gc.ca.

Karen R. Kelly, Email: karen.r.kelly8.civ@mail.mil

Susan P. Proctor, Email: susan.p.proctor.civ@mail.mil

Ainars Stepens, Email: Ainars.Stepens@rsu.lv.

Graham White, Email: gwhite1@mail.dstl.gov.uk.

Wes O. Zimmermann, Email: wesselzimmermann@hotmail.com

References

  • 1.No authors listed. Absolute and relative morbidity burdens attributable to various illnesses and injuries, active component, U.S. Armed Forces, 2018. MSMR. 2019;26(5):2–10. [PubMed]
  • 2.Dijksma I, Bekkers M, Spek B, Lucas C, Stuiver M. Epidemiology and financial burden of musculoskeletal injuries as the leading health problem in the military. Mil Med. 2020;185(3–4):e480–e486. doi: 10.1093/milmed/usz328. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Orr RM, Johnston V, Coyle J, Pope R. Reported load carriage injuries of the Australian army soldier. J Occup Rehabil. 2015;25(2):316–322. doi: 10.1007/s10926-014-9540-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Sammito S. Direct and indirect costs caused by accidents at workplace sport activities. Präv Gesundheitsf. 2011;6(4):245–248. [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Strowbridge NF, Burgess KR. Sports and training injuries in British soldiers: the Colchester Garrison Sports Injury and Rehabilitation Centre. J R Army Med Corps. 2002;148(3):236–243. doi: 10.1136/jramc-148-03-03. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Wardle SL, Greeves JP. Mitigating the risk of musculoskeletal injury: A systematic review of the most effective injury prevention strategies for military personnel. J Sci Med Sport. 2017;20(Suppl 4):S3–S10. doi: 10.1016/j.jsams.2017.09.014. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Reis JP, Trone DW, Macera CA, Rauh MJ. Factors associated with discharge during marine corps basic training. Mil Med. 2007;172(9):936–941. doi: 10.7205/milmed.172.9.936. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Darakjy S, Marin RE, Knapik JJ, Jones BH. Injuries and illnesses among armor brigade soldiers during operational training. Mil Med. 2006;171(11):1051–1056. doi: 10.7205/milmed.171.11.1051. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Patel AA, Hauret KG, Taylor BJ, Jones BH. Non-battle injuries among U.S. Army soldiers deployed to Afghanistan and Iraq, 2001–2013. J Safety Res. 2017;60:29–34. doi: 10.1016/j.jsr.2016.11.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Belmont PJ, Jr, Goodman GP, Waterman B, DeZee K, Burks R, Owens BD. Disease and nonbattle injuries sustained by a U.S. Army Brigade Combat Team during Operation Iraqi Freedom. Mil Med. 2010;175(7):469–476. doi: 10.7205/milmed-d-10-00041. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Goodman GP, Schoenfeld AJ, Owens BD, Dutton JR, Burks R, Belmont PJ. Non-emergent orthopaedic injuries sustained by soldiers in Operation Iraqi Freedom. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2012;94(8):728–735. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.K.00129. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Lincoln AE, Smith GS, Amoroso PJ, Bell NS. The natural history and risk factors of musculoskeletal conditions resulting in disability among US Army personnel. Work. 2002;18(2):99–113. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Bergman BP, Miller SA. Equal opportunities, equal risks? Overuse injuries in female military recruits. J Public Health Med. 2001;23(1):35–39. doi: 10.1093/pubmed/23.1.35. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Taanila H, Hemminki AJM, Suni JH, Pihlajamäki H, Parkkari J. Low physical fitness is a strong predictor of health problems among young men: a follow-up study of 1411 male conscripts. BMC Public Health. 2011;11:590. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-11-590. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.de la Motte SJ, Lisman P, Gribbin TC, Murphy K, Deuster PA. Systematic review of the association between physical fitness and musculoskeletal injury risk: part 3—flexibility, power, speed, balance, and agility. J Strength Cond Res. 2017;33(6):1723–1735. doi: 10.1519/JSC.0000000000002382. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Lisman PJ, de la Motte SJ, Gribbin TC, Jaffin DP, Murphy K, Deuster PA. A systematic review of the association between physical fitness and musculoskeletal injury risk: part 1—cardiorespiratory endurance. J Strength Cond Res. 2017;31(6):1744–1757. doi: 10.1519/JSC.0000000000001855. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Knapik J, Steelman R. Risk factors for injuries during military static-line airborne operations: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Athl Train. 2016;51(11):962–980. doi: 10.4085/1062-6050-51.9.10. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Molloy JM. Factors influencing running-related musculoskeletal injury risk among U.S. Military Recruits. Mil Med. 2016;181(6):512–523. doi: 10.7205/MILMED-D-15-00143. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Knapik JJ. The importance of physical fitness for injury prevention: part 1. J Spec Oper Med. 2015;15(1):123–127. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Knapik JJ. The importance of physical fitness for injury prevention: part 2. J Spec Oper Med. 2015;15(2):112–115. doi: 10.55460/1IEC-921I. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Bulzacchelli MT, Sulsky SI, Rodriguez-Monguio R, Karlsson LH, Hill MOT. Injury during U.S. Army basic combat training: a systematic review of risk factor studies. Am J Prev Med. 2014;47(6):813–822. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2014.08.008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Wentz L, Liu PY, Haymes E, Ilich JZ. Females have a greater incidence of stress fractures than males in both military and athletic populations: a systemic review. Mil Med. 2011;176(4):420–430. doi: 10.7205/milmed-d-10-00322. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Dao D, Sodhi S, Tabasinejad R, Peterson D, Ayeni OR, Bhandari M, et al. Serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D levels and stress fractures in military personnel: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Am J Sports Med. 2015;43(8):2064–2072. doi: 10.1177/0363546514555971. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Bedno SA, Jackson R, Feng X, Walton IL, Boivin MR, Cowan DN. Meta-analysis of cigarette smoking and musculoskeletal injuries in military training. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2017;49(11):2191–2197. doi: 10.1249/MSS.0000000000001349. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Tomes CD, Sawyer S, Orr R, Schram B. Ability of fitness testing to predict injury risk during initial tactical training: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Inj Prev. 2020;26(1):67–81. doi: 10.1136/injuryprev-2019-043245. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Knapik JJ, Steelman R. Risk factors for injuries during airborne static line operations. J Spec Oper Med. 2014;14(3):95–97. doi: 10.55460/AU63-1DVQ. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Bell NS, Mangione TW, Hemenway D, Amoroso PJ, Jones BH. High injury rates among female army trainees: a function of gender? Am J Prev Med. 2000;18(3 Suppl):141–146. doi: 10.1016/s0749-3797(99)00173-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Liberati A, Altman DG, Tetzlaff J, Mulrow C, Gøtzsche PC, Ioannidis JPA, et al. The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate health care interventions: explanation and elaboration. PLoS Med. 2009;6(7):e1000100. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1000100. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Greenhalgh T, Peacock R. Effectiveness and efficiency of search methods in systematic reviews of complex evidence: audit of primary sources. BMJ. 2005;331(7524):1064–1065. doi: 10.1136/bmj.38636.593461.68. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Dixon SJ, Creaby MW, Allsopp AJ. Comparison of static and dynamic biomechanical measures in military recruits with and without a history of third metatarsal stress fracture. Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon) 2006;21(4):412–419. doi: 10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2005.11.009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Waterman BR, Gun B, Bader JO, Orr JD, Belmont PJ. Epidemiology of lower extremity stress fractures in the United States Military. Mil Med. 2016;181(10):1308–1313. doi: 10.7205/MILMED-D-15-00571. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Itskoviz D, Marom T, Ostfeld I. Trends of stress fracture prevalence among Israel Defense Forces basic trainees. Mil Med. 2011;176(1):56–59. doi: 10.7205/milmed-d-10-00209. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Jones SB, Knapik JJ, Jones BH. Seasonal variations in injury rates in U.S. Army ordnance training. Mil Med. 2008;173(4):362–368. doi: 10.7205/milmed.173.4.362. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Jones BH, Hauret KG, Dye SK, Hauschild VD, Rossi SP, Richardson MD, Friedl KE. Impact of physical fitness and body composition on injury risk among active young adults: a study of army trainees. J Sci Med Sport. 2017;20(Suppl 4):S17–S22. doi: 10.1016/j.jsams.2017.09.015. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Bedno SA, Nelson DA, Kurina LM, Choi YS. Gender differences in the associations of body mass index, physical fitness and tobacco use with lower extremity musculoskeletal injuries among new US Army soldiers. Inj Prev. 2019;25(4):295–300. doi: 10.1136/injuryprev-2017-042669. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Kuikka PI, Pihlajamäki HK, Mattila VM. Knee injuries related to sports in young adult males during military service—incidence and risk factors. Scand J Med Sci Sports. 2013;23(3):281–287. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0838.2011.01397.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Mattila VM, Kuronen P, Pihlajamäki H. Nature and risk factors of injury hospitalization in young adults: a follow-up of 135,987 military conscripts. Scand J Public Health. 2007;35(4):418–423. doi: 10.1080/14034940601181439. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Mattila VM, Niva M, Kiuru M, Pihlajamäki H. Risk factors for bone stress injuries: a follow-up study of 102,515 person-years. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2007;39(7):1061–1066. doi: 10.1249/01.mss.0b013e318053721d. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Sormaala MJ, Niva MH, Kiuru MJ, Mattila VM, Pihlajamäki HK. Stress injuries of the calcaneus detected with magnetic resonance imaging in military recruits. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2006;88(10):2237–2242. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.E.01447. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Craig SC, Lee T. Attention to detail: injuries at altitude among U.S. army military static line parachutists. Mil Med. 2000;165(4):268–271. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Packnett ER, Niebuhr DW, Bedno SA, Cowan DN. Body mass index, medical qualification status, and discharge during the first year of US Army service. Am J Clin Nutr. 2011;93(3):608–614. doi: 10.3945/ajcn.110.007070. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Sulsky SI, Bulzacchelli MT, Zhu L, Karlsson L, McKinnon CJ, Hill OT, Kardouni JR. Risk factors for training-related injuries during U.S. Army Basic Combat Training. Mil Med. 2018;183(suppl_1):55–65. doi: 10.1093/milmed/usx147. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Activity AMS. Relationship between body mass index and musculoskeletal system and connective tissue disorders, US Army, 1990–1999. Med Surveill Mon Rep. 2000;6:2–10. [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Cameron KL, Owens BD, DeBerardino TM. Incidence of ankle sprains among active-duty members of the United States Armed Services from 1998 through 2006. J Athl Train. 2010;45(1):29–38. doi: 10.4085/1062-6050-45.1.29. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Montain SJ, McGraw SM, Ely MR, Grier TL, Knapik JJ. A retrospective cohort study on the influence of UV index and race/ethnicity on risk of stress and lower limb fractures. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2013;14:135. doi: 10.1186/1471-2474-14-135. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Knapik JJ, Sharp MA, Montain SJ. Association between stress fracture incidence and predicted body fat in United States Army Basic Combat Training recruits. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2018;19(1):161. doi: 10.1186/s12891-018-2061-3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Knapik J, Montain SJ, McGraw S, Grier T, Ely M, Jones BH. Stress fracture risk factors in basic combat training. Int J Sports Med. 2012;33(11):940–946. doi: 10.1055/s-0032-1311583. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Hruby A, Bulathsinhala L, McKinnon CJ, Hill OT, Montain SJ, Young AJ, et al. BMI and lower extremity injury in U.S. army soldiers, 2001–2011. Am J Prev Med. 2016;50(6):e163–e171. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2015.10.015. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Bulathsinhala L, Hughes JM, McKinnon CJ, Kardouni JR, Guerriere KI, Popp KL, et al. Risk of stress fracture varies by race/ethnic origin in a cohort study of 1.3 million US Army soldiers. J Bone Miner Res. 2017;32(7):1546–1553. doi: 10.1002/jbmr.3131. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Hughes JM, McKinnon CJ, Taylor KM, Kardouni JR, Bulathsinhala L, Guerriere KI, et al. Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug prescriptions are associated with increased stress fracture diagnosis in the US Army population. J Bone Miner Res. 2019;34(3):429–436. doi: 10.1002/jbmr.3616. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Sillanpää P, Mattila VM, Iivonen T, Visuri T, Pihlajamäki H. Incidence and risk factors of acute traumatic primary patellar dislocation. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2008;40(4):606–611. doi: 10.1249/MSS.0b013e318160740f. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Canham-Chervak M. The Association of Health Risk Behaviors and Training-related Injury Among U.S. Army Basic Trainees. 2006. http://www.dtic.mil/get-tr-doc/pdf?AD=ADA568679. Accessed 14 Feb 2019.
  • 53.Chatzipapas CN, Drosos GI, Kazakos KI, Tripsianis G, Iatrou C, Verettas DAJ. Stress fractures in military men and bone quality related factors. Int J Sports Med. 2008;29(11):922–926. doi: 10.1055/s-2008-1038690. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Cosio-Lima L, Brown K, Reynolds KL, Gregg R, Perry RA., Jr Injury and illness incidence in a Sergeants Major Academy class. Mil Med. 2013;178(7):735–741. doi: 10.7205/MILMED-D-12-00494. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Lappe J, Davies K, Recker R, Heaney R. Quantitative ultrasound: use in screening for susceptibility to stress fractures in female army recruits. J Bone Miner Res. 2005;20(4):571–578. doi: 10.1359/JBMR.041208. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56.Lappe JM, Stegman MR, Recker RR. The impact of lifestyle factors on stress fractures in female Army recruits. Osteoporos Int. 2001;12(1):35–42. doi: 10.1007/s001980170155. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57.Robinson M, Siddall A, Bilzon J, Thompson D, Greeves J, Izard R, et al. Low fitness, low body mass and prior injury predict injury risk during military recruit training: a prospective cohort study in the British Army. BMJ Open Sport Exerc Med. 2016;2(1):e000100. doi: 10.1136/bmjsem-2015-000100. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 58.Schneider GA, Bigelow C, Amoroso PJ. Evaluating risk of re-injury among 1214 army airborne soldiers using a stratified survival model. Am J Prev Med. 2000;18(3 Suppl):156–163. doi: 10.1016/s0749-3797(99)00177-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 59.Taanila HP, Suni JH, Pihlajamaki HK, Mattila VM, Ohrankammen O, Vuorinen P, Parkkari JP. Predictors of low back pain in physically active conscripts with special emphasis on muscular fitness. Spine J. 2012;12(9):737–748. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2012.01.006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 60.Wilkinson DM, Blacker SD, Richmond VL, Horner FE, Rayson MP, Spiess A, Knapik JJ. Injury rates and injury risk factors among British army infantry soldiers: final report. Med Sci Sports Exer. 2009;42:283–284. [Google Scholar]
  • 61.Givon U, Friedman E, Reiner A, Vered I, Finestone A, Shemer J. Stress fractures in the Israeli Defense Forces from 1995 to 1996. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2000;373:227–232. doi: 10.1097/00003086-200004000-00027. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 62.Moran DS, Finestone AS, Arbel Y, Shabshin N, Laor A. A simplified model to predict stress fracture in young elite combat recruits. J Strength Cond Res. 2012;26(9):2585–2592. doi: 10.1519/JSC.0b013e31823f2733. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 63.Moran DS, Heled Y, Arbel Y, Israeli E, Finestone AS, Evans RK, et al. Dietary intake and stress fractures among elite male combat recruits. J Int Soc Sports Nutr. 2012;9(1):6. doi: 10.1186/1550-2783-9-6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 64.Cosman F, Ruffing J, Zion M, Uhorchak J, Ralston S, Tendy S, et al. Determinants of stress fracture risk in United States Military Academy cadets. Bone. 2013;55(2):359–366. doi: 10.1016/j.bone.2013.04.011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 65.Sanchez-Santos MT, Davey T, Leyland KM, Allsopp AJ, Lanham-New SA, Judge A, et al. Development of a prediction model for stress fracture during an intensive Physical Training Program: The Royal Marines Commandos. Orthop J Sports Med. 2017;5(7):2325967117716381. doi: 10.1177/2325967117716381. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 66.Dash N, Kushwaha A. Stress fractures—a prospective study amongst recruits. Med J Armed Forces India. 2012;68(2):118–122. doi: 10.1016/S0377-1237(12)60021-5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 67.Kovcan B, Vodicar J, Šimenko J, Videmšek M, Pori P, Vedran H. Retrospective and cross-sectional analysis of physical training-related musculoskeletal injuries in Slovenian Armed Forces. Mil Med. 2019;184(1–2):e195–e199. doi: 10.1093/milmed/usy156. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 68.Wyss T, Roos L, Hofstetter MC, Frey F, Mäder U. Impact of training patterns on injury incidences in 12 Swiss Army basic military training schools. Mil Med. 2014;179(1):49–55. doi: 10.7205/MILMED-D-13-00289. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 69.Altarac M, Gardner JW, Popovich RM, Potter R, Knapik JJ, Jones BH. Cigarette smoking and exercise-related injuries among young men and women. Am J Prev Med. 2000;18(3 Suppl):96–102. doi: 10.1016/s0749-3797(99)00166-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 70.Anderson MK, Grier T, Canham-Chervak M, Bushman TT, Jones BH. Occupation and other risk factors for injury among enlisted U.S. army soldiers. Public Health. 2015;129(5):531–538. doi: 10.1016/j.puhe.2015.02.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 71.Anderson MK, Grier T, Dada EO, Canham-Chervak M, Jones BH. The role of gender and physical performance on injuries: an army study. Am J Prev Med. 2017;52(5):e131–e138. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2016.11.012. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 72.Bedno SA, Cowan DN, Urban N, Niebuhr DW. Effect of pre-accession physical fitness on training injuries among US Army recruits. Work. 2013;44(4):509–515. doi: 10.3233/WOR-2012-1355. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 73.Brooks RD, Grier T, Dada EO, Jones BH. The combined effect of cigarette smoking and fitness on injury risk in men and women. Nicotine Tob Res. 2019;21(12):1621–1628. doi: 10.1093/ntr/nty155. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 74.Cowan DN, Bedno SA, Urban N, Lee DS, Niebuhr DW. Step test performance and risk of stress fractures among female army trainees. Am J Prev Med. 2012;42(6):620–624. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2012.02.014. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 75.Cowan DN, Bedno SA, Urban N, Yi B, Niebuhr DW. Musculoskeletal injuries among overweight army trainees: incidence and health care utilization. Occup Med (Lond) 2011;61(4):247–252. doi: 10.1093/occmed/kqr028. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 76.Davey T, Lanham-New SA, Shaw AM, Cobley R, Allsopp AJ, Hajjawi MOR, et al. Fundamental differences in axial and appendicular bone density in stress fractured and uninjured royal marine recruits—a matched case-control study. Bone. 2015;73:120–126. doi: 10.1016/j.bone.2014.12.018. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 77.Fallowfield JL, Leiper RG, Shaw AM, Whittamore DR, Lanham-New SA, Allsopp AJ, et al. Risk of injury in Royal Air Force Training: does sex really matter? Mil Med. 2018 doi: 10.1093/milmed/usy177. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 78.Grier TL, Canham-Chervak M, Anderson MK, Bushman TT, Jones BH. Effects of physical training and fitness on running injuries in physically active young men. J Strength Cond Res. 2017;31(1):207–216. doi: 10.1519/JSC.0000000000001487. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 79.Grier TL, Knapik JJ, Canada S, Canham-Chervak M, Jones BH. Risk factors associated with self-reported training-related injury before arrival at the US Army ordnance school. Public Health. 2010;124(7):417–423. doi: 10.1016/j.puhe.2010.03.016. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 80.Kelly EW, Jonson SR, Cohen ME, Shaffer R. Stress fractures of the pelvis in female navy recruits: an analysis of possible mechanisms of injury. Mil Med. 2000;165(2):142–146. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 81.Knapik JJ, Brosch LC, Venuto M, Swedler DI, Bullock SH, Gaines LS, et al. Effect on injuries of assigning shoes based on foot shape in air force basic training. Am J Prev Med. 2010;38(1 Suppl):S197–211. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2009.10.013. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 82.Knapik JJ, Graham B, Cobbs J, Thompson D, Steelman R, Jones BH. A prospective investigation of injury incidence and injury risk factors among Army recruits in military police training. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2013;14:32. doi: 10.1186/1471-2474-14-32. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 83.Knapik JJ, Graham BS, Rieger J, Steelman R, Pendergrass T. Activities associated with injuries in initial entry training. Mil Med. 2013;178(5):500–506. doi: 10.7205/MILMED-D-12-00507. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 84.Knapik JJ, Jones SB, Darakjy S, Hauret KG, Nevin R, Grier T, Jones BH. Injuries and injury risk factors among members of the United States Army Band. Am J Ind Med. 2007;50(12):951–961. doi: 10.1002/ajim.20532. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 85.Knapik JJ, Sharp MA, Canham-Chervak M, Hauret K, Patton JF, Jones BH. Risk factors for training-related injuries among men and women in basic combat training. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2001;33(6):946–954. doi: 10.1097/00005768-200106000-00014. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 86.Knapik JJ, Spiess A, Swedler D, Grier T, Darakjy S, Amoroso P, et al. Injury risk factors in parachuting and acceptability of the parachute ankle brace. Aviat Space Environ Med. 2008;79(7):689–694. doi: 10.3357/asem.2273.2008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 87.Knapik JJ, Swedler D, Grier T, Hauret KG, Bullock S, Williams K, et al. Injury reduction effectiveness of prescribing running shoes based on foot shape in basic combat training: Technical Report No. 12-MA-05SB-08. Aberdeen Proving Ground, MD; 2008.
  • 88.Knapik JJ, Trone D, Swedler DI, Villasenor A, Schmied E, Bullock S, Jones BH. Injury reduction effectiveness of assigning running shoes based on foot shape in Marine Corps basic training: No. 12-MA-05SBA-08B. Aberdeen Proving Ground, MD; 2009. [DOI] [PubMed]
  • 89.Korvala J, Hartikka H, Pihlajamäki H, Solovieva S, Ruohola JP, Sahi T, et al. Genetic predisposition for femoral neck stress fractures in military conscripts. BMC Genet. 2010;11:95. doi: 10.1186/1471-2156-11-95. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 90.Lauder TD, Dixit S, Pezzin LE, Williams MV, Campbell CS, Davis GD. The relation between stress fractures and bone mineral density: evidence from active-duty Army women. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2000;81(1):73–79. doi: 10.1016/s0003-9993(00)90225-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 91.Munnoch K, Bridger RS. Smoking and injury in Royal Marines' training. Occup Med (Lond) 2007;57(3):214–216. doi: 10.1093/occmed/kql170. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 92.Nagai T, Lovalekar M, Wohleber MF, Perlsweig KA, Wirt MD, Beals K. Poor anaerobic power/capability and static balance predicted prospective musculoskeletal injuries among Soldiers of the 101st Airborne (Air Assault) Division. J Sci Med Sport. 2017;20(Suppl 4):S11–S16. doi: 10.1016/j.jsams.2017.10.023. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 93.Pihlajamäki H, Parviainen M, Kyröläinen H, Kautiainen H, Kiviranta I. Regular physical exercise before entering military service may protect young adult men from fatigue fractures. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2019;20(1):126. doi: 10.1186/s12891-019-2513-4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 94.Psaila M, Ranson C. Risk factors for lower leg, ankle and foot injuries during basic military training in the Maltese Armed Forces. Phys Ther Sport. 2017;24:7–12. doi: 10.1016/j.ptsp.2016.09.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 95.Rappole C, Grier T, Anderson MK, Hauschild V, Jones BH. Associations of age, aerobic fitness, and body mass index with injury in an operational Army brigade. J Sci Med Sport. 2017;20(Suppl 4):S45–50. doi: 10.1016/j.jsams.2017.08.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 96.Reynolds K, Cosio-Lima L, Bovill M, Tharion W, Williams J, Hodges T. A comparison of injuries, limited-duty days, and injury risk factors in infantry, artillery, construction engineers, and special forces soldiers. Mil Med. 2009;174(7):702–708. doi: 10.7205/milmed-d-02-2008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 97.Reynolds K, Cosio-Lima L, Creedon J, Gregg R, Zigmont T. Injury occurrence and risk factors in construction engineers and combat artillery soldiers. Mil Med. 2002;167(12):971–977. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 98.Reynolds K, Williams J, Miller C, Mathis A, Dettori J. Injuries and risk factors in an 18-day marine winter mountain training exercise. Mil Med. 2000;165(12):905–910. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 99.Roos L, Boesch M, Sefidan S, Frey F, Mäder U, Annen H, et al. Adapted marching distances and physical training decrease recruits' injuries and attrition. Mil Med. 2015;180(3):329–336. doi: 10.7205/MILMED-D-14-00184. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 100.Ruohola JP, Laaksi I, Ylikomi T, Haataja R, Mattila VM, Sahi T, et al. Association between serum 25(OH)D concentrations and bone stress fractures in Finnish young men. J Bone Miner Res. 2006;21(9):1483–1488. doi: 10.1359/jbmr.060607. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 101.Scheinowitz M, Yanovich R, Sharvit N, Arnon M, Moran DS. Effect of cardiovascular and muscular endurance is not associated with stress fracture incidence in female military recruits: a 12-month follow up study. J Basic Clin Physiol Pharmacol. 2017;28(3):219–224. doi: 10.1515/jbcpp-2015-0098. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 102.Sharma J, Heagerty R, Dalal S, Banerjee B, Booker T. Risk factors associated with musculoskeletal injury: a prospective study of British infantry recruits. Curr Rheumatol Rev. 2019;15(1):50–58. doi: 10.2174/1573397114666180430103855. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 103.Sharma J, Golby J, Greeves J, Spears IR. Biomechanical and lifestyle risk factors for medial tibia stress syndrome in army recruits: a prospective study. Gait Posture. 2011;33(3):361–365. doi: 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2010.12.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 104.Taanila H, Suni JH, Kannus P, Pihlajamaki H, Ruohola JP, Viskari J, et al. Risk factors of acute and overuse musculoskeletal injuries among young conscripts: a population-based cohort study. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2015;16:104. doi: 10.1186/s12891-015-0557-7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 105.Trone DW, Cipriani DJ, Raman R, Wingard DL, Shaffer RA, Macera CA. Self-reported smoking and musculoskeletal overuse injury among male and female U.S. marine corps recruits. Mil Med. 2014;179(7):735–743. doi: 10.7205/MILMED-D-13-00516. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 106.Wang X, Wang P, Zhou W. Risk factors of military training-related injuries in recruits of Chinese People's Armed Police Forces. Chin J Traumatol. 2003;6(1):12–17. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 107.Wunderlin S, Roos L, Roth R, Faude O, Frey F, Wyss T. Trunk muscle strength tests to predict injuries, attrition and military ability in soldiers. J Sports Med Phys Fitness. 2015;55(5):535–543. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 108.Zhao L, Chang Q, Huang T, Huang C. Prospective cohort study of the risk factors for stress fractures in Chinese male infantry recruits. J Int Med Res. 2016;44(4):787–795. doi: 10.1177/0300060516639751. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 109.Shaffer RA, Rauh MJ, Brodine SK, Trone DW, Macera CA. Predictors of stress fracture susceptibility in young female recruits. Am J Sports Med. 2006;34(1):108–115. doi: 10.1177/0363546505278703. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 110.Cameron KL, Mountcastle SB, Nelson BJ, DeBerardino TM, Duffey ML, Svoboda SJ, et al. History of shoulder instability and subsequent injury during four years of follow-up: a survival analysis. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2013;95(5):439–445. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.L.00252. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 111.Evans R, Reynolds K, Creedon J, Murphy M. Incidence of acute injury related to fitness testing of U.S. Army personnel. Mil Med. 2005;170(12):1005–1011. doi: 10.7205/milmed.170.12.1005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 112.Finestone A, Milgrom C, Wolf O, Petrov K, Evans R, Moran D. Epidemiology of metatarsal stress fractures versus tibial and femoral stress fractures during elite training. Foot Ankle Int. 2011;32(1):16–20. doi: 10.3113/FAI.2011.0016. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 113.Garnock C, Witchalls J, Newman P. Predicting individual risk for medial tibial stress syndrome in navy recruits. J Sci Med Sport. 2018;21(6):586–590. doi: 10.1016/j.jsams.2017.10.020. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 114.George SZ, Childs JD, Teyhen DS, Wu SS, Wright AC, Dugan JL, et al. Predictors of occurrence and severity of first time low back pain episodes: findings from a military inception cohort. PLoS ONE. 2012;7(2):e30597. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0030597. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 115.Hill OT, Bulathsinhala L, Scofield DE, Haley TF, Bernasek TL. Risk factors for soft tissue knee injuries in active duty U.S. army soldiers, 2000–2005. Mil Med. 2013;178(6):676–682. doi: 10.7205/MILMED-D-13-00049. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 116.Knapik JJ, Graham B, Cobbs J, Thompson D, Steelman R, Jones BH. A prospective investigation of injury incidence and risk factors among army recruits in combat engineer training. J Occup Med Toxicol. 2013;8(1):5. doi: 10.1186/1745-6673-8-5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 117.Kucera KL, Marshall SW, Wolf SH, Padua DA, Cameron KL, Beutler AI. Association of injury history and incident injury in Cadet Basic Military Training. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2016;48(6):1053–1061. doi: 10.1249/MSS.0000000000000872. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 118.Lisman P, O'Connor FG, Deuster PA, Knapik JJ. Functional movement screen and aerobic fitness predict injuries in military training. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2013;45(4):636–643. doi: 10.1249/MSS.0b013e31827a1c4c. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 119.Monnier A, Larsson H, Nero H, Djupsjöbacka M, Äng BO. A longitudinal observational study of back pain incidence, risk factors and occupational physical activity in Swedish marine trainees. BMJ Open. 2019;9(5):e025150. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-025150. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 120.Rice H, Nunns M, House C, Fallowfield J, Allsopp A, Dixon S. A narrow bimalleolar width is a risk factor for ankle inversion injury in male military recruits: a prospective study. Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon) 2017;41:14–19. doi: 10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2016.11.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 121.Roy TC, Songer T, Ye F, LaPorte R, Grier T, Anderson M, et al. Physical training risk factors for musculoskeletal injury in female soldiers. Mil Med. 2014;179(12):1432–1438. doi: 10.7205/MILMED-D-14-00164. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 122.Scott SA, Simon JE, Van Der Pol B, Docherty CL. Risk factors for sustaining a lower extremity injury in an Army Reserve Officer Training Corps Cadet Population. Mil Med. 2015;180(8):910–916. doi: 10.7205/MILMED-D-14-00618. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 123.Taanila H, Suni J, Pihlajamäki H, Mattila VM, Ohrankämmen O, Vuorinen P, et al. Aetiology and risk factors of musculoskeletal disorders in physically active conscripts: a follow-up study in the Finnish defence forces. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2010;11:146. doi: 10.1186/1471-2474-11-146. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 124.Merkel D, Moran DS, Yanovich R, Evans RK, Finestone AS, Constantini N, et al. The association between hematological and inflammatory factors and stress fractures among female military recruits. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2008;40(11 Suppl):S691–S697. doi: 10.1249/MSS.0b013e318189560c. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 125.Moran DS, Israeli E, Evans RK, Yanovich R, Constantini N, Shabshin N, et al. Prediction model for stress fracture in young female recruits during basic training. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2008;40(11 Suppl):S636–S644. doi: 10.1249/MSS.0b013e3181893164. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 126.Burgi AA, Gorham ED, Garland CF, Mohr SB, Garland FC, Zeng K, et al. High serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D is associated with a low incidence of stress fractures. J Bone Miner Res. 2011;26(10):2371–2377. doi: 10.1002/jbmr.451. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 127.Davey T, Lanham-New SA, Shaw AM, Hale B, Cobley R, Berry JL, et al. Low serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D is associated with increased risk of stress fracture during royal marine recruit training. Osteoporos Int. 2016;27(1):171–179. doi: 10.1007/s00198-015-3228-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 128.Owens BD, Dawson L, Burks R, Cameron KL. Incidence of shoulder dislocation in the United States military: demographic considerations from a high-risk population. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2009;91(4):791–796. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.H.00514. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 129.Schermann H, Karakis I, Ankory R, Kadar A, Yoffe V, Shlaifer A, et al. Musculoskeletal injuries among female soldiers working with dogs. Mil Med. 2018;183(9–10):e343–e348. doi: 10.1093/milmed/usy105. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 130.Constantini N, Finestone AS, Hod N, Shub I, Heinemann S, Foldes AJ, et al. Equipment modification is associated with fewer stress fractures in female Israel border police recruits. Mil Med. 2010;175(10):799–804. doi: 10.7205/milmed-d-09-00253. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 131.Konitzer LN, Fargo MV, Brininger TL, Lim RM. Association between back, neck, and upper extremity musculoskeletal pain and the individual body armor. J Hand Ther. 2008;21(2):143–148. doi: 10.1197/j.jht.2007.10.017. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 132.Rappole C, Chervak MC, Grier T, Anderson MK, Jones BH. Factors associated with lower extremity training-related injuries among Enlisted Women in U.S. army operational units. J Mil Veterans Healt. 2018;26(1):18–28. [Google Scholar]
  • 133.Roy TC, Ritland BM, Knapik JJ, Sharp MA. Lifting tasks are associated with injuries during the early portion of a deployment to Afghanistan. Mil Med. 2012;177(6):716–722. doi: 10.7205/milmed-d-11-00402. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 134.Roy TC, Ritland BM, Sharp MA. A description of injuries in men and women while serving in Afghanistan. Mil Med. 2015;180(2):126–131. doi: 10.7205/MILMED-D-14-00321. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 135.Roy TC. Diagnoses and mechanisms of musculoskeletal injuries in an infantry brigade combat team deployed to Afghanistan evaluated by the brigade physical therapist. Mil Med. 2011;176(8):903–908. doi: 10.7205/milmed-d-11-00006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 136.Schwartz O, Malka I, Olsen CH, Dudkiewicz I, Bader T. Overuse injuries in the IDF’s Combat Training Units: rates, types, and mechanisms of injury. Mil Med. 2018;183(3–4):e196–200. doi: 10.1093/milmed/usx055. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 137.Sefton JM, Lohse KR, McAdam JS. Prediction of injuries and injury types in Army Basic Training, Infantry, Armor, and Cavalry Trainees using a common fitness screen. J Athl Train. 2016;51(11):849–857. doi: 10.4085/1062-6050-51.9.09. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 138.Sharma J, Dixon J, Dalal S, Heagerty R, Spears I. Musculoskeletal injuries in British army recruits: a prospective study of incidence in different Infantry Regiments. J R Army Med Corps. 2017;163(6):406–411. doi: 10.1136/jramc-2016-000657. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 139.Skeehan CD, Tribble DR, Sanders JW, Putnam SD, Armstrong AW, Riddle MS. Nonbattle injury among deployed troops: an epidemiologic study. Mil Med. 2009;174(12):1256–1262. doi: 10.7205/milmed-d-02-6008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 140.Beck TJ, Ruff CB, Shaffer RA, Betsinger K, Trone DW, Brodine SK. Stress fracture in military recruits: gender differences in muscle and bone susceptibility factors. Bone. 2000;27(3):437–444. doi: 10.1016/s8756-3282(00)00342-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 141.Canham-Chervak M, Knapik JJ, Hauret K, Cuthie J, Craig S. Determining physical fitness criteria for entry into Army Basic Combat Training: can these criteria be based on injury risk? 2000. http://www.dtic.mil/dtic/tr/fulltext/u2/a374717.pdf. Accessed 1 Mar 2014.
  • 142.Dixon S, Nunns M, House C, Rice H, Mostazir M, Stiles V, et al. Prospective study of biomechanical risk factors for second and third metatarsal stress fractures in military recruits. J Sci Med Sport. 2019;22(2):135–139. doi: 10.1016/j.jsams.2018.06.015. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 143.Havenetidis K, Paxinos T. Risk factors for musculoskeletal injuries among Greek Army officer cadets undergoing Basic Combat Training. Mil Med. 2011;176(10):1111–1116. doi: 10.7205/milmed-d-10-00448. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 144.Henderson NE, Knapik JJ, Shaffer SW, McKenzie TH, Schneider GM. Injuries and injury risk factors among men and women in U.S. army combat medic advanced individual training. Mil Med. 2000;165(9):647–652. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 145.Knapik JJ, Darakjy S, Hauret KG, Canada S, Scott S, Rieger W, et al. Increasing the physical fitness of low-fit recruits before basic combat training: an evaluation of fitness, injuries, and training outcomes. Mil Med. 2006;171(1):45–54. doi: 10.7205/milmed.171.1.45. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 146.Knapik JJ, Jones SB, Darakjy S, Hauret KG, Bullock SH, Sharp MA, et al. Injury rates and injury risk factors among U.S. army wheel vehicle mechanics. Mil Med. 2007;172(9):988–996. doi: 10.7205/milmed.172.9.988. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 147.Ma JZ, Cui SF, Hu F, Lu QJ, Li W. Incidence and characteristics of meniscal injuries in cadets at a military school, 2013–2015. J Athl Train. 2016;51(11):876–879. doi: 10.4085/1062-6050-51.10.11. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 148.Mahieu NN, Witvrouw E, Stevens V, Van Tiggelen D, Roget P. Intrinsic risk factors for the development of achilles tendon overuse injury: a prospective study. Am J Sports Med. 2006;34(2):226–235. doi: 10.1177/0363546505279918. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 149.Moran DS, Evans R, Arbel Y, Luria O, Hadid A, Yanovich R, et al. Physical and psychological stressors linked with stress fractures in recruit training. Scand J Med Sci Sports. 2013;23(4):443–450. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0838.2011.01420.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 150.Nunns M, House C, Rice H, Mostazir M, Davey T, Stiles V, et al. Four biomechanical and anthropometric measures predict tibial stress fracture: a prospective study of 1065 Royal Marines. Br J Sports Med. 2016;50(19):1206–1210. doi: 10.1136/bjsports-2015-095394. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 151.Nye NS, Pawlak MT, Webber BJ, Tchandja JN, Milner MR. Description and rate of musculoskeletal injuries in air force basic military trainees, 2012–2014. J Athl Train. 2016;51(11):858–865. doi: 10.4085/1062-6050-51.10.10. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 152.Owens B, Mountcastle S, White D. Racial differences in tendon rupture incidence. Int J Sports Med. 2007;28(7):617–620. doi: 10.1055/s-2007-964837. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 153.Parr JJ, Clark NC, Abt JP, Kresta JY, Keenan KA, Kane SF, et al. Residual impact of previous injury on musculoskeletal characteristics in special forces operators. Orthop J Sports Med. 2015;3(11):2325967115616581. doi: 10.1177/2325967115616581. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 154.Rabin A, Kozol Z, Finestone AS. Limited ankle dorsiflexion increases the risk for mid-portion Achilles tendinopathy in infantry recruits: a prospective cohort study. J Foot Ankle Res. 2014;7(1):48. doi: 10.1186/s13047-014-0048-3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 155.Sobhani V, Shakibaee A, Khatibi Aghda A, Emami Meybodi MK, Delavari A, Jahandideh D. Studying the relation between medial tibial stress syndrome and anatomic and anthropometric characteristics of military male personnel. Asian J Sports Med. 2015;6(2):e23811. doi: 10.5812/asjsm.23811. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 156.Trybulec B, Majchrzak E. Injuries and factors determining their occurrence in paratroopers of airborne forces. Balt J Health Phys A. 2016;8(2):78–86. [Google Scholar]
  • 157.Heebner NR, Abt JP, Lovalekar M, Beals K, Sell TC, Morgan J, et al. Physical and performance characteristics related to unintentional musculoskeletal injury in special forces operators: a prospective analysis. J Athl Train. 2017;52(12):1153–1160. doi: 10.4085/1062-6050-52.12.22. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 158.Sell TC, Clark NC, Wood D, Abt JP, Lovalekar M, Lephart SM. Single-leg balance impairments persist in fully operational military special forces operators with a previous history of low back pain. Orthop J Sports Med. 2014;2(5):2325967114532780. doi: 10.1177/2325967114532780. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 159.Allsopp AJ, Scarpello EG, Andrews S, Pethybridge RJ. Survival of the fittest? The scientific basis for the Royal Navy pre-joining fitness test. J R Nav Med Serv. 2003;89(1):11–18. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 160.Billings CE. Epidemiology of injuries and illnesses during the United States Air Force Academy 2002 Basic Cadet Training program: documenting the need for prevention. Mil Med. 2004;169(8):664–670. doi: 10.7205/milmed.169.8.664. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 161.Blacker SD, Wilkinson DM, Bilzon JLJ, Rayson MP. Risk factors for training injuries among British Army recruits. Mil Med. 2008;173(3):278–286. doi: 10.7205/milmed.173.3.278. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 162.Havenetidis K, Paxinos T, Kardaris D, Bissas A. Prognostic potential of body composition indices in detecting risk of musculoskeletal injury in army officer cadet profiles. Phys Sports Med. 2017;45(2):114–119. doi: 10.1080/00913847.2017.1298977. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 163.Kodesh E, Shargal E, Kislev-Cohen R, Funk S, Dorfman L, Samuelly G, et al. Examination of the effectiveness of predictors for musculoskeletal injuries in female soldiers. J Sports Sci Med. 2015;14(3):515–521. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 164.Kupferer KR, Bush DM, Cornell JE, Lawrence VA, Alexander JL, Ramos RG, et al. Femoral neck stress fracture in Air Force basic trainees. Mil Med. 2014;179(1):56–61. doi: 10.7205/MILMED-D-13-00154. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 165.Waterman BR, Belmont PJ, Jr, Cameron KL, DeBerardino TM, Owens BD. Epidemiology of ankle sprain at the United States Military Academy. Am J Sports Med. 2010;38(4):797–803. doi: 10.1177/0363546509350757. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 166.Gundlach N, Sammito S, Böckelmann I. Risk factors for accidents during sports while serving in German armed forces. Sportverletz Sportschaden. 2012;26(1):45–48. doi: 10.1055/s-0031-1299107. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 167.Finestone A, Milgrom C, Evans R, Yanovich R, Constantini N, Moran DS. Overuse injuries in female infantry recruits during low-intensity basic training. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2008;40(11 Suppl):S630–S635. doi: 10.1249/MSS.0b013e3181892ff9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 168.Krauss MR, Garvin NU, Boivin MR, Cowan DN. Excess stress fractures, musculoskeletal injuries, and health care utilization among unfit and overweight female army trainees. Am J Sports Med. 2017;45(2):311–316. doi: 10.1177/0363546516675862. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 169.Hughes CD, Weinrauch PCL. Military static line parachute injuries in an Australian commando battalion. ANZ J Surg. 2008;78(10):848–852. doi: 10.1111/j.1445-2197.2008.04581.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 170.Burne SG, Khan KM, Boudville PB, Mallet RJ, Newman PM, Steinman LJ, et al. Risk factors associated with exertional medial tibial pain: a 12 month prospective clinical study. Br J Sports Med. 2004;38(4):441–445. doi: 10.1136/bjsm.2002.004499. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 171.Rauh MJ, Macera CA, Trone DW, Reis JP, Shaffer RA. Selected static anatomic measures predict overuse injuries in female recruits. Mil Med. 2010;175(5):329–335. doi: 10.7205/milmed-d-09-00158. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 172.Keenan KA, Wohleber MF, Perlsweig KA, Baldwin TM, Caviston M, Lovalekar M, et al. Association of prospective lower extremity musculoskeletal injury and musculoskeletal, balance, and physiological characteristics in Special Operations Forces. J Sci Med Sport. 2017;20(Suppl 4):S34–S39. doi: 10.1016/j.jsams.2017.09.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 173.Esterman A, Pilotto L. Foot shape and its effect on functioning in Royal Australian Air Force recruits. Part 1: prospective cohort study. Mil Med. 2005;170(7):623–628. doi: 10.7205/milmed.170.7.623. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 174.Hetsroni I, Finestone A, Milgrom C, Ben Sira D, Nyska M, Radeva-Petrova D, et al. Prospective biomechanical study of the association between foot pronation and the incidence of anterior knee pain among military recruits. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2006;88(7):905–908. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.88B7.17826. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 175.Levy JC, Mizel MS, Wilson LS, Fox W, McHale K, Taylor DC, et al. Incidence of foot and ankle injuries in West Point cadets with pes planus compared to the general cadet population. Foot Ankle Int. 2006;27(12):1060–1064. doi: 10.1177/107110070602701211. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 176.Yates B, White S. The incidence and risk factors in the development of medial tibial stress syndrome among naval recruits. Am J Sports Med. 2004;32(3):772–780. doi: 10.1177/0095399703258776. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 177.Roy TC, Knapik JJ, Ritland BM, Murphy N, Sharp MA. Risk factors for musculoskeletal injuries for soldiers deployed to Afghanistan. Aviat Space Environ Med. 2012;83(11):1060–1066. doi: 10.3357/asem.3341.2012. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 178.Grier TL, Morrison S, Knapik JJ, Canham-Chervak M, Jones BH. Risk factors for injuries in the U.S. Army Ordnance School. Mil Med. 2011;176(11):1292–1299. doi: 10.7205/milmed-d-11-00215. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 179.Hall LJ. Relationship between 1.5-mile run time, injury risk and training outcome in British army recruits. J R Army Med Corps. 2017;163(6):376–382. doi: 10.1136/jramc-2016-000756. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 180.Hauret KG, Steelman RA, Pierce JR, Alemany JA, Sharp MA, Foulis SA, et al. Association of Performance on the Occupational Physical Assessment Test with Injuries and Attrition During Initial Entry Training – OPAT Phase I: PHR # S.0047229–18b. Aberdeen Proving Ground, MD: U.S. Army Public Health Center. DTIC: AD1061860; 2018.
  • 181.Heller R, Stammers H. Running to breaking point? The relationship between 1.5-mile run time and injury risk in female recruits during British army basic training. J R Army Med Corps. 2020;166(E):e3–e7. doi: 10.1136/jramc-2018-001012. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 182.Knapik JJ, Hauret KG, Arnold S, Canham-Chervak M, Mansfield AJ, Hoedebecke EL, et al. Injury and fitness outcomes during implementation of physical readiness training. Int J Sports Med. 2003;24(5):372–381. doi: 10.1055/s-2003-40710. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 183.Knapik JJ, Swedler DI, Grier TL, Hauret KG, Bullock SH, Williams KW, et al. Injury reduction effectiveness of selecting running shoes based on plantar shape. J Strength Cond Res. 2009;23(3):685–697. doi: 10.1519/JSC.0b013e3181a0fc63. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 184.Martin RC, Grier T, Canham-Chervak M, Bushman TT, Anderson MK, Dada EO, et al. Risk factors for sprains and strains among physically active young men: a US Army study. US Army Med Dep J. 2018;2–18:14–21. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 185.Müller-Schilling L, Gundlach N, Böckelmann I, Sammito S. Physical fitness as a risk factor for injuries and excessive stress symptoms during basic military training. Int Arch Occup Environ Health. 2019;92(6):837–841. doi: 10.1007/s00420-019-01423-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 186.Rauh MJ, Macera CA, Trone DW, Shaffer RA, Brodine SK. Epidemiology of stress fracture and lower-extremity overuse injury in female recruits. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2006;38(9):1571–1577. doi: 10.1249/01.mss.0000227543.51293.9d. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 187.Rosendal L, Langberg H, Skov-Jensen A, Kjaer M. Incidence of injury and physical performance adaptations during military training. Clin J Sport Med. 2003;13(3):157–163. doi: 10.1097/00042752-200305000-00006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 188.Välimäki VV, Alfthan H, Lehmuskallio E, Löyttyniemi E, Sahi T, Suominen H, et al. Risk factors for clinical stress fractures in male military recruits: a prospective cohort study. Bone. 2005;37(2):267–273. doi: 10.1016/j.bone.2005.04.016. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 189.Wyss T, Von Vigier RO, Frey F, Mäder U. The Swiss army physical fitness test battery predicts risk of overuse injuries among recruits. J Sports Med Phys Fitness. 2012;52(5):513–521. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 190.Finestone AS, Milgrom C, Yanovich R, Evans R, Constantini N, Moran DS. Evaluation of the performance of females as light infantry soldiers. Biomed Res Int. 2014;2014:572953. doi: 10.1155/2014/572953. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 191.Gam A, Goldstein L, Karmon Y, Mintser I, Grotto I, Guri A, et al. Comparison of stress fractures of male and female recruits during basic training in the Israeli anti-aircraft forces. Mil Med. 2005;170(8):710–712. doi: 10.7205/milmed.170.8.710. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 192.Gemmell IMM. Injuries among female army recruits: a conflict of legislation. J R Soc Med. 2002;95:23–27. doi: 10.1258/jrsm.95.1.23. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 193.Snedecor MR, Boudreau CF, Ellis BE, Schulman J, Hite M, Chambers BUS. Air force recruit injury and health study. Am J Prev Med. 2000;18(3 Suppl):129–140. doi: 10.1016/s0749-3797(00)00109-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 194.Goss DL, Moore JH, Slivka EM, Hatler BS. Comparison of injury rates between cadets with limb length inequalities and matched control subjects over 1 year of military training and athletic participation. Mil Med. 2006;171(6):522–525. doi: 10.7205/milmed.171.6.522. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 195.Knapik JJ, Canham-Chervak M, Hauret K, Laurin MJ, Hoedebecke E, Craig S, et al. Seasonal variations in injury rates during US Army Basic Combat Training. Ann Occup Hyg. 2002;46(1):15–23. doi: 10.1093/annhyg/mef013. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 196.Mattila VM, Parkkari J, Korpela H, Pihlajamäki H. Hospitalisation for injuries among Finnish conscripts in 1990–1999. Accid Anal Prev. 2006;38(1):99–104. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2005.07.005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 197.Taanila H, Suni J, Pihlajamäki H, Mattila VM, Ohrankämmen O, Vuorinen P, et al. Musculoskeletal disorders in physically active conscripts: a one-year follow-up study in the Finnish Defence Forces. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2009;10:89. doi: 10.1186/1471-2474-10-89. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 198.Helton GL, Cameron KL, Zifchock RA, Miller E, Goss DL, Song J, et al. Association between running shoe characteristics and lower extremity injuries in United States military academy cadets. Am J Sports Med. 2019;47(12):2853–2862. doi: 10.1177/0363546519870534. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 199.Knapik JJ, Hauret KG, Canada S, Marin R, Jones B. Association between ambulatory physical activity and injuries during United States Army Basic Combat Training. J Phys Act Health. 2011;8(4):496–502. doi: 10.1123/jpah.8.4.496. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 200.Schuh A, Grier T, Canham-Chervak M, Hauschild V, Roy T, Jones BJ. Risk factors for injury associated with low, moderate, and high mileage road marching in a U.S. Army infantry brigade. J Sci Med Sport. 2017;20:S28–S33. doi: 10.1016/j.jsams.2017.07.027. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 201.Knapik J, Darakjy S, Scott SJ, Hauret KG, Canada S, Marin R, et al. Evaluation of a standardized physical training program for basic combat training. J Strength Cond Res. 2005;19(2):246–253. doi: 10.1519/16324.1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 202.Ivarsson A, Johnson U, Andersen MB, Tranaeus U, Stenling A, Lindwall M. Psychosocial factors and sport injuries: meta-analyses for prediction and prevention. Sports Med. 2017;47(2):353–365. doi: 10.1007/s40279-016-0578-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 203.Junge A. The influence of psychological factors on sports injuries. Review of the literature. Am J Sports Med. 2000;28(5 Suppl):S10–S15. doi: 10.1177/28.suppl_5.s-10. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Data Availability Statement

All data generated or analyzed in this review are included in the published article.


Articles from Military Medical Research are provided here courtesy of BMC

RESOURCES