Skip to main content
Current Research in Pharmacology and Drug Discovery logoLink to Current Research in Pharmacology and Drug Discovery
. 2020 Dec 15;2:100007. doi: 10.1016/j.crphar.2020.100007

Tuberculosis and pharmacological interactions: A narrative review

Niccolò Riccardi a,b, Diana Canetti a,c, Paola Rodari b, Giorgio Besozzi a, Laura Saderi a,d, Marco Dettori d, Luigi R Codecasa a,e, Giovanni Sotgiu a,d,
PMCID: PMC8663953  PMID: 34909643

Abstract

Even if major improvements in therapeutic regimens and treatment outcomes have been progressively achieved, tuberculosis (TB) remains the leading cause of death from a single infectious microorganism. To improve TB treatment success as well as patients' quality of life, drug-drug-interactions (DDIs) need to be wisely managed. Comprehensive knowledge of anti-TB drugs, pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamic (PK/PD) parameters, potential patients’ changes in absorption and distribution, possible side effects and interactions, is mandatory to built effective anti-TB regimens. Optimization of treatments and adherence to international guidelines can help bend the curve of TB-related mortality and, ultimately, decrease the likelihood of treatment failure and drop-out during anti-TB treatment. Aim of this paper is to describe the most relevant DDIs between anti-TB and other drugs used in daily clinical practice, providing an updated and “easy-to-use” guide to minimize adverse effects, drop-outs and, in the long run, increase treatment success.

Keywords: Tuberculosis, Drug-drug interactions, Clinical use, TB treatment

Highlights

  • Tuberculosis (TB) remains the leading cause of death from a single infectious microorganism.

  • Comprehensive knowledge of anti-TB drugs and PK/PD parameters is mandatory to built effective anti-TB regimens.

  • Drug-drug-interactions (DDIs) need to be avoided and/or wisely managed to ensure treatment success.

  • Optimization of anti-TB treatment to avoid DDIs can help to bend the curve of TB related mortality.

1. Introduction

Even if major improvements in therapeutic regimens and treatment outcomes have been progressively achieved, tuberculosis (TB) remains the leading cause of death from a single infectious microorganism (World Health Organization, 2014, 2019).

Since the introduction of rifampicin in the 70s’, an effective short-course regimen for drug-susceptible (DS) forms of TB has been saving millions of lives worldwide. A standardized regimen characterized by a 2-month intensive (bactericidal) phase with four drugs [isoniazid (H), rifampicin (R), ethambutol (E), and pyrazinamide (Z); 2HRZE] and a 4-month continuation (sterilizing) phase with HR is key to achieve microbiological and clinical cure, if taken correctly (World Health Organization, 2014, 2019).

However, 10 million individuals are estimated to develop TB annually worldwide and treatment success is hampered by drug-resistant strains of Mycobacterium tuberculosis (Mtb), comorbidities, scarce adherence to treatment, adverse events of anti-TB drugs, and drug-drug interactions (DDIs) (Villa et al., 2020; Riccardi et al., 2019; Bisson et al., 2020; Soanker et al., 2020). Optimization of treatments and adherence to international guidelines can help bend the curve of TB-related mortality, as well as decrease the likelihood of treatment failure and drop-out during anti-TB treatment (Nahid et al., 2019). New drugs have been added to the anti-TB armamentarium and new DDIs can occur (Berger et al., 2020; Dheda et al., 2019; Riccardi et al., 2018; Bigelow et al., 2020).

Aim of this paper is to describe the most relevant DDIs between anti-TB and other drugs used in daily clinical practice, providing an updated and “easy-to-use” guide to minimize adverse effects, drop-outs and, ultimately, increase treatment success.

2. Methods

For the first-line drugs HRZE and for every TB drugs enlisted in the World Health Organization guidelines for the management of DR-TB (WHO consolidated guidelines, 2019), the following information are described: i) pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamic (PK/PD) parameters; ii) potential changes in absorption and distribution; ii) most prevalent DDIs; iv) therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) when available.

2.1. Anti-TB drugs

2.1.1. Rifampicin

Rifampicin, which belongs to the ansamycins and was discovered in 1965 from the soil bacteria Amycolatopsis rifamycinica (Sensi, 1983), displays antibacterial activity against Gram-positive cocci and Gram-negative bacteria, as well as against mycobacteria (Rothstein, 2016). It can selectively inhibit the DNA-dependent RNA polymerase both by sterically blocking the path of the elongating RNA at the 5′ end and by decreasing the affinity of the RNA polymerase for short RNA transcripts (Campbell et al., 2001; Schulz and Zillig, 1981).

Rifampicin is an highly lipid-soluble drug with a PK profile that shares equal distribution in plasma and tissues, with a plasmatic half-life ranging between 2 and 5 ​h it strongly induces human P450 cytochrome oxidases, notably CYP3A4, CYP2A, CYP2B, CYP2C, and CYP3A, as well as the human P glycoprotein ABC transporter, thus leading to a number of remarkable DDIs (Riccardi et al., 2020a) (Table 1).

Table 1.

Most common rifampicin DDIs.

Class of drug Drug Mediated protein or mechanism Rifampicin PL Drug PL Other effects References
Analgesics Methadone CYP3A4; CYP2B6; CYP2C19; CYP2C9 overdose if inducer discontinuation Kreek et al. (1976)
Morphine hepatic metabolism induction Fromm et al. (1997)
Oxycodone, fentanyl, codeine CYP3A4 overdose if inducer discontinuation Product Information. OxyContin (oxycodone)
Anesthetics Alfentanil CYP3A4
Halothane hepatotoxicity, hepatic encephalopathy Most and Markle (1974)
Antacids Aluminum hydroxide/magnesium hydroxide increased gastric pH; chelation Product Information. Rifadin (rifampin)
Anti-arrhythmics Amiodarone CYP3A4 Zarembski et al. (1999)
Disopyramide Aitio et al. (1981)
Propafenone CYP3A4 Dilger et al., 2000, Castel et al., 1990
Digitoxin CYP2C19; CYP3A4; P glycoprotein
Digoxin P glycoprotein; renal tubular secretion Greiner et al., 1999, Novi et al., 1980
Quinidine CYP3A4 Bussey et al. (1984)
Antibiotics Clarithromycin CYP3A4 Wallace et al. (1995)
Clindamycin CYP3A4 Bernard et al. (2015)
Cefazolin, other cephalosporins vitamine K-dependent coagulopathy severe coagulation disorders Lerner and Lubin (1974)
Chloramphenicol hepatic metabolism induction Prober (1985)
Dapsone CYP3A34; CYP2C9; CYP2E1 Horowitz et al., 1992, Peters et al., 1977
Doxicicline CYP3A4 Colmenero et al. (1994)
Linezolid P glycoprotein Egle et al., 2005, Gebhart et al., 2007, Gandelman et al., 2011
Moxifloxacin glucuronidation; sulphation;
P glycoprotein
Nijland et al. (2007)
Anticoagulants Warfarin CYP3A4 Casner (1996)
Dabigatran P glycoprotein Product Information. Pradaxa (dabigatran).
Apixaban CYP3A4;
P glycoprotein
Product Information. Eliquis (apixaban)
Rivaroxaban CYP3A4 Product Information. Xarelto (rivaroxaban)
Edoxaban P glycoprotein Product Information. Savaysa (edoxaban)
Anticonvulsants Phenytoin CYP2C9; CYP2C19 Kay et al. (1985)
Lamotrigine glucuronidation Wimpelmann et al., 2019, Ebert et al., 2000
Antidepressants Nortriptyline, amytriptiline CYP450 Bebchuk and Stewart (1991)
Anti-diabetics Chlorpropamide CYP450
Rosiglitazone CYP2C8 Niemi et al. (2004)
Antiemetics Ondansetron CYP3A4; CYP1A2 Villikka et al. (1999)
Antifungals Caspofungin Product Information. Cancidas (caspofungin)
Fluconazole CYP450 Tett et al., 1992, Rajasingham et al., 2018
Itraconazole, ketoconazole CYP3A4 Tucker et al. (1992)
Posaconazole CYP3A4; P glycoprotein; UGT1A1 Product Information. Noxafil (posaconazole)
Anthelmintics Praziquantel CYP450 Ridtitid et al. (2002)
Antimalarials Atovaquone rifampicin enzyme-induction Product Information. Mepron (atovaquone)
Quinine CYP3A4 Pukrittayakamee et al. (2003)
Antipsychotics Haloperidol CYP3A4
Antituberculars Isoniazid additive hepatotoxic effect hepatotoxicity Acocella et al. (1972)
Pyrazinamide McNeill et al. (2003); CDC (2001)
Delamanid CYP3A4 EMA, 2013
Antivirals anti-HCV Daclatasvir, simeprevir, ​sofosbuvir, ledipasvir CYP3A4; P glycoprotein Talavera Pons et al. (2017)
Anxiolytics/hypnotics Zolpidem CYP3A4; CYP1A2 Villikka et al. (1997)
Diazepam, triazolam hepatic metabolism induction
Bronchodilators Theophylline CYP3A4; CYP1A2 Boyce EG, 1985;
Powell-Jackson et al. (1985)
Cancer therapies Cyclophosphamide CYP3A4; CYP2B6; CYP2C9 Rose BD, 2005
Irinotecan CYP3A4 Product Information. Camptosar (irinotecan)
Lorlatinib hepatotoxicity Product Information. Lorbrena (lorlatinib)
Dasatinib, zanubrutinib Mu S., 2020
Tamoxifen, toremifene
Contraceptives Ethinyl estradiol CYP3A4 Skolnick et al. (1976)
Corticosteroids Prednisolone, prednisone Lee KH, 1993
Dexamethasone
Hypertensives Losartan CYP3A4; CYP2C9 Williamson KM, 1998
Metoprolol, propranolol, bisoprolol CYP450 Kirch et al. (1986)
Diltiazem CYP3A4
Verapamil
Nifedipine Tada et al. (1992);
Holtbecker N, 1996
Immunosuppressants (SOT) Tacrolimus CYP3A4;
P glycoprotein
Bhaloo and Prasad (2003)
Cyclosporine Van Buren et al. (1984)
Lipid lowering drugs Simvastatin, fluvastatin CYP2C9 Scripture and Pieper (2001)
Pravastatin cMOAT; MRP2 Kyrklund et al. (2004)
Protonic pump inhibitors Omeprazole, esomeprazole CYP3A4; CYP2C19 Product Information. Prilosec (omeprazole)
Retrovirals Zidovudine glucuronidation Gallicano et al. (1999)
Tenofovir alafenamide P glycoprotein Custodio JM, 2017;
Cerrone M, 2018
NNRTI CYP3A4
Efavirenz hepatotoxicity Brennan-Benson P, 2005
PI MMWR, 2000; CDC, 1996
Atazanavir
Darunavir/ritonavir
Saquinavir/ritonavir CYP3A4; P glycoprotein hepatotoxicity
Raltegravir UGT1A1
Bictegravir Custodio JM, 2018
Dolutegravir UGT1A1; CYP3A4 Dooley K, 2018
Thyroid hormones Levothyroxine, liothyronin CYP450 Nolan SR, 1999

Abbreviations: DDI, drug-drug interactions; PL, plasmatic level; SOT, solid organ transplantation; NNRTI, Non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors; PI, Protease inhibitors.

It is available both in oral (best adsorbed during fasting, avoiding food interactions) or intravenous formulations (Rothstein, 2016; Gengenbacher and Kaufmann, 2012).

TDM of rifampicin should be ideally assessed 2 ​h post dose on empty stomach, with a desirable range of 8–15 ​mg/L, in order to ensure efficacy and avoid toxicity (Fernandes et al., 2017).

2.1.2. Isoniazid

Isoniazid, firstly discovered in 1920 and used as antimycobacterial compound in the 1950s, displays mycobactericidal action against replicating mycobacteria, whereas it is bacteriostatic against mycobacteria in the latent form (Harvey et al., 2006; Timmins and Deretic, 2006). Its efficacy relies on the destruction of the mycobacterial cell wall, acting as a prodrug activated by the mycobacterial enzyme KatG and generating reactive oxygen species (ROS) that interfere with the mycobacterial cell wall (Timmins and Deretic, 2006; Stehr et al., 2015).

Isoniazid can be administered orally, intramuscularly, or intravenously; it is promptly absorbed after oral administration and reaches the peak of serum concentrations after 0.5–2 ​h (Timmins and Deretic, 2006).

Isoniazid inhibits the cytochrome P450 system and i acts as a mild monoamine oxidase inhibitor (MAO-I) (Stehr et al., 2015) (Table 2).

Table 2.

Most common isoniazid DDIs.

Class of drug Drug Mediated protein or mechanism Isoniazid PL Drug PL Other effects References
Alcohol antagonists Disulfiram dopamine metabolism inhibition neuropsychiatric disorders Whittington HG, 1969
Analgesics Acetaminophen CYP2E1 hepatotoxicity Nolan CM, 1994; Crippin JS, 1993
Antacids Aluminum hydroxide ↓ isoniazid absorption Hurwitz A, 1974
Anticonvulsants Carbamazepine CYP3A4 Wright JM, 1982
Valproate hepatic metabolism inhibition ↑ isoniazid toxicity Dockweiler U, 1987
Phenitoin CYP450 Witmer DR, 1984
Anti-diabetics Oral hypoglycemics and insulin interference with glucose metabolism ↕ glycemia at drug suspension Ganguly RJ, 2018
Antifungals Ketoconazole, itraconazole CYP3A4 Product Information. Nizoral (ketoconazole)
Antituberculars Rifampicin CYP450 hepatotoxicity; haematological abnormalities Askgaard DS, 1995; Nagayama N, 2004
Cycloserine dizziness Mattila MJ, 1969
Bronchodilators Theophylline CYP3A4; CYP1A2 Hoglund P, 1987
Recreational drugs Alcohol hepatotoxicity Product Information. INH (isoniazid)

Abbreviations: DDI, drug-drug interactions; PL, plasmatic level; NNRTI, Non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors; PI, Protease inhibitors.

TDM should be assessed 2 ​h post dose on empty stomach, with a desirable range of 3–6 ​mg/L (Fernandes et al., 2017).

2.1.3. Pyrazinamide

Pyrazinamide is a nicotinamide analog included in the anti-TB regimen in 1970 and characterized by sterilizing activity and efficacy against semi-dormant MTB strains. Moreover, it displays synergistic activity when added to rifampicin-containing regimens (Gopal et al., 2019; Jiménez del Cerro and Rivera Hernández, 1992). In fact, it penetrates necrotic caseous tissue, where it is converted to the active form pyrazinoic acid, killing non-growing, drug-tolerant tubercle bacilli through the inhibition of the coenzyme A biosynthesis (Jiménez del Cerro and Rivera Hernández, 1992).

Pyrazinamide displays excellent oral absorption, without any food interferences (Jiménez del Cerro and Rivera Hernández, 1992) It can increase blood ureic acid level, leading to acute gout. Liver is probably involved in its katabolism.

Concomitant administration of pyrazinamide with isoniazid and/or rifampin is associated with an increased risk of hepatotoxicity due to an additive effect. Careful assessment is needed when it is prescribed with potentially hepatotoxic agents (e.g., pexidartinib, pretomanid, mipomersen).

A unique case of cyclosporine plasmatic level reduction after pyrazinamide association was reported (Peets et al., 1965).

TDM should be ideally assessed 2 ​h post dose on empty stomach, with a desirable range of 20–60 ​mg/L (Fernandes et al., 2017).

2.1.4. Ethambutol

Ethambutol, which was discovered in 1961, is a bacteriostatic against actively growing mycobacterial bacilli: it inhibits the enzymes arabinosyltransferases involved in the synthesis of mycobacterial cell wall (Lee and Nguyen, 2020).

Ethambutol can be administered orally or intravenously and is promptly absorbed after oral administration, reaching the peak of serum concentrations after 2 ​h (Lee and Nguyen, 2020); it undergoes partial hepatic metabolism.

Coadministration with aluminium salts should be avoided because it delays and reduces the absorption of ethambutol (Riccardi et al., 2020b). Other drugs potentially causing optic neuritis should be avoided (Riccardi et al., 2020b).

TDM should be ideally assessed between 2 and 6 ​h post dose on full or empty stomach, with a desirable range of 20–60 ​mg/L (Fernandes et al., 2017).

2.1.5. Linezolid

Linezolid is a synthetic oxazolidinone with bacteriostatic activity against mycobacteria and Gram-positive bacteria (Dryden, 2011). It binds to the 50S subunit of the prokaryotic ribosome, preventing formation of the initiation complex and inhibiting protein synthesis (Quinn and Stern, 2009). Linezolid, which is available both intravenously and orally with excellent bioavailability (fatty food can decrease its absorption) (Dryden, 2011), is metabolized to two inactive metabolites, an aminoethoxyacetic acid (metabolite A) and a hydroxyethyl glycine (metabolite B), with a plasmatic elimination half-life of 3.4–7.4 ​h (Quinn and Stern, 2009). It is a reversible inhibitor of monoamine oxidases A and B and serotonin agonists should be carefully prescribed to avoid the occurrence of the serotonin syndrome (Ziganshina et al., 2013) (Table 3).

Table 3.

Most common linezolid DDIs.

Class of drug Drug Mediated protein or mechanism Linezolid PL Drug PL Other effects References
Adrenergic agents Pseudoephedrine ↑ sympathomimetic effect systolic hypertension Hendershot PE, 2001
Phenylpropanolamine
Antibiotics/antituberculars Rifampin P glycoprotein Trittler R, 2005; Egle H, 2005; Gebhart BC, 2007; Gandelman K, 2011
Anticoagulants Warfarin low grade ↓ INR Sakai Y, 2015
Antidepressants MAOi inhibition serotonin syndrome Boyer EW, 2005
SSRI Paroxetine
SSRI Fluvoxamine
SSRI Fluoxetine
SSRI Citalopram
SSRI Fluvoxamine
SSRI Sertraline
SSRI Escitalopram
SSRI Vilazodone
SNRI Venlafaxine, desvelafaxina
SNRI Duloxetine
Anti-Parkinson Rasagiline MAOi inhibition serotonin syndrome Boyer EW, 2005; FDA Drug Safety Communication, 2011
Morphine derivatives Dextromethorphan ↑ sympathomimetic effect serotonin syndrome Hendershot PE, 2001
Opioid analgesics Meperidine brainstem 5-HT1A and 2A receptors hyperstimulation serotonin syndrome Product Information. Meperidine Hydrochloride Injection, USP (meperidine)
Fentanyl Corsini Campioli C, 2020

Abbreviations: DDI, drug-drug interactions; PL, plasmatic level; SSRI, Selective Serotonine Reuptake Inhibitor; SNRI, Serotonine and Norepinephrine Reuptake Inhibitor; MAOi, monoamine oxidase inhibitor.

TDM of linezolid should be ideally assessed immediately before the administration, with a desirable range of 2–7 ​mg/L (Fernandes et al., 2017).

2.1.6. Fluoroquinolones (Levofloxacin and Moxifloxacin)

Fluoroquinolones, which can inhibit the DNA gyrase responsible for supercoiling of nucleic acid, show a broad-spectrum antimicrobial activity (Reynolds et al., 1996). Levofloxacin and moxifloxacin are recommended by the WHO for the treatment of multi-drug resistant (MDR)-TB (WHO consolidated guidelines, 2019). Levofloxacin is available both orally and intravenously, whereas moxifloxacin can be administered only orally. Their prescription with or without other drugs was associated with the risk of cardiac arrhythmias, fungal or bacterial infections, psychosis, and convulsions (Gler et al., 2012) (Table 4).

Table 4.

Most common antitubercular fluoroquinolones DDIs.

Class of drug Drug Mediated protein or mechanism Levo/moxi PL Drug PL Other effects References
Antacids Aluminum/magnesium/calcium salts chelation (Nix et al., 1990)
Sucralfate (Lehto et al., 1994)
Anti-arrhythmics Quinidine, procainamide (IA class) ↑ QT interval rare: arrhythmias, torsade de pointes (Owens, 2001)
Amiodarone, sotalole (III class) rare: arrhythmias, torsade de pointes (Owens, 2001)
Antibiotics/antituberculars Rifampin glucuronidation; sulphation ↓ moxifloxacine (Nijland et al., 2007)
Anticoagulants Warfarin metabolism inhibition;
vitamin K-producing intestinal bacteria inhibition
↑ INR Jones CB, 2002
Anti-diabetics Insulin ATP-sensitive K channels ↕ glycemia Gajjar DA, 2000
Oral hypoglycemics ↕ glycemia Gajjar DA, 2000
Bronchodilators Theophylline GABA? SNC toxicity Segev S, 1988
Calcium channel blockers Bepridil ↑ QT interval rare: arrhythmias, torsade de pointes
Cancer therapies Osimertinib ↑ QT interval rare: arrhythmias, torsade de pointes Bian S, 2020
Immunosuppressants (SOT) Cyclosporine low grade ↓ hepatic metabolism Federico S, 2006
Tacrolimus Federico S, 2006
NSAIDs Diclofenac, others GABA? CNS toxicity Segev S, 1988
Fenbufen CNS toxicity Segev S, 1988
Retrovirals Didanosine chelation (Al or Mg-containing formulations) Sahai J, 1993
Supplements Calcium supplements chelation Frost RW, 1992
Iron supplements Polk RE, 1989
Zinc supplements Polk RE, 1989
Others Cimetidine low grade ↓ tubular secretion Stass H, 2005
Probenecid
Vegetable charcoal oral moxifloxacin ↓ absorption ↓ moxifloxacine

Abbreviations: DDI, drug-drug interactions; PL, plasmatic level; Levo, levofloxacin; Moxi, moxifloxacin; NSAIDs, Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs; SOT, solid organ transplantation; CNS, central nervous system; GABA, gamma-aminobutyric acid receptors.

TDM should be ideally assessed 2 ​h after their administration on full or empty stomach, with a desirable range of 8–12 ​mg/L and 3–5 ​mg/L for levofloxacin and moxifloxacin, respectively (Fernandes et al., 2017).

2.1.7. Delamanid

Delamanid is a dihydro-nitroimidazooxazole with early bactericidal activity for patients aged ≥3 years (WHO consolidated guidelines, 2019; Gupta et al., 2016; Gupta et al., 2015; Matsumoto et al., 2006). It was recently approved for the treatment of MDR-TB.

The pro-drug is activated by a deazaflavin dependent nitro-reductase into a metabolite which blocks the cell wall synthesis of methoxymycolic and ketomycolic acids, two components of mycobacterial (European Medicines Agency, 2014).

Delamanid administered orally has a three-fold increased bioavailability intaking a high-fat meal (Diacon et al., 2011). Its maximum plasmatic concentration is reached 4–5 ​h after oral administration, its half-life lasts 38 ​h, with a steady-state achieved after 10–14 days (Paccaly et al., 2012).

Being a CYP3A4 substrate, its level is strongly reduced in case of co-administration with strong CYP3A4 enzyme inducers (e.g., rifampicin). Lopinavir/ritonavir increase plasmatic levels of delamanid and, then, the risk of toxicity (Riccardi et al., 2020c). It was recommended caution when prescribed with clofazimine (Yadav et al., 2016).

The risk of QTc prolongation is increased when administered with fluoroquinolones and in hypoalbuminemic patients. Currently, no standardized TDM range has been proposed.

2.1.8. Clofazimine

Clofazimine is a hydrophobic riminophenazine which presumably interferes with the mycobacterial respiratory chain and ion transporters (Riccardi et al., 2020c).

It is prescribed for non-tuberculous mycobacteria-related diseases, TB, and leprosy; its oral bioavailability is 70%, improved by food for an increased absorption (Riccardi et al., 2020c).

Clofazimine can inhibit CYP3A4 in vitro, but also can weakly induce CYP3A4 (Riccardi et al., 2020c). It can prolong QTc interval and impair the liver function (Riccardi et al., 2020c).

TDM should be assessed 2 ​h after its administration on full or empty stomach, with a desirable range of 0.5–4 ​mg/L (Fernandes et al., 2017).

2.1.9. Bedaquiline

Bedaquiline is an oral diarylquinoline, approved for pulmonary MDR-TB in adults (Yadav et al., 2016; Andries et al., 2014). It blocks the proton pump (specifically, subunit c) for mycobacterial ATP synthase, critically reducing ATP level and, then, causing cell death (Hartkoorn et al., 2014). Synthesis of subunit c is encoded by the atpE gene and its mutation in Mycobacterium tuberculosis is directly associated to poor drug susceptibility (Centers for Disease Contr). Furthermore, mutations of the drug efflux pump are linked to bedaquiline resistance, similarly to its upregulation which favours cross-resistance between bedaquiline and clofazimine (Nimmo et al., 2020). Drug susceptibility test (DST) and whole genome sequencing (WGS) for bedaquiline should be performed to assess the susceptibility of the collected strains (Alffenaar et al., 2015). DDIs have been observed between bedaquiline and CYP3A4 inducers and inhibitors (Table 5).

Table 5.

Most common bedaquiline DDIs.

Class of drug Drug Mediated protein or mechanism Bedaquiline PL Other drug PL Other effects References
Antidepressant citalopram QTc prolongation Drug package leaflet
escitalopram
Antibiotic clarithromycin QTc prolongation
azithromycin
levofloxacin
moxifloxacin
lefamulin
Antiparasitic fexinidazole QTc prolongation
piperaquine
chloroquine
halofantrine
pentamidine
Antifungal posaconazole QTc prolongation, inhibition of CYP3A4
voriconazole QTc prolongation, inhibition of CYP3A4
fluconazole QTc prolongation, inhibition of CYP3A4
itraconazole inhibition of CYP3A4
Antipsychotic thioridazine QTc prolongation
flupentixol
pimozide
quetipine
amisulpride
clozapine
aloperidol
droperidol
olanzapine
risperidone
Cancer drugs nilotinib QTc prolongation
entrectinib
ribociclib
vemurafenib
dasatinib
encorafenib
enzalutamide
gilteritinib
inotuzumab
midostaurin
mitotane
osimertinib
toremifene
dabrafenib QTc prolungation, induction of CYP3A4
lorlatinib induction of CYP3A4
pexidartinib induction of CYP3A4
Procynetic/antiemetic domperidon QTc prolongation
ondansetron
Anti-hyperlipidemic probucol QTc prolongation
Anti-arrhythmics amiodarone QTc prolongation
dronedarone
flecainide
pilsicainide
propafenone
dofetilide
sotalol
Antihistamine astemizole QTc prolongation
Antituberculars clofazimine QTc prolongation
demalanid
rifampicin induction of CYP3A4 Svensson 2015
rifabutine induction of CYP3A4
rifapentine induction of CYP3A4
Antihypertensive lofexidine QTc prolongation
Antiretroviral lopinavir inhibition of CYP3A4 (Pandie et al., 2016)
atazanavir inhibition of CYP3A4
darunavir inhibition of CYP3A4
cobicistat inhibition of CYP3A4
ritonavir inhibition of CYP3A4
efavirenz induction of CYP3A4
etravirine induction of CYP3A4
Analgesic methadone QTc prolongation
Pulmonary hypertension drug bosentan induction of CYP3A4
Antiepileptic cenobamate induction of CYP3A4
carbamazepine induction of CYP3A4
phenobarbital induction of CYP3A4
phenytoin induction of CYP3A4
Antivirals anti-HCV ombitasvir inhibition of CYP3A4
paritaprevir inhibition of CYP3A4
dasabuvir inhibition of CYP3A4

Abbreviations: DDI, drug-drug interactions; PL, plasmatic level.

Bedaquiline can cause QT prolongation, leading to cardiac arrhythmia and/or death. Hence, patients should be monitored for symptoms of cardiac toxicity and by electrocardiogram during the follow-up. It should be interrupted in case of clinically significant ventricular arrhythmia or QTc >500 ​ms (Nguyen et al., 2018). Ongoing studies are evaluating the most accurate TDM values (Nguyen et al., 2018; Bolhuis et al., 2016).

2.1.10. Cycloserine/Terizidone

Cycloserine, which is similar to the amino acid D-alanine, can interrupt the inclusion of the D-alanine into the peptidoglycan of the cell wall (Cycloserine, 2008; http://www.tbdrugmonograpa). It has an oral bioavailability when not administered with a high fat meal (http://www.tbdrugmonograpa). It can show central nervous system (CNS) toxicity (careful administration in case of alcohol exposure, history of seizure, depression, suicidal behaviours, and mood instability) and can interfere with the absorption of isoniazid (http://www.tbdrugmonograpa). Cycloserine should be used with extreme caution in patients with renal impairment and avoided when creatinine clearance of <50 ​ml/min (http://www.tbdrugmonograpb). Terizidone, which is composed by two molecules of cycloserine, shares the same pharmacological features of cycloserine, but it can be administered in patients with a creatinine clearance <50 ​ml/min and in patients in dialysis with an appropriate dose adjustment (http://www.tbdrugmonograpa). Terizidone also penetrates less in CNS being therefore more tolerable.

2.1.11. Meropenem/imipenem-cilastatin

Meropenem and imipenem/cilastatin are broad-spectrum carbapenems used with clavulanic acid in the treatment of MDR-TB. Meropenem with clavulanic acid has bactericidal activity and can sterilise cultures within 2 weeks inhibiting the BlaC beta-lactamase (De Lorenzo et al., 2013). They are administered intravenously and may have neuro-toxicity (caution in patients with TB meningitis and when coadministered with ganciclovir and valproic acid). Renal function should be periodically checked due to their renal excretion (De Lorenzo et al., 2013).

TDM of meropenem has a desirable range of 8–12 ​mg/L (Fernandes et al., 2017).

2.1.12. Amikacin

The aminoglycoside amikacin can inhibit mycobacteria, Gram-negative bacteria, Nocardia spp., and Staphylococcus aureus, by blocking the 30S ribosomal subunit with the modification of the conformation of the A site, reducing proofreading capabilities of the ribosome and thus increasing mistranslation (Ramirez and Tolmasky, 2017).

It is mainly administered intravenously, intramuscularly, through nebulization, but it can be administered intrathecally or intraventricularly (Ramirez and Tolmasky, 2017). It shows a renal excretion, and can increase the risk of ototoxicity and nephrotoxicity, especially in case of long-term exposure. TDM can reduce the risk of adverse events (Ramirez and Tolmasky, 2017). DDIs can be relevant with other drugs associated with oto- and nephron-toxicity (e.g., diuretics, cephalosporins, ciclosporin, colistimethate sodium, and tacrolimus). There is increased risk of hypocalcaemia when prescribed with bisphosphonates.

TDM should be ​< ​5 ​mg/L (trough, immediately before infusion) and 25–35 ​mg/L (peak, 1 ​h after intravenous administration) (http://www.tbdrugmonograpb).

2.1.13. Ethionamide/Prothionamide

Ethionamide, which was discovered in 1959, is a prodrug undergoing hepatic metabolism. Its efficacy was proved for M. tuberculosis, M. bovis, M. Laepre, M. Avium, and M. smegmatis (Ethionamide, 2008; http://www.tbdrugmonograpc). It disrupts the mycobacterial cell wall through the inhibition of the inhA gene product enoyl-ACP reductase. Ethionamide is available orally and can be administered both with and without food (Ethionamide, 2008). Neurotoxicity is linked to increased blood level of ethionamide. Alcohol exposure can favour psychotic reactions. Prothionamide is a thioamide interchangeable with ethionamide (http://www.tbdrugmonograpc).

It should be administered with caution in patients with liver failure. Moreover, it is structurally similar to methimazole and, then, thyroid function should be routinely checked to avoid the occurrence of hypothyroidism (http://www.tbdrugmonograpc). In diabetic patients glucose blood level should be monitored for the risk of hypoglycaemia (http://www.tbdrugmonograpc).

2.1.14. P-aminosalicylic acid (PAS)

PAS, discovered in 1944, is available in an oral formulation; it should be administered with acid food to increase its absorption (Abulfathi et al., 2020).

DDIs with dichlorphenamide may lead to increased levels of PAS by unknown mechanism. PAS may decrease blood level of rifampicin. Moreover, PAS decreases effects of benazepril by pharmacodynamic antagonism and increases adverse events of dapsone.

3. Discussion

The ambitious WHO goal of TB elimination can be achieved if a comprehensive strategy is implemented. The WHO TB Strategy, approved by the World Health Assembly in 2014, is built on three pillars (World Health Organization, 2014).

One of them, which can be found in the previous WHO strategy, is based on the improvement of the clinical management of individuals infected by Mycobacterium tuberculosis strains (World Health Organization, 2014).

The mismanagement of patients with TB disease can be associated to a poor prognosis, increased risk of transmission of Mtb to susceptible individuals, and emergence (and spread) of drug-resistant strains (Bisson et al., 2020; Nahid et al., 2019; Dheda et al., 2019).

The successful outcome of the TB patients depends on patient- and healthcare-related factors. The appropriate prescription of effective and safe drugs is the outcome of several variables: adherence to scientifically sound treatment guidelines, availability of quality-assured drugs, accurate assessment of the drug susceptibility testing for the collected Mtb isolates, and adequate follow-up (which depends on the efficiency of the national and regional healthcare infrastructure and of the national TB program).

However, patient's adherence to the prescribed regimens is key, especially for individuals infected by MDR MTB strains, where the duration of the therapy is longer (~24 months) and characterized by a high risk of drug-related adverse events (the currently available therapeutic armamentarium is less effective, less safe, and more expensive if compared with that adopted for drug-susceptible TB) (Nahid et al., 2019; Dheda et al., 2019).

The poor adherence and the risk of adverse events depend on the anti-TB drugs themselves and on their pharmacological interactions with other concomitant therapies.

Then, the clinical success inevitably passes through the prevention of DDIs and drug-adverse events to improve TB treatment adherence and,ultimately, the WHO outcome treatment success. Careful evaluation of possible DDIs before creating an anti-TB regimen is a key moment to ensure efficacy, safety, and ameliorate patients’ quality of life (19,57). Up-to-date knowledge of anti-TB drugs PK/PD parameters coupled with TDM are helpful tools to guide physicians to tailored and effective treatments.

The aim of the present article was to give a concise summary that can aid physicians in their daily clinical practice.

However, several potential interactions are unknown because some of them occurred in countries where an effective pharmaco-vigilance system is not in place. The low TB incidence countries characterized by a lower treatment prescription rate cannot assess some interactions which can occur where more TB patients are treated.

Furthermore, the evolving drug market has a marginal impact in low income countries where TB incidence is high. The combination of those epidemiological conditions does not help identifying the full pharmacological profile of the anti-TB drugs.

More information can be retrieved from the HIV/AIDS-related evidence: major efforts have been performed since the 90s’ to better describe the characteristics of the anti-HIV drugs (Bisson et al., 2020). The high incidence of TB/HIV co-infection has favoured the study of DDIs between the options prescribed for the HIV infection and those for the TB disease.

However, TB patients can have several comorbidities needing complicated drug prescriptions: diabetes mellitus, cancers, COPD, asthma, auto-immune disorders, and other chronic conditions need to be treated with old-fashioned or new drugs with known and unknown DDIs.

The metabolic interactions can increase or decrease drugs’ levels affecting the therapeutic targets and the clinical outcomes. Some adverse events could change the natural history: for instance, the increased hazard of cardiac events related to the new drug bedaquiline, or the old clofazimine, prescribed with potentially cardio-toxic drugs could increase the risk of death.

The relevant costs associated to the poor clinical outcomes and to the occurrence of DDIs-related adverse events should be kept into careful consideration, especially in countries where the financial issues affect the strength and the efficiency of the health-care system. In theory, those events can be prevented.

More research is needed in this delicate field. The process of research and development does not finish after the market approval by the regulatory agencies. Post-marketing surveillance studies, supported by basic and translational research, could change the scenario, adding key insights to the expected improved management of TB patients.

Funding/support

None.

CRediT authorship contribution statement

Niccolò Riccardi: Conceptualization, Validation, Writing - original draft, Writing - review & editing. Diana Canetti: Data curation, Methodology, Validation, Writing - original draft, Writing - review & editing. Paola Rodari: Data curation, Methodology, Validation, Writing - original draft, Writing - review & editing. Giorgio Besozzi: Validation, Writing - review & editing. Laura Saderi: Data curation, Methodology, Validation, Writing - review & editing. Marco Dettori: Validation, Writing - original draft, Writing - review & editing. Luigi R. Codecasa: Supervision, Validation, Writing - review & editing. Giovanni Sotgiu: Conceptualization, Project administration, Supervision, Validation, Writing - review & editing.

Declaration of competing interest

The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.

Contributor Information

Niccolò Riccardi, Email: niccolo.riccardi@yahoo.it.

Diana Canetti, Email: Canetti.diana@hsr.it.

Paola Rodari, Email: Paola.rodari@sacrocuore.it.

Giorgio Besozzi, Email: besozzig@gmail.com.

Laura Saderi, Email: lsaderi@uniss.it.

Luigi R. Codecasa, Email: luigiruffo.codecasa@ospedaleniguarda.it.

Giovanni Sotgiu, Email: gsotgiu@uniss.it.

References

  1. Abulfathi A.A., Donald P.R., Adams K., Svensson E.M., Diacon A.H., Reuter H. The pharmacokinetics of para-aminosalicylic acid and its relationship to efficacy and intolerance. Br. J. Clin. Pharmacol. 2020 May 29 doi: 10.1111/bcp.14395. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Acocella G, Bonollo L, Garimoldi M, et al. Kinetics of rifampicin and isoniazid administered alone and in combination to normal subjects and patients with liver disease. Gut. 1972;13:47–53. doi: 10.1136/gut.13.1.47. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Aitio M.L., Mansury L., Tala E., Haataja M., Aitio A. The effect of enzyme induction on the metabolism of disopyramide in man. Br. J. Clin. Pharmacol. 1981 Mar;11(3):279–285. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2125.1981.tb00535.x. PMID: 7213529; PMCID: PMC1401616. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Alffenaar J.W., Bolhuis M., van Hateren K., Sturkenboom M., Akkerman O., de Lange W., Greijdanus B., van der Werf T., Touw D. Determination of bedaquiline in human serum using liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 2015 Sep;59(9):5675–5680. doi: 10.1128/AAC.00276-15. Epub 2015 Jul 6. PMID: 26149993; PMCID: PMC4538542. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Andries K., Villellas C., Coeck N., Thys K., Gevers T., et al. Acquired resistance of Mycobacterium tuberculosis to bedaquiline. PLoS One. 2014;9(7) doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0102135. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Bebchuk J.M., Stewart D.E. Drug interaction between rifampin and nortriptyline: a case report. Int. J. Psychiatr. Med. 1991;21(2):183–187. doi: 10.2190/KBVT-M0K5-8FPD-439H. PMID: 1894457. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Berger C.A., Alipanah N., Kheir F., Ruminjo J.K., Nahid P., Thomson C. Summary for clinicians: 2019 clinical practice guideline summary for the treatment of drug-resistant tuberculosis. Ann Am Thorac Soc. 2020;17(8):911–917. doi: 10.1513/AnnalsATS.202004-318CME. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Bernard A., Kermarrec G., Parize P., Caruba T., Bouvet A., Mainardi J.L., Sabatier B., Nich C. Dramatic reduction of clindamycin serum concentration in staphylococcal osteoarticular infection patients treated with the oral clindamycin-rifampicin combination. J. Infect. 2015 Aug;71(2):200–206. doi: 10.1016/j.jinf.2015.03.013. Epub 2015 Apr 30. PMID: 25936632. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Bhaloo S., Prasad G.V. Severe reduction in tacrolimus levels with rifampin despite multiple cytochrome P450 inhibitors: a case report. Transplant Proc. 2003 Nov;35(7):2449–2451. doi: 10.1016/j.transproceed.2003.08.019. PMID: 14611983. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Bigelow K.M., Tasneen R., Chang Y.S., Dooley K.E., Nuermberger E.L. Preserved efficacy and reduced toxicity with intermittent linezolid dosing in combination with bedaquiline and pretomanid in a murine TB model [published online ahead of print, 2020 Jul 20] Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 2020 doi: 10.1128/AAC.01178-20. AAC.01178-20. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Bisson G.P., Bastos M., Campbell J.R., et al. Mortality in adults with multidrug-resistant tuberculosis and HIV by antiretroviral therapy and tuberculosis drug use: an individual patient data meta-analysis. Lancet. 2020;396(10248):402–411. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(20)31316-7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Bolhuis M.S., Akkerman O.W., Sturkenboom M.G., de Lange W.C., van der Werf T.S., Alffenaar J.C. Individualized treatment of multidrug-resistant tuberculosis using therapeutic drug monitoring. Int J Mycobacteriol. 2016 Dec;5(Suppl. 1):S44–S45. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmyco.2016.07.003. Epub 2016 Aug 8. PMID: 28043603. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Bussey H.I., Merritt G.J., Hill E.G. The influence of rifampin on quinidine and digoxin. Arch. Intern. Med. 1984 May;144(5):1021–1023. PMID: 6712395. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Campbell E.A., Korzheva N., Mustaev A., Murakami K., Nair S., Goldfarb A., Darst S.A. Structural mechanism for rifampicin inhibition of bacterial rna polymerase. Cell. 2001 Mar 23;104(6):901–912. doi: 10.1016/s0092-8674(01)00286-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Casner P.R. Inability to attain oral anticoagulation: warfarin-rifampin interaction revisited. South Med. J. 1996 Dec;89(12):1200–1203. doi: 10.1097/00007611-199612000-00014. PMID: 8969357. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Castel J.M., Cappiello E., Leopaldi D., Latini R. Rifampicin lowers plasma concentrations of propafenone and its antiarrhythmic effect. Br. J. Clin. Pharmacol. 1990 Jul;30(1):155–156. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2125.1990.tb03759.x. PMID: 2390428; PMCID: PMC1368291. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. CDC, Centers for Disease Control Update: fatal and severe liver injuries associated with rifampin and pyrazinamide for latent tuberculosis infection, and revisions in American Thoracic Society/CDC recommendations--United States. Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2001;50:733–735. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Tuberculosis (TB). Treatment of multidrug-resistant tuberculosis: bedaquiline. https://www.cdc.gov/tb/publications/factsheets/treatment/bedaquiline.htm
  19. Colmenero J.D., Fernández-Gallardo L.C., Agúndez J.A., Sedeño J., Benítez J., Valverde E. Possible implications of doxycycline-rifampin interaction for treatment of brucellosis. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 1994 Dec;38(12):2798–2802. doi: 10.1128/aac.38.12.2798. PMID: 7695265; PMCID: PMC188288. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Cycloserine Tuberculosis (Edinb). 2008 Mar;88(2):100–101. doi: 10.1016/S1472-9792(08)70007-6. PMID: 18486041. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. De Lorenzo S., Alffenaar J.W., Sotgiu G., Centis R., D'Ambrosio L., Tiberi S., Bolhuis M.S., van Altena R., Viggiani P., Piana A., Spanevello A., Migliori G.B. Efficacy and safety of meropenem-clavulanate added to linezolid-containing regimens in the treatment of MDR-/XDR-TB. Eur. Respir. J. 2013 Jun;41(6):1386–1392. doi: 10.1183/09031936.00124312. Epub 2012 Sep 20. PMID: 22997218. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Dheda K., Gumbo T., Maartens G., et al. The Lancet Respiratory Medicine Commission: 2019 update: epidemiology, pathogenesis, transmission, diagnosis, and management of multidrug-resistant and incurable tuberculosis. Lancet Respir Med. 2019;7(9):820–826. doi: 10.1016/S2213-2600(19)30263-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Diacon A.H., Dawson R., Hanekom M., Narunsky K., Venter A., Hittel N., et al. Early bactericidal activity of delamanid (OPC-67683) in smear-positive pulmonary tuberculosis patients. Int. J. Tubercul. Lung Dis. 2011;15:949–954. doi: 10.5588/ijtld.10.0616. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Dilger K., Hofmann U., Klotz U. Enzyme induction in the elderly: effect of rifampin on the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of propafenone. Clin. Pharmacol. Ther. 2000 May;67(5):512–520. doi: 10.1067/mcp.2000.106872. PMID: 10824630. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Dryden M.S. Linezolid pharmacokinetics and phar- macodynamics in clinical treatment. J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 2011;66(Suppl. 4):iv7–iv15. doi: 10.1093/jac/dkr072. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Ebert U., Thong N.Q., Oertel R., Kirch W. Effects of rifampicin and cimetidine on pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of lamotrigine in healthy subjects. Eur. J. Clin. Pharmacol. 2000 Jul;56(4):299–304. doi: 10.1007/s002280000146. PMID: 10954343. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Egle H., Trittler R., Kümmerer K., Lemmen S.W. Linezolid and rifampin: Drug interaction contrary to expectations? Clin. Pharmacol. Ther. 2005 May;77(5):451–453. doi: 10.1016/j.clpt.2005.01.020. PMID: 15900290. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Ethionamide Tuberculosis (Edinb). 2008 Mar;88(2):106–108. doi: 10.1016/S1472-9792(08)70009-X. PMID: 18486043. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. European Medicines Agency . European Medicines Agency; London: 2014. Deltyba: Summary of Product Characteristics. [Google Scholar]
  30. Fernandes G.F.D.S., Salgado H.R.N., Santos J.L.D. Isoniazid: a review of characteristics, properties and analytical methods. Crit. Rev. Anal. Chem. 2017;47(4):298–308. doi: 10.1080/10408347.2017.1281098. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Fromm M.F., Eckhardt K., Li S., Schänzle G., Hofmann U., Mikus G., Eichelbaum M. Loss of analgesic effect of morphine due to coadministration of rifampin. Pain. 1997 Aug;72(1-2):261–267. doi: 10.1016/s0304-3959(97)00044-4. PMID: 9272811. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Gallicano K.D., Sahai J., Shukla V.K., Seguin I., Pakuts A., Kwok D., Foster B.C., Cameron D.W. Induction of zidovudine glucuronidation and amination pathways by rifampicin in HIV-infected patients. Br J Clin Pharmacol. 1999 Aug;48(2):168–179. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2125.1999.00987.x. PMID: 10417493; PMCID: PMC2014298. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. Gandelman K., Zhu T., Fahmi O.A., Glue P., Lian K., Obach R.S., Damle B. Unexpected effect of rifampin on the pharmacokinetics of linezolid: in silico and in vitro approaches to explain its mechanism. J. Clin. Pharmacol. 2011 Feb;51(2):229–236. doi: 10.1177/0091270010366445. Epub 2010 Apr 6. PMID: 20371736. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. Gebhart B.C., Barker B.C., Markewitz B.A. Decreased serum linezolid levels in a critically ill patient receiving concomitant linezolid and rifampin. Pharmacotherapy. 2007 Mar;27(3):476–479. doi: 10.1592/phco.27.3.476. PMID: 17316160. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  35. Gengenbacher M., Kaufmann S.H. Mycobacterium tuberculosis: success through dormancy. FEMS Microbiol. Rev. 2012;36(3):514–532. doi: 10.1111/j.1574-6976.2012.00331.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  36. Gler M.T., Skripconoka V., Sanchez-Garavito E., et al. Delamanid for multidrug-resistant pulmonary tuberculosis. N. Engl. J. Med. 2012;366:2151–2160. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1112433. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  37. Gopal P., Grüber G., Dartois V., Dick T. Pharmacological and molecular mechanisms behind the sterilizing activity of pyrazinamide. Trends Pharmacol. Sci. 2019;40(12):930–940. doi: 10.1016/j.tips.2019.10.005. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  38. Greiner B., Eichelbaum M., Fritz P., Kreichgauer H.P., von Richter O., Zundler J., Kroemer H.K. The role of intestinal P-glycoprotein in the interaction of digoxin and rifampin. J. Clin. Invest. 1999 Jul;104(2):147–153. doi: 10.1172/JCI6663. Erratum in: J Clin Invest 2002 Aug;110(4):571. PMID: 10411543; PMCID: PMC408477. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  39. Gupta R., Geiter L.J., Wells C.D., Gao M., Cirule A., Xiao H. Delamanid for extensively drug-resistant tuberculosis. N. Engl. J. Med. 2015;373:291–292. doi: 10.1056/NEJMc1415332. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  40. Gupta R., Wells C.D., Hittel N., Hafkin J., Geiter L.J. Delamanid in the treatment of multidrug-resistant tuberculosis. Int. J. Tubercul. Lung Dis. 2016;20:33–37. doi: 10.5588/ijtld.16.0125. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  41. Hartkoorn R.C., Uplekar S., Cole S.T. Cross-resistance between clofazimine and bedaquiline through upregulation of MmpL5 in Mycobacterium tuberculosis. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 2014;58(5):2979. doi: 10.1128/AAC.00037-14. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  42. Harvey Richard A., Howland Richard D., Mycek Mary Julia, Champe Pamela C. In: Pharmacology. fourth ed. Harvey Richard A., Champe Pamela C., editors. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2006. p. 864. [Google Scholar]
  43. Horowitz H.W., Jorde U.P., Wormser G.P. Drug interactions in use of dapsone for Pneumocystis carinii prophylaxis. Lancet. 1992 Mar 21;339(8795):747. doi: 10.1016/0140-6736(92)90649-n. PMID: 1347616. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  44. Jiménez del Cerro L.A., Rivera Hernández F. Effect of pyrazinamide on ciclosporin levels. Nephron. 1992;62(1):113. doi: 10.1159/000187010. PMID: 1436277. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  45. Kay L., Kampmann J.P., Svendsen T.L., Vergman B., Hansen J.E., Skovsted L., Kristensen M. Influence of rifampicin and isoniazid on the kinetics of phenytoin. Br. J. Clin. Pharmacol. 1985 Oct;20(4):323–326. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2125.1985.tb05071.x. PMID: 4074601; PMCID: PMC1400889. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  46. Kirch W., Rose I., Klingmann I., Pabst J., Ohnhaus E.E. Interaction of bisoprolol with cimetidine and rifampicin. Eur J Clin Pharmacol. 1986;31(1):59–62. doi: 10.1007/BF00870987. PMID: 2877885. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  47. Kreek M.J., Garfield J.W., Gutjahr C.L., Giusti L.M. Rifampin-induced methadone withdrawal. N. Engl. J. Med. 1976 May 13;294(20):1104–1106. doi: 10.1056/NEJM197605132942008. PMID: 1256526. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  48. Kyrklund C., Backman J.T., Neuvonen M., Neuvonen P.J. Effect of rifampicin on pravastatin pharmacokinetics in healthy subjects. Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2004 Feb;57(2):181–187. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2125.2003.01972.x. PMID: 14748817; PMCID: PMC1884432. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  49. Lee N., Nguyen H. StatPearls. StatPearls Publishing; Treasure Island (FL): 2020. Ethambutol. June 10. [Google Scholar]
  50. Lehto P., Kivistö K.T., Neuvonen P.J. The effect of ferrous sulphate on the absorption of norfloxacin, ciprofloxacin and ofloxacin. Br. J. Clin. Pharmacol. 1994 Jan;37(1):82–85. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2125.1994.tb04245.x. PMID: 8148225; PMCID: PMC1364716. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  51. Lerner PI, Lubin A. Letter: Coagulopathy with cefazolin in uremia. N. Engl. J. Med. 1974 Jun 6;290(23):1324. doi: 10.1056/NEJM197406062902317. PMID: 4827633. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  52. Matsumoto M., Hashizume H., Tomishige T., Kawasaki M., Tsubouchi H., Sasaki H., et al. OPC-67683, a nitro-dihydro-imidazooxazole derivative with promising action against tuberculosis in vitro and in mice. PLoS Med. 2006;3:e466. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.0030466. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  53. McNeill L, Allen M, Estrada C, Cook P. Pyrazinamide and rifampin vs isoniazid for the treatment of latent tuberculosis: improved completion rates but more hepatotoxicity. Chest. 2003;123:102–106. doi: 10.1378/chest.123.1.102. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  54. Most JA, Markle GB., 4th A nearly fatal hepatotoxic reaction to rifampin after halothane anesthesia. Am. J. Surg. 1974 May;127(5):593–595. doi: 10.1016/0002-9610(74)90324-9. PMID: 4822375. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  55. Nahid P., Mase S.R., Migliori G.B., et al. Treatment of drug-resistant tuberculosis. An official ATS/CDC/ERS/IDSA clinical practice guideline [published correction appears in Am J Respir Crit care med. 2020 Feb 15;201(4):500-501] Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med. 2019;200(10):e93–e142. doi: 10.1164/rccm.201909-1874ST. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  56. Nguyen T.V.A., Anthony R.M., Bañuls A.L., Nguyen T.V.A., Vu D.H., Alffenaar J.C. Bedaquiline resistance: its emergence, mechanism, and prevention. Clin. Infect. Dis. 2018 May 2;66(10):1625–1630. doi: 10.1093/cid/cix992. PMID: 29126225. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  57. Niemi M, Backman JT, Neuvonen PJ. Effects of trimethoprim and rifampin on the pharmacokinetics of the cytochrome P450 2C8 substrate rosiglitazone. Clin. Pharmacol. Ther. 2004;76:239–249. doi: 10.1016/j.clpt.2004.05.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  58. Nijland H.M., Ruslami R., Suroto A.J., Burger D.M., Alisjahbana B., van Crevel R., Aarnoutse R.E. Rifampicin reduces plasma concentrations of moxifloxacin in patients with tuberculosis. Clin. Infect. Dis. 2007 Oct 15;45(8):1001–1007. doi: 10.1086/521894. Epub 2007 Sep 4. PMID: 17879915. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  59. Nimmo C., Millard J., Brien K., Moodley S., van Dorp L., Lutchminarain K., Wolf A., Grant A.D., Balloux F., Pym A.S., Padayatchi N., O'Donnell M. Bedaquiline resistance in drug-resistant tuberculosis HIV co-infected patients. Eur. Respir. J. 2020 Jun 4;55(6):1902383. doi: 10.1183/13993003.02383-2019. PMID: 32060065; PMCID: PMC7270361. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  60. Nix D.E., Wilton J.H., Ronald B., Distlerath L., Williams V.C., Norman A. Inhibition of norfloxacin absorption by antacids. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 1990 Mar;34(3):432–435. doi: 10.1128/aac.34.3.432. PMID: 2334155; PMCID: PMC171610. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  61. Novi C., Bissoli F., Simonati V., Volpini T., Baroli A., Vignati G. Rifampin and digoxin: possible drug interaction in a dialysis patient. JAMA. 1980 Dec 5;244(22):2521–2522. doi: 10.1001/jama.1980.03310220023017. PMID: 7431585. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  62. Owens R.C., Jr. Risk assessment for antimicrobial agent-induced QTc interval prolongation and torsades de pointes. Pharmacotherapy. 2001 Mar;21(3):301–319. doi: 10.1592/phco.21.3.301.34206. PMID: 11253855. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  63. WHO Consolidated Guidelines on Drug-Resistant Tuberculosis Treatment. World Health Organization; Geneva: 2019. Licence: CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  64. Paccaly A., Petersen C., Patil S., et al. 9th International AIDS Conference; Washington, DC. 2012. Absence of clinically relevant drug interaction between delamanid, a new drug for multidrug-resistant tuberculosis (MDR-TB) and tenofovir or lopinavir/ritonavir in healthy subjects. Abstract No WEPE043. [Google Scholar]
  65. Pandie M., Wiesner L., McIlleron H., Hughes J., Siwendu S., Conradie F., Variava E., Maartens G. Drug-drug interactions between bedaquiline and the antiretrovirals lopinavir/ritonavir and nevirapine in HIV-infected patients with drug-resistant TB. J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 2016 Apr;71(4):1037–1040. doi: 10.1093/jac/dkv447. Epub 2016 Jan 7. PMID: 26747099. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  66. Peets E.A., Sweeney W.M., Place V.A., Buyske D.A. The absorption, excretion, and metabolic fate OF ethambutol IN man. Am. Rev. Respir. Dis. 1965;91:51–58. doi: 10.1164/arrd.1965.91.1.51. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  67. Peters J.H., Gordon G.R., Murray Ichikawa W., Gilber R.H., Welch T.M., Goucher C.R. Measurement of rifampin in plasma: chemical vs bacteriologic assay. Proc. West Pharmacol. Soc. 1977;20:211–215. PMID: 896824. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  68. Powell-Jackson P.R., Jamieson A.P., Gray B.J., Moxham J., Williams R. Effect of rifampicin administration on theophylline pharmacokinetics in humans. Am Rev Respir Dis. 1985 Jun;131(6):939–940. doi: 10.1164/arrd.1985.131.6.939. PMID: 4003946. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  69. Prober C.G. Effect of rifampin on chloramphenicol levels. N. Engl. J. Med. 1985 Mar 21;312(12):788–789. doi: 10.1056/NEJM198503213121212. PMID: 3974656. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  70. Pukrittayakamee S, Prakongpan S, Wanwimolruk S, Clemens R, Looareesuwan S, White NJ. Adverse effect of rifampin on quinine efficacy in uncomplicated falciparum malaria. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 2003;47:1509–1513. doi: 10.1128/AAC.47.5.1509-1513.2003. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  71. Quinn D.K., Stern T.A. Linezolid and serotonin syndrome. Prim. Care Companion J. Clin. Psychiatry. 2009;11(6):353–356. doi: 10.4088/PCC.09r00853. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  72. Rajasingham R., Meya D.B., Boulware D.R. Are fluconazole or sertraline dose adjustments necessary with concomitant rifampin? HIV Med. 2018;19:e64–e65. doi: 10.1111/hiv.12543. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  73. Ramirez M.S., Tolmasky M.E. Amikacin: uses, resistance, and prospects for inhibition. Molecules. 2017;22(12):2267. doi: 10.3390/molecules22122267. Published 2017 Dec 19. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  74. Reynolds J.E.F., Parfitt K., Parsons A.V., Sweetmann S.C., editors. Martindale: the Extra Pharmacopoeia. first ed. Royal Pharmaceutical Society; London: 1996. p. 1881. [Google Scholar]
  75. Riccardi N., Del Puente F., Magnè F., Taramasso L., Di Biagio A. Bedaquiline: a new hope for shorter and better anti-tuberculosis regimens. Recent Pat. Anti-Infect. Drug Discov. 2018;13(1):3–11. doi: 10.2174/1574891X12666170619101904. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  76. Riccardi N., Alagna R., Saderi L., et al. Towards tailored regimens in the treatment of drug-resistant tuberculosis: a retrospective study in two Italian reference Centres. BMC Infect. Dis. 2019;19(1):564. doi: 10.1186/s12879-019-4211-0. Published 2019 Jun 28. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  77. Riccardi N., Villa S., Alagna R., et al. Advantages and challenges of tailored regimens for drug-resistant tuberculosis: a StopTB Italia look into the future. Infect. Drug Resist. 2020;13:2795–2800. doi: 10.2147/IDR.S257480. Published 2020 Aug 11. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  78. Riccardi N., Monticelli J., Antonello R.M., et al. Therapeutic options for infections due to vanB genotype vancomycin-resistant Enterococci [published online ahead of print, 2020 Aug 14] Microb. Drug Resist. 2020 doi: 10.1089/mdr.2020.0171. 10.1089/mdr.2020.0171. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  79. Riccardi N., Giacomelli A., Canetti D., Comelli A., Intini E., Gaiera G., Diaw M.M., Udwadia Z., Besozzi G., Codecasa L., Biagio A.D. Clofazimine: an old drug for never-ending diseases. Future Microbiol. 2020 May;15:557–566. doi: 10.2217/fmb-2019-0231. Epub 2020 Jun 1. PMID: 32476494. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  80. Ridtitid W, Wongnawa M, Mahatthanatrakul W, Punyo J, Sunbhanich M. Rifampin markedly decreases plasma concentrations of praziquantel in healthy volunteers. Clin. Pharmacol. Ther. 2002;72:505–513. doi: 10.1067/mcp.2002.129319. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  81. Rothstein D.M. Rifamycins, alone and in combination. Cold Spring Harb Perspect Med. 2016 Jul 01;6(7) doi: 10.1101/cshperspect.a027011. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  82. Schulz W., Zillig W. Rifampicin inhibition of RNA synthesis by destabilisation of DNA-RNA polymerase-oligonucleotide-complexes. Nucleic Acids Res. 1981 Dec 21;9(24):6889–6906. doi: 10.1093/nar/9.24.6889. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  83. Scripture C.D., Pieper J.A. Clinical pharmacokinetics of fluvastatin. Clin Pharmacokinet. 2001;40(4):263–281. doi: 10.2165/00003088-200140040-00003. PMID: 11368292. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  84. Sensi P. History of the development of rifampin. Rev. Infect. Dis. 1983;5(Suppl. 3):S402–S406. doi: 10.1093/clinids/5.supplement_3.s402. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  85. Skolnick J.L., Stoler B.S., Katz D.B., Anderson W.H. Rifampin, oral contraceptives, and pregnancy. JAMA. 1976 Sep 20;236(12):1382. PMID: 989097. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  86. Soanker R., Subbalaxmi M.V.S., Lakshmi A.V. Evaluation of risk factors for development of anti-tubercular therapy induced hepatotoxicity - a prospective study [published online ahead of print, 2020 Jun 26] Curr. Drug Saf. 2020 doi: 10.2174/1574886315666200626164554. 10.2174/1574886315666200626164554. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  87. Stehr M., Elamin A.A., Singh M. Pyrazinamide: the importance of uncovering the mechanisms of action in mycobacteria. Expert Rev. Anti Infect. Ther. 2015;13(5):593–603. doi: 10.1586/14787210.2015.1021784. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  88. Tada Y., Tsuda Y., Otsuka T., Nagasawa K., Kimura H., Kusaba T., Sakata T. Case report: nifedipine-rifampicin interaction attenuates the effect on blood pressure in a patient with essential hypertension. Am J Med Sci. 1992 Jan;303(1):25–27. doi: 10.1097/00000441-199201000-00006. PMID: 1345893. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  89. Talavera Pons S., Boyer A., Lamblin G., Chennell P., Châtenet F.T., Nicolas C., Sautou V., Abergel A. Managing drug-drug interactions with new direct-acting antiviral agents in chronic hepatitis C. Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2017 Feb;83(2):269–293. doi: 10.1111/bcp.13095. Epub 2016 Oct 26. PMID: 27530469; PMCID: PMC5237698. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  90. http://www.tbdrugmonographs.co.uk/terizidone.html
  91. http://www.tbdrugmonographs.co.uk/amikacin.html
  92. http://www.tbdrugmonographs.co.uk/prothionamide.html
  93. Tett S, Carey D, Lee H-S. Drug interactions with fluconazole. Med. J. Aust. 1992;156:365. doi: 10.5694/j.1326-5377.1992.tb139816.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  94. Timmins G.S., Deretic V. Mechanisms of action of isoniazid. Mol. Microbiol. 2006;62(5):1220–1227. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2958.2006.05467.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  95. Tucker RM, Denning DW, Hanson LH, et al. Interaction of azoles with rifampin, phenytoin, and carbamazepine: in vitro and clinical observations. Clin. Infect. Dis. 1992;14:165–174. doi: 10.1093/clinids/14.1.165. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  96. Van Buren D., Wideman C.A., Ried M., Gibbons S., Van Buren C.T., Jarowenko M., Flechner S.M., Frazier O.H., Cooley D.A., Kahan B.D. The antagonistic effect of rifampin upon cyclosporine bioavailability. Transplant Proc. 1984 Dec;16(6):1642–1645. PMID: 6390878. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  97. Villa S., Riccardi N., Canetti D., et al. From the past, a long way to future challenges for a greater control of tuberculosis. Tuberculosis (Edinb) 2020;123:101948. doi: 10.1016/j.tube.2020.101948. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  98. Villikka K., Kivistö K.T., Luurila H., Neuvonen P.J. Rifampin reduces plasma concentrations and effects of zolpidem. Clin Pharmacol Ther. 1997 Dec;62(6):629–634. doi: 10.1016/S0009-9236(97)90082-5. PMID: 9433391. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  99. Villikka K, Kivisto KT, Neuvonen PJ. The effect of rifampin on the pharmacokinetics of oral and intravenous ondansetron. Clin. Pharmacol. Ther. 1999;65:377–381. doi: 10.1016/S0009-9236(99)70130-X. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  100. Wallace R.J., Jr., Brown B.A., Griffith D.E., Girard W., Tanaka K. Reduced serum levels of clarithromycin in patients treated with multidrug regimens including rifampin or rifabutin for Mycobacterium avium-M. intracellulare infection. J. Infect. Dis. 1995 Mar;171(3):747–750. doi: 10.1093/infdis/171.3.747. PMID: 7876634. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  101. Wimpelmann J., Høvik H., Riedel B., Slørdal L. The interaction between rifampicin and lamotrigine: A case report. Br. J. Clin. Pharmacol. 2019 Aug;85(8):1859–1860. doi: 10.1111/bcp.13973. Epub 2019 May 29. PMID: 31144345; PMCID: PMC6624381. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  102. World Health Organization . World Health Organization; Geneva: 2014. Documentation for World Health Assembly 67 (A67/11) [Google Scholar]
  103. World Health Organization . World Health Organization; Geneva: 2019. Global Tuberculosis Report 2019. (WHO/325 CDS/TB/2019.15) [Google Scholar]
  104. Yadav S., Rawal G., Bax M. Bedaquiline: a novel antitubercular agent for the treatment of multidrug-resistant tuberculosis. J. Clin. Diagn. Res. 2016 Aug;10(8) doi: 10.7860/JCDR/2016/19052.8286. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  105. Zarembski D.G., Fischer S.A., Santucci P.A., Porter M.T., Costanzo M.R., Trohman R.G. Impact of rifampin on serum amiodarone concentrations in a patient with congenital heart disease. Pharmacotherapy. 1999 Feb;19(2):249–251. doi: 10.1592/phco.19.3.249.30929. PMID: 10030779. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  106. Ziganshina L.E., Titarenko A.F., Davies G.R. Fluoroquinolones for treating tuberculosis (presumed drug-sensitive) Cochrane Database Syst. Rev. 2013;2013(6):CD004795. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD004795.pub4. Published 2013 Jun 6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Current Research in Pharmacology and Drug Discovery are provided here courtesy of Elsevier

RESOURCES