Skip to main content
Cureus logoLink to Cureus
. 2021 Dec 7;13(12):e20246. doi: 10.7759/cureus.20246

Patterns and Impact of Traumatic Brain Injury at King Abdulaziz Medical City in Jeddah, Saudi Arabia: A Retrospective Cohort Study

Fareeda S Alghamdi Jr 1,, Dania M Alsabbali 1, Yasmin H Qadi 1, Sarah M Albugami 1, Ahmed Lary 2
Editors: Alexander Muacevic, John R Adler
PMCID: PMC8664366  PMID: 34912650

Abstract

Objectives

The objectives of this study are to explore the most common causes, patterns, and severities of head traumas, to evaluate the outcomes of traumatic head injury (TBI) patients followed in the clinic, and to calculate the prevalence of admitted cases.

Methods

In our retrospective cohort study, we included all the cases of adults above 18 years old diagnosed with head traumas (171 patients). The inclusion criteria were patients who presented to the emergency department at National Guard Health Affairs (NGHA), Jeddah, Saudi Arabia from 2016 to 2020. Patients were categorized according to their Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) score upon admission.

Results

Of the 171 patients in this study, 151 (88.3%) were males and 20 (11.7%) were females. The median age of our patients was 31 years. Most of the cases had no medical illnesses 124 (72.5%). The most common mechanism of injury was motor vehicle accidents (MVAs) in the majority of our cases (105, 61.4%), followed by falls from heights (34, 19.9%). The commonest computed tomography (CT) finding was subdural hematoma (47, 27.4%). The majority of the associated injuries were thoracic cases (43, 25.1%), followed by spinal (40, 23.4%). Most of the patients were admitted to NGHA (120, 70.2%), while the rest (51, 29.8%) were transferred from other hospitals. Of the total of 171 patients, 134 (78.4%) were treated conservatively. There were no associations between mortality nor length of stay and patients’ demographics, except for GCS on admission showed a significant p-value (<0.005).

Conclusion

In this study, it was found that the most common causes of TBI are MVAs followed by falls from heights. Therefore, preventive measures such as traffic safety rules need to be addressed.

Keywords: subdural hematoma (sdh), fall from height, glasgow coma scale, motor vehicle accident, traumatic brain injuries

Introduction

Traumatic brain injury (TBI) is any interference with the normal function of the brain that can be caused by any force to the head the latter of which has been shown by Al-Habib et al. to result from mainly MVAs and pedestrian injuries [1,2]. It has been reported that the global incidence rate of TBI at 200 per 100,000 people annually, making it an essential topic of research [3]. Moreover, TBI is the leading cause of morbidity and mortality in Americans between 1 and 45 years old [4]. The most common cause of TBI is motor vehicle accidents (MVAs) contributing to 60% of all injuries followed by falls which account for 25%-30% of total injuries [5]. Similarly, a study conducted in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia revealed that the majority of injuries were caused by motor vehicle collisions and pedestrian injuries in 69.4% and 16.8%, respectively [2]. 

The types of TBI can be divided into two major categories which are primary and secondary injuries based on the timing of the insult. Primary injuries include those sustained at the time of the traumatic event. For example, vascular disruption, contusions, and diffuse axonal injury. Secondary injuries result from metabolic and physiologic changes that begin at the time of the initial injury and can last for hours and days. Secondary brain injuries include cerebral edema, alterations in cerebral blood flow, and intracranial hypertension [6]. Another way of categorizing TBI is by the level of severity using the Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) score. The GCS score has been the most widely used clinical measure of the severity of injury in patients with TBI since 1974, and it is one of the parameters that will be assessed in this research [7].

Since King Abdulaziz Medical City is a level 1 trauma center, a large number of patients with TBI were available for this research study. These cases are either admitted cases or eligible transferred cases from other facilities. Therefore, we aim to explore the most common causes of TBIs at our institutions including MVAs, falls, direct trauma, and other possible causes. This will aid in implementing prevention programs for injury mechanisms in general including those with the highest prevalence and worst clinical outcomes. In addition, it will encourage building trauma centers in multiple areas with staff trained to deal with TBI.

Materials and methods

Study area/settings

This retrospective review was a single-center study conducted in the Department of Neurosurgery, King Abdulaziz Medical City, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia. Data from 2016-2020 for all patients admitted to this department who fulfilled the inclusion and exclusion criteria were collected from the electronic database as IRB permission was taken, protocol number: NRJ21J/053/02. 

Study subjects

The included cases in this study were those who were admitted or transferred to neurosurgery due to head trauma at King Abdulaziz Medical City in Jeddah from 2016 to 2020. Patients who sustained injuries without head injury to the neurosurgery department, dead on presentation, or sustained injury during hospital stay due to other reasons were excluded. The study design was a retrospective cohort study.

Sample size

The requisite sample size was calculated using Rasoft software from the website www.rasoft.com/samplesize.html. The total number of TBI patients who presented to the ER from 2016 to 2020 is 500 patients. The required sample size was estimated at a 95% confidence interval with an estimated margin of error plus or minus 5%. The required minimum sample size was determined to be 2018. As our population is limited we included all patients that fit the criteria in the study.

Data collection methods, instruments used, measurements

Data included each patient's demographics, mechanism of injury, GCS score, clinical diagnosis, associated injuries, length of stay, function on discharge, and disposition.

Data management and analysis plan

All analyses were conducted using Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (SPSS) 2.0 (IBM Corp., Armonk, NY). A p-value <0.5 was considered significant. Qualitative variables were presented as frequency and percentages, while quantitative variables as +/- mean standard deviation. The Chi-square test was used to compare qualitative variables, while the T-test and analysis of variance (ANOVA) were used to compare quantitative variables. 

Results

Among all cases who presented with TBIs between January 1, 2016 and December 31, 2020 to the National Guard Health Affairs (NGHA), a total of 171 cases met the inclusion criteria of the present study and were analyzed. The sample median age was 31 years old with an interquartile range (IQR) of 36 years. Of 171 patients, 151 males (88.3%). Most of the included cases (72.5%) had no medical illnesses. Among those who had comorbidities, 8.8% of cases were suffering from one chronic disease, while 18.7% had two or more chronic diseases which included diabetes mellitus, hypertension, cardiovascular diseases, osteoarthritis, thyroid diseases, malignancy, and psychiatric disorders. Motor vehicle accidents (61.4 %) dominated the mechanisms of injury in the current sample which was more than 60% of the mechanisms followed by injuries due to falls from height which was the case in 41.86% of the patients (Table 1). 

Table 1. Demographic characteristics of traumatic brain injury patients.

IQR: interquartile range; MVA: motor vehicle accident.

n = 171 Median IQR
Age (years) 31 36
  Frequency (n) Percentage (%)
Gender
Male 151 88.3
Female 20 11.7
Comorbidities
None 124 72.5
One comorbidity  15 8.8
Two or more comorbidities 32 18.7
Mechanism of injury Male Female
MVA 91 14
Fall from heights 30 4
Hit by heavy object 5 0
Pedestrian 19 1
Other 6 1

TBIs were not the only injuries in these patients, since many individuals suffered from multiple other associated injuries. Thoracic injuries (25.1%) were the most common specified associated injuries. Additionally, spinal injuries were the second most prevalent associated injuries representing 23.4%. Moreover, other associated injuries were present in 72 cases (42.1%). Initial computed tomography (CT) findings were studied, and subdural Hematomas were prevalent in 53.2% of the 171 cases making it the most common CT finding in all patients of this study (Table 2).

Table 2. Associated injuries and CT findings in traumatic brain injury patients.

EENT: eye, ear, nose and throat; CT: computed tomography. *This includes skull fractures, brain edema, and brain infractions.

n = 171 Frequency (n) Percentage (%)
Associated injuries    
Thoracic injury 43 25.1
Spinal injury 40 23.4
Limb fracture 39 22.8
Abdominal injury   26 15.2
Facial fracture 19 11.1
Skull fracture 10 5.8
EENT injury 8 4.7
Other associated injuries 72 42.1
CT findings    
Isolated subdural hematoma 47 27.5
Isolated subarachnoid hemorrhage (SAH) 15 8.8
Isolated brain contusion 12 7
Isolated epidural hemorrhage 12 7
Isolated intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH) 4 2.3
Isolated brain hernia 1 0.6
Isolated intervertebral hemorrhage 1 0.6
Subdural hematoma + hernia + ICH 1 0.6
Subdural hematoma + SAH + ICH 1 0.6
Subdural hematoma + SAH + brain contusion 5 2.9
Subdural hematoma + ICH + brain contusion 2 1.2
Subdural hematoma + brain hernia 2 1.2
Subdural hematoma + brain hernia + ICH + SAH 1 0.6
Subdural hematoma + diffuse axonal injury 1 0.6
Subdural hematoma + epidural hematoma 9 5.3
Subdural hematoma + SAH 11 6.4
Subdural hematoma + SAH + interventricular hemorrhage 1 0.6
Subdural hematoma + brain contusion 2 1.2
Subdural hematoma + epidural hematoma + SAH + diffuse axonal injury 1 0.6
Subdural hematoma + epidural hematoma + SAH 1 0.2
Subdural hematoma + epidural hematoma + ICH 1 0.6
Subdural hematoma + SAH + intraventricular hemorrhage + ICH + brain hernia 1 0.6
Subdural hematoma + epidural hematoma + interventricular hemorrhage 1 0.6
Subdural hematoma + interventricular hemorrhage 1 0.6
Subdural hematoma + ICH 2 1.2
ICH + brain hernia 2 1.2
ICH + interventricular hemorrhage 1 0.6
ICH + SAH 2 1.2
Epidural hematoma + SAH 2 1.2
Epidural hematoma + SAH + ICH 2 1.2
Epidural hematoma + SAH + brain contusion 2 1.2
Epidural hematoma + brain contusion 1 0.6
Epidural hematoma + ICH 3 1.8
Epidural hematoma + brain hernia 1 0.6
SAH + brain contusion 6 3.5
SAH + ICH 1 0.6
SAH + ICH + interventricular hemorrhage 1 0.6
SAH + diffuse axonal injury 1 0.6
SAH + epidural hematoma + brain hernia + ICH 1 0.6
Other CT findings* 9 5.3

The majority of the cases (70.2%) were admitted to the NGHA through the emergency department while 29.8% were transferred from other sites of admission. According to the records, the median length of stay of these 171 patients was 10 days (IQR = 27 days). Among all 171 patients, most patients (63.7%) were diagnosed with intracranial hematoma based on initial CT findings or magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) done later on admission. Regarding the treatment, the larger proportion of these patients (78.4%) were treated conservatively, while 15.20% underwent neurosurgical intervention for their operative TBI. Furthermore, 84.2% of the patients were alive after receiving treatment; however, the other 15.2% of patients, unfortunately, expired. Table 3 shows detailed data of the patients’ course of admission. GCS score at the time of diagnosis and discharge were summarized in Table 4.

Table 3. Course of patients after admission.

IQR: interquartile range; NGHA: National Guard Health Affairs Hospital. *Home without healthcare. **This includes: brain contusion, brain herniation, and diffuse axonal injury.

n = 171 Median IQR
Length of stay (days) 10 27
  Frequency (n) Percentage (%)
Admission source (n=171)    
NGHA 120 70.2
Transferred 51 29.8
Admission site (n=141)    
Neurosurgery 57 40.4
Care under other specialties 84 59.6
Disposition (n=132)    
Nursing home 2 1.5
Home with health care 16   12.1  
Home* 114 86.4
Diagnosis    
Traumatic brain injury 13 7.6
Intracranial hematomas/hemorrhage 109 63.7
Other diagnoses** 49 28.7
Treatment    
Conservative 134 78.4
Operative 37 21.6
Outcome    
Alive 144 84.2
Deceased 27 15.8

Table 4. GCS score of traumatic brain injury patients.

GCS: Glasgow Coma Scale.

  GCS score on admission GCS score on discharge
N = 171 Frequency Percentage Frequency Percentage
15 – 13 60 35.1 95 55.6
12 – 9 26 15.2 16 9.4
< 9 72 42.1 15 8.8
Unknown 13 7.6 45 26.2

Demographic characteristics and other factors such as the mechanism of injury and GCS score were studied to search for an association with mortality. Although differences were observed between many groups, these differences were not statistically significant. Table 5 illustrates the distribution of some of these factors. Moreover, the length of stay was investigated. Difference in length of stay based on numerous factors such as age, gender, GCS score and mechanism of injury were studied. The GCS score on admission was associated with a difference in the length of stay and this difference achieved a statistical significance. However, associations between the length of stay and other factors were not statistically significant (Table 6).

Table 5. Association between mortality and patients demographics.

*Mann Whitney U test. **Kruskal-Wallis H.

n = 171 Alive Deceased p-value
Age (years)     0.967*
≤ 20 27 5 (3%)  
21 – 40 62 11 (6%)  
≥ 40  55 11 (6%)  
Gender     0.353**
Male 126 25 (15%)  
Female 18 2 (1%)  
Comorbidities     0.535*
None 46 7 (4%)  
Present 98 20 (12%)  

Table 6. Difference in length of stay between groups of traumatic brain injury patients.

MVA: motor vehicle accident; GCS: Glasgow Coma Scale. *Mann Whitney U test. **Kruskal-Wallis H.

Variable Groups Mean rank U/H p-value
Age (years) ≤ 20 77.11 1.258 0.533**
  21 – 40 88.78    
  ≥ 40 85.99    
Gender Male 83.20 1155.500 0.095*
  Female 102.73    
Comorbidities None 87.21 2900.000 0.5*
  Present 81.72    
Mechanism of injury MVA 85.40 2.504 0.644**
  Fall from height 81.62    
  Hit by heavy object 62.60    
  Pedestrian 97.50    
  Other 87.93    
GCS score on admission 15 – 13 60.98 24.009 <0.005**
  12 – 9 92.19    
  < 9 99.61    
  Unknown 108.19    

Discussion

This study was a retrospective analysis of cases presenting with TBI. TBI incidences differ greatly between and within countries due to a lack of data on an exact definition of head injury, subtypes, etiology, methodological concerns, and outcomes. The study's findings revealed that the most common cause of TBI was a motor vehicle accident (MVA) followed by fall from heights. Similar findings were observed in studies done in other Middle Eastern nations such as the United Arab Emirates and Qatar, indicating that MVAs are the leading cause of trauma in TBI [8]. Research performed in the United States in 2007 and 2013 found that falls from great heights and assault were the top causes of TBI, while MVAs remained the leading cause of mortality following TBI [9,10]. In the present study, the majority of the patients presenting with TBI were males, and the leading cause among males was MVAs, thus emphasizing the importance of preventive measures and appropriated public health programs, including traffic safety rules. These findings are in accordance with previous reports from other provinces in Saudi Arabia [11,12]. In our study, more than one-fourth of patients were suffering from chronic diseases, and it has been reported by others that the presence of diabetes mellitus, hypertension, and cardiovascular problems could promote poor clinical outcomes in TBI patients [13-15]. 

The pathophysiology of TBI is a complex process that begins with primary and secondary injuries resulting in short or long-term brain impairments. The primary impairment is directly related to the brain's major external impacts causing compression and shearing of adjacent tissues with or without loss of consciousness. The secondary injury occurs minutes to days after the main impact and is caused by a molecular, chemical, and inflammatory cascade resulting in cranial and systemic complications [16]. Brain injuries incurred in MVAs, assaults, or falls from heights typically result in damage to multiple body sites, including the spine and vertebrae, and these are found to be the prime cause of mortality and disability [17]. The findings of our study showed thoracic injury and spine injury were the more commonly associated injuries seen in these patients. One report showed that in an overall major trauma outcome study in cases with severe extracranial injury (SEI) alone, the mortality rate was 8.3%; it was three times higher in the SEI with head injury group (14.5%) than in the non-head injury patients (5.1%) [18]. In another report, moderate brain injury on its own had a 4.2% mortality rate. When combined with extracranial injury the risk of death was double that due to extracranial injury alone [19]. Patients with injury in extracranial sites could have a massive extracranial site hemorrhage, which could result in a coagulopathy or decreased cerebral blood flow both of which could result in secondary brain damage [20,21]. We observed a mortality rate of 15.8%, even though there was no significant association seen with age, gender, and presence of comorbidities. Studies show that older age groups have significantly higher mortality rates after TBI incidence [22,23]. A study done by Munivenkatappa et al. reported that the mortality rate among female patients was significantly higher compared to males (3.4% vs. 1.6%) [23]. Thus it is important to consider these factors to predict the outcomes that can help doctors to take precautionary measures while managing patients with TBI. Patients suspected of having suffered a TBI should be transferred directly to a Level I or II Trauma Care Center (TCC) unless they require life-saving stabilization in a non-TCC [24]. 

Coma severity is measured using the GCS score, which may be used to a wide range of acute medical and trauma patients, and it should be determined soon after arrival or within less than one hour after arrival to the hospital. A GCS score of 15-13 is considered as a mild, 9-13, a moderate and 3-8, a severe head injury [25]. In our study, patients with severe and moderate GCS scores on admission had significantly longer hospital stays than those with mild GCS scores. However, no statistically significant differences in the length of hospital stay were associated with age, gender, comorbidities, and mechanism of injury. Patients with severe GCS scores were found to have more poor clinical outcomes and higher mortality rates [26]. Also, it is reported that a 100% mortality was seen in cases with fixed and dilated pupils with severe GCS scores [27,28]. A GCS score of ≥ 13 has been reported to have better clinical outcomes following TBI, and individuals with GCS scores ≤13 must be examined frequently and constantly monitored since these patients may require emergency intubation [29].

Our study was cross-sectional hospital-based with a retrospective design; hence could have some limitations of its own. Our study's data collection, refining, and quality control techniques are comparable to those of prior databases; retrospective investigations still carry their own inherent biases and these cannot be ignored completely. Second, as this is a hospital-based study, there may be a potential for referral bias. Also, we didn't record the type of interventions these patients received while they were in the hospital, which might affect their recovery. Thirdly, "milder" head injuries that didn't require hospitalization might be missed since the database includes people who were admitted or died in the emergency department.

Conclusions

In this study, it was found that the most common causes of TBI are MVAs followed by falls from height. Therefore, preventive measures such as traffic safety rules need to be addressed. Furthermore, TBI is not broadly studied in our region, thus, we recommend conducting further research in this area to highlight the importance of implementing safety measures and building trauma centers that will aid in better patients' outcome in terms of morbidity and mortality.

The content published in Cureus is the result of clinical experience and/or research by independent individuals or organizations. Cureus is not responsible for the scientific accuracy or reliability of data or conclusions published herein. All content published within Cureus is intended only for educational, research and reference purposes. Additionally, articles published within Cureus should not be deemed a suitable substitute for the advice of a qualified health care professional. Do not disregard or avoid professional medical advice due to content published within Cureus.

The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Human Ethics

Consent was obtained or waived by all participants in this study. Department of Neurosurgery, King Abdulaziz Medical City, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia issued approval NRJ21J/053/02

Animal Ethics

Animal subjects: All authors have confirmed that this study did not involve animal subjects or tissue.

References

  • 1.Traumatic Brain Injury. https://www.aans.org/en/Patients/Neurosurgical-Conditions-and-Treatments/Traumatic-Brain-Injury 2020
  • 2.Causes and patterns of adult traumatic head injuries in Saudi Arabia: implications for injury prevention. Al-Habib A, A-Shail A, Alaqeel A, Zamakhshary M, Al-Bedah K, Alqunai M, Al-Enazi S. Ann Saudi Med. 2013;33:351–355. doi: 10.5144/0256-4947.2013.351. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Changing spectrum of traumatic head injuries: demographics and outcome analysis in a tertiary care referral center. [ Dec; 2020 ];Junaid M, Afsheen A, Tahir A, Bukhari SS, Kalsoom A. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/27427137/ J Pak Med Assoc. 2016 66:864–868. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Gasco J, Nader R. New York: Thieme; 2013. The essential neurosurgery companion. [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Narain TP, Ravi R. Ramamurthi and Tandon's Textbook of Neurosurgery (Vol. 1) New Delhi: Jaypee Brothers Pvt. Ltd.; 2012. Ramamurthi and Tandon's Textbook of Neurosurgery (Vol. 1) [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Valadka AB, Andrews BT. New York: Thieme; 2011. Neurotrauma Evidence-Based Answers to Common Questions. [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Chesnut RM, Ghajar J, Mass A, et al. [ Dec; 2020 ]. 2021. Early indicators of prognosis in severe traumatic brain injury. [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Epidemiology of head injury in the United Arab Emirates. Al-Kuwaiti A, Hefny AF, Bellou A, Eid HO, Abu-Zidan FM. Ulus Travma Acil Cerrahi Derg. 2012;18:213–218. doi: 10.5505/tjtes.2012.03710. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Epidemiologic aspects of brain injury. Kraus JF, McArthur DL. Neurol Clin. 1996;14:435–450. doi: 10.1016/s0733-8619(05)70266-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Faul M, Xu L, Wald M, Coronado V. Traumatic Brain Injury in the United States: Emergency department visits, hospitalizations and deaths 2002-2006. Atlanta, GA: National Center for Injury Prevention and Control, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Taylor CA, Bell JM, Breiding MJ, Xu L. https://www.cdc.gov/traumaticbraininjury/pdf/blue_book.pdf MMWR Surveill Summ. 2010;66:1–16. [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Epidemiology of traumatic head injury in children and adolescents in a major trauma center in Saudi Arabia: implications for injury prevention. Alhabdan S, Zamakhshary M, AlNaimi M, et al. Ann Saudi Med. 2013;33:52–56. doi: 10.5144/0256-4947.2013.52. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Patterns, Types, and Outcomes of Head Injury in Aseer Region, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia. Alnaami I, Alshehri S, Alghamdi S, et al. Neurosci J. 2019;2019:2782146. doi: 10.1155/2019/2782146. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Review: Traumatic brain injury and hyperglycemia, a potentially modifiable risk factor. Shi J, Dong B, Mao Y, Guan W, Cao J, Zhu R, Wang S. Oncotarget. 2016;7:71052–71061. doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.11958. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Hypertension and head injury. Shiozaki T. Curr Hypertens Rep. 2005;7:450–453. doi: 10.1007/s11906-005-0040-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Traumatic brain injury: a disease process, not an event. Masel BE, DeWitt DS. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/20504161/ J Neurotrauma. 2010;27:1529–1540. doi: 10.1089/neu.2010.1358. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Traumatic brain injury: current treatment strategies and future endeavors. Galgano M, Toshkezi G, Qiu X, Russell T, Chin L, Zhao LR. Cell Transplant. 2017;26:1118–1130. doi: 10.1177/0963689717714102. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.The epidemiology of traumatic death. A population-based analysis. Shackford SR, Mackersie RC, Holbrook TL, Davis JW, Hollingsworth-Fridlund P, Hoyt DB, Wolf PL. Arch Surg. 1993;128:571–575. doi: 10.1001/archsurg.1993.01420170107016. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Comparison of mortality, morbidity, and severity of 59,713 head injured patients with 114,447 patients with extracranial injuries. Gennarelli TA, Champion HR, Copes WS, Sacco WJ. J Trauma. 1994;37:962–968. doi: 10.1097/00005373-199412000-00016. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Unexpected contribution of moderate traumatic brain injury to death after major trauma. McMahon CG, Yates DW, Campbell FM, Hollis S, Woodford M. https://journals.lww.com/jtrauma/Abstract/1999/11000/Unexpected_Contribution_of_Moderate_Traumatic.13.aspx. J Trauma. 1999;47:891–895. doi: 10.1097/00005373-199911000-00013. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.The effect of concomitant peripheral injury on traumatic brain injury pathobiology and outcome. McDonald SJ, Sun M, Agoston DV, Shultz SR. J Neuroinflammation. 2016;13:90. doi: 10.1186/s12974-016-0555-1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Outcomes after traumatic brain injury with concomitant severe extracranial injuries. Watanabe T, Kawai Y, Iwamura A, Maegawa N, Fukushima H, Okuchi K. Neurol Med Chir. 2018;58:393–399. doi: 10.2176/nmc.oa.2018-0116. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Acute traumatic brain injury: mortality in the elderly. Herou E, Romner B, Tomasevic G. World Neurosurg. 2015;83:996–1001. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2015.02.023. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Traumatic brain injury: does gender influence outcomes? Munivenkatappa A, Agrawal A, Shukla DP, Kumaraswamy D, Devi BI. Int J Crit Illn Inj Sci. 2016;6:70–73. doi: 10.4103/2229-5151.183024. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Mortality rates of severe traumatic brain injury patients: impact of direct versus nondirect transfers. Prabhakaran K, Petrone P, Lombardo G, Stoller C, Policastro A, Marini CP. J Surg Res. 2017;219:66–71. doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2017.05.103. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Assessment of coma and impaired consciousness: a practical scale. Teasdale G, Jennett B. Lancet. 1974;304:81–84. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(74)91639-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Is it possible to recover from traumatic brain injury and a Glasgow coma scale score of 3 at emergency department presentation? Sadaka F, Jadhav A, Miller M, Saifo A, O'Brien J, Trottier S. Am J Emerg Med. 2018;36:1624–1626. doi: 10.1016/j.ajem.2018.01.051. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Use of admission Glasgow Coma Score, pupil size, and pupil reactivity to determine outcome for trauma patients. Lieberman JD, Pasquale MD, Garcia R, Cipolle MD, Mark Li P, Wasser TE. J Trauma. 2003;55:437–442. doi: 10.1097/01.TA.0000081882.79587.17. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Do trauma patients with a Glasgow Coma Scale score of 3 and bilateral fixed and dilated pupils have any chance of survival? Tien HC, Cunha JR, Wu SN, Chughtai T, Tremblay LN, Brenneman FD, Rizoli SB. J Trauma. 2006;60:274–278. doi: 10.1097/01.ta.0000197177.13379.f4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Effect of age on Glasgow coma scale in patients with moderate and severe traumatic brain injury: an approach with propensity score-matched population. Rau CS, Wu SC, Chen YC, Chien PC, Hsieh HY, Kuo PJ, Hsieh CH. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2017;14 doi: 10.3390/ijerph14111378. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Cureus are provided here courtesy of Cureus Inc.

RESOURCES