Skip to main content
NCBI home page
Springer Nature - PMC COVID-19 Collection logoLink to Springer Nature - PMC COVID-19 Collection
. 2021 Dec 11;56(6):341–347. doi: 10.1007/s10272-021-1010-9

Labour Market Participation of Older Workers: Drivers and Obstacles

Ulrich Walwei 1,✉,#, Jürgen Deller 2,✉,#
PMCID: PMC8664665  PMID: 34924596

Abstract

From an international comparative point of view the paper deals with driving forces and potential obstacles for the labour market participation of older workers. It goes into depth by focusing on four case studies that seem to be typical for different contexts. Germany, Israel, Italy and Sweden were selected in order to examine the development and the situation of older workers in detail. Each country stands for a specific configuration, e.g. because it may represent a trend reversal, a continuously outstanding performance, or lasting problems. The cases also provde information on pension reforms and approaches to better manage ageing workforces, in some cases including a new balance of work and retirement. Being aware of the different country situations, it becomes obvious that one size of politics does not fit all. Independent of national policies, employability over the life cycle should gain more attention. Regarding future developments, continuous skill improvement and a healthy work environment are indispensable to keep older workers in work.

Footnotes

Ulrich Walwei, Institute for Employment Research (IAB), Nuremberg, Germany.

Jürgen Deller, Leuphana University of Lueneburg, Germany.

Both authors contributed equally to this manuscript.

Contributor Information

Ulrich Walwei, Email: ulrich.walwei@iab.de.

Jürgen Deller, Email: deller@uni.leuphana.de.

References

  1. Albin, M., T. Bodin and E. Wadensjö (2015), National report: Sweden, In H. M. Hasselhorn and W. Apt (eds.), Understanding employment participation of older workers: Creating a knowledge base for future labor market challenges, Research Report, Federal Ministry of Labor and Social Affairs (BMAS) and Federal Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (BAuA).
  2. Anger S, Trahms A, Westermeier C. Erwerbsarbeit nach Renteneintritt. Wirtschaftsdienst. 2018;98(12):904–906. doi: 10.1007/s10273-018-2385-5. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  3. Axelrad H. Early retirement and late retirement: Comparative analysis of 20 European countries. International Journal of Sociology. 2018;48(3):231–250. doi: 10.1080/00207659.2018.1483004. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  4. Axelrad H. Perception versus official data: Employers’ knowledge about the aging workforce. Journal of Aging and Social Policy. 2020;33(2):177–199. doi: 10.1080/08959420.2020.1769535. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Bauer, A., J. Fuchs, H. Gartner, M. Hummel, C. Hutter, S. Wanger, E. Weber and G. Zika (2020), IAB-Prognose 2020/2021: Arbeitsmarkt auf schwierigem Erholungskurs, IAB-Kurzbericht, 19/2020.
  6. Bertoni, M. and G. Brunello (2017), Does delayed retirement affect youth employment? Evidence from Italian local labour markets, IZA Institute of Labor Economics DP, 10733.
  7. Börsch-Supan, A., M. Coppola and J. Rausch (2014), Die “Rente mit 63”: Wer sind die Begünstigten? Was sind die Auswirkungen auf die Gesetzliche Rentenversicherung?, MEA-discussion paper, 17/2014.
  8. Bosch G. Qualifikationsanforderungen an Arbeitnehmer—flexibel und zukunftsgerichtet. Wirtschaftsdienst. 2011;91(13):27–33. doi: 10.1007/s10273-011-1180-3. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  9. Colussi, T. (2020), IZA Covid-19 crisis response monitoring: Italy, IZA Institute of Labor Economics.
  10. Czepek, J., N. Gürtzgen, A. Moczall and E. Weber (2017), Halten rentenberechtigter Mitarbeiter in den Betrieben: Vor allem kürzere und flexiblere Arbeitszeiten kommen zum Einsatz, IAB-Kurzbericht, 16/2017.
  11. Deller, J. and U. Walwei (forthcoming), Workforce age trends and projections, in H. Zacher and C. W. Rudolph (eds.), Age and work: Advances in theory, methods, and practice, Routledge.
  12. Dietz M, Walwei U. Germany — no country for old workers? Zeitschrift für ArbeitsmarktForschung. 2011;44(4):363–376. [Google Scholar]
  13. Eichhorst W, Marx P. Reforming German labor market institutions: A dual path to flexibility. Journal of European Social Policy. 2011;21(1):73–87. doi: 10.1177/0958928710385731. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  14. Eurostat (2020), Unemployment statistics, https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/web/lfs/data/database.
  15. Fuchs, H. and A. Weiss (2018), Israel’s labor market: An overview, Taub Center for Social Policy Studies in Israel.
  16. Gesundheitsberichterstattung des Bundes (2020), Selbsteinschätzung des Gesundheitszustandes von Personen ab 16 Jahren, Anteil der befragten Personen in Prozent (EU-SILC).
  17. Kennedy, J. F. (1963), Remarks in Heber Springs, Arkansas, at the Dedication of Grers Ferry Dam, The American Presidency Project, http://www.presidency.ucsb.edu/ws/index.php?pid=9455 (11 August 2021).
  18. Laun, L. and M. Palme (2018), The recent rise of labor force participation of older workers in Sweden, National Bureau of Economic Research Working Paper, 24593.
  19. Laun T, Wallenius J. A life cycle model of health and retirement: The case of Swedish pension reform. Journal of Public Economics. 2015;127(C):127–136. doi: 10.1016/j.jpubeco.2013.11.002. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  20. Larom, T. and O. Lifshitz (2018), The labor market in Israel, 2000–2016, IZA World of Labor, 415.
  21. Marino, F. and L. Nunziata (2017), The labor market in Italy, 2000–2016, IZA World of Labor, 407.
  22. Möller J. Did the German model survive the labor market reforms? Journal for Labor Market Research. 2015;48(2):151–168. doi: 10.1007/s12651-015-0182-9. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  23. OECD (2018), Italy: Key policies to promote longer working lives, Country note 2007 to 2017.
  24. OECD (2020), OECD Employment Outlook 2020: Worker Security and the COVID-19 Crisis, OECD Publishing.
  25. OECD (2021), Data.oecd.org (9 April 2021).
  26. Schneider, H. and U. Rinne (2019), The labor market in Germany, 2000–2018, IZA World of Labor, 379.
  27. Socci, M., A. Principi, J. Bauknecht, G. Naegele and V. Gerling (2017), Final country report: Italy, MoPAct — Mobilising the potential of active ageing in Europe, Work package 3: Extending working lives.
  28. Steiner V. The labor market for older workers in Germany. Journal for Labor Market Research. 2017;50(1):1–14. doi: 10.1007/s12651-017-0221-9. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  29. United Nations (2019), Department of Economic and Social Affairs, Population Division, World Population Prospects.
  30. Venti S, Wise D. The long reach of education: Early retirement. Journal of the Economics of Aging. 2015;6:133–148. doi: 10.1016/j.jeoa.2015.08.001. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Walwei, U. (2015), From deregulation to re-regulation: Trend reversal in German labor market institutions and its possible implications, IAB-Discussion Paper, 10/2015.
  32. Walwei U. Silver Ager im Arbeitsmarktaufschwung: Wie steht es um die Qualität der Beschäftigung. Deutsche Rentenversicherung. 2018;73(2):144–158. [Google Scholar]
  33. Walwei U. Trends in der Beschäftigung Älterer. Rahmenbedingungen für betriebliche Personalpolitik. WSI-Mitteilungen. 2018;71(1):3–11. doi: 10.5771/0342-300X-2018-1-3. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  34. Westermeier, C. (2019), Ältere am Arbeitsmarkt: Eine stabile Beschäftigung vor dem Rentenalter begünstigt die Weiterarbeit, IAB-Kurzbericht, 15/2019.

Articles from Inter Economics are provided here courtesy of Nature Publishing Group

RESOURCES