Skip to main content
Journal of Clinical Microbiology logoLink to Journal of Clinical Microbiology
. 2000 May;38(5):1990–1991. doi: 10.1128/jcm.38.5.1990-1991.2000

Bartonella henselae Infection as a Cause of Fever of Unknown Origin

Masato Tsukahara 1,*, Hidehiro Tsuneoka 2, Hidechika Iino 1, Ichiro Murano 3, Hirohiko Takahashi 4, Masashi Uchida 5
PMCID: PMC86647  PMID: 10790137

Abstract

Fourteen of 41 patients (34%) with a serological diagnosis of Bartonella henselae infection were found to have prolonged fever or fever of unknown origin, suggesting that generalized systemic B. henselae infection is not rare in immunocompetent healthy individuals.


The clinical spectrum of Bartonella henselae infection varies, ranging from classic cat scratch disease with only lymphadenopathy to severe systemic disease. In general, immunocompetent individuals tend to develop classic cat scratch disease, while immunocompromised individuals tend to have systemic disease (1). We report the prevalence of systemic B. henselae infection among otherwise healthy individuals.

Between 9 July 1996 and 7 January 1999, a total of 119 patients (80 children and 39 adults) suspected of having cat scratch disease because of either lymphadenopathy or fever of unknown origin and pet ownership were referred to us for serological diagnosis. All the patients had no underlying diseases. Sera from 33 hospitals located in central and southwestern areas of Japan were included in this study, and referring doctors included pediatricians, physicians, surgeons, otolaryngologists, ophthalmologists, dentists, radiologists, and pathologists. Serological diagnosis using the indirect fluorescent-antibody (IFA) method (4, 6) was made on the basis of either elevated titers of immunoglobulin M (IgM) (≥1:20) or IgG (≥1:256) antibodies or a fourfold rise in IgG titer between acute- and convalescent-phase sera. The sensitivity and specificity of our IFA method were 87 and 97.7%, respectively.

The 119 patients were categorized into four groups by clinical features (Table 1). Group 1 included patients with regional lymphadenopathy and mild symptoms, with no fever or a fever lasting less than 7 days, indicating classic cat scratch disease. Group 2 included patients with regional lymphadenopathy and a prolonged fever, lasting more than 7 days. Group 3 included patients without lymphadenopathy and with a fever lasting less than 7 days. Group 4 included patients without lymphadenopathy and with a fever lasting more than 7 days. The numbers of patients in the groups were 90, 16, 2, and 11, respectively. There were no differences between the groups in terms of age, sex, or exposures to cats.

TABLE 1.

Clinical and laboratory findings for 119 patients

Group Features No. of patients with the following IFA result:
Negative Positive Total
1 Lymphadenopathy and fever (<7 days) 63 27a 90
2 Lymphadenopathy and fever (≥7 days) 10 6 16
3 No lymphadenopathy and fever (<7 days) 2 0 2
4 No lymphadenopathy and fever (≥7 days) 3 8 11
Total 78 41 119
a

Classic cat scratch disease, including two patients with unilateral neuroretinitis. 

Of the 119 patients, 41 (31 children and 10 adults) were serologically positive for B. henselae, whereas 78 were serologically negative. Out of the 41 patients who tested positive for IFA, 27 (18 children and 9 adults) were from group 1, 6 (all children) were from group 2, and 8 (7 children and 1 adult) were from group 4.

Table 2 summarizes the clinical features for the 14 patients from groups 2 and 4 (fever lasting more than 7 days) who tested positive for IFA. The maximum temperature of these patients ranged from 39.0 to 40.5°C. Despite a prolonged fever, they were otherwise in good condition. It is noteworthy that 8 (7 children) of the 14 patients had no lymph node swelling, even though they had a prolonged fever, lasting from 7 to 25 days. Of these eight, three had hepatic granuloma and/or splenic granuloma. By using PCR analysis (5), we were able to confirm that one patient had septicemia, whereas we could not confirm septicemia for three patients. The other six patients had regional lymphadenopathy accompanied by a prolonged fever, lasting from 9 to 30 days, and PCR analysis confirmed septicemia in one patient.

TABLE 2.

Clinical features for patients with prolonged fever (≥7 days)

Patient Age (yr) Sexa Regional lymphadenopathyb Duration of fever (days) Symptom(s) IFA titer
PCR resultc Pet ownership
IgM IgG
1 13 F 15 Malaised 1,024 ND Cate
15 10 F 10 Malaise 512 +, granulomaf Cate, doge
36 9 F 14 Headache, back pain 80 1,024 ND Cat
44 25 F 14 Abdominal pain 80 1,024 +, granulomag Dog
−, PB
77 9 F 20 160 2,048 +, PB Cat
87 9 M 14 Malaise, weight loss 320 2,048 ND Cat
88 4 F 25 4,096 −, PB Cat
107 9 F 7 Sore throat 40 1,024 −, PB Cat
21 10 M + 10 Sore throat 1,024 ND Dog
23 9 F + 24 Malaise 80 1,024 ND Cat
25 1 M + 14 512 ND Cat
31 5 F + 9 20 512 ND Cat
74 11 F + 11 Malaise, headache 320 1,024 +, PB Cat, dog
117 9 F + 30 Malaise 40 1,024 −, PB; +, pus Cat, dog
a

F, female; M, male. 

b

−, absent; +, present. 

c

+, positive; −, negative; ND, not done. The tissue tested was granuloma peripheral blood cells (PB) or pus. 

d

Multiple hypoechoic lesions in the liver were found by echocardiography. 

e

No ownership, but a positive history of pet contact. 

f

Histopathological diagnosis was obtained from resected tissue. 

g

Hepatic hypoechoic lesions and splenic granuloma were seen in resected tissue. 

B. henselae has been reported as a cause of fever with bacteremia or fever of unknown origin in both immunocompetent and immunocompromised hosts (2, 3, 7). Previous reports indicated that B. henselae infection may cause fever of unknown origin without regional lymphadenopathy or hepatosplenic involvement (2, 3, 7) and is one of most common infectious diseases in children (2). Our findings support previous reports and suggest that generalized systemic B. henselae infection is not rare in healthy individuals and that children seem to be more prone to develop a prolonged fever or fever of unknown origin.

If a patient with prolonged fever or fever of unknown origin, irrespective of lymphadenopathy, owns a pet, especially a cat or dog, or has a history of pet contact, the possibility of B. henselae infection should be considered.

Acknowledgments

We thank the referring doctors for allowing us to analyze blood samples from patients suspected of having cat scratch disease.

REFERENCES

  • 1.Anderson B E, Neuman M A. Bartonella spp. as emerging human pathogens. Clin Microbiol Rev. 1997;10:203–219. doi: 10.1128/cmr.10.2.203. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Jacobs R F, Schutze G E. Bartonella henselae as a cause of prolonged fever and fever of unknown origin in children. Clin Infect Dis. 1998;26:80–84. doi: 10.1086/516256. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Lucey D, Dolan M, Moss C W, Garcia M, Hollis D G, Wegner S, Morgan G, Almeida R, Leong D, Greisen K S, Welch D F, Slater L N. Relapsing illness due to Rochalimaea henselae in immunocompetent hosts: implication for therapy and new epidemiological associations. Clin Infect Dis. 1992;14:683–688. doi: 10.1093/clinids/14.3.683. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Regnery R L, Olson J G, Perkins B A, Bibb W. Serological response to “Rochalimaea henselae” antigen in suspected cat-scratch disease. Lancet. 1992;339:1443–1445. doi: 10.1016/0140-6736(92)92032-b. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Tsukahara M, Tsuneoka H, Iino H, Ohno K, Murano I. Bartonella henselae infection from a dog. Lancet. 1998;352:1682. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(05)61455-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Tsuneoka H, Fujii R, Yamamoto K, Fujisawa K, Matsuda M, Iino H, Tsukahara M. Determination of anti-Bartonella henselae antibody by indirect fluorescence antibody test—comparison of two types of antigen: non-cocultivated B. henselae and cocultivated B. henselae with Vero cells. J Jpn Assoc Infect Dis. 1998;72:801–807. doi: 10.11150/kansenshogakuzasshi1970.72.801. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Welch D F, Pickett D A, Slater L N, Steigerwalt A G, Brenner D J. Rochalimaea henselae sp. nov., a cause of septicemia, bacillary angiomatosis, and parenchymal bacillary peliosis. J Clin Microbiol. 1992;30:275–280. doi: 10.1128/jcm.30.2.275-280.1992. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Journal of Clinical Microbiology are provided here courtesy of American Society for Microbiology (ASM)

RESOURCES