Skip to main content
Neurologia medico-chirurgica logoLink to Neurologia medico-chirurgica
. 2021 Nov 3;61(12):675–710. doi: 10.2176/nmc.st.2021-0254

The Japan Neurosurgical Database: Statistics Update 2018 and 2019

Koji IIHARA 1,, Nobuhito SAITO 2, Michiyasu SUZUKI 3, Isao DATE 4, Yukihiko FUJII 5, Kiyohiro HOUKIN 6, Tooru INOUE 7, Toru IWAMA 8, Takakazu KAWAMATA 9, Phyo KIM 10, Hiroyuki KINOUCHI 11, Haruhiko KISHIMA 12, Eiji KOHMURA 13, Kaoru KURISU 14, Keisuke MARUYAMA 15, Yuji MATSUMARU 16, Nobuhiro MIKUNI 17, Susumu MIYAMOTO 18, Akio MORITA 19, Hiroyuki NAKASE 20, Yoshitaka NARITA 21, Ryo NISHIKAWA 22, Kazuhiko NOZAKI 23, Kuniaki OGASAWARA 24, Kenji OHATA 25, Nobuyuki SAKAI 26, Hiroaki SAKAMOTO 27, Yoshiaki SHIOKAWA 28, Jun C TAKAHASHI 29, Keisuke UEKI 30, Toshihiko WAKABAYASHI 31, Koji YOSHIMOTO 32, Hajime ARAI 33, Teiji TOMINAGA 34; on behalf of the Japan Neurosurgical Society
PMCID: PMC8666296  PMID: 34732592

Abstract

Each year, the Japan Neurosurgical Society (JNS) reports up-to-date statistics from the Japan Neurosurgical Database regarding case volume, patient demographics, and in-hospital outcomes of the overall cohort and neurosurgical subgroup according to the major classifications of main diagnosis. We hereby report patient demographics, in-hospital mortality, length of hospital stay, purpose of admission, number of medical management, direct surgery, endovascular treatment, and radiosurgery of the patients based on the major classifications and/or main diagnosis registered in 2018 and 2019 in the overall cohort (523283 and 571143 patients, respectively) and neurosurgical subgroup (177184 and 191595 patients, respectively). The patient demographics, disease severity, proportion of purpose of admission (e.g., operation, 33.9–33.5%) and emergent admission (68.4–67.8%), and in-hospital mortality (e.g., cerebrovascular diseases, 6.3–6.5%; brain tumor, 3.1–3%; and neurotrauma, 4.3%) in the overall cohort were comparable between 2018 and 2019. In total, 207783 and 225217 neurosurgical procedures were performed in the neurosurgical subgroup in 2018 and 2019, respectively, of which endovascular treatment comprised 19.1% and 20.3%, respectively. Neurosurgical management of chronic subdural hematoma (19.4–18.9%) and cerebral aneurysm (15.4–14.8%) was most common. Notably, the proportion of management of ischemic stroke/transient ischemic attack, including recombinant tissue plasminogen activator infusion and endovascular acute reperfusion therapy, increased from 7.5% in 2018 to 8.8% in 2019. The JNS statistical update represents a critical resource for the lay public, policy makers, media professionals, neurosurgeons, healthcare administrators, researchers, health advocates, and others seeking the best available data on neurosurgical practice.

Keywords: national database, neurosurgery, performance measure, quality of care, registry

Introduction

In response to an increasing interest in evidence-based medicine, improving the quality of patient care, patient safety, and neurosurgical training, the Japan Neurosurgical Society (JNS) established the Japan Neurosurgical Database (JND) in 2017, a prospective observational study registry.1) Unlike the National Neurosurgery Quality and Outcomes Database in the US2) and the Neurosurgical National Audit Program in the UK,3) the JND registers all patients’ clinical data primarily from the JNS training institutions. We previously reported the overview of the JND and results of the first-year 2018 survey (523283 cases), related to patient demographics and in-hospital outcomes in a nationwide, real-world situation. We found unique aspects of neurosurgical practice in Japan such as significant engagement not only in neurosurgical but also in non-neurosurgical patient care.1)

Each year, the JNS reports the most up-to-date JND statistics related to caseload, patient demographics, and in-hospital outcomes of the overall cohort and a neurosurgical subgroup according to the major classification of main diagnosis. Additionally, they have reported the annual number of neurosurgical, endovascular, and radiosurgical procedures performed in 2018 and 2019 in the participating hospitals. The JND statistical update represents a critical resource for the lay public, policy makers, media professionals, neurosurgeons, healthcare administrators, researchers, health advocates, and others seeking the best available data on neurosurgical practice.1) Herein, we report up-to-date JND statistics of procedures performed in 2018 and 2019.

Methods

Ethics statement

This study was approved by the research ethics committee of the JNS (2017009) and the Yamagata University Institutional Review Board (2017009R2-1), which waived the requirement for individual informed consent. Patients were provided with an opportunity to indicate whether they wanted to share their clinical information when they registered for care. Our study protocol followed the “opt-out” rule.

Data sources and collection

All hospitals belonging to the JNS training programs were asked to participate in the JND project. Additionally, other hospitals where JNS board-certified neurosurgeons are enrolled were permitted to participate in this project for the renewal of their board certification. The inclusion criteria and registration items of the JND have been reported previously.1) Briefly, the database consists of multiple hierarchical levels. The first level contains basic clinical information such as data identification number, age, sex, postal code of home address, level of consciousness on admission as measured by the Japan Coma Scale, and route (e.g., emergency transportation) or mode (emergency or scheduled) of admission. The second level consists of the major classifications of the JND diseases, main diagnosis, and purposes of admission. The following are the seven major classifications: 1) cerebrovascular diseases, 2) brain tumor, 3) neurotrauma, 4) hydrocephalus/developmental anomalies, 5) functional neurosurgery, 6) spinal and peripheral nerve disorders, and 7) encephalitis/infection/inflammatory and miscellaneous diseases. The main diagnosis is selected from a list linked to the major classification, and up to three subsidiary diagnoses can be registered for each admission. The mode of operation is selected from a list of operations based on the relevant main or subsidiary diagnoses. Up to five operations can be registered for each diagnosis. The mode of operation is classified into types of interventions (e.g., direct surgery versus endovascular procedure, burr hole surgery, and craniotomy versus endoscopy). Clinical outcomes at discharge are measured by the modified Rankin Scale and/or Glasgow Outcome Scale (GOS; specifically for neurotrauma); in-hospital mortality, short-term functional outcome, length of hospital stay, and destination after discharge are registered. The data are fixed and summarized on a yearly basis (January 1 to December 31), and the chief neurosurgeons are responsible for the submission of patient clinical data within 3 months of discharge.

Annual case volume based on the major classification

The number of registered cases in 2019 in the overall cohort and neurosurgical subgroup was calculated based on the major classification of the main diagnosis as reported previously.1) The neurosurgical subgroup consisted of patients who had undergone at least one neurosurgical procedure related to the main diagnosis. Patient demographics (age and sex), length of hospital stay, and in-hospital mortality were examined based on the main diagnosis of the overall cohort and neurosurgical subgroup, respectively.

Annual neurosurgical, endovascular, and radiosurgical case volume based on the main diagnosis

In this study, the number of registered neurosurgical, endovascular, and radiosurgical procedures performed in 2018 and 2019 in the participating hospitals was calculated based on the corresponding main and/or subsidiary diagnoses.

Statistical analysis

We described the number and proportion of registered patients in the overall cohort and neurosurgical subgroup based on the major classification of the main diagnosis. Age and length of hospital stay were described using mean ± standard deviation, and median and 25th to 75th quartile. P values <0.05 were judged to indicate statistical significance. All statistical analyses were performed with JMP software (version pro 13; SAS Institute, Cary, NC, USA).

Results

The number of the participating hospitals in the JND increased from 1373 in 2018 to 1497 in 2019. The number of registered patients in the JND increased from 523283 (414.8/100000 people/year) to 571423 (451.9/100000 people/year) in the overall cohort and 177184 (140.1/100000 people/year) to 191595 (151.9/100000 people/year) in the neurosurgical subgroup from 2018 to 2019 (Fig. 1).

Fig. 1.

Fig. 1

The Japan Neurosurgical Database. Registered case volume in 2018 and 2019 based on the major classifications.

Patient demographics and clinical outcomes based on the major classification of the main diagnosis in the overall cohort in 2019

The proportion of major classification for the overall cohort in 2019 (Table 1) was quite similar to that reported in the first-year survey. Briefly, cerebrovascular diseases comprised 53.9% of all cases, followed by neurotrauma, brain tumor, functional neurosurgery, spinal and peripheral nerve disorders, encephalitis/infection/inflammatory and miscellaneous diseases, and hydrocephalus/developmental anomalies.

Table 1. Demographic data of the overall cohort in the JND in 2018 and 2019.

Major classification Calendar Year Case volume Age Men (%) In-hospital mortality (%) Length of hospital stay
no. % (mean ± SD) (median ± IQR)
Cerebrovascular diseases 2019 308010 53.9 70.8 (15.0) 53.5 6.3 16 (7–31)
2018 277885 53.1 70.5 (14.9) 53.7 6.5 16 (8–31)
Brain tumor 2019 56093 9.8 61.1 (18.1) 50.1 3.1 12 (3–25)
2018 54332 10.4 60.9 (18.0) 50.5 3 12 (3–25)
Neurotrauma 2019 105268 18.4 70.8 (21.2) 63.4 4.3 9 (4-18)
2018 99747 19.1 70.3 (21.2) 63.8 4.3 9 (4–18)
Hydrocephalus/Developmental anomalies 2019 16564 2.9 56.7 (31.2) 53.5 1.1 12 (4–21)
2018 14931 2.9 56.2 (31.0) 53 1.2 12 (5–23)
Spinal and peripheral nerve disorders 2019 31369 5.5 66.4 (16.6) 57.8 0.6 15 (9–24)
2018 26715 5.1 66.4 (16.6) 57.9 0.5 15 (9–25)
Functional neurosurgery 2019 36841 6.4 60.5 (21.2) 53.3 1 8 (3–15)
2018 33521 6.4 60.5 (21.2) 52.8 1.1 8 (4–16)
Encephalitis/Infection/Inflammatory/Miscellaneous diseases 2019 17278 3 64.8 (21.2) 50 3.8 8 (3–20)
2018 15363 2.9 64.9 (20.0) 49.6 3.8 8 (3–20)

JND: Japan Neurosurgical Database, SD: standard deviation, IQR: interquartile range.

Patient demographics, length of hospital stay, and in-hospital mortality remained approximately the same as those observed in the first-year survey.

Males comprised the largest proportion in neurotrauma (63.4%), followed by spinal and peripheral nerve disorders (57.8%). For the remaining classifications, the proportion of males ranged between 50 and 55%. In-hospital mortality was highest for cerebrovascular diseases (6.3%), followed by neurotrauma (4.3%). The median length of hospital stay was longest for those with cerebrovascular diseases (range 8–16 days, for all major classifications).

Patient demographics and clinical outcomes based on the major classification of the main diagnosis in the neurosurgical subgroup in 2019

The proportion of major classification for the neurosurgical subgroup in 2019 (Table 2) were quite similar to those reported in the first-year survey. Cerebrovascular diseases comprised 41.7% of all cases, followed by neurotrauma, brain tumor, spinal and peripheral nerve disorders, hydrocephalus/developmental anomalies, functional neurosurgery, and encephalitis/infection/inflammatory and miscellaneous diseases. As with the overall cohort, patient demographics, length of hospital stay, and in-hospital mortality remained approximately the same as those observed in the first-year survey.

Table 2. Demographic data of the neurosurgical subgroup in the JND in 2018 and 2019.

Major classification Calendar Year Case volume Age Men (%) In-hospital mortality (%) Length of hospital stay
no. % (mean ± SD) (median ± IQR)
Cerebrovascular diseases 2019 79924 41.7 67.7 (15.1) 50.6 5.8 19 (10–37)
2018 72607 41 67.1 (14.9) 50.5 6 20 (11–37)
Brain tumor 2019 23460 12.2 58.8 (18.2) 47.8 1.9 20 (14–36)
2018 22641 12.8 58.6 (18.2) 48.3 1.8 20 (14–36)
Neurotrauma 2019 46904 24.5 76.4 (14.2) 68.1 3.4 10 (8–19)
2018 45216 25.5 76.0 (14.3) 68.2 3.4 10 (8–19)
Hydrocephalus/Developmental anomalies 2019 9926 5.2 56.0 (30.6) 52.3 1.4 16 (11–29)
2018 9309 5.3 54.9 (30.7) 51.2 1.6 17 (12–30)
Spinal and peripheral nerve disorders 2019 21028 11 66.1 (15.4) 59.6 0.3 16 (11–25)
2018 17969 10.1 66.0 (15.4) 59.6 0.3 16 (11–26)
Functional neurosurgery 2019 7295 3.8 54.8 (19.8) 47 0.1 12 (10–19)
2018 6643 3.7 55.0 (19.7) 45.1 0.1 13 (10–19)
Encephalitis/Infection/ Inflammatory/Miscellaneous diseases 2019 3058 1.6 60.8 (20.4) 54.8 2.6 22 (11–44)
2018 2799 1.6 60.8 (19.8) 54.2 2.5 23 (12–44)

JND: Japan Neurosurgical Database, SD: standard deviation, IQR: interquartile range.

The proportion of males ranged from 47.0% in functional neurosurgery to 68.1% in neurotrauma. In-hospital mortality was the highest in cerebrovascular diseases (5.8%), followed by neurotrauma (3.4%), and the lowest in functional neurosurgery (0.1%). The median length of hospital stay was the longest for those with encephalitis/infection/inflammatory and miscellaneous diseases (range, 10–22 days for all major classifications).

Proportion of major classification of the overall cohort by age in 2019

When patients in the overall cohort were divided based on decades (age), patients aged 70–79 years comprised the largest proportion (28.7%), followed by those aged 80–89 years (23.2%) and 60–69 years (17.7%) (Fig. 1). Regarding the proportion of major classification of patients in each decade of the overall cohort, similar findings were observed in 2019 compared to those observed in 2018. Briefly, cerebrovascular diseases comprised more than 50% of patients of each decade aged ≥40 years, and neurotrauma classification showed bimodal peaks greater than 25% in patients of each decade aged 0–19 years and 80–100 years. The proportion of brain tumor was more than 10% in those of each decade aged between 0 and 69 years with a peak (19.7%) at 30–39 years. The proportion of hydrocephalus/developmental anomalies was 34.4% in patients aged 0–9 years and markedly decreased in patients aged >10 years. Functional neurosurgery peaked in patients who were aged 20–29 years (24.3%), followed by those aged 10–19 years and 30–39 years; spinal and peripheral nerve disorders remained approximately constant (4.1–7.6%) in those aged 10–89 years with a peak (7.6%) at 30–39 years.

Proportion of major classification of the neurosurgical subgroup by age group in 2019

In total, 191581 neurosurgical procedures were performed in 2019. When patients in the neurosurgical subgroup were divided into decades, patients aged 70–79 years comprised the largest proportion (30.4%), followed by those aged 80–89 years (20.9%) and 60–69 years (18.8%) (Fig. 2). Regarding the proportion of major classification of patients in each decade of the neurosurgical subgroup, similar findings were observed in 2019 as those observed in 2018. Compared to the overall cohort, a higher proportion of neurotrauma and a lower proportion of cerebrovascular diseases were observed in elderly patients (aged >80 years) in the neurosurgical subgroup. A higher proportion of spinal and peripheral nerve disorders and a lower proportion of functional neurosurgery across a broad range of age were also observed in 2019.

Fig. 2.

Fig. 2

The purpose of admission of the registered patients in 2018 and 2019. CVD: cerebrovascular diseases.

Basic clinical information and patient management in 2018 and 2019

Basic clinical information of the registered patients of the overall cohort in 2018 and 2019 is shown in Table 3. In 2018, alert and Japan Coma Scale 1-, 2-, and 3-digit patients comprised 50.5%, 34.2%, 8.4%, and 6.7%, respectively, of all cases. The proportion of patients within the overall cohort in 2018 and 2019, measured using GCS, is also shown. Regarding the route of admission, direct admission from the patients’ home comprised 83.1% of all cases, followed by transfer from another hospital or clinic. Emergency admission and transportation by ambulance were noted in 68.4% and 44.6% of all cases, respectively, in 2018. Home was the most common destination of discharge, followed by transfer to another hospital. Short-term functional outcomes measured by the modified Rankin Scale have also been included (Table 3). Similar results were obtained in the overall cohort in 2019.

Table 3. Basic clinical information of the overall cohort in the JND in 2018 and 2019.

Overall cohort Case no. % Case no. %
JCS on admission 2018 2019
0. normal 264213 50.5 289406 50.6
1. Almost fully conscious 79518 15.2 86286 15.1
2. Unable to recognize time, place, and person 48201 9.2 53477 9.4
3. Unable to recall name or date of birth 51604 9.9 57137 10.0
10. Can be aroused easily by being spoken to 27713 5.3 30094 5.3
20. Can be aroused with a loud voice or shaking of shoulders 8543 1.6 8797 1.5
30. Can be aroused only by repeated mechanical stimuli 7494 1.4 7871 1.4
100. Responds with movements to avoid the stimulus 11316 2.2 12024 2.1
200. Responds with slight movements, including decerebrate and decorticate posture 13918 2.7 14329 2.5
300. Does not respond at all except for changes in respiratory rhythm 9842 1.9 10173 1.8
900. Unknown 921 0.2 1829 0.3
GCS (summed score; for the neurotrauma cases only) 2018 2019
3 1480 2.1 1612 2.0
4 859 1.2 1026 1.3
5 481 0.7 541 0.7
6 1347 1.9 1427 1.8
7 1058 1.5 1104 1.4
8 906 1.3 941 1.2
9 1063 1.5 1142 1.4
10 1416 2.0 1555 1.9
11 1697 2.4 1801 2.2
12 2209 3.1 2453 3.0
13 4887 7.0 5240 6.5
14 16775 23.9 19367 24.0
15 34052 48.5 40588 50.2
Eye opening (E) 2018 2019
4. Open spontaneously 54004 76.9 63520 78.6
3. Open to verbal command 7825 11.1 8388 10.4
2. Open to pain 1524 2.2 1602 2.0
1. No eye opening 5193 7.4 5699 7.1
Verbal response (V) 2018 2019
5. Oriented 36544 52.0 43223 53.5
4. Confused 19256 27.4 22106 27.4
3. Inappropriate words 3752 5.3 4066 5.0
2. Incomprehensive sounds 2349 3.3 2515 3.1
1. No verbal response/1: Intubated (T) 6642 9.5 7206 8.9
Verbal response (V) 2018 2019
6. Obeys commands 56475 80.4 65983 81.6
5. Localising pain 5881 8.4 6343 7.8
4. Withdrawal from pain 2843 4.0 3031 3.8
3. Flexion to pain 664 0.9 766 0.9
2. Extension to pain 972 1.4 1125 1.4
1. No motor response 1743 2.5 1919 2.4
Route of admission 2018 2019
1. In-hospital referral from other department 13531 2.6 14667 2.6
2. Direct admission from patient home 434591 83.1 476736 83.4
3. Transfer from other hospital or clinic 46440 8.9 49159 8.6
4. Transfer from nursing home, welfare facility 24263 4.6 26968 4.7
5. In-hospital birth 195 0.0 216 0.0
6. Others 4263 0.8 3677 0.6
Scheduled/emergent admission 2018 2019
Scheduled 165390 31.6 183822 32.2
Emergent admission 357893 68.4 387601 67.8
Ambulance use 2018 2019
No 290089 55.4 318180 55.7
Yes 233194 44.6 253243 44.3
Destination of discharge 2018 2019
1. In-hospital other department 20319 3.9 22919 4.0
2. Home 333169 63.7 361711 63.3
3. Transfer to other hospital 115249 22.0 126943 22.2
4. Geriatric health services facility 14836 2.8 16484 2.9
5. Nursing home other than hospitals 13482 2.6 15547 2.7
6. In-hospital death 25162 4.8 26878 4.7
7. Others 1066 0.2 941 0.2
mRS at discharge 2018 2019
0. No symptoms 144947 27.7 154379 27.0
1. No significant disability. Able to carry out all usual activities, despite some symptoms 116821 22.3 128810 22.5
2. Slight disability. Able to look after own affairs without assistance, but unable to carry out all previous activities 77996 14.9 83815 14.7
3. Moderate disability. Requires some help, but able to walk unassisted. 59199 11.3 65860 11.5
4. Moderately severe disability. Unable to attend to own bodily needs without assistance and unable to walk unassisted 62737 12.0 71028 12.4
5. Severe disability. Requires constant nursing care and attention, bedridden, incontinent 36245 6.9 40466 7.1
6. Dead 25338 4.8 27065 4.7
GOS at discharge 2018 2019
1. Dead 3492 5.5 3897 5.2
2. Vegetative state 1194 1.9 1404 1.9
3. Severely disabled 13757 21.7 16672 22.5
4. Moderately disabled 7839 12.4 9975 13.4
5. Good recovery 35025 55.3 40264 54.2

JND: Japan Neurosurgical Database, GCS: Glasgow Outcome Scale, mRS: modified Rankin Scale.

The purpose of admission, diagnostic modalities/examination, and medical management are reported in Table 4. Computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging were the most common diagnostic modalities, followed by catheter angiography and higher cognitive function tests. Medial management and diagnosis/investigation were the most common purposes of admission, followed by rehabilitation. Approximately one-third of the patients underwent operation for each admission. Adjuvant therapies such as radiotherapy and chemotherapy comprised less than 4% and 2% of all cases, respectively. Details of medical management based on the types of drugs and route of administration of chemotherapy have also been included (Table 4). Neurointensive treatment under monitoring was performed in approximately 6% of cases. The use of stereotactic radiotherapy, other radiotherapy, and other adjuvant therapy for brain tumors are reported in Table 4. Basic clinical information based on the major classifications is shown in Figs. 25.

Table 4. Purpose of admission, in-hospital diagnostic modalities, medical management, short-time clinical outcomes, and adjuvant therapies of the overall cohort in the JND in 2018 and 2019.

Case no. % Case no. %
Overall cohort 523283 571423
Purpose of admission 2018 2019
Diagnosis/Investigation 292239 55.8 356963 62.5
Education admission 1406 0.3 1165 0.2
Medical management 296842 56.7 341341 59.7
Operation 177184 33.9 191595 33.5
Chemotherapy 6851 1.3 7313 1.3
Radiotherapy 19302 3.7 19190 3.4
Rehabilitation 207005 39.6 260957 45.7
Terminal care 4899 0.9 5854 1.0
Other adjunctive therapy for brain tumor 176 0.0 151 0.0
Diagnostic modalities/examination 2018 2019
CT 219655 42.0 269530 47.2
MRI 190739 36.5 235538 41.2
EEG 12750 2.4 15697 2.7
Nuclear medicine (SPECT, PET) 11964 2.3 13759 2.4
Higher cognitive function test 37051 7.1 52612 9.2
Myelography 2626 0.5 3041 0.5
Catheter angiography and interpretation 57085 10.9 66026 11.6
Others 29953 5.7 44312 7.8
Medical management 2018 2019
Antiplatelet therapy 93881 17.9 111537 19.5
Anticoagulation therapy 48795 9.3 58994 10.3
Brain protective therapy (edaravone) 74327 14.2 84620 14.8
Anti-edema therapy (glycerol, mannitol) 41191 7.9 45288 7.9
Medical management of seizure and epilepsy 45402 8.7 52275 9.1
Medical management of headache 28972 5.5 36171 6.3
Neurointensive treatment under monitoring 31916 6.1 36858 6.5
Medical management of infection 16038 3.1 20414 3.6
Others 104560 20.0 133425 23.3
Chemotherapy 2018 2019
Oral 3295 0.6 3617 0.6
Intravenous 4509 0.9 4832 0.8
Intrathecal 119 0.0 129 0.0
Intracerebral 188 0.0 208 0.0
Intra-arterial 14 0.0 11 0.0
Others 30 0.0 31 0.0
SRS 2018 2019
Total 15759 3.0 15570 2.7
Cerebrovascular diseases 553 587
Brain tumor 14870 14614
Neurotrauma 4 6
Hydrocephalus/Developmental anomalies 10 7
Spinal and peripheral nerve disorders 70 74
Functional neurosurgery 242 273
Encephalitis/Infection/Inflammatory/Miscellaneous diseases 10 9
Radiotherapy other than SRS 2018 2019
Local 4412 0.8 4505 0.8
Whole brain 1416 0.3 1433 0.3
Whole spinal 67 0.0 102 0.0
Others (proton, heavy particle radiotherapy) 54 0.0 42 0.0
Other adjuvant therapy for brain tumors 2018 2019
Immunotherapy 56 0.0 30 0.0
Optune 19 0.0 17 0.0

JND: Japan Neurosurgical Database, SRS: stereotactic radiosurgery, CT: computed tomography, MRI: magnetic resonance imaging, EEG: electroencephalogram, SPECT: single photon emission computed tomograph, PET: positron emission tomography.

Fig. 5.

Fig. 5

Details of patient management in 2018 and 2019. CVD: cerebrovascular diseases, DA: developmental anomalies, PNDs: peripheral nerve disorders, NS: neurosurgery.

Annual case volume of direct surgery, endovascular treatment, and other treatment based on the main diagnosis

The annual number of all admitted patients in the overall cohort and direct surgery and endovascular treatment based on the main diagnosis are reported for the seven major diagnoses. The proportion of specific direct surgery and endovascular treatment for each main diagnosis is shown in Tables 511. In 2018 and 2019, endovascular treatment comprised 19.1% and 20.3% of all neurosurgical procedures.

Table 5. Case volume of DS and EVT for cerebrovascular diseases in the JND in 2018 and 2019.

Modality Mode of operations 2018 2019
Case no. % (in all admission) % (in DS/EVT case) Case no. % (in all admission) % (in DS/EVT case)
2001. Cerebral aneurysm 52292 56466
DS Neck clipping 15426 29.5 48.3 15305 27.1 45.9
For ruptured 7819 7551
DS Coating 388 0.7 1.2 362 0.6 1.1
For ruptured 116 132
DS Parent artery proximal occlusion (parent artery clipping) 228 0.4 0.7 238 0.4 0.7
For ruptured 111 113
DS Trapping 325 0.6 1.0 278 0.5 0.8
For ruptured 228 182
DS Bypass (combined) 378 0.7 1.2 362 0.6 1.1
For ruptured 186 158
DS Others 1028 2.0 3.2 1013 1.8 3.0
For ruptured 922 917
EVT Coil embolization (w/o stent) 9794 18.7 30.7 10671 18.9 32.0
For ruptured 5210 5653
EVT Coil embolization (with stent) 3496 6.7 11.0 4166 7.4 12.5
For ruptured 724 820
EVT Flow diverter 423 0.8 1.3 543 1.0 1.6
For ruptured 4 14
EVT Others 283 0.5 0.9 308 0.5 0.9
For ruptured 205 227
EVT Endovascular therapy for cerebral vasospasm (ruptured cases only) 1178 2.3 3.7 1278 2.3 3.8
2012. Ischemic stroke/transient ischemic attack 127361 144999
Intravenous t-PA infusion 6832 5.4 43.9 8830 6.1 44.3
EVT Acute reperfusion therapy 9740 7.6 62.5 12493 8.6 62.7
DS Decompression craniectomy 1304 1.0 8.4 1456 1.0 7.3
Others 769 0.6 4.9 748 0.5 3.8
2005. Carotid stenosis (cervical) 20171 22013
DS Endarterectomy 3766 18.7 30.4 4053 18.4 29.7
DS STA–MCA bypass 314 1.6 2.5 373 1.7 2.7
DS Other bypass surgery 25 0.1 0.2 24 0.1 0.2
EVT Carotid stenting 7595 37.7 61.4 8471 38.5 62.2
EVT Percutaneous angioplasty (w/o stenting) 585 2.9 4.7 679 3.1 5.0
EVT Percutaneous angioplasty (w/o stenting) 129 0.6 1.0 101 0.5 0.7
2009. Hypertensive intracerebral hemorrhage 51251 56132
DS Removal of hematoma 7312 14.3 77.9 7900 14.1 78.7
DS Ventricular drainage 1967 3.8 20.9 2140 3.8 21.3
Others 495 1.0 5.3 512 0.9 5.1
2007. Intracranial arterial occlusive disease (excluding moyamoya disease) 5368 6029
DS STA–MCA bypass 1165 21.7 53.4 1345 22.3 54.1
DS OA–PICA bypass 8 0.1 0.4 8 0.1 0.3
DS Other revascularization 32 0.6 1.5 32 0.5 1.3
EVT Percutaneous angioplasty (with stent) 343 6.4 15.7 436 7.2 17.5
EVT Percutaneous angioplasty (w/o stent) 491 9.1 22.5 567 9.4 22.8
EVT Others 92 1.7 4.2 75 1.2 3.0
2003. Dural arteriovenous fistula 4184 4735
DS Shunt obliteration 258 6.2 12.3 273 5.8 12.2
EVT Endovascular embolization 1752 41.9 83.2 1914 40.4 85.4
DS Removal of hematoma 56 1.3 2.7 51 1.1 2.3
Others 57 1.4 2.7 42 0.9 1.9
2002. Cerebral arteriovenous malformation 3647 4080
DS Removal 842 23.1 44.1 909 22.3 43.3
EVT Endovascular embolization 772 21.2 40.4 890 21.8 42.4
DS Removal of hematoma 297 8.1 15.5 305 7.5 14.5
Others 132 3.6 6.9 136 3.3 6.5
2008. Moyamoya disease 4274 4837
DS Direct bypass 1301 30.4 70.1 1378 28.5 69.0
DS Indirect bypass 974 22.8 52.5 1023 21.1 51.2
DS Removal of hematoma 138 3.2 7.4 151 3.1 7.6
DS Ventricular drainage 133 3.1 7.2 135 2.8 6.8
Others 73 1.7 3.9 67 1.4 3.4
2010. Nonhypertensive intracerebral hemorrhage (excluding moyamoya disease and vascular malformation) 6797 7012
DS Removal of hematoma 1198 17.6 76.3 1250 17.8 81.3
DS Ventricular drainage 219 3.2 13.9 185 2.6 12.0
Others 148 2.2 9.4 124 1.8 8.1
2014. Skull defect (after external decompression) 1149 1419
DS Cranioplasty 1125 97.9 97.8 1398 98.5 98.3
2006. Extracranial arterial occlusive disease (excluding cervical carotid stenosis) 2084 2177
DS Endarterecotomy 37 1.8 2.0 41 1.9 4.0
DS STA–MCA bypass 257 12.3 13.8 303 13.9 29.7
DS OA–PICA bypass 1 0.0 0.1 1 0.0 0.1
DS Other revascularization 42 2.0 2.3 46 2.1 4.5
EVT Percutaneous angioplasty (with stent) 489 23.5 26.3 487 22.4 47.7
EVT Percutaneous angioplasty (w/o stent) 152 7.3 8.2 153 7.0 15.0
EVT Others 20 1.0 1.1 26 1.2 2.5
2011. Cerebral arterial dissection 3722 4152
DS Coating 5 0.1 0.7 4 0.1 0.5
DS Proximal artery clipping 38 1.0 5.3 23 0.6 3.1
DS Trapping 47 1.3 6.6 75 1.8 10.1
DS Bypass (combined) 28 0.8 3.9 44 1.1 5.9
DS Others 49 1.3 6.9 64 1.5 8.6
EVT Coil embolization (with stent) 327 8.8 46.0 347 8.4 46.7
EVT Coil embolization (w/o stent) 166 4.5 23.3 145 3.5 19.5
EVT Others 77 2.1 10.8 100 2.4 13.5
2004. Cavernous malformation 1291 1427
DS Removal 270 20.9 92.2 296 20.7 94.0
Others 15 1.2 5.1 18 1.3 5.7
2013. Cerebral venous thrombosis 519 559
EVT Endovascular surgery 53 10.2 54.6 46 8.2 48.4
DS Decompression craniectomy 20 3.9 20.6 28 5.0 29.5
Others 21 4.0 21.6 17 3.0 17.9
2090. Other cerebrovascular diseases 743 658

DS: direct surgery, EVT: endovascular treatment, JND: Japan Neurosurgical Database, w/o: without.

Table 11. Case volume of DS for encephalopathy/infection/inflammatory/miscellaneous diseases in the JND in 2018 and 2019.

Modality Mode of operations 2018 2019
Case no. % (in all admission) % (in DS case) Case no. % (in all admission) % (in DS case)
7901. Others 11713 13897
Others (e.g., tracheostomy) 1430 12.2 84.5 2059 14.8 88.4
7304. Bacterial infection – other bacterial infection 1759 1809
Removal 209 11.9 26.2 227 12.5 25.3
Drainage 75 4.3 9.4 92 5.1 10.2
Others 495 28.1 62.1 571 31.6 63.5
7302. Bacterial infection – cerebral abscess 822 890
Removal 241 29.3 31.3 311 34.9 35.8
Drainage 423 51.5 54.9 447 50.2 51.4
Others 97 11.8 12.6 104 11.7 12.0
7303. Bacterial infection – subdural empyema 493 514
Removal 173 35.1 34.6 210 40.9 39.0
Drainage 214 43.4 42.8 213 41.4 39.6
Others 104 21.1 20.8 111 21.6 20.6
7601. Other infectious diseases 884 1081
Biopsy 8 0.9 2.5 15 1.4 4.1
Others 281 31.8 89.5 317 29.3 87.3
7301. Bacterial infection – meningitis 626 677
Removal 9 1.4 4.4 11 1.6 5.8
Drainage 24 3.8 11.8 44 6.5 23.2
Others 162 25.9 79.4 131 19.4 68.9
7703. Inflammatory diseases – angiitis 100 125
Biopsy 72 72.0 96.0 100 80.0 98.0
Others 2 2.0 2.7 2 1.6 2.0
7705. Inflammatory diseases – other inflammatory diseases 400 406
Biopsy 66 16.5 64.7 67 16.5 67.0
Others 29 7.3 28.4 31 7.6 31.0
7701. Inflammatory diseases – degenerative diseases 202 220
Biopsy 35 17.3 83.3 27 12.3 84.4
Others 6 3.0 14.3 4 1.8 12.5
7202. Viral infection – encephalitis 248 254
Biopsy 7 2.8 50.0 11 4.3 68.8
Others 7 2.8 50.0 4 1.6 25.0
7702. Inflammatory diseases – collagen diseases 50 34
Biopsy 13 26.0 81.3 13 38.2 92.9
Others 0 0.0 0.0 1 2.9 7.1
7201. Viral infection – meningitis 667 815
Biopsy 2 0.3 18.2 2 0.2 18.2
Others 9 1.3 81.8 9 1.1 81.8
7704. Inflammatory diseases – sarcoidosis 21 17
Biopsy 4 19.0 50.0 10 58.8 100.0
Others 3 14.3 37.5 0 0.0 0.0
7204. Viral infection – other virus infection 236 246
Biopsy 4 66.7 3 1.2 33.3
Others 2 33.3 6 2.4 66.7
7501. Neurosyphilis 5 6
Biopsy 0 0.0 0.0 0 0.0 0.0
Others 1 20.0 100.0 2 33.3 100.0
7401. Tuberculosis 21 16
Biopsy 3 14.3 33.3 1 6.3 50.0
Others 6 28.6 66.7 1 6.3 50.0
7203. Viral infection – slow virus infection 13 9
Biopsy 2 100.0 0 0.0
Others 0 0.0 2 100.0

DS: direct surgery, JND: Japan Neurosurgical Database.

1) Cerebrovascular diseases

In the overall cohort, the most common main diagnoses, defined as those comprising more than 10%, were ischemic stroke/transient ischemic attack, cerebral aneurysm, and hypertensive intracerebral hemorrhage (45.8%, 18.8%, and 18.4%, respectively, in 2018).

In the neurosurgical subgroup, the total case volume of cerebrovascular diseases increased by 10.5% between 2018 and 2019, and the most common main diagnoses were cerebral aneurysm, ischemic stroke/transient ischemic attack, carotid stenosis, and hypertensive intracerebral hemorrhage (38.5%, 18.8%, 14.9%, and 11.3%, respectively, in 2018). Similar results were obtained in 2019. For cerebrovascular diseases, endovascular treatment was performed in 45.8% and 48% of all procedures in 2018 and 2019, respectively.

Regarding specific treatment (≥10 cases in 2018), there was a marked increase (≥20%) from 2018 to 2019 in the use of flow diverters for cerebral aneurysm, intravenous t-PA infusion and endovascular acute reperfusion therapy for ischemic stroke/transient ischemic attack, percutaneous angioplasty with stent for intracranial occlusive disease (other than moyamoya disease), cranioplasty for skull defect after external decompression, and trapping and combined bypass for cerebral arterial dissection. Contrastingly, percutaneous angioplasty without stenting and proximal artery clipping for cerebral artery dissection decreased by more than 20%.

2) Brain tumors

In the overall cohort, the most common main diagnoses were metastatic brain tumor, meningioma, and glioblastoma (31.2%, 18.7%, and 12.5%, respectively, in 2018).

In the neurosurgical subgroup, the total case volume of brain tumor increased by 3.6% between 2018 and 2019, and the most common main diagnoses were meningioma, metastatic brain tumor, pituitary adenoma, and glioblastoma (29.0%, 14.1%, 12.3%, and 10.8%, respectively, in 2018). Similar results were obtained in 2019. For brain tumors, endovascular treatment was performed in 5.9% and 6.2% of all procedures in 2018 and 2019, respectively. Regarding specific treatment (≥10 cases in 2018), there was a marked increase (≥20%) from 2018 to 2019 in extensive skull base tumor resection with reconstruction and decompressive craniectomy for meningioma, removal and extensive skull base tumor resection with reconstruction of pituitary adenoma, extensive skull base tumor resection with reconstruction for other brain tumors, embolization of hemangioblastoma, removal of cystic lesion (other than dermoid, epidermoid, and arachnoid cyst), transnasal surgery and other treatment such as Ommaya reservoir placement for germ cell tumor and pineal tumor, removal and extensive skull base tumor resection with reconstruction of chordoma and chondrosarcoma, and cranioplasty for skull defect after external decompression. Contrastingly, biopsy of pituitary adenoma, schwannoma, craniopharyngioma, and intraorbital tumor; other treatments such as Ommaya reservoir placement for astrocytoma, oligodendroglioma, and cystic lesion (other than dermoid, epidermoid, and arachnoid cyst); tumor embolization for glioblastoma and other neuroepithelial tumor; and extensive skull base tumor resection with reconstruction for craniopharyngioma and dermoid and epidermoid decreased by more than 20%.

3) Neurotrauma

In the overall cohort, the most common main diagnoses were traumatic intracranial hemorrhagic group and chronic subdural hematoma (CSDH; 39.6% and 38.4%, respectively, in 2018).

In the neurosurgical subgroup, the total case volume of neurotrauma increased by 3.7% between 2018 and 2019, and the most common main diagnoses were CSDH and traumatic intracranial hemorrhaging (80% and 14.6%, respectively, in 2018). Similar results were obtained in 2019. Regarding neurotrauma, endovascular treatment was performed in 0.1% and 0.2% of all procedures in 2018 and 2019, respectively. Regarding specific treatment (≥10 cases in 2018), there was a marked increase (≥20%) from 2018 to 2019 in other treatments for CSDH (excluding burr hole and irrigation and removal of hematoma), endovascular treatment for traumatic cerebrovascular diseases, and optic nerve decompression for optic canal fracture.

4) Hydrocephalus and developmental anomalies

In the overall cohort, the most common main diagnoses were acquired hydrocephalus and idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus (47.0% and 35.1%, respectively, in 2018).

In the neurosurgical subgroup, the total case volume of hydrocephalus and developmental anomalies increased by 7.3% between 2018 and 2019, and the most common main diagnoses were acquired hydrocephalus and idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus (61.4% and 24.1%, respectively, in 2018). Similar results were obtained in 2019. Regarding specific treatment (≥10 cases in 2018), there was marked increase (≥20%) from 2018 to 2019 in ventriculoatrial shunt, shunt revision, third ventriculostomy, and other treatments for idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus, other treatments (e.g., removal of devices) for craniosynostosis, other treatments for other spinal cord/spinal anomaly and other cranial/cerebral anomaly, and other treatments for encephalocele. Contrastingly, the number of cases of lumboperitoneal shunt, ventriculoatrial shunt, ventricular drainage for congenital hydrocephalus, and foramen magnum decompression for Chiari malformation (Type II) decreased by more than 20% from 2018 to 2019.

5) Spinal and peripheral nerve disorders

In the overall cohort, the most common main diagnoses were spinal degenerative disorders and vertebral compression fracture caused by spinal trauma (56.3% and 11.8%, respectively, in 2018).

In the neurosurgical subgroup, the total case volume of spinal and peripheral nerve disorders increased by 16.7% from 2018 and 2019, and the most common main diagnoses were spinal degenerative disorders (67.1% of all cases in 2018). Similar results were obtained in 2019. Regarding spinal and peripheral nerve disorders, endovascular treatment was performed in 0.7% and 0.8% in 2018 and 2019, respectively. Regarding specific treatment (≥10 cases in 2018), there was a marked increase (≥20%) from 2018 to 2019 in posterior decompression and other treatments for spinal degenerative disorders; fixation and percutaneous vertebroplasty for vertebral compression fracture by spinal trauma; fixation for other spinal trauma; partial removal, biopsy, and other treatments for spinal intramedullary tumor; other treatment for spinal trauma without bone injury; total/subtotal and partial removal for spinal extramedullary tumor with extradural and paraspinal extension; endovascular obliteration of dural arteriovenous fistula and extradural arteriovenous fistula; removal and other treatments for spinal extradural hematoma; fixation and other treatments for spinal infection with abscess formation; foramen magnum decompression and other treatments for syringomyelia with tonsillar descent; and release surgery for brachial plexus injury. Contrastingly, anterior decompression, other treatments for carpal tunnel syndrome, posterior fixation for other spinal and peripheral nerve disorders, partial removal and other treatment for spinal extramedullary tumors (intradural confined), anterior decompression and percutaneous vertebroplasty for other spinal trauma, anterior decompression for spinal trauma with dislocation fracture, anterior decompression for spinal infection with abscess formation, other treatments for carpal tunnel syndrome, and total/subtotal removal of primary vertebral tumor decreased by more than 20%.

6) Functional neurosurgery

In the overall cohort, the most common main diagnoses were epilepsy (70% of all cases in 2018).

In the neurosurgical subgroup, the total case volume of functional neurosurgery increased by 8% between 2018 and 2019, and the most common main diagnoses were hemifacial spasm, Parkinson’s disease, trigeminal neuralgia, and epilepsy. Similar results were obtained in 2019. Regarding specific treatment (≥10 cases in 2018), there was a marked increase (≥20%) from 2018 to 2019 in other treatments for hemifacial spasm; implantation of intracranial electrodes; temporal lobectomy, focal resection for neocortical epilepsy, multilobar resection (functional or anatomical), and other treatments for epilepsy; stereotactic neurosurgery (ablation) for dystonia; stereotactic neurosurgery (deep brain stimulation, ablation, and focused ultrasound), implantation of other stimulation systems, and other functional surgeries for essential tremor; implantation of spinal cord stimulation system for other functional disorders; and other treatments for other functional neurosurgery. Contrastingly, other stereotactic neurosurgeries and implantation of other stimulation systems for Parkinson’s disease, and multiple hippocampal transection for epilepsy decreased by more than 20%.

7) Encephalopathy/infection/inflammatory/miscellaneous diseases

In the overall cohort, the most common main diagnoses were miscellaneous diseases (registered as others) (61.2% of all cases in 2018).

In the neurosurgical subgroup, the total case volume of functional neurosurgery increased by 20.2% between 2018 and 2019, and the most common main diagnoses were miscellaneous diseases (registered as others) and bacterial infection (other bacterial infection) (37.0%, 17.4%, 16.9%, and 10.9%, respectively, in 2018). Similar results were obtained in 2019. Regarding specific treatment (≥10 cases in 2018), there was a marked increase (≥20%) from 2018 to 2019 in treatments (e.g., tracheostomy) for other diseases, drainage for bacterial cerebral abscess, removal of subdural empyema, and biopsy for inflammatory diseases (angiitis). Contrastingly, the number of cases of biopsy for inflammatory degenerative diseases decreased by more than 20%.

Discussion

The JND has succeeded in creating a comprehensive database with 1,093,917 cases admitted to more than 1300 training institutions of the JNS between January 2018 and December 2019. The number of participating hospitals in this project increased by approximately 7.0%, with a corresponding increase in the registered patients (9.2% in the overall cohort). Overall, the demographics and clinical outcomes of the registered patients remained almost unchanged between 2018 and 2019. This JND Statistical Update 2018–2019 provides us with the largest-ever, clinical epidemiology statistics of real-world neurosurgical practices in Japan.

Basic clinical information and patient management in 2018 and 2019

Data on the purposes of admission to neurosurgical departments demonstrated that neurosurgeons in Japan are involved in not only operations but a wide range of clinical practices such as diagnosis, medical management, and rehabilitation.1) Regarding medical treatment in neurosurgical admission, antiplatelet and anticoagulation treatment and neuroprotective therapy (e.g., edaravone4)) are performed mainly for cerebrovascular diseases, whereas other medical treatments such as anti-edema therapy and seizure and epilepsy control are used for a wider range of the major classifications. Although individual drug names are not included in this database, such information may be useful for designing clinical research and market research for new drug development. Notably, neurointensive treatment under monitoring (6.5% of all cases in 2019) is performed mainly for cerebrovascular diseases and neurotrauma. Various studies involving 40,000 patients have suggested that outcomes are improved when patients who have neurocritical conditions (e.g., stroke and traumatic brain injury) are cared for in specialized neurointensive care units, especially with the involvement of neurointensivists.5) A previous study using data from the Japan Neurotrauma Data Bank showed that the management and monitoring of intracranial pressure are both important for the management and care of severe brain injury.6) Further studies are required to investigate the effect of neurocritical care and quality assessment on patient outcomes, especially after stroke and neurotrauma.

Neurosurgical emergencies are an important cause of disability and mortality. In the JND, direct admission from home comprised the largest proportion regarding the route of admission, and a high proportion of emergency admission and ambulance use suggest the significant involvement of acute care in neurosurgery, as seen in other countries.7) A previous study from the US showed that acute cerebrovascular diseases, intracranial injury, spinal cord injury, and occlusion/stenosis of precerebral arteries requiring emergency neurosurgery carry an important nationwide burden in terms of complications, deaths, charges, and length of stay.8) Further studies are necessary to examine the national burden of neurosurgical conditions requiring neurosurgical procedures in Japan.

The JND as an infrastructure of multicenter clinical research

With the ongoing transition from a fee-for-service to a quality-based healthcare system, the use of “big data” in neurosurgical clinical research has become increasingly popular.916) One method of capturing outcomes has been through the use of administrative databases. A previous study in 2018 from the US showed that a total of 324 articles were identified since 2000 with an exponential increase since 2011.17) In the US, the National Inpatient Sample was the most commonly used database with an average study size of 114841 subjects.17) When categorizing study objectives, “outcomes” was the most common one.17) Between quality-based reimbursement policies and outcomes reporting on a national scale in the US, it appears that the efforts of clinical researchers are directed at using this nationwide data for population-level analysis worldwide.

In Japan, the Diagnosis Procedure Combination (DPC), a mixed-case patient classification system, was launched in 2002 by the Japanese Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare and is linked with a hospital financing system.14) By 2015, the DPC system had been adopted by an estimated 1580 acute care hospitals, representing approximately half of all Japanese hospital beds and encompassing a wide variety of centers, including rural and urban, academic and nonacademic, and small and large hospitals. Since 2014, several study groups in collaboration with the JNS and other relevant societies have published papers on various aspects of real-world neurosurgical and stroke practices.911,13,15,16,18)

Unlike such administrative databases, the JND data are unique in that this database was created by the database committee of the JNS for specific purposes as reported previously.1) Although no central review of the registered data has been conducted, the registered data are validated by neurosurgeons. Overall, the patient demographics and short-term clinical outcomes based on the major classifications remained unchanged in 2018 and 2019. Considering the high proportion of participating hospitals in the JND among the training institutions of the JNS, these findings suggest that the JND data may be useful to calculate the crude incidence of neurosurgical diseases and procedures in Japan. Some of the emerging trends in this paper, however, such as the increased use of intravenous recombinant tissue plasminogen activator administration and mechanical thrombectomy for acute ischemic stroke are consistent with previous reports in response to the movement toward nationwide implementation of primary stroke centers in Japan.11,19) Notably, we found that in the modern endovascular era, endovascular treatment comprised approximately half of all neurosurgical procedures in Japan.20) The increased use of flow diverters for cerebral aneurysms is also compatible with recent reports worldwide.21)

Due to the limited data sources of the current form of the JND, the granularity and specificity of the data related to neurosurgical procedures and practices are limited. Therefore, the types of clinical research that could be performed are limited to practice patterns, utilization, and broad assessments of safety or outcomes for a class of procedures.22,23) For example, the higher proportion of neurotrauma in the neurosurgical subgroup observed among patients aged 80–89 years is consistent with the result of a previous nationwide study on CSDH in Japan using the DPC database.16) In this paper, the authors estimated that the annual incidence of newly diagnosed CSDH is approximately 24000 cases/year and enrolled 63000 CSDH for a 3-year (2010–2013) study period. However, the JND database showed that burr hole irrigation for CSDH was performed in approximately 40000 cases in Japan. Even though the recurrence rate is estimated to be approximately 13%,16) the actual incidence of newly diagnosed CSDH in Japan might be higher than that reported previously. This may be partly because aging of the Japanese population has accelerated in the last 10 years. Thus, the JND data are useful to examine clinical epidemiology of neurosurgical diseases and discuss selection bias in future studies in Japan.

The JND was originally designed to have a multi-layered database, and the statistics of the first-layer database, covering all fields of subspecialties, is described in this paper.1) Relevant societies of the subspecialties of the JNS published the paper using clinical registries such as the Japanese Registry of Neuroendovascular Therapy,19,20,24) the Brain Tumor Registry of Japan,25,26) the Japan Neurotrauma Data Bank,6,27) and registries of pediatric neurosurgery,28,29) functional neurosurgery,30,31) unruptured aneurysms and cerebrovascular surgery,32,33) moyamoya diseases,3436) and stereotactic radiosurgery.

The Launching Effectiveness Research to Guide Practice in Neurosurgery Workshop was held in 2015 by the National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke.37) The workshop concluded that in the future, advances in information technology such as electronic health records could lead to creation of a massive database where clinical data from all neurosurgeons are integrated and analyzed, ending the separation of clinical research and practice and leading to a new “science of principle.”37,38) Recently, a novel method of measuring the quality of stroke care was developed (the Close The Gap-Stroke) by combining health insurance claim data with data from electronic health records.13) Further efforts are necessary to promote clinical research using the JND, in collaboration with relevant stakeholders and experts all over Japan.

Neurosurgical registries for advancing quality and device surveillance

The improvement of quality and outcomes of neurosurgery depends primarily on persuading neurosurgeons to change their practice for the better. The Society of Cardiothoracic Surgeons of Great Britain and Ireland, in response to the reports of the public inquiry into children’s heart surgery at the British Royal Infirmary, launched the national quality improvement initiatives in cardiovascular surgery. The Society of British Neurological Surgeons established the Neurosurgical National Audit Programme in 2013 as part of a major quality improvement initiative to support neurosurgical units in the UK and Ireland.39) Similarly, the Quality Outcomes Database, formerly known as the National Neurosurgery Quality and Outcomes Database, was established in the US by the NeuroPoint Alliance in collaboration with relevant national stakeholders and experts to collect, measure, and analyze practice patterns and neurosurgical outcomes, and the Quality and Outcomes Database’s spine modules have evolved into the largest North American spine registries.4042) The JND will provide the national benchmark on the quality of neurosurgical practices and make international comparison possible in all kinds of neurosurgical procedures.

Apart from the collection of data for performance of surgeons and institutions, registries have a major and important capacity to provide information about medical devices and, in particular, about implants that are an integral part of surgical care.43) In 2018, as the second tier of the JND database, the JNS launched two multicenter prospective observation studies focusing on neurosurgical devices with monitoring systems that ensure data reliability. These registrations have been developed for the use of clinical researches on cervical artificial disc replacement surgery (study name: a multicenter study on the efficacy and safety of a cervical artificial disc replacement) and pediatric ventriculoperitoneal shunt (study name: an evaluation of the therapeutic effect of a ventricular peritoneal shunt on pediatric hydrocephalus). Highly reliable registrations are carried out by the committee on medical device registries of the JNS, using the REDCap electron data capture system under the standard operating procedures. Some data of cervical artificial disc replacement surgery will be used for post-marketing surveillance. The initial registration for cervical artificial disc replacement with one intervertebral level surgery has been completed in 54 cases throughout 17 institutions as post-marketing surveillance following government regulations, and an additional 27 cases registered for a JNS initiative study. Regarding the registration of pediatric ventriculoperitoneal shunts, 114 cases have been registered throughout 42 institutions. These registries include detailed device-specific information, clinical demographics, outcomes, and key imaging studies from DICOM data. In the future, the JNS will increase the number of such medical device registries complying with Good Clinical Practice and ministerial ordinance on Good Post-marketing Study Practice in collaboration with industries.

Limitations of the JND Data

Although the JND data from hospital records comprise an important part of the available sources of information of epidemiologic studies on neurosurgical practices, some limitations exist. First, hospital admissions are selective in relation to personal characteristics, severity of diseases, associated conditions, and admission policies. Second, the JND data are not designed for specific research, so they may be incomplete or missing and variable with respect to the diagnostic quality of records. Thus, if we wish to combine data from different hospitals, problems of comparability may be encountered. Third, the population at risk (denominator) is generally not defined. Although all hospitals in Japan belong to the secondary medical area, the catchment area of neurosurgical practice may differ based on the subspeciality and necessity of emergent medical services (e.g., ruptured aneurysm and epilepsy). Further, patients with some diseases related to neurosurgical practices (e.g., stroke, spinal diseases, and epilepsy) may also be admitted to and treated by other medical departments.

Conclusions

The JND statistical update 2018–2019 represents a critical resource for the lay public, policy makers, media professionals, neurosurgeons, healthcare administrators, researchers, health advocates, and others seeking the best available data on neurosurgical practices. The findings of the JND may provide important insights into achieving better treatment outcomes, quality of care, patient safety, education, and research and development activities for Japanese neurosurgeons in the future.

Supplementary Material

The participating institutions are listed in Supplementary Table 1 (available online).

Acknowledgments

Creation of the JND was supported by the Practical Research Project for Life-Style related Diseases including Cardiovascular Diseases and Diabetes Mellitus managed by the Japan Agency for Medical Research and Development (16hk0102037h0001, 17hk0102037h0002, 18hk0102037h0003). We also thank all the collaborators of the 1360 participating hospitals in the JND, Ms. Misa Takegami and Dr. Kunihiro Nishimura (National Cerebral and Cardiovascular Center) for preparing the manuscript, and the secretarial assistance provided by Ms. Kei Watanabe of the JNS.

Conflicts of Interest Disclosure

The funder had no role in the design and conduct of the study; collection, management, analysis, and interpretation of the data; preparation, review, or approval of the manuscript; or decision to submit the manuscript for publication. All authors have no conflicts of interest.

Fig. 3.

Fig. 3

Impaired level of consicousness on admission of the registered patients based on the major classifications in 2018 and 2019. CVD: cerebrovascular diseases, DA: developmental anomalies, PNDs: peripheral nerve disorders, NS: neurosurgery.

Fig. 4.

Fig. 4

The proportion of ambulance use based on the major classifications in 2018 and 2019. CVD: cerebrovascular diseases, DA: developmental anomalies.

Table 6. Case volume of DS and EVT or brain tumors in the JND in 2018 and 2019.

Modality Mode of Operations 2018 2019
Case no. % (in all admission) % (in DS/EVT case) Case no. % (in all admission) % (in DS/EVT case)
1101. Meningioma 10383 10659
Removal 5501 53.0 74.9 5596 53.9 74.1
Biopsy 32 0.3 0.4 29 0.3 0.4
Transnasal surgery 144 1.4 2.0 147 1.4 1.9
Extensive skull base tumor resection reconstruction 184 1.8 2.5 225 2.2 3.0
EVT Tumor embolization 1279 12.3 17.4 1376 13.3 18.2
Others (e.g., Ommaya reservoir) 227 2.2 3.1 222 2.1 2.9
Decompressive craniectomy 31 0.3 0.4 51 0.5 0.7
1116. Metastatic brain tumor 17297 17082
Removal 3025 17.5 84.6 3210 18.8 85.7
Biopsy 157 0.9 4.4 165 1.0 4.4
Transnasal surgery 17 0.1 0.5 16 0.1 0.4
Extensive skull base tumor resection reconstruction 7 0.0 0.2 8 0.0 0.2
EVT Tumor embolization 23 0.1 0.6 26 0.2 0.7
Others (e.g., Ommaya reservoir) 365 2.1 10.2 368 2.2 9.8
Decompressive craniectomy 25 0.1 0.7 22 0.1 0.6
1106. Pituitary adenoma 4204 4571
Removal 638 15.2 20.4 795 17.4 23.5
Biopsy 13 0.3 0.4 4 0.1 0.1
Transnasal surgery 2777 66.1 88.9 3039 66.5 89.7
Extensive skull base tumor resection. reconstruction 27 0.6 0.9 34 0.7 1.0
EVT Tumor embolization 2 0.0 0.1 0 0.0 0.0
Others (e.g., Ommaya reservoir) 36 0.9 1.2 35 0.8 1.0
Decompressive craniectomy 2 0.0 0.1 4 0.1 0.1
1104. Glioblastoma 6924 7702
Removal 2149 31.0 78.7 2325 30.2 79.3
Biopsy 390 5.6 14.3 441 5.7 15.0
Transnasal surgery 1 0.0 0.0 3 0.0 0.1
Extensive skull base tumor resection reconstruction 2 0.0 0.1 0 0.0 0.0
EVT Tumor embolization 25 0.4 0.9 16 0.2 0.5
Others (e.g., Ommaya reservoir) 157 2.3 5.8 155 2.0 5.3
Decompressive craniectomy 31 0.4 1.1 27 0.4 0.9
1107. Schwannoma 2821 3077
Removal 1419 50.3 91.7 1483 48.2 90.5
Biopsy 13 0.5 0.8 9 0.3 0.5
Transnasal surgery 13 0.5 0.8 12 0.4 0.7
Extensive skull base tumor resection reconstruction 54 1.9 3.5 51 1.7 3.1
EVT Tumor embolization 9 0.3 0.6 25 0.8 1.5
Others (e.g., Ommaya reservoir) 37 1.3 2.4 44 1.4 2.7
Decompressive craniectomy 11 0.4 0.7 12 0.4 0.7
1109. Malignant lymphoma 2650 2843
Removal 410 15.5 36.1 374 13.2 31.7
Biopsy 669 25.2 58.8 761 26.8 64.5
Transnasal surgery 5 0.2 0.4 7 0.2 0.6
Extensive skull base tumor resection reconstruction 1 0.0 0.1 1 0.0 0.1
EVT Tumor embolization 2 0.1 0.2 1 0.0 0.1
Others (e.g., Ommaya reservoir) 68 2.6 6.0 58 2.0 4.9
Decompressive craniectomy 8 0.3 0.7 9 0.3 0.8
1102. Astrocytoma 2691 2615
Removal 829 30.8 72.8 796 30.4 71.9
Biopsy 234 8.7 20.5 258 9.9 23.3
Transnasal surgery 4 0.1 0.4 4 0.2 0.4
Extensive skull base tumor resection reconstruction 1 0.0 0.1 1 0.0 0.1
EVT Tumor embolization 1 0.0 0.1 4 0.2 0.4
Others (e.g., Ommaya reservoir) 63 2.3 5.5 48 1.8 4.3
Decompressive craniectomy 2 0.1 0.2 5 0.2 0.5
1118. Other brain tumor 1697 1906
Removal 483 28.5 62.6 489 25.7 63.1
Biopsy 107 6.3 13.9 124 6.5 16.0
Transnasal surgery 54 3.2 7.0 46 2.4 5.9
Extensive skull base tumor resection reconstruction 14 0.8 1.8 26 1.4 3.4
EVT Tumor embolization 42 2.5 5.4 36 1.9 4.6
Others (e.g., Ommaya reservoir) 68 4.0 8.8 62 3.3 8.0
Decompressive craniectomy 9 0.5 1.2 9 0.5 1.2
1105. Other neuroepithelial tumor 1286 1288
Removal 449 34.9 74.8 435 33.8 76.3
Biopsy 63 4.9 10.5 71 5.5 12.5
Transnasal surgery 12 0.9 2.0 10 0.8 1.8
Extensive skull base tumor resection reconstruction 5 0.4 0.8 2 0.2 0.4
EVT Tumor embolization 12 0.9 2.0 5 0.4 0.9
Others (e.g., Ommaya reservoir) 59 4.6 9.8 55 4.3 9.6
Decompressive craniectomy 2 0.2 0.3 0 0.0 0.0
1110. Hemangioblastoma 625 691
Removal 378 60.5 82.2 422 61.1 76.9
Biopsy 3 0.5 0.7 2 0.3 0.4
Transnasal surgery 0 0.0 0.0 2 0.3 0.4
Extensive skull base tumor resection reconstruction 3 0.5 0.7 3 0.4 0.5
EVT Tumor embolization 53 8.5 11.5 86 12.4 15.7
Others (e.g., Ommaya reservoir) 27 4.3 5.9 27 3.9 4.9
Decompressive craniectomy 2 0.3 0.4 11 1.6 2.0
1108. Craniopharyngioma 802 740
Removal 242 30.2 49.9 243 32.8 54.6
Biopsy 18 2.2 3.7 11 1.5 2.5
Transnasal surgery 219 27.3 45.2 212 28.6 47.6
Extensive skull base tumor resection reconstruction 20 2.5 4.1 15 2.0 3.4
EVT Tumor embolization 1 0.1 0.2 0 0.0 0.0
Others (e.g., Ommaya reservoir) 34 4.2 7.0 33 4.5 7.4
Decompressive craniectomy 0 0.0 0.0 1 0.1 0.2
1103. Oligodendroglioma 1165 1022
Removal 440 37.8 88.5 243 23.8 55.1
Biopsy 30 2.6 6.0 15 1.5 3.4
Transnasal surgery 0 0.0 0.0 0 0.0 0.0
Extensive skull base tumor resection reconstruction 1 0.1 0.2 0 0.0 0.0
EVT Tumor embolization 1 0.1 0.2 1 0.1 0.2
Others (e.g., Ommaya reservoir) 23 2.0 4.6 9 0.9 2.0
Decompressive craniectomy 0 0.0 0.0 1 0.1 0.2
1113. Cystic lesion (other than dermoid, epidermoid, arachnoid cyst) 431 553
Removal 94 21.8 28.8 135 24.4 35.2
Biopsy 6 1.4 1.8 7 1.3 1.8
Transnasal surgery 215 49.9 66.0 253 45.8 66.1
Extensive skull base tumor resection reconstruction 0 0.0 0.0 3 0.5 0.8
EVT Tumor embolization 1 0.2 0.3 0 0.0 0.0
Others (e.g., Ommaya reservoir) 31 7.2 9.5 21 3.8 5.5
Decompressive craniectomy 1 0.2 0.3 1 0.2 0.3
1111. Germ cell tumor, pineal tumor 654 709
Removal 121 18.5 41.9 118 16.6 42.0
Biopsy 131 20.0 45.3 121 17.1 43.1
Transnasal surgery 17 2.6 5.9 23 3.2 8.2
Extensive skull base tumor resection reconstruction 0 0.0 0.0 0 0.0 0.0
EVT Tumor embolization 2 0.3 0.7 1 0.1 0.4
Others (e.g., Ommaya reservoir) 36 5.5 12.5 49 6.9 17.4
Decompressive craniectomy 0 0.0 0.0 0 0.0 0.0
1112. Dermoid, epidermoid 257 227
Removal 168 65.4 87.0 158 69.6 89.8
Biopsy 5 1.9 2.6 4 1.8 2.3
Transnasal surgery 1 0.4 0.5 1 0.4 0.6
Extensive skull base tumor resection reconstruction 12 4.7 6.2 7 3.1 4.0
EVT Tumor embolization 0 0.0 0.0 0 0.0 0.0
Others (e.g., Ommaya reservoir) 8 3.1 4.1 5 2.2 2.8
Decompressive craniectomy 0 0.0 0.0 0 0.0 0.0
1202. Benign skull tumor 197 203
Removal 152 77.2 89.4 154 75.9 91.7
Biopsy 12 6.1 7.1 10 4.9 6.0
EVT Tumor embolization 1 0.5 0.6 1 0.5 0.6
1114. Chordoma, chondrosarcoma 246 289
Removal 53 21.5 36.6 69 23.9 41.6
Biopsy 2 0.8 1.4 2 0.7 1.2
Transnasal surgery 99 40.2 68.3 103 35.6 62.0
Extensive skull base tumor resection reconstruction 10 4.1 6.9 14 4.8 8.4
EVT Tumor embolization 2 0.8 1.4 4 1.4 2.4
Others (e.g., Ommaya reservoir) 5 2.0 3.4 4 1.4 2.4
Decompressive craniectomy 0 0.0 0.0 0 0.0 0.0
1301. Intraorbital tumor 235 210
Removal 132 56.2 87.4 114 54.3 87.7
Biopsy 10 4.3 6.6 7 3.3 5.4
EVT Tumor embolization 1 0.4 0.7 5 2.4 3.8
1201. Malignant skull tumor 170 175
Removal 98 57.6 79.0 96 54.9 76.8
Biopsy 18 10.6 14.5 19 10.9 15.2
EVT Tumor embolization 6 3.5 4.8 8 4.6 6.4
1115. Primary skull base tumor (other than chordoma, chondrosarcoma including direct invasion to nasopharyngeal locations) 212 204
Removal 33 15.6 23.4 26 12.7 21.5
Biopsy 2 0.9 1.4 3 1.5 2.5
Transnasal surgery 30 14.2 21.3 17 8.3 14.0
Extensive skull base tumor resection reconstruction 65 30.7 46.1 70 34.3 57.9
EVT Tumor embolization 19 9.0 13.5 13 6.4 10.7
Others (e.g., Ommaya reservoir) 2 0.9 1.4 3 1.5 2.5
Decompressive craniectomy 1 0.5 0.7 1 0.5 0.8
1303. Skull defect after decompression 88 98
Cranioplasty 82 93.2 95.3 111 113.3 96.5
1302. Scalp tumor 139 124
Removal 114 82.0 87.7 105 84.7 92.9
Biopsy 3 2.2 2.3 2 1.6 1.8
EVT Tumor embolization 7 5.0 5.4 2 1.6 1.8
1117. Embryonal brain tumor 225 193
Removal 59 26.2 75.6 59 30.6 69.4
Biopsy 8 3.6 10 5.2 11.8
Transnasal surgery 0 0.0 0.0 1 0.5 1.2
Extensive skull base tumor resection reconstruction 0 0.0 0.0 1 0.5 1.2
EVT Tumor embolization 0 0.0 0.0 0 0.0 0.0
Others (e.g., Ommaya reservoir) 16 7.1 20.5 20 10.4 23.5
Decompressive craniectomy 0 0.0 0.0 2 1.0 2.4
1203. Other skull tumor 119 115
Removal 49 41.2 69.0 39 33.9 72.2
Biopsy 16 13.4 22.5 10 8.7 18.5
EVT Tumor embolization 1 0.8 1.4 4 3.5 7.4

DS: direct surgery, EVT: endovascular treatment, JND: Japan Neurosurgical Database.

Table 7. Case volume of DS and EVT for neurotrauma in the JND in 2018 and 2019.

Modality Mode of operations 2018 2019
Case no. % (in all admission) % (in DS/EVT case) Case no. % (in all admission) % (in DS/EVT case)
3002. CSDH 40889 42630
Burr hole and irrigation 39291 96.1 97.3 40734 95.6 97.4
Removal of hematoma (craniotomy) 531 1.3 1.3 551 1.3 1.3
Others 304 0.7 0.8 378 0.9 0.9
3100. Traumatic intracranial hemorrhage group 42233 45521
Removal of hematoma (craniotomy) 5473 13.0 74.3 5620 12.3 74.8
Decompressive craniectomy 1471 3.5 20.0 1487 3.3 19.8
Burr hole surgery 963 2.3 13.1 1079 2.4 14.4
Others 649 1.5 8.8 611 1.3 8.1
3016. Skull defect after external decompression 1151 1219
Cranioplasty 1137 98.8 98.1 1213 99.5 98.9
3090. Other head trauma 1899 1971
Others 437 23.0 93.8 521 26.4 95.4
3017. CSF leakage 845 805
Repair of CSF leakage 273 32.3 93.8 322 40.0 96.7
3004. Skull fracture 4025 4114
Cranioplasty 176 4.4 88.9 192 4.7 90.6
3010. Traumatic cerebrovascular diseases 502 371
Bypass surgery 3 0.6 2.8 1 0.3 0.8
EVT Endovascular surgery 65 12.9 59.6 91 24.5 77.1
Others 39 7.8 35.8 23 6.2 19.5
3007. Intraventricular hemorrhage 490 370
Ventricular drainage 51 10.4 72.9 34 9.2 65.4
3006. Diffuse axonal injury 531 549
Placement of ICP monitor 21 4.0 65.6 21 3.8 65.6
Ventricular drainage 10 1.9 31.3 10 1.8 31.3
3014. Facial injury (facial bone fracture) 620 653
Facial fracture reduction 24 3.9 88.9 21 3.2 91.3
3008. Cranial nerve injury (optic canal fracture) 29 32
Optic nerve decompression 14 48.3 100.0 17 53.1 85.0
Others 0 0.0 0.0 1 3.1 5.0
3018. Penetrating brain injury 18 28
Removal of foreign material 13 72.2 92.9 15 53.6 88.2
3013. Facial injury (orbital fracture) 412 398
Open reduction of orbital fracture 10 2.4 100.0 5 1.3 100.0

DS: direct surgery, EVT: endovascular treatment, JND: Japan Neurosurgical Database, CSDH: chronic subdural hematoma, CSF: cerebrospinal fluid, ICP: intracranial pressure.

Table 8. Case volume of DS for hydrocephalus and developmental anomalies in the JND in 2018 and 2019.

Modality Mode of operations 2018 2019
Case no. % (in all admission) % (in DS case) Case no. % (in all admission) % (in DS case)
4002. Acquired (secondary) hydrocephalus 10268 10951
VP shunt 4650 45.3 41.5 4896 44.7 40.9
LP shunt 1641 16.0 14.6 1745 15.9 14.6
VA shunt 151 1.5 1.3 122 1.1 1.0
Shunt revision 493 4.8 4.4 559 5.1 4.7
Third ventriculostomy 424 4.1 3.8 468 4.3 3.9
Ventricular drainage 3051 29.7 27.2 3394 31.0 28.3
Shunt removal 488 4.8 4.4 584 5.3 4.9
Others 640 6.2 5.7 639 5.8 5.3
4003. Idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus 7673 8962
VP shunt 1921 25.0 43.7 2221 24.8 43.7
LP shunt 1871 24.4 42.5 2084 23.3 41.0
VA shunt 140 1.8 3.2 190 2.1 3.7
Shunt revision 168 2.2 3.8 229 2.6 4.5
Third ventriculostomy 26 0.3 0.6 44 0.5 0.9
Ventricular drainage 101 1.3 2.3 113 1.3 2.2
Shunt removal 145 1.9 3.3 165 1.8 3.2
Others 75 1.0 1.7 110 1.2 2.2
4001. Congenital hydrocephalus 1051 1012
VP shunt 383 36.4 38.6 340 33.6 39.5
LP shunt 10 1.0 1.0 6 0.6 0.7
VA shunt 27 2.6 2.7 18 1.8 2.1
Shunt revision 209 19.9 21.1 185 18.3 21.5
Third ventriculostomy 148 14.1 14.9 131 12.9 15.2
Ventricular drainage 127 12.1 12.8 101 10.0 11.7
Shunt removal 105 10.0 10.6 95 9.4 11.0
Others 133 12.7 13.4 83 8.2 9.7
4202. Spinal lipoma 624 671
Untethering 342 54.8 91.2 367 54.7 95.1
Others 37 5.9 9.9 39 5.8 10.1
4004. Craniosynostosis 490 543
Cranioplasty (without distraction) 99 20.2 27.4 105 19.3 27.3
Cranioplasty (with distraction) 109 22.2 30.2 106 19.5 27.5
Suturectomy 40 8.2 11.1 34 6.3 8.8
Others (e.g., removal of devices) 112 22.9 31.0 137 25.2 35.6
4290. Other spinal cord/spinal anomaly 400 535
Untethering 155 38.8 79.1 166 31.0 74.8
Others 39 9.8 19.9 50 9.3 22.5
4101. Chiari malformation (Type I) 332 336
Foramen magnum decompression 212 63.9 93.0 185 55.1 91.1
Syringo–subarachnoid shunt 5 1.5 2.2 13 3.9 6.4
Fixation 3 0.9 1.3 2 0.6 1.0
Others 23 6.9 10.1 17 5.1 8.4
4006. Arachnoid cyst 348 327
Fenestration (craniotomy) 60 17.2 29.3 52 15.9 26.7
Fenestration (endoscopic) 86 24.7 42.0 85 26.0 43.6
Cyst-peritoneal shunt 20 5.7 9.8 22 6.7 11.3
Others 38 10.9 18.5 36 11.0 18.5
4201. Myelomeningocele/myeloschisis 276 311
Repair 87 31.5 65.4 101 32.5 77.1
Others 42 15.2 31.6 30 9.6 22.9
4090. Other cranial/cerebral anomaly 153 157
Surgery 41 26.8 70.7 45 28.7 76.3
Others 18 11.8 31.0 26 16.6 44.1
4005. Encephalocele 81 93
Repair 46 56.8 85.2 40 43.0 76.9
Others 7 8.6 13.0 10 10.8 19.2
4190. Other anomaly of craniocervical junction 77 72
Foramen magnum decompression 19 24.7 52.8 19 26.4 59.4
Syringo–subarachnoid shunt 2 2.6 5.6 0 0.0 0.0
Fixation 9 11.7 25.0 9 12.5 28.1
Others 9 11.7 25.0 10 13.9 31.3
4102. Chiari malformation (Type II) 75 71
Foramen magnum decompression 16 21.3 69.6 11 15.5 78.6
Syringo–subarachnoid shunt 2 2.7 8.7 1 1.4 7.1
Fixation 0 0.0 0.0 0 0.0 0.0
Others 8 10.7 34.8 4 5.6 28.6

DS: direct surgery, JND: Japan Neurosurgical Database, VP: ventriculoperitoneal, LP: lumboperitoneal, VA: ventriculoatrial.

Table 9. Case volume of DS and EVT for spinal and peripheral nerve disorders in the JND in 2018 and 2019.

Modality Mode of operations 2018 2019
Case no. % (in all admission) % (in DS/EVT case) Case no. % (in all admission) % (in DS/EVT case)
5100. Spinal degenerative disorders 15734 19045
Anterior decompression 904 5.7 7.1 902 4.7 5.8
Anterior fixation 1533 9.7 12.0 1710 9.0 11.0
Posterior decompression 7654 48.6 59.9 9342 49.1 60.3
Posterior fixation 2209 14.0 17.3 2622 13.8 16.9
Discectomy 2194 13.9 17.2 2354 12.4 15.2
Simultaneous anterior and posterior decompression 264 1.7 2.1 257 1.3 1.7
Others 756 4.8 5.9 1045 5.5 6.8
5503. Spinal trauma – vertebral compression fracture 3309 4020
Anterior decompression 18 0.5 1.3 13 0.3 0.7
Posterior decompression 103 3.1 7.2 120 3.0 6.7
Fixation 354 10.7 24.9 442 11.0 24.7
Percutaneous vertebroplasty 959 29.0 67.4 1283 31.9 71.7
Others 108 3.3 7.6 121 3.0 6.8
5701. Peripheral nerve disorders – carpal tunnel syndrome 528 564
Release surgery 358 67.8 66.4 403 71.5 71.2
Others 177 33.5 32.8 137 24.3 24.2
5890. Other spinal and peripheral nerve disorders 1395 1306
Posterior fixation 117 8.4 17.0 66 5.1 12.6
Simultaneous anterior and posterior decompression 5 0.4 0.7 3 0.2 0.6
Others 535 38.4 77.8 440 33.7 84.3
5202. Spinal tumor – extramedullary tumor (intradural confined) 510 565
Total/subtotal removal 390 76.5 85.3 429 75.9 91.3
Partial removal 36 7.1 7.9 28 5.0 6.0
Biopsy 2 0.4 0.4 0 0.0 0.0
Others 15 2.9 3.3 6 1.1 1.3
5590. Spinal trauma – other spinal trauma 897 1137
Anterior decompression 28 3.1 8.1 22 1.9 5.5
Posterior decompression 134 14.9 38.8 158 13.9 39.8
Fixation 179 20.0 51.9 217 19.1 54.7
Percutaneous vertebroplasty 27 3.0 7.8 18 1.6 4.5
Others 70 7.8 20.3 83 7.3 20.9
5201. Spinal tumor – intramedullary tumor 452 563
Total/subtotal removal 184 40.7 68.4 197 35.0 59.7
Partial removal 47 10.4 17.5 72 12.8 21.8
Biopsy 20 4.4 7.4 38 6.7 11.5
Others 10 2.2 3.7 17 3.0 5.2
5501. Spinal trauma – without bone injury 1151 1225
Anterior decompression 38 3.3 12.9 28 2.3 9.2
Posterior decompression 199 17.3 67.5 214 17.5 70.4
Fixation 79 6.9 26.8 82 6.7 27.0
Percutaneous vertebroplasty 6 0.5 2.0 10 0.8 3.3
Others 22 1.9 7.5 28 2.3 9.2
5801. Spinal deformity 491 392
Posterior fixation 163 33.2 43.1 86 21.9 33.2
Simultaneous anterior and posterior decompression 21 4.3 5.6 5 1.3 1.9
Others 185 37.7 48.9 160 40.8 61.8
5502. Spinal trauma – dislocation fracture 362 367
Anterior decompression 23 6.4 9.2 17 4.6 6.7
Posterior decompression 57 15.7 22.8 57 15.5 22.4
Fixation 189 52.2 75.6 190 51.8 74.8
Percutaneous vertebroplasty 5 1.4 2.0 15 4.1 5.9
Others 41 11.3 16.4 42 11.4 16.5
5203. Spinal tumor – extramedullary tumor (extradural and paraspinal extension) 222 297
Total/subtotal removal 141 63.5 75.0 171 57.6 71.8
Partial removal 34 15.3 18.1 45 15.2 18.9
Biopsy 3 1.4 1.6 5 1.7 2.1
Others 6 2.7 3.2 10 3.4 4.2
5401. Spinal vascular diseases – dural arteriovenous fistula 333 392
Arteriovenous fistula obliteration 97 29.1 50.8 106 27.0 45.3
Removal 9 2.7 4.7 23 5.9 9.8
Others 6 1.8 3.1 8 2.0 3.4
EVT Endovascular obliteration 91 27.3 47.6 111 28.3 47.4
5790. Peripheral nerve disorders – other peripheral nerve disorders 688 756
Release surgery 134 19.5 67.3 138 18.3 69.0
Others 63 9.2 31.7 59 7.8 29.5
5406. Spinal vascular diseases – extradural hematoma 210 276
Arteriovenous fistula obliteration 1 0.5 1.0 0 0.0 0.0
Removal 58 27.6 56.9 90 32.6 57.3
Others 39 18.6 38.2 59 21.4 37.6
EVT Endovascular obliteration 1 0.5 1.0 0 0.0 0.0
5601. Spinal infection – with abscess formation 158 216
Anterior decompression 12 7.6 9.3 8 3.7 5.1
Posterior decompression 48 30.4 37.2 51 23.6 32.5
Fixation 33 20.9 25.6 45 20.8 28.7
Others 52 32.9 40.3 71 32.9 45.2
5205. Spinal tumor – metastatic vertebral tumor 309 300
Total/subtotal removal 44 14.2 29.1 37 12.3 27.6
Partial removal 63 20.4 41.7 62 20.7 46.3
Biopsy 11 3.6 7.3 10 3.3 7.5
Others 25 8.1 16.6 25 8.3 18.7
5301. Syringomyelia – tonsillar descent (chiari Type I) 157 199
Syringo shunt 10 6.4 10.2 11 5.5 9.6
Foramen magnum decompression 79 50.3 80.6 96 48.2 83.5
Lysis of adhesion 2 1.3 2.0 6 3.0 5.2
Others 10 6.4 10.2 13 6.5 11.3
5703. Peripheral nerve disorders – tarsal tunnel syndrome 75 105
Release surgery 72 96.0 87.8 105 100.0 92.1
Others 10 13.3 12.2 4 3.8 3.5
5290. Spinal tumor – other spinal tumor 101 121
Total/subtotal removal 39 38.6 62.9 36 29.8 52.2
Partial removal 8 7.9 12.9 10 8.3 14.5
Biopsy 4 4.0 6.5 11 9.1 15.9
Others 5 5.0 8.1 11 9.1 15.9
5704. Peripheral nerve disorders – brachial plexus injury 64 77
Release surgery 37 57.8 82.2 50 64.9 82.0
Others 12 18.8 26.7 11 14.3 18.0
5602. Spinal infection – without abscess formation 121 137
Anterior decompression 6 5.0 14.3 0 0.0 0.0
Posterior decompression 11 9.1 26.2 13 9.5 22.8
Fixation 16 13.2 38.1 19 13.9 33.3
Others 20 16.5 47.6 30 21.9 52.6
5302. Syringomyelia – adhesive arachnoiditis 97 67
Syringo shunt 28 28.9 47.5 24 35.8 44.4
Foramen magnum decompression 2 2.1 3.4 4 6.0 7.4
Lysis of adhesion 24 24.7 40.7 24 35.8 44.4
Others 13 13.4 22.0 11 16.4 20.4
5403. Spinal vascular diseases – extradural arteriovenous fistula 51 58
Arteriovenous fistula obliteration 15 29.4 48.4 13 22.4 34.2
Removal 2 3.9 6.5 0 0.0 0.0
Others 0 0.0 0.0 2 3.4 5.3
EVT Endovascular obliteration 17 33.3 54.8 28 48.3 73.7
5490. Spinal vascular diseases – other spinal vascular disorders 174 208
Arteriovenous fistula obliteration 0 0.0 0.0 1 0.5 2.7
Removal 6 3.4 26.1 13 6.3 35.1
Others 12 6.9 52.2 12 5.8 32.4
EVT Endovascular obliteration 4 2.3 17.4 10 4.8 27.0
5702. Peripheral nerve disorders – cubital tunnel syndrome 59 50
Release surgery 34 57.6 64.2 34 68.0 91.9
Others 19 32.2 35.8 5 10.0 13.5
5204. Spinal tumor – primary vertebral tumor 66 60
Total/subtotal removal 20 30.3 52.6 9 15.0 25.7
Partial removal 9 13.6 23.7 16 26.7 45.7
Biopsy 5 7.6 13.2 3 5.0 8.6
Others 4 6.1 10.5 5 8.3 14.3
5390. Syringomyelia – others 61 59
Syringo shunt 19 31.1 63.3 13 22.0 43.3
Foramen magnum decompression 1 1.6 3.3 6 10.2 20.0
Lysis of adhesion 4 6.6 13.3 1 1.7 3.3
Others 9 14.8 30.0 13 22.0 43.3
5404. Spinal vascular diseases – intramedullary arteriovenous malformation 59 71
Arteriovenous fistula obliteration 5 8.5 22.7 1 1.4 4.0
Removal 4 6.8 18.2 7 9.9 28.0
Others 3 5.1 13.6 2 2.8 8.0
EVT Endovascular obliteration 12 20.3 54.5 14 19.7 56.0
5402. Spinal vascular diseases – perimedullary arteriovenous malformation 63 48
Arteriovenous fistula obliteration 21 33.3 53.8 10 20.8 43.5
Removal 4 6.3 10.3 2 4.2 8.7
Others 3 4.8 7.7 1 2.1 4.3
EVT Endovascular obliteration 12 19.0 54.5 10 20.8 43.5
5405. Spinal vascular diseases – cavernous malformation 37 30
Arteriovenous fistula obliteration 1 2.7 7.1 1 3.3 7.7
Removal 11 29.7 78.6 12 40.0 92.3
Others 0 0.0 0.0 0 0.0 0.0
EVT Endovascular obliteration 0 0.0 0.0 1 3.3 7.7
5303. Syringomyelia –traumatic 21 12
Syringo shunt 7 33.3 63.6 5 41.7 62.5
Foramen magnum decompression 0 0.0 0.0 0 0.0 0.0
Lysis of adhesion 2 9.5 18.2 1 8.3 12.5
Others 2 9.5 18.2 2 16.7 25.0

DS: direct surgery, EVT: endovascular treatment, JND: Japan Neurosurgical Database.

Table 10. Case volume of direct surgery (DS) for functional neurosurgery in the JND in 2018 and 2019.

Modality Mode of operations 2018 2019
Case no. % (in all admission) % (in DS Case) Case no. % (in all admission) % (in DS case)
6102. Hemifacial spasm 1919 2017
Microvascular decompression 1739 90.6 98.7 1815 90.0 98.6
Others 14 0.7 0.8 22 1.1 1.2
6201. Parkinson’s disease 2717 2839
Stereotactic neurosurgery (deep brain stimulation) 606 22.3 38.9 523 18.4 35.0
Stereotactic neurosurgery (ablation) 24 0.9 1.5 26 0.9 1.7
Stereotactic neurosurgery (focused ultrasound) 0 0.0 0.0 0 0.0 0.0
Stereotactic neurosurgery (others) 25 0.9 1.6 12 0.4 0.8
Implantation of spinal cord stimulation system 38 1.4 2.4 19 0.7 1.3
Implantation of other stimulation system 374 13.8 24.0 357 12.6 23.9
Implantation of drug delivery infusion pump 1 0.0 0.1 1 0.0 0.1
Neurotomy (selective) 0 0.0 0.0 0 0.0 0.0
Dorsal rhizotomy (selective) 0 0.0 0.0 0 0.0 0.0
Other functional neurosurgery 474 17.4 30.4 546 19.2 36.5
6001. Epilepsy 26121 28608
Implantation of intracranial electrodes 187 0.7 15.4 246 0.9 18.0
Temporal lobectomy (for TLE) 144 0.6 11.8 173 0.6 12.6
Selective amygdalohippocampectomy 76 0.3 6.3 83 0.3 6.1
Multiple hippocampal transection 24 0.1 2.0 14 0.0 1.0
Lobectomy (excluding for TLE, functional or anatomical) 25 0.1 2.1 37 0.1 2.7
Multilober resection (functional or anatomical) 16 0.1 1.3 37 0.1 2.7
Lesionectomy (structural lesion) 122 0.5 10.0 141 0.5 10.3
Focus resection (for neocortical epilepsy) 59 0.2 4.9 76 0.3 5.6
Hemispherectomy (functional or anatomical) 25 0.1 2.1 30 0.1 2.2
Callosotomy 150 0.6 12.3 151 0.5 11.0
MST 11 0.0 0.9 5 0.0 0.4
Stereotactic ablation (including laser or MRI guided) 17 0.1 1.4 1 0.0 0.1
Implantation of vagus nerve stimulation system 274 1.0 22.5 247 0.9 18.0
Others 161 0.6 13.2 195 0.7 14.2
6101. Trigeminal neuralgia 1656 1834
Microvascular decompression 1196 72.2 97.9 1330 72.5 97.9
Others 20 1.2 1.6 21 1.1 1.5
6206. Pain 1038 1230
Stereotactic neurosurgery (deep brain stimulation) 2 0.2 0.4 0 0.0 0.0
Stereotactic neurosurgery (ablation) 0 0.0 0.0 1 0.1 0.2
Stereotactic neurosurgery (focused ultrasound) 0 0.0 0.0 0 0.0 0.0
Stereotactic neurosurgery (others) 1 0.1 0.2 0 0.0 0.0
Implantation of spinal cord stimulation system 398 38.3 72.8 456 37.1 80.0
Implantation of other stimulation system 14 1.3 2.6 14 1.1 2.5
Implantation of drug delivery infusion pump 2 0.2 0.4 4 0.3 0.7
Neurotomy (selective) 2 0.2 0.4 3 0.2 0.5
Dorsal rhizotomy (selective) 7 0.7 1.3 3 0.2 0.5
Other functional neurosurgery 117 11.3 21.4 87 7.1 15.3
6203. Dystonia 337 427
Stereotactic neurosurgery (deep brain stimulation) 65 19.3 22.3 55 12.9 15.5
Stereotactic neurosurgery (ablation) 90 26.7 30.8 163 38.2 46.0
Stereotactic neurosurgery (focused ultrasound) 2 0.6 0.7 0 0.0 0.0
Stereotactic neurosurgery (others) 4 1.2 1.4 5 1.2 1.4
Implantation of spinal cord stimulation system 5 1.5 1.7 5 1.2 1.4
Implantation of other stimulation system 50 14.8 17.1 48 11.2 13.6
Implantation of drug delivery infusion pump 4 1.2 1.4 10 2.3 2.8
Neurotomy (selective) 0 0.0 0.0 4 0.9 1.1
Dorsal rhizotomy (selective) 0 0.0 0.0 0 0.0 0.0
Other functional neurosurgery 70 20.8 24.0 64 15.0 18.1
6205. Spasticity 829 1070
Stereotactic neurosurgery (deep brain stimulation) 0 0.0 0.0 1 0.1 0.3
Stereotactic neurosurgery (ablation) 2 0.2 0.6 2 0.2 0.6
Stereotactic neurosurgery (focused ultrasound) 0 0.0 0.0 0 0.0 0.0
Stereotactic neurosurgery (others) 0 0.0 0.0 0 0.0 0.0
Implantation of spinal cord stimulation system 7 0.8 2.3 3 0.3 0.9
Implantation of other stimulation system 2 0.2 0.6 1 0.1 0.3
Implantation of drug delivery infusion pump 217 26.2 70.0 234 21.9 70.1
Neurotomy (selective) 6 0.7 1.9 12 1.1 3.6
Dorsal rhizotomy (selective) 9 1.1 2.9 11 1.0 3.3
Other functional neurosurgery 63 7.6 20.3 67 6.3 20.1
6202. Essential tremor 277 426
Stereotactic neurosurgery (deep brain stimulation) 39 14.1 18.8 51 12.0 15.3
Stereotactic neurosurgery (ablation) 75 27.1 36.2 116 27.2 34.8
Stereotactic neurosurgery (focused ultrasound) 34 12.3 16.4 84 19.7 25.2
Stereotactic neurosurgery (others) 1 0.4 0.5 3 0.7 0.9
Implantation of spinal cord stimulation system 0 0.0 0.0 1 0.2 0.3
Implantation of other stimulation system 26 9.4 12.6 33 7.7 9.9
Implantation of drug delivery infusion pump 0 0.0 0.0 0 0.0 0.0
Neurotomy (selective) 0 0.0 0.0 0 0.0 0.0
Dorsal rhizotomy (selective) 0 0.0 0.0 0 0.0 0.0
Other functional neurosurgery 32 11.6 15.5 45 10.6 13.5
6290. Other functional disorders 2009 2440
Stereotactic neurosurgery (deep brain stimulation) 1 0.0 1.1 1 0.0 0.7
Stereotactic neurosurgery (ablation) 3 0.1 3.2 11 0.5 8.1
Stereotactic neurosurgery (focused ultrasound) 0 0.0 0.0 0 0.0 0.0
Stereotactic neurosurgery (others) 1 0.0 1.1 0 0.0 0.0
Implantation of spinal cord stimulation system 21 1.0 22.1 39 1.6 28.9
Implantation of other stimulation system 2 0.1 2.1 1 0.0 0.7
Implantation of drug delivery infusion pump 16 0.8 16.8 14 0.6 10.4
Neurotomy (selective) 0 0.0 0.0 0 0.0 0.0
Dorsal rhizotomy (selective) 2 0.1 2.1 0 0.0 0.0
Other functional neurosurgery 49 2.4 51.6 67 2.7 49.6
6204. Other involuntary movement disorders 273 262
Stereotactic neurosurgery (deep brain stimulation) 17 6.2 32.1 14 5.3 22.6
Stereotactic neurosurgery (ablation) 7 2.6 13.2 13 5.0 21.0
Stereotactic neurosurgery (focused ultrasound) 1 0.4 1.9 0 0.0 0.0
Stereotactic neurosurgery (others) 0 0.0 0.0 0 0.0 0.0
Implantation of spinal cord stimulation system 2 0.7 3.8 3 1.1 4.8
Implantation of other stimulation system 8 2.9 15.1 14 5.3 22.6
Implantation of drug delivery infusion pump 7 2.6 13.2 1 0.4 1.6
Neurotomy (selective) 0 0.0 0.0 1 0.4 1.6
Dorsal rhizotomy (selective) 0 0.0 0.0 0 0.0 0.0
Other functional neurosurgery 11 4.0 20.8 16 6.1 25.8
6190. Other neurovascular compression syndrome 142 145
Other neurovascular compression syndrome 56 39.4 91.8 55 37.9 90.2
Others 4 2.8 6.6 6 4.1 9.8

DS: direct surgery, JND: Japan Neurosurgical Database, TLE: temporal lobe epilepsy, MST: multiple subpial transection, MRI: magnetic resonance imaging.

References

  • 1).Anderson IA, Kailaya-Vasan A, Nelson RJ, Tolias CM: Clipping aneurysms improves outcomes for patients undergoing coiling. J Neurosurg 1–7, 2018, ahead of print [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2).Asher AL, McCormick PC, Selden NR, Ghogawala Z, McGirt MJ: The National Neurosurgery Quality and Outcomes Database and NeuroPoint Alliance: rationale, development, and implementation. Neurosurg Focus 34: E2, 2013 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3).Asher AL, Speroff T, Dittus RS, et al. : The National Neurosurgery Quality and Outcomes Database (N2QOD): a collaborative North American outcomes registry to advance value-based spine care. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 39: S106–116, 2014 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4).Busl KM, Bleck TP, Varelas PN: Neurocritical care outcomes, research, and technology: a review. JAMA Neurol 76: 612–618, 2019 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5).Clark S, Boyle L, Matthews P, Schweder P, Deng C, Campbell D: Development and validation of a multivariate prediction model of perioperative mortality in neurosurgery: The New Zealand neurosurgical risk tool (NZRISK-NEURO). Neurosurgery 87: E313–E320, 2020 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6).GBD 2017 US Neurological Disorders Collaborators. Feigin VL, Vos T, et al. : Burden of neurological disorders across the US From 1990-2017: a global burden of disease study. JAMA Neurol 78: 165–176, 2021 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7).De la Garza Ramos R, Goodwin CR, Nakhla J, et al. : The nationwide burden of neurological conditions requiring emergency neurosurgery. Neurosurgery 81: 422–431, 2017 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8).Edaravone Acute Infarction Study Group: Effect of a novel free radical scavenger, edaravone (MCI-186), on acute brain infarction . Randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind study at multicenters. Cerebrovasc Dis 15: 222–229, 2003 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9).Fiorella D, Gache L, Frame D, Arthur AS: How safe and effective are flow diverters for the treatment of unruptured small/medium intracranial aneurysms of the internal carotid artery? Meta-analysis for evidence-based performance goals. J Neurointerv Surg 12: 869–873, 2020 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10).Funakoshi Y, Hata N, Kuga D, et al. : Current trend in treatment of glioblastoma in Japan: a national survey using the diagnostic procedure combination database (J-ASPECT study-glioblastoma). Int J Clin Oncol 26: 1441–1449, 2021 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11).Hayakawa M, Matsumaru Y, Yamagami H, et al. : Trends in endovascular reperfusion therapy for acute stroke after introduction of mechanical thrombectomy devices: Japanese registry of neuroendovascular therapy (JR-NET)3. Neurol Med Chir (Tokyo) 60: 191–201, 2020 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12).Hiramatsu M, Sugiu K, Hishikawa T, et al. : Results of 1940 embolizations for dural arteriovenous fistulas: Japanese Registry of Neuroendovascular Therapy (JR-NET3). J Neurosurg 1–8, 2019, ahead of print [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13).Hosomi K, Shimokawa T, Ikoma K, et al. : Daily repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation of primary motor cortex for neuropathic pain: a randomized, multicenter, double-blind, crossover, sham-controlled trial. Pain 154: 1065–1072, 2013 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14).Hosomi K, Sugiyama K, Nakamura Y, et al. : A randomized controlled trial of 5 daily sessions and continuous trial of 4 weekly sessions of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation for neuropathic pain. Pain 161: 351–360, 2020 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15).Iihara K, Nishimura K, Kada A, et al. : Effects of comprehensive stroke care capabilities on in-hospital mortality of patients with ischemic and hemorrhagic stroke: J-ASPECT study. PLoS One 9: e96819, 2014 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16).Iihara K, Tominaga T, Saito N, et al. : The Japan Neurosurgical Database: overview and results of the first-year survey. Neurol Med Chir (Tokyo) 60: 165–190, 2020 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17).Ikawa F, Morita A, Nakayama T, et al. : A register-based SAH study in Japan: high incidence rate and recent decline trend based on lifestyle. J Neurosurg 134: 983–991, 2020 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18).Kada A, Ogasawara K, Kitazono T, et al. : National trends in outcomes of ischemic stroke and prognostic influence of stroke center capability in Japan, 2010–2016. Int J Stroke 1747493019884526, 2019, ahead of print [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19).Kawada T, Hishikawa T, Date I, Tominari S, Morita A: Risk of rupture of unruptured cerebral aneurysms in elderly patients. Neurology 86: 1650, 2016 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20).Kuroda S, AMORE Study Group : Asymptomatic moyamoya disease: literature review and ongoing AMORE study. Neurol Med Chir (Tokyo) 55: 194–198, 2015 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21).McGirt MJ, Speroff T, Dittus RS, Harrell FE, Jr., Asher AL: The National Neurosurgery Quality and Outcomes Database (N2QOD): general overview and pilot-year project description. Neurosurg Focus 34: E6, 2013 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22).Miyamoto S, Yoshimoto T, Hashimoto N, et al. : Effects of extracranial-intracranial bypass for patients with hemorrhagic moyamoya disease: results of the Japan Adult Moyamoya Trial. Stroke 45: 1415–1421, 2014 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23).UCAS Japan Investigators. Morita A, Kirino T, et al. : The natural course of unruptured cerebral aneurysms in a Japanese cohort. N Engl J Med 366: 2474–2482, 2012 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24).Narita Y, Shibui S, Committee of Brain Tumor Registry of Japan Supported by the Japan Neurosurgical S : Trends and outcomes in the treatment of gliomas based on data during 2001-2004 from the Brain Tumor Registry of Japan. Neurol Med Chir (Tokyo) 55: 286–295, 2015 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25).Nishimura A, Nishimura K, Kada A, Iihara K; J-ASPECT Study GROUP: status and future perspectives of utilizing big data in neurosurgical and stroke research. Neurol Med Chir (Tokyo) 56: 655–663, 2016 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26).Oi S, Inagaki T, Shinoda M, et al. : Guideline for management and treatment of fetal and congenital hydrocephalus: Center of Excellence-Fetal and Congenital Hydrocephalus Top 10 Japan Guideline 2011. Childs Nerv Syst 27: 1563–1570, 2011 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27).Oi S, Nomura S, Nagasaka M, et al. : Embryopathogenetic surgicoanatomical classification of dysraphism and surgical outcome of spinal lipoma: a nationwide multicenter cooperative study in Japan. J Neurosurg Pediatr 3: 412–419, 2009 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28).Oravec CS, Motiwala M, Reed K, et al. : Big data research in neurosurgery: a critical look at this popular new study design. Neurosurgery 82: 728–746, 2018 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29).Oya S, Ikawa F, Ichihara N, et al. : Nation-wide brain tumor registry-based study of intracranial meningioma in Japan: analysis of surgery-related risks. Neurol Med Chir (Tokyo) 61: 98–106, 2021 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30).Parker SL, McGirt MJ, Bekelis K, et al. : The National Neurosurgery Quality and Outcomes Database Qualified Clinical Data Registry: 2015 measure specifications and rationale. Neurosurg Focus 39: E4, 2015 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31).Pittman CA, Miranpuri AS: Neurosurgery clinical registry data collection utilizing informatics for integrating biology and the bedside and electronic health records at the University of Rochester. Neurosurg Focus 39: E16, 2015 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32).Ren N, Nishimura A, Kurogi A, et al. : Measuring quality of care for ischemic stroke treated with acute reperfusion therapy in Japan - the close the gap-stroke. Circ J 85: 201–209, 2021 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33).Reponen E, Tuominen H, Korja M: Quality of British and American nationwide quality of care and patient safety benchmarking programs: case neurosurgery. Neurosurgery 85: 500–507, 2019 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34).Sakai N, Uchida K, Iihara K, et al. : Japanese surveillance of neuroendovascular therapy in JR-NET - Part II. Japanese Registry of neuroendovascular treatment 3. Main report. Neurol Med Chir (Tokyo) 59: 106–115, 2019 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35).Schuhmann MU, Rickels E, Rosahl SK, Schneekloth CG, Samii M: Acute care in neurosurgery: quantity, quality, and challenges. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 71: 182–187, 2001 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36).Sedrakyan A, Campbell B, Graves S, Cronenwett JL: Surgical registries for advancing quality and device surveillance. The Lancet 388: 1358–1360, 2016 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37).Sherrod BA, Johnston JM, Rocque BG: Risk factors for unplanned readmission within 30 days after pediatric neurosurgery: a nationwide analysis of 9799 procedures from the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program. J Neurosurg Pediatr 18: 350–362, 2016 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38).Shimoda K, Maeda T, Tado M, Yoshino A, Katayama Y, Bullock MR: Outcome and surgical management for geriatric traumatic brain injury: analysis of 888 cases registered in the Japan Neurotrauma Data Bank. World Neurosurg 82: 1300–1306, 2014 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39).Suehiro E, Fujiyama Y, Koizumi H, Suzuki M: Directions for use of intracranial pressure monitoring in the treatment of severe traumatic brain injury using data from The Japan Neurotrauma Data Bank. J Neurotrauma 34: 2230–2234, 2017 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40).Takahashi JC, Funaki T, Houkin K, et al. : Significance of the hemorrhagic site for recurrent bleeding: prespecified analysis in the Japan Adult Moyamoya Trial. Stroke 47: 37–43, 2016 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41).Toi H, Kinoshita K, Hirai S, et al. : Present epidemiology of chronic subdural hematoma in Japan: analysis of 63,358 cases recorded in a national administrative database. J Neurosurg 128: 222–228, 2018 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42).Walicke P, Abosch A, Asher A, et al. : Launching effectiveness research to guide practice in neurosurgery: a National Institute Neurological Disorders and Stroke Workshop Report. Neurosurgery 80: 505–514, 2017 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43).Wilde HW, Reese JC, Azab MA, Karsy M, Guan J, Rolston JD: Evaluating the landscape of clinical research in neurosurgery. Neurosurgery 85: E485–E493, 2019 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Neurologia medico-chirurgica are provided here courtesy of Japan Neurosurgical Society

RESOURCES