Skip to main content
Journal of Animal Science logoLink to Journal of Animal Science
. 2021 Nov 19;99(12):skab331. doi: 10.1093/jas/skab331

Nutritional and functional values of lysed Corynebacterium glutamicum cell mass for intestinal health and growth of nursery pigs

Yi-Chi Cheng 1, Marcos Elias Duarte 1, Sung Woo Kim 1,
PMCID: PMC8668180  PMID: 34902029

Abstract

The objective was to determine the nutritional and functional values of lysed Corynebacterium glutamicum cell mass (CGCM) as a protein supplement and a source of cell wall fragments supporting the growth and intestinal health of nursery pigs. Thirty-two pigs (21 d of age) were allotted to four treatments (n = 8) based on the randomized block design with sex and initial body weight (BW) as blocks. The main effect was the dietary supplementation of lysed CGCM (0, 0.7, 1.4, and 2.1%) replacing blood plasma and fed in two phases (10 and 11 d, respectively). Feed intake and BW were measured at the end of each phase. Pigs were euthanized on day 21 to collect jejunal tissue and mucosa to evaluate intestinal health. Ileal digesta were collected to measure the apparent ileal digestibility of nutrients in diets. Data were analyzed using Proc Mixed and Reg of SAS. Increasing daily intake of CGCM increased (linear; P < 0.05) ADG of pigs. Increasing CGCM supplementation affected (quadratic; P < 0.05) the relative abundance of Lactobacillaceae (minimum: 26.4% at 1.2% CGCM), Helicobacteraceae (maximum: 29.3% at 1.2% CGCM), and Campylobacteraceae (maximum: 9.0% at 1.0% CGCM). Increasing CGCM supplementation affected (quadratic; P < 0.05) the concentrations of immunoglobulin G (maximum: 4.94 µg/mg of protein at 1.0% CGCM) and protein carbonyl (PC; maximum: 6.12 nmol/mg of protein at 1.1% CGCM), whereas linearly decreased (P < 0.05) malondialdehyde (MDA) in the proximal jejunal mucosa. Increasing CGCM supplemention affected (quadratic; P < 0.05) intestinal enterocyte proliferation rate (maximum: 13.3% at 1.0% CGCM), whereas it did not affect intestinal morphology and the nutrient digestibility. In conclusion, supplementing 1.0% to 1.2%, reducing blood plasma supplementation by 0.7% to 0.9%, respectively, increased potential pathogenic microbiota associated in the jejunal mucosa resulting in increased immune response, enterocyte proliferation, and PC concentration. However, supplementing diets with 2.1% CGCM, replacing 1.5% blood plasma, improved growth performance, and reduced MDA without affecting nutrient digestibility, intestinal morphology, and microbiota in the jejunal mucosa. In this study, based on the polynomial contrast, supplementing 1.0% to 1.2% CGCM suppressed the benefits from blood plasma, whereas supplementing 2.1% CGCM showed functional benefits of CGCM with similar effects from blood plasma supplementation.

Keywords: Corynebacterium glutamicum, growth performance, intestinal health, mucosa-associated microbiota, pigs, protein supplement

Introduction

Soybean meal has been predominantly used as a protein supplement in pig production. However, the antinutritional factors such as allergenic proteins, trypsin inhibitors, and flatulence producing oligosaccharides limit its use in nursery pig diets (Kim et al., 2003; Hong et al., 2004; Taliercio and Kim, 2013). Previous studies have shown that animal protein supplements, including blood plasma and fish meal, enhance growth performance, nutrient digestibility, and intestinal health of nursery pigs (Kim and Easter, 2001; Bosi et al., 2004; Weaver et al., 2014). Blood plasma contains 17% to 23% immunoglobulin (Ig) G, which is sufficient to enhance the immune system by inhibiting the adherence of antigens in the intestinal mucosa and, consequently, improving the growth performance (Touchette et al., 2002; Pierce et al., 2005; Tran et al., 2014). However, animal protein supplements are expensive and short in supply in animal feeding (USDA, 2019). The rising cost of pig diets leads nutritionists to increase attention to alternatives replacing conventional animal protein supplements (Øverland et al., 2001; Carlson et al., 2005; Kim et al., 2010).

Alternative protein supplements with adequate nutritional values and bioavailability include single cell protein (SCP), processed vegetable protein, and insect protein (Kim et al., 2019). The SCP, including yeast, microalgae, and bacterial cells, contains high levels amino acids (AA), fats, and vitamins (Kihlberg, 1972; Michalak et al., 2015; Lopes et al., 2017). However, intact SCP supplemented in animal diets may cause reduced growth performance, intestinal health, and nutrient digestibility due to indigestible cell wall (Rumsey et al., 1991; Zhang et al., 2013; Cruz et al., 2020) and the potential endogenous toxins (Farstad, 1977) reducing nutrient digestibility and causing intestinal challenges to young pigs (Kim et al., 2019). The utilization of chemical, enzymatic, and physical processes to lyse bacterial cell wall can release digestible and functional contents from the cell (Namioka et al., 1991; Ugalde and Castrillo, 2002; Becker and Richmond, 2004). In addition, the use of non-harmful bacteria such as Methylococcus capsulatus (Ritala et al., 2017) and Corynebacterium glutamicum (Lee et al., 2016) can overcome the potential toxicity of SCP.

Corynebacterium glutamicum is a Gram-positive bacteria, commonly used to produce AA, and generally recognized as safe (AAFCO, 2008). After the production of AA, Corynebacterium glutamicum cell mass (CGCM) is removed by filtration and then disposed of or used as fertilizers (Kircher and Pfefferle, 2001). However, CGCM contains similar concentrations of protein and AA to animal protein supplements (Zhang et al., 2013) and could partially replace some conventional animal protein supplements, such as fish meal, poultry meal, and blood plasma in feeding pigs. Selected components of bacterial cell called cell-wall glycopolymers (CWGs) including peptidoglycan (PGN), teichoic acid (TA), and lipoprotein can show immunomodulatory functions in the intestine of pigs (Namba et al., 1981; Namioka et al., 1991; Akira et al., 2006) by activating immune cells (Katayama et al., 2011; Poulsen et al., 2018). Additionally, the surface layer proteins (Slp) and TA play important roles in pathogen exclusions (Johnson-henry et al., 2007; Oelschlaeger, 2010). In order to enhance the possible use of such cell wall components, fragmentation or lysis of cell walls can enhance their roles in immune modulation (Humann and Lenz, 2009; Shen et al., 2009), in addition to the release of cell contents as a source of nutrients for pigs (Øverland et al., 2010).

It is hypothesized that lysed CGCM as a protein supplement, replacing blood plasma, would provide nutritional and functional benefits by increasing nutrient utilization and by enhancing intestinal health in nursery pigs. To test the hypothesis, the objectives were to evaluate nutritional values of lysed CGCM as a novel protein supplement and to evaluate the functional roles of lysed CGCM to enhance the intestinal health of nursery pigs.

Materials and Methods

The experimental protocol was approved by the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee of North Carolina State University.

Preparation of lysed CGCM

Lysine broth including intact CGCM was obtained from CJ Bio (Fort Dodge, IA). The lysine broth containing 15% to 20% dry matter (DM) was centrifuged at 3,100 × g for 15 min to obtain pellets. Deionized water was added and vortexed for 30 s or longer until pellets were reconstituted in deionized water. Eighty liters of CGCM in deionized water went through the lysis using a French press (120 L/h capacity, NS3006H, Niro Soavi S.p.A., Parma, Italia) at 900 bars for 4 s at 30 °C with a maximum allowance of 70 °C in the holding tube. After the holding time, the CGCM in deionized water flowed to a serpentine tube immersed into chilled water for rapid cooling. The lysis process was completed in four cycles in a continuous system (Biomanufacturing Training and Education Center, North Carolina State University). The lysed CGCM was dried using a freeze dryer (24DX48, Virtis, Gardiner, NY). The lysing process was based on the study by Rumsey et al. (1991).

Images of CGCM before and after the lysis were taken using a variable pressure scanning electron microscope (S3200N, Hitachi, Japan) at the 5 kV efficient voltage and 10 mm working distance to obtain the percentage of lysed cells. Each image of CGCM from before and after the lysis (Figure 1) was evenly divided into eight sections. The intact and lysed cells were counted to calculate the percentage of lysed cells in each section (Table 1). Protein and AA composition of intact and lysed CGCM (Table 1) were measured in triplication at Agricultural Experimental Station Chemical Laboratories, University of Missouri (Columbia, MO).

Figure 1.

Figure 1.

Images of Corynebacterium glutamicum cell mass before (A) and after (B) homogenization taken by Scanning Electron Microscope (S3200N, Hitachi, Japan).

Table 1.

Percentage of lysed cells and analyzed nutrient composition in Corynebacterium glutamicum cell mass (CGCM) (as-is basis)

CGCM
Intact Lysed SEM
Lysed CGCM, %1 4.3 58.8 2.0
Crude protein, % 79.9 80.5 0.3
Indispensable amino acids, %
 Arginine 4.5 4.5 0.0
 Histidine 1.7 1.7 0.0
 Isoleucine 3.8 3.8 0.0
 Leucine 5.9 6.0 0.1
 Lysine 7.4 4.6 1.4
 Methionine 1.4 1.4 0.0
 Phenylalanine 3.1 3.1 0.0
 Threonine 3.5 3.6 0.0
 Tryptophan 0.3 0.8 0.2
 Valine 5.2 5.3 0.0

1Each image from intact and lysed CGCM was evenly divided into eight sections and the numbers of intact and lysed cells were counted to calculate the percentage of lysed cells in each section.

Animals, experimental design, and diets

Thirty-two nursery pigs (16 barrows and 16 gilts) at 21 d of age with initial body weight (BW) of 7.2 ± 0.6 kg were used for the experiment. Pigs were allotted to four dietary treatments (n = 8) based on the randomized complete block design with initial BW (light and heavy) and sex (gilts and barrows) as blocking criteria. All pigs were housed in individual pens and had ad libitum access to water and the assigned experimental diets for 21 d based on two phases: phase 1 (days 0 to 10) and phase 2 (days 11 to 21). Dietary treatments consisted of a basal diet with lysed CGCM at four levels (0, 0.7, 1.4, and 2.1%) of CGCM replacing blood plasma, based on Lys content (i.e., at 6.9:4.6 blood plasma to lysed CGCM Lys ratio). Therefore, up to 1.5% blood plasma was replaced by 2.1% CGCM. All experimental diets were formulated to meet or exceed the nutrient requirements based on the study by NRC (2012). The composition of mash experimental diets is shown in Table 2. Titanium dioxide (0.4%) was added to the feed as an indigestible external marker and fed during the last 7 d of the experiment.

Table 2.

Composition of experimental diets (as-fed basis)

Item CGCM
Phase 1 Phase 2
0% 0.7% 1.4% 2.1% 0% 0.7% 1.4% 2.1%
Feedstuff, %
 Yellow dent corn, ground 42.8 42.5 42.2 41.9 50.3 50.0 49.7 49.4
 Whey permeate 24.0 24.0 24.0 24.0 15.0 15.0 15.0 15.0
 Poultry fat 2.15 2.27 2.39 2.51 1.98 2.10 2.22 2.34
 Soybean meal, 48% CP 20.0 20.0 20.0 20.0 23.0 23.0 23.0 23.0
 Poultry meal 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 2.80 2.80 2.80 2.80
 Fish meal 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 - - - -
 Blood plasma 2.90 2.40 1.90 1.40 4.08 3.58 3.08 2.58
 CGCM1 0.00 0.70 1.40 2.10 0.00 0.70 1.40 2.10
l-Lys 0.72 0.72 0.71 0.71 0.43 0.43 0.42 0.42
dl-Met 0.31 0.31 0.32 0.32 0.18 0.17 0.18 0.18
l-Thr 0.27 0.27 0.26 0.26 0.12 0.12 0.11 0.11
l-Trp 0.05 0.05 0.06 0.06 0.00 0.00 0.01 0.01
 Salt 0.25 0.25 0.25 0.25 0.25 0.25 0.25 0.25
 Dicalcium phosphate 0.65 0.65 0.65 0.65 0.85 0.84 0.84 0.84
 Limestone 0.70 0.70 0.70 0.70 0.85 0.84 0.84 0.84
 Vitamin premix2 0.03 0.03 0.03 0.03 0.03 0.03 0.03 0.03
 Mineral premix3 0.15 0.15 0.15 0.15 0.15 0.15 0.15 0.15
Calculated composition
 DM, % 90.6 90.7 90.8 90.9 90.2 90.3 90.4 90.4
 ME, kcal/kg 3,401 3,401 3,401 3,401 3,401 3,401 3,401 3,401
 SID4 Lys, % 1.50 1.50 1.50 1.50 1.35 1.35 1.35 1.35
 SID Met+Cys, % 0.83 0.83 0.83 0.83 0.74 0.74 0.74 0.74
 SID Trp, % 0.25 0.25 0.25 0.25 0.23 0.23 0.23 0.23
 SID Thr, % 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.79 0.79 0.79 0.79
 Ca, % 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.80 0.80 0.80 0.80
 STTD5 P, % 0.46 0.46 0.45 0.44 0.42 0.42 0.41 0.40
Analyzed composition, %
 DM6 90.4 90.2 90.2 90.4 90.4 89.7 90.1 90.0
 CP 22.4 23.3 23.1 23.2 22.7 23.6 23.7 23.8
 EE7 4.22 4.53 4.62 4.83 4.41 4.10 4.37 4.29

1CGCM, Corynebacterium glutamicum cell mass.

2The vitamin premix provided the following per kilogram of complete diet: 6,613.8 IU of vitamin A as vitamin A acetate, 992.0 IU of vitamin D3, 19.8 IU of vitamin E, 2.64 mg of vitamin K as menadione sodium bisulfate, 0.03 mg of vitamin B12, 4.63 mg of riboflavin, 18.52 mg of D-pantothenic acid as calcium pantothenate, 26.45 mg of niacin, and 0.07 mg of biotin.

3The trace mineral premix provides the following per kilogram of complete diet: 33.0 mg Mn as manganous oxide, 109.5 mg of Fe as ferrous sulfate, 109.5 mg of Zn as zinc sulfate, 16.5 mg of Cu as copper sulfate, 0.3 mg of I as ethylenediamine dihydroiodide, and 0.3 mg of Se as sodium selenite.

4SID, standardized ileal digestible.

5STTD, standardized total tract digestible.

6DM, dry matter.

7EE, ether extract.

Growth performance and fecal score

The BW and feed intake of each pig were recorded at days 0, 10, and 21 to calculate BW, ADG, ADFI, G:F, and daily CGCM intake. Fecal scores were recorded individually on every odd day from days 3 to 19. Fecal scores were: (1) very hard and dry stool, (2) firm stool, (3) normal stool, (4) loose stool, and (5) watery stool with no shape following Weaver and Kim (2014) and Guo et al. (2015).

Sample collection

After 21 d of feeding, all pigs were euthanized by exsanguination after the penetration of a captive bolt to the head to collect samples. Sections of proximal (1.5 m after the pyloric duodenal junction) and distal (1.5 m before the ileocecal junction) jejunum were collected and rinsed with 0.9% saline solution to collect mucosa and tissue. The jejunal mucosa was collected into 2 mL microcentrifuge tubes and immediately frozen in liquid nitrogen, and then stored at −80 °C for determination of immune status, oxidative stress markers, and microbiota. Proximal and distal jejunum tissues (5 cm) were collected into 50 mL polypropylene tubes with 40 mL of 10% buffered formaldehyde solution for histological evaluation. Ileal digesta was collected into 150 mL containers placed on ice and then stored at −20 °C for analysis of apparent ileal digestibility (AID).

Relative abundance and diversity of jejunal mucosa-associated microbiota

Distal jejunal mucosa samples were used to extract DNA using QIAamp Fast DNA Stool Mini Kit (#51604, Qiagen, Germantown, MD) following the description from Duarte et al. (2020). Samples were sent to Mako Medical Laboratories (Raleigh, NC) for microbial sequencing using the 16S rRNA technique. Libraries were prepared with the Ion Xpress Plus Fragment Library Kit (cat. no. 4471269, Thermo Fisher Scientific) from the expanded target regions, and the IonCode Barcode Adapters 1-384 Kit (cat. no. A29751, Thermo Fisher Scientific) was used for barcoding and multiplexing of the prepared libraries. The libraries were quantified with the Ion Universal Library Quantitation Kit (cat. no. A26217, Thermo Fisher Scientific) and samples were diluted to equivalent concentration and pooled into multiplexed libraries for template preparation. Template preparation and chip loading were performed using the Ion Chef instructions and sequencing was performed on the Ion S5 system with the Ion 520 & Ion 530 Kit-Chef (cat. no. A30010, Thermo Fisher Scientific) and the Ion 530 Chip Kit-4 Reactions (cat. no. A27763, Thermo Fisher Scientific). Sequences were processed using the Torrent Suite Software (version 5.2.2) (Thermo Fisher Scientific). Using the Ion Reporter Software Suite (version 5.2) of bioinformatics analysis tools applied on sequence data analysis, alignment to GreenGenes and MicroSeq databases, alpha and beta diversity plot generation, and OTU table generation. Following Duarte et al. (2021), OTU data were used to calculate the relative abundance. OTU with relative abundance <1.0% were combined as Others for statistical analysis.

Immune status and oxidative stress

Jejunal mucosa samples (1 g) from microcentrifuge tubes were taken and added with 2 mL of PBS solution into 5 mL polypropylene tubes. Mucosa samples were homogenized using a tissue homogenizer (Tissuemiser, Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc., Rockford, IL) for 30 s on ice and transferred to a new 2 mL microcentrifuge tube for centrifugation for 15 min at 14,000 × g at 4 °C as described by Holanda et al. (2020). The supernatant was divided into eight sets of 0.25 mL into polypropylene tubes and stored at −80 °C for further analysis.

The concentrations of total protein, tumor necrosis factor alpha (TNFα), interleukin-8 (IL-8), malondialdehyde (MDA), protein carbonyl (PC), IgA, and IgG were analyzed by the colorimetric method and the absorbance was measured on a plate reader (Synergy HT, BioTek Instruments; Winooski, VT) and the Gen5 Data Analysis Software (BioTek Instruments).

The concentration of total protein was analyzed by using Pierce BCA Protein Assay Kit (#23225, Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA) following procedures of Jang and Kim (2019). Mucosa samples were diluted (1:60) to reach the working range of 20 to 2,000 μg/mL. The absorbance was measured at 562 nm. The concentration of total protein was calculated by the standard curve and used to normalize the concentrations of TNFα, IL-8, IgA, IgG, MDA, and PC.

The concentration of TNFα was analyzed in proximal and distal mucosa using the Porcine TNFα Immunoassay Kit (#PTA00, R&D Systems; Minneapolis, MN) as described by Chen et al. (2017). The working range of standards was 0 to 1,500 pg/mL. The absorbance was measured at 450 nm. The concentration of TNFα was calculated by the standard curve and described as pg/mg of protein. The concentration of IL-8 was analyzed using the Porcine IL-8/CXCL8 Immunoassay Kit (#P8000, R&D Systems) following Moita et al. (2021). Mucosa samples were diluted (1:8) to reach the working range of standards from 0 to 4,000 pg/mL. The absorbance was measured at 450 nm. The concentration of IL-8 was calculated by the standard curve and described as ng/mg of protein. The concentration of IgA was analyzed using the pig ELISA kit (# E101-102, Bethyl Laboratories; Montgomery, TX) following the description from Weaver and Kim (2014) in serum. Mucosa samples were diluted (1:500) to reach the working range of standards from 15.6 to 1,000 ng/mL. The absorbance was measured at 450 nm. The concentration of IgA was calculated by the standard curve and described as μg/mg of protein. The concentration of IgG was analyzed using the pig ELISA kit (# E101-104, Bethyl Laboratories) following Duarte et al. (2020). Mucosa samples were diluted (1:1,000) to reach the working range of standards from 7.8 to 500 ng/mL. The absorbance was measured at 450 nm. The concentration of IgG was calculated by the standard curve and described as μg/mg of protein. The concentration of MDA was analyzed using Thiobarbituric Acid Reactive Substance MDA Quantitation Assay Kit (#STA-330, Cell Biolabs, Inc., San Diego, CA) following Zhao and Kim (2020). The working range of MDA standards was 0 to 125 μM. The absorbance was measured at 532 nm. The concentration of MDA was calculated by standard curve and described as µmol/mg of protein. The concentration of PC was analyzed using Protein Carbonyl ELISA Kit (#STA-310, Cell Biolabs, Inc.) following the description from Duarte et al. (2019). All samples were diluted to reach the protein concentration at 10 μg/mL to meet the working range of standards from 0.375 to 7.5 nmol/mg protein. The absorbance was measured at 450 nm. The concentration of PC was calculated by the standard curve and described as nmol/mg of protein.

Intestinal morphology and crypt cell proliferation

Two sections of proximal and distal jejunum were cut and placed into cassettes and sent to North Carolina State University College of Veterinary Medicine Histopathology Lab (Raleigh, NC) for immunohistochemistry staining with Ki-67 assay. One slide represented one pig. Pictures were taken using a microscope (CX31, Olympus, Tokyo, Japan) and Infinity Analyze and Capture software (Lumenera Corporation, Ottawa, Canada).

Pictures were taken at magnification 40× to measure villus height (VH) and width (VW), crypt depth (CD), and villus height to crypt depth ratio (VH:CD). Lengths of 15 well-shaped villi and corresponding crypts were measured in each slide. Pictures of 15 well-shaped crypts were taken from each slide at magnification 100× and cropped to calculate the percentage of the Ki-67-positive cells to the number of epithelial cells in a crypt by operating the ImageJS (http://imagejs.org). The percentage of Ki-67-positive cells was used as an indicator of the enterocyte proliferation rate in the crypt (Chen et al., 2017; Duarte et al., 2019).

Apparent ileal digestibility

Frozen ileal digesta samples were dried by a freeze dryer (24DX48, Virtis). Phase 2 diets and freeze dried ileal digesta were ground to fine powder form. The concentration of titanium dioxide in the diets and digesta was measured by following Myers et al. (2004). The DM was measured by following Passos et al. (2015). The gross energy (GE) was measured using a bomb calorimeter (Parr 6200, Parr Instrument Company; Moline, IL). Ether extract (EE) was analyzed by following AOAC (2006), method (920.39). Diets and ileal digesta samples were sent to Agricultural Experimental Station Chemical Laboratories, University of Missouri to analyze CP and AA without hydrolysis.

Apparent ileal digestibility of DM, GE, EE, CP, and AA was calculated as previously described by Chen et al. (2020) and Holanda and Kim (2020). The AID was calculated using the equation:

AID% = 100 × {1 – [(TiO2 in a diet/TiO2 in digesta) × (nutrient in digesta/nutrient in a diet)]

Statistical analysis

All data except for fecal score were analyzed based on a randomized complete block design using Mixed procedure by SAS 9.3 (SAS Inc., Cary, NC). Initial BW and sex were considered as blocks. Dietary treatments were defined as fixed effects and blocks were random effects. The LSMEANS statement was used to calculate mean values for all treatments. Linear and quadratic effects of increasing CGCM supplementation were tested by orthogonal polynomial contrasts using the CONTRAST statement. When a quadratic effect was significant (P < 0.05), the procedure RSREG was used to predict the critical value and the stationary point. The linear and quadratic effects of daily intake (g/d) of CGCM were tested by REG procedures. The analysis of fecal score data was performed by using Kruskal–Wallis test with Dwass, Steel, Critchlow-Fligner method option for pairwise two-sided multiple comparisons following Guo et al. (2015). Statistical significance was P < 0.05 and 0.05 ≤ P < 0.10 were considered as a tendency.

Results

Lysis of CGCM

The process of homogenization using a French press increased (P < 0.05) the proportion of lysed Corynebacterium glutamicum cells from 4.3% in intact CGCM to 58% (Table 1).

Growth performance and fecal score

Increasing CGCM supplementation did not affect the growth performance of nursery pigs (Table 3). However, when the growth performance data were analyzed based on CGCM intake (g/d), the ADG was linearly increased (P < 0.05; Figure 2).

Table 3.

Growth performance of nursery pigs fed diets with increasing Corynebacterium glutamicum cell mass (CGCM) supplementation

CGCM, %1 P-value
Item 0 0.7 1.4 2.1 SEM Linear Quadratic
BW, kg
 Initial 7.1 7.1 7.2 7.2 0.6 0.569 0.964
 Final, day 21 12.1 12.0 12.1 12.7 1.1 0.494 0.599
ADG, g 237 234 234 264 33 0.554 0.591
ADFI, g 433 433 456 471 36 0.378 0.820
G:F 0.55 0.53 0.50 0.55 0.04 0.910 0.309

1Four supplemental levels of CGCM (n = 32 total, n = 8 per supplemental level).

Figure 2.

Figure 2.

Average daily gain of nursery pigs with increasing daily intake of Corynebacterium glutamicum cell mass (CGCM). Linear model: y = 7.7x + 210, P-value < 0.05 (overall model), 0.039 (slope), and <0.0001 (intercept), x = daily CGCM intake (g/d), y = ADG (g/d).

Pigs fed 0.7% CGCM had lower (P < 0.05) fecal score than pigs fed 0% CGCM on day 19 of the experiment, whereas no differences were observed among other treatments (Figure 3).

Figure 3.

Figure 3.

Fecal score of nursery pigs fed diets with increasing Corynebacterium glutamicum cell mass (CGCM) supplementation from 0% to 2.1% (0, 0.7, 1.4, and 2.1%). Fecal scores were: (1) very hard and dry stool, (2) firm stool, (3) normal stool, (4) loose stool, and (5) watery stool with no shape. *0 vs. 0.7: P < 0.05.

Relative abundance and diversity of mucosa-associated microbiota

Increasing CGCM supplementation had quadratic effects (P < 0.05) on the alpha diversity of jejunal mucosa-associated microbiota estimated with Shannon index at family (maximum 2.8 at 1.0% CGCM), genus (maximum 2.7 at 1.0% CGCM), and species (maximum 3.8 at 1.0% CGCM) levels (Table 4). Increasing CGCM supplementation had quadratic effects (P < 0.05) on the alpha diversity of jejunal mucosa-associated microbiota estimated with Simpson index at family (maximum 0.8 at 1.1% CGCM), genus (maximum 0.7 at 1.1% CGCM), and species (maximum 0.9 at 1.1% CGCM) levels.

Table 4.

Alpha-diversity of the mucosa-associated microbiota in the distal jejunum1 of nursery pigs fed diets with increasing Corynebacterium glutamicum cell mass (CGCM) supplementation

CGCM, %2 P-value
0 0.7 1.4 2.1 SEM Linear Quadratic
Family
 Chao 1 44.6 46.9 44.0 49.1 6.1 0.702 0.819
 Shannon 2.07 2.95 2.39 2.06 0.30 0.554 0.012
 Simpson 0.57 0.77 0.69 0.61 0.07 0.891 0.007
Genus
 Chao 1 47.6 44.6 43.3 43.8 4.4 0.514 0.689
 Shannon 2.09 2.88 2.35 1.95 0.32 0.349 0.016
 Simpson 0.55 0.75 0.67 0.59 0.07 0.849 0.007
Species
 Chao 1 78.8 71.3 64.1 78.6 7.6 0.817 0.179
 Shannon 3.09 3.84 3.58 3.04 0.32 0.663 0.017
 Simpson 0.73 0.87 0.84 0.79 0.04 0.287 0.016

1Distal: 1.5 m before the ileocecal junction.

2Four supplemental levels of CGCM (n = 32 total, n = 8 per supplemental level).

When the data were analyzed based on the daily CGCM intake (g/d), increasing the daily CGCM intake tended to have quadratic effects on the alpha diversity of jejunal mucosa-associated microbiota estimated with Simpson index (P = 0.094) at the family level with the maximum 0.75 at 5.4 g/d CGCM intake (quadratic model: y = −0.005x2 + 0.056x + 0.595; R² = 0.15). Increasing the daily CGCM intake tended to have the quadratic effects on the alpha diversity of jejunal mucosa-associated microbiota estimated with Shannon (P = 0.091) and Simpson (P = 0.079) indexes at the genus level with the maximum at 2.71 and 0.74, when the daily CGCM intakes were 4.7 (quadratic model: y = −0.025x2 + 0.234x + 2.159; R² = 0.16) and 5.4 g/d (quadratic model: y = −0.006x2 + 0.064x + 0.568; R² = 0.18), respectively. Increasing the daily CGCM intake had the quadratic effects (P < 0.05) on the alpha diversity of jejunal mucosa-associated microbiota estimated with Shannon and Simpson indexes at the species level with the maximum at 3.88 and 0.88, when the daily CGCM intake was 5.0 g/d (Figure 4a) and 5.9 g/d (Figure 4b), respectively.

Figure 4.

Figure 4.

(a) Alpha diversity (Shannon index) of mucosa-associated microbiota at the species level in the distal jejunum of nursery pigs with increasing daily intake of Corynebacterium glutamicum cell mass (CGCM). Quadratic model: y = −0.030x2 + 0.304x + 3.122, P-value < 0.05 (overall model), 0.009 (x2), 0.017 (x), and <0.0001 (intercept), x = CGCM intake (g/d), y = Shannon index. (b). Alpha diversity (Simpson index) of mucosa-associated microbiota at the species level in the distal jejunum of nursery pigs with increasing daily intake of Corynebacterium glutamicum cell mass (CGCM). Quadratic model: y = −0.004x2 + 0.047x + 0.740, P-value < 0.05 (overall model), 0.007 (x2), 0.004 (x), and <0.0001 (intercept), x = CGCM intake, (g/d), y = Simpson index.

At the phylum level, increasing CGCM supplementation had quadratic effects (P < 0.05) on the minimum relative abundances of Firmicutes (minimum 37.8% at 1.1% CGCM) and Proteobacteria (maximum 44.0% at 1.1% CGCM) and tended to have a quadratic effect (P = 0.058) on the relative abundance of Actinobacteria (Table 5). When the data were analyzed based on the daily CGCM intake (g/d), increasing the daily CGCM intake tended to have a quadratic effect (P = 0.055) on the relative abundance of Firmicutes with minimum 37.5% at 5.4 g/d CGCM intake (Figure 5a). Increasing the daily CGCM intake had quadratic effect (P < 0.05) on the relative abundance of Proteobacteria with maximum abundance at 46.5%, when the daily CGCM intake was 5.6 g/d (Figure 5b).

Table 5.

Relative abundance of mucosa-associated microbiota at the phylum level in the distal jejunum1 of nursery pigs fed diets with increasing Corynebacterium glutamicum cell mass (CGCM) supplementation

CGCM, %2 P-value
0 0.7 1.4 2.1 SEM Linear Quadratic
Firmicutes 65.2 38.5 42.4 56.1 9.8 0.455 0.009
Bacteroidetes 17.3 9.2 13.8 16.1 6.9 0.962 0.301
Proteobacteria 14.5 43.2 39.1 25.3 6.7 0.353 0.005
Actinobacteria 2.5 4.6 4.2 2.3 1.1 0.820 0.058
Spirochaetes 0.6 6.8 0.3 0.1 2.5 0.430 0.201
Others3 0.2 0.3 0.7 0.2 0.3 0.750 0.268
F/B ratio4 13.7 14.0 7.3 25.4 7.8 0.365 0.207

1Distal jejunum: 1.5 m before the ileocecal junction.

2Four supplemental levels of CGCM (n = 32 total, n = 8 per supplemental level).

3The OTU with the relative abundance < 1.0% within each level was combined in each phlyum.

4F/B ratio, firmicutes to bacteroidetes ratio.

Figure 5.

Figure 5.

(a). Relative abundance of Firmicutes in the mucosa of distal jejunum of nursery pigs with increasing daily intake of Corynebacterium glutamicum cell mass (CGCM). Quadratic model: y = 0.859x2 – 9.324x + 62.803, P-value = 0.055 (overall model), 0.017 (x2), 0.0020 (x), and <0.0001 (intercept), x = CGCM intake (g/d), y = Firmicutes (%). (b). Relative abundance of Proteobacteria in the mucosa of distal jejunum of nursery pigs with increasing daily intake of Corynebacterium glutamicum cell mass (CGCM). Quadratic model: y = −0.964x2 + 10.809x + 16.263, P-value <0.05 (overall model), 0.002 (x2), 0.002 (x), and 0.016 (intercept), x = CGCM intake (g/d), y = Proteobacteria (%).

At the family level, increasing CGCM supplementation had quadratic effects (P < 0.05) on the relative abundance of Lactobacillaceae (minimum 26.4% at 1.2% CGCM), Helicobacteraceae (maximum 29.3% at 1.2% CGCM), and Campylobacteraceae (maximum 9.0% at 1.0% CGCM) (Table 6). Increasing CGCM supplementation tended to have a quadratic effect (P = 0.060) on the relative abundance of Propionibacteriaceae, whereas linearly reduced (P < 0.05) the relative abundance of Bifidobacteriaceae. When the data were analyzed based on the daily CGCM intake (g/d), increasing the daily CGCM intake tended to have quadratic effects on the relative abundance of Helicobacteraceae (P = 0.053) and Campylobacteraceae (P = 0.098) with minimum abundance at 31.3% and 9.0% when the daily CGCM intake was 5.8 g/d (quadratic model: y = 0.692x2 + 8.027x + 8.036; R² = 0.20) and 5.1 g/d (quadratic model: y = −0.284x2 + 2.867x + 1.735; R² = 0.16), respectively. Increasing the daily CGCM intake tended to linearly reduce (P = 0.067) the relative abundance of Bifidobacteriaceae (linear model: y = −0.074x + 1.514; R² = 0.11).

Table 6.

The relative abundance of mucosa-associated microbiota at the family level in the distal jejunum1 of nursery pigs fed diets with increasing Corynebacterium glutamicum cell mass (CGCM) supplementation

CGCM, %2 P-value
0 0.7 1.4 2.1 SEM Linear Quadratic
Lactobacillaceae 51.2 23.3 34.6 37.4 11.2 0.364 0.048
Helicobacteraceae 7.0 25.7 28.3 17.7 6.7 0.263 0.042
Prevotellaceae 17.1 8.7 13.2 15.4 6.7 0.988 0.272
Veillonellaceae 9.8 6.1 6.6 7.3 3.0 0.546 0.413
Campylobacteraceae 0.9 10.5 5.6 0.7 2.9 0.667 0.022
Clostridiaceae 0.9 3.1 0.0 3.0 1.9 0.638 0.772
Succinivibrionaceae 2.6 0.6 1.7 1.0 1.4 0.455 0.563
Peptostreptococcaceae 0.4 2.0 0.0 3.3 2.2 0.397 0.609
Pasteurellaceae 1.3 0.3 1.0 3.0 1.8 0.406 0.355
Bifidobacteriaceae 1.5 1.5 1.1 0.6 0.4 0.029 0.419
Corynebacteriaceae 0.3 1.4 1.8 1.1 0.6 0.253 0.149
Streptococcaceae 1.2 1.2 0.3 0.9 0.5 0.417 0.528
Propionibacteriaceae 0.4 1.0 1.0 0.4 0.3 0.870 0.060
Pseudomonadaceae 0.2 1.1 0.2 0.5 0.4 0.994 0.410
Others3 5.2 13.7 6.1 7.7 2.2 0.995 0.145

1Distal jejunum: 1.5 m before the ileocecal junction.

2Four supplemental levels of CGCM (n = 32 total, n = 8 per supplemental level).

3The OTU with the relative abundance < 1.0% within each level was combined in each family.

At the genus level, increasing CGCM supplementation tended to have quadratic effects on the relative abundance of Lactobacillus (P = 0.056) and Propionibacterium (P = 0.073) and had quadratic effects (P < 0.05) on the relative abundance of Helicobacter (31.9%) and Campylobacter (9.4%) at 1.2% and 1.0% CGCM, respectively (Table 7). Increasing CGCM supplementation tended to linearly reduce (P = 0.068) the relative abundance of Megasphaera and linearly reduced (P < 0.05) relative abundance of Bifidobacterium. When the data were analyzed based on the daily CGCM intake (g/d), increasing the daily CGCM intake had a quadratic effect (P < 0.05) on the relative abundance of Helicobacter with 33.9% at 5.7 g/d CGCM intake (quadratic model: y = −0.737x2 + 8.368x + 10.102; R² = 0.20). Increasing the daily CGCM intake tended to linearly reduce (P = 0.064) the relative abundance of Bifidobacterium (linear model: y = −0.086x + 1.625; R² = 0.12).

Table 7.

The relative abundance of mucosa-associated microbiota at the genus level in the distal jejunum1 of nursery pigs fed diets with increasing Corynebacterium glutamicum cell mass (CGCM) supplementation

CGCM, %2 P-value
0 0.7 1.4 2.1 SEM Linear Quadratic
Lactobacillus 54.2 26.0 37.1 38.4 11.3 0.271 0.056
Helicobacter 8.4 30.4 28.8 19.1 6.9 0.331 0.033
Prevotella 13.9 8.1 11.4 16.1 7.7 0.649 0.297
Campylobacter 0.8 10.4 6.7 0.8 3.3 0.806 0.031
Mitsuokella 4.3 1.4 2.3 2.1 1.1 0.270 0.250
Clostridium 0.8 3.7 0.0 4.3 3.0 0.517 0.730
Selenomonas 1.2 1.7 1.1 4.1 1.9 0.320 0.503
Megasphaera 3.7 1.4 1.1 0.6 1.2 0.068 0.435
Succinivibrio 2.6 0.6 1.6 0.9 1.4 0.416 0.581
Actinobacillus 1.0 0.3 1.0 3.3 1.9 0.337 0.387
Corynebacterium 0.3 1.7 2.1 1.3 0.8 0.309 0.142
Bifidobacterium 1.5 1.6 1.1 0.6 0.4 0.029 0.410
Propionibacterium 0.5 1.3 1.1 0.5 0.4 0.866 0.073
Pseudomonas 0.2 1.3 0.2 0.5 0.4 0.938 0.355
Others3 6.7 10.2 6.4 7.5 2.3 0.880 0.532

1Distal jejunum: 1.5 m before the ileocecal junction.

2Four supplemental levels of CGCM (n = 32 total, n = 8 per supplemental level).

3The OTU with the relative abundance < 1.0% within each level was combined in each genus.

At the species level, increasing CGCM supplementation linearly reduced (P = 0.023) the relative abundance of Prevotella sp. (Table 8). Increasing CGCM supplementation tended to linearly reduce (P = 0.096) and tended to have a quadratic effect (P = 0.090) on the relative abundance of Lactobacillus kitasatonis and tended to linearly reduce (P = 0.053) the relative abundance of Corynebacterium glutamicum. Increasing CGCM supplementation had a quadratic effect (P < 0.05) on the relative abundance of Pelomonas puraquae (maximum 1.1% at 1.0% CGCM). When the data were analyzed based on the daily CGCM intake (g/d), increasing the daily CGCM intake tended to linearly reduce (P = 0.077) the relative abundance of Prevotella sp. (Figure 6a). Increasing the daily CGCM intake had a quadratic effect (P < 0.05) on the relative abundances of Pelomonas puraquae with minimum abundance at 1.2%, when the daily CGCM intake was 4.8 g/d (Figure 6b).

Table 8.

The relative abundance of mucosa-associated microbiota at the species level in the distal jejunum1 of nursery pigs fed diets with increasing Corynebacterium glutamicum cell mass (CGCM) supplementation

CGCM, %2 P-value
0 0.7 1.4 2.1 SEM Linear Quadratic
Lactobacillus kitasatonis 33.1 10.9 16.8 21.3 10.4 0.096 0.090
Prevotella copri 11.7 10.2 17.8 17.1 8.8 0.390 0.440
Helicobacter rappini 4.6 13.1 10.1 7.6 2.8 0.201 0.113
Lactobacillus mucosae 9.7 8.1 7.8 5.0 3.1 0.512 0.794
Helicobacter mastomyrinus 3.6 8.9 7.3 7.4 3.7 0.494 0.439
Lactobacillus delbrueckii 4.1 2.7 2.5 6.3 2.3 0.567 0.815
Campylobacter upsaliensis 0.2 5.2 6.2 0.5 2.5 0.117 0.532
Mitsuokella jalaludinii 4.8 1.1 2.6 1.7 1.3 0.226 0.107
Campylobacter coli 0.6 7.1 0.2 0.2 3.4 0.943 0.124
Prevotella stercorea 2.0 1.5 2.1 2.2 1.3 0.931 0.630
Dialister succinatiphilus 1.7 1.2 3.0 0.3 0.9 0.350 0.358
Prevotella sp. 3.4 0.7 0.8 1.1 0.9 0.023 0.125
Propionibacterium acnes 0.8 2.1 2.2 0.9 0.7 0.141 0.408
Selenomonas bovis 0.8 1.5 0.9 2.6 1.4 0.959 0.696
Corynebacterium glutamicum 0.2 1.8 2.3 1.2 0.7 0.053 0.533
Lactobacillus sp. 0.5 0.9 0.9 2.7 1.3 0.816 0.927
Succinivibrio dextrinosolvens 2.3 0.3 1.2 0.9 1.5 0.502 0.327
Selenomonas lipolytica 0.8 0.9 0.8 1.9 0.9 0.968 0.922
Pelomonas puraquae 0.4 1.2 0.9 0.2 0.3 0.119 0.040
Helicobacter canadensis 0.4 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.2 0.242 0.412
Others3 14.2 20.6 14.8 18.9 5.1 0.933 0.325

1Distal jejunum: 1.5 m before the ileocecal junction.

2Four supplemental levels of CGCM (n = 32 total, n = 8 per supplemental level).

3The OTU with the relative abundance < 1.0% within each level was combined in each species.

Figure 6.

Figure 6.

(a). Relative abundance of Prevotella sp. in the mucosa of distal jejunum of nursery pigs with increasing daily intake of Corynebacterium glutamicum cell mass (CGCM). Linear model: y = −0.201x + 2.524, P-value = 0.077 (overall model), 0.077 (slope), and 0.001 (intercept), x = CGCM intake (g/d), y = Prevotella sp. (%). (b). Relative abundance of Pelomonas puraquae in the mucosa of distal jejunum of nursery pigs with increasing daily intake of Corynebacterium glutamicum cell mass (CGCM). Quadratic model: y = −0.033x2 + 0.312x + 0.420, P-value < 0.05 (overall model), 0.001 (x2), 0.004 (x), and 0.047 (intercept), x = CGCM intake (g/d), y = Pelomonas puraquae (%).

Immune status and oxidative stress

In the proximal jejunal mucosa, increasing CGCM supplementation did not affect the concentration of TNFα and IL-8 in nursery pigs (Table 9). Increasing CGCM supplementation tended to have a quadratic effect (P = 0.051) on the concentration of IgA and had quadratic effects (P < 0.05) on the concentrations of IgG (maximum 4.94 µg/mg of protein at 1.0% CGCM) and PC (maximum 6.12 nmol/mg of protein at 1.1% CGCM). Whereas increasing CGCM supplementation linearly reduced (P < 0.05) the concentration of MDA. When the data were analyzed based on daily CGCM intake (g/d), increasing the daily intake of CGCM tended to have a quadratic effect (P = 0.080) on the concentration of PC with maximum 6.19 nmol/mg of protein at 4.9 g/d CGCM intake (Figure 7).

Table 9.

Immune and oxidative stress markers in the jejunal mucosa of nursery pigs fed diets with increasing Corynebacterium glutamicum cell mass (CGCM) supplementation

CGCM, %1 P-value
Item 0 0.7 1.4 2.1 SEM Linear Quadratic
Proximal jejunal mucosa2, amount/mg of protein
TNFα3, pg 0.83 0.62 0.74 0.75 0.12 0.786 0.284
IL-84, ng 0.49 0.56 0.54 0.47 0.07 0.709 0.241
IgA5, µg 3.06 4.08 5.39 3.20 0.78 0.621 0.051
IgG6, µg 2.26 2.91 3.61 1.99 0.47 0.958 0.025
MDA7, µmol/g 0.64 0.51 0.51 0.47 0.07 0.028 0.382
PC8, nmol 5.09 5.80 6.22 5.07 0.64 0.860 0.047
Distal jejunal mucosa9, amount/mg of protein
TNFα, pg 2.36 2.55 2.29 1.82 0.33 0.219 0.327
IL-8, ng 0.80 0.77 0.98 0.56 0.12 0.297 0.098
IgA, µg 3.56 3.62 4.00 2.59 0.73 0.360 0.246
IgG, µg 3.32 3.17 4.07 2.63 0.66 0.687 0.326
MDA, µmol/g 0.69 0.70 0.67 0.55 0.10 0.292 0.471
PC, nmol 4.93 5.95 6.56 5.06 0.83 0.717 0.051

1Four supplemental levels of CGCM (n = 32 total, n = 8 per supplemental level).

2Proximal jejunum: 1.5 m after the pyloric duodenal junction.

3 TNFα, tumor necrosis factor alpha.

4IL-8, interleukin 8.

5IgA, immunoglobulin A.

6IgG, immunoglobulin G.

7MDA, malondialdehyde.

8PC, protein carbonyl.

9Distal: 1.5 m before the ileocecal junction.

Figure 7.

Figure 7.

The change of protein carbonyl (PC) in the mucosa of proximal jejunum of nursery pigs with increasing daily intake of Corynebacterium glutamicum cell mass (CGCM). Quadratic model: y = −0.047x2 + 0.459x + 5.061, P-value = 0.080 (overall model), 0.031 (x2), 0.053 (x), and <0.0001 (intercept), x = CGCM intake (g/d), y = PC (nmol/mg of protein).

In the distal jejunal mucosa, increasing CGCM supplementation did not affect the concentration of TNFα, IgA, IgG, and MDA in nursery pigs (Table 9). Increasing CGCM supplementation tended to have quadratic effects on the concentration of IL-8 (P = 0.098) and PC (P = 0.051).

Intestinal morphology and crypt cell proliferation

Increasing CGCM supplementation did not affect VH, VW, and CD in proximal and distal jejunum (Table 10). Whereas increasing CGCM supplementation tended to linearly reduce (P = 0.090) VH:CD in the proximal jejunal mucosa and had a quadratic effect (P < 0.05) on the maximum intestinal enterocyte proliferation rate (13.3%) at 1.0% CGCM in the distal jejunal mucosa.

Table 10.

Proximal and distal intestinal morphology and enterocyte proliferation of nursery pigs fed diets with increasing Corynebacterium glutamicum cell mass (CGCM) supplementation

CGCM, %1 P-value
Item 0 0.7 1.4 2.1 SEM Linear Quadratic
Proximal2 jejunal tissue
Villus height, μm 509 447 481 444 27 0.190 0.649
Villus width, μm 121 118 117 116 6 0.451 0.890
Crypt depth, μm 257 239 277 264 46 0.439 0.878
VH:CD3 2.05 1.96 1.86 1.74 0.33 0.090 0.905
Ki-67+4, % 10.1 10.9 12.7 10.6 2.1 0.581 0.292
Distal5 jejunal tissue
Villus height, μm 307 327 291 386 31 0.165 0.233
Villus width, μm 97 97 96 106 5 0.189 0.288
Crypt depth, μm 262 277 281 288 15 0.257 0.796
VH:CD 1.17 1.23 1.05 1.39 0.11 0.357 0.214
Ki-67+, % 10.3 13.4 12.6 10.3 1.5 0.833 0.004

1Four supplemental levels of CGCM (n = 32 total, n = 8 per supplemental level).

2Proximal jejunum: 1.5 m after the pyloric duodenal junction.

3VH:CD, villus height to crypt depth ratio.

4Ki-67+, enterocyte proliferation rate in crypt.

5Distal jejunum: 1.5 m before the ileocecal junction.

Apparent ileal digestibility

Increasing CGCM supplementation did not affect the AID of DM, GE, EE, CP, and AA in nursery pig diets (Table 11).

Table 11.

Apparent ileal digestibility of nutrients in diets (dry matter basis) with increasing Corynebacterium glutamicum cell mass (CGCM) supplementation fed to nursery pigs

CGCM, %1 P value
Item, %2 0 0.7 1.4 2.1 SEM Linear Quadratic
DM 48.8 36.6 55.8 43.3 5.3 0.908 0.978
GE 57.5 46.6 65.2 54.6 5.1 0.629 0.972
EE 66.9 44.3 66.2 61.0 5.6 0.849 0.139
CP 74.6 68.4 71.7 71.6 3.1 0.698 0.372
Indispensable AA
Arg 83.4 78.8 81.7 80.4 2.2 0.542 0.484
His 89.2 87.2 88.9 88.6 1.3 0.977 0.545
Ile 82.5 78.4 80.5 78.3 2.2 0.293 0.681
Leu 64.3 62.6 68.5 64.2 3.6 0.742 0.747
Lys 77.7 75.7 75.2 74.4 2.8 0.386 0.836
Met 93.5 92.7 92.4 92.7 1.2 0.518 0.558
Phe 81.2 77.0 79.8 78.0 2.5 0.521 0.639
Thr 79.6 77.2 77.1 76.6 2.7 0.370 0.681
Trp 95.9 95.0 95.4 95.9 0.6 0.895 0.291
Val 76.8 71.4 77.8 73.8 2.3 0.810 0.770
Dispensable AA
Ala 73.4 66.3 65.8 65.6 4.4 0.161 0.363
Asp 59.4 50.8 48.5 52.7 6.1 0.395 0.296
Cys 87.8 84.5 86.0 87.9 1.7 0.798 0.147
Glu 35.9 39.7 35.2 37.4 8.6 0.999 0.917
Gly 66.6 63.2 64.4 62.6 4.1 0.566 0.865
Pro 71.5 64.4 68.9 68.5 4.0 0.783 0.399
Ser 81.5 76.8 80.2 77.2 2.4 0.398 0.745
Tyr 87.2 83.5 86.3 85.8 1.7 0.861 0.396

1Four supplemental levels of CGCM (n = 32 total, n = 8 per supplemental level).

2DM, dry matter; GE, gross energy; EE, ether extract; AA, amino acids.

Discussion

This study demonstrated that CGCM can be supplemented up to 2.1%, replacing 1.5% blood plasma, in diets without affecting the growth performance and intestinal health of nursery pigs. Additionally, increasing daily CGCM intake increased the ADG of pigs. The results observed in this study are in accordance with previous studies showing that SCP can be used as alternative protein supplements to replace plant or animal protein supplements improving growth performance in broilers (Schøyen et al., 2007; Chand and Khan, 2014) and pigs (Hu et al., 2014; Sampath et al., 2021). Furthermore, blood plasma has high protein and energy digestibility in diets (Chae et al., 1999; Jeong et al., 2016); however, replacing blood plasma by increasing CGCM supplementation did not affect nutrient digestibility of diets, indicating that supplementing 2.1% CGCM can replace 1.5% blood plasma without compromising the nutrient digestibility in diets fed to nursery pigs.

Previous studies have demonstrated that diet composition greatly affected the intestinal microbiota (Etheridge et al., 1984; Upadrasta et al., 2013; Niu et al., 2015). Interestingly, in this study, the increasing CGCM supplementation, replacing blood plasma, showed a quadratic effect on the relative abundance of Firmicutes and Proteobacteria, two of the dominant microbiota phyla in the jejunal mucosa of pigs (Adhikari et al., 2019; Duarte et al., 2021). The supplementation of CGCM up to 1.1% or 5.6 g/d increased the relative abundance of Proteobacteria and reduced the relative abundance of Firmicutes. Conversely, supplementing 2.1% CGCM in diets reduced the relative abundance of Proteobacteria and increased the relative abundance of Firmicutes. The relative abundance of Helicobacteraceae, which belongs to Proteobacteria, is commonly associated to unhealthy pigs (Zhang et al., 2017; Vigors et al., 2019; Duarte et al., 2020), whereas increased relative abundance of Lactobacillaceae in Firmicutes is predominant in healthy pigs (Zhang et al., 2018; Adhikari et al., 2019).

Blood plasma not only is highly digestible but also provides around 20% of IgG that plays an essential role in the immune response by affecting the host immune system and intestinal microbiota (Tran et al., 2014, 2018). Igs from blood plasma bind to potential antigens in the small intestinal lumen and limit the adherence and colonization of potential pathogens, resulting in lower activation of immune response (Touchette et al., 2002). Furthermore, previous studies showed that blood plasma supplemented in diets for pigs (Tran et al., 2018) and broilers (Campbell et al., 2019) increased the relative abundance of Lactobacillaceae, which can increase the production of anti-inflammatory cytokines and, consequently, reduce proinflammatory cytokines (Macia et al., 2012). The cell wall of Gram-positive bacteria, including Corynebacterium glutamicum, contains TA and Slp that can affect the intestinal microbiota by immunomodulatory effects (Katayama et al., 2011; Poulsen et al., 2018) and by competitive exclusion (Johnson-henry et al., 2007; Oelschlaeger, 2010). Previous studies reported that the Slp isolated from cell wall of Lactobacillus attaches to receptors on the intestinal epithelial cells and, consequently, reduces the availability of receptors for the adherence of potential pathogens (Scheuring et al., 2002; Johnson-henry et al., 2007). In this study, based on the orthogonal polynomial model used in the statistical analysis, supplementing CGCM at 0% to 1.1%, replacing 0% to 0.7% blood plasma, reduced available Ig from blood plasma, whereas TA and Slp were not sufficiently provided from CGCM yet limiting functional benefits of CGCM on the intestinal microbiota. The insufficient availability of Ig, TA, and Slp when supplementing 1.1% or 5.6 g/d CGCM resulted in an increased relative abundance of Proteobacteria mainly by increasing the abundance of Helicobacteraceae. However, supplementing 2.1% CGCM, replacing 1.5% blood plasma, in diets may have provided sufficient TA and Slp for their functional roles reducing the relative abundance of Proteobacteria and increasing Firmicutes in the jejunal mucosa.

The alpha diversity of intestinal microbiota can also be affected by the diet composition (Power et al., 2014; Baker et al., 2021). The carbohydrates, including PGN and TA, in the cell wall of Gram-positive bacteria can be used as sources of energy by intestinal microbiota and affect the diversity of the gut microbiota in humans and pigs (Kaoutari et al., 2013; Kogut and Arsenault, 2016). High diversity is usually correlated with healthy status (Bhandari et al., 2008; Fouhse et al., 2016; Kim and Duarte, 2021). However, in this study, the highest diversity was associated with the highest abundance of potential harmful bacteria and highest immune response. According to Tran et al. (2018), it is unclear to decide whether increased or reduced alpha diversity of fecal microbiota is beneficial to intestinal health, therefore further assessment of microbial composition at different taxonomic levels is necessary.

The modulation of intestinal microbiota is generally associated with changes in the immune response (Duarte and Kim, 2021). The effects of increasing CGCM supplementation on the relative abundance of the microbiota observed in this study can explain the results on the immune and the oxidative stress status. The increased relative abundance of Proteobacteria, including Helicobacteraceae and Campylobacteraceae, can affect the immune system and oxidative stress status in the jejunum of nursery pigs (McOrist et al., 1992; Aiba et al., 1998). In response to Gram-negative bacteria, including the Proteobacteria, the intestinal immune cells produce IgG to protect the host against systemic infection (Zeng et al., 2016). Conversely, previous studies showed that greater relative abundance of Lactobacillaceae can be associated with the synthesis of anti-inflammatory cytokines (Tran et al., 2018; Campbell et al., 2019).

Previous study showed that pigs fed blood plasma in diets improved intestinal health by preventing from the production of proinflammatory cytokines, such as TNFα, IL-8, and interferon-γ, resulting in apoptosis of infected cells and the production of additional proinflammatory cytokines and chemokines (Tran et al., 2014). Therefore, blood plasma supplementation would be efficiently utilized for growth by enhancing intestinal health and nutrient utilization (Pérez-Bosque et al., 2004; Pierce et al., 2005). The cell wall of Gram-positive bacteria, including Corynebacterium glutamicum, contains CWGs that have immunomodulatory functions, reducing excessive immune reactions (Weidenmaier and Peschel, 2008; Yasuda et al., 2008). The CWGs from bacterial cell wall bind to the immune cells, including dendritic cells and macrophages, and then activate innate and adaptive immune response (Weidenmaier and Peschel, 2008). According to Ha et al. (2006), PGN derived from bacterial wall activates the production of IgA by receptors on the innate intestinal epithelium in mice. It is well known that Ig can reduce inflammatory status in nursery pigs (Bosi et al., 2004). In the current study, supplemental CGCM at 1.0% reducing blood plasma supplementation by 0.7%, in diets caused increased immune response, whereas supplemental CGCM at 2.1%, reducing blood plasma supplementation by 1.5%, in diets did not affect intestinal health compared to pigs fed diets without CGCM. This result may indicate that supplemental CGCM at 2.1% in diets may overcome the increased immune response caused by the reduction of supplemental blood plasma at 1.5% due to the modulation of the jejunal mucosa-associated microbiota.

The activation of the immune system can increase the production of reactive oxygen species leading to an increase in oxidative stress (Gilljam et al., 2020). Malondialdehyde and PC are considered biomarkers of oxidative stress (Shacter, 2000). In the current study, pigs fed diets with increasing CGCM supplementation had reduced the concentration of MDA, indicating less lipid peroxidation in the proximal jejunal mucosa. Supplementing 1.1% or 4.9 g/d CGCM had the highest concentration of PC in proximal jejunal mucosa which can be associated with the greater immune response caused by the increased abundance of Proteobacteria at 1.1% CGCM.

The oxidative stress can cause damage in the enterocytes by oxidizing lipids, proteins, and DNA resulting in cellular apoptosis, consequently, affecting the intestinal morphology (Sido et al., 2017; Duarte et al., 2019). Increasing cell death is associated to a greater crypt cell proliferation (Pluske et al., 1997). In this study, the maximum enterocyte proliferation was observed with the supplementation 1.0% CGCM. Increased intestinal enterocyte proliferation rate results in reducing the nutrient utilization due to more immature cells with lower digestive enzyme activities (Håkenåsen et al., 2020). Additionally, intestinal integrity may affect the digestion and absorption capability of monogastric animals (Montagne et al., 2003; Holanda and Kim, 2020); however, in this study, increasing CGCM supplementation did not affect the AID of nutrients of diets fed to pigs.

In conclusion, based on the polynomial model, supplementing CGCM at 1.0% to 1.2%, reducing the blood plasma supplementation by 0.7% to 0.9%, respectively, increased potential pathogenic microbiota resulting in increased immune response, enterocyte proliferation, and PC concentration. However, supplementing CGCM at 2.1%, reducing blood plasma supplementation by 1.5%, improved growth performance, and reduced MDA concentration without affecting nutrient digestibility, intestinal morphology, and microbiota in the jejunal mucosa. Collectively, supplementing 1.0% to 1.2% CGCM suppressed the benefits from blood plasma, whereas supplementing 2.1% CGCM showed functional benefits of CGCM with similar effects from blood plasma supplementation.

Acknowledgments

This study was supported by CJ Blossom Park Grant Proposal Competition Award (Suwon, Korea) and North Carolina Agricultural Foundation (Raleigh, NC).

Glossary

Abbreviations

AA

amino acid(s)

ADFI

average daily feed intake

ADG

average daily gain

AID

apparent ileal digestibility

CD

crypt depth

DM

dry matter

EE

ether extract

GE

gross energy

G:F

gain-to-feed ratio

IBW

initial body weight

MDA

malondialdehyde

ME

metabolizable energy

PGN

peptidoglycan

SCP

single cell protein

SID

standard ileal digestibility

Slp

surface-layer protein

STTD

standardized total tract digestible

TA

teichoic acid

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no real or perceived conflicts of interest.

Literature Cited

  1. AAFCO (Association of American Feed Control Officials) . 2008. Official feed definitions. Official Publication of the Association of American Feed Control Officials. Inc., Oxford, IN. [Google Scholar]
  2. Adhikari, B., Kim S. W., and Kwon Y. M.. . 2019. Characterization of microbiota associated with digesta and mucosa in different regions of gastrointestinal tract of nursery pigs. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 20:9–12. doi: 10.3390/ijms20071630 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Aiba, Y., Suzuki N., Kabir A. M., Takagi A., and Koga Y.. . 1998. Lactic acid-mediated suppression of Helicobacter pylori by the oral administration of Lactobacillus salivarius as a probiotic in a gnotobiotic murine model. Am. J. Gastroenterol. 93:2097–2101. doi: 10.1111/j.1572-0241.1998.00600.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Akira, S., Uematsu S., and Takeuchi O.. . 2006. Pathogen recognition and innate immunity. Cell 124:783–801. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2006.02.015 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. AOAC . 2006. Official methods of analysis. 18th ed. In: George, J., and Latimer W., editors. Gaithersburg (MD): AOAC International. [Google Scholar]
  6. Baker, J. T., Duarte M. E., Holanda D. M., and Kim S. W.. . 2021. Friend or foe? impacts of dietary xylans, xylooligosaccharides, and xylanases on intestinal health and growth performance of monogastric animals. Animals. 11:1–28. doi: 10.3390/ani11030609 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Becker, W., and Richmond A.. . 2004. Microalgae in human and animal nutrition. Handb. Microalgal Cult. Biotechnol. Appl. Phycol. 312–351. doi: 10.1002/9780470995280 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  8. Bhandari, S. K., Xu B., Nyachoti C. M., Giesting D. W., and Krause D. O.. . 2008. Evaluation of alternatives to antibiotics using an Escherichia colt k88+ model of piglet diarrhea: effects on gut microbial ecology. J. Anim. Sci. 86:836–847. doi: 10.2527/jas.2006-822 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Bosi, P., Casini L., Finamore A., Cremokolini C., Merialdi G., Trevisi P., Nobili F., and Mengheri E.. . 2004. Spray-dried plasma improves growth performance and reduces inflammatory status of weaned pigs challenged with enterotoxigenic Escherichia coli K88. J. Anim. Sci. 82:1764–1772. doi: 10.2527/2004.8261764x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Campbell, J. M., Crenshaw J. D., González-Esquerra R., and Polo J.. . 2019. Impact of spray-dried plasma on intestinal health and broiler performance. Microorganisms. 7:219. doi: 10.3390/microorganisms7080219 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Carlson, M. S., Veum T. L., and Turk J. R.. . 2005. Effects of yeast extract versus animal plasma in weanling pig diets on growth performance and intestinal morphology. J. Swine Heal. Prod. 13:204–209. [Google Scholar]
  12. Chae, B. J., Han I. K., Kim J. H., Yang C. J., Hancock J. D., Kim I. H., and Anderson D. A.. . 1999. Effects of dietary protein sources on ileal digestibility and growth performance for early-weaned pigs. Livest. Prod. Sci. 58:45–54. doi: 10.1016/S0301-6226(98)00184-5 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  13. Chand, N., and Khan R. U.. . 2014. Replacement of soybean meal with yeast single cell protein in broiler ration: the effect on performance traits. Pak. J. Zool. 46:1753–1758. [Google Scholar]
  14. Chen, H., Zhang S., and Kim S. W.. . 2020. Effects of supplemental xylanase on health of the small intestine in nursery pigs fed diets with corn distillers’ dried grains with solubles. J. Anim. Sci. 98:1–10. doi: 10.1093/jas/skaa185 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Chen, H., Zhang S., Park I., and Kim S. W.. . 2017. Impacts of energy feeds and supplemental protease on growth performance, nutrient digestibility, and gut health of pigs from 18 to 45 kg body weight. Anim. Nutr. 3:359–365. doi: 10.1016/j.aninu.2017.09.005 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Cruz, A., Sterten H., Steinhoff F. S., Mydland L. T., and Øverland M.. . 2020. Cyberlindnera jadinii yeast as a protein source for broiler chickens: effects on growth performance and digestive function from hatching to 30 days of age. Poult. Sci. 99:3168–3178. doi: 10.1016/j.psj.2020.01.023 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Duarte, M. E., and Kim S. W.. . 2021. Intestinal microbiota and its interaction to intestinal health in nursery pigs. Anim. Nutr. in press. doi:1 10.1016/j.aninu.2021.05.001 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Duarte, M. E., Sparks C., and Kim S. W.. . 2021. Modulation of jejunal mucosa-associated microbiota in relation to intestinal health and nutrient digestibility in pigs by supplementation of β-glucanase to corn–soybean meal-based diets with xylanase. J. Anim. Sci. 99:1–13. doi: 10.1093/jas/skab190 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Duarte, M. E., Tyus J., and Kim S. W.. . 2020. Synbiotic effects of enzyme and probiotics on intestinal health and growth of newly weaned pigs challenged with enterotoxigenic f18+escherichia coli. Front. Vet. Sci. 7:7–573. doi: 10.3389/fvets.2020.00573 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Duarte, M. E., Zhou F. X., W. M.Dutra, Jr, and Kim S. W.. . 2019. Dietary supplementation of xylanase and protease on growth performance, digesta viscosity, nutrient digestibility, immune and oxidative stress status, and gut health of newly weaned pigs. Anim. Nutr. 5:351–358. doi: 10.1016/j.aninu.2019.04.005 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Etheridge, R. D., Seerley R. W., and Wyatt R. D.. . 1984. The effect of diet on performance, digestibility, blood composition and intestinal microflora of weaned pigs. J. Anim. Sci. 58:1396–1402. doi: 10.2527/jas1984.5861396x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Farstad, L. 1977. Biological effects of feeding single cell protein produced by pseudomonas methylotropha from methanol to chickens. Acta Agric. Scand. 27:129–137. doi: 10.1080/00015127709435121 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  23. Fouhse, J. M., Zijlstra R. T., and Willing B. P.. . 2016. The role of gut microbiota in the health and disease of pigs. Anim. Front. 6:30–36. doi: 10.2527/af.2016-0031 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  24. Gilljam, K. M., Holm K. L., Zahoor M., Centonze F. G., Farhan H., and Blomhoff H. K.. . 2020. Differential effects of reactive oxygen species on IgG versus IgM levels in TLR-stimulated B cells. J. Immunol. 204:2133–2142. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.1901131 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Guo, J. Y., Phillips C. E., Coffey M. T., and Kim S. W.. . 2015. Efficacy of a supplemental candy coproduct as an alternative carbohydrate source to lactose on growth performance of newly weaned pigs in a commercial farm condition. J. Anim. Sci. 93:5304–5312. doi: 10.2527/jas.2015-9328 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Ha, S. A., Tsuji M., Suzuki K., Meek B., Yasuda N., Kaisho T., and Fagarasan S.. . 2006. Regulation of b1 cell migration by signals through toll-like receptors. J. Exp. Med. 203:2541–2550. doi: 10.1084/jem.20061041 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Håkenåsen, I. M., Øverland M., Ånestad R., Åkesson C. P., Sundaram A. Y. M., Press C. M., and Mydland L. T.. . 2020. Gene expression and gastrointestinal function is altered in piglet small intestine by weaning and inclusion of cyberlindnera jadinii yeast as a protein source. J. Funct. Foods. 73:104118. doi: 10.1016/j.jff.2020.104118 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  28. Holanda, D. M., and Kim S. W.. . 2020. Efficacy of mycotoxin detoxifiers on health and growth of newly-weaned pigs under chronic dietary challenge of deoxynivalenol. Toxins (Basel). 12. doi: 10.3390/toxins12050311 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Holanda, D. M., Yiannikouris A., and Kim S. W.. . 2020. Investigation of the efficacy of a postbiotic yeast cell wall-based blend on newly-weaned pigs under a dietary challenge of multiple mycotoxins with emphasis on deoxynivalenol. Toxins (Basel). 12:504. doi: 10.3390/toxins12080504 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Hong, K. J., Lee C. H., and Kim S. W.. . 2004. Aspergillus oryzae GB-107 fermentation improves nutritional quality of food soybeans and feed soybean meals. J. Med. Food 7:430–435. doi: 10.1089/jmf.2004.7.430 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Hu, L., Che L., Su G., Xuan Y., Luo G., Han F., Wu Y., Tian G., Wu C., Fang Z., Lin Y., Xu S., and Wu D.. . 2014. Inclusion of yeast-derived protein in weanling diet improves growth performance, intestinal health, and anti-oxidative capability of piglets. Czech J. Anim. Sci. 59:327–336. doi: 10.17221/7531-CJAS [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  32. Humann, J., and Lenz L. L.. . 2009. Bacterial peptidoglycan-degrading enzymes and their impact on host muropeptide detection. J. Innate Immun. 1:88–97. doi: 10.1159/000181181 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. Jang, K. B., and Kim S. W.. . 2019. Supplemental effects of dietary nucleotides on intestinal health and growth performance of newly weaned pigs. J. Anim. Sci. 97:4875–4882. doi: 10.1093/jas/skz334 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. Jeong, J. S., Park J. W., Lee S. I., and Kim I. H.. . 2016. Apparent ileal digestibility of nutrients and amino acids in soybean meal, fish meal, spray-dried plasma protein and fermented soybean meal to weaned pigs. Anim. Sci. J. 87:697–702. doi: 10.1111/asj.12483 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  35. Johnson-Henry, K. C., Hagen K. E., Gordonpour M., Tompkins T. A., and Sherman P. M.. . 2007. Surface-layer protein extracts from Lactobacillus helveticus inhibit enterohaemorrhagic Escherichia coli O157:H7 adhesion to epithelial cells. Cell. Microbiol. 9:356–367. doi: 10.1111/j.1462-5822.2006.00791.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  36. Kaoutari, A. El, Armougom F., Gordon J. I., Raoult D., and Henrissat B.. . 2013. The abundance and variety of carbohydrate-active enzymes in the human gut microbiota. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 11:497–504. doi: 10.1038/nrmicro3050 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  37. Katayama, M., Fukuda T., Okamura T., Suzuki E., Tamura K., Shimizu Y., Suda Y., and Suzuki K.. . 2011. Effect of dietary addition of seaweed and licorice on the immune performance of pigs. Anim. Sci. J. 82:274–281. doi: 10.1111/j.1740-0929.2010.00826.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  38. Kihlberg, R. 1972. The microbe as a source of food. Annu. Rev. Microbiol. 26:427–466. doi: 10.1146/annurev.mi.26.100172.002235 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  39. Kim, S. W., and Duarte M. E.. . 2021. Understanding intestinal health in nursery pigs and the relevant nutritional strategies. Anim. Biosci. 34:338–344. doi: 10.5713/ab.21.0010 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  40. Kim, S. W., and Easter R. A.. . 2001. Nutritional value of fish meals in the diet for young pigs. J. Anim. Sci. 79:1829–1839. doi: 10.2527/2001.7971829x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  41. Kim, S. W., van Heugten E., Ji F., Lee C. H., and Mateo R. D.. . 2010. Fermented soybean meal as a vegetable protein source for nursery pigs: I. Effects on growth performance of nursery pigs. J. Anim. Sci. 88:214–224. doi: 10.2527/jas.2009-1993 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  42. Kim, S. W., Knabe D. A., Hong K. J., and Easter R. A.. . 2003. Use of carbohydrases in corn–soybean meal-based nursery diets. J. Anim. Sci. 81:2496–2504. doi: 10.2527/2003.81102496x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  43. Kim, S. W., Less J. F., Wang L., Yan T., Kiron V., Kaushik S. J., and Lei X. G.. . 2019. Meeting global feed protein demand: challenge, opportunity, and strategy. Annu. Rev. Anim. Biosci. 7:221–243. doi: 10.1146/annurev-animal-030117-014838 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  44. Kircher, M., and Pfefferle W.. . 2001. The fermentative production of l-lysine as an animal feed additive. Chemosphere. 43:27–31. doi: 10.1016/S0045-6535(00)00320-9 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  45. Kogut, M. H., and Arsenault R. J.. . 2016. Editorial: gut health: the new paradigm in food animal production. Front. Vet. Sci. 3. doi: 10.3389/fvets.2016.00071 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  46. Lee, J. Y., Na Y. A., Kim E., Lee H. S., and Kim P.. . 2016. The actinobacterium corynebacterium glutamicum, an industrial workhorse. J. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 26:807–822. doi: 10.4014/jmb.1601.01053 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  47. Lopes, D. B., Madeira Júnior J. V., de Castro Reis L. V., Macena Leão K. M., and Alves Macedo G.. . 2017. Microbial production of added-value ingredients: state of the art. In: Microbial production of food ingredients and additives. London, UK: Elsevier; p. 1–32. [Google Scholar]
  48. Macia, L., Thorburn A. N., Binge L. C., Marino E., Rogers K. E., Maslowski K. M., Vieira A. T., Kranich J., and Mackay C. R.. . 2012. Microbial influences on epithelial integrity and immune function as a basis for inflammatory diseases. Immunol. Rev. 245:164–176. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-065X.2011.01080.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  49. McOrist, S., MacIntyre N., Stokes C. R., and Lawson G. H. K.. . 1992. Immunocytological responses in porcine proliferative enteropathies. Infect. Immun. 60:4184–4191. doi: 10.1128/iai.60.10.4184-4191.1992 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  50. Michalak, I., Chojnacka K., and Korniewicz D.. . 2015. New feed supplement from macroalgae as the dietary source of microelements for pigs. Open Chem. 13:1341–1352. doi: 10.1515/chem-2015-0149 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  51. Moita, V. H. C., Duarte M. E., da Silva S. N., and Kim S. W.. . 2021. Supplemental effects of functional oils on the modulation of mucosa-associated microbiota, intestinal health, and growth performance of nursery pigs. Animals. 11:1591. doi: 10.3390/ani11061591 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  52. Montagne, L., Pluske J. R., and Hampson D. J.. . 2003. A review of interactions between dietary fibre and the intestinal mucosa, and their consequences on digestive health in young non-ruminant animals. Anim. Feed Sci. Technol. 108:95–117. doi: 10.1016/S0377-8401(03)00163-9 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  53. Myers, W. D., Ludden P. A., Nayigihugu V., and Hess B. W.. . 2004. Technical note: a procedure for the preparation and quantitative analysis of samples for titanium dioxide. J. Anim. Sci. 82:179–183. doi: 10.2527/2004.821179x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  54. Namba, Y., Hidaka Y., Taki K., and Morimoto T.. . 1981. Effect of oral administration of lysozyme or digested bacterial cell walls on immunostimulation in guinea pigs. Infect. Immun. 31:580–583. doi: 10.1128/iai.31.2.580-583.1981 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  55. Namioka, S., Sasaki T., and Maede Y.. . 1991. Immunopotentiation of the small intestine of weaning piglets by peptidoglycan derived from bifidobacterium thermophilum. Bifidobact. Microflora. 10:1–9. doi: 10.12938/bifidus1982.10.1_1 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  56. Niu, Q., Li P., Hao S., Zhang Y., Kim S. W., Li H., Ma X., Gao S., He L., Wu W., Huang X., Hua J., Zhou B., and Huang R.. . 2015. Dynamic distribution of the gut microbiota and the relationship with apparent crude fiber digestibility and growth stages in pigs. Sci. Rep. 5:1–7. doi: 10.1038/srep09938 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  57. NRC . 2012. Nutrient requirements of swine. 11th rev. ed. , washington, DC: National Academies Press. [Google Scholar]
  58. Oelschlaeger, T. A. 2010. Mechanisms of probiotic actions – a review. Int. J. Med. Microbiol. 300:57–62. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmm.2009.08.005 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  59. Øverland, M., Skrede A., and Matre T.. . 2001. Bacterial protein grown on natural gas as feed for pigs. Acta Agric. Scand. Sect. A - Anim. Sci. 51:97–106. doi: 10.1080/090647001750193422 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  60. Øverland, M., Tauson A. H., Shearer K., and Skrede A.. . 2010. Evaluation of methane-utilising bacteria products as feed ingredients for monogastric animals. Arch. Anim. Nutr. 64:171–189. doi: 10.1080/17450391003691534 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  61. Passos, A. A., Park I., Ferket P., von Heimendahl E., and Kim S. W.. . 2015. Effect of dietary supplementation of xylanase on apparent ileal digestibility of nutrients, viscosity of digesta, and intestinal morphology of growing pigs fed corn and soybean meal based diet. Anim. Nutr. 1:19–23. doi: 10.1016/j.aninu.2015.02.006 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  62. Pérez-Bosque, A., Pelegrí C., Vicario M., Castell M., Russell L., Campbell J. M., J. D.Quigley, 3rd, Polo J., Amat C., and Moretó M.. . 2004. Dietary plasma protein affects the immune response of weaned rats challenged with S. aureus Superantigen B. J. Nutr. 134:2667–2672. doi: 10.1093/jn/134.10.2667 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  63. Pierce, J. L., Cromwell G. L., Lindemann M. D., Russell L. E., and Weaver E. M.. . 2005. Effects of spray-dried animal plasma and immunoglobulins on performance of early weaned pigs. J. Anim. Sci. 83:2876–2885. doi: 10.2527/2005.83122876x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  64. Pluske, J. R., Hampson D. J., and Williams I. H.. . 1997. Factors influencing the structure and function of the small intestine in the weaned pig: a review. Livest. Prod. Sci. 51:215–236. doi: 10.1016/S0301-6226(97)00057-2 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  65. Poulsen, A. S. R., de Jonge N., Nielsen J. L., Højberg O., Lauridsen C., Cutting S. M., and Canibe N.. . 2018. Impact of bacillus spp. spores and gentamicin on the gastrointestinal microbiota of suckling and newly weaned piglets. PLoS One. 13:1–22. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0207382 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  66. Power, S. E., O’Toole P. W., Stanton C., Ross R. P., and Fitzgerald G. F.. . 2014. Intestinal microbiota, diet and health. Br. J. Nutr. 111:387–402. doi: 10.1017/S0007114513002560 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  67. Ritala, A., Häkkinen S. T., Toivari M., and Wiebe M. G.. . 2017. Single cell protein-state-of-the-art, industrial landscape and patents 2001-2016. Front. Microbiol. 8. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2017.02009 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  68. Rumsey, G. L., Hughes S. G., Smith R. R., Kinsella J. E., and Shetty K. J.. . 1991. Digestibility and energy values of intact, disrupted and extracts from brewer’s dried yeast fed to rainbow trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss). Anim. Feed Sci. Technol. 33:185–193. doi: 10.1016/0377-8401(91)90059-2 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  69. Sampath, V., Heon Baek D., Shanmugam S., and Kim I. H.. . 2021. Dietary inclusion of blood plasma with yeast (Saccharomyces cerevisiae) supplementation enhanced the growth performance, nutrient digestibility, lactobacillus count, and reduced gas emissions in weaning pigs. Animals. 11:759. doi: 10.3390/ani11030759 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  70. Scheuring, S., Stahlberg H., Chami M., Houssin C., Rigaud J. L., and Engel A.. . 2002. Charting and unzipping the surface layer of Corynebacterium glutamicum with the atomic force microscope. Mol. Microbiol. 44:675–684. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2958.2002.02864.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  71. Schøyen, H. F., Svihus B., Storebakken T., and Skrede A.. . 2007. Bacterial protein meal produced on natural gas replacing soybean meal or fish meal in broiler chicken diets. Arch. Anim. Nutr. 61:276–291. doi: 10.1080/17450390701431953 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  72. Shacter, E. 2000. Quantification and significance of protein oxidation in biological samples. Drug Metab. Rev. 32:307–326. doi: 10.1081/dmr-100102336 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  73. Shen, Y. B., Piao X. S., Kim S. W., Wang L., Liu P., Yoon I., and Zhen Y. G.. . 2009. Effects of yeast culture supplementation on growth performance, intestinal health, and immune response of nursery pigs. J. Anim. Sci. 87:2614–2624. doi: 10.2527/jas.2008-1512 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  74. Sido, A., Radhakrishnan S., Kim S. W., Eriksson E., Shen F., Li Q., Bhat V., Reddivari L., and Vanamala J. K. P.. . 2017. A food-based approach that targets interleukin-6, a key regulator of chronic intestinal inflammation and colon carcinogenesis. J. Nutr. Biochem. 43:11–17. doi: 10.1016/j.jnutbio.2017.01.012 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  75. Taliercio, E., and Kim S. W.. . 2013. Epitopes from two soybean glycinin subunits are antigenic in pigs. J. Sci. Food Agric. 93:2927–2932. doi: 10.1002/jsfa.6113 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  76. Touchette, K. J., Carroll J. A., Allee G. L., Matteri R. L., Dyer C. J., Beausang L. A., and Zannelli M. E.. . 2002. Effect of spray-dried plasma and lipopolysaccharide exposure on weaned pigs: I. Effects on the immune axis of weaned pigs. J. Anim. Sci. 80:494–501. doi: 10.2527/2002.802494x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  77. Tran, H., Anderson C. L., Bundy J. W., Fernando S. C., Miller P. S., and Burkey T. E.. . 2018. Effects of spray-dried porcine plasma on fecal microbiota in nursery pigs. J. Anim. Sci. 96:1017–1031. doi: 10.1093/jas/skx034 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  78. Tran, H., Bundy J. W., Li Y. S., Carney-Hinkle E. E., Miller P. S., and Burkey T. E.. . 2014. Effects of spray-dried porcine plasma on growth performance, immune response, total antioxidant capacity, and gut morphology of nursery pigs. J. Anim. Sci. 92:4494–4504. doi: 10.2527/jas.2014-7620 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  79. Ugalde, U. O., and Castrillo J. I.. . 2002. Single cell proteins from fungi and yeasts. Appl. Mycol. Biotechnol. 2:123–149. doi: 10.1016/S1874-5334(02)80008-9 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  80. Upadrasta, A., O’Sullivan L., O’Sullivan O., Sexton N., Lawlor P. G., Hill C., Fitzgerald G. F., Stanton C., and Ross R. P.. . 2013. The effect of dietary supplementation with spent cider yeast on the Swine distal gut microbiome. PLoS One 8:e75714. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0075714 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  81. USDA . 2019. Department of agriculture, national agricultural statistics service, agricultural statistics. 2010. Washington DC, USA: USDA. [Google Scholar]
  82. Vigors, S., O’ Doherty J., McDonnell M., Rattigan R., and Sweeney T.. . 2019. 369 an investigation into the influence of the seaweed extract laminarin on post-weaning pig performance and the intestinal microbiome. J. Anim. Sci. 97:132–132. doi: 10.1093/jas/skz258.269 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  83. Weaver, A. C., Campbell J. M., Crenshaw J. D., Polo J., and Kim S. W.. . 2014. Efficacy of dietary spray dried plasma protein to mitigate the negative effects on performance of pigs fed diets with corn naturally contaminated with multiple mycotoxins. J. Anim. Sci. 92:3878–3886. doi: 10.2527/jas.2013-6939 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  84. Weaver, A. C., and Kim S. W.. . 2014. Supplemental nucleotides high in inosine 5′-monophosphate to improve the growth and health of nursery pigs. J. Anim. Sci. 92:645–651. doi: 10.2527/jas.2013-6564 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  85. Weidenmaier, C., and Peschel A.. . 2008. Teichoic acids and related cell-wall glycopolymers in Gram-positive physiology and host interactions. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 6:276–287. doi: 10.1038/nrmicro1861 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  86. Yasuda, E., Serata M., and Sako T.. . 2008. Suppressive effect on activation of macrophages by Lactobacillus casei strain Shirota genes determining the synthesis of cell wall-associated polysaccharides. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 74: 4746–4755. doi: 10.1128/AEM.00412-08 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  87. Zeng, M. Y., Cisalpino D., Varadarajan S., Hellman J., Warren H. S., Cascalho M., Inohara N., and Núñez G.. . 2016. Gut microbiota-induced immunoglobulin G controls systemic infection by symbiotic bacteria and pathogens. Immunity 44:647–658. doi: 10.1016/j.immuni.2016.02.006 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  88. Zhang, H. Y., Piao X. S., Li P., Yi J. Q., Zhang Q., Li Q. Y., Liu J. D., and Wang G. Q.. . 2013. Effects of single cell protein replacing fish meal in diet on growth performance, nutrient digestibility and intestinal morphology in weaned pigs. Asian-Australas. J. Anim. Sci. 26:1320–1328. doi: 10.5713/ajas.2013.13200 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  89. Zhang, L., Wu W., Lee Y. K., Xie J., and Zhang H.. . 2018. Spatial heterogeneity and co-occurrence of mucosal and luminal microbiome across swine intestinal tract. Front. Microbiol. 9. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2018.00048 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  90. Zhang, W., Zhu Y.-H., Zhou D., Wu Q., Song D., Dicksved J., and Wang J.-F.. . 2017. Oral administration of a select mixture of bacillus probiotics affects the gut microbiota and goblet cell function following Escherichia coli challenge in newly weaned pigs of genotype muc4 that are supposed to be enterotoxigenic e. coli f4ab/ac receptor. E. G. Dudley, editor. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 83:1–18. doi: 10.1128/AEM.02747-16 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  91. Zhao, Y., and Kim S. W.. . 2020. Oxidative stress status and reproductive performance of sows during gestation and lactation under different thermal environments. Asian-Australas. J. Anim. Sci. 33:722–731. doi: 10.5713/ajas.19.0334 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Journal of Animal Science are provided here courtesy of Oxford University Press

RESOURCES