Abstract
The aim of this study was to clarify the influence of Lactobacillus spp. on the degree of endometrial inflammation in the postpartum period and the relationship between Lactobacillus spp. and pathogenic bacteria in the endometrium of postpartum dairy cows. Endometrial samples were collected from 41 Holstein-Friesian cows at 4 and 8 weeks postpartum using cytobrushes for polymorphonuclear neutrophil (PMN) count and bacterial culture to isolate Lactobacillus spp., Escherichiacoli, and Trueperella pyogenes. The 4-week samples were divided into four groups (E+L+), (E+L−), (E−L+), (E−L−) according to whether endometritis was diagnosed (E+) and Lactobacillus spp. was isolated (L+). The diagnostic criterion for cytological endometritis was > 18% PMN. The average PMN% in the E+L+ group was lower than that in the E+L-group (P < 0.05) at 8 weeks postpartum. There were no significant correlations between the number of colonies of Lactobacillus spp. and E. coli or between that of Lactobacillus spp. and T. pyogenes. Lactobacillus spp. could reduce PMN% in dairy cows with endometritis during the puerperal period. In conclusion, the intrauterine presence of Lactobacillus spp. may have a positive effect on uterine involution in postpartum dairy cows.
Keywords: Bovine uterus, Endometritis, Lactobacillus spp., Pathogenic bacteria
Bovine endometritis is an inflammation of the uterine epithelial cells, and bacterial infections of the endometrium can cause uterine disease in dairy cattle after parturition, leading to decreased productivity, including subfertility [1, 2]. Endometritis curbs the secretion of LH surge and inhibits postpartum follicle growth and function, which disturbs ovulation, resulting in non-pregnancy, an increase in days open, and a reduced pregnancy rate [3,4,5]. The related decrease in annual milk production due to extended days open and low reproductive performance causes substantial economic losses. Uterine diseases are estimated to cost €1.411 billion and $650 million annually in the EU and USA, respectively [2]. Therefore, these costs should be reduced or eliminated by preventing and/or treating postpartum endometritis.
As one of the main causes of endometritis, pathogenic bacteria cannot be ignored, and Escherichia coli and Trueperella pyogenes are two species that have been shown to cause this disease [6]. During 5 to 60 days postpartum, E. coli and T. pyogenes were isolated from the uterus of cows with endometritis in 49.2% and 22.5% of the animals, respectively [3]. The presence of E. coli early in the postpartum period results in endometrial infection by feces through the unclosed cervix [4]. T. pyogenes often cause high-grade uterine contamination with E. coli as E. coli products inhibit the function of neutrophils and may support the co-infection of uteri by T. pyogenes at later times. [6]. Additionally, T. pyogenes possesses a mechanism that adheres to epithelial cells. T. pyogenes also expresses pyolysin, which is cytolytic for immune cells, including macrophages [7].
Some species of Lactobacillus are resident bacteria in the vagina of healthy heifers [8]. Previous research has verified that Lactobacillus spp. release lactic acid, reduce environmental pH levels, control bacterial growth [9, 10], and produce antimicrobial compounds such as hydrogen peroxide [11, 12], and/or inhibiting the adhesion of other bacteria. Lactic acid bacteria co-cultured with cow uterine epithelial cells in vitro showed a positive effect on the prevention of E. coli infection [13]. A recent study reported that Lactobacillus spp. were present in both the vagina and the uterus of cows during the postpartum period [14].
Stimulation of the immune response of bovine endometrial epithelial cells by certain species of Lactobacillus has been shown in in vitro experiments; a co-culture with L. ruminis revealed immunomodulatory properties of the uterus [14]. Polymorphonuclear neutrophils (PMNs) leave the blood and migrate toward areas of inflammation [15, 16]. Previous reports have confirmed that bacterial infection in the uterus and endometritis induce endometrial PMN infiltration [17]. Therefore, the percentage of PMNs to all nucleated cells (PMN%) in the uterus is an important index for monitoring uterine involution and diagnosing endometritis in cows [18, 19]. However, no definitive reports are demonstrating the relationship between the spontaneous presence of Lactobacillus spp. and PMN% in the bovine uterus or confirming whether their presence has a positive effect on uterine involution.
The aim of the present study was to clarify the association between Lactobacillus spp. and endometrial PMN% and to elucidate the relationship between Lactobacillus spp. and pathogenic bacteria (E. coli and T. pyogenes) in the uterus of postpartum dairy cows.
Materials and Methods
Animals
This study involved 41 clinically healthy Holstein-Friesian cows reared on a dairy farm. The average age of the cows was 4.5 ± 1.4 years, and the average parity was 2.4 ± 1.2. The experimental period was from July 2017 to October 2018. Cytological and bacteriological examinations of the endometrium were performed at weeks 4 (28 ± 3 days; w4) and 8 (56 ± 3 days; w8) postpartum (pp) (Fig. 1). The animals were left untreated during the experimental period.
Fig. 1.
Experimental design. Holstein-Friesian cows (n = 41) undergo two procedures: 1. Uterine smear sampling: 2. Bacterial sampling in the research. DIM: days in milk.
The care and use of animals complied with local animal welfare laws, guidelines, and policies.
Cytobrush technique
The genital area was sprayed with alcohol, the labia were gently opened, and a cytobrush (Metribrush, Fujihira Industry Co., Ltd., Tokyo, Japan), which was composed of a stainless-steel sleeve and long handle brush, was inserted into the vagina. To prevent contamination, the brush was placed in the sleeve during insertion. Then, the brush head was pushed through the cervix to the middle of the uterine body and rolled to collect the cells. Two endometrial samples were collected, and one was smeared onto two clean glass slides and fixed using 99% ethanol. The other cytobrush samples were shaken 100 times in 1 ml of physiological saline for bacterial culture. The samples were placed at 0–5°C in an icebox and transported to the laboratory within 6 h.
Endometrial cytology
The samples fixed on the glass slide were stained using Diff-Quik (Sysmex, Kobe, Japan) staining solution, air-dried, and placed under a microscope at 400 × magnification. Two hundred nucleated cells were classified per piece. The average proportion of PMN counts over the nucleated cells on the two slides was calculated as PMN percentage (PMN%). The diagnostic criteria for cytological endometritis were > 18 PMN% [18] at w4 pp and > 4% at w8 pp [20].
Bacteriological examination
The samples for bacteriology were serially diluted with saline (×10, ×100, ×1000, or ×100, ×10,000, and ×100,000 times dilutions), and 100 μl of each concentration of liquid was inoculated by pipette into 5% horse blood (horse whole blood defibrinated sterile, Nippon Bio-Supp. Center, Tokyo, Japan) containing SCD medium (Trypto-Soya Agar; Nissui Co., Tokyo, Japan) in duplicate for aerobic and anaerobic cultures. The media were placed in an incubator at 37°C for 48 h. To isolate Lactobacillus spp., a non-diluted part of the bacterial sample was cultured individually on MRS agar at pH 4.5 with acetic acid (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA), and placed in an anaerobic environment in an incubator at 37°C for 48 h. Bacterial species were determined according to the microbial identification system (MALDI Biotyper; Bruker Daltonik GmbH, Bremen, Germany), and the number of bacterial colonies was calculated for each sample. Positive bacteria were defined as one or more colonies of each bacterial species detected, whereas negative bacteria were defined as no colony detected.
Division of the experimental group
Endometrial samples were collected from 41 cows at w4 and w8 and used in the present study. According to the criterion for PMN% or isolation of Lactobacillus spp. at w4, the cows were classified into endometritis (E+) and non-endometritis (E–) groups, and Lactobacillus spp.-positive (L+) and Lactobacillus spp.-negative groups (L–). Therefore, the animals were divided into four categories: (E+L+), (E+L−), (E−L+), and (E−L−). To clarify how the timing of the presence of Lactobacillus spp. affected uterine involution after calving, the animals were further divided into four groups: (w4–w8–), (w4–w8+), (w4+w8–), and (w4+w8+) groups according to the presence (+) or absence (–) of Lactobacillus spp. at weeks 4 (w4) and 8 (w8) pp.
Statistical analysis
The proportion of cows with endometritis between w4 and w8 within each L+ or L– group and between the L+ and L– groups was compared using Fisher’s exact test. PMN% at w4 and w8 were analyzed between the E+L+, E+L–, E–L+, and E–L– groups, and within each group using the Mann-Whitney U test. Similarly, PMN% at w4 or w8 was analyzed among w4–w8–, w4–w8+, w4+w8–, and w4+w8+ groups, and within these groups by Mann-Whitney U test. The detection rates of E. coli and T. pyogenes were compared between the Lactobacillus spp. isolated group and no Lactobacillus spp. isolated group by Chi-squared test, irrespective of the week. Spearman’s rank correlation coefficient was used to analyze the number of colonies of Lactobacillus spp., E. coli, and T. pyogenes. The number of Lactobacillus spp. colonies was compared using the Mann-Whitney U-test between cows with and without endometritis. The correlation between PMN% and the number of colonies in Lactobacillus spp. was also analyzed using Spearman’s rank correlation coefficient. To compare the four groups according to the presence of Lactobacillus spp. at weeks 4 (w4) and 8 (w8), multiple comparison analysis was conducted using pairwise Wilcoxon rank-sum tests. All statistical analyses were conducted using R software (version 4.0.5; R Core Team, Vienna, Austria). Differences were considered statistically significant at P ˂ 0.05. Values are expressed as mean ± SD.
Results
Association between Lactobacillus spp. and endometritis
Endometritis positivity rates in the L+ group at w4 and w8 were 30.0% (6/20) and 10.0% (2/20), respectively, and those in the L– group were 23.8% (5/21) and 23.8% (5/21), respectively (Table 1). There were no significant changes in the positive rate of endometritis from w4 to w8 in the L+ and L– groups.
Table 1. Distribution of cows with E+: endometritis 1) or E–: no-endometritis at w4 or w8 and those with or without Lactobacillus spp. at w4 2).
Weeks | Lactobacillus spp. at w4 | E+ (n) | E– (n) | Total (n) | Positive rate (%) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
w4 | L+ | 6 | 14 | 20 | 30.0 |
L– | 5 | 16 | 21 | 23.8 | |
w8 | L+ | 2 | 18 | 20 | 10.0 |
L– | 5 | 16 | 21 | 23.8 |
1) Cows with endometrial PMN% greater than 18 are diagnosed as endometritis-positive at w4, and those with endometrial PMN% greater than 4 are diagnosed as endometritis-positive at w8. 2) Cows with Lactobacillus spp. detected at w4 are diagnosed as L+.
While the average PMN% at w4 in the E+L– group (57.0 ± 22.5%) was similar (P = 0.36) to that in the E+L+ group (45.7 ± 25.2%), the average PMN% in the E+L– group (23.6 ± 26.4%) was significantly higher (P < 0.05) than that in the E+L+ group (1.1 ± 1.2%) at w8 (Fig. 2). PMN% in the E–L– group (3.8 ± 4.9%) was not different (P = 1.0) from that in the E–L+ group (2.5 ± 2.2%) at w4, and no difference (P = 0.9) was found in PMN% between the E–L– group (2.4 ± 5.6%) and E–L+ group (7.0 ± 15.3%) at w8.
Fig. 2.
Association of Lactobacillus spp. and endometritis in postpartum dairy cows. PMN% in the endometrium of dairy cows with or without endometritis and with or without Lactobacillus spp., which are diagnosed at w4 pp, are compared at w4 and w8 pp. E+ (upper panels): These graphs show that endometritis is diagnosed at week 4 postpartum. E– (lower panels): These graphs show that endometritis is not diagnosed at week 4 postpartum. L+: Cows with Lactobacillus spp. L–: Cows without Lactobacillus spp. w4: PMN% at week 4 postpartum. w8: PMN% at week 8 postpartum. * P < 0.05.
Association of the presence of Lactobacillus spp. in the uterus with endometrial PMN%
Based on the bacteriological examination results, eight cows were classified into the w4–w8+ group, 10 cows in the w4+w8+ group, 13 cows in the w4–w8– group, and 10 cows in the w4+w8– group (Fig. 3). There was no significant difference in PMN% among the four groups at w4 (w4–w8+: 5.4 ± 11.3%; w4+w8+: 14.2 ± 27.3%; w4–w8–: 23.3 ± 29.8%; w4+w8–: 16.8 ± 21.9%) and w8 (w4–w8+: 4.9 ± 11.9%; w4+w8+: 9.6 ± 17.6%; w4–w8–: 8.9 ± 18.0%; w4+w8–: 0.9 ± 0.8%), respectively (Supplementary Fig. 1). However, PMN% in the w4+w8– group at w8 (0.9 ± 0.8%) was lower (P < 0.05) than that at w4 (16.8 ± 21.9%, Fig. 3). Moreover, while the endometritis rate in the w4–w8– group remained the same (30.8%, 4/13) from w4 to w8, that in the w4+w8– group decreased from 40% (4/10) at w4 to 0% (0/10) at w8.
Fig. 3.
Comparison of PMN% in the endometrium of dairy cows with Lactobacillus spp. present cows or absent cows at week 4 or week 8 postpartum. w4–w8+: Lactobacillus spp. are not isolated at week 4 but are isolated at week 8 postpartum. w4+w8+: Lactobacillus spp. are isolated at both week 4 and week 8 postpartum. w4–w8–: Lactobacillus spp. are not isolated at weeks 4 and 8 postpartum. w4+w8–: Lactobacillus spp. are isolated at week 4 but not isolated at week 8 postpartum. * P < 0.01.
Association of the intrauterine presence of Lactobacillus spp. with pathogenic bacteria
Since both E. coli and T. pyogenes were isolated simultaneously from two of the 82 samples, the two samples were included in both E. coli positive and T. pyogenes positive categories, creating a total of 84 samples. Lactobacillus spp. were isolated in 39 of the 84 (46.4%) samples and were absent in the remaining 45 (53.6%). E. coli was present in 10 (25.6%) of the 39 samples in the Lactobacillus spp. isolated group, and in five (11.1%) of the 45 samples in the Lactobacillus spp.-absent group, and there was no significant difference in the percentage of E. coli positives between the two groups. Similarly, no significant difference was found in the T. pyogenes positive rate in the Lactobacillus spp. present group (six samples; 15.4%) and Lactobacillus spp. absent group (nine samples; 20.0%). There were no significant correlations between the number of colonies of Lactobacillus spp. and E. coli or between Lactobacillus spp. and T. pyogenes.
Association of Lactobacillus spp. colony number with PMN%
The colony number of Lactobacillus spp. at w4 in the E+ group (81.4 ± 100.2) was not significantly different from that in the E– group (90.6 ± 112.7). Similarly, the colony number at w8 in the E+ group (136.7 ± 148.4) was not different from that in the E– group (85 ± 107.4). In a total of 39 samples from which Lactobacillus spp. were isolated at either w4 or w8, no significant change in PMN% was observed with an increase in Lactobacillus spp. colony number.
Discussion
In the present study, we investigated the association between the presence of Lactobacillus spp. and the degree of endometrial inflammation and pathogenic bacteria in the endometrium of postpartum dairy cows.
Uterine epithelial cells may regenerate approximately 25 days after parturition [21]; therefore, the timing of endometrial sampling was determined at w4 (28 ± 3 days pp) to remove the effects of physiological inflammation during the puerperium period of uterine involution. In the present study, Lactobacillus spp. decreased the prevalence of endometritis, which corroborates previous research showing that Lactobacillus spp. reduced the incidence of uterine infection in periparturient dairy cows [22]. In addition, the E+L+ group had lower PMN% at w8 compared to the E+L– group. These results indicate that the presence of Lactobacillus spp. in cows with endometritis during the puerperium period (w4) may mitigate endometrial inflammation by w8. Some Lactobacillus species may release hydrogen peroxide, and lactobacilli are present in the vaginal microflora of healthy cows, where they can prevent pathogen colonization by the production of antagonistic substances such as lactic acid, hydrogen peroxide, or bacteriocins [10, 23]. This possibly explains how Lactobacillus spp. can inhibit the development of endometritis.
Regarding the relationship between the presence of Lactobacillus spp. and endometrial PMN%, the w4–w8– group had a high average PMN% at both w4 and w8, and the endometritis rate in the w4–w8– group remained the same (30.8%, 4/13) from w4 to w8. These results show that uterine involution stagnated during the period from w4 to w8 in cows with a high degree of inflammation and no Lactobacillus spp. in the endometrium at w4, since the absence of Lactobacillus spp. may have affected postpartum uterine involution. In contrast, the w4+w8– group was the only group with an average PMN% (16.8 ± 21.9%), which was substantially higher than the cut-off points of 4% for endometritis at w4, which then significantly decreased to the “no-endometritis” level (0.9 ± 0.8%) by w8. Additionally, the endometritis rate in the w4+w8– group decreased from 40% (4/10) at w4 to 0% (0/10) at w8. It is assumed that even if the degree of uterine inflammation is high at w4, the presence of Lactobacillus spp. may sufficiently reduce the degree of endometrial inflammation by w8. A previous study showed that the co-culture of Lactobacillus spp. with endometrial epithelial cells in vitro can stimulate epithelial cells to secrete immune factors [14]. Another study observed that intravaginal administration of Lactobacillus spp. before and after calving accelerated postpartum uterine involution in dairy cows [24]. In the present study, the w4–w8+ and w4+w8+ groups had lower average PMN% values than the other two groups between w4 and w8. It is conjectured that if the degree of endometrial inflammation was sufficiently low by w4, there would have been no additional positive effect of Lactobacillus spp.
Previous studies have confirmed that Lactobacillus spp. inhibit bacterial growth by producing lactic acid and hydrogen peroxide [12, 25, 26, 27]. Tachedjian et al. (2017) suggested that lactic acid is a major antimicrobial factor produced by lactobacilli [28]. Previous research has shown that E. coli possesses three different types of systems to resist acid stress from pH 2 to 4.5 [29]. No apparent inhibitory effect of Lactobacillus spp. on T. pyogenes and E. coli infections was observed in the present study. One of the reasons for this discrepancy may be due to the small sample size for the comparison of the colony number, and further research using a larger population is required to elucidate whether Lactobacillus spp. inhibit the growth of E. coli and T. pyogenes.
To reveal the relationship between the number of Lactobacillus spp. colonies and uterine PMN percentage, Lactobacillus spp. colony counts and PMN% were observed. The data showed no significant change in PMN% with an increase in Lactobacillus spp. colony number. These results contradict the findings of a previous report stating that lactic acid production by L. crispatus and L. gasseri inactivated the growth of several different bacterial species, including Chlamydia trachomatis [30], Neisseria gonorrhoeae [31], and E. coli, in vitro. In the present study, the effect of Lactobacillus spp. on the uterine environment in dairy cows was monitored during the middle and last stages of the puerperal period (w4 to w8 pp). Future studies are needed, focusing on these effects at an earlier stage of the puerperal period, such as week 3 or earlier postpartum. Moreover, alternative methods to determine the bacterial quantity would aid in understanding the interactions between Lactobacillus spp. and other bacterial species in the bovine uterus.
In conclusion, the average PMN% at 8 weeks postpartum in the E+L+ group was significantly lower than that in the E+L–group. The timing of the presence of Lactobacillus spp. at a certain stage after calving may have diagnostic significance. Further studies with a larger sample size are required to clarify the actual effects on fertility in the field.
Conflict of interests
The authors declare no conflicts of interest associated with this manuscript.
Supplementary
Acknowledgments
This work was supported by JSPS KAKENHI (Grant No. 16H05038 to TO). The authors wish to thank Nakamura Cattle Farm for their assistance with sample collection.
References
- 1.Bretzlaff K. Rationale for treatment of endometritis in the dairy cow. Vet Clin North Am Food Anim Pract 1987; 3: 593–607. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Sheldon IM, Cronin J, Goetze L, Donofrio G, Schuberth H-J. Defining postpartum uterine disease and the mechanisms of infection and immunity in the female reproductive tract in cattle. Biol Reprod 2009; 81: 1025–1032. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Brodzki P, Bochniarz M, Brodzki A, Wrona Z, Wawron W. Trueperella pyogenes and Escherichia coli as an etiological factor of endometritis in cows and the susceptibility of these bacteria to selected antibiotics. Pol J Vet Sci 2014; 17: 657–664. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Sheldon IM, Noakes DE, Rycroft AN, Pfeiffer DU, Dobson H. Influence of uterine bacterial contamination after parturition on ovarian dominant follicle selection and follicle growth and function in cattle. Reproduction 2002; 123: 837–845. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Ghanem ME, Tezuka E, Devkota B, Izaike Y, Osawa T. Persistence of uterine bacterial infection, and its associations with endometritis and ovarian function in postpartum dairy cows. J Reprod Dev 2015; 61: 54–60. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Zerbe H, Ossadnik C, Leibold W, Schuberth HJ. Influence of Escherichia coli and Arcanobacterium pyogenes isolated from bovine puerperal uteri on phenotypic and functional properties of neutrophils. Vet Microbiol 2001; 79: 351–365. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Jost BH, Billington SJ. Arcanobacterium pyogenes: molecular pathogenesis of an animal opportunist. Antonie van Leeuwenhoek 2005; 88: 87–102. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Otero C, Saavedra L, Silva de Ruiz C, Wilde O, Holgado AR, Nader-Macías ME. Vaginal bacterial microflora modifications during the growth of healthy cows. Lett Appl Microbiol 2000; 31: 251–254. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Atassi F, Brassart D, Grob P, Graf F, Servin AL. Lactobacillus strains isolated from the vaginal microbiota of healthy women inhibit Prevotella bivia and Gardnerella vaginalis in coculture and cell culture. FEMS Immunol Med Microbiol 2006; 48: 424–432. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Otero MC, Morelli L, Nader-Macías ME. Probiotic properties of vaginal lactic acid bacteria to prevent metritis in cattle. Lett Appl Microbiol 2006; 43: 91–97. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Dover SE, Aroutcheva AA, Faro S, Chikindas ML. Natural antimicrobials and their role in vaginal health: A short review. Int J Probiotics Prebiotics 2008; 3: 219–230. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Eschenbach DA, Davick PR, Williams BL, Klebanoff SJ, Young-Smith K, Critchlow CM, Holmes KK. Prevalence of hydrogen peroxide-producing Lactobacillus species in normal women and women with bacterial vaginosis. J Clin Microbiol 1989; 27: 251–256. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Genís S, Bach À, Fàbregas F, Arís A. Potential of lactic acid bacteria at regulating Escherichia coli infection and inflammation of bovine endometrium. Theriogenology 2016; 85: 625–637. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Gärtner MA, Bondzio A, Braun N, Jung M, Einspanier R, Gabler C. Detection and characterisation of Lactobacillus spp. in the bovine uterus and their influence on bovine endometrial epithelial cells in vitro. PLoS One 2015; 10: e0119793. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Paape M, Mehrzad J, Zhao X, Detilleux J, Burvenich C. Defense of the bovine mammary gland by polymorphonuclear neutrophil leukocytes. J Mammary Gland Biol Neoplasia 2002; 7: 109–121. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Paape MJ, Bannerman DD, Zhao X, Lee JW. The bovine neutrophil: Structure and function in blood and milk. Vet Res 2003; 34: 597–627. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Gilbert RO, Shin ST, Guard CL, Erb HN, Frajblat M. Prevalence of endometritis and its effects on reproductive performance of dairy cows. Theriogenology 2005; 64: 1879–1888. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Kasimanickam R, Duffield TF, Foster RA, Gartley CJ, Leslie KE, Walton JS, Johnson WH. Endometrial cytology and ultrasonography for the detection of subclinical endometritis in postpartum dairy cows. Theriogenology 2004; 62: 9–23. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Dubuc J, Duffield TF, Leslie KE, Walton JS, LeBlanc SJ. Definitions and diagnosis of postpartum endometritis in dairy cows. J Dairy Sci 2010; 93: 5225–5233. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Madoz LV, Giuliodori MJ, Jaureguiberry M, Plöntzke J, Drillich M, de la Sota RL. The relationship between endometrial cytology during estrous cycle and cutoff points for the diagnosis of subclinical endometritis in grazing dairy cows. J Dairy Sci 2013; 96: 4333–4339. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Sheldon IM, Williams EJ, Miller AN, Nash DM, Herath S. Uterine diseases in cattle after parturition. Vet J 2008; 176: 115–121. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Deng Q, Odhiambo JF, Farooq U, Lam T, Dunn SM, Ametaj BN. Intravaginal lactic Acid bacteria modulated local and systemic immune responses and lowered the incidence of uterine infections in periparturient dairy cows. PLoS One 2015; 10: e0124167. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Collins EB, Aramaki K. Production of Hydrogen peroxide by Lactobacillus acidophilus. J Dairy Sci 1980; 63: 353–357. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Deng Q, Odhiambo JF, Farooq U, Lam T, Dunn SM, Gänzle MG, Ametaj BN. Intravaginally administered lactic acid bacteria expedited uterine involution and modulated hormonal profiles of transition dairy cows. J Dairy Sci 2015; 98: 6018–6028. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Cotter PD, Hill C. Surviving the acid test: responses of gram-positive bacteria to low pH. Microbiol Mol Biol Rev 2003; 67: 429–453. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Alakomi HL, Skyttä E, Saarela M, Mattila-Sandholm T, Latva-Kala K, Helander IM. Lactic acid permeabilizes gram-negative bacteria by disrupting the outer membrane. Appl Environ Microbiol 2000; 66: 2001–2005. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Genís S, Sánchez-Chardi A, Bach À, Fàbregas F, Arís A. A combination of lactic acid bacteria regulates Escherichia coli infection and inflammation of the bovine endometrium. J Dairy Sci 2017; 100: 479–492. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Tachedjian G, Aldunate M, Bradshaw CS, Cone RA. The role of lactic acid production by probiotic Lactobacillus species in vaginal health. Res Microbiol 2017; 168: 782–792. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Richard HT, Foster JW. Acid resistance in Escherichia coli. Adv Appl Microbiol 2003; 52: 167–186. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Martius J, Krohn MA, Hillier SL, Stamm WE, Holmes KK, Eschenbach DA. Relationships of vaginal Lactobacillus species, cervical Chlamydia trachomatis, and bacterial vaginosis to preterm birth. Obstet Gynecol 1988; 71: 89–95. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Foschi C, Salvo M, Cevenini R, Parolin C, Vitali B, Marangoni A. Vaginal lactobacilli reduce Neisseria gonorrhoeae viability through multiple strategies: an in vitro study. Front Cell Infect Microbiol 2017; 7: 502. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.