Abstract
Although effective control of blood pressure (BP) reduces the risk of cardiovascular events in patients with hypertension, BP control rates among treated patients in actual clinical practice are less than optimal. Although the costs of medicines and medical care (which are difficult to estimate both in clinical trials and general clinical practice) are important, medication‐taking behavior—adherence and persistence with antihypertensive regimens—influences BP control rates. Many factors affect adherence and persistence with medications, including efficacy and tolerability of drugs prescribed, such that rates vary greatly among antihypertensive classes. In general, medications with fewer adverse effects (in registration trials or large outcomes studies) are associated with increased adherence and lower discontinuation rates. More widespread use of such agents, particularly those available in generic formulations or in low‐cost formularies, may lead to better long‐term BP control and fewer cardiovascular events.
Extensive evidence has demonstrated that effective control of blood pressure (BP) reduces the risk of cardiovascular events in patients with hypertension. 1 , 2 Data from placebo‐controlled clinical trials indicate that reductions of 10 mm Hg to 12 mm Hg in systolic BP or 5 mm Hg to 6 mm Hg in diastolic BP, or both, lower the risk of stroke by 38%, cardiovascular death by 21%, and coronary heart disease by 16%. 3 BP control rates in recent major clinical trials have ranged from 66% in the Antihypertensive and Lipid‐Lowering Treatment to Prevent Heart Attack Trial (ALLHAT) 4 to almost 80% in the US arm of the Avoiding Cardiovascular Events Through Combination Therapy in Patients Living With Systolic Hypertension (ACCOMPLISH) trial. 5 However, despite the importance of achieving BP control, hypertension control rates (<140/90 mm Hg, at minimum) remain suboptimal in actual clinical practice. According to the most recent results of the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) 2005–2006, the estimated BP control rate among all hypertensive patients is 44% and among treated hypertensive patients is 64%. 6 These rates are similar to those reported recently by the National Ambulatory Medical Care Survey of physicians in office settings: only 39% to 44% of treated hypertensive patients were at recommended BP levels. 7 , 8 These numbers fall short of the Healthy People 2010 target of BP control in 50% of all hypertensive patients, 9 and leave room for considerable improvement.
The discrepancy between clinical trial results of good BP control and actual clinical practice is due to a number of factors, including differences in medication‐taking behavior, ie, adherence and persistence with drug therapy regimens. Adherence is defined as the appropriate use of therapy, including taking medications at the prescribed frequency/interval and dose/dosing regimen. 10 , 11 Adherence is reported as the percentage of prescribed doses taken per defined period of time and is a dynamic parameter that can change over time, as when a patient becomes more adherent with therapy just before a visit to the physician. The leading problem associated with adherence is lack of persistence with drug therapy. 12 Persistence on the other hand is defined as continuing the use of a medication(s) for the specified treatment period and is measured in terms of time (eg, days, weeks, months). 10 , 11 Historically, however, compliance was used as a catchall term that encompassed a patient’s adherence and persistence.
In the past 5 years there has been a shift away from use of the term compliance to adherence to describe the correspondence of a patient’s medication‐taking behavior with prescriber recommendations. 10 , 13 , 14 The rationale for this change in terminology is that compliance implies professional dominance in the social contract between the health care provider and patient, whereas adherence suggests that a patient can be a partner in medical decision‐making. 13 , 14 In hypertension, adherence is less likely to be confused with “arterial compliance,” an important topic in its own right. In the United States, the term compliance has been largely appropriated by quality‐assurance experts, and refers to the correspondence of treatment patterns and behaviors of health care professionals with recommended national guidelines. Nonetheless, both terms continue to be used in the medical literature. 11 , 14
Factors Related to Poor Adherence and Persistence
Factors contributing to the lack of adherence and persistence with therapy have been grouped into 5 categories: patient‐related, condition‐related, therapy‐related, health system–related, and socioeconomic factors (Table I). 15 Patients may have a poor understanding or may lack awareness of the long‐term consequences of elevated BP or the importance of BP control, particularly because hypertension is often asymptomatic and life‐long (condition‐related). 14 Lack of awareness may be particularly relevant for newly diagnosed hypertensive patients, who generally have lower persistence rates than patients with established hypertension. 16 , 17 , 18
Table I.
Category | Factors Related to Hypertension |
---|---|
Patient‐related | Lack of understanding of importance of achieving BP control, lack of understanding regarding how to take medications, perceived lack of drug efficacy, quality of life |
Physician‐related | Failure to modify therapy to meet BP goals, failure to involve patient in decision‐making, insufficient patient education |
Condition‐related | Asymptomatic, life‐long |
Therapy‐related | Adverse effects, complexity of regimen, cost |
Health system–related | Access to health care, lack of follow‐up, convenience of appointment scheduling |
Socioeconomic | Differential treatment of socioeconomic and ethnic groups, lack of insurance, lack of transportation, lack of social support system |
Abbreviation: BP, blood pressure. Adapted from the World Health Organization 2003. 15
Other factors contributing to poor adherence and persistence are therapy‐related. Complex medication regimens—multiple drugs and/or multiple doses per day—have been shown to decrease adherence, 19 as has a high total number of medications. 20 Initial choice of therapy, either a monotherapy or a combination regimen, can affect adherence and persistence as well. 21
The contributions of adherence and persistence to the total cost of care are complex. The influence of economic factors on adherence and persistence are difficult to estimate, both for clinical trials and in general medical practice. Patients in research protocols often receive study medications free of charge and some of their medical care costs are reduced, compared with care outside of the research setting. Most recent estimates of persistence and adherence are derived from pharmacy records, which do not capture prescriptions that are not filled. Studies of pharmacy databases seldom account for potential economic confounders, such as differences across drug classes in pharmacy copayments, tiered formularies, or nongeneric formulations. Across many studies, lack of health insurance, particularly among treated patients, correlates with poor adherence, 22 as does the level of drug copayment among the insured. 23 , 24 , 25 Cost‐related nonadherence is more likely among patients with mood disorders and those with a heavy disease burden, regardless of drug coverage status, poverty status, or out‐of‐pocket drug costs. 26 However, health system–related factors may also apply, as many groups with health insurance and access to medical care, such as Medicare beneficiaries and US military veterans, sometimes have suboptimal BP control, although recent data from the veteran population suggest that changes in the health care system can improve BP control. 27 , 28
Who is Adherent?
The NHANES database provides some indication of factors often associated with discontinuing antihypertensive drug therapy. 29 Nonpersistence with antihypertensive drug therapy was 12 times higher in younger (<30 years) than in older patients (>50 years), 31% higher in men than in women, and 43% higher in Hispanic patients compared with other racial/ethnic groups. Other factors include having a low income, having no health insurance, and not having visited a physician within the previous year. 29 Other investigators have identified greater adherence and persistence in hypertensive patients with concomitant cardiovascular conditions. 30
Consequences of Poor Adherence and Persistence
The consequences of poor adherence and persistence with antihypertensive drug therapy are the same as those for hypertension itself—a higher risk for cardiovascular disease, hospitalization, and increased health care utilization and cost. 10 , 31 A study that evaluated adherence to angiotensin‐converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors, angiotensin II receptor blockers (ARBs), and/or β‐blockers in patients with ischemic heart disease and diabetes mellitus found that patients who were adherent were at lower risk for all‐cause mortality (odds ratio, 0.52; 95% confidence interval, 0.39–0.69), and that nonadherent patients had a mortality risk that was similar to those who had not been prescribed these agents. 32 The impact of persistence on the primary prevention of myocardial infarction and stroke was also analyzed: nonpersistence with antihypertensive drug therapy was associated with a 15% increase in the risk of acute myocardial and a 28% increase in the risk of stroke in patients who were evaluated for an initial 2‐year period followed by an additional 2‐year period or until a cardiovascular event occurred. 33 Likewise, a retrospective cohort study of hypertensive men and women aged 65 years or younger found that the 1‐year risk of hospitalization was significantly lower for patients who were 80% to 100% adherent with their antihypertensive regimen than those who were not. 34 Although drug costs were higher, overall medical costs were lower for patients who were 80% to 100% adherent compared with those with other adherence levels and were significantly better than those with adherence levels ≤59%.
Independent of adherence, higher BP is also associated with increased health care utilization and number/frequency of physician visits. In an analysis of 1000 hypertensive patients in managed care, higher maximum BP was significantly correlated with increased drug costs and number and frequency of physician visits. 35 Drug costs were approximately 1.8 times higher and the number of visits 1.8 to 2.4 times higher in patients with BP ≥160/100 mg Hg than in those with BP <130/85 mm Hg. The mean interval between physician visits was also shorter in patients with uncontrolled BP. 35
Adherence and Persistence With Antihypertensive Regimens
Typically, about 50% of patients discontinue antihypertensive therapy after 1 year, 10 a rate comparable with that of other long‐term therapies for relatively asymptomatic conditions. 36 Reports of long‐term persistence with antihypertensive therapy range from 14% 37 to 73% 18 at 1 year; from 9% 38 to 59% 18 at 3 years, from 16% to 51% at 4 years, 39 and up to 39% at 10 years. 40 In one study, the median time to overall discontinuation of antihypertensive drug therapy was 3.07 years. 41 Numerous studies of antihypertensive agents published over nearly a decade have consistently demonstrated higher persistence rates with some classes than with others. Generally, inhibitors of the renin‐angiotensin system (RAS) have the highest persistence rates and diuretics the lowest rates (Table II). 17 , 18 , 21 , 37 , 38 , 39 , 41 , 42 , 43 , 44 , 45
Table II.
Study | No. | Persistence Rate (%) | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Diuretic | β‐Blocker | CCB | ACEI | ARB | ||
1 Year | ||||||
Bloom 1998 42 | 21,723 | 38 | 43 | 50 | 58 | 64 |
Conlin 2001 39 | 15,175 | 21 | 46 | 54 | 61 | 67 |
Hasford 2002 21 | 2,416 | 34 | 50 | 44 | 42 | 51 |
Bourgault 2005 17 | 21,326 | 45 | 50 | 55 | 59 | 66 |
Erkens 2005 43 | 2,243 | 33 | 35 | 35 | 60 | 62 |
Perreault 2005 18 | 14,947 | 61 | 68 | 68 | 71 | 73 |
Hoer 2007 37 | 62,745 | 26 | 14 | 34 | 34 | 53 |
Patel 2007 44 | 242,882 | 30 | 40 | 38 | 48 | 52 |
Elliott 2007 45 | 60,685 | 56 | – | 60 | 65 | 69 |
3 Years | ||||||
Bourgault 2005 17 | 21,326 | 29 | 34 | 38 | 40 | 53 |
Hasford 2007 38 | 13,763 | 9 | 13 | 12 | 14 | 11 |
Perreault 2005 17 | 21,011 | 48 | 57 | 58 | 58 | 59 |
4 Years | ||||||
Burke 2006 41 | 109,454 | 31 | 33 | 35 | 40 | 42 |
Conlin 2001 39 | 15,175 | 16 | 35 | 41 | 46 | 51 |
Abbreviations: ACEI, angiotensin‐converting enzyme inhibitor; ARB, angiotensin receptor blocker; CCB, calcium channel blocker.
Adherence rates by antihypertensive drug class generally parallel those for persistence rates. In one analysis, after controlling for age, sex, year of initial prescription, and Charlson Comorbidity Index, adherence rates were 90.1% for valsartan, 89.9% for lisinopril, 85.2% for amlodipine, and 78.6% for hydrochlorothiazide. 45 These findings are in agreement with earlier reported 1‐year adherence rates for an ARB (88.9%), an ACE inhibitor (86.6%), and a dihydropyridine calcium channel blocker (CCB). 46
Discontinuation rates are a different measure of medication‐taking behavior that is related to persistence. In a recent study, discontinuation rates for various antihypertensive drug classes during the first year were 44.2% with a diuretic, 39.7% with a CCB, 35.2% with an ACE inhibitor, and 30.6% with an ARB. 45 The time to discontinuation of therapy was 137.0 days overall and ranged from 116.2 days for a diuretic to 177.5 days for ARB therapy, a significant difference. 45 Preliminary reports of meta‐analyses (including 18 studies involving 631,579 patients) found the same rank order for discontinuation of original antihypertensive drug after 1 year (from most to least likely) as follows: diuretic >β‐blocker >CCB >ACE inhibitor >ARB. 47 , 48 The differences were significant for all classes compared with the diuretic. This larger and more comprehensive analysis confirms and extends the findings from earlier studies. 17 , 18 , 39 , 41 , 42
A variety of factors influence persistence with antihypertensive medication (Table III), 17 , 18 , 39 , 40 , 42 , 45 , 49 , 50 , 51 , 52 but one of the most significant may be adverse effects. This is particularly relevant since hypertension is often asymptomatic. In a prospective cohort study of patients starting a new antihypertensive agent, discontinuation rates of 12% at 1 month and 24% at 3 months were largely attributable to the incidence of adverse effects, as patients reporting adverse effects were almost twice as likely to discontinue treatment as those who did not. 52 A 2001 meta‐analysis of discontinuations specifically due to adverse events according to antihypertensive drug classes found that CCBs, β‐blockers, and ACE inhibitors had higher discontinuation rates than placebo, while diuretics and ARBs had lower discontinuation rates. 53 In actively controlled trials, higher discontinuations due to adverse effects were noted for diuretics and β‐blockers vs CCBs and for ARBs vs ACE inhibitors.
Table III.
Factor | Finding |
---|---|
Age | Older patients more persistent than younger patients |
Sex | Women usually more persistent than men |
Initial monotherapy | Persistence highest with angiotensin receptor blockers, lowest with diuretics |
Comorbidity | Discontinuation rates higher with higher comorbidity index |
Adverse effects | Occurrence of adverse effects increases discontinuation |
Prescription coverage | Discontinuation rates lower with drug coverage |
Combination Regimens
More than two thirds of patients require ≥2 antihypertensive agents (typically having complementary mechanisms of action) to achieve their BP goal. Moreover, patients with diabetes mellitus, chronic kidney disease, or heart disease now have a lower BP target (<130/80 mm Hg) and may require ≥3 agents. 1 , 54 Fixed‐dose combination pills provide improved BP lowering, often with a lower frequency and/or severity of side effects, compared with higher doses of the individual agents, which may improve tolerability. Pills containing appropriately chosen agents can reduce pill burden and increase long‐term adherence. Persistence rates for combination therapy at 1 year are significantly better than rates for monotherapy with diuretics, β‐blockers, and/or CCBs. 18 , 46
A low dose of a thiazide‐type or thiazide‐like diuretic enhances the efficacy of most other antihypertensive agents with no increase in the occurrence of adverse events. 55 , 56 , 57 , 58 The combination of an ACE inhibitor or ARB with a CCB also has significantly greater BP‐lowering effects and a lower incidence and severity of peripheral edema, compared with high‐dose CCB monotherapy, 55 , 59 , 60 which may result in improved tolerability and higher persistence. A recent meta‐analysis of 42 factorial‐design trials involving 10,968 patients given a thiazide diuretic, β‐blocker, CCB, or ACE inhibitor showed approximately a 5‐fold greater reduction in BP with the combination of 2 of these drug classes, compared with doubling the dose of one drug. 61 In contrast, some combinations can be troublesome. Although a combination of an ARB and an ACE inhibitor has been approved by the US Food and Drug Administration for patients with heart failure and to reduce proteinuria, 62 a greater risk of adverse effects, 63 and poorer outcomes in high‐risk cardiovascular patients have been noted. 64
Strategies to Improve Adherence and Persistence
Since the many factors that contribute to poor adherence and/or persistence with antihypertensive therapy (Table III) are not mutually exclusive, interventions to improve adherence and persistence with therapy are multidisciplinary and comprehensive in nature and include cognitive, behavioral, and affective strategies tailored to a specific patient. 10 , 65 Physicians often individualize antihypertensive regimens, taking into account the degree of BP elevation, concomitant conditions (eg, diabetes, chronic kidney disease), absolute cardiovascular risk, and an assessment of the patient’s past medication‐taking behavior. Involving the patient in treatment decisions as well as ensuring that the patient understands the consequences of hypertension and the importance of its treatment, providing adequate follow‐up, and modifying the regimen as necessary to achieve the target BP level may also be important.
Conclusions
Many factors affect adherence and persistence rates, including efficacy and tolerability of drugs prescribed. A better understanding of adherence and persistence with antihypertensive medication regimens, factors affecting each, and strategies to improve medication‐taking behavior likely will improve BP control rates and lower the economic burden of hypertension and its consequent cardiovascular effects.
Acknowledgment and disclosure: The author wishes to thank Landmark Programs, Inc, for bibliographic and editorial assistance, supported by an unrestricted educational grant from Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation.
References
- 1. Chobanian AV, Bakris GL, Black HR, et al. Seventh report of the joint national committee on prevention, detection, evaluation, and treatment of high blood pressure. Hypertension. 2003;42:1206–1252. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2. Wang J‐G, Staessen JA, Franklin SS, et al. Systolic and diastolic blood pressure lowering as determinants of cardiovascular outcome. Hypertension. 2005;45:907–913. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3. MacMahon S, Rodgers A. The effects of antihypertensive treatment on vascular disease: reappraisal of the evidence in 1994. J Vasc Med Biol. 1993;4:265–271. [Google Scholar]
- 4. Cushman WC, Ford CE, Cutler JA, et al. Success and predictors of blood pressure control in diverse North American settings: the antihypertensive and lipid‐lowering treatment to prevent heart attack trial (ALLHAT). J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich). 2002;4:393–404. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5. Jamerson K, Bakris GL, Dahlöf B, et al. Exceptional early blood pressure control rates: the ACCOMPLISH trial. Blood Press. 2007;16:80–86. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6. Ostchega Y, Yoon SS, Hughes J, et al. Hypertension awareness, treatment, and control‐Continued disparities in adults: United States, 2005–2006. National Center for Health Statistics, Data Brief #3. 2008 (January): 1–8, 2008. [PubMed]
- 7. Ma J, Stafford RS. Screening, treatment, and control of hypertension in US private physician offices, 2003–2004. Hypertension. 2008;51:1275–1281. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8. Fang J, Alderman MH, Keenan NL, et al. Hypertension control at physicians’ offices in the United States. Am J Hypertens. 2008;21:136–142. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services . Healthy People 2010: Understanding and Improving Health, 2nd edn. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office; 2000. Available at: ww.healthypeople.gov/Document/HTML/Volume1/12Heart.htm#_Toc490544222. Accessed November 7, 2008. [Google Scholar]
- 10. Burnier M. Medication adherence and persistence as the cornerstone of effective antihypertensive therapy. Am J Hypertens. 2006;19:1190–1196. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11. Halpern MT, Khan ZM, Schmier JK, et al. Recommendations for evaluating compliance and persistence with hypertension therapy using retrospective data. Hypertension. 2006;47:1039–1048. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12. Vrijens B, Vincze G, Kristanto P, et al. Adherence to prescribed antihypertensive drug treatments: longitudinal study of electronically compiled dosing histories. BMJ. 2008;336:1114–1117. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13. Tilson HH. Adherence or compliance? Changes in terminology. Ann Pharmacother. 2004;38:161–162. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14. Krousel‐Wood M, Thomas S, Muntner P, et al. Medication adherence: a key factor in achieving blood pressure control and good clinical outcomes in hypertensive patients. Curr Opin Cardiol. 2004;19:357–362. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15. World Health Organization . Adherence to long‐term therapies: evidence for action. Geneva, Switzerland: World Health Organization; 2003. http://www.emro.who.int/ncd/Publications/adherence_report.pdf. Accessed August 1, 2008. [Google Scholar]
- 16. Caro JJ, Salas M, Speckman JL, et al. Persistence with treatment for hypertension in actual practice. Can Med Assoc J. 1999;160:31–37. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17. Bourgault C, Sénécal M, Brisson M, et al. Persistence and discontinuation patterns of antihypertensive therapy among newly treated patients: a population‐based study. J Hum Hypertens. 2005;19:607–613. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18. Perreault S, Lamarre D, Blais L, et al. Persistence with treatment in newly treated middle‐aged patients with essential hypertension. Ann Pharmacother. 2005;39:1401–1408. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19. Schroeder K, Fahey T, Ebrahim S. How can we improve adherence to blood pressure‐lowering medication in ambulatory care? Systematic review of randomized controlled trials. Arch Intern Med. 2004;1645:722–732. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20. Bramley TJ, Gerbino PP, Nightengale BS, et al. Relationship of blood pressure control to adherence with antihypertensive monotherapy in 13 managed care organizations. J Manag Care Pharm. 2006;12:239–245. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21. Hasford J, Mimran A, Simons WR. A population‐based European cohort study of persistence in newly diagnosed hypertensive patients. J Hum Hypertens. 2002;16:569–575. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22. Duru OK, Vargas RB, Kermah D, et al. Health insurance status and hypertension monitoring and control in the United States. Am J Hypertens. 2007;20:348–353. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23. Zhang D, Carlson AM, Gleason PP, et al. Relationship of the magnitude of member cost‐share and medication persistence with newly initiated renin angiotensin system blockers. J Manag Care Pharm. 2007;13:664–676. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24. Briesacher BA, Limcangco R, Frech‐Tamas F. New‐user persistence with antihypertensives and prescription cost‐sharing. J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich). 2008;9:831–836. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25. Taira DA, Wong KS, Frech‐Tamas F, et al. Copayment level and compliance with antihypertensive medication: analysis and policy implications for managed care. Am J Manag Care. 2006;12:678–683. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26. Briesacher BA, Gurwitz JH, Soumerai SB. Patients at‐risk for cost‐related medication nonadherence: a review of the literature. J Gen Intern Med. 2007;22:864–871. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27. Berlowitz DR, Ash AS, Hickey C, et al. Inadequate management of blood pressure in a hypertensive population. N Engl J Med. 1998;339:1957–1963. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28. Siegel D, Lopez J, Meier J. Antihypertensive medication adherence in the Department of Veterans Affairs. Am J Med. 2007;120:26–32. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29. Bautista LE. Predictors of persistence with antihypertensive therapy: results from the NHANES. Am J Hypertens. 2008;21:183–188. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30. Briesacher BA, Andrade SE, Fouayzi H, et al. Comparison of drug adherence rates among patients with seven different medical conditions. Pharmacotherapy. 2008;28:437–443. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31. Rosamond W, Flegal K, Furier K, et al. Heart disease and stroke statistics: 2008 update. A Report from the American Heart Association Statistics Committee and Stroke Statistics Subcommittee. Circulation. 2008;117:e25–e146. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32. Ho PM, Magid DJ, Masoudi FA, et al. Adherence to cardioprotective medications and mortality among patients with diabetes and ischemic heart disease. BMC Cardiovasc Disord. 2006;6:48. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33. Breekveldt‐Postma NS, Penning‐van Beest FJA, Siiskonen SJ, et al. The effect of discontinuation of antihypertensives on the risk of acute myocardial infarction and stroke. Curr Med Res Opin. 2008;24:121–127. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34. Sokol MC, McGuigan KA, Verbrugge RR, et al. Impact of medication adherence on hospitalization risk and healthcare cost. Med Care. 2005;43:521–530. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35. Paramore LC, Halpern MT, Lapuerta P, et al. Impact of poorly controlled hypertension on healthcare resource utilization and cost. Am J Manag Care. 2001;7:389–398. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36. McDonald HP, Garg AX, Haynes RB. Interventions to enhance patient adherence to medication prescriptions: scientific review. JAMA. 2002;288:2868–2879. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37. Hoer A, Gothe H, Khan ZM, et al. Persistence and adherence with antihypertensive drug therapy in a German sickness fund population. J Hum Hypertens. 2007;21:744–746. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38. Hasford J, Schroder‐Bernhardi D, Rottenkolber M, et al. Persistence with antihypertensive treatments: results of a 3‐year follow‐up cohort study. Eur J Clin Pharmacol. 2007;36:1055–1061. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39. Conlin PR, Gerth WC, Fox J, et al. Four‐year persistence patterns among patients initiating therapy with the angiotensin II receptor antagonist losartan versus other antihypertensive drug classes. Clin Ther. 2001;23:1999–2010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40. Van Wijk BLG, Klungel OH, Heerdink ER, et al. Rate and determinants of 10‐year persistence with antihypertensive drugs. J Hypertens. 2005;23:2101–2107. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41. Burke TA, Sturkenboom MC, Lu SE, et al. Discontinuation of antihypertensive drugs among newly diagnosed hypertensive patients in UK general practice. J Hypertens. 2006;24:1193–1200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42. Bloom BS. Continuation of initial antihypertensive medication after 1 year of therapy. Clin Ther. 1998;20:671–681. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43. Erkens JA, Panneman MMJ, Klungel OH, et al. Differences in antihypertensive drug persistence associated with drug class and gender: a PHARMO study. Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf. 2005;14:795–803. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44. Patel BV, Remigio‐Baker RA, Mehta D, et al. Effects of initial antihypertensive drug class on patient persistence and compliance in a usual‐care setting in the United States. J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich). 2007;9:692–700. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45. Elliott WJ, Plauschinat CA, Skrepnek GH, et al. Persistence, adherence, and risk of discontinuation associated with commonly prescribed antihypertensive drug monotherapies. J Am Board Fam Med. 2007;20:72–80. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46. Wogen J, Kreilick CA, Livornese RC, et al. Patient adherence with amlodipine, lisinopril, or valsartan therapy in a usual‐care setting. J Manag Care Pharm. 2003;9:424–429. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47. Elliott WJ, Meyer PM. One‐year discontinuation rates of antihypertensive drugs in clinical practice: a network meta‐analysis [abstract]. J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich). 2007;9(suppl A):A210. [Google Scholar]
- 48. Elliott WJ, Meyer PM, Basu S. One‐year persistence with initial antihypertensive drug therapy: a comparison of network and Bayesian meta‐analyses [abstract]. J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich). 2008;10(suppl A):A113–A114. [Google Scholar]
- 49. Marentette MA, Gerth WC, Billings DK, et al. Antihypertensive persistence and drug class. Can J Cardiol. 2002;18:649–656. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50. Degli Esposti E, Sturani A, Di Martino M, et al. Long‐term persistence with antihypertensive drugs in new patients. J Hum Hypertens. 2002;16:439–444. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51. Caro JJ, Speckman JL, Salas M, et al. Effect of initial drug choice on persistence with antihypertensive therapy: the importance of actual practice data. Can Med Assoc J. 1999;160:41–46. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52. Grégoire J‐P, Moisan J, Guibert R, et al. Determinants of discontinuation of new courses of antihypertensive medications. J Clin Epidemiol. 2002;55:728–735. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53. Ross SD, Akhras KS, Zhang S, et al. Discontinuation of antihypertensive drugs due to adverse events: a systematic review and meta‐analysis. Pharmacotherapy. 2001;21:940–953. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54. Rosendorff C, Black HR, Cannon CP, et al. Treatment of hypertension in the prevention and management of ischemic heart disease: a Scientific Statement from the American Heart Association Council for High Blood Pressure Research and the Councils on Clinical Cardiology and Epidemiology and Prevention. Circulation. 2007;115:2761–2788. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55. Trenkwalder P. Combination therapy with AT1‐receptor blockers. J Hum Hypertens. 2002;16:S17–S25. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 56. Ruilope LM, Malacco E, Khyder Y, et al. Efficacy and tolerability of combination therapy with valsartan plus hydrochlorothiazide compared with amlodipine monotherapy in hypertensive patients with other cardiovascular risk factors: the VAST study. Clin Ther. 2005;27:578–587. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 57. Neutel JM, Franklin SS, Oparil S, et al. Efficacy and safety of irbesartan/HCTZ combination therapy as initial treatment for rapid control of severe hypertension. J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich). 2006;8:850–857. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 58. Tedesco MA, Natale F, Calabro R. Effects of monotherapy and combination therapy on blood pressure control and target organ damage: a randomized prospective intervention study in a large population of hypertensive patients. J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich). 2006;8:634–641. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 59. Hasebe N, Kikuchi K, for the NICE Combi Study Group . Controlled‐release nifedipine and candesartan low‐dose combination therapy in patients with essential hypertension: the NICE Combi (Nifedipine and Candesartan Combination) Study. J Hypertens. 2005;23:445–453. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 60. Philipp T, Smith TR, Glazer R, et al. Two multi‐center, 8‐week, randomized, double‐blind, placebo‐controlled, parallel‐group studies evaluating the efficacy and tolerability of amlodipine and valsartan in combination and as monotherapy in adult patients with mild to moderate essential hypertension. Clin Ther. 2007;29:563–580. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 61. Wald DS, Law M, Morris JK, et al. Combination therapy versus monotherapy in reducing blood pressure: meta‐analysis on 11,000 participants from 42 trials. Am J Med. 2009;122:290–300. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 62. Kunz R, Friedrich C, Wolbers M, et al. Meta‐analysis: Effect of monotherapy and combination therapy with inhibitors of the renin–angiotensin system on proteinuria in renal disease. Ann Intern Med. 2008;138:30–48. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 63. Phillips CO, Kashani A, Ko DK, et al. Adverse effects of combination angiotensin II blockers plus angiotensin converting‐enzyme inhibitors for left ventricular dysfunction: a quantitative review of data from randomized clinical trials. Arch Intern Med. 2007;167:1930–1936. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 64. ONTARGET Investigators . Telmisartan, ramipril or both in patients at high risk for vascular events. N Engl J Med. 2008;358:1547–1549. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 65. Düsing R. Overcoming barriers to effective blood pressure control in patients with hypertension. Cur Med Res Opin. 2006;22:1545–1553. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]