Abstract
To improve the potential treatment strategies of incurable renal cell carcinoma (RCC), which is highly resistant to chemotherapy and radiotherapy, the present study established a combination therapy with immunostimulatory factor (ISTF) and anti-4-1BB monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) to augment the antitumor response in a murine RCC model. ISTF isolated from Actinobacillus actinomycetemcomitans stimulates macrophages, dendritic cells and B cells to produce IL-6, TNF-α, nitric oxide and major histocompatibility complex class II expression. 4-1BB (CD137) is expressed in activated immune cells, including activated T cells, and is a promising target for cancer immunotherapy. The administration of anti-4-1BB mAbs promoted antitumor immunity via enhancing CD11c+CD8+ T cells. The CD11c+CD8+ T cells were characterized by high killing activity and IFN-γ-producing ability, representing a phenotype of active effector cytotoxic T lymphocytes. The present study showed that combination therapy with ISTF and anti-4-1BB mAbs promoted partial tumor regression with established RCC, but monotherapy with ISTF or anti-4-1BB mAbs did not. These effects were speculated to be caused by the increase in CD11c+CD8+ T cells in the spleen and tumor, and IFN-γ production. These insights into the effector mechanisms of the combination of ISTF and anti-4-1BB mAbs may be useful for targeting incurable RCC.
Keywords: renal cell carcinoma, 4-1BB, immunostimulating factor, CD11c+CD8+ T cells, IFN-γ
Introduction
Renal cell carcinoma (RCC) is the most common form of kidney cancer. Its incidence has steadily risen over the past 10 years, and it accounts for 2–3% of all adult malignancies (1). RCC cells show high multidrug resistance, which makes chemotherapy ineffective, and radiotherapy can only relieve the symptoms (2). RCC cells have a lower rate of cleavage than other cancer cells, which is speculated to be a cause of resistance to chemotherapy and radiotherapy (3,4). Due to the poor response of RCC to radiotherapy and chemotherapy, the 5-year survival rate for metastatic RCC is only 10% (5). Previously, treatment of RCC was rare and was occasionally managed by the patient's own immune system (2). For this reason, immunotherapy using IFN-γ and IL-2 has been experimentally used for the treatment of RCC (6–8). However, several clinical applications of IFN-γ and IL-2 immunotherapy have shown that the overall prognosis of patients remains poor, with only 20% of patients responding for short periods of time; the therapy also induces severe toxicity (9). Due to these disappointing outcomes, the development of novel therapies for RCC is urgent, and a number of studies are now being conducted worldwide.
4-1BB (CD137) is expressed on activated T cells and delivers co-stimulatory signals for T cell activation when it binds to 4-1BB ligand or in ligation with agonistic anti-4-1BB monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) (10,11). The systemic administration of agonistic anti-4-1BB mAbs to tumor-bearing mice with P815 mastocytoma, AG104A sarcoma (12), B10.2 fibrosarcoma (13) and CT26 colon carcinoma (14) caused tumor regression, but they had no effect on weakly or poorly immunogenic tumors, such as B16 melanoma, C3 tumors and TC-1 lung carcinoma (15). Researchers have tested the efficacy of combinations of anti-4-1BB mAbs and various reagents to enhance the anticancer effects. Previously, using a murine RCC tumor model, we showed that a combination of subtoxic doses of fluorouracil (5-FU) and anti-4-1BB mAb eradicated established tumors, while either 5-FU or anti-4-1BB mAb monotherapy did not (16). In addition, immune checkpoint blockade in combination with anti-VEGF or anti-programmed cell death protein 1 (PD-1) have been found to augment T cell-mediated antitumor immunity in metastatic RCC (17,18). The expression of PD-1 on 4-1BB T cells may be novel therapeutic targets for immunotherapy of metastatic RCC (19,20).
Actinobacillus actinomycetemcomitans (A. actinomycetemcomitans) is associated with several human diseases, including endocarditis, meningitis, osteomyelitis, subcutaneous abscesses and periodontal disease (21–25). The immunostimulatory factor (ISTF; 13 kDa) isolated from A. actinomycetemcomitans, has potent mitogenic activity on mouse B cells and human peripheral blood mononuclear cells (26). ISTF has been reported to stimulate macrophages and dendritic cells in the spleens of BALB/c mice and also has the ability to induce the direct activation of mouse macrophages to induce IL-6, TNF-α, nitric oxide and major histocompatibility complex (MHC) class II expression (27). In addition, ISTF is a proteinaceous material that directly induces the proliferation of B lymphocytes, but does not affect the proliferation of T lymphocytes, even in the presence of antigen-presenting cells (APCs) (26).
To fully activate T cells, both antigen recognition (peptide and MHC complex) and co-stimulatory signals provided by APCs are required (28). In the absence of co-stimulatory signals, antigen presentation induces T cell anergy, while co-stimulatory signals activate non-responding tumor-specific T cells (29). ISTF is expected to be highly active against APCs, and anticancer activity can be expected to be increased by the amplification of the overall immune response (27). Therefore, in the present study it was hypothesized that a combination of ISTF, promoting antigen presentation, and 4-1BB mAbs, stimulating T cell co-stimulation signals, could increase T cell activity to eradicate RCC. The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of a combination of ISTF and agonistic anti-4-1BB mAbs in the RCC model, which is associated with multidrug resistance and does not respond well to anticancer therapy.
Materials and methods
Animals and reagents
Female Balb/c mice (7 weeks of age, 156 mice) were purchased from Orient Bio, Inc. The mice were housed under specific pathogen-free conditions at 18–24°C and 40–70% humidity in a 12 h light-dark cycle, with ad libitum access to food and water. Animal studies were approved by the University of Ulsan Animal Care and Use Committee (approval no. HTC-14-030; Nam-gu, Republic of Korea). All mice were subjected to anesthesia by tribromoethanol [intraperitoneally (i.p.) injection, 250 mg/kg, 30 min] or euthanasia by using a flow rate of 3–7 liters per min with CO2 for a 10-liter volume. Hybridomas (Clone 3E1) producing agonistic anti-4-1BB mAb were a gift from Dr Robert Mittler (Emory University, Atlanta, GA, USA). Anti-CD3 monoclonal antibody (cat. no. 557306), FITC-CD3 (cat. no. 553061), PE-CD8 (cat. no. 553032), FITC-CD8 (cat. no. 553030), PerCP-Cy™ 5.5-CD8 (cat. no. 551162), PE-B220 (cat. no. 553089), PerCP-Cy™5.5-CD4 (cat. no. 550954), PE-CD4 (cat. no. 557308), PE-Foxp3 (cat. no. 560408), PE-F4/80 (cat. no. 565410), PE-DX5 (cat. no. 553858), PE-CD11b (cat. no. 557397), FITC-Gr1 (cat. no. 553126), PE-CD11c (cat. no. 557401), FITC-CD11c (cat. no. 557400), PE-IFN-γ (cat. no. 562020) were purchased from BD Pharmingen (BD Biosciences). The gene encoding an ISTF from Actinobacillus actinomycetemcomitans was cloned into the pET-32a(+) DNA-Novagen expression vector (Sigma-Aldrich; Merck KGaA). The recombinant vector containing a full-length ISTF gene fused with a C-terminal His6 tag was transformed into E. coli BL21 (DE3; Stratagene; Agilent Technologies, Inc.). The expression of the recombinant ISTF was induced by incubation with 1 mM isopropyl β-D-1-thiogalactopyranoside (IPTG; Sigma-Aldrich; Merck KGaA) at 20°C for 4 h, and the recombinant ISTF was purified using a Protino® Ni-TED column (Machery-Nagel GmbH) according to the manufacturer's protocols.
Tumor cells and animal experiments
Renca cells were purchased from the Korean Cell Line Bank (Korean Cell Line Research Foundation) and cultured in RPMI-1640 medium (Gibco; Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc.) supplemented with 10% FBS (Gibco; Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc.). For the animal experiments, log-phase cells were washed and resuspended in PBS immediately before injection into mice. Mice weighing 20±0.5 g were subcutaneously (s.c.) injected with Renca tumor cells into the site over the right flank (1×106/mouse, 100 µl). ISTF was injected i.p. on days 3, 7 and 12, and anti-4-1BB mAb (3E1) was injected i.p. on days 7 and 12, while a control group received PBS and rat IgG (16,27). The tumor diameter was measured every 2–3 days, and the tumor volume (in mm3) was calculated using a caliper. The tumor size was expressed as the tumor volume based on the following formula: Tumor volume (mm3) × (major axis) × (minor axis) × (height) ×0.52. The animals were sacrificed when the longest dimensions of the tumors were >20 mm. Mice were considered tumor free when the tumor dimensions were <1 mm; they were kept under observation for at least 60 days. At least 6–10 mice/treatment group were examined throughout the day, and each reported experiment was representative of at least three similarly performed experiments.
Isolation of splenocytes
The murine spleen was placed in a petri dish with 5 ml Hanks' balanced salt solution buffer, and the spleen was cut into small pieces (~0.2 cm2) with a scalpel blade. The small pieces were crushed using the plunger end of a syringe and then the cell suspensions were passed through a cell strainer. After centrifugation (220 × g, 5 min, 4°C) the cell pellet was suspended in 2–5 ml cold 1X RBC Lysis buffer (eBioscience; Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc.). After incubating the suspension for 5 min on ice, cells were washed with 10–20 ml cold PBS. Cells (1×106 cells/ml) were suspended in 1% BSA (Roche Diagnostics) in PBS for fluorescence activated cell sorting (FACS) analysis or in RPMI-1640 medium for cytokine analysis.
Isolation of tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs) from tumor tissue
TILs were isolated from tumor tissues as described previously (30) with minor modifications. Briefly, tumors were excised (2–3 mm in width), and the fragments were incubated in RPMI-1640 medium containing 10% FBS, collagenase type I (300 U/ml; Gibco; Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc.) and DNase I (50 U/ml; Sigma-Aldrich; Merck KGaA) at 37°C for 90 min. Thereafter, the digested fragments were passed through steel mesh, layered over superimposed layers of 54 and 63% Percoll and centrifuged at 400 × g for 45 min at room temperature. TILs were recovered at the interface between 54 and 63% of the Percoll layers.
Surgical removal of tumor-draining lymph nodes (TDLNs)
At day 14 after injection with ISTF and anti-4-BB mAb, tumor-bearing mice were subjected to surgical removal of the adjacent inguinal lymph nodes (3).
Hepatocellular damage assay
To detect serum alanine aminotransferase (ALT) and aspartate aminotransferase (AST), serum was collected by centrifugation at 585 × g for 15 min at 4°C from peripheral blood obtained through the retro-orbital bleeding procedure. ALT and AST activity, indicators of hepatocellular injury, were measured using the Enzy-Chrom™ Alanine Transaminase Assay Kit (cat. no. EALT-100; BioAssay Systems) and Enzy-Chrom™ Aspartate Transaminase Assay Kit (cat. no. EASTR-100; BioAssay Systems).
FACS analysis
For FACS analysis, splenocytes and TILs were blocked with the Fc receptor-blocking mAb 2.4G2 for 20 min at 4°C and stained with 4G2, FITC-CD3, PE-CD4, PE-CD8, PE-DX5, PE-CD11b and FITC-CD11c mAbs for 30 min at 4°C. After washing, they were analyzed with a FACSCalibur flow cytometer (Becton, Dickinson and Company). Data were analyzed by using FlowJo v10 software (FlowJo LLC).
Determination of intracellular cytokines
To measure the expression of IFN-γ, spleens were isolated from Renca-bearing mice on day 14 and cultured with PMA (50 ng/ml; Sigma-Aldrich; Merck KGaA) and ionomycin (500 ng/ml; Sigma-Aldrich; Merck KGaA), and cytokine release was prevented by treatment with Golgi-stop (BD Pharmingen; BD Biosciences). Following surface staining for Cy-CD8 and FITC-C11c, the cells were fixed in Cytofix/Cytoperm solution (BD Pharmingen; BD Biosciences) for 30 min at 4°C and stained with PE-conjugated anti-mouse IFN-γ for 30 min at 4°C (cat. no. 562333; BD Biosciences). Finally, they were analyzed on a FACSCanto™ II (BD Biosciences) with FlowJo v10 software.
Cytokine analysis
Splenocytes (2×106) were stimulated with CD3 mAb (0.1 µg/ml), anti-4-1BB mAb (5 µg/ml) and ISTF (10 µg/ml). After 48 h of incubation, culture supernatants were collected. The cytokines in the culture supernatants were quantified using a cytometric bead array kit (BD Biosciences), according to the manufacturer's protocol. They were analyzed on a FACSCanto™ II (BD Biosciences) with FlowJo v10 software.
Statistical analysis
All experiments were conducted at least three times, and the data are presented as the mean ± standard error of the mean. All the data were analyzed using GraphPad Prism 9 (GraphPad Software, Inc.). Statistical analyses were performed using one-way ANOVA with Tukey's post hoc test, and Shapiro-Wilk test was performed as a test of normality. Survival analysis was performed using the Kaplan-Meier method; the log-rank test was used to determine statistical significance. P<0.05 was considered to indicate a statistically significant difference.
Results
Combined therapy with ISTF and anti-4-1BB mAb eradicates Renca tumors
To observe whether combined therapy with ISTF and anti-4-1BB mAb could eradicate Renca tumors, mice were treated with 100 µg ISTF and 100 µg anti-4-1BB mAb. Mice inoculated with Renca tumors were injected with ISTF on days 3, 7 and 12 with anti-4-1BB mAb on days 7 and 12, while the control group received PBS and rat IgG. The tumors in the control mice grew, and these mice died from tumor overgrowth by day 37. The tumor growth of the 4-1BB-mono-treated mice was slower than that of the control mice, but the ISFF-mono-treated group was similar to the control group; i.e., ISTF mono-treatment was ineffective. The combined treatment of mice with ISTF and agonistic 4-1BB antibody had a greater antitumor effect than ISTF or anti-4-1BB mAb alone, and 50% of mice showed partial tumor regression between days 12 and 17 (Fig. 1A and B). In addition, ISTF alone or 4-1BB alone, or 4-1BB and ISTF co-administration did not induce liver toxicity, as indicated by the levels of ALT and AST (Fig. 1C). The control and ISTF monotherapy mice all died between days 31 and 37 after tumor cell inoculation. Monotherapy with anti-4-1BB mAb showed modest antitumor effects. The anti-4-1BB mAb monotherapy group had slower tumor growth and survived longer than the control group, but eventually, these mice died between 37 and 43 days. ISTF and anti-4-1BB mAb co-treatment notably inhibited tumor growth (Fig. 1A) and increased the mouse survival time compared with the other experimental groups. A total of 50% of the ISTF and anti-4-1BB mAb co-treated mice survived until the end of the experiment (Fig. 1D).
ISTF and anti-4-1BB mAb co-treatment induces marked expansion of CD11c+CD8+ cells in splenocytes of tumor-bearing mice
To analyze the relationship between tumor regression and immune cell populations, the cell populations in the spleens of mice bearing the Renca tumors were analyzed. As shown in Fig. 1A, ISTF and 4-1BB co-treatment almost removed the tumor ~day 17. Thus, on day 14 after Renca tumor cell inoculation, spleens were harvested by sacrificing the mice, and the percentage of CD3+CD4+ T cells, CD3+CD8+ T cells, B220+ B cells, CD3+DX5+ natural killer (NK) cells, CD11b+F480+ macrophages, CD4+Fox3+ Treg cells and CD11c+ CD8+ T cells were analyzed by FACS. The proportion of CD3+CD8+ T cells in the ISTF + 4-1BB group was significantly higher than that in the control mice, but comparable to that in the 4-1BB-monotherapy mice (Figs. 2A and S1A). The percentage of CD11c+CD8+ T cells in the ISTF + 4-1BB group showed the most prominent increase compared with that for either treatment alone. These cells constituted 18% of the total spleen cells of the ISTF and anti-4-1BB mAb co-treated mice, but only 1.1% of those of the control IgG and PBS-treated mice. The percentage of CD11c+CD8+ cells in the anti-4-1BB mAb monotherapy group was 4.9%, higher than that in the control group, but lower than that in the ISTF + 4-1BB group. Even with 4-1BB treatment alone, the percentage of CD11c+CD8+ cells increased 4.5-fold compared with the control group, but the increase was an 16-fold increase in the ISTF + 4-1BB group compared with the control group (Figs. 2B and S1B). The percentages of CD4+Fox3+ Treg cells (Figs. 2C and S1C), CD11b+F480+ macrophages (Figs. 2D and S2D), CD3+CD4+ T cells (Figs. 2E and S1E), CD3+DX5+ NK cells (Figs. 2F and S1F) and CD11b+Gr1inT cells (Figs. 2G and S1G) showed no significant differences between groups. However, the percentage of B220+ B cells (Figs. 2H and S1H) was decreased in the ISTF + 4-1BB group compared with the control group. These results showed that combination therapy with ISTF and anti-4-1BB mAb had a synergistic effect on the increase in CD8+CD11c+ T cells in tumor-bearing mice.
Combined therapy with ISTF and anti-4-1BB mAb induces a greater increase in the number of tumor-reactive effector cells than suppressor cells
As shown in the image in Fig. 3A, the sizes of the spleens and TDLNs of the mice in the ISTF + 4-1BB group were larger than those in the other experimental groups. Consistent with this, the number of splenocytes in the ISTF + 4-1BB group was also significantly higher than in the other experimental groups. On the other hand, the number of splenocytes in the 4-1BB-treated mice was higher than that in the control, but the number of cells in the ISTF-treated group was similar to that in the control (Fig. 3B). Subsequent detailed analysis of the immune cell subpopulations revealed that the number of CD11c+ CD8+ T cells in the ISTF + 4-1BB group was significantly increased compared with the other groups (Fig. 3C). The numbers of CD3+CD4+ T cells (Fig. 3D) and CD3+CD8+ T cells (Fig. 3E) increased in the ISTF + 4-1BB group compared with the control and ISTF groups, but were similarly increased in the 4-1BB group. The numbers of CD3+DX5+ NK cells (Fig. 3F), CD11b+F480+ macrophages (Fig. 3G), and B220+ B cells (Fig. 3H) were similar between the groups. The numbers of CD11b+Gr1inT cells (Fig. 3I) and CD4+Foxp3+ cells (Fig. 3J) increased in the ISTF + 4-1BB group compared with the control and ISTF groups, however, there were no significant differences compared with the 4-1BB administration group. The ratio of tumor-reactive immune cells to suppressor cells has been shown to be more important than the density or total number of each subtype for antitumor immune responses in human and animal models (31–33). Therefore, the present study next investigated the ratios of CD4+Foxp3+ cells and CD11b+Gr1inT cells, which are considered regulatory T cells and myeloid-derived suppressor cells, respectively (31,34,35), to CD8+ T cells and CD11c+CD8+ T cells. The CD3+CD8+ cell/CD4+Foxp3+ cell, CD3+CD8+ cell/CD11b+Gr1inT cell, CD11c+CD8+ cell/CD4+Foxp3+ cell, and CD11c+CD8+ cell/CD11b+Gr1inT cell ratios were increased 2.8-, 2.6-, 13.6- and 11.3-fold, respectively, in the ISTF + 4-1BB group, compared with the control group (Fig. 3K-N). This indicated that combined therapy with ISTF and anti-4-1BB mAb led to a greater increase in the number of tumor-reactive effector cells than suppressor cells.
Combined therapy with ISTF and anti-4-1BB mAb induces marked expansion of CD11c+CD8+ cells in TILs
We previously reported that CD11c+CD8+ T cells play a role in antitumor immunity in melanoma mouse models (36). The administration of anti-4-1BB mAb to B16F10-melanoma-bearing mice can induce the marked expansion of CD11c+CD8+ T cells in parallel with the suppression of pulmonary tumors (37). As CD11c+CD8+ T cells express high levels of CD107a, a marker of activated cytotoxic T lymphocytes (CTLs), they have been suggested to be cells with a role in the antitumor immunity induced by anti-4-1BB mAb (36). In addition, CD8+ T cells in TILs are considered critical immune effector cells for antitumor immune responses (3). This prompted the present study to analyze CD8+ T cells and CD11c+CD8+ T cells in TILs. TILs from the tumors of each type of mouse were purified and characterized. The TILs mainly consisted of CD4+ T cells, CD8+ T cells, and CD11c+CD8+ T cells. The percentages of CD3+CD4+ T cells were similar between the groups (Figs. 4A and S2). The percentages and numbers of CD3+CD8+ T cells (Fig. 4B) and CD11c+CD8+ T cells (Fig. 4C) showed greater increases in the ISTF + 4-1BB group than in the other experimental groups. The in the ISTF + 4-1BB group had the highest numbers of TIL cells per mg of tumor compared with the other groups (Fig. 4D). As the difference in tumor size between the ISTF + 4-1BB group and control group may have affected the number and frequency of TIL subtypes in tumors, the number of TIL subtypes in the same amounts of tumor tissue were compared. The numbers of CD3+CD4+ T cells, CD3+CD8+ T cells and CD11c+CD8+ T cells per mg of tumor tissue were 2.7-, 11.1-, 32.3-fold higher, respectively, in the ISTF + 4-1BB group than in the control group (Fig. 4E-G).
CD11c+CD8+ T cells increased by combination therapy with ISTF and anti-4-1BB mAb have high IFN-g production ability
The next goal was to determine whether the significant increases in CD8+ T cells and CD11c+CD8+ T cells induced by anti-4-1BB mAb and ISTF co-administration resulted in antitumor activity. IFN-γ has been considered to be a key cytokine in tumor immunity (38). To further clarify the mechanisms underlying the ISTF- and 4-1BB-mediated antitumor immunity in our model, IFN-γ production in CD8+ T cells and CD11c+CD8+ T cells was investigated by intracellular cytokine staining. As expected, the IFN-γ-producing CD8+ T cells and CD11c+CD8+ T cells were much higher in the ISTF + 4-1BB group than those in the control mice. IFN-γ-producing CD8+ T cells constituted 31.9% of the total splenocytes of mice in the ISTF + 4-1BB group, and 5.2 and 18.9% of those in the ISTF or 4-1BB monotherapy groups, respectively (Fig. 5A). Among CD8+ T cells, the proportion and number of CD11c+IFN-γ+ cells were 10.8-fold or 4.1-fold and 36.4-fold or 6.6-fold higher in the mice in the ISTF + 4-1BB group than the ISTF or 4-1BB monotherapy groups, respectively (Fig. 5B). In the mice in the ISTF + 4-1BB group, 66.7% of the CD8+CD11c+ cells secreted IFN-γ (Fig. 5C). Therefore, a significantly increased number of CD11c+CD8+ T cells, due to anti-4-1BB mAb and ISTF co-administration, had high IFN-γ production activity and represent antitumor effector cells.
ISTF and anti-4-1BB mAb co-treatment increases the production of inflammatory cytokines
Studies have shown that the production of pro-inflammatory cytokines can contribute to cancer immunotherapy, acting on every phase of the cancer immune cycle, including improving antigen priming, increasing the number of effector immune cells in the tumor microenvironment and enhancing their cytolytic activity (39,40). IFN-γ is known to play an important role in the anticancer activity of CD8+ T cells (38,41).
Next, the ability of ISTF and anti-4-1BB mAb combined therapy to directly induce cytokine production was analyzed in vitro. Pro-inflammatory cytokines, including IFN-γ, were measured in the supernatants of splenocytes from naïve mice stimulated with various combinations of anti-CD3 mAb (0.1 µg/ml), anti-4-1BB mAb (5 µg/ml) and ISTF (10 µg/ml). ISTF, anti-4-1BB mAb and anti-CD3 mAb co-treatment increased the production of IFN-γ (Fig. 6A), IL-6 (Fig. 6B) and TNF-α (Fig. 6C). In particular, IFN-γ showed a significant synergistic effect compared with the mono-treatment groups (Fig. 6A). The ISTF mono-treatment without stimulation with 4-1BB and CD3 also resulted in increased production of IL-6, IFN-γ and TNF-α compared with the vehicle-treated group, but the levels of IFN-γ and IL-6 were significantly lower than that of the co-treatment group (Fig. 6A-C). IL-10 is considered an immunosuppressive cytokine because it can decrease the antigen-presenting activity of dendritic cells (DCs) and inhibit the cytotoxic and cytokine-release functions performed by T and NK lymphocytes (42,43). The level of IL-10 production in the ISTF and 4-1BB co-stimulation group was similar to that in the ISTF and 4-1BB mono-stimulated groups, and there was no significant difference (Fig. 6D).
Discussion
The present study reported a marked increase in CD11c+CD8+ T cells in response to anti-4-1BB mAb and ISTF co-treatment in a tumor model, together with the suppression of tumor growth. ISTF is a component of the bacterial outer membrane, a proteinaceous material distinct from LPS, that can exist in a soluble form and is released by growing and/or lysed bacteria (26). Influenced by the fact that ISTF stimulates APC cells such as macrophages and DCs, the present study investigated whether ISTF could increase the immunotherapeutic efficiency in the treatment of tumors.
Although cytokine therapy with IL-2 and IFN-γ has been used for advanced RCC, it has only proved efficacious in a limited proportion of patients (16,44). RCC is an immunogenic tumor, based on its response to immunotherapy and the increase in tumor T cell infiltration (45). Agonistic mAbs targeting 4-1BB have been developed to harness 4-1BB signaling for cancer immunotherapy (46). 4-1BB, an inducible costimulatory receptor, is transiently expressed after T cell receptor engagement on T cells (3). In the tumor micro-environment (TME), 4-1BB activation can enhance the activity of tumor-specific CTLs (47,48). In the present study, anti-4-1BB mAb monotherapy caused slower tumor growth and longer survival compared with the control group. Further studies should be performed to address the mechanism underlying this effect, but we suggest that it was due to the increase of myeloid-derived suppressor cells, regulatory T cells and TGF-α in TME (49,50). Previously, anti-4-1BB mAb, urelumab (IgG4), showed hepatotoxicity at high doses (≥1 mg/kg), but was demonstrated to be safe at 0.1 mg/kg every 3 weeks (51). In addition, utomilumab (IgG2) has been found to activate 4-1BB through Fc-mediated crosslinking and shows weaker agonist activity than urelumab (52,53). The modest antitumor activity of utomilumab is better tolerated by patients as monotherapy (51), and no synergic effects with PD-1 blockade in combination therapy (54). Thus, to reduce adverse effects and improve the antitumor activity of 4-1BB, it has been identified that bispecific antibody (MCLA-145) can activate 4-1BB without crosslinking via engagement of PD-L1 to enhance tumor-specific T cell response (55). Therefore, it was hypothesized in the current study that a combination of ISTF, promoting antigen presentation and anti-4-1BB mAb, stimulating T cell co-stimulation signals, could increase T cell activity to eradicate RCC. It was found that a combined treatment of mice with ISTF and agonistic 4-1BB antibody increased the antitumor effects and CD11c+CD8+ T cells than just ISTF or anti-4-1BB mAb alone. Additionally, most of the CD11c+CD8+ T cells were effector cells that produced IFN-γ, which is very important for anticancer activity. It was also confirmed in vitro that ISTF and 4-1BB stimulation increased IFN-γ production in T cells. In addition, ISTF, anti-4-1BB mAb and anti-CD3 mAb co-treatment showed increased synergistic effects on IFN-γ compared with the effects in the mono-treatment groups.
Consistent with our previous report (36), Takeda et al (56) and Choi et al (57) also demonstrated that CD11c+CD8+ T cells are effectors of anti-4-1BB-mediated tumor suppression through the induction of Ag-specific CD8+ T cells and an increase in IFN-γ-producing ability, which represents an active phenotype of the effector CTLs. The increase in CD11c expression in CD8+ T cells can be induced by various immunological stimuli, such as microbial infections or Ag and agonistic anti-4-1BB mAb (58). The level of CD11c expression in CD8+ T cells can be a useful marker for the evaluation of the degree of expansion and the quality of tumor-specific CTLs as well as a marker for predicting the efficacy of antitumor immunotherapies (56). As such, CD11c+CD8+ T cells have been considered effector cells that play a role in the antitumor immunity induced upon stimulation with Ag and anti-4-1BB mAbs. The ultimate goal of cancer immunotherapies is to establish large numbers of effector T cells that have potent antitumor activity. Although ISTF alone did not show anticancer activity in the present study, it showed anticancer activity when co-administered with anti-4-1BB mAb. Thus, it was suggested that it may be used as an adjuvant agent for anticancer immunotherapy.
These results indicated that a combination of ISTF and anti-4-1BB mAb eradicated established tumors by the marked expansion of CD11c+CD8+ T cells with anticancer activity in tumor-bearing mice; therefore, it could be a useful strategy by which to target both antigen presentation and T cell co-stimulatory signals in incurable RCC.
Supplementary Material
Acknowledgements
Not applicable.
Funding Statement
This research was supported by the Basic Science Research Program through the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF), funded by the Ministry of Education (grant nos. NRF-2017R1D1A1B03036287, NRF-2017R1D1A1B03032831, NRF-2014R1A6A1030318 and NRF-2015R1D1A1A01059994).
Availability of data and materials
All data generated or analyzed during this study are included in this published article.
Authors' contributions
SAJ, HTC, WGA and BSK were responsible for the conceptualization of the present study. SAJ, SMP and YJ acquired, analyzed and interpreted the data. SAJ, SMP and YJ confirm the authenticity of all the raw data. SAJ, HTC, WGA and BSK provided the resources. SAJ, YJ, HTC, WGA and BSK wrote, reviewed and edited the manuscript, and gave the final approval of the manuscript. All authors have read and approved the final manuscript.
Ethics approval and consent to participate
Animal studies were approved by the University of Ulsan Animal Care and Use Committee (approval no. HTC-14-030; Nam-gu, Republic of Korea).
Patient consent for publication
Not applicable.
Competing interests
The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
References
- 1.Vitale MG, Carteni G. Recent developments in second and third line therapy of metastatic renal cell carcinoma. Expert Rev Anticancer Ther. 2016;16:469–471. doi: 10.1586/14737140.2016.1168696. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Makhov P, Joshi S, Ghatalia P, Kutikov A, Uzzo RG, Kolenko VM. Resistance to systemic therapies in clear cell renal cell carcinoma: Mechanisms and management strategies. Mol Cancer Ther. 2018;17:1355–1364. doi: 10.1158/1535-7163.MCT-17-1299. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Bartkowiak T, Curran MA. 4-1BB Agonists: Multi-potent potentiators of tumor immunity. Front Oncol. 2015;5:117. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2015.00117. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Yagoda A, Abi-Rached B, Petrylak D. Chemotherapy for advanced renal-cell carcinoma: 1983–1993. Semin Oncol. 1995;22:42–60. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Reeves DJ, Liu CY. Treatment of metastatic renal cell carcinoma. Cancer Chemother Pharmacol. 2009;64:11–25. doi: 10.1007/s00280-009-0983-z. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Hah YS, Koo KC. Immunology and immunotherapeutic approaches for advanced renal cell carcinoma: A comprehensive review. Int J Mol Sci. 2021;22:4452. doi: 10.3390/ijms22094452. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Brown LC, Desai K, Zhang T, Ornstein MC. The immunotherapy landscape in renal cell carcinoma. BioDrugs. 2020;34:733–748. doi: 10.1007/s40259-020-00449-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Considine B, Hurwitz ME. Current status and future directions of immunotherapy in renal cell carcinoma. Curr Oncol Rep. 2019;21:34. doi: 10.1007/s11912-019-0779-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Negrier S, Escudier B, Lasset C, Douillard JY, Savary J, Chevreau C, Ravaud A, Mercatello A, Peny J, Mousseau M, et al. Recombinant human interleukin-2, recombinant human interferon alfa-2a, or both in metastatic renal-cell carcinoma. Groupe Francais d'Immunotherapie. N Engl J Med. 1998;338:1272–1278. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199804303381805. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Sica G, Chen L. Modulation of the immune response through 4-1BB. Adv Exp Med Biol. 2000;465:355–362. doi: 10.1007/0-306-46817-4_30. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Vinay DS, Kwon BS. Role of 4-1BB in immune responses. Semin Immunol. 1998;10:481–489. doi: 10.1006/smim.1998.0157. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Melero I, Shuford WW, Newby SA, Aruffo A, Ledbetter JA, Hellström KE, Mittler RS, Chen L. Monoclonal antibodies against the 4-1BB T-cell activation molecule eradicate established tumors. Nat Med. 1997;3:682–685. doi: 10.1038/nm0697-682. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Miller RE, Jones J, Le T, Whitmore J, Boiani N, Gliniak B, Lynch DH. 4-1BB-specific monoclonal antibody promotes the generation of tumor-specific immune responses by direct activation of CD8 T cells in a CD40-dependent manner. J Immunol. 2002;169:1792–1800. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.169.4.1792. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Taraban VY, Rowley TF, O'Brien L, Chan HT, Haswell LE, Green MH, Tutt AL, Glennie MJ, Al-Shamkhani A. Expression and costimulatory effects of the TNF receptor superfamily members CD134 (OX40) and CD137 (4–1BB), and their role in the generation of anti-tumor immune responses. Eur J Immunol. 2002;32:3617–3627. doi: 10.1002/1521-4141(200212)32:12<3617::AID-IMMU3617>3.0.CO;2-M. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Wilcox RA, Flies DB, Zhu G, Johnson AJ, Tamada K, Chapoval AI, Strome SE, Pease LR, Chen L. Provision of antigen and CD137 signaling breaks immunological ignorance, promoting regression of poorly immunogenic tumors. J Clin Invest. 2002;109:651–659. doi: 10.1172/JCI0214184. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Ju SA, Cheon SH, Park SM, Tam NQ, Kim YM, An WG, Kim BS. Eradication of established renal cell carcinoma by a combination of 5-fluorouracil and anti-4-1BB monoclonal antibody in mice. Int J Cancer. 2008;122:2784–2790. doi: 10.1002/ijc.23457. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Wallin JJ, Bendell JC, Funke R, Sznol M, Korski K, Jones S, Hernandez G, Mier J, He X, Hodi FS, et al. Atezolizumab in combination with bevacizumab enhances antigen-specific T-cell migration in metastatic renal cell carcinoma. Nat Commun. 2016;7:12624. doi: 10.1038/ncomms12624. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.McDermott DF, Sosman JA, Sznol M, Massard C, Gordon MS, Hamid O, Powderly JD, Infante JR, Fassò M, Wang YV, et al. Atezolizumab, an Anti-programmed death-ligand 1 antibody, in metastatic renal cell carcinoma: Long-term safety, clinical activity, and immune correlates from a phase ia study. J Clin Oncol. 2016;34:833–842. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2015.63.7421. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Zizzari IG, Napoletano C, Di Filippo A, Botticelli A, Gelibter A, Calabrò F, Rossi E, Schinzari G, Urbano F, Pomati G, et al. Exploratory pilot study of circulating biomarkers in metastatic renal cell carcinoma. Cancers (Basel) 2020;12:2620. doi: 10.3390/cancers12092620. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Li Y, Wang Z, Jiang W, Zeng H, Liu Z, Lin Z, Qu Y, Xiong Y, Wang J, Chang Y, et al. Tumor-infiltrating TNFRSF9 + CD8 + T cells define different subsets of clear cell renal cell carcinoma with prognosis and immunotherapeutic response. Oncoimmunology. 2020;9:1838141. doi: 10.1080/2162402X.2020.1838141. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Bromley GS, Solender M. Hand infection caused by Actinobacillus actinomycetemcomitans. J Hand Surg Am. 1986;11:434–436. doi: 10.1016/S0363-5023(86)80159-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Hofstad T, Stallemo A. Subacute bacterial endocarditis due to Actinobacillus actinomycetemcomitans. Scand J Infect Dis. 1981;13:78–79. doi: 10.1080/00365548.1981.11690372. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Patel PK, Seitchik MW. Actinobacillus actinomycetemcomitans: A new cause for granuloma of the parotid gland and buccal space. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1986;77:476–478. doi: 10.1097/00006534-198603000-00029. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Salman RA, Bonk SJ, Salman DG, Glickman RS. Submandibular space abscess due to Actinobacillus actinomycetemcomitans. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 1986;44:1002–1005. doi: 10.1016/S0278-2391(86)80055-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Weir DM, Blackwell CC. Interaction of bacteria with the immune system. J Clin Lab Immunol. 1983;10:1–12. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Jeong SJ, Yee ST, Jo WS, Yu SH, Lee SH, Lim YJ, Yoo YH, Kim JM, Lee JD, Jeong MH. A novel factor isolated from Actinobacillus actinomycetemcomitans stimulates mouse B cells and human peripheral blood mononuclear cells. Infect Immun. 2000;68:5132–5138. doi: 10.1128/IAI.68.9.5132-5138.2000. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Jo WS, Yee ST, Yoon S, Nam BH, Do E, Jung BS, Jeong SJ, Hong SH, Yoo YH, Kang CD, et al. Immunostimulating factor isolated from Actinobacillus actinomycetemcomitans stimulates monocytes and inflammatory macrophages. Microbiol Immunol. 2006;50:535–542. doi: 10.1111/j.1348-0421.2006.tb03823.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Cheuk AT, Mufti GJ, Guinn BA. Role of 4-1BB:4-1BB ligand in cancer immunotherapy. Cancer Gene Ther. 2004;11:215–226. doi: 10.1038/sj.cgt.7700670. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Schwartz RH. T cell anergy. Annu Rev Immunol. 2003;21:305–334. doi: 10.1146/annurev.immunol.21.120601.141110. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Ju SA, Lee SC, Kwon TH, Heo SK, Park SM, Paek HN, Suh JH, Cho HR, Kwon B, Kwon BS, Kim BS. Immunity to melanoma mediated by 4-1BB is associated with enhanced activity of tumour-infiltrating lymphocytes. Immunol Cell Biol. 2005;83:344–351. doi: 10.1111/j.1440-1711.2005.01330.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Shen Z, Zhou S, Wang Y, Li RL, Zhong C, Liang C, Sun Y. Higher intratumoral infiltrated Foxp3+ Treg numbers and Foxp3+/CD8+ ratio are associated with adverse prognosis in resectable gastric cancer. J Cancer Res Clin Oncol. 2010;136:1585–1595. doi: 10.1007/s00432-010-0816-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Sato E, Olson SH, Ahn J, Bundy B, Nishikawa H, Qian F, Jungbluth AA, Frosina D, Gnjatic S, Ambrosone C, et al. Intraepithelial CD8+ tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes and a high CD8+/regulatory T cell ratio are associated with favorable prognosis in ovarian cancer. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2005;102:18538–18543. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0509182102. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Ju SA, Park SM, Lee YS, Bae JH, Yu R, An WG, Suh JH, Kim BS. Administration of 6-gingerol greatly enhances the number of tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes in murine tumors. Int J Cancer. 2012;130:2618–2628. doi: 10.1002/ijc.26316. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Sarkar R, Mathew A, Sehrawat S. Myeloid-derived suppressor cells confer infectious tolerance to dampen virus-induced tissue immunoinflammation. J Immunol. 2019;203:1325–1337. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.1900142. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Obregon-Henao A, Henao-Tamayo M, Orme IM, Ordway DJ. Gr1(int)CD11b+ myeloid-derived suppressor cells in Mycobacterium tuberculosis infection. PLoS One. 2013;8:e80669. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0080669. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Ju SA, Park SM, Lee SC, Kwon BS, Kim BS. Marked expansion of CD11c+CD8+ T-cells in melanoma-bearing mice induced by anti-4-1BB monoclonal antibody. Mol Cells. 2007;24:132–138. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Kim SH, Singh R, Han C, Cho E, Kim YI, Lee DG, Kim YH, Kim SS, Shin DH, You HJ, et al. Chronic activation of 4-1BB signaling induces granuloma development in tumor-draining lymph nodes that is detrimental to subsequent CD8+ T cell responses. Cell Mol Immunol. 2021;18:1956–1968. doi: 10.1038/s41423-020-00533-3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Castro F, Cardoso AP, Goncalves RM, Serre K, Oliveira MJ. Interferon-gamma at the crossroads of tumor immune surveillance or evasion. Front Immunol. 2018;9:847. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2018.00847. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Chen DS, Mellman I. Oncology meets immunology: The cancer-immunity cycle. Immunity. 2013;39:1–10. doi: 10.1016/j.immuni.2013.07.012. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Chen DS, Mellman I. Elements of cancer immunity and the cancer-immune set point. Nature. 2017;541:321–330. doi: 10.1038/nature21349. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Bhat P, Leggatt G, Waterhouse N, Frazer IH. Interferon-gamma derived from cytotoxic lymphocytes directly enhances their motility and cytotoxicity. Cell Death Dis. 2017;8:e2836. doi: 10.1038/cddis.2017.67. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Llopiz D, Ruiz M, Infante S, Villanueva L, Silva L, Hervas-Stubbs S, Alignani D, Guruceaga E, Lasarte JJ, Sarobe P. IL-10 expression defines an immunosuppressive dendritic cell population induced by antitumor therapeutic vaccination. Oncotarget. 2017;8:2659–2671. doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.13736. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Moore KW, de Waal Malefyt R, Coffman RL, O'Garra A. Interleukin-10 and the interleukin-10 receptor. Annu Rev Immunol. 2001;19:683–765. doi: 10.1146/annurev.immunol.19.1.683. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Motzer RJ, Bander NH, Nanus DM. Renal-cell carcinoma. N Engl J Med. 1996;335:865–875. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199609193351207. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Vuong L, Kotecha RR, Voss MH, Hakimi AA. Tumor microenvironment dynamics in clear-cell renal cell carcinoma. Cancer Discov. 2019;9:1349–1357. doi: 10.1158/2159-8290.CD-19-0499. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Chester C, Sanmamed MF, Wang J, Melero I. Immunotherapy targeting 4-1BB: Mechanistic rationale, clinical results, and future strategies. Blood. 2018;131:49–57. doi: 10.1182/blood-2017-06-741041. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Gros A, Robbins PF, Yao X, Li YF, Turcotte S, Tran E, Wunderlich JR, Mixon A, Farid S, Dudley ME. PD-1 identifies the patient-specific CD8+ tumor-reactive repertoire infiltrating human tumors. J Clin Invest. 2014;124:2246–2259. doi: 10.1172/JCI73639. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Ye Q, Song DG, Poussin M, Yamamoto T, Best A, Li C, Coukos G, Powell DJ., Jr CD137 accurately identifies and enriches for naturally occurring tumor-reactive T cells in tumor. Clin Cancer Res. 2014;20:44–55. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-13-0945. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Ochoa AC, Zea AH, Hernandez C, Rodriguez PC. Arginase, prostaglandins, and myeloid-derived suppressor cells in renal cell carcinoma. Clin Cancer Res. 2007;13((Suppl)):721s–726s. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-06-2197. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50.Yu JW, Bhattacharya S, Yanamandra N, Kilian D, Shi H, Yadavilli S, Katlinskaya Y, Kaczynski H, Conner M, Benson W, et al. Tumor-immune profiling of murine syngeneic tumor models as a framework to guide mechanistic studies and predict therapy response in distinct tumor microenvironments. PLoS One. 2018;13:e0206223. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0206223. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51.Segal NH, Logan TF, Hodi FS, McDermott D, Melero I, Hamid O, Schmidt H, Robert C, Chiarion-Sileni V, Ascierto PA, et al. Results from an integrated safety analysis of urelumab, an agonist Anti-CD137 monoclonal antibody. Clin Cancer Res. 2017;23:1929–1936. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-16-1272. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52.Li Y, Tan S, Zhang C, Chai Y, He M, Zhang CW, Wang Q, Tong Z, Liu K, Lei Y, et al. Limited cross-linking of 4-1BB by 4-1BB ligand and the agonist monoclonal antibody utomilumab. Cell Rep. 2018;25:909–920.e4. doi: 10.1016/j.celrep.2018.09.073. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53.Chin SM, Kimberlin CR, Roe-Zurz Z, Zhang P, Xu A, Liao-Chan S, Sen D, Nager AR, Oakdale NS, Brown C, et al. Structure of the 4-1BB/4-1BBL complex and distinct binding and functional properties of utomilumab and urelumab. Nat Commun. 2018;9:4679. doi: 10.1038/s41467-018-07136-7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54.Tolcher AW, Sznol M, Hu-Lieskovan S, Papadopoulos KP, Patnaik A, Rasco DW, Di Gravio D, Huang B, Gambhire D, Chen Y, et al. Phase Ib study of utomilumab (PF-05082566), a 4-1BB/CD137 agonist, in combination with pembrolizumab (MK-3475) in patients with advanced solid tumors. Clin Cancer Res. 2017;23:5349–5357. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-17-1243. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55.Geuijen C, Tacken P, Wang LC, Klooster R, van Loo PF, Zhou J, Mondal A, Liu YB, Kramer A, Condamine T, et al. A human CD137×PD-L1 bispecific antibody promotes anti-tumor immunity via context-dependent T cell costimulation and checkpoint blockade. Nat Commun. 2021;12:4445. doi: 10.1038/s41467-021-24767-5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 56.Takeda Y, Azuma M, Matsumoto M, Seya T. Tumoricidal efficacy coincides with CD11c up-regulation in antigen-specific CD8(+) T cells during vaccine immunotherapy. J Exp Clin Cancer Res. 2016;35:143. doi: 10.1186/s13046-016-0416-x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 57.Choi BK, Kim YH, Kang WJ, Lee SK, Kim KH, Shin SM, Yokoyama WM, Kim TY, Kwon BS. Mechanisms involved in synergistic anticancer immunity of anti-4-1BB and anti-CD4 therapy. Cancer Res. 2007;67:8891–8899. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-07-1056. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 58.Vinay DS, Kwon BS. CD11c+CD8+ T cells: Two-faced adaptive immune regulators. Cell Immunol. 2010;264:18–22. doi: 10.1016/j.cellimm.2010.05.010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Supplementary Materials
Data Availability Statement
All data generated or analyzed during this study are included in this published article.