Abstract
Background
This population study aimed to investigate influenza and influenza-like respiratory virus infections in children during the 2019/20 influenza season and the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic in Poland.
Material/Methods
This study analyzed data from the National Influenza Centre, the Department of Influenza Research at the National Institute of Public Health, and 16 Voivodeship Sanitary and Epidemiological Stations in Poland. Nose and throat swabs were obtained from children during the 2019/20 influenza season and the COVID-19 pandemic. Viral RNA detection was performed using quantitative reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction (qRT-PCR) to diagnose influenza virus infection and viral subtypes.
Results
In the analyzed group, both cases of influenza A and B and infections with influenza-like viruses were confirmed. Among all cases caused by influenza viruses, influenza A was more frequent than B, with predominance of the A/H1N1/pdm09 subtype. The flu-like virus which infected most children was the human respiratory syncytial virus (RSV). The greatest number of cases with RSV was registered in the group of the youngest children (0–4 years).
Conclusions
This population study from Poland showed that during the COVID-19 pandemic, and during the winter influenza season of 2019/20, influenza and influenza-like viral infections in children showed some differences from previous influenza seasons. The findings highlight the importance of viral infection surveillance and influenza vaccination in the pediatric population.
Keywords: Epidemiology; Influenza A virus; Influenza B virus; Influenza, Human; Respiratory Syncytial Virus, Human
Background
Every epidemic season, infections due to influenza viruses are a common cause of illnesses among children. Both healthy and chronically ill children can be affected by complications from the virus itself or from a secondary bacterial infection.
Influenza is an acute infectious disease caused by a flu virus that affects the respiratory tract. Humans are vulnerable to A, B, and C subtypes, which most often spread by airborne droplets. Influenza A virus additionally exists in the form of different subtypes, eg, A/H1N1, A/H3N2. Influenza A is the most severe one, while influenza B has milder symptoms. Children are most often infected with the influenza C virus, in which case the course of the disease is usually mild. The duration of influenza and its course depend not only on the properties of the pathogen, but also on the physical condition and response of a person’s immune system.
The influenza virus is spread from person to person by airborne droplets, by transmission of large particles (contamination by contact with contaminated objects or hands is also possible). The incubation period is on average 1–2 days (1–4 days). The period of infectivity depends mainly on the immune status of the organism and the age of the patient. Healthy adults without comorbidities can become infected even a day before and 5–7 days after the first symptoms of the disease appear. Children and people with impaired immune systems may shed the virus a few days before the symptoms appear, up to more than 10 days after the symptoms of the infection have ceased [1]. Characteristic to influenza is a sudden onset of symptoms, which notably include high fever, even up to 40°C. Among the most common symptoms of influenza in adults, we also observe muscle aches, headaches, chills, general weakness, or breakdown. Also, there may be dry cough, obstruction of the upper respiratory tract, and runny nose. In children, symptoms can often be non-specific. However, according to observations of pediatricians, influenza in children most often manifests itself in the form of an acute infection of the upper respiratory tract. Otitis media is often associated with influenza symptoms in children [2]. Seizures are found in 10–20% of children [3]. Gastrointestinal symptoms (eg, nausea and vomiting) are more common with influenza B, and 40–80% of children have changes in the radiographic image (X-ray) of the lungs [1]. Less common symptoms include runny nose, chest pain, eye pain, and sensitivity to light.
Influenza causes diseases of an epidemic character, occurring every season or pandemics, recurring every several to several dozen years, which are worldwide in scope. Pandemics occur about 3 times in a century and can kill tens of millions of people. The most tragic pandemic was Spanish flu. According to current estimates, 50–100 million people died because of it [4]. The most effective preventive measures against influenza infections are vaccinations. They alleviate the course of the disease and prevent complications from influenza, which can be very serious, especially in children. It should be remembered that children are outposts that spread influenza infections, so remember to vaccinate children in nurseries and kindergartens as well as teachers against flu seasonally. The Advisory Committee on Vaccinations (ACIP) recommends influenza vaccination for all healthy people from the age of 6 months (depending on the type of vaccine), unless there are medical contraindications. Since November 2019, the live attenuated intranasal flu vaccine is available for both children (older than 24 months) and adolescents [5,6]. Influenza vaccines are safe, effective, and well tolerated. They are characterized by the lowest number of adverse post-vaccination reactions recorded. After vaccination, local reactions may occur, such as redness, soreness, and swelling at the injection site, and, less frequently, general reactions (a slight increase in body temperature, pain in muscles, joints and head) that disappear after a few days may occur.
If left untreated, influenza can sometimes cause serious complications, which can even be fatal. Children are an important risk group for developing post-flu complications because their immune systems are still poorly developed. These complications include pneumonia and bronchitis, secondary bacterial pneumonia and bronchiolitis (especially in infants and children), otitis media, and others. Respiratory failure, encephalopathy, streptococcal angina, exacerbation of chronic diseases (eg, asthma, diabetes, chronic kidney failure), myositis, myocarditis and pericarditis, meningitis, or encephalitis may occur as well as partial hearing loss and even deafness, neurological complications, including Guillain-Barré syndrome, convulsions, severe seizures, and transplant rejection [7].
In the 2020/2021 epidemic season, in addition to influenza and other widespread flu-like infections, a new virus appeared, which was the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2). It is responsible for the ongoing COVID-19 pandemic. This disease affects the respiratory system of patients of all ages, in extreme cases leading to severe respiratory and multi-organ failure, which can lead to the death of the patient. Both the influenza and SARS-CoV-2 viruses primarily attack the patient’s respiratory system, and in both, pneumonia may be a complication. For infants and sick children, the risk of getting infected with influenza and SARS-CoV-2 is similar. Doctors warn that with the advent of the influenza season, many people may become infected with the SARS-CoV-2 and influenza virus simultaneously. In Poland, infections caused by this new pathogen coincided with the 2019/2020 influenza season, because the peak of influenza incidence was recorded in the 9th week of the season, ie, February 24-March 1, 2020 [8]. The World Health Organization (WHO) emphasizes the need of increased monitoring of influenza virus infections, noting that the influenza virus can quickly mutate, and that the recent pandemic of the influenza virus, so-called The Hong Kong era of 1968–1969, caused by the A/H3N2/ subtype, caused 1–4 million deaths all over the world. It is crucial not to overlook a new subtype of influenza A virus, with potentially highly pathogenic features. The WHO states that we should not forget about influenza not only in terms of the Global Influenza Surveillance and Response System (GISRS), but also in vaccinations, which are reported in Flu News Europe and FluNet [9–11]. We should also be aware that influenza virus co-infection with SARS-CoV-2 may occur.
Therefore, the present population study aimed to investigate influenza and influenza-like respiratory virus infections in children during the 2019/20 influenza season and the COVID-19 pandemic in Poland using data from the National Influenza Centre, the Department of Influenza Research at the National Institute of Public Health, and 16 Voivodeship Sanitary and Epidemiological Stations.
Material and Methods
The material for the study was nose and throat swabs collected during the 2019/2020 epidemic season. The analyzed material was collected between week 40 of 2019 and week 39 of 2020 (ie, Oct 01 2019–Sep 30 2020). The swabs were analyzed at the Department of Influenza Research, National Influenza Center at NIPH-NIH and Voivodship Sanitary Epidemiological Stations (VSES). In this study we analyzed the group of children up to 14 years old, with an additional division into 3 smaller age groups: 0–4, 5–9, and 10–14 years. There were in total 999 samples, which were tested for the presence of influenza virus and reported in the SENTINEL and NON-SENTINEL Influenza Surveillance System.
Isolation of RNA
RNA isolation was performed from nasal and throat swabs suspended in 1 ml of saline. For this isolation, the Maxwell 16 Viral Total Nucleic Acid Purification Kit (Promega Corporation, Madison, WI, USA) was used in accordance with the instructions provided by the manufacturer. From 200 μl of a clinical sample suspended in 1 ml of physiological saline, 50 μl of RNA suspended in RNAse-free water was obtained.
Real-Time Polymerase Chain Reaction
Quantitative polymerase chain reaction (qRT-PCR) was used to determine the influenza virus type and subtype (for positive samples). In the Department of Influenza Research, National Influenza Centre, the reaction is performed with the SuperScript Platinum III kit (Invitrogen) and the Rotor-Gene Q thermal cycler (Qiagen). We used primer and probe kits (influenza A, influenza A/H3N2/, influenza A/H1N1/pdm09, and influenza B) obtained from the International Reagent Resource (IRR) of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. The sequences of the primers and probes from IRR were not publicly available. RNA was subjected to reverse transcription (50°C for 30 min). After initiation (1 cycle at 95°C for 2 min), the DNA was subjected to 45 cycles of amplification: denaturation (95°C for 15 s), annealing (55°C for 30 s), and elongation (72°C for 20 s). The positive controls of the reactions were viruses derived from the vaccine for the 2019–2020 epidemic season (A/Brisbane/02/2018 (H1N1)pdm09, A/Kansas/14/2017/ (H3N2), B/Colorado/06/2017 (B/Victoria/2/87 lineage), and B/Phuket/3073/2013 (B/Yamagata/16/88 lineage)). The negative control was the RNase-free water provided in the kit. RNA of vaccine viruses selected by the World Health Organization were used as positive controls. Similar analysis was conducted in the VSESs. See Table 1 for the details of the methodology.
Table 1.
The diagnostic methods used in 16 Voivodship Sanitary Epidemiological Stations in in the epidemic season 2018–2019 in Poland.
| Voivodship Sanitary Epidemiological Station | Diagnostic equipment | Kits |
|---|---|---|
| Białystok | LightCycler 96 (Roche) CFX96 (Biorad) |
Allplex SARS-CoV-2/FluA/FluB/RSV Assay (Seegene) Allplex Respiratory Panel 1 (Flu/RSV/FluA subtyping (Seegene) |
| Bydgoszcz | CFX 96 (Bio-Rad) Gene Xpert Analyzer (Cepheid) |
Allplex Respiratory Panel 1 Assay (Seegene) Xpress SARS-CoV2/FLU/RSV (for Gene Xpert) |
| Gdańsk | Aparat LightCycler® 480 II (Roche) | RealAccurate® Quadruplex Influenza PCR Kit |
| Gorzów Wlkp. | LightCycler 480 II (Roche) | LightCycler Multiplex RNA Virus Master (Roche) LightMix Modular Influenza B (Roche) LightMix Modular Influenza A/H1 (Roche) |
| Katowice | LightCycler 480 II (Roche) | PowerChek Pandemic H1N1/H3N2 Real Time RT-PCR Kit (Kogene Biotech); FTD Flu (Fast Track Diagnostics) |
| Kielce | CFX-96 Real-Time System Thermocycler by BioRad |
Allplex Respiratory Panel 1, (influenza viruses: A, B, AH1N1, AH1N1 pdm 09, AH3N2, RSVA, RSVB) (Seegene) Alplex SARS – CoV-2/FluA/FluB/RSV Assay (Seegene) |
| Cracow | Rotor-Gene Q MDx 5 plex Real-time PCR by Bioer |
One tube multiplex PCR for influenza A H1N1, B, H1N1, H3, H5 and H7 (Fast Track Diagnostics) Vitassay qPCR Flu+RSV+SARS-CoV-2 |
| Lublin | CFX96 Bio-Rad Cepheid GeneXpert |
Quadruplex Influenza PCR Kit, RealAccurate Xpert Xpress SARS-CoV-2/FLU/RSV Xpert Xpress SARS-CoV-2/FLU/RSV |
| Łódź | CFX96 Deep Well Real-Time PCR (Bio-Rad Laboratories) |
Viasure Real Time Detection Kit by CerTesr BIOTEC |
| Olsztyn | CFX96 Bio-Rad | cDNA Synthesis Premix (Seegene) RV16 Detection (Seegene) Respiratory Panel 1 (Seegene) SARS-CoV-2/Flu A/Flu B/RSV Assay (Seegene) |
| Opole | Real Time PCR MIC-4 (bio molecular systems – Syngen) Real Time PCR System SLAN 96S thermocycler (Argenta) |
FLU A+B (VIASURE, Syngen) |
| Poznań | GeneXpert (Cepheid) 7500 Real-Time PCR (Applied Biosystems) Montania 4896 Real-Time PCR Anatolia Geneworks |
Xpert Flu A,B, A/H1N1/pdm09 H1N1 Detection Kit v3 (Bosphore) |
| Rzeszów | 7500 Real Time PCR System (Applied Biosystems) LightCycler 480 II (Roche) CFX 96 Real Time System (BIO-RAD) |
Real Accurate Quadruplex Influenza PCR Kit – PathoFinder B. V. Allplex SARS-CoV-2/FluA/FluB/RSV Assay – Seegene Inc. RealCycler FLUS-UX – Progenie Molecular FTD Respiratory pathogens 21 – Fast Track Diagnostics AmpliSens Influenza virus A-type-H5, H7, H9-FRT – Federal Budget Institute of Science, Central Research Institute for Epidemiology |
| Szczecin | Rotor Gene Q (Qiagen) | PowerChek Influenza A/B Real-time PCR Kit (Kogenebiotech Co) PowerChek Pandemic H1N1/H3N2 Real-time PCR Kit (Kogenebiotech Co) |
| Warsaw | GeneXpert (Cepheid) | Xpert Flu A,B, A/H1N1/pdm09, Xpert Xpress Flu-RSV |
| Wrocław | Rotor-Gene (Qiagen) LightCycler 96 (Roche) |
Viasure FLU A+B Real Time PCR Detection Kit (CerTest Biotec) Viasure FLU Typing I (H1H3) Real Time PCR Detection Kit (CerTest Biotec) RealAccurate Quadruplex Influenza PCR Kit (PathoFinder) |
Statistical Analysis
We attempted to assess whether there were statistically significant differences between age groups with respect to their vulnerability to viruses, performing a number of 2-sample Z-tests. For this purpose, appropriately grouped data were treated as drawn from binomial distributions, whose parameters (success rates) were to be compared with each other.
Limitations of the Study
This work is based on the analyses of samples that were reported to the sentinel influenza surveillance system. Not every tested sample is reported to this system. Consequently, the number of patients and samples in the given seasons could be much higher.
Results
In the 2019/2020 epidemic season, 999 samples taken from children up to 14 years of age were analyzed. As part of the SENTINEL program, 305 samples were tested (they constituted 30.5% of all samples analyzed within this age group). From outside the SENTINEL program, 694 samples were analyzed (ie, 69.5% of the total number of samples analyzed in this age group). Out of all the samples tested, 53.9% of cases of infection with influenza viruses and influenza-like viruses (538 samples) were confirmed. The percentage of positive samples is presented in Figure 1.
Figure 1.

The percentage of positive samples in relation to all the tested samples in the 0–14 years age group in the 2019–2020 epidemic season in Poland.
As one can see in Figure 1, the majority of positive cases were influenza infections, and the ratio of influenza infections to all positive cases seems to increase with age: 84.1% for 0–4 years, 92.9% for 5–9 years, and 97.8% for 10–14 years. A more rigorous statistical analysis allows us to state that the youngest population is different in this respect from the 2 older populations (P value=0.5% and 0.1%, respectively). Such a finding supports the notion that immunity system of youngest children is not fully developed and pathogens less dangerous than influenza can pose a serious threat to them. On the other hand, with the confidence level of 5% we were not able to find statistically significant differences between the 5–9 and 10–14 years groups (P value=8.9%).
Similar to the previous epidemic season, infections caused by influenza A definitely dominated (460 cases) over influenza B (22 cases). Influenza A/H1N1/pdm09 viruses dominated among the types of influenza A viruses (64 cases, which accounted for 13.9% of all cases caused by influenza A virus). Thirty-three infections with influenza A/H3N2/ were confirmed (7.2% of influenza A infections). The remaining infections with influenza A were non-selected cases (363 positive samples, accounting for 79% of influenza A confirmations). The percentage share of influenza viruses and their subtypes is presented in Figure 2.
Figure 2.

The percentage share of influenza viruses and their subtypes in children in the 0–14 years age group in the 2019/2020 epidemic season in Poland.
The results obtained were also analyzed in 3 more detailed age groups, according to the National Influenza Centre for Innovation Influenza Surveillance [12]. The highest number of influenza A infections was confirmed in the group of the youngest children (0–4 years) (204 confirmed cases); 172 cases of influenza A were confirmed in the 5–9 age group and 84 cases in the group of the oldest children (ie, 10–14 years of age). As for the confirmation of influenza B, there were 7 in the 0–4 age group, 10 in the 5–9 age group, and 5 in the 10–14 age group. The number of confirmed cases of the influenza virus in the 0–4, 5–9, and 10–14 age groups in the 2019/2020 epidemic season in Poland is presented in Figure 3. We aimed to test whether there were statistically significant differences in influenza A to B infection ratio between the age groups. With 95% certainty, we were not able to reject the hypothesis that these populations were the same in this respect (P values=74%, 47%, and 67%, respectively).
Figure 3.
The number of confirmed cases of the influenza virus in the age groups 0–4, 5–9, 10–14 years in the 2019/2020 epidemic season in Poland.
Influenza-like virus infections are also quite common in children up to the age of 14 years, which is confirmed by the analyzed research results. An additional analysis was also carried out in 3 more detailed age groups (0–4 years, 5–9 years, and 10–14 years). The obtained results show that the highest number of infections with influenza viruses was confirmed in the age group of the youngest children up to 4 years of age, accounting for 77.4% of influenza-like virus infections in children aged 0–4 years (41 patients). In the 5–9 age group, 9 cases were confirmed (1.7% of all infections with influenza viruses), while in the age group of the oldest children aged 10–14 years, there were only 3 cases (5.7%). Among influenza-like viruses, RSV was the dominant virus, with 28 confirmed cases; the largest number was found in the age group of the youngest children aged 0–4 years (23 infections). In the analyzed samples from children aged 0–14 years, infections with other influenza viruses were also confirmed: 13 cases of Rhinovirus, 4 cases of including parainfluenza 3 (PIV3), 3 cases of including parainfluenza 1 (PIV1) infections, 2 cases of human adenovirus (ADV) and 1 case of including parainfluenza 2 (PIV2), human corona viruses 229E/NL63 (Coronavirus 229E/NL63) and human metapneumovirus (hMPV) infections each. The percentage share of influenza-like viruses is presented in Figure 4.
Figure 4.

The percentage share of influenza-like viruses in the 0–14 age group in the 2019/2020 epidemic season in Poland.
In the 2019/2020 epidemic season, co-infections were also confirmed in the analyzed samples from children aged 0–14 years, ie, infection with 2 or more respiratory viruses: influenza or influenza-like viruses. Confirmed co-infections are presented in Table 2.
Table 2.
Co-infections with respiratory viruses in children 0–14 years of age in the 2019/2020 epidemic season.
| No. | Patient’s age | Influenza viruses |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2 months | Rhi+RSV B |
| 2 | 2 months | A+RSV B+Rhi A/B/C+PIV-1 |
| 3 | 4 months | A+Rhi A/B/C |
| 4 | 4 months | A+Rhi A/B/C |
| 5 | 1 year | A/H1N1/pdm09+ADV |
| 6 | 5 years | A+RSV |
| 7 | 8 years | A/H3N2+RSV |
| 8 | 9 years | Enterovirus+PIV-3 |
| 9 | 9 years | A+RSV A+PIV-3 |
| 10 | 9 years | A+ADV |
| 11 | 10 years | PIV-1+PIV-2 |
Discussion
The presented data indicate a very common occurrence of respiratory virus infections among children. Analysis of samples taken from children in the 0–14 age group in the 2019/2020 epidemic season shows that the influenza A virus dominated in the pediatric population in Poland. The A/H1N1/pdm09 virus was the dominant subtype. Similar tendencies can be noticed both in other European countries, as well as in the rest of the world [13]. In the season 2019/2020, activity of influenza A/H3N2/ and B were increased in relation to the influenza season 2018/2019 [14]. The highest number of infections with both influenza viruses and influenza-like viruses was recorded among the youngest children aged 0–4 years. [14]. This confirms that younger age is associated with a less mature immune system and greater vulnerability to viruses. Babies still lack protective antibodies, and the antibodies obtained from the mother only protect the baby during the first months of life [15,16]. It has been shown that in older children, subtype A/H3N2 causes the most severe course of disease. Subtype A/H1N1 causes milder disease, and subtype B causes the mildest course of disease [17].
Children staying in same-age groups (eg, nurseries, kindergartens, schools) develop such infections much more often. The data of the NIPH PZH-PIB shows that in Poland, an average of 30–40% of infections with influenza viruses and influenza-like viruses are registered among children [18–21].
In agreement with the recommendation of the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP), the American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP), and the Council of the European Union, EU member states should take coordinated action to mitigate the impact of seasonal influenza by promoting vaccinations, especially for people from risk groups. However, despite the recommendations, in 2019, only 0.96% of children aged 0–14 years were vaccinated against influenza (0.53% of children aged 0–4, 0.43% of children aged 5–14) [8]. It should be realized that the more people are vaccinated, the fewer people get sick; therefore, the number of people who can become infected decreases. It is worth being vaccinated before of the epidemic season. In 2003, some regions of the United States recorded a large spike in influenza as early as October, especially among young children. This means, that the flu epidemic broke out at the height of the flu vaccination period, which is luckily rare [17]. Younger children have higher risk of being hospitalized due to flu, especially those under 2 years of age. In fact, most children with the influenza virus under age 6 months are hospitalized due to infection [17]. Research by Antonova et al showed that children with laboratory-confirmed influenza infection were often hospitalized (0.3–20%), needed medical visits (1.7–2.8 visits per case), and had to take antibiotics (7–55%), antipyretic drugs and other medications to alleviate the symptoms of the disease (76–99%) [22].
In Poland, several cases of child deaths due to flu complications are registered every season. In the 2019/2020 season, 5 deaths of children in the 5–14 age group were registered, while in the 2018/2019 season 1 child from the 0–4 age group died [8]. These deaths are recorded as deaths caused by concomitant chronic diseases, especially cardiovascular and respiratory diseases, and complications of influenza, especially pneumonia.
Analyzing the course of both diseases in children, due to infection with the influenza virus and caused by the SARS-CoV-2 virus, influenza seems to be a more dangerous threat to children. Children usually go through COVID-19 asymptomatically or with mild symptoms, but are exposed to a more severe course of flu and a greater risk of complications.
The burden of influenza in children is substantial and has a significant direct impact on the ill children and an indirect impact on their families. The research results presented by Taghioff et al support vaccination against influenza, reducing the risk of sepsis, stroke, and venous thrombosis. They suggest a potential protective effect, reducing the need for patients to stay in the hospital emergency department and the hospital intensive care unit, which may benefit populations during the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic [15].
Research shows that COVID-19 can be more contagious than flu [23]. However, due to the very similar clinical symptoms when infected with these viruses, it is important that patients with flu-like infections be tested for both SARS-CoV-2 and influenza.
Conclusions
Influenza is a viral infection that can lead to serious, even life-threatening complications in children. Children are an important group at risk from flu complications and are the main group for the spread of viral infections. The presented data indicates a very common occurrence of respiratory virus infections among children. This population study from Poland showed that during the COVID-19 pandemic and during the winter influenza season of 2019/20, influenza and influenza-like viral infections in children showed some differences from previous influenza seasons. For this reason, the percentage of influenza vaccination in the pediatric population should be significantly increased, especially now, due to the current epidemiological situation related to the ongoing SARS-CoV-2 pandemic. The flu vaccine can boost our immune system. We should also be aware that influenza virus co-infection with SARS-CoV-2 may occur. An efficiently functioning epidemiological and virological surveillance system, representative for the country as a whole, is essential to observe and control influenza outbreaks, which otherwise might lead to epidemics or even pandemics. These findings highlight the importance of viral infection surveillance and influenza vaccination in the pediatric population.
Acknowledgements
We acknowledge the physicians and employees of the Voivodship Sanitary Epidemiologic Stations participating in the sentinel and non-sentinel programs for their input into the influenza surveillance system in Poland.
Footnotes
Conflict of interest: None declared
Declaration of Figures’ Authenticity
All figures submitted have been created by the authors, who confirm that the images are original with no duplication and have not been previously published in whole or in part.
Financial support: Funded by the National Institute of Public Health NIH – NRI, research grant No. BI-1/2021
References
- 1.Zawłocka E, Chwiećko J, Jackowska T. [Falling ill with flu in children under 2 years of age]. Nowa Pediatria. 2016;3(2016):105–12. [in Polish] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Fiore AE, Fry A, Shay D, et al. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention: Antiviral agents for the treatment and chemoprophylaxis of influenza. MMWR Recomm Rep. 2011;60(1):1–24. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Aguirre E, Papenburg J, Ouakki M, et al. Comparison of pandemic and seasonal influenza in the Pediatric Emergency Department. Ped Infect Dis J. 2011;30(8):633–39. doi: 10.1097/INF.0b013e3182103d54. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Murray J, Lopez AD, Chin B, et al. Estimation of potential global pandemic influenza mortality on the basis of vital registry data from the 1918–20 pandemic: A quantitative analysis. Lancet. 2006;368(9554):2211–18. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(06)69895-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Grohskopf LA, Alyanak E, Broder KR, et al. Prevention and control of seasonal influenza with vaccines: Recommendations of the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices – United States, 2019–20 influenza season. MMWR Recomm Rep. 2019;68(3):1–21. doi: 10.15585/mmwr.rr6803a1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.American Academy of Pediatrics, Committee on Infectious Diseases. Recommendations for prevention and control of influenza in children (2019–2020) Pediatrics. 2019;44(4):e20192478. doi: 10.1542/peds.2019-2478. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Brydak LB. [Clinical characteristics of influenza and post-influenza complications. Influenza, influenza pandemic, myth or a real threat]. Warsaw: Rytm; 2008. pp. 101–23. [in Polish] [Google Scholar]
- 8.NIZP PZH-PIB. 2021. Available from: http://wwwold.pzh.gov.pl/oldpage/epimeld/2019/Sz_2019pdf#page=27&zoom=auto,-274,642[in Polish]
- 9.Brydak LB. [Influenza history. Influenza, influenza pandemic, myth or a real threat]. Warsaw: Rytm; 2008. pp. 9–34. [in Polish] [Google Scholar]
- 10. https://flunewseurope.org/
- 11. https://www.who.int/teams/global-influenza-programme
- 12.Bednarska K, Hallmann-Szelińska E, Kondratiuk K, et al. [Innovations in influenza surveillance]. Probl Hig Epidemiol. 2016;97(2):101–5. [in Polish] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Flu News Europe. Weekly influenza surveillance – Bulletin Archives. [serial online] [cited 2021 Sept 1]: Available from: https://flunewseurope.org/Archives.
- 14.Kondratiuk K, Hallmann E, Łuniewska K, et al. Epidemiology of influenza viruses and viruses causing influenza-like illness in children under 14 years old in the 2018–2019 epidemic season in Poland. Med Sci Monit. 2021;27:e929303. doi: 10.12659/MSM.929303. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Taghioff SM, Slavin BR, Holton T, Singh D. Examining the potential benefits of the influenza vaccine against SARS-CoV-2: Aerospective cohort analysis of 74,754 patients. PLoS ONE. 2021;16(8):e0255541. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0255541. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Kumar V. Influenza in children. Indian J Pediatr. 2017;84(2):139–43. doi: 10.1007/s12098-016-2232-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Monto AS. Epidemiology of influenza. Vaccine. 2008;26(Suppl 4):D45–48. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2008.07.066. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Hallmann-Szelińska E, Bednarska K, Kondratiuk K, et al. Viral infections in children in the 2014/2015 epidemic season in Poland. Adv Exp Med Biol. 2016;912:51–56. doi: 10.1007/5584_2016_209. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Cieślak K, Szymański K, Kowalczyk D, Brydak LB. Influenza and influenza-like viruses in children in the epidemic season 2015/2016 in Poland. Adv Exp Med Biol. 2017;968:13–18. doi: 10.1007/5584_2016_178. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Cieślak K, Kowalczyk D, Szymański K, et al. Influenza and influenza-like viruses: Frequent infections in children under 14 years of age during the 2016/2017 epidemic season. Adv Exp Med Biol. 2018;1114:83–87. doi: 10.1007/5584_2018_229. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Łuniewska K, Szymański K, Hallmann-Szelińska E, et al. Infections caused by influenza viruses among children in Poland during the 2017/18 epidemic season. Adv Exp Med Biol. 2019;1211:97–102. doi: 10.1007/5584_2019_393. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Antonova EN, Rycroft CE, Ambrose CS, et al. Burden of paediatric influenza in Western Europe: A systematic review. BMC Public Health. 2012;12:968. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-12-968. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Petersen E, Koopmans M, Go U, et al. Comparing SARS-CoV-2 with SARS-CoV and influenza pandemics. Lancet Infect Dis. 2020;20(9):e238–44. doi: 10.1016/S1473-3099(20)30484-9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

