Skip to main content
IET Nanobiotechnology logoLink to IET Nanobiotechnology
. 2016 Dec 1;10(6):374–381. doi: 10.1049/iet-nbt.2015.0088

In‐vitro toxicity of carbon nanotube/polylysine colloids to colon cancer cells

Alejandro Ansón‐Casaos 1,, Laura Grasa 2,3, Desirée Pereboom 4,5, José Emilio Mesonero 2,3, Alvaro Casanova 4, María Divina Murillo 2, María Teresa Martínez 1
PMCID: PMC8676553  PMID: 27906137

Abstract

Single‐walled carbon nanotubes (SWCNTs) are thoroughly purified and dispersed in an aqueous solution of high molecular weight poly‐L‐lysine (pLlys). Human intestinal epithelial Caco‐2/TC7 cells are incubated with the SWCNT dispersions in pLlys, and their effects on cell viability are studied by image flow cytometry. No significant changes are observed in the cell culture wells up to pLlys concentrations of 10 μg ml−1. However, high mortality is detected at pLlys concentrations of 100 μg ml−1. The presence of oxygen‐free SWCNTs does not modify the effects of pLlys on cell cultures at any of the tested concentrations (≤1 μg ml−1). In addition, SWCNTs having an 8 wt.% of surface oxygen are tested with identical results. Thus, purified SWCNTs, even bearing oxygen functional groups, act as inert particles in the cell culture medium. This result supports the applicability of SWCNTs as carriers in pharmacological formulations against digestive tract diseases.

Inspec keywords: single‐wall carbon nanotubes, cellular biophysics, molecular weight, filled polymers, biochemistry, cancer, colloids

Other keywords: surface oxygen, mortality, cell culture wells, image flow cytometry, human intestinal epithelial Caco‐2/TC7 cells, molecular weight, aqueous solution, single walled carbon nanotubes, colon cancer cells, carbon nanotube‐polylysine colloids, toxicity

1 Introduction

Poly‐L‐lysine (pLlys) is a polypeptide made of the essential amino acid L‐lysine. The natural form of pLlys (ɛ ‐pLlys) contains 25–35 L‐lysine residues, and is produced by certain microorganisms by the linkage between α ‐carboxyl groups and ɛ ‐amino groups [1]. Applications of ɛ ‐pLlys range from food industry to biomedicine and biosensors [1, 2]. Artificial methods for pLlys synthesis typically yield α ‐pLlys, since the polymerisation occurs through the α ‐amino group, and can reach much higher molecular weights than natural ɛ ‐pLlys. Synthetic pLlys is utilised as an adhesion promoter in cell cultures, and it is being investigated for its antineoplastic activity, anti‐prion activity, and gene delivery properties [3, 4, 5].

Single‐walled carbon nanotubes (SWCNTs) have been proposed for several applications in biomedicine, including their potential as nanocarriers for therapeutic and probe molecules [6]. The adsorption interactions and chemical reaction paths provided by SWCNT surfaces are expected to be excellent tools for the design of multipurpose supramolecular biostructures. However, important toxicity issues need to be understood and controlled before the application of SWCNTs to biological systems [7].

It has been previously confirmed that arc‐discharge SWCNTs can induce oxidative stress in intestinal epithelial cells, and affect the contractility of ileum [8, 9]. Possible reasons for those adverse effects are attributed to metal catalyst impurities (Ni, Y), surface functional groups or the particle size [7]. Quite recently, we have reported the possibility of purifying and dispersing pristine or functionalised arc‐discharge SWCNTs by ultracentrifugation in different aqueous media [10]. Interestingly for biomedical applications, metal catalyst impurities can be totally eliminated by that method, and the dispersion medium can be chosen among a range of surfactants, polymers, and biomolecules [10]. Long polymer chains are preferred for the stabilisation of carbon nanotubes in water suspensions through excluded volume interactions [11]. Previously, SWCNTs have been covalently functionalised with pLlys as a method for further derivatisation [12]. In addition, non‐covalent functionalisation with pLlys has been proposed as a way for the preparation of water‐stable dispersions of carbon nanotubes [13, 14].

In this work, arc‐discharge SWCNTs are purified and dispersed in a high molecular weight pLlys solution. Metal impurities, as well as amorphous carbon and graphitic particles are totally eliminated from SWCNTs by the purification treatment. Toxicity of SWCNT/pLlys dispersions is studied by flow cytometry in the human intestinal epithelial Caco‐2/TC7 cell line. As a blank experiment, we study the effects of high molecular weight pLlys on those colon cancer cells. Since the presence of oxygenated functional groups on carbon nanotube surfaces could modify their toxicology [15], two SWCNT materials are compared, one containing a certain amount of functional groups while the other bearing no surface oxygen. The roles of pLlys and SWCNTs are clarified, at least from a chemical viewpoint, towards the preparation of pharmacological complexes against colorectal cancer.

2 Materials and methods

2.1 Preparation of SWCNT powder materials

The pristine SWCNT material was purchased from Carbon Solutions Inc., Riverside, California (AP‐SWNT grade). This SWCNT material is synthesised by the arc discharge method using Ni/Y catalysts, and contains approximately 30 wt% metal catalyst residue. The average SWCNT diameter is in the range of 1.4–1.6 nm, calculated from optical absorption and Raman spectroscopy. The average SWCNT length in centrifuged dispersions is of 400–800 nm, according to atomic force microscopy measurements [16].

In our laboratories, the pristine SWCNT powder material was air‐oxidised in an oven at 350°C for 1 h, with a process yield of 85 wt%. Then, the material was refluxed in 150 ml of 3 M HCl at 150°C for 4 h, filtered through a 3 μm polycarbonate membrane, washed with 300 ml of water, and dried at 70°C for 20 h. The cumulative yield after the acid treatment was of 56 wt%. For the total removal of surface oxygen, a fraction of the acid treated material (SWCNT‐HCl) was heated at 10°C min−1 and treated at 700°C for 5 min under a N2 flow in a horizontal tubular reactor. The thermal treatment yield was of 92 wt%, and the resulting powder material is hereafter called SWCNT‐700.

2.2 Characterisation of SWCNT powder materials

Oxygen content determination was performed in a Thermo Flash 1112 elemental analyser by sample pyrolysis at 1080°C. Thermogravimetric analysis (TGA) experiments were performed in a Setaram Setsys Evolution balance. Metal contents were calculated after combustion of the samples in an air flow at 1000°C. The TGA residue after combustion mainly consists of metal oxides. The initial metal content can be approximated by assuming an oxygen content of 25 wt% in the TGA residue [17].

For the determination of extinction coefficients, the SWCNT‐HCl and SWCNT‐700 materials were dispersed in a sodium deoxycholate (DOC, Acros Organics 218591000) aqueous solution [10, 18]. In a typical experiment, 10 ml of 1 wt/vol% DOC was added to 1 mg of the SWCNT powders, and the mixture was tip‐sonicated (Hielscher UP400S at 24 kHz) in an ice bath for approximately 1 h. Absorbance of the resulting dispersions was measured in a Shimadzu UV‐2401PC spectrometer. Extinction coefficients (ɛ) were calculated applying the Lambert‐Beer law at 600 and 850 nm.

2.3 Preparation and characterisation of SWCNT dispersions in pLlys

A pLlys aqueous solution with a concentration of 0.1 wt/vol% was purchased from Sigma‐Aldrich (Ref. P8920, Mw = 150, 000–300, 000). The solution (10 ml) was added to 10 or 30 mg of the SWCNT‐HCl or the SWCNT‐700 powder materials, respectively. The mixtures were tip‐sonicated (Hielscher UP400S at 24 kHz) in an ice bath for approximately 1 h. The dispersions were centrifuged at 120,000g for 1 h in a Beckman Coulter L‐100 XP ultracentrifuge provided with a SW55Ti 3671 rotor and Beckman centrifugation tubes (Ref. 326819). The supernatant was carefully decanted and the sediment was discarded. Depending on the original powder material, SWCNT‐HCl or SWCNT‐700, the resulting purified SWCNTs are hereafter called SWCNT‐P or SWCNT‐P700 respectively. It is worthy of remark that SWCNTs are directly purified by centrifugation in the active pLlys medium, thus saving preparative stages and leading to good‐stability dispersions of fine particles.

Visible‐near‐infrared (Vis‐NIR) spectra of the dispersions were measured in 2 ml quartz cuvettes using Shimadzu UV‐2401PC and Bruker VERTEX 70 spectrometers. Purity indexes were calculated from spectral data in the window of 7750–11,750 cm−1, according to Itkis et al. [19].

Conductivity (σ), electrophoretic mobility (μ), and zeta potential (ζ) were determined in a Malvern Zetasizer Nano device. A Crison GLP21 pH‐metre was utilised for pH determinations.

Cryogenic transmission electron microscopy (Cryo‐TEM) images were taken in a Tecnai T20 (FEI) microscope working at 200 kV. Samples were prepared by vitrification with liquid ethane. The vitrified samples were transferred to a low‐temperature sample‐holder, and kept at the liquid nitrogen temperature during the observation.

Energy dispersive X‐ray spectroscopy (EDX, Hitachi S3400N) allows the quantitative determination of metals and other impurities with an accuracy of better than 0.1 wt.%. The SWCNT dispersions in pLlys were filtered through 0.3 μm polycarbonate membranes, and the residue was dried and analysed directly on the filters.

2.4 Cell culture

This study was carried out in the human enterocyte‐like cell line Caco‐2/TC [20], provided by Edith Brot‐Laroche (INSERM, UMR S 872, Centre de Recherches de Cordeliers, Paris). Caco‐2/TC7 cells have been used in the present study since they are an excellent human enterocyte‐like model to study intestinal epithelial physiology [20, 21]. The cells were cultured at 37°C in an atmosphere of 5% CO2 and maintained in high glucose DMEM supplemented with 2 mM glutamine, 100 U ml−1 penicillin, 100 µg ml−1 streptomycin, 1% non‐essential amino acids, and 20% heat inactivated fetal bovine serum (Life Technologies, Carlsbad, CA, USA). The cells were passaged enzymatically (0.25% trypsin–1 mM EDTA) and subcultured in 25 cm2 plastic culture flasks (Sarstedt, Nuembrecht, Germany). The medium was changed 48 h after seeding and daily thereafter.

For cell viability experiments, cells were seeded in six‐well plates at a density of 2 × 105 cells/well, and measurements were carried out 14 days after seeding (9 days after confluence).

Caco‐2 cells were incubated for 24 h with pLlys and the purified SWCNTs dispersed in pLlys. In the experiments, stock solutions of 1 mg ml−1 pLlys, 8 µg ml−1 SWCNT‐P + 1 mg ml−1 pLlys, and 9 µg ml−1 SWCNT‐P700 + 1 mg ml−1 pLlys were added to the culture medium. Five concentrations of SWCNT‐P (0.08, 0.8, 8, 80 and 800 ng ml−1) and SWCNT‐P700 (0.09, 0.9, 9, 90 and 900 ng ml−1) dispersed in their corresponding concentrations of pLlys (0.01, 0.1, 1, 10 and 100 µg ml−1) were assayed. In control experiments, cells were incubated in culture medium without adding any substance.

After the incubations with the different substances, cells were detached enzymatically (0.25% trypsin – 1 mM EDTA, for 30 min; 95% of cell viability) and separated using a micropipette. Individualised cells were collected by centrifugation at 900g for 5 min at room temperature, and the cell pellet was washed twice in PBS. Finally, cells (4–5 × 106 cells/sample) were resuspended in 400 µl of cold PBS and kept on ice until flow cytometry determinations.

2.5 Viability studies by image flow cytometry

The Image Stream X (ISX Amnis Corporation, Seattle, WA, USA) flow cytometer was used to assess the viability of the cells. Images were collected using two cameras obtaining brightfield, side scatter (SSC for cells complexity using 785 nm lasers), and signals with different band‐pass filters. The signals obtained in each channel of the flow cytometer were measured as intensity and location of fluorescence. The analysed events were selected from the focused cells. The results were obtained in biparametric graphs, representing the normalised frequency of the events and the intensity of fluorescence in all samples.

Propidium iodide staining was used to assess cellular damage induced by SWCNTs and pLlys [22, 23]. Carboxyfluorescein diacetate (cFDA) staining was also used in some control experiments to assess the live cells, as retention of this dye by the cells indicates membrane integrity and functional cytoplasmic enzymes [24]. Single‐cell suspensions of Caco‐2/TC7 cells in PBS (2 × 106 cells/sample) were incubated with 1.87 μM propidium iodide for 3 min or 2 μM cFDA for 15 min in the dark at room temperature. Immediately after incubation with propidium iodide or cFDA, signals from cells (104 cells/sample) were taken using a 660 to 745 nm bandpass filter for red fluorescence or a 480 to 560 nm bandpass filter for green fluorescence. Data were analysed using the IDEAS 5.0.252 software (Amnis Corporation).

2.6 Statistical analysis

Results of viable cells were measured as the percentage of the control (100%) in the same experiment and expressed as means ± SEM (standard error of the mean) of at least four independent experiments with consecutive passages. Differences between the concentrations for each treatment and between treatments for each concentration were analysed using one‐way ANOVA followed by Bonferroni's post‐hoc group comparison test. Data were analysed with GraphPad Prism5 software (GraphPad Prism, San Diego, CA), and the differences with P ‐values <0.05 were considered statistically significant.

3 Results and discussion

3.1 Characterisation of the modified SWCNT solids

Metal and oxygen contents in the modified SWCNTs are included in Table 1. Metal content in both the SWCNT‐HCl and SWCNT‐700 materials is <10 wt.%, indicating that acid treatment decreases the metal content to approximately 1/3 of the starting level in pristine SWCNTs. We will see that metals are finally eliminated after the subsequent step of ultracentrifugation.

Table 1.

Characterisation of the modified SWCNT powder materials: Oxygen content, metal content, and extinction coefficient (ɛλ )

SWCNT‐HCl SWCNT‐700
O, wt% 7.63 0.80
TGA metal residue, wt% 11.3 12.7
metal content, wt% 8.5 9.5
ɛ 600, ml mg−1 cm−1 a 23.9 ± 1.4 20.4 ± 1.1
ɛ 850, ml mg−1 cm−1 a 18.9 ± 0.9 16.4 ± 0.9

a The extinction coefficient was calculated for 0.1 mg mL−1 of SWCNTs dispersions in a 1 wt/vol% DOC aqueous solution

According to elemental analysis results, oxygen content in the SWCNT‐HCl solid is approximately 8 wt.%, which is lower than typical values for carbon nanotubes treated with oxidant acids such as HNO3 or H2 SO4 [10]. However, it must be considered that there is still a substantial amount of oxygen functional groups on the SWCNT‐HCl solid. Therefore, a thermal treatment at 700°C is applied that removes most of the remaining surface oxygen. In fact, the SWCNT‐700 material contains <1 wt.% oxygen. Direct oxygen determination was confirmed by TGA experiments under inert atmosphere (Supplementary Information).

Table 1 includes the extinction coefficients (ɛ) determined for the SWCNT‐HCl and SWCNT‐700 dispersions at 600 and 850 nm (ɛ 600 and ɛ 850), respectively. These parameters are subsequently utilised to calculate the concentrations of the purified SWCNT‐P and SWCNT‐P700 dispersions in pLlys after ultracentrifugation. The extinction coefficients measured in the present work are somewhat lower than others previously published for similar SWCNT materials [16]. The difference could be associated to several causes: (i) carbon impurities that are still present in the SWCNT‐HCl and SWCNT‐700 samples, and are later eliminated with ultracentrifugation; (ii) effects of air oxidation and acid treatments on the SWCNT response to light; and (iii) SWCNT bundling, even though no material aggregation was apparent during the measurements. In any case, the possible deviations do not substantially affect the conclusions of this work.

3.2 Characterisation of the purified SWCNT dispersions

It has been shown above that the SWCNT‐HCl solid contains a substantial amount of oxygen functional groups, while most of the surface oxygen was removed from the SWCNT‐700 material. Oxygen functional groups contribute to the stabilisation of SWCNTs in the colloidal dispersion, since they promote specific adhesion interactions with pLlys [25]. Therefore, different stabilities are observed in the SWCNT‐HCl and SWCNT‐700 dispersions in pLlys, particularly when they are purified by ultracentrifugation. In both cases, centrifugation yields are low, in agreement with previous observations regarding the stability of pLlys/SWCNT complexes in aqueous dispersions [13]. A purified SWCNT‐P supernatant can be obtained from a starting SWCNT‐HCl concentration of 10 mg ml−1. However, the starting concentration must be increased to 30 mg ml−1 for the preparation of the SWCNT‐P700 sample from the SWCNT‐700 solid. For lower starting concentrations, all the solid falls to the sediment fraction, and no supernatant is collected. Likewise, it is expected that purified SWCNT dispersions with higher concentrations would be obtained by increasing the initial load.

Table 2 includes physical properties of the purified SWCNT‐P and SWCNT‐P700 dispersions in pLlys, which are utilised for our viability experiments. The SWCNT‐P700 dispersion was diluted with fresh pLlys in order to have a nearly identical absorbance to the SWCNT‐P dispersion, facilitating a direct comparison between both purified dispersions. Applying the previously determined extinction coefficients (Table 1), the SWCNT concentration in the purified dispersions was calculated to be nearly 10 μg ml−1.

Table 2.

Properties of the purified SWCNT dispersions in pLlys: Absorbance (Aλ ), concentration (C), zeta potential (ζ), electrophoretic mobility (μ), conductivity (σ), pH, purity index, and metal content in the filtered solid

SWCNT‐P SWCNT‐P700
A 600 0.191 0.184
A 850 0.144 0.144
C, μg ml−1 8 9
ζ, mV 45.8 ± 0.3 43.5 ± 0.7
μ, μm cm V−1 s−1 3.59 ± 0.02 3.41 ± 0.06
σ, mS cm−1 0.451 ± 0.004 0.439 ± 0.004
pHa 7.3 7.3
purity index 0.25 0.28
metal content, wt% ≤0.05 ≤0.05

a The pH of a 0.1 wt/vol% pLlys solution is of 6.9

The zeta potential (ζ) of the SWCNT‐P dispersion is higher than that of the SWCNT‐P700 dispersion (Table 2), probably due to the different oxygen content in the original SWCNT solids. This fact confirms that SWCNTs in the SWCNT‐P dispersion still bear some oxygen functional groups after centrifugation, which can interact with the positively charged amino groups of pLlys. The zeta potential of both purified dispersions is >40 mV, thus above the classical criterion to be considered stable colloids.

The purity of the SWCNT‐P and SWCNT‐P700 dispersions was first assessed by vis/NIR spectroscopy (Fig. 1 A). The SWCNT resonant bands (M 11, S 22 and S 33) in the purified dispersions are clearly more intense than in a dispersion containing pristine SWCNTs. The intensity increment can be quantified in a relative way by means of the purity index, which is here calculated from the S 22 band transition. The purity indexes of the purified dispersions are 0.25 and 0.28, while it is approximately 0.10 for pristine SWCNTs. Specifically, the increase in the purity index can be associated to the removal of graphitic particles and amorphous carbon impurities during ultracentrifugation [10].

Fig. 1.

Fig. 1

Characterisation of SWCNT dispersions

A Visible‐NIR spectra of pristine SWCNT (a), SWCNT‐P (b), and SWCNT‐P700 (c) and

B Cryo‐TEM image taken from the SWCNT‐P

Cryo‐TEM images are a powerful tool for the study of SWCNT bundling in liquid dispersions, avoiding aggregation effects due to filtration and classical TEM sample preparation [26]. In the purified dispersions, SWCNTs are mostly individualised or forming very thin bundles (Fig. 1 B). Cryo‐TEM images also show that SWCNTs are several hundreds of nanometers long.

To confirm metal removal from the SWCNT‐P and SWCNT‐P700 dispersions in pLlys, a fraction of both dispersions was filtered through polycarbonate membranes and characterised by EDX spectroscopy. In fact, metal contents in the purified materials are below the EDX detection limit (≤0.5 wt%).

3.3 Toxicity on Caco‐2/TC7 cells

In control experiments, biparametric graphs and images of Caco‐2/TC7 cells without any treatment were obtained by image flow cytometry (Fig. 2). In the biparametric graphs, Caco‐2/TC7 cells were selected and distributed into two populations according to their propidium iodide fluorescence intensity. The cells with low fluorescence intensity are live cells (control population), while high fluorescence levels show dead cells (Fig. 2 a). Fig. 2 b shows the morphology and cFDA staining of live cells captured by the microscope in brightfield, cFDA, or combined brightfield/cFDA channels. Fig. 2 c shows the morphology and propidium iodide staining of dead cells captured by the microscope in brightfield, propidium iodide, or combined brightfield/propidium iodide channels.

Fig. 2.

Fig. 2

Representative biparametric graph (a) and images of Caco‐2 cells (b, c) obtained by image flow cytometry. b, c Show the live cells and dead cells differentiated for cFDA or IP fluorescence, respectively. Scale bar, 20 μm

The toxicity of pLlys and both the purified SWCNT‐P and SWCNT‐P700 dispersions in pLlys was tested. The pLlys concentration is assumed to be identical to that of the original solution (0.1 wt./vol.%), and stock SWCNT concentrations are 8 and 9 μg ml−1, respectively for the SWCNT‐P and SWCNT‐P700 dispersions. Different aliquots of the reference pLlys solution or the purified dispersions are added to cell incubation wells, resulting in final concentrations in the range of 0.01–100 μg ml−1 for pLlys, 0.08–800 ng ml−1 for SWCNT‐P, and 0.09–900 ng ml−1 for SWCNT‐P700. Therefore, Caco‐2/TC7 cells were incubated for 24 h with 0.01–100 µg ml−1 pLlys, 0.08–800 ng ml−1 SWCNT‐P + 0.01–100 µg ml−1 pLlys, and 0.09–900 ng ml−1 SWCNT‐P700 + 0.01–100 µg ml−1 pLlys. The percentages of viable cells, expressed as the percentage of control (100%) and determined by image flow cytometry with propidium iodide, are summarised in Fig. 3.

Fig. 3.

Fig. 3

Effects of pLlys, SWCNT‐P + pLlys, and SWCNT‐P700 + pLlys on Caco‐2/TC7 cell viability. Values are means ± SEM of ≥4 independent experiments

Incubation of intestinal epithelial Caco‐2/TC7 cells with pLlys up to 10 µg ml−1, SWCNT‐P up to 80 ng ml−1, or SWCNT‐P700 up to 90 ng ml−1, revealed similar percentages of cell viability to control experiments (Fig. 3). However, the incubation with 100 µg ml−1 pLlys resulted in a significant reduction of viable cells compared with all the other concentrations tested (Figs. 3, 4, 5, 6; n ≥ 4; one way ANOVA p < 0.01 for pLlys and p < 0.001 for SWCNT‐P and SWCNT‐P700).

Fig. 4.

Fig. 4

Representative biparametric graphs and images of Caco‐2 cells obtained by image flow cytometry after propidium iodide staining. Caco‐2/TC7 cells incubated with 10 μg ml−1 pLlys, (a,c). Caco‐2/TC7 cells incubated with 100 μg ml−1 pLlys (b,d). Scale bar, 20 µm

Fig. 5.

Fig. 5

Representative biparametric graphs and images of Caco‐2 cells obtained by image flow cytometry after propidium iodide staining. a, c Caco‐2/TC7 cells incubated with 80 ng ml−1 SWCNT‐P + 10 μg ml−1 pLlys. b, d Caco‐2/TC7 cells incubated with 800 ng ml−1 SWCNT‐P + 100 μg ml−1 pLlys (b, d). Scale bar, 20 µm

Fig. 6.

Fig. 6

Representative biparametric graphs and images of Caco‐2 cells obtained by image flow cytometry after propidium iodide staining. a, c Caco‐2/TC7 cells incubated with 90 ng ml−1 SWCNT‐P700 + 10 μg ml pLlys. b, d Caco‐2/TC7 cells incubated with 900 ng ml−1 SWCNT‐P700 + 100 μg ml−1 pLlys (b, d). Scale bar, 20 µm

The results indicate that pLlys at a concentration of 100 µg ml−1 has a cytotoxic effect on Caco‐2/TC7 cells. Only pLlys concentrations below 10 µg ml−1 have no significant effect on the viability of these cells, in good agreement with previous observations for other cancer cells types [3]. There were no significant differences between pLlys, SWCNT‐P or SWCNT‐P700 treatments at any concentration in the assayed ranges (Fig. 3). Incubation with SWCNT‐P up to 80 ng ml−1 or SWCNT‐P700 up to 90 ng ml−1 does not modify the viability of Caco‐2/TC7 cells, indicating that both types of SWCNTs do not have cytotoxic effects at the tested concentrations. Moreover, the cytotoxic effects observed at SWCNT concentrations higher than 100 ng ml−1 are caused by pLlys, and do not indicate SWCNT toxicity. Previous works have already suggested the necessity of evaluating the effects of the dispersion medium when SWCNT toxicity is measured [27, 28, 29].

It has to be remarked that the presence of oxygen functional groups in the SWCNT‐P sample does not produce any effect at the tested concentrations, since no differences are observed from the oxygen‐free SWCNT‐P700 sample. Highly purified SWCNTs, at least up to concentrations of nearly 1 µg ml−1, act as inert particles in the cell culture medium. While pLlys maintains its activity against colon cancer cells, SWCNTs could be utilised as carriers for other active principles or excipients in a hypothetical pharmacological complex.

4 Conclusions

Stable dispersions of highly purified arc‐discharge SWCNTs in a high molecular weight pLlys aqueous solution are prepared by subsequent stages of air oxidation, acid treatment, and ultracentrifugation in the pLlys solution. Neat pLlys strongly decreases the viability of intestinal Caco‐2 cells at concentrations of higher than 10 μg ml−1, as observed by image flow cytometry. However, highly purified SWCNTs, even containing a certain amount of oxygen functional groups, do not cause any effect on Caco‐2 cells at the tested concentrations. Previously reported interferences of SWCNT samples on cell cultures are avoided after a careful purification process. This result supports the utilisation of SWCNTs as a chemically inert drug vehicle for the treatment of intestinal tract diseases.

5 Acknowledgments

The authors thank the analysis services of Instituto de Carboquímica ICB‐CSIC, and the LMA‐INA‐University of Zaragoza. This work was funded by the Spanish Ministry MINECO and the European Regional Development Fund under the projects PRI‐PIBAR‐2011‐1 and ENE2013‐48816‐C5‐5‐R, and the Government of Aragon and the European Social Fund (DGA‐ESF‐T66 Grupo Consolidado and DGA‐ESF‐B61 Grupo Consolidado).

6 References

  • 1. Pandey A.K. Kumar A.: ‘Improved microbial biosynthesis strategies and multifarious applications of the natural biopolymer epsilon‐poly‐L‐lysine’, Process Biochem., 2014, 49, pp. 496 –505 (doi: 10.1016/j.procbio.2013.12.009) [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 2. Ye R. Xu H. Wan C. et al.: ‘Antibacterial activity and mechanism of action of ɛ‐poly‐L‐lysine’, Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun., 2013, 439, pp. 148 –153 (doi: 10.1016/j.bbrc.2013.08.001) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3. Arnold L.J. Dagan A. Gutheil J. et al.: ‘Antineoplastic activity of poly(L‐lysine) with some ascites tumor cells’, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 1979, 76, pp. 3246 –3250 (doi: 10.1073/pnas.76.7.3246) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4. Titlow W.B. Lee C.H. Ryou C.: ‘Characterization of toxicological properties of L‐lysine polymers in CD‐1 mice’, J. Microbiol. Biotechnol., 2013, 23, pp. 1015 –1022 (doi: 10.4014/jmb.1302.02055) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5. Zhou D. Li C. Hu Y. et al.: ‘Glycopolymer modification on physicochemical and biological properties of poly (L‐lysine) for gene delivery’, Int. J. Biol. Macromol., 2012, 50, pp. 965 –973 (doi: 10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2012.02.021) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6. Peretz S. Regev O.: ‘Carbon nanotubes as nanocarriers in medicine’, Curr. Opin. Colloid Interface Sci., 2012, 17, pp. 360 –368 (doi: 10.1016/j.cocis.2012.09.001) [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 7. Firme C.P. Bandaru P.R.: ‘Toxicity issues in the application of carbon nanotubes to biological systems’, Nanomed.‐Nanotechnol. Biol. Med., 2010, 6, pp. 245 –256 (doi: 10.1016/j.nano.2009.07.003) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8. Grasa L. Ansón‐Casaos A. Martínez M.T. et al.: ‘Single‐walled carbon nanotubes (SWCNTs) enhance KCl‐, acetylcholine, and serotonin‐induced contractions and evoke oxidative stress on rabbit ileum’, J. Biomed. Nanotechnol., 2014, 10, pp. 529 –542 (doi: 10.1166/jbn.2014.1732) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9. Pichardo S. Gutierrez‐Praena D. Puerto M. et al.: ‘Oxidative stress responses to carboxylic acid functionalized single wall carbon nanotubes on the human intestinal cell line Caco‐2’, Toxicol. In Vitro, 2012, 26, pp. 672 –677 (doi: 10.1016/j.tiv.2012.03.007) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10. Ansón‐Casaos A. González‐Domínguez J.M. Lafragueta I. et al.: ‘Optical absorption response of chemically modified single‐walled carbon nanotubes upon ultracentrifugation in various dispersants’, Carbon, 2014, 66, pp. 105 –118 (doi: 10.1016/j.carbon.2013.08.048) [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 11. Moore V.C. Strano M.S. Haroz E.H. et al.: ‘Individually suspended single‐walled carbon nanotubes in various surfactants’, Nano Lett., 2003, 3, pp. 1379 –1382 (doi: 10.1021/nl034524j) [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 12. Zhang Y. Li J. Shen Y. et al.: ‘Poly‐L‐lysine functionalization of single‐walled carbon nanotubes’, J. Phys. Chem. B, 2004, 108, pp. 15343 –15346 (doi: 10.1021/jp0471094) [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 13. Salzmann C.G. Lee G.K.C. Ward M.A.H. et al.: ‘Highly hydrophilic and stable polypeptide/single‐wall carbon nanotube conjugates’, J. Mater. Chem., 2008, 18, pp. 1977 –1983 (doi: 10.1039/b800494c) [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 14. Ling X. Wei Y. Zou L. et al.: ‘Functionalization and dispersion of multiwalled carbon nanotubes modified with poly‐L‐lysine’, Colloid. Surf. A‐Physicochem. Eng. Asp., 2014, 443, pp. 19 –26 (doi: 10.1016/j.colsurfa.2013.10.053) [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 15. Figarol A. Pourchez J. Boudard D. et al.: ‘Biological response to purification and acid functionalization of carbon nanotubes’, J. Nanopart. Res., 2014, 16, p. 2507 (doi: 10.1007/s11051-014-2507-y) [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 16. Blanch A.J. Lenehan C.E. Quinton J.S.: ‘Parametric analysis of sonication and centrifugation variables for dispersion of single walled carbon nanotubes in aqueous solutions of sodium dodecylbenzene sulfonate’, Carbon, 2011, 49, pp. 5213 –5228 (doi: 10.1016/j.carbon.2011.07.039) [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 17. Zhao B. Itkis M.E. Niyogi S. et al.: ‘Extinction coefficients and purity of single‐walled carbon nanotubes’, J. Nanosci. Nanotechnol., 2004, 4, pp. 995 –1004 (doi: 10.1166/jnn.2004.134) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18. Haggenmueller R. Rahatekar S.S. Fagan J.A. et al.: ‘Comparison of the quality of aqueous dispersions of single wall carbon nanotubes using surfactants and biomolecules’, Langmuir, 2008, 24, pp. 5070 –5078 (doi: 10.1021/la703008r) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19. Itkis M.E. Perea D.E. Jung R. et al.: ‘Comparison of analytical techniques for purity evaluation of single‐walled carbon nanotubes’, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2005, 127, pp. 3439 –3448 (doi: 10.1021/ja043061w) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20. Chantret I. Rodolosse A. Barbat A. et al.: ‘Rousset, Differential expression of sucrase‐isomaltase in clones isolated from early and late passages of the cell line Caco‐2: evidence for glucose‐dependent negative regulation’, J. Cell Sci., 1994, 107, pp. 213 –225 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21. Iceta R. Mesonero J.E. Aramayona J.J. et al.: ‘Molecular characterization and intracellular regulation of the human serotonin transporter in Caco‐2 cells’, J. Physiol. Pharmacol., 2006, 57, pp. 119 –130 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22. Chang L. Gallego‐Perez D. Zhao X. et al.: ‘Dielectrophoresis‐assisted 3D Nanoelectroporation for Non‐viral Cell Transfection in Adoptive Immunotherapy’, Lab. Chip., 2015, 15, pp. 3147 –3153 (doi: 10.1039/C5LC00553A) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23. Riccardi C. Nicoletti I.: ‘Analysis of apoptosis by propidium iodide staining and flow cytometry’, Nat. Protoc., 2006, 1, pp. 1458 –1461 (doi: 10.1038/nprot.2006.238) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24. Bunthof C.J. Bloemen K. Breeuwer P. et al.: ‘Flow cytometry assessment of the viability of lactic acid bacteria’, Appl. Environ. Microbiol., 2001, 67, pp. 2326 –2335 (doi: 10.1128/AEM.67.5.2326-2335.2001) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25. Li X. Chen W. Zhan Q. et al.: ‘Direct measurements of interactions between polypeptides and carbon nanotubes’, J. Phys. Chem. B, 2006, 110, pp. 12621 –12625 (doi: 10.1021/jp061518d) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26. Grossiord N. Regev O. Loos J. et al.: ‘Time‐dependent study of the exfoliation process of carbon nanotubes in aqueous dispersions by using uv‐visible spectroscopy’, Anal. Chem., 2005, 77, pp. 5135 –5139 (doi: 10.1021/ac050358j) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27. Dong L. Joseph K.L. Witkowski C.M. et al.: ‘Cytotoxicity of single‐walled carbon nanotubes suspended in various surfactants’, Nanotechnology, 2008, 19, p. 255702 (doi: 10.1088/0957-4484/19/25/255702) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28. Dong L. Witkowski C.M. Craig M.M. et al.: ‘Citotoxicity effects of different surfactant molecules conjugated to carbon nanotubes on human astrocytoma cells’, Nanoscale Res. Lett., 2009, 4, pp. 1517 –1523 (doi: 10.1007/s11671-009-9429-0) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29. Alpatova A.L. Shan W. Babica P. et al.: ‘Single‐walled carbon nanotubes dispersed in aqueous media via non‐covalent functionalization: effect of dispersant on stability, cytotoxicity, and epigenetic toxicity of nanotube suspensions’, Water Res., 2010, 44, pp. 505 –520 (doi: 10.1016/j.watres.2009.09.042) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from IET Nanobiotechnology are provided here courtesy of Wiley

RESOURCES