Skip to main content
Innovation in Aging logoLink to Innovation in Aging
. 2021 Dec 17;5(Suppl 1):433. doi: 10.1093/geroni/igab046.1684

AgingPLUS: Examining the Malleability of Implicit Views of Aging

Heidi Tseng 1, Garrett Forsyth 1, Abigail Nehrkorn-Bailey 1, Diana Rodriguez 1, Kat Thompson 1, Manfred Diehl 1
PMCID: PMC8680368

Abstract

AgingPLUS also examines whether the intervention can change participants’ implicit VOA. To that end, participants completed a lexical decision-making task (LDMT) and the Brief Implicit Association Test (BIAT) at baseline and post-intervention. One-way ANCOVAs with baseline scores as covariate were used for these analyses. For LDMT, there was no significant difference between the groups regarding their post-intervention latencies for old-positive words, F(1,181) = 0.01, p = .60, old-negative words, F(1,181) = 0.43, p = .51, young-positive words, F(1,181) = 0.19, p = .67, and young-negative words, F(1,181) = 1.16, p = .28. For BIAT, both groups showed a slight preference for the young at baseline (mean d = 0.39), and post-intervention (mean d = 0.38). There was no significant difference between the groups regarding post-intervention d scores, F(1,181) = 0.002, p = .97. These preliminary findings suggest that in the current subsample, AgingPLUS did not significantly change participants’ implicit VOA.


Articles from Innovation in Aging are provided here courtesy of Oxford University Press

RESOURCES