Skip to main content
NIHPA Author Manuscripts logoLink to NIHPA Author Manuscripts
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2022 Dec 1.
Published in final edited form as: Am J Gastroenterol. 2021 Dec 1;116(12):2385–2389. doi: 10.14309/ajg.0000000000001346

Liver-Unrelated Comorbid Conditions do not impact Cognitive Performance or Hepatic Encephalopathy Progression in Cirrhosis

Chathur Acharya 1, Omar Nadhem 1, Jawaid Shaw 1, Ramzi Hassouneh 1, Andrew Fagan 1, Sara McGeorge 1, Richard K Sterling 1, Puneet Puri 1, Michael Fuchs 1, Velimir Luketic 1, Arun J Sanyal 1, James B Wade 2, HoChong S Gilles 3, Douglas M Heuman 1, Felicia Tinsley 1, Scott Matherly 1, Hannah Lee 1, Mohammad S Siddiqui 1, Leroy R Thacker 3, Jasmohan S Bajaj 1
PMCID: PMC8683569  NIHMSID: NIHMS1709163  PMID: 34140445

Abstract

We aimed to determine the effect of co-morbidities on Covert (CHE) diagnosis and overt (OHE) development. Cirrhotic outpatients underwent CHE testing and 2-year follow-up. Cox regression was performed for time to OHE. 700 patients (60 years, 84% men, MELD 11) and 33% prior OHE underwent testing and follow-up. Major co-morbidities were hypertension (54%), diabetes (35%) and depression (29%). Common medications were PPI (49%), beta-blockers (32%) and opioids (21%). 90 (40%) prior-OHE patients developed recurrence 93(30,206) days post-testing predicted only by liver-related variables. Demographics, cirrhosis characteristics and opioid use, but not other co-morbid conditions, were associated with CHE diagnosis and OHE progression.

Keywords: Psychometric hepatic encephalopathy score, cardiovascular, psychiatric, recurrence, hospitalization

INTRODUCTION:

Cognitive impairment due to covert hepatic encephalopathy (CHE)(1) is associated with poor clinical and psychosocial outcomes. Most CHE tests are sensitive to cognitive change but their relative specificity needs to be explored(2) in the context of liver-unrelated comorbidities(3, 4). Population-based studies have indicated the role of some comorbidities but a granular approach with cognitive testing is needed to inform future studies (3, 5). Our aim was then to examine liver-related and unrelated variables that can affect CHE on the psychometric hepatic encephalopathy score (PHES) and their impact on future overt HE (OHE) development.

METHODS:

Patients with cirrhosis >18 years underwent PHES(score ≤−4=CHE) after consent (6). We excluded inpatients, those with uncontrolled psychiatric conditions, those actively abusing alcohol/drugs, unable to follow testing strategies or consent and those whose life expectancy was <1 month. We examined charts going back 1 year from testing to evaluate cirrhosis details, co-morbidities, and chronic medications (>3 months). Co-morbid conditions evaluated were type 2 diabetes, hypertension, coronary artery disease, congestive heart failure. hyper/hypothyroidism, COPD, inflammatory bowel disease. depression, anxiety, hypnotic use, chronic opioid use, neuropathic pain medication and PPI use. These conditions can impact cognition and are often comorbid with cirrhosis. Charlson’s comorbidity index was also calculated. Multi-variable logistic regression for liver-related/unrelated variables with CHE as the outcome was performed. All subjects were followed for two years for time to OHE defined by grade ≥2 requiring admission and Cox regression analysis was performed.

RESULTS:

Seven hundred patients (203 VCU and 497 VA), mostly men (80%) with a mean age was 59.4±7 years were enrolled. Most were Caucasian (62.5%) followed by African-American (27.8%). The most common cirrhosis-related complication was ascites (44%) followed by prior OHE (33%) and variceal bleeding (15%) (Table 1). Two hundred thirty four patients had neither CHE/OHE, 235 had CHE without OHE and 231 had prior OHE (Figure S1). More cognitively impaired groups were likely to be male-predominant, with higher alcohol-related etiology, cirrhosis severity and associated medications (PPI, NSBB) and opioids. Sixty-eight patients were on lactulose-only, 34 rifaximin only and 129 both. Most opioid use (n=124) was chronic oxycodone.

Table 1:

Comparison of variables between patients with/without CHE and OHE

Variable (N (%) unless
otherwise mentioned
No CHE or OHE
(N=234)
CHE no-OHE
(N=235)
Prior OHE
(N=231)
p-value
Demographical covariables
Age median (IQR) 60(54,65) 61(57,64) 60(56.7,64) 0.15
Sex (male) 163(69.6%) 220(94%) 199 (86%) <0.0001
Race (Caucasian) 150(64.1%) 132(56%) 156(67.5%) 0.0338
Hepatitis C Etiology 127(54.2%) 153(65%) 110(47.6%) 0.0006
Alcohol-related Etiology 14(6%) 32(13.6%) 61(26.4%) <0.0001
NASH Etiology 51(21.7%) 32(13.6%) 32(13.8%) 0.025
Education (years) 14(12,15.25) 12(12,14) 12(12,14) 0.0002
Liver disease severity covariables
MELD score median (IQR) 8(7,12) 10(7,14) 15(11.8,19) <0.0001
Prior TIPS 2(0.8%) 3(1%) 19(8.2%) <0.0001
Ascites 50(21.3%) 82(35%) 169(73.1%) <0.0001
Refractory ascites 17(7.2%) 22(9.3%) 45(19.4%) 0.0062
Prior variceal bleeding 23(9.8%) 23(9.7%) 56(24.4%) <0.0001
Hepatocellular cancer 27(11.5%) 49(20.8) 32(13.8%) 0.0069
Furosemide only 8(3.3%) 13(5.5%) 13(4.8%) 0.45
Spironolactone only 9(3.8%) 7(3%) 12(5.2%) 0.46
Furosemide and spironolactone 41(17.5%) 60(25.5%) 134(58%) <0.0001
Prior Hepatorenal syndrome 1 (0.43%) 3(1.28%) 9(3.9%) 0.02
SBP prophylaxis 5(2%) 19(8%) 38(11.5%) <0.0001
Median (IQR) PHES score 0(−1,1) −6(−8,−4.25) −7(−12,−3) <0.0001
GI covariables
Crohn’s Disease 1(0%) 0(0.43%) 2(0.87%) 0.35
Ulcerative Colitis 6(2.5%) 1(0.43%) 2(0.87%) 0.09
Endocrinological covariables
Diabetes Mellitus 77(32.9%) 84(35.7%) 76(32.9%) 0.757
Diabetes Mellitus on Insulin 31(13.2%) 43(18.2%) 47(20.3%) 0.113
Hypothyroidism 30(12.8%) 15(6.4%) 30(13%) 0.031
Hyperthyroidism 0(0%) 3(1.28%) 3(1.29%) 0.2
Cardiovascular covariables
Statin 48(20.5%) 64 (27.2%) 35(15.15%) 0.0058
Oher Lipid lowering therapies 3(1.28%) 4(1.7%) 2(0.9%) 0.9
Hypertension 138(58.9%) 140(59.5%) 99(42.8%) 0.0002
Congestive heart failure 5(2%) 7(3%) 5(2%) 0.86
Coronary artery disease 19(8%) 26(11%) 20(8.6%) 0.5
COPD 9(3.8%) 19(8%) 15(6.5%) 0.15
Prior Stroke 4(1.7%) 4(1.7%) q 5(1.8%) 0.8
Psychiatric covariables
Depression 67(28.6%) 67(28.5%) 67(29%) 0.99
Anxiety 19(8%) 11(46.8%) 17(7.3%) 0.29
SSRI 22(9.4%) 31(13.2%) 35(15.2%) 0.163
Tricyclic antidepressants 7(3%) 6(2.5%) 4(1.7%) 0.66
SNRI 1(0.43%) 5(2.1%) 5(1.6%) 0.22
Benzodiazepines 5(2.1%) 2(0.85%) 7(3%) 0.24
Pregabalin 0(0) 1(0.43%) 2(0.87%) 0.4
Gabapentin 18(7.7%) 31(13.2%) 26(11.3%) 0.14
Medication related covariables
Opioid use 32(13.6%) 56(23.8%) 55(23.8%) 0.0072
PPI use 97(41.4%) 108(46%) 132(57%) 0.0023
Nonselective Beta blockers 41(17.5%) 62(26.3%) 119(51.5%) <0.0001
Overall comorbidity
Charlson Comorbidity index 5(4,5.25) 5(4,6) 5(4,6) 0.097

PPI: proton pump inhibitors, NASH: non-alcoholic steatohepatitis, PHES: psychometric hepatic encephalopathy score, CHE: covert hepatic encephalopathy, OHE: overt hepatic encephalopathy, HCC: hepatocellular cancer, MELD: model for end-stage liver disease, SSRI: selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors, SNRI: serotonin-norepinephrine reuptake Inhibitor, COPD: chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, TIPS: transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunting, SBP: spontaneous bacterial peritonitis

Multi-variable Analyses:

CHE diagnosis (Table 2):

Table 2:

Logistic regression analysis for CHE on PHES as dependent variable in all patients and those with prior OHE with liver-related/unrelated variables

In all Patients (n=700) Only in those with OHE (n=231)
Variable OR (95% CI) p-value Variable OR (95% CI) p-value
UNIVARIABLE ANALYSIS UNIVARIABLE ANALYSIS
Age 1.03 (1.03-1.05) 0.0008 Education 0.8 (0.7-0.9) 0.0067
Education 0.86 (0.8-0.92) <0.0001 Male sex 3.8 (1.6-9.5) 0.0028
Alcohol etiology 3.1(1.96-4.9) <0.0001 Alcohol etiology 2.7(1.14-6.44) 0.028
NASH etiology 0.55(0.30-0.82) 0.0009 MELD score 1.04(0.98-1.11) 0.12
Male sex 5.6 (3.3-8.8) <0.0001 Ascites 2.02(1.01-4.4) 0.046
MELD score 1.08 (1.05-1.12) <0.0001 Refractory ascites 3.4(1.18-10.2) 0.023
Prior OHE 3.5 (2.4-5.1) <0.0001 Variceal bleeding 0.8(0.4-1.7) 0.68
Lactulose use 1.98(1.11-3.53) 0.02 PPI use 2.14(1.12-4.07) 0.02
Rifaximin use 2.6(1.77-3.78) <0.0001 NSBB 3.7(2.7-5.3) <0.0001
Ascites 2.8 (2.04-3.89) <0.0001
Refractory ascites 2.05(1.74-3.4) 0.0036
HCC 1.74 (1.11-2.72) 0.014
Opioid use 2.02 (1.35-3.03) 0.0006
PPI use 1.58 (1.16-2.15) 0.0032
NSBB 1.5 (1.1-2.07) 0.0081
MULTIVARIABLE ANALYSIS MULTIVARIABLE ANALYSIS
Age 1.054(1.02-1.07) <0.0001 Alcohol etiology 1.6 (1.07-2.5) 0.02
Male sex 4.7(2.8-7.9) <0.0001 Ascites 6.1 (4.2-9) <0.0001
Alcohol etiology 2.26(1.37-3.7) 0.0014 NSBB 2.1(1.5-3.2) <0.0001
Education 0.87(0.81-0.9) 0.0009
Prior OHE 2.23 (1.4-3.2) 0.0003
Ascites 2.17(1.4-3.2) 0.0001
Opioid use 1.99(1.3-3.1) 0.0027

Univariable models show variables that were near p<0.10 with CHE on PHES in both populations. These included all co-morbid conditions, use of lactulose, rifaximin, and other cirrhosis-related/unrelated medications. Only the variables that were p<0.10 on univariable analysis were entered into the multi-variable analysis. The only liver unrelated variable that was associated with CHE on PHES was opioids in the entire group but not in the OHE group. NSBB: non-selective beta-blockers, PPI: proton pump inhibitors, CCI: Charlson Co-morbidity index, NASH: non-alcoholic steatohepatitis, PHES: psychometric hepatic encephalopathy score, CHE: covert hepatic encephalopathy, OHE: overt hepatic encephalopathy, HCC: hepatocellular cancer, MELD: model for end-stage liver disease

In all patients, age, male sex, education, alcohol-etiology, prior OHE, ascites and opioid use were significant, while in those with prior OHE only ascites, NSBB and alcohol- etiology were. No interactions were noted and none of liver-unrelated variables, including CCI were significant.

Cox Regression:

Since only 6 each in No-CHE/OHE and CHE/no-OHE group developed OHE, we focused on the 90 prior OHE patients who required OHE-related hospitalization a median time of 93(30,206) days after testing. Cox regression showed alcohol-related etiology, MELD score and CHE were significant predictors of time to recurrence. None of the liver-unrelated co-morbid conditions, CCI or other complications of liver disease were contributory (Table 3).

Table 3:

Factors associated with time to OHE-related readmission on Cox regression analysis.

Variable Estimate p-value HR (95% CI)
Liver Related Covariables (significant)
Alcohol Etiology 0.0831 0.011 1.608 (1.026, 2.477)
MELD score 0.0376 <0.001 1.038 (1.005, 1.071)
Covert Hepatic Encephalopathy 0.0831 0.015 1.087 (1.003, 1.860)
Endocrinological Comorbidities
Diabetes Mellitus 0.3318 0.1352 1.393 (0.900, 2.130)
Diabetes Mellitus on Insulin 0.1236 0.6398 1.132 (0.678, 1.888)
Hypothyroidism 0.4059 0.2611 1.501 (0.764, 2.948)
Cardiovascular Comorbidities
Hypertension 0.1346 0.5306 1.144 (0.749, 1.743)
Congestive Heart Failure −0.8801 0.3815 0.415 (0.058, 2.978)
Coronary Artery Disease −0.0114 0.9755 0.989 (0.439, 1.926)
Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease −0.8707 0.0890 0.419 (0.132, 1.328)
Psychiatric Comorbidities
Depression 0.1529 0.5046 1.165 (0.737, 1.798)
Anxiety −0.1070 0.7986 0.899 (0.348, 1.901)
Medication use related Comorbidities
Opioid Use 0.2222 0.3535 1.249 (0.773, 1.954)
Proton Pump Inhibitor use −0.0854 0.7004 0.918 (0.596, 1.425)
Nonselective Beta-blockers −0.2941 0.2895 0.745 (0.445, 1.300)
Overall Comorbidity Risk
Charlson Comorbidity index −0.0881 0.1876 0.916 (0.796, 1.042)

Significant variables are in the bold font, MELD: model for end-stage liver disease

DISCUSSION:

Our results demonstrate that despite the liver-unrelated comorbidities that are prevalent in outpatients with cirrhosis, liver-related factors were the major determinants of cognitive impairment on PHES. These findings were extended on to prediction of OHE recurrence in this cohort. Several important co-morbid conditions such hypertension, diabetes and cardio-pulmonary diseases are independently associated with cognitive impairment (7-9). Regardless of the duration and control of diabetes (insulin use, hemoglobin A1c), our cohort did not show a significant impact of diabetes. This was also seen with several other comorbidities (coronary artery disease, COPD, thyroid, neuropsychiatric and their impact on cognitive performance.

Our data extend prior studies with larger numbers or with granular, patient-level data rather than population-based analyses with a focus on not only cross-sectional data but prediction of the clinically relevant OHE-related hospitalizations(10). We found consistent changes related to alcohol, prior OHE and demographics with cognitive impairment(11, 12). Ascites and NSBB use, reflecting portal hypertension were associated with CHE(13, 14) which we extend in a larger setting. The only liver unrelated conditions related to CHE was opioid use, which our study extends to a larger granular cohort(3). Therefore, this large, prospectively collected cohort with concomitant cognitive testing and analysis of liver-related/unrelated variables provides evidence that despite multiple comorbidities, PHES and OHE-related hospitalizations are related on liver-related conditions. These results are important as they can expand potential eligibility for CHE testing using PHES beyond those used in prior studies into a population with major co-morbid conditions and medication use that is more representative of the Western clinic population (15). This can encourage greater equity and access for cognitive testing, interpretation, and potential therapy for a larger proportion of patients with cirrhosis than the status quo. It is interesting these co-morbid conditions were unrelated to PHES performance in the presence of cirrhosis. It could be that the major impact of cirrhosis on the subcortical function required for PHES that may not be as affected by other co-morbid conditions.

Our study is limited by the low number of no-OHE patients developing OHE, likely due to requirement of hospitalizations. We also only performed the paper-pencil test PHES once in this assessment; it is likely that other modalities such as electronic or neurophysiological analyses, inflammatory assessment, as well as multiple assessments could have further improved the modeling. We also only used MELD score rather than Child score to ensure that OHE and ascites could be analyzed separately. We did not include the severity or duration of co-morbidities but only their presence.

We conclude in a large two center cohort of outpatients with cirrhosis that there is a major burden of liver-unrelated co-morbid conditions, which do not significantly impact cognitive performance on PHES. Therefore, impaired PHES performance represents CHE even in patients with cirrhosis-unrelated co-morbid conditions. Moreover, these co-morbid conditions are not associated with the development of overt hepatic encephalopathy on long-term follow-up. Therefore, despite the increasing comorbid disease burden, it is largely the liver disease that affects hepatic encephalopathy-related cognitive and hospitalization outcomes in patients with cirrhosis.

Supplementary Material

Supplementary File

Figure S1: Flow of patients based on CHE, prior OHE or both.

STUDY HIGHLIGHTS:

WHAT IS KNOWN

  • Covert hepatic encephalopathy (CHE) is associated with poor clinical and psychosocial outcomes in cirrhosis, including overt HE (OHE) development.

  • The impact of co-morbid conditions, which are increasing among patients with cirrhosis on cognitive tests such as psychometric hepatic encephalopathy score (PHES) used to diagnose CHE needs to be clarified.

WHAT IS NEW HERE

  • We performed PHES in 700 outpatients with cirrhosis (234 neither CHE/OHE, 235 CHE without OHE and 231 prior OHE) and determined the impact of co-morbid conditions on PHES and prediction for OHE events over 2 years.

  • In all subjects, PHES was associated with demographics, opioid use, and cirrhosis-related variables, while in those with prior OHE, only cirrhosis-related variables were contributory.

  • On follow-up, 90 patients developed OHE a median of 93(30,206) days after testing and only cirrhosis-related variables (alcohol etiology, MELD score and CHE) but not other co-morbid conditions were significant predictors of time to recurrence.

  • Cirrhosis-unrelated co-morbid conditions did not impact either PHES performance, CHE diagnosis or time to OHE development in this large cohort and this testing strategy may be specific for CHE diagnosis in cirrhosis patients with co-morbid conditions.

Financial support:

Partly supported by VA Merit 2I0CX001076, R21TR003095 and RO1HS025412 to JSB

Abbreviations:

HE

hepatic encephalopathy

CHE

covert hepatic encephalopathy

OHE

overt hepatic encephalopathy

PHES

Psychometric hepatic encephalopathy score

PPI

proton pump inhibitors

TIPS

trans-jugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt

AKI

acute kidney injury

HRS

hepatorenal syndrome

NSBB

non-selective beta-blockers

HCC

hepatocellular cancer

CHF

congestive heart failure

IBD

inflammatory bowel disease

SSRI

serotonin receptor inhibitors

SVR

sustained virological response

Footnotes

Potential competing interests: None for any author

References

  • 1.Vilstrup H, Amodio P, Bajaj J, et al. Hepatic encephalopathy in chronic liver disease: 2014 Practice Guideline by the American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases and the European Association for the Study of the Liver. Hepatology 2014;60:715–35. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Goldbecker A, Weissenborn K, Hamidi Shahrezaei G, et al. Comparison of the most favoured methods for the diagnosis of hepatic encephalopathy in liver transplantation candidates. Gut 2013;62:1497–504. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Tapper EB, Henderson JB, Parikh ND, et al. Incidence of and Risk Factors for Hepatic Encephalopathy in a Population-Based Cohort of Americans With Cirrhosis. Hepatol Commun 2019;3:1510–1519. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Bajaj JS, Duarte-Rojo A, Xie JJ, et al. Minimal Hepatic Encephalopathy and Mild Cognitive Impairment Worsen Quality of Life in Elderly Patients With Cirrhosis. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2020;18:3008–3016 e2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Gronbaek L, Watson H, Vilstrup H, et al. Benzodiazepines and risk for hepatic encephalopathy in patients with cirrhosis and ascites. United European Gastroenterol J 2018;6:407–412. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Allampati S, Duarte-Rojo A, Thacker LR, et al. Diagnosis of Minimal Hepatic Encephalopathy Using Stroop EncephalApp: A Multicenter US-Based, Norm-Based Study. Am J Gastroenterol 2016;111:78–86. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Gottesman RF, Schneider AL, Albert M, et al. Midlife hypertension and 20-year cognitive change: the atherosclerosis risk in communities neurocognitive study. JAMA Neurol 2014;71:1218–27. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Kivipelto M, Helkala EL, Hanninen T, et al. Midlife vascular risk factors and late-life mild cognitive impairment: A population-based study. Neurology 2001;56:1683–9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Whitmer RA, Sidney S, Selby J, et al. Midlife cardiovascular risk factors and risk of dementia in late life. Neurology 2005;64:277–81. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Tapper EB, Zhao L, Nikirk S, et al. Incidence and Bedside Predictors of the First Episode of Overt Hepatic Encephalopathy in Patients With Cirrhosis. Am J Gastroenterol 2020;115:2017–2025. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Davis BC, Bajaj JS. Effects of Alcohol on the Brain in Cirrhosis: Beyond Hepatic Encephalopathy. Alcohol Clin Exp Res 2018;42:660–667. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Riggio O, Ridola L, Pasquale C, et al. Evidence of persistent cognitive impairment after resolution of overt hepatic encephalopathy. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2011;9:181–3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.de Franchis R, Baveno VIF. Expanding consensus in portal hypertension: Report of the Baveno VI Consensus Workshop: Stratifying risk and individualizing care for portal hypertension. J Hepatol 2015;63:743–52. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Labenz C, Nagel M, Toenges G, et al. Impact of non-selective ss-blockers on hepatic encephalopathy in patients with liver cirrhosis. Eur J Intern Med 2020;82:83–89. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Bajaj JS, Lauridsen M, Tapper EB, et al. Important Unresolved Questions in the Management of Hepatic Encephalopathy: An ISHEN Consensus. Am J Gastroenterol 2020;115:989–1002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Supplementary File

Figure S1: Flow of patients based on CHE, prior OHE or both.

RESOURCES