Abstract
The first cave-dwelling Solenogastres—marine shell-less worm-like mollusks—were sampled from Mediterranean marine caves floor silt in the Marseille area. The mollusks were 1.5 mm in length, had a transparent body with shiny spicules and appear to represent a new Tegulaherpia species. Electron microscopy revealed a high number of microbial cells, located on the surface of the spicules as well as in the cuticle of Tegulaherpia sp. The observed microbial cells varied in morphology and were unequally distributed through the cuticle, reaching a highest density on the dorsal and lateral sides and being practically absent on the ventral side. Next Generation Sequencing (NGS) of V4 region of 16S rRNA gene amplicons, obtained from the DNA samples of whole bodies of Tegulaherpia sp. revealed three dominating microorganisms, two of which were bacteria of Bacteroidetes and Nitrospirae phyla, while the third one represented archaea of Thaumarchaeota phylum. The Operational Taxonomic Unit (OTU), affiliated with Bacteroidetes was an uncultured bacteria of the family Saprospiraceae (93–95% of Bacteroidetes and 25–44% of the total community, depending on sample), OTU, affiliated with Nitrospirae belonged to the genus Nitrospira (8–30% of the community), while the thaumarchaeal OTU was classified as Candidatus Nitrosopumilus (11–15% of the community). Members of these three microbial taxa are known to form associations with various marine animals such as sponges or snails where they contribute to nitrogen metabolism or the decomposition of biopolymers. A similar role is assumed to be played by the microorganisms associated with Tegulaherpia sp.
Keywords: Microbial symbionts, Solenogastres, Marine cave, Thaumarchaeota, NGS
Introduction
Although the northwestern Mediterranean marine biota is one of the best-studied in the world, some remote, less-accessible ecosystems are still likely hotspots of unknown diversity. Underwater marine caves are numerous in the Marseille area (SE France) due to the karstic nature of the seashore that cannot be accessed by standard oceanographic gear and can only be explored by speleo-divers (Harmelin, Vacelet & Vasseur, 1985). Due to the darkness and low water circulation, these caves are characterized by oligotrophy, in a very similar way to the deep sea. As a consequence, some of the microorganisms from marine caves are also deepwater species, or species belonging to taxa for which deepwater representatives are known (Calado, Chevaldonné & Santos, 2004; Bakran-Petricioli et al., 2007; Janssen, Chevaldonné & Martinez-Arbizu, 2013; Chevaldonné et al., 2015; Cárdenas et al., 2018; Chevaldonné & Pretus, 2021). Moreover, some exceptional caves further provide a cold thermal regime (mean ca. 13–15 °C), similar to that of the Mediterranean deep sea areas (Vacelet, Boury-Esnault & Harmelin, 1994; Bakran-Petricioli et al., 2007).
Our knowledge of the benthic communities of marine caves is still incomplete. Most emphasis has been devoted to the most conspicuous components of either the fixed fauna, such as sponges or bryozoans (e.g., Harmelin, Vacelet & Vasseur, 1985; Harmelin, 1997; Grenier et al., 2018), or the mobile fauna such as teleost fish and crustaceans (e.g., Ledoyer, 1989; Chevaldonné & Lejeusne, 2003; Bussotti, Di Franco A. Francour & Guidetti, 2015). Some studies have focused on cave sediment meiofauna, often with an emphasis on targeted taxonomic groups (see examples in Janssen, Chevaldonné & Martinez-Arbizu, 2013; Zeppilli et al., 2018). Meiofauna proved to be a good indicator of ecological processes in marine caves. Near Marseille, Janssen, Chevaldonné & Martinez-Arbizu (2013) studied the meiofauna of the 3PP marine cave (depth 25–30 m below sea level) sediment, one of such exceptional cold-water caves. The 3PP cave was characterized by very low abundances of meiofaunal organisms usually found at abyssal sites (Janssen, Chevaldonné & Martinez-Arbizu, 2013). Moreover, they noted significant differences in meiofauna community along the transect from the outside to the innermost part of the cave: tardigrades were restricted to the inner parts of the cave, while copepod diversity decreased towards the inner parts. Such interesting findings prompted further investigations of the macro- and meiofauna, especially of yet poorly-studied groups.
Although Sørensen, Jørgensen & Boesgaard (2000) and Boesgaard & Kristensen (2001) pointed to the presence of unknown aplacophoran species in one cave system in Australia, there has been no mention of Solenogastres in marine cave studies so far. Solenogastres (Mollusca) is a small group of marine shell-less worm-like mollusks that inhabit various depths, from the sublittoral to the abyssal, including hydrothermal vents (Scheltema, 2008). They are mostly epibenthic or epizoic organisms living and feeding on cnidarians, while some groups feed on other organisms such as polychaetes, nemerteans, and bryozoans (Todt & Salvini-Plawen, 2005; Salvini-Plawen & Oztürk, 2006; García-Álvarez & Salvini-Plawen, 2007; Bergmeier, Ostermair & Jörger, 2021). Most species are less than 5 mm in length with the smallest being less than a millimeter long and the biggest reaching over 300 mm (Todt, 2013). One of the significant morphological characteristics of Solenogastres is the integument with a thick cuticle composed of a glycoprotein complex with high concentration of acid mucopolysaccharides, low concentrations of protein (Beedham & Trueman, 1968) and chitin (Furuhashi et al., 2009). The cuticle of Solenogastres contains calcareous spicules of different shapes, originated from the epidermal epithelium (Scheltema, Tscherkassky & Kuzirian, 1994). The surface of most Solenogastres remains clean from bacteria, but microbial associations have been found in three Solenogastres species including Neomenia carinata from soft bottoms at 18–565 m depth (Scheltema, Tscherkassky & Kuzirian, 1994) and two species from hydrothermal vents, Helicoradomenia cf. acredema and Helicoradomenia sp. (Katz, Cavanaugh & Bright, 2006). The bacterial symbionts of the two hot vent Helicoradomenia species had similar morphology and epi- and endocuticular localization (Katz, Cavanaugh & Bright, 2006). Since the epidermis of Solenogastres contains secretory cells (Scheltema, Tscherkassky & Kuzirian, 1994), it is possible that the epicuticular bacteria can obtain energy or/and nutrients from the secreted compounds (Katz, Cavanaugh & Bright, 2006). In its turn, endocuticular bacteria might be chitinolytic, as it is known for many marine heterotrophic bacteria (Cottrell et al., 2000).
The present work was aimed to investigate the diversity of microbial community associated with a new species of Solenogastres, living in marine caves in the area of Marseille (NW Mediterranean Sea). The possible Sonegostres-microorganisms interactions are also discussed.
Material and Methods
All material was sampled in the Calanques National Park, near Marseille, in the middle (ca. 40 m from entrance) and the deep (ca. 60 m from entrance) parts of Jarre cave (17 m depth, 43°11′45′N, 5°22′55′E). Bottom sediment was collected by SCUBA diving with a 20 cm-wide box on ca. one cm sediment depth and a length of 120 cm. In May 2019, 1 specimen was obtained from the middle part and 3 from the deep part of the cave, while in October 2019, 2 were found in the middle and 2 in the deep part. Five specimens were used for morphological studies (two for SEM and three for TEM) and three specimens fixed in 96% ethanol for molecular studies, of the latter one specimen was collected in May and two in October.
Morphological studies
All studies specimens of Tegulaherpia sp. were relaxed before fixation using isotonic to seawater magnesium chloride solution. For transmission electron microscopy, three specimens were fixed in 2.5% glutaraldehyde (Electron Microscopy Supplies (EMS, Pennsylvania, USA) and post-fixed in 1% osmium tetroxide (EMS, Pennsylvania, USA) buffered with 0.1 mol sodium cacodylate buffer. Following steps, dehydration and embedding to the Spurr resin (EMS, Pennsylvania, USA), were performed according to Vortsepneva, Herbert & Kantor (2021).
Ultrathin (70–80 nm) sections were made using a diamond knife (Diatome, Jumbo) and Leica EM UC6 and UC7 ultramicrotomes. All ultrathin sections were contrasted using 1% uranyl acetate and 0.4% lead citrate according the protocol (Vortsepneva, Herbert & Kantor, 2021). Ultrathin sections were examined using a Jeol JEM 1011 transmission electron microscope.
For scanning electron microscopy (SEM) two specimens were fixed using the same protocol as for the TEM, followed by dehydrating and drying as it was performed by (Vortsepneva, Herbert & Kantor, 2021). The specimens were mounted on aluminum stubs, sputter coated with platinum and palladium, and examined using JEOL JSM-6380L (JEOL, USA) and CamScan S2 (Cambridge Instrument Scientific Company, England) scanning electron microscopes.
DNA isolation and sequencing
Three specimens were fixed in 96% ethanol and stored at −20 °C for four to six months. The whole bodies of three Tegulaherpia sp. specimens were used for the study of their microbial communities. Total DNA was isolated with DNeasy PowerLyzer Microbial Kit (Qiagen, Germany) according to the manufacturer’s instructions using FastPrep-24™ 5G bead beating grinder and lysis system (MP Biomedicals, USA). The concentration of isolated DNA was measured using Qubit™ dsDNA HS Assay Kit (Thermo Fisher Scientific, USA) and Qubit 2.0 fluorimeter (Thermo Fisher Scientific, USA). Purified DNA was stored at −20 °C.
Amplicon libraries were prepared as described in Gohl et al. (2016). Two consecutive rounds of PCR were performed on a StepOne Plus Real-Time instrument (Thermo Fisher Scientific, USA) using qPCRmix-HS SYBR mixture (Evrogen, Russia). The primers for the V4 region of 16S rRNA gene (Fadrosh et al., 2014) contained the Illumina TruSeq sequencing primer adapters and 515F/Pro-mod-805R primer sequences (Hugerth et al., 2014; Merkel et al., 2019) were used for the first amplification step: forward primer (5′-TCG TCG GCA GCG TCA GAT GTG TAT AAG AGA CAG NNN NNN GTG BCA GCM GCC GCG GTA A-3′), and reverse primer (5′- GTC TCG TGG GCT CGG AGA TGT GTA TAA GAG ACA GNN NNN NGA CTA CNV GGG TMT CTA ATC C-3′). The first PCR amplification was performed as follows: 32 cycles of denaturation at 95 °C for 25 s; primer annealing at 56 °C for 20 s; DNA synthesis at 72 °C for 30 s, and a final elongation at 72 °C for 20 min. The second PCR stage was performed using barcoding primers as described by Gohl et al. (2016). The second amplification was performed as follows: 10 cycles of denaturation at 95 °C for 20 s, primer annealing at 59 °C for 20 s, DNA synthesis at 72 °C, for 30 s, and a final elongation step at 72 °C for 20 min. The resulting PCR products were used for the preparation of libraries for Illumina sequencing.
High-throughput sequencing of the libraries was performed with MiSeq Reagent Micro Kit v2 (300-cycles) MS-103-1002 (Illumina, USA) on a MiSeq sequencer (Illumina, USA) according to the manufacturer’s instructions.
The raw reads were processed as described in Gavrilov et al. (2019). All the reads of the V4 region of 16S rRNA gene obtained in two replicates for each sample were analyzed using the SILVAngs service with default parameters (https://ngs.arb-silva.de/silvangs/) and SILVA138.1 SSU database. NCBI BLASTn (https://blast.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/Blast.cgi) with various parameters, and databases were used for manual curation of taxonomy of the sequences of interest. The current version of the SILVAngs (as of August 2021) uses the Silva taxonomy that is, in turn, based on the Genome Taxonomy Database (GTDB, https://gtdb.ecogenomic.org/) taxonomy. However, since this taxonomy is still not generally accepted and unfamiliar to a wide range of readers we will use the taxa approved by the Bergey’s Manual of Systematics of Archaea and Bacteria (https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/book/10.1002/9781118960608) indicating the correspondence of taxa in these two taxonomical systems in the results section.
All the obtained sequences were deposited into the NCBI under BioProject accession number PRJNA773997.
Results
External morphology and identification
The length of the Solenogastres specimens collected for this work varied from one to two mm. The body was light-colored and covered by scales (Figs. 1A, 1B), which gave a characteristic shine. The specimens had uniform scale-like sclerites, a distichous radula, lateroventral foregut glands belonging to type A (with ducts and extraepithlial gland cells), copulatory spicules, and the mouth opening separated from the vestibular cavity. These morphological characteristics (Salvini-Plawen, 1986; García-Álvarez & Salvini-Plawen, 2007) allow us to propose a novel Solenogastres species, belonging to the Tegulaherpia genus.
Figure 1. General morphology of sales of Tegulaherpia sp.
(A) Photo light microscopy, (B–D) SEM. a. General view of different in size specimens. b. View from above of the body surface. (C–D) Scales with bacteria on the scales surface. Head arrows labeled bacterial cells.
Integument morphology and microbial cells
Two major morphotypes of microbial cells occurred on the surface of the body, identified with scanning electron microscopy as rods and cocci (Figs. 1B, 1C). Bacterial cells were present at the anterior end and absent at the posterior end of the mollusks (Figs. 1B, 1C).
The study of ultrathin sections of the cuticle, which was 6 µm thick, revealed that the prokaryotes are not only located on the mollusks’ surface but also within the deeper layers of the cuticle of the anterior part (Fig. 2). The microorganisms were distributed unequally through the cuticle: they reached a relatively high density on the dorsal and lateral sides and were practically absent on the ventral side (Fig. 3).
Figure 2. Ultrastructure of the epithelium and cuticle of Tegulaherpia sp.
Transversal section, TEM micrographs. (A) Epithelium and cuticle containing bacteria. (B) Apical part of epithelium and bacteria immersed in epithelial cells (arrow). (C) Epithelium with a hole from forming scale. (D) Cuticle with different morphotypes of bacteria. bl, basal lamina; ep, epithelium; cu, cuticle; mu, muscles; n, nucleus; sc, scale.
Figure 3. Ultrastructure of bacteria associated with cuticle.
TEM micrographs. (A) Cuticle with rods inside and at the upper border of the cuticle. (B) Bacteria with Gram-negative cell-wall type at the upper layer of the cuticle. (C) Rod-shaped or cocci bacteria located within the cuticle. (D) Spirilla, located within the cuticle.
Based on TEM, four main morphotypes of prokaryotes associated with Tegulaherpia sp. were identified: short rods (Figs. 2, 3A, 3C), long rods (Fig. 3B), spirilla-like (Fig. 3D), and cocci (Fig. 2D). Short rods were located inside the cuticle and also appeared to enter the epithelial cells of the mollusk (Fig. 3B). Long rods were only located on the surface of the cuticle (Fig. 3B). This type, as well as cocci, was the most numerous cells, found on the cuticle surface. The average length of the spirilla was 2 µm, and they were located exclusively inside the cuticle. Cocci (1 µm) were less common and were not found in the epithelium.
Microbial community composition
To identify the microbial community associated with Tegulaherpia sp., the amplicons of the V4 region of the 16S rRNA (SSU) genes were sequenced from the total DNA, isolated from the whole bodies of three individual mollusks. The representatives of bacterial phyla Bacteroidetes (26–47%), Proteobacteria (10–32%), Nitrospirae (8–30%), as well as of the archaeal phylum Thaumarchaeota (11–15%), predominated in all samples (Fig. 4).
Figure 4. Relative abundance of prokaryotes, associated with three specimens of Tegulaherpia sp. according to the 16S rRNA gene sequence (V4 region) analysis.
(A) Total community, phylum level; (B) Bacteroidetes (= Bacteroidota in Silva/GTDB) distribution on the level of families; (C) Proteobacteria distribution on the level of orders. Nitrospirae (= Nitrospirota in Silva/GTDB) and Thaumarchaeota (= Crenarchaeota/Nitrososphaeria in Silva/GTDB) were represented by single OTUs (see the text).
Bacteroidetes were represented almost exclusively by an uncultured bacterium of the family Saprospiraceae (93–95% of Bacteroidetes and 25–44% of the total community). Results of manual BLAST of this most abundant OTU, belonging to Saprospiraceae, using the nr/nt database with “type material” limitation resulted in Haliscomenobacter and Lewinella members among the best hits (≤89% of sequence identities with the query). Nitrospirae were represented solely by one OTU, belonging to the genus Nitrospira, which is a second after Saprospiraceae most abundant OTU (8–30% depending on the specimen of Tegulaherpia sp). The classes Alphaproteobacteria and Gammaproteobacteria belonging to the phylum Proteobacteria constituted 3–7% and 7–25% of total reads, respectively. As opposed to all other predominant phyla, Proteobacteria were represented by several dominating OTUs. Alphaproteobacteria were represented by Rhodobacteraceae with 1–2% of the total reads in all three samples, whereas Gammaproteobacteria were represented by the UBA10353 marine group (2–62% of Gammaproteobacteria and 0–6% of the total community), various Enterobacterales (4–69% of Gammaproteobacteria and 0–18% of the total community) with Vibrio sp. as the most numerous representative (22–44% of Enterobacterales and 0–9% of the total community) and the deep lineage SS1-B-07-19 (0–9% of Gammaproteobacteria and 0–3% of total community, depending on the specimen analyzed, Fig. 4). The Archaeal OTU identified in all samples as one of three dominating taxa was classified as Candidatus Nitrosopumilus (11–15% of the total community) belonging to the phylum Thaumarchaeota.
Discussion
The Tegulaherpia sp., collected during this work is the first Solenogastres species found in underwater marine caves of the north-western Mediterranean. This species inhabits the upper layer of soft sediment. According to the content of the intestine (the presence of cnidarian nematocysts in the cells of the intestine), it was assumed that this species feeds on small burrowing Cnidaria, which were also found in this biotope (our own observations). The microscopic studies of all five specimens of Tegulaherpia sp. identified prokaryotes on the surface of the scales and through all the thickness of the cuticle. The microorganisms varied in morphology and localization: long rods and cocci were located on the surface of the cuticle while short rods and spirilla were inside the cuticle. The short rods were also numerous in the apical part of epithelial cells. This distribution of prokaryotes through the body of the mollusk is similar to that of the hot vent Solenogastres belonging to genus Helicoradomenia (Katz, Cavanaugh & Bright, 2006). Despite the fact that all studied individuals contained microorganisms and that microorganisms with different morphology were unequally distributed in the cuticle, we did not find evidences indicating physiological integration, such as would occur in specialized organs.
Association of Solenogastres and microorganisms has been poorly studied so far and based on the Helicoradomenia species living in deep-sea hydrothermal vents (Katz, Cavanaugh & Bright, 2006) and Neomenia carinata inhabiting soft sediments in moderate depths. However, in the latter case the only known fact is that bacteria are associated with the Neomenia carinata mantle epithelium (Scheltema, Tscherkassky & Kuzirian, 1994).
The microbial communities associated with Tegulaherpia sp., detected by 16S rRNA gene amplicons sequencing, are dominated by prokaryotes of the bacterial phyla Bacteroidetes, Nitrospirae and Proteobacteria as well as the archaeal phylum Thaumarchaeota. Similarly to morphological observations, the microbial associates composition was consistent among the three individuals collected at different time, suggesting these associations were not artifactual. The presence of Thaumarchaeota and Bacteroidetes members makes these communities different from the Helicoradomenia sp. where these taxa were not detected (Katz, Cavanaugh & Bright, 2006). In the case of Thaumarchaeota this result seems to be solid since the FISH probe Arch915, used by Katz and co-authors in 2006, is covering (86.1%) Candidatus Nitrosopumilus, what was verified using Silva TestProbe 3.0 (https://www.arb-silva.de/search/testprobe/). In the case of Bacteroidetes,the FISH probe CF319a does not cover (coverage = 1.5%) the Saprospiraceae family. On the other hand a large portion of cells of Helicoradomenia sp. symbionts were unknown bacteria (hybridized with universal bacterial primers but did not hybridize with any of the group-specific primer used by Katz, Cavanaugh & Bright (2006), suggesting at least some of them might be closely related to Tegulaherpia sp. bacterial symbionts including Bacteroidetes representatives.
The most abundant OTUs in Tegulaherpia sp. were related to Saprospiraceae (Lewinella and Haliscomenobacter), Nitrospira and Candidatus Nitrosopumilis. For each of them, symbiotic relationships with higher organisms are known. For instance, members of the genus Lewinella, were isolated from marine mollusks (sea snails) and were able to degrade polysaccharides and proteins (Khan et al., 2007). Their presence in the mollusks might indicate a symbiotic or parasitic relationship with Tegulaherpia sp. based on the degradation of cuticle polymers as chitin (Furuhashi et al., 2009) or glycoproteins with mucopolysaccharides (Beedham & Trueman, 1968). In turn, Haliscomenobacter representatives are widespread in a number of habitats including that of marine origin as marine waters, guts of marine fish (Gao et al., 2020), red algae healthy tissues (Fernandes et al., 2012) and others. Moreover, the dominating microorganisms in Tegulaherpia sp. microorganisms are known to form similar associations with other hosts: the community of a sponge, Cymbastela concentrica, was composed of the chemolithotrophic nitrite-oxidizing bacterium Nitrospira sp., a representative of the family Phyllobacteriaceae (Alphaproteobacteria) and the chemolithotrophic ammonia-oxidizing archaeon Candidatus Nitrosopumilus sediminis AR2 (Thaumarchaeota) (Moitinho-Silva et al., 2017). The sponge-microbial interaction might include production and sharing of various nutrients, e.g., vitamins, as well as redox sensing and response. For instance, Cymbastela concentrica was supposed to contribute to the nitrogen metabolism of these microorganisms by supplying them with organic nitrogen compounds which they convert to ammonium, nitrite and nitrate during nitrification, denitrification and nitrate respiration (Moitinho-Silva et al., 2017).
In this respect the Thaumarchaeota and Nitrospira symbionts of Tegulaherpia sp. most probably contribute to a common nitrogen metabolism with their host whereas Bacteroidetes and Alphaproteobacteria and Gammaroteobacteria members are feeding on the mollusk‘s cuticle polymers or secreted compounds as it was proposed for Helicoradomenia sp. (Katz, Cavanaugh & Bright, 2006).
Altogether, our results document a novel Solenogastres species inhabiting environments so far unknown for these mollusks and possessing unique microbial associations on and within its cuticle. The observed microbial community is different from that found in Helicoradomenia species inhabiting deep sea hot vents. This is likely linked with the difference in the level of energy supply between these two habitats. Both are (almost) light-independent, however, unlike hot vents, underwater caves typically do not provide a constant inflow of reduced compounds needed for chemosynthesis, making cave species solely dependent on scarce organic compounds imported from the outside, which makes these caves similar to deep sea bottom sediments. Further studies are needed to reveal in more details the metabolic characteristics of the dominating microbial symbionts of Tegulaherpia sp. and their functional interactions with their host.
Supplemental Information
results of SilvaNGS profiling of V4 16S rRNA gene amplicon sequences of Solenogastres microbial symbionts.
Acknowledgments
We are grateful to Professor Elena S. Lobakova and Professor Martin V. Sørensen for the fruitful discussions. We express our gratitude to Laurent Vanbostal and Dr. Alexander Ereskovsky for the help in sampling. Logistics and field assistance were provided by IMBE and OSU Institut Pythéas in Marseille, France, through the diving and laboratory facilities at Station Marine d’Endoume and its research vessels Antedon 2 and Astroides and their pilots and crew. Sincere appreciation goes to G. Davidovich, A. Bogdanov and the Electron Microscopy Laboratory of the Shared Facilities Center of Lomonosov Moscow State University and S. Metelev, G. Bykov and I.D. Papanin from the Institute for the Biology of Inland Waters, Russian Academy of Sciences for the help with the electron microscopy. Light microscopy and scanning electron microscopy was made possible at the Center of microscopy, WSBS, MSU.
Funding Statement
This research was carried out as part of the Scientific Project of the State Order of the Government of the Russian Federation to Lomonosov Moscow State University (121032300121-0). The work was supported by RFBR grant # 20-04-01010. Alexandra Klyukina and Ilya Kublanov also received support from the Russian Ministry of Science and Higher Education. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.
Additional Information and Declarations
Competing Interests
Christiane Todt is employed by Rådgivende Biologer AS.
Author Contributions
Elena Vortsepneva conceived and designed the experiments, performed the experiments, analyzed the data, prepared figures and/or tables, authored or reviewed drafts of the paper, and approved the final draft.
Pierre Chevaldonné and Alexander Tzetlin conceived and designed the experiments, performed the experiments, analyzed the data, authored or reviewed drafts of the paper, and approved the final draft.
Alexandra Klyukina performed the experiments, analyzed the data, prepared figures and/or tables, authored or reviewed drafts of the paper, and approved the final draft.
Elizaveta Naduvaeva performed the experiments, prepared figures and/or tables, and approved the final draft.
Christiane Todt analyzed the data, authored or reviewed drafts of the paper, and approved the final draft.
Anna Zhadan performed the experiments, analyzed the data, authored or reviewed drafts of the paper, and approved the final draft.
Ilya Kublanov conceived and designed the experiments, analyzed the data, authored or reviewed drafts of the paper, and approved the final draft.
Data Availability
The following information was supplied regarding data availability:
The raw data are available in the Supplemental File.
References
- Bakran-Petricioli et al. (2007).Bakran-Petricioli T, Vacelet J, Zibrowius H, Petricioli D, Chevaldonné P, Rada T. New data on the distribution of the deep-sea sponges Asbestopluma hypogea and Oopsacas minut a in the Mediterranean Sea. Marine Ecology. An Evolutionary Perspective. 2007;28:10–23. doi: 10.1111/j.1439-0485.2007.00179.x. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Beedham & Trueman (1968).Beedham GE, Trueman ER. The cuticle of the Aplacophora and its evolutionary significance in the Mollusca. Journal of Zoology. 1968;154:443–451. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-7998.1968.tb01676.x. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Bergmeier, Ostermair & Jörger (2021).Bergmeier FS, Ostermair L, Jörger KM. Specialized predation by deep-sea Solenogastres revealed by sequencing of gut contents. Current Biology. 2021;31(13):R836–R837. doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2021.05.031. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Boesgaard & Kristensen (2001).Boesgaard TM, Kristensen RM. Tardigrades from Australian marine caves, With a redescription of Actinarctus neretinus (Arthrotardigrada) Zoologischer Anzeiger. 2001;240:253–264. doi: 10.1078/0044-5231-00033. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Bussotti et al. (2015).Bussotti S, Di Franco A, Francour P, Guidetti P. Fish assemblages of mediterranean marine caves. PLOS ONE. 2015;1:e0122632. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0122632. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Calado, Chevaldonné & Santos (2004).Calado R, Chevaldonné P, dos Santos A. A new species of the deep-sea genus Bresilia (Crustacea: Decapoda: Bresiliidae) discovered from a shallow-water cave in Madeira. Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the U.K. 2004;84:191–199. doi: 10.1017/S0025315404009051h. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Cárdenas et al. (2018).Cárdenas P, Vacelet J, Chevaldonné P, Pérez T, Xavier JR. From marine caves to the deep-sea, a new look at Caminella (Demospongiae, Geodiidae) in the Atlanto-Mediterranean region. Zootaxa. 2018;4466:174–196. doi: 10.11646/zootaxa.4466.1.14. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Chevaldonné & Lejeusne (2003).Chevaldonné P, Lejeusne C. Regional warming-induced species shift in north-west Mediterranean marine caves. Ecology Letters. 2003;6:371–379. doi: 10.1046/j.1461-0248.2003.00439.x. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Chevaldonné et al. (2015).Chevaldonné P, Pérez T, Crouzet JM, Bay-Nouailhat W, Bay-Nouailhat A, Fourt M, Almón B, Pérez J, Aguilar R, Vacelet J. Unexpected records of ‘deep-sea’ carnivorous sponges Asbestopluma hypogea in the shallow NE Atlantic shed light on new conservation issues. Marine Ecology. 2015;36:475–484. doi: 10.1111/maec.12155. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Chevaldonné & Pretus (2021).Chevaldonné P, Pretus JL. Rediscovery of the rare Mediterranean marine cave stenopodid shrimp Odontozona addaia Pretus, 1990, 30 years after its original description (Crustacea: Decapoda: Stenopodidea) Zootaxa. 2021;4950(1):137–148. doi: 10.11646/zootaxa.4950.1.7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Cottrell et al. (2000).Cottrell MT, Wood DN, Yu L, Kirchman DL. Selected chitinase genes in cultured and uncultured marine bacteria in the α- and γ-subclasses of the Proteobacteria. Applied and Environmental Microbiology. 2000;66(3):1195–1201. doi: 10.1128/AEM.66.3.1195-1201.2000. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Fadrosh et al. (2014).Fadrosh DW, Ma B, Gajer P, Sengamalay N, Ott S, Brotman RM, Ravel J. An improved dual-indexing approach for multiplexed 16S rRNA gene sequencing on the Illumina MiSeq platform. Microbiome. 2014;2:6. doi: 10.1186/2049-2618-2-6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Fernandes et al. (2012).Fernandes N, Steinberg P, Rusch D, Kjelleberg S, Thomas T. Community structure and functional gene profile of bacteria on healthy and diseased thalli of the red seaweed Delisea pulchra. PLOS ONE. 2012;7(12):e50854. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0050854. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Furuhashi et al. (2009).Furuhashi T, Schwarzinger C, Miksik I, Smrz M, Beran A. Molluscan shell evolution with review of shell calcification hypothesis. Comparative Biochemistry and Physiology –B Biochemistry and Molecular Biology. 2009;154(3):351–371. doi: 10.1016/j.cbpb.2009.07.011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Gao et al. (2020).Gao YM, Zou KS, Zhou L, Huang XD, Li YY, Gao XY, Chen X, Zhang XY. Deep insights into gut microbiota in four carnivorous coral reef fishes from the South China Sea. Microorganisms. 2020;8(3):426. doi: 10.3390/microorganisms8030426. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- García-Álvarez & Salvini-Plawen (2007).García-Álvarez O, Salvini-Plawen LV. Species and diagnosis of the families and genera of Solenogastres (Mollusca) Iberus. 2007;25(2):73–143. [Google Scholar]
- Gavrilov et al. (2019).Gavrilov SN, Korzhenkov AA, Kublanov IV, Bargiela R, Zamana LV, Popova AA, Peter SV, Golyshin N, Golyshina OV. Microbial communities of polymetallic deposits’ acidic ecosystems of continental climatic zone with high temperature contrasts. Frontiers in Microbiology. 2019;10:1573. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2019.01573. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Gohl et al. (2016).Gohl DM, MacLean A, Hauge A, Becker A, Walek D, Beckman KB. An optimized protocol for high-throughput amplicon-based microbiome profiling. Protoc. Exch. 2016 doi: 10.1038/protex.2016.030. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Grenier et al. (2018).Grenier M, Ruiz C, Fourt M, Santonja M, Dubois M, Klautau M, Vacelet J, Boury-Esnault N, Pérez T. Sponge inventory of the French Mediterranean waters, with an emphasis on cave-dwelling species. Zootaxa. 2018;4466(1):205–228. doi: 10.11646/zootaxa.4466.1.16. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Harmelin (1997).Harmelin JG. Diversity of bryozoans in a Mediterranean sublittoral cave with bathyal-like conditions: role of dispersal processes and local factors. Marine Ecology Progress Series. 1997;153:139–152. doi: 10.3354/meps153139. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Harmelin, Vacelet & Vasseur (1985).Harmelin JG, Vacelet J, Vasseur P. Les grottes sous-marines obscures: un milieu extrême et un remarquable biotope refuge. Téthys. 1985;11:214–229. [Google Scholar]
- Hugerth et al. (2014).Hugerth LW, Wefer HA, Lundin S, Jakobsson HE, Lindberg M, Rodin S, Engstrand L, Andersson AF. DegePrime, a program for degenerate primer design for broad-taxonomic-range PCR in microbial ecology studies. Applied and Environmental Microbiology 80. 2014;16:5116–5123. doi: 10.1128/AEM.01403-14. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Janssen, Chevaldonné & Martinez-Arbizu (2013).Janssen A, Chevaldonné P, Martinez-Arbizu P. The meiobenthic copepod fauna of a marine cave (3PP cave, NW Mediterranean) closely resembles that of deep-sea communities. Marine Ecology Progress Series. 2013;479:99–113. doi: 10.3354/meps10207. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Katz, Cavanaugh & Bright (2006).Katz S, Cavanaugh CM, Bright M. Symbiosis of epi- and endocuticular bacteria with Helicoradomenia spp. (Mollusca, Aplacophora, Solenogastres) from deep-sea hydrothermal vents. Marine Ecology Progress Series. 2006;320:89–99. doi: 10.3354/meps320089. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Khan et al. (2007).Khan ST, Fukunaga Y, Nakagawa Y, Harayama S. Emended descriptions of the genus Lewinella and of Lewinella cohaerens, Lewinella nigricans and Lewinella persica, and description of Lewinella lutea sp. nov. and Lewinella marina sp. nov. International Journal of Systematic and Evolutionary Microbiology. 2007;57(12):2946–2951. doi: 10.1099/ijs.0.65308-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Ledoyer (1989).Ledoyer M. Les mysidacés (Crustacea) des grottes sous-marines obscures De Méditerranée nord-occidentale et du proche Atlantique (Portugal et Madère) Marine Nature. 1989;2:39–62. [Google Scholar]
- Merkel et al. (2019).Merkel AY, Tarnovetskii IY, Podosokorskaya OA, Toshchakov SV. Analysis of 16S rRNA primer systems for profiling of thermophilic microbial communities. Microbiology. 2019;88:671–680. doi: 10.1134/S0026261719060110. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Moitinho-Silva et al. (2017).Moitinho-Silva L, Díez-Vives C, Batani G, Esteves AIS, Jahn MT, Thomas T. Integrated metabolism in sponge–microbe symbiosis revealed by genome-centered metatranscriptomics. The ISME Journal. 2017;11:1651–1666. doi: 10.1038/ismej.2017.25. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Salvini-Plawen (1986).Salvini-Plawen L. Einige Solenogastres (Mollusca) der europäischen meiofauna. Annalen Des Naturhistorischen Museums in Wien. Serie B Für Botanik Und Zoologie. 1986:373–385. [Google Scholar]
- Salvini-Plawen & Oztürk (2006).Salvini-Plawen LV, Oztürk B. New records of Caudofoveata (Falcidens gutturosus, Prochaetoderma raduliferum) and of Solenogastres (Eleutheromenia carinata, spec. nov.) from the eastern Mediterranean Sea (Mollusca) Spixiana. 2006;29(3):217. [Google Scholar]
- Scheltema (2008).Scheltema AH. Biogeography, diversity, and evolution through vicariance of the hydrothermal vent aplacophoran genus Helicoradomenia (Aplacophora, Mollusca) Journal of Shellfish Research. 2008;27(1):91–96. doi: 10.2983/0730-8000(2008)27[91:BDAETV]2.0.CO;2. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Scheltema, Tscherkassky & Kuzirian (1994).Scheltema AH, Tscherkassky M, Kuzirian AM. Aplacophora. In: Harrison FW, editor. Microscopic anatomy of invertebrates. Mollusca. vol. 5. Wiley-Liss; New York: 1994. pp. 13–54. [Google Scholar]
- Sørensen, Jørgensen & Boesgaard (2000).Sørensen MV, Jørgensen A, Boesgaard TM. A new Echinoderes (Kinorhyncha, Cyclorhagida) from a submarine cave in New South Wales, Australia. Cahiers De Biologie Marine. 2000;41(2):167–179. [Google Scholar]
- Todt (2013).Todt C. Aplacophoran mollusks-still obscure and difficult? American Malacological Bulletin. 2013;31(1):181–187. doi: 10.4003/006.031.0110. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Todt & Salvini-Plawen (2005).Todt C, Salvini-Plawen L. The digestive tract of Helicoradomenia (Solenogastres, Mollusca), aplacophoran molluscs from the hydrothermal vents of the East Pacific Rise. Invertebrate Biology. 2005;124(3):230–253. doi: 10.1111/j.1744-7410.2005.00023.x. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Vacelet, Boury-Esnault & Harmelin (1994).Vacelet J, Boury-Esnault N, Harmelin JG. Hexactinellid Cave, a unique deep-sea habitat in the SCUBA zone. Deep Sea Research Part I: Oceanographic Research Papers. 1994;41(7):965–973. [Google Scholar]
- Vortsepneva, Herbert & Kantor (2021).Vortsepneva E, Herbert DJ, Kantor Y. The rhipidoglossan radula: formation and morphology of the radula in Puncturella naochina (Linnaeus, 1771) (Fissurellidae, Vetigastropoda) Journal of Morphology. 2021;282(10):1523–1532. doi: 10.1002/jmor.21402. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Zeppilli et al. (2018).Zeppilli D, Leduc D, Fontanier C, Fontaneto D, Fuchs S, Gooday AJ, Goineau A, Ingels J, Ivanenko VN, Kristensen RM, Cardoso Neves R, Sanchez N, Sandulli R, Sarrazin J, Sørensen MV, Tasiemski A, Vanreusel A, Autret M, Bourdonnay L, Claireaux M, Coquillé V, De Wever L, Durand R, Marchant J, Toomey L, Fernandes D. Characteristics of meiofauna in extreme marine ecosystems: a review. Marine Biodiversity. 2018;48:35–71. doi: 10.1007/s12526-017-0815-z. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Supplementary Materials
results of SilvaNGS profiling of V4 16S rRNA gene amplicon sequences of Solenogastres microbial symbionts.
Data Availability Statement
The following information was supplied regarding data availability:
The raw data are available in the Supplemental File.