Disparities and Racism Experienced Among Older African Americans Nearing End of Life

Abstract

Purpose of Review

The purpose of this review is to examine racism in healthcare as it relates to older African American adults. We focus on health disparities in old age and medical mismanagement throughout their lifespan.

Recent Findings

In the United States there have been extensive medical advances over the past several decades. Individuals are living longer, and illnesses that were deemed terminal in the past are now considered chronic illnesses. While most individuals living with chronic illness have experienced better quality of life, this is not the case for many African American older adults.

Summary

Older African American adults are less likely to have their chronic illness sufficiently managed and are more likely to die from chronic illnesses that are well controlled in Whites. African American older adults also continue to suffer from poorer healthcare outcomes throughout the lifespan to end-of-life.

In the United States overall people are living longer, yet African Americans aged 18–49 are twice as likely to die from heart disease than Whites [1]. This disparity is in part due to younger African Americans being diagnosed with chronic diseases normally seen in older populations [1]. Having lived with chronic diseases longer, African Americans experience significant symptom burden and higher risk of complications as they age in comparison to their non-Hispanic White counterparts [1, 2]. This increased morbidity related to living longer with chronic illness can intensify the suffering older African American patients experience towards the end-of-life (EOL) [3].

The emergence of COVID-19 in early 2020 placed further emphasis on the reprehensible mortality gap between African Americans and Whites as report after report demonstrated Blacks accounted for the highest mortality rate – a rate that was 2.3 times higher than Whites and Asian Americans [4]. These numbers support the notion that the Black Community is facing a syndemic (two concurrent epidemics, in this case COVID-19 and racism). Syndemic theory explains the tendency for multiple co-existing and interacting epidemics to develop under conditions of health and social disparities [5, 6]. With increased COVID-19 exposure and mortality rates intersecting with persistent national health and social inequalities, generated by systemic racism, it is evident that Black Americans live in various degrees of crisis as documented by former Surgeon General, Dr. David Satcher, in a landmark paper [7].

Due to current social, economic, and political structures, many African Americans experience chronic illness within an impoverished environment with decreased access to quality primary care and professional medical support [8]. The purpose of this review is to explore racism in healthcare as it relates to older African American adults’ experience with health disparities and medical mismanagement throughout their lifespan. We will highlight how these detrimental experiences influence the disparities seen in advanced care planning and EOL service utilization, in turn impacting African Americans’ lived experience with serious illness until death. We conclude this article by sharing recommendations to address these concerns, primarily through African American community involvement in the development of culturally responsive programs geared to drive clinician conversations with seriously ill African Americans and their families.

Disparities and the Chronic Illness Experience

Pain Mismanagement

Older African American adults often report experiencing pain levels of five and higher, as well as higher levels of insomnia, depression, and inferior memory quality [9]. Yet, older African American adults are at increased risk of being undertreated for pain. In addition to having their pain under-accessed, they are less likely to receive opioid and non-opioid-based medications [10–12]. A study analyzing data from a dataset within the Baltimore Study of Black Aging series, assessed activities of daily living (ADL) and pain in older African American adults [13]. Results showed that bodily pain and two or more comorbidities were significantly associated with ADL disability. Another study looking at a subset of the Health and Retirement Study (HRS) data in 2010 (n = 1,925) showed that older African American female adults over 65 reported the most chronic pain and higher pain intensity outcomes [14]. Study results showed that over one-third of Blacks in this study described that pain affected their ability to meet their financial needs. A meta-analysis [15] that examined racial differences in osteoarthritis pain between African American/Blacks and Non-Hispanic Whites found higher pain severity in African Americans, and another large study that included 4707 cancer survivors, affirmed that race/ethnicity remain a significant barrier to pain [16]. Pain negatively affects individuals psychologically, physiologically, cognitively, spiritually, and physically, yet pain in older African American adults continues to be undermanaged [12]. This results not only in increased suffering, but also strains relationships with providers leading to distrust of clinicians and the healthcare system [17].

These statistics support the notion that due to the subjective nature of pain, implicit bias in clinicians as well as other negative perceptions of African Americans, including racism, can lead to undertreatment [18, 19]. Prevalent misconceptions among clinicians include the historical misconception that African Americans have a high pain tolerance and do not experience pain sensitivity in the same way that Whites do [20]. Another frequently cited mistaken belief by clinicians is that African American patients in pain are drug seeking, resulting in providers not assessing the pain and also not treating it [21].

Over and above clinicians’ biased misconceptions, are misconceptions perpetuated by researchers who create pain assessment measures. Many pain scales and measures have not been tested for validity and reliability in diverse populations [11]. Not using valid tools in diverse populations can be a crucial contributor to pain being under-assessed and undertreated. All patients deserve the right to have their pain optimally managed. Yet African American patients will continue to be under-assessed and undertreated as long as there is a reluctance by clinicians (and by the healthcare system to hold clinicians accountable) to assess–and adequately treat–these patients for pain.

Poor Communication and Disregard of Cultural, Spiritual and Religious Values of African Americans

A second area in which African Americans experience poorer provision of healthcare is with inferior provider communication, information giving, patient participation, and participatory decision-making compared to White patients [22]. In studies of African American older adults, poorer patient-provider communication was seen when the patient belonged to a racial/ethnic minority group, and if the clinician possessed decreased cultural competence and unconscious bias [23, 24].

The structural influence model of health communication posits that EOL discussions lead to communication goals (including terminal illness awareness, treatment preferences, and do-not-resuscitate (DNR) codes). Social factors greatly influence how EOL conversations go and serve to predict subsequent clinical outcomes. This has been supported by research [25], that found that Black patients who engaged in EOL discussions with their physician were more likely to prefer symptom-directed care than those who did not. Having a DNR order in place neither decreased the likelihood that Black patients would use hospice care in their last week of life nor increased the likelihood that Black patients received EOL care consistent with their preferences.

For many African Americans, EOL care is influenced by religion and spirituality. The Pew Report found that 80% of African Americans are religious [26]. Thus, many African Americans rely on their faith when reflecting on mortality [27]. This faith has sustained African Americans during tumultuous moments from slavery to segregation to current-day events resulting from systematic racism. Thus, spirituality is vital in African American Christian patients’ and families’ lives; and, when they face EOL, they pull from their faith and speak of “miracles” and healing [28].

At end of life, the objective is to provide “goal-concordant” care based on what the patient and family value and want. Despite care that is not goal-concordant being considered as a “medical error” [29], the hope for a miracle and the belief that God is the ultimate decider of who lives and who dies is frequently dismissed and disregarded [27, 29–31]. African American patients and families deserve care that is equitable and preserves the life that their loved one has lived and acknowledges their faith and beliefs [32]. Yet, studies have shown that African Americans have a higher rate of “non-goal-concordant care” than Whites [33].

In summary, despite communication between Black patients and their physician/healthcare providers, health outcome disparities persist. These disparities suggest that there is a deficiency, disregard, and misperception by clinicians. When it comes to concordant care, the goal is not just to have conversations, but to understand and respect the patient and their family’s wishes.

Advance Care Planning

We have presented strong evidence that African Americans are at high risk of suffering disproportionately from substandard, and at times biased, care throughout their serious illness experience. This inferior care results in African Americans being less likely to utilize EOL services compared to Whites [34–37]. Among African Americans, advance care planning (ACP) completion rates are substantially lower [29, 37, 38]. African Americans are more likely to pursue informal EOL planning. Yet even when African Americans have their preferences recorded, they are less likely than Whites to have their preferences upheld by clinicians in hospitals [25].

In a systematic review of the literature focusing on barriers to completing ACP in the African American community, [29] several themes emerged including beliefs about illness, death and dying and suffering; family and community structure; support and burden; religion and spirituality; preferences regarding life-sustaining treatment; health literacy; style of processing and enacting health decisions; communication with medical teams; and attitudes about EOL planning. Based on these findings, the conclusion was that a combination of personal, interpersonal, and system-level factors, including the strong influence of slavery in the US, has shaped African Americans’ beliefs and attitudes about EOL.

In a meta-analysis [39], De Souza et al. found that older African American adults are less likely than their same aged counterparts to complete advance directives. Reasons for this included the avoidance of EOL conversations, miscommunication between providers and patient/caregivers, differing cultural beliefs, and lack of trust for healthcare providers [39, 40]. Since clinicians often rely on the Advance Directive document to guide EOL care, in the absence of such documentation African Americans are less likely to have their treatment preferences observed. Yet a provider engaging in a conversation with the patient and family, in which the patient’s wishes and values are elicited, could easily result in a clear understanding. The key is both having the conversation and respecting the cultural, religious, and spiritual values that originate from the conversation.

Hospice and Palliative Care

African Americans often opt for more intensive treatment options at the EOL. A study with a cohort of 1212 individuals from the Reasons for Geographic and Racial Difference in Stroke (REGARDS 2003—2007) dataset showed that Blacks were more likely to continue treatment at the EOL and less hospice usage than their White counterparts [41]. For older adults with dementia and the likelihood of live discharge from hospice, two studies found that African Americans weresignificantly more likely to experience a live discharge from hospice than Whites; some of these discharges occurred following acute hospitalizations [42, 43]. These findings signify that African Americans experience arduous disruptions in care at EOL resulting in a higher likelihood of them not being able to benefit from these services due to acute hospitalization [43].

Multiple reasons are cited in the literature for the underuse of hospice services. The medical workforce’s demographic composition is a significant factor to discuss. Many African Americans are hesitant to place trust in medical professionals not belonging to the same race; this mistrust is in part due to a long and very painful history of medical segregation, uninformed experimentation, and current exposure to microaggressions and implicit bias [22, 25, 33]. Social-environmental barriers, such as financial burden, care setting or geographic location, and provider communication, have also negatively affected African Americans’ access to EOL services [44]. Finally, the care of African Americans by family members (“who else did we have to depend on?”) for generations continues today, where the older loved one is kept at home with the family caring for him/her, regardless of the sacrifice required (Fig. 1) [45].

Fig. 1.

Racism in Healthcare for the African American Older Adult

Recommendations

Increase Culturally Responsive End-of-Life Programs

African Americans suffer in serious illness and EOL due to a lack of culturally appropriate programs that are designed to address their concerns adequately and equitably. Culture fundamentally shapes how individuals make meaning out of illness, suffering, and dying, [46, 47], and it strongly influences people’s responses to diagnosis, illness, and treatment preferences [48, 49]. Historically EOL care has been rooted in White middle-class cultural and religious values; [30, 50], with a different frame of reference, value system, and life experience than most African Americans [51]. Considering patients’ and families’ cultures is essential in all aspects of palliative care. Palliative care is intended to provide seriously ill older adults with expert care, goals of care discussions, and advance care planning for not only the patient but the caregiver [52]. However, culturally appropriate care models that consider the diverse cultural preferences of seriously ill rural patients and their family caregivers were not available until Elk and team created the first such model, in which community members were the guides for this program, demonstrating its feasibility [45] and currently testing its efficacy [53].

Further efforts are needed to overcome barriers in pain management of African Americans with chronic conditions. One way to do this is to change health care approaches and policies. Recommendations should be based upon metrics that hold organizations accountable for the treatment of pain among all patients. African American patients must have equitable pain assessment and pain treatment [21]. Further research needs to be aimed at using tools in healthcare that capture the voices of minorities.

We also need to extend our efforts to change surface-level content of EOL focused health care education to African American populations. Some studies have attempted this through simple modifications of materials by adding pictures and verbiage that would appeal to African Americans and ensuring that study facilitators represent race and similar participants' social backgrounds [54]. What is missing from these studies is family support and family-centered decision-making, [55] family interconnectedness, and the collectivism valued by African Americans [56]. Therefore, significant efforts must be made to gain insight into African American family members’ cultural values and serious illness preferences. African Americans often value faith, spiritual beliefs, and spiritual leader guidance [30], especially as they cope with illness and make treatment decisions.

The Black Church is among the most important institutions in the African American community, providing spiritual, social, and health benefits. Pastors are key community leaders; their input and involvement can influence health programs’ implementation and outcomes [57]. Acknowledging the cultural perspectives of African American families and pastors who minister to patients is the first step in developing culturally based goals of care interventions. Including these values and spirituality-related elements has the power to improve cognitive, emotional, and behavioral outcomes at EOL and can help overcome multiple barriers to EOL service usage [19, 44, 54].

Honest Communication from Healthcare Team

Numerous studies have reported the importance of honest/frank discussion in ACP [58–60]. Ongoing conversations have been shown to be effective in eliciting preferences at EOL [61, 62]. These gradual and culturally respectful conversations have been helpful in prompting conversations about EOL, and in building trust with African American patients and their families Yet a recent study has found that African African healthcare proxies who engaged in EOL discussions with a healthcare provdider report increased unmanaged needs related to sadness and anxiety [63]. Further exploration of this is required, as it seems these conversations are not meeting the full needs of African American healthcare proxies. Provider communication is key to engaging older African Americans and their caregivers in EOL conversations. When racist perceptions or even stereotypical thoughts impact the communication process, there is increased risk for miscommunication and breakdown of the process [42].

Approaches that consider cultural-related preferences should include the healthcare workers’ involvement from diverse backgrounds to help create advance directives [64]. A diverse workforce can help guide physicians, patients, and proxies towards an optimal representation of care based on their values, including burden and comfort [65], autonomy and dignity [66], and religiosity/spirituality [67]. A diverse workforce not only attracts diverse patient populations but increases patient satisfaction [68]. Studies have also suggested that interdisciplinary teams work to enhance communications [69]. Interdisciplinary teams have several roles. If one discipline cannot reach the patient there is opportunity that another can. These types of teams collectively hold a breadth of knowledge. Through this combined knowledge, the team can provide patients with relevant and timely information. Furthermore, when multiple disciplines work together, it increases patient satisfaction, decreases patient adverse safety events, and improves quality of care [70].

Next, having culturally concordant discussions may be impactful to patient-provider discussions. This may be most helpful in having discussions about prognosis, as well as having conversations that provoke EOL care preferences. Culturally centered conversations allow individuals to integrate their beliefs and values during the treatment plan. When goals and values are elicited, communication is enhanced [71]. With improved culturally concordant communication, patients and families are more likely to understand prognosis and receive useful information about their diagnosis more readily. By understanding, respecting, and honoring the beliefs and values of African American communities, healthcare providers can cultivate cultural preferences into EOL discussions. Future interventions should be directed at training providers in having discussions that incorporate patient beliefs. Trainings based on African American community recommendations [72] are the key as listening to community voices towards health equity.

With the recent pandemic of COVID-19, the peril that the African American community faces are further showcased. With deaths in this community doubling those of deaths in any other race [4], it is important to address that some African Americans’ will lack of trust in the healthcare system. This mistrust in the healthcare system directly contributes to low healthcare utilization, poorer health outcomes, and decreased healthcare literacy [73]. Efforts must be directed towards community outreach and partnerships to raise awareness about the virus and promote health-seeking behaviors. These efforts must be made in a manner that is culturally congruent and incorporates patients’ preference.

Research has shown that organizations who train their providers to incorporate patient preferences into their care delivery experience higher patient satisfaction [74]. The healthcare system needs to take ownership of training its professionals to provide care that is accessible to all cultures. A deep reflection of this construct has been done since the murder of George Floyd and the subsequent awakening in the US and beyond [75]. Anti-racism training programs are proliferating, programs that allow providers to examine themselves and engage in deep reflection into their practice in order to combat implicit and systemic bias [76]. Without the healthcare system and clinicians understanding and self-reflecting on concepts taught through such trainings, our society cannot make advances. Anti-racism training is critical for our country to take steps toward an equitable healthcare system. This includes a need for healthcare providers to learn to recognize and respect the patient burden of slavery and racism. The historic mistrust of the healthcare system further multiplies disparate outcomes in healthcare.

Community Based Participatory Research

For a fundamental shift in EOL health disparities, African American community voices MUST be listened to and involved in the change [77]. One way to systematically include African American agents in program development and implementation is community-based participatory research [78–80]. CBPR consists of obtaining input from and involvement of members of the local community. Utilizing CBPR methods increases the likelihood that the findings will be accepted and embraced by the community. By way of community-based research, the infusion of different African American perspectives, rural, urban, older adults, and young adults, can be gathered. This understanding of their perspective aims to help improve African Americans’ EOL experience drastically [45]. Without these perspectives, any ‘culturally’ developed program loses its authenticity and value (Table 1).

Table 1.

Literature Based Recommendations to address racism in care of African Americans

CATEGORY AUTHOR, YEAR	TITLE	RECOMMENDATIONS TO ERADICATE RACISM
Increase culturally responsive end-of-life programs
Gross et al. [57]	“As a Community, We Need to be More Health Conscious”: Pastors’ Perceptions on the Health Status of the Black Church and African American Communities	1. Interventions using cultural considerations or adaptations promote participation amongst African Americans 2. Interventions should also promote holistic practices and involve key community members, such as pastors
Elk et al. [19]	Social Inequalities in Palliative Care for Cancer Patients in the United States: A Structured Review	1. Palliative care programs should aim to be concordant with cultural preferences for treatment 2. Future research must be directed towards assessing barriers to care
Gardner et al. [44]	Racial and Ethnic Disparities in Palliative Care: A Systematic Scoping Review	1. Practice ought to be directed towards understanding cultural context as a barrier for care at EOL 2. Policies have to be aimed at promoting high quality programs for disadvantaged populations 3. Further research needs to be targeted towards identifying continued barriers to care for minorities
Hart and Matthews [54]	End-of-Life Interventions for African Americans with Serious Illness: A Scoping Review	1. There needs to be a standardized integration of culturally centered EOL programs for African Americans 2. Culturally relevant programs should be used to promote awareness and positive behavioral outcomes
Honest communication from the healthcare team
Cardona et al. [58]	Dissonance on perceptions of end-of-life needs between health-care providers and members of the public: Quantitative cross-sectional surveys	1. Policies are needed to safeguard a supportive environment for EOL discussions 2. EOL discussions should happen early and timely 3. Educational interventions for clinicians can assist in encouraging these conversations
Balaban [61]	A Physician’s Guide to Talking About End-of-Life Care	1. There must be an understanding of how patients and families experience the end-of-life process 2. Providers need to acquire skills that allows for sensitivity in communication, in order for effective communication to evolve naturally
Pfeifer and Head [71]	Which Critical Communication Skills Are Essential for Interdisciplinary End-of-Life Discussions	1. Engage professionals from various disciplines to draw in and have honest conversations with patients and families 2. Provide patients with multiple opportunities for ongoing discussions about prognosis 3. Acknowledge that giving difficult advice is not the end to having prognostic conversations with patients, there must be an opportunity for exploration
Elk et al. [72]	African American Communities Speak to Palliative Care Clinicians: Evaluation of an Innovative Community-Developed Communication Skills Training Program	1. Promote the implementation of provider training programs to increase culturally competent communication 2. Understand the language of communication style from community participants is key to effective conversation
Community based participatory research (CBPR)
Devia et al. [78]	Advancing system and policy changes for social and racial justice: comparing a Rural and Urban Community-Based Participatory Research Partnership in the U.S	1. Use CBPR to partner with communities and systems to provide equitable distribution of resources 2. Use partnerships to develop strategies to address social determinants of health
Sofolahan-Oladeinde et al. [80]	Using community-based participatory research in patient-centered outcomes research to address health disparities in under-represented communities	1. Partner with communities in order to eliminate healthcare disparities in care 2. CBPR is a longstanding and proven method and should be used to achieve patient centered outcomes
Elk et al. [45]	Developing and Testing the Feasibility of a Culturally Based Tele-Palliative Care Consult Based on the Cultural Values and Preferences of Southern, Rural African American and White Community Members: A Program by and for the Community	1. Palliative care programs should be developed in partnership with community members 2. Promote engagement between the community and the healthcare team 3. Programs should be built by and with the community to promote satisfaction with its members

Conclusion

There is an unacceptable difference in the way African Americans receive EOL care. It is critical that systemic racism in healthcare be addressed to ensure equitable care. The first step is recognizing, acknowledging, and respecting the inequity, disrespect, and disregard our African American patients have experienced [81]. Next, systemic and individual racism must be addressed at multiple levels: policy level, institutional level; community wide, and individually. Moreover, institutions must partner with communities to build trust between African Americans and the healthcare system. Finally, and most importantly, the voices of the African American community must be heard, there needs to be more representation of African Americans in healthcare, and partnerships between institutions that provide healthcare and the community must be formed if we are to truly achieve health equity for African Americans at EOL [77].

Authors’ Contributions

All authors served in the development, writing, editing, reviewing, and approval for the submission of this manuscript.

Funding

The authors report no funding supported the development of this manuscript.

Compliance with Ethical Standards

Conflicts of interest/Competing interests

The authors have no conflicts or competing interests to disclose.

Human and Animal Rights and Informed Consent

This article does not contain any studies with human or animal subjects performed by any of the authors.