Skip to main content
Fungal Systematics and Evolution logoLink to Fungal Systematics and Evolution
. 2021 Jun 2;8:9–25. doi: 10.3114/fuse.2021.08.02

Three independent evolutionary events of sequestrate Lactifluus species in Australasia

T Lebel 1,2,3,*, JA Cooper 3, MA Castellano 4, J Nuytinck 5
PMCID: PMC8687060  PMID: 35005569

Abstract

Three Australian species with sequestrate basidiome forms are recorded for the first time in the genus Lactifluus based on nuclear ITS-LSU and morphological data. These species represent three rare independent evolutionary events resulting in sequestrate basidiomes arising from agaricoid species in three different sections in two subgenera. All three species have highly reduced basidiome forms, and no species with intermediate forms have been found. Lactifluus dendriticus is unique in the genus in having highly branched, dendritic terminal elements in the pileipellis. We provide full descriptions of two species: Zelleromyces dendriticus (= Lactifluus dendriticus comb. nov.) in Lactifluus subg. Lactifluus sect. Gerardii, and Lactifluus geoprofluens sp. nov. in Lf. subg. Lactifluus sect. Lactifluus. A reduced description is provided for the third, Lactifluus sp. prov. KV181 in Lf. subg. Pseudogymnocarpi sect. Pseudogymnocarpi, as it is currently known from a single sequence.

Keywords: lactarioid, new taxa, ruffle-like, systematics, taxonomy

INTRODUCTION

Distinguishing species of Lactarius and Lactifluus is difficult enough, but the loss or reduction of macroscopic features in sequestrate species makes them equally problematic to distinguish between genera. In Lactarius, sequestrate basidiome forms are known from three main subgenera: subg. Plinthogalus, subg. Russularia, and subg. Lactarius (Dring & Pegler 1978, Beaton et al. 1984, Desjardin 2003, Nuytinck et al. 2003, Eberhardt & Verbeken 2004, Verbeken & Walleyn 2010, Wang et al. 2012, Verbeken et al. 2014a, b, Sang et al. 2016, Beenken et al. 2016, De Crop et al. 2017, Vidal et al. 2019). All of the Australasian lactarioid sequestrate forms were historically described in the genera Zelleromyces, Arcangeliella or Gastrolactarius, based on morphology, following Northern Hemisphere circumscriptions of genera. Apart from a regional treatment of species of Zelleromyces by Beaton et al. (1984) for Victoria, in which the descriptions and illustrations to six species were provided, Australian species have been little studied. Bougher & Syme (1998) provided a further description of Z. daucinus from Western Australia, Grgurinovic (1997) short descriptions and a key to three South Australian species, and Trappe & Claridge (2003, 2008) descriptions of two more species. However, the diversification of sequestrate basidiome forms in Lactarius in Australasia is known to be high, with eight species currently described and a further 20–25 species remaining to be described (Beaton et al. 1984, Bougher & Lebel 2001, Lebel 2002b, Trappe & Claridge 2003, 2008, Lebel et al. unpub. data). However, no phylogenetic analyses of subgenus or sectional placement has as yet been completed for these taxa or the related epigeal taxa, and species circumscription remains based on morphology.

While conducting research on Australasian sequestrate lactarioid taxa and the Lactifluus clarkeae species complex, DNA sequencing revealed species with affinities to Lactifluus rather than Lactarius. This unexpected finding led us to study their morphological characters in detail, test species delimitation and further examine the phylogenetic relationships between agaricoid and sequestrate Lactifluus species, to determine whether sequestrate forms in Lactifluus are the result of independent evolutionary events, similar to the pattern seen in Lactarius (Verbeken et al. 2014a, Sheedy et al. 2016). Here we provide descriptions where possible and confirm placement of the taxa in different subgenera within Lactifluus.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Morphology

Several hundred collections from Australasian herbaria and fungaria (MEL, PERTH, BRI, AD, HO, CANB, PDD) and material held at Oregon State Herbarium (OSC) were examined from diverse geographic regions and habitat types across Australia. Detailed coordinate and elevation data for collections mentioned here are available online through the Atlas of Living Australia (https://www.ala.org.au/). Collections matching morphological characters of the known Lactifluus related taxa, or with typical Lactifluus pileipellis structure and cystidia form (approximately 35 collections), were examined in greater detail and sampled for DNA sequencing. Macroscopic characters are described and measured from fresh material, field notes of other collectors, or dried herbarium collections. Measurements taken using dried fungarium material are listed as such and are estimated to be approximately 30 % smaller than measurements taken from fresh specimens. This estimate is based on fresh and dry weights of 30 recent collections of lactarioid sequestrate basidiomes. Colours are described in general terms from field observations in daylight conditions. Habitat, associated plant communities, sporulating season, presence and nature of latex, fresh odour, and taste are based on field notes.

Microscopic characters are described from examination of dried fungarium material. Hand-cut sections were rehydrated in 5 % KOH solution then mounted in congo red to observe the hymenium, trama, and pileipellis. Spore size, shape, ornamentation and amyloidity were observed in lamellae tissue mounted in Melzer’s reagent. Measurements of microscopic characters were taken on an Olympus BX-52 microscope at ×400 or ×1 000 using an Olympus DP-73 camera attachment and measurement tools in cellSens standard (v. 1.16). Microscopic measurements are given as a raw range of length × width with mean ± standard deviation (SD) of n measurements in parentheses. The length/width quotient (Q) of individual spores is presented as the raw range of Q values with mean ± standard deviation (SD) of n measurements in parentheses. Basidia, basidioles, and cystidia measurements are given as length (not including sterigmata) × width at widest point, and width at base or apex. Pseudocystidia, laticiferous hyphae, and hyaline hyphae measurements are given as a raw range of diameters. In highly reduced sequestrate basidiomes there is some difficulty in determining position of cystidial elements, thus in descriptions provided here they are referred to as hymenial cystidia.

Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) of gold-sputtered basidiospores mounted on carbon tape was performed using a Thermo Fisher Scientific XL30 FEG microscope (Waltham, USA) at the University of Melbourne Biosciences Microscopy Unit.

All photographs are based on the type collections unless otherwise stated. Names of fungaria are abbreviated according to Thiers (2011) (http://sweetgum.nybg.org/ih/ — continuously updated). We use the abbreviation ‘Lf.’ to distinguish Lactifluus from Lactarius (‘L.’) when discussing species in these genera.

Molecular studies

Protocols for DNA extraction (Qiagen Plant DNeasy kit, Germantown, USA or the EZNA forensic kit, Omega Bio-tek, Norcross USA, for samples older than 1995), PCR, and sequencing followed those in Lebel & Syme (2012) and Lebel et al. (2015) and the references therein. Assembly, manual editing, and preliminary alignment of sequences were performed within Geneious v. 9.1.7 (Biomatters Ltd). Individual alignments for the ITS and LSU were then manually trimmed in BioEdit v. 7.1.3 (Hall 2011) and some final manual editing done in Geneious v. 9.1.7. The concatenated alignment and phylogenetic trees are available from the Landcare Research datastore https://doi.org/10.7931/n4fc-4z93.

Sequences of the ITS and LSU from similar species (based on blast searches), and representative taxa to cover subgenera and sections within Lactifluus were retrieved from GenBank and UNITE (Kõljalg et al. 2013), to generate a concatenated alignment. This was done with the on-line version of MAFFT v. 7 (Katoh et al. 2019). Three species of Multifurca were utilised as outgroup. Novel sequences representing collections from Australasia and other regions generated for this study are listed in Table 1 with relevant GenBank accession numbers, and all sequences utilised in analyses. Sequences labelled as provisional taxa “Lf. sp. 1–13” are numbered according to a broader analysis of Australasian species of Lactifluus which will be published elsewhere; we have retained the numbering convention for consistency.

Table 1.

Specimens used in the phylogenetic analysis, including infrageneric taxon, species (as originally identified in the field or as labelled in GenBank), herbarium numbers and typification, country of origin, and ITS/LSU GenBank accession numbers. New sequences generated for this study are indicated in bold. Abbreviations used: AU - Australia, NZ - New Zealand, NCal - New Caledonia, WA - Western Australia, VIC - Victoria, TAS - Tasmania, SA - South Australia, NT - Northern Territory, NSW - New South Wales, QLD - Queensland, FrIsland - Fraser Island.

(Infrageneric) taxon Species Herbarium or collection number Country GenBank accession numbers
ITS LSU
Multifurca Multifurca ochricompacta BB02107 n/a DQ421984 DQ421984
Multifurca sp. MEL238568 AU MW134734 MW128106
Multifurca stenophylla CWD584 AU JX266628 JX266633
Multifurca zonaria FH12-009 Thailand KR364083 KR364212
subg. Gymnocarpi sect. Gymnocarpi Lactifluus foetens ADK3688 BR Benin KR364022 KR364149
Lactifluus gymnocarpus EDC12-047 GENT Cameroon KR364065 KR364194
Lactifluus tanzanicus TS1277 Tanzania KR364037 n/a
subg. Gymnocarpi sect. Luteoli Lactifluus brunneoviolascens AV13-038 GENT Italy KR364123 KR364246
Lactifluus caliendrifer KW378 GENT Holotype Thailand MK517655 n/a
Lactifluus luteolus AV05-253 GENT USA KR364016 KR364142
Lactifluus russulisporus REH9398 NY Holotype AU KR364097 KR364229
subg. Gymnocarpi sect. Nebulosi Lactifluus chiapanensis V.M.Bandala 4374A GENT Mexico GU258297 GU265580
Lactifluus guadeloupensis RC_Guad11-023 LIP Holotype Guadeloupe KP691412 KP691421
subg. Gymnocarpi sect. Panuoidei Lactifluus panuoides G128 Guyana KJ786647 KJ786551
subg. Gymnocarpi sect. Phlebonemi Lactifluus aff. phlebonemus EDC12-023 GENT Cameroon KR364062 KR364191
subg. Gymnocarpi sect. Tomentosi Lactifluus albens MEL2231695 Type AU_WA MW134740 MW128112
Lactifluus aurantioruber MEL2257827 AU_TAS MW134745 MW128115
Lactifluus clarkeae MEL2101947 Epitype AU_SA MW134754 MW128120
Lactifluus clarkeae PDD102596 NZ MW134770 MW128130
Lactifluus flocktonae MEL2238290 Epitype AU_VIC JX266621 JX266637
Lactifluus psammophilus MEL2238407 Type AU_VIC MW134791 MW128144
Lactifluus pseudoflocktonae MEL2238269 Holotype AU_VIC MW134801 MW128151
Lactifluus sp. 1 environmental sample CMMy30M1 New Caledonia KY774240 n/a
Lactifluus sp. 5 PGK13-130 Nothofagus New Caledonia KP691436 KR605507
Lactifluus sp. 6 environmental sample KT-26 Tristaniopsis New Caledonia LC271308 n/a
subg. Lactariopsis sect. Albati Lactifluus vellereus UE20.09.2004-22 UPS n/a DQ422034 DQ422034
subg. Lactariopsis sect. Edules Lactifluus edulis FN05-628 GENT Malawi KR364020 KR364147
subg. Lactariopsis sect. Lactariopsis Lactifluus annulatoangustifolius BB00-1518 PC Madagascar AY606981 KR364253
Lactifluus velutissimus JD886 Congo KR364075 KR364204
subg. Lactariopsis sect. Neotropicus Lactifluus venezuelanus RC_Gaud11-017 LIP Guadeloupe KP691411 KP691420
subg. Lactifluus sect. Allardii Lactifluus allardii AV05-286 GENT USA KF220015 KF220124
subg. Lactifluus sect. Ambicystidiati Lactifluus ambicystidiatus KUN_F88179 China KR908670 KR908672
subg. Lactifluus sect. Gerardii Lactifluus auriculiformis AV12-050 GENT Holotype Thailand KR364086 KR364216
Lactifluus bhandaryi TENN 051830 Holotype Nepal KR364111 n/a
Lactifluus conchatulus LTH457 GENT Isotype Thailand GU258296 GU265659
Lactifluus coniculus DS07-496 GENT Holotype Sri Lanka GU258236 GU265594
Lactifluus coniculus DS07-497 GENT Sri Lanka GU258237 GU265595
subg. Lactifluus sect. Gerardii Lactifluus dendriticus comb. nov . MEL2063377 AU_VIC MW471118 MW471115
Lactifluus dendriticus comb. nov . MEL2292167_CANB748620 AU_VIC MW471119 MW471116
Lactifluus dendriticus comb. nov . MEL2326248 AU_VIC MW471120 n/a
Lactifluus dendriticus comb. nov . MEL2126553 AU_VIC MW471121 n/a
Lactifluus dendriticus comb. nov . MEL2061947 AU_NSW MW471122 n/a
Lactifluus fuscomarginatus GO2010-144 Mexico KC152157 n/a
Lactifluus genevievae G.Gates_D.Ratkowsky 17-2-2005 AU GU258294 GU265657
Lactifluus gerardiellus KW386 GENT Holotype Thailand KX889845 KX889844
Lactifluus gerardii AV05-375 GENT USA GU258254 GU265616
Lactifluus gerardii Desjardin3630 USA GU258220 n/a
Lactifluus igniculus LE262983 Type Vietnam JX442759 n/a
Lactifluus indicus CAL 1282 Holotype India KU145119 KU145121
Lactifluus leae AV-RW04-90 GENT Thailand GU258244
Lactifluus leae FH12-13 GENT Thailand KF432957
Lactifluus leonardii P.Leonard 35607 AU GU258295 GU265658
Lactifluus leonardii G.Gates 29-1-2002 AU GU258304 GU265664
Lactifluus limbatus DS06-230 GENT Malaysia GU258222 GU265578
Lactifluus limbatus DS06-247 GENT Malaysia GU258223 GU265579
Lactifluus midnapurensis CAL 1516 Holotype India KY785175 KY785177
Lactifluus ochrogalactus E.Nagasawa 80-102 TMI Type Japan GU258280
Lactifluus parvigerardii KUN_F61367 Holotype China JF975641 JF975642
Lactifluus petersenii AV05-267 GENT USA GU258282 GU265643
Lactifluus pulchrellus KW304_FH12-037 GENT Holotype Thailand KR364092 KR364223
Lactifluus raspei EDC14-517 Holotype Thailand KX889849 n/a
Lactifluus reticulatovenosus Horak 6472 GENT Holotype Indonesia GU258286 GU265649
Lactifluus robustus K16053113 China KY353803 KY353806
Lactifluus robustus K15052822 China KY353802 KY353805
Lactifluus sepiaceus MEL2300727 AU GU258293 GU265656
Lactifluus sepiaceus MEL1054958 AU_VIC MW134808 n/a
Lactifluus sepiaceus P.Leonard 40509 NZ GU258287 GU265650
Lactifluus sinensis K15060710 Holotype China KT900208 n/a
Lactifluus sinensis K15070203 China KT900209 n/a
Lactifluus sinensis environmental sample HIB12 China JX457047 n/a
Lactifluus sp. DS06-003 GENT Malaysia GU258231 GU265588
Lactifluus sp. AV05-283 GENT USA GU258259 n/a
Lactifluus sp. DPLewis6983 USA GU258272 n/a
Lactifluus sp. Desjardin3564 n/a GU258273 n/a
Lactifluus sp. 10 P.Leonard 10409 AU JF731001 JF731003
Lactifluus sp. 10 MEL2305122 AU_QLD MW134809 n/a
Lactifluus sp. 10 MEL2332066 AU_QLD MW134810 n/a
Lactifluus sp. 11 PL26078 AU n/a MW128157
Lactifluus sp. 12 R.E.Halling 6800 AU JF731000 JF731002
Lactifluus sp. 13 environmental sample RFLP61 AU DQ388868 n/a
Lactifluus sp. 13 environmental sample Toosoil16 AU KC222796 n/a
Lactifluus sp. 13 environmental sample Toosoil56 AU KC222836 n/a
Lactifluus subgerardii AV05-389 GENT USA GU258271 n/a
Lactifluus wirrabara G.Gates_D.Ratkowsky 12-07-2003 AU GU258306 GU265666
Lactifluus wirrabara G.Gates_D.Ratkowsky 17-01-2002 AU GU258305 GU265665
Lactifluus wirrabara G.Gates_D.Ratkowsky 24-01-2004 AU GU258307 n/a
Lactifluus wirrabara JET943 MEL AU GU258291 n/a
subg. Lactifluus sect. Lactifluus Lactifluus acicularis DS07-456 GENT Thailand HQ318224 HQ318125
Lactifluus acicularis KVP08-033 GENT Thailand HQ318242 HQ318150
Lactifluus corrugis JN2004-015 GENT USA JQ753820 JQ348262
Lactifluus corrugis AV05-291 GENT USA JQ753823 JQ348266
Lactifluus crocatus LTH268 GENT Thailand HQ318266 HQ318181
Lactifluus crocatus LTH202 GENT Thailand HQ318248 HQ318157
Lactifluus dissitus AV-KD-KVP09-082 GENT India n/a JN389035
Lactifluus distantifolius DS07-461 GENT Isotype Thailand HQ318223 HQ318124
Lactifluus distantifolius LTH288 GENT Thailand HQ318274 HQ318193
Lactifluus geoprofluens sp. nov. MEL2145804 Holotype AU_VIC MW471123 MW471117
Lactifluus jetiae MEL2238281 Holotype AU_VIC MW134811 MW128158
Lactifluus jetiae MEL2341759 AU_VIC MW134813 n/a
Lactifluus leptomerus AV-KD-KVP09-130 GENT India JN388971 JN389022
Lactifluus leptomerus AV-KD-KVP09-131 GENT Holotype India JN388972 JN389023
Lactifluus longipilus LTH273 GENT Thailand HQ318276 HQ318195
Lactifluus longipilus LTH168 GENT Thailand HQ318235 HQ318143
Lactifluus maenamensis KD 16-008 India MF928075 n/a
Lactifluus mexicanus Montoya5276 Holotype Mexico MK211181 MK211190
Lactifluus oedematopus AV07-079 GENT Belgium JQ753835 JQ348270
Lactifluus oedematopus RW1228 GENT France HQ318216 HQ318116
Lactifluus oedematopus KVP12-001 GENT Neotype Germany KR364100 KR364232
Lactifluus pagodicystidiatus MEL2121979 AU_VIC MW134815 MW128161
Lactifluus pagodicystidiatus MEL2150777 Holotype AU_VIC MW134816 MW128162
Lactifluus pallidilamellatus Leticia Montoya 4716 Mexico JQ753824 JQ348268
Lactifluus pinguis LTH117 GENT Holotype Thailand HQ318211 HQ318111
Lactifluus pinguis LTH169 GENT Thailand HQ318221 HQ318121
Lactifluus rugulostipitatus MEL2329677 Holotype AU_NT MW134817 MW128163
Lactifluus rugulostipitatus MEL2329673 AU_NT MW134819 n/a
Lactifluus sp. KIINA158 GENT China HQ318225 HQ318126
Lactifluus sp. AV-KD-KVP09-134 GENT India JN388978 JN389026
Lactifluus sp. AV-KD-KVP09-128 India n/a JN389020
Lactifluus sp. AV-KD-KVP09-137 India n/a JN389027
Lactifluus sp. AV-KD-KVP09-129 India n/a JN389021
Lactifluus sp. OSA-My-3993 Japan n/a AB238645
Lactifluus sp. OSA-My-3998 Japan n/a AB238650
Lactifluus sp. OSA-My-4003 Japan n/a AB238655
Lactifluus sp. OSA-My-3994 Japan n/a AB238646
Lactifluus sp. OSA-My-4014 Japan n/a AB238666
Lactifluus sp. OSA-My-4015 Japan n/a AB238667
Lactifluus sp. OSA-My-3999 Japan n/a AB238651
Lactifluus sp. LTH313 GENT Thailand HQ318272 HQ318190
Lactifluus sp. LTH133 GENT Thailand HQ318212 HQ318112
Lactifluus sp. KVP08-006 GENT Thailand HQ318229 HQ318136
Lactifluus sp. LTH231 GENT Thailand HQ318278 HQ318197
Lactifluus sp. LTH123 GENT Thailand HQ318222 HQ318122
Lactifluus sp. LTH294 GENT Thailand HQ318273 HQ318191
Lactifluus sp. KVP08-021 GENT Thailand HQ318233 HQ318140
Lactifluus sp. LTH170 GENT Thailand HQ318252 HQ318165
Lactifluus sp. LTH264 GENT Thailand HQ318264 HQ318179
Lactifluus sp. KVP08-008 GENT Thailand HQ318231 HQ318138
Lactifluus sp. LTH249 GENT Thailand n/a HQ318176
Lactifluus sp. LTH284 GENT Thailand HQ318253 HQ318166
Lactifluus sp. KVP08-026 GENT Thailand HQ318238 HQ318146
Lactifluus sp. DED7577 USA n/a HQ318188
Lactifluus sp. AV05-394 GENT USA GU258300 GU265660
Lactifluus sp. EIU-ASM10990 USA JQ358921 JN940236
Lactifluus sp. AV04-209 GENT USA JN388977 JN388998
Lactifluus sp. EIU-ASM11130 USA JQ358938 JN940223
Lactifluus sp. SAM310809-02 TENN USA MF773609 n/a
Lactifluus sp. MycoMap10398 USA MH975019 n/a
Lactifluus sp. AV05-337 GENT USA JQ753821 n/a
Lactifluus sp. AV04-167 GENT n/a JQ753827 JQ348273
Lactifluus sp. 8 environmental sample RFLP38 AU_QLD DQ388845 n/a
Lactifluus sp. 8 environmental sample RFLP39 AU_QLD DQ388846 n/a
Lactifluus sp. 8 environmental sample RFLP5 AU_QLD DQ388812 n/a
Lactifluus sp. 9 REH9320 NY AU KR364096 KR364228
Lactifluus sp. 9 environmental sample Toosoil58 AU_QLD KC222838 n/a
Lactifluus subvolemus KVP08-048 GENT Slovenia JQ753927 JQ348379
Lactifluus subvolemus LAS75_092-A Sweden n/a JQ348348
Lactifluus versiformis AV-KD-KVP09-047 GENT India JN388964 JN389032
Lactifluus versiformis AV-KD-KVP09-014 GENT Holotype India JN388963 JN389029
Lactifluus vitellinus LTH348 GENT Thailand HQ318251 HQ318164
Lactifluus vitellinus KVP08-024 GENT Holotype Thailand HQ318236 HQ318144
Lactifluus volemus UE09.08.2004-5 UPS n/a DQ422008 DQ422008
subg. Lactifluus sect. Piperati Lactifluus albopicri MDB_F12_18 AU_NT MN598888 MN598864
Lactifluus albopicrus MEL2297391 Type AU_VIC MN598874 MN598855
Lactifluus austropiperatus PERTH07550324 Type AU_QLD MN614115 MN614111
Lactifluus austropiperatus MEL2150778 AU_VIC MN614116 MN614112
Lactifluus dwaliensis LTH67 GENT Thailand KF220108 KF220203
Lactifluus glaucescens M.Lecomte_2002-20-9-3 France KF220031 KF220134
Lactifluus leucophaeus AV97-382 GENT Papua New Guinea GU258299 GU265640
Lactifluus piperatus M.Lecomte_2001-8-19-23 France KF220120 KF220212
subg. Lactifluus sect. Tenuicystidiati Lactifluus subpruinosus KUN_F76034 China KC154110 KC154136
Lactifluus tropicosinicus KUN_F59626 China KC154120 KC154146
subg. Pseudogymnocarpi Lactifluus armeniacus EDC14-501 GENT Holotype Thailand KR364127 n/a
Lactifluus sp. TENN065929 USA KR364102 KR364233
Lactifluus sp. JN2011-012 GENT Vietnam KR364045 KR364171
Lactifluus sp. 7 AQ797939 AU_QLD n/a MW128164
Lactifluus sp. 7 FG2018031 AU_QLD MW134820 MW128165
Lactifluus sp. 7 AQ794627 AU_QLD MW134821 MW128166
Lactifluus volemoides TS0705 Holotype Tanzania KR364038 KR364165
subg. Pseudogymnocarpi sect. Pseudogymnocarpi Lactifluus cf. pseudogymnocarpus AV05-085 GENT Malawi KR364012 n/a
Lactifluus cf. pumilus EDC12-066 GENT Cameroon KR364067 n/a
Lactifluus flavellus MD393 Holotype Togo LK392594 n/a
Lactifluus gymnocarpoides JD885 DR Congo KR364074 n/a
Lactifluus holophyllus ASIS19960 South Korea MF611684 MF611659
Lactifluus holophyllus ASIS22632 South Korea MF611685 n/a
Lactifluus holophyllus SFC20150812-63 Holotype South Korea MF611683 n/a
Lactifluus hygrophoroides AV05-251 GENT USA HQ318285 HQ318208
Lactifluus hygrophoroides EIU-ASM10004 clone c4 USA JQ358911 n/a
Lactifluus longisporus AV94-557 GENT Burundi KR364118 KR364244
Lactifluus longisporus AV11-025 GENT Tanzania KR364054 n/a
Lactifluus luteolamellatus MHHNU8297 China MK167429 n/a
Lactifluus luteolamellatus SFC20150818-39 South Korea MF611680 n/a
Lactifluus luteopus AV94-463 GENT Type Burundi KR364119 n/a
Lactifluus luteopus EDC11-087 GENT Tanzania KR364049 KR364176
Lactifluus medusae EDC12-152 GENT Cameroon KR364069 n/a
Lactifluus pseudohygrophoroides SFC20140821-45 Holotype South Korea MF611682 MF611657
Lactifluus pseudohygrophoroides SFC20150813-71 South Korea MF611681 n/a
Lactifluus pseudoluteopus LTH155 GENT Thailand HQ318286 HQ318210
Lactifluus pseudoluteopus FH12-026 GENT Thailand KR364084 n/a
Lactifluus pseudoluteopus environmental sample CD15 Thailand FJ644702 n/a
Lactifluus rugatus EP 1212_7 LGAM-AUA Greece KR364104 KR364235
Lactifluus rugatus PA2010R Greece MH125243 n/a
Lactifluus rugatus 4_01_2015 Italy KU885436 n/a
Lactifluus sp. environmental sample L7524_Russ MAD37 Madagascar FR731264 n/a
Lactifluus sp. environmental sample T071b Thailand JN969388 n/a
Lactifluus sp. MycoMap6251 USA MK560130 n/a
Lactifluus sp. MycoMap6284 USA MK560131 n/a
Lactifluus sp. FLAS-F-61011 USA MH016945 n/a
Lactifluus sp. KUNF58696 n/a KC154100 n/a
Lactifluus sp. KV181 AU_NSW MW471124 n/a
Lactifluus sudanicus AV11-174 MD105 Togo HG426469 KR364186
Lactifluus sudanicus MD148 Togo HG426476 n/a

Phylogenetic analyses of the concatenated ITS+LSU alignment was performed with Maximum Likelihood (ML) in RAxML v. 8.2.12 (Stamatakis et al. 2014) using the CIPRES Science Gateway v. 3.3 (Miller et al. 2010). The final alignment comprised 211 specimens (195 ITS and 146 LSU sequences), consisting of 2 087 bp including gaps. Gaps in alignments were treated as missing data. The tree was visualised in FigTree v. 1.4.2 (Rambaut 2009).

RESULTS

Sequestrate forms arose independently in at least three sections in two subgenera of Lactifluus: subg. Lactifluus sect. Gerardii (Lf. dendriticus comb. nov.) and sect. Lactifluus (Lf. geoprofluens sp. nov.), and subg. Pseudogymnocarpi sect. Pseudogymnocarpi (Lf. sp. prov. KV181). Lactifluus dendriticus comb. nov. appears to be a wide-spread species from eastern Australia, ectomycorrhizal with Eucalyptus and Acacia. It is in a strongly supported clade, sister to Lf. wirrabara, three provisional Australian species with agaricoid basidiomes (Lf. sp. prov. 10–12), an environmental sequence with unknown basidiome form Lf. sp. prov. 13 from Australia, Lf. limbatus from Malaysia, Lf. sinensis from China, Lf. coniculus from Sri Lanka, and Lf. midnapurensis from India in section Gerardii (Fig. 1). All of these Asian taxa are associated with lowland tropical rainforest dominated by Dipterocarp taxa (Stubbe et al. 2012, Song et al. 2017, Phookamsak et al. 2019).

Fig. 1.


Fig. 1.

Maximum Likelihood tree based on ITS and LSU sequences for subgenus Lactifluus sections Gerardii, Piperati, Ambicystidiati, and Allardi; subgenus Gymnocarpi sections Tomentosi, Phlebonemi, Panuioidei, Nebulosi, Luteoli, Gymnocarpi, and Lf. vellereus from Lf. sect. Albati, subg. Lactariopsis, with outgroup Multifurca. Bold lines indicate ML support ≥ 90 %. Bold text sequences of sequestrate taxa generated for this study. Red text: Australian specimens or sequences, blue text: New Zealand specimens, green text: New Caledonia specimens or sequences.

Lactifluus geoprofluens sp. nov. is in a weakly supported clade with two agaricoid species Lf. jetiae nom. prov. (Fig. 3C) and Lf. rugulostipitatus nom. prov. (in press; these provisional species will be published elsewhere), a third provisional species known only from environmental sequences (Lf. sp. prov. 8), several undescribed taxa with agaricoid basidiomes from Thailand and Japan, and Lf. distantifolius and Lf. Longipilus (Fig. 2). More data are required to reliably recognise sister relationships as branch support values are low in this mixed clade of mostly undescribed taxa.

Fig. 3.


Fig. 3.

Basidiomata of new sequestrate species and representative agaricoid species. A. Lactifluus wirrabara (JET 943; photo J.E. Tonkin). B. Lf. dendriticus (photo T. Lebel). C. Lf. jetiae (photo J.E. Tonkin). D. Lf. geoprofluens (photo L. Vaughan). E. Lf. rugatus (photo U. Pero). F. Lf. sp. prov. KV181 (photo T. Lebel). Scale bars = 10 mm

Fig. 2.


Fig. 2.

Maximum Likelihood tree based on ITS and LSU sequences for subgenus Lactifluus sections Lactifluus and Tenuicystidiati; and subgenus Pseudogymnocarpi section Pseudogymnocarpi and an unnamed clade, and exemplars from sections Lactariopsis, Neotropicus and Edules. Bold lines ML ≥ 90 %. Bold text sequences generated for this study. Red text: Australian specimens or sequences.

A single sequence of the sequestrate Lactifluus sp. prov. KV181 is in a clade with a mix of species from diverse geographic locations, Lf. pseudoluteopus from Thailand, Lf. hygrophoroides from North America, Lf. rugatus from Southern Europe, and Lf. holophyllus and Lf. luteolamellatus from South Korea in sect. Pseudogymnocarpi. While we did take a small sample for DNA in the field, unfortunately, the single collection of Lf. sp. prov. KV181 was destroyed by mould contamination after drying and discarded, and no further collections of this sequestrate taxon were found while looking through abundant material of sequestrate lactarioid taxa in herbaria. Thus while a full description cannot be provided at this time, we do provide a photo of basidiomes, and a partial description, in the hope that further material will be found.

Taxonomy

Section Gerardii

Lactifluus dendriticus (T. Lebel) T. Lebel, J. Cooper & Nuytinck, comb. nov. MycoBank MB 838127. Figs 3B, 4A–F.

Fig. 4.


Fig. 4.

Lactifluus dendriticus. A. Cross-section of pileipellis with dendritic terminal elements. B. Scalp section showing dendritic terminal elements. C. Dendritic terminal elements. D. Basidiospores. E. Hymenial trama with pseudocystidia. F. Scanning Electron Microscopy photo micrograph of basidiospores. Scale bars: A–D, F = 10 μm, E = 50 μm.

Basionym: Zelleromyces dendriticus T. Lebel, Australasian Mycologist 21: 4. 2002. figs 14. MB 373383.

Etymology: The specific epithet, “dendriticus” (L), refers to the dendritic terminal element of the pileipellis.

Diagnosis: This species can be distinguished by the pale sequestrate basidiomes, unique dendritic terminal elements forming a short turf in the pileipellis, and globose spores.

Typus: Australia, Victoria, Errinundra National Park, The Gap Scenic Reserve, Gunmark Road, 1.3 km southeast of Survey Road, Claridge site 124, 28 May 1996, A. Jumpponen & J. Trappe 18478 (holotype MEL 2063482, isotype OSC 80519).

Basidiomes hypogeal, sequestrate, 5–25 × 5–20 mm, globose to subglobose, slightly irregular or furrowed near point of attachment; locules exposed at point of attachment in some basidiomata as pileus is incomplete, surface dry, smooth to minutely fibrillose or verrucose, white with a faint yellowish tinge and often with small darker yellow-brown patches, pileipellis thin, off-white in cross-section. Hymenophore loculate, locules large 0.5–2 mm diam, somewhat irregular, white when young, becoming pale yellow to pale brown-yellow with maturity, pale tan when dried. Stipe-columella absent. Latex scant to abundant, white, unchanging. Taste mild. Odour mildly sweet, pleasant. Basidiospores 9.0–10.8 × 8.5–10.6 μm ( =9.8 ± 0.53 × 9.69 ± 0.64, n = 50), globose [Q=1.0–1.05 ( = 1.01 ± 0.02, n = 50)], walls weakly amyloid, ornamentation a fine, complete to almost complete regular mesh reticulum ± 0.5–0.7 μm high, with few scattered, isolated warts also present; hilar appendix small, central, plage absent. Basidia 33–65 × 7–13 μm, elongated clavate to cylindrical or rarely narrowly ventricose, hyaline, thin-walled, with 2 or 4 robust, slightly curved sterigmata 4–10 × 2–3.5 μm. Hymenophoral trama 14–22 μm wide, a narrow central strand of crowded, hyaline hyphae 2–4 μm diam, with slightly thickened walls intermixed with scattered sinuous laticiferous hyphae 3–7.5 μm diam, sphaerocytes absent; subhymenium 15–35 μm wide, with two or three tiers of ± isodiametric cells 8–15 μm diam. Pseudocystidia absent or when present, 5–11 μm diam, thin-walled, cylindrical to narrowly clavate, scattered, with oily refractive contents; arising in trama from laticiferous hyphae extending up through the subhymenium. Pileipellis 18–45 μm wide, composed of a very narrow cutis with an almost complete turf of thick-walled (throughout length) dendritic terminal elements and scattered rare laticiferous hyphae when young, this turf becoming patchy as basidiomata expands; no gelatinous matter or very little in some basidiomes apparent amongst terminal elements dendritic terminal elements less branched and intricate when young, variously and often elaborately branched when older, coralloid to irregularly repeatedly branched with coralloid tips, 18–32 μm high, 4–25 μm wide, 3–6 μm at base, walls thick. Pileus trama 32–60 μm wide, of tightly interwoven, subgelatinous, hyaline hyphae 2–4 μm diam, more crowded towards the surface than within, with scattered to common, sinuous laticiferous hyphae 3–8 μm diam, refractive in KOH; sphaerocytes absent.

Ecology and Distribution: Sporulating in April–July in small to large groups, at mid to higher elevations in the mountains of south eastern Australia in Victoria, Tasmania, and New South Wales. Hypogeal in mixed forests of Eucalyptus fastigata, E. cypellocarpa, E. radiata, E. dalrympleana, E. globoidea, E. obliqua, E. pauciflora, E. stellulata, E. regnans, Acacia dealbata, A. melanoxylon, A. aculeatissima, A. cognata, or A. mearnsii.

Additional specimens examined: Australia, Victoria, Kinglake National Park, 120 m down Mountain Creek Track, 8 Jul. 1993, M.A. Castellano OSC 80520 (MEL 2063479); East Gippsland, Errinundra National Park, The Gap Scenic Reserve, Gunmark Road, 1.3 km SE of Survey Road, Claridge Site 124, 30 May 2003, A.W. Claridge, W. Colgan III, A. Jumpponen, I. Kratzer AWC5079 (CANB 748631); ibid., Gap Road, 50 m E of Bonang River Bridge, Claridge Site 117, 9 May 2003, A.W. Claridge AWC4731 (CANB 65451); ibid. Claridge Site 117, 27 May 1999, J.M. Trappe AWC2589 (MEL 2105044); ibid., 27 May 1999, J.M. Trappe AWC2588 (MEL 2105043); ibid., Gap Road, 3.9 km E of Bonang Highway, Claridge site 118, 28 May 1996, J.M. Trappe 18434 (MEL 2063477); ibid., Gap Road, 2.1 km west of track to Result Creek Falls, Claridge Site 138, 11 Jun. 1996, J.M. Trappe 19022 (MEL 2063472); ibid., Gap Road, 5.2 km E of Junction with Bonang Highway, Claridge Site 119, 9 May 2003, J.M. Trappe & A.W. Claridge AWC4741 (DAR 76661, CANB 748620, MEL 2292167) (also in K, NY, BPI, FH); ibid., Claridge Site 119, 26 May 2001, T. Lebel AWC3994 (CANB 736252); ibid., Gap Road, 2.1 km west of track to Result Creek Falls, Claridge Site 138, 11 Jun. 1996, A.M. Jumpponen JMT19021 (MEL 2063473); Rich Forest Management Block, Jack Road, 0.7 km N of Winter Road, Claridge Retrospective Study Site R19, 27 Apr. 1996, A.W. Claridge AWC352 (CANB 669623); Lind National Park, Euchre Valley Road, 0.2 km W of Junction with Lind Park Road, Claridge Site 74, 29 May 1999, A.W. Claridge AWC2746B (MEL 210507); Murrungowar Forest Management Block, Princes Highway, 0.4 km E of Junction with Bendoc Ridge Road, Claridge Site 64, 26 May 1999, T. Lebel AWC2556 (MEL 2105041); 2.4 km N of Baw Baw National Park,16 Jun. 1994, J.M. Trappe H6792 (PERTH 7593031); 20 km west of Mansfield near Mt Buller, 9 Jul. 1993, T. Lebel JMT14063 (MEL 2063478); Alpine National Park, Black Mountain Road, Rams Horn Track. Claridge Site No. 78, 11 Nov. 2008, A.W. Claridge JMT18089 (MEL 2326248); Noojee State Park, ca. 1 km from Tooronga Road, along Link Road in small carpark area, 25 Feb. 2002, S.H. Lewis 791 (MEL 2061947); North east of Marysville on Lady Talbot Drive, wishing Well Track, 19 Apr. 1999, T. Lebel TL5 (MEL 2063377); New South Wales, Bombala, Bondi Gulf Nature Reserve, Bondi Gulf Road, 4 km E of Cann Valley Highway, Claridge Site 53, 15 Jun. 1999, J.M. Trappe AWC2972 (CANB 748185); Tasmania, Break O’Day, Elephant Pass, 16 kms southeast of St Marys, 2 May 1990, N. Malajczuk MEL 2063481; Elephant Pass, 2 May 1990, J.M. Trappe H1373 (PERTH 7673167).

Notes: A revised description of Lactifluus dendriticus is provided here to enable better comparisons to other taxa, and to incorporate more data from fresh collections. Detailed illustrations of spores, pileipellis and hymenophore structure and constituent elements were provided as part of the original description (Lebel 2002). Lactifluus dendriticus is widespread in eucalypt forests occurring in regions with relatively higher rainfall. Its basidiomata do not always produce a latex when cut or bruised. Microscopically, Lactifluus dendriticus is unique, with distinct highly branched pileal terminal elements (Fig. 4A–C) that have not been observed in any other species of sequestrate or currently known agaricoid Russulales taxa.

Taxa in the larger clade, Lactifluus wirrabara, Lf. limbatus, Lf. coniculus, Lf. sinensis, and Lf. midnapurensis all have brownish agaricoid basidiocarps (Fig. 3A), and spores with a low almost complete to complete reticulum; however these species have smaller, subglobose to broadly ellipsoid spores, and very different pileicystidia or pileal terminal elements.

Section Lactifluus

Lactifluus geoprofluens T. Lebel, Castellano, Claridge & Trappe, sp. nov. MycoBank MB 838126. Figs 3D, 5A–F.

Fig. 5.


Fig. 5.

Lactifluus geoprofluens A. Lampropallisade pileipellis terminal elements (te), subpellis (sp) and context (c). B. Pileipellis terminal elements (te) and subpellis (sp). C. Hymenial trama. D–E. Basidiospores. F. Scanning Electron Microscopy photo micrograph of basidiospores. Scale bars: A, C = 50 μm; B = 20 μm; D–F =10 μm.

Etymology: The species epithet, “profluens”, from Latin, meaning “freely flowing” referring to the abundantly flowing latex in cut basidiomes of this species, and “geo” in reference to the hypogeal basidiomes.

Diagnosis: Differs from other currently known lactarioid sequestrate taxa by the faint fishy odour, abundant white latex, globose to occasionally barely subglobose basidiospores, up to 10.5 × 10.0 μm, ornamented with a robust amyloid reticulum, and presence of dendritic pileal terminal elements

Typus: Australia, Victoria, East Gippsland, Rich Forest Management Block, near Jack Road 0.7 km N of junction with Winter Road, Claridge site R19, 29 Feb. 1996, A.W. Claridge AWC201 (holotype MEL 2145804).

Basidiomes hypogeal, sequestrate, 5–15 mm broad, globose to subglobose or irregular, surface dry, smooth to rugulose and irregularly folded radially particularly around the point of attachment to substrate, minutely pruinose and velutinous, pale orange-ochre to almost reddish-brown in folds; pileus in cross-section thin (≤ 0.5 mm), pale orange becoming orange-brown in dried specimens. Hymenophore loculate, locules 0.5–2 mm, labyrinthine and vaguely radial from columella attachment, pale orange-ochre to reddish orange-brown. Stipe-columella present or absent, much reduced if present and variable, 0.5–3 mm long × 0.5–2 mm wide, irregularly cylindrical, slightly tapering towards the base, orange-ochre to reddish-brown in patches, minutely pruinose and finely rugulose; context golden to reddish-brown. Latex white, unchanging, abundant along the pileipellis edges and the interior of the hymenophore. Taste mild. Odour not obvious or slightly fishy when fresh. Basidiospores 8.0–10.5 × 8.0–10.0 μm ( = 9.85 ± 0.43 × 9.79 ± 0.35, n = 40), globose to occasionally barely subglobose [Q = 1.00–1.05 ( = 1.02 ± 0.02, n = 40)], walls amyloid between ridges and plage distally to completely amyloid, ornamentation reticulate with ridge apices to 1 μm tall. Basidia 31–52 × 8–14 μm ( = 44.18 ± 5.33 × 11.25 ± 1.08, n = 19), 3–6 μm wide at base ( = 3.87 ± 0.54, n = 16), clavate, mostly 4-spored but occasionally 3-spored; sterigmata 3–10 × 1–2.5 μm, ( = 7.18 ± 2.20 × 2.00 ± 0.51, n = 12); basidioles 30–51 × 6–11 μm ( = 39.89 ± 4.46 × 9.14 ± 1.41, n = 14), 2–5 μm wide at base ( = 3.36 ± 0.74, n = 14), cylindrical to barely clavate. Hymenophoral trama comprised of interwoven and parallel tightly packed hyphae 2–3 μm diam, interspersed with sinuous laticiferous hyphae 5–7 μm diam ( = 5.64 ± 0.31, n = 8) and occasional sphaerocytes 30–45 × 17–38 μm; subhymenium composed of chains of 3–4 inflated cells 8–21 × 6–17 μm ( = 11.30 ± 6.70 × 10.40 ± 5.72, n = 18), laticiferous hyphae present and occasionally extending into pseudocystidia 3–8 μm diam., thin-walled, cylindrical to slightly tortuous, with oily refractive contents. Hymenial cystidia scarce, when present not well differentiated, 31–52 × 7–11 μm ( = 46.34 ± 4.78 × 9.56 ± 1.16, n = 12), subcylindrical tapering to apex, apex mucronate or obtuse, rarely emergent above hymenium, hyaline, thin-walled, contents scattered when present. Pileipellis a lampropalisade; subpellis composed of 3–6 layers of thin-walled polygonal cells 8–19 × 7–17 ( = 15.02 ± 3.28 × 13.20 ± 2.06, n = 12) μm; lamprocystidia 18–27 × 2–5 μm ( = 24.32 ± 4.12 × 3.73 ± 1.02, n = 15), elongate cylindrical and slightly sinuate, tapering toward apex, apex mucronate or capitate or obtuse, thick-walled, basal width 2–5 μm ( = 3.73 ± 1.02, n = 15), and apical width 1–3 μm ( = 1.59 ± 0.35, n = 15); pileus trama similar to hymenophoral trama, heteromerous, hyphae tightly compressed and interwoven, sphaerocytes not abundant.

Ecology and distribution: Sporulating in February–June in cool temperate forests in NE Victoria. Hypogeal in mixed forests of Eucalyptus maculata, E. muellerana, E. paniculata, E. obliqua, E. cypellocarpa, E. delegatensis, Angophora floribunda, E. longifolia, E. muellerana, E. sieberi, E. baxteri, E. botryoides, with an Acacia cognata, A. verticillata, A. melanoxylon, A. mucronata, A. longifolia, A. mearnsii, A. implexa understorey.

Additional specimens examined: Australia, Victoria, East Gippsland, Mimosa Rocks National Park, Tanja-Tathra Road, 0.5 km N of junction with track Leading to ‘Gillards’, Claridge Site 40, 7 Jun. 2003, J.M. Trappe, A.W. Claridge, A. Jumpponen AWC5539 (OSC 148637); ibid., Murrangowar Forest Management Block, Bendoc Ridge Road, 0.4 km from Princes Hwy, Claridge Site 66, 2 Jun. 2003, M. Vavrek AWC5306 (OSC 148635); ibid., Cape Conran-Sydenham Inlet Coastal Park, Swampy Creek trail, Crossing of Swampy Creek, Claridge site 128, 31 May 2003, A. Jumpponen AWC5204 (OSC 148634); ibid., East Gippsland, Rich Forest Management Block, junction of Mills Road and Jack Rich Divide Track, Claridge Retrospective study site R8, 18 Jul. 1996, B. Gunn JMT19613 and AWC452 (OSC 159173); ibid., Nunniong Forest Management Block, off Nunniong Road, Claridge site 106 (relocated 1999), 18 May 2001, T. Lebel AWC3614 (OSC 148633); Ben Boyd National Park, Bittangabee Picnic Area, Bittangabee Creek, Crossing of Walking Track leading N from Picnic Area, Claridge Site 52, 4 Jun. 2003, A. Jumpponen AWC5415 (OSC 148636); Lind National Park, Euchre Valley Road, 0.2 km W of Junction with Lind Park Road, Claridge site 13 (1999 relocation), 29 May 2001, W. Colgan III AWC4223 (OSC 148632).

Notes: This hypogeous, sequestrate fungus is known from cool-temperate mixed species Eucalyptus forest in East Gippsland, Victoria. It differs from the other two sequestrate taxa in often having a distinct columella, radial-locular hymenophore and abundant white latex in all tissues. Lactifluus geoprofluens shares with other species in Lactifluus section Lactifluus the fishy odour, velutinous orange-brown pileus and a lampropalisade pileipellis structure. The basidiospores in Lf. geoprofluens are large (up to 10.5 × 10 μm) and globose (Q = 1–1.05), unique among the Australian section Lactifluus species.

Section Pseudogymnocarpi

Lactifluus sp. prov. KV181 Fig. 3F.

Basidiomes sequestrate, up to 19 mm broad, globose to subglobose, surface dry, smooth to minutely pruinose and velutinous, pale creamy yellow-tan with some minor slightly darker bruising; pileipellis in section thin (≤ 0.5 mm), pale tan. Hymenophore loculate, empty locules 0.5–2 mm, labyrinthine, orange-ochre. Stipe absent; columella present, percurrent central strand, 0.5–2 mm wide, white to pale cream. Latex white turning slightly yellowish, abundant, particularly along the pileipellis edges and the interior of the hymenophore near columella. Taste mild. Odour faint, fungal.

Distribution and habitat: Sporulating in June in cool temperate open woodland in the eastern tablelands of New South Wales. Hypogeal in mixed Eucalyptus forest.

Sequence data: Australia, New South Wales, Gibraltar Range National Park, Mulligans Dr., 16 Jun. 2006, K. Vernes, T. Lebel & A. O’Malley KV181.

Notes: We provide the image of the basidiome and general notes in the hope that further material will be found. Our analyses show that this taxon is in a strongly supported section Pseudogymnocarpi, however support values within the clade are low (Fig. 2). The majority of agaricoid species currently known within this clade (e.g. Lf. rugatus, Lf. pseudoluteopus, Lf. hygrophoroides) have pale orange to orange-red pilei and stipe, pale coloured lamellae, abundant white latex (Fig. 3E), and an association with Fagaceae or Pinaceae. The lack of microscopic detail, and additional data for Australasian agaricoid taxa or environmental sequences, precludes any statements regarding how well this sequestrate taxon fits in this clade generally.

DISCUSSION

Both agaricoid and pleurotoid basidiome forms have been found in Lactifluus. In this predominantly agaricoid genus, the pleurotoid habit has at least seven different origins in three subgenera: subg. Lactifluus section Gerardii, subg. Lactariopsis and subg. Gymnocarpi (De Crop et al. 2017). No pleurotoid forms are thus far known in Lactarius, but they have been found in Russula (Buyck & Horak 1999, Henkel et al. 2000). Before the present study, sequestrate forms were not known from Lactifluus, but have evolved many times over in Lactarius; the evolution of a sequestrate basidiome form thus appears to be a rare event in Lactifluus.

All three sequestrate Lactifluus species have a phylogenetic affinity with Southeast Asian taxa. Some, like Lf. geoprofluens and Lf. dendriticus, probably evolved in Australia from local ancestors (that have a SE Asian descent - or other way around; cannot be determined at this point). However, the isolated position of Lf. sp. prov. KV181 is intriguing, as apart from Asian relatives, a European and a North American species are also closely related. This could be due to under sampling of the Australian and Malesian taxa in particular. However, placement within section Pseudogymnocarpi is well supported (BS 98 %).

While the number of species in Lactarius with sequestrate basidiome forms is much greater (in the order of 25–30 undescribed and nine named species known for Australasia; and a further 22 spp. worldwide) than in Lactifluus, all sequestrate taxa also appear to have evolved as independent and isolated incidents within the genus (Trappe et al. 2002, Desjardin 2003, Verbeken et al. 2014a, Sheedy et al. 2016). None of the sequestrate taxa have evolved into a clade containing a large diversity of species with similar basidiome forms, all indicative of relatively recent origin of this basidiome form in Lactarius (Verbeken et al. 2014a) and Lactifluus. The recent description of several sequestrate Lactarius from tropical forests (Verbeken et al. 2014a, b, Buyck et al. 2017), and discovery of hidden diversity of Australasian Lactifluus species lend support to the theory that sequestrate basidiome forms are essentially an excellent way to maintain a fairly constant relative humidity in the enclosed hymenophore, allowing full development of spores to ensue, regardless of arid, seasonally dry or tropical, seasonally waterlogged conditions (Beever & Lebel 2014).

Unsurprisingly, given the trouble with morphological differentiation of Lactifluus and Lactarius agaricoid species, it is also difficult to distinguish taxa with sequestrate basidiomes. As a broad generalisation, in Australia, the majority of sequestrate Lactarius have yellow to orange to red tinged basidiomes, whereas two of the three Lactifluus taxa described in this study have white to pale cream basidiomes. Pale basidiome colouring is more common in Australasian sequestrate russuloid taxa (Beaton et al. 1984, Lebel & Trappe 2000, Lebel & Castellano 2002, Lebel 2002a, b, 2003a, b, Lebel & Tonkin 2007). General trends in microscopic differentiation between Lactarius and Lactifluus were formulated by Verbeken & Nuytinck (2013) and can be summarised as: (i) thick-walled elements in the pileipellis and stipitipellis, as well as lamprocystidia, are generally present in Lactifluus and very rarely observed in Lactarius, and (ii) a hymenophoral trama composed of sphaerocytes (as in Russula) is common in Lactifluus but is rarely observed in Lactarius. Both trends don’t seem to hold up for the sequestrate Lactifluus species. The loss of thick-walled elements in pileus and hymenium in sequestrate forms could be due to increased folding and loculisation of the hymenophoral trama in combination with loss of ballistospory (i.e. no longer require spacing to allow for spore drop). As the basidiomes are submersed in the soil, dispersal of spores by vectors such as marsupial mammals or insects, is highly likely; by having thin walls the ripe basidiomes would be easier to break open or eat. The highly branched, angular pileal dendritic terminal elements of Lf. dendriticus are unique. The presence of distinctively shaped pileicystidia or terminal elements is more typical of species of Russula but rarely seen in milkcaps (Verbeken 1996a, Verbeken & Walleyn 2010). Initially thought to be a contaminant, perhaps a mycenoid mycoparasite or virus, but these terminal elements are found consistently in multiple basidiomes from geographically distant collections, and no DNA sequences for mycenoid taxa were ever recovered as contaminants.

In Lactifluus section Gerardii the majority of species have a brown stipe and pileus contrasting with white mostly distant lamellae, reticulate spore ornamentation < 2 μm high, a palisade pileipellis structure, and are generally lacking in macrocystidia (Stubbe et al. 2010, De Crop et al. 2017, 2018). The basidiomes can also be small, white and pleurotoid, with thick-walled terminal elements in the pileipellis (Stubbe et al. 2012, Latha et al. 2016, De Crop et al. 2018). Several of the agaricoid and pleurotoid taxa have latex that changes colour on exposure, however this is not the case for Lf. dendriticus. While the pale sequestrate basidiomes of Lf. dendriticus can be easily mistaken for sequestrate russuloid taxa as latex production is variable, the more open form of locules in the hymenophoral tissue tend to suggest a lactarioid taxon. However, it is the unique dendritic pileal terminal elements of Lf. dendriticus that are intriguing. How does a cystidium evolve from a simple filamentous, perhaps irregularly capitate form, to a highly branched, sharp angled form?

Lactifluus geoprofluens is readily distinguished from Australian and international species in Lf. section Lactifluus by lacking lamprocystidia, having large globose basidiospores and a sequestrate basidiome form. It is the first known sequestrate member of Lf. section Lactifluus (De Crop et al. 2017). Unfortunately, we do not have an image of the fresh basidiomes of Lf. geoprofluens, however the field notes all state pale orange-ochre to reddish brown in colour, with slightly paler hymenophoral tissue.

We currently lack data to describe Lf. sp. prov. KV181 as a new species, but we do provide a picture and a description of field characteristics. It is the first time a non-agaricoid representative of Lf. subg. Pseudogymnocarpi is documented, and the first Australasian representative in section Pseudogymnocarpi. We look forward to obtaining new material for further examination.

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

We gratefully acknowledge the curation staff at MEL, BRI, and OSC who facilitated access to material for study. The molecular work conducted by James Douch, Luke Vaughan, and Lachlan Tegart was supported by the Jim Willis Studentship program hosted by the Royal Botanic Gardens Victoria, and by some external funding through the ‘Fungal Barcode Project’ Bioplatforms and the Australian Genome Research Facility. Travel by Jorinde Nuyinck to MEL was supported by Australian Biological Resources grant (RFL217-63). J.A. Cooper is supported by the Strategic Investment Fund of the New Zealand Ministry for Business, Innovation and Employment (MBIE). We also thank J.M. Trappe and A.W. Claridge for providing additional material of Lf. geoprofluens.

Footnotes

Citation: Lebel T, Cooper JA, Castellano MA, Nuytinck J (2021). Three independent evolutionary events of sequestrate Lactifluus species in Australasi. Fungal Systematics and Evolution 8: 9–25. doi: 10.3114/fuse.2021.08.02

Corresponding editor: P.W. Crous

Conflict of interest: The authors declare that there is no conflict of interest.

REFERENCES

  1. Beaton G, Pegler DN, Young TWK. (1984). Gasteroid basidiomycota of Victoria state, Australia. 2. Russulales. Kew Bulletin 39: 669–698. [Google Scholar]
  2. Beenken L, Sainge MN, Kocyan A. (2016). Lactarius megalopterus, a new angiocarpous species from a tropical rainforest in Central Africa, shows adaptations to endozoochorous spore dispersal. Mycological Progress 15: 58. [Google Scholar]
  3. Beever RE, Lebel T. (2014). Truffles of New Zealand: a discussion of bird dispersal characteristics of fruit bodies. Auckland Botanical Society 69: 170–178. [Google Scholar]
  4. Bougher NL, Lebel T. (2001). Sequestrate (truffle-like) fungi of Australia and New Zealand. Australian Systematic Botany 14: 439–484. [Google Scholar]
  5. Buyck B, Horak E. (1999). New taxa of pleurotoid Russulaceae. Mycologia 91: 532–537 [Google Scholar]
  6. Buyck B, Duhem B, Das K. et al. (2017). Fungal Biodiversity Profiles 21–30. Cryptogamie, Mycologie 38: 101–146. [Google Scholar]
  7. De Crop E, Hampe F, Wisitrassameewong K, et al. (2018). Novel diversity in Lactifluus section Gerardii from Asia: five new species with pleurotoid or small agaricoid basidiocarps. Mycologia 110: 962–984. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. De Crop E, Nuytinck J, Van de Putte K, et al. (2017). A multi-gene phylogeny of Lactifluus (Basidiomycota, Russulales) translated into a new infrageneric classification of the genus. Persoonia 38: 58–80. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Desjardin DE. (2003). A unique ballistosporic hypogeous sequestrate Lactarius from California. Mycologia 95: 148–155. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Dring DM, Pegler DN. (1978). New and noteworthy gasteroid relatives of the Agaricales from tropical Africa. Kew Bulletin 32: 563–569. [Google Scholar]
  11. Eberhardt U, Verbeken A. (2004). Sequestrate Lactarius species from tropical Africa: L. angiocarpus nov. sp. and L. dolichocaulis comb. nov. Mycological Research 108: 1042–1052. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Hall T. (2011). Bioedit v7.1.3. http://www.mbio.ncsu.edu/bioedit/bioedit.html. [Google Scholar]
  13. Heenan PB, Smissen RD. (2013). Revised circumscription of Nothofagus and recognition of the segregate genera Fuscospora, Lophozonia, and Trisyngyne (Nothofagaceae). Phytotaxa 146: 1–31. [Google Scholar]
  14. Henkel TW, Aime MC, Miller SL. (2000). Systematics of pleurotoid Russulaceae from Guyana and Japan, with notes on their ectomycorrhizal status. Mycologia 92: 1119–1132 [Google Scholar]
  15. Katoh K, Rozewicki J, Yamada KD. (2019). MAFFT online service: multiple sequence alignment, interactive sequence choice and visualization. Briefings in Bioinformatics 20: 1160–1166. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Kõljalg U, Nilsson RH, Abarenkov K, et al. (2013). Towards a unified paradigm for sequence-based identification of fungi. Molecular Ecology 22: 5271–5277. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Latha KPD, Raj KNA, Farook VA. et al. (2016). Three new species of Russulaceae from India based on morphology and molecular phylogeny. Phytotaxa 246: 61–77. [Google Scholar]
  18. Lebel T. (2002a). The sequestrate Russulales of New Zealand. New Zealand Journal of Botany 40: 489–509. [Google Scholar]
  19. Lebel T. (2002b). Zelleromyces dendriticus a new species from Australia. Australasian Mycologist 20: 4–8. [Google Scholar]
  20. Lebel T. (2003a). Australasian Truffle-like Fungi XV. Cystangium. Australian Systematic Botany 16: 371–400. [Google Scholar]
  21. Lebel T. (2003b). Australasian Truffle-like Fungi XVI. Gymnomyces. Australian Systematic Botany 16: 401–426. [Google Scholar]
  22. Lebel T, Castellano MA. (2002). Type studies of sequestrate Russulales. Part II. Species related to Russula from Australia and New Zealand. Mycologia. 94: 327–354. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Lebel T, Castellano MA, Beever RE. (2015). Cryptic diversity in the sequestrate genus Stephanospora (Stephanosporaceae: Agaricales) in Australasia. Fungal Biology 119: 201–228. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Lebel T, Syme A. (2012.) Sequestrate species of Agaricus and Macrolepiota from Australia: new species and combinations and their position in a calibrated phylogeny. Mycologia 104: 496–520. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Lebel T, Tonkin JE. (2007). Australasian species of Macowanites are sequestrate species of Russula (Russulaceae, Basidiomycota). Australian Systematic Botany 20: 355–381. [Google Scholar]
  26. Lebel T, Trappe JM. (2000). Type studies of sequestrate Russulales. Part I. Generic type species. Mycologia 92: 1188–1205. [Google Scholar]
  27. Miller MA, Pfeiffer W, Schwartz T. (2010). Creating the CIPRES Science Gateway for inference of large phylogenetic trees. In: Proceedings of the Gateway Computing Environments Workshop (GCE), 14 Nov. 2010, New Orleans, LA: 1–8. [Google Scholar]
  28. Nuytinck J, Verbeken A, Delarue S, Walleyn R. (2003). Systematics of European sequestrate lactarioid Russulaceae with spiny spore ornamentation. Belgian Journal of Botany 136: 145–153. [Google Scholar]
  29. Phookamsak R, Hyde KD, Jeewon R, et al. (2019). Fungal diversity notes 929–1035: taxonomic and phylogenetic contributions on genera and species of fungi. Fungal Diversity 95: 1–273. [Google Scholar]
  30. Rambaut A. (2009). FigTree. http://tree.bio.ed.ac.uk/software/figtree/.
  31. Sang X-Y, Li X-D, Wang Y-W, et al. (2016). Four new sequestrate species of Russulaceae found in China. Phytotaxa 289: 101–117. [Google Scholar]
  32. Sheedy EM, Martin AF, Ryberg M. et al. (2016). Dating the emergence of truffle-like fungi in Australia, by using an augmented meta-analysis. Australian Systematic Botany 29: 284–302. [Google Scholar]
  33. Song Y, Zhang JB, Li JW. et al. (2017). Lactifluus sinensis sp. nov. and L. sinensis var. reticulatus var. nov. (Russulaceae) from southern China. Nova Hedwigia. 107: 91–103. [Google Scholar]
  34. Stamatakis A. (2014). RAxML Version 8: A tool for Phylogenetic Analysis and Post-Analysis of Large Phylogenies. Bioinformatics 30: 1312–1313. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  35. Stubbe D, Le HT, Wang XH, et al. (2012). The Australasian species of Lactarius subgenus Gerardii (Russulales). Fungal Diversity 52: 141–167. [Google Scholar]
  36. Stubbe D, Nuytinck J, Verbeken A. (2010). Critical assessment of the Lactarius gerardii species complex (Russulales). Fungal Biology 114: 271–283. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  37. Thiers B. (2011) (continuously updated). Index Herbariorum: a global directory of public herbaria and associated staff. New York Botanical Garden’s Virtual Herbarium. http://sweetgum.nybg.org/ih/. [Google Scholar]
  38. Trappe JM, Claridge AW. (2003). Australasian sequestrate (truffle-like) fungi 15. New species from tree line in the Australian Alps. Australasian Mycologist 22: 27–38. [Google Scholar]
  39. Trappe JM, Claridge AW. (2008). Arcangeliella claridgei comb. nov. and A. corkii comb. nov. transferred from the genus Zelleromyces. Australasian Mycologist 27: 117. [Google Scholar]
  40. Trappe JM, Lebel T, Castellano MA. (2002). Nomenclatural revisions in the sequestrate russuloid genera. Mycotaxon 81: 195–214. [Google Scholar]
  41. Verbeken A. (1996). Biodiversity of the genus Lactarius Pers. in tropical Africa. Part 1, text. Part 2, plates and maps. Ph.D. dissertation. Biology Department, Ghent University, Belgium. [Google Scholar]
  42. Verbeken A, Hampe F, Wissitrassameewong K. et al. (2014b). A new angiocarpous Lactarius species from Thailand. Phytotaxa 181: 163–170. [Google Scholar]
  43. Verbeken A, Nuytinck J. (2013). Not every milkcap is a Lactarius. Scripta Botanica Belgica 51: 162–168. [Google Scholar]
  44. Verbeken A, Stubbe D, Van de Putte K, et al. (2014a). Tales of the unexpected: angiocarpous representatives of the Russulaceae in tropical South East Asia. Persoonia 32: 13–24. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  45. Verbeken A, Walleyn R. (2010). Fungus Flora of Tropical Africa, volume 2. Monograph of Lactarius in Tropical Africa. Nationale Plantentuin België, Meise. [Google Scholar]
  46. Vidal JM, Alvarado P, Loizides M. et al. (2019). A phylogenetic and taxonomic revision of sequestrate Russulaceae in Mediterranean and temperate Europe. Persoonia 42: 127–185. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  47. Wang XH, Stubbe D, Verbeken A. (2012). Lactifluus parvigerardii sp. nov., a new link towards the pleurotoid habit in Lactifluus subgen. Gerardii (Russulaceae, Russulales). Cryptogamie, Mycologie 33: 181–190. [Google Scholar]

Articles from Fungal Systematics and Evolution are provided here courtesy of Westerdijk Fungal Biodiversity Institute

RESOURCES