Skip to main content
Clinical Kidney Journal logoLink to Clinical Kidney Journal
. 2021 Jul 6;14(12):2497–2523. doi: 10.1093/ckj/sfab120

Polypharmacy and medication use in patients with chronic kidney disease with and without kidney replacement therapy compared to matched controls

Manon J M van Oosten 1,, Susan J J Logtenberg 2, Marc H Hemmelder 3,4, Martijn J H Leegte 5, Henk J G Bilo 6,7,8, Kitty J Jager 9, Vianda S Stel 10
PMCID: PMC8690067  PMID: 34950462

ABSTRACT

Background

This study aims to examine polypharmacy (PP) prevalence in patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD) Stage G4/G5 and patients with kidney replacement therapy (KRT) compared with matched controls from the general population. Furthermore, we examine risk factors for PP and describe the most commonly dispensed medications.

Methods

Dutch health claims data were used to identify three patient groups: CKD Stage G4/G5, dialysis and kidney transplant patients. Each patient was matched to two controls based on age, sex and socio-economic status (SES) score. We differentiated between ‘all medication use’ and ‘chronic medication use’. PP was defined at three levels: use of ≥5 medications (PP), ≥10 medications [excessive PP (EPP)] and ≥15 medications [hyper PP (HPP)].

Results

The PP prevalence for all medication use was 87, 93 and 95% in CKD Stage G4/G5, dialysis and kidney transplant patients, respectively. For chronic medication use, this was 66, 70 and 75%, respectively. PP and comorbidity prevalence were higher in patients than in controls. EPP was 42 times more common in young CKD Stage G4/G5 patients (ages 20–44 years) than in controls, while this ratio was 3.8 in patients ≥75 years. Older age (64–75 and ≥75 years) was a risk factor for PP in CKD Stage G4/G5 and kidney transplant patients. Dialysis patients ≥75 years of age had a lower risk of PP compared with their younger counterparts. Additional risk factors in all patients were low SES, diabetes mellitus, vascular disease, hospitalization and an emergency room visit. The most commonly dispensed medications were proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) and statins.

Conclusions

CKD Stage G4/G5 patients and patients on KRT have a high medication burden, far beyond that of individuals from the general population, as a result of their kidney disease and a large burden of comorbidities. A critical approach to medication prescription in general, and of specific medications like PPIs and statins (in the dialysis population), could be a first step towards more appropriate medication use.

Keywords: CKD, dialysis, health claims data, kidney transplantation, medication use, polypharmacy

Graphical Abstract

Graphical Abstract.

Graphical Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Polypharmacy (PP), defined as the concomitant use of medications by one individual, is a frequent phenomenon in clinical practice [1, 2]. Older age and multimorbidity are associated with the growing PP prevalence [2–4]. Chronic kidney disease (CKD) patients often have a large burden of comorbidities and commonly require a multitude of medications to prevent further progression of CKD, to treat its complications and to treat comorbidities [5]. This makes PP a part of their life [6–8]. PP puts patients at risk of medication-related problems, such as drug–drug interactions, suboptimal therapeutic response, a higher risk of adverse drug events and decreased medication adherence [5, 9]. Additionally, PP is associated with poorer quality of life, increased healthcare utilization with higher healthcare costs and a higher risk of morbidity and mortality [2, 10, 11]. Whether the poor outcomes associated with PP are merely a reflection of a person’s poor health remain unclear. Nevertheless, findings from previously published papers suggest an association between PP and mortality, even after adjustment for measured confounders such as comorbidities [12].

The prevalence of PP varies across countries and stages of CKD [6–8, 10, 13–17]. Current studies mostly report on elderly patients, only a few studies have used nationwide data and most studies lack a comparison with the general population [6, 7, 15]. This study aims to examine PP in patients with CKD Stage G4/G5 and patients on kidney replacement therapy (KRT) compared with matched general population controls of similar age, sex and socio-economic status (SES), while making use of a national health insurance database encompassing the complete known Dutch kidney disease population. Furthermore, we aim to determine risk factors for PP and commonly dispensed medications.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Vektis insurance claims database

We used the Vektis database, which includes virtually all Dutch citizens [18]. Vektis contains reimbursement data on all medical procedures covered by the Health Insurance Act and demographic data such as sex, year of birth, area of residence, SES (Appendix 1) and date of death [19].

All hospital procedures in The Netherlands are reimbursed via physician claims called Diagnosis–Treatment Combinations (DBCs) [20]. Vektis also includes pharmacy dispensing data on anatomical therapeutic chemical code level, the defined daily dose (DDD) and the quantity of supplied medication per year. A DDD is a technical unit that reflects the assumed average maintenance dose per day for a medication used for its main indication [21]. The annual quantity supplied for a specific medication is a product of the DDD and the number of days a medication was dispensed. Information on over-the-counter medications and medications administered during a hospital admission or dialysis treatment are missing, since the costs for the latter are covered by the hospital DBC. Since health claims databases lack clinical data, we used proxies [e.g. pharmaceutical cost groups (PCGs)], to assess the prevalence and number of chronic conditions (Appendix 1) [22, 23]. Hospitalization, intensive care unit (ICU) admission and emergency room (ER) visits were identified by specific healthcare operation codes, an element of the DBC code (Appendix 1).

Study population

We selected adults (i.e. ≥20 years) with CKD Stage G4/G5 or on KRT using 2017 healthcare claims data. Patients were divided into three patient groups: CKD Stage G4/G5 [estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) <30 mL/min/1.73 m2] without KRT, dialysis patients and kidney transplant patients. Patients were excluded if they switched between groups in 2017 (i.e. from CKD Stage G4/G5 to KRT and vice versa or between KRT modalities), if they died in 2017 or if matching was impossible (Figure 1).

FIGURE 1:

FIGURE 1:

Flow chart study participants

CKD Stage G4/G5 without KRT

We selected patients with a CKD Stage G4/G5 health claim on 1 January 2017. Since primary care does not have ‘disease-specific’ claims comparable to DBCs, we could not identify patients solely treated in primary care.

Dialysis

Patients with a health claim for dialysis on 1 January 2017 were selected regardless of dialysis modality.

Kidney transplantation

Patients with a health claim for kidney transplantation on 1 January 2017 were selected.

Control groups

Two controls per patient, matched for age, sex and SES (per quartile) were selected, provided they had no CKD-related healthcare claim.

PP

Medications with a cumulative annual DDD ≥15 (except for antibiotic treatment) and medications with a cumulative annual DDD ≥180 were selected. The first group (DDD ≥15) was further indicated as ‘all medication use’, to prevent inclusion of medication dispensed for a very short period, and the second cut-off (DDD ≥180) as ‘chronic medication use’.

We defined PP at three levels: concurrent use of ≥5 medications (PP), ≥10 medications [excessive PP (EPP)] and ≥15 medications [hyper PP (HPP)]. For combination medications, the individual substances could not be extracted and therefore were counted as one.

Statistical analysis

To describe baseline characteristics we used means and standard deviations (SDs) for continuous variables and frequency distributions with percentages for categorical variables. To compare baseline characteristics between patients and controls we used the chi-squared test for categorical variables and the Mann–Whitney U-test for non-normally distributed continuous variables. We calculated the PP, EPP and HPP prevalences in all patient (sub)groups and controls and expressed them as percentages. These analyses were repeated in a sensitivity analysis, including all patients who died in 2017. Ratios were calculated by dividing the PP prevalence of patients by the respective prevalence in controls. Univariate and multivariate logistic regressions were used to analyse the association between the independent variables [e.g. age, sex and diabetes mellitus (DM)] and the outcome (i.e. EPP based on chronic medication use). The EPP prevalence was low (i.e. ≤15%) and therefore the rare disease assumption for logistic regression was met [24]. For the identification of confounders, we took the criteria for confounding into account [25]. Associations were expressed as odd ratios (ORs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). We considered a P-value <0.05 as statistically significant. Analyses were performed in SAS version 9.4 (SAS Institute, Cary, NC, USA).

RESULTS

Baseline characteristics

We included 27 573 individuals: 14 905 CKD Stage G4/G5 without KRT, 3872 dialysis and 8796 transplant patients, with mean ages of 75.6, 70.8 and 56.5 years, respectively (Table 1).

Table 1.

Baseline characteristics of CKD Stage G4/G5 without KRT, dialysis and kidney transplant patients and matched controls

Characteristics CKD Dialysis Kidney transplantation
Patients (n = 14 905) Matched controls (n = 29 810) P-value Patients (n = 3872) Matched controls (n = 7744) P-value Patients (n = 8796) Matched controls (n = 17 592) P-value
Age (years), median (25th–75th percentile) 78.0 (70.0–84.0) 78.0 (70.0–84.0) 0.99 74.0 (64.0–80.0) 74.0 (64.0–80.0) 1.00 58.0 (48.8–67.0) 58.0 (48.8–67.0) 1.00
Age (years), mean (SD) 75.6 (11.2) 75.6 (11.2) 0.99 70.8 (13.2) 70.8 (13.2) 1.00 56.5 (13.6) 56.5 (13.6) 1.00
Age (years), %
 20–44 1.8 1.8 4.5 4.5 19.6 19.6
 45–64 12.2 12.2 22.5 22.5 48.4 48.4
 65–74 25.0 25.0 25.8 25.8 24.6 24.6
 ≥75 61.0 61.0 1.00 47.3 47.3 1.00 7.5 7.5 1.00
Sex (male), % 52.8 52.8 1.00 58.8 58.8 1.00 59.8 59.8 1.00
SES score, median (25th–75th percentile) −0.20 (−1.04–0.45) −0.18 (−1.01–0.45) 0.16 −0.35 (−1.21–0.33) −0.32 (−1.21–0.36) 0.25 −0.09 (−1.03–0.57) −0.11 (−1.01–0.57) 0.61
Quartiles, %
 Q1 28.1 28.1 33.6 33.6 27.6 27.6
 Q2 26.5 26.5 26.6 26.6 24.9 24.9
 Q3 25.2 25.2 22.4 22.4 23.7 23.7
 Q4 20.2 20.2 1.00 17.4 17.4 1.00 23.9 23.9 1.00
No. of chronic conditions, mean (SD) 1.92 (11.2) 0.68 (0.98) <0.0001 1.86 (1.15) 0.61 (0.96) <0.0001 1.46 (0.95) 0.33 (0.71) <0.0001
Chronic conditions, %
 0 10.8 55.2 13.2 63.3 12.6 77.8
 1 25.9 21.0 24.3 19.3 45.7 14.1
 ≥2 63.4 23.8 <0.0001 62.6 17.3 <0.0001 41.7 8.1 <0.0001
DM, % 35.9 11.0 <0.0001 31.1 9.8 <0.0001 28.3 5.4 <0.0001
Macrovascular disease, % 17.7 5.2 <0.0001 29.2 4.8 <0.0001 11.3 2.4 <0.0001
 Coronary artery disease, % 8.7 4.3 <0.0001 13.2 4.3 <0.0001 6.0 2.5 <0.0001
 Peripheral artery disease, % 8.4 2.0 <0.0001 16.9 1.8 <0.0001 4.9 0.82 <0.0001
 CVA/TIA, % 2.5 1.7 <0.0001 3.6 1.5 <0.0001 1.6 0.67 <0.0001
Malignancy, % 13.7 7.4 <0.0001 16.4 6.9 <0.0001 19.2 3.6 <0.0001
Hypertension, % 88.0 35.7 <0.0001 82.7 31.7 <0.0001 86.6 17.2 <0.0001
Hospitalization, % 28.7 8.7 <0.0001 52.3 7.8 <0.0001 28.8 4.4 <0.0001
ICU admittance, % 2.6 0.78 <0.0001 8.4 0.81 <0.0001 2.5 0.35 <0.0001
ER visit, % 28.5 10.1 <0.0001 49.5 9.2 <0.0001 32.2 5.6 <0.0001

Q: quartile; CVA/TIA: cerebrovascular accident/transient ischaemic attack.

Chronic comorbidity conditions were 2.9 times more prevalent in CKD Stage G4/G5 patients than in controls (1.92 versus 0.68), 3.0 times higher in dialysis patients (1.86 versus 0.61) and 4.4 times higher in transplant patients (1.46 versus 0.33). In all patient groups, the prevalence of DM, macrovascular disease and hypertension was significantly higher than in controls.

Number of dispensed medications

All medication use

The median number of dispensed medications was 10 for CKD Stage G4/G5 patients, 12 for dialysis patients and 11 for transplant patients compared with 1, 1 and 0 in controls, respectively (Figure 2).

FIGURE 2:

FIGURE 2:

Total number of dispensed medication per percentage of CKD stage G4/G5 not on KRT patients, dialysis and kidney transplant patients versus matched controls; all medication use

Chronic medication use

The median number of dispensed medications was six in all patient groups, compared with zero in controls (Figure 3).

FIGURE 3:

FIGURE 3:

Total number of dispensed medication per percentage of CKD stage G4/G5 not on KRT patients, dialysis and kidney transplant patients versus matched controls; chronic medication use

PP

Figure 4 presents the prevalence and ratio of PP in patients versus controls for ‘all medication use’ (left panel) and ‘chronic medication use’ (right panel). The results of the sensitivity analyses were consistent with the results of the main analyses (Appendix 2).

FIGURE 4:

FIGURE 4:

Percentage and ratio of polypharmacy of CKD stage G4/G5 without KRT, dialysis and kidney transplant patients versus matched controls for (left) all medication use and (right) chronic medication use

Overall

All medication use

The PP, EPP and HPP prevalences were 87.4, 56.6 and 22.8%, respectively, in patients with CKD Stage G4/G5; 93.4, 69.3 and 31.5%, respectively, in dialysis patients; and 94.8, 60.0 and 21.5%, respectively, in transplant patients (Figure 4). For all comparisons, the PP, EPP and HPP prevalences were much higher in patients than in controls, with ratios ranging from 2.6 (PP in CKD patients versus controls) to 23.9 (EPP in transplant patients versus controls).

Chronic medication use

Overall, PP based on chronic medication use was less common than PP based on all medication use (Figure 4). The PP, EPP and HPP prevalences were 66.1, 13.3 and 0.9%, respectively, in CKD Stage G4/G5 patients; 70.0, 15.1 and 1.2%, respectively, in dialysis patients; and 75.0, 14.9 and 1.0%, respectively, in transplant patients. Ratios ranged from 3.7 (PP in CKD patients) to 25.8 (EPP in transplant patients).

Patient subgroups

Tables 2 and 3 show the prevalence and ratio of PP in patients versus controls for different subgroups and for ‘all’ and ‘chronic medication use’. Since the PP prevalence for ‘all medication use’ was very high and the HPP prevalence for ‘chronic medication use’ was very low, these results are not shown.

Table 2.

Percentage and ratio of PP (‘all medication use’) in different subgroups of CKD Stage G4/G5 without KRT patients (n = 14 905), dialysis patients (n = 3872) and kidney transplant patients (n = 8796) versus matched controls (n = 29 810, n = 7744 and n = 17 592, respectively)

All medication use
CKD Dialysis Kidney transplantation
EPP ≥10 drugs HPP ≥15 drugs EPP ≥10 drugs HPP ≥15 drugs EPP ≥10 drugs HPP ≥15 drugs
Subgroups Patients Matched controls Ratio Patients Matched controls Ratio Patients Matched controls Ratio Patients Matched controls Ratio Patients Matched controls Ratio Patients Matched controls Ratio
PP overall, % 56.6 12.0 4.7 22.8 3.0 7.6 69.3 10.4 6.7 31.5 2.6 11.9 60.0 4.0 14.9 21.5 0.90 23.9
Age (years), %
 20–44 23.0 0.55 42.0 6.6 0.0 47.4 0.87 54.7 19.7 38.5 0.49 78.1 8.5 0.09 98.0
 45–64 45.1 3.1 14.4 16.2 0.60 26.8 67.0 3.8 17.4 32.6 1.2 27.0 59.2 2.8 21.1 20.0 0.69 28.8
 65–74 56.7 7.6 7.5 23.3 1.6 14.9 74.0 7.6 9.7 36.4 1.9 19.1 73.4 6.8 10.8 31.0 1.3 23.1
 ≥75 60.0 16.0 3.8 24.4 4.2 5.8 69.8 15.9 4.4 29.5 4.0 7.4 77.4 12.0 6.4 34.2 2.9 11.9
Sex, %
 Male 56.6 11.7 4.8 21.9 2.8 7.7 69.1 9.9 7.0 31.2 2.5 12.3 59.1 3.8 15.6 19.7 0.73 26.9
 Female 56.7 12.4 4.6 23.9 3.2 7.4 69.5 11.1 6.3 32.1 2.8 11.4 61.4 4.4 14.0 24.2 1.1 21.1
SES, %
 Q1 58.4 13.7 4.2 24.7 3.7 6.7 68.7 11.9 5.8 29.4 3.2 9.3 62.4 4.4 14.0 23.3 1.1 22.2
 Q2 57.6 12.1 4.8 23.7 3.0 8.0 70.8 9.9 7.2 33.5 2.9 11.7 60.9 4.5 13.5 21.5 1.1 20.0
 Q3 55.4 11.2 4.9 21.8 2.8 7.9 67.6 9.4 7.2 32.6 2.3 14.1 60.1 3.7 16.4 21.6 0.67 32.1
 Q4 54.5 10.6 5.1 20.4 2.5 8.2 70.3 9.7 7.3 31.6 1.8 17.8 56.3 3.4 16.5 19.4 0.76 25.4
No. of chronic conditions, %
 0 6.2 0.63 10.0 0.62 0.08 7.9 24.0 0.55 43.5 5.3 21.3 0.21 100.6 2.7 0.04 73.9
 1 31.4 11.4 2.8 6.1 1.5 4.0 53.8 10.8 5.0 14.6 1.5 9.9 47.4 6.1 7.7 9.6 0.72 13.3
 ≥2 75.5 46.6 1.6 33.4 13.3 2.5 84.8 45.9 1.8 43.6 13.6 3.2 85.5 37.0 2.3 40.2 9.5 4.2
DM, % 78.1 42.5 1.8 37.9 12.4 3.0 86.9 41.0 2.1 51.1 13.0 3.9 86.0 29.7 2.9 41.6 7.4 5.7
Macrovascular disease, % 79.0 47.5 1.7 39.7 15.3 2.6 84.6 45.2 1.9 48.2 14.7 3.3 89.8 36.0 2.5 49.4 7.9 6.3
 Coronary artery disease, % 84.6 36.5 2.3 44.0 11.5 3.8 89.4 38.2 2.3 56.0 13.6 4.1 90.8 24.6 3.7 53.2 5.1 10.4
 Peripheral artery disease, % 75.9 41.1 1.8 37.6 14.6 2.6 82.7 34.1 2.4 46.2 8.7 5.3 90.8 35.2 2.6 49.7 7.6 6.5
 CVA/TIA, % 77.3 38.3 2.0 41.0 10.8 3.8 84.8 32.7 2.6 42.8 8.8 4.8 87.9 17.8 4.9 48.9 3.4 14.4
Malignancy, % 66.4 27.8 2.4 29.8 8.8 3.4 74.2 25.5 2.9 38.6 6.3 6.1 67.0 18.4 3.6 28.0 4.1 6.8
Hypertension, % 62.8 30.7 2.0 25.6 8.0 3.2 77.1 29.7 2.6 35.9 8.0 4.5 65.3 19.6 3.3 23.9 4.4 5.4
Hospitalization, % 78.2 47.1 1.7 42.9 17.1 2.5 79.2 44.4 1.8 43.0 14.5 3.0 81.8 28.2 2.9 42.6 9.5 4.5
ICU admittance, % 85.4 60.5 1.4 52.0 23.6 2.2 83.1 60.3 1.4 50.3 25.4 2.0 90.8 50.8 1.8 59.0 24.6 2.4
ER visit, % 78.5 42.6 1.8 43.5 15.1 2.9 78.4 41.1 1.9 41.3 14.8 2.8 78.0 22.8 3.4 38.5 7.5 5.1

Table 3.

Percentage and ratio of PP (‘chronic medication use’) in different subgroups of CKD Stage G4/G5 without KRT patients (n = 14 905), dialysis patients (n = 3872) and kidney transplant patients (n = 8796) versus matched controls (respectively n = 29810, n = 7744 and n = 17 592)

Chronic medication use
CKD Dialysis Kidney transplantation
PP ≥5 drugs EPP ≥10 drugs PP ≥5 drugs EPP ≥10 drugs PP ≥5 drugs EPP ≥10 drugs
Subgroups Patients Matched controls Ratio Patients Matched controls Ratio Patients Matched controls Ratio Patients Matched controls Ratio Patients Matched controls Ratio Patients Matched controls Ratio
PP overall, % 66.1 17.8 3.7 13.3 1.5 9.0 70.0 15.8 4.4 15.1 1.5 10.4 75.0 6.7 11.3 14.9 0.55 27.3
Age (years), %
 20–44 28.1 0.7 38.5 3.3 50.9 0.9 58.7 5.2 56.2 0.52 107.6 4.5 0.03 154.0
 45–64 56.5 5.3 10.6 11.8 0.58 20.5 68.6 5.8 11.8 18.6 0.80 23.1 77.0 4.6 16.8 14.7 0.39 37.9
 65–74 69.4 12.6 5.5 15.9 1.1 14.1 73.5 12.8 5.7 18.5 1.0 18.4 83.1 11.9 7.0 21.3 1.0 20.9
 ≥75 67.7 23.0 2.9 12.9 1.8 7.0 70.6 23.6 3.0 12.6 2.2 5.8 85.0 18.8 4.5 22.4 1.4 16.4
Sex, %
 Male, % 67.5 18.5 3.6 13.8 1.7 8.1 71.0 16.3 4.3 16.0 1.4 11.0 77.6 6.7 11.6 15.8 0.56 28.1
 Female, % 64.4 17.1 3.8 12.9 1.2 10.5 68.5 15.0 4.6 13.8 1.5 9.4 71.3 6.6 10.7 13.6 0.52 26.0
SES, %
 Q1 68.3 19.7 3.5 14.8 1.9 7.6 69.4 17.3 4.0 15.4 1.9 8.2 75.9 7.6 10.0 16.4 0.62 26.4
 Q2 66.8 17.9 3.7 13.8 1.5 8.9 71.2 15.8 4.5 15.6 1.6 10.0 76.4 7.5 10.2 15.9 0.48 33.0
 Q3 64.7 17.3 3.7 12.8 1.1 11.3 70.2 14.8 4.8 16.3 1.2 13.4 73.6 5.9 12.5 14.5 0.55 26.2
 Q4 63.6 15.9 4.0 11.5 1.2 9.7 69.4 14.5 4.8 12.5 0.82 15.3 74.1 5.5 13.4 12.7 0.52 24.3
No. of chronic conditions, %
 0 5.3 0.6 9.2 0.12 0.01 11.1 18.9 0.4 44.1 0.20 27.6 0.13 210.0 0.18
 1 46.3 20.8 2.2 0.91 0.12 7.9 53.5 20.3 2.6 2.4 0.20 12.2 71.1 11.8 6.0 4.3 0.08 53.2
 ≥2 84.5 66.2 1.3 20.7 7.2 2.9 87.2 67.0 1.3 23.1 8.2 2.8 93.7 60.2 1.6 31.0 6.6 4.7
DM, % 86.2 61.8 1.4 25.6 8.3 3.1 84.3 63.5 1.3 27.6 9.6 2.9 91.8 52.0 1.8 34.2 6.1 5.6
Macrovascular disease, % 84.3 61.1 1.4 23.0 7.4 3.1 79.7 60.2 1.3 24.1 7.0 3.5 90.7 50.9 1.8 34.1 6.0 5.6
 Coronary artery disease, % 87.8 51.5 1.7 25.8 6.3 4.1 88.1 49.7 1.8 31.9 8.2 3.9 93.3 39.4 2.4 38.2 3.9 9.7
 Peripheral artery disease, % 83.6 52.3 1.6 22.9 7.6 3.0 74.6 50.0 1.5 20.4 2.9 7.0 90.8 52.4 1.7 34.2 8.3 4.1
 CVA/TIA, % 78.7 44.8 1.8 18.3 4.2 4.3 74.6 40.7 1.8 19.6 1.8 11.1 83.0 25.4 3.3 28.4
Malignancy, % 71.8 35.0 2.1 15.2 3.7 4.1 73.2 33.7 2.2 15.3 3.7 4.1 78.4 25.3 3.1 17.0 2.1 8.2
Hypertension, % 73.2 45.9 1.6 15.1 4.0 3.8 77.6 45.5 1.7 17.5 4.4 3.9 80.8 33.5 2.4 17.0 2.9 5.8
Hospitalization, % 76.7 45.4 1.7 20.0 5.5 3.6 72.1 43.2 1.7 18.1 6.3 2.9 81.7 30.7 2.7 22.5 5.0 4.5
ICU admittance, % 77.3 52.8 1.5 16.4 8.2 2.0 69.6 54.0 1.3 22.1 9.5 2.3 79.3 55.7 1.4 28.1 9.8 2.9
ER visit, % 77.4 44.5 1.7 20.1 5.1 3.9 71.2 42.1 1.7 18.2 5.6 3.2 80.5 24.3 3.3 21.7 3.2 6.9

All medication use

In CKD Stage G4/G5 and in transplant patients, the EPP and HPP prevalences were highest in patients ≥75 years of age (CKD G4/G5: 60.0 and 24.4%; transplantation: 77.4 and 34.2%). EPP was 42.0 times more common in young CKD patients (ages 20–44 years) than in controls, and this ratio declined with age to 3.8 in patients ≥75 years (Tables 2). PP was more common in both patients and controls with chronic conditions, such as diabetes or macrovascular disease, with EP prevalence ranging from 78.1 to 89.8% in patient groups and 24.6 to 47.5% in controls. The highest PP prevalence (EPP 90.8%) was found in transplant patients with coronary artery disease.

Chronic medication use

PP was most common in CKD patients (69.4%) and dialysis patients (73.5%) ages 65–74 years and in transplant patients (85.0%) ≥75 years of age. Ratios between patient and control groups decreased with increasing age. The prevalence of PP was high in patients with chronic conditions in all patient groups (Table 3).

Risk factors for PP

Table 4 presents the unadjusted and adjusted association between patient demographics and disease-related variables and EPP (≥10 medications, ‘chronic medication use’). Below we discuss the fully adjusted models if adjustment for potential confounders was possible.

Table 4.

Unadjusted and adjusted analysis of variables associated with PP (defined as ≥10 medications for chronic medication usea) in CKD Stage G4/G5 without KRT patients, dialysis patients and kidney transplant patients, using logistic regression

CKD Dialysis Kidney transplantation
Unadjusted Age-, sex-, SES-adjusted model Fully adjusted model Unadjusted Age-, sex-, SES-adjusted model Fully adjusted model Unadjusted Age-, sex-, SES-adjusted model Fully adjusted model
Variables OR 95% CI OR 95% CI OR 95% CI OR 95% CI OR 95% CI OR 95% CI OR 95% CI OR 95% CI OR 95% CI
Age categories (years)
  20–64 Ref. Ref. Ref.
 65–74 1.57 1.33–1.85 NAb NAb 1.16 0.92–1.46 NAb NAb 3.69 2.89–4.71 NAb NAb
  ≥75 1.24 1.06–1.44 NAb NAb 0.74 0.59–0.91 NAb NAb 5.88 4.60–7.51 NAb NAb
Age (continuous, per 10 years) 1.01 0.96–1.05 NAb NAb 0.96 0.90–1.03 NAb NAb 1.51 1.44–1.59 NAb NAb
Sex
 Female Ref. Ref. Ref.
 Male 1.08 0.98–1.19 NAb NAb 1.18 0.99–1.42 NAb NAb 1.19 1.05–1.34 NAb NAb
SES (categories)
 Q1 1.34 1.17–1.55 NAb NAb 1.28 0.97–1.68 NAb NAb 1.34 1.13–1.59 NAb NAb
 Q2 1.23 1.07–1.43 NAb NAb 1.29 0.97–1.72 NAb NAb 1.29 1.09–1.54 NAb NAb
 Q3 1.14 0.98–1.32 NAb NAb 1.36 1.02–1.82 NAb NAb 1.16 0.97–1.39 NAb NAb
 Q4 Ref. Ref. Ref.
DM 5.00 4.51–5.54 4.98 4.50–5.52 NAb 3.64 3.04–4.36 3.69 3.08–4.43 NAb 6.59 5.81–7.48 5.59 4.91–6.36 NAb
Vascular disease 2.36 2.12–2.62 2.36 2.12–2.63 2.01c 1.80–2.25 2.46 2.06–2.95 2.49 2.08–2.99 2.08c 1.72–2.51 3.64 3.14–4.22 2.86 2.45–3.33 2.51c 2.14–2.96
Hospitalization 2.10 1.91–2.31 2.10 1.90–2.31 1.35d 1.17–1.55 1.66 1.38–1.99 1.66 1.39–1.99 1.13 d 0.90–1.42 2.16 1.91–2.44 1.99 1.76–2.25 1.29 d 1.09–1.52
ICU admittance 1.29 0.98–1.69 1.28 0.98–1.69 0.64e 0.47–0.86 1.68 1.27–2.21 1.66 1.26–2.19 1.10 e 0.81–1.49 2.29 1.70–3.10 1.99 1.46–2.71 1.10 e 0.78–1.55
ER visit 2.12 1.92–2.33 2.11 1.92–2.33 1.69f 1.53–1.88 1.62 1.35–1.94 1.63 1.37–1.96 1.34 f 1.11–1.62 2.09 1.85–2.35 2.01 1.78–2.27 1.76 f 1.54–2.00
a

The overall PP rates (for PP defined as ≥10 medications for chronic medication use) are considered rare enough to reasonably allow for the rare disease assumption for logistic regression.

b

For this variable, no confounders could be identified considering the criteria for confounding (NA: not applicable).

c

Model adjusted for age, sex, SES and DM.

d

Model adjusted for age, sex, SES, DM, vascular disease and ER visits.

e

Model adjusted for age, sex, SES, DM, vascular disease, hospitalization and ER visits.

f

Model adjusted for age, sex, SES, DM and vascular disease.

CKD Stage G4/G5 without KRT

Patients ages 65–74 years [OR 1.57 (95% CI 1.33–1.85)] and ≥75 years [OR 1.24 (95% CI 1.06–1.44)] had a higher EPP risk compared with patients ages 20–64 years. In addition, an SES score in the lowest two quartiles compared with an SES score in the highest quartile [OR 1.34 (95% CI 1.17–1.55) versus OR 1.23 (95% CI 1.07–1.43)], diabetes [OR 4.98 (95% CI 4.51–5.54)] or vascular disease [OR 2.01 (95% CI 2.12–2.62)], as well as hospitalization [OR 1.35 (95% CI 1.17–1.55)] and an ER visit [OR 1.69 (95% CI 1.53–1.88)] were significantly associated with PP.

Dialysis

Patients ≥75 years of age had a lower risk of EPP [OR 0.74 (95% CI 0.59–0.91)] compared with patients ages 20–64 years. The most pronounced risk factors for EPP in dialysis patients were diabetes [OR 3.69 (95% CI 3.08–4.43)] and vascular disease [OR 2.08 (95% CI 1.72–2.51)].

Kidney transplantation

Patients ages 65–74 years [OR 3.69 (95% CI 2.89–4.71)] and ≥75 years [OR 5.88 (95% CI 4.60–7.51)] had a higher EPP risk compared with patients ages 20–64 years. In addition, being male [OR 1.19 (95% CI 1.05–1.34)], having an SES score in the lowest two quartiles compared with an SES score in the highest quartile [OR 1.34 (95% CI 1.13–1.59) versus OR 1.29 (95% CI 1.09–1.54)], diabetes [OR 5.59 (95% CI 4.91–6.36)] or vascular disease [OR 2.51 (95% CI 2.14–2.96)], hospitalization [OR 1.29 (95% CI 1.09–1.52)] and an ER visit [OR 1.76 (95% CI 1.54–2.00)] were significantly associated with EPP.

Dispensed medication classes

Table 5 shows the most commonly dispensed chronic medication. Proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) were among the most commonly dispensed medications in patients, with ≥50% of patients using a PPI versus 8–19% of controls. Also, statins were commonly dispensed (53, 51 and 40% in CKD Stage G4/G5, transplant and dialysis patients, respectively). Dispensed medication classes for all medication use are shown in Appendix 3. Of note, 3–12% of CKD patients with DM do not use antidiabetic medication, whereas 17–19% of controls with DM are diet-controlled (Appendix 3, Table A1). Furthermore, 63–75% of CKD patients with DM chronically use antidiabetic medication compared with 61–65% of controls (Table 5).

Table 5.

Percentage of most commonly dispensed medication classes of CKD Stage G4/G5 without KRT patients, dialysis patients and kidney transplant patients and matched controls: medication classes defined for chronic medication use

Chronic medication use
CKD Dialysis Kidney transplantation
Patients, % Matched controls, % Patients, % Matched controls, % Patients, % Matched controls, %
Medication classes (n = 14 905) (n = 29 810) (n = 3872) (n = 7744) (n = 8796) (n = 17 592)
Cardiovascular drugs
 ACE inhibitors 23.6 11.1 11.4 10.4 24.6 5.3
 ARB 27.9 9.8 13.2 7.9 17.6 4.8
 Beta-blockers 29.1 9.1 25.1 7.9 29.6 3.7
 Calcium channel blockers 39.8 9.3 29.7 8.5 43.4 4.2
 Diuretics 43.1 10.1 44.3 8.6 19.1 3.8
Statins 52.8 19.3 39.5 18.3 50.8 10.2
PPIs 51.9 19.4 65.5 16.8 54.0 8.2
Vitamin D analogues 50.6 12.5 43.4 9.9 48.5 4.7
Antithrombotic agents 45.2 19.2 50.3 17.2 29.6 7.6
 Platelet aggregation inhibitors 38.8 15.3 44.6 13.9 23.9 6.2
 Vitamin K antagonist 5.6 2.1 6.3 1.8 4.3 0.67
 Heparin 0.27 0.14 0.44 0.10 0.47 0.06
 DOAC/NOAC 1.1 1.9 0.03 1.6 1.4 0.76
Antidiabetics 25.8 6.6 19.6 6.4 21.3 3.5
 Insulin 15.8 2.1 14.8 2.1 11.2 1.0
 Metformin 2.2 4.7 0.03 4.8 9.2 2.6
 Sulphonylurea derivative 10.3 2.9 4.5 2.5 7.1 1.5

ACE: angiotensin-converting enzyme; ARB: angiotensin II receptor blocker; DOAC/NOAC: direct oral anticoagulant/novel oral anticoagulant.

DISCUSSION

This study using Dutch health claims data demonstrates that PP is highly prevalent in CKD Stage G4/G5 patients and patients with KRT compared with the general population. Since multimorbidity is one of the driving factors of PP, we must note that chronic comorbid conditions were three to four times more prevalent in patients than in controls. In our study, PP prevalence based on ‘all medication use’ ranged from 87% in CKD Stage G4/G5 to 94–95% in dialysis and transplant patients. The prevalence was lower for chronic medication use. Older age was an important risk factor for PP in CKD Stage G4/G5 and transplant patients, whereas dialysis patients ≥75 years of age had a lower risk of PP compared with younger counterparts. For all patients, additional risk factors were lower SES, DM, vascular disease, hospitalization and an ER visit during the year. The PP prevalence ratio between patients and controls declined with age. The most commonly dispensed medications were PPIs and statins, with more than half of patients using these medications.

Strengths and limitations

The main strength of this article is the use of a health claims database with almost complete national coverage of Stage G4/G5 CKD patients, by which we could study CKD Stage G4/G5 and KRT patients in the same cohort and compare them with the general population. Pharmacy dispensing data were complete and contained all medication dispensed by the pharmacy. This in contrast to other studies that used data from patient questionnaires, which heavily relies on patient memory. Another strength of pharmacy dispensing data is that they only include prescribed medication that was actually dispensed and do not cover prescribed medications that were never collected at the pharmacy. Although information on medication adherence is often missing in studies describing medication use, the regular dispensing of medication in a health claims database is an indirect yet strong indication that the medication was routinely taken.

We must consider several limitations. First, although the identification of dialysis and transplant patients is accurate using health claims data [26], we were unable to identify patients with CKD treated in primary care, being mostly elderly patients [27]. Furthermore, data on medication adherence are missing. In addition, we were unable to identify medication given during dialysis sessions. Therefore the PP levels of dialysis patients reported in this study are likely an underestimation of their actual medication burden. Finally, the estimation of chronic conditions in our study was based on proxies that are vulnerable to inaccuracy.

Prevalence of PP

The comparison of the prevalence of PP with other studies is challenging due to the substantial differences in patient selection, definition of PP and data collection. Almost all previously performed studies collected cross-sectional medication data via patient reports or medical charts. Our study is unique in that we used pharmacy dispensing data, which enabled us to monitor all dispensed medication. The availability of the annual quantity of supplied medications makes it possible to differentiate between all and chronic medication use.

The considerably higher PP prevalence based on all medication use compared with chronic medication use suggests that patients often receive short-term medication or experience medication changes. Although PP prevalence based on chronic medication use better reflects the structural medication burden, this type of medication use is not reported in other studies. Therefore we can only discuss our findings on the PP prevalence in the perspective of other studies on all medication use.

CKD Stage G4/G5 without KRT

Current literature describes PP prevalence in different stages of CKD, using different definitions of PP and mainly in elderly patients. Two studies describe PP prevalence in CKD Stage G4/G5 patients. Of these, Schmidt et al. [6] reported a PP prevalence of 92% (eGFR <30mL/min/1.73 m2). Hayward et al. [15] describe prevalences of 91% (≥5 medications) and 43% (≥10 medications) in a group of elderly (age >65 years) patients (eGFR <20 mL/min/1.73 m2) of different European countries. Within the subset of Dutch patients in this study, a prevalence of 91% (≥5 medications) and 43% (≥10 medications) was described. All results are comparable to our findings. Lower PP prevalence was found in patients with CKD Stages G1–G3 [6–8].

Dialysis

It is well known that dialysis patients have a high medication burden [13, 28, 29]. A pooled analysis reported that dialysis patients use 12 different medications [10, 29]. We report a median of 12 medications. A study from Saudi Arabia with 95 haemodialysis patients reported a 98% PP prevalence (>5 medications) [16], which is comparable to our PP prevalence. A Canadian study reported that 93.1% of elderly haemodialysis patients (age ≥65 years) used five or more medications [10]. No previous studies have reported on EP and HP prevalence and we are the first study in a much larger cohort of dialysis patients of all ages.

Kidney transplantation

A high pill burden is also described in transplant patients, ranging from 7 to 32 pills per day, depending on the time period after transplantation [30–32]. An Argentinean study described a mean of 7.8 different medications, while we describe a median of 10 different medications [33]. Only one Polish study reported PP prevalence in a much smaller group of 136 transplant patients as 56% (5–9 medications) and 17% (≥10 medications) [17]. We demonstrated a considerably higher PP and EP prevalence in our larger cohort of transplant patients.

Comparison with the general population

To our knowledge, this is the first study comparing the PP prevalence of CKD Stage G4/G5 patients and KRT patients with a matched control group from the general population. We demonstrate that PP prevalence is already substantially higher in young patients compared with controls, probably reflecting the high number of comorbidities in CKD patients already at a young age. The ratio of PP between patients and controls decreases with increasing age, because medication use increases more with age in the general population than it does in patients [34].

Risk factors for PP

We confirm a positive association between PP and older age in CKD Stage G4/G5 and transplant patients [6, 8, 17, 35]. The inverse association between PP and age ≥75 years in dialysis patients may suggest some reluctance to prescribe medication in the elderly dialysis patient with limited life expectancy and being at high risk for medication-related problems. We confirm that the presence of chronic conditions like DM and cardiovascular disease are risk factors for PP in all patients [6, 10, 16, 36].

Next, we described a positive association between low SES and PP for CKD Stage G4/G5 and transplant patients, in line with other studies [6, 8]. A possible explanation is that individuals with a low SES often have low health literacy and are more vulnerable to comorbid illness. Lastly, we are the first to demonstrate a positive association between PP and hospitalization or an ER visit. We hypothesize that patients with an indication for an ER visit or hospital admission likely have severe comorbid conditions or complications of their CKD for which they need additional medication prescriptions. Moreover, PP itself may be associated with hospitalization in the elderly population [37, 38], although this was not confirmed elsewhere [39].

Medication dispensing

The increased cardiovascular risk of CKD patients is reflected in the high number of medications to prevent or treat cardiovascular conditions. Recent guidelines recommend statin prescription to CKD Stage G4/G5 patients [40]. Although (almost) all CKD Stage G4/G5 patients would be expected to fulfil the criteria for statin prescription, only half of the patients in our study used statins. Conversely, several studies question the benefit of statin therapy for dialysis patients [41–43]. Guidelines suggest that statins should not be routinely ‘initiated’, though they should be continued when patients already use statins when initiating dialysis treatment [44]. We suggest a critical evaluation of statin treatment in dialysis patients to reduce some of the medication burden. This also may be the case for PPIs [45]. More than 50% of CKD Stage G4/G5 and transplant patients, and even >65% of dialysis patients, used a PPI in our study. Previous studies reported PPI use of 30, 50 and 52% in haemodialysis patients and 33, 49 and 62% in CKD Stage G4/G5 patients, respectively [10, 15, 36]. The literature reports that the indication for PPI use in dialysis patients was unknown >25% of the time [46]. Since the long-term use of PPIs can have negative consequences, deprescribing of PPIs should be considered [47].

CONCLUSION

Our study demonstrates that patients with CKD Stage G4/G5 and patients on KRT have a very high medication burden, far beyond that of individuals from the general population. Important PP risk factors are age, SES, DM, vascular disease, hospitalization and an ER visit.

Medication treatment of CKD patients is a challenging balance between the benefits of pharmacotherapy for the treatment of kidney disease and comorbidities and the disadvantages of potentially inappropriate prescribing or adverse drug interaction [48]. Although physicians often check whether the prescribed medication is appropriate in their patient, it is not easy to minimize the medication burden. As directed by the Hippocratic Oath, physicians strive for optimal treatment of their patients, while avoiding those twin traps of overtreatment and therapeutic nihilism. Undertreatment has been repeatedly associated with unfavourable outcomes in dialysis patients [49]. Despite the fact that therapeutic nihilism should be avoided at all times, we propose that a critical approach to the prescription of specific medications like PPIs in all CKD patients and statins in the dialysis population could be a first step towards more appropriate medication use. Finding a proper balance between potentially beneficial medication and needless use of medications with adverse effects will remain a challenge.

FUNDING

This work is financed by a grant from the Dutch Kidney Foundation.

CONFLICT OF INTEREST STATEMENT

None declared.

DATA AVAILABILITY STATEMENT

The Vektis database used for this study can only be accessed by contacting Vektis (see www.vektis.nl).

APPENDIX 1. VARIABLES BASED ON DATA OF THE VEKTIS DATABASE

SES

The SES was established by the Netherlands Institute for Social Research and is based on a person’s postal code [20]. The SES score is derived from the mean income in the residential area, the percentage of people with low education and low income as well as the fraction of unemployed people in the area. The national mean SES score is 0 and ranges from −8.07 to +3.06, where a lower score indicates a lower SES and a higher score indicates a higher SES.

DM

The definition of the variable DM is based on a combination of hospital claims (DBC codes), pharmaceutical claims and health claims for primary care activities.

Definition of DM

Diagnosis code
Internal medicine
313.221 DM without secondary complications
313.222 DM with secondary complications
313.223 DM chronic pump therapy
ATC code
A10 Drugs used in diabetes
Primary care activity code
11602 Multidisciplinary care T2DM—head tariff
13029 Diabetes medical support per year
13030 Diabetes regulation—insulin therapy
400001 Multidisciplinary care T2DM—organization and infrastructure

ATC, anatomical therapeutic chemical.

Macrovascular disease, coronary artery disease, peripheral artery disease and cerebrovascular accident (CVA)/transient ischaemic attack (TIA)

The variable macrovascular disease is a combination of the variables coronary artery disease, peripheral artery disease and CVA/TIA. The definitions of the variables coronary artery disease (= 1), peripheral artery disease (= 2) and CVA/TIA (= 3) are based on hospital claims (DBC codes).

Definition of macrovascular disease
Diagnosis code Variable
Cardiology
313.101 Symptomatic ischaemic heart disease 1
313.102 Instable angina, myocardial infarction 1
313.121 CVA/TIA 3
313.123 Aneurysm 2
313.124 Atherosclerosis of the extremities/peripheral artery disease 2
313.129 Aneurysm and other arterial vascular malformations 2
Surgery
303.403 Aneurysm thoracic aorta (including rupture) 2
303.405 Aneurysm iliac aorta 2
303.406 Aneurysm abdominal aorta, rupture 2
303.409 Vascular malformations abdomen/pelvis 2
303.410 Vascular damage upper extremity 2
303.412 Peripheral arterial occlusive disease Stage 1, arm 2
303.416 Aneurysm lower extremity 2
303.418 Peripheral arterial occlusive disease Stage 2, intermittent claudication 2
303.419 Peripheral arterial occlusive disease Stage 3, rest pain 2
303.420 Peripheral arterial occlusive disease Stage 4, gangrene 2
303.427 Crural ulcer 2
303.431 Buerger’s disease 2
303.432 Diabetic foot 2
303.439 Other peripheral artery disease 2
Cardiology
320.2 Thoracic pain, possible angina pectoris 1
320.3 Angina pectoris, no ischaemia detected yet 1
320.4 Angina pectoris, ischaemia detected 1
320.5 Ischaemia without angina pectoris (silent ischaemia) 1
320.7 Unstable/progressive angina pectoris 1
320.9 Acute myocardial infarction (q/non-q) anterior wall 1
320.11 Acute myocardial infarction (q/non-q) elsewhere 1
320.13 Follow-up after myocardial infarction 1
320.15 Follow-up after PTCA and/or CABG 1
320.202 Angina pectoris, stable 1
320.203 Angina pectoris, unstable 1
320.204 ST elevation myocardial infarction 1
320.205 Non ST elevation myocardial infarction 1
320.801 Follow-up after acute coronary syndrome 1
320.802 Follow-up after PTCA and/or CABG and/or ablation 1
Neurology
330.1101 Subarachnoid haemorrhage 3
330.1102 Intracerebral haemorrhage 3
330.1103 Intracranial haemorrhage (sub/epidural) 3
330.1111 Cerebral ischaemia 3
330.1112 TIA (including amaurosis fugax) 3
Physical medicine and rehabilitation
327.0313 CVA 3
Cardiothoracic surgery
328.2320 Coronary artery bypass graft (CABG), venous grafts and maximum 1 arterial graft 1
328.2400 CABG (≥2 arterial grafts) 1
328.2415 CABG (1 arterial graft) + mitral valve replacement 1
328.2425 CABG (1 arterial graft) + aortic valve replacement 1
328.2470 Left ventricular plasty + CABG 1
328.2550 CABG + MVR ± tricuspid valve replacement 1
328.2555 CABG (2 arterial grafts) + MVR 1
328.2560 CABG (1 arterial graft) + AVR + MVR 1
328.2570 CABG (2 arterial grafts) + AVR 1
328.2585 CABG + hypertrophic obstructive cardiomyopathy 1
328.2630 Ventricular tachycardia + CABG 1
328.2635 Maze + CABG 1
328.2640 Ventricular septal rupture + CABG 1
328.2645 MVR + AVR + CABG 1
328.2650 MVR + CABG (2 arterial grafts) 1
328.2655 AVR + CABG + hypertrophic obstructive cardiomyopathy 1
328.2665 Aortic root + CABG 1
328.2720 Aortic dissection ± CABG 1
328.2740 Aortic ascending + CABG 1
328.2770 Aortic root + CABG + MVR 1
328.2775 Aortic dissection B/conservative 2
328.2785 Maze + CABG or AVR + MVR ± TVR 1
328.2810 Thoracoabdominal aneurysm 2
328.3210 Carotid endarterectomy 2
328.3320 Acute aortic aneurysm 2
Geriatric medicine
335.263 CVA/TIA 3

Malignancy

The definition of the variable malignancy is based on hospital claims (DBC codes).

Definition of malignancies
Diagnosis code
Ophthalmology
301.358 Tumour of the orbit
Ear Nose Throat
302.20 Vestibular schwannoma
302.21 Malignant tumour ear
302.60 Malignant oral cavity tumour Stages 1 and 2
302.61 Malignant oral cavity tumour Stages 3 and 4
302.62 Malignant oropharyngeal tumour Stages 1 and 2
302.63 Malignant oropharyngeal tumour Stages 3 and 4
302.64 Malignant hypopharyngeal tumour Stages 1 and 2
302.65 Malignant hypopharyngeal tumour Stages 3 and 4
302.66 Malignant laryngeal tumour Stages 1 and 2
302.67 Malignant laryngeal tumour Stages 3 and 4
302.68 Malignant nasopharyngeal tumour Stages 1 and 2
302.69 Malignant nasopharyngeal tumour Stages 3 and 4
302.72 Malignant tumour salivary gland
302.84 Malignant tumour throat
302.88 Malignant skin tumour head/throat
Surgery
303.303 Malignant neoplasm thyroid
303.306 Malignant neoplasm salivary glands
303.313 Neoplasm bronchus, lung
303.314 Neoplasm mediastinum/pleura (mesothelioma)
303.315 Malignant neoplasm oesophagus
303.318 Malignant neoplasm breast
303.319 Malignant neoplasm oesophagus/gastric cardia
303.330 Malignant neoplasm stomach
303.331 Malignant neoplasm gall bladder
303.332 Malignant neoplasm pancreas/bile ducts
303.333 Malignant neoplasm colon (excluding sigmoid/rectum)
303.334 Malignant neoplasm rectosigmoid transition zone
303.335 Malignant neoplasm rectum
303.346 Malignant neoplasm stomach, excluding gastric cardia
303.347 Peritoneal carcinomatosis caused by colorectal carcinoma without metastasis
303.348 Neoplasm liver (including metastasis)
303.349 Other malignant neoplasms abdomen
303.350 Malignant melanoma of the skin
303.352 Malignant neoplasm soft tissue
303.353 Hogdkin lymphoma, non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL)
303.357 Germ cell tumour
303.358 Neuroblastoma
303.359 Other oncological diagnosis
303.360 Metastasis bone
303.363 Malignant neoplasm bone (excluding metastasis)
303.367 Malignant neoplasm liver (including metastasis)
303.370 Wilms tumour
Plastic surgery
304.35 Excision tumours with axial flap reposition, or with frozen tissue section, >5 or large malignant tumours
304.509 Malignant tumour, not in functional area (FA)
304.511 Malignant tumour in FA wherefore transposition or transplantation <1%
304.513 Excision tumour wherefore transposition or transplantation in FA 1–3% or non-FA >3%, 2–5 tumours
Orthopaedic surgery
305.1110 Metastasis in bone
305.1140 Malignant neoplasm bone
305.1150 Malignant neoplasm soft tissue
Urology
306.40 Malignant neoplasm prostate
306.45 Malignant neoplasm prostate with lymph nodes
306.48 Malignant neoplasm prostate (orchidectomy)
306.50 Penile cancer
306.92 Penile cancer with lymph nodes
Gynaecology
307.M11 Malignant neoplasm vulva
307.M12 Malignant neoplasm vagina
307.M13 Malignant neoplasm cervix
307.M14 Malignant neoplasm endometrium
307.M15 Malignant neoplasm myometrium
307.M16 Malignant neoplasm of ovarian/fallopian tube
307.M17 Chorionic carcinoma
307.M99 Malignant neoplasm other
Neurosurgery
308.1810 Neurosurgical part of stereotactic radiotherapy
Dermatology
310.14 Malignant dermatosis
Internal medicine
313.214 Malignant neoplasm thyroid
313.264 Malignant neoplasm adrenal gland
313.291 Multiple endocrine neoplasia syndrome
313.621 Malignant neoplasm, small cell carcinoma bronchus
313.622 Malignant neoplasm, large cell carcinoma bronchus
313.623 Thymoma
313.624 Malignant neoplasm pleura
313.629 Other thoracic malignancies not further specified
313.751 Hodgkin lymphoma
313.752 NHL low grade
313.753 NHL intermediate grade/high grade
313.754 Multiple myeloma/primary amyloidosis
313.755 Monoclonal gammopathy
313.756 Acute lymphoid leukaemia
313.757 Chronic lymphoid leukaemia, Waldenström’s and Hairy cell leukaemia
313.761 Acute myeloid leukaemia/Refractory anaemia with excess blasts (RAEB) in transformation
313.762 RAEB
313.771 Chronic myeloid leukaemia
313.773 Chronic myelomonocytic leukaemia
313.801 Malignant neoplasm head–throat
313.802 Malignant neoplasm central nervous system (primary)
313.811 Malignant neoplasm breast
313.821 Malignant neoplasm ovarium
313.822 Malignant neoplasm cervix
313.823 Malignant neoplasm endometrium
313.831 Malignant neoplasm testicle
313.832 Malignant neoplasm prostate
313.833 Malignant neoplasm urinary tract
313.834 Malignant neoplasm kidney/Grawitz
313.839 Other malignant neoplasm in urogenital tract
313.841 Malignant neoplasm bone and articular cartilage
313.842 Malignant neoplasm skin/melanoma
313.843 Malignant neoplasm soft tissue
313.899 Malignant neoplasm not further specified
313.904 Malignant neoplasm oesophagus/gastric cardia
313.914 Malignant neoplasm stomach (excluding gastric cardia)
313.927 Malignant neoplasm colorectal
313.964 Malignant neoplasm pancreas
313.979 Other malignancies digestive tract
Gastroenterology
318.307 Oesophagus/cardia malignancy
318.407 Stomach cancer, excluding gastric cardia cancer
318.408 Lymphoma
318.610 Colorectal cancer
731.312 Malignant neoplasm liver
313.735 Cholangiocarcinoma
313.810 Oncological treatment in case of gastrointestinal malignancy
313.906 Oncology, not gastrointestinal
Pulmonology
322.1303 Non-small-cell lung carcinoma
322.1304 Small-cell lung carcinoma
322.1305 Mesothelioma
322.1308 Metastasis of tumour elsewhere
Neurology
330.202 Primary malignant neoplasm intracranial
330.203 Secondary neoplasm intracranial (metastasis)
330.213 Secondary neoplasm extracranial (metastasis)
330.223 Secondary spinal neoplasm (metastasis)
330.233 Secondary neoplasm extraspinal/epidural/spine (metastasis)
330.241 Leptomeningeal malignancy
330.242 Primary leptomeningeal malignancy
330.243 Secondary leptomeningeal malignancy
330.251 Paraneoplastic condition
330.299 Other neuro-oncology
Radiotherapy
361.101 Head and neck cancer and thyroid cancer
361.102 Gastrointestinal cancer
361.103 Lung and other intrathoracic cancer
361.104 Bone and soft tissue cancer
361.105 Breast cancer
361.106 Gynaecological cancer
361.107 Urological cancer
361.108 Tumour in central nervous system
361.109 Other malignant conditions
361.110 Haematological cancer
361.111 Unknown primary tumour
361.302 Screening of late effects of cancer treatment

Hypertension

The definition of the variable hypertension is based on a combination of hospital claims (DBC codes) and pharmaceutical claims.

Definition of hypertension

Diagnosis code
Internal medicine
313.311 Hypertension
Cardiology
320.902 Hypertension
ATC code
C02 Antihypertensives
C03 Diuretics
C04 Peripheral vasodilators
C07 Beta-blocking agents
C08 Calcium channel blockers
C09 Agents acting on the renin–angiotensin system

Hospitalization

The definition of the variable hospitalization is based on health claims for hospital care activities that are linked to hospital claims (DBC codes). We excluded hospital care activities if the admission was related to transplantation care.

Definition of hospitalization
Hospital activity code
190218 Nursing day
Following care product codes were excluded
979002140 Kidney transplantation with hospital admittance
979002141 Kidney transplantation
979002142 Living-donor kidney transplantation with hospital admittance
979002143 Living-donor kidney transplantation
979002052 Transplantation of kidney and pancreas
979002053 Transplantation of kidney and pancreas with hospital admittance
979002036 Transplantation of pancreas
979002037 Transplantation of pancreas with hospital admittance
979002136 Liver transplantation with hospital admittance
979002137 Liver transplantation
979002139 Partial liver transplantation
979002159 Care for transplantation recipient with maximum of 13 nursing days
979002160 Care for transplantation recipient with 14–28 nursing days
979002161 Care for transplantation recipient with 29–56 nursing days
979002162 Care for transplantation recipient with more than 56 nursing days
979002214 Liver transplantation or transplantation of liver and kidney with hospital admittance
979002215 Liver transplantation or transplantation of liver and kidney
979002297 Pancreas transplantation
979002299 Deceased-donor kidney transplantation with more than 28 nursing days
979002300 Deceased-donor kidney transplantation with maximum of 28 nursing days
979002302 Living-donor kidney transplantation with more than 28 nursing days
979002303 Living-donor kidney transplantation with maximum of 28 nursing days
979002305 Combined organ transplantation with more than 28 nursing days
979002306 Combined organ transplantation with maximum of 28 nursing days

ICU admission

The definition of the variable ICU admissions is based on hospital declaration codes that are linked to hospital claims (DBC codes).

Definition of ICU admission

Hospital declaration code
039611 Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation treatment supplement
190125 ICU treatment day supplement Group 1
190126 ICU admittance supplement Group 1—registration on first day on ICU
190127 ICU ventilator supplement Group 1
190128 ICU dialysis supplement Group 1
190129 ICU consult
190130 Interhospital critical care transport (<2 h)
190131 Interhospital critical care transport (≥2 h)
190132 Medical ICU (MICU) transport (<2 h)
190133 MICU transport (≥2 h)
190134 ICU treatment day supplement Group 2
190135 ICU admittance supplement Group 2—registration on first day on ICU
190136 ICU ventilator supplement Group 2
190137 ICU dialysis supplement Group 2
190141 ICU treatment day supplement Group 3
190142 ICU admittance supplement Group 3—registration on first day on ICU
190143 ICU ventilator supplement Group 3
190144 ICU dialysis supplement Group 3
190150 Neonatal ICU
190151 Paediatric ICU
190153 ICU treatment day—light care
190154 ICU treatment day—medium care
190155 ICU treatment day—heavy care
190156 Dialysis supplement—per ICU day
190157 ICU day—Type 1
190158 ICU day—Type 1

ER visits

The definition of the variable ER visits is based on hospital declaration codes that are linked to hospital claims (DBC codes).

Definition of ER visits

Hospital declaration code
190015 Emergency care contact on an emergency department
190016 Emergency care contact outside the emergency department, elsewhere in the hospital

Chronic conditions based on PCGs

Since clinical data are lacking in health claims databases, we used PCGs as a proxy to determine chronic conditions. PCGs are defined by the Zorginstituut Nederland (National Health Care Institute) and are used as a risk adjuster in the Dutch healthcare system [18]. Within this risk adjustment system, Dutch insurance companies receive an equalization contribution from the Healthcare Insurance Fund depending on the risk profile of the insured population. This risk profile is based on, among other things, age, gender, SES and the number of chronic conditions (PCGs), as these factors have been shown to increase the healthcare costs in subsequent years [21].

PCGs are based on the assumption that chronic conditions can be reliably identified by claims for specific prescribed drugs [18, 19]. A person is assigned to a PCG if the prescribed medication for a chronic condition is more than a certain amount during a calendar year (e.g. 180 DDD, which approximates 6 months of medication use). The validity of pharmacy claims data to identify chronic conditions has been evaluated before and has been shown to provide reliable estimates of chronic disease burden when clinical data are missing [22–24].

Chronic conditions based on PCGS

A total of 37 PCGs for the risk adjustment of 2019 (based on pharmacy data of 2017) are defined in this section [25]. We excluded the PCGs for CKD and transplantation since these overlap with the main diagnosis of our study population. Appendix 1 (Tables A1– A33) provides the chronic conditions used in this study derived from the PCGs, with the ATC codes and DDDs used for the classification of PCGs.

Defined PCGs 2019
Description
1 Acromegaly
2 Asthma
3 Autoimmune disorders (based on add-on)
4 Cancer I (based on add-on)
5 Cancer II (based on add-on)
6 Central nervous system disorders: multiple sclerosis
7 Central nervous system disorders: other
8 Chronic anticoagulant use
9 Chronic pain excluding opioids
10 COPD/heavy asthma
11 COPD/heavy asthma (based on add-on)
12 Crohn’s disease/ulcerative colitis
13 Cystic fibrosis/pancreas enzymes
14 Depression
15 DM Type Ia, with hypertension
16 DM Type Ib, without hypertension
17 DM Type IIa, with hypertension
18 DM Type IIb, without hypertension
19 Epilepsy
20 Extreme high costs Cluster 1 (based on pharmacy claims and add-on)
21 Extreme high costs Cluster 2 (based on add-on)
22 Extreme high costs Cluster 3 (based on add-on)
23 Glaucoma
24 Growth disorders (based on add-on)
25 Heart diseases
26 HIV/AIDS
27 Hormone sensitive tumours
28 Immunoglobulin therapy (based on add-on)
29 Neuropathic pain
30 Parkinson’s disease
31 Psoriasis
32 Psychosis and addiction (excluding nicotin)
33 Pulmonary (arterial) hypertension
34 Renal disorders
35 Rheumatoid arthritis
36 Thyroid disorders
37 Transplantation

Appendix Table A1.

DDDs for acromegaly

ATC code Oral
H01AX01 10 mg
H01CB02 0.7 mg
H01CB03 3 mg
H01CB05 1.2 mg

Table A2.

DDDs for asthma

ATC code Inhalation (aerosol) Inhalation (powder) Inhalation (solution) Oral Parenteral Rectal
R03AC02 0.8 mg 0.8 mg 10 mg
R03AC03 2 mg 2 mg 20 mg
R03AC12 0.1 mg 0.1 mg
R03AC13 24 μg 24 μg
R03AK06 4 doses 2 doses
R03AK07 2–4 doses
R03AK08 4 doses
R03AK010 1 dose
R03AK011 2–4 doses
R03AK012 2 doses
R03BA01 0.8 mg 0.8 mg 1.5 mg
R03BA02 0.8 mg 0.8 mg 1.5 mg
R03BA05 0.6 mg 0.6 mg 1.5 mg
R03BA08 0.16 mg
R03BC01 40 mg 80 mg 80 mg
R03BC03 8 mg
R03CC02 12 mg 12
R03DC03 10 mg

Restriction: only if there is no ATC code for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD)/heavy asthma or COPD/heavy asthma (based on add-on).

Table A3.

DDDs for autoimmune diseases (based on add-on)

ATC code Parental Oral Subcutaneous
L04AA24 27 mg
L04AA26 25 mg
L04AA29 10 mg
L04AA32 60 mg
L04AA33 5.4 mg
L04AA37 4 mg
L04AB01 7 mg
L04AB02 3.75 mg
L04AB04 2.9 mg
L04AB05 14 mg
L04AB06 1.66 mg
L04AC03 100 mg
L04AC05 540 μg
L04AC07 20 mg
L04AC08 2.7 mg
L04AC10 10 mg
L04AC11 37 mg
L04AC12 15 mg
L04AC13 2.9 mg
L04AC14 14.3 mg

Based on additional reimbursements or add-ons: expensive or orphan drugs.

Table A4.

ATC codes for cancer I (based on add-on)

ATC code Name
L01AA01 Cyclofosfamide
L01AA02 Chloorambucil
L01AA03 Melfalan
L01AA09 Bendamustine
L01AB01 Busulfan
L01AC01 Thiotepa
L01AD02 Lomustine
L01AX03 Temozolomide
L01BA04 Pemetrexed
L01BB03 Tioguanine
L01BB05 Fludarabine
L01BB06 Clofarabine
L01BB07 Nelarabine
L01BC01 Cytarabine
L01BC03 Tegafur
L01BC05 Gemcitabine
L01BC06 Capecitabine
L01BC07 Azacitidine
L01BC08 Decitabine
L01BC53 Tegafur and Gimeracil and Oteracil
L01BC59 Trifluridine and Tipiracil
L01CA01 Vinblastine
L01CA02 Vincristine
L01CA04 Vinorelbine
L01CB01 Etoposide
L01CB02 Teniposide
L01CD01 Paclitaxel
L01CD02 Docetaxel
L01CD04 Cabazitaxel
L01CX01 Trabectedine
L01DB01 Doxorubicine
L01DB03 Epirubicine
L01DB06 Idarubicine
L01DB07 Mitoxantron
L01DB11 Pixantron
L01DC01 Bleomycine
L01DC03 Mitomycine
L01XA01 Cisplatine
L01XA03 Oxaliplatine
L01XB01 Procarbazine
L01XC Avelumab
L01XC dinutuximab Beta
L01XC02 Rituximab
L01XC03 Trastuzumab
L01XC06 Cetuximab
L01XC07 Bevacizumab
L01XC08 Panitumumab
L01XC10 Ofatumumab
L01XC11 Ipilimumab
L01XC12 Brentuximab Vedotine
L01XC13 Pertuzumab
L01XC14 Trastuzumab-Emtansine
L01XC15 Obinutuzumab
L01XC17 Nivolumab
L01XC18 Pembrolizumab
L01XC19 Blinatumomab
L01XC21 Ramucirumab
L01XC22 Necitumumab
L01XC23 Elotuzumab
L01XC24 Daratumumab
L01XC26 Inotuzumab Ozogamicine
L01XC27 Olaratumab
L01XC32 Azetolizumab
L01XD05 Temoporfine
L01XE01 Imatinib
L01XE02 Gefitinib
L01XE03 Erlotinib
L01XE04 Sunitinib
L01XE05 Sorafenib
L01XE06 Dasatinib
L01XE07 Lapatinib
L01XE08 Nilotinib
L01XE09 Temsirolimus
L01XE10 Everolimus
L01XE11 Pazopanib
L01XE12 Vandetanib
L01XE13 Afatinib
L01XE14 Bosutinib
L01XE15 Vemurafenib
L01XE16 Crizotinib
L01XE17 Axitinib
L01XE18 Ruxolitinib
L01XE21 Regorafenib
L01XE23 Dabrafenib
L01XE24 Ponatinib
L01XE25 Trametinib
L01XE26 Cabozantinib
L01XE27 Ibrutinib
L01XE28 Ceritinib
L01XE29 Lenvatinib
L01XE31 Nintedanib
L01XE33 Palbociclib
L01XE35 Osimertinib
L01XE38 Cobimetinib
L01XE39 Midostaurine
L01XE42 Ribociclib
L01XX01 Amsacrine
L01XX02 Asparaginase
L01XX05 Hydroxycarbamide
L01XX11 Estramustine
L01XX14 Tretinone
L01XX17 Topotecan
L01XX19 Irinotecan
L01XX23 Mitotaan
L01XX24 Pegasparagase
L01XX25 Bexaroteen
L01XX27 Arseentrioxide
L01XX32 Bortezomib
L01XX35 Anagrelide
L01XX41 Eribuline
L01XX42 Panobinostat
L01XX43 Vismodegib
L01XX44 Aflibercept
L01XX45 Carfilzomib
L01XX46 Olaparib
L01XX47 Idelalisib
L01XX50 Ixazomib
L01XX51 Talimogeen Laherparepvec
L01XX52 Venetoclax
L02BB04 Enzalutamide
L02BX03 Abirateron
L03AX16 Plerixafor
L04AX02 Thalidomide
L04AX04 Lenalidomide
L04AX06 Pomalidomide
V10XX02 Ibritumomab-Tiuxetan
V10XX03 Radium-223 Dichloride

Based on additional reimbursements or add-ons: expensive or orphan drugs.

DDD not applicable; instead, the number of health claims are counted.

Table A5.

ATC codes for cancer II (based on add-on)

ATC code Name
L01AX04 Dacarbazine
L01BB02 Mercaptopurine
L01BB03 Tioguanine
L01BC02 Fluorouracil
L03AC01 Aldesleukine
V10XX04 lutetium Oxotreotide

Based on additional reimbursements or add-ons: expensive or orphan drugs.

DDD not applicable; instead, the number of health claims are counted.

Restriction: only if there is no ATC code for cancer I.

Table A6.

DDDs for central nervous system disorders: multiple sclerosis

ATC code Oral Parenteral
L03AB07 4.3 mg
L03AB08 4 milIU
L03AB13 8.9 μg
L03AX13 20 μg
L04AA27 0.5 mg
L04AA31 14 mg
N07XX09 480 mg

milIU, million international units.

Table A7.

DDDs for central nervous system disorders: other

ATC code Oral Parenteral
A07AA11 600 mg
M03BX01 50 mg 0.55 mg
M03BX02 12 mg
N07XX02 0.1 g

Restriction: only if there is no ATC code for central nervous system disorders: multiple sclerosis

Table A8.

DDDs for chronic anticoagulant use

ATC-code Oral
B01AA04 3 mg
B01AA07 5 mg
B01AE07 0.3 g
B01AF01 20 mg
B01AF02 10 mg
B01AF03 60 mg

Restriction: only if there is no ATC code for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD)/heavy asthma, COPD/heavy asthma (based on add-on), heart diseases and pulmonary (arterial) hypertension.

Table A9.

DDDs for chronic pain excluding opioids

ATC-code Oral Rectal Parenteral Transdermal
M01AA01 300 mg
M01AB01 100 mg 100 mg 100 mg
M01AB05 100 mg 100 mg 100 mg
M01AB16 200 mg
M01AB55 100 mg
M01AC01 20 mg 20 mg 20 mg
M01AC06 15 mg 15 mg 15 mg
M01AE01 1.2 g 1.2 g 1.2 g
M01AE02 500 mg 500 mg
M01AE03 150 mg 150 mg 150 mg
M01AE11 600 mg 600 mg
M01AE17 75 mg 75 mg
M01AE52 500 mg
M01AH01 200 mg
M01AH05 60 mg
M01AX01 1 g
N01BX04 4 g
N06AA09 75 mg 75 mg
N06AX21 60 mg

Restriction: only if there is no ATC code for neuropathic pain.

Table A10.

DDDs for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD)/heavy asthma

ATC code Oral Inhalation (aerosol) Inhalation (powder) Inhalation (solution) Parental Rectal
R03AC18 150 μg
R03AC19 5 μg
R03AL01 6 doses 3 doses
R03AL02 6 doses 7.5 mL
R03AL03 1 dose
R03AL04 1 dose
R03AL05 2 doses
R03AL06 2 doses
R03AL09 4 doses
R03BB01 0.12 mg 0.12 mg 0.3 mg
R03BB04 10 μg 5 μg
R03BB05 664 μg
R03BB06 44 μg
R03BB07 55 μg
R03DA04 0.4 g 0.4 g 0.4 g

Restriction: only if there is no ATC code for COPD/heavy asthma (based on add-on).

Table A11.

DDDs for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD)/heavy asthma (based on add-on)

ATC code Parental
R03DX05 16 mg
R03DX08 7.5 mg
R03DX09 3.6 mg

Based on additional reimbursements or add-ons: expensive or orphan drugs.

Table A12.

DDDs for Crohn’s disease/ulcerative colitis

ATC code Oral Rectal
A07EA04 100 mL
A07EA06 9 mg 1 tablet
A07EC02 1.5 g 1.5 g
A07EC03 1 g

Restriction: only if there is no ATC code for autoimmune diseases.

Table A13.

DDDs for cystic fibrosis/pancreas enzymes

ATC code Inhalation (powder) Inhalation (solution) Oral
A09AA02 4–6 tablets/capsules
J01GB01 112 mg 0.3 g
J01XB01 3 milIU
R05CB13 2.5 mg
R07AX30 4 tablets

milIU: million international units.

Table A14.

DDDs for depression

ATC code Oral Parenteral
N06AA02 0.1 g 0.1 g
N06AA04 0.1 g 0.1 g
N06AA10 75 mg 30 mg
N06AA12 0.1 g 0.1 g
N06AA16 0.15 g
N06AA21 0.1 g 0.1 g
N06AB03 20 mg
N06AB04 20 mg 20 mg
N06AB05 20 mg
N06AB06 50 mg
N06AB08 0.1 g
N06AB10 10 mg
N06AF03 60 mg
N06AF04 10 mg
N06AG02 0.3 g
N06AX03 60 mg
N06AX05 0.3 g
N06AX11 30 mg
N06AX12 0.3 Ga
N06AX16 0.1 g
N06AX22 25 mg
N06AX26 10 mg

Restriction: only if there is no ATC code for psychoses and addiction.

a

Drugs used to quit smoking excluded.

Table A15.

DDDs for DM Type I, DM Type Ia (>90 DDDs hypertension) or DM Type Ib (≤90 DDDs hypertension)

ATC code Parenteral
A10AB01 40 IU
A10AB04 40 IU
A10AB05 40 IU
A10AB06 40 IU
A10AC01 40 IU
A10AD01 40 IU
A10AD04 40 IU
A10AD05 40 IU
A10AD06 40 IU
A10AE04 40 IU
A10AE05 40 IU
A10AE06 40 IU
A10AE54 40 IU
A10AE56 40 IU

Table A16.

DDDs for DM Type II, DM Type IIa (>90 DDDs hypertension) or DM Type IIb (≤90 DDDs hypertension)

ATC code Oral Parenteral Parenteral depot
A10BA02 2 g
A10BB01 10 mg
A10BB03 1.5 g
A10BB09 60 mg
A10BB12 2 mg
A10BD02 2 tablets
A10BD05 2 tablets
A10BD07 2 tablets
A10BD08 2 tablets
A10BD10 2 tablets
A10BD11 2 tablets
A10BD15 2 tablets
A10BD16 2 tablets
A10BD20 2 tablets
A10BF01 0.3 g
A10BG03 30 mg
A10BH01 0.1 g
A10BH02 0.1 g
A10BH03 5 mg
A10BH05 5mg
A10BJ01 15 μg 286 μg
A10BJ02 1.2 mg
A10BJ03 20 μg
A10BJ05 0.16 mg
A10BK01 10 mg
A10BK02 200 mg
A10BK03 17.5 mg
A10BX02 4 mg

Restriction: Only if there is no ATC code for DM Type I (Ia or Ib).

Table A17.

DDDs for epilepsy

ATC-code Oral Parenteral Rectal
N03AA02 0.1 g 0.1 g
N03AA03 1.25 g
N03AB02 0.3 g 0.3 g
N03AD01 1.25 g
N03AE01 8 mg 8 mg
N03AF01 1 g 1 g
N03AF02 1 g
N03AF03 1.4 g
N03AG01 1.5 g 1.5 g 1.5 g
N03AG04 2 g
N03AX03 0.4 g
N03AX09 0.3 g
N03AX10 2.4 g
N03AX11 0.3 g
N03AX14 1.5 g 1.5 g
N03AX15 0.2 g
N03AX17 1 g
N03AX18 0.3 g 0.3 g
N03AX21 0.9 g
NO3AX22 8 mg
NO3AX23 100 mg 100 mg
N05BA09 20mg

Table A18.

ATC codes for extremely high costs, Cluster 1 (based on pharmacy claims and add-on)

ATC code Name
A16AA05 Cargluminezuur
A16AB02 Imiglucerase
A16AB03 Agalsidase Alfa
A16AB04 Agalsidase Beta
A16AB10 Velaglucerase Alfa
A16AX06 Miglustat
B01AC09 Epoprostenol
B01AC21 Treprostinil
N07XX08 Tafamidis

Based on additional reimbursements or add-ons: expensive or orphan drugs.

DDD not applicable; instead, the number of health claims are counted.

Table A19.

ATC codes for extreme high costs, Cluster 2 (based on add-on)

ATC code Name
A16AB05 Laronidase
L04AA25 Eculizumab

Based on additional reimbursements or add-ons: expensive or orphan drugs.

DDD not applicable; instead, the number of health claims are counted.

Table A20.

ATC codes for extreme high costs, Cluster 2 (based on add-on)

ATC code Name
A16AB07 Alglucosidase Alfa
A16AB08 Galsulfase
A16AB09 Idursulfase

Based on additional reimbursements or add-ons: expensive or orphan drugs.

DDD not applicable; instead, the number of health claims are counted.

Table A21.

DDDs for glaucoma

ATC-code Oral Parenteral Ocular
S01EA03 0.3 mL
S01EA05 0.2 mL
S01EB01 0.4/40 mL/mg
S01EC01 0.75 g 0.75 g
S01EC03 0.3 mL
S01EC04 0.2 mL
S01EC54 0.2 mL
S01ED01 0.2 mL
S01ED02 0.2 mL
S01ED03 0.2 mL
S01ED05 0.2 mL
S01ED51 0.1/0.2 mL
S01ED54 0.3 mL
S01EE01 0.1 mL
S01EE03 0.1 mL
S01EE04 0.1 mL
S01EE05 0.3mL

Table A22.

ATC codes and DDDs for growth disorders (based on add-on)

ATC-code Parenteral
H01AC01 2 IU
H01AC03 2 mg

Based on additional reimbursements or add-ons: expensive or orphan drugs.

Table A23.

DDDs for heart diseases

ATC- code Oral Oral (aerosol) Parenteral Sublingual Transdermal
C01AA05 0.25 mg 0.25 mg
C01BA01 1.2 g
C01BA03 0.4 mg 0.4 mg
C01BB01 3 g
C01BC03 0.3 g 0.3 g
C01BC04 0.2 g 0.2 g
C01BD01 0.2 g 0.2 g
C01CE02 50 mg
C01CE03 1 g
C01DA02 5 mg 2.5 mg 10 mg 2.5 mg 5 mg
C01DA08 60 mg 20 mg 10 mg 20 mg 0.1 g
C01DA14 40 mg
C01DX16 40 mg
C01EB17 10mg
C03CA01 40 mg 40 mg
C03CA02 1 mg 1 mg
C09DX04 2 tablets

Table A24.

ATC codes and DDDs for HIV/AIDS

ATC-code Oral Parenteral
J05AE01 1.8 g
J05AE02 2.4 g
J05AE03 1.2 g
J05AE07 1.4 g
J05AE08 0.3 g
J05AE09 1 g
J05AE10 1.2 g
J05AF01 0.6 g 0.6 g
J05AF02 0.4 g
J05AF04 80 mg
J05AF05 0.3 g
J05AF06 0.6 g
J05AF07 0.245 g
J05AF09 0.2 g
J05AG01 0.4 g
J05AG03 0.6 g
J05AG04 0.4 g
J05AG05 25 mg
J05AR01 2 tablets
J05AR02 1 tablet
J05AR03 1 tablet
J05AR04 2 tablets
J05AR06 1 tablet
J05AR08 1 tablet
J05AR09 1 tablet
J05AR10 0.8 g
J05AR13 1 tablet
J05AR14 1 tablet
J05AR17 1 tablet
J05AR18 1 tablet
J05AR19 1 tablet
J05AX07 0.18 g
J05AX08 0.8 g
J05AX09 0.6 g
J05AX12 50 mg
V03AX03 150 mg

Table A25.

DDDs for hormone-sensitive tumours

ATC-code Oral Parenteral Parenteral depot Implantation Nasal
L02AB01 0.16 g
L02AB02 1 g 1 g
L02AE01 1.5 mg 0.11 mg 1.2 mg
L02AE02 1mg 0.134 mg 60 μg
L02AE03 0.129 mg
L02AE05 0.137 mg
L02BA01 20 mg
L02BA03 8.3 mg
L02BB01 0.75 g
L02BB02 0.3 g
L02BB03 50 mg
L02BG03 1 mg
L02BG04 2.5 mg
L02BG06 25 mg
L02BX01 3.6 mg
L02BX02 2.7 mg

Restriction: only if there is no ATC code for cancer I or cancer II.

Table A26.

ATC codes for immunoglobulin therapy (based on add-on)

ATC code Name
J06BA02 Immunoglobuline i.v.

Based on additional reimbursements or add-ons: expensive or orphan drugs.

DDD not applicable; instead, the number of health claims are counted.

Table A27.

DDDs for neuropathic pain

ATC-code Oral
N03AX12 1.8 g
N03AX16 0.3 g

Table A28.

DDDs for Parkinson’s disease

ATC-code Oral Parenteral Transdermal
N04BA02 0.6 g
N04BA03 0.45 g
N04BB01 0.2 g
N04BC01 40 mg
N04BC02 3 mg
N04BC04 6 mg
N04BC05 2.5 mg
N04BC07 20 mg
N04BC09 6 mg
N04BD01 5 mg
N04BD02 1 mg
N04BD03 75 mg
N04BX01 0.45 g
N04BX02 1 g

Table A29.

ATC codes and DDDs for psoriasis

ATC-code Oral Transdermal
D05AC01 1 g or mg or mL
D05AX02 1 g or mg or mL
D05AX03 1 g or mg or mL
D05AX52 1 g or mg or mL
D05BA02 10 mg
D05BB02 35 mg
D05BX 120 mg
D05BX51 120 mg

Restriction: only if there is no ATC code for autoimmune disorders.

Table A30.

DDDs for psychosis and addiction (excluding nicotin)

ATC-code Oral Parenteral Parenteral depot Rectal Sublingual
N05AA01 0.3 g 0.1 g 0.3 g
N05AB02 10 mg 1 mg
N05AB03 30 mg 10 mg 7 mg 16 mg
N05AC01 50 mg 20 mg
N05AD01 8 mg 8 mg 3.3 mg
N05AD05 0.2 g
N05AD06 10 mg 10 mg 3.3 mg
N05AE03 16 mg
N05AE05 60 mg
N05AF01 6 mg 4 mg
N05AF03 0.3 g 50 mg
N05AF05 30 mg 30 mg 15 mg
N05AG01 0.7 mg
N05AG02 4 mg
N05AG03 6 mg
N05AH02 0.3 g 0.3 g
N05AH03 10 mg 10 mg 10 mg
N05AH04 0.4 g
N05AL01 0.8 g 0.8 g
N05AX08 5 mg 2.7 mg
N05AX12 15 mg 15 mg 13.3 mg
N05AX13 6 mg 2.5 mg
N07BB01 0.2 g
N07BB03 2 g
N07BB04 50 mg
N07BB05 18 mg
N07BC01 8 mg
N07BC02 25 mg 25 mg
N07BC51 8mg

Table A31.

DDDs for pulmonary (arterial) hypertension

ATC-code Oral Parenteral Inhalation
B01AC11 50 μg 150 μg
B01AC27 1.8 mg
C02KX01 250 mg
C02KX02 7.5 mg
C02KX04 10 mg
C02KX05 4.5 mg
G04BE03 50 mg
G04BE08 10 mg

Table A32.

DDDs for rheumatoid arthritis

ATC-code Oral Parenteral Rectal
A07EC01 2 g 2 g
L01BA01 3.571 mg
L04AA13 20 mg
L04AX03 2.5 mg 3.571 mg
M01CB01 2.4 mg
M01CC01 0.5 g
P01BA02 0.516 g

Restriction: Only if there is no ATC code for auto-immune disorders.

Table A33.

DDDs for thyroid disorders

ATC-code Oral Parenteral
H03AA01 0.15 mg 0.15mg
H03AA02 60 μg 60 μg
H03BA02 0.1 g
H03BB01 15 mg
H03BB02 10 mg

APPENDIX 2: SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS

Sensitivity analysis was performed in which the prevalence of PP was examined in case all deceased patients in 2017 were included.

CKD Dialysis Kidney transplantation
Main analysis (n = 14 905) Sensitivity analysis (n = 17 198) Main analysis (n = 3872) Sensitivity analysis (n = 17 198) Main analysis (n = 8796) Sensitivity analysis (n = 9087)
All medication use, %
PP ≥5 drugs 87.4 85.2 93.4 89.8 94.8 94.4
EPP ≥10 drugs 56.7 55.8 69.3 66.2 60.0 60.4
HPP ≥15 drugs 22.8 23.1 31.5 29.9 21.5 22.2
Chronic medication use
PP ≥5 drugs 66.1 60.8 70.0 60.9 75.0 73.8
EPP ≥10 drugs 13.3 12.0 15.1 12.7 14.9 14.7
HPP ≥15 drugs 0.85 0.74 1.2 1.0 1.0 1.0

APPENDIX 3

Table A1.

Percentage of most commonly prescribed dispensed medication classes of CKD stage G4/G5 not on KRT, dialysis and kidney transplant patients and matched controls; medication classes defined for all medication use

All medication use
CKD Dialysis Kidney transplantation
Patients, % Matched controls, % Patients, % Matched controls, % Patients, % Matched controls, %
Medication classes (n = 14 905) (n = 29 810) (n = 3872) (n = 7744) (n = 8796) (n = 17 592)
Cardiovascular drugs
 ACE inhibitors 30.0 13.0 16.8 11.9 31.5 6.1
 ARB 31.4 10.7 16.7 8.9 20.8 5.1
 Beta-blockers 56.6 19.1 61.3 16.6 56.4 8.1
 Calcium channel blockers 44.1 10.8 35.9 9.8 47.9 4.9
 Diuretics 51.0 14.2 45.7 11.8 26.1 5.
Statins 61.3 22.7 48.2 21.4 63.5 12.0
PPIs 56.9 22.8 71.0 19.8 58.2 10.1
Vitamin D analogues 73.3 15.1 76.2 11.9 65.3 5.7
Antithrombotic agents 64.5 25.3 70.5 21.5 39.5 9.6
 Platelet aggregation inhibitors 41.7 16.4 49.6 14.7 26.2 6.8
 Vitamin K antagonist 24.2 6.7 26.9 5.0 12.3 1.5
 Heparin 3.0 1.2 4.4 1.1 4.1 0.7
 DOAC/NOAC 2.1 2.9 0.08 2.4 2.5 1.1
Antidiabetics 31.8 8.8 27.5 8.0 27.4 4.5
 Insulin 19.9 2.6 22.0 2.6 15.2 1.3
 Metformin 6.4 7.2 0.31 6.6 15.0 3.8
 Sulphonureumderivate 13.2 3.6 6.8 3.1 8.8 1.8
 SGLT2 inhibitors 0.09 0.05 0.09 0.13 0.06
 DPP-4 inhibitors 2.9 0.34 1.8 0.27 1.1 0.15
 GLP-1 analogues 0.28 0.06 0.10 0.14 0.14 0.11
Antibiotics 39.4 19.0 51.9 16.8 54.3 12.5
Cinacalcet 2.2 0.04 23.5 0.03 8.2 0.01
Osteoporosis prophylaxis
 Bisfosfonates 2.0 2.6 0.28 1.9 8.5 0.81
 Calcium derivates 15.3 6.4 22.4 4.8 26.6 2.1
Urate-lowering therapy 25.4 1.9 17.2 1.6 14.6 0.88
Phosphate binders 12.1 0.02 78.5 0.05 3.0 0.02
Haematopoietic
 Irona 14.2 1.6 4.6 1.2 7.1 0.54
 EPOa 18.8 0.13 4.7 0.12 5.4 0.01
Opioids 8.6 3.2 13.2 2.8 6.7 1.5
a

Intravenous iron and EPO therapy were not included in this study.

SGLT2: sodium–glucose-cotransporter 2; DPP-4: dipeptidylpeptidase-4; GLP-1: glucagon-like peptide-1; EPO: erythropoietin.

Table A2.

Percentage of most commonly prescribed dispensed medication classes of CKD stage G4/G5 not on KRT, dialysis and kidney transplant patients and matched controls; medication classes defined for chronic use (complement to Table 5 in main article)

Chronic medication use
CKD Dialysis Kidney transplantation
Patients (%) Matched controls (%) Patients (%) Matched controls (%) Patients (%) Matched controls (%)
Medication classes (n = 14,905) (n = 29,810) (n = 3,872) (n = 7,744) (n = 8,796) (n = 17,592)
Antidiabetics
 SGLT2 inhibitors 0.05 0.02 0.06 0.08 0.02
 DPP-4 inhibitors 2.1 0.28 1.2 0.19 0.76 0.09
 GLP-1 analogues 0.19 0.04 0.08 0.12 0.07 0.11
Antibiotics 0.40 0.17 0.80 0.19 1.4 0.10
Cinacalcet 0.98 0.02 12.7 4.5
Osteoporosis prophylaxis
 Bisfosfonates 1.4 2.1 0.08 1.5 6.2 0.65
 Calcium derivates 10.7 4.8 15.2 3.6 18.2 1.5
Urate-lowering therapy 7.7 0.81 2.9 0.77 5.5 0.35
Phosphate binders 1.6 44.6 0.28
Hematopoietics
 Irona 3.4 0.35 1.0 0.36 1.2 0.05
 EPO 8.1 0.08 0.85 0.08 2.26
Opioids 1.7 0.58 2.0 0.52 1.2 0.34
a

Intravenous iron and EPO therapy were not included in this study.

DOAC/NOAC: direct oral anticoagulant/novel oral anticoagulant; SGLT2: sodium-glucose-cotransporter 2; DPP-4: dipeptidylpeptidase-4; GLP-1: glucagon-like peptide-1; EPO: erythropoietin.

Contributor Information

Manon J M van Oosten, Department of Medical Informatics, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.

Susan J J Logtenberg, Department of Internal Medicine, Diakonessenhuis, Utrecht, The Netherlands.

Marc H Hemmelder, Division of Nephrology, Department of Internal Medicine, Maastricht University Medical Center, The Netherlands; Cardiovascular Research Institute Maastricht, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands.

Martijn J H Leegte, Dutch Renal Registry, Nefrovisie Foundation, Utrecht, The Netherlands.

Henk J G Bilo, Diabetes Research Center and Department of Epidemiology and Statistics, Isala Hospital, Zwolle, The Netherlands; Department of Internal Medicine, University Medical Center, Groningen, The Netherlands; Faculty of Medicine, Groningen University, Groningen, The Netherlands.

Kitty J Jager, Department of Medical Informatics, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.

Vianda S Stel, Department of Medical Informatics, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.

REFERENCES

  • 1. Fincke  BG, Snyder  K, Cantillon  C  et al.  Three complementary definitions of polypharmacy: methods, application and comparison of findings in a large prescription database. Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf  2005; 14: 121–128 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2. Payne  RA.  The epidemiology of polypharmacy. Clin Med (Lond)  2016; 16: 465–469 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3. Morin  L, Johnell  K, Laroche  ML  et al.  The epidemiology of polypharmacy in older adults: register-based prospective cohort study. Clin Epidemiol  2018; 10: 289–298 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4. Fano  V.  Estimating the prevalence and the determinants of polypharmacy using data from a health administrative database: a comparison of results obtained employing different algorithms. Adv Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf  2014; 3: 151 [Google Scholar]
  • 5. Mason  NA, Bakus  JL.  Strategies for reducing polypharmacy and other medication-related problems in chronic kidney disease. Semin Dial  2010; 23: 55–61 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6. Schmidt  IM, Hübner  S, Nadal  J  et al.  Patterns of medication use and the burden of polypharmacy in patients with chronic kidney disease: the German Chronic Kidney Disease study. Clin Kidney J  2019; 12: 663–672 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7. Laville  SM, Metzger  M, Stengel  B  et al.  Evaluation of the adequacy of drug prescriptions in patients with chronic kidney disease: results from the CKD-REIN cohort. Br J Clin Pharmacol  2018; 84: 2811–2823 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8. Fraser  SDS, Roderick  PJ, May  CR  et al.  The burden of comorbidity in people with chronic kidney disease stage 3: a cohort study. BMC Nephrol  2015; 16: 193. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9. Mason  NA.  Polypharmacy and medication-related complications in the chronic kidney disease patient. Curr Opin Nephrol Hypertens  2011; 20: 492–497 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10. Battistella  M, Jandoc  R, Ng  JY  et al.  A province-wide, cross-sectional study of demographics and medication use of patients in hemodialysis units across Ontario. Can J Kidney Health Dis  2018; 5: 2054358118760832. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11. Park  HY, Ryu  HN, Shim  MK  et al.  Prescribed drugs and polypharmacy in healthcare service users in South Korea: an analysis based on National Health Insurance Claims data. Int J Clin Pharmacol Ther  2016; 54: 369–377 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12. Leelakanok  N, Holcombe  AL, Lund  BC  et al.  Association between polypharmacy and death: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Am Pharm Assoc  2017; 57: 729–738.e10 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13. Parker  K, Nikam  M, Jayanti  A, Mitra  S.  Medication burden in CKD-5D: impact of dialysis modality and setting. Clin Kidney J  2014; 7: 557–561 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14. St Peter  WL.  Management of polypharmacy in dialysis patients. Semin Dial  2015; 28: 427–432 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15. Hayward  S, Hole  B, Denholm  R  et al.  International prescribing patterns and polypharmacy in older people with advanced chronic kidney disease: results from the European Quality study. Nephrol Dial Transplant  2020; 36: 503–511 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16. Alshamrani  M, Almalki  A, Qureshi  M  et al.  Polypharmacy and medication-related problems in hemodialysis patients: a call for deprescribing. Pharmacy (Basel)  2018; 6: 76. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17. Woźniak  I, Kolonko  A, Chudek  J  et al.  Influence of polypharmacy on the quality of life in stable kidney transplant recipients. Transplant Proc  2018; 50: 1896–1899 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18. Vektis. Vektis - Inzichten op maat.  www.vektis.nl (3 March 2020, date last accessed)
  • 19. de Boo  A.  Vektis - information center for health care services. TSG  2011; 89: 358–359 [Google Scholar]
  • 20. Westerdijk  M, Zuurbier  J, Ludwig  M, Prins  S.  Defining care products to finance health care in the Netherlands. Eur J Health Econ  2012; 13: 203–221 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21. World Health Organization. Defined Daily Dose. Definition and General Considerations. Geneva: World Health Organization. 2021. https://www.who.int/tools/atc-ddd-toolkit/about-ddd
  • 22. Lamers  LM.  Pharmacy costs groups: a risk-adjuster for capitation payments based on the use of prescribed drugs. Med Care  1999; 37: 824–830 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23. Lamers  LM, van Vliet  RCJA.  The Pharmacy-based Cost Group model: validating and adjusting the classification of medications for chronic conditions to the Dutch situation. Health Policy  2004; 68: 113–121 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24. Greenland  S, Thomas  DC.  On the need for the rare disease assumption in case-control studies. Am J Epidemiol  1982; 116: 547–553 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25. Jager  KJ, Zoccali  C, Macleod  A  et al.  Confounding: what it is and how to deal with it. Kidney Int  2008; 73: 256–260 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26. Mohnen  SM, van Oosten  MJM, Los  J  et al.  Healthcare costs of patients on different renal replacement modalities – analysis of Dutch health insurance claims data. PLoS One  2019; 14: e0220800. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27. van Oosten  MJM, Brohet  RM, Logtenberg  SJJ  et al.  The validity of Dutch health claims data for identifying patients with chronic kidney disease: a hospital-based study in the Netherlands. Clin Kidney J  2021; 14: 1586–1593 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28. Chiu  YW, Teitelbaum  I, Misra  M  et al.  Pill burden, adherence, hyperphosphatemia, and quality of life in maintenance dialysis patients. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol  2009; 4: 1089–1096 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29. Manley  HJ, Cannella  CA, Bailie  GR  et al.  Medication-related problems in ambulatory hemodialysis patients: a pooled analysis. Am J Kidney Dis  2005; 46: 669–680 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30. Hardinger  KL, Hutcherson  T, Preston  D  et al.  Influence of pill burden and drug cost on renal function after transplantation. Pharmacotherapy  2012; 32: 427–432 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31. Adhikari  UR, Taraphder  A, Hazra  A  et al.  Pill burden does not influence compliance with oral medication in recipients of renal transplant. Indian J Pharmacol  2016; 48: 21–25 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32. Low  JK, Crawford  K, Manias  E  et al.  Quantifying the medication burden of kidney transplant recipients in the first year post-transplantation. Int J Clin Pharm  2018; 40: 1242–1249 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33. Bril  F, Castro  V, Centurion  IG  et al.  A systematic approach to assess the burden of drug interactions in adult kidney transplant patients. Curr Drug Saf  2016; 11: 156–163 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34. Cadogan  CA, Ryan  C, Hughes  CM.  Appropriate polypharmacy and medicine safety: when many is not too many. Drug Saf  2016; 39: 109–116 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35. Schuler  J, Dückelmann  C, Beindl  W  et al.  Polypharmacy and inappropriate prescribing in elderly internal-medicine patients in Austria. Wien Klin Wochenschr  2008; 120: 733–741 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36. Manley  HJ, Garvin  CG, Drayer  DK  et al.  Medication prescribing patterns in ambulatory haemodialysis patients: comparisons of USRDS to a large not-for-profit dialysis provider. Nephrol Dial Transplant 2004; 19: 1842–1848 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37. Parker  K, Wong  J.  Is polypharmacy an increasing burden in chronic kidney disease? The German experience. Clin Kidney J  2019; 12: 659–662 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38. Fried  TR, O’Leary  J, Towle  V  et al.  Health outcomes associated with polypharmacy in community-dwelling older adults: a systematic review. J Am Geriatr Soc  2014; 62: 2261–2272 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39. Payne  RA, Abel  GA, Avery  AJ  et al.  Is polypharmacy always hazardous? A retrospective cohort analysis using linked electronic health records from primary and secondary care. Br J Clin Pharmacol  2014; 77: 1073–1082 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40. NHG-Richtlijen. Chronische nierschade. https://richtlijnen.nhg.org/standaarden/chronische-nierschade
  • 41. Wanner  C, Krane  V, März  W  et al.  Atorvastatin in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus undergoing hemodialysis. N Engl J Med  2005; 353: 238–248 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42. Baigent  C, Landray  MJ, Reith  C  et al.  The effects of lowering LDL cholesterol with simvastatin plus ezetimibe in patients with chronic kidney disease (Study of Heart and Renal Protection): a randomised placebo-controlled trial. Lancet 2011; 377: 2181–2192 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43. Fellström  BC, Jardine  AG, Schmieder  RE  et al.  Rosuvastatin and cardiovascular events in patients undergoing hemodialysis. N Engl J Med  2009; 360: 1395–1407 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44. Wanner  C, Tonelli  M, Kidney Disease: Improving Global Outcomes Lipid Guideline Development Work Group Members.  KDIGO clinical practice guideline for lipid management in CKD: summary of recommendation statements and clinical approach to the patient. Kidney Int  2014; 85: 1303–1309 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45. Desbuissons  G, Mercadal  L.  Use of proton pump inhibitors in dialysis patients: a double-edged sword. J Nephrol  2021; 34: 661–672 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46. McIntyre  C, McQuillan  R, Bell  C  et al.  Targeted deprescribing in an outpatient hemodialysis unit: a quality improvement study to decrease polypharmacy. Am J Kidney Dis  2017; 70: 611–618 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47. Triantafylidis  LK, Hawley  CE, Perry  LP  et al.  The role of deprescribing in older adults with chronic kidney disease. Drugs Aging  2018; 35: 973–984 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48. MacRae  CE, Mercer  S, Guthrie  B.  Potentially inappropriate prescribing in people with chronic kidney disease: cross-sectional analysis of a large population cohort. Br J Gen Pract  2020; 71: e483–e490 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49. Ortiz  A, Covic  A, Fliser  D  et al.  Epidemiology, contributors to, and clinical trials of mortality risk in chronic kidney failure. Lancet  2014; 383: 1831–1843 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Data Availability Statement

The Vektis database used for this study can only be accessed by contacting Vektis (see www.vektis.nl).


Articles from Clinical Kidney Journal are provided here courtesy of Oxford University Press

RESOURCES