Abstract
Exosomes are endogenous extracellular vesicles (30–100 nm) composed with membrane lipid bilayer which carry vesicular proteins, enzymes, mRNA, miRNA and nucleic acids. They act as messengers for intra- and inter-cellular communication. In addition to their physiological roles, exosomes have the potential to encapsulate and deliver small chemotherapeutic drugs and biological molecules such as proteins and nucleic acid-based drugs to the recipient tissue or organs. Due to their biological properties, exosomes have better organotropism, homing capacity, cellular uptake and cargo release ability than other synthetic nano-drug carriers such as liposomes, micelles and nanogels. The secretion of tumor-derived exosomes is increased in the hypoxic and acidic tumor microenvironment, which can be used as a target for nontoxic and nonimmunogenic drug delivery vehicles for various cancers. Moreover, exosomes have the potential to carry both hydrophilic and hydrophobic chemotherapeutic drugs, bypass RES effect and bypass BBB. Exosomes can be isolated from other types of EVs and cell debris based on their size, density and specific surface proteins through ultracentrifugation, density gradient separation, precipitation, immunoaffinity interaction and gel filtration. Drugs can be loaded into exosomes at the biogenesis stage or with the isolated exosomes by incubation, electroporation, extrusion or sonication methods. Finally, exosomal cargo vehicles can be characterized by ultrastructural microscopic analysis. In this review we intend to summarize the inception, structure and function of the exosomes, role of exosomes in immunological regulation and cancer, methods of isolation and characterization of exosomes and products under clinical trials. This review will provide an inclusive insight of exosomes in drug delivery.
Keywords: exosomes, extracellular vesicles, biogenesis, tumor microenvironment, drug delivery, nano drug carriers
I. INTRODUCTION
Tumour microenvironment (TME) have several barriers to deliver therapeutic drugs into the site of action. Vascular endothelial boundaries, mononuclear phagocyte framework, low pH, low oxygenation and high interstitial liquid weight are the most widely recognized TME obstructions.1,2 It is a big challenge to deliver a sufficient quantity of chemotherapeutic drugs to the target tumor site without harmful side effects to the normal tissue.3 Nano drug delivery is one of the strategies which has the potential benefit to overcome the challenge related to chemotherapeutic drug failure and off-target toxicity.4-11 Nano drug carriers (NDCs) increase drug solubility, bioavailability and biodistribution.12,13 Moreover, passively targeted NDCs act via enhanced permeability and retention effect by passing through leaky vasculature and poor lymphatic drainage of tumor site.14-17
Liposomes, micelles, dendrimers, antibodies and polymeric materials are among the recently emerged and clinically approved NDCs.18-23 Currently, there are various, clinically approved nanotechnology-based chemotherapeutic drugs. There are also numerous drugs at clinical and preclinical stages of development.24 NDCs can encapsulate ionic, lipophilic and hydrophilic as well as hydrophobic drugs. Ideal NDCs should be stable, nonimmunogenic, biodegradable, cost-effective, easy to fabricate, convenient for drug loading and be able to release their cargo at the targeted site of action.25-27 However, opsonization of nanoparticles by the reticuloendothelial system (RES) is the main drawback of NDCs.28 Modification of NDCs with polyethylene glycol (PEG) serves to by-pass the RES and improves the flow half-existence of medications and subsequently helps to deliver at targeted areas with increased restorative adequacy.29,30 It is still challenging to develop an ideal NDCs by formulation driven approach.31 Currently, there is an upcoming new paradigm to use exosome vehicle in place of synthetic lipidic or polymeric NDCs.32-36 Exosomes, a type of extracellular vesicles (EVs) which can be secreted naturally by all kinds of cells and can be readily found in different body fluids.37,38 Like liposomes, exosomes are also a phospholipid bilayer containing cell-derived vesicles which can load different proteins, lipids and nucleic acids.39 Unlike other synthetic NDCs vesicles, exosomes are composed of varying surface membrane proteins.39 Exosomes are 30–150 nm in diameter, with vesicular membrane thickness of 5–8 nm, which carry a net negative charge with a density range between 1.13–1.19 g/mL.40,41 Exosomes have zeta potential in the range of −10 to −50 mV in phosphate buffered saline.42,33
Endogenous NDCs can deliver chemotherapeutic drugs with higher efficiency and lesser side effects than synthetic NDCs.44,45 Exosomes have a described natural ability to transport functional biomolecules, such as RNAs, DNAs, and proteins in their lumen. Naturally, exosomes have also favorable tumor homing property and high stability. These properties have enabled them to be considered as future suitable NDCs for chemotherapeutics.46,47 In this review, we delineate the latest studies on the role of exosomes as endogenous NDCs for chemotherapeutic agents. Further, background information on the biogenesis, biological function, isolation mechanisms, characterization methods, drug loading mechanisms, and the exosomes under clinical trials has also been discussed.
II. BIOGENESIS, CARGO SORTING, EXOCYTOSIS, CELLULAR UPTAKE, AND VESICULAR RELEASE OF EXOSOMES
Exosome biogenesis includes several intra-cellular processes; endocytosis of the plasma membrane, formation of early endosome (EE), transformation of EE into late endosome (LE)/multivesicular bodies (MVBs), fusion of MVBs to plasma membrane for exosome release, or fusion of MVB to the lysosomes for degradation.48 An overview of the biogenesis process of exosomes is represented in Fig. 1. EE are formed close to active endocytosis site through the invaginated plasma membrane to maintain endocytic space for lipids, proteins and other molecules.49-51 The EE transform into LE or MVB. Intraluminal vesicles (ILVs) are formed from LE through inward budding of MVBs.52,53 ILVs are packages of sorted trace cytosolic components, transmembrane proteins and nucleic acid components.54 MVBs fuse to the plasma membrane and release ILVs into extracellular space as exosomes. In contrary, some portions of MVBs fuse to lysosomes for degradation.54,55 However, it is currently unknown what mechanisms differentiate “secretary MVB from degradative MVB.”56
FIG. 1:
Exosome biogenesis, cargo sorting, and release. Vesicle formation and cargo sorting starts from the endocytosis and ends in the MVBs. (A) Endocytosis of the plasma membrane. (B) Uptake of proteins, nucleic acids, and membrane–associated molecules into encysted body and formation of EE. (C) Transformation of EE in to MVB/LE, ILV formation by inward budding of MVB/LE, and cargo sorting through ESCRT and ESCRT independent pathways. (D) Fusion of MVB/LE with the plasma membrane and lysosome. (E) Exocytosis of exosome in response of MVB/plasma membrane interaction. (F) Degradation of MVBs/LE by lysosome.
Exosomes biogenesis is closely related to the sorting of cargo molecules.57 Exosomes get their vesicular components through endosomal sorting complexes required for transport (ESCRT) or ESCRT independent pathways.58,59 ESCRT complexes are cytoplasmic proteins which take part in membrane budding or bending MVB biogenesis and takes part in sorting of proteins, non-ubiquitinated, lipids and nucleic acids into the ILV.60 Vacuolar protein sorting protein 31(VPS-31), VPS-4B and tumor susceptibility gene 101 protein (TSG101) are ESCRT proteins which sort exosomal cargo into MVBs/ILV.61,62 ESCRT independent pathway involves melanosomes, sphingomyelinase pathway and ATP-biding cassette transporters (ABT).48,63-66
Melanosomes are specialized endosomal structure present in pigment cells which create MVB like morphology for ILVs formation.63,64,67 The exosomal membranes have a lipid raft membrane with lipid raft association protein which is involved in protein sorting and exosome assembly.65,68,69 Moreover, cell surface protein components like tetraspanin proteins (CD63) and ceramide helps to load proteins into ILVs through ESCRT independent pathways.48
Subsequent to exosome cargo sorting, a fusion of MVBs with the plasma membrane leads to exosome exocytosis and release to the local and distant environment.70 The recruitment of exocytic membrane (SNAREs) to the anchored MVB is the essential step, and then small GTPases (Rab27a, Rab27b) take part in the final release role.71-73 SNARE proteins (SNAP23, syntaxin-4 and VAMP7) are involved in the release of exosomes. However, reports by Edgar et al., Mobius et al., and Verweijet et al. demonstrated that some portion of exosomes remain attached to the parent cell surface and are involved in signaling platforms for juxtracrine communication.74-76
Exosomal internalization and intracellular trafficking are the vital steps to cross the biological barriers and deliver the vesicular cargo components.77 Cellular uptake of exosomes has been shown to occur via; clathrin-mediated endocytosis, lipid raft-mediated endocytosis, heparin sulfate proteoglycans-dependent endocytosis, phagocytosis or by direct fusion with the plasma membrane.78-81 Katrin et al. demonstrated that the uptake of exosome depends on the extracellular signal-regulated kinase, Hsp27 signaling and lipid raft mediated endocytosis.82 The fusion of internalized exosomes with lysosomes/endosomes results in cargo release in the cytoplasm and transfer of cellular information from donor to recipient cells.70 Figure 2 shows the multi-level process of exosome uptake, internalization and cargo release.
FIG. 2:
Mechanism of exosome–cell interaction, cellular uptake, and cargo release. Ligands on the exosome surface membrane bind to the target cell membrane and fusion of exosome and uptake of exosome occur through: (1) Fusion of the exosomal membrane with the cellular membrane, (2) endocytosis and downstream signaling cascade, and (3) fusion of exosomes into endosome/lysosome and cargo release into the cytosol.
III. VESICULAR COMPOSITION OF EXOSOMES
Exosomes have phospholipid bilayer and contain various exosomal membrane surface proteins. The bio-synthesized exosome membranes are composed of flotillin, annexins, GTPases, sphingomyelin, cholesterol, ceramide and also MHC-II. In addition to those, endosome-specific tetraspanins and biogenesis-related proteins appear on the surface of the exosome membrane.51,54 Tetraspanins (CD9, CD9, CD37, CD53, CD63, CD81 and CD82) are exosomal surface proteins which take part in fusion, penetration and invasion processes of exosomes.83 Heat shock proteins (Hsp27, Hsp60, Hsp70, and Hsp90) are also packed abundantly in exosomes as part of a stress response.83 Hsps are involved in antigen binding, presentation and even in preventing in vitro aggregation of unfolded proteins through hydrophobic interaction.84 Cell adhesion proteins (integrins, lactadherin and intercellular adhesion molecule 1) are also found in exosomes which help in fusion of exosomes to cells and extracellular matrix.85 Major histocompatibility molecules (MHC) class I and II are mainly found in mast cells (MCs) derived exosomes and these play a key role in immunoregulation.83,86 MVB formation proteins (Tsg101, Alix, and Vps) are exosomal proteins involved in exosomes release and transport.52 Rab family proteins (Rab2, Rab5, Rab27, Rab35 and Rab7) are also found in exosomes and are involved in exosome biogenesis, release, transport and docking of the MVB to the plasma membrane.83,87,88
The composition of lipids are thought to be different according to the source of exosomes.54 However, the majority of exosomes are composed of sphingomyelin, phosphatidylcholine, phosphatidylethanolamine, phosphatidylserines and phosphatidylinositol.89 These lipids have a function in vesicular membrane formation and stability of exosomes. Epidermal growth factor (EGFR) signal transduction proteins, β-catenin proteins, phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase (P13K), and mucin are also components of exosomes that likely participate in cell signaling events in recipient cells.90,91
Exosomes are mini-illustrative version of parental cells with major intra-vesicular conglomerations of proteins, lipids and nucleic acids.92,93 The complexity and diversity of vesicular packages are mainly determined by their donor cells.94,95 Based on the latest studies, there are around 4563 proteins, 194 lipids, 1639 mRNA and 764 miRNAs found in exosomes.96-99 Figure 3 shows the schematic diagram of the exosomal surface and vesicular core components. The core of the exosomes is composed of proteins, nucleic acids and enzymes. Exosomal proteins are also miscellaneous based on the sources and parent cells.100,101 Glycoproteins, ESCRT proteins and membrane transport proteins (associated lysosomal proteins, CD13 and PG regulatory proteins) are also components of exosomal vesicles. Other major components depending on the cell source include; histones, ribosomal proteins, ubiquitin, major vault protein and complement factor 3.83 Proteins related to metabolic enzymes like fatty acid synthetase, glyceraldehyde-3-phosphatedehydrogenase, phosphoglyc eratekinase1, ATPase, phosphoglycerate mutase 1, pyruvate kinase isozymes M1/M2, ATP citrate lyase, glucose-6-phosphate isomerase, peroxiredoxin1, aspartate aminotransferase and aldehyde reductase are some of the common enzymes identified in exosomal vesicles.83,102-104
FIG. 3:
Exosome vesicle and vesicular components. Exosomes have a phospholipid bilayer (yellow) and contain various exosomal membrane surface proteins. The core of the exosomes is composed of proteins, nucleic acids, and enzymes.
IV. SOURCES OF EXOSOMES
Exosomes are secreted by almost all types of endothelial and cancer cells and found in different body fluids such as blood plasma, urine, milk, saliva, amniotic, bronchioalveolar, synovial and also in ascites fluids.105,106 Among the circulating exosomes, 80–90% are derived from platelets, lymphocytes, dendritic cells (DCs) and other immune cells. Epithelial cells, macrophages, mast cells, reticulocytes, neurons, B-cells, T-cells, oligodendrocytes, Schwann cells and tumor cells are readily studied source of exosomes.83,107-109
The vesicular composition of exosomes is entirely dependent on parental cells and fluids and it is an indicator for pathophysiological roles in any organisms.110 Ferguson et al. reported the integrin signaling differences between prostate cancer cell (PC3) derived exosomes and human embryonic kidney cells (HEK) 293 derived exosomes.110 The PC3 derived exosomes contained more mRNA than HEK. In other studies, milk-derived exosomes have been reported as immunomodulatory inducers.111,112 The report by Agrawal et al. demonstrated that milk-derived exosomes were used for oral delivery of paclitaxel.113 Chen et al. revealed that porcine milk-derived exosomes could promote the proliferation of intestinal epithelial cells.114 Exosomes from biliary fluids have shown significant regulatory roles in cholangiocytes proliferation and viral inhibition.115 Tumor-derived exosomes play a role in cell and microenvironment interactions.116,117 Adipocytes and HepG-2 cells are also reported as sources of exosomes and showed the interactions of cells and microenvironment communications.118
V. PATHOPHYSIOLOGICAL ROLES OF EXOSOMES
Exosomes intervene in cellular or organ crosstalk in both physiologic and pathologic conditions through autocrine, paracrine or endocrine signaling pathways.118-121 Exosomes play a pivotal role in bioactive molecule transportation, immune response, antigen-presentation, protein quality regulation, cellular homeostasis and extracellular matrix remodelling.122-125 Exosomes are involved in mRNA transfer and mRNA regulation in the recipient cells and even in protein translation.126 So, exosomes transfer information from parent cells to the neighbor or target cells through direct stimulation by surface-bound ligands and epigenetic programming.127
Exosomal surface proteins and intra-vesicular components determine the specific functions of exosomes.39 Exosomes balance brain homeostasis and nervous system plasticity by promoting the release of toxic or harmful intracellular components including damaged proteins, lipids or nucleic acids.128,129 Exosomal protein transporters have a role in protein trafficking and also in adjusting the homeostasis of the intracellular compartment by removing obsolete and toxic components.128,130 Exosomes serve as a mediator of communication between astroglia and neuron in the central nervous system (CNS).131 Exosomes can also mediate the signaling between pancreatic β-cells.132 Exosomes take part in glucose metabolism and regulation through insulin signaling cascade at the peripheral tissues.133 Exosomes mediate the crosstalk between cardiac cells and concurrently, cardiac cell-derived exosomes can be an informative marker for homeostasis of the cardiovascular system. Exosomes derived from cardiovascular origin can also be found in blood and pericardial fluids which have a role in endocrine signaling.134 Urinary exosomes help to detect potential biomarkers of renal disease and prostate cancers.135,136 Exosomes from urine-derived stem cells have direct physiological role inhibiting podocyte apoptosis, promote vascular regeneration and increase cell survival by suppressing caspase-3 overexpression and increasing glomerular endothelial cell proliferation.137 miRNAs derived from urinary exosomes serve as biomarkers for salt sensitivity and inverse salt sensitivity of hypertension pathways.138 Urinary exosomes also transfer miRNA to tubular cells and modulate ROMK1 potassium channel level in collecting duct cells.139,140
Exosomes are also involved in several pathogeneses, including autoimmune disease progression, tumor metastasis and infection transmissions.141 Exosomes transport pathological neurotic proteins between neuron cells and evolve in different neurodegenerative diseases.142 Similarly, exosomes are also involved in insulin resistance and obesity through the insulin pathway.143,144 Deng et al. revealed that adipose tissue-derived exosomes mediate the communication between adipose tissue and macrophages and have roles in insulin resistance through the TLR4/TRIF pathways.145 Exosomes may accelerate or inhibit the process of bacterial, viral and malarial infections by carrying substances of pathogen origin.146
VI. ROLE OF EXOSOMES IN IMMUNE REGULATION
Immune regulation is among one of the biological roles of exosomes which involves immune activation, antigen expression regulation and immune suppression.147 Shenoda et al. showed the potential of antigen-presenting cells (APCs) derived exosomes in immune response modulation.148 DCs and macrophages derived exosomes have the role of delivering and presenting functional MHC-peptide complexes to the target cells.149 Raposo et al. demonstrated the part of B-cell–derived exosomes in antigen presentation and T-cell activation.150 In this study, DCs derived exosomes also expressed class I and II MHC molecules. DC derived exosomes can activate CD8+ and CD4+ T cells and induce an immune response.151 Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) derived exosomes express significant amount of Hsp70, enhance tumor immunogenicity and increase the activity of NK cells by up regulation of the inhibitory receptor CD94 and down regulation of the activating receptor CD69.152
Exosomes secreted in the TME may trigger immune cells for antitumor activity or may inhibit their antitumor activity.153 Rao et al. demonstrated that tumor cell-derived exosomes (TDE) activate the immune response and enhance the anticancer effects.154 Conversely, tumor derived exosomes can help in tumor microenvironment programming, tumor progression, and metastasis by silencing antitumor immune response. A study by Poggio et al. showed that tumor-derived exosomes inhibit the activation of T-cell by its PD-L1 proteins and the tumor growth is thought to be suppressed by blocking exosomal PD-L1.155
Recently, a study by Jonathan et al., Damo et al., and others showed the potential benefit of DCs derived exosomes for cancer vaccine development.156-162 Graeme et al. showed that exosomal Hsp70 can activate natural killer cells163 and macrophages.164 Akiko et al. demonstrated the role of exosomes in cellular homeostasis by removing harmful DNA from the target cells, preventing aberrant immune responses and blocking viral cellular machinery.165
Though, exosomes are essential compositions for viral and bacterial infection and pathogenesis, and they are also involved in an immune response against pathogens by delivering antiviral factors to neighbouring cells.166 Platelet-derived exosomes carry prostaglandins and play a crucial role in coagulation, thrombosis, vascular senescence, permeability and also an inflammatory function.167
VII. ROLE OF EXOSOMES IN THE TUMOR MICROENVIRONMENT
TME is the indicative marker of cancer evolution, and it is a vital factor for tumor growth and metastasis.168,169 TDEs share tremendous similar biological compositions with their parent cancer cells.170 TDEs contain tumor derived DNAs, RNAs, growth factors, angiogenetic factors, extracellular matrix (ECM) molecules, enzymes, and different proteins. Exosomes have several roles in tumor evolution and progression, including tumor angiogenesis, tumor cell proliferation, migration, metastasis and apoptosis.171-174 Corcoran et al. demonstrated the role of TDE in tumor–tumor and tumor–fibroblast communication by transferring chemoresistance substances.175 TDE can cause vascular leakage and dissemination of tumor cells.176,177 TDE induces angiogenesis in TME through cargo compositions such as vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) and angiopoietin.173 Xie et al. reported that human hepatocellular carcinoma secretes exosomal angiopoietin-2 and has a novel pathway to induce tumor angiogenesis.178 Song et al. reported that TDE or small EVs promote angiogenesis by heparin bound bevacizumab-insensitive VEGF.179 TDE can also induce epithelial-mesenchymal transition, degrade the matrix, activate macrophages and disturb endothelial cells.174 Exosomes have a signal-mediating role between tumor cells and their surrounding cells.180,181 TDE may help in the formation of stiff microenvironment through ECM remodeling. Exosome mediated ECM remodeling promotes local tumor invasion in the TME.182
In the TME, cancer-associated fibroblasts (CAF) secrete exosomes which might enhance tumor growth under nutrient deprivation conditions.183 Tumor cells secrete exosomes in hypoxic conditions, and these TDE activate glycolysis for cancer cell hypoxic environment resistance.184 The glycolysis process is through miRNA-145/HIF-1α/PDK1 pathway. Exosomes enhance tumor invasion, motility and metastasis by inducing the expression of TGF-β and TGF-β-activated kinase-1.185 TDE play a rate limiting role in the modulation and shaping of TME through transferring oncogenic features to the surrounding endothelial cells.185
VIII. EXOSOMES AS NANO-SIZED CHEMOTHERAPEUTIC DRUG DELIVERY VEHICLES
Ideal NDCs should be able to load and convey a targeted drug to the target tissue, recognized by targeted ligand, deliver the payload at the targeted tissue and bypass the off-target toxicity of healthy cells.186 Exosomes are thought to be a standard nano-drug carrier with numerous benefits. They are highly stable and have the ability to cross the blood-brain barrier (BBB), intrinsic ability to target specific tissues without immunogenicity problems.14,187,188 The BBB is the main challenging factor for delivering chemotherapeutic drugs to glioblastoma (GBM) therapy. Due to this, chemotherapeutics drugs like DOX, PTX, methotrexate and vincristine demonstrated poor therapeutic effect against GBM.201,202 Due to its physical characteristics and biological origin, exosome-based drug delivery may bring a better outcome for GBM treatment due to enhanced permeability through BBB. Yang et al. revealed that exosome-based delivery of anticancer drugs could help them cross the BBB through receptor mediated endocytosis. Brain specific exosomal surface markers like CD63 tetraspanins act as transmembrane protein, transferrin, LDL and insulin receptors help the exosome encapsulated drug to by-pass the barrier.203 A similar study by Ruenn et al. explained the use of MSC derived exosomes as a delivery vesicle for proteasome and its potential benefit to bypass BBB.204 A study by Ibolya et al. suggested that BBB-derived exosomes can be used as NDC and they have ability to bypass the BBB.205 PTX and DOX encapsulated in the mouse brain endothelial cell line-derived exosomes crossed the BBB and showed better efficacy in a zebrafish model.205 Further, due to their nano-size and endogenous property, exosome-based chemotherapeutic delivery is thought to improve drug stability, blood circulation time, accumulation in tumor site and enhance cytotoxicity.206
Exosomes can shuttle small chemotherapeutic drugs to the tumor site.207,208 Table 1 represents exosomes as potential candidates for chemotherapeutic drug delivery with different drug loading methods and sources of exosomes. The chemotherapeutic Doxorubicin (DOX), Paclitaxel (PTX) and Withaferin A can be delivered to the target site with milk-derived exosomes.209 Additionally, bovine milk-derived exosomes showed potential benefits for oral drug delivery and prevented gastric acid degradation of a drug molecule. The exosomal delivery of those chemotherapeutics showed higher antiproliferative efficacy than free drugs against A549 lung cancer cell lines. Sun et al. showed the potential of exosome for curcumin delivery with enhanced anti-inflammatory activity compared with free curcumin.190 In vivo and in vitro results demonstrated that the solubility, stability, and bioavailability were increased due to encapsulation of curcumin in exosomes. Schindler et al. demonstrated the exosomal delivery of DOX enables rapid cell entry and enhanced in vitro cytotoxicity.210 The intracellular accumulation of exosomal DOX was improved by 18-, 21-, and 65-fold compared with free DOX, Myocet, and Doxil, respectively. The data show the potential of exosome as better endogenous cargo vehicle compared with synthetic NDC. A similar study by Gong et al. showed a nanoscale target specific exosome as the co-delivery vehicle of DOX and cholesterol-modified miRNA to triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) cells.211 Disintegrin and metalloproteinase 15 (A15) were used as targeting ligands for macrophage-derived exosome for the co-delivery in TNBC treatment.212,213
TABLE 1:
Drug–loading methods, exosome origin, and delivery of exosomal cargo
| Methods | Exosome origin | Route | Therapeutic |
|---|---|---|---|
| Incubation Drugs with cells or drugs with isolated exosomes | MSCs (pre–loading) | In vitro | PTX189 |
| EL–4 cells Macrophages |
Intravenous Intranasal |
Curcumin190 Curcumin191 |
|
| Monocytes/macrophages | In vitro | DOX192 | |
| Endothelial//tumor | In vitro | Porphyrin193 | |
| Glioblastoma cells | Intravenous | siRNA194 | |
| Macrophages | In vitro | PTX195 | |
| Electroporation | Dendritic cells | In vitro | DOX196 |
| Macrophages | Intravenous/in vitro | PTX195 | |
| Endothelial/tumor | In vitro | Porphyrin193 | |
| DCs | Intravenous | siRNA197 | |
| Sonication | Macrophages | Intravenous/in vitro | PTX195 |
| HEK 297 and MCF–7 | In vitro | siRNA198 ssDNA199 |
|
| Macrophages | Intranasally | Catalase200 | |
| Extrusion | Endothelial/tumor | In vitro | Porphyrin193 |
| Freeze and thaw cycles | Monocyte/macrophage | In vitro | Catalase/Dox192,193 |
Besides small chemotherapeutic drugs, exosomes show good cargo versatility to deliver small nucleic acid and proteins as well. Exosomes have a natural capacity to transport siRNA, shRNA, miRNA and proteins.214 A study by Wahlgren et al. demonstrated the potential of plasma-derived exosomes for the delivery of siRNA to monocytes and lymphocytes.215 Similarly, Andaloussi et al. reported that exosome-based delivery of siRNA can cross biological barriers.216 Yim et al. reported that exosome engineering helps for efficient intracellular delivery of soluble proteins.217 The study shows novel exosome as a protein carrier with high loading capacity and delivering efficiency.
Tumor cell-derived exosomes fuse preferentially with their parent cancer cells and can be used as Trojan horses for chemotherapeutic delivery.218 The cellular uptake and target homing potential of exosomes are enhanced with the existence of vesicular surface proteins.54,219 Exosomes have free access to agglomerate in leaky vasculature and solid tumor.220 Moreover, the permeability of exosomes into a tumor cell is 10 times more than synthesized liposomes formulation.219 Qiao et al. demonstrated cancer derived exosomes have potential to target their parent tumors and deliver drugs selectively to their parent cells.218 The exosomal integrins involve in the adherence of exosome to the recipient cancer cell. Exosomal delivery of DOX enhanced the antitumor efficacy and also showed less off-target accumulation in the heart.218 Toffoli et al. demonstrated that the exosomal delivery of DOX decreases the off-target cardiotoxicity compared with free DOX.221 Ayuko et al. explained that exosomal integrins determine the organotropism effect of exosome into specific tissue. The fusion of specific exosomal integrins with cell-associated ECM mediates the exosome uptake into specific target.222 A study by Tian et al. demonstrated the use of immature dendritic cell-derived exosome to target αV-integrin positive cancer cells, and the targeted exosomes showed high affinity both in vivo and in vitro experiments.196 Tetraspanins, which are membrane glycoproteins on the surface of exosomes, can aid in recipient cell binding and fusion.223 The minor differences of tetraspanin complexes can have a significant role for target isolation, fusion, selective cellular uptake and internalization through ligand-receptor interaction.224 Tetraspanin 8 (encoded by Tspan8 gene) might have different internalization than CD9 and CD51.225 Rana et al. demonstrated that CD11b and CD54-positive cells preferentially attach with Tspan8 expressing exosomes.226 The tetraspanin web, a complex network of tetraspanin protein-protein interactions, is thought to contribute to the efficient and selective cellular uptake of exosomes. The cytotoxicity of DOX has also assessed in MDA MB-231 and HCT-116 cell lines in vitro and an MDA MB 231 xenograft mouse model. The data revealed that the exosomal delivery of DOX reduces the systemic off-target cardiotoxicity. A report by Hirsh et al. showed that embryonic stem cell-derived exosomes increase the antiproliferative activity of DOX in breast cancer cell lines (MCF-7, MDA MB-231 and MDA MB-468).227 The systemic administration of DOX showed enhanced anti-proliferative activity without systemic toxicity to normal cells.228 Kim et al. demonstrated that cancer derived exosomes may mimic the cancer membrane structure and initiate their internalization for effective treatment.229
Exosomes have aqueous core and lipid bilayers that help to encapsulate both hydrophilic and lipophilic cargo.230-232 Exosomal encapsulation increases the drugs solubility, stability, and bioavailability.233,234 Saari et al. demonstrated that exosomes loaded PTX showed higher cytotoxicity effect than exosome free PTX to autologous cancer cells.235 PTX encapsulated in MSC derived exosomes showed an increased cytotoxic effect on human pancreatic adenocarcinoma cell lines.236
Interestingly, exosomes prefer acidic conditions for high cellular release, fusion and uptake.237-239 Exosomes can help to overcome a pH-gradient-related challenges in chemotherapeutic drug delivery. Exosomes also have the potential to target specific cancer, deliver specific drugs and by-pass the drug efflux system.240 A study by Kim et al. indicated the potential benefit of exosome to overcome MDR efflux pump effect of cancer cells.240 This study demonstrated exosomal encapsulated PTX was useful to overcome Pgp-mediated drug efflux. The accumulation of exosomal DOX was higher than free DOX in MDR cells and also showed up to 30 times higher cellular internalization than liposome.195 Alvarez-Erviti et al. reported the resistance of exosomes to RES and its ability to cross multiple biological barriers. The study also showed the delivery of siRNA to the mouse brain with dendritic cell-derived exosome through systemic injections.197 Kalimuthu et al. showed the potential benefit of MSC-derived exosomes convey PTX to MDA-MB231 and showed enhanced effect than free PTX in nude mice model.241 MSC-derived exosomes showed suppression of tumor growth and demonstrated successful targeting for colon cancer and human pancreatic adenocarcinoma.242
A. Exosomes for Lung Cancer
Exosomes have been studied as a new option for delivery of drugs for lung cancer.243,244 Exosomes can avoid the issue related to toxicity, clearance, and bioavailability. Exosomes have been reported as potential delivery carriers for drugs like curcumin, PTX, celastrol, and anthocyanidins to lung cancer.244 Aqil et al. reported that exosomal formulation enhances therapeutic response of celastrol against lung cancer cells. The exosome loaded celastrol, which is a plant-derived triterpenoid has shown significant anti-cancer effect than free drug. Furthermore, the in vivo data show that the systemic toxicological effect of exosomal delivery was also lower than free celastrol. The systemic toxicity was assessed by liver and kidney function test parameters.245 Similarly, bovine-milk-derived exosomes were used to deliver curcumin to in vitro lung cancer cells and showed enhanced tissue distribution and efficacy with lesser systemic toxicity.209 A study by Munagala et al. demonstrated the ability to load anthocyanidins (aglycones) into milk-derived exosomes. Anthocyanidins, which are extracted from plants, have antiproliferative, apoptotic, anti-inflammatory and antioxidant properties. Exosomes loaded with anthocyanidins showed significantly higher anti-proliferative effect with an ~ 4- to 60-fold decrease in IC50 compared with free drug.246
B. Exosomes for Breast Cancer
Globally, breast cancer is the most prevalent and second leading cause of mortality next to lung cancer. Mainly, it is the top cause of cancer-related deaths in the female population. Chemotherapy, hormonal therapy, radiotherapy and surgical resection are the existing treatment options currently available.247 Chemotherapeutics like DOX, epirubicin, docetaxel (DTX), PTX, carboplatin, cyclophosphamide, and fluorouracil help to treat breast cancer.248 However, drug resistance and toxicity are the most common challenges of the available treatment options.249,250 Better treatment options and delivery methods are vastly needed for the treatment of breast cancer. Nanomedicine such as exosome-based drug delivery is a promising new therapeutic approach for breast cancer chemotherapy.251 Gong et al. demonstrated the functional exosome-mediated co-delivery of DOX and thermophilically modified miRNA for triple-negative breast cancer therapy.213
The immature dendritic cell-derived exosomes showed the delivery potential of DOX with higher efficacy. Exosomes isolated from mouse and modified with RGD peptide have shown lower immunogenicity reported by Tian et al.228 A similar study by Toffoli et al. showed that exosomal delivery of DOX had less cardiac toxicity than free drug.252 MSC-derived exosomes were also tested for PTX delivery into MDA MB-231 cells, and the result was promising to use exosomes as chemotherapeutic drug carrier for better efficacy. Table 2 highlights the exosome-based drug delivery systems under clinical investigation.
TABLE 2:
Exosome–based drug delivery under clinical investigation
| Study | Title | Disease | Trial ID | Phase | Year |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | A pilot clinical study on inhalation of mesenchymal stem cell exosomes treating severe novel coronavirus pneumonia | SARS CoV–2 | NCT04276987 | Phase I | 2020 |
| 2 | Allogenic mesenchymal stem cell derived exosome in patients with acute ischemic stroke | Acute ischemic stroke, cerebrovascular disorders | NCT03384433 | Phase I/II | 2017 |
| 3 | Evaluation of adipose derived stem cells exosomes in treatment of periodontitis | Periodontitis | NCT04270006 | Early Phase I | 2020 |
| 4 | Effect of plasma derived exosomes on cutaneous wound healing | Cutaneous ulcers | NCT02565264 | Early Phase I | 2015 |
| 5 | Study investigating the ability of plant exosomes to deliver curcumin to normal and colon cancer tissue | Colon cancer | NCT01294072 | Phase I | 2011 |
| 6 | Exosomes and Immunotherapy in non–Hodgkin B–cell lymphomas (ExoReBLy) | Lymphoma, B–cell, aggressive non–Hodgkin (B–NHL) | NCT03985696 | NA | 2019 |
| 7 | Trial of a vaccination with tumor antigen–loaded dendritic cell–derived exosomes (CSET 1437) | Non–small–cell lung cancer | NCT01159288 | Phase II | 2010 |
| 8 | Pilot immunotherapy trial for recurrent malignant gliomas | Malignant glioma of brain | NCT01550523 | Phase I | 2012 |
| 9 | Isolation and characterization of the extracellular vesicles secreted by the human endometrium | Exosome collection | NCT02797834 | NA | 2016 |
| 10 | MSC–Exosomes promote healing of MHs (MSCs) | Macular Holes | NCT03437759 | Early Phase I | 2018 |
| 11 | Effect of micro–vesicles and exosomes therapy on β–cell mass in Type I diabetes mellitus | Type I diabetes mellitus | NCT02138331 | Phase II/III | 2014 |
| 12 | A safety study of Intravenous stem cell–derived extracellular Vesicles (UNEX–42) in preterm neonates at high risk for BPD | Bronchopulmonary Dysplasia | NCT03857841 | Phase I | 2019 |
| 13 | Exosomes in treating participants with metastatic pancreas cancer with KrasG12D mutation | Metastatic pancreatic adenocarcinoma, pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma, stage intravenous pancreatic cancer AJCC v8 | NCT03608631 | Phase I | 2018 |
| 14 | Clinical trial of tumor cell–derived microparticles packaging chemotherapeutic drugs to treat malignant pleural effusion | Malignant pleural effusion | NCT02657460 | Phase II | 2016 |
| 15 | Safety and effectiveness study of tumor cell–derived microparticles to treat malignant ascites and pleural effusion | Malignant pleural effusion, malignant ascites | NCT01854866 | Phase II | 2013 |
IX. METHODS FOR ISOLATING EXOSOMES
Cellular debris, apoptotic bodies, exosomes, and other EVs are found together in the biological fluids. Exosomes with physical properties such as density, shape, size and surface proteins are the basis for isolation mechanisms.37 Combining two or more isolation methods can help to separate exosomes from other interfering components efficiently.253,254 Table 3 shows the physical properties of exosomes and other EVs such as micro-vesicles (MVs) and apoptotic bodies.
TABLE 3:
Physical properties of exosomes, micro–vesicles (MVs), and apoptotic bodies
| EVs and sizes | Biogenesis methods | Density/sucrose gradient |
Centrifugal force used |
Differential markers | Refs. |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Exosome 30–100 nm | ESCRT dependent ESCRT independent | 1.13–1.19 −g/mL | 1–2 × 105 g | CD81, CD63, CD9, Syntenin I, ADAM10, TSG101 EHD4, Annexin XI | 261-263 |
| Microvesicles 100–1000 nm | Cell surface blebbing | 1.25–1.30 g | 1 × 104–2 × 105 g | Actin–4, ARF6, VCAMP3 | 261,262,264 |
| Apoptotic bodies 1–5 μm | Apoptotic pathway | 1.16–1.28 −g/mL | 1 × 104–2 × 105 g | S1PR1/3, Motilin, Phosphatidylserine, Actin–4, Annexin V, C3b, Thrombospondin | 264,265 |
A. Ultracentrifugation
Centrifugation is a process which utilizes different centrifugal forces to sediment particulate constituents according to their density, size and shape. Ultracentrifugation is a centrifugation process which uses up to 6 × 106 g centrifugal forces and helps to isolate much smaller components such as; ribosomes, proteins, viruses, exosomes and other EVs. Acceleration (g), radius of rotation, a viscosity of the sample, and a sedimentation path length are the determining factors for efficient isolation of exosomes. Reports showed that particle size fraction between 20 and 250 nm can be isolated by ultracentrifugation and the subsequent centrifugation or size exclusion process yields the desired exosomes.255,256 The ultracentrifugation method is considered as a gold standard method for exosome isolation and exosomes need 1 × 105 to 2 × 105 g centrifugation for 1 hour.257,258 During the sequential centrifugation process, MVs, apoptotic bodies, cell debris, cells, and other particles with higher buoyant density sediment before exosomes.257 However, it is essential to note that due to overlapping densities and sizes, most current methods can only enrich for small EV (i.e., exosomes). Figure 4 shows a schematic diagram of the ultracentrifugation method for exosome isolation.
FIG. 4:
Exosome extraction from biological fluids. Shown are ultracentrifugation methods to isolate exosome from cells.
B. Density Gradient Ultracentrifugation (DGUC)
It helps to isolate and analyze nano-scale materials based on the size, structure and morphology differences. DGUC “refines” the isolated vesicles and uses a density gradient medium with a density of 1.07 g/mL or less.258 Iodixanol in water, ice-cold PBS, and sucrose are the common gradient medium which are used for exosome isolation.259,260 There are commercially available iodixanol density gradient fractionation membranes which are used to separate exosomes from non-vesicular components. The biological suspension is added to the gradient medium and components layered with complete gradient. DGUC helps to isolate samples with identical gradients. Apoptotic bodies, protein aggregates, and other non-exosome micro vesicles may interfere with the final isolated exosome product through ultracentrifugation.259 DGUC helps to overcome the limitations of ultracentrifugation and gives the purest exosomes.266,267 Kang et al. showed the application of DGUC for refined and high-performance exosome isolation method.260 Briefly, after the isolation of cellular debris, applying 1 × 105 g for 3 hours with 60% iodixanol and then centrifuging with 1 × 105 g for 18 hours with 40% iodixanol helps to form up to 12 iodixanol gradient fractions and two exosome fractions. Ultracentrifugation uses a continuous density gradient or a stepwise gradient to minimize the interferences of those particulate materials from exosomes.264
C. Filtration
The filtration approach solely depends on molecular weight or sizes of components and helps to get optimum exosome yield.268,269 Ultrafiltration, gel filtration and hydrostatic dialysis are included under filtration principles of exosome isolation. Exosomes can be isolated from the other EV components and cellular debris based on their defined molecular weight or size exclusion limit with a standard membrane filter. There are commercially available polyvinylidene carbonate membrane filter with various pore size ranges for osmosis, nanofiltration and microfiltration application.270
D. Ultrafiltration
It uses membrane filters with pore sizes of 50–450 nm to isolate exosomes from cellular debris and larger EVs.271,272 By using nano-size filter membrane, targeted size exosomes can be isolated. Ultrafiltration method is commonly used as a subsequent step of ultracentrifugation and as a final step to gel filtration and chromatography.273,274 Ultrafiltration can be processed either by tangential flow filtration (TFF) or by direct flow filtration (DFF) methods.275 The DFF method, which is also called dead-end filtration, has membrane fouling and impaired particle separation problem. Moreover, DFF is preferred only for small volume samples, for example, up to 30 mL.276
TFF, which also called as crossflow filtration, is a more rapid, efficient and convenient process to isolate large scale exosomes volumes.276,277 TFF is the process in which the sample fluid flows tangentially across the filter membrane and avoid cake or clog formation. Briefly, samples are filtered through a 0.2-μm polyethersulfone (PES) membrane, larger particulate matter like cell debris and apoptosis bodies are detained out. Then, the semi-processed filtrate sample including exosomes is subjected to the ultrafiltration process through a TFF system by 500-kDa molecular weight cutoff cartridge with 120 mL/min feed-flow rate, < 3.5 psi transmembrane pressure, and > 10:1 crossflow rate.276 The exosomes are too large to pass through the pores and kept as retentate. Conversely, small molecules, including free proteins, pass through hollow fiber pores and are eluted as permeate and ultimately discarded from the process.278 For quality exosome isolation and purification, the retentate samples are re-concentrated serially by TFF and contaminants smaller than the 500 kDa are depleted.278 Finally, the purified exosomes are resuspended and stored in 0.1M sucrose in a polyethylene terephthalate glycol (PETG) bottle at −80°C and used for the desired analysis. Generally, exosomes can be isolated successfully by combining different isolation methods such as ultrafiltration with ultracentrifugation or centrifugation with ultrafiltration.253 Filtration with lower pore diameter membrane and ultracentrifugation provides pure exosomes.279
E. Hydrostatic Filtration Dialysis (HFD)
It helps mainly to isolate the whole EVs from highly diluted solution without ultracentrifugation process.280 Musante et al. showed HFD protocol for isolation of EVs from urine samples.281 At the initial step of HFD, samples are centrifuged with 2000 × g to remove cells, bacteria, and debris as a pellet. Then, the supernatant is kept in dialysis membrane (1000 kPa) and particles of 1000 kPa or less pass through the membrane accordingly with hydrostatic pressure differences. Finally, exosomes vesicles are sedimented with 40,000 × g by centrifugation. In HFD isolation process, exosome fractions recover in an early stage and it is considered as an advantage compared with multistep centrifugation. HFD is also considered as an efficient method compared with ultracentrifugation.282,283
F. Size-Exclusion Chromatography (SEC)
This method mainly helps to remove protein and lipoprotein impurities from isolated exosomes.284,285 It has been used to separate exosomes from urine and blood plasma proteins. It is used as a subsequent isolation method to ultracentrifugation and ultrafiltration. Sepharose 2B/CL4B, qEV and Sephacryl S-400 are the columns which are generally used to isolate exosomes by gel filtration chromatography.264 SEC can be done under low pressure, which helps to isolate exosomes with intact integrity.
G. Precipitation
It is a method which is based on charge precipitation of exosomes from biological fluids. Negatively charged exosomes can interact with positively charged protamine in PEG 35,000 Da matrix and form precipitate.286 The recovery and resuspension of exosomes are more efficient than ultracentrifugation-based isolation.287 Kanchi et al. reported the potential benefit of polymeric precipitation method to isolate urinary exosomes with less labor and without expensive equipment.288 This method first utilizes DL-dithiothreitol solution to reduce or remove the polymeric networks of Tamm-Horsfall protein and then precipitation of exosomes can be achieved with only 10,000 × g centripetal force at 25°C and 30 min. There are also commercial kits available which utilize polymeric precipitation approach and eliminate ultracentrifugation. ExoQuick™, Exo-spin™ are the commercially available total exosome isolation reagent from Invitrogen™ and miRCURY™.289
H. Immunoaffinity Interactions
Immunoaffinity method is an ideal method to isolate pure exosome with the principle of immunoaffinity interaction between the exosome surface proteins (antigens) and their target antibody or isolating ligands molecules.290 It helps to isolate a specific type of exosomes according to their surface markers. Microplate-based enzyme linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) is an example of immunoaffinity isolation kit which is used to isolate exosomes according to the exosome surface markers. Tetraspanin proteins are the determining factors for this isolation method. Anti-CD9, anti-CD63, and anti-CD81 are common examples of antibodies used in immunoaffinity exosome isolation. Tauro et al. showed that immunoaffinity method can be used to isolate exosomes from colon cancer cells with higher efficiency than ultracentrifugation and density gradient isolation.291 Zarovni et al. reported an exosome isolation method with an antibody-coated, magnetic particle-based technique for isolation of exosomes.292
I. Microfluidic-Based Isolation
Microfluidic based exosome isolation may include immune-affinity approaches for exosome trapping, nano-porous membrane sieving approaches or nanowire on micropillar for exosome trapping. All three systems require chips with viscoelastic analysis and electric manipulation for the exosome isolation process. The specificity of exosomes is high, with microfluidic chip-based immunoaffinity capturing methods. Exosomes with size range between 40–100 nm are specifically entrapped with this microfluidic chip. Kanwar et al. reported the benefit of ExoChip for exosome isolation and quantification.293 Sieving approaches can be used to filter exosomes from the whole blood with pressure or via electrophoresis.294 The utilization of pressure makes separation time shorter, and the electric field results in high exosome purity. Specificity, reproducibility, low isolation time, and less isolation cost are some of the benefits of microfluidic-based exosome isolation.295
X. EXOSOMAL DRUG-LOADING METHODOLOGIES
Generally, drugs can be sorted into exosomes by two methods: active loading and passive loading.46,125 Figure 5 shows the schematic diagram of the pre-drug loading and post-drug loading methods. Active loading method is also termed as remote or post-loading approaches.232 It is a method in which the drug loading process is performed with isolated exosomes. The passive loading approach, which is also called preloading method, deals with the secretion of drug-loaded exosomes from a pretreated donor or source cells.232 The passive loading method does not require the addition of active substances into the system. The active loading approach has been proven to be more effective in achieving a higher drug-vesicle ratio due to its active pumping mechanisms.193 Conversely, the post loading approach is more suitable for hydrophobic drugs than hydrophilic drugs.
FIG. 5:
Exosomal drug–loading approaches. Drug–loaded exosomes can be secreted in pretreated cells or tissues, and exosomes with encapsulated drugs can be isolated from cell secreted EVS. Drugs can also be loaded in to ready–made or isolated exosome by active/passive drug–loading methods.
A. Passive Loading Approaches
1. Incubation of Drug with Targeted Exosome Donor Cells
Target cells are treated with a desired drug and then drug loaded exosomes are secreted from the pretreated cells.93,296 Pascucci et al. demonstrated the secretion of PTX loaded exosomes from pretreated SR4987 mesenchymal stroma cells.297 In the study, first the cells were treated and incubated with low dose PTX for 24 hours, and then the cells were washed and reseeded in new flask with fresh medium. Finally, the PTX-loaded exosomes were isolated and collected from the cell culture medium after 48 hours. For release of drug loaded exosomes, the pretreated donor cells may be exposed to biological or mechanical stimuli such as heat, hypoxia and ultraviolet light or combination.298-301
2. Incubation of Drug with Isolated Exosomes
This approach is referred as a passive method of loading. Drugs and exosomes are simply incubated together for some time and the drugs diffuse into the exosomes due to concentration gradient.125 This method is suitable for loading hydrophobic drugs and the drug loading efficiency is directly related with hydrophobicity of drugs. Dongmel et al. showed the curcumin loaded exosome by incubation method.190 Exosomes and curcumin were mixed in PBS and incubated for 5 min at 22°C and the mixture was centrifuged based on different sucrose gradient. The solubility, stability and bioavailability of curcumin were enhanced by exosome encapsulations as compared with free curcumin.190 Similarly, enzyme catalase was loaded into exosomes by incubating in PBS buffer for 18 hours at room temperature.200
B. Active Drug-Loading Approaches
1. Incubation with Membrane Permeabilizers
This method uses membrane permeabilizer surfactant like saponins.296,302 Briefly, the interaction of cholesterol and a surfactant leads to exosomal membrane permeability.93,193 It is suitable to load small hydrophilic molecules into exosomes up to 11-fold higher than passive incubation method. Compared with simple incubation, membrane permeability methods have enhanced loading efficiency.
2. Sonication
The isolated exosomes are mixed with drugs and then sonicated by using a homogenizer probe.303 Drug loading by sonication method uses mechanical shear force to diffuse into the exosomes through deformed membrane.125 Kim et al. reported that exosome membrane integrity decreases after sonication. Even though membrane microviscosity significantly decreased after sonication, the sonication process does not affect the membrane-bound proteins and lipid contents of the exosome.240 Moreover, the integrity of the exosome membrane can be restored with 1-hour incubation at 37°C.
3. Extrusion
It is a type of post-loading approach which utilizes a syringe-based lipid extruder and has harsh mechanical force.232,304 Briefly, the target drug and isolated exosomes are loaded into the extruder with 100- to 40-nm porous membrane at a regulated temperature, and then the drug mixed with disrupted exosome membrane. Fuhrmann et al. showed the benefit of extrusion type drug loading for exosomes.305 Porphyrin was loaded into triple-negative breast cancer cells (MDA MB-231)-derived exosomes. The cytotoxicity effect of porphyrin was higher when loaded with extrusion type loading compared with incubation method. Result demonstrated that extrusion method loading modified the zeta potential of the original exosomes. The number of extrusion processes have contribution for effective drug loading.
4. Freeze and Thaw Cycles
This method has three steps: incubation of isolated exosome with drug for a given time at room temperature, freeze at −80°C or below (liquid nitrogen), and finally thaw at room temperature.188,232 For better drug loading, the mentioned process is repeated at least for three cycles. Compared with sonication or extrusion methods, the freeze/thaw loading method has lower drug loading capacity.125
5. Electroporation
This method utilizes an electrical field which disturbs the phospholipids bilayer of exosomes and creates small pores on it.207,306 The most efficient electroporation protocols use 750 V and 10 pulses.307 The drugs can then be diffused or sorted through the developed pores, and meanwhile, the membrane is recovered after loading. Larger molecules such as nucleotides (siRNA/miRNA) can be loaded into exosomes by electroporation loading approaches.215,305 Electroporation also helps to load smaller hydrophilic molecules. It has low loading capacity due to the issue related with RNA aggregation and exosome instability.305
XI. CHARACTERIZATION OF EXOSOMES
A. Transmission Electron Microscopy (TEM)
The principle involved in TEM is similar to that of the light microscope. However, TEM uses electrons with smaller-wavelength than that of light. The optimal resolution is far better than that of light microscopy.308 TEM is known to be the gold standard to study the morphology of exosomes by electron microscopic imaging, due to small size of exosomes and ease of sample preparation. TEM has a resolution of 1nm with broad beam to focus the sample, negative staining is considered to be simple and rapid, lasting for 2–3 hours to generate two-dimensional image. Briefly, exosomes are first fixed in 2% w/v paraformaldehyde, deposited on carbon coated Formvar grids, and incubated for 20 min. The precoated grids are then washed with phosphate buffered saline and incubated with crosslinking agent like glutaraldehyde and washed with water. The exosome vesicles are then stained with 2% w/v of uranyl acetate solution and air dried.309 TEM can be used to: confirm the existence of exosomes in the solution, study the morphology of vesicles and to assess the quality of exosomes.310 Because TEM has limitations such as lack of reproducibility and inefficiency, it is rarely used to quantify exosomes. Exosome surface markers can be identified and quantified by using immuno-electron microscopy,311 it encompasses incubating exosome vesicles with primary antibodies and secondary antibodies attached to 5- to 40-nm gold particles. Cup-shaped morphology was reported for exosomes by TEM.312
B. Scanning Electron Microscopy (SEM)
The basic principle involved is an accelerated electron in an SEM carry significant amounts of kinetic energy, and this energy is dissipated as a variety of signals produced by electron-sample interactions when the incident electrons are decelerated in the solid sample. Sample scanning in SEM is line by line using fine point beam.313 Here, SEM focuses surface of samples to get three-dimensional image of exosomes. Briefly, exosomes are fixed on carbon coated/copper grids with glutaraldehyde and dehydrated with ethanol. The grids are air dried and coated with gold using sputtering machine at a thickness range of 2 to 10 nm. Then the samples are ready to analyze by SEM.314,315 Reports revealed that SEM imaging of exosomes is round and bulging in appearance.316
C. Cryogenic Electron Microscopy (Cryo-EM)
Cryo-EM is a type of TEM in which a typical sample preparation involves cryogenic temperature for native aqueous environment observation. For cryo-EM analysis, the liquid suspended exosomes are placed on a grid, then it is rapidly immersed in liquid ethane to allow the vitrification of exosome sample. After vitrification process, the samples can be directly analyzed for imaging by cryo-EM or transferred in liquid nitrogen for storage for further analysis.317 Morphology of exosomes by cryo-EM was found to be bilayer structures and sometimes surrounded by smaller vesicles.318,319
D. Atomic Force Microscopy (AFM)
AFM uses a cantilever with a very sharp tip to scan over a sample surface. As the tip approaches the surface, the close-range, attractive force between the surface and the tip cause the cantilever to deflect towards the surface. AFM is useful for checking the topography of exosomes with high resolution less than 1 nm.320 Briefly, an exosome vesicle suspension is placed on a mica substrate and allowed to air dry at room temperature. The dried samples are then washed with ultrapure water and allowed to dry in liquid nitrogen gas. Here the silicon probes are used to view the sample under AFM and analyzed with software.321 This technique is useful to identify the specific receptor sites on exosome surface, for example, Sharma et al. reported multiple CD63 receptor sites on exosome using immunogold imaging by AFM.322
E. Nanoparticle-Tracking Analysis (NTA)
NTA is one of the most sophisticated methods for measurement of size distribution and concentration of sample by capturing the Brownian motion of particles in a video. Based on the different diffusion movements of large and small particles in the surrounding liquid, the hydrodynamic diameter of the particles is determined. NTA provides better and reproducible results compared with TEM and flow cytometry. NTA is able to detect the vesicles with diameter range of 30–1000 nm with high resolution. The basic principle involved in this is dynamic light scattering principle along with usage of Stokes-Einstein equation to quantify particle concentration and size.323 As per the NanoSight NS300 equipped with a 488-nm laser (Malvern Panalytical, Malvern, UK) user manual, under the scattered settings, each sample is loaded by syringe pump with speed of 15 into the machine, Camera level was set at 11 and an analysis detection threshold of 3. Each video had a duration of 40 sec with frame rates of 25 frames/sec. The entire process of sample analysis consumes about 10–15 min to obtain the data of particle size distribution and concentration. NTA version 3.2 software was used to record and analyze the sample videos. All these analyzes are carried out quickly and statistically reliably as required in the scattered light or fluorescence mode.324
Electrophoretic light scattering principle (the movement of the particles in an applied electric field) was applied to measure the zeta potential of exosomes to evaluate the vesicle stability in solution state. ZetaView® set up will be used in NTA for zeta potential measurement. For NTA and zeta potential analysis samples will be diluted at 1:1000 in PBS, and vortexed/sonicated for 10 min at room temperature.325
F. Asymmetric Flow Field-Flow Fractionation Technology (AF4)
AF4 is the technique used to separate distinct subsets of extracellular vesicles such as exosomes based on their density and hydrodynamic properties. In this technique, exosomes are forced through a forward laminar channel and, based on their Brownian motion sorted into different populations. Larger particles have lower diffusion rates and tend to move more slowly. However, smaller particles have higher diffusion rates and tend to move faster. Several studies have been reported for comparison between AF4 and NTA for exosome analysis.326 AF4 was able to distinguish various vesicle subpopulations. including the discovery of a novel particles ~ 30 nm in size termed exomeres. But NTA, has shown a single, broad peak from 50 to 150 nm. Therefore, AF4 is a superior, advanced technique to address the size heterogeneity of exosome characterization.327
G. Resistive Pulse Sensing (RPS)
RPS is the technique that measures the size of individual vesicles in the fluid passed through small orifice based on their electrical resistance.328 RPS is able to detect the vesicle size range of 50–1000 nm. Spectradyne, LLC is a leading company in the microfluidic measurement of colloidal particles. RPS has higher size resolution with better accuracy in measuring particle size distribution compared with dynamic light scattering and NTA techniques. The results obtained for same sample by RPS analysis are in close correlation with count obtained by TEM. Grabarek et al. showed that NTA failed to distinguish exosomes from liposomes, protein aggregates and bacteria and the concentrations are 5- to 10-fold higher compared with RPS analysis.329
H. Flow Cytometry
Flow cytometry is not a reliable technique to detect exosomes because of low resolution. Several studies have been reported that extracellular vesicle of size range of 300–500 nm can be semi-quantitatively detected based on their surface markers.330 Briefly, exosomes were incubated for 15 min with aldehyde/sulfate-latex beads with continuous rotation for reaction. The reaction was stopped by adding glycine and bovine serum albumin (BSA) solution. Exosomes bound beads were washed with PBS and blocked with BSA solution. For a specific membrane marker detection primary antibodies and fluorescence labeled secondary antibodies were added in sequence. Incubation of exosome bound beads with an isotype control followed by a secondary antibody or in the absence of primary antibodies act as negative control. Using this method, Melo et al. reported that exosomes derived from non-tumorigenic cells carry less glypican-1 compared with exosomes derived from pancreatic cancer cells.331
I. Exo View Platform
Exo View is an antibody-based exosome array by Nano View Biosciences. This technique enables the differentiation of exosomes subpopulation with a very low sample volume and is less time consuming compared with flow cytometric technique. Exosome sample or biological fluids containing exosomes are incubated with the chips overnight. After incubation, chips are rinsed with PBS on a shaker and air dried. Captured exosomes are identified using single particle interferometric reflectance imaging sensor technology. Characterization concepts using purified exosomes from a HEK 293 cell culture and clinical relevance of exosome characterization was demonstrated directly from human cerebrospinal fluids.332 This technique allows enhanced contrast in the signal from particles. Antibodies against exosome surface markers are arrayed on silicon chips by this method.
J. Other Methods
In vivo tracking of exosomes can be done by using several methods such as labeling the exosomes with lipophilic carbocyanine dyes, including PKH67 and PKH26 (red) and the other method include labeling of exosomal markers like CD63 with green fluorescence protein (GFP) or mCherry in the cells.333 The fate of fluorescently labeled exosomes in blood circulation of mice were detected using the IVIS Spectrum system.334
XII. CHALLENGES AND FUTURE DIRECTIONS
The research and clinical studies related to the utilization of exosomes for therapeutic drug delivery is still in its infancy, a more advanced understanding and systematic characterization methods are on demand. The significant limitations of exosomes as drug delivery agent is rotated on lack of standard extraction and loading methods, risk of delivering unwanted exosomes related cargo substances. Lack of standard exosome isolation protocol is leading to low purity and batch-to batch variations. Large scale exosome isolation is still challenging and it is a costly process to perform clinical studies.258 Similarly, lack of standard drug loading protocol and low loading efficiency are the main challenges of exosome as cargo vehicle. There is not adequate proteomic data and understanding about exosome nature in the pathophysiological conditions. The study shows that, the unwanted biological effect of exosomes may promote drug resistance between cancer cells through horizontal transfer of miRNA.335 Exosomes require clinical-grade standards and characterization and purification methods to ensure quantitative and qualitative exosome extraction and for the safe drug delivery process.
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
We thank all authors whose research was cited in this review. This work was supported by the NSF-CREST center for Complex Material Design, Multidimensional Additive Processing (CoManD) Award #1735968, the Research Centers in Minority Institutions (RCMI) Program Award #5U54MD0075007582-35.
REFERENCES
- 1.Sriraman S, Aryasomayajula B, Torchilin V. Barriers to drug delivery in solid tumors. Tissue Barriers. 2014;2:e29528. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Lucas AT, Price LS, Schorzman A, Zamboni WC. Complex effects of tumor microenvironment on the tumor disposition of carrier-mediated agents. Nanomedicine. 2017;12(16):2021–42. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Bahrami B, Hojjat-Farsangi M, Mohammadi H, Anvari E, Ghalamfarsa G, Yousefi M, Jadidi-Niaragh F. Nanoparticles and targeted drug delivery in cancer therapy. Immunol Lett. 2017. October;190:64–83. PubMed PMID: 28760499. Epub 2017/08/02. eng. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Dadwal A, Baldi A, Kumar Narang R. Nanoparticles as carriers for drug delivery in cancer. Artif Cells Nanomed Biotechnol. 2018;46(Suppl 2):295–305. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Hartshorn CM, Bradbury MS, Lanza GM, Nel AE, Rao J, Wang AZ, Wiesner UB, Yang L, Grodzinski P. Nanotechnology strategies to advance outcomes in clinical cancer care. ACS Nano. 2018;12(1):24–43. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Shegokar R, Athawale R, Kurup N, Yang R, Chougule MB. Lipid–based nanoparticles for targeted drug delivery of anticancer drug. In: Mishra V, Kesharwani P, Amin MCIM, Iyer A, editors. Nanotechnology–based approaches for targeting and delivery of drugs and genes. New York: Elsevier; 2017. p. 287–321. [Google Scholar]
- 7.Patel AR, Chougule MB, Tim E, Francis KP, Safe S, Singh M. Theranostic tumor homing nanocarriers for the treatment of lung cancer. Nanomedicine. 2014. July;10(5):1053–63. PubMed PMID: 24355163. PMCID: PMC4061286. Epub 2013/12/21. eng. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Boakye CH, Patel K, Doddapaneni R, Bagde A, Marepally S, Singh M. Novel amphiphilic lipid augments the co-delivery of erlotinib and IL36 siRNA into the skin for psoriasis treatment. J Control Release. 2017;246:120–32. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Ferdous AJ, Stembridge NY, Singh M. Role of monensin PLGA polymer nanoparticles and liposomes as potentiator of ricin A immunotoxins in vitro. J Control Release. 1998;50(1-3):71–8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Hedrick E, Lee S-O, Doddapaneni R, Singh M, Safe S. Nuclear receptor 4A1 as a drug target for breast cancer chemotherapy. Endocr Relat Cancer. 2015;22(5):831–40. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Kommineni N, Mahira S, Domb AJ, Khan W. Cabazitaxel-loaded nanocarriers for cancer therapy with reduced side effects. Pharmaceutics. 2019;11(3):141. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Patel K, Chowdhury N, Doddapaneni R, Boakye CH, Godugu C, Singh M. Piperlongumine for enhancing oral bioavailability and cytotoxicity of docetaxel in triple-negative breast cancer. J Pharm Sci. 2015;104(12):4417–26. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Kommineni N, Saka R, Bulbake U, Khan W. Cabazitaxel and thymoquinone co-loaded lipospheres as a synergistic combination for breast cancer. Chem Phys Lipids. 2019;224:104707. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Xin Y, Yin M, Zhao L, Meng F, Luo L. Recent progress on nanoparticle-based drug delivery systems for cancer therapy. Cancer Biol Med. 2017. August;14(3):228–41. PubMed PMID: 28884040. PMCID: PMC5570600. Epub 2017/09/09. eng. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Patel K, Doddapaneni R, Chowdhury N, Boakye CH, Behl G, Singh M. Tumor stromal disrupting agent enhances the anticancer efficacy of docetaxel loaded PEGylated liposomes in lung cancer. Nanomedicine. 2016. .June;11(11):1377–92. PubMed PMID: 27171485. PMCID: PMC4910941. Epub 2016/05/14. eng. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Chowdhury N, Vhora I, Patel K, Doddapaneni R, Mondal A, Singh M. Liposomes co-loaded with 6-phosphofructo-2-kinase/fructose-2,6-biphosphatase 3 (PFKFB3) shRNA plasmid and docetaxel for the treatment of non-small cell lung cancer. Pharm Res. 2017;34(11):2371–84. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Golombek SK, May JN, Theek B, Appold L, Drude N, Kiessling F, Lammers T. Tumor targeting via EPR: Strategies to enhance patient responses. Adv Drug Deliv Rev. 2018. May;130:17–38. PubMed PMID: 30009886. PMCID: PMC6130746. Epub 2018/07/17. eng. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Gulati M, Grover M, Singh M, Singh S. Study of azathioprine encapsulation into liposomes. J Microencapsul. 1998. Jul-Aug;15(4):485–94. PubMed PMID: 9651870. Epub 1998/07/04. eng. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Andey T, Sudhakar G, Marepally S, Patel A, Banerjee R, Singh M. Lipid nanocarriers of a lipid-conjugated estrogenic derivative inhibit tumor growth and enhance cisplatin activity against triple-negative breast cancer: Pharmacokinetic and efficacy evaluation. Mol Pharm. 2015. April 6;12(4):1105–20. PubMed PMID: 25661724. Epub 2015/02/11. eng. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Patel AR, Chougule MB, I T, Patlolla R, Wang G, Singh M. Efficacy of aerosolized celecoxib encapsulated nanostructured lipid carrier in non-small cell lung cancer in combination with docetaxel. Pharm Res. 2013. May;30(5):1435–46. PubMed PMID: 23361589. PMCID: PMC3618607. Epub 2013/01/31. eng. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Tekade RK, Maheshwari R, Soni N, Tekade M, Chougule MB. Nanotechnology for the development of nanomedicine. In: Mishra V, Kesharwani P, Amin MCIM, Iyer A, editors. Nanotechnology–based approaches for targeting and delivery of drugs and genes. New York: Elsevier; 2017. p. 3–61. [Google Scholar]
- 22.Boakye CH, Patel K, Singh M. Doxorubicin liposomes as an investigative model to study the skin permeation of nanocarriers. Int J Pharm. 2015;489(1-2):106–16. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Griffin T, Rybak ME, Recht L, Singh M, Salimi A, Raso V. Potentiation of antitumor immunotoxins by liposomal monensin. J Natl Cancer Inst. 1993. February 17;85(4):292–8. PubMed PMID: 8426373. Epub 1993/02/17. eng. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Bobo D, Robinson KJ, Islam J, Thurecht KJ, Corrie SR. Nanoparticle-based medicines: A review of FDA-approved materials and clinical trials to date. Pharm Res. 2016;33(10):2373–87. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Bale S, Khurana A, Reddy AS, Singh M, Godugu C. Overview on therapeutic applications of microparticulate drug delivery systems. Crit Rev Ther Drug Carrier Syst. 2016;33(4):309–61. PubMed PMID: 27910739. Epub 2016/12/03. eng. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Din FU, Aman W, Ullah I, Qureshi OS, Mustapha O, Shafique S, Zeb A. Effective use of nanocarriers as drug delivery systems for the treatment of selected tumors. Int J Nanomedicine. 2017;12:7291–309. PubMed PMID: 29042776. PMCID: PMC5634382. Epub 2017/10/19. eng. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Pathade AD, Kommineni N, Bulbake U, Thummar MM, Samanthula G, Khan W. Preparation and comparison of oral bioavailability for different nano-formulations of Olaparib. AAPS PharmSciTech. 2019. August 6;20(7):276. PubMed PMID: 31388783. Epub 2019/08/08. eng. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Alphandéry E. Biodistribution and targeting properties of iron oxide nanoparticles for treatments of cancer and iron anemia disease. Nanotoxicology. 2019;13(5):573–96. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Suk JS, Xu Q, Kim N, Hanes J, Ensign LM. PEGylation as a strategy for improving nanoparticle-based drug and gene delivery. Adv Drug Deliv Rev. 2016. April 1;99(Pt A):28–51. PubMed PMID: 26456916. PMCID: PMC4798869. Epub 2015/10/13. eng. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Doddapaneni R, Patel K, Owaid IH, Singh M. Tumor neovasculature-targeted cationic PEGylated liposomes of gambogic acid for the treatment of triple-negative breast cancer. Drug Deliv. 2016. May;23(4):1232–41. PubMed PMID: 26701717. PMCID: PMC5024788. Epub 2015/12/25. eng. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Bhatia S Nanoparticles types, classification, characterization, fabrication methods and drug delivery applications. In: Natural polymer drug delivery systems. New York: Springer; 2016. p. 33–93. [Google Scholar]
- 32.Ha D, Yang N, Nadithe V. Exosomes as therapeutic drug carriers and delivery vehicles across biological membranes: Current perspectives and future challenges. Acta Pharm Sin B. 2016. July;6(4):287–96. PubMed PMID: 27471669. PMCID: PMC4951582. Epub 2016/07/30. eng. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Conlan RS, Pisano S, Oliveira MI, Ferrari M, Mendes Pinto I. Exosomes as reconfigurable therapeutic systems. Trends Mol Med. 2017. July;23(7):636–50. PubMed PMID: 28648185. PMCID: PMC5657340. Epub 2017/06/27. eng. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Singh M, Ghose T, Faulkner G, Kralovec J, Mezei M. Targeting of methotrexate-containing liposomes with a monoclonal antibody against human renal cancer. Cancer Res. 1989;49(14):3976–84. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Ashfaq UA, Riaz M, Yasmeen E, Yousaf MZ. Recent advances in nanoparticle-based targeted drug-delivery systems against cancer and role of tumor microenvironment. Crit Rev Ther Drug Carrier Syst. 2017;34(4):317–53. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Desai P, Ann D, Wang J, Prabhu S. Pancreatic cancer: Recent advances in nanoformulation-based therapies. Crit Rev Ther Drug Carrier Syst. 2019;36(1):59–91. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Doyle LM, Wang MZ. Overview of extracellular vesicles, their origin, composition, purpose, and methods for exosome isolation and analysis. Cells. 2019. July 15;8(7):727. PubMed PMID: 31311206. PMCID: PMC6678302. Epub 2019/07/18. eng. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Javeed N, Mukhopadhyay D. Exosomes and their role in the micro-/macro-environment: A comprehensive review. J Biomed Res. 2017. September 26;31(5):386–94. PubMed PMID: 28290182. PMCID: PMC5706431. Epub 2017/03/16. eng. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Antimisiaris SG, Mourtas S, Marazioti A. Exosomes and exosome-inspired vesicles for targeted drug delivery. Pharmaceutics. 2018. November 6;10(4):218. PubMed PMID: 30404188. PMCID: PMC6321407. Epub 2018/11/09. eng. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Bobrie A, Colombo M, Raposo G, Théry C. Exosome secretion: Molecular mechanisms and roles in immune responses. Traffic. 2011;12(12):1659–68. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.De Toro J, Herschlik L, Waldner C, Mongini C. Emerging roles of exosomes in normal and pathological conditions: New insights for diagnosis and therapeutic applications. Front Immunol. 2015;6:203. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Vázquez-Ríos AJ, Molina-Crespo Á, Bouzo BL, López-López R, Moreno-Bueno G, de la Fuente M. Exosome-mimetic nanoplatforms for targeted cancer drug delivery. J Nanobiotechnology. 2019;17(1):85. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Nguyen DB, Ly TBT, Wesseling MC, Hittinger M, Torge A, Devitt A, Perrie Y, Bernhardt I. Characterization of microvesicles released from human red blood cells. Cell Physiol Biochem. 2016;38(3):1085–99. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Sun D, Zhuang X, Zhang S, Deng ZB, Grizzle W, Miller D, Zhang HG. Exosomes are endogenous nanoparticles that can deliver biological information between cells. Adv Drug Deliv Rev. 2013. March;65(3):342–7. PubMed PMID: 22776312. Epub 2012/07/11. eng. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Raza A, Rasheed T, Nabeel F, Hayat U, Bilal M, Iqbal HMN. Endogenous and exogenous stimuli-responsive drug delivery systems for programmed site-specific release. Molecules. 2019. March 21;24(6):1117. PubMed PMID: 30901827. PMCID: PMC6470858. Epub 2019/03/25. eng. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Akuma P, Okagu OD, Udenigwe CC. Naturally occurring exosome vesicles as potential delivery vehicle for bioactive compounds. Front Sustain Food Syst. 2019;3:23. [Google Scholar]
- 47.Li X, Corbett AL, Taatizadeh E, Tasnim N, Little JP, Garnis C, Daugaard M, Guns E, Hoorfar M, Li ITS. Challenges and opportunities in exosome research-Perspectives from biology, engineering, and cancer therapy. APL Bioeng. 2019. March;3(1):011503. PubMed PMID: 31069333. PMCID: PMC6481742. Epub 2019/05/10. eng. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.H Rashed M, Bayraktar E, K Helal G, Abd-Ellah MF, Amero P, Chavez-Reyes A, Rodriguez-Aguayo C. Exosomes: From garbage bins to promising therapeutic targets. Int J Mol Sci. 2017;18(3):538. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Dreyer F, Baur A. Biogenesis and functions of exosomes and extracellular vesicles. Methods Mol Biol. 2016;1448:201–16. PubMed PMID: 27317183. Epub 2016/06/19. eng. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50.McAndrews KM, Kalluri R. Mechanisms associated with biogenesis of exosomes in cancer. Mol Cancer. 2019. March 30;18(1):52. PubMed PMID: 30925917. PMCID: PMC6441149. Epub 2019/03/31. eng. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51.Hessvik NP, Llorente A. Current knowledge on exosome biogenesis and release. Cell Mol Life Sci. 2018. January;75(2):193–208. PubMed PMID: 28733901. PMCID: PMC5756260. Epub 2017/07/25. eng. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52.Hessvik NP, Llorente A. Current knowledge on exosome biogenesis and release. Cell Mol Life Sci. 2018;75(2):193–208. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53.Tetta C, Ghigo E, Silengo L, Deregibus MC, Camussi G. Extracellular vesicles as an emerging mechanism of cell-to-cell communication. Endocrine. 2013;44(1):11–9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54.Zhang Y, Liu Y, Liu H, Tang WH. Exosomes: Biogenesis, biologic function and clinical potential. Cell Biosci. 2019;9:19. PubMed PMID: 30815248. PMCID: PMC6377728. Epub 2019/03/01. eng. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55.Record M. Intercellular communication by exosomes in placenta: A possible role in cell fusion? Placenta. 2014;35(5):297–302. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 56.Villarroya-Beltri C, Baixauli F, Mittelbrunn M, Fernández-Delgado I, Torralba D, Moreno-Gonzalo O, Baldanta S, Enrich C, Guerra S, Sánchez-Madrid F. ISGylation controls exosome secretion by promoting lysosomal degradation of MVB proteins. Nat Commun. 2016;7(1):1–11. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 57.Bebelman MP, Smit MJ, Pegtel DM, Baglio SR. Biogenesis and function of extracellular vesicles in cancer. Pharmacol Ther. 2018;188:1–11. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 58.Abels ER, Breakefield XO. Introduction to extracellular vesicles: Biogenesis, RNA cargo selection, content, release, and uptake. Springer; 2016. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 59.Colombo M, Moita C, van Niel G, Kowal J, Vigneron J, Benaroch P, Manel N, Moita LF, Théry C, Raposo G. Analysis of ESCRT functions in exosome biogenesis, composition and secretion highlights the heterogeneity of extracellular vesicles. J Cell Sci. 2013;126(24):5553–65. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 60.Frankel EB, Audhya A. ESCRT-dependent cargo sorting at multivesicular endosomes. Semin Cell Dev Biol. 2018. February;74:4–10. PubMed PMID: 28797838. PMCID: PMC5803488. Epub 2017/08/12.eng. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 61.Schmidt O, Teis D. The ESCRT machinery. Curr Biol. 2012. February 21;22(4):R116–20. PubMed PMID: 22361144. PMCID: PMC3314914. Epub 2012/03/01. eng. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 62.Mattissek C, Teis D. The role of the endosomal sorting complexes required for transport (ESCRT) in tumorigenesis. Mol Membr Biol. 2014. June;31(4):111–9. PubMed PMID: 24641493. PMCID: PMC4059258. Epub 2014/03/20. eng. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 63.Babst M. MVB vesicle formation: ESCRT-dependent, ESCRT-independent and everything in between. Curr Opin Cell Biol. 2011;23(4):452–7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 64.Van Niel G, Charrin S, Simoes S, Romao M, Rochin L, Saftig P, Marks MS, Rubinstein E, Raposo G. The tetraspanin CD63 regulates ESCRT-independent and-dependent endosomal sorting during melanogenesis. Dev Cell. 2011;21(4):708–21. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 65.Li S-P, Lin Z-X, Jiang X-Y, Yu X-Y. Exosomal cargo-loading and synthetic exosome-mimics as potential therapeutic tools. Acta Pharmacol Sin. 2018;39(4):542–51. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 66.Aung T, Chapuy B, Vogel D, Wenzel D, Oppermann M, Lahmann M, Weinhage T, Menck K, Hupfeld T, Koch R. Exosomal evasion of humoral immunotherapy in aggressive B-cell lymphoma modulated by ATP-binding cassette transporter A3. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2011;108(37):15336–41. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 67.Aung T, Chapuy B, Vogel D, Wenzel D, Oppermann M, Lahmann M, Weinhage T, Menck K, Hupfeld T, Koch R, Trümper L, Wulf GG. Exosomal evasion of humoral immunotherapy in aggressive B-cell lymphoma modulated by ATP-binding cassette transporter A3. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2011. September 13;108(37):15336–41. PubMed PMID: 21873242. PMCID: PMC3174603. Epub 2011/08/30. eng. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 68.de Gassart A, Géminard C, Février B, Raposo G, Vidal M. Lipid raft-associated protein sorting in exosomes. Blood. 2003;102(13):4336–44. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 69.Allen JA, Halverson-Tamboli RA, Rasenick MM. Lipid raft microdomains and neurotransmitter signalling. Nat Rev Neurosci. 2007;8(2):128–40. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 70.Joshi BS, de Beer MA, Giepmans BN, Zuhorn IS. Endocytosis of extracellular vesicles and release of their cargo from endosomes. ACS Nano. 2020;14(4):4444–55. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 71.Van Niel G, d’Angelo G, Raposo G. Shedding light on the cell biology of extracellular vesicles. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 2018;19(4):213. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 72.Koles K, Nunnari J, Korkut C, Barria R, Brewer C, Li Y, Leszyk J, Zhang B, Budnik V. Mechanism of evenness interrupted (Evi)-exosome release at synaptic boutons. J Biol Chem. 2012;287(20):16820–34. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 73.Ostrowski M, Carmo NB, Krumeich S, Fanget I, Raposo G, Savina A, Moita CF, Schauer K, Hume AN, Freitas RP. Rab27a and Rab27b control different steps of the exosome secretion pathway. Nat Cell Biol. 2010;12(1):19–30. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 74.Edgar JR, Manna PT, Nishimura S, Banting G, Robinson MS. Tetherin is an exosomal tether. Elife. 2016;5:e17180. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 75.Verweij FJ, Bebelman MP, Jimenez CR, Garcia-Vallejo JJ, Janssen H, Neefjes J, Knot JC, de Goeij-de Haas R, Piersma SR, Baglio SR, Verhage M, Middeldorp JM, Zomer A, van Rheenen J, Coppolino MG, Hurbain I, Raposo G, Smit MJ, Toonen RFG, van Niel G, Pegtel DM. Quantifying exosome secretion from single cells reveals a modulatory role for GPCR signaling. J Cell Biol. 2018. March 5;217(3):1129–42. PubMed PMID: 29339438. PMCID: PMC5839777. Epub 2018/01/18. eng. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 76.Möbius W, Ohno-Iwashita Y, Donselaar EGv, Oorschot VM, Shimada Y, Fujimoto T, Heijnen HF, Geuze HJ, Slot JW. Immunoelectron microscopic localization of cholesterol using biotinylated and non-cytolytic perfringolysin O. J Histochem Cytochem. 2002;50(1):43–55. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 77.Elsharkasy OM, Nordin JZ, Hagey DW, de Jong OG, Schiffelers RM, Andaloussi SE, Vader P. Extracellular vesicles as drug delivery systems: Why and how? Adv Drug Deliv Rev. 2020;159:332–43. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 78.Verdera HC, Gitz-Francois JJ, Schiffelers RM, Vader P. Cellular uptake of extracellular vesicles is mediated by clathrin-independent endocytosis and macropinocytosis. J Control Release. 2017;266:100–8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 79.Escrevente C, Keller S, Altevogt P, Costa J. Interaction and uptake of exosomes by ovarian cancer cells. BMC Cancer. 2011;11(1):108. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 80.Goh WJ, Zou S, Ong WY, Torta F, Alexandra AF, Schiffelers RM, Storm G, Wang J-W, Czarny B, Pastorin G. Bioinspired cell-derived nanovesicles versus exosomes as drug delivery systems: A cost-effective alternative. Sci Rep. 2017;7(1):1–10. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 81.Tian T, Wang Y, Wang H, Zhu Z, Xiao Z. Visualizing of the cellular uptake and intracellular trafficking of exosomes by live-cell microscopy. J Cell Biochem. 2010;111(2):488–96. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 82.Svensson KJ, Christianson HC, Wittrup A, Bourseau-Guilmain E, Lindqvist E, Svensson LM, Mörgelin M, Belting M. Exosome uptake depends on ERK1/2-heat shock protein 27 signaling and lipid Raft-mediated endocytosis negatively regulated by caveolin-1. J Biol Chem. 2013;288(24):17713–24. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 83.Théry C, Zitvogel L, Amigorena S. Exosomes: Composition, biogenesis and function. Nat Rev Immunol. 2002;2(8):569–79. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 84.Reddy VS, Madala SK, Trinath J, Reddy GB. Extracellular small heat shock proteins: Exosomal biogenesis and function. Cell Stress Chaperones. 2018;23(3):441–54. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 85.Shimaoka M, Kawamoto E, Gaowa A, Okamoto T, Park EJ. Connexins and integrins in exosomes. Cancers. 2019. January 17;11(1):106. PubMed PMID: 30658425. PMCID: PMC6356207. Epub 2019/01/20. eng. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 86.Robbins PD, Morelli AE. Regulation of immune responses by extracellular vesicles. Nat Rev Immunol. 2014;14(3):195–208. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 87.Hsu C, Morohashi Y, Yoshimura S-I, Manrique-Hoyos N, Jung S, Lauterbach MA, Bakhti M, Grønborg M, Möbius W, Rhee J. Regulation of exosome secretion by Rab35 and its GTPase-activating proteins TBC1D10A–C. J Cell Biol. 2010;189(2):223–32. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 88.Blanc L, Vidal M. New insights into the function of Rab GTPases in the context of exosomal secretion. Small GTPases. 2018;9(1-2):95–106. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 89.Skotland T, Hessvik NP, Sandvig K, Llorente A. Exosomal lipid composition and the role of ether lipids and phosphoinositides in exosome biology. J Lipid Res. 2019;60(1):9–18. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 90.Meckes DG, Shair KH, Marquitz AR, Kung C-P, Edwards RH, Raab-Traub N. Human tumor virus utilizes exosomes for intercellular communication. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2010;107(47):20370–5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 91.Meckes DG, Gunawardena HP, Dekroon RM, Heaton PR, Edwards RH, Ozgur S, Griffith JD, Damania B, Raab-Traub N. Modulation of B-cell exosome proteins by gamma herpesvirus infection. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2013;110(31):E2925–E33. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 92.Zhang B, Gao L, Ma L, Luo Y, Yang H, Cui Z. 3D Bioprinting: A novel avenue for manufacturing tissues and organs. Engineering. 2019;5:777–94. [Google Scholar]
- 93.Antimisiaris SG, Mourtas S, Marazioti A. Exosomes and exosome-inspired vesicles for targeted drug delivery. Pharmaceutics. 2018;10(4):218. PubMed PMID: 30404188. eng. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 94.Su S-A, Xie Y, Fu Z, Wang Y, Wang J-A, Xiang M. Emerging role of exosome-mediated intercellular communication in vascular remodeling. Oncotarget. 2017;8(15):25700. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 95.Jeppesen DK, Fenix AM, Franklin JL, Higginbotham JN, Zhang Q, Zimmerman LJ, Liebler DC, Ping J, Liu Q, Evans R, Fissell WH, Patton JG, Rome LH, Burnette DT, Coffey RJ. Reassessment of exosome composition. Cell. 2019;177(2):428–45.e18. PubMed PMID: 30951670. eng. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 96.Bruschi M, Ravera S, Santucci L, Candiano G, Bartolucci M, Calzia D, Lavarello C, Inglese E, Petretto A, Ghiggeri G. The human urinary exosome as a potential metabolic effector cargo. Exp Rev Proteomics. 2015;12(4):425–32. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 97.Beach A, Zhang H-G, Ratajczak MZ, Kakar SS. Exosomes: An overview of biogenesis, composition and role in ovarian cancer. J Ovarian Res. 2014;7(1):14. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 98.Lin J, Li J, Huang B, Liu J, Chen X, Chen X-M, Xu Y-M, Huang L-F, Wang X-Z. Exosomes: Novel biomarkers for clinical diagnosis. Sci World J. 2015;2015. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 99.Mathivanan S, Simpson RJ. ExoCarta: A compendium of exosomal proteins and RNA. Proteomics. 2009;9(21):4997–5000. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 100.Vlassov AV, Magdaleno S, Setterquist R, Conrad R. Exosomes: Current knowledge of their composition, biological functions, and diagnostic and therapeutic potentials. Biochim Biophys Acta. 2012;1820(7):940–8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 101.Carayon K, Chaoui K, Ronzier E, Lazar I, Bertrand-Michel J, Roques V, Balor S, Terce F, Lopez A, Salomé L. Proteolipidic composition of exosomes changes during reticulocyte maturation. J Biol Chem. 2011;286(39):34426–39. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 102.Zhang Y, Liu Y, Liu H, Tang WH. Exosomes: Biogenesis, biologic function and clinical potential. Cell Biosci. 2019;9(1):1–18. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 103.Keller S, Sanderson MP, Stoeck A, Altevogt P. Exosomes: From biogenesis and secretion to biological function. Immunol Lett. 2006;107(2):102–8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 104.Kalluri R. The biology and function of exosomes in cancer. J Clin Invest. 2016;126(4):1208–15. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 105.Simpson RJ, Jensen SS, Lim JW. Proteomic profiling of exosomes: Current perspectives. Proteomics. 2008. October;8(19):4083–99. PubMed PMID: 18780348. Epub 2008/09/10. eng. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 106.Properzi F, Logozzi M, Fais S. Exosomes: The future of biomarkers in medicine. Biomark Med. 2013. October;7(5):769–78. PubMed PMID: 24044569. Epub 2013/09/21. eng. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 107.Kahlert C, Melo SA, Protopopov A, Tang J, Seth S, Koch M, Zhang J, Weitz J, Chin L, Futreal A, Kalluri R. Identification of double-stranded genomic DNA spanning all chromosomes with mutated KRAS and p53 DNA in the serum exosomes of patients with pancreatic cancer. J Biol Chem. 2014. February 14;289(7):3869–75. PubMed PMID: 24398677. PMCID: PMC3924256. Epub 2014/01/09. eng. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 108.Valadi H, Ekström K, Bossios A, Sjöstrand M, Lee JJ, Lötvall JO. Exosome-mediated transfer of mRNAs and microRNAs is a novel mechanism of genetic exchange between cells. Nat Cell Biol. 2007. June;9(6):654–9. PubMed PMID: 17486113. Epub 2007/05/09. eng. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 109.Ratajczak J, Wysoczynski M, Hayek F, Janowska-Wieczorek A, Ratajczak MZ. Membrane-derived microvesicles: Important and underappreciated mediators of cell-to-cell communication. Leukemia. 2006. September;20(9):1487–95. PubMed PMID: 16791265. Epub 2006/06/23. eng. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 110.Ferguson S, Kim S, Lee C, Deci M, Nguyen J. The phenotypic effects of exosomes secreted from distinct cellular sources: A comparative study based on miRNA composition. AAPS J. 2018;20(4):67. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 111.Reinhardt TA, Lippolis JD, Nonnecke BJ, Sacco RE. Bovine milk exosome proteome. J Proteomics. 2012. February 16;75(5):1486–92. PubMed PMID: 22129587. Epub 2011/12/02. eng. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 112.Izumi H, Tsuda M, Sato Y, Kosaka N, Ochiya T, Iwamoto H, Namba K, Takeda Y. Bovine milk exosomes contain microRNA and mRNA and are taken up by human macrophages. J Dairy Sci. 2015. May;98(5):2920–33. PubMed PMID: 25726110. Epub 2015/03/03. eng. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 113.Agrawal AK, Aqil F, Jeyabalan J, Spencer WA, Beck J, Gachuki BW, Alhakeem SS, Oben K, Munagala R, Bondada S. Milk-derived exosomes for oral delivery of paclitaxel. Nanomedicine. 2017;13(5):1627–36. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 114.Chen T, Xie M-Y, Sun J-J, Ye R-S, Cheng X, Sun R-P, Wei L-M, Li M, Lin D-L, Jiang Q-Y. Porcine milk-derived exosomes promote proliferation of intestinal epithelial cells. Sci Rep. 2016;6:33862. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 115.Masyuk AI, Huang BQ, Ward CJ, Gradilone SA, Banales JM, Masyuk TV, Radtke B, Splinter PL, LaRusso NF. Biliary exosomes influence cholangiocyte regulatory mechanisms and proliferation through interaction with primary cilia. Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol. 2010. October;299(4):G990–9. PubMed PMID: 20634433. PMCID: PMC2957333. Epub 2010/07/17. eng. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 116.Maia J, Caja S, Strano Moraes MC, Couto N, Costa-Silva B. Exosome-based cell-cell communication in the tumor microenvironment. Front Cell Dev Biol. 2018;6:18. PubMed PMID: 29515996. PMCID: PMC5826063. Epub 2018/03/09. eng. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 117.Wan Z, Gao X, Dong Y, Zhao Y, Chen X, Yang G, Liu L. Exosome-mediated cell-cell communication in tumor progression. Am J Cancer Res. 2018;8(9):1661–73. PubMed PMID: 30323961. PMCID: PMC6176174. Epub 2018/10/17. eng. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 118.Wang S, Xu M, Li X, Su X, Xiao X, Keating A, Zhao RC. Exosomes released by hepatocarcinoma cells endow adipocytes with tumor-promoting properties. .J Hematol Oncol. 2018. June 14;11(1):82. PubMed PMID: 29898759. PMCID: PMC6001126. Epub 2018/06/15. eng. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 119.Campanella C, Rappa F, Sciumè C, Marino Gammazza A, Barone R, Bucchieri F, David S, Curcurù G, Caruso Bavisotto C, Pitruzzella A, Geraci G, Modica G, Farina F, Zummo G, Fais S, Conway de Macario E, Macario AJ, Cappello F. Heat shock protein 60 levels in tissue and circulating exosomes in human large bowel cancer before and after ablative surgery. Cancer. 2015. September 15;121(18):3230–9. PubMed PMID: 26060090. Epub 2015/06/11. eng. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 120.Purushothaman A, Bandari SK, Liu J, Mobley JA, Brown EE, Sanderson RD. Fibronectin on the surface of myeloma cell-derived exosomes mediates exosome-cell interactions. J Biol Chem. 2016. January 22;291(4):1652–63. PubMed PMID: 26601950. PMCID: PMC4722448. Epub 2015/11/26. eng. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 121.Wu C, Du S, Zhang J, Liang A, Liu Y. Exosomes and breast cancer: A comprehensive review of novel therapeutic strategies from diagnosis to treatment. Cancer Gene Ther. 2017;24(1):6–12. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 122.van Dommelen SM, Vader P, Lakhal S, Kooijmans SA, van Solinge WW, Wood MJ, Schiffelers RM. Microvesicles and exosomes: Opportunities for cell-derived membrane vesicles in drug delivery. J Control Release. 2012. July 20;161(2):635–44. PubMed PMID: 22138068. Epub 2011/12/06. eng. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 123.Crescitelli R, Lässer C, Szabó TG, Kittel A, Eldh M, Dianzani I, Buzás EI, Lötvall J. Distinct RNA profiles in subpopulations of extracellular vesicles: Apoptotic bodies, microvesicles and exosomes. J Extracell Vesicles. 2013;2. PubMed PMID: 24223256. PMCID: PMC3823106. Epub 2013/11/14. eng. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 124.Abels ER, Breakefield XO. Introduction to extracellular vesicles: Biogenesis, RNA cargo selection, content, release, and uptake. Cell Mol Neurobiol. 2016. April;36(3):301–12. PubMed PMID: 27053351. PMCID: PMC5546313. Epub 2016/04/08. eng. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 125.Luan X, Sansanaphongpricha K, Myers I, Chen H, Yuan H, Sun D. Engineering exosomes as refined biological nanoplatforms for drug delivery. Acta Pharmacol Sin. 2017. June;38(6):754–63. PubMed PMID: 28392567. PMCID: PMC5520184. Epub 2017/04/11. eng. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 126.Li S, Li S, Wu S, Chen L. Exosomes modulate the viral replication and host immune responses in HBV infection. Biomed Res Int. 2019;2019. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 127.Behbahani GD, Khani S, Hosseini HM, Abbaszadeh-Goudarzi K, Nazeri S. The role of exosomes contents on genetic and epigenetic alterations of recipient cancer cells. Iran J Basic Med Sci. 2016. October;19(10):1031–9. PubMed PMID: 27872698. PMCID: PMC5110650. Epub 2016/11/23. eng. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 128.Liu W, Bai X, Zhang A, Huang J, Xu S, Zhang J. Role of exosomes in central nervous system diseases. Front Mol Neurosci. 2019;12:240. PubMed PMID: 31636538. PMCID: PMC6787718. Epub 2019/10/23. eng. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 129.Desdín-Micó G, Mittelbrunn M. Role of exosomes in the protection of cellular homeostasis. Cell Adh Migr. 2017. March 4;11(2):127–34. PubMed PMID: 27875097. PMCID: PMC5351736. Epub 2016/11/23. eng. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 130.Pascual M, Ibáñez F, Guerri C. Exosomes as mediators of neuron-glia communication in neuroinflammation. Neural Regen Res. 2020. May;15(5):796–801. PubMed PMID: 31719239. PMCID: PMC6990780. Epub 2019/11/14. eng. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 131.Men Y, Yelick J, Jin S, Tian Y, Chiang MSR, Higashimori H, Brown E, Jarvis R, Yang Y. Exosome reporter mice reveal the involvement of exosomes in mediating neuron to astroglia communication in the CNS. Nat Commun. 2019;10(1):1–18. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 132.Salem ESB, Fan GC. Pathological effects of exosomes in mediating diabetic cardiomyopathy. Adv Exp Med Biol. 2017;998:113–38. PubMed PMID: 28936736. PMCID: PMC6205207. Epub 2017/09/25. eng. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 133.Wang L, Zhang B, Zheng W, Kang M, Chen Q, Qin W, Li C, Zhang Y, Shao Y, Wu Y. Exosomes derived from pancreatic cancer cells induce insulin resistance in C2C12 myotube cells through the PI3K/Akt/FoxO1 pathway. Sci Rep. 2017. .July 14;7(1):5384. PubMed PMID: 28710412. PMCID: PMC5511275. Epub 2017/07/16. eng. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 134.Ibrahim A, Marbán E. Exosomes: Fundamental biology and roles in cardiovascular physiology. Annu Rev Physiol. 2016;78:67–83. PubMed PMID: 26667071. PMCID: PMC5425157. Epub 2015/12/17. eng. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 135.Rodríguez M, Bajo-Santos C, Hessvik NP, Lorenz S, Fromm B, Berge V, Sandvig K, Linē A, Llorente A. Identification of non-invasive miRNAs biomarkers for prostate cancer by deep sequencing analysis of urinary exosomes. Mol Cancer. 2017;16(1):156. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 136.Zhou H, Cheruvanky A, Hu X, Matsumoto T, Hiramatsu N, Cho ME, Berger A, Leelahavanichkul A, Doi K, Chawla LS. Urinary exosomal transcription factors, a new class of biomarkers for renal disease. Kidney Int. 2008;74(5):613–21. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 137.Jiang Z-Z, Liu Y-M, Niu X, Yin J-Y, Hu B, Guo S-C, Fan Y, Wang Y, Wang N-S. Exosomes secreted by human urine-derived stem cells could prevent kidney complications from type I diabetes in rats. Stem Cell Res Ther. 2016;7(1):24. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 138.Du M, Shi D, Yuan L, Li P, Chu H, Qin C, Yin C, Zhang Z, Wang M. Circulating miR-497 and miR-663b in plasma are potential novel biomarkers for bladder cancer. Sci Rep. 2015;5:10437. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 139.Gracia T, Wang X, Su Y, Norgett EE, Williams TL, Moreno P, Micklem G, Frankl FEK. Urinary exosomes contain microRNAs capable of paracrine modulation of tubular transporters in kidney. Sci Rep. 2017;7(1):1–11. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 140.Barros ER, Carvajal CA. Urinary exosomes and their cargo: Potential biomarkers for mineralocorticoid arterial hypertension? Front Endocrinol. 2017;8:230. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 141.Salem ES, Fan G-C. Pathological effects of exosomes in mediating diabetic cardiomyopathy. Exosomes in Cardiovascular Diseases: Springer; 2017. p. 113–38. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 142.Yuyama K, Igarashi Y. Physiological and pathological roles of exosomes in the nervous system. Biomol Concepts. 2016;7(1):53–68. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 143.Dang SY, Leng Y, Wang ZX, Xiao X, Zhang X, Wen T, Gong HZ, Hong A, Ma Y. Exosomal transfer of obesity adipose tissue for decreased miR-141-3p mediate insulin resistance of hepatocytes. Int J Biol Sci. 2019;15(2):351–68. PubMed PMID: 30745826. PMCID: PMC6367552. Epub 2019/02/13. eng. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 144.Ge Q, Xie XX, Xiao X, Li X. Exosome-like vesicles as new mediators and therapeutic targets for treating insulin resistance and β-cell mass failure in type 2 diabetes mellitus. J Diabetes Res. 2019:3256060. PubMed PMID: 30993115. PMCID: PMC6434285. Epub 2019/04/18. eng. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 145.Deng Z-B, Poliakov A, Hardy RW, Clements R, Liu C, Liu Y, Wang J, Xiang X, Zhang S, Zhuang X. Adipose tissue exosome-like vesicles mediate activation of macrophage-induced insulin resistance. Diabetes. 2009;58(11):2498–505. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 146.Zhang W, Jiang X, Bao J, Wang Y, Liu H, Tang L. Exosomes in pathogen infections: A bridge to deliver molecules and link functions. Front Immunol. 2018;9:90. PubMed PMID: 29483904. PMCID: PMC5816030. Epub 2018/02/28. eng. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 147.Robbins PD, Morelli AE. Regulation of immune responses by extracellular vesicles. Nat Rev Immunol. 2014. March;14(3):195–208. PubMed PMID: 24566916. PMCID: PMC4350779. Epub 2014/02/26. eng. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 148.Shenoda BB, Ajit SK. Modulation of immune responses by exosomes derived from antigen-presenting cells. Clin Med Insights Pathol. 2016;9(Suppl 1):1–8. PubMed PMID: 27660518. PMCID: PMC5024790. Epub 2016/09/24. eng. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 149.Shenoda BB, Ajit SK. Modulation of immune responses by exosomes derived from antigen-presenting cells. Clin Med Insights Pathol. 2016;9:CPath. S39925. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 150.Raposo G, Stoorvogel W. Extracellular vesicles: Exosomes, microvesicles, and friends. J Cell Biol. 2013;200(4):373–83. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 151.Li Q, Wang H, Peng H, Huyan T, Cacalano NA. Exosomes: Versatile nano mediators of immune regulation. Cancers. 2019. October 14;11(10). PubMed PMID: 31615107. PMCID: PMC6826959. Epub 2019/10/17. eng. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 152.Han Q, Zhao H, Jiang Y, Yin C, Zhang J. HCC-derived exosomes: Critical player and target for cancer immune escape. Cells. 2019. June 8;8(6):558. PubMed PMID: 31181729. PMCID: PMC6627799. Epub 2019/06/12. eng. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 153.Bae S, Brumbaugh J, Bonavida B. Exosomes derived from cancerous and non-cancerous cells regulate the anti-tumor response in the tumor microenvironment. Genes Cancer. 2018. March;9(3-4):87–100. PubMed PMID: 30108680. PMCID: PMC6086005. Epub 2018/08/16. eng. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 154.Rao Q, Zuo B, Lu Z, Gao X, You A, Wu C, Du Z, Yin H. Tumor-derived exosomes elicit tumor suppression in murine hepatocellular carcinoma models and humans in vitro. Hepatology. 2016;64(2):456–72. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 155.Poggio M, Hu T, Pai C-C, Chu B, Belair CD, Chang A, Montabana E, Lang UE, Fu Q, Fong L. Suppression of exosomal PD-L1 induces systemic anti-tumor immunity and memory. Cell. 2019;177(2):414–27. e13. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 156.Gabrilovich DI, Ciernik IF, Carbone DP. Dendritic cells in antitumor immune responses: I. Defective antigen presentation in tumor-bearing hosts. Cell Immunol. 1996;170(1):101–10. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 157.André F, Chaput N, Schartz NE, Flament C, Aubert N, Bernard J, Lemonnier F, Raposo G, Escudier B, Hsu D-H. Exosomes as potent cell-free peptide-based vaccine. I. Dendritic cell-derived exosomes transfer functional MHC class I/peptide complexes to dendritic cells. J Immunol. 2004;172(4):2126–36. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 158.Chaput N, Schartz NE, André F, Taïeb J, Novault S, Bonnaventure P, Aubert N, Bernard J, Lemonnier F, Merad M. Exosomes as potent cell-free peptide-based vaccine. II. Exosomes in CpG adjuvants efficiently prime naive Tc1 lymphocytes leading to tumor rejection. J Immunol. 2004;172(4):2137–46. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 159.Taieb J, Chaput N, Schartz N, Roux S, Novault S, Ménard C, Ghiringhelli F, Terme M, Carpentier AF, Darrasse-Jése G. Chemoimmunotherapy of tumors: Cyclophosphamide synergizes with exosome based vaccines. J Immunol. 2006;176(5):2722–9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 160.Pitt JM, André F, Amigorena S, Soria J-C, Eggermont A, Kroemer G, Zitvogel L. Dendritic cell–derived exosomes for cancer therapy. J Clin Invest. 2016;126(4):1224–32. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 161.Escudier B, Dorval T, Chaput N, André F, Caby M-P, Novault S, Flament C, Leboulaire C, Borg C, Amigorena S. Vaccination of metastatic melanoma patients with autologous dendritic cell (DC) derived-exosomes: Results of the first phase I clinical trial. J Transl Med. 2005;3(1):10. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 162.Zitvogel L, Regnault A, Lozier A, Wolfers J, Flament C, Tenza D, Ricciardi-Castagnoli P, Raposo G, Amigorena S. Eradication of established murine tumors using a novel cell-free vaccine: Dendritic cell derived exosomes. Nat Med. 1998;4(5):594–600. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 163.Tian K, Bae J, Bakarich SE, Yang C, Gately RD, Spinks GM, in het Panhuis M, Suo Z, Vlassak JJ. 3D printing of transparent and conductive heterogeneous hydrogel–elastomer systems. Adv Mater. 2017;29(10):1604827. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 164.Lancaster GI, Febbraio MA. Exosome-dependent trafficking of HSP70 a novel secretory pathway for cellular stress proteins. J Biol Chem. 2005;280(24):23349–55. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 165.Takahashi A, Okada R, Nagao K, Kawamata Y, Hanyu A, Yoshimoto S, Takasugi M, Watanabe S, Kanemaki MT, Obuse C, Hara E. Exosomes maintain cellular homeostasis by excreting harmful DNA from cells. Nat Commun. 2017. May 16;8:15287. PubMed PMID: 28508895. PMCID: PMC5440838. Epub 2017/05/17. eng. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 166.Rodrigues M, Fan J, Lyon C, Wan M, Hu Y. Role of extracellular vesicles in viral and bacterial infections: Pathogenesis, diagnostics, and therapeutics. Theranostics. 2018;8(10):2709–21. PubMed PMID: 29774070. PMCID: PMC5957004. Epub 2018/05/19. eng. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 167.Oggero S, Austin-Williams S, Norling LV. The contrasting role of extracellular vesicles in vascular inflammation and tissue repair. Front Pharmacol. 2019;10:1479. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 168.Arneth B. Tumor microenvironment. Medicina. 2019. December 30;56(1):15. PubMed PMID: 31906017. PMCID: PMC7023392. Epub 2020/01/08. eng. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 169.Binnewies M, Roberts EW, Kersten K, Chan V, Fearon DF, Merad M, Coussens LM, Gabrilovich DI, Ostrand-Rosenberg S, Hedrick CC, Vonderheide RH, Pittet MJ, Jain RK, Zou W, Howcroft TK, Woodhouse EC, Weinberg RA, Krummel MF. Understanding the tumor immune microenvironment (TIME) for effective therapy. Nat Med. 2018. May;24(5):541–50. PubMed PMID: 29686425. PMCID: PMC5998822. Epub 2018/04/25. eng. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 170.Whiteside TL. Tumor-derived exosomes and their role in cancer progression. Adv Clin Chem. 2016;74:103–41. PubMed PMID: 27117662. PMCID: PMC5382933. Epub 2016/04/28. eng. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 171.Azmi AS, Bao B, Sarkar FH. Exosomes in cancer development, metastasis, and drug resistance: A comprehensive review. Cancer Metastasis Rev. 2013;32(3):623–42. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 172.Osaki M, Okada F. Exosomes and their role in cancer progression. Yonago Acta Med. 2019;62(2):182–90. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 173.Gluszko A, Mirza SM, Piszczatowska K, Kantor I, Struga M, Szczepanski MJ. The role of tumor-derived exosomes in tumor angiogenesis and tumor progression. Curr Issues Pharm Med Sci. 2019;32(4):193–202. [Google Scholar]
- 174.An T, Qin S, Xu Y, Tang Y, Huang Y, Situ B, Inal JM, Zheng L. Exosomes serve as tumour markers for personalized diagnostics owing to their important role in cancer metastasis. J Extracell Vesicles. 2015;4(1):27522. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 175.Corcoran C, Rani S, O’Brien K, O’Neill A, Prencipe M, Sheikh R, Webb G, McDermott R, Watson W, Crown J, O’Driscoll L. Docetaxel-resistance in prostate cancer: Evaluating associated phenotypic changes and potential for resistance transfer via exosomes. PLoS One. 2012;7(12):e50999. PubMed PMID: 23251413. PMCID: PMC3519481. Epub 2012/12/20. eng. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 176.Wu M, Wang G, Hu W, Yao Y, Yu XF. Emerging roles and therapeutic value of exosomes in cancer metastasis. Mol Cancer. 2019. March 30;18(1):53. PubMed PMID: 30925925. PMCID: PMC6441156. Epub 2019/03/31. eng. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 177.Fang JH, Zhang ZJ, Shang LR, Luo YW, Lin YF, Yuan Y, Zhuang SM. Hepatoma cell-secreted exosomal microRNA-103 increases vascular permeability and promotes metastasis by targeting junction proteins. Hepatology. 2018. October;68(4):1459–75. PubMed PMID: 29637568. Epub 2018/04/11. eng. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 178.Xie J-Y, Wei J-X, Lv L-H, Han Q-F, Yang W-B, Li G-L, Wang P-X, Wu S-B, Duan J-X, Zhuo W-F. Angiopoietin-2 induces angiogenesis via exosomes in human hepatocellular carcinoma. Cell Commun Signal. 2020;18(1):1–13. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 179.Ko SY, Lee W, Kenny HA, Dang LH, Ellis LM, Jonasch E, Lengyel E, Naora H. Cancer-derived small extracellular vesicles promote angiogenesis by heparin-bound, bevacizumab-insensitive VEGF, independent of vesicle uptake. Commun Biol. 2019;2(1):1–17. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 180.Achreja A, Zhao H, Yang L, Yun TH, Marini J, Nagrath D. Exo-MFA–a 13C metabolic flux analysis framework to dissect tumor microenvironment-secreted exosome contributions towards cancer cell metabolism. Metab Engineer. 2017;43:156–72. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 181.Languino LR, Singh A, Prisco M, Inman GJ, Luginbuhl A, Curry JM, South AP. Exosome-mediated transfer from the tumor microenvironment increases TGFβ signaling in squamous cell carcinoma. Am J Transl Res. 2016;8(5):2432. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 182.Wu Q, Zhou L, Lv D, Zhu X, Tang H. Exosome-mediated communication in the tumor microenvironment contributes to hepatocellular carcinoma development and progression. J Hematol Oncol. 2019;12(1):53. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 183.Zhao H, Yang L, Baddour J, Achreja A, Bernard V, Moss T, Marini JC, Tudawe T, Seviour EG, San Lucas FA. Tumor microenvironment derived exosomes pleiotropically modulate cancer cell metabolism. Elife. 2016;5:e10250. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 184.Meng W, Hao Y, He C, Li L, Zhu G. Exosome-orchestrated hypoxic tumor microenvironment. Mol Cancer. 2019;18(1):57. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 185.Wu Q, Zhou L, Lv D, Zhu X, Tang H. Exosome-mediated communication in the tumor microenvironment contributes to hepatocellular carcinoma development and progression. J Hematol Oncol. 2019. May 29;12(1):53. PubMed PMID: 31142326. PMCID: PMC6542024. Epub 2019/05/31. eng. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 186.Armstrong JP, Stevens MM. Strategic design of extracellular vesicle drug delivery systems. Adv Drug Deliv Rev. 2018;130:12–6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 187.Bell BM, Kirk ID, Hiltbrunner S, Gabrielsson S, Bultema JJ. Designer exosomes as next-generation cancer immunotherapy. Nanomedicine. 2016;12(1):163–9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 188.Haney MJ, Klyachko NL, Zhao Y, Gupta R, Plotnikova EG, He Z, Patel T, Piroyan A, Sokolsky M, Kabanov AV. Exosomes as drug delivery vehicles for Parkinson’s disease therapy. J Control Release. 2015;207:18–30. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 189.Pascucci L, Coccè V, Bonomi A, Ami D, Ceccarelli P, Ciusani E, Viganò L, Locatelli A, Sisto F, Doglia SM, Parati E, Bernardo ME, Muraca M, Alessandri G, Bondiolotti G, Pessina A. Paclitaxel is incorporated by mesenchymal stromal cells and released in exosomes that inhibit in vitro tumor growth: A new approach for drug delivery. J Control Release. 2014. October 28;192:262–70. PubMed PMID: 25084218. Epub 2014/08/02. eng. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 190.Sun D, Zhuang X, Xiang X, Liu Y, Zhang S, Liu C, Barnes S, Grizzle W, Miller D, Zhang HG. A novel nanoparticle drug delivery system: The anti-inflammatory activity of curcumin is enhanced when encapsulated in exosomes. Mol Ther. 2010. September;18(9):1606–14. PubMed PMID: 20571541. PMCID: PMC2956928. Epub 2010/06/24. eng. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 191.Zhuang X, Xiang X, Grizzle W, Sun D, Zhang S, Axtell RC, Ju S, Mu J, Zhang L, Steinman L, Miller D, Zhang HG. Treatment of brain inflammatory diseases by delivering exosome encapsulated anti-inflammatory drugs from the nasal region to the brain. Mol Ther. 2011. October;19(10):1769–79. PubMed PMID: 21915101. PMCID: PMC3188748. Epub 2011/09/15. eng. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 192.Goh WJ, Lee CK, Zou S, Woon EC, Czarny B, Pastorin G. Doxorubicin-loaded cell-derived nanovesicles: An alternative targeted approach for anti-tumor therapy. Int J Nanomedicine. 2017;12:2759–67. PubMed PMID: 28435256. PMCID: PMC5388236. Epub 2017/04/25. eng. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 193.Fuhrmann G, Serio A, Mazo M, Nair R, Stevens MM. Active loading into extracellular vesicles significantly improves the cellular uptake and photodynamic effect of porphyrins. J Control Release. 2015. May 10;205:35–44. PubMed PMID: 25483424. Epub 2014/12/09. eng. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 194.Didiot MC, Hall LM, Coles AH, Haraszti RA, Godinho BM, Chase K, Sapp E, Ly S, Alterman JF, Hassler MR, Echeverria D, Raj L, Morrissey DV, DiFiglia M, Aronin N, Khvorova A. Exosome-mediated delivery of hydrophobically modified siRNA for huntingtin mRNA silencing. Mol Ther. 2016. October;24(10):1836–47. PubMed PMID: 27506293. PMCID: PMC5112038. Epub 2016/08/11. eng. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 195.Kim MS, Haney MJ, Zhao Y, Mahajan V, Deygen I, Klyachko NL, Inskoe E, Piroyan A, Sokolsky M, Okolie O, Hingtgen SD, Kabanov AV, Batrakova EV. Development of exosome-encapsulated paclitaxel to overcome MDR in cancer cells. Nanomedicine. 2016. April;12(3):655–64. PubMed PMID: 26586551. PMCID: PMC4809755. Epub 2015/11/21. eng. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 196.Tian Y, Li S, Song J, Ji T, Zhu M, Anderson GJ, Wei J, Nie G. A doxorubicin delivery platform using engineered natural membrane vesicle exosomes for targeted tumor therapy. Biomaterials. 2014. February;35(7):2383–90. PubMed PMID: 24345736. Epub 2013/12/19. eng. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 197.Alvarez-Erviti L, Seow Y, Yin H, Betts C, Lakhal S, Wood MJ. Delivery of siRNA to the mouse brain by systemic injection of targeted exosomes. Nat Biotechnol. 2011. April;29(4):341–5. PubMed PMID: 21423189. Epub 2011/03/23. eng. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 198.Lamichhane TN, Jeyaram A, Patel DB, Parajuli B, Livingston NK, Arumugasaamy N, Schardt JS, Jay SM. Oncogene knockdown via active loading of small RNAs into extracellular vesicles by sonication. Cell Mol Bioeng. 2016. September;9(3):315–24. PubMed PMID: 27800035. PMCID: PMC5084850. Epub 2016/11/02. eng. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 199.Lamichhane TN, Raiker RS, Jay SM. Exogenous DNA loading into extracellular vesicles via electroporation is size-dependent and enables limited gene delivery. Mol Pharm. 2015. October 5;12(10):3650–7. PubMed PMID: 26376343. PMCID: PMC4826735. Epub 2015/09/17. eng. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 200.Haney MJ, Klyachko NL, Zhao Y, Gupta R, Plotnikova EG, He Z, Patel T, Piroyan A, Sokolsky M, Kabanov AV, Batrakova EV. Exosomes as drug delivery vehicles for Parkinson’s disease therapy. J Control Release. 2015. June 10;207:18–30. PubMed PMID: 25836593. PMCID: PMC4430381. Epub 2015/04/04. eng. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 201.Triarico S, Maurizi P, Mastrangelo S, Attinà G, Capozza MA, Ruggiero A. Improving the brain delivery of chemotherapeutic drugs in childhood brain tumors. Cancers. 2019. June 13;11(6). PubMed PMID: 31200562. PMCID: PMC6627959. Epub 2019/06/16. eng. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 202.Dréan A, Goldwirt L, Verreault M, Canney M, Schmitt C, Guehennec J, Delattre J-Y, Carpentier A, Idbaih A. Blood-brain barrier, cytotoxic chemotherapies and glioblastoma. Exp Rev Neurother. 2016;16(11):1285–300. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 203.Yang T, Martin P, Fogarty B, Brown A, Schurman K, Phipps R, Yin VP, Lockman P, Bai S. Exosome delivered anticancer drugs across the blood-brain barrier for brain cancer therapy in Danio rerio. Pharm Res. 2015;32(6):2003–14. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 204.Lai RC, Tan SS, Teh BJ, Sze SK, Arslan F, de Kleijn DP, Choo A, Lim SK. Proteolytic potential of the MSC exosome proteome: Implications for an exosome-mediated delivery of therapeutic proteasome. Int J Proteomics. 2012;2012:971907. PubMed PMID: 22852084. PMCID: PMC3407643. Epub 2012/08/02. eng. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 205.András IE, Toborek M. Extracellular vesicles of the blood-brain barrier. Tissue Barriers. 2016;4(1):e1131804. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 206.Arrighetti N, Corbo C, Evangelopoulos M, Pastò A, Zuco V, Tasciotti E. Exosome-like nanovectors for drug delivery in cancer. Curr Med Chem. 2019;26(33):6132–48. PubMed PMID: 30182846. PMCID: PMC6395517. Epub 2018/09/06. eng. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 207.Alvarez-Erviti L, Seow Y, Yin H, Betts C, Lakhal S, Wood MJ. Delivery of siRNA to the mouse brain by systemic injection of targeted exosomes. Nat Biotechnol. 2011;29(4):341–5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 208.Chinnappan M, Srivastava A, Amreddy N, Razaq M, Pareek V, Ahmed R, Mehta M, Peterson JE, Munshi A, Ramesh R. Exosomes as drug delivery vehicle and contributor of resistance to anticancer drugs. Cancer Lett. 2020;486:18–28. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 209.Munagala R, Aqil F, Jeyabalan J, Gupta RC. Bovine milk-derived exosomes for drug delivery. Cancer Lett. 2016. February 1;371(1):48–61. PubMed PMID: 26604130. PMCID: PMC4706492. Epub 2015/11/26. eng. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 210.Schindler C, Collinson A, Matthews C, Pointon A, Jenkinson L, Minter RR, Vaughan TJ, Tigue NJ. Exosomal delivery of doxorubicin enables rapid cell entry and enhanced in vitro potency. PLoS One. 2019;14(3):e0214545. PubMed PMID: 30925190. PMCID: PMC6440694. Epub 2019/03/30. eng. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 211.Gong C, Tian J, Wang Z, Gao Y, Wu X, Ding X, Qiang L, Li G, Han Z, Yuan Y, Gao S. Functional exosome-mediated co-delivery of doxorubicin and hydrophobically modified microRNA 159 for triple-negative breast cancer therapy. J Nanobiotechnology. 2019. September 3;17(1):93. PubMed PMID: 31481080. PMCID: PMC6721253. Epub 2019/09/05. eng. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 212.Huyan T, Li H, Peng H, Chen J, Yang R, Zhang W, Li Q. Extracellular vesicles–advanced nanocarriers in cancer therapy: Progress and achievements. Int J Nanomed. 2020;15:6485. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 213.Gong C, Tian J, Wang Z, Gao Y, Wu X, Ding X, Qiang L, Li G, Han Z, Yuan Y. Functional exosome-mediated co-delivery of doxorubicin and hydrophobically modified microRNA 159 for triple-negative breast cancer therapy. J Nanobiotechnol. 2019;17(1):1–18. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 214.Johnsen KB, Gudbergsson JM, Skov MN, Pilgaard L, Moos T, Duroux M. A comprehensive overview of exosomes as drug delivery vehicles—endogenous nanocarriers for targeted cancer therapy. Biochim Biophys Acta. 2014;1846(1):75–87. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 215.Wahlgren J, Karlson TDL, Brisslert M, Vaziri Sani F, Telemo E, Sunnerhagen P, Valadi H. Plasma exosomes can deliver exogenous short interfering RNA to monocytes and lymphocytes. Nucleic Acids Res. 2012;40(17):e130–e. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 216.Andaloussi SE, Lakhal S, Mäger I, Wood MJ. Exosomes for targeted siRNA delivery across biological barriers. Adv Drug Deliv Rev. 2013;65(3):391–7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 217.Yim N, Ryu S-W, Choi K, Lee KR, Lee S, Choi H, Kim J, Shaker MR, Sun W, Park J-H. Exosome engineering for efficient intracellular delivery of soluble proteins using optically reversible protein–protein interaction module. Nat Commun. 2016;7(1):1–9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 218.Qiao L, Hu S, Huang K, Su T, Li Z, Vandergriff A, Cores J, Dinh P-U, Allen T, Shen D. Tumor cell-derived exosomes home to their cells of origin and can be used as Trojan horses to deliver cancer drugs. Theranostics. 2020;10(8):3474. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 219.Smyth TJ, Redzic JS, Graner MW, Anchordoquy TJ. Examination of the specificity of tumor cell derived exosomes with tumor cells in vitro. Biochim Biophys Acta. 2014. November;1838(11):2954–65. PubMed PMID: 25102470. PMCID: PMC5657189. Epub 2014/08/08. eng. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 220.Roma-Rodrigues C, Mendes R, Baptista PV, Fernandes AR. Targeting tumor microenvironment for cancer therapy. Int J Mol Sci. 2019. February 15;20(4). PubMed PMID: 30781344. PMCID: PMC6413095. Epub 2019/02/20. eng. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 221.Toffoli G, Hadla M, Corona G, Caligiuri I, Palazzolo S, Semeraro S, Gamini A, Canzonieri V, Rizzolio F. Exosomal doxorubicin reduces the cardiac toxicity of doxorubicin. Nanomedicine. 2015. October;10(19):2963–71. PubMed PMID: 26420143. Epub 2015/10/01. eng. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 222.Hoshino A, Costa-Silva B, Shen T-L, Rodrigues G, Hashimoto A, Mark MT, Molina H, Kohsaka S, Di Giannatale A, Ceder S. Tumour exosome integrins determine organotropic metastasis. Nature. 2015;527(7578):329–35. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 223.Lu J, Li J, Liu S, Wang T, Ianni A, Bober E, Braun T, Xiang R, Yue S. Exosomal tetraspanins mediate cancer metastasis by altering host microenvironment. Oncotarget. 2017. September 22;8(37):62803–15. PubMed PMID: 28977990. PMCID: PMC5617550. Epub 2017/10/06. eng. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 224.Minciacchi VR, Freeman MR, Di Vizio D. Extracellular vesicles in cancer: Exosomes, microvesicles and the emerging role of large oncosomes. Semin Cell Dev Biol. 2015. April;40:41–51. PubMed PMID: 25721812. PMCID: PMC4747631. Epub 2015/02/28. eng. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 225.Andreu Z, Yáñez-Mó M. Tetraspanins in extracellular vesicle formation and function. Front Immunol. 2014;5:442. PubMed PMID: 25278937. PMCID: PMC4165315. Epub 2014/10/04. eng. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 226.Rana S, Yue S, Stadel D, Zöller M. Toward tailored exosomes: The exosomal tetraspanin web contributes to target cell selection. Int J Biochem Cell Biol. 2012;44(9):1574–84. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 227.Hirsch AM. Embryonic Stem cell-derived exosomes increase the antiproliferative activity of doxorubicin in breast cancer [dissertation]. Richmond, VA: Virginia Commonwealth University; 2019. [Google Scholar]
- 228.Tian Y, Li S, Song J, Ji T, Zhu M, Anderson GJ, Wei J, Nie G. A doxorubicin delivery platform using engineered natural membrane vesicle exosomes for targeted tumor therapy. Biomaterials. 2014;35(7):2383–90. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 229.Kim SM, Yang Y, Oh SJ, Hong Y, Seo M, Jang M. Cancer-derived exosomes as a delivery platform of CRISPR/Cas9 confer cancer cell tropism-dependent targeting. J Control Release. 2017;266:8–16. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 230.Conlan RS, Pisano S, Oliveira MI, Ferrari M, Pinto IM. Exosomes as reconfigurable therapeutic systems. Trends Mol Med. 2017;23(7):636–50. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 231.Tran PH, Wang T, Yin W, Tran TT, Barua HT, Zhang Y, Midge SB, Nguyen TN, Lee B-J, Duan W. Development of a nanoamorphous exosomal delivery system as an effective biological platform for improved encapsulation of hydrophobic drugs. Int J Pharm. 2019;566:697–707. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 232.Luan X, Sansanaphongpricha K, Myers I, Chen H, Yuan H, Sun D. Engineering exosomes as refined biological nanoplatforms for drug delivery. Acta Pharmacol Sin. 2017;38(6):754–63. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 233.Ha D, Yang N, Nadithe V. Exosomes as therapeutic drug carriers and delivery vehicles across biological membranes: Current perspectives and future challenges. Acta Pharm Sin B. 2016;6(4):287–96. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 234.Ren J, He W, Zheng L, Duan H. From structures to functions: Insights into exosomes as promising drug delivery vehicles. Biomater Sci. 2016;4(6):910–21. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 235.Saari H, Lázaro-Ibáñez E, Viitala T, Vuorimaa-Laukkanen E, Siljander P, Yliperttula M. Microvesicle- and exosome-mediated drug delivery enhances the cytotoxicity of Paclitaxel in autologous prostate cancer cells. J Control Release. 2015. December 28;220(Pt B):727–37. PubMed PMID: 26390807. Epub 2015/09/24. eng. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 236.Chopra N, Dutt Arya B, Jain N, Yadav P, Wajid S, Singh SP, Choudhury S. Biophysical characterization and drug delivery potential of exosomes from human Wharton’s jelly-derived mesenchymal stem cells. ACS Omega. 2019. August 20;4(8):13143–52. PubMed PMID: 31460441. PMCID: PMC6705090. Epub 2019/08/29. eng. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 237.Federici C, Petrucci F, Caimi S, Cesolini A, Logozzi M, Borghi M, D’Ilio S, Lugini L, Violante N, Azzarito T. Exosome release and low pH belong to a framework of resistance of human melanoma cells to cisplatin. PLoS One. 2014;9(2):e88193. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 238.Parolini I, Federici C, Raggi C, Lugini L, Palleschi S, De Milito A, Coscia C, Iessi E, Logozzi M, Molinari A. Microenvironmental pH is a key factor for exosome traffic in tumor cells. J Biol Chem. 2009;284(49):34211–22. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 239.Ban J-J, Lee M, Im W, Kim M. Low pH increases the yield of exosome isolation. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2015;461(1):76–9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 240.Kim MS, Haney MJ, Zhao Y, Mahajan V, Deygen I, Klyachko NL, Inskoe E, Piroyan A, Sokolsky M, Okolie O. Development of exosome-encapsulated paclitaxel to overcome MDR in cancer cells. Nanomedicine. 2016;12(3):655–64. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 241.Kalimuthu S, Gangadaran P, Rajendran RL, Zhu L, Oh JM, Lee HW, Gopal A, Baek SH, Jeong SY, Lee SW, Lee J, Ahn BC. A New approach for loading anticancer drugs into mesenchymal stem cell-derived exosome mimetics for cancer therapy. Front Pharmacol. 2018;9:1116. PubMed PMID: 30319428. PMCID: PMC6168623. Epub 2018/10/16. eng. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 242.Lou G, Chen Z, Zheng M, Liu Y. Mesenchymal stem cell-derived exosomes as a new therapeutic strategy for liver diseases. Exp Mol Med. 2017;49(6):e346–e. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 243.Kim MS. Exosome mediated delivery of paclitaxel for the treatment of multi-drug resistant pulmonary metastases [dissertation]. Chapel Hill, NC: University of North Carolina; 2016. [Google Scholar]
- 244.Srivastava A,Amreddy N,Razaq M, Towner R, Zhao YD, Ahmed RA, Munshi A, Ramesh R. Exosomes as theranostics for lung cancer. Adv Cancer Res. 2018;139:1–33. PubMed PMID: 29941101. PMCID: PMC6548197. Epub 2018/06/27. eng. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 245.Aqil F, Kausar H, Agrawal AK, Jeyabalan J, Kyakulaga A-H, Munagala R, Gupta R. Exosomal formulation enhances therapeutic response of celastrol against lung cancer. Exp Mol Pathol. 2016;101(1):12–21. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 246.Munagala R, Aqil F, Jeyabalan J, Agrawal AK, Mudd AM, Kyakulaga AH, Singh IP, Vadhanam MV, Gupta RC. Exosomal formulation of anthocyanidins against multiple cancer types. Cancer Lett. 2017. May 1;393:94–102. PubMed PMID: 28202351. PMCID: PMC5837866. Epub 2017/02/17. eng. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 247.Wörmann B. Breast cancer: Basics, screening, diagnostics and treatment. Med Monatsschr Pharm. 2017. February;40(2):55–64. PubMed PMID: 29952495. Epub 2017/02/01. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 248.Deng X, Wu H, Gao F, Su Y, Li Q, Liu S, Cai J. Brachytherapy in the treatment of breast cancer. Int J Clin Oncol. 2017. August;22(4):641–50. PubMed PMID: 28664300. Epub 2017/07/01. eng. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 249.Andey T, Patel A, Jackson T, Safe S, Singh M. 1,1-Bis (3’-indolyl)-1-(p-substitutedphenyl)methane compounds inhibit lung cancer cell and tumor growth in a metastasis model. Eur J Pharm Sci. 2013. October 9;50(2):227–41. PubMed PMID: 23892137. PMCID: PMC3838903. Epub 2013/07/31. eng. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 250.Hedrick E, Lee S-O, Doddapaneni R, Singh M, Safe S. NR4A1 antagonists inhibit β1-integrin-dependent breast cancer cell migration. Mol Cell Biol. 2016;36(9):1383–94. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 251.Syn NL, Wang L, Chow EK-H, Lim CT, Goh B-C. Exosomes in cancer nanomedicine and immunotherapy: Prospects and challenges. Trends Biotechnol. 2017;35(7):665–76. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 252.Toffoli G, Hadla M, Corona G, Caligiuri I, Palazzolo S, Semeraro S, Gamini A, Canzonieri V, Rizzolio F. Exosomal doxorubicin reduces the cardiac toxicity of doxorubicin. Nanomedicine. 2015;10(19):2963–71. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 253.Konoshenko MY, Lekchnov EA, Vlassov AV, Laktionov PP. Isolation of extracellular vesicles: General methodologies and latest trends. Biomed Res Int. 2018;2018. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 254.Greening DW, Xu R, Ji H, Tauro BJ, Simpson RJ. A protocol for exosome isolation and characterization: Evaluation of ultracentrifugation, density-gradient separation, and immunoaffinity capture methods. Methods Mol Biol. 2015;1295:179–209. PubMed PMID: 25820723. Epub 2015/03/31. eng. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 255.Benedikter BJ, Bouwman FG, Vajen T, Heinzmann AC, Grauls G, Mariman EC, Wouters EF, Savelkoul PH, Lopez-Iglesias C, Koenen RR. Ultrafiltration combined with size exclusion chromatography efficiently isolates extracellular vesicles from cell culture media for compositional and functional studies. Sci Rep. 2017;7(1):1–13. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 256.Koh YQ, Almughlliq FB, Vaswani K, Peiris HN, Mitchell MD. Exosome enrichment by ultracentrifugation and size exclusion chromatography. Front Biosci. 2018. January 1;23:865–74. PubMed PMID: 28930577. Epub 2017/09/21. eng. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 257.Greening DW, Xu R, Ji H, Tauro BJ, Simpson RJ. A protocol for exosome isolation and characterization: Evaluation of ultracentrifugation, density-gradient separation, and immunoaffinity capture methods. Proteomic Profiling: Springer; 2015. p. 179–209. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 258.Taylor DD, Shah S. Methods of isolating extracellular vesicles impact down-stream analyses of their cargoes. Methods. 2015;87:3–10. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 259.Onódi Z, Pelyhe C, Terézia Nagy C, Brenner GB, Almási L, Kittel Á, Manček-Keber M, Ferdinandy P, Buzás EI, Giricz Z. Isolation of high-purity extracellular vesicles by the combination of iodixanol density gradient ultracentrifugation and bind-elute chromatography from blood plasma. Front Physiol. 2018;9:1479. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 260.Li K, Wong DK, Hong KY, Raffai RL. Cushioned–density gradient ultracentrifugation (C-DGUC): A refined and high performance method for the isolation, characterization, and use of exosomes. Extracellular RNA: Springer; 2018. p. 69–83. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 261.Colombo M, Raposo G, Théry C. Biogenesis, secretion, and intercellular interactions of exosomes and other extracellular vesicles. Annu Rev Cell Dev Biol. 2014;30:255–89. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 262.Carnino JM, Lee H, Jin Y. Isolation and characterization of extracellular vesicles from Bronchoalveolar lavage fluid: A review and comparison of different methods. Respir Res. 2019;20(1):240. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 263.Kowal J, Arras G, Colombo M, Jouve M, Morath JP, Primdal-Bengtson B, Dingli F, Loew D, Tkach M, Théry C. Proteomic comparison defines novel markers to characterize heterogeneous populations of extracellular vesicle subtypes. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2016;113(8):E968–E77. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 264.Konoshenko MY, Lekchnov EA, Vlassov AV, Laktionov PP. Isolation of extracellular vesicles: General methodologies and latest trends. Biomed Res Int. 2018;2018:8545347. PubMed PMID: 29662902. PMCID: PMC5831698. Epub 2018/04/18. eng. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 265.Szatanek R, Baran J, Siedlar M, Baj-Krzyworzeka M. Isolation of extracellular vesicles: Determining the correct approach. Int J Mol Med. 2015;36(1):11–7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 266.Souness A, Zamboni F, Walker GM, Collins MN. Influence of scaffold design on 3D printed cell constructs. J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater. 2018;106(2):533–45. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 267.Van Deun J, Mestdagh P, Sormunen R, Cocquyt V, Vermaelen K, Vandesompele J, Bracke M, De Wever O, Hendrix A. The impact of disparate isolation methods for extracellular vesicles on downstream RNA profiling. J Extracell Vesicles. 2014;3(1):24858. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 268.Yamashita T, Takahashi Y, Nishikawa M, Takakura Y. Effect of exosome isolation methods on physicochemical properties of exosomes and clearance of exosomes from the blood circulation. Eur J Pharm Biopharm. 2016;98:1–8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 269.Tataruch-Weinert D, Musante L, Kretz O, Holthofer H. Urinary extracellular vesicles for RNA extraction: Optimization of a protocol devoid of prokaryote contamination. J Extracell Vesicles. 2016;5(1):30281. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 270.Tan X, Rodrigue D. A review on porous polymeric membrane preparation. Part I: Production techniques with polysulfone and poly(vinylidene fluoride). Polymers. 2019;11(7):1160. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 271.Bunggulawa EJ, Wang W, Yin T, Wang N, Durkan C, Wang Y, Wang G. Recent advancements in the use of exosomes as drug delivery systems. J Nanobiotechnol. 2018;16(1):1–13. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 272.Xu R, Greening DW, Zhu H-J, Takahashi N, Simpson RJ. Extracellular vesicle isolation and characterization: Toward clinical application. J Clin Invest. 2016;126(4):1152–62. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 273.Alvarez ML, Khosroheidari M, Ravi RK, DiStefano JK. Comparison of protein, microRNA, and mRNA yields using different methods of urinary exosome isolation for the discovery of kidney disease biomarkers. Kidney Int. 2012;82(9):1024–32. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 274.Yang D, Zhang W, Zhang H, Zhang F, Chen L, Ma L, Larcher LM, Chen S, Liu N, Zhao Q, Tran PHL, Chen C, Veedu RN, Wang T. Progress, opportunity, and perspective on exosome isolation - efforts for efficient exosome-based theranostics. Theranostics. 2020;10(8):3684–707. PubMed PMID: 32206116. PMCID: PMC7069071. Epub 2020/03/25. eng. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 275.Yang D, Zhang W, Zhang H, Zhang F, Chen L, Ma L, Larcher LM, Chen S, Liu N, Zhao Q. Progress, opportunity, and perspective on exosome isolation-efforts for efficient exosome-based theranostics. Theranostics. 2020;10(8):3684. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 276.Busatto S, Vilanilam G, Ticer T, Lin W-L, Dickson DW, Shapiro S, Bergese P, Wolfram J. Tangential flow filtration for highly efficient concentration of extracellular vesicles from large volumes of fluid. Cells. 2018;7(12):273. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 277.Haraszti RA, Miller R, Stoppato M, Sere YY, Coles A, Didiot M-C, Wollacott R, Sapp E, Dubuke ML, Li X. Exosomes produced from 3D cultures of MSCs by tangential flow filtration show higher yield and improved activity. Mol Ther. 2018;26(12):2838–47. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 278.Heinemann ML, Ilmer M, Silva LP, Hawke DH, Recio A, Vorontsova MA, Alt E, Vykoukal J. Benchtop isolation and characterization of functional exosomes by sequential filtration. J Chromatogr A. 2014;1371:125–35. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 279.Witwer KW, Buzás EI, Bemis LT, Bora A, Lässer C, Lötvall J, Nolte-‘t Hoen EN, Piper MG, Sivaraman S, Skog J. Standardization of sample collection, isolation and analysis methods in extracellular vesicle research. J Extracell Vesicles. 2013;2(1):20360. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 280.Musante L, Tataruch DE, Holthofer H. Use and isolation of urinary exosomes as biomarkers for diabetic nephropathy. Front Endocrinol. 2014;5:149. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 281.Musante L, Tataruch D, Gu D, Benito-Martin A, Calzaferri G, Aherne S, Holthofer H. A simplified method to recover urinary vesicles for clinical applications, and sample banking. Sci Rep. 2014;4:7532. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 282.Musante L, Tataruch D, Gu D, Benito-Martin A, Calzaferri G, Aherne S, Holthofer H. A simplified method to recover urinary vesicles for clinical applications, and sample banking. Sci Rep. 2014. December 23;4:7532. PubMed PMID: 25532487. PMCID: PMC4274508. Epub 2014/12/24. eng. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 283.Li P, Kaslan M, Lee SH, Yao J, Gao Z. Progress in exosome isolation techniques. Theranostics. 2017;7(3):789–804. PubMed PMID: 28255367. PMCID: PMC5327650. Epub 2017/03/04. eng. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 284.Gámez-Valero A, Monguió-Tortajada M, Carreras-Planella L, Beyer K, Borràs FE. Size-exclusion chromatography-based isolation minimally alters extracellular vesicles’ characteristics compared to precipitating agents. Sci Rep. 2016;6:33641. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 285.Böing AN, Van Der Pol E, Grootemaat AE, Coumans FA, Sturk A, Nieuwland R. Single-step isolation of extracellular vesicles by size-exclusion chromatography. J Extracell Vesicles. 2014;3(1):23430. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 286.Rider MA, Hurwitz SN, Meckes DG Jr. ExtraPEG: A polyethylene glycol-based method for enrichment of extracellular vesicles. Sci Rep. 2016;6:23978. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 287.Deregibus MC, Figliolini F, D’Antico S, Manzini PM, Pasquino C, De Lena M, Tetta C, Brizzi MF, Camussi G. Charge-based precipitation of extracellular vesicles. Int J Mol Med. 2016. November;38(5):1359–66. PubMed PMID: 28025988. PMCID: PMC5065305. Epub 2016/12/28. eng. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 288.Kanchi Ravi R, Khosroheidari M, DiStefano JK. A modified precipitation method to isolate urinary exosomes. J Vis Exp. 2015. January 16(95):51158. PubMed PMID: 25651044. PMCID: PMC4354538. Epub 2015/02/05. eng. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 289.Contreras-Naranjo JC, Wu HJ, Ugaz VM. Microfluidics for exosome isolation and analysis: Enabling liquid biopsy for personalized medicine. Lab Chip. 2017. October 25;17(21):3558–77. PubMed PMID: 28832692. PMCID: PMC5656537. Epub 2017/08/24. eng. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 290.Gurunathan S, Kang M-H, Jeyaraj M, Qasim M, Kim J-H. Review of the isolation, characterization, biological function, and multifarious therapeutic approaches of exosomes. Cells. 2019;8(4):307. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 291.Tauro BJ, Greening DW, Mathias RA, Ji H, Mathivanan S, Scott AM, Simpson RJ. Comparison of ultracentrifugation, density gradient separation, and immunoaffinity capture methods for isolating human colon cancer cell line LIM1863-derived exosomes. Methods. 2012. February;56(2):293–304. PubMed PMID: 22285593. Epub 2012/01/31. eng. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 292.Zarovni N, Corrado A, Guazzi P, Zocco D, Lari E, Radano G, Muhhina J, Fondelli C, Gavrilova J, Chiesi A. Integrated isolation and quantitative analysis of exosome shuttled proteins and nucleic acids using immunocapture approaches. Methods. 2015;87:46–58. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 293.Kanwar SS, Dunlay CJ, Simeone DM, Nagrath S. Microfluidic device (ExoChip) for on-chip isolation, quantification and characterization of circulating exosomes. Lab Chip. 2014;14(11):1891–900. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 294.Davies RT, Kim J, Jang SC, Choi E-J, Gho YS, Park J. Microfluidic filtration system to isolate extracellular vesicles from blood. Lab Chip. 2012;12(24):5202–10. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 295.Liga A, Vliegenthart A, Oosthuyzen W, Dear J, Kersaudy-Kerhoas M. Exosome isolation: A microfluidic road-map. Lab Chip. 2015;15(11):2388–94. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 296.Sun D, Zhuang X, Xiang X, Liu Y, Zhang S, Liu C, Barnes S, Grizzle W, Miller D, Zhang H-G. A novel nanoparticle drug delivery system: The anti-inflammatory activity of curcumin is enhanced when encapsulated in exosomes. Mol Ther. 2010;18(9):1606–14. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 297.Pascucci L, Coccè V, Bonomi A, Ami D, Ceccarelli P, Ciusani E, Viganò L, Locatelli A, Sisto F, Doglia SM. Paclitaxel is incorporated by mesenchymal stromal cells and released in exosomes that inhibit in vitro tumor growth: A new approach for drug delivery. J Control Release. 2014;192:262–70. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 298.Chen T, Guo J, Yang M, Zhu X, Cao X. Chemokine-containing exosomes are released from heat-stressed tumor cells via lipid raft-dependent pathway and act as efficient tumor vaccine. J Immunol. 2011;186(4):2219–28. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 299.King HW, Michael MZ, Gleadle JM. Hypoxic enhancement of exosome release by breast cancer cells. BMC Cancer. 2012;12(1):421. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 300.Li J, Lee Y, Johansson HJ, Mäger I, Vader P, Nordin JZ, Wiklander OP, Lehtiö J, Wood MJ, Andaloussi SE. Serum-free culture alters the quantity and protein composition of neuroblastoma-derived extracellular vesicles. J Extracell Vesicles. 2015;4(1):26883. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 301.Wang L-Y, Shi X-Y, Yang C-S, Huang D-M. Versatile RBC-derived vesicles as nanoparticle vector of photosensitizers for photodynamic therapy. Nanoscale. 2013;5(1):416–21. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 302.Podolak I, Galanty A, Sobolewska D. Saponins as cytotoxic agents: A review. Phytochem Rev. 2010. September;9(3):425–74. PubMed PMID: 20835386. PMCID: PMC2928447. Epub 2010/09/14. eng. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 303.Lamichhane TN, Jeyaram A, Patel DB, Parajuli B, Livingston NK, Arumugasaamy N, Schardt JS, Jay SM. Oncogene knockdown via active loading of small RNAs into extracellular vesicles by sonication. Cell Mol Bioeng. 2016;9(3):315–24. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 304.Bhardwaj U, Burgess DJ. Physicochemical properties of extruded and non-extruded liposomes containing the hydrophobic drug dexamethasone. Int J Pharm. 2010;388(1-2):181–9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 305.Fuhrmann G, Serio A, Mazo M, Nair R, Stevens MM. Active loading into extracellular vesicles significantly improves the cellular uptake and photodynamic effect of porphyrins. J Control Release. 2015;205:35–44. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 306.Lamichhane TN, Jay SM. Production of extracellular vesicles loaded with therapeutic cargo. Methods Mol Biol. 2018;1831:37–47. PubMed PMID: 30051423. PMCID: PMC6387584. Epub 2018/07/28. eng. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 307.Pomatto MAC, Bussolati B, D’Antico S, Ghiotto S, Tetta C, Brizzi MF, Camussi G. Improved loading of plasma-derived extracellular vesicles to encapsulate antitumor miRNAs. Mol Ther Methods Clin Dev. 2019;13:133–44. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 308.Ma H, Shieh K-J, Qiao TX. Study of transmission electron microscopy (TEM) and scanning electron microscopy (SEM). Nat Sci. 2006;4(3):14–22. [Google Scholar]
- 309.Jung MK, Mun JY. Sample preparation and imaging of exosomes by transmission electron microscopy. J Vis Exp. 2018;131:e56482. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 310.Wu Y, Deng W, Klinke DJ II. Exosomes: Improved methods to characterize their morphology, RNA content, and surface protein biomarkers. Analyst. 2015;140(19):6631–42. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 311.Araujo CL. Prostatic acid phosphatase as a regulator of endo/exocytosis and lysosomal degradation [dissertation]. Helsinki, Finland: University of Helsinki; 2016. [Google Scholar]
- 312.Zhang L, Wu X, Luo C, Chen X, Yang L, Tao J, Shi J. The 786-0 renal cancer cell-derived exosomes promote angiogenesis by downregulating the expression of hepatocyte cell adhesion molecule. Mol Med Rep. 2013;8(1):272–6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 313.Goldstein JI, Newbury DE, Michael JR, Ritchie NW, Scott JHJ, Joy DC. Scanning electron microscopy and X-ray microanalysis. New York: Springer; 2017. [Google Scholar]
- 314.Nguyen JNT, Harbison AM. Scanning electron microscopy sample preparation and imaging. Molecular Profiling: Springer; 2017. p. 71–84. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 315.Sokolova V, Ludwig A-K, Hornung S, Rotan O, Horn PA, Epple M, Giebel B. Characterisation of exosomes derived from human cells by nanoparticle tracking analysis and scanning electron microscopy. Colloids Surf B Biointerfaces. 2011;87(1):146–50. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 316.Brinton LT, Sloane HS, Kester M, Kelly KA. Formation and role of exosomes in cancer. Cell Mol Life Sci. 2015;72(4):659–71. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 317.Yuana Y, Koning RI, Kuil ME, Rensen PC, Koster AJ, Bertina RM, Osanto S. Cryo-electron microscopy of extracellular vesicles in fresh plasma. J Extracell Vesicles. 2013;2(1):21494. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 318.Tatischeff I, Larquet E, Falcón-Pérez JM, Turpin P-Y, Kruglik SG. Fast characterisation of cell-derived extracellular vesicles by nanoparticles tracking analysis, cryo-electron microscopy, and Raman tweezers microspectroscopy. J Extracell Vesicles. 2012;1(1):19179. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 319.Höög JL, Lötvall J. Diversity of extracellular vesicles in human ejaculates revealed by cryo-electron microscopy. J Extracell Vesicles. 2015;4(1):28680. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 320.Paolini L, Zendrini A, Di Noto G, Busatto S, Lottini E, Radeghieri A, Dossi A, Caneschi A, Ricotta D, Bergese P. Residual matrix from different separation techniques impacts exosome biological activity. Sci Rep. 2016;6:23550. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 321.Parisse P, Rago I, Severino LU, Perissinotto F, Ambrosetti E, Paoletti P, Ricci M, Beltrami A, Cesselli D, Casalis L. Atomic force microscopy analysis of extracellular vesicles. Eur Biophys J. 2017;46(8):813–20. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 322.Sharma S, Rasool HI, Palanisamy V, Mathisen C, Schmidt M, Wong DT, Gimzewski JK. Structural-mechanical characterization of nanoparticle exosomes in human saliva, using correlative AFM, FESEM, and force spectroscopy. ACS Nano. 2010;4(4):1921–6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 323.Dragovic RA, Gardiner C, Brooks AS, Tannetta DS, Ferguson DJ, Hole P, Carr B, Redman CW, Harris AL, Dobson PJ. Sizing and phenotyping of cellular vesicles using nanoparticle tracking analysis. Nanomedicine. 2011;7(6):780–8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 324.Chia BS,Low YP, Wang Q, Li P, Gao Z. Advances in exosome quantification techniques. Trends Anal Chem. 2017;86:93–106. [Google Scholar]
- 325.Gast M, Sobek H, Mizaikoff B. Nanoparticle tracking of adenovirus by light scattering and fluorescence detection. Hum Gene Ther Methods. 2019;30(6):235–44. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 326.Hagendorfer H, Kaegi R, Parlinska M, Sinnet B, Ludwig C, Ulrich A. Characterization of silver nanoparticle products using asymmetric flow field flow fractionation with a multidetector approach–a comparison to transmission electron microscopy and batch dynamic light scattering. Anal Chem. 2012;84(6):2678–85. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 327.Zhang H, Lyden D. Asymmetric-flow field-flow fractionation technology for exomere and small extracellular vesicle separation and characterization. Nat Protoc. 2019;14(4):1027–53. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 328.Somerville JA, Willmott GR, Eldridge J, Griffiths M, McGrath KM. Size and charge characterisation of a submicrometre oil-in-water emulsion using resistive pulse sensing with tunable pores. J Colloid Interface Sci. 2013;394:243–51. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 329.Grabarek AD, Weinbuch D, Jiskoot W, Hawe A. Critical evaluation of microfluidic resistive pulse sensing for quantification and sizing of nanometer-and micrometer-sized particles in biopharmaceutical products. J Pharm Sci. 2019;108(1):563–73. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 330.Suárez H, Gámez-Valero A, Reyes R, López-Martín S, Rodríguez MJ, Carrascosa JL, Cabañas C, Borràs FE, Yáñez-Mó M. A bead-assisted flow cytometry method for the semi-quantitative analysis of Extracellular Vesicles. Sci Rep. 2017;7(1):11271. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 331.Melo SA, Luecke LB, Kahlert C, Fernandez AF, Gammon ST, Kaye J, LeBleu VS, Mittendorf EA, Weitz J, Rahbari N. Glypican-1 identifies cancer exosomes and detects early pancreatic cancer. Nature. 2015;523(7559):177–82. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 332.Daaboul GG, Gagni P, Benussi L, Bettotti P, Ciani M, Cretich M, Freedman DS, Ghidoni R, Ozkumur AY, Piotto C. Digital detection of exosomes by interferometric imaging. Sci Rep. 2016;6:37246. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 333.Takahashi Y, Nishikawa M, Shinotsuka H, Matsui Y, Ohara S, Imai T, Takakura Y. Visualization and in vivo tracking of the exosomes of murine melanoma B16-BL6 cells in mice after intravenous injection. J Biotechnol. 2013;165(2):77–84. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 334.Hoffman RM. Application of GFP imaging in cancer. Lab Invest. 2015;95(4):432–52. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 335.Ratajczak MZ, Ratajczak J. Extracellular microvesicles/exosomes: Discovery, disbelief, acceptance, and the future? Leukemia. 2020:1–10. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]





