Skip to main content
BMC Medical Genomics logoLink to BMC Medical Genomics
. 2021 Dec 20;14:299. doi: 10.1186/s12920-021-01147-y

Secondary myelodysplastic syndromes identified via next-generation sequencing in a non-small cell lung cancer patient

Yongzhi Feng 1,#, Xialin Chen 2,#, Keran Jiang 3, Ding Zhang 3, Feng Tao 1, Dan Ni 1, Jun Zhang 4, Lixin Wu 5, Jinping Cai 3, Libin Jiang 6,, GenHua Yu 7,, Lin Shi 3,
PMCID: PMC8691080  PMID: 34930266

Abstract

Background

Myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS) is a group of clonal disorders characterized by ineffective and dysplastic hematopoiesis in the bone marrow with a high risk of progression to leukemia. Many studies have demonstrated that chemo-radiotherapy for cancer patients and exposure to certain chemicals may increase the risk of secondary MDS, which is characterized by specific chromosomal abnormalities and genomic alterations. Since next-generation sequencing (NGS) has been widely used for the diagnosis of cancer patients, advanced analysis of the sequencing data may provide supplementary information for secondary MDS.

Case presentation

A male patient with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and bone metastases has presented distal obstructive inflammation, the enlargement of the left hilar, mediastinal lymph node metastases, and multiple bone metastases. This patient has undergone long-term exposures to certain chemicals. Moreover, the deletion of chromosome 7 and 5q is detected in his peripheral blood sequencing, indicating secondary MDS, subsequently confirmed by bone marrow examination.

Conclusion

In this case, an NSCLC patient was diagnosed with secondary MDS via NGS analysis, indicating that the NGS analysis may serve as supplementary for diagnosis of secondary MDS and provide useful information of therapeutic regimens for subsequent-line treatment of EGFR-mutated lung cancer. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first report of acquired MDS in a lung adenocarcinoma patient.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12920-021-01147-y.

Keywords: Myelodysplastic syndromes, Non-small cell lung cancer, Next-generation sequencing, Copy number variations, Case report

Background

Myelodysplastic syndromes (MDSs) are clonal stem-cell disorders characterized by ineffective hemopoiesis leading to morphologic dysplasia, peripheral cytopenias, and potentially developing acute myeloid leukemia. The syndromes are more common in older people, with a median age of 65–70 years at diagnosis, and less than 10% of the patients are younger than 50 years of age [1]. MDS can be divided into primary and secondary, and the etiology and pathogenesis of primary MDS are still unclear, while secondary MDS follows treatment with chemotherapy or irradiation. The yearly incidence rate of MDS is approximately 4.5 per 100,000 people in the general population [2], and 10% of the MDS cases are acquired [3]. Secondary MDS has been reported in various solid tumors, such as breast cancer, ovarian cancer, prostate cancer, and lung cancer [46]. Compared with primary MDS, secondary MDS presents a higher incidence of chromosomal abnormalities, especially complex (≥ 3) abnormalities, and a worse prognosis [1, 7]. Therefore, secondary MDS has become one of the long-term complications after tumor treatment, which has attracted extensive attention of clinicians.

To date, the diagnosis of MDS is mainly based on blood tests, bone marrow tests, and cytogenetics. The revised WHO classification (WHO 2016) of MDS has included that the presence of an SF3B1 mutation could be considered as MDS with ringed sideroblasts (MDS-RS) [8]. Sequencing techniques are becoming a complementary diagnostic assay in MDS-RS ever since [9]. With the next-generation sequencing (NGS) analysis, more mutations are found to be involved in either primary or secondary MDS disease, such as epigenetic regulators (TET2, ASXL1, DNMT3A, IDH1, IDH2, EZH2), transcription factors (ETV6, RUNX1, TP53), signal transduction proteins (CBL, JAK2, KRAS, NRAS), and genes related to the RNA splicing machinery (SF3B1, SRSF2, U2AF1, ZRSR2) [9].

In this report, we described that a non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patient had MDS-associated chromosomal abnormalities via DNA hybrid NGS analysis and was confirmed as MDS by bone marrow tests. Since NGS testing has been widely used for biomarker diagnosis for tumor patients [10], NGS data analysis for chromosomal abnormalities and gene mutations could serve as a supplementary method for the diagnosis of secondary MDS.

Case presentation

A 66-year-old male with back pain and cough for two weeks was admitted to the First Hospital of Jiaxing on 8 August 2019. A thoracic computed tomography (CT) scan revealed that the malignant tumor on the left upper lobe was complicated by distal obstructive inflammation, the enlargement of the left hilar and mediastinal lymph nodes, and the multiple bone metastases on 25 August 2019 (Fig. 1A). Immunohistochemical (IHC) results of the posterior iliac bone marrow biopsy specimen showed the positive expression of CD3, CD20, CD34, CD235a, and NPO, and the negative CD61 expression. IHC results of an endoscopic biopsy specimen of the bronchial mucosa on the upper left lobe showed the positive expression of TTF1, CK7, NapsinA, Ki67, CK, and EMA, and the negative expression of CK5/6, P40, CgA, Syn, and CD45 on 6 September 2019. Histopathologic observations showed infiltration of atypia cells in mucosal and fibrous tissues. The detection tools of pathology and cytology included automatic IHC staining (BenchMark XT, Roche, The United States), digital slice scanner, image analysis software (Pannoramic 250, 3DHistech, Hungary), and microscope (Eclipse Ci-S, Nikon, Japan). Finally, the patient was diagnosed with stage IVb lung adenocarcinoma combing with bone metastases.

Fig. 1.

Fig. 1

Chest CT scans (mediastinal window). A The chest CT scan showed distal obstructive inflammation, the enlargement of the left hilar and mediastinal lymph nodes when the patient was diagnosed with NSCLC. B After seven months of gefitinib treatment, the maximal tumor size in the lung lesion did not reduce. C After one month of toripalimab and bevacizumab treatment, the tumor was found to be markedly regressed

To seek potential therapeutic opportunities, the FFPE tissue and control sample (white blood cell) of the patient were detected using a 733-gene NGS panel in a College of American Pathologists (CAP) and Clinical Laboratory Improvement Amendments (CLIA) certificated lab. Sequencing reads were mapped against the hg19/GRCh37 genome, and duplicate reads were removed, followed by variants calling in targeted regions using an in-house developed bioinformatics algorithm. The algorithm utilized a filtering model containing background error correction, strand bias, base quality, mapping quality, short tandem repeat regions, and low-quality mapping ratio 25 [11]. The NGS analysis results indicated that the patient had an EGFR exon 19 p.L747_S752del somatic mutation with an allelic fraction of 73.19% and TP53 p.H179L germline mutation. Besides, the whole chromosome 7 and 5q deletion were detected using NGS-based copy number variation (CNV) analyses (Fig. 2), which were classical abnormalities associated with MDS. According to the clinical inquiry, the patient was a farmer by occupation, which means that he has long been exposed to certain chemicals such as pesticides, fertilizers, and solvents containing benzene. In addition, he smoked for 40 years. Taking all these findings together, we suspected the patient with secondary MDS. The results of the physiological blood indexes and the bone marrow aspiration test showed a decrease of platelet counts and the elevation of myelocyte counts. The proportion of blast was 5%, and the morphology of the cells presented the characteristics of MDS, which further confirmed our speculation (Fig. 3 and Additional file 1: Fig. S1).

Fig. 2.

Fig. 2

The copy number deletion region on chromosomal 5 and 7 identified by NGS data in this patient

Fig. 3.

Fig. 3

Bone marrow morphology of this case showed the increase of marrow blast. 1000 × represents the multiple of the microscope

In terms of treatment, the EGFR-positive mutation patient was administered with gefitinib starting from 20 August 2019. Due to decreasing platelet counts, azacitidine was administrated for four courses of treatment. However, the thrombocytopenia had not been significantly improved, and the size of the maximal tumor in the lung lesion did not decrease after seven months’ treatment (Fig. 1B). On 10 April 2020, a pathological report showed the infiltration of poorly differentiated cancer cells into the fibrous tissue. IHC results suggested the neuroendocrine tumor, in which small cell carcinoma and atypical carcinoid tumor accounted for about 40% and 60%, respectively. On 7 April and 28 April 2020, considering positive PD-L1 expression and high tumor mutation burden (TMB) in the tissue sample, the patient was administrated with toripalimab (a PD-1 inhibitor) and bevacizumab. Platelet counts returned to near-normal levels gradually, and the tumor lesion shrank obviously (Fig. 4). It was concluded that the patient reached a partial response (PR) (Fig. 1C). The progression-free survival was four months.

Fig. 4.

Fig. 4

Dynamic changes of white blood cell (WBC) counts and platelet (Plt) counts through the course of therapy. The WBC and platelet count restored near-normal level after treatment. Red background, normal range of platelet count; Blue background, normal range of WBC count

Discussion and conclusions

The most common techniques for MDS diagnosis are identification of bone marrow morphology and cytogenetic analysis. Since morphology characteristics are subjective and empirical, cytogenetic analysis has been used as a major measurement for MDS diagnosis. Chromosomal anomalies are detected in approximately 50% of patients with primary MDS and 80% of patients with secondary MDS associated with chemotherapy or other toxic agents [12]. With the fast development and wide applications of NGS technologies, many studies have reported that 70–80% of MDS patients carry specific DNA alterations [13].

Here, we reported an NSCLC patient with molecular characteristics of MDS, including TP53 p.H179L mutation, and chromosome 7 and 5q deletion detected using targeted NGS. Deletion of chromosome 5 is one of the most common cytogenetic abnormalities in MDS, accounting for 10–15% of MDS cases [14]. Chromosome 7 deletion with extra cytogenetic aberration is the second most frequent chromosomal abnormality in MDS, associated with poor overall survival and a high transformation rate to leukemia [15]. TP53 pathogenic mutation mainly develops resistance to apoptosis mechanism. It is reported that TP53 alterations were in about 10% of MDS patients, predominantly in therapy-related MDS [16]. Based on the common molecular characteristics of MDS by NGS, further cell morphology analysis, such as bone marrow smear, was carried out and confirmed MDS, indicating that NGS detection has additional predictive value in the diagnosis of MDS. Therefore, physicians must pay attention to the NGS results for a better overall treatment plan, regardless of whether patients have already shown specific MDS characteristics or not. Notably, our patient resistant to EGFR-TKI therapy achieved a PR after toripalimab plus bevacizumab, suggesting that immunotherapy combined with anti-angiogenesis therapy may be effective in the subsequent-line treatment of EGFR-mutated lung cancer with positive PD-L1 expression and high TMB [17].

In conclusion, molecular abnormality analysis is valuable in the diagnosis of MDS and pathogenesis research leading to tumorigenesis of MDS patients. Also, our case suggested that NSCLC is one of the cancer types associated with an increased risk of secondary MDS.

Supplementary Information

12920_2021_1147_MOESM1_ESM.jpg (129.2KB, jpg)

Additional file 1. Figure S1. Other fields of bone marrow morphology.

Acknowledgements

The authors wish to gratefully acknowledge the patient for allowing us to publish his case report.

Abbreviations

MDS

Myelodysplastic syndrome

NSCLC

Non-small cell lung cancer

NGS

Next-generation sequencing

CNV

Copy number variation

PR

Partial response

Authors' contributions

FT, DN, and JZ analyzed the CT examination and interpreted the data. LXW, LBJ, and GHY analyzed the bone marrow examination and interpreted the data. LS performed the genetic testing. KRJ, LS, and DZ interpreted the results. YZF wrote the first draft with the assistance of XLC. KRJ was responsible for submitting the final report. XLC DZ, and JPC contributed to the revision. All authors have reviewed and approved the submission of the manuscript.

Funding

This case report did not obtain any grant from the public, commercial, or not-for-profit organization.

Availability of data and materials

All the raw FASTQ data have been deposited in the National Genomics Data Center (NGDC) BioProject database, and the revelant accession number is “PRJCA007440”. The web link to the hg19/GRCh37 genome dataset used in our study is https://hgdownload.cse.ucsc.edu/goldenPath/hg19/bigZips/hg19.fa.gz.

Declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Not applicable.

Consent for publication

The patient consented to the publication of the case report.

Informed consent

Informed written consent was obtained from this patient for publication of this case. Consent is available upon request.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Footnotes

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Yongzhi Feng and Xialin Chen contributed equally to this work and should be regarded as co-first authors

Contributor Information

Libin Jiang, Email: jkzjuedu@163.com.

GenHua Yu, Email: zjhzygh@163.com.

Lin Shi, Email: dsmscm@3dmedcare.com.

References

  • 1.De Roos AJ, Deeg HJ, Davis S. A population-based study of survival in patients with secondary myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS): impact of type and treatment of primary cancers. Cancer Causes Control. 2007;18:1199–1208. doi: 10.1007/s10552-007-9060-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Jing Y, Shen X, Mei Q, Han W. Spotlight on decitabine for myelodysplastic syndromes in Chinese patients. Onco Targets Ther. 2015;8:2783–2790. doi: 10.2147/OTT.S81093. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Graubert T. Therapy-related myelodysplastic syndrome: models and genetics. Biol Blood Marrow Transplant. 2010;16:S45–47. doi: 10.1016/j.bbmt.2009.10.019. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Kaplan HG, Malmgren JA, Atwood MK. Increased incidence of myelodysplastic syndrome and acute myeloid leukemia following breast cancer treatment with radiation alone or combined with chemotherapy: a registry cohort analysis 1990–2005. BMC Cancer. 2011;11:260. doi: 10.1186/1471-2407-11-260. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Mukherjee S, Reddy CA, Ciezki JP, et al. Risk for developing myelodysplastic syndromes in prostate cancer patients definitively treated with radiation. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2014;106:djt462. doi: 10.1093/jnci/djt462. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Griesinger F, Metz M, Trumper L, Schulz T, Haase D. Secondary leukaemia after cure for locally advanced NSCLC: alkylating type secondary leukaemia after induction therapy with docetaxel and carboplatin for NSCLC IIIB. Lung Cancer. 2004;44:261–265. doi: 10.1016/j.lungcan.2003.11.015. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Bhatia S. Therapy-related myelodysplasia and acute myeloid leukemia. Semin Oncol. 2013;40:666–675. doi: 10.1053/j.seminoncol.2013.09.013. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Arber DA, Orazi A, Hasserjian R, et al. The 2016 revision to the World Health Organization classification of myeloid neoplasms and acute leukemia. Blood. 2016;127:2391–2405. doi: 10.1182/blood-2016-03-643544. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Janusz K, Del Rey M, Abaigar M, et al. A two-step approach for sequencing spliceosome-related genes as a complementary diagnostic assay in MDS patients with ringed sideroblasts. Leuk Res. 2017;56:82–87. doi: 10.1016/j.leukres.2017.01.031. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Frampton GM, Fichtenholtz A, Otto GA, et al. Development and validation of a clinical cancer genomic profiling test based on massively parallel DNA sequencing. Nat Biotechnol. 2013;31:1023–1031. doi: 10.1038/nbt.2696. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Su D, Zhang D, Chen K, et al. High performance of targeted next generation sequencing on variance detection in clinical tumor specimens in comparison with current conventional methods. J Exp Clin Cancer Res. 2017;36:121. doi: 10.1186/s13046-017-0591-4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Haase D, Germing U, Schanz J, et al. New insights into the prognostic impact of the karyotype in MDS and correlation with subtypes: evidence from a core dataset of 2124 patients. Blood. 2007;110:4385–4395. doi: 10.1182/blood-2007-03-082404. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Haferlach T, Nagata Y, Grossmann V, et al. Landscape of genetic lesions in 944 patients with myelodysplastic syndromes. Leukemia. 2014;28:241–247. doi: 10.1038/leu.2013.336. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Nagata Y, Maciejewski JP. The functional mechanisms of mutations in myelodysplastic syndrome. Leukemia. 2019;33(12):2779–2794. doi: 10.1038/s41375-019-0617-3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Crisà E, Kulasekararaj AG, Adema V, et al. Impact of somatic mutations in myelodysplastic patients with isolated partial or total loss of chromosome 7. Leukemia. 2020;34(9):2441–2450. doi: 10.1038/s41375-020-0728-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Kita-Sasai Y, Horiike S, Misawa S, et al. International prognostic scoring system and TP53 mutations are independent prognostic indicators for patients with myelodysplastic syndrome. Br J Haematol. 2001;115(2):309–312. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2141.2001.03073.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Passaro A, Jänne PA, Mok T, et al. Overcoming therapy resistance in EGFR-mutant lung cancer. Nat Cancer. 2021;2:377–391. doi: 10.1038/s43018-021-00195-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

12920_2021_1147_MOESM1_ESM.jpg (129.2KB, jpg)

Additional file 1. Figure S1. Other fields of bone marrow morphology.

Data Availability Statement

All the raw FASTQ data have been deposited in the National Genomics Data Center (NGDC) BioProject database, and the revelant accession number is “PRJCA007440”. The web link to the hg19/GRCh37 genome dataset used in our study is https://hgdownload.cse.ucsc.edu/goldenPath/hg19/bigZips/hg19.fa.gz.


Articles from BMC Medical Genomics are provided here courtesy of BMC

RESOURCES