Skip to main content
Acta Veterinaria Scandinavica logoLink to Acta Veterinaria Scandinavica
. 1972 Dec 1;13(4):472–483. doi: 10.1186/BF03547153

Serological Cross-Reactions Between Different Brucella Species and Yersinia Enterocolitica Immunodiffusion and Immunoelectrophoresis

Serologiska kursreaktioner mellan olika Brucella species och Yersinia enterocolitica

B Hurvell 1,
PMCID: PMC8691664  PMID: 4118522

Abstract

By immunodiffusion and immunoelectrophoresis tests in agarose serological cross-reactions were demonstrated between Yersinia enterocolitica type IX and Brucella strains from four species (Brucella abortus, Brucella melitensis, Brucella suis and Brucella neotomae). No qualitative differences between these strains in their tendencies to cross-react with Yersinia enterocolitica type IX were observed. Brucella canis and Brucella ovis, which have nonsmooth colonial morphology, gave no demonstrable cross-reaction with Yersinia enterocolitica type IX.

The results of absorption tests and qualitative staining reaction of the obtained precipitation lines suggest that the antigenic determinants common to Brucella and Yersinia enterocolitica type IX seemed to be associated with the outer layer and in the lipopolysaccharide complex of the respective bacteria. By immunodiffusion and immunoelectrophoresis it was possible to identify in hyperimmune sera those antibodies that derive from Brucella and Yersinia enterocolitica type IX.

Keyword: serological cross-reaction, Brucella species, Yersinia enterocolitica serotype IX, immunodiffusion, immunoelectrophoresis

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (1.6 MB).

References

  1. Ahvonen P, Jansson E, Aho K. Marked cross-agglutination between Brucellae and a subtype of Yersinia enterocolitica. Acta path, microbiol. scand. 1969;75:291–295. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Baughn R E, Freeman B A. Antigenic structure of Brucella suis spheroplasts. J. Bact. 1966;92:1298–1303. doi: 10.1128/jb.92.5.1298-1303.1966. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Braun W, Bonesiell A. Independent variation of characteristics in Brucella abortus variants and their detection. Amer. J. vet. Res. 1947;8:386–390. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Clausen, J.: Immunochemical Techniques for the Identification and Estimation of Macromolecules. North-Holland Publishing Company, Amsterdam 1969, 531.
  5. Crowle, A. J.: Immunodiffusion. Academic Press, New York and London 1961, 306.
  6. Diaz, R., L. M. Jones, D. Leong & J. B. Wilson: Differences between Brucella antigens involved in indirect hemagglutination tests with normal and tanned red blood cells. J. Bact. 1967, 94, 499–505. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  7. Diaz R, Jones L, Wilson J B. Antigenic relationship of the gramnegative organism causing canine abortion to smooth and rough Brucellae. J. Bact. 1968;95:618–624. doi: 10.1128/jb.95.2.618-624.1968. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Diaz, R., R. Lacalle, M. P. Medrano & D. Leong: Immunobiological activities of the endotoxin from Yersinia enterocolitica strain M.Y. 79. Proc. Vth Int. Congr. Infectious Diseases, Vienna 1970, 11–17.
  9. Henry B S. Dissociation in the genus Brucella. J. infect. Dis. 1933;52:374–402. doi: 10.1093/infdis/52.3.374. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  10. Huruell, B., P. Ahvonen & E. Thal: Serological cross-reactions between different Brucella species and Yersinia enterocolitica. Proc. 11th Nord. Vet. Congr., Bergen 1970, 282. [PubMed]
  11. Hurvell B, Ahvonen P, Thal E. Serological cross-reactions between different Brucella species and Yersinia enterocolitica. Agglutination and complement fixation. Acta vet. scand. 1971;12:86–94. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Leong D, Diaz R, Milner K, Rudbach J, Wilson J B. Some structural and biological properties of Brucella endotoxin. Infect. Immun. 1970;1:174–182. doi: 10.1128/iai.1.2.174-182.1970. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Miller L, Houghton J A. The micro-Kjeldahl determination of the nitrogen content of amino acids and proteins. J. biol. Chem. 1945;159:373–383. [Google Scholar]
  14. Uriel J, Grabar P. A new technique for direct detection of glycoproteins and polysaccharides after electrophoresis or immunoelectrophoresis in agar gel. Analyt. Biochem. 1961;2:80–82. doi: 10.1016/0003-2697(61)90042-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Acta Veterinaria Scandinavica are provided here courtesy of BMC

RESOURCES