Abstract
A recyclable and efficient heterogeneous, green catalyst based on the synthesis of Keggin-type polyoxometalate (H3PMo12O40) and vitamin B1 analogue 3-ethyl-5-(2-hydroxyethyl)-4-methylthiazol-3-ium (HEMT), i.e., [HEMTH]H2[PMo12O40] was prepared. Oxa-Pictet–Spengler cyclization of arylethanols and aldehydes were catalyzed to afford various substituted isochromans in moderate conditions with excellent yields using dimethyl carbonate (DMC) as a green solvent. Furthermore, this protocol was applicable in a gram-scale reaction, and the catalyst could be recycled eight times without significant loss of activity.
An efficient heterogeneous and green catalyst [HEMTH]H2[PMo12O40] was prepared to catalysis the oxa-Pictet–Spengler cyclization of arylethanols and aldehydes to afford isochromans with excellent yields using dimethyl carbonate as a green solvent.
Introduction
Green chemistry has been widely advocated for the reasons of economic development, environmental degradation, resource consumption and so on. In particular, green catalytic chemistry has received widespread attention. As part of our interest in the field of polyoxometalates (POMs) and green chemistry, POMs have played vital roles in organic synthesis as acid–base catalysts for the past few decades.1–7 Among those, the application of noncorrosive, inexpensive, and readily available Keggin-type heteropolyacids (HPAs) for organic transformations including condensation, cycloaddition and coupling reactions has been extensively studied.8–14 However, HPAs are generally homogeneous catalysts in most of the reported systems. Since homogeneous catalysts are difficult to recycle, there is an urgent need to develop a recyclable heterogeneous catalytic system based on HPAs from the perspective of environmental sustainability.15–21
Ionic liquids (ILs) have drawn considerable attention among various heterogeneous designs of HPAs due to their non-volatility, high thermal stability, and excellent catalytic activity. In the past few decades, the counter-cation precursors of some typical HPAs-based ionic liquids have been designed as pyridine, 1-methyl imidazole, and 1-methyl-2-pyrrolidinone, etc.22–27 Our group is committed to developing HPA-based ionic liquids for green synthesis. In the previous work, our group synthesized [HMTH]2H2[SiW12O40] using H4SiW12O40 and the analogue compound 5-(2-hydroxyethyl)-4-methylthiazole (HMT) of vitamin B1 as the counter-cation precursor.28 Various polysubstituted olefins were synthesized by the dehydration of alcohols with alcohols (or alkenes) in a green solvent dimethyl carbonate (DMC) catalyzed by [HMTH]2H2[SiW12O40]. We are making attempts to further develop this catalytic system for more valuable reactions, for example, the synthesis of isochromans from arylethanols and aldehydes via oxa-Pictet–Spengler cyclization (Scheme 1a).
Isochroman is a prominent structure motif and is the core structure of numerous bioactive natural products, such as 6-methoxy-1,1,3,7-tetramethylisochroman-8-ol (DMHI), glucoside B and aspergillus pseudodeflectus (Scheme 1b), which are valuable biologically and pharmaceutically active organic molecules.29–31 Due to the importance of isochromans, the synthesis of isochromans have undoubtedly received considerable attention, and the synthetic methods of isochromans have achieved greatly development.32,33 There are two important methods for the synthesis of isochromans, including the cyclo-dehydration of homophthalyl alcohols and the cyclization of phenylethanol which is called oxa-Pictet–Spengler reaction.34,35 The catalysts are used in the latter are usually Fe(OTf)2, Bi(OTf)3, SnCl4 and other expensive Lewis acid, or HCl, TfOH and other corrosive Bronsted acid (TfOH = trifluoromethanesulfonic acid).33,36–40 And the solvents are toluene, benzene, dioxane and so on.41–45 These methods show disadvantages such as long reaction times, high temperature, and unrecyclable catalysts. Therefore, it is urgent to develop a green and efficient catalytic system for the synthesis of isochromans.
Based on our previous research on the application of HPAs-based ionic liquids in various reactions, we envisioned that the application of inexpensive, noncorrosive, acidic HPAs-based ionic liquids could be a green, practical and efficient strategy for the synthesis of isochromans via oxa-Pictet–Spengler reaction. Herein, we report a practical protocol to synthesize isochromans under the mild conditions catalysized by [HEMTH]H2[PMo12O40] (Scheme 1c). This catalyst could be easily recycled at least 8 times without significantly reducing activity or selectivity.
Results and discussion
To optimize the optimal reaction conditions, we carried out our study by the reaction of 2-(3,4-dimethoxyphenyl)ethan-1-ol 1a and benzaldehyde 2a in dichloroethane (DCE) at 50 °C for 10 min using different HPAs (3 mol%), i.e., H3PMo12O40, H3PW12O40, H4SiW12O40 as catalyst (Fig. 1A). First, the catalytic effects of HPAs was investigated. As shown in Fig. 1B, H3PMo12O40 was the best catalyst for the reaction and the yield of product 3a was 80%. 54% and 43% yields of 3a was obtained in the cases of H3PW12O40 and H4SiW12O40 as catalysts. No yield of 3a was observed when the reaction was performed in the absence of catalyst. Among those HPAs, H3PMo12O40 shows the weakest acidity but the softest heteropoly anion. Subsequently, H3PMo12O40 was applied as optimal catalyst to screen the solvent. Some common solvents were examined, and the effect of some green solvents on the reaction has been mainly studied including propylene carbonate (PC), ethylene carbonate (EC), cyclopentyl methyl ether (CPME), dimethyl carbonate (DMC), H2O. As shown in Fig. 1C, no yield was observed when the reaction was conducted in H2O. The reaction in PC and EC delivered 3a in 54% and 35% yield, respectively. While 3a can be obtained with good yields in DMC and CPME. In particular, 3a could be obtained in 89% yield when DMC was used as solvent (see ESI† for details). Subsequently, [HMTH]H2[PMo12O40] (ILs-1), [HEMTH]H2[PMo12O40] (ILs-2), and [HBMTH]H2[PMo12O40] (ILs-3) were prepared using 5-(2-hydroxyethyl)-4-methylthiazole (HMT), 3-ethyl-5-(2-hydroxyethyl)-4-methylthiazol-3-ium (HEMT), 3-benzyl-5-(2-hydroxyethyl)-4-methylthiazol-3-ium (HBMT) and H3PMo12O40 as the raw materials by a procedure similar to the literature.28 Accordingly, [HEMTH]2H[PMo12O40] (ILs-4) and [HEMTH]3[PMo12O40] (ILs-5) were prepared using 2 mmol and 3 mmol of HEMT and H3PMo12O40 (1 mmol), respectively (IR characterization is shown in Fig. S1†). All of the ionic liquids were used as catalysts in the condensation reaction. It is clear that ILs-2 exhibits better catalytic activity than other ionic liquids as shown in Fig. 1D.
Then, we studied the influence of reaction temperature, time and catalyst loading on the reaction. As shown in Fig. 2, the conversion of the substrate could reach 99% at 30 °C, but the selectivity is relatively low. When the temperature was risen, the yield of the desired product 3a could be obtained 85% at 70 °C (Fig. 2A). As can be seen from Fig. 2B, with the increase of the reaction time, the yield of the desired product 3a gradually increased to 91% in 20 min. To further improve the yield of desired product 3a, the catalyst loading in the reaction was studied. It can be found that the yield of the product 3a gradually increased to 95% with the increase of the catalyst loading up to 4 mol% (Fig. 2C). Finally, the optimal condition for the oxa-Pictet–Spengler reaction of 2-(3,4-dimethoxyphenyl)ethan-1-ol 1a and benzaldehyde 2a was established when 4 mol% [HEMTH]H2[PMo12O40] was used as catalyst in DMC at 70 °C for 20 min.
With the optimized reaction conditions in hand, we examined the scope of the method and found that it proceeded well with various substituted aldehydes. This reaction system was not only suitable for aromatic aldehydes, but also for aliphatic aldehydes (Table 1). As can be seen from the table, 2-(3,4-dimethoxyphenyl)ethan-1-ol reacted with arylaldehydes bearing electron-withdrawing groups, such as –F, –Cl, –Br, –NO2, –CN, could afford isolated yield of the corresponding isochroman products over 92% (92–96%) 92% (92–96%) (3b–3i, 3o). While arylaldehydes with electron-donating groups, such as –CH3, –OCH3, –OCH2CH3, –CH(CH3)2, could provide isolated yield of the corresponding isochroman products in up to 95% (91–95%) (3j–3n, 3p). The reaction was carried out using ortho-, meta-, and para-substituted aromatic aldehydes as reaction substrate. As shown in Table 1, affected by steric hindrance, the yields of the desired products obtained from para-aldehydes was higher than that of meta-aldehydes, while the yields from meta-aldehydes was higher than the desired product obtained from ortho-aldehydes (3c > 3d > 3e, 3g > 3h > 3i, 3j > 3k > 3l). Particularly, aliphatic aldehydes were proved to be also equally applicable to this catalytic system and afford isochromans in high isolated yields (3r–3u), including butyraldehyde, pentanal, hexaldehyde and phenylacetaldehyde. Meanwhile, phenethyl alcohol was applied to test the reaction activity under the optimal catalytic conditions, it could be found that in case of non-activated phenethyl alcohol which had no activating substituents on phenyl ring, the reaction did not occur as obviously as expected. As long as there was an activated functional group on the benzene ring, the reaction could proceed well. For example, 2-(3-methoxyphenyl)ethan-1-ol reacted with benzaldehyde under optimal reaction conditions and 94% of the corresponding desired product 3q was obtained.
[HEMTH]H2[PMo12O40]-catalyzed oxa-Pictet–Spengler reaction of arylethanols and aldehydes to access substituted isochromansa.
Reaction conditions: 1 (0.6 mmol), 2 (0.66 mmol), [HEMTH]H2[PMo12O40] (4 mol%), DMC (3 mL), isolated yields.
Additionally, it had been found that the catalytic system was easy to scale-up at gram-scale to synthesize the substituted isochromans via the direct oxa-Pictet–Spengler reaction of arylethanols and aldehydes, which is quite important in terms of sustainability and practical application. As can be seen from Scheme 2, the reaction of 1a (6 mmol, 1.09 g) and 2a (6.6 mmol, 0.70 g) generated the desired products 3a in 91% of isolated yield catalyzed by [HEMTH]H2[PMo12O40] (4 mol%) in DMC at 70 °C for 1 h (Scheme 2A). The gram-scale ring condensation reaction of 1a and 2g generated the product 3g in yield of 93% under identical conditions (Scheme 2B). Similarly, the reaction of 1b and 2a could produce the corresponding product 3q in 90% yield at the same reaction conditions as above (Scheme 2C).
To test the reusability of the catalyst, the model reaction of 2-(3,4-dimethoxyphenyl)ethan-1-ol 1a and benzaldehyde 2a was carried out in the presence of 10 mol% of [HEMTH]H2[PMo12O40] under the optimal reaction conditions. As shown in Fig. 3A, the ionic liquid [HEMTH]H2[PMo12O40] could be recycled at least 8 times without significant loss of activity. And after 8 cycles of reactions, XRD comparisons of the catalyst [HEMTH]H2[PMo12O40] before and after the reaction were performed, and it was found that the catalyst did not change, which further confirmed that the catalyst still has catalytic activity (Fig. 3B).
According to literatures,35,37,38 a possible reaction mechanism was inferred as shown in Scheme 3. First, the aldehyde 2 was activated by ILs-2 to form A, and then the activated aldehyde A was attacked by two different positions of alcohol 1 to form B and C. Then B underwent an intramolecular Friedel–Crafts reaction and closed the ring to form the desired product 3, while C underwent an intramolecular dehydration to form the isochroman derivative.
Conclusions
In conclusion, we successfully developed the [HEMTH]H2PMo12O40/DMC green, recyclable and efficient heterogeneous catalytic system for the synthesis of isochromans from arylethanols and aldehydes via oxa-Pictet–Spengler cyclization in excellent yields. Furthermore, the catalytic system has the advantages of high yield, low catalyst loading, and short reaction time. It is worth noting that the reaction could be scaled up and the heterogeneous catalyst could be reused at least 8 times without significant loss of activity. Such findings may pave the way for the development of new green chemistry transformations.
Experimental
Typical procedure for direct oxa-Pictet–Spengler reaction of arylethanols with aldehydes
To a 4 mL reaction vial, 2-(3,4-dimethoxyphenyl)ethan-1-ol (0.6 mmol), benzaldehyde (0.66 mmol), [HEMTH]H2[PMo12O40] (4 mol%) and DMC (3 mL) were added. Then the reaction was carried out in screw cap vials with a Teflon seal at 70 °C for desired time. After cooling to room temperature, the mixture was further purified by column chromatography (petroleum ether/EtOAc) to afford the desired products (see the ESI† for details).
Disposal of catalyst in cyclic experiment
The reaction system was centrifuged, the supernatant was removed, the precipitation part (catalyst) was washed five times with ethyl acetate, dried under vacuum at 50 °C for 2 h, and then put into the next cycle again.
Conflicts of interest
There are no conflicts to declare.
Supplementary Material
Acknowledgments
Financial support from the Research Found of East China University of Technology (no. DHBK2019265, DHBK2019267, DHBK2019264), the Open Fund of the Jiangxi Province Key Laboratory of Synthetic Chemistry (JXSC202008), Natural Science Foundation of Jiangxi Province, China (20202BABL203004), National Natural Science Foundation of China (21804019, 22001034) are gratefully acknowledged.
Electronic supplementary information (ESI) available. See DOI: 10.1039/d1ra01004b
Notes and references
- Yang G. P. Dilixiati D. Yang T. Liu D. Yu B. Hu C. W. Appl. Organomet. Chem. 2018;32:e4450. doi: 10.1002/aoc.4450. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Yang G.-P. Shang S.-X. Yu B. Hu C.-W. Inorg. Chem. Front. 2018;5:2472–2477. doi: 10.1039/C8QI00678D. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Katsoulis D. E. Chem. Rev. 1998;98:359–388. doi: 10.1021/cr960398a. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Wang S. S. Yang G. Y. Chem. Rev. 2015;115:4893–4962. doi: 10.1021/cr500390v. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Wang M.-Y. Ma R. He L.-N. Sci. China: Chem. 2016;59:507–516. doi: 10.1007/s11426-016-5560-9. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Uematsu T. Miyamoto Y. Ogasawara Y. Suzuki K. Yamaguchi K. Mizuno N. Catal. Sci. Technol. 2016;6:222–233. doi: 10.1039/C5CY01552A. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Zhang J. Huang Y. Li G. Wei Y. Coord. Chem. Rev. 2019;378:395–414. doi: 10.1016/j.ccr.2017.10.025. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Yang G. P. He X. Yu B. Hu C. W. Appl. Organomet. Chem. 2018;32:e4532. doi: 10.1002/aoc.4532. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Feng X. Yang T. He X. Yu B. Hu C. W. Appl. Organomet. Chem. 2018;32:e4314. doi: 10.1002/aoc.4314. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Yang G. P. Zhang N. Ma N. N. Yu B. Hu C. W. Adv. Synth. Catal. 2017;359:926–932. doi: 10.1002/adsc.201601231. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Yang G. Liu Y. Li K. Liu W. Yu B. Hu C. Chin. Chem. Lett. 2020;31:3233–3236. doi: 10.1016/j.cclet.2020.07.018. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Suzuki K. Jeong J. Yamaguchi K. Mizuno N. New J. Chem. 2016;40:1014–1021. doi: 10.1039/C5NJ01045D. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Yue Q. Lu Y. Zhang Z. Tian H. R. N Wang H. H Li X. X Liu S. New J. Chem. 2020;44:16913–16920. doi: 10.1039/D0NJ03473H. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Leng Y. Wang J. Zhu D. Zhang M. Zhao P. Long Z. Huang J. Green Chem. 2011;13:1636–1639. doi: 10.1039/C1GC15302A. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Lu L.-H. Zhou S.-J. Sun M. Chen J.-L. Xia W. Yu X. Xu X. He W.-M. ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng. 2018;7:1574–1579. doi: 10.1021/acssuschemeng.8b05344. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Wu C. Xiao H.-J. Wang S.-W. Tang M.-S. Tang Z.-L. Xia W. Li W.-F. Cao Z. He W.-M. ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng. 2019;7:2169–2175. doi: 10.1021/acssuschemeng.8b04877. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Cui G. Li Y. Liu J. Wang H. Li Z. Wang J. ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng. 2018;6:15292–15300. doi: 10.1021/acssuschemeng.8b03748. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Yu B. Cheng B. B. Liu W. Q. Li W. Wang S. S. Cao J. Hu C. W. Adv. Synth. Catal. 2016;358:90–97. doi: 10.1002/adsc.201500921. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Huang X. Zhang X. Zhang D. Yang S. Feng X. Li J. Lin Z. Cao J. Pan R. Chi Y. Chem.–Eur. J. 2014;20:2557–2564. doi: 10.1002/chem.201303714. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Mizuno N. Misono M. Chem. Rev. 1998;98:199–218. doi: 10.1021/cr960401q. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Heravi M. M. Vazin Fard M. Faghihi Z. Green Chem. Lett. Rev. 2013;6:282–300. doi: 10.1080/17518253.2013.846415. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Yang G.-P. Jiang N. Huang X.-Q. Yu B. Hu C.-W. Mol. Catal. 2019;468:80–85. doi: 10.1016/j.mcat.2019.02.019. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Wang M.-Y. Song Q.-W. Ma R. Xie J.-N. He L.-N. Green Chem. 2016;18:282–287. doi: 10.1039/C5GC02311D. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Wu C. Lu L.-H. Peng A.-Z. Jia G.-K. Peng C. Cao Z. Tang Z. He W.-M. Xu X. Green Chem. 2018;20:3683–3688. doi: 10.1039/C8GC00491A. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Xie L.-Y. Peng S. Lu L.-H. Hu J. Bao W.-H. Zeng F. Tang Z. Xu X. He W.-M. ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng. 2018;6:7989–7994. doi: 10.1021/acssuschemeng.8b01358. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Amarasekara A. S. Chem. Rev. 2016;116:6133–6183. doi: 10.1021/acs.chemrev.5b00763. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Li X.-Y. Zheng S.-S. Liu X.-F. Yang Z.-W. Tan T.-Y. Yu A. He L.-N. ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng. 2018;6:8130–8135. doi: 10.1021/acssuschemeng.8b02352. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Yang G.-P. Wu X. Yu B. Hu C.-W. ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng. 2019;7:3727–3732. doi: 10.1021/acssuschemeng.8b06445. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Bernini R. Crisante F. D'Acunzo F. Gentili P. Ussia E. New J. Chem. 2016;40:3314–3322. doi: 10.1039/C5NJ03133H. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Cameron D. W. Cromartie R. I. T. Kingston D. G. I. Todd A. R. J. Chem. Soc. 1964:51. doi: 10.1039/JR9640000051. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Peng J. Lu F. Ralph J. Phytochemistry. 1999;50:659–666. doi: 10.1016/S0031-9422(98)00572-X. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Larghi E. L. Kaufman T. S. Eur. J. Org. Chem. 2011;2011:5195–5231. doi: 10.1002/ejoc.201100271. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Yokoyama A. Ohwada T. Shudo K. J. Org. Chem. 1999;64:611–617. doi: 10.1021/jo982019e. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Saeed A. Chin. Chem. Lett. 2010;21:261–264. doi: 10.1016/j.cclet.2009.11.009. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Saito A. Takayama M. Yamazaki A. Numaguchi J. Hanzawa Y. Tetrahedron. 2007;63:4039–4047. doi: 10.1016/j.tet.2007.02.123. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Zhou J. Wang C. Xue D. Tang W. Xiao J. Li C. Tetrahedron. 2018;74:7040–7046. doi: 10.1016/j.tet.2018.10.028. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Hegedüs A. Hell Z. Org. Biomol. Chem. 2006;4:1220–1222. doi: 10.1039/B601314G. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Guiso M. Marra C. Cavarischia C. Tetrahedron Lett. 2001;42:6531–6534. doi: 10.1016/S0040-4039(01)01307-7. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Bianchi D. A. Blanco N. E. Carrillo N. Kaufman T. S. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2004;52:1923–1927. doi: 10.1021/jf0351117. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Lherbet C. Soupaya D. Baudoin-Dehoux C. André C. Blonski C. Hoffmann P. Tetrahedron Lett. 2008;49:5449–5451. doi: 10.1016/j.tetlet.2008.07.007. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Eid C. N. Shim J. Bikker J. Lin M. J. Org. Chem. 2009;74:423–426. doi: 10.1021/jo801945n. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Larghi E. L. Kaufman T. S. Synthesis. 2006;2006:187–220. [Google Scholar]
- Maresh J. J. Crowe S. O. Ralko A. A. Aparece M. D. Murphy C. M. Krzeszowiec M. Mullowney M. W. Tetrahedron Lett. 2014;55:5047–5051. doi: 10.1016/j.tetlet.2014.07.043. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Bouguerne B. Lherbet C. Baltas M. Lett. Org. Chem. 2010;7:420–423. doi: 10.2174/157017810791824883. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Guiso M. Bianco A. Marra C. Cavarischia C. Eur. J. Org. Chem. 2003:3407–3411. doi: 10.1002/ejoc.200300182. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.