Abstract
Background
Anaplasma, Babesia and Theileria are tick-borne pathogens (TBPs) that affect livestock worldwide. However, information on these pathogens in yaks (Bos grunniens) and Tibetan sheep (Ovis aries) on the Qinghai-Tibet Plateau (QTP), China, is limited. In this study, Anaplasma spp., Babesia spp. and Theileria spp. infections were assessed in yaks and Tibetan sheep from Qinghai Province.
Methods
A total of 734 blood samples were collected from 425 yaks and 309 Tibetan sheep at nine sampling sites. Standard or nested polymerase chain reaction was employed to screen all the blood samples using species- or genus-specific primers.
Results
The results showed that 14.1% (60/425) of yaks and 79.9% (247/309) of Tibetan sheep were infected with at least one pathogen. Anaplasma ovis, Anaplasma bovis, Anaplasma capra, Anaplasma phagocytophilum, Babesia bovis and Theileria spp. were detected in this study, with total infection rates for all the assessed animals of 22.1% (162/734), 16.3% (120/734), 23.6% (173/734), 8.2% (60/734), 2.7% (20/734) and 19.3% (142/734), respectively. For yaks, the infection rate of A. bovis was 6.4% (27/425), that of B. bovis was 4.7% (20/425) and that of Theileria spp. was 3.3% (14/425). Moreover, 52.4% (162/309) of the Tibetan sheep samples were infected with A. ovis, 30.1% (93/309) with A. bovis, 56.0% (173/309) with A. capra, 19.4% (60/309) with A. phagocytophilum and 41.4% (128/309) with Theileria spp.
Conclusions
This study revealed the prevalence of Anaplasma spp., Babesia spp. and Theileria spp. in yaks and Tibetan sheep in Qinghai Province, China, and provides new data for a better understanding of the epidemiology of TBPs in these animals in this area of the QTP, China.
Graphical Abstract
Supplementary Information
The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s13071-021-05109-2.
Keywords: Tick-borne pathogens, Yak, Tibetan sheep, Qinghai-Tibet Plateau
Background
The Qinghai-Tibet Plateau (QTP), the largest and highest plateau in the world (and thus sometimes referred to as the “roof of the world” or the “third pole” [1, 2]), is located in northwest China. A variety of domestic livestock are maintained on the QTP, including yaks (Bos grunniens), Tibetan sheep (Ovis aries), cattle, Mongolian sheep, goats, camels (Camelus bactrianus) and horses [3]. Yak and Tibetan sheep are indigenous to the QTP, and provide local herdsmen with milk, meat, fuel (yak dung) and wool [4].
In recent years, tick-borne pathogens (TBPs) have attracted increasing attention due to the economic losses they cause in animal production and the risk they pose to humans. Tibetan sheep and yaks range freely on the high-altitude QTP, a harsh environment with a cold climate and low rainfall, and share pastureland with other animals there [5]. This increases the potential risk of transmission of pathogens, including TBPs, such as Anaplasma, Babesia and Theileria, the respective etiological agents of anaplasmosis, babesiosis and theileriosis in animals [6].
Anaplasma, a genus of the class Alphaproteobacteria, are Gram-negative obligate intracellular pathogens which are transmitted by hard ticks to vertebrate hosts and infect different blood cells of the host [7]. In sheep and cattle, infection with these bacteria is characterized by high fever and fatigue, loss of appetite, a sudden decrease in milk production, miscarriage, stillbirth, low fertility, decreased semen quality and other clinical symptoms [8]. Anaplasma infections have been reported in many areas of China. For example, Anaplasma ovis, Anaplasma bovis and Anaplasma phagocytophilum have been detected in sheep in Qinghai Province and the Xinjiang Uygur Autonomous Region [9–13], while Anaplasma capra, Anaplasma marginale, Anaplasma centrale and Anaplasma platys have been detected in both humans and cattle in Heilongjiang Province and Chongqing City, China [6, 14].
The genus Babesia was discovered from the red blood cells of cattle in Romania in the nineteenth century [15]. Bovine babesiosis is caused by Babesia bigemina, Babesia bovis, Babesia divergens, Babesia major and Babesia occultans. In an acute case of bovine babesiosis, the main clinical features include high fever, loss of appetite, anemia, hemoglobinuria and lethargy [16], and the disease in farm animals leads to economic losses for farmers. Babesia spp., including Babesia motasi-like, Babesia sp. BQ1 (Lintan and Ningxian), Babesia sp. Tianzhu and Babesia sp. Hebei subgroups, have been found in and identified from sheep and goats in 16 provinces of China [17]. Investigations have also been undertaken on B. bovis, B. bigemina and B. ovata infections in beef cattle, dairy cattle and yaks in 14 provinces in China [18].
Theileria is an obligate intracellular hemoprotozoan parasite which is transmitted by ixodid ticks and affects a range of domestic and wild animals. Theileriosis leads to a decline in the growth rate and productivity of infected animals, and thus is a limiting factor in the development of animal husbandry [19]. On the eastern Tibetan Plateau in China (Sichuan Province), infections with Theileria sinensis, Theileria luwenshuni and Theileria equi have been detected in yaks, Tibetan sheep and Tibetan horses [20]. Moreover, Theileria orientalis [21], Theileria uilenbergi [13], Theileria ovis and Theileria spp. [22] have also been identified in cattle and yaks in northwestern China.
Epidemiological and molecular information on TBP infections in livestock on the QTP is limited. The data provided herein increase the available knowledge on the epidemiology of TBPs in livestock on the QTP, and provide a theoretical basis for the prevention and treatment of these pathogens in this area of China.
Methods
Blood sample collection and DNA extraction
A total of 734 whole blood samples (comprising those from 425 yaks and 309 Tibetan sheep) were randomly collected from animals on different farms in Guoluo Tibetan Autonomous Prefecture (hereafter ‘Guoluo’) and Yushu Tibetan Autonomous Prefecture (hereafter ‘Yushu’) in the Sanjiangyuan area (which is sometimes referred to as the “water tower of China”) of Qinghai Province (Fig. 1; Additional file 1: Table S1). Blood samples were taken from the jugular vein and collected in tubes containing ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid. Genomic DNA was extracted using the MagPure Blood DNA KF Kit (Magen, China) according to the manufacturer’s manual. The DNA concentration was confirmed using a K5800 ultramicro spectrophotometer (Kaiao Technology, China), and the DNA was stored at − 80 °C until further use.
Fig. 1.
Map of the Qinghai-Tibetan Plateau and Qinghai Province showing the sampling sites and altitude (in meters). Rhombuses indicate the sampling locations
Pathogen detection by polymerase chain reaction
Standard or nested polymerase chain reaction (PCR) was employed to screen all blood samples using species- or genus-specific primers (Additional file 1: Table S2), including A. ovis major surface protein 4 (msp4) [23], A. bovis 16S ribosomal RNA (16S rRNA) [24], A. capra citrate synthase (gltA) [25], A. phagocytophilum 16S rRNA [26], A. marginale msp4 [23], Babesia ovis 18S ribosomal RNA (18S rRNA) [27], B. bovis spherical body protein 4 (SBP4) [28], B. bigemina rhoptry-associated protein 1a (rap1a) [28], B. motasi-like Lintan/Ningxian/Tianzhu rhoptry-associated protein 1b (rap1b) [17], and Theileria spp. 18S rRNA [29]. The PCR mixture consisted of 2 µl of DNA template, 0.5 µl each of forward and reverse primer (100 μM), 0.1 µl of Taq polymerase (0.5 U; New England BioLabs, USA), 0.2 µl of deoxyribonucleotide triphosphate (200 μM; New England BioLabs, USA), 1 µl of 10× ThermoPol Reaction Buffer (New England BioLabs), and double-distilled water for a total volume of 10 µl. DNA samples from the blood of animals infected with the respective pathogens, which had been collected and stored properly in previous studies, were used as positive controls. Double-distilled water was used as a negative control.
Sequencing and phylogenetic analyses
The positive PCR products of 30% of each organism were selected randomly and sequenced. The PCR products were purified using the EasyPure Quick Gel Extraction Kit (TransGen, China) and cloned into the pMD19 T vector, which was transformed into competent Escherichia coli DH5α cells using the pMD19 (Simple) T-Vector Cloning Kit (TaKaRa, Japan). At least two positive clones were sequenced at Sangon Biotech (Shanghai). The nucleotide sequence identities were determined by performing GenBank Basic Local Alignment Search Tool nucleotide (BLASTn) analysis (https://blast.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/Blast.cgi). Phylogenetic trees based on the obtained sequences were constructed using MEGA 7.0 [30].
Statistical analysis
The chi-square test was performed to evaluate the difference in prevalence between different parameters. Exposure variables included area (Guoluo and Yushu) and altitude (3000–4000 m and 4000–5000 m). Observed differences were considered to be statistically significant when P < 0.05.
Results
Infection rates of Anaplasma, Babesia and Theileria in yaks and Tibetan sheep
A total of 734 whole blood samples were collected and screened. The pathogens detected in these animals were A. capra (23.6%, n = 173), followed by A. ovis (22.1%, n = 162), Theileria spp. (19.3%, n = 142), A. bovis (16.3%, n = 120), A. phagocytophilum (8.2%, n = 60) and B. bovis (2.7%, n = 20) (Table 1). All 425 blood samples of yaks were negative for A. ovis, A. capra and A. phagocytophilum, and 309 blood samples of Tibetan sheep were negative for B. bovis. A total of 14.1% (60/425) of the yaks and 79.9% (247/309) of the Tibetan sheep were positive for at least one pathogen. In addition, 51.4% (202/393) of the animals from Guoluo and 30.8% (105/341) of the animals from Yushu were positive for at least one pathogen (Table 2).
Table 1.
The prevalence of tick-borne pathogens (TBPs) in yaks and Tibetan sheep on the Qinghai-Tibetan Plateau (QTP)
| TBPs | Prevalence (%) of TBPs | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yaks | Tibetan sheep | Total | |||||||
| Guoluo | Yushu | Total | Guoluo | Yushu | Total | Guoluo | Yushu | Total | |
| (n = 210) | (n = 215) | (n = 425) | (n = 183) | (n = 126) | (n = 309) | (n = 393) | (n = 341) | (n = 734) | |
| Anaplasma ovis | 0 | 0 | 0 | 132 (72.1) | 30 (23.8) | 162 (52.4) | 132 (33.6) | 30 (8.8) | 162 (22.1) |
| Anaplasma bovis | 13 (6.2) | 14 (6.5) | 27 (6.4) | 92 (50.3) | 1 (0.8) | 93 (30.1) | 105 (26.7) | 15 (4.4) | 120 (16.3) |
| Anaplasma capra | 0 | 0 | 0 | 154 (84.2) | 19 (15.1) | 173 (56.0) | 154 (39.2) | 19 (5.6) | 173 (23.6) |
| Anaplasma phagocytophilum | 0 | 0 | 0 | 29 (15.8) | 31 (24.6) | 60 (19.4) | 29 (7.4) | 31 (9.1) | 60 (8.2) |
| Babesia bovis | 5 (2.4) | 15 (7.0) | 20 (4.7) | 0 | 0 | 0 | 5 (1.3) | 15 (4.4) | 20 (2.7) |
| Theileria spp. | 6 (2.9) | 8 (3.7) | 14 (3.3) | 120 (65.6) | 8 (6.3) | 128 (41.4) | 126 (32.1) | 16 (4.7) | 142 (19.3) |
Table 2.
Single and mixed infections of TBPs in yaks and Tibetan sheep on the QTP
| TBPs | Prevalence (%) of TBPs | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yaks | Tibetan sheep | Total | |||||||
| Guoluo | Yushu | Total | Guoluo | Yushu | Total | Guoluo | Yushu | Total | |
| (n = 210) | (n = 215) | (n = 425) | (n = 183) | (n = 126) | (n = 309) | (n = 393) | (n = 341) | (n = 734) | |
| Anaplasma ovis (A. o.) | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 (0.5) | 13 (10.3) | 14 (4.5) | 1 (0.3) | 13 (3.8) | 14 (1.9) |
| Anaplasma bovis (A. b) | 13 (6.2) | 14 (6.5) | 27 (6.4) | 3 (1.6) | 0 | 3 (1.0) | 16 (4.1) | 14 (4.1) | 30 (4.1) |
| Anaplasma capra (A. c.) | 0 | 0 | 0 | 7 (3.8) | 7 (5.6) | 14 (4.5) | 7 (1.8) | 7 (2.1) | 14 (1.9) |
| Anaplasma phagocytophilum (A. p.) | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 (0.5) | 28 (22.2) | 29 (9.4) | 1 (0.3) | 28 (8.2) | 29 (4.0) |
| Babesia bovis (B. bo.) | 5 (2.4) | 14 (6.5) | 19 (4.5) | 0 | 0 | 0 | 5 (1.3) | 14 (4.1) | 19 (2.6) |
| Theileria spp. (T.) | 6 (2.9) | 7 (3.3) | 13 (3.1) | 5 (2.7) | 2 (1.6) | 7 (2.3) | 11 (2.8) | 9 (2.6) | 20 (2.7) |
| A. o. + A. b. | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 (2.2) | 0 | 4 (1.3) | 4 (1.0) | 0 | 4 (0.5) |
| A. o. + A. c. | 0 | 0 | 0 | 13 (7.1) | 10 (7.9) | 23 (7.4) | 13 (3.3) | 10 (2.9) | 23 (3.1) |
| A. o. + A. p. | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 (1.6) | 2 (0.6) | 0 | 2 (0.6) | 2 (0.3) |
| A. o. + T. | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 (3.2) | 4 (1.3) | 0 | 4 (1.2) | 4 (0.5) |
| A. b. + A. c. | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 (1.1) | 0 | 2 (0.6) | 2 (0.5) | 0 | 2 (0.3) |
| A. b. + A. p. | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 (0.8) | 1 (0.3) | 0 | 1 (0.3) | 1 (0.1) |
| A. c. + A. p. | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 (1.1) | 0 | 2 (0.6) | 2 (0.5) | 0 | 2 (0.3) |
| A. c. + T. | 0 | 0 | 0 | 13 (7.1) | 1 (0.8) | 14 (4.5) | 13 (3.3) | 1 (0.3) | 14 (1.9) |
| A. p. + T. | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 (0.5) | 0 | 1 (0.3) | 1 (0.3) | 0 | 1 (0.1) |
| B. bo. + T. | 0 | 1 (0.5) | 1 (0.2) | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 (0.3) | 1 (0.1) |
| A. o. + A. b. + A. c. | 0 | 0 | 0 | 17 (9.3) | 0 | 17 (5.5) | 17 (4.3) | 0 | 17 (2.3) |
| A. o. + A. b. + T. | 0 | 0 | 0 | 5 (2.7) | 0 | 5 (1.6) | 5 (1.3) | 0 | 5 (0.7) |
| A. o. + A. c. + A. p. | 0 | 0 | 0 | 6 (3.3) | 0 | 6 (1.9) | 6 (1.5) | 0 | 6 (0.8) |
| A. o. + A. c. + T. | 0 | 0 | 0 | 22 (12.0) | 1 (0.8) | 23 (7.4) | 22 (5.6) | 1 (0.3) | 23 (3.1) |
| A. o. + A. p. + T. | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 (1.6) | 0 | 3 (1.0) | 3 (0.8) | 0 | 3 (0.4) |
| A. b. + A. c. + T. | 0 | 0 | 0 | 11 (6.0) | 0 | 11 (3.6) | 11 (2.8) | 0 | 11 (1.5) |
| A. o. + A. b. + A. c. + A. p. | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 (1.6) | 0 | 3 (1.0) | 3 (0.8) | 0 | 3 (0.4) |
| A. o. + A. b. + A. c. + T. | 0 | 0 | 0 | 46 (25.1) | 0 | 46 (14.9) | 46 (11.7) | 0 | 46 (6.3) |
| A. o. + A. c. + A. p. + T. | 0 | 0 | 0 | 11 (6.0) | 0 | 11 (3.6) | 11 (2.8) | 0 | 11 (1.5) |
| A. o. + A. b. + A. c. + A. p. + T. | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 (1.1) | 0 | 2 (0.6) | 2 (0.5) | 0 | 2 (0.3) |
| Total mixed infections | 0 | 1 (0.5) | 1 (0.2) | 161 (88.0) | 19 (15.1) | 180 (58.3) | 161 (41.0) | 20 (5.9) | 181 (24.7) |
| Total positive | 24 (11.4) | 36 (16.7) | 60 (14.1) | 178 (97.3) | 69 (54.8) | 247 (79.9) | 202 (51.4) | 105 (30.8) | 307 (41.8) |
For other abbreviations, see Table 1
The infection rates of B. bovis in yaks were significantly higher in Yushu compared to Guoluo (χ2 = 4.56, df = 1, P = 0.0328). The infection rates of A. ovis (χ2 = 23.77, df = 1, P < 0.0001), A. bovis (χ2 = 52.14, df = 1, P < 0.0001), A. capra (χ2 = 46.81, df = 1, P < 0.0001) and Theileria spp. (χ2 = 50.75, df = 1, P < 0.0001) in Tibetan sheep were significantly higher in Guoluo compared to Yushu. In addition, the infection rates of A. phagocytophilum in Tibetan sheep and B. bovis and Theileria spp. in yaks were significantly correlated with altitude (Table 3). Infection rates of Theileria spp. (χ2 = 6.02, df = 1, P = 0.0141), B. bovis (χ2 = 5.77, df = 1, P = 0.0163) and A. phagocytophilum (χ2 = 23.10, df = 1, P < 0.0001) were significantly different between the groups at 3000- to 4000-m and 4000- to 5000-m altitude (Table 3).
Table 3.
The infection rates of TBPs in yaks and Tibetan sheep by prefecture and altitude of the sampling sites
| Animal | Parameter | Number of positive samples (infection rate %) | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Anaplasma ovis | Anaplasma bovis | Anaplasma capra | Anaplasma phagocytophilum | Babesia bovis | Theileria spp. | ||
| Yak | Prefecture | ||||||
| Guoluo | 0 | 13 (6.2) | 0 | 0 | 5 (2.4) | 6 (2.9) | |
| Yushu | 0 | 14 (6.5) | 0 | 0 | 15 (7.0) | 8 (3.7) | |
| Statistical analysis | |||||||
| χ2 | 0.02 | 4.56 | 0.23 | ||||
| df | 1 | 1 | 1 | ||||
| P-value | 0.8987 | 0.0328 | 0.6293 | ||||
| Altitude (m) | |||||||
| 3000–4000 | 0 | 13 (5.8) | 0 | 0 | 5 (2.2) | 12 (5.4) | |
| 4000–5000 | 0 | 14 (6.9) | 0 | 0 | 15 (7.4) | 2 (1.0) | |
| Statistical analysis | |||||||
| χ2 | 0.19 | 5.77 | 6.02 | ||||
| df | 1 | 1 | 1 | ||||
| P-value | 0.6628 | 0.0163 | 0.0141 | ||||
| Tibetan sheep | Prefecture | ||||||
| Guoluo | 132 (72.1) | 92 (50.3) | 154 (84.2) | 29 (15.8) | 0 | 120 (65.6) | |
| Yushu | 30 (23.8) | 1 (0.8) | 19 (15.1) | 31 (24.6) | 0 | 8 (6.3) | |
| Statistical analysis | |||||||
| χ2 | 23.77 | 52.14 | 46.81 | 2.44 | 50.75 | ||
| df | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | ||
| P-value | < 0.0001 | < 0.0001 | < 0.0001 | 0.1185 | < 0.0001 | ||
| Altitude (m) | |||||||
| 3000–4000 | 92 (50.3) | 46 (25.1) | 107 (58.5) | 55 (30.1) | 0 | 80 (43.7) | |
| 4000–5000 | 70 (55.6) | 47 (37.3) | 66 (52.4) | 5 (4.0) | 0 | 48 (38.1) | |
| Statistical analysis | |||||||
| χ2 | 0.26 | 2.78 | 0.32 | 23.10 | 0.41 | ||
| df | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | ||
| P-value | 0.6108 | 0.0956 | 0.5721 | < 0.0001 | 0.5242 | ||
Sequencing analysis
Table 4 shows the 38 representative sequences that were submitted to GenBank from this study.
Table 4.
Accession numbers of DNA sequences from this study deposited in GenBank
| Obtained sequences | Closest BLASTn match | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pathogen | Animal | Target gene | Accession number | Length (bp) | Identity (%) | Pathogen isolate | Accession number (host, country) |
| Anaplasma ovis | Tibetan sheep | msp4 | MZ130286 | 347 | 100 | A. ovis | MN39479 (sheep, China) |
| Tibetan sheep | MZ130287 | 347 | 100 | A. ovis | MN39479 (sheep, China) | ||
| Anaplasma bovis | Tibetan sheep | 16S rRNA | MZ069105 | 551 | 99.46 | A. bovis | KJ659040 (sika deer, China) |
| Yak | MZ069106 | 551 | 99.64 | A. bovis | KJ659040 (sika deer, China) | ||
| Yak | MZ069107 | 551 | 99.82 | A. bovis | MT036513 (sheep, Russia) | ||
| Yak | MZ069108 | 550 | 99.82 | A. bovis | MT036513 (sheep, Russia) | ||
| Yak | MZ069109 | 551 | 99.82 | A. bovis | MT036513 (sheep, Russia) | ||
| Yak | MZ069110 | 551 | 100 | A. bovis | MT036513 (sheep, Russia) | ||
| Yak | MZ069111 | 551 | 99.64 | A. bovis | MT036513 (sheep, Russia) | ||
| Yak | MZ069112 | 551 | 100 | A. bovis | KJ639885 (red deer, China) | ||
| Tibetan sheep | MZ069105 | 551 | 99.46 | A. bovis | KJ659040 (sika deer, China) | ||
| Anaplasma capra | Tibetan sheep | gltA | MZ130264 | 793 | 74.43 | A. capra | MH029895 (tick, China) |
| Tibetan sheep | MZ130265 | 794 | 74.08 | A. capra | MH029895 (tick, China) | ||
| Tibetan sheep | MZ130266 | 793 | 74.02 | A. capra | MH029895 (tick, China) | ||
| Anaplasma phagocytophilum | Tibetan sheep | 16S rRNA | MZ073291 | 545 | 99.82 | A. phagocytophilum | KC422267 (tick, North Korea) |
| Tibetan sheep | MZ073292 | 545 | 99.27 | A. phagocytophilum | MT754352 (cattle, South Korea) | ||
| Tibetan sheep | MZ073293 | 545 | 99.63 | A. phagocytophilum | KC422267 (tick, North Korea) | ||
| Tibetan sheep | MZ073294 | 545 | 99.63 | A. phagocytophilum | KC422267 (tick, North Korea) | ||
| Babesia bovis | Yak | SBP4 | MZ130288 | 503 | 99.40 | B. bovis | KX685399 (cattle, Benin) |
| Yak | MZ130289 | 503 | 100 | B. bovis | AB617641 cattle Syria | ||
| Yak | MZ130290 | 503 | 99.80 | B. bovis | KX685399 (cattle, Benin) | ||
| Yak | MZ130291 | 503 | 99.80 | B. bovis | KX685399 (cattle, Benin) | ||
| Yak | MZ130292 | 503 | 99.80 | B. bovis | KX685399 (cattle, Benin) | ||
| Yak | MZ130293 | 503 | 99.60 | B. bovis | KX685399 (cattle, Benin) | ||
| Yak | MZ130294 | 503 | 99.80 | B. bovis | KX685399 (cattle, Benin) | ||
| Yak | MZ130295 | 503 | 100 | B. bovis | KX685399 (cattle, Benin) | ||
| Theileria spp. | Tibetan sheep | 18S rRNA | MZ047352 | 583 | 100 | T. ovis | MN394810 (yak, China) |
| Tibetan sheep | MZ047353 | 583 | 99.49 | T. ovis | MN394810 (yak, China) | ||
| Tibetan sheep | MZ047354 | 583 | 99.66 | T. ovis | MN394810 (yak, China) | ||
| Tibetan sheep | MZ047355 | 583 | 99.83 | T. ovis | MN394810 (yak, China) | ||
| Tibetan sheep | MZ047356 | 584 | 99.66 | T. ovis | MN394810 (yak, China) | ||
| Tibetan sheep | MZ047357 | 583 | 99.49 | T. ovis | MN394810 (yak, China) | ||
| Tibetan sheep | MZ047358 | 583 | 100 | T. ovis | MN394810 (yak, China) | ||
| Yak | MZ047359 | 583 | 99.83 | T. ovis | MN394810 (yak, China) | ||
| Yak | MZ047360 | 583 | 99.83 | T. ovis | MN394810 (yak, China) | ||
| Yak | MZ047361 | 583 | 99.49 | T. ovis | MN394810 (yak, China) | ||
| Yak | MZ047362 | 582 | 96.42 | T. ovis | MN394810 (yak, China) | ||
| Yak | MZ047363 | 583 | 99.14 | T. ovis | MN394810 (yak, China) | ||
BLASTn Basic Local Alignment Search Tool nucleotide, bp base pair, rRNA ribosomal RNA
The BLASTn analysis showed that the two partial sequences of the msp4 genomic region of A. ovis from Tibetan sheep had 100% identity with the A. ovis sequence (MN39479) from sheep in China. The nine partial sequences of the A. bovis 16S rRNA from yaks and Tibetan sheep shared 99.1–99.8% identity with each other and 99.5–100% similarity with previously published sequences from Russia (MT036513) and China (KJ659040, KJ639885). Anaplasma capra gltA sequences and A. phagocytophilum 16S rRNA sequences from Tibetan sheep shared 99.6–99.7% and 99.1–99.8% identities with each other and 74.0–74.4% and 99.3–99.8% similarities with sequences from China (MH029895), and North and South Korea (KC422267, MT754352), respectively.
In addition, BLASTn analysis of the SBP4 gene showed that the B. bovis sequences obtained in this study shared 99.0–99.8% identity with each other and 99.4–100% similarity with previously published sequences from Benin (KX685399) and Syria (AB617641). Moreover, sequence analysis revealed that the nucleotide sequences of Theileria spp. 18S rRNA in this study shared 96.0–100% identity with each other and 99.1–100% similarity with T. ovis species (MN394810) from China.
Phylogenetic analyses
Phylogenetic analysis of the sequences obtained in this study was based on the neighbor-joining method. The analysis based on the msp4 gene of A. ovis in Tibetan sheep grouped the sequences from the present study into the same clade along with A. ovis isolates from Qinghai, China (Fig. 2). All A. bovis 16S rRNA sequences obtained in this study from Tibetan sheep and yaks were grouped into the same clade as isolates from Russia, Iran, Tunisia, Pakistan, Japan and China in the phylogenetic tree (Fig. 3). All four A. phagocytophilum 16S rRNA sequences obtained in this study were in the same clade as those from Japan, Korea and other provinces of China (Fig. 4). In the B. bovis phylogenetic tree, all the yak-derived sequences in this study were grouped into the same clade as those from cattle from Indonesia, Benin and China (Fig. 5). In addition, phylogenetic analysis of Theileria spp. based on the 18S rRNA gene showed that sequences obtained from the Tibetan sheep and yaks were grouped with the T. ovis clade with sheep, cattle, Tibetan sheep, yak and goat isolates from Iran, Egypt, China and Turkey (Fig. 6). However, in the phylogenetic tree of A. capra, all the obtained sequences from Tibetan sheep in the current study formed a separate branch, while other sequences of different animals from China were clustered together (Fig. 7).
Fig. 2.
Phylogenetic tree based on Anaplasma ovis msp4 partial sequences [347 base pairs (bp)] obtained in this study. The tree was constructed with the neighbor-joining method using MEGA7.0. Numbers at nodes represent percentage occurrence of clades in 500 bootstrap replications of data. Sequences from this study are in bold. Anaplasma marginale (AY010250) and Anaplasma marginale (KU497715) were used as outgroups. The black circles indicate the sequences from Tibetan sheep in this study
Fig. 3.
Phylogenetic tree based on Anaplasma bovis 16S ribosomal RNA (rRNA) partial sequences (551 bp) obtained in this study. The tree was constructed with the neighbor-joining method using MEGA7.0. Numbers at nodes represent percentage occurrence of clades in 500 bootstrap replications of data. Sequences from this study are in bold. Anaplasma capra (MT052417) was used as the outgroup. The black circle indicates the sequence from Tibetan sheep and the white circles indicate the sequences from yaks in this study
Fig. 4.
Phylogenetic tree based on Anaplasma phagocytophilum 16S rRNA partial sequences (546/565 bp) obtained in this study. The tree was constructed with the neighbor-joining method using MEGA7.0. Numbers at nodes represent percentage occurrence of clades in 500 bootstrap replications of data. Sequences from this study are shown in bold. Anaplasma bovis (AB588968) was used as the outgroup. The black circles indicate the sequences from Tibetan sheep in this study. For abbreviations, see Figs. 1 and 2
Fig. 5.
Phylogenetic tree based on Babesia bovis msp4 partial sequences (503 bp) obtained in this study. The tree was constructed with the neighbor-joining method using MEGA7.0. Numbers at nodes represent percentage occurrence of clades in 500 bootstrap replications of data. Sequences from this study are in bold. Babesia bigemina (XM012912519) was used as the outgroup. The white circles indicate the sequences from yaks in this study
Fig. 6.
Phylogenetic tree based on Theileria ovis 18S rRNA partial sequences (581 bp) obtained in this study. The tree was constructed with the neighbor-joining method using MEGA7.0. Numbers at nodes represent percentage occurrence of clades in 500 bootstrap replications of data. Sequences from this study are in bold. Babesia bovis (KF928960) was used as the outgroup. The black circles indicate the sequences from Tibetan sheep and the white circles the sequences from yaks in this study. For abbreviations, see Figs. 1 and 2
Fig. 7.
Phylogenetic tree based on Anaplasma capra gltA partial sequences (793 bp) obtained in this study. The tree was constructed with the neighbor-joining method using MEGA7.0. Numbers at nodes represent percentage occurrence of clades in 500 bootstrap replications of data. Sequences from this study are in bold. Anaplasma phagocytophilum (JQ622145) was used as the outgroup. The black circles indicate the sequences from Tibetan sheep in this study
Discussion
We investigated the molecular prevalence and genetic diversity of TBPs in yaks and Tibetan sheep on the QTP to increase the amount of available epidemiological data on these pathogens in this area of China. Anaplasma spp., Babesia spp. and Theileria spp. were detected in the yaks and Tibetan sheep in the locations studied.
A total of four Anaplasma species were detected in blood samples of yaks and Tibetan sheep from Guoluo and Yushu. The infection rates of A. ovis, A. capra and A. phagocytophilum in Tibetan sheep were 52.4%, 56.0% and 19.4%, respectively, but none of these species were detected in yaks. Anaplasma bovis was detected in samples from both types of animals, although the infection rate was higher in Tibetan sheep (30.1%) than in yaks (6.4%), which suggests that the former may be more susceptible to this pathogen than the latter. Anaplasma ovis has not only been reported in many areas of China but also in other countries, at a positivity rate ranging from 16.05 to 83.9% [9, 10, 12, 13, 31–34]. This suggests that this pathogen, which causes sheep anaplasmosis, is an important infectious agent. Anaplasma bovis has also been detected in animals from different countries, such as cattle from Pakistan [35], cats from Angola [36], sheep and goats from Tunisia [37], goats from China [38] and Korean water deer from Korea [39].
In the present study, positive rates of 19.4% and 56.0% were found for A. phagocytophilum and A. capra respectively, in Tibetan sheep. These two pathogens can infect not only ruminants but also humans [14, 40]. The infection rate of A. phagocytophilum in Tibetan sheep in the present study was lower than that in sheep (42.9%) and goats (38.5%) in previous studies carried out in Gansu [41]. However, the infection rate of A. capra was higher in the present study than in previous investigations [42]. These markedly different results may be due to the fact that A. capra is found in a variety of ticks, including Haemaphysalis qinghaiensis [42], a species of tick unique to the QTP, and grazing is more likely to increase the exposure of animals to ticks.
The main pathogens that cause bovine babesiosis, which was first reported in China in 1948, are B. bovis and B. bigemina [43]. Previous studies on the prevalence of B. bovis in China found that this species was widespread in cattle in 14 provinces of the country, with infection rates ranging from 1.0 to 60.0%. Among these, the infection rate of B. bovis in yaks in two cities in Gansu Province, one of which is located east and the other northeast of the QTP, was 13.0%, while this species was not detected in yaks in Qinghai Province [18]. In this study, the infection rate of B. bovis was 4.7%, which is lower than that previously reported [18]. This could be due to differences between the studies in terms of geographic and temporal factors and vector distribution [44].
Ovine theileriosis was reported as early as 1956 in Qinghai, China [45]. This disease was originally thought to be caused by T. ovis [46], but infection with different Theileria species has been detected in different animals in China and in other countries worldwide [6, 13, 47–49]. Previous studies have reported T. sinensis and T. orientalis infections in cattle and T. luwenshuni and T. uilenbergi infections in sheep from Chongqing City and Xinjiang Province in China, respectively [6, 13]. Sequencing analysis performed in the present study showed that only T. ovis was present in yaks and Tibetan sheep on the QTP. The infection rates of Theileria in Tibetan sheep were significantly higher than those in yaks, which is a similar finding to that of a previous report [50]. The high prevalence of T. ovis in sheep in China and in other countries indicates that this pathogen cannot be neglected [47–54]. A study by Luo et al. [55] showed that H. qinghaiensis was the main disseminator of T. ovis on the QTP, and this may explain the high infection rate of this pathogen in Tibetan sheep in the present study. The T. ovis sequences obtained in the present study were also in the same clade as the T. ovis sequence detected in Rhipicephalus turanicus from Xinjiang [22], a neighboring province of Qinghai.
The results of this study show that Guoluo and Yushu are significantly impacted by the prevalence of B. bovis (χ2 = 4.56, df = 1, P = 0.0328) in yaks and the prevalence of A. ovis (χ2 = 23.77, df = 1, P < 0.0001), A. bovis (χ2 = 52.14, df = 1, P < 0.0001), A. capra (χ2 = 46.81, df = 1, P < 0.0001) and T. ovis (χ2 = 50.75, df = 1, P < 0.0001) in Tibetan sheep. These results may be related to the vegetation type, climate and landform of the two sampling areas. Altitude was shown to have a significant impact on the prevalence of B. bovis (χ2 = 5.77, df = 1, P = 0.0163) and T. ovis (χ2 = 6.02, df = 1, P = 0.0141) in yaks, and that of A. phagocytophilum (χ2 = 23.10, df = 1, P < 0.0001) in Tibetan sheep. Han et al. [56] investigated mixed infections of Anaplasma species in ixodid ticks and sheep, and found high co-infections in the latter. Several Anaplasma species have been detected in H. qinghaiensis [57], which implies that this common tick vector may be responsible for mixed infections with these pathogens.
Previous studies detected A. marginale and B. bigemina in sheep and yaks in Xinjiang Province, respectively, and B. motasi-like L/N/T in sheep in Qinghai Province [9, 12, 18]. However, none of these pathogens, or B. ovis, were detected in any of the animals in the present study, which may be due to differences in species distributions and abundances of tick vectors between the sampling sites. The fact that none of these four pathogens were detected in this study also suggests that they may have low prevalences in Guoluo and Yushu or that they may not be present at all.
Conclusions
This study reports the prevalence of Anaplasma spp., Babesia spp. and Theileria spp. in yaks and Tibetan sheep in Qinghai Province, China. The results of this study add to existing epidemiological information on tick-borne diseases in yaks and Tibetan sheep in Sanjiangyuan, and provide basic data for the development of programs for the prevention and control of TBPs in domestic animals in this area of the QTP hinterland. However, further studies are needed to investigate the relationship between ticks and pathogens in Qinghai Province to provide more information on the epidemiology of TBPs in this area of China.
Supplementary Information
Additional file 1: Table S1. Samples collected from yaks and Tibetan sheep on the Qinghai-Tibetan Plateau (QTP). Table S2. Primers used in this study to detect tick-borne pathogens infections in yaks and Tibetan sheep on the QTP.
Acknowledgements
Not applicable.
Abbreviations
- BLASTn
Basic Local Alignment Search Tool nucleotide
- PCR
Polymerase chain reaction
- QTP
Qinghai-Tibet Plateau
- 16S rRNA
16S ribosomal RNA
- 18S rRNA
18S ribosomal RNA
- TBPs
Tick-borne pathogens
Authors’ contributions
YL, YS, JL, YH, WC, RL, ZC, TQ and JY designed the study and sampling methods. YH, WC, RL, YW, PM, ST and ZC undertook the laboratory work. YH and JL analyzed the results. YH wrote the original draft of the manuscript. YL, YS, JL, MK reviewed the manuscript. All the authors read and approved the final manuscript.
Funding
Financial support for this study was provided by the Regular Assistance Project of the International Department of the Ministry of Science and Technology of China (grant no. KY201904013), the Special Project for Scientific and Technological International Cooperation of the Science and Technology Department, Qinghai Province (2021-HZ-801), and the Veterinary Bureau Scientific Research Foundation of Qinghai Province (NMSY-2021-05).
Availability of data and materials
The datasets generated or analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request. All the nucleotide sequences obtained in this study have been deposited in GenBank and the accession numbers are provided in Table 4.
Declarations
Ethics approval and consent to participate
The study was conducted in compliance with the rules of the Ethics Committee of Qinghai University, Chinese Academy of Sciences (no. SL-2021016).
Consent for publication
Not applicable.
Competing interests
The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
Footnotes
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Contributor Information
Yongcai He, Email: YongcaiHe@126.com.
Wangkai Chen, Email: chenwangkai@qhu.edu.cn.
Ping Ma, Email: 2983439260@qq.com.
Yaoping Wei, Email: 2282525031@qq.com.
Ruishan Li, Email: 1715338480@qq.com.
Zhihong Chen, Email: 501984683@qq.com.
Shuyu Tian, Email: 2423894098@qq.com.
Tongsheng Qi, Email: 15997054129@163.com.
Jinfang Yang, Email: 1802180158@qq.com.
Yali Sun, Email: yalisun@qhu.edu.cn.
Jixu Li, Email: lijixu@qhu.edu.cn.
Ming Kang, Email: 2013990003@qhu.edu.cn.
Ying Li, Email: YingLi@126.com.
References
- 1.Wu T. The Qinghai-Tibetan plateau: how high do Tibetans live? High Alt Med Biol. 2001;2:489–499. doi: 10.1089/152702901753397054. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Tang L, Duan X, Kong F, Zhang F, Zheng Y, Li Z, et al. Influences of climate change on area variation of Qinghai Lake on Qinghai-Tibetan Plateau since 1980s. Sci Rep. 2018;8:7331. doi: 10.1038/s41598-018-25683-3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Zhang Q, Zhang Z, Ai S, Wang X, Zhang R, Duan Z. Cryptosporidium spp., Enterocytozoon bieneusi, and Giardia duodenalis from animal sources in the Qinghai-Tibetan Plateau Area (QTPA) in China. Comp Immunol Microbiol Infect Dis. 2019;67:101346. doi: 10.1016/j.cimid.2019.101346. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Li K, Mehmood K, Zhang H, Jiang X, Shahzad M, Dong X, et al. Characterization of fungus microbial diversity in healthy and diarrheal yaks in Gannan region of Tibet Autonomous Prefecture. Acta Trop. 2018;182:14–26. doi: 10.1016/j.actatropica.2018.02.017. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Jin Y, Fei J, Cai J, Wang X, Li N, Guo Y, et al. Multilocus genotyping of Giardia duodenalis in Tibetan sheep and yaks in Qinghai, China. Vet Parasitol. 2017;247:70–76. doi: 10.1016/j.vetpar.2017.09.021. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Zhou Z, Li K, Sun Y, Shi J, Li H, Chen Y, et al. Molecular epidemiology and risk factors of Anaplasma spp., Babesia spp. and Theileria spp. infection in cattle in Chongqing, China. PLoS ONE. 2019;14:e0215585. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0215585. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Rar V, Tkachev S, Tikunova N. Genetic diversity of Anaplasma bacteria: twenty years later. Infect Genet Evol. 2021;91:104833. doi: 10.1016/j.meegid.2021.104833. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Atif FA. Alphaproteobacteria of genus Anaplasma (Rickettsiales: Anaplasmataceae): epidemiology and characteristics of Anaplasma species related to veterinary and public health importance. Parasitology. 2016;143:659–685. doi: 10.1017/S0031182016000238. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Li J, Ma L, Moumouni PA, Jian Y, Wang G, Zhang X, et al. Molecular survey and characterization of tick-borne pathogens in sheep from Qinghai, China. Small Rumin Res. 2019;175:23–30. [Google Scholar]
- 10.Li J, Jian Y, Jia L, Galon EM, Benedicto B, Wang G, et al. Molecular characterization of tick-borne bacteria and protozoans in yaks (Bos grunniens), Tibetan sheep (Ovis aries) and Bactrian camels (Camelus bactrianus) in the Qinghai-Tibetan Plateau Area, China. Ticks Tick Borne Dis. 2020;11:101466. doi: 10.1016/j.ttbdis.2020.101466. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Zhang QX, Wang Y, Li Y, Han SY, Wang B, Yuan GH, et al. Vector-borne pathogens with veterinary and public health significance in Melophagus ovinus (sheep ked) from the Qinghai-Tibet Plateau. Pathogens. 2021;10:249. doi: 10.3390/pathogens10020249. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Yang J, Li Y, Liu Z, Liu J, Niu Q, Ren Q, et al. Molecular detection and characterization of Anaplasma spp. in sheep and cattle from Xinjiang, northwest China. Parasit Vectors. 2015;8:108. doi: 10.1186/s13071-015-0727-3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Li Y, Galon EM, Guo Q, Rizk MA, Moumouni PFA, Liu M, et al. Molecular detection and identification of Babesia spp., Theileria spp., and Anaplasma spp. in sheep from border regions, northwestern China. Front Vet Sci. 2020;7:630. doi: 10.3389/fvets.2020.00630. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Li H, Zheng YC, Ma L, Jia N, Jiang BG, Jiang RR, et al. Human infection with a novel tick-borne Anaplasma species in China: a surveillance study. Lancet Infect Dis. 2015;15:663–670. doi: 10.1016/S1473-3099(15)70051-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Uilenberg G. Babesia—a historical overview. Vet Parasitol. 2006;138:3–10. doi: 10.1016/j.vetpar.2006.01.035. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Ceylan O, Xuan X, Sevinc F. Primary tick-borne protozoan and rickettsial infections of animals in Turkey. Pathogens. 2021;10:231. doi: 10.3390/pathogens10020231. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Niu Q, Liu Z, Yang J, Yu P, Pan Y, Zhai B, et al. Genetic diversity and molecular characterization of Babesia motasi-like in small ruminants and ixodid ticks from China. Infect Genet Evol. 2016;41:8–15. doi: 10.1016/j.meegid.2016.03.007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Niu Q, Liu Z, Yu P, Yang J, Abdallah MO, Guan G, et al. Genetic characterization and molecular survey of Babesia bovis, Babesia bigemina and Babesia ovata in cattle, dairy cattle and yaks in China. Parasit Vectors. 2015;8:518. doi: 10.1186/s13071-015-1110-0. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Clift SJ, Collins NE, Oosthuizen MC, Steyl JCA, Lawrence JA, Mitchell EP. The pathology of pathogenic theileriosis in African wild artiodactyls. Vet Pathol. 2020;57:24–48. doi: 10.1177/0300985819879443. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Hao L, Yuan D, Li S, Jia T, Guo L, Hou W, et al. Detection of Theileria spp. in ticks, sheep keds (Melophagus ovinus), and livestock in the eastern Tibetan Plateau, China. Parasitol Res. 2020;119:2641–2648. doi: 10.1007/s00436-020-06757-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Qin G, Li Y, Liu J, Liu Z, Yang J, Zhang L, et al. Molecular detection and characterization of Theileria infection in cattle and yaks from Tibet Plateau Region, China. Parasitol Res. 2016;115:2647–2652. doi: 10.1007/s00436-016-5011-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Song R, Wang Q, Guo F, Liu X, Song S, Chen C, et al. Detection of Babesia spp., Theileria spp. and Anaplasma ovis in border regions, northwestern China. Transbound Emerg Dis. 2018;65:1537–1544. doi: 10.1111/tbed.12894. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Torina A, Agnone A, Blanda V, Alongi A, D’Agostino R, Caracappa S, et al. Development and validation of two PCR tests for the detection of and differentiation between Anaplasma ovis and Anaplasma marginale. Ticks Tick Borne Dis. 2012;3:283–287. doi: 10.1016/j.ttbdis.2012.10.033. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Reye AL, Arinola OG, Hübschen JM, Muller CP. Pathogen prevalence in ticks collected from the vegetation and livestock in Nigeria. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2012;78:2562–2568. doi: 10.1128/AEM.06686-11. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Li H, Cui XM, Cui N, Yang ZD, Hu JG, Fan YD, et al. Human infection with novel spotted fever group Rickettsia genotype, China, 2015. Emerg Infect Dis. 2016;22:2153–2156. doi: 10.3201/eid2212.160962. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Massung RF, Slater K, Owens JH, Nicholson WL, Mather TN, Solberg VB, et al. Nested PCR assay for detection of granulocytic ehrlichiae. J Clin Microbiol. 1998;36:1090–1095. doi: 10.1128/jcm.36.4.1090-1095.1998. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Aktas M, Altay K, Dumanli N. Development of a polymerase chain reaction method for diagnosis of Babesia ovis infection in sheep and goats. Vet Parasitol. 2005;133:277–281. doi: 10.1016/j.vetpar.2005.05.057. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Terkawi MA, Huyen NX, Wibowo PE, Seuseu FJ, Aboulaila M, Ueno A, et al. Spherical body protein 4 is a new serological antigen for global detection of Babesia bovis infection in cattle. Clin Vaccine Immunol. 2011;18:337–342. doi: 10.1128/CVI.00388-10. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Cao S, Zhang S, Jia L, Xue S, Yu L, Kamyingkird K, et al. Molecular detection of Theileria species in sheep from northern China. J Vet Med Sci. 2013;75:1227–1230. doi: 10.1292/jvms.13-0028. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Kumar S, Stecher G, Tamura K. MEGA7: molecular evolutionary genetics analysis version 7.0 for bigger datasets. Mol Biol Evol. 2016;33:1870–1874. doi: 10.1093/molbev/msw054. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Aouadi A, Leulmi H, Boucheikhchoukh M, Benakhla A, Raoult D, Parola P. Molecular evidence of tick-borne hemoprotozoan-parasites (Theileria ovis and Babesia ovis) and bacteria in ticks and blood from small ruminants in northern Algeria. Comp Immunol Microbiol Infect Dis. 2017;50:34–39. doi: 10.1016/j.cimid.2016.11.008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Ringo AE, Adjou Moumouni PF, Taioe M, Jirapattharasate C, Liu M, Wang G, et al. Molecular analysis of tick-borne protozoan and rickettsial pathogens in small ruminants from two South African provinces. Parasitol Int. 2018;67:144–149. doi: 10.1016/j.parint.2017.11.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Lee SH, Mossaad E, Ibrahim AM, Ismail AA, Adjou Moumouni PF, Liu M, et al. Detection and molecular characterization of tick-borne pathogens infecting sheep and goats in Blue Nile and West Kordofan states in Sudan. Ticks Tick Born Dis. 2018;9:598–604. doi: 10.1016/j.ttbdis.2018.01.014. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Ceylan O, Byamukama B, Ceylan C, Galon EM, Liu M, Masatani T, et al. Tick-borne hemoparasites of sheep: a molecular research in Turkey. Pathogens. 2021;10:162. doi: 10.3390/pathogens10020162. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Iqbal N, Mukhtar MU, Yang J, Sajid MS, Niu Q, Guan G, et al. First molecular evidence of Anaplasma bovis and Anaplasma phagocytophilum in bovine from Central Punjab, Pakistan. Pathogens. 2019;8:155. doi: 10.3390/pathogens8030155. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Oliveira AC, Luz MF, Granada S, Vilhena H, Nachum-Biala Y, Lopes AP, et al. Molecular detection of Anaplasma bovis, Ehrlichia canis and Hepatozoon felis in cats from Luanda, Angola. Parasit Vectors. 2018;11:167. doi: 10.1186/s13071-018-2767-y. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Ben Said M, Belkahia H, Karaoud M, Bousrih M, Yahiaoui M, Daaloul-Jedidi M, et al. First molecular survey of Anaplasma bovis in small ruminants from Tunisia. Vet Microbiol. 2015;179:322–326. doi: 10.1016/j.vetmic.2015.05.022. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Wang H, Yang J, Mukhtar MU, Liu Z, Zhang M, Wang X, et al. Molecular detection and identification of tick-borne bacteria and protozoans in goats and wild Siberian roe deer (Capreolus pygargus) from Heilongjiang Province, northeastern China. Parasit Vectors. 2019;12:296. doi: 10.1186/s13071-019-3553-1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Kang JG, Ko S, Kim YJ, Yang HJ, Lee H, Shin NS, et al. New genetic variants of Anaplasma phagocytophilum and Anaplasma bovis from Korean water deer (Hydropotes inermis argyropus) Vector Borne Zoonotic Dis. 2011;11:929–938. doi: 10.1089/vbz.2010.0214. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Chen SM, Dumler JS, Bakken JS, Walker DH. Identification of a granulocytotropic Ehrlichia species as the etiologic agent of human disease. J Clin Microbiol. 1994;32:589–595. doi: 10.1128/jcm.32.3.589-595.1994. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Yang J, Liu Z, Guan G, Liu Q, Li Y, Chen Z, et al. Prevalence of Anaplasma phagocytophilum in ruminants, rodents and ticks in Gansu, north-western China. J Med Microbiol. 2013;62:254–258. doi: 10.1099/jmm.0.046771-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Peng Y, Wang K, Zhao S, Yan Y, Wang H, Jing J, et al. Detection and phylogenetic characterization of Anaplasma capra: an emerging pathogen in sheep and goats in China. Front Cell Infect Microbiol. 2018;8:283. doi: 10.3389/fcimb.2018.00283. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Yin H, Lu W, Luo J. Babesiosis in China. Trop Anim Health Prod. 1997;29(Suppl. 4):11–15. doi: 10.1007/BF02632908. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Wang J, Yang J, Gao S, Wang X, Sun H, Lv Z, et al. Genetic diversity of Babesia bovis MSA-1, MSA-2b and MSA-2c in China. Pathogens. 2020;9:473. doi: 10.3390/pathogens9060473. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Yin H, Schnittger L, Luo J, Seitzer U, Ahmed JS. Ovine theileriosis in China: a new look at an old story. Parasitol Res. 2007;101(Suppl. 2):191–195. doi: 10.1007/s00436-007-0689-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Yang F, Feng Z, Yu G, Liu J, Wei Z, He X. A report on ovine theileriosis in Ganning animal farm station in Ganzi district. Chin Vet Sci. 1958;2:33–37. [Google Scholar]
- 47.Razmi G, Pourhosseini M, Yaghfouri S, Rashidi A, Seidabadi M. Molecular detection of Theileria spp. and Babesia spp. in sheep and ixodid ticks from the northeast of Iran. J Parasitol. 2013;99:77–81. doi: 10.1645/GE-3202.1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Razmi G, Yaghfoori S. Molecular surveillance of Theileria ovis, Theileria lestoquardi and Theileria annulata infection in sheep and ixodid ticks in Iran. Onderstepoort J Vet Res. 2013;80:635. doi: 10.4102/ojvr.v80i1.635. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Ringo AE, Aboge GO, Adjou Moumouni PF, Hun Lee S, Jirapattharasate C, Liu M, et al. Molecular detection and genetic characterisation of pathogenic Theileria, Anaplasma and Ehrlichia species among apparently healthy sheep in central and western Kenya. Onderstepoort J Vet Res. 2019;86:e1–e8. doi: 10.4102/ojvr.v86i1.1630. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50.Wang Y, Wang B, Zhang Q, Li Y, Yang Z, Han S, et al. The common occurrence of Theileria ovis in Tibetan Sheep and the first report of Theileria sinensis in yaks from southern Qinghai, China. Acta Parasitol. 2021;66:1177–1185. doi: 10.1007/s11686-021-00381-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51.Zhou M, Cao S, Sevinc F, Sevinc M, Ceylan O, Ekici S, et al. Molecular detection and genetic characterization of Babesia, Theileria and Anaplasma amongst apparently healthy sheep and goats in the central region of Turkey. Ticks Tick Borne Dis. 2017;8:246–252. doi: 10.1016/j.ttbdis.2016.11.006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52.Gebrekidan H, Hailu A, Kassahun A, Rohoušová I, Maia C, Talmi-Frank D, et al. Theileria infection in domestic ruminants in northern Ethiopia. Vet Parasitol. 2014;200:31–38. doi: 10.1016/j.vetpar.2013.11.017. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53.El Imam AH, Hassan SM, Gameel AA, El Hussein AM, Taha KM, Oosthuizen MC. Molecular identification of different Theileria and Babesia species infecting sheep in Sudan. Ann Parasitol. 2016;62:47–54. doi: 10.17420/ap6201.31. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54.Li Y, Guan G, Ma M, Liu J, Ren Q, Luo J, et al. Theileria ovis discovered in China. Exp Parasitol. 2011;127:304–307. doi: 10.1016/j.exppara.2010.07.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55.Luo J, Yin H. Theileriosis of sheep and goats in China. Trop Anim Health Prod. 1997;29(Suppl. 4):8–10. doi: 10.1007/BF02632907. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 56.Yang J, Han R, Niu Q, Liu Z, Guan G, Liu G, et al. Occurrence of four Anaplasma species with veterinary and public health significance in sheep, northwestern China. Ticks Tick Borne Dis. 2018;9:82–85. doi: 10.1016/j.ttbdis.2017.10.005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 57.Han R, Yang JF, Mukhtar MU, Chen Z, Niu QL, Lin YQ, et al. Molecular detection of Anaplasma infections in ixodid ticks from the Qinghai-Tibet Plateau. Infect Dis Poverty. 2019;8:12. doi: 10.1186/s40249-019-0522-z. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Supplementary Materials
Additional file 1: Table S1. Samples collected from yaks and Tibetan sheep on the Qinghai-Tibetan Plateau (QTP). Table S2. Primers used in this study to detect tick-borne pathogens infections in yaks and Tibetan sheep on the QTP.
Data Availability Statement
The datasets generated or analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request. All the nucleotide sequences obtained in this study have been deposited in GenBank and the accession numbers are provided in Table 4.