Skip to main content
Microbiology logoLink to Microbiology
. 2021 Oct 26;167(10):001099. doi: 10.1099/mic.0.001099

A small RNA is functional in Escherichia fergusonii despite containing a large insertion

Austin P Wright 1,2, H Auguste Dutcher 1, Brianna Butler 1, Timothy J Nice 2, Rahul Raghavan 1,3,*
PMCID: PMC8698209  PMID: 34698627

Abstract

Bacterial small RNAs (sRNAs) are important regulators of gene expression; however, the impact of natural mutations on sRNA functions has not been studied extensively. Here we show that the sRNA MgrR contains a unique 53 bp insertion in Escherichia fergusonii , a close relative of Escherichia coli and Salmonella enterica . The insertion is a repetitive extragenic palindromic (REP) sequence that could block transcription, but full-length MgrR is produced in E. fergusonii , showing that the insertion has not affected sRNA production. Additionally, despite containing the large insertion, the sRNA appears to be functional because deletion of mgrR made E. fergusonii more susceptible to H2O2. The molecular details of MgrR’s roles in H2O2defence are yet to be defined, but our results suggest that having an alternative function allowed the sRNA to be retained in E. fergusonii despite it sustaining a large, potentially disruptive mutation.

Keywords: sRNA, MgrR, Escherichia fergusonii, oxidative stress, sRNA evolution

Introduction

Small RNAs (sRNAs) regulate gene expression in bacteria by modulating translation and mRNA stability [1]. In Escherichia coli and Salmonella enterica , expression of the sRNA MgrR is upregulated by the PhoP/PhoQ two-component system in response to low availability of Mg2+ [2, 3]. The sRNA in turn downregulates the production of the lipopolysaccharide-modifying enzyme EptB, and in concert with the small protein MgtS, boosts intracellular Mg2+ levels [2, 4, 5]. MgrR is conserved across enteric bacteria and is ~100 nt long [5], but in E. fergusonii , an understudied opportunistic pathogen [6, 7], the mgrR gene is interrupted by a 53 bp sequence. Large insertions typically disrupt the functions of protein-coding genes, but their impact on sRNA genes are unknown. In this study, we show that despite containing the insertion, full-length MgrR is produced in response to low Mg2+ availability, and the sRNA enhances E. fergusonii ’s peroxide resistance. This function seems to be unique to E. fergusonii ’s MgrR, indicating that it contributed to the retention of the sRNA despite it seemingly losing the ancestral function of eptB regulation.

Methods

Bacterial strains and plasmids

Bacterial strains used in this study are listed in Table S2. All bacteria were either grown in Lysogeny Broth (LB) or in N-minimal medium containing 10 µM or 10 mM MgCl2 [8]. Kanamycin (KAN) was used at a final concentration of 50 µg ml−1, ampicillin (AMP) at 100 µg ml−1 and chloramphenicol (CAM) at 25 µg ml−1. The wild-type (WT) strain used in this study was E. fergusonii ATCC 35469, which was obtained from American Type Culture Collection (ATCC) [6]. The RL7 (ΔmgrR::KANr) strain was constructed using primers listed in Table S3 and the λ Red recombination system [9]. Briefly, a PCR fragment obtained by amplifying the kanamycin resistance gene (KANr) from the pKD4 vector was recombined into the chromosome of wild-type E. fergusonii carrying the pKD78 vector that encodes the λ Red function. The transformed cells were selected on LB-KAN plates and deletion of mgrR gene was verified by PCR and DNA sequencing. KANr inserted in place of mgrR in the chromosome of RL7 was eliminated using thermal induction (43 °C) of FLP synthase present on pCP20 to generate the DEL strain.

A chromosomal-complementation strain (COMP) was constructed by introducing the mgrR gene along with its natural promoter within a defunct partial IS621 in the intergenic region between rhamnulose-1-phosphate aldolase (EFER_RS19330) and lactaldehyde reductase (EFER_RS19335) genes in DEL. E. fergusonii ’s mgrR gene along with its promoter, 1000 bp of sequences from each side of the insertion site, and KANr (from pKD4) were amplified using PCR (see Table S3 for primer sequences). The PCR fragments along with linearized pKD78 (using BstXI) were assembled into a circular plasmid using an In-Fusion cloning kit (Clontech) and transformed into E. coli Stellar cells (Clontech) following the manufacturer’s protocols. Transformed cells were plated on LB-CAM plates and incubated at 30 °C. Colonies that grew overnight were plated on LB-KAN at 30 °C overnight, and plasmids were isolated using GeneJet miniprep kit (Thermo Fisher Scientific). DEL cells were transformed with the newly assembled plasmid via electroporation (BioRad MicroPulser, 2.5 kV), allowed to recovered at 30 °C and were plated on LB-KAN and incubated overnight at 43 °C. Integration of mgrR gene along with its natural promoter was confirmed by DNA sequencing.

Measuring MgrR expression

N-minimal medium with 10 mM MgCl2 was inoculated with WT E. fergusonii and incubated overnight at 37 °C. The overnight culture was diluted in N-minimal medium with either low (10 µM) or high (10 mM) Mg2+ concentrations and were grown to an OD600 of ~0.5 and RNA Stop Solution (5 % phenol, 95 % ethanol) was added. Total RNA was extracted using TRI reagent (Thermo Fisher Scientific), treated with DNase, and 500 µg of DNA-free RNA was used to generate cDNA using random hexamer primers. A SYBR Green master mix (Thermo Fisher Scientific) along with 2 µl of cDNA was used in qPCR reactions to measure mgrR expression under low and high Mg2+ conditions. As a control, expression of pmrD, a known PhoP-regulated gene, was also measured. Expression values were normalized using 16S rRNA gene expression.

Overexpression of MgrR was accomplished using the arabinose inducible promotor on the pBAD33 plasmid [10]. Overnight cultures of WTpBAD33, RL7pBAD33 and RL7pBAD33-mgrR (Table S2) were diluted 1 : 1000 in fresh LB-CAM containing 0.2 % l-arabinose and grown to an OD600 of ~0.5. RNA stop solution (5 % phenol, 95 % ethanol) was added, cells were pelleted by centrifugation, total RNA was isolated and mgrR and eptB expression was measured using qRT-PCR, as described above.

Rapid amplification of 3′ cDNA ends (3′ RACE)

N-minimal medium with 10 mM Mg2+ was inoculated with WT E. fergusonii and grown overnight at 37 °C. The overnight culture was diluted in fresh N-minimal medium with 10 µM Mg+2 and grown to an OD600 of ~0.5, at which point rifampicin (300 µg ml−1) was added and RNA was isolated using TRI reagent (Thermo Fisher Scientific). After DNase treatment, a poly-A tail was added to the 3′ ends of RNA using E. coli poly(A) polymerase, and cDNA was generated using the adapter primer provided in the kit (Table S3). MgrR cDNA was amplified using an mgrR-specific primer and the abridged universal amplification primer (Table S3). The PCR product was cloned into pGEM-T Easy Vector (Promega) and colonies were sequenced using M13 primers to determine the 3′ end of MgrR.

Hydrogen peroxide sensitivity assays

To perform a disc-based H2O2 sensitivity assay, 100 µl of overnight cultures of WT, DEL and COMP strains of E. fergusonii , and NM 22540 (wild-type) and KM129 (ΔmgrR::KANr) strains of E. coli were spread on LB plates that contained 25 ml of LB agarose. Then, 10 mm paper discs were placed in the centre of the LB plates, loaded with 10 µl of 10 M H2O2 and incubated at 37 °C overnight. The next day photographs were taken of each plate and the area of clearing was measured with ImageJ [11]. Statistical significance between the three E. fergusonii strains was measured using one-way ANOVA followed by Tukey’s HSD test, and between the two E. coli strains using two-tailed, unpaired Student’s t-test.

Evolutionary reconstruction

The Enterobacterales phylogenetic tree was downloaded from MicrobesOnLine. Prevalence of MgrR across Enterobacterales was determined using a covariance-modelling-based approach [12]. The presence/absence pattern for MgrR was input into Gain and Loss Mapping Engine (GLOOME) [13] to determine the sRNA’s node of origin. The gain node was the most ancestral node with a posterior probability of ≥0.6, where all nodes leading from this ancestor to E. coli MG1655 had a posterior probability ≥0.6, as described previously [12].

Results and discussion

MgrR arose in Enterobacteriaceae

Using a covariance-modelling-based approach, we recently determined the prevalence of several sRNAs, including that of MgrR, across the order Enterobacterales [12]. An evolutionary reconstruction of MgrR origination based on this data indicated that the sRNA emerged in the family Enterobacteriaceae (Node 8 in Fig. 1). The only genus in this family without MgrR is Cronobacter , but it contains mgtS, a gene typically found next to mgrR [5]. Interestingly, the genome location of mgtS in Cronobacter is different from that in other Enterobacteriaceae members [5]. This divergent genetic locus of mgtS in Cronobacter was likely a result of genome rearrangement, a process that can disrupt sRNA genes [14]. Hence, it is possible that MgrR was present in the common ancestor of all Enterobacteriaceae members (Node 7 in Fig. 1) and was later lost in Cronobacter through genome rearrangements. Irrespective of the exact node-of-origin, this sRNA is present exclusively in the family Enterobacteriaceae.

Fig. 1.

Fig. 1.

MgrR arose in Enterobacteriaceae. An Enterobacterales phylogenetic tree downloaded from MicrobesOnLine is shown. The presence or absence of MgrR in each bacterium is depicted with filled or blank squares on the right. The predicted node of origin (N8) of MgrR is marked with a red circle.

MgrR in E. fergusonii contains an insertion

An analysis of mgrR genes across Enterobacteriaceae showed that the sRNA is ~100 nt in length in all taxa except in E. fergusonii (Table S1). On closer examination, we discovered that the 53 bp insertion within the mgrR gene in E. fergusonii is a repetitive extragenic palindromic (REP) sequence (Fig. 2). Typically, these hairpin-like elements are found in intergenic regions [15], and E. fergusonii contains several other copies of this element, suggesting that the REP sequence invaded the mgrR gene from another location in E. fergusonii ’s genome.

Fig. 2.

Fig. 2.

MgrR contains a large insertion. (a) A predicted secondary structure of MgrR in E. fergusonii . The hairpin-like REP insertion is in red. (b) Genomic sequence around the mgrR gene in E. fergusonii . The sequences in bold italics are the predicted PhoP-binding sites, and a putative −10 sequence is boxed. The underlined nucleotides correspond to the eptB-binding site predicted in E. coli , and the REP sequence is in red [2].

E. fergusonii expresses full-length MgrR in response to low magnesium availability

In bacteria, REP-containing regions are transcribed [16, 17], but they form stem-loop-like structures that could prematurely terminate transcription [18]. To rule out this possibility, we performed a 3′ RACE assay, which confirmed that full-length MgrR was produced when E. fergusonii was grown in medium containing low (10 µM) Mg2+ concentration (Fig. 3). In addition, expression of MgrR was significantly higher in the low-magnesium condition in comparison to growth in medium with high (10 mM) Mg2+ concentration (Fig. 3). These data, along with the presence of a putative PhoP-binding site upstream of the mgrR gene (Fig. 2), indicate that expression of MgrR in E. fergusonii is regulated by the PhoP/PhoQ two-component system, as observed in E. coli [2].

Fig. 3.

Fig. 3.

Full-length MgrR is expressed in response to low magnesium availability. (a) A PCR product from the MgrR 3′ RACE assay is shown. The amplicon, which was sequenced to determine the 3′ end of MgrR, is larger (~200 bp) than MgrR (151 nt) due to the addition of a poly-A tail and an adapter sequence as part of the 3′ RACE assay. (b) Increase in expression of MgrR in E. fergusonii grown in low Mg2+ (10 µM) compared to high Mg2+ (10 mM). As a control, expression of pmrD, a known PhoP-regulated gene, was also measured under the same conditions. Fold-change values (mean+/-sd) were calculated from two independent growth experiments.

MgrR may not regulate eptB in E. fergusonii

In E. coli , MgrR downregulates the expression of the eptB gene, which encodes a lipopolysaccharide-modifying enzyme [2]. To check whether MgrR has the same function in E. fergusonii , we measured eptB expression in wild-type (WT), mgrR-deletion (DEL) and mgrR-overexpression (OE) strains of E. fergusonii during exponential growth. Although OE produced ~12-fold more MgrR than WT, and MgrR was not detectable in DEL, the expression levels of eptB in the three E. fergusonii strains did not differ significantly from each other (P=0.235, One-way ANOVA) (Fig. 4). This result is different from what was observed in E. coli , where MgrR caused 2–3-fold downregulation of eptB expression in wild-type compared to an mgrR-deletion strain during exponential growth [2]. Although REP is inserted outside of the predicted eptB-binding site (Fig. 2), the presence of the hairpin-like element in close proximity might be interfering with MgrR-eptB interaction, thereby diminishing the sRNA’s ability to control eptB expression in E. fergusonii .

Fig. 4.

Fig. 4.

Expression of eptB is not impacted by MgrR in E. fergusonii . Expression of (a) MgrR and (b) eptB was measured in wild-type (WT), mgrR-deletion (DEL) and mgrR-overexpression (OE) strains of E. fergusonii . Expression fold change values relative to WT (taken as 1) are shown. Fold-change (mean+/-sd) were calculated from two independent growth experiments. Expression of eptB did not differ significantly between the three strains (P=0.235, one-way ANOVA).

MgrR improves E. fergusonii ’s H2O2 resistance

Despite the apparent loss of eptB regulation, REP insertion does not seem to have rendered MgrR nonfunctional. An mgrR-deletion strain of E. fergusonii had significantly reduced resistance to H2O2 in comparison to wild-type and mgrR-complementation strains (Fig. 5), indicating that the sRNA has a role in E. fergusonii ’s ability to withstand H2O2 stress. We could not test the contribution, if any, of REP towards this function because we were unable to create a version of MgrR without this hairpin-like element in E. fergusonii . However, it is unlikely that the double-stranded REP region has a direct role in MgrR function because binding of sRNAs to target mRNAs typically occur via single-stranded regions [19]. Alternatively, the highly structured nature of REP could improve MgrR’s stability and prolong its survival into a different growth stage, thereby indirectly allowing the sRNA to acquire new targets [20].

Fig. 5.

Fig. 5.

MgrR improves E. fergusonii’s H2O2 resistance. Bacterial growth in response to hydrogen peroxide exposure was measured using a disc-based assay. Representative assay images are shown in the top panels and horizontal bars in the bottom panel correspond to the mean of three biological replicates. Strains of E. fergusonii (a) and E. coli (b) used: WT, wild-type; DEL, mgrR-deletion; COMP, complementation. Statistical significance in (a) was calculated using one-way ANOVA followed by Tukey’s HSD test (***P≤0.001), and in (b) using two-tailed, unpaired Student’s t-test (P=0.865).

MgrR’s ability to enhance H2O2 resistance appears to be specific to E. fergusonii because deletion of mgrR did not alter E. coli’s H2O2 sensitivity (Fig. 5). Interestingly, wild-type E. fergusonii appear to be much more resistant to H2O2 than wild-type E. coli ; however, the respective contributions of MgrR and peroxidases present in the two bacteria to this phenotype are currently unknown. Further studies are required to understand the molecular details of how MgrR improves E. fergusonii’s H2O2 resistance, but if this function was gained prior to REP insertion, it could have contributed to the retention of the sRNA despite the apparent loss of eptB regulation. Alternatively, even after sustaining an insertion that affected eptB regulation, the sRNA gene’s small size (151 bp out of the 4.6 million bp genome) could have buffered it against deletion, thereby providing MgrR enough time to gain new functions. Future studies should clarify whether other sRNAs have survived large perturbations, and whether having multiple functions and/or small size make sRNAs resilient to potentially disruptive mutations.

Supplementary Data

Supplementary material 2

Funding information

This project was supported in part by NIH grants AI133023 and DE028409 to R.R. T.J.N. was supported by NIH grant AI130055 and by a faculty development award from the Sunlin and Priscilla Chou Foundation.

Acknowledgements

We thank Susan Gottesman for providing E. coli strains.

Conflicts of interest

The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest.

Footnotes

Abbreviations: COMP, mgrR-complementation strain; DEL, mgrR-deletion strain; OE, mgrR-overexpression strain; REP, repetitive extragenic palindromic sequence; sRNA, small RNA; WT, wild-type strain.

Three supplementary tables are available with the online version of this article.

References

  • 1.Hör J, Matera G, Vogel J, Gottesman S, Storz G. Trans-acting small rnas and their effects on gene expression in Escherichia coli and salmonella enterica. EcoSal Plus. 2020;9 doi: 10.1128/ecosalplus.ESP-0030-2019. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Moon K, Gottesman S. A phoq/p-regulated small RNA regulates sensitivity of Escherichia coli to antimicrobial peptides. Mol Microbiol. 2009;74:1314–1330. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2958.2009.06944.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Raghavan R, Groisman EA, Ochman H. Genome-wide detection of novel regulatory rnas in E. Coli. Genome Res. 2011;21:1487–1497. doi: 10.1101/gr.119370.110. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Moon K, Six DA, Lee HJ, Raetz CRH, Gottesman S. Complex transcriptional and post-transcriptional regulation of an enzyme for lipopolysaccharide modification. Mol Microbiol. 2013;89:52–64. doi: 10.1111/mmi.12257. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Yin X, Wu Orr M, Wang H, Hobbs EC, Shabalina SA, et al. The small protein MGTS and small RNA MGRR modulate the pita phosphate symporter to boost intracellular magnesium levels. Mol Microbiol. 2019;111:131–144. doi: 10.1111/mmi.14143. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Farmer JJ, 3rd, Fanning GR, Davis BR, O’Hara CM, Riddle C, et al. Escherichia fergusonii and Enterobacter taylorae, two new species of enterobacteriaceae isolated from clinical specimens. J Clin Microbiol. 1985;21:77–81. doi: 10.1128/jcm.21.1.77-81.1985. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Funke G, Hany A, Altwegg M. Isolation of Escherichia fergusonii from four different sites in a patient with pancreatic carcinoma and cholangiosepsis. J Clin Microbiol. 1993;31:2201–2203. doi: 10.1128/jcm.31.8.2201-2203.1993. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Groisman EA, Kayser J, Soncini FC. Regulation of polymyxin resistance and adaptation to low-mg2+ environments. J Bacteriol. 1997;179:7040–7045. doi: 10.1128/jb.179.22.7040-7045.1997. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Datsenko KA, Wanner BL. One-step inactivation of chromosomal genes in Escherichia coli K-12 using PCR products. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2000;97:6640–6645. doi: 10.1073/pnas.120163297. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Guzman L-. M, Belin D, Carson MJ, Beckwith J. Tight regulation, modulation, and high-level expression by vectors containing the arabinose PBAD promoter. J Bacteriol. 1995;177:4121–4130. doi: 10.1128/jb.177.14.4121-4130.1995. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Rueden CT, Schindelin J, Hiner MC, DeZonia BE, Walter AE, et al. Imagej2: IMAGEJ for the next generation of scientific image data. BMC Bioinformatics. 2017;18:529. doi: 10.1186/s12859-017-1934-z. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Krieger M, Dutcher HA, Ashford AJ, Raghavan R. A peroxide-responding sRNA evolved from a peroxidase mRNA. bioRxiv. 2012:2021.10.18.464853. doi: 10.1093/molbev/msac020. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Cohen O, Ashkenazy H, Belinky F, Huchon D, Pupko T. GLOOME: Gain loss mapping engine. Bioinformatics. 2010;26:2914–2915. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btq549. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Raghavan R, Kacharia FR, Millar JA, Sislak CD, Ochman H. Genome rearrangements can make and break small RNA genes. Genome Biol Evol. 2015;7:557–566. doi: 10.1093/gbe/evv009. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Qian Z, Adhya S. DNA repeat sequences: Diversity and versatility of functions. Curr Genet. 2017;63:411–416. doi: 10.1007/s00294-016-0654-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Thomason MK, Bischler T, Eisenbart SK, Förstner KU, Zhang A, et al. Global transcriptional start site mapping using differential RNA sequencing reveals novel antisense rnas in Escherichia coli. J Bacteriol. 2015;197:18–28. doi: 10.1128/JB.02096-14. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Wachter S, Raghavan R, Wachter J, Minnick MF. Identification of novel mites (miniature inverted-repeat transposable elements) in Coxiella burnetii: Implications for protein and small RNA evolution. BMC Genomics. 2018;19:247. doi: 10.1186/s12864-018-4608-y. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Johnson CM, Chen Y, Lee H, Ke A, Weaver KE, et al. Identification of a conserved branched RNA structure that functions as a factor-independent terminator. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2014;111:3573–3578. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1315374111. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Updegrove TB, Shabalina SA, Storz G. How do base-pairing small RNAs evolve? FEMS Microbiol Rev. 2015;39:379–391. doi: 10.1093/femsre/fuv014. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Dutcher HA, Raghavan R. Origin, evolution, and loss of bacterial small rnas. Microbiol Spectr. 2018;6 doi: 10.1128/microbiolspec.RWR-0004-2017. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Supplementary material 2

Articles from Microbiology are provided here courtesy of Microbiology Society

RESOURCES