Abstract
Microvessels-on-a-chip have enabled in vitro studies to closely simulate in vivo microvessel environment. However, assessing microvessel permeability, a functional measure of microvascular exchange, has not been attainable in nonpermeable microfluidic platforms. This study developed a new approach that enables permeability coefficients (Ps) to be quantified in microvessels developed in nonpermeable chip platforms by integrating avidin-biotin technology. Microvessels were developed on biotinylated fibronectin-coated microfluidic channels. Solute transport was assessed by perfusing microvessels with fluorescence-labeled avidin. Avidin molecules that crossed endothelium were captured by substrate biotin and recorded with real-time confocal images. The Ps was derived from the rate of avidin-biotin accumulation at the substrate relative to solute concentration difference across microvessel wall. Avidin tracers with different physiochemical properties were used to characterize the barrier properties of the microvessel wall. The measured baseline Ps and inflammatory mediator-induced increases in Ps and endothelial cell (EC) [Ca2+]i resembled those observed in intact microvessels. Importantly, the spatial accumulation of avidin-biotin at substrate defines the transport pathways. Glycocalyx layer is well formed on endothelium and its degradation increased transcellular transport without affecting EC junctions. This study demonstrated that in vitro microvessels developed in this simply designed microfluidics structurally possess in vivo-like glycocalyx layer and EC junctions and functionally recapitulate basal barrier properties and stimuli-induced responses observed in intact microvessels. This new approach overcomes the limitations of nonpermeable microfluidics and provides an easily executed highly reproducible in vitro microvessel model with in vivo microvessel functionality, suitable for a wide range of applications in blood and vascular research and drug development.
NEW & NOTEWORTHY Our study developed a novel method that allows permeability coefficient to be measured in microvessels developed in nonpermeable microfluidic platforms using avidin-biotin technology. It overcomes the major limitation of nonpermeable microfluidic system and provides a simply designed easily executed and highly reproducible in vitro microvessel model with permeability accessibility. This model with in vivo-like endothelial junctions, glycocalyx, and permeability properties advances microfluidics in microvascular research, suitable for a wide range of biomedical and clinical applications.
Listen to this article's corresponding podcast at https://ajpheart.podbean.com/e/new-permeability-assessment-of-microvessels-on-a-chip/.
Keywords: application of avidin-biotin interaction, glycocalyx, microvessel permeability, microvessels-on-a-chip, solute transport pathways
INTRODUCTION
Microvessels are the site for fluid and solutes exchange between blood and surrounding tissues and are essential to the goal of circulation. The permeability properties of microvascular walls determine the selectivity of all pathways across microvessel wall for fluid and solutes transport and are critical for the exchange function. Clinical and experimental evidence indicate that increased vascular permeability results in tissue edema, driving the deleterious consequences of many disease-associated vascular complications. It is thus important to assess permeability properties of the microvessels under investigation to identify critical factors that initiate permeability increases and contribute to the progression of microvascular barrier dysfunction. Such information is crucial to a better understanding of the pathogenesis of cardiovascular diseases and to the development of novel therapeutic approaches.
Permeability measurements have been used for the assessment of microvessel barrier function in vivo or ex vivo in whole animal, organ, and individually perfused microvessels, as well as in vitro using cultured microvascular endothelial cells (ECs) (1, 2). Based on current literature information, the baseline permeability of cultured EC monolayers typically is orders of magnitude higher than those measured in intact microvessels, which manifests a proinflammatory phenotype (2). Recent advancements in microfluidic technologies have enabled in vitro cell culture conditions to closely simulate the in vivo tissue environment (3). ECs grown in microfluidics with continuous flow have shown in vivo-like endothelial junctions and surface layer of glycocalyx (4–7). The engineered vascular networks have demonstrated comparable microvascular structures and stimuli-induced cellular responses to those observed in intact microvessels (3–11). Increasing evidence indicates that cultured microvascular networks have great potentials for a broad range of human disease-related studies, such as angiogenesis, thrombosis, hemodynamic impact on ECs, blood cell/EC interactions, tumor metastases, and stimuli-induced EC [Ca2+]i and nitric oxide signals (4–9). However, acquiring quantitative assessment of microvessel permeability, an important functional measure of microvessels, has not been attainable in all chip platforms. The commonly used polydimethysiloxane (PDMS)-based microfluidic devices in the absence of hydrogel implantation are impermeable for solute transport and, therefore, are not suitable for permeability measurements. Permeability assessments often require more complex microfluidic designs, such as diffusive hydrogel-based platforms, two-layer membrane-based microfluidics, or self-assembled vascular networks within hydrogel matrices (7, 10–17). In addition, the variable diffusive property of each matrix composition requires detailed characterizations of solute transfer within each microfluidic scaffold to achieve a standardized quantification of microvessel permeability (8, 13, 18). These complexities have thus prevented the quantitative assessments of permeability as a standard functional measure of microvessels in many chip platforms.
Recently, avidin-biotin interactions have been used in static cultured EC monolayers to illustrate local leakages and transport pathways (19, 20). In this study, we applied the avidin-biotin technology to microfluidic microvascular networks and provide an easily implemented method to quantify permeability coefficients in microvessels grown in PDMS-based devices. Using this approach, we delineated the temporal and spatial changes in permeability coefficients to solutes with different physicochemical properties and transport pathways under both control and stimulated conditions. The importance of assessing permeability coefficients such as Ps over commonly used fluorescence intensity measurements of transported molecules (19–21) is that permeability coefficients incorporate the driving force for solute and fluid transport, vessel geometry, and the surface area for transport into the equation, representing the true permeability properties of the vascular wall, and therefore could be used to compare permeability properties of the vascular wall between studies or cross platforms. The quantitative measures of permeability coefficients presented here enable the barrier function of microvessels developed in different chip platforms to be compared with those measured in intact microvessels and, therefore, further validate their utilities for biomedical applications.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Microfluidic Device Design and Fabrication
The microchannel pattern is designed as a two-level branched microchannel network with channel widths at 120 µm and 60 µm and a uniform height of 80 µm. Standard photolithography was used for the master mold fabrication and PDMS soft lithography was used for the microfluidic microchannel network fabrication. The base was formed by a glass coverslip (No. 1) spin-coated with a thin layer of PDMS to permit high-resolution imaging. At the distal end of each mother channel, an inlet and an outlet were created with a biopsy punch for cell loading, media, reagent perfusion, and perfusate collection. The schematic design of the device is shown in Fig. 1A. The shear stress distribution within the microchannel network was simulated by COMSOL Multiphysics modeling software and illustrated in Fig. 1B. Calculations were based on device geometry, a 0.22 µL/min perfusion rate and a culture medium viscosity at 37°C. Details have been previously described (4, 6).
Figure 1.
Schematic illustration of the microfluidics and sheer stress distribution within microchannel networks. A: microfluidic pattern, channel diameters, and perfusion illustration. B: simulation of wall shear stress distribution within the microchannel networks via COMSOL Multiphysics modeling software, which was based on device geometry, a 0.22 µL/min perfusion rate, and a culture medium viscosity at 37°C. C: endothelial cells under culture in microchannels (bright field). D: confocal images of the vascular wall endothelial cells outlined by Calcein Red at X–Y and X–Z focal planes of the microchannels.
In Vitro Microvessel Development in Microchannel Networks
Each device was first loaded with deionized water and sterilized with UV light for 8 h. After sterilization, microchannels were rinsed with phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) and coated with fibronectin solution (100 μg/mL, Cat. No. PHE0023, Gibco) containing biotin (0.25 mg/mL, Cat. No. 21338, Thermo Fisher Scientific) overnight at 4°C. The device was then rinsed with PBS to remove the free coating solution and reloaded with culture medium followed by a 15-min incubation at 37°C before cell seeding. Primary rat dermal microvascular endothelial cells (RDMECs) and culture medium were purchased from Cell Biologics (Cat. No. M1266 and RA-6064). Cultured RDMECs between passages 2 and 5 were used for this study. RDMECs in suspension were loaded into channels from the device inlet and cultured in 5% CO2 incubator at 37°C without perfusion for ∼5 to 6 h to allow cell adhesion to the coating layer along the microchannels. Additional cell loading and gentle device titling were used to achieve uniform cell adhesion at the desired cell density. After cell seeding, culture medium was perfused into the microchannels at a constant flow rate of 0.22 μL/min through an inlet tubing connected to a motor pump (Harvard Apparatus Holliston, MA). After 2 to 3 days of culture, the in vitro microvessels were well formed and ready for experiments (Fig. 1C). Details have been previously described (4).
Confocal Fluorescence Imaging
Leica TCS SP8 confocal system with solid-state lasers and hybrid detectors (HyDs) were used for fluorescence imaging. Leica ×40 objective (NA 1.3) was used for image acquisitions except where noted otherwise. The excitation and emission laser wavelength settings used for each fluorescent tracer are listed in appendix Table A1.
Table A1.
Excitation/emission wavelengths used for confocal images with fluorescence labeling
| Tracer | Excitation Laser, nm | Emission Setting, nm |
|---|---|---|
| FITC-Avidin | 488 | 510–530 |
| RPE-NeutrAvidin | 552 | 570–590 |
| Qdot-streptavidin | 638 | 660–690 |
| Fluo-4 AM | 488 | 510–530 |
| Texas Red-Avidin | 638 | 650–680 |
| DAPI | 405 | 440–460 |
| Calcein Red | 552 | 570–590 |
| FITC-lectin | 488 | 510–530 |
RPE, R-Phycoerythrin.
For immunofluorescent staining of vascular endothelial (VE)-cadherin, RDMECs were fixed with 2% paraformaldehyde and blocked with 1% bovine serum, followed by 0.1% Triton X-100 for permeabilization before staining for VE-cadherin (primary antibody, Cat. No. SC-6458, Santa Cruz; secondary antibody, Cat. No. A-11055, donkey-anti-goat IgG, Life Technologies). Fluorescence images were obtained after nuclei staining with DAPI for 10 min (300 nM).
Fluo-4 AM was used to measure EC intracellular calcium concentration ([Ca2+]i). Devices with well-developed microvessel networks were first perfused with Fluo-4 AM (5 µM, Cat. No. F23917, Life Technologies) in 1% BSA-Ringer solution for 40 min, followed by BSA-Ringer perfusion alone for 5 min to wash the free Fluo-4 AM from the vessel lumen before collecting baseline images. Platelet-activating factor (PAF; 10 nM, Sigma) that has known effects on EC [Ca2+]i and microvessel permeability (22) was selected as a representative agonist to induce increases in EC [Ca2+]i and permeability in RDMEC-formed microvessels. Calcium and permeability images were recorded simultaneously for this set of experiment.
Visualization of glycocalyx on ECs was achieved by FITC-lectin staining (5 µM, Cat. No. F14201, Life Technologies). Calcein Red (3 µM) and DAPI (300 nM) were used to outline ECs and nuclei, respectively. Images were collected before and after perfusion with either 10 nM PAF or 10 µM hydrogen peroxide for up to 30 min. The images of calcein-labeled vascular wall ECs at X–Z focal planes are shown in Fig. 1D. The cross-sectional image at X–Z focal plane was acquired using the super Z-galvanometric stage. The thickness of glycocalyx was quantified by measuring the height (number of pixels) of FITC-lectin-labeled glycocalyx above Calcein Red-labeled endothelial cells on the X–Z cross-sectional confocal images and converted to the length based on the system calibration at 0.042 µm/pixel. Leica SP8 confocal hybrid detector offers near zero noise. The signal-to-noise ratio of FITC-lectin is ∼15–30:1.
Measurements of Solute Permeability Coefficient Using Biotin-Avidin Interaction in Microvessels-on-a-Chip Networks
The quantification of solute permeability coefficient (Ps) was slightly modified from Ps measurements in individually perfused microvessels based on Fick’s first law where Ps is a measure of solute flux (Js) per unit area of microvessel wall (A) in relation to the solute concentration difference (ΔC) across the microvessel wall (23)
| (1) |
At the beginning of the experiment, ΔC is equal to the initial concentration of the solute in the vessel lumen (C0) due to the negligible amount of the solute at extracellular space. The value of C0 represents the initial number of molecules (N0) per vessel lumen volume (Vc), C0 = N0/Vc, and Js is calculated from the rate of the molecules across the endothelium.
| (2) |
As the fluorescence intensity (I) recorded in the images is in proportion to the number of solute molecules (Fig. 2A), Eq. 2 is then be converted to the following:
| (3) |
Figure 2.
Fluorescence intensity calibration of the microfluidic device. A: linear relationships between the molecule fluorescence intensity and the molecule concentration. Each avidin tracer was perfused into microfluidic networks in the absence of endothelial cells (ECs) and biotin coating, and the fluorescence intensity (FI) in the vessel lumen is plotted as a function of tracer concentration. B: the coating layer biotin-binding capacity to FITC-Avidin. Microfluidic device coated with fibronectin solution containing biotin (0.25 mg/mL) in the absence of ECs was perfused with FITC-Avidin at the experimental concentration of 0.09 µM in 1% BSA-Ringer solution. During image collections, the channel lumen was briefly perfused with tracer-free 1% BSA-Ringer solution and resumed tracer perfusion right after. Images were collected at different FITC-Avidin perfusion time (B1). The recoded FI represents the FITC-Avidin captured by biotin at the coating layer and the measured FI values are shown in B2. The increased FI as a function of FITC-Avidin perfusion time is plotted in B3. The time-dependent increases in FITC-Avidin binding reached mean FI of 224 AU after 90 min of perfusion, which is far beyond the biotin-binding capacity required for our experiments. All tests presented in A and B were conducted under the same image settings as those used for experimental image collections. AU, arbitrary unit; RPE, R-Phycoerythrin.
For cylindrical geometry of the vessels, equals half the radius. Our microfluidic channels have a rectangular geometry (Fig. 1D) where is equal to where a and b are the width and height of the channel, respectively. Ps calculation of the microvessels in microfluidic devices was thus
| (4) |
In this study, the solute flux is the rate of avidin tracers across the endothelium. Each Avidin, Streptavidin, or NeutrAvidin protein can bind up to four biotin molecules with kinetics of 7 × 107 M−1·s−1 (24, 25). This fast reaction rate suggests that the diffusion of avidin to its binding site is one of the rate-limiting factors for their interaction (24). Based on the fast-binding kinetics and high binding affinity between biotin and avidin, as well as sufficient biotin available for avidin binding (ratio of avidin to biotin at 1:10,000) under our experimental conditions, we assume that all the avidin molecules crossed ECs were immediately captured and immobilized by substrate biotin, forming stable biotin-avidin complex, and were not diffusible molecules anymore. Therefore, the rate of biotin-avidin complex formation (dI/dt, the slope of the FI profile) represents the solute flux, which is diffusion controlled, whereas the amount of the immobilized biotin-avidin accumulation at the coating layer should not affect the diffusion process. Since the PDMS channel is impermeable to both solute and liquid, there was no convective transport and the diffusible solute outside of EC layer is negligible. The binding between biotin and avidin, due to the high binding strength, is near irreversible, and the formation of biotin-avidin complex is cumulative. Based on the characterizations of biotin-avidin interaction, Ps was then calculated based on the slope of accumulated Avidin FI (dI/dt) at substrate, the tracer FI in the vessel lumen (I0) during vessel perfusion, and the vessel dimension (Eq. 4). The transport pathways of each tracer were differentiated by the spatial distribution of the tracers at substrate in relation to the cell structures in the vessel wall. Different size and charge of fluorescence-labeled Avidin, Neutr-Avidin, and Strept-Avidin were used for Ps measurements, which are FITC-Avidin, R-Phycoerythrin (RPE)-Neutr-Avidin, nanoparticle (Qdot 800)-Strept-Avidin, and Texas Red-Avidin. Leica TCS SP-8 confocal system and a Leica ×25 objective (NA, 0.95) were used for image collection. Each fluorescent tracer was perfused into microvessel networks at a concentration of 0.09 µM in 1% BSA-Ringer solution.
To assure sufficient binding capacity of biotin to avidin molecules crossed EC layer, the concentration ratio of avidin tracer to biotin at coating layer was ∼1:10,000 (0.09 µM:1 mM) in all experiments. The linearity of the lumen tracer fluorescence intensity (FI) as a function of tracer concentration is shown in Fig. 2A, which was conducted in microchannels in the absence of ECs and biotin coating. The binding capacity of biotin at the coating layer to avidin molecules was tested in FITC-Avidin (0.09 µM) perfused biotin-coated microchannels in the absence of ECs. Image settings in all tests were identical to those used in the experiment. Images shown in Fig. 2B1 were acquired during the brief perfusion of tracer-free solution to wash away the unbound tracer in the channel lumen, and therefore, the FI recorded was only from the FITC-Avidin that was bound to biotin at coating layer (Fig. 2, B2–B3). Results showed that FITC-Avidin binding to biotin at coating layer continuously increased in a time-dependent manner and the FI was up to 223.78 (arbitrary units, AU) after 90 min perfusion, far beyond the maximum FI detected during the experiments. These results provide experimental evidence that the coating layer has sufficient biotin to catch all the avidin molecules crossed ECs under our experimental conditions.
In permeability studies, all images were captured in the absence of free tracer in the vessel lumen, i.e., the vessel networks were briefly perfused with tracer-free solution during image collection and resumed tracer perfusion right after. This step not only washed away residual molecules in the vessel lumen and any fluid containing free unbound avidin molecules in the channel including fluid at cell junctions to make sure the FI measured represents the amount of avidin flux captured by the substrate biotin, but also resets the concentration gradient and lumen background to their initial states for each image collected. Baseline permeability was measured during 20 min of tracer perfusion and platelet-activating factor (PAF, 10 nM) was applied after baseline measurements. Stacks of images were acquired with a 1,024 × 1,024-pixel scan format at 0.35-μm z-step in 2-min intervals. Mean FI was quantified from identical segments of vessels before and after stimulus application. Three consecutive focal planes from each Z-stack confocal images were used for FI quantification and data were derived from four segments of the microfluidic channels from each device. Each set of experiments was conducted in greater than or equal to four devices, and the n is the mean of each device, presented as means ± SE. To ensure robust and unbiased results for rigorous and reproducible scientific findings, cross checking results, blinded data analyses, and appropriate statistical analyses were used for data processing.
RESULTS
Continuous Flow in Microfluidics Facilitates the Formation of In Vivo-like Adherens Junctions between Endothelial Cells
Junctions between ECs play important roles in regulating microvascular barrier function, and vascular endothelial (VE)-cadherin is a major adhesion molecule of adherens junctions between ECs. To evaluate the EC junctions in RDMEC-formed microvessels, VE-cadherin was immuno-labeled in microfluidic microvessels and its distribution pattern was compared with those in intact rat mesenteric venules and RDMECs grown under static culture conditions. Figure 3A shows well-formed VE-cadherin between RDMECs in microfluidic microvessel networks. Importantly, its smooth and continuous distribution at cell junctions reflected the characteristics of the rat venules in vivo (Fig. 3B) (6), which was in contrast to the stitching pattern commonly observed in ECs cultured under static conditions (Fig. 3C). The formation of in vivo-like adherens junctions in microvessels grown in microfluidics indicates that flow plays an important role in junctional formation between ECs and that our microfluidic cell culture conditions enabled an in vitro environment closer to the physiological in vivo setting when compared with static cell culture conditions.
Figure 3.
In vivo-like vascular endothelial (VE)-cadherin formation between endothelial cells (ECs) grown in microfluidic channels. A: VE-cadherin distribution of rat dermal microvascular ECs (RDMECs) within the perfused microchannel networks, which is similar to the pattern observed in intact rat mesenteric venule [B, previously published in Ref. 6 used with permission]. C: VE-cadherin distribution of RDMECs cultured under static conditions. VE-cadherin was conjugated with FITC (green), and cell nucleus was stained with DAPI (blue).
Baseline Permeability Coefficients of the In Vitro Microvessels
The baseline permeability coefficients (Ps) to fluorescence-labeled avidin tracers, FITC-Avidin, RPE-Neutr-Avidin, and Qdot-Strept-Avidin, were measured during perfusion of BSA-Ringer solution containing each of the tracers at a concentration of 0.09 µM in microvessel networks (1 tracer per device, n = 8 devices/group). The baseline Ps values of three tracers are summarized in Fig. 4A. The mean baseline Ps to FITC-Avidin (66–69 kDa, isoelectric point, pI, at 10.5) was 2.83 ± 0.06 × 10−6 cm/s, which falls into the range of the Ps to albumin (similar molecular mass to Avidin) measured in isolated rat skeletal muscle venules, and is ∼5 times higher than that measured in rat mesentery venules (26–28). RPE-Neutr-Avidin is a large fluorescent-labeled deglycosylated avidin with pI at 4.8 (RPE) and 6.5 (Neutr-Avidin), respectively. Its molecular mass is ∼4.5 times larger than FITC-Avidin. The Ps for this large RPE-Neutr-Avidin is 0.91 ± 0.01 × 10−6 cm/s, which is ∼30% of the Ps value of FITC-Avindin. Confocal images in Fig. 4B (left 3 columns) illustrate that a minimal or invisible amount of FITC-Avidin and RPE-Neutr-Avidin crossed endothelium under basal conditions. The streptavidin linked Qdot 800-conjugate is an even larger molecule with size ∼15 to 20 nm. However, these large molecules, likely due to the amphiphilic property of coated Qdot (29), enable to cross the cell membrane. The baseline images of Qdot-Strept-Avidin in Fig. 4B show a uniform, low level of Qdot-Strept-Avidin binding at substrate nonnuclear regions, indicating that these molecules crossed endothelium through transcellular pathways as opposed to paracellular pathways. The measured baseline Ps for Qdot-Strept-Avidin is 11.37 ± 0.30 × 10−6 cm/s, the highest value among the three tracers. More prominent distinctions of the tracer accumulation patterns are illustrated under stimulated conditions with increased permeability (results of the next section).
Figure 4.

Permeability coefficient (Ps) measurements in in vitro microfluidic microvessels under basal and stimulated conditions. A: summary results of baseline Ps to FITC-Avidin, R-Phycoerythrin (RPE)-Neutr-Avidin, and Qdot-Strept-Avidin (n = 8/group). B: confocal images showing the transport of FITC-Avidin, RPE-Neutr-Avidin, and Qdot-Strept-Avidin under baseline and platelet-activating factor (PAF 10 nM) stimulated conditions. The images illustrate the time-dependent accumulation of each avidin tracer across endothelium and stabilized on spot by substrate biotin. The spatial pattern of avidin accumulation outlines the transport pathways (paracellular vs. transcellular). C: schematic illustration of PAF-induced increases in avidin transport and the transport pathways correlating to the pattern of each avidin tracer accumulation shown in B. D–F: summary graph showing the overlay plot of the time-dependent cumulative fluorescence intensity (FI) profile of each avidin tracer and the calculated values of Ps to that tracer as a function of PAF perfusion time (n = 4/group). G: summary graph showing PAF-induced peak increases in Ps to each tracer relative to its baseline control (n = 4/group). Paired t test was used for statistical analysis. ***P < 0.0004 and ****P < 0.0001. AU, arbitrary unit. n is the number of devices used in each group.
Platelet-Activating Factor Increases Permeability Coefficient of the In Vitro Microvessels
PAF, an inflammatory mediator, has been demonstrated to cause transient increases in permeability and gap formation between ECs in intact rat mesenteric venules (30, 31). In this study, we used PAF to assess the changes in Ps and define the transport pathways in microfluidic microvessels. After measuring baseline Ps to an individual tracer, each device was perfused with PAF (10 nM) in the presence of the same concentration of tracer as that used for control. The confocal images were then collected every 2 min for 16 min during PAF perfusion (Fig. 4B). The changes in fluorescence intensity (FI) and the calculated Ps of each tracer as a function of PAF perfusion time are plotted in Fig. 4, D–F (n = 4 devices/group). The FI curve of each tracer represents the cumulative tracer molecules captured by biotin at substrate over time and the slope of the FI increase is the tracer accumulation rate (dI/dt), i.e., the solute flux. The plateau of the FI curve indicates the termination of the increased solute flux. The PAF-induced increases in Ps to each tracer derived from dI/dt are overlaid with the FI curve. A transient increase in Ps was observed in all three tracers. The increased Ps peaked 6–8 min after the start of PAF application and returned to control values in 14–16 min.
The Ps to FITC-Avidin increased from a mean baseline of 2.91 ± 0.1 × 10−6 cm/s to a peak of 23.60 ± 0.52 × 10−6 cm/s at 8 min of PAF perfusion, which is 8.13 ± 0.19 times that of the control (Fig. 4, D and G). The confocal images in Fig. 4B (top row) illustrate the spatial distribution of the crossed FITC-Avidin at substrate over a 16 min of PAF exposure. The crossed tracer molecules localized along all junctions between ECs in a relatively uniform pattern, indicating that all ECs reacted to PAF in a similar manner and the transport of FITC-Avidin was through intercellular gaps formed between ECs. The Ps to RPE-Neutr-Avidin increased from a mean base value of 0.90 ± 0.03 × 10−6 cm/s to a peak of 4.11 ± 0.09 × 10−6 cm/s, ∼4.56 times that of the control (Fig. 4, E and G). This larger RPE-Neutr-Avidin molecule was only detected at tricellular junctions, where three cells meet and often form larger gaps than those at bilateral junctions (Fig. 4B, middle row). These results indicate that the transport of both FITC-Avidin and RPE-Neutr-Avidin is through paracellular pathways and that the sizes of the gaps and the size of the solute determine the magnitude of the flux. In contrast to the spatial accumulation patterns of FITC-Avidin and RPE-Neutr-Avidin, the transport of Qdot-Strept-Avidin is notably through the whole cell layer, i.e., transcellular pathways (Fig. 4B, bottom row). The Ps to Qdot-Strept-Avidin increased from a baseline of 11.95 ± 0.19 × 10−6 cm/s to a peak of 125.02 ± 3.60 × 10−6 cm/s at 6 min of the PAF perfusion (10.46-fold increase, Fig. 4, F and G). The PAF-induced peak increases in Ps for each tracer relative to its baseline control are summarized in Fig. 4G. Figure 4C provides the schematic illustration of the transport pathways simulating the pattern of each tracer accumulation as shown in Fig. 4B.
PAF-Induced Increases in EC [Ca2+]i and Permeability Coefficient
Previous studies conducted in intact microvessels demonstrated that the agonist-induced increase in EC [Ca2+]i is an initiation signal for EC gap formation and subsequent increases in microvessel permeability (22, 30, 32–35). However, EC [Ca2+]i and permeability were measured in separate experiments. In this study, we are able to measure the changes in Ps and EC [Ca2+]i simultaneously, which enables us to precisely define their temporal relation upon PAF application. EC [Ca2+]i was measured with a fluorescent Ca2+ indicator, Fluo-4. After loading Fluo-4 am into ECs lining the microchannel networks, the free Fluo-4 AM in the vessel lumen was washed out with BSA-Ringer perfusion before collecting images for baseline and PAF-induced increases in EC [Ca2+]i. [Ca2+]i images were collected at 15-s intervals. The changes in Ps were assessed with perfusion of Texas Red-Avidin in the same vessel segment where [Ca2+]i images were collected. The images of Texas Red-Avidin accumulation were collected at 2-min intervals consistent with measurement of Ps alone. Figure 5A shows the representative images of Fluo-4 FI changes and the accumulation of Texas Red-Avidin before and after PAF exposure at selected time points. Figure 5B shows the overlay of the FI profile of Texas Red-Avidin and the Ps changes as a function of time following PAF (10 nM) application (n = 4 devices). Ps to Texas Red-Avidin increased from a mean base value of 2.46 ± 0.24 × 10−6 cm/s to a peak of 21.74 ± 1.19 × 10−6 cm/s 8 min after the start of PAF perfusion and declined close to the basal level at 16 min, a pattern and magnitude of Ps increase similar to that of FITC-Avidin (Fig. 4D). Figure 5C plots the time course of PAF-induced increases in EC [Ca2+]i against that of the Ps (n = 4 devices). Results showed that EC [Ca2+]i increased immediately following PAF application and reached a peak value at 4.65 ± 0.09 times that of the control in 3 min. However, Ps did not increase till ∼2 min after the start of PAF perfusion and reached its peak in 6 min, demonstrating a 5-min separation between the two peaks. The overlay plot (Fig. 5C) illustrates the temporal relationship between these two sequential events.
Figure 5.
Platelet-activating factor (PAF)-induced increases in endothelial cell (EC) [Ca2+]i and permeability coefficient (Ps) to Texas Red-Avidin in microfluidic microvessels. A: confocal images showing the simultaneous changes in EC [Ca2+]i and Texas Red-Avidin transport before and after the start of PAF perfusion for 4 and 10 min. Green channel shows PAF-induced changes in Fluo-4 fluorescence intensity (FI) representing the changes in EC [Ca2+]i and the red channel shows PAF-induced Texas Red-Avidin accumulation at the substrate of the vessel wall. B: the overlay plot of the cumulative fluorescence intensity (FI) of Texas Red-Avidin and the calculated Ps as a function of PAF perfusion time (n = 4 devices per group). C: the superimposed plot of PAF-induced increases in EC [Ca2+]i and Ps to Texas Red-Avidin as a function of time following PAF perfusion, illustrating their temporal relationship (n = 4 devices/group). AU, arbitrary unit.
Role of Glycocalyx in Microvessel Permeability
Glycocalyx has been implicated to play an important role in microvessel barrier function (36, 37), and glycocalyx degradation was often associated with oxidative stress under disease conditions (38–43). Currently, the direct impact of degraded glycocalyx on microvessel permeability remains controversial (36, 44–46). Here, we first demonstrated that microvessels developed in microfluidics possess a well-formed layer of glycocalyx on the surface of endothelium. The control image in Fig. 6A illustrates FITC-lectin-labeled glycocalyx lining the vessel wall at an X–Z focal plane. The mean thickness of FITC-lectin-labeled glycocalyx was 422 ± 17 nm under control conditions (averaged from 5 devices and 5 regions per device), which fell into the thickness range of glycocalyx reported in mammalian capillaries (36, 38, 47).
Figure 6.

Glycocalyx and its role in basal and PAF-induced permeability increase in microfluidic microvessels. A: representative confocal images showing FITC-lectin-labeled glycocalyx (green) and Calcein Red-labeled endothelial cells at X–Z focal plane of the vessel wall. Microfluidic microvessels possess a well-formed glycocalyx layer (green) above endothelium under control conditions (top image). The bottom three confocal images show time-dependent degradation of glycocalyx during perfusion of H2O2 at 10 µM. A complete depletion of glycocalyx occurred at 20 min of H2O2 perfusion. B: confocal images demonstrating time-dependent accumulation of FITC-Avidin (green, top row) and Qdot-Strept-Avidin (yellow, bottom row) at endothelial cell (EC) substrate during H2O2 (10 µM) perfusion (left 2 columns) followed by the application of PAF (10 nM, right 3 columns). Calcein Red was used to outline ECs in images of the top row. DAPI (blue) was used to outline EC nuclei in images at the bottom row. C: superimposed time courses of the Ps changes during H2O2 perfusion and the application of PAF with and without the initial perfusion of H2O2. Orange curves are the time courses of Ps to Qdot-Strept-Avidin (left y-axis) and green curves are the time courses of Ps to FITC-Avidin (right y-axis), n = 4 devices/group. D: summary results of the Ps values under control, after glycocalyx degradation by H2O2 perfusion and PAF-induced peak increases in Ps in the presence and absence of glycocalyx. The left two columns with green color are Ps to FITC-Avidin and the right two columns with purple color are Ps to Qdot-Strept-Avidin. Each column data are paired experiments conducted in the same vessel segment (n = 4 devices/group). Paired t test was used for paired data comparisons and one-way ANOVA is used for between-group comparisons. NS P > 0.3, *P = 0.01, ****P < 0.00001. NS, not significant; PAF, platelet-activating factor.
To investigate the role of glycocalyx in microvessel permeability, we perfused the microvessels with a pathologically relevant concentration of H2O2 (10 µM) and illustrated a time-dependent glycocalyx degradation and concomitant changes in Ps to different solutes with real-time confocal imaging. The time-dependent changes in glycocalyx during H2O2 perfusion are illustrated in Fig. 6A with simultaneously labeled ECs (Calcein Red) and glycocalyx (FITC-lectin) at a cross-sectional view (X–Z focal plane). Images demonstrated that 20 min of H2O2 perfusion at 10 µM caused a complete depletion of glycocalyx. Ps to Qdot-Strept-Avidin and FITC-Avidin were measured before and during H2O2 perfusion. Images in Fig. 6B (left 2 columns) and Fig. 6C demonstrate that H2O2-induced depletion of glycocalyx did not cause significant changes in Ps to FITC-Avidin but increased Ps to Qdot-Strept-Avidin through transcellular pathways. Ps to Qdot-Strept-Avidin started to increase at 8 min of H2O2 perfusion, correlating to a partial glycocalyx degradation shown in Fig. 6A. At 20 min of H2O2 perfusion, Ps increased from a baseline of 11.53 ± 0.34 × 10−6 cm/s to 83.45 ± 3.98 × 10−6 cm/s, 7.24 ± 0.26 times that of the control. In contrast, Ps to FITC-Avidin showed no significant increase after 20 min of H2O2 perfusion and the images in Fig. 6B confirmed no significant accumulation of FITC-Avidin at EC junctions, indicating that H2O2 perfusion for 20 min with depleted glycocalyx did not affect EC junctions.
We then examined the effect of impaired glycocalyx on PAF-induced permeability increases. PAF was applied to vessel lumen after 20 min of H2O2 perfusion in each device. Upon PAF application, Ps to Qdot-Strept-Avidin further increased to a peak value of 138.58 ± 1.95 × 10−6 cm/s in 2 min. The mean peak value was slightly higher (P = 0.01) than that measured with intact glycocalyx, but the time to peak was 4 min faster than that of PAF application alone. Ps to FITC-Avidin increased from 3.77 ± 0.11 × 10−6 cm/s (after H2O2 perfusion for 20 min) to a peak value of 27.04 ± 0.67 × 10−6 cm/s 6 min after the start of PAF perfusion. The peak values of Ps to FITC-Avidin were not significantly different from vessels with intact glycocalyx, but the time to peak was 2 min faster with depleted glycocalyx. The Ps increases in the presence and absence of glycocalyx are shown in Fig. 6C, and the results are summarized in Fig. 6D (n = 4 devices/group).
DISCUSSION
Our study introduces a novel method that allows the microvessel permeability coefficient (Ps) to be measured in nonpermeable microfluidic platforms using avidin-biotin technology. This approach overcomes the limitations of nonpermeable microfluidic platforms and permits not only quantitative assessments of permeability properties of the microvessel wall but also spatial illustration of solute transport pathways. Using this newly developed approach, our study demonstrated that microvessels developed in a PDMS-based chip platform structurally possess in vivo-like EC junctions and glycocalyx surface layer and functionally recapitulate the basal barrier properties and Ps and EC [Ca2+]i responses to inflammatory stimuli observed in intact microvessels. Permeability measurement is a critical assessment of the barrier function of microvessel wall, which has not been easily implanted in most of the microvessel-on-a chip models. This newly developed permeability assessment approach overcomes the major limitation of nonpermeable microfluidic platforms and offers a well-characterized in vitro microvessel model for a wide range of applications in human disease studies and pharmaceutical screening.
Permeability Assessments in Microvessels-on-Chip Platforms
Microvessels in vivo have multiple layers of barrier contributing to the selectivity and quantity of fluid and solute transport, which are the surface layer of glycocalyx, endothelium, basement membrane, and surrounding perivascular cells such as pericytes or smooth muscle cells. Under basal conditions, glycocalyx and endothelium are the main barriers excluding macromolecules across the vascular wall (1). Under chronic inflammatory conditions, when the glycocalyx and endothelial barriers are compromised, the basement membrane and perivascular cells could stabilize the vascular wall, serving as additional barriers to lessen the extent of increased permeability (31). Our single-channel-patterned microvessel network platform is composed of a single layer of endothelial cell-formed microvessels, lacking surrounding perivascular cells and in vivo-like extracellular matrices. However, this study demonstrates that microfluidic microvessels formed by a single layer of endothelial cells possess in vivo-like glycocalyx and junctional proteins and recapitulate the basal barrier function and EC responses to inflammatory stimuli of intact microvessels in vivo. These results indicate that the in vivo-like endothelial junctions and glycocalyx layer developed under continuous flow in microfluidic devices are the key components contributing to their barrier function, making distinctions from the proinflammatory phenotype often observed in endothelial monolayers cultured under static conditions (2, 36).
The hydrogel-coated microchannels or self-assembled microvascular networks within hydrogel matrices better represent the in vivo extracellular environment than ECs grown in collagen or fibronectin-coated none-permeable microfluidic channels. Those chip platforms make them well suited for investigations that focus on the influence of perivascular environment in microvascular development. However, the hydrogel-based platforms add additional complexity and variables for permeability assessment, such as composition-dependent diffusive properties of the hydrogel and the inconsistent patterns of self-assembled microvessel networks (21, 48). These variables create challenges for applications that require a reproducible in vitro microvessel model with controlled vascular patterns and flow dynamics, as well as consistent baseline permeability to serve as a standardized control before further experimentations. In addition, the hydrogel-based platforms often rely on electron microscopy or additional intracellular staining to define transport pathways. In contrast, the PDMS-based microfluidic devices used in our study are easy to create desired microchannel patterns with predictable flow dynamics under defined flow conditions. Importantly, the in vitro microvascular networks developed in such devices are highly reproducible. It also allows smaller channel diameters with longer term stability of microvessels than those developed in three-dimensional tissue scaffolds (7). Within microvasculature, postcapillary venules are the main sites of leakages during inflammation (1, 2). Studies conducted in individually perfused rat mesenteric venules showed that the diameters of those venules are in a range of 35–50 µm (22, 30, 34). The smaller microchannels used for this study have diameter of 60 µm, which is very close to in vivo venular diameters we have studied previously. Despite these unique features and advantages of PDMS-based microfluidic devices over other platforms, the major limitation of such chip platforms is the nonpermeable microchannels that prevent the assessments of permeability. Our newly developed in vitro microvessel model overcomes this limitation and presents an easily executed approach that enables the quantification of permeability coefficients to be conducted in nonpermeable microfluidic devices, as well as the direct visualization of solute transport pathways. This model advances the microfluidic technology and opens up a wide range of translational applications such as investigations of patient blood interactions with human microvascular ECs to detect pathological factors that increase permeability, to identify cellular and molecular signaling pathways that regulate permeability, and to conduct mechanistic investigations for drug delivery and screening processes.
Reviewing some of the microvessel permeability measurements conducted in intact and isolated microvessels (Table 1), the values vary based on the solute size and charge, as well as the selectivity or structural variations of the microvessel wall among species, tissue origin, and vessel type (23, 26–28, 49, 50, 52–54). Based on studies by Sarelius et al. (26), the Ps of albumin in venules is ∼3–4 times higher than that of arterioles measured in the same tissue, reflecting the differences in vessel wall cell composition and structure. The venular Ps in muscle microvessels in general is higher than those in mesenteries, reflective of their differences in organ or tissue origins (26–28, 51, 52). In this study, the microfluidic microvessels were developed from rat dermal microvessel ECs. Our measured basal Ps values to FITC-Avidin and Texas Red-Avidin (66–69 kDa) that have similar molecular mass to albumin (55) but carry positive charges (pI at 10.5) are in the range of Ps to albumin measured in intact muscle venules (26). RPE-Neutr-Avidin (300 kDa), a large fluorescence molecule conjugated deglycosylated avidin with increased mass and more neutral isoelectric points (4.8 for RPE and 6.5 for Neutr-Avidin) had ∼30% of the Ps value to FITC-Avidin, demonstrating the solute size selectivity of the microvessel wall. However, Qdot-Strept-Avidin (15–20 nm), the largest tracer we used for this study, was able to cross cell membrane and served as a useful tracer to assess solute transport through transcellular pathways. One advantage of using the nonpermeable chip platform is that the detected solute flux at biotin substrate is the result of net diffusion without convective (solvent drag) component and the influence of diffusion variations of the surrounding tissue.
Table 1.
Solute permeability values measured in intact vessel and microfluidic microvessels
| Species/Organ | Vessel Type | Solute | Baseline Ps 10−6 cm/s | Stimulation | Ps Peak 10−6 cm/s | Reference |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Frog mesentery | Venules | α-Lactalbumin | 2.1 | (23) | ||
| Albumin | 1.41 ± 0.67 | (27) | ||||
| LDL | 0.78 ± 0.14 | Ca Ionophore A23187 (5 µM) | 9.62 ± 1.56 | (49) | ||
| Dextran-20 | 0.32 ± 0.29 | 11.42 ± 1.57 | ||||
| Hamster mesentery | Venules | LDL | 0.27 | Histamine (100 µM) | 2.32 | (50) |
| Swine coronary | Venules | Albumin | 3.74 ± 0.45 | Histamine (10 µM) | 10.24 ± 1.97 | (51) |
| 1.48 ± 0.62 | (27) | |||||
| Mouse cremaster | Arterioles | Albumin | 0.99 ± 0.11 | (26) | ||
| Venules | 4.44 ± 0.79 | |||||
| Rat skeletal muscle | Arterioles | Albumin | 0.84 ± 0.13 | |||
| Venules | 2.50 ± 0.37 | |||||
| Rat mesentery | Venules | α-Lactalbumin | 5.0 ± 0.4 | TNF-α | 5.2 ± 0.6 | (52) |
| α-Lactalbumin | 4.4 ± 0.5 | VEGF (1 nM) | 15 ± 1.9 | (28) | ||
| Albumin | 0.49 ± 0.03 | 3.6 ± 0.32 | ||||
| 0.56 ± 0.20 | ||||||
| Rat dermal microvess-el ECs | In vitro microvessels in microfluidics | FITC-Avidin | 2.91 ± 0.1 | PAF (10 nM) | 23.60 ± 0.52 | This study |
| Texas Red-Avidin | 2.46 ± 0.24 | 21.74 ± 1.19 | ||||
| RPE-Neutr-Avidin | 0.90 ± 0.03 | 4.11 ± 0.09 | ||||
| Qdot-Strept-Avidin | 11.95 ± 0.19 | 125.02 ± 3.60 |
ECs, endothelial cell; PAF, platelet-activating factor; RPE, R-Phycoerythrin.
Solute Transport through Paracellular versus Transcellular Pathways
Cumulative research evidence indicated that solute and fluid transport across microvascular endothelium involve both transcellular and paracellular pathways (1). In continuous endothelium, the transcellular transport of certain small molecules is receptor-mediated and macromolecules such as albumin are transported by vesicles or cluster of caveolae and vesiculo-vacuolar organelles (VVOs, vesicle formed channels across ECs) (1, 56–59). Paracellular transport is regulated by the junctions between ECs and the openings or gaps formed between ECs upon exposure to inflammatory mediators have been considered as the primary pathways for increased permeability, especially in postcapillary venules (1, 30, 60, 61).
Paracellular transport under stimulated or inflammatory conditions has been evidenced by the junctional accumulations of carbon or fluorescent microspheres and by outlining EC borders with silver nitrate deposition through microscopic images and electron micrographs (30, 60–62). Studies showed that inflammatory mediators such as histamine, substance P, or PAF all cause transient increases in permeability. Importantly, the magnitude of increased permeability is correlated with the number and size of formed gaps, and the permeability recovery phase is associated with gap closure (30, 63). Our microfluidic in vitro microvessel studies resembled those findings. We observed transient increases in permeability upon PAF stimulation with peak occurred at 6–8 min after the start of PAF perfusion. The declining phase of increased permeability was correlated with the plateau of solute accumulation (fluorescence intensity) indicating no further increased solute flux. However, it is reasonable to challenge that this plateau of fluorescence intensity was the result of binding saturation due to insufficient available biotin for crossed avidin molecules. Our biotin-binding capacity test shown in Fig. 2B demonstrates that perfusion of 0.09 µM FITC-Avidin to the biotin-coated microchannels increased FITC intensity at coating layer in a time-dependent manner and reached 224 (AU) after 90 min of perfusion, whereas the maximum cumulated mean FI value in Fig. 4D (FITC-Avidin) was ∼13 (AU) and the maximum FI values of biotin-avidin at cell junctional regions at the end of 16 min of PAF perfusion were in a range of 17–38 (AU). These results provide experimental evidence that the 1:10,000 avidin to biotin concentration ratio used in our experimental setting provided sufficient biotin to catch all crossed avidin molecules during the experiments. The transient increases in Ps during PAF perfusion were not due to the saturated avidin binding to the available biotin. Importantly, the transient nature of the permeability responses to PAF and many other inflammatory mediators such as bradykinin, ATP, etc., has been well documented (22, 30, 32–35). Our results are consistent to those studies.
Because of the high binding affinity between avidin and biotin, all crossed avidin molecules were registered on the spot of biotinylated substrate and thereby spatially outlined the sites of leakage. The traversed FITC-Avidin and RPE-Avidin molecules were all deposited at the EC junctional area of the substrate, indicating that they crossed endothelium via paracellular pathways. With identical stimulation and consistent EC responses to PAF, our results demonstrated that the magnitude of the solute flux depends on the size of both the solute and the EC gaps. The peak Ps to RPE-Neutr-Avidin (larger molecule) is only about half of the peak Ps to FITC-Avidin. The crossed FITC-Avidin located along all junctions between ECs, whereas RPE-Neutr-Avidin (4.5 times the size of FITC-Avidin) was only detected at tricellular junctions where there were larger gaps than those at bilateral junctions (Fig. 4B, middle row), suggesting that the size of RPE-Neutr-Avidin was larger than majority of EC bilateral gaps. In contrast to the pattern of FITC-Avidin and RPE-Neutr-Avidin deposition outlining EC junctions, indicative of paracellular transport, Qdot-Strept-Avidin were deposited at the entire nonnuclear region of the substrate under both basal and stimulated conditions, illustrating their transcellular route across endothelium. This observation is consistent with another study using cultured EC monolayers (20). The mechanism whereby Qdot-Strept-Avidin is able to penetrate plasma membrane and cross endothelium remains unclear. Variable Qdot products have been used as live cell trackers and the uptake of Qdot nanocrystals is considered passive and nonreceptor mediated and can be incorporated in cytoplasmic vesicles (64, 65). Currently, whether transcellular pathways contribute to the agonist-induced increases in macromolecule transport remain under debate (1, 63). Increased frequency of vacuoles and VVOs has been observed in inflammatory mediator-stimulated endothelium of microvessels (66, 67). Our results showed that Ps to Qdot-Strept-Avidin increased over 10-fold in response to PAF, which further support the role of transcellular transport in increased permeability.
Temporal Relationship between PAF-Induced Increases in EC [Ca2+]i and Microvessel Permeability
Studies in individually perfused intact microvessels indicate that inflammatory mediator-induced increases in EC [Ca2+]i are required to increase microvessel permeability and that the peak level of EC [Ca2+]i determines the extent of gap formation and increased microvessel permeability (22, 30, 32–35). However, in previous studies, the changes in EC [Ca2+]i and permeability were measured separately in different vessels, and therefore, their temporal relationship could not be well defined. This newly developed permeability assessment in microfluidic microvessels permits simultaneous measurements of EC [Ca2+]i and Ps, which precisely defines their temporal relationship during PAF exposure. Our results demonstrated an immediate increase in EC [Ca2+]i but delayed Ps response upon PAF exposure. The immediate increase in EC [Ca2+]i in response to PAF was consistent with that observed in ATP-exposed microfluidic microvessels (6). Previous studies in intact microvessels also demonstrated that agonist-induced calcium release from internal stores alone (∼20% to 30% of the [Ca2+]i peak value) in the absence of extracellular Ca2+ or restricting Ca2+ influx to a very low level abolished the permeability increases, indicating that an above a threshold EC [Ca2+]i level is required to sufficiently increase permeability (32, 33). Linking these observations to the 2-min delay of Ps response observed in this study, we predict that the delayed Ps increase may reflect the time needed for EC [Ca2+]i increased to a level sufficient to initiate the calcium-dependent interaction of actin/myosin in ECs, followed by the activation of cytoskeletal contractile machinery to form gaps between ECs, as well as the start of increasing solute transport across the endothelium. The 5-min separation between the two peak values indicates that the maximum cellular actions and solute transport in response to the peak of EC [Ca2+]i has a further delay by ∼3 min.
Role of Glycocalyx Layer in Vascular Permeability
Glycocalyx that lines the luminal surface of entire vasculature has been recognized to play important roles in vascular barrier homeostasis, such as the selectivity for solute transport, the rate of solute penetration, vascular permeability, mechanotransduction, leukocyte adhesion, etc. (1, 36, 37). The degradation and shedding of glycocalyx have been found under a variety of pathological conditions (38–43). However, the direct impact of degraded glycocalyx on microvessel permeability remains controversial (36, 44–46). Enzymatic partial digestion of a thinner layer of glycocalyx (150 nm) in frog capillaries by pronase has shown to increase hydraulic conductivity (Lp) by about twofold without changing the intercellular cleft (68). Although others showed that glycocalyx shedding-associated alterations of vascular permeability in rat vessels depended on the composition of perfusion fluid, suggesting that glycocalyx shedding itself does not alter permeability (44, 46). In this study, we used a pathologically relevant concentration of H2O2 (10 µM) to degrade glycocalyx and demonstrated the real-time changes in glycocalyx and their corresponding changes in permeability. It is important to point out that H2O2 at 10 µM is a concentration close to the human plasma levels of H2O2 under pathological conditions (69, 70). We consider the plasma H2O2 concentration to be the net balance of the constant production of reactive oxygen species and their reactions with plasma enzymes such as SOD and catalase in the vasculature, representing the effective level of peroxide that affects endothelial cells lining the vascular walls. An important feature of the use of individually perfused microvessels in vivo or microvessels-on-a-chip in vitro for the H2O2 studies is the constantly refreshed perfusate in the vessel lumen, which exposes the endothelium with a relatively constant concentration of H2O2, closely simulating the in vivo situation. This constantly replenished H2O2 in the perfusate makes a fundamental difference from the one-time addition of reactive reagents to the tissue or cell culture medium that results in an immediate reaction of the reactive agents with the cells and other components in the medium and lost its activity quickly. In those studies, usually hundreds of μmol/L or mmol/L concentrations of H2O2 were required to show some of the responses (71–74). Our previous study demonstrated that perfusion of rat mesenteric microvessels with H2O2 at 10 µM had no immediate effect on hydraulic conductivity, Lp, and EC [Ca2+]i, and that the increases in Lp occurred after 1 h of H2O2 perfusion (75). In this study, we demonstrate that H2O2 (10 µM) perfusion depleted glycocalyx in ∼20 min. The H2O2-induced quick degradation of glycocalyx and its delayed Lp effect implies that glycocalyx may not have an important role in the maintenance of basal Lp in rat microvessels. Here, the role of glycocalyx in microvessel barrier function is further evaluated by measuring Ps to solutes with different physiochemical properties under both basal and stimulated conditions before and during glycocalyx degradation with H2O2. Results demonstrated that depletion of glycocalyx did not alter basal Ps to FITC-Avidin, endothelial junctions, and PAF-induced peak Ps increase, but shortened the time to PAF-induced Ps peak by 2 min when compared with that with intact glycocalyx. The reduced time to PAF-induced peak indicates that glycocalyx restricts the rate of solute penetration but does not alter PAF-induced intercellular gap formation and the maximum amount of solute across endothelium through paracellular pathways. In contrast, glycocalyx depletion not only increased basal Ps to Qdot-Strept-Avidin through transcellular pathways by sevenfold but also further increased its PAF-induced peak value and shortened the time to peak by 4 min. The latter observations indicate that glycocalyx plays important roles in restriction of selective molecules and their transport through transcellular pathways. The depletion of glycocalyx, although not affecting EC junctions and paracellular transport, increases transcellular transport under both basal and stimulated conditions. Currently, there has been no in vivo information about the real-time effect of H2O2 on glycocalyx shedding. An intravital microscopic study in hamster cremaster vessels demonstrated that a bolus intravenous injection of Ox-LDL transiently diminished the EC surface layer by 60% within 25 min by observing the changes in distance between erythrocytes and the capillary EC surface (76), which suggested that oxidative stress can cause the shedding of glycocalyx layer quickly in vivo.
Summary
Our study demonstrated that microvessels developed under continuous flow conditions not only developed in vivo-like endothelial junctions but also a well-formed endothelial surface layer of glycocalyx. Importantly, the application of avidin-biotin technology to in vitro microfluidic microvessels overcomes the major limitations of microvessels developed in nonpermeable microfluidics. The permeability coefficient measurements using this newly developed technique further demonstrated that these in vitro microvessels recapitulate the barrier properties and the Ps and EC [Ca2+]i responses to inflammatory stimuli observed in intact microvessels. Our study further demonstrated that the simultaneous measurements of Ps, EC [Ca2+]i, as well as the real-time illustration of the alterations of EC junctions and glycocalyx in microfluidic microvessel networks would further advance microfluidics for blood research, especially for investigations of patient-specific blood component interactions with human endothelial cell-developed microvessels, benefiting both basic science and clinical applications.
GRANTS
This work was supported by the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute Grants HL130363 and HL144620.
DISCLOSURES
No conflicts of interest, financial or otherwise, are declared by the authors.
AUTHOR CONTRIBUTIONS
F.G., H.S., and P.H. conceived and designed research; F.G., H.S., and X.L. performed experiments; F.G., H.S., X.L., and P.H. analyzed data; H.S. and P.H. interpreted results of experiments; F.G., H.S., X.L., and P.H. prepared figures; P.H. drafted manuscript; H.S., X.L., and P.H. edited and revised manuscript; F.G., H.S., X.L., and P.H. approved final version of manuscript.
APPENDIX
The excitation and emission laser wavelength settings used for each fluorescent tracer are listed in Table A1, and the physiochemical properties of the tracers are outlined in Table A2.
Table A2.
Molecular mass and isoelectric point of the proteins used for tracers and permeability measurements
| Protein | Molecular Mass | Size, nm | Isoelectric Point |
|---|---|---|---|
| Avidin | 67–68 kDa | 10.5 | |
| Neutravidin | 60 kDa | 6.3 | |
| Streptavidin | 53 kDa | 6.8–7.5 | |
| R-Phycoerythrin | 240 kDa | 4.8 | |
| FITC | 589 mol wt | ||
| Texas red | 625 mol wt | ||
| Albumin | 66 kDa | 3.8 | 4.7–5.6 |
| α-Lactalbumin | 14 kDa | 2.01 | 4.6–5.2 |
| LDL | 2,300,000 kDa | 19–28 | |
| Qdot nanocrystals | >500 kDa | 10–20 | |
| Qdot-streptavidin | 5–10 Streptavidins per Qdot using polyethylene glycol linker | 15–20 |
REFERENCES
- 1.Michel CC, Curry FE. Microvascular permeability. Physiol Rev 79: 703–761, 1999. doi: 10.1152/physrev.1999.79.3.703. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Curry FR, Adamson RH. Vascular permeability modulation at the cell, microvessel, or whole organ level: towards closing gaps in our knowledge. Cardiovasc Res 87: 218–229, 2010. doi: 10.1093/cvr/cvq115. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Haase K, Kamm RD. Advances in on-chip vascularization. Regen Med 12: 285–302, 2017. doi: 10.2217/rme-2016-0152. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Xu S, Li X, Liu Y, He P. Development and characterization of in vitro microvessel network and quantitative measurements of endothelial [Ca2+]i and nitric oxide production. J Vis Exp: e54014, 2016. doi: 10.3791/54014. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Tsvirkun D, Grichine A, Duperray A, Misbah C, Bureau L. Microvasculature on a chip: study of the endothelial surface layer and the flow structure of red blood cells. Sci Rep 7: 45036, 2017. doi: 10.1038/srep45036. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Li X, Xu S, He P, Liu Y. In vitro recapitulation of functional microvessels for the study of endothelial shear response, nitric oxide and [Ca2+]i. PLoS One 10: e0126797, 2015. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0126797. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Zheng Y, Chen J, Craven M, Choi NW, Totorica S, Diaz-Santana A, Kermani P, Hempstead B, Fischbach-Teschl C, López JA, Stroock AD. In vitro microvessels for the study of angiogenesis and thrombosis. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 109: 9342–9347, 2012. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1201240109. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Rayner SG, Zheng Y. Engineered microvessels for the study of human disease. J Biomech Eng 138: 1108011, 2016. doi: 10.1115/1.4034428. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Sato M, Sasaki N, Ato M, Hirakawa S, Sato K, Sato K. Microcirculation-on-a-chip: a microfluidic platform for assaying blood- and lymphatic-vessel permeability. PLoS One 10: e0137301, 2015. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0137301. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Offeddu GS, Haase K, Gillrie MR, Li R, Morozova O, Hickman D, Knutson CG, Kamm RD. An on-chip model of protein paracellular and transcellular permeability in the microcirculation. Biomaterials 212: 115–125, 2019. doi: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2019.05.022. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Chrobak KM, Potter DR, Tien J. Formation of perfused, functional microvascular tubes in vitro. Microvasc Res 71: 185–196, 2006. doi: 10.1016/j.mvr.2006.02.005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Young EW, Watson MW, Srigunapalan S, Wheeler AR, Simmons CA. Technique for real-time measurements of endothelial permeability in a microfluidic membrane chip using laser-induced fluorescence detection. Anal Chem 82: 808–816, 2010. doi: 10.1021/ac901560w. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Morgan JP, Delnero PF, Zheng Y, Verbridge SS, Chen J, Craven M, Choi NW, Diaz-Santana A, Kermani P, Hempstead B, López JA, Corso TN, Fischbach C, Stroock AD. Formation of microvascular networks in vitro. Nat Protoc 8: 1820–1836, 2013. doi: 10.1038/nprot.2013.110. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Kim S, Lee H, Chung M, Jeon NL. Engineering of functional, perfusable 3D microvascular networks on a chip. Lab Chip 13: 1489–1500, 2013. [Erratum in Lab Chip 13: 4891, 2013]. doi: 10.1039/c3lc41320a. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Wang X, Phan DT, Sobrino A, George SC, Hughes CC, Lee AP. Engineering anastomosis between living capillary networks and endothelial cell-lined microfluidic channels. Lab Chip 16: 282–290, 2016. doi: 10.1039/c5lc01050k. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Lee H, Kim S, Chung M, Kim JH, Jeon NL. A bioengineered array of 3D microvessels for vascular permeability assay. Microvasc Res 91: 90–98, 2014. doi: 10.1016/j.mvr.2013.12.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Polacheck WJ, Kutys ML, Yang J, Eyckmans J, Wu Y, Vasavada H, Hirschi KK, Chen CS. A non-canonical Notch complex regulates adherens junctions and vascular barrier function. Nature 552: 258–262, 2017. doi: 10.1038/nature24998. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Choi NW, Cabodi M, Held B, Gleghorn JP, Bonassar LJ, Stroock AD. Microfluidic scaffolds for tissue engineering. Nat Mater 6: 908–915, 2007. doi: 10.1038/nmat2022. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Dubrovskyi O, Birukova AA, Birukov KG. Measurement of local permeability at subcellular level in cell models of agonist- and ventilator-induced lung injury. Lab Invest 93: 254–263, 2013. doi: 10.1038/labinvest.2012.159. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Ghim M, Alpresa P, Yang SW, Braakman ST, Gray SG, Sherwin SJ, van Reeuwijk M, Weinberg PD. Visualization of three pathways for macromolecule transport across cultured endothelium and their modification by flow. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol 313: H959–H973, 2017. [Erratum in Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol 319: H359, 2020]. doi: 10.1152/ajpheart.00218.2017. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.López JA, Zheng Y. Synthetic microvessels. J Thromb Haemost 11, Suppl 1: 67–74, 2013. doi: 10.1111/jth.12245. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Zhou X, He P. Temporal and spatial correlation of platelet-activating factor-induced increases in endothelial [Ca2+]i, nitric oxide, and gap formation in intact venules. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol 301: H1788–H1797, 2011. doi: 10.1152/ajpheart.00599.2011. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Huxley VH, Curry FE, Adamson RH. Quantitative fluorescence microscopy on single capillaries: α-lactalbumin transport. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol 252: H188–H197, 1987. doi: 10.1152/ajpheart.1987.252.1.H188. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Green NM. Avidin. 1. The use of [14C] biotin for kinetic studies and for assay. Biochem J 89: 585–591, 1963. doi: 10.1042/bj0890585. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Wilchek M, Bayer EA. Introduction to avidin-biotin technology. Methods Enzymol 184: 5–13, 1990. doi: 10.1016/0076-6879(90)84256-g. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Sarelius IH, Kuebel JM, Wang J, Huxley VH. Macromolecule permeability of in situ and excised rodent skeletal muscle arterioles and venules. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol 290: H474–H480, 2006. doi: 10.1152/ajpheart.00655.2005. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Rumbaut RE, Huxley VH. Similar permeability responses to nitric oxide synthase inhibitors of venules from three animal species. Microvasc Res 64: 21–31, 2002. doi: 10.1006/mvre.2002.2394. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Fu BM, Shen S. Acute VEGF effect on solute permeability of mammalian microvessels in vivo. Microvasc Res 68: 51–62, 2004. doi: 10.1016/j.mvr.2004.03.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Marie E, Sagan S, Cribier S, Tribet C. Amphiphilic macromolecules on cell membranes: from protective layers to controlled permeabilization. J Membr Biol 247: 861–881, 2014. doi: 10.1007/s00232-014-9679-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Jiang Y, Wen K, Zhou X, Schwegler-Berry D, Castranova V, He P. Three-dimensional localization and quantification of PAF-induced gap formation in intact venular microvessels. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol 295: H898–H906, 2008. doi: 10.1152/ajpheart.00309.2008. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Yuan D, Xu S, He P. Enhanced permeability responses to inflammation in streptozotocin-induced diabetic rat venules: rho-mediated alterations of actin cytoskeleton and VE-cadherin. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol 307: H44–H53, 2014. doi: 10.1152/ajpheart.00929.2013. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.He P, Curry FE. Depolarization modulates endothelial cell calcium influx and microvessel permeability. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol 261: H1246–H1254, 1991. doi: 10.1152/ajpheart.1991.261.4.H1246. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.He P, Zhang X, Curry FE. Ca2+ entry through conductive pathway modulates receptor-mediated increase in microvessel permeability. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol 271: H2377–H2387, 1996. doi: 10.1152/ajpheart.1996.271.6.H2377. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Zhu L, He P. Platelet-activating factor increases endothelial [Ca2+]i and NO production in individually perfused intact microvessels. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol 288: H2869–H2877, 2005. doi: 10.1152/ajpheart.01080.2004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Zhou X, He P. Endothelial [Ca2+]i and caveolin-1 antagonistically regulate eNOS activity and microvessel permeability in rat venules. Cardiovasc Res 87: 340–347, 2010. doi: 10.1093/cvr/cvq006. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Curry FE, Adamson RH. Endothelial glycocalyx: permeability barrier and mechanosensor. Ann Biomed Eng 40: 828–839, 2012. doi: 10.1007/s10439-011-0429-8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Curry FE, Michel CC. The endothelial glycocalyx: barrier functions versus red cell hemodynamics: a model of steady state ultrafiltration through a bi-layer formed by a porous outer layer and more selective membrane-associated inner layer. Biorheology 56: 113–130, 2019. doi: 10.3233/BIR-180198. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.van den Berg BM, Nieuwdorp M, Stroes ES, Vink H. Glycocalyx and endothelial (dys) function: from mice to men. Pharmacol Rep 58, Suppl: 75–80, 2006. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Diebel LN, Liberati DM, Martin JV. Acute hyperglycemia increases sepsis related glycocalyx degradation and endothelial cellular injury: a microfluidic study. Am J Surg 217: 1076–1082, 2019. doi: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2018.12.066. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Dogne S, Flamion B. Endothelial glycocalyx impairment in disease: focus on hyaluronan shedding. Am J Pathol 190: 768–780, 2020. doi: 10.1016/j.ajpath.2019.11.016. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Nieuwdorp M, Mooij HL, Kroon J, Atasever B, Spaan JA, Ince C, Holleman F, Diamant M, Heine RJ, Hoekstra JB, Kastelein JJ, Stroes ES, Vink H. Endothelial glycocalyx damage coincides with microalbuminuria in type 1 diabetes. Diabetes 55: 1127–1132, 2006. doi: 10.2337/diabetes.55.04.06.db05-1619. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Broekhuizen LN, Lemkes BA, Mooij HL, Meuwese MC, Verberne H, Holleman F, Schlingemann RO, Nieuwdorp M, Stroes ES, Vink H. Effect of sulodexide on endothelial glycocalyx and vascular permeability in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus. Diabetologia 53: 2646–2655, 2010. doi: 10.1007/s00125-010-1910-x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Nieuwdorp M, van Haeften TW, Gouverneur MC, Mooij HL, van Lieshout MH, Levi M, Meijers JC, Holleman F, Hoekstra JB, Vink H, Kastelein JJ, Stroes ES. Loss of endothelial glycocalyx during acute hyperglycemia coincides with endothelial dysfunction and coagulation activation in vivo. Diabetes 55: 480–486, 2006. doi: 10.2337/diabetes.55.02.06.db05-1103. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Guerci P, Ergin B, Uz Z, Ince Y, Westphal M, Heger M, Ince C. Glycocalyx degradation is independent of vascular barrier permeability increase in nontraumatic hemorrhagic shock in rats. Anesth Analg 129: 598–607, 2019. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0000000000003918. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Weinbaum S, Tarbell JM, Damiano ER. The structure and function of the endothelial glycocalyx layer. Annu Rev Biomed Eng 9: 121–167, 2007. doi: 10.1146/annurev.bioeng.9.060906.151959. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Ergin B, Guerci P, Uz Z, Westphal M, Ince Y, Hilty M, Ince C. Hemodilution causes glycocalyx shedding without affecting vascular endothelial barrier permeability in rats. J Clin Transl Res 5: 243–252, 2020. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Vink H, Duling BR. Identification of distinct luminal domains for macromolecules, erythrocytes, and leukocytes within mammalian capillaries. Circ Res 79: 581–589, 1996. doi: 10.1161/01.res.79.3.581. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Sato K, Sato K. Recent progress in the development of microfluidic vascular models. Anal Sci 34: 755–764, 2018. doi: 10.2116/analsci.17R006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Rutledge JC, Curry FE, Blanche P, Krauss RM. Solvent drag of LDL across mammalian endothelial barriers with increased permeability. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol 268: H1982–H1991, 1995. doi: 10.1152/ajpheart.1995.268.5.H1982. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50.Rutledge JC, Curry FR, Lenz JF, Davis PA. Low density lipoprotein transport across a microvascular endothelial barrier after permeability is increased. Circ Res 66: 486–495, 1990. doi: 10.1161/01.res.66.2.486. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51.Yuan Y, Granger HJ, Zawieja DC, DeFily DV, Chilian WM. Histamine increases venular permeability via a phospholipase C-NO synthase-guanylate cyclase cascade. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol 264: H1734–H1739, 1993. doi: 10.1152/ajpheart.1993.264.5.H1734. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52.Zeng M, Zhang H, Lowell C, He P. Tumor necrosis factor-α-induced leukocyte adhesion and microvessel permeability. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol 283: H2420–H2430, 2002. doi: 10.1152/ajpheart.00787.2001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53.Crone C, Frøkjaer-Jensen J, Friedman JJ, Christensen O. The permeability of single capillaries to potassium ions. J Gen Physiol 71: 195–220, 1978. doi: 10.1085/jgp.71.2.195. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54.Yuan Y, Chilian WM, Granger HJ, Zawieja DC. Permeability to albumin in isolated coronary venules. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol 265: H543–H552, 1993. doi: 10.1152/ajpheart.1993.265.2.H543. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55.Tojo A, Kinugasa S. Mechanisms of glomerular albumin filtration and tubular reabsorption. Int J Nephrol 2012: 481520, 2012. doi: 10.1155/2012/481520. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 56.Muradashvili N, Lominadze D. Role of fibrinogen in cerebrovascular dysfunction after traumatic brain injury. Brain Inj 27: 1508–1515, 2013. doi: 10.3109/02699052.2013.823562. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 57.Park-Windhol C, D'Amore PA. Disorders of vascular permeability. Annu Rev Pathol 11: 251–281, 2016. doi: 10.1146/annurev-pathol-012615-044506. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 58.Dvorak AM, Feng D. The vesiculo-vacuolar organelle (VVO). A new endothelial cell permeability organelle. J Histochem Cytochem 49: 419–432, 2001. doi: 10.1177/002215540104900401. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 59.Simionescu M, Popov D, Sima A. Endothelial transcytosis in health and disease. Cell Tissue Res 335: 27–40, 2009. doi: 10.1007/s00441-008-0688-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 60.McDonald DM. Endothelial gaps and permeability of venules in rat tracheas exposed to inflammatory stimuli. Am J Physiol Lung Cell Mol Physiol 266: L61–L83, 1994. doi: 10.1152/ajplung.1994.266.1.L61. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 61.Majno G, Palade GE, Schoefl GI. Studies on inflammation. II. The site of action of histamine and serotonin along the vascular tree: a topographic study. J Biophys Biochem Cytol 11: 607–626, 1961. doi: 10.1083/jcb.11.3.607. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 62.Majno G, Palade GE. Studies on inflammation. 1. The effect of histamine and serotonin on vascular permeability: an electron microscopic study. J Biophys Biochem Cytol 11: 571–605, 1961. doi: 10.1083/jcb.11.3.571. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 63.Baluk P, Hirata A, Thurston G, Fujiwara T, Neal CR, Michel CC, McDonald DM. Endothelial gaps: time course of formation and closure in inflamed venules of rats. Am J Physiol Lung Cell Mol Physiol 272: L155–L170, 1997. doi: 10.1152/ajplung.1997.272.1.L155. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 64.Lin S, Xie X, Patel MR, Yang YH, Li Z, Cao F, Gheysens O, Zhang Y, Gambhir SS, Rao JH, Wu JC. Quantum dot imaging for embryonic stem cells. BMC Biotechnol 7: 67, 2007. doi: 10.1186/1472-6750-7-67. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 65.Fountaine TJ, Wincovitch SM, Geho DH, Garfield SH, Pittaluga S. Multispectral imaging of clinically relevant cellular targets in tonsil and lymphoid tissue using semiconductor quantum dots. Mod Pathol 19: 1181–1191, 2006. doi: 10.1038/modpathol.3800628. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 66.Feng D, Nagy JA, Hipp J, Pyne K, Dvorak HF, Dvorak AM. Reinterpretation of endothelial cell gaps induced by vasoactive mediators in guinea-pig, mouse and rat: many are transcellular pores. J Physiol 504: 747–761, 1997. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-7793.1997.747bd.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 67.Neal CR, Michel CC. Transcellular openings through microvascular walls in acutely inflamed frog mesentery. Exp Physiol 77: 917–920, 1992. doi: 10.1113/expphysiol.1992.sp003659. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 68.Adamson RH. Permeability of frog mesenteric capillaries after partial pronase digestion of the endothelial glycocalyx. J Physiol 428: 1–13, 1990. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1990.sp018197. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 69.Lacy F, Kailasam MT, O’Connor DT, Schmid-Schönbein GW, Parmer RJ. Plasma hydrogen peroxide production in human essential hypertension: role of heredity, gender, and ethnicity. Hypertension 36: 878–884, 2000. doi: 10.1161/01.hyp.36.5.878. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 70.Banerjee D, Madhusoodanan UK, Nayak S, Jacob J. Urinary hydrogen peroxide: a probable marker of oxidative stress in malignancy. Clin Chim Acta 334: 205–209, 2003. doi: 10.1016/s0009-8981(03)00236-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 71.Alexander JS, Alexander BC, Eppihimer LA, Goodyear N, Haque R, Davis CP, Kalogeris TJ, Carden DL, Zhu YN, Kevil CG. Inflammatory mediators induce sequestration of VE-cadherin in cultured human endothelial cells. Inflammation 24: 99–113, 2000. doi: 10.1023/a:1007025325451. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 72.Kevil CG, Oshima T, Alexander B, Coe LL, Alexander JS. H2O2-mediated permeability: role of MAPK and occludin. Am J Physiol Cell Physiol 279: C21–C30, 2000. doi: 10.1152/ajpcell.2000.279.1.C21. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 73.Suresh K, Servinsky L, Reyes J, Baksh S, Undem C, Caterina M, Pearse DB, Shimoda LA. Hydrogen peroxide-induced calcium influx in lung microvascular endothelial cells involves TRPV4. Am J Physiol Lung Cell Mol Physiol 309: L1467–L1477, 2015. doi: 10.1152/ajplung.00275.2015. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 74.Jin BY, Lin AJ, Golan DE, Michel T. MARCKS protein mediates hydrogen peroxide regulation of endothelial permeability. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 109: 14864–14869, 2012. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1204974109. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 75.Zhou X, Yuan D, Wang M, He P. H2O2-induced endothelial NO production contributes to vascular cell apoptosis and increased permeability in rat venules. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol 304: H82–H93, 2013. doi: 10.1152/ajpheart.00300.2012. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 76.Vink H, Constantinescu AA, Spaan JA. Oxidized lipoproteins degrade the endothelial surface layer: implications for platelet-endothelial cell adhesion. Circulation 101: 1500–1502, 2000. doi: 10.1161/01.cir.101.13.1500. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]





