Abstract
How and when potential becomes restricted in differentiating stem cell daughters is poorly understood. While it is thought that signals from the niche are actively required to prevent differentiation, another model proposes that stem cells can reversibly transit between multiple states, some of which are primed, but not committed, to differentiate. In the Drosophila testis, somatic cyst stem cells (CySCs) generate cyst cells, which encapsulate the germline to support its development. We find that CySCs are maintained independently of niche self-renewal signals if activity of the PI3K/Tor pathway is inhibited. Conversely, PI3K/Tor is not sufficient alone to drive differentiation, suggesting that it acts to license cells for differentiation. Indeed, we find that the germline is required for differentiation of CySCs in response to PI3K/Tor elevation, indicating that final commitment to differentiation involves several steps and intercellular communication. We propose that CySC daughter cells are plastic, that their fate depends on the availability of neighbouring germ cells, and that PI3K/Tor acts to induce a primed state for CySC daughters to enable coordinated differentiation with the germline.
Author summary
Stem cells are unique in their ability to regenerate adult tissues by dividing to provide new stem cells, a process called self-renewal, and cells that will differentiate and maintain tissue function. How and when the daughters that differentiate lose the ability to self-renew is still poorly understood. Self-renewal depends on signals that are provided by the supportive micro-environment, or niche, in which the stem cells reside. It was assumed that simply losing access to this environment and the signals it provides was sufficient to direct differentiation. Here we use the Drosophila testis as a model to show that this is not the case. Instead, differentiation must be actively induced by signalling, and stem cells deprived of all signals can be maintained. Studying the relative timings of the various inputs into differentiation leads us to propose that a series of events ensure appropriate differentiation. First, stem cells receive differentiation-inducing signals that promote a permissive, or primed, state which is reversible and does not preclude self-renewal. The final commitment comes from interacting with other cells in the tissue, ensuring that differentiation always occurs in a coordinated manner among the different cell types composing this tissue.
Introduction
In tissues with high turnover, stem cells are crucial to maintaining homeostasis by producing new differentiated offspring to replace lost cells. Ensuring long-term tissue maintenance requires that stem cells self-renew, in addition to producing differentiating daughters. Self-renewal capacity was shown early on not to be intrinsic to a stem cell, but to rely instead on the local environment of the cell, termed a niche [1]. The first such niche was identified in the Drosophila ovary [2,3], and our understanding of stem cell-niche interactions has greatly increased since then [4,5]. A common feature of many niches is that the signals they produce actively inhibit differentiation of resident stem cells, exemplified by repression of the differentiation factor bag of marbles (bam) by niche-derived Bone Morphogenetic Protein (BMP) signals in the Drosophila germline stem cells (GSCs) [6]. This model of niche function implies that the stem cell state is inherently unstable and must be actively maintained. However, in tissues varying from the Drosophila ovary and testis to the mouse intestine [7–10], disrupting certain signalling pathways results in the accumulation of stem cells, implying that stem cell differentiation requires active signalling.
In parallel to this model of stem cell fate in which niche or differentiation signals are instructive, studies conducting lineage tracing of cells expressing markers of a more differentiated fate have shown that marker expression can fluctuate and does not reflect potential, giving rise to a more nuanced picture of what constitutes stem cell identity [11–16]. This work suggests that stem cell potential is distributed across a population of cells within which different states exist where some cells have a higher propensity, or bias, towards self-renewal and some towards differentiation. How stem cells transition between these states and out of the stem cell pool and the contribution of niche signals to these transitions is poorly understood.
To probe how and when stem cell daughters commit to differentiation, we study the somatic lineage in the Drosophila testis. The testis stem cell niche, called the hub, is composed of approximately 10–12 quiescent cells that support two stem cell populations (Fig 1A) [17]. GSCs adhere tightly to the hub and divide with invariantly oriented divisions, generating in most cases two daughters with asymmetric fates. The differentiating daughter, known as a gonialblast, undergoes 4 rounds of division with incomplete cytokinesis to form a cyst which matures into spermatocytes. The second population, somatic cyst stem cells (CySCs), gives rise to post-mitotic differentiating cells, called cyst cells. These tightly associate with a gonialblast in a 2:1 ratio, ensheathing the developing cyst and eventually sealing off the germline from the environment (Fig 1A) [18–21]. Coordination between the lineages and support from the soma are essential for germ cell differentiation and fertility [18,19,22,23]. Recent work has shown that this coordination is not regulated through synchronised stem cell divisions but instead at the level of co-differentiation of gonialblasts and CySC daughters, when encystment leads to abscission of the gonialblast from the GSC [24]. How the two lineages temporally coordinate their differentiation is difficult to envisage if differentiation is simply a consequence of loss of niche signals. CySCs rely primarily on activity of the Janus Kinase and Signal Transducer and Activator of Transcription (JAK/STAT) pathway for self-renewal [25], while additional signals including the Hedgehog (Hh), Hippo (Hpo), Mitogen-Activated Protein Kinase (MAPK) and Slit/Robo pathways regulate proliferation and niche occupancy [26–31]. BMPs produced by the hub and the CySCs maintain GSC self-renewal, and do so at least in part by directly repressing expression of the differentiation factor bam, supporting the model in which niche-derived signals repress differentiation [32,33].
In the cyst lineage, however, clonal assays have revealed that CySC divisions produce equipotent daughters which stochastically self-renew or differentiate and that CySC replacement at the niche by neighbours is a frequent event [28]. CySCs are identified by contact with the niche and progression through the cell cycle, while differentiated cells are post-mitotic; mitoses are only observed at the hub [34,35]. CySCs express the transcription factor Zn finger homeodomain 1 (Zfh1), which is necessary and sufficient for self-renewal [25]. Zfh1 expression is downregulated during differentiation and cyst cells begin expressing the cyst cell marker Eyes Absent (Eya) [36]. Zfh1 expression labels a larger pool of cells than actually contact the hub, suggesting that CySC potential may extend beyond cells with direct hub contact. Consistently, although CySC divisions result in only one cell inheriting the attachment to the hub [35], clonal experiments show that both daughters of a CySC division can gain access to the hub [28]. Indeed, recent work tracing cells lacking hub cell contact showed that they can give rise to labelled CySCs [37]. Finally, cyst cell differentiation requires signalling through the Phosphoinositide 3-kinase (PI3K)/Target of Rapamycin (Tor) pathway (Fig 1B) [10,38,39]. High levels of PI3K and Tor activity are detected in Zfh1-positive cells that do not contact the hub, suggestive of a role during early stages of differentiation. Indeed, CySCs deficient for Tor or PI3K pathway activity maintain Zfh1 expression and fail to express Eya, while clones with gain-of-function mutations in the pathway are not maintained at the hub [10,28,39]. Thus, cyst cell differentiation is actively induced by signalling through PI3K/Tor, yet how the differentiation of cyst cells is temporally regulated to ensure coordination with the germline is not understood.
Here we set out to understand how cyst cell differentiation is regulated by addressing the role of PI3K/Tor signalling in cyst cells. We show that CySC differentiation requires Tor activity even in the absence JAK/STAT signalling, implying that differentiation is not a default state in the absence of niche-derived self-renewal signals. Conversely, the sufficiency of PI3K/Tor to drive differentiation is relative: clonal increases in PI3K/Tor drive differentiation while lineage-wide increases do not. These observations are consistent with a model in which high PI3K/Tor activity primes cells for differentiation but is not sufficient for commitment; clones with artificially increased PI3K/Tor activity are in a persistent primed state and more likely to differentiate. Furthermore, we show that the ability of increased PI3K/Tor to promote differentiation requires the presence of the germline. We propose that CySC differentiation into cyst cells occurs in reversible steps: loss of niche access and self-renewal signals, followed by acquisition of differentiation competence driven by PI3K/Tor activity, before the final commitment to differentiation which occurs upon interaction with a gonialblast. Our work suggests that actively regulating differentiation in this way is an important mechanism for achieving coordination across lineages.
Results
Tor is required for cyst cell differentiation in the absence of JAK/STAT signalling
In the somatic cyst lineage of the testis, JAK/STAT signalling is both necessary and sufficient to maintain CySC fate, while PI3K/Tor activity is required for cyst cell differentiation [10,25]. We sought to understand how differentiation is initiated upon withdrawal of JAK/STAT signalling, and whether Tor is required in this process.
We used a temperature-sensitive mutant for the sole Drosophila STAT, Stat92E, to deplete JAK/STAT activity in adult males. In testes from these mutants, as described previously [40,41], both GSCs and CySCs were rapidly lost to differentiation. By 7 days at the restrictive temperature (29°C), no GSCs were present at the hub and few, if any, CySCs were observed, defined as cells expressing Zfh1 and negative for expression of the differentiation marker Eya (Fig 1D, compare to control in Fig 1C, quantified in Fig 1J, P<0.0001, Kruskal-Wallis test with Dunn’s multiple comparisons, N = 18 for control, N = 19 for Stat92Ets). To characterise the events involved in initiating differentiation, we examined testes from Stat92Ets animals prior to the stem cells being lost to differentiation. Previous work has shown that 16 h after shifting to the restrictive temperature, GSCs are still present [41]. We counted Zfh1-expressing, Eya-negative cells at an earlier time point after shifting to the restrictive temperature, reasoning that CySCs would also be present. Indeed, 6 h after shifting to 29°C, we counted 33.8 ± 0.8 CySCs in Stat92E/+ heterozygous controls compared to 35.4 ± 1.0 in Stat92Ets animals (Fig 1E and 1F, P<0.24, Mann-Whitney test, N = 26 and N = 25, respectively). We used an antibody recognising phosphorylated eIF4E-Binding Protein (p4E-BP) to monitor Tor activity in Stat92Ets testes at this early timepoint after Stat depletion, since this is a well-established readout of Tor activity and was shown to require Tor activity in the testes [10,42,43]. In control Stat92E/+ heterozygous animals shifted to 29°C for 6 h, p4E-BP was highly expressed in the second row of somatic cells from the hub, and lower in the first row of CySCs that directly contact the hub (Fig 1E, arrowheads). In contrast, in Stat92Ets mutant animals, the pattern of p4E-BP changed so that high p4E-BP was now detected in somatic cells directly adjacent to the hub (Fig 1F, arrowheads). We quantified the fluorescence intensity in the CySCs immediately contacting the hub and observed a statistically significant increase in Stat92Ets mutants compared to control (Fig 1K, P<0.0001, t-test). Other pathways have been shown to be involved in CySC fate decisions, in particular Hedgehog (Hh) signalling, which determines the size of the stem cell pool but is neither required nor sufficient to prevent differentiation [27–29]. We asked whether Hh signalling also influenced Tor signalling by analysing p4E-BP expression in testes over-expressing the repressive (CiR) or activated form (CiAct) of the Hh effector Cubitus interruptus (Ci). Although these manipulations affected the number of Zfh1-positive CySCs, they did not result in changes in the pattern of p4E-BP, which remained excluded from CySCs in contact with the hub (S1A–S1C Fig, white arrowheads) and enriched in daughters leaving the niche (S1A–S1C Fig, yellow arrowheads). These results show that Tor activity is induced in CySCs that will differentiate upon depletion of JAK/STAT, and precedes detectable changes in morphology and marker expression.
Since previous work showed that Tor activity is required for differentiation [10,39] and since Tor activity is upregulated upon JAK/STAT loss, we asked whether Tor is required for the CySC differentiation that occurs following loss of Stat92E activity. In other words, we tested whether cyst cell differentiation is a default state in cells lacking JAK/STAT activity, or whether differentiation is induced by Tor. As shown above, loss of JAK/STAT by shifting Stat92Ets animals to the restrictive temperature for 7 days results in almost complete loss of CySCs and GSCs (Fig 1C and 1D). Conversely, inhibiting Tor activity by feeding the inhibitor Rapamycin led to Zfh1-positive cells being found away from the hub which did not express Eya (Fig 1G), indicating a block in differentiation. When Stat92Ets mutant animals were fed Rapamycin and shifted to the restrictive temperature, testes contained Zfh1-positive cells distant from the hub and few Eya-positive cells (Fig 1H), indicating that these testes accumulated undifferentiated CySCs. In addition, Vasa-positive GSCs were present in these testes, although since the role of Tor signalling in germ cells has not been established, it is unclear whether this is an indirect consequence of restoring CySC function or an autonomous effect on GSCs. To confirm that the ectopic Zfh1-positive cells are indeed CySCs, we assessed whether any cells incorporated the nucleotide analogue EdU, as CySCs are the only proliferating somatic cells in the testis. We observed EdU incorporation in Zfh1-positive cells in Stat92Ets animals fed with Rapamycin (Fig 1I), indicating that Rapamycin feeding maintained CySCs even in the absence of JAK/STAT activity.
Altogether, these results demonstrate that cyst cell differentiation requires active signalling through Tor, even in the absence of the main self-renewal factor, JAK/STAT. This finding suggests that CySC identity can be maintained in the absence of niche signals, as long as differentiation signals are also inhibited.
Clonal increases in Tor activity promote cyst cell differentiation
These results together with previously published work [10,38,39] show that Tor activity is absolutely necessary for cyst cell differentiation. We next asked whether increases in Tor activity directly induce differentiation or whether it is merely permissive for differentiation. To this end, we used mitotic recombination to generate single cell CySC clones with gain-of-function mutations in the PI3K/Tor pathway. Since CySCs are the only mitotic somatic cells, all labelled somatic cells are the result of a CySC division. We examined clones at 2 days post clone induction (dpci) to verify induction rates, and at 7 dpci to assess the persistence of these clones, which directly reflects the self-renewal and differentiation capacity of the labelled cells.
In controls, clones were reliably induced at 2 dpci (Fig 2A and 2E), and many of these clones were present a week after induction (Fig 2B and 2F). Clones at 7 dpci consisted of both CySCs, identified as the first row of Traffic Jam (Tj)-positive somatic cells from the hub (Fig 2B and 2F arrowheads), and differentiated cyst cells, which were displaced from the hub and grew larger (Fig 2B and 2F arrows). Clones mutant for genes encoding components of the Tor repressive Tuberous Sclerosis Complex (TSC), Tsc1 or gigas (gig, the Drosophila homologue of Tsc2) were also recovered at 2 dpci (Fig 2C and 2G, arrowheads), indicating that mutant CySCs could be induced. However, by 7 dpci, labelled CySC clones were rarely recovered (Fig 2D, 2H and 2M, P<0.0001 for Tsc1 compared to control, P<0.005 for gig compared to control), implying that the mutant cells had differentiated. Indeed, some testes with no CySC clones contained labelled cells distant from the hub, consistent with a mutant CySC that had differentiated and left the niche (Fig 2D and 2H, arrows). We obtained similar results when generating clones mutant for the PI3K inhibitor, Pten (see below), confirming previous observations that Pten, and Tsc1 mutant and wild type clones over-expressing the catalytic subunit of PI3K, Dp110, were not maintained at the niche and differentiated [28].
To confirm that Tsc1 and gig mutant clones were lost to differentiation, we stained these clones with antibodies against Zfh1 and Eya, to mark CySCs and differentiated cyst cells. While control clones were composed of both Zfh1-expressing CySCs and Eya-positive cyst cells (Fig 2I and 2K, arrowheads and arrows, respectively), Tsc1 and gig homozygous mutant clones consisted mostly of Eya-positive cells (Fig 2J and 2L, arrows). We asked whether these clones might be lost from the niche due to decreased adhesion. We stained clones with an antibody against Armadillo (Arm), the Drosophila homologue of β-Catenin. In both control and Tsc1 mutant clones, Arm was detected along the outline of the clone, in the extension contacting the hub (S2A and S2B Fig arrows). Moreover, the same analysis showed that Tsc1 mutant clones engulfed and associated closely with germ cells (S2B Fig, red arrowhead), indicating that the mutant cells could interact with gonialblasts and differentiate. Finally, we tested whether Tsc1 and gig mutant clones were lost due to increased cell death by staining with an antibody against cleaved Death Caspase-1 (Dcp-1), which labels apoptotic cells. We observed no increase in Dcp-1 staining in mutant clones compared to control (S2D and S2E Fig, 3/13 control clones containing a Dcp-1-positive cell compared to 2/9 gig mutant clones, and 1/20 control clones compared to 1/9 Tsc1 mutants, P<0.45, Fisher’s exact test).
In sum, CySC clones with hyper-activated PI3K or Tor signalling self-renew less well than control CySC clones, and are lost from the niche through differentiation. This implies that PI3K/Tor activity is either deleterious for self-renewal, or is sufficient to promote differentiation. Since the results described in prior work [10,38,39] and in Fig 1 argue that Tor is necessary for differentiation, the most parsimonious interpretation is that clonally increasing PI3K/Tor activity induces CySCs to differentiate into cyst cells.
Lineage-wide increases in Tor activity do not affect CySCs
The data presented so far appeared to support a model in which, as daughters of a CySC division leave the hub and are out of the range of JAK/STAT signalling, they upregulate PI3K/Tor activity to differentiate. This is consistent with the observation that high levels of the Tor target p4E-BP are detected in the second row of Zfh1-expressing cells (Fig 1E and [10,39]). However, although CySCs divide such that only one daughter cell inherits the hub attachment [35], clonal analysis showed that both daughter cells are equipotent [28], suggesting that cells away from the hub maintain the ability to self-renew. Moreover, lineage tracing using spichthyin (spict)-Gal4, which is expressed in Zfh1-positive cells in the second row, indicate that these cells do give rise to CySCs [37], raising the possibility that cells with high PI3K/Tor do not necessarily differentiate. We confirmed that indeed, spict-Gal4-driven GFP and high levels of p4E-BP do indeed colocalise in Zfh1-expressing cells (S3 Fig, arrows). Thus, cells with high PI3K/Tor are not necessarily committed to differentiate.
As a further test for the sufficiency of increased PI3K/Tor in promoting CySC differentiation, we hyper-activated signalling in all CySCs using the traffic jam (tj)-Gal4 driver. We predicted that, if increasing signalling drives differentiation, many or most CySCs would be lost to differentiation, resulting in testes containing few or no Zfh1-expressing cells, similar to loss-of-function of JAK/STAT signalling. Surprisingly, over-expression of Dp110 or knockdown of Tsc1 using tj-Gal4 resulted in testes that were indistinguishable from control (compare Fig 3A, 3C and 3E). There was no significant change in the number of Zfh1-positive and Eya-negative CySCs (Fig 3J, 45±1.1 in control compared to 41.9±1.5 and 45.5±2.4 in Dp110-expressing or Tsc1 knockdown testes, respectively, N = 19,18,11, P<0.25). To rule out experimental artefacts, we tested whether these constructs could induce ectopic PI3K and Tor activity. First, we used engrailed (en)-Gal4 to drive expression of UAS-Dp110 or UAS-Tsc1 RNAi in the posterior compartment of larval wing imaginal discs, where PI3K and Tor are well-established regulators of growth during development. Compared to the anterior compartment of the same discs, Dp110 over-expression and Tsc1 knockdown both led to reduced density of cell nuclei, reflecting increased growth (S4A–S4D Fig). We also used established readouts for the activity of both pathways: phosphorylated Akt1 (pAkt) for PI3K signalling, and phosphorylated S6 Kinase (pS6k) for Tor signalling. Over-expressing Dp110 in wing discs led to a robust increase in pAkt (S4B Fig) and knockdown of Tsc1 resulted in increased pS6k staining in the posterior compartment (S4D Fig). Finally, we tested for increased pathway activity in testes under these conditions. Tsc1 knock down or Dp110 over-expression in the cyst lineage resulted in increased p4E-BP staining (Fig 3H and 3I, compare with Fig 3G, quantified in Fig 3K), indicating that these manipulations elevate Tor activity, even if they do not affect the number of CySCs.
To confirm that CySCs were indeed still present under conditions of PI3K or Tor hyperactivation, we used an enhancer trap in the escargot locus, esg-GFP (Fig 3B, 3D and 3F) to label CySCs and early cyst cells [44]. We observed no differences in Esg-GFP expression when Tor was hyperactivated compared to controls (Fig 3B, 3D and 3F). We also assayed for proliferation by EdU incorporation, since CySCs are the only proliferating somatic cells in the testes. Zfh1-positive cells that incorporated EdU were readily observed when PI3K or Tor were hyperactivated (S5A, S5C and S5E Fig). Finally, we assessed JAK/STAT signalling under these conditions, and observed no changes in the pattern of Stat92E labelling (S5B, S5D and S5F Fig), or in the expression of Chinmo, which is downregulated during cyst cell differentiation [45].
We therefore conclude that increasing PI3K or Tor activity in CySCs is sufficient to drive differentiation when such manipulations are carried out in clones, but not in the entire CySC population.
Differentiation of CySCs with increased PI3K activity depends on signalling in neighbouring cells
The experiments described above suggest a model in which PI3K/Tor activity induces a permissive state for differentiation, but does not commit cells to differentiation. We propose that PI3K/Tor activity acts as a licensing factor to permit differentiation, and therefore increases the likelihood of differentiation, but upon exposure to hub-derived signals, cells experiencing high PI3K/Tor can self-renew. This model predicts that in clonal experiments, increasing PI3K/Tor results in an increased probability of differentiation and eventual loss of the clone from the stem cell pool, while in lineage-wide gain-of-function, all cells are licensed to differentiate but only a proportion will commit to a differentiated fate.
We took two approaches to test the model that PI3K/Tor signalling primes cells for differentiation. First, one prediction is that the differentiation of Pten mutant clones is due to higher PI3K/Tor signal in the mutant clones causing them to remain in a permissive state for differentiation, and not an intrinsic inability to self-renew. We reasoned that the maintenance of Pten mutant CySC clones could be rescued by increasing PI3K levels in all CySCs, thereby equalising the differentiation likelihood between Pten mutants and neighbours. We generated negatively-marked clones, either wild type or mutant for Pten, and assessed whether these clones were observed at 2 dpci and 7 dpci. As previously, control Tj-positive clones lacking GFP were observed in the first row from the hub at both 2 and 7 dpci, indicating that CySC clones were induced and maintained over the course of the experiment (Fig 4A and 4B). In contrast, and consistent with published data [28], Pten mutant clones, although induced robustly (Fig 4C), were rarely recovered by 7 dpci (Fig 4D and 4I, P<0.0001). When we used the C587-Gal4 driver to over-express Dp110 in CySCs, wild type clones were recovered at similar rates to control (Fig 4E, 4F and 4I, P<0.7). However, Pten mutant clones induced in testes where Dp110 was expressed with tj-Gal4 were recovered as frequently as wild type clones at 7 dpci (Fig 4G–4I, P<0.06) and were significantly rescued compared to Pten mutant clones in a control background (P<0.0001). These data indicate that Pten mutant CySCs maintain the ability to self-renew but that they are normally prevented from doing so by an increased tendency to differentiate compared to neighbouring cells.
As a second test of the hypothesis that PI3K/Tor activity acts to licence cells for differentiation, we generated mosaic testes containing cells with defined levels of PI3K activity. To ensure that both cell types can both self-renew and differentiate, we generated clones that were wild type in a background where all cells had elevated PI3K activity (Fig 5A, and see Materials and Methods and S1 Table for how clones were generated and relevant genotypes). In this situation, as shown in Fig 3, Dp110 over-expressing CySCs had no detectable phenotype and self-renewed well. However, we predicted that if PI3K levels determined the ability of cells to differentiate, wild type clones would be less likely to differentiate than Dp110-expressing cells, and that over time, wild type cells should come to dominate the CySC pool. We expressed Dp110 together with GFP under the control of tj-Gal4 and induced clones in this background that expressed the Gal4 inhibitor, Gal80. These clones had no Gal4 activity and were therefore wild type for PI3K, and were labelled by loss of GFP expression. When we generated Gal80-expressing wild type clones in testes expressing only GFP under tj-Gal4 control, we observed a mix of GFP-positive and negative cells with a broad distribution of clone sizes (Fig 5B and 5D), consistent with previous observations that CySCs compete stochastically with each other for niche occupancy, with each stem cell having an equal chance of outcompeting its neighbour or of being displaced from the niche [28]. When we induced Gal80-expressing clones in testes expressing both GFP and Dp110 under tj-Gal4 control, many more GFP-negative cells were observed at 14 dpci (Fig 5C and 5D, P<0.0006). This was not due to increased clone induction rates, as similar numbers of GFP-negative cells were present at 2 dpci (14.7 ± 1.6 GFP-negative cells in control compared to 13.2 ± 2.8 in a Dp110-expressing background, N = 29 and 13, respectively, P<0.58). Thus, the ability of Gal80 clones with wild type levels of PI3K to self-renew was significantly affected by PI3K levels in neighbouring cells: in control conditions, these clones have no obvious advantage; however, when surrounded by PI3K-high cells, they are more likely to self-renew and colonise the niche.
Germ cells promote cyst lineage differentiation
The experiments described above indicate that PI3K/Tor signalling is required to allow CySCs to differentiate, but that it is not sufficient to commit cells to differentiation. This implies that differentiation itself requires an additional input, and that only a subset of the cells that are primed receive this and go on to differentiate. In the testis, cyst cells co-differentiate with GSC daughters, gonialblasts, such that two cyst cells encapsulate one goniablast. Gonialblasts, therefore, are a good candidate to be the limiting resource for cyst cell differentiation.
First, we tested whether the presence of a germline affected cyst lineage differentiation. Previous work has shown that agametic testes display ectopically proliferating somatic cells, consistent with excess undifferentiated CySCs being present [46]. We generated testes in which the germline was forced to undergo differentiation, by expressing the germ cell differentiation factor Bam under control of the GSC and early germ cell driver nanos (nos)-Gal4 [47]. Bam expression in the germline resulted in variably penetrant germ cell loss from the niche. In testes completely lacking a germline, we observed ectopic Zfh1-expressing cells many cell diameters away from the hub, and few Eya-positive cells (Fig 6A and 6B). Moreover, we detected many Zfh1-positive cells that were proliferating, as assessed by EdU incorporation (Fig 6B). Additionally, Chinmo expression was maintained away from the hub (S6A and S6C Fig arrows), consistent with a lack of differentiation in these conditions. We tested whether this could be due to ectopic JAK/STAT signalling and found that stabilised Stat92E could be detected up to three cell diameters away from the hub when the germline was ablated (S6B and S6D Fig), suggesting that the absence of GSCs allows further diffusion of the JAK/STAT ligand Unpaired, but is not sufficient to explain ectopic self-renewal distant from the hub (Fig 6B). These data show that loss of the germline results in ectopic CySC-like cells, consistent with published work implicating germ cells in promoting cyst cell differentiation [46].
To test the hypothesis that CySC daughter cells are competing for gonialblasts to co-differentiate with, we induced clones with a gain-of-function mutation in the PI3K/Tor pathway in agametic testes. If the role of PI3K/Tor is indeed to prime CySC daughter cells to encapsulate a gonialblast, the lack of gonialblasts would result in clones with elevated PI3K/Tor remaining undifferentiated. Conversely, if elevating PI3K/Tor was sufficient to drive differentiation independently of the germline, these clones should differentiate, similar to PI3K/Tor gain-of-function clones in wild type testes (Fig 2). Clones mutant for the Tor pathway inhibitor Tsc1 were readily induced and observed at 2 dpci (Fig 6D and 6G), but differentiated rapidly and few CySC-containing clones were recovered at 7 dpci, compared to control clones (Fig 6C and 6G, P<0.0001). However, when we generated Tsc1 mutant clones in testes where the germline underwent forced differentiation, CySC clones were now recovered at similar rates to control clones (Fig 6E–6G, P<0.8). Thus, in the absence of germ cells to encyst, CySCs with elevated Tor activity can self-renew similarly to control CySCs. These data imply that Tor does not autonomously promote differentiation, but, together with our previous experiments, show that Tor activity regulates the ability of individual CySC daughter cells to co-differentiate with the germline.
Discussion
The data presented here suggest that cyst cell differentiation is an induced state, and that CySC daughter cells need multiple inputs in order to commit to differentiation (Fig 7). We propose that upon losing access to niche-derived JAK/STAT pathway ligands, CySCs can be primed to differentiate by high levels of PI3K/Tor activity, but do not commit to differentiation until they associate with a gonialblast. Primed CySCs may return to the niche and continue to self-renew if they do not receive this secondary signal. This mechanism to limit differentiation of cyst cells ensures the temporal coordination of cyst cell and gonialblast differentiation.
While much emphasis has been placed on the role of the niche in maintaining stem cell self-renewal, recent work indicates that in the ovary, a separate niche promotes germ cell progression through differentiation [7,48]. Similarly, in the vertebrate intestine, BMP inhibition results in ectopic stem-like cells, indicating a role for BMP signalling in promoting differentiation [8,9]. In both these instances, however, loss of the differentiation signal results in increased self-renewal signalling. Indeed, in the fly ovary, reducing the genetic dose of the GSC self-renewal ligand dpp could suppress the accumulation of undifferentiated germ cells caused by disrupting the differentiation niche [48]. By contrast, we show here that Tor is required independently of JAK/STAT signalling to promote cyst cell differentiation, confirming previous work which had shown no upregulation of STAT activity in ectopic CySC-like cells observed upon PI3K/Tor loss-of-function [10]. CySCs deprived of both self-renewal and differentiation-promoting signals maintain a stable stem-like fate, implying that differentiation is not an inevitable consequence of losing access to niche-derived signals. This situation is reminiscent of that described for embryonic stem cells (ESCs), in which self-renewal signals are not necessary for stem cell maintenance if differentiation signals are inhibited [49]. Thus, the ground state of ESCs is to self-renew in the absence of extrinsic signals, and we propose that CySCs similarly have a ground state favourable to self-renewal. This finding suggests that fate decisions may be regulated similarly in embryonic and adult stem cells.
Our results indicate that PI3K/Tor is not simply sufficient for differentiation, however, raising the question as to its role. One attractive model is that PI3K/Tor activity “primes” CySC daughter cells to differentiate, such that Zfh1-positive cells with high PI3K/Tor are able to exit the stem cell pool, but require other signals to do so. We show that cells experiencing high PI3K/Tor activity can go on to maintain CySC fate and self-renew, consistent with the observation that Zfh1-expressing cells in the second row from the hub can give rise to CySCs over time [37]. These cells, although more likely to differentiate, are not necessarily committed to differentiation, and can return to positions adjacent to the hub where PI3K/Tor signalling is lower. This model implies that CySCs exist in multiple states, where some are more biased towards self-renewal, and others towards differentiation, but that cells can transit reversibly between these states [12,50]. As such, the effective stem cell pool consists of both cells directly contacting the hub and those behind them, and the role of PI3K/Tor signalling is to promote the transition to a state biased towards differentiation. How it does so, and what its relevant targets are, is still unclear, although recent work indicates that suppression of autophagy by Tor is important for cyst cell differentiation [39]. Intriguingly, PI3K activity inhibits clonal expansion in mammalian epidermis by promoting progenitor differentiation, but promotes ectopic proliferation and hyperplasia when activated in a widespread manner, suggesting that similar mechanisms may be at play in control of epidermal progenitor differentiation [51,52].
Finally, we present evidence that exit from the cyst stem cell pool depends on the presence of the germline and that PI3K/Tor activity does not regulate this step in differentiation. Previous work had shown that the germline is required to promote cell cycle exit and fate progression in the cyst lineage [46], and conversely, that the encystment of each gonialblast by two cyst cells is required for germ cell differentiation [18,19]. How this coordination and ratio are achieved is still poorly understood; recent work showed that the two stem cells do not synchronise their divisions to produce daughters to co-differentiate [24]. Rather, the abscission, and subsequent differentiation, of the gonialblast from its sibling GSC depends on encystment by cyst cells. The data presented here show that gonialblasts are required for cyst cell differentiation even when Tor is elevated, suggesting that in normal conditions cyst cell differentiation is delayed until a cyst composed of two cyst cells and one gonialblast is assembled. This is consistent with the observation that differentiated cyst cells are always found associated with germ cell cysts. Thus, regulated differentiation of both lineages is essential in order to achieve the coordinated assembly of a cyst. We speculate that PI3K/Tor may prime CySC daughters to interact with neighbouring gonialblasts and promote assembly of this 3-cell cyst. This would explain why relatively high PI3K/Tor activity levels induce CySCs to differentiate, by promoting cyst cell-gonialblast interactions. In the absence of a neighbouring gonialblast, a cell with high PI3K/Tor may come under the influence of niche signals and continue to self-renew. What the final signal promoting the irreversible differentiation of the cyst and exit of the CySC daughters from the stem cell pool is currently unknown. Our model is remarkably similar to that proposed in the case of the mammalian testis, where the germline stem cell pool consists of two populations, one of which is biased towards self-renewal and another towards differentiation, but where individual cells can reversibly move between the populations, until they commit to differentiation [53,54]. This model provides an elegant solution to ensuring that the balance of self-renewal and differentiation is maintained when the differentiation cue is external to the lineage, in the case of the testis, induced by periodic signals of the seminiferous cycle [55]. Our data suggest that, in addition, segregating the signals controlling licensing and commitment to differentiation may ensure the robust coordination of multiple lineages for proper tissue function.
Materials and methods
Fly stocks and husbandry
We used the following fly stocks: Oregon-R; Stat92EF; Stat92E85C9; FRT82B, Tsc1Q87X (gift of N. Tapon); FRT82B, Tsc129; gig192, FRT80B; Ptendj189, FRT40A; UAS-Tsc1 RNAi (BDSC#54034); UAS-Dp110 (gift of L. Johnston); UAS-bam::GFP (gift of R. Lehmann); UAS-CiR (UAS-Ci76, gift of V. Fernandes); UAS-Ciact (UAS-Ci5Ncm5, UAS-Ci5m30; gift of D. Kalderon); tj-Gal4 (Kyoto DGRC#104055); nos-Gal4-VP16 (gift of R. Lehmann); C587-Gal4 (gift of R. Lehmann); spict-Gal4 (Kyoto DGRC#112900); esg-GFP (gift of L. Jones); en-Gal4 (gift of L. Johnston); tub>stop>Gal80 (BDSC#39213).
Rapamycin feeding was achieved by keeping flies on fly food to which 100 μl of a 4 mM rapamycin stock solution in ethanol was added and air dried. Flies were transferred to fresh vials every 2 days.
Flies were raised at 25°C, except tj-Gal4 and C587-Gal4 crosses which were raised at 18°C and adult flies of the correct genotype were maintained at 29°C for 10 days to achieve maximum Gal4 activity.
Positively-marked clones were induced using the MARCM technique [56] with a single 1h-long heat shock at 37°C. Gal80 clones were generated using a flipout cassette in which GAL80 is expressed upon recombination-mediated excision of a stop sequence [57]. Clones were induced using hs-FLP12 (BDSC#1929) and with a 30 minute-heat shock at 37°C to maintain low induction rates.
For a full list of genotypes by figure, see S1 Table.
Immunohistochemistry
Following dissection, testes were fixed in 4% paraformaldehyde in PBS for 15 minutes, then permeabilised twice for 30 minutes in PBS with 0.5% Triton X-100. Samples were then blocked in PBS, 0.2% Triton X-100, 1% Bovine Serum Albumin (PBTB), before being incubated overnight with primary antibodies at 4°C, washed twice for 30 minutes in PBTB, and incubated at room temperature for 2 hours with secondary antibodies. After two washes in PBS, 0.2% Triton X-100 for 30 minutes, testes were mounted on slides with Vectashield medium (Vector labs), and imaged using a Zeiss LSM800, LSM880, or a Leica Sp8 confocal microscope. To detect phosphorylated epitopes, we dissected and fixed in buffer containing phosphatase inhibitors as previously described [26]. EdU incorporation was carried out by incubating dissected samples in Schneider’s medium with 10μM EdU (Invitrogen) for 30 minutes prior to fixing. After primary and secondary antibody steps, samples were incubated in buffer containing 0.1 mM THPTA, 2 mM sodium ascorbate, 1 mM CuSO4 and 2.5 μM fluorescently-conjugated picolyl azide (Click Chemistry Tools) for 30 minutes, then briefly washed and mounted for imaging.
We used the following primary antibodies: rabbit anti-Zfh1 (1:5000, gift of R. Lehmann), guinea pig anti-Zfh1 (1:500, gift of J. Skeath), rabbit anti-phospho-4E-BP1 (1:200, Cell Signaling #2855), rabbit anti-phospho-Akt (1:200, Cell Signaling #9271), rabbit anti-phospho-S6k (1:200, Cell Signaling #9209), guinea pig anti-Tj (1:3000, gift of D. Godt), rabbit anti-GFP (1:500, Invitrogen #A-6455), chicken anti-GFP (1:500, Aves Labs #GFP-1010), rat anti-Chinmo (1:50, gift of N. Sokol), rabbit anti-Stat92E (1:1000, gift of E. Bach), rabbit anti-cleaved Dcp-1 (1:500, Cell Signaling #9578); rat anti-Vasa developed by D. Williams and A.C. Spradling (1:20), mouse anti-Fas3 (7G10) developed by C. Goodman (1:20), mouse anti-Eya (10H6), developed by S. Benzer and N.M. Bonini (1:20), rat anti-Ncad (DN-Ex#8), developed by T. Uemura (1:20), mouse anti-Dlg (4F3) developed by C. Goodman (1:20), mouse anti-Arm (N2 7A1 Armadillo), developed by E. Wieschaus were all obtained from the Developmental Studies Hybridoma Bank, created by the NICHD of the NIH and maintained at The University of Iowa, Department of Biology, Iowa City, IA 52242.
Statistical analysis
Unless otherwise indicated, numbers shown are mean ± standard error. Significance for stem cell number counts was determined using Mann-Whitney tests for pairwise comparison, or non-parametric ANOVA (Kruskal-Wallis test) followed by Dunn’s multiple comparisons test to assess differences between multiple samples. For clone recovery rates, Fisher’s exact test was carried out. All P values were determined using GraphPad Prism software. Plots show individual data points and the lines indicate the mean and 95% confidence interval.
Supporting information
Acknowledgments
We are grateful to members of the Amoyel, Fernandes, Poole and Barrios labs for productive discussions, to Vilaiwan Fernandes, Ben Simons, Claudio Stern, Richard Poole and Barbara Conradt for critical comments on the manuscript. Many thanks to Salvador Herrera for suggesting the use of Gal80 flipout cassettes and to members of the fly community for stocks and antibodies.
Data Availability
All relevant data are within the manuscript and its Supporting Information files.
Funding Statement
This work was funded by the Medical Research Council (https://mrc.ukri.org/), with a Career Development Award (Ref: MR/P009646/2) to MA. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.
References
- 1.Schofield R. The relationship between the spleen colony-forming cell and the haemopoietic stem cell. Blood Cells. 1978;4: 7–25. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Xie T, Spradling AC. decapentaplegic is essential for the maintenance and division of germline stem cells in the Drosophila ovary. Cell. 1998;94: 251–260. doi: 10.1016/s0092-8674(00)81424-5 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Xie T, Spradling AC. A niche maintaining germ line stem cells in the Drosophila ovary. Science (80-). 2000;290: 328–330. doi: 10.1126/science.290.5490.328 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Morrison SJ, Spradling AC. Stem Cells and Niches: Mechanisms That Promote Stem Cell Maintenance throughout Life. Cell. Cell Press; 2008. pp. 598–611. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2008.01.038 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Jones DL, Wagers AJ. No place like home: Anatomy and function of the stem cell niche. Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol; 2008. pp. 11–21. doi: 10.1038/nrm2319 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Chen D, McKearin D. Dpp Signaling Silences bam Transcription Directly to Establish Asymmetric Divisions of Germline Stem Cells. Curr Biol. 2003;13: 1786–1791. doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2003.09.033 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Kirilly D, Wang S, Xie T. Self-maintained escort cells form a germline stem cell differentiation niche. Development. 2011;138: 5087–5097. doi: 10.1242/dev.067850 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Haramis APG, Begthel H, Van Den Born M, Van Es J, Jonkheer S, Offerhaus GJA, et al. De Novo Crypt Formation and Juvenile Polyposis on BMP Inhibition in Mouse Intestine. Science (80-). 2004;303: 1684–1686. doi: 10.1126/science.1093587 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.He XC, Zhang J, Tong WG, Tawfik O, Ross J, Scoville DH, et al. BMP signaling inhibits intestinal stem cell self-renewal through suppression of Wnt-β-catenin signaling. Nat Genet. 2004;36: 1117–1121. doi: 10.1038/ng1430 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Amoyel M, Hillion KH, Margolis SR, Bach EA. Somatic stem cell differentiation is regulated by PI3K/Tor signaling in response to local cues. Dev. 2016;143: 3914–3925. doi: 10.1242/dev.139782 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Krieger T, Simons BD. Dynamic stem cell heterogeneity. Development (Cambridge). Company of Biologists Ltd; 2015. pp. 1396–1406. doi: 10.1242/dev.101063 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Chatzeli L, Simons BD. Tracing the dynamics of stem cell fate. Cold Spring Harb Perspect Biol. 2020;12. doi: 10.1101/cshperspect.a036202 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Tai K, Cockburn K, Greco V. Flexibility sustains epithelial tissue homeostasis. Current Opinion in Cell Biology. Elsevier Ltd; 2019. pp. 84–91. doi: 10.1016/j.ceb.2019.04.009 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Ge Y, Fuchs E. Stretching the limits: From homeostasis to stem cell plasticity in wound healing and cancer. Nature Reviews Genetics. Nature Publishing Group; 2018. pp. 311–325. doi: 10.1038/nrg.2018.9 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Clevers H, Watt FM. Defining Adult Stem Cells by Function, not by Phenotype. Annu Rev Biochem. 2018;87: 1015–1027. doi: 10.1146/annurev-biochem-062917-012341 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Donati G, Watt FM. Stem cell heterogeneity and plasticity in epithelia. Cell Stem Cell. Cell Press; 2015. pp. 465–476. doi: 10.1016/j.stem.2015.04.014 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Greenspan LJ, de Cuevas M, Matunis E. Genetics of Gonadal Stem Cell Renewal. Annu Rev Cell Dev Biol. 2015;31: 291–315. doi: 10.1146/annurev-cellbio-100913-013344 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Kiger AA, White-Cooper H, Fuller MT. Somatic support cells restrict germline stem cell self-renewal and promote differentiation. Nature. 2000;407: 750–754. doi: 10.1038/35037606 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Tran J, Brenner TJ, DiNardo S. Somatic control over the germline stem cell lineage during Drosophila spermatogenesis. Nature. 2000;407: 754–757. doi: 10.1038/35037613 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Fairchild MJ, Smendziuk CM, Tanentzapf G. A somatic permeability barrier around the germline is essential for Drosophila spermatogenesis. Development. 2015;142: 268–281. doi: 10.1242/dev.114967 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Shields AR, Spence AC, Yamashita YM, Davies EL, Fuller MT. The actin-binding protein profilin is required for germline stem cell maintenance and germ cell enclosure by somatic cyst cells. Dev. 2014;141: 73–82. doi: 10.1242/dev.101931 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Smendziuk CM, Messenberg A, Wayne Vogl A, Tanentzapf G. Bi-directional gap junction-mediated soma-germline communication is essential for spermatogenesis. Dev. 2015;142: 2598–2609. doi: 10.1242/dev.123448 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Matunis E, Tran J, Gönczy P, Caldwell K, DiNardo S. Punt and schnurri regulate a somatically derived signal that restricts proliferation of committed progenitors in the germline. Development. 1997;124: 4383–4391. Available: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/9334286/ [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Lenhart KF, DiNardo S. Somatic Cell Encystment Promotes Abscission in Germline Stem Cells following a Regulated Block in Cytokinesis. Dev Cell. 2015;34: 192–205. doi: 10.1016/j.devcel.2015.05.003 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Leatherman JL, Di Nardo S. Zfh-1 controls somatic stem cell self-renewal in the Drosophila testis and nonautonomously influences germline stem cell self-renewal. Cell Stem Cell. 2008;3: 44–54. doi: 10.1016/j.stem.2008.05.001 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Amoyel M, Anderson J, Suisse A, Glasner J, Bach EA. Socs36E Controls Niche Competition by Repressing MAPK Signaling in the Drosophila Testis. PLoS Genet. 2016;12. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1005815 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Amoyel M, Sanny J, Burel M, Bach EA. Hedgehog is required for CySC self-renewal but does not contribute to the GSC niche in the Drosophila testis. Dev. 2013;140: 56–65. doi: 10.1242/dev.086413 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Amoyel M, Simons BD, Bach EA. Neutral competition of stem cells is skewed by proliferative changes downstream of Hh and Hpo. EMBO J. 2014;33: 2295–2313. doi: 10.15252/embj.201387500 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Michel M, Kupinski AP, Raabe I, Bökel C. Hh signalling is essential for somatic stem cell maintenance in the drosophila testis niche. J Cell Sci. 2012;125: 2663–2669. doi: 10.1242/dev.075242 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Stine RR, Greenspan LJ, Ramachandran K V., Matunis EL. Coordinate Regulation of Stem Cell Competition by Slit-Robo and JAK-STAT Signaling in the Drosophila Testis. PLoS Genet. 2014;10. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1004713 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Singh SR, Liu Y, Zhao J, Zeng X, Hou SX. The novel tumour suppressor Madm regulates stem cell competition in the Drosophila testis. Nat Commun. 2016;7. doi: 10.1038/ncomms10473 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Shivdasani AA, Ingham PW. Regulation of Stem Cell Maintenance and Transit Amplifying Cell Proliferation by TGF-β Signaling in Drosophila Spermatogenesis. Curr Biol. 2003;13: 2065–2072. doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2003.10.063 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Kawase E, Wong MD, Ding BC, Xie T. Gbb/Bmp signaling is essential for maintaining germline stem cells and for repressing bam transcription in the Drosophila testis. Development. 2004;131: 1365–1375. doi: 10.1242/dev.01025 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Hardy RW, Tokuyasu KT, Lindsley DL, Garavito M. The germinal proliferation center in the testis of Drosophila melanogaster. J Ultrasructure Res. 1979;69: 180–190. doi: 10.1016/s0022-5320(79)90108-4 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Cheng J, Tiyaboonchai A, Yamashita YM, Hunt AJ. Asymmetric division of cyst stem cells in Drosophila testis is ensured by anaphase spindle repositioning. Development. 2011;138: 831–837. doi: 10.1242/dev.057901 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Fabrizio JJ, Boyle M, DiNardo S. A somatic role for eyes absent (eya) and sine oculis (so) in Drosophila spermatocyte development. Dev Biol. 2003;258: 117–128. doi: 10.1016/s0012-1606(03)00127-1 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Chiang ACY, Yang H, Yamashita YM. spict, a cyst cell-specific gene, regulates starvation-induced spermatogonial cell death in the Drosophila testis. Sci Rep. 2017;7. doi: 10.1038/s41598-017-00035-9 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Tamirisa S, Papagiannouli F, Rempel E, Ermakova O, Trost N, Zhou J, et al. Decoding the Regulatory Logic of the Drosophila Male Stem Cell System. Cell Rep. 2018;24: 3072–3086. doi: 10.1016/j.celrep.2018.08.013 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Sênos Demarco R, Uyemura BS, Jones DL. EGFR Signaling Stimulates Autophagy to Regulate Stem Cell Maintenance and Lipid Homeostasis in the Drosophila Testis. Cell Rep. 2020;30: 1101–1116.e5. doi: 10.1016/j.celrep.2019.12.086 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Brawley C, Matunis E. Regeneration of male germline stem cells by spermatogonial dedifferentiation in vivo. Science (80-). 2004;304: 1331–1334. doi: 10.1126/science.1097676 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Leatherman JL, Dinardo S. Germline self-renewal requires cyst stem cells and stat regulates niche adhesion in Drosophila testes. Nat Cell Biol. 2010;12: 806–811. doi: 10.1038/ncb2086 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Gingras AC, Gygi SP, Raught B, Polakiewicz RD, Abraham RT, Hoekstra MF, et al. Regulation of 4E-BP1 phosphorylation: A novel two step mechanism. Genes Dev. 1999;13: 1422–1437. doi: 10.1101/gad.13.11.1422 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Miron M, Lasko P, Sonenberg N. Signaling from Akt to FRAP/TOR Targets both 4E-BP andS6K in Drosophilamelanogaster. Mol Cell Biol. 2003;23: 9117–9126. doi: 10.1128/MCB.23.24.9117-9126.2003 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Voog J, Sandall SL, Hime GR, Resende LPF, Loza-Coll M, Aslanian A, et al. Escargot Restricts Niche Cell to Stem Cell Conversion in the Drosophila Testis. Cell Rep. 2014;7: 722–734. doi: 10.1016/j.celrep.2014.04.025 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Flaherty MS, Salis P, Evans CJ, Ekas LA, Marouf A, Zavadil J, et al. Chinmo Is a Functional Effector of the JAK/STAT Pathway that Regulates Eye Development, Tumor Formation, and Stem Cell Self-Renewal in Drosophila. Dev Cell. 2010;18: 556–568. doi: 10.1016/j.devcel.2010.02.006 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Gonczy P, DiNardo S. The germ line regulates somatic cyst cell proliferation and fate during Drosophila spermatogenesis. Development. 1996;122. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Sheng XR, Brawley CM, Matunis EL. Dedifferentiating Spermatogonia Outcompete Somatic Stem Cells for Niche Occupancy in the Drosophila Testis. Cell Stem Cell. 2009;5: 191–203. doi: 10.1016/j.stem.2009.05.024 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Wang S, Gao Y, Song X, Ma X, Zhu X, Mao Y, et al. Wnt signaling-mediated redox regulation maintains the germ line stem cell differentiation niche. Elife. 2015;4. doi: 10.7554/eLife.08174 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Ying QL, Wray J, Nichols J, Batlle-Morera L, Doble B, Woodgett J, et al. The ground state of embryonic stem cell self-renewal. Nature. 2008;453: 519–523. doi: 10.1038/nature06968 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50.Enver T, Pera M, Peterson C, Andrews PW. Stem Cell States, Fates, and the Rules of Attraction. Cell Stem Cell. Elsevier; 2009. pp. 387–397. doi: 10.1016/j.stem.2009.04.011 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51.Ying Z, Sandoval M, Beronja S. Oncogenic activation of PI3K induces progenitor cell differentiation to suppress epidermal growth. Nat Cell Biol. 2018;20: 1256–1266. doi: 10.1038/s41556-018-0218-9 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52.Murayama K, Kimura T, Tarutani M, Tomooka M, Hayashi R, Okabe M, et al. Akt activation induces epidermal hyperplasia and proliferation of epidermal progenitors. Oncogene. 2007;26: 4882–4888. doi: 10.1038/sj.onc.1210274 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53.Hara K, Nakagawa T, Enomoto H, Suzuki M, Yamamoto M, Simons BD, et al. Mouse spermatogenic stem cells continually interconvert between equipotent singly isolated and syncytial states. Cell Stem Cell. 2014;14: 658–672. doi: 10.1016/j.stem.2014.01.019 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54.Nakagawa T, Sharma M, Nabeshima YI, Braun RE, Yoshida S. Functional hierarchy and reversibility within the murine spermatogenic stem cell compartment. Science (80-). 2010;328: 62–67. doi: 10.1126/science.1182868 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55.Yoshida S. Open niche regulation of mouse spermatogenic stem cells. Dev Growth Differ. 2018;60: 542–552. doi: 10.1111/dgd.12574 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 56.Lee T, Luo L. Mosaic analysis with a repressible neurotechnique cell marker for studies of gene function in neuronal morphogenesis. Neuron. 1999;22: 451–461. doi: 10.1016/s0896-6273(00)80701-1 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 57.Bohm RA, Welch WP, Goodnight LK, Cox LW, Henry LG, Gunter TC, et al. A genetic mosaic approach for neural circuit mapping in Drosophila. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2010;107: 16378–16383. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1004669107 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Supplementary Materials
Data Availability Statement
All relevant data are within the manuscript and its Supporting Information files.